Scribd
Upload
149 views1 page

Short Report Marking Scheme

This document provides an evaluation form for a short report. It contains 3 questions that evaluate different elements of the report. Question 1 evaluates the data and results section, assessing how complete, accurate and organized the data collection and presentation is. Question 2 evaluates the analysis and discussion section, assessing how thoroughly the results are analyzed and discussed. Question 3 evaluates the conclusions section, assessing how fully justified the conclusions are. Each question includes scoring criteria for rating that element on a scale of 0 to the listed total marks.

Uploaded by

Muhammad Azrul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
149 views1 page

Short Report Marking Scheme

This document provides an evaluation form for a short report. It contains 3 questions that evaluate different elements of the report. Question 1 evaluates the data and results section, assessing how complete, accurate and organized the data collection and presentation is. Question 2 evaluates the analysis and discussion section, assessing how thoroughly the results are analyzed and discussed. Question 3 evaluates the conclusions section, assessing how fully justified the conclusions are. Each question includes scoring criteria for rating that element on a scale of 0 to the listed total marks.

Uploaded by

Muhammad Azrul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

SHORT REPORT EVALUATION FORM

EVALUATION (5%)
* Circle only one option for each question :-

Q1. Data and Result (LO1, PO1) TOTAL: 2 MARKS


All data required were recorded and are presented in an orderly
manner which reflects an accurate experiment. This includes a
2
proper plot of graphic or table of the measurement data. All units of
measurement are included.
All data required were recorded and presented in an orderly manner.
Plot of graphic or table of the measurement data represents less
1.6
accurate experiment, but quantitatively can still be acceptable. All
units of measurement are included.
All data required were recorded and presented in a disorganized
manner. Plot of graphic or table of the measurement data represents
less accurate experiment. The data is quantitatively doubted. Not all
1.2 4
units of measurement are included.
Data required were not completely recorded. Presentation of
measurement data in graphic or table is poor. The data cannot be 0.8
trusted quantitatively. Most of measurement units are not included.
No data were recorded and no presentation of measurement data is
0
included.

Q2. Analysis and Discussion (LO4, PO7) TOTAL: 2 MARKS


All results are presented in table or graph in prescribed standard
format. Detailed analysis and discussion made based on the 2
experimental results.
All results are presented in table or graph in prescribed standard
format. Insufficient analysis and discussion made based on the 1.6
experimental results.
Insufficient results are analyzed and presented in appropriate
formats without discussion.
1.2 4
Insufficient results are presented in appropriate formats without
0.8
analysis and discussion.
Fewer results presented without any appropriate format, analysis
0.4
and discussion.

Q3. Conclusions (LO2, PO2) TOTAL: 1 MARK


All conclusions are made with full justification. 1
All conclusions are made without full justification. 0.8
Partial conclusion made with justification. 0.6
Partial conclusion made with partial justification. 0.4 2
Conclusions are made without any justification. 0.2

You might also like