Road Sector in India
Road Sector in India
Report
on
To
Prof. Raghuram
Prof. Rekha Jain
Prof. Sebastian Morris
On
August 24 2001
By
Ajeet K Choudhary
Deepak Dangayach
Prashant Dwivedi
Tarun Sharma
Venu Madhav P.
Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 3
Trend in Road Traffic ................................................................................................................................. 3
Problems ....................................................................................................................................................... 4
National Highways Development project............................................................................................... 4
Frame work for Commercialization of Highways ................................................................................. 5
Current Status of Road Network in India .............................................................................................. 5
Comparison with Other Countries ........................................................................................................... 6
Statutes and Institutional Structure........................................................................................................ 7
National Highway Development Plan (NHDP) ...................................................................................... 8
NHDP Mandate ............................................................................................................................................ 9
Funding plan for development of roads............................................................................................... 10
Current Status............................................................................................................................................ 12
Governmental Support............................................................................................................................. 12
Management Of Highway Built Through Private Investment.......................................................... 13
Key Issues facing the Sector .................................................................................................................. 14
Other Innovative Road Development Projects ................................................................................... 16
Impact of NHDP on Domestic Industry................................................................................................ 17
Review of the book- Indian Highways: A framework for commercialization............................... 18
Present status of Indian highways ........................................................................................................ 18
Strategy for funding highway development ........................................................................................ 19
Shadow tolls/annuity scheme ................................................................................................................ 19
Phased development ................................................................................................................................ 21
Rationale for user charges ...................................................................................................................... 21
Need for reform and restructuring........................................................................................................ 22
Model framework ...................................................................................................................................... 22
Rationale for phased development ....................................................................................................... 23
Technical Parameters ............................................................................................................................... 23
Concession period ..................................................................................................................................... 24
Selection of Concessionaire .................................................................................................................... 24
Grant ............................................................................................................................................................ 24
Concession fee........................................................................................................................................... 24
Risk Allocation............................................................................................................................................ 25
Financial Close ........................................................................................................................................... 25
User Fee ...................................................................................................................................................... 25
Local traffic ................................................................................................................................................. 26
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 2
Construction ............................................................................................................................................... 26
Operation .................................................................................................................................................... 26
Right of Substitution................................................................................................................................. 26
Force Majeure ............................................................................................................................................ 26
Termination ................................................................................................................................................ 27
Monitoring and Supervision .................................................................................................................... 27
Government Support and Guarantees ................................................................................................. 27
Miscellaneous ............................................................................................................................................. 28
Applicability to State Highways .............................................................................................................. 28
References .................................................................................................................................................. 29
Exhibits ........................................................................................................................................................ 30
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 3
Introduction
India has one of the largest road networks in the world (over 3 million km at present). For
the purpose of management and administration, roads in India are divided into the following
five categories:
?? National Highways (NH)
?? State Highways (SH)
?? Major District Roads (MDR)
?? Other District Roads (ODR)
?? Village Roads (VR)
The National Highways are intended to facilitate medium and long distance inter-city
passenger and freight traffic across the country. The State Highways are supposed to carry
the traffic along major centers within the State. Other District Roads and Village Roads
provide villages accessibility to meet their social needs as also the means to transport
agriculture produce from village to nearby markets. Major District Roads provide the
secondary function of linkage between main roads and rural roads.
The Road network in the country is as under
Other roads including major district roads (MDR) other district roads
28,46,400
(ODR) & village roads (VR)
Problems
There has been no matching growth of the main road network comprising of National and
State Highways as seen from the table given below:
The main roads have not kept pace with traffic in terms of quality also. Out of the total
171,445 Km. Length of National and State Highways only 2 percent of their length is four-
lane, 34% two-lane, and 64% single lane. As far as NHs are concerned, only 5% of their
length is four-lane, 80% two-lane and the balance 15% continues to be single lane.
Thus the road sector, in spite of its high priority is adversely affected by the poor quality and
service levels. The poor quality of Indian roads is highlighted by congestion, old fatigued
bridges and culverts, railway crossings, low safety, no by-passes and slow traffic movement.
The deficiencies in the road network is causing huge economic losses due to slow
transportation and also contributing to high rate of road accidents.
However, road development has been ignored in most of the development plans of India.
National & State highways comprise around 5.9% of the total 3.1mn kms of road network.
National highways, which carry 40% of the total traffic, comprise just 2% of the total road
network (Refer Table 2).
Of the total 182,000 kms of state and national highways only 1% is four lanes, 34% is two
lanes. Around two thirds is still one lane. The poor state of road infrastructure has badly
affected the transportation in our country. Our commercial vehicles are able to make only
250-300 kms in single day against 500-600 kms in developed countries. This shows the poor
state of road infrastructure, one of the most vital elements for economic growth.
Table 2: Indian Road Network
(in Kms.)
Total Length 33,00,000
National Highways 52,000*
State Highways 1,28,000
Major District Roads 4,70,000
Village and other Roads 26,50,000
*NHs are less than 2%but carry more than 40% of traffic
Railways
Road
NHDP Mandate
Primary mandate is time and cost bound implementation of National Highways Development
Project (NHDP) through host of funding options including from external multilateral agencies
like World Bank, Asian Development Bank, OECF etc. Work mainly comprises of
strengthening and four laning of high-density corridors around 13,000 Kms in three phases,
over a period of 10 years. The components are
??Golden Quadrilateral - 5,952 Kms connecting Delhi-Calcutta-Chennai-Mumbai
??North-South-East-West Corridor - 7,300 Kms connecting Kashmir to
Kanyakumari and Silchar to Porbandhar
1
The Hindu Business Line, July 3, 2001
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 10
??Providing road connectivity to 12 major ports and high-density road to Madurai
??Involving the private sector in financing the construction, maintenance and operation
of National Highways and wayside amenities
??Improvement, maintenance and augmentation of the existing National Highways
network
??Implementation of road safety measures and environmental management.
Funding plan for development of roads
Roads are primarily funded through budgetary allocations. Central government provides
funds for National Highways and State Government for other roads. Presently the total
allocations, central and state, available for road development are to the tune of Rs110bn,
which is just 42% of total transportation revenues received by the government. This implies
the inefficiency of our system, which consumes 58% of the total revenues received by the
transportation sector.
The following table shows the quantum of investments expected to be invested in the NHDP
over the next three years.
Table 5: Investment Statistics
Investments in NHDP (Rs
bn)
Particulars FY01E FY02E FY03
Quadrilateral 19.5 59.0 87.2
Corridor 7.3 8.1 7.9
Total 26.8 67.1 95.1
Source: India Infoline
For funding NHDP, annuity based model is primarily been adopted. NHAI proposes to
finance its projects by a host of financing mechanisms.
??Cess on Diesel & Petrol is expected to provide Rs20bn annually for National Highway
Development Program. The states are also getting Rs9.62bn for development of
state roads. A dedicated road fund has been created by the central government. It is
expected that the total collections in the fund will be to the tune of around Rs50bn.
The allocations from the fund would be as shown:
o 50% of the proceeds from additional excise duty on diesel would be allocated
for development of rural roads.
o Of the remaining balance, 57.5% would be provided for national highways,
27% for state roads, 3% for development of roads of interstate and economic
importance and 12.5% for railway safety works such as rail roads over
bridges, manning of level crossings etc.
??Issuance of bonds by NHAI guaranteed by Government. In FY01, NHAI has raised
Rs5bn through issuance of Bonds. The borrowing programme of the authority was
delayed because of 54EA and 54EC benefits accorded to investments in Mutual
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 11
Funds till September 2000. In the second round of issue the authority has raised
Rs20bn in March 2001.
??In budget 2001-02, government has increased the allocations for development of
roads by 93% to Rs87.27bn.
??Through external funding agencies like World Bank, Asian Development Bank and
OECF. World Bank has already sanctioned loans worth US$897mn and Asian
Development Bank has sanctioned loans worth US$180mn. NHAI further expects to
raise US$400mn from World Bank and US$200mn from ADB for NHDP every year.
??Talks are in advanced stages for an assistance of US$500mn from World Bank Loan
and US$340mn ADB.
??Issuing of Infrastructure Bonds – In FY01, the authority issued raised Rs25bn from
the issue of Infrastructure Bonds. They propose to further raise Rs31bn in FY02 and
around Rs62bn in FY03.
??By setting up its independent companies and borrowing from the market. The
authority has already set up two companies, Moradabad Toll Bridge Company and
Vadodara Halol Toll road
??Company for getting sops and getting funds from the markets. Through Build,
Operate and Transfer schemes by providing necessary regulatory framework for
accessing private financing The various BOT schemes include
o SPV’
s (Special Purpose Vehicles)
o Annuity
o Shadow Tolling
Table 6: Financing Plan for NHDP
Source Rs. Cr.
Total Cost 54,000
Revenue
Cess on Petrol and Diesel 20,000
External Assistance 20,000
Market Borrowings 10,000
Private Sector Participation 4,000
In addition the Government has also invited proposals for pre-qualification for private sector
participation in four 4-laning and one expressway project.
Context
The decade of the nineties witnesses a series of economic reforms in India. The government
has since committed to the second generation of reforms aimed at achieving an annual
growth rate of 7 to 8 per cent. Such acceleration in growth is bound to create a massive
demand for infrastructure services such as power, telecom, roads, ports, railways and civil
aviation. All these sectors are already suffering from a large backlog of development, and
the pace of economic growth may itself be constrained in the absence of a quantum jump in
the provision of these services.
Highways, one of the key elements of infrastructure, are entirely owned and operated by the
government. Following the Nagpur plan of 1943, national highways constitute the principal
network for commercial and strategic transportation requirements, traversing through the
states and connecting the major ports. The responsibility for developing and maintaining the
national highways network rests with the central government while the state highways
belong to the respective state governments.
Over the years, the augmentation and maintenance of the road network ahs suffered from a
prolonged neglect owing to the inadequate budgetary allocation. Recognizing the transport
growth and the inadequacy of budgetary outlays to address this constraint, the government
of India decided in 1995 to invite private investment in the highways sector. Several policy
measures have since been announced for commercialization of highways based on user
charges. A detailed framework for awarding the first highway project on ‘Build, Operate and
Transfer’(BOT) basis is still being evolved.
Phased development
The blue print for the national highway development should envisage four0-laning of
national highways in the first phase top be followed by six-laning, along with the services
lanes, after gap of 7-9 years. At the six-laning stage, access control may be introduced for
effecting better traffic management and confining slow moving traffic to service lanes. At
that stage, the national highways would be close to expressway standards, catering to a
much greater volume of traffic. Given the resource constraints, phased development alone
would be sustainable option.
Model framework
Whatever be the nature and ownership of four-laning projects, the framework governing
their operations would have to be uniform so as to provide an assured minimum level of
service and safety to the users across the country. Ensuring a level playing field for all the
investors would require that a common framework, whether owned by the
government/NHAI or by private entities, govern all project companies. An appropriate
framework would also virtually eliminate the scope for increasing the liabilities of NHAI as
compared to the present arrangement where the gap between the tender price of highway
projects and their out-turn price is very wide and unsustainable. Such a framework would
also save on time and transaction costs, besides imparting transparency and fairness.
The author proposed a Model Concession Agreement, which tries to deals with all the critical
issues relevant to limited recourse financing of infrastructure projects, and tries to address
equitable the concerns of all principal stakeholders, such as the investor, lenders, the
government and NHAI, with an emphatic orientation in favor of the user. The author expects
that adoption of this framework should accelerate the pace of highway development by
motivating both the NHAI as well as the prospective entrepreneurs to improve the
performance and achieve the targets of growth and development.
Overview of the framework
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 23
The four critical elements that determine the financial viability of a highway project are
traffic volumes, user fee, concession period and capital costs. As the existing highways have
dedicated traffic and the government has prescribed the user fee for uniform application
across the country, the revenue streams can be assessed with reasonable accuracy. The
concession period on the other hand can be extended only for marginally improving project
viability. As three of the above stated four parameter are pre-determined, capital costs is the
only viable element for the bidders to determine the financial viability if a project, and they
would seek an appropriate capital grant/subsidy (being offered by the authority in order to
arrive at an acceptable rate or return.
In such a scenario, higher the capital costs, greater would be the compulsion of project
sponsors to seek larger grants from the government to leverage a larger pool of extra-
budgetary resources, including private investment, resulting in a smaller programme of
highway development. It is therefore important to reply on cost effective designs and to
combine them with a phased investment programme to enable a more efficient and
sustainable development to highways.
As a general principle, capacity augmentation of the nation al highways should be based on
the standards adopted for the on-going projects assisted by the World Bank and the Asian
Development Bank. All these projects are restricted to four-laning, and the recent
suggestion that BOT projects must begin with six-laning should not be pursued, both on
grounds of financial viability as well as the volumes of existing and likely traffic. Sic-laning
should be undertaken only after 7 to 9 years of four-laning, to be accompanied by
substantial up gradation of designs and standards, such as provision of service lanes for
slow-moving traffic, bypasses in urban and semi-urban-areas, grade separation and access
control. On projects where traffic volumes and compositions so justify, service lanes may be
constructed along with the initial four-laning.
Technical Parameters
Presently, the focus is on construction specifications in the agreements. However, the model
agreement proposes technical parameters based on output specifications having a direct
effect on the level of service. The fundamental requirements for design, construction,
operations and maintenance of the Project Highway should be identified so as to leave
scope for innovation and value addition by the concessionaire.
This also provides for the concessionaire flexibility to develop and adopt cost effective
designs without compromising on the quality of service for the users.
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 24
Concession period
A concession period of 22 years has been proposed for a phased six-lane project. This may
be increased or reduced by 3 years depending on the traffic volumes and capital costs of
each project. The time required for construction (2 years) has been included in the
concession period to encourage early completion to maximize toll revenues.
At any time before the completion of 7 years, the concessionaire or Authority would be
entitled to withdraw from the six-laning option, which will reduce the concession period to
12 years (16 years if service lanes are constructed).
Thus the concessionaire is likely to structure and finance the project as a four-lane project.
Selection of Concessionaire
The selection would be based on open competitive bidding. All project parameters such as
concession period, toll rates, price indexation and technical parameters would be frozen and
short listed bidders would be required to specify the amount of grant required by them. The
bidder seeking minimum grant would b awarded the contract.
Grant
According to the Model Agreement, the NHAI would provide the grant in the form of equity
support and the concessionaire should be allowed to fund up to 50% of the project equity
out of such grant. This would reduce the promoters’equity burden and facilitate leveraging
of larger volumes of debt. Any grant in excess of equity support may be used for defraying
O&M expenses in the initial phase.
Concession fee
In the initial years, the concessionaire has substantial outflows of capital due to debt
service obligations. However, over the years, the cash flows increase due to increasing
revenues and reduced interest payments. Therefore, the model agreement proposes that
the concessionaire pays no concession fees in the initial years.
In the subsequent years, the concession fee is proposed to be levied on an ascending
revenue sharing basis. Since the concession fee is to be paid in the later years, the present
value of the fees is lower for the concessionaire.
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 25
Risk Allocation
The model agreement attempts to allocate risks to the parties who are best equipped to
manage them. Project risks have been allocated to the private sector to the extent that it is
capable of managing them. It also increases the scope of innovation and efficiencies in costs
and services by the private sector.
The commercial and technical risks relating to construction, operation and maintenance are
allocated to the concessionaire, as it is best suited to manage them. Other commercial risks,
like rate of growth of traffic are being allocated to the concessionaire. The traffic risk is
mitigated, as Project Highway is a monopoly where existing traffic volumes can be measured
precisely. All direct and indirect political risks are being allocated to NHAI.
Since GDP growth rate bears a direct relation to the growth of traffic. Therefore the
Agreement provides for extension of the concession period in event of economic slowdown
leading to an average GDP growth of less than 5.5% over the first seven years. Similarly,
the concession period is proposed to be reduced if the average GDP growth rate exceeds
7% over the same period.
Financial Close
The agreement stipulates a time limit of 240 days (extendable to 360 days) failing which the
bid security amount shall be forfeited. This is possible if all the parameters are well defined
and all the requisite preparatory work has been undertaken. The model agreement provides
the framework for obtaining the financial closure within the stipulated time. It will result in
substantial cost reduction.
User Fee
The agreement provides for indexation of user fees to the extent of 30% linked to WPI and
exchange rate variations (20% indexed to WPI and 10% to exchange rate variations). A
higher level of indexation is not being favored due to the following reasons:
It would require users to pay more for a declining (more congested) level of service when
they should be receiving the benefit of a depreciated fee.
A higher indexation would also add to uncertainties in the financial projections.
At the time of six laning however, a one time increase in toll rates has been proposed for
neutralizing inflation occurring between project commencing and six laning.
Since the user fee has also been linked to the exchange rate variations, it allows the bidders
to individually determine the extent of foreign equity and external loans that such a linkage
would sustain.
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 26
In order to improve the financial viability of the toll roads, a predetermined increase in user
fee has been provided during the first 5 years. This is done to improve the revenue streams.
The user fee in the first year has not been kept at a very high level to avoid the risk of user
resistance.
Local traffic
It is proposed that the highway should be used by local residents without any payment of
tolls until free service lanes are provided. It would improve the local support for the project
and avoid any legal or political opposition. Frequent travelers would be allowed at a
concessional rate based on daily or monthly passes.
Construction
Handing over the possession of the required land and obtaining all environmental clearances
are being proposed as conditions precedent to be satisfied by the Authority.
The agreement defines the scope of the project with precision and predictability in order for
the concessionaire to determine his costs and obligations.
Before the commencement of the collection of user fee, the concessionaire will be required
to subject the highway to specified tests for ensuring compliance with the output
specifications relating to the level and safety of service for the users.
Operation
Operational performance would be the most important test of the service delivery. The
agreement provides for an elaborate mechanism to evaluate and upgrade safety
requirements on a continuing basis. A dedicated Safety Reserve has been proposed for
meeting the additional cost relating to up gradation of safety measures. The agreement also
provides for traffic regulation, police assistance, emergency medical services and rescue
operations.
Right of Substitution
The lenders in the highways sector require assignment and substitution rights so that the
concession can be transferred to another company in the event of failure of the
concessionaire to operate the project successfully.
Force Majeure
The agreement contains the requisite provisions for dealing with Force Majeure events. It
particularly provides protection to the concessionaire against political actions that may have
material adverse effect on the project.
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 27
Termination
In the event of termination, the Agreement provides for a compulsory buyout by the NHAI.
Termination payments have been quantified precisely in the agreement. Political force
majeure and NHAI default are proposed to qualify for adequate compensatory payments to
the concessionaire and thus guard against any discriminatory action by NHAI or
government.
Debt will be fully protected by NHAI in the event of termination, except for two situations:
When termination occurs as a result of default by the concessionaire, 90% of the debt will
be protected
In the event of non-political force majeure, 90% of the debt beyond insurance cover will be
protected
Miscellaneous
A regular traffic census and annual survey has been stipulated for keeping track of traffic
growth. Sample checks by the Authority would also be carried out.
India Infrastructure Report 2001, Edited By Sebastian Morris, Oxford University Press, New
Delhi
http://www.economictimes.com/Budgetcountdown/lroads.htm
Freight traffic
Year GDP (In Cr at Total Traffic Road Movement
1980-81 (btkm)
prices)
(btkm) %
1984-85 132,367 343 161 47
1991-92 185,503 524 267 51
1998-99 281,691 869 585 67
2005-06 1442
Passenger Traffic
1984-85 132,367 966 739 77
1991-92 185,503 1477 1162 79
1998-99 281,691 2450 2046 84
2005-06 4065
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 31
Exhibit 2: Sources Of Funds
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 32
Total 643
Status : February,2001
A Report on Road Sector In India Group IX, Section B 34
Exhibit 5