0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views2 pages

Advanced Group Theory Exercise

(1) Induced representations allow constructing a representation of a group G from a representation of a subgroup H. (2) For a group T with subgroup G4, taking the trivial 1D representation of G4 yields a 3D representation of T, with basis vectors corresponding to the cosets of G4 in T. (3) This 3D representation acts on the basis vectors in the same way as the representation given in Problem 1, relating the construction to the problem.

Uploaded by

Jason Payne
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views2 pages

Advanced Group Theory Exercise

(1) Induced representations allow constructing a representation of a group G from a representation of a subgroup H. (2) For a group T with subgroup G4, taking the trivial 1D representation of G4 yields a 3D representation of T, with basis vectors corresponding to the cosets of G4 in T. (3) This 3D representation acts on the basis vectors in the same way as the representation given in Problem 1, relating the construction to the problem.

Uploaded by

Jason Payne
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

PH7009: Group Theory and Symmetry 7009:

Classroom Exercise 2 Supplement


TA: Jason Payne

Here we will briefly introduced the notion of induced representations in order to clarify what
is going on in Problem 1 of Classroom Exercise 2. We will closely follow the discussion (and
notation) given in 3.11 of [1], just so that you have something else to reference, if needed.
The setup-up is as follows: consider a group G, a subgroup H, and a d-dimensional repre-
sentation r of H, i.e. a homomorphism r : H GL(d). The goal of the method of induced
representations is then to take this representation r of the subgroup H, and construct a repre-
sentation of the entire group G.
As you all should be familiar with by now, having r means that for each element h H,
we have an operator M(h)[r] acting on a d-dimensional vector space1 H. Given some basis |ii
(where i = 1, 2, , d) for H, this means that we can write each M(h)[r] as a d d matrix:

M(h)[r] : |ii 7 M(h)[r] ij |ji




(where we are using the Einstein summation convention on the js). Now, in order to move
towards all of G, rather than just H, we consider a new space:

G H/,

which is just some fancy notation for the space obtained by taking all possible pairs (g, |ii) with
g G and |ii H (thats the G H part), and then identifying (i.e. treating as if they are the
same) all pairs of the form
(gh, |ii) g, M(h)[r] ij |ji .
 

In other words, we absorb any pieces of h showing up in a given element g 0 = gh G into |ii
using the representation r.
Now, suppose that the coset space G/H consists of N cosets, and write them as

H, g1 H, g2 H, , gN 1 H,

where g1 , , gN 1 G \ H. Recall that these form a partition of G, i.e.

G = H g1 H g2 H gN 1 H, 2

i.e. that every element of G lies in on (and only one) coset. This means that the aforementioned
space is simply given by
G H/ = (G/H) H,
since any two pairs (g, |ii) and (g 0 , |ji) with g, g 0 gk H are considered as the same.
So.... who cares? What can we do with this (G/H) H gadget? Well, we can easily turn it
into a dN -dimensional vector space VdN by treating the pairs (gk , |ii) as a basis vectors |gk , ii,
and then taking (formal) linear combinations (similar to what one does when forming the group
algebra, so that you can define the regular representation):

VdN := {ki |gk , ii}.


1
In [1] they talk about having a Hilbert space, but this isnt needed for what were talking about here, so lets
just forget about that...
2
... and gi H gj H = for all i 6= j...
Furtheremore, and more importantly, we can easily define a dN -dimensional representation
IndGH [r] : G GL(dN ) of all of G on VdN as follows:

IndGH [r](g)|gk , ii = |ggk , ii.

One can check that this makes sense mathematically by looking through the details on page 62
of [1], but we wont dwell on that here: suffice to say, it works.

Note
This representation IndGH [r] definitely does not have to be irreducible, in general, as you
will see.

So, we were able to successfully construct a representation of the entire group G starting
from just a representation of one of its subgroups. The relevance of this to Problem 1(a)3 lies in
considering the case when G = T := G4 o Z3 , H = G4 , and taking r as a trivial representation
G4 . Since (whether G4 is D2 or Z4 ) there are only 1-dimensional (irreducible) representations of
G4 , we will have d = 1; moreover, T /G4 = Z3 , so N = 3. In other words, we will ultimately end
up with a dN = 3-dimensional representation at the end. This means that we have a basis |10 i
(the prime is just to distinguish this vector from another vector later) for the 1D vector space
C that G4 is being represented on, which we combine with the three elements (e, b, and b2 ) of
T /G4 in order to obtain a basis for the space (T /G4 ) C:

|e, 10 i, |b, 10 i, and |b2 , 10 i.

Since the 10 in these vectors is superfluous in this case, we can throw them out and simply write
our basis as
|e, 10 i |ei, |b, 10 i |bi, and |b2 , 10 i |b2 i.
Now, how does (as an illustrative example) IndTG4 [r](b), which we will write as (b) for simplicity
(and to be rather suggestive) behave? Well, based on what we said earlier, we have

(b)|ei = |bei = |bi, (b)|bi = |bbi = |b2 i, (b)|b2 i = |bb2 i = |ei.

In other words, the vectors |ei, |bi, |b2 i are nothing more than the vectors |1i, |2i, |3i that were
given in the problem!
This is what is going on throughout Problem 1: you are given some representation of G4 ,
from which you can construct a representation of the entire group T that acts on the space
spanned by |1i, |2i, and |3i. This representation is defined in the way described above, i.e. it
basically boils down to just the group multiplication!

References
[1] P. Ramond, Group Theory A Physicists Survey, CUP (2010).

[2] W.-K. Tung, Group Theory in Physics, World Scientific, 2003 reprint.

3
... and similar things could be said about the rest of Problem 1 in particular, one can adapt what is said
here to complete Problem 1(b) without using the Theorem 3.6 and the Corollary to Theorem 3.7 in [2]...

You might also like