Ward Family Vs Academy Sports + Outdoors
Ward Family Vs Academy Sports + Outdoors
Ward Family Vs Academy Sports + Outdoors
12/13/2017 5:32 PM
Donna Kay McKinney
cit pps sac2
Bexar County District Clerk
Accepted By: Krystal Gonzalez
2017CI23341
CAUSE NO. ________________
COME NOW, Chris Ward, Individually and as Representative of the Estates of Joann
Ward, Deceased and B.W., Deceased Minor, and as Next Friend of R.W., a Minor; Robert
Lookingbill; and Dalia Lookingbill, Individually and as next friend of R.G., a minor, and as
Representative of the Estate of E.G., Deceased Minor, Plaintiffs, complaining of Academy, Ltd.
d/b/a Academy Sports + Outdoors, hereinafter Defendant, and for cause of action would
DISCOVERY LEVEL
1. Plaintiffs intend to conduct discovery under Level III of the Texas Rules Civil
2. Plaintiffs Chris Ward, R.W., and R.G. are residents of Wilson County, Texas. Robert
Lookingbill and Dalia Lookingbill are residents of Bexar County, Texas. At the time of their death,
Joann Ward, E.G. and B.W. were residents of Wilson County, Texas.
corporation headquartered and authorized to do business in Harris County, Texas and may be served
through its Agent for Service of Process, Genetha Turner, at 1540 North Mason Road, Katy, Texas
77449.
4. The Court has jurisdiction over the controversy because damages are within the
is the county in which all or a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims
occurred.
FACTS
6. It all begins with familyyours, mine and ours. Chris and Joann Ward were the
picture of a blended family. Joann had two daughters, R.G. and E.G., before entering the marriage,
and Chris had R.W. Joann and Chris married in 2011 and soon thereafter their daughter B.W. was
born. For Joann, her family was her world and Chris was her soulmate.
8. On the morning of November 5, 2017, Joann awoke, made breakfast for her family
and got the kids dressed for Church. It was her and Chriss sixth wedding anniversary and she
wanted to spend the day with her family. Chris, a truck driver, decided to stay home that morning,
to sleep in after working a late shift. He promised to meet up with the family later for some much
needed family time. Undeterred, Joann packed up her children as she did every weekend and made
called home. Joann and Chris family had planned on meeting up after Church for a celebratory
9. Just minutes into the morning church service, Joann, her four children, and the small
congregation of First Baptist Church were under siege. Praise and worship songs which had filled
the air were interrupted by rapid gunfire. The Church was being attacked.
10. Bullets sprayed through the wooden walls of the tiny church, shattering windows and
puncturing holes in the wooden floors. Startled and confused, the congregants soon saw a man
dressed in black tactical gear storm in, cursing Everybody is gonna f***ing die! His face was
covered by a mask with a white skull. As soon as shots rang out, Joann shoved her oldest daughter,
R.G., out of the wayto hideand Joann fell on top of her three youngest children, trying to
protect her babies from the hail of bullets filling the Church. R.G.s eyeglasses would be hit
blown off her face as she fell and crawled underneath a pew seeking cover.
11. The shooter stalked the roomdetermined to kill everyone in it. When he saw
Joann, shielding her young children, he aimed at herintent on killing her and anyone she was
killed, including Joann and two of her daughtersE.G. and B.W. Another twenty congregants had
been injured.
12. Joanns stepson, R.W., had been shot five times. His stomach and groin were
pierced, damaging his bladder and kidney; the five year olds arm was so mutilated by bullets it was
nearly amputated. Over a month later, R.W. remains hospitalized with several additional surgeries
remaining. His shattered femur isnt healing as well as hoped and the young boys kidneys continue
to struggle.
13. Despite his youth and the long road ahead, R.W.s doctors call him brave and a
tough guy. Chris and his in-laws, Robert and Dalia Lookingbill, hope that R.W. is released in
time for the holidaythough its difficult for Chris to imagine Christmas without his wife and
daughters.
14. Despite having his permit to carry delayed by a possibly disqualifying issue in
2015, the Shooter who terrorized the small First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs, Devin
Kelley, (hereinafter Kelley), had little difficulty purchasing a Ruger AR-556 rifle from Academy
Sporting Goods in San Antonio, in April, 2016.1 Months later, Kelley would use a Ruger AR-556
assault rifle as he terrorized and brutally murdered 26 innocent peopleincluding Joann Ward,
B.W., and E.G. Kelley also used the Ruger when pelting young R.W. with at least five bullets.
15. Academy, a sporting goods and apparel retailer, offers its customers the ease and
1
From 2014 to the day of the shooting, Kelley purchased four gunstwo in Colorado and two in Texas. See
https://patch.com/texas/sanantonio/texas-shooters-gun-permit-delayed-disqualifying-issue.
different rifles, 401 different pistols, 238 different shotguns, 12 modern sporting rifles, 133
revolvers, and 2 black powder guns.2 It is unclear how Kelley purchased the Ruger AR-556, but
it is undisputed that he used the Ruger in the November 5, 2017 mass shooting.
16. At the time Kelley purchased the Ruger, he reported a Colorado Springs, Colorado
address on his Firearms Transaction Record, Form 4473, a federal form. This fact alone should
have disqualified Kelley from ever purchasing the assault rifle. Kelleys identification indicated he
was a resident of Coloradonot Texas. Thus, he never should have been sold the very weapon he
used in the Sutherland Springs shooting as it would be illegal for Kelley to ever transport that gun to
his residence. Rather, Defendant, upon Kelley purchasing the weapon, should have transferred the
firearm to Colorado, for Kelley, a Colorado resident, to retrieve. The Ruger should have never been
placed in Kelleys hands in Texas. Importantly this incident is not the first incident of Academy
failing to follow applicable lawsthough it is, the first incident that resulted in the deaths of 26
17. Plaintiffs incorporate each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully restated herein in
full.
18. At all material times to this suit, Defendant owed Plaintiffs a duty of reasonable care
to ensure the safety, care and well-being of the public, including Plaintiffs, and had or assumed a
2
See https://www.academy.com/shop/browse/shooting/firearms. Academy offers its customers 1295 guns via ship to
store delivery and 1,111 guns online only. In store, Academy offers a mere 431 guns. Id.
care, and such failure was negligent and a proximate cause of the incident in question and resulting
damages to Plaintiff. These acts include, but are not limited to, the following:
c. Failing to properly follow applicable law in the marketing and sale of firearms;
19. Plaintiffs will show that one or all of the above-mentioned acts and/or omissions
constitute negligence and are a proximate cause of the occurrence in question and the injuries and
20. Plaintiffs incorporate each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully restated herein in
full.
21. At all material times to this suit, Defendant owed Plaintiffs a duty of reasonable care
to ensure the safety, care and well-being of the public, including Plaintiffs. These duties include,
but are not limited to, the hiring, retention, and supervision of trained employees to ensure that all
legally required guidelines are fulfilled at the time of purchasing any firearm. Defendant breached
these duties when its employee(s) sold a gun to Kelley in violation of the existing laws.
22. Despite actual or constructive knowledge of its employees to its patrons, Defendant
failed to properly supervise and/or control Defendants actions. Specifically, Defendants following
3
See http://kfor.com/2017/11/29/metro-man-says-academy-made-big-mistake-when-selling-him-a-gun/.
d. Failing to properly supervise, monitor, and/or control employees tasked with selling
firearms to the public;
e. Failing to continually monitor and/or screen their employees to ensure they are fit to
sell firearms to the public;
23. Plaintiffs incorporate each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully restated herein in
full.
24. At all material times to this suit, Defendant owed Plaintiffs a duty of reasonable care
to ensure the safety, care and well-being of the public, including Plaintiffs. By selling the gun to
Kelley without the proper oversight and by failing to follow policies, procedures, and applicable
law in selling firearms pursuant to the laws, Defendant supplied Kelley with a dangerous
instrumentality that caused the deaths and injuries to Plaintiffs with that instrumentality.
25. Plaintiffs incorporate each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully restated herein in
full.
26. The acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, as set forth herein, was also such
knowing and willful failures to abide by the applicable safety guidelines regarding selling and
purchasing firearms in the State of Texas, they constitute malicious, willful, wanton, grossly
Plaintiffs injuries as such give rise to, and warrant, the imposition by a jury of significant punitive
damages in an amount to the determined by that jury of no more than $25 million dollars against
Defendant.
DAMAGES
27. Plaintiffs incorporate each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully restated herein in
full.
Plaintiffs Chris Ward, Individually and as Representative of the Estates of Joann Ward and B.W.;
Robert Lookingbill; and Dalia Lookingbill, Individually, as next friend of R.G., and as
Representative of the Estate of E.G., bring claims as wrongful death beneficiaries, pursuant to
Chapter 71 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and have suffered in each of the following
29. Plaintiff, Chris Ward as Next Friend of R.W., seeks to recover from Defendant the
b. Physical pain and mental anguish that, in reasonable probability, R.W. will
sustain in the future;
h. Medical care expenses that, in reasonable probability, R.W. will incur in the
future; and
30. Dalia Lookingbill, as next friend of R.G., seeks the following elements of damage in
b. Physical pain and mental anguish that, in reasonable probability, R.G. will
sustain in the future;
31. Plaintiffs reserve the right to plead additional and more specific damages in the
Plaintiffs have suffered in the past up to the time of trial, but in addition, those that they, in
reasonable probability, will continue to suffer in the future. As such, Plaintiffs affirmatively plead
that they seek monetary relief over $25,000,000.00, including damages of any kind, penalties, costs,
expenses, pre-judgment interest, and attorney fees; and a demand for all the other relief to which the
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
32. All conditions precedent have been performed or have occurred as required by Rule
33. Pursuant to Rule 193.7 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs hereby give
actual notice to Defendant that any and all documents produced may be used against the Defendant
producing the document at any pretrial proceeding and/or at the trial of this matter without the
34. Pursuant to Rule 194 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant is requested
to disclose the information and material described in Rule 194.2 within fifty (50) days of the
JURY DEMAND
PRAYER
e. Court Costs;
f. That Plaintiffs recover pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the legal rate per
annum against Defendant; and, Plaintiffs further pray,
g. That Plaintiffs receive such other and further relief, both at law and in equity, to
which Plaintiffs may show themselves to be justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
&