HAC Training Course - 1st Part - PPT (Mod
HAC Training Course - 1st Part - PPT (Mod
DUSTS EXPLOSIONS
Slide 5 2011 DEKRA The Global Experts in Explosion & Process Safety
ATEX Directive 1999/92/EC (ATEX 137)
- Employers Obligations
On minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of
workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres
Flammability Corrective
data Conformity measures:
replacement
equipment reconditioning
inspection certifications
Layout of Explosion
classified
H.A.C.
areas Protection
+
Technical and
signs
organizational
Document
Risk analysis measures:
procedures
Process data protection/
prevention
+ visits against explosions
+ standards training
The Global Experts in Explosion & Process Safety
THEORY OF EXPLOSIONS
Oxidant
Combustible Ignition
source
Oxidant
Mixing Confinement
Mixture Comburent
Combustible Ignition
source
Flash point
Auto-ignition
Temperature
Explosion limits
Minimum Ignition
Energy (MIE)
Minimum Igniting
Current (MIC)
Maximum Experimental
Safe Gap (MESG)
Vapour Density
In air In oxygen
T2 300 C
T3 200 C
T4 135 C
T5 100 C
T6 85 C
Not a flammability
parameter
Flammable or Not
Ignition Sensitivity
Thermal Instability
Fire Risk
Agricultural
- corn, milk powder, sugar
Carbonaceous
- coal, peat, activated charcoal
Chemical
- adipic acid, sulfur, anthraquinone
Pharmaceutical
- aspirin, paracetamol, ibuprofen
Metal
- aluminium, iron, zinc
Needs to be considered
alongside LIT where
appropriate
Godbert-Greenwald
furnace is internationally
standardised
Dusts Vapours/gases
Kst Kg
Flour 87 Methane 55
Starch 150 Propane 75
Aspirin 217 Toluene 56
Pigments 286 Methanol 66
Aluminium 650 Hydrogen 550
Air is 21 % oxygen
Specialised topic
Liquid Conductivity
Chargeability
NFPA 654: Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from
the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate
Solids
The basic elements for establishing the hazardous zone types are the
identification of the source of release and the determination of the
grade of release.
Each item of process equipment (for example, tank, pump, pipeline,
vessel, valve etc.) should be considered as a potential source of
release of flammable material. If the item cannot foreseeably contain
flammable material, it will clearly not give rise to a hazardous area
around it. The same will apply if the item contains a flammable
material but cannot release it into the atmosphere (for example, an all-
welded pipeline is not considered to be a source of release).
- zone 0
- zone 1 TYPE
- zone 2 OF EMISSION
- non-hazardous area
NORMAL FAILURE
CONTINUOUS
OPERATIONS ERROR
A continuous grade of release
normally leads to a zone 0, a primary
grade to zone 1 and a secondary ZONE 0 ZONE 1 ZONE 2
grade to zone 2
The greater the release rate, the larger the extent of the zone.
The release rate depends itself on other parameters:
Geometry of the source of release
Release velocity
Concentration
Volatility of a flammable liquid
Liquid temperature
In most cases, the liquid temperature will be below the boiling point and
the vapour release rate will depend principally on the following
parameters:
liquid temperature;
vapour pressure of the liquid at its surface temperature;
dimensions of the evaporation surface;
ventilation and air movement.
Where:
f is the efficiency of the ventilation in terms of its effectiveness in diluting
the explosive gas atmosphere, with f ranging from f = 1 (ideal situation)
to, typically f = 5 (impeded air flow).
C is the number of fresh air changes per unit time (s-1)
Determine Vz and dz
(EN-60079-10 and CEI 31-35) (CEI 31-35)
Ventilation calculations
natural ventilation
Cases:
Outdoor Indoor
0.55 0.55
Gas emission (low 42300 Qg f
d z =
42300 Qg f
d z =
kz
M k LEL % vol w M k LEL % vol w
velocity) dz dz
A
0,5
(
d z = 16,5 P 10 5 )
0 ,5
M 0, 4 dz
1
k LEL %vol
A kz
0,5
100 100
emission
Other cases
E.1607.80'
CONTROL
PANEL
Continuous grade
continuously, or for long periods, or frequently
Primary grade
periodically or occasionally in normal operation
Secondary grade
not in normal operation. Only infrequently and for short periods
These risks depend on the properties of the dust and the thickness of
layers, which is influenced by the nature of the housekeeping. The
likelihood of a layer causing a fire can be controlled by the correct
selection of equipment and effective housekeeping.
NOT calculable!
Affected by
- working methods
- ventilation
- housekeeping
- maintenance
- plant structure and layout
WHERE CAN
Find potential sources of IT
release GET OUT?
Assumptions for flanges: flange hole size 0.25 mm2, spreading pool
reaches steady state dimensions because response time is very long
Assumptions for mechanical seal: seal hole size 5 mm2
Assumptions:/
Assumptions:/
Assumptions for flanges: flange hole size 0.25 mm2, spreading pool
reaches steady state dimensions because response time is very long
Assumptions : the only substance that is stored inside this kind of tank is
LPG, flange hole size 0.25 mm2
Assumptions for safety devices (not connected to the flare or treatment):
flow rate is not that one caused by external fire but because of leaks
Emission
treatment
system
Accident happens:
Risk: its the product of the likelyhood that a potential danger happens with a
certain magnitude
Magnitude
High
Likelyhood
Risk:
Mid High
Medium
Low Low
For example, an equipment with a maximum surface temperature is about 105 C will be classified T4.
The user will have to verify if T4 (135C) <AIT
The Global Experts in Explosion & Process Safety
2nd classifying : Temperature classes
Temperature class