5 Naturalism and Education
5 Naturalism and Education
5 Naturalism and Education
I. Naturalism
A. Naturalism is based on the assumption that nature is the whole reality. Nature is a total
system that contains and explains all existence, including human beings and human nature. It
holds that there is but a single order of reality, which is matter in motion; many Naturalists,
especially in ancient Greece, were materialists who denied the belief in a supernatural order
of reality.
B. Unlike the neatly defined categories of Idealism, Realism and Thomism, Naturalism is difficult
to define. There are also varieties of Naturalists.
1. Jean Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) veered back and forth from a romantic view of
human nature to the rationalist perspective of the Enlightenment.
2. Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi (1746- 1827), who also used Rousseaus ideas in his
educational method, retained a belief in a supernatural God.
3. Herbert Spencer (1820-1903) recast Darwinian evolutionary theory into a sociology of
knowledge that stressed a highly competitive ethical system.
C. Naturalism either rejects or diminishes the importance of the supernatural, it provides some
clear contrast with Theistic Realism. Pragmatism barrowed some of the themes of
Naturalism.
E. Naturalism has the following common elements that contributed to the twentieth- century
progressive education:
1. Childrens learning should originate with direct sensory experience in their immediate
environment rather than with verbalism such as lectures, preachment, and books.
2. Childhood is an appropriate, necessary, and valuable stage of human growth and
development; the curriculum and instruction should low from the childs impulses and
instincts.
3. Childhood and adolescence are not of one piece but are cumulative stages of human
development that have their own readiness for learning and appropriate learning
exercises.
4. The school should not be regarded as separate from but should be an extension of the
childs environment.
C. In Emile, Rousseaus didactic novel, a boy, in experiencing a natural education, has his
character formed in such a way that his original inclination to amour de soi is so developed
that he can resist and overcome the social temptations and pressures that lead to amour
Page | 1
proper. Rousseau has Emile develop naturally, on a country estate, away from corrupting
social institutions and conventions. True to his belief that human beings have their own
timetable for learning, Rousseau organized education according to Emiles stages of
development. For each stage of development, the child, Emile, showed signs that he was
ready to learn what was appropriate to that stage; his actions, or learning episodes and
activities, were also appropriate to the particular developmental stage. Based upon these
stages, human learning could be viewed sequentially with educational results that were
cumulative.
D. Rousseaus concept of childhood sharply contrasted with the view of the child that was
dominant when he wrote mile. The early eighteenth century view, still influenced heavily by
John Calvin, saw childhood as a necessary evil to be gotten through as quickly as possible.
Children, particularly the very young, were dirty, noisy, mischievous, and prone to evil and
idleness. In the traditional view, the good child was as adult like as possible. The good
child, a miniature adult was dutiful, quiet, and obedient. The shorter the time devoted to
childlike play, games, and behavior, the better. Seeing the child as a primitive innocent,
Rousseau viewed childhood as the most natural stage of human development. It was a time
that was to be enjoyed and savored as long as possible.
Page | 2
4. Education for moral development had both positive and negative aspects. Enjoying or
suffering the consequences of ones own action was its own reward or punishment.
Reference:
Gutek, Gerald L. Philosophical and Ideological Perspectives on Education. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1988.
Page | 3