Scribd
Upload
35 views4 pages

ADX Report For Untitled Experiment EJEMPO

1) An experiment was designed to investigate the effects of temperature (T), concentration (C), and catalyst (K) on the response (Y1) using a 2-level full factorial design with 8 runs. 2) The predictive model found temperature (T) and the interaction of temperature and catalyst (T*K) to be significant terms to predict the response. 3) Optimization of the factors recommended a temperature of 180C, concentration of 30%, and catalyst B to achieve the highest predicted response of 81.5.

Uploaded by

vianca
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
35 views4 pages

ADX Report For Untitled Experiment EJEMPO

1) An experiment was designed to investigate the effects of temperature (T), concentration (C), and catalyst (K) on the response (Y1) using a 2-level full factorial design with 8 runs. 2) The predictive model found temperature (T) and the interaction of temperature and catalyst (T*K) to be significant terms to predict the response. 3) Optimization of the factors recommended a temperature of 180C, concentration of 30%, and catalyst B to achieve the highest predicted response of 81.5.

Uploaded by

vianca
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

ADX Report for Untitled Experiment

Today's date: 08AUG2002


Experiment creation date: 08AUG2002

Design Details
Design Details
Design Type Two-level
Number of factors 3
Number of runs 8
Resolution Full

Factors and Responses

Factor Label Low Center High Response


T TEMPERATURA(C) 160 170 180 Y1
C CONCENTRACION(%) 20 30 40
K CATALIZADOR A 0 B

Confounding Rules
No confounding rules

Design Points
Coded Design

Run Coded Factor Values Response Values


Number T C K Y1
1 -1 -1 -1 60
2 1 -1 -1 72
3 -1 1 -1 54
4 1 1 -1 68
5 -1 -1 1 52
6 1 -1 1 83
7 -1 1 1 45
8 1 1 1 80

Uncoded Design

Run Uncoded Factor Values Response Values


Number T C K Y1
1 160 20 A 60
2 180 20 A 72
3 160 40 A 54
4 180 40 A 68
5 160 20 B 52
6 180 20 B 83
7 160 40 B 45
8 180 40 B 80

Fit Details
Fit for Y1
Check Assumptions Analysis for Y1
Response Transformation
Optimal transformation from Box-Cox plot Y1**2
Transformation recommended by ADX Y1**2
Transformation applied for analysis Y1
Response scaling shift 0
Outlier Observations
Outlier statistic Poutlier
Outlier criterion 0.05
Run numbers deleted from analysis None
Influential Observations
Run numbers deleted from analysis None

ANOVA for Y1
Master Model Predictive Model
Source DF SS MS F Pr > F DF SS MS F Pr > F
T 1 1058 1058 2116 0.013837 1 1058 1058 76.94545 0.000931
C 1 50 50 100 0.063451
K 1 4.5 4.5 9 0.204833 1 4.5 4.5 0.327273 0.597885
T*C 1 4.5 4.5 9 0.204833
T*K 1 200 200 400 0.031805 1 200 200 14.54545 0.018878
C*K 1 0 0 0 1

Model 6 1317 219.5 439 0.036518 3 1262.5 420.8333 30.60606 0.003222


Error 1 0.5 0.5 4 55 13.75
Total 7 1317.5 7 1317.5

Fit Statistics for Y1


Master Model Predictive Model
RMSE 0.707107 3.708099
R-square 99.96% 95.83%
Adjusted R-square 99.73% 92.69%
Coefficient of Variation 1.100555 5.771361

Alias Structure for Y1


Master Model Predictive Model
No effects aliased. No effects aliased.

Predictive Model for Y1


Coded Levels(-1,1)
Y1 = 64.25 + 11.5*T + 0.75*K + 5*T*K
Uncoded Levels
Y1 = -215.5 + 1.65*T + 168.5*(K='A') - T*(K='A')

Effects for Y1
Master Model Predictive Model
Term Estimate Std Err t Pr > |t| Estimate Std Err t Pr > |t|
0.00093
T 23 0.5 46 0.013837 23 2.622022 8.771856
1
C -5 0.5 -10 0.063451
K 1.5 0.5 3 0.204833 1.5 2.622022 0.572078 0.597885
T*C 1.5 0.5 3 0.204833
T*K 10 0.5 20 0.031805 10 2.622022 3.81385 0.018878
C*K 0 0.5 0 1

Optimization Details
Desirability
Y1
D(Y1) = 0 when Y1 < 45
D(Y1) = 0.5 when Y1 = 62.5
D(Y1) = 1 when Y1 > 80
Power = 1 for lower half
Power = 1 for upper half

Prediction Profile Settings

Factor Label Optimal Setting Response Estimated Value


T TEMPERATURA(C) 170 Y1 63.5
C CONCENTRACION(%) 30 Desirability 52.86%
K CATALIZADOR A

Numerical Optimization Results


TEMPERATURA(C) CONCENTRACION(%) CATALIZADOR Y1
180 20 B 81.5
180 25 B 81.5
180 30 B 81.5
180 35 B 81.5
180 40 B 81.5
175 20 B 73.25
175 25 B 73.25
175 30 B 73.25
175 35 B 73.25
175 40 B 73.25
180 20 A 70
180 25 A 70
180 30 A 70
180 35 A 70
180 40 A 70
175 20 A 66.75
175 25 A 66.75
175 30 A 66.75
175 35 A 66.75
175 40 A 66.75
170 20 B 65
170 25 B 65
170 30 B 65
170 35 B 65
170 40 B 65

You might also like