Business Ethics Week 1 Assigment

Byron Matamoros
Business Ethics
25 November 2017
Monsanto Attempts to Balance Stakeholder Interest
1. Does Monsanto maintain an ethical culture that effectively responds to various
stakeholders?
No, they do not stick to an ethical culture that benefits all the stakeholders of the
company. In some manners because the products have benefited many farmers.
Nevertheless, the top management officers of the company seem to be acting at the moral
minimum by complying with the law, which they have already modified to legally
introduce their products and so to generate equity for the company. Although they have
tried to create a corporate responsible companys image, their practices provide a
different view for the company. The case presented some situations in which the
company created product that aimed at benefiting all the stakeholders. However, they
have caused harm not only to customers but also to people who live near the place where
Monsanto products are used. The company has recently tried to implement an approach
to respond to all the stakeholders concerns but they have relied too much on legislation.
Furthermore, they are facing two major obstacles, which are the size of the company and
the chemicals they use. First, Monsanto is a large company facing many concerns from
people all over the world. They can solve this issue by establishing solid ethical behavior
practices that come from the upper levels to the subordinates. In addition, they can use a
customers approach to find solutions to the harms that their products have caused. The
second problem involves the chemicals that they use because they have weakening the
soil and other natural resources. To solve these problems Monsanto must use time, effort,
money, and people concerns to create a positive impact on the company and its
stakeholders. Therefore, Monsanto is still not using an ethical culture that responds to
various stakeholders.
2. Compare the benefits of growing GM seeds for crops with the potential negative
consequences of using them?
The benefits of genetically modified seeds are countless because they represent an
opportunity to create abundance and diversity. Genetically modified crops can potentially
raise agricultural productivity and reduce the need for environmentally harmful pesticides
(Qaim, 2010). They reduce the cost of production such as machinery, fuel, and chemical
pesticides. Furthermore, the study and implementation of GM seeds represents an
opportunity to understand the behavior and adaptation of genes. At the same time, it gives
the opportunity of using those studies for the benefit of the humankind. However, the
study of genes and its repercussion has not been fully developed. For instance, the case
suggests that it is possible that the use of Monsanto chemicals can generate super bugs
and super bugs. Moreover, the GM crops are considered expensive and cannot be
afforded by any kind of producer. In addition, the indiscriminate use of those resources
may cause negative environmental effects by reducing biodiversity and polluting the
environment.
3. How should Monsanto manage the potential harm to plant and animal life from
using products such as Roundup?
The most ethical decision that Monsanto could take is to stop the production and distribution
of Roundup. Since it has been proved that the product is potentially hazardous, it is not
ethical to sell it. So, they should stop the production of Roundup and invest money, time, and
human capital to develop a safer product. Stopping the production of Roundup may represent
an ethical dilemma for the company officials. This is because they own a duty to the
stockholders, which is maximize their earnings. On the other hand, they also own a duty to
consumer, which is to provide a high quality product. Even though Monsanto might stop
earning profit for a while, they can recover from the loss by providing a quality product that
can also attract new customer. Therefore, as a responsible company, Monsanto must show
that it is really concern about the effects that their product has on people and the
environment.
References
Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2017). Business ethics: Ethical Decision Making and
Cases. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Qaim, M. (2015, November 05). The Benefits of Genetically Modified Crops-and the Costs of
Inefficient Regulation. Retrieved November 23, 2017, from
http://www.rff.org/blog/2010/benefits-genetically-modified-crops-and-costs-inefficient-
regulation

Business Ethics Week 1 Assigment

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Business Ethics Week 1 Assigment

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Business Ethics Week 1 Assigment

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Byron Matamoros

Monsanto Attempts to Balance Stakeholder Interest

1. Does Monsanto maintain an ethical culture that effectively responds to various

tried to create a corporate responsible companys image, their practices provide a

consequences of using them?

pesticides. Furthermore, the study and implementation of GM seeds represents an

using products such as Roundup?

Cases. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Inefficient Regulation. Retrieved November 23, 2017, from

You might also like