Overview

Overview of Digital Design

Dr DC Hendry

January 2006

1 Course Information:
1. Lecturer: Dr David Hendry.
2. Three meetings per week, normally two lectures and one tutorial.
3. Also laboratories, as advertised on the level 3 notice board.
4. Recommended texts: one of
Zwolinski Digital System Design with VHDL Pearson.
Dewey Analysis and Design of Digital Systems with VHDL PWS
Floyd Digital Fundamentals with VHDL Pearson.
5. Web Page: http://www.eng.abdn.ac.uk/~eng186/eg3560

2 Digital Systems

Digital electronics is at the heart of the majority of modern electronic devices -

digital television sets, mobile phones, computers and game systems. Products
such as automobiles are increasingly dependent upon digital electronic control
systems to provide low cost implementations but also increasing functionality.

Digital systems, as opposed to analogue systems, have always been seen as

providing excellent repeatability (each unit manufactured behaves as any other),
tolerance to temperature variations and supply voltage variations, and a degree
of noise immunity. In the early days of digital electronics however this came at
considerable cost as discrete logic gates (individual NAND or NOR gates) were
used to construct these systems. This resulted in physically massive systems -
the early equivalent of todays PC filled a number of rooms. Representing data

Revision : 1.3 Page 1 of 7 Dr DC Hendry

 Overview

with a 32-bit binary number simply required more components and wires than
representing the same data with an analogue voltage.

The advent of VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) devices however began to
change this. Using an essentially photographic process it became possible to
fabricate many thousands of logic gates on one piece of silicon - the silicon chip.
Today we construct silicon chips with many millions of logic gates at low cost.
For example, a 5mm x 5mm silicon chip will today contain about 3 million logic
gates and costs about $5 to manufacture in quantity. The design costs for such a
device will normally exceed $5M however. For smaller quantities, FPGAs may
be used. These devices also provide logic gates, but logic gates whose function
and interconnections may be chosen after manufacture by setting memory bits
within the device. These are often economic for low to medium quantities, they
are also very useful for experimenting and learning with.

The crucial point about todays digital design is the large number of gates
involved in a design. Our design techniques must be able to permit completion
of a design involving some millions of logic gates with an acceptable time-scale,
and with a modest design team. Inevitably, design automation is adopted - that
is, CAD tools (Computer Aided Design tools) are used.

The next section compares an earlier style of digital design based on schematic
capture tools and manual design techniques with the current mainstream design
technique based on simulation and synthesis of an HDL (Hardware Description
Language).

3 Design Techniques

3.1 Manual Techniques

The very earliest digital circuits were of course designed with nothing more than
pen and paper, and then debugged by building the circuit and checking with
an oscilloscope and logic probe (a simple pen like device which indicates if the
wire it touches is at logic 0, logic 1, or is not driven). As soon as computer
systems with a graphics capability became available CAD tools were produced
which permitted a design to be entered into the computer via schematic capture,
and to be simulated.

When first introduced these tools greatly increased design productivity. Schemat-
ics were more rapidly entered and easily changed as the design progressed. Sim-
ulation tools permitted a degree of testing of the design before committing to a
time consuming and costly construction phase.

Revision : 1.3 Page 2 of 7 Dr DC Hendry

3.2 The Hardware Description Language Approach Overview

As design complexity increased and commercial pressures required shorter and

shorter design time-scales however, the limitations of this approach became
clear.

Schematic entry tools required the designer to enter the design at the logic gate
level. This does not mean that for a large design with one million logic gates
a schematic with one million gates was required! For such a design hierarchy
would be used to build up a larger design using many instances of a simpler
design. Thus in principle a 32 bit adder would be constructed by designing a 1
bit adder as a schematic, and then constructing a 32 bit adder using 32 instances
of that 1 bit adder. Nevertheless, the designer has first to manually design the
logic circuit to gate level - a time consuming and tedious process.

At the lower levels of the design (expressed in terms of logic gates such as
AND and OR) the schematic capture tool makes good use of graphics to pro-
vide an easily understood diagram. The logic symbols for elementary gates are
standardised and easily recognised. At higher levels of the design (registers,
functional units, FSMs) there are few standard symbols - the nmenonic value is
lost.

3.2 The Hardware Description Language Approach

A Hardware Description Language (HDL) provides a computer like language

which specifies the required digital logic. The designer uses this language to
describe the system required. The design may be simulated and corrected as
necessary. Next the designer synthesises the circuit to either an FPGA or to a
VLSI device. This uses a computer tool analogous to a software compiler which
translates the HDL description into a circuit consisting of basic logic gates and
flip-flops as necessary. The resulting circuit is known as a netlist.

The synthesis process provides the designer with rapidly applied optimisation
techniques, techniques which will usually be more effective that manual tech-
niques. The ease of applying these techniques also means that the designer may
have time to experiment with different design approaches at a higher level.

Use of the synthesis tool also means that when we prepare a design we do not
have to commit to a particular manufacturers FPGA or silicon process. It is
only when we synthesise that a particular FPGA or silicon process must be
specified. This has the great advantage that our HDL designs can be easily
transferred from one process to another. Indeed, this capability has opened
up a new industry segment known as IP (Intellectual Property). A number of
companies now exist solely to provide IP Cores, HDL designs of for example a
microprocessor, or perhaps an MPEG decoder. These companies then sell this
synthesisable description to designers constructing complex designs.

Revision : 1.3 Page 3 of 7 Dr DC Hendry

 Overview

4 Implementation Techniques

Weve already mentioned FPGAs and VLSI devices above, this section gives a
little more detail on these devices and one other means of implementing digital
systems.

4.1 Discrete Components

The first digital systems were implemented with individual gates and flips-flops
constructed from discrete transistors and other components. Indeed the first
computer produced about 50 years ago used this techniques. Physically however
these machines were large and very costly.

It was soon realised that rather than producing single transistor on a piece
of silicon, packaging those individual transistors and then connecting them to-
gether on a printed circuit board, that it was very much more efficient to place a
number of transistors forming a common circuit onto one piece of silicon - pro-
ducing an integrated circuit. This gave rise to circuits forming complete logic
gates within one package, for example, the 7400 device contains four two-input
NAND gates in one package. These devices were described as SSI Small Scale
Integration.

Until the availability of FPGAs for low volume products, and widespread access
to VLSI design for high volume products, families such as the 74xx devices were
the main implementation technique for digital circuits. As increasing numbers
of transistors could be integrated onto a single chip,MSI (Medium Scale Inte-
gration) and LSI (Large Scale Integration) devices, devices such as the 741616
(a 16 bit x 16 bit multiplier) became available within this family.

4.2 VLSI Devices

VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) devices included increasing numbers of

transistors, and so logic gates, onto one piece of silicon. Initially, but a few
companies produced these devices, companies such as Fairchild (regarding by
many as the inventor of the integrated circuit), Texas Instruments, and National
Semiconductor in the US, and Plessey, GEC and Ferranti in the UK.

These devices provided efficient implementations of commonly required func-

tions. Designers then used a number of these VLSI devices, with SSI devices as
glue to complete a design. This approach has limitations as to performance
and cost.

Revision : 1.3 Page 4 of 7 Dr DC Hendry

4.3 FPGAs Overview

The next step was to permit complete designs to be placed on a single chip.
Since each design could be specific to a particular application, the terminology
ASIC arose (Application Specific Integrated Circuit). The design of VLSI de-
vices was now carried out in many more locations, although manufacture was
concentrated in a few locations where the increasingly expensive fabrication
plants were available. To cater for this design process great effort was expended
on the research and development of CAD tools for VLSI devices.

Todays VLSI devices offer the designer many millions of logic gates at continu-
ally falling costs. There is one great disadvantage however. Once a design is in
production unit cost may be say $5, but the cost to design, including the cost
of manufacturing the photographic masks required, will exceed $5M. For small
scale manufacture (and Universities!) this is a formidable barrier.

4.3 FPGAs

FPGAs (Field Programmable Gate Arrays) provide a VLSI device consisting of

a large number of logic blocks whose function is determined by bits loaded into
a memory within the device. These bits determine the function of each logic
block, and the interconnect between. Loading these bit patterns is normally
done when power is applied to the device by loading the bit stream from an
adjacent memory chip.

Thus the manufacturer of the FPGA uses standard VLSI techniques to produce
many millions of these devices. Lower scale manufacturers then load the required
bit pattern (program the device) to give the circuit they require within their
equipment.

5 Complexity

At the level of an individual gate, a digital circuit is very simple. Real circuits
however do not consist of one or even a few gates, but of many gates (often
millions) and flip-flops. The design problem then becomes one of dealing with
the complexity which arises from a large number of basic components. Strategies
for dealing with such complexity are:

5.1 Hierarchy

Weve seen an example of this strategy already in section 3.1 where an example
of building an adder using a large number of one-bit adders was used. This

Revision : 1.3 Page 5 of 7 Dr DC Hendry

5.2 Abstraction Overview

same strategy can be used in a variety of forms, but the general pattern is the
same.

To construct a larger component we consider a design in which that compo-

nent consists of a number of smaller components each of which are identical.
Repeated use of the simpler component then constructs the larger component.

5.2 Abstraction

When we build a digital system at different points in the design we think in terms
of bits, or in terms of integers, or in terms of perhaps digital images. Clearly all
integers in a digital system are eventually represented by bits, but we may not
need that level of detail to think about a particular design problem. Abstraction
levels refer to an appropriate choice of description to fit the particular design
problem. Figure 1 illustrates a general set of abstraction levels for digital design.
For a particular design however, abstractions appropriate to that design may
also apply.

Less detail, highly abstract

Processors

Instructions

RTL

Logic Gate

Transistors

Layout
More detail, many simple blocks

Figure 1: Abstraction Levels

This is not quite the same as hierarchy, as there may be layers of hierarchy
within a given abstraction layer (for example, a flip-flop may be regarded as a
number of interconnected logic gates).

Revision : 1.3 Page 6 of 7 Dr DC Hendry

 Overview

6 Challenges

Both VLSI devices and FPGAs (really a subset of VLSI devices) are increasing in
size year on year. Speed of execution increases, the number of devices available
increases relentlessly it would seem. Table 1 gives an abstract from the ITRS
(International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors) predictions for this
decade.

Year Introduced 1999 2002 2004 2008 2011

Feature Size nm 180 130 90 60 40
Transistors (Millions) 110 220 441 1852 4568

Table 1: Semiconductor Industry Roadmap - ASIC

Gate count in such a table is normally taken to be the number of transistors

divided by four, and is then the equivalent number of 2-input NAND gates,
since a 2-input NAND requires four transistors.

And of course, its you who will have to design these devices! Once you have
come to terms with the design process, the theoretical principles, the vast lit-
erature of methods available, and the CAD tools, you really do have enormous
freedom - the main limitation is your imagination.

Revision : 1.3 Page 7 of 7 Dr DC Hendry