Patience is recognized as essential virtue especially in the context of leadership. In the context of
decision making, patience is primarily associated with correct timing. Time pressure often impacts
decision quality, patience is crucial in obtaining the desired decision outcome. Leadership is
characterized by 24 factors and patience is found to be one of the most significant element of the
leadership. Since time pressure is also involved in decision making, so there is inverse relation between
the amount of time to deliberate on a decision and the decision quality.
Some studies do not find a significant connection between time pressure and decision-making
effectiveness. Most importantly, the goal of any decision maker is to balance the demands for fast
decisions against the demands for decision quality. Consequently, there was a gap in the previous
literature about the role of patience in decision making. The purpose of this study was to explore
leaders perceptions of and experiences with patience and eventually build an interactionist model,
which depicts the process of decision making with patience by using grounded theory method.
Moreover, through an inductive approach, this paper bridges the gap between the conceptual arguments
and empirical findings by presenting an interactionist conceptual model that can improve the
understanding of patience in decision making.
Methodology
The current study was conducted using a qualitative approach as it aimed to explore leaders
perceptions and experiences with patience and eventually build a theoretical model in relation to the
role of patience in leadership. Because the aim of the study was to obtain insight into the experiences
of the participants in their own words, this study adopted a grounded theory research design.
Future Research
The findings of this study is considered as Exploratory Research, future research should focus
on surfacing concepts and their potential inter-relationships.
The sample taken for this study contains few leaders from business organization, future studies
should be organized to include other population.
The current study is only restricting to reliance on self-report measures of character strengths,
future research should be conducted to focus on multi-method assessment.
2|Page M Farhan