0% found this document useful (0 votes)
243 views3 pages

Finding A Potential Function For Three-Dimensional Conservative Vector Fields

The document describes finding a potential function for a 3D conservative vector field. It gives an example vector field and checks that it is conservative by calculating its curl, which is zero. It then finds the potential function through integrating partial derivatives of the vector field components with respect to x, y, and z. This yields a potential function f(x,y,z) that satisfies the gradient of f being equal to the original vector field F.

Uploaded by

Fahad Chowdhury
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
243 views3 pages

Finding A Potential Function For Three-Dimensional Conservative Vector Fields

The document describes finding a potential function for a 3D conservative vector field. It gives an example vector field and checks that it is conservative by calculating its curl, which is zero. It then finds the potential function through integrating partial derivatives of the vector field components with respect to x, y, and z. This yields a potential function f(x,y,z) that satisfies the gradient of f being equal to the original vector field F.

Uploaded by

Fahad Chowdhury
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Math Insight

Finding a potential function for three-dimensional conservative vector


fields
In this page, we give an example of finding a potential function of a three-dimensional conservative vector field. This
procedure is an extension of the procedure of finding the potential function of a two-dimensional field .

The vector field we'll analyze is

3 xy 2 3 xy 2 2
F(x, y, z) = (2xyz + ye ,x z + xe , 3x y z + cos z).

We first check if it is conservative by calculating its curl, which in terms of the components of F, is

F3 F2 F1 F3 F2 F1
curl F = ( , , ).
y z z x x y

Since

F3 F2
2 2
= = 3x z
y z

F1 F3
2
= = 6xyz
z x

F2 F1
3 xy
= = 2xz + (1 + xy)e ,
x y

the curl of F is zero. The vector field is defined in all R , which is simply connected, so F is conservative.
3

We need to find a potential function f (x, y, z) that satisfies f = F , i.e., the three conditions

f
3 xy
(x, y, z) = 2xyz + ye
x

f
2 3 xy
(x, y, z) = x z + xe
y

f
2 2
(x, y, z) = 3x yz + cos z.
z

f
We start with the first condition involving . We integrate with respect to x, viewing y and z as constants, to obtain that
x

f (x, y, z) must satisfy

2 3 xy
f (x, y, z) = x yz +e + g(y, z).

Since we viewed y and z as constants, the constant of integration g(y, z) can be an arbitrary function of y and z. You can
verify that f (x, y, z) does satisfy the first condition.

Now, we simply need to determine what g(y, z) must be for f to satisfy the remaining two conditions involving derivatives
with respect to y and z. Let's differentiate our new expression for f with respect to y , obtaining
f g
2 3 xy
(x, y, z) = x z + xe + (y, z)
y y

f
We need to f to satisfy the second condition, above, involving . For this to be true, we require
y

g
(y, z) = 0.
y

g
Since F is conservative, this equation for must be a function of y and z alone (and not involve x). If x appeared, we
y

would know we had made a mistake somewhere. Since x is absent, we can keep going.

g
In this case, since we need (y, z) = 0 , we conclude that g(y, z) cannot depend on y . It must be a function of z alone,
y

which we'll call h(z). Our expression for f (x, y, z) simplifies to

2 3 xy
f (x, y, z) = x yz +e + h(z)

f
We have one more condition to satisfy, the one involving . We differentiate our new expression for f with respect to z:
z

f dh
2 2
= 3x y z + (z).
z dz

For f (x, y, z) to satisfy the third condition for f , the function h(z) must satisfy

dh
(z) = cos z.
dz

This is good news, as dh


does not depend on x or y . If it had, we would know something went wrong
dz

We can easily integrate to obtain an expression for h,

h(z) = sin z + k

for an arbitrary constant k. A potential function can only be determined up to an arbitrary constant, since we only have
conditions on its derivatives. But, line integrals of F depend only on differences among the values of f (x, y, z) . The constant
k will always cancel out, so we can just set k = 0 .

Therefore, our potential function for

3 xy 2 3 xy 2 2
F(x, y, z) = (2xyz + ye ,x z + xe , 3x y z + cos z).

is

2 3 xy
f (x, y, z) = x yz +e + sin z.

For any curve C from point p to point q, the integral of F is

F ds = f (q) f (p)
C

independent of the path taken by C . Although we had to do a lot of work to calculate f , the last step of computing the
integral is simple.

If C is the arc of a helix parametrized by c(t) = (cos t, sin t, t) for 0 t /2 , the line integral of F is simply
F ds = f (c(/2)) f (c(0))
C

= f (0, 1, /2) f (1, 0, 0)



0 0
= 0+e + sin 0e sin 0 = 1 + 1 1 = 1.
2

See also
The gradient theorem for line integrals
How to determine if a vector field is conservative
Finding a potential function for conservative vector fields
Testing if three-dimensional vector fields are conservative

Lighten up
An introduction to conservative vector fields

Cite this as

Nykamp DQ, Finding a potential function for three-dimensional conservative vector fields. From Math Insight.
http://mathinsight.org/conservative_vector_field_find_potential_3d

Keywords: conservative, gradient theorem, path independent, potential function

Finding a potential function for three-dimensional conservative vector fields by Duane Q. Nykamp is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License. For permissions beyond the scope of this license,
please contact us.

You might also like