Maximum Rivet Pitch Study 20111115

Template created: 11.05.
2011
Template created by T. Sill
Template released by J. Szafraniak
Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Maximum Rivet Pitch Survey ISSUE 0.1 15.11.2011
Title:
Maximum Rivet Pitch Survey
Report-Nr: 106082-001
Subject/Title: Maximum Rivet Pitch Survey
Issue: 0.1
Date: 10.06.11
Summary:
NAME DATE & SIGNATURE

Prepared: Backhaus, Jan Onne
Checked: last name, first name
Released: last name, first name
Hauptsitz / Headquarters Geschftsfhrung / Telefon / Telephone Sitz der Gesellschaft / Bankverbindung / Bank details
ELAN GmbH Executive Board +49 40 21909-0 Registered office Dresdner Bank AG
Channel Tower Dipl.-Ing. Stefan Karstens Telefax / Telefax: D-21079 Hamburg BLZ / Sort code: 530 800 30
Karnapp 25 Dipl.-Ing. Jrg Manthey +49 40 21909-2001 Handelsregister / Konto-Nr / Account-No.:
21079 Hamburg Dipl.-Wirtsch.-Ing. Tristan Pfurr [email protected] Court of jurisdiction 0 797 000 600
Deutschland/Germany www.elan-edag.com Amtsgericht Hamburg HRB 93203 IBAN: DE66 5308 0030 0797 0006 00
USt.-ld / VAT-ID: DE 242108050 S.W.I.F.T. / BIC: DRESDEFF
371860389.doc Page 1 of 18
Template created: 11.05.2011

List of Distribution
Department / Company Name
371860389.doc Page 2 of 18

Record of Revisions
Issue Date Effect on Reason

Page Para
1 01.06.11 Initial version
371860389.doc Page 3 of 18

Table of References
N TITLE REFERENCE ISSUE DATE SOURCE
SIGLUM NAME
1 Reference Structure
Design Principles for V51RSDP07001.
4.0 29.05.09 EDSBK ANDISSAC D.
A350 XWB Volume 4
4
2 Handbuch Struktur AIRBUS/I
45131-01 C 04 Mester
Berechnung ASB
3 Reference Structure
Design Principles for V51RSDP07001.
4.0 21.07.09 EDSBS ANDISSAC D.
A350 XWB Volume 1
1
4 Bruhn analysis and
Purdue
design of flight - 1973 1973 E.F. Bruhn
University
vehicle structures
5 AIRFRAME Stress ISBN 962-7128- Michael Chun-Yung
2 Jan99
Analysis and Sizing 08-2 Niu
6 Air Tightness FEM ELAN-
X53RP1128335 1.1 Aug11 Jan Onne Backhaus
Study AUSY
371860389.doc Page 4 of 18

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION8
2 Literature Study 8
2.1 Design rules.......................................................................................................... 8
2.2 Structural failure criteria......................................................................................10
2.3 Air Tightness Criterion.........................................................................................12
3 Analytical Study 13
3.1 Max. Rivet Pitch..................................................................................................13
4 FEM 16
4.1 Air Tightness.......................................................................................................16
5 Summary 16
6 APPENDIX 17
6.1 Abbreviations......................................................................................................17
371860389.doc Page 5 of 18

TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure 1: IRB geometry (principle sketch).............................................................................10

Figure 2: Design Limitations [4].............................................................................................11
371860389.doc Page 6 of 18

TABLE OF TABLES
Fehler! Es konnten keine Eintrge fr ein Abbildungsverzeichnis gefunden werden.
371860389.doc Page 7 of 18

1 INTRODUCTION
Books checked without positive findings:

Roark
NIU
Pflger
Konstruieren mit Faser-Kunststoff-Verbunden
2 Literature Study
2.1 Design rules
2.1.1 Introduction
The RSDPs [1] demands certain requirements for longitudinal joints. These are
The primary function of (..) junctions is to link two CFRP adjacent fuselage panels in
order to realize a closed fuselage skin.
The junction must be able to sustain the transfer of loads between the two panels.
Those junctions are located in a pressurized area; indeed, they must guarantee air
tightness. The general rule for a bolted joint to cover this requirement is to have at
minimum 2 rows of fasteners at tight pitch (between 4.5 and 6 ).
The junctions must respect the aerodynamic requirements.
()
The range of fasteners diameters used in these junctions will be between 4.8 mm to
6.35 mm.
Fastener pitch and edge distance applied will be in accordance to RSDP Volume 1
chapter 4. (see [1] chapter 5.1)
Three basic requirements are named in the above-cited text of the RSDPs. These are:
1.) Structure must bear a certain force without failing
2.) Structure must be aerodynamic
3.) Structure must guarantee air tightness tight pitch between 4.5 and 6
Requirement 1 and 2 will be discussed more closely in chapter 2.2 and chapter 2.3.
2.1.2 RSDP Volume 1

The RSDP Volume 1 [3] chapter 2.8.3.1 defines the rivet pitch for primary structures to be:
4d s 6d
371860389.doc Page 8 of 18

while pointing out that due to reparability reasons Pitch values below 4,5 may not be
compatible with some of these [reparability] requirements. [3]
2.1.3 RSDP Volume 2

The RSDP Volume 2 chapter 2.8.3.1 defines the rivet pitch s to be:
4.5d s 6d
371860389.doc Page 9 of 18

2.2 Structural failure criteria
2.2.1 Load calculation IRB

The load calculation for inter-rivet buckling assumes a monolithic, undisturbed section.
Influence by rivet holes, rivet geometry or the load introduction by the rivet are neglected.
Therefore the inter-rivet stress can be calculated as:
M
IR ,max
W
with M = Moment
W = Section modulus
2.2.2 IRB in Handbuch der Strukturberechnung [2]

2.2.2.1 Chapter 45131-01 Inter-Rivet Buckling
Chapter 45131-01 Inter-Rivet Buckling of the HSB deals with the analysis of the sheet
buckling between two rivets (inter rivet buckling). [2] The method calculates a critical inter-
rivet buckling stress, which is then compared with the prevailing stresses. Figure 1 shows a
principle sketch of the reviewed geometry. Figure 2 is an excerpt from [2] and gives the
formulas for the calculation of the critical inter-rivet buckling stress. Beside other factors the
rivet type C is taken in consideration.
Figure 1: IRB geometry (principle sketch)
Figure 2: Excerpt from [2] - Calculation of critical buckling stress
371860389.doc Page 10 of 18

2.2.2.2 Chapter 45132-01 Wrinkling of riveted plate-stiffener assemblies under

compression loading
Chapter 45132-01 Wrinkling of riveted plate-stiffener assemblies under compression
loading of the HSB gives recommended maximum values for the fastener pitch (..) based
on tests. The maximum pitch can be calculated by the following equation:
1.27 1.2
s bst bst
k k*
with
s = fastener pitch in loading direction
k = buckling factor
k* = modified buckling factor
bst = distance between stiffeners
2.2.2.3 Chapter 45400-01 Buckling of curved plates under compression and shear
loading
Chapter 45400-01 Buckling of curved plates under compression and shear loading of the
HSB deals with the influence of the curvature of a panel of the buckling load. Whether or not
this can be adapted to modify the calculation of critical inter rivet buckling stresses as
described above is not explicitly mentioned by the author.
2.2.3 Rivet pitch acc. Bruhn [4]

Chapter C7.22 of [4] gives General design limitations to prevent secondary failure in sheet-
stiffener Panels. Two main failure modes including the rivet pitch are identified: inter-rivet
buckling and face wrinkling. Based on Figure 3 the following design rules with respect to
the maximum rivet pitch are given:
b0 should be as small as possible

p/bs < 0.5 to avoid IRB
p/D 8 to avoid face wrinkling
Figure 3: Design Limitations [4]
371860389.doc Page 11 of 18

2.2.4 IRB in AIRFRAME Stress Analysis and Sizing [5]

For the analysis of inter-rivet buckling NIU uses the same theory as that for buckling of a flat
plate or sheet as a column () with two fixed edges at each end (at rivet) [5] (see Figure 4).
For a flat skin with unloaded free edges he calculates the IRB force as:
2
t
F 0.9 c E
s
with
t = Skin thickness
s = Rivet spacing (equivalent to column length)
c = End-fixity coefficient (c=4.0 for universal heady)
E = E-Modulus
Figure 4: IRB at NIU [5]
2.3 Air Tightness Criterion

Those junctions are located in a pressurized area; indeed, they must guarantee air tightness.
The general rule for a bolted joint to cover this requirement is to have at minimum 2 rows of
fasteners at tight pitch (between 4.5 and 6 ).
(see [1] chapter 5.1)
2.3.1 RSDPs
The RSDP Volume 4 [1] say that the minimum distance between two rows of rivets must be
assessed by stress to assure air tightness (chapter 5.2 Longitudinal Overlap Design). See
also Figure 5.
371860389.doc Page 12 of 18

Figure 5: Minimum rivet distance in hoop direction for longitudinal joints
3 Analytical Study
3.1 Max. Rivet Pitch
3.1.1 Influence of rivet pitch acc. [2] 45131-01 Issue C Year 2004
A parameter study has been performed using the inter-rivet buckling method described in [2].
The goal was to determine the influence of the skin thickness on the inter-rivet buckling
event. As inter-rivet buckling often occurs after buckling of the skin, which again is influenced
by the skin thickness, the following assumption has been made:.
Assumption:
Effective width of the structure stays constant regardless of the difference in skin
thickness
Table 1 to Table 3 show results from the parameter study. The E-Modulus and the yield
strength under compression have been set according to CFRP, T300 / 914C (see HSB
12921-01 Issue D Year 1986). The rivet type has been assumed to be a blind rivet with a
normal head so that the factor C is constant.
In run 1 shown in Table 1 the skin thickness has been varied while the rivet pitch has been
set to a constant value (31 mm) to see the influence on the system. As expected the critical
inter-rivet buckling stress raises with raising skin thickness.
In run 2 shown in Table 2 the rivet pitch has been varied while the skin thickness has been
set constant. As expected the critical inter-rivet buckling stress decreases with smaller rivet
pitch. The behaviour, however, seems to be linear for rivet pitches until 20 mm and becomes
non-linear for s>20mm (compare with Figure 6)
In run 3 shown in Table 3 the critical inter-rivet buckling stress has been set constant to learn
about the influence of the skin thickness on the possible rivet-pitch. A linear relationship
between skin thickness and rivet pitch becomes obvious when visualizing the date (see
Figure 7).
371860389.doc Page 13 of 18

s 31,00 mm 31,00 mm 31,00 mm 31,00 mm 31,00 mm 31,00 mm 31,00 mm

t 1,00 mm 1,25 mm 1,50 mm 1,75 mm 2,00 mm 2,25 mm 2,50 mm
Ec 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa
Rc0.2 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa
C 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
psi 3,1800 2,5440 2,1200 1,8171 1,5900 1,4133 1,2720
sigma_cr,irb 134 MPa 209 MPa 300 MPa 409 MPa 534 MPa 663 MPa 764 MPa
Table 1: Variation of skin thickness with constant rivet pitch
s 31,00 mm 25,00 mm 20,00 mm 15,00 mm 10,00 mm 5,00 mm

t 1,25 mm 1,25 mm 1,25 mm 1,25 mm 1,25 mm 1,25 mm
Ec 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa
Rc0.2 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa
C 2 2 2 2 2 2
psi 2,5440 2,0516 1,6413 1,2310 0,8206 0,4103
sigma_cr,irb 209 MPa 321 MPa 501 MPa 792 MPa 1046 MPa 1243 MPa
Table 2: Variation of rivet pitch with constant skin thickness
Variation of s; t=const
1400
1200
1000
sigma,cr [MPa]
800
600
400
200
0
0,00 mm 5,00 mm 10,00 mm 15,00 mm 20,00 mm 25,00 mm 30,00 mm 35,00 mm
s [mm]
Figure 6: Variation of rivet pitch with constant skin thickness (see Table 2)
s 82,72 mm 62,04 mm 41,36 mm 31,02 mm 25,85 mm

t 4,00 mm 3,00 mm 2,00 mm 1,50 mm 1,25 mm
Ec 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa 78000 MPa
Rc0.2 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa 1350 MPa
C 2 2 2 2 2
psi 2,1213 2,1213 2,1213 2,1213 2,1213
sigma_cr,irb 300 MPa 300 MPa 300 MPa 300 MPa 300 MPa
Table 3: Variation of skin thickness with constant sigma,cr,irb
371860389.doc Page 14 of 18

Variation of t; sigma,cr=const.
90
80
70
60
rivet pitch [mm]
50
40
30
Bezugsspannung:
20
sigma, ideel = (PI^2 x E) / (12 x (1-nue^2) x (t/b)^2)
Knickspannung:
10 sigma, Ki = sigma, ideel x k
0
0,00 mm 0,50 mm 1,00 mm 1,50 mm 2,00 mm 2,50 mm 3,00 mm 3,50 mm 4,00 mm 4,50 mm
mit K = C nach Tabelleskin
unten
thickness t [mm]
Figure 7: Variation of skin thickness with constant sigma,cr,irb (see Table 3)
3.1.2 Influence of rivet pitch acc. classic plate buckling

Classic plate buckling is used to model the buckling behaviour of the inter-rivet area in ISAMI
by the following formula:
2
2 E t
ideal
12 1 b
2
Ki c ideal
With this a relation between thickness of skin, buckling stress and rivet pitch is derived and
displayed in Figure 8. The following assumptions have been made:
Assumptions:
E= 78000 MPa
= 0,28
c= 2 (blind rivet with normal head OR Lockbolt (rivet, close tolerance) with flush head)
The maximum rivet pitch is a linear function of the laminate thickness. The maximum
buckling stress is a quadratic function of both laminate thickness and maximum rivet pitch.
(see Figure 8).
371860389.doc Page 15 of 18

Rivet Pitch based on plate buckling

160
140
120
Rivet Pitch in [mm]
100 600 MPa

500 MPa
400 MPa
80
300 MPa
200 MPa
60
100 MPa
40
20
0
1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4
Laminate Thickness in [mm]
Figure 8: max. Rivet pitch according sigma, ki and laminate thickness
371860389.doc Page 16 of 18

4 FEM
4.1 Air Tightness
A linear FEM study has been performed to determine the influence of the rivet distance on air
tightness for thin skins. [6] documents the FEM study and its results. The conclusion is drawn
as follows:
The air tightness analysis has shown that air tightness would be maintained for a spacing of
12d and below for the 1.65mm thick type 1 skin and for 9d and below for the 1.125mm thick
type 2 skin. Figure 9 gives a screenshot of the used FEM model.
Figure 9: FEM Model
5 Summary
371860389.doc Page 17 of 18

6 APPENDIX
6.1 Abbreviations
HSB Handbuch der Struktuberechnung [2]

IRB Inter Rivet Buckling
bst Distance between stiffeners

c clamping factor
d Nominal rivet shank diameter
E E-Modulus
k Buckling factor
k* Modified buckling factor
s Fastener pitch in loading direction
t skin thickness
Poisson ratio
371860389.doc Page 18 of 18

Maximum Rivet Pitch Study 20111115

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Maximum Rivet Pitch Study 20111115

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Maximum Rivet Pitch Study 20111115

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Template created: 11.05.

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Subject/Title: Maximum Rivet Pitch Survey

NAME DATE & SIGNATURE

Checked: last name, first name

Released: last name, first name

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Department / Company Name

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Issue Date Effect on Reason

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

N TITLE REFERENCE ISSUE DATE SOURCE

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Figure 1: IRB geometry (principle sketch).............................................................................10

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Fehler! Es konnten keine Eintrge fr ein Abbildungsverzeichnis gefunden werden.

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Books checked without positive findings:

2.1.2 RSDP Volume 1

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

2.1.3 RSDP Volume 2

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

2.2 Structural failure criteria

2.2.1 Load calculation IRB

2.2.2 IRB in Handbuch der Strukturberechnung [2]

Figure 1: IRB geometry (principle sketch)

Figure 2: Excerpt from [2] - Calculation of critical buckling stress

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

2.2.2.2 Chapter 45132-01 Wrinkling of riveted plate-stiffener assemblies under

2.2.3 Rivet pitch acc. Bruhn [4]

b0 should be as small as possible

Figure 3: Design Limitations [4]

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

2.2.4 IRB in AIRFRAME Stress Analysis and Sizing [5]

Figure 4: IRB at NIU [5]

2.3 Air Tightness Criterion

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Figure 5: Minimum rivet distance in hoop direction for longitudinal joints

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

s 31,00 mm 31,00 mm 31,00 mm 31,00 mm 31,00 mm 31,00 mm 31,00 mm

s 31,00 mm 25,00 mm 20,00 mm 15,00 mm 10,00 mm 5,00 mm

s 82,72 mm 62,04 mm 41,36 mm 31,02 mm 25,85 mm

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Figure 7: Variation of skin thickness with constant sigma,cr,irb (see Table 3)

3.1.2 Influence of rivet pitch acc. classic plate buckling

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Rivet Pitch based on plate buckling

100 600 MPa

Figure 8: max. Rivet pitch according sigma, ki and laminate thickness

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

Figure 9: FEM Model

Title: REFERENCE 105860-001) DATE

HSB Handbuch der Struktuberechnung [2]

bst Distance between stiffeners

You might also like