This article originally appeared in Aero-Astro Annual 2006-2007, a publication of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

© 2007 MIT

THE SILENT AIRCRAFT

 THE SILENT AIRCRAFT
By Ann Dowling, Edward Greitzer,
Thomas Hynes, James Hileman,
and Zoltan Spakovszky

Aircraft noise is recognized as a major barrier in the expansion

of airport operations. While there has been progress in aircraft The Silent Aircraft Initiative was
noise reduction, further reductions become harder to achieve. created to meet the challenge of
The problem is made more difficult by the anticipated increase further reducing aircraft noise the
in noise due to the growth in aircraft operations. Greener by in face of ever-increasing aircraft
Design, a UK working group that seeks “solutions to the chal- operations. The approach was to make
lenge posed by aviation’s impact on the environment,” has radical reduction in noise a primary
stated: “the downward trend in noise exposure around airports design criterion. The project goal was
of past years … has now flattened out at major airports. Virtu- to design an aircraft quiet enough
ally all the older aircraft have been phased out and, while to be imperceptible to people in the
the continued fleet renewal will introduce progressively quieter urban environment around airports
types, the benefit will be appreciably less than has been while being competitive with existing
achieved from phasing out of (older, noisier) aircraft.” and next generation aircraft fuel burn
and emissions. A key project outcome
was the conceptual “Silent Aircraft eXperimental” design SAX-40. The aircraft has an esti-
mated noise level less than the background noise of a well-populated area and a predicted
23% fuel burn reduction compared to current civil aircraft.

SAI aimed to take a major step beyond aviation industry’s noise reduction targets, a target
that would call for a highly integrated airframe and engines, as well as operations and design
co-optimized for low noise. This ambitious goal would necessitate involving a range of
partners from academia, industry, and government; a collaboration among organizations
and individuals with different skills and interests. For example, the project would include

The Silent Aircraft 1

While originally conceived to make a substantial reduction in airplane noise, the MIT-Cambridge University silent aircraft
design could achieve 124 passenger-miles per gallon, almost 25 percent more than current aircraft. Aimed at the 2030
time frame, some of the quiet technologies the MIT-Cambridge team developed could be incorporated sooner.
 The silent aircraft is designed to carry
215 passengers with a range of 5000
nautical miles at a cruise of Mach 0.8.
The conceptual design airframe differs
radically from current civil aircraft.
There are conventional supercritical
wings, but the fuselage is a lift-
ing body, aerodynamically shaped
to achieve enhanced low speed and
cruise performance without the need
for conventional flaps and a tail. The
wingspan is 222 feet (67.5 m) including
the winglet, maximum takeoff weight is
332,000 lbs (151,000 kg).

research into airframe and engine design, and ways to reduce noise by changing takeoff
and approach procedures. There would be an economic assessment of regulatory scenarios
under which the aircraft would present an attractive business case to an airline, and an
estimate of national and local economic benefits.

SAI is one of the Cambridge (University)-MIT Institute’s Knowledge Integration

Communities (KICs); research communities exploring ways for academia, industry, and
government to work together. The KIC fosters linkages and two-way flows of information
between academic researchers and their colleagues in commerce, enhancing the impact of
the research. The SAI community comprised airframers, engine manufacturers, airport and
airline operators, air traffic controllers, regulators, and measurement specialists; more than
30 partners, in addition to the academics.

2 AERO-ASTRO 2006-2007
DESIGN FEATURES
We designed for an aircraft mission of 215 passengers with a range of 5000 nm at a cruise
Mach number of 0.8. The conceptual design’s airframe differs radically from current
civil aircraft. There are conventional supercritical wings, but the fuselage is a lifting body,
aerodynamically shaped to achieve enhanced low speed and cruise performance without
the need for flaps and a tail. The design parameter Mach number times lift/drag ratio is 20;
for reference the Boeing Phantom Works Blended Wing Body has 17-18. The wing span
is 222 feet (67.5 m) including the winglet, and the maximum takeoff weight is 332,000 lbs
(151,000 kg).
FOR THE CONCEPT AIRCRAFT THE
The aircraft is propelled by a distributed high bypass ratio propulsion
COMMUNITY NOISE LEVELS ARE
system (cruise bypass ratio of 12) embedded in the fuselage. There
ESTIMATED NOT TO EXCEED 63
are nine geared fans driven by three gas generators. Each inlet
DBA FOR TYPICAL MISSIONS,
feeds air to one engine cluster comprised of a turbofan and two
COMPARABLE TO THE BACKGROUND
auxiliary fans.
NOISE IN URBAN DAYTIME
For the concept aircraft the community noise levels are estimated not ENVIRONMENTS.
to exceed 63 dBA for typical missions, comparable to the background
noise in urban daytime environments. A substantial reduction (75 dB in cumulative
Effective Perceived Noise for sideline, takeoff, and approach) is estimated relative to the
current International Civil Aviation Organization noise standard.

There is a major fuel efficiency improvement predicted relative to current civil aircraft: 124
passenger-miles per (US) gallon compared to 101 passenger-miles per gallon for a Boeing
777, a 23% increase. For reference, the Toyota Prius hybrid car carrying two passengers is
reported as having a city-highway fuel burn of 96 passenger-miles per gallon. It is expected
that further fuel efficiency, even with respect to this major saving, could be achieved in an
aircraft design specifically targeted to minimize fuel consumption and emissions.

The Silent Aircraft 3

 NOISE REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES
Low noise is not achieved by a single design feature. It results from many disciplines inte-
grated into the design and operation of a noise-minimizing aircraft system. Many of these
design features also reduce fuel burn and emissions.

The rationale for use of these features of the aircraft and the propulsion system can be
summarized as follows:

• Low noise approach operations: On approach, the airframe generates half the noise
and the noise sources strongly scale with the flight velocity. Substantial noise
reductions can thus be achieved by using a low speed approach and a displaced
runway threshold on landing, thereby increasing distance to listeners on the
ground.

• Efficient airframe centerbody design: The leading edge region of the centerbody is
aerodynamically shaped to balance aerodynamic moments for pitch trim and
to provide static stability without a tail. At cruise conditions, the all-lifting
airframe is calculated to achieve an elliptical span load distribution, improving
the Mach number times lift/drag ratio parameter by 15% compared to current
blended-wing body type aircraft designs. The enhanced low speed airframe
performance allows stall speed reduction by 25% compared to current aircraft
of similar size.

• Airfoil trailing edge treatment: Trailing edge brushes have been found to reduce
the scattering noise from turbulence near the trailing edges. The estimated
trailing edge noise reduction is 4 dBA.

• Faired undercarriage: The undercarriage noise sources can be mitigated by

partially enclosing wheels and axles. Estimated noise reduction from use of
fairings is roughly 6 dBA.

4 AERO-ASTRO 2006-2007
• Deployable, drooped leading edge: A deployable drooped leading edge can provide
the required lift during low speed operations without the use of slats, thus
eliminating slat noise. The drooped leading edge is stowed at cruise. Deploy-
ment power levels are comparable to a conventional slat. The Airbus A380
uses this configuration.

• Quiet drag (needed on approach) via increased induced

drag: Large wing area and high angle of attack provide
the lift at low speed without using deployable flaps,
eliminating a major source of airframe noise on
takeoff and landing. A combination of elevons and
thrust vectoring can increase the induced drag to the
required level, while trimming the aircraft.

• Embedded, aircraft boundary layer ingesting, distributed

propulsion system: Ingestion of fuselage boundary layer
air into the engine allows a potential reduced fuel
burn. There is a trade between this gain and the
losses due to the increased duct length needed for
noise attenuation. Embedding the engines within
the airframe implies a high degree of airframe and
engine integration. Engine airflow is now affected
by the airframe and, similarly, the presence of the
engines alters the flow around the aircraft. There
are several major challenges, associated with the The silent aircraft is propelled by a distributed high bypass ratio propulsion system
(cruise bypass ratio of 12). Unlike most civil aircraft today, which have their engines
non-uniform flow into the engine (distortion), mounted externally, the silent aircraft’s engines are embedded in the fuselage. There
are nine geared fans driven by three gas generators. Each inlet feeds air to one engine
which must be addressed for a practical aircraft cluster comprising a turbofan and two auxiliary fans. The top image shows a top view of
configuration. the engines, indicating the gearing for the cluster (of three fans — one engine) that sits
in each of the three intakes. The bottom image is a side view of the engine in the duct,
to illustrate the length of duct available for acoustic liners. Overall conceptual design is
aimed at the 2030 time frame, but part of the project strategy is that some of the quiet
technologies the team developed could be incorporated nearer term.

The Silent Aircraft 5

 • Variable area exhaust nozzle to permit ultra-high bypass ratio, low fan pressure ratio,
engines: To reduce the engine noise at takeoff the engine exhaust velocity
must be decreased. To ensure fan operability at the low power needed for low
exhaust velocity the exhaust nozzle is designed to have variable area, with
takeoff bypass ratio of 18, and cruise bypass ratio of 12. The low engine rota-
tional speed during approach enabled by the variable nozzle reduces the rear-
ward fan noise and the airframe drag requirements. The fan design, however,
must now accommodate the broad range of flows associated with operation of
low pressure ratio fans at different flight conditions.

• Airframe shielding of engine noise: Placing the engines above the airframe prevents
engine noise from reaching the observer. Engine forward radiated noise is
virtually eradicated on the ground.

• Optimized takeoff thrust management: Thrust, climb angle, and nozzle area would
be continuously varied during takeoff to maintain a set noise level outside the
airport boundary. This would allow the specified noise level to be met at all
times during departure.

• Optimized extensive liners: The embedded propulsion system allows smaller

engine diameter and thus increased non-dimensional (length/diameter) duct
length. The longer inlet and exit ducts provide scope to further reduce engine
noise by allowing additional acoustic liners, compared to
SAI HAS BEEN AN INSTRUCTIVE AND conventional nacelles, to absorb the engine noise. In the
USEFUL EXPERIMENT IN ACADEMIC- design configuration, use of an optimized multi-segment liner
INDUSTRY INTERACTIONS, FROM results in an estimated 20 dBA reduction of engine noise.
STRATEGIC PLANNING AND
DECISIONS TO DETAILED WORKING
LEVEL TECHNICAL INTERCHANGE.

6 AERO-ASTRO 2006-2007
THE COLLABORATIVE PROCESS
A range of skills and interests beyond those of the two universities was needed to tackle the
many challenges, necessitating a collaboration that included regulators, airport operators,
airlines, aerospace manufacturers and representatives of community groups. SAI has been
an instructive and useful experiment in academic-industry interactions on several levels
— from strategic planning and decisions (input from the KIC members had a direct impact
on the project goals) to detailed working level technical interchange.

Formal meetings of all the partners in the Knowledge Integration Community occurred
at roughly eight-month intervals, but interaction with some partners was more frequent.
Industrial partners gave the academic researchers access to some of their in-house design
codes. Boeing, Rolls-Royce, NASA, and ITP conducted reviews and provided feedback on
the designs. For example, Boeing made available its Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
code, WingMOD, which optimizes the aircraft planform for a given mission. Rolls-Royce
allowed use of the company’s design, performance, and noise evaluation tools to examine
concepts for new engine designs.

An academic team project that is carried out as

part of student degree programs contains a set of
goals that creates a tension in the overall conduct
of the project. Each student needs to develop the
new ideas that comprise his or her thesis in order
to get their degree, and these need to be visible as a
contribution that the particular student has made.
However, there is also a need for the research
results to be integrated into a workable design
concept. There must thus be a clear, mutual,

This chart compares the effective perceived noise level of current commercial aircraft
with the dramatically lower level for the SAX-40 (silent aircraft). For the SAX-40, the
community noise levels are estimated not to exceed 63 dBA for typical missions, which
is comparable to the background noise in urban daytime environments.

The Silent Aircraft 7

 and explicit understanding by the advisor and student as to what the expected intellectual
contribution for the thesis will be and how it will be consistent with participation in the
overall design.

Beyond the above discussions, however, processes were needed to ensure

THERE MUST BE A CLEAR, productive collaboration of the large research group as an integrated
MUTUAL, AND EXPLICIT product team. This implies a vital need for effective communication and
UNDERSTANDING BY THE information exchange and the ability to make strategic decisions, some-
ADVISOR AND STUDENT AS times based on limited available information. Weekly video conferences,
TO WHAT THE EXPECTED and even more frequent email and telephone contact, were essential
INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTION for the former aspect of the design integration, but, in industry, a chief
FOR THE THESIS WILL BE AND engineer would deal with the latter type of issues. As the different pieces
HOW IT WILL BE CONSISTENT of the research started to come together and progress was made on the
WITH PARTICIPATION IN THE component designs, it became evident that such a function would also be
OVERALL DESIGN. of great value on the project. A faculty member and a post doctoral asso-
ciate were assigned, and shared effectively, the role of co-chief engineers.

Finally, there were issues for which team members formed ad hoc task forces to address
design decisions at crucial stages of the project. Examples of specific questions addressed
in this manner are “What should be the design range?” and “Should the engines be
podded or embedded?” The task forces were several week-long focused activities, drawing
on members from all the relevant aspects of the research and involving exchanges of
personnel. This last element helped to build the working relationships and also defuse
“we-they” perspectives.

While collaboration was essential throughout the project, it was perhaps most critical in
the area of aircraft operations, in which the team in Operations worked to develop an
advanced form of Continuous Descent Arrival for current aircraft. CDA is a procedure
enabling aircraft to make a single continuous descent from altitude to landing, rather than

8 AERO-ASTRO 2006-2007
the current procedure which involves a series of descent “steps.” It reduces
PUTTING THE NEW PROCEDURES
noise levels on the ground along the approach path while also reducing
IN PLACE WAS A MANY-STEP TASK
fuel burn. Putting the new procedures in place was a many-step task that
THAT REQUIRED AGREEMENTS
required agreements among air traffic controllers, regulators, suppliers,
AMONG AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS,
airport operators, and airlines; it is an example of something that could not
REGULATORS, SUPPLIERS, AIRPORT
have been achieved without this type of partnership.
OPERATORS, AND AIRLINES; IT IS
In summary, the silent aircraft project brought industry, academia, and AN EXAMPLE OF SOMETHING
other stakeholders together around a “grand challenge” which captured THAT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN
the enthusiasm and imagination of all those involved. The Knowledge ACHIEVED WITHOUT THIS TYPE
Integration Community includes industry, government, and academia, and OF PARTNERSHIP.
provides an exciting way to address problems with a large reach, underpin-
ning the vital nature of collaboration in achieving the potential for step-
change improvements. As well as the conceptual design of a new type of aircraft, some of
the technologies developed could be introduced into more incremental aircraft and engine
designs. Collaboration and teaming occurred in basically all aspects of the project and,
because of this, SAI has been very much an enterprise in which the whole is greater than
the sum of the separate parts.

Dame Ann Dowling is Professor and Head of Division in the Cambridge University
Engineering Department and was the Cambridge lead for the silent aircraft project.
Edward Greitzer is the H. N. Slater Professor and Deputy Department Head of the
MIT Aeronautics and Astronautics Department and was the MIT lead. Thomas Hynes
is a Senior Lecturer in the Cambridge University Engineering Department and was
head of the engine team. James Hileman and Zoltan Spakovszky are a Research
Engineer and Associate Professor, respectively, in the Aero-Astro Department, and
were the two project co-Chief Engineers.

The Silent Aircraft 9