Hyperspectral Sensors For Military Applications: R. Richter
Hyperspectral Sensors For Military Applications: R. Richter
Hyperspectral Sensors For Military Applications: R. Richter
R. Richter
DLR, German Aerospace Center
Remote Sensing Data Center
D-82234 Wessling
GERMANY
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses issues related to the use of hyperspectral sensors. Key issues for interpretation
are spectral databases of natural backgrounds and military targets as well as the accurate calibration
and atmospheric correction. A typical application is presented and future developments are outlined.
1. INTRODUCTION
Currently, airborne hyperspectral remote sensing has a 20 year history starting with the Airborne
Imaging Spectrometer (AIS) in 1985. The hyperspectral imaging spectrometers evolved from the
multispectral instruments. Multispectral instruments typically have about 10 spectral bands with
bandwidths between 50 - 200 nm and spectral gaps, typical representatives are Landsat TM
(spaceborne, 7 bands) and Daedalus AADS1268 (airborne, 11 bands). Hyperspectral sensors typically
have 100 - 300 bands with bandwidths of 2 - 20 nm, and a continuous coverage of large spectral
regions (Gower et al. 1992, Vane et al. 1993, Cocks et al. 1998). Table 1 contains a list of the early
first hyperspectral instruments (1985-1989) and some later developments.
With imaging hyperspectral sensors each pixel has an associated continuous spectrum that can be used
to identify surface materials, quantify material constituents (unmixing) and perform a sub-pixel
analysis (unmixing). For military applications the target / background discrimination is an important
issue where improvements can be achieved with hyperspectral techniques.
2. REQUIREMENTS
The requirements for a successful operation of hyperspectral imaging sensors are the compilation of
spectral databases containing natural and artificial targets. Some of these databases are publicly
Richter, R. (2005) Hyperspectral Sensors for Military Applications. In Emerging EO Phenomenology (pp. KN1-1 KN1-4). Meeting
Proceedings RTO-MP-SET-094, Keynote 1. Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: RTO. Available from: http://www.rto.nato.int/abstracts.asp.
RTO-MP-SET-094 KN1 - 1
UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED
Form Approved
Report Documentation Page OMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington
VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it
does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF
ABSTRACT OF PAGES RESPONSIBLE PERSON
a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE
UU 4
unclassified unclassified unclassified
available, e.g. from the USGS, John Hopkins University (JHU), whereas the military databases are
classified. A second requirement is the application of a radiative transfer code to be able to convert
from at-sensor radiance or scaled digital numbers to surface reflectance or emissivity. Depending on
the spectral resolution, MODTRAN or FASCODE are commonly employed (Berk et al. 2000,
http://www.ontar.com). The third important topic is the spectral and radiometric calibration of the
sensor. For use with geographic information systems the geocoding/orthorectification is essential. Fig.
1 shows a sketch of the radiation components of the atmosphere, the reflected and emitted surface
radiance and the basic sensor components. Fig. 2 summarizes the processing chain from level 0 data to
level 2.
The target / background discrimination can be performed with a variety of methods, exploring the full
spectral space or using compression algorithms (PCA, MNF). In addition, physical and statistical
models are commonly used for background suppression. A popular method is the matched filter
concept which can be calculated based on the covariance matrix. The concept has been used
extensively in information and signal processing (Turin 1975, Poor, 1983).
KN1 - 2 RTO-MP-SET-094
UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED
UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED
3. EXAMPLE
Figure 3 shows an example of AVIRIS data with an airfield locating several small aircrafts. The targets
were identified with a matched filter for the blue paint spectrum at the bottom of the figure (source:
http://www.rsinc.com/envi/mil_intel_story2.asp).
...
4. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
Except for the experimental Hyperion no commercially available hyperspectral data is currently
available from space. However, several countries are planning spaceborne hyperspectral missions. A
RTO-MP-SET-094 KN1 - 3
UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED
UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED
further ambitious step will be the operation of ultraspectral instruments with a spectral bandwidth
smaller than 1 nm and channel numbers around 1000 enabling trace gas detection and quantification.
An example of a ground-based FTS spectrum in the thermal region is presented in Fig. 4 showing a
number of narrow ozone spectral features.
REFERENCES
Berk, A., Anderson, G. P., Acharya, P: K., Chetwynd, J. H., Bernstein, L. S., Shettle, E. P., Matthew, M.
W., and Adler-Golden, S. M., 2000, MODTRAN4 Users Manual", Air Force Research Laboratory,
Hanscom AFB, MA, U.S.A.
Cocks, T., Jenssen, R., Stewart, A., Wilson, I., and Shields, T., 1998, "The HyMap airborne hyperspectral
sensor: the system, calibration and performance", First EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, 6-8
Oct. 1998, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 37-42.
Gower, J. F. R., Borstad, G. A., Anger, C. D., and Edel, H.R., 1992, "CCD-based imaging spectroscopy
for remote sensing: the FLI and CASI programs", Canadian J. Remote Sensing, Vol. 18, 199-208.
Poor, H. V., 1983, "Robust matched filters", IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-29, 677-687.
Turin, G. L., 1975, "Minimax strategies for matched-filter detection", IEEE Transactions on
Communications, COM-23, 1370-1371.
Vane G., and Goetz, A. F. H., 1993, "Terrestrial imaging Spectrometry: current status, future trends",
Remote Sensing Environment, Vol. 44, 117-126.
KN1 - 4 RTO-MP-SET-094
UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED