0% found this document useful (0 votes)
330 views6 pages

Lecture Notes: Divergence Theorem and Stokes' Theorem

This document summarizes two theorems - the divergence theorem and Stokes' theorem - that relate surface integrals to volume integrals. The divergence theorem states that a surface integral of a vector field over the closed boundary of a region is equal to the volume integral of the divergence of that field over the entire region. Stokes' theorem relates a line integral around a closed curve to a surface integral over any surface bounded by that curve. The document provides examples and proofs of these theorems.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
330 views6 pages

Lecture Notes: Divergence Theorem and Stokes' Theorem

This document summarizes two theorems - the divergence theorem and Stokes' theorem - that relate surface integrals to volume integrals. The divergence theorem states that a surface integral of a vector field over the closed boundary of a region is equal to the volume integral of the divergence of that field over the entire region. Stokes' theorem relates a line integral around a closed curve to a surface integral over any surface bounded by that curve. The document provides examples and proofs of these theorems.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Lecture Notes: Divergence Theorem and Stokes Theorem

Yufei Tao
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Chinese University of Hong Kong
[email protected]

In this lecture, we will discuss two useful theorems on surface integrals.

1 Divergence Theorem
Theorem 1 (Divergence Theorem). Let T be a closed region in R3 that is bounded by a surface S,
which is the union of a finite number of smooth surfaces S1 , S2 , .., Sk . Let f1 , f2 , and f3 be functions
of x, y, z that have continuous partial derivatives on each Si (1 i k). If we orient S by taking
its outer side, then it holds that
f1 f2 f3
ZZZ ZZ
+ + dxdydz = f1 dydz + f2 dxdz + f3 dxdy.
T x y z S

We omit a proof for the theorem (which follows the same idea as our proof of the Greens
theorem, and is a good exercise for you). The theorem is also called Gauss Theorem.

Example 1. Calculate the volume of the ball x2 + y 2 + z 2 1.

Solution. Let T be the target ball, and S be its boundary x2 + y 2 + z 2 = 1, oriented by having its
outer side taken. Introduce f1 = 0, f2 = 0, and f3 = z. Then, by Theorem 1, we know that
ZZZ ZZ
1 dxdydz = z dxdy. (1)
T S

Denote by S1 the upper half of S satisfying z 0, and S2 the lower half of S satisfying z 0.
We thus have:
ZZ ZZ ZZ
z dxdy = z dxdy + z dxdy. (2)
S S1 S2
RR
Let us first calculate S1 z dxdy. Note that S1 is oriented with its upper side taken. Hence:
ZZ ZZ
z dxdy = z dxdy. (3)
S1 D

Let us represent S1 in a parametric form: r(u, v) = [x(u, v), y(u, v), z(u, v)] where

x(u, v) = cos u sin v


y(u, v) = sin u sin v
z(u, v) = cos v

1
where u [0, 2] and v [0, /2]. Let R be the collection of all such (u, v). Now we change the
integral variables in (3) to u and v by the Jacobian rule:
ZZ ZZ
z dxdy = cos v sin v cos v dudv = 2/3.
D R
RR RRR
Similarly, we also have S2 z dxdy = 2/3. Thus, we know from (1) and (2) that T 1 dxdydz =
4/3.

Example 2. Let T be the cube as shown below, and S be its boundary surface with its outer side
taken.
y
z
(1, 1, 1)

Calculate
ZZ
y(x z) dydz + x2 dzdx + (y 2 + xz) dxdy.
S

Solution. By Theorem 1, we have:


ZZ ZZZ
2 2
y(x z) dydz + x dzdx + (y + xz) dxdy = x + y dxdydz. (4)
S T

We know
ZZZ Z 1 Z 1 Z 1  
x dxdydz = x dx dy dz = 1/2.
T 0 0 0
RRR
Similarly, T y dxdydz = 1/2. Hence, (4) equals 1.

Remark 1. You may be wondering why Theorem 1 is called the Divergence Theorem. In fact,
if we define a vector function f (x, y, z) = [f1 , f2 , f3 ], then divf = f 1
+ f f3
y + z . Hence, the left
2
RRR x
hand side of the equation in Theorem 1 can also be written as T divf dxdydz.

Remark 2. Recall that surface integrals are inherently 2d. Hence, the divergence theorem essen-
tially reveals a relationship between a 2d integral and a 3d integral. Also recall that, in contrast,
the Greens theorem reveals a relationship between a 1d integral and a 2d integral.

2 Stokes Theorem
Consider S to be a piecewise-smooth surface with a closed boundary curve C. Note that, not all
surfaces have a boundary curve, e.g., a sphere x2 + y 2 + z 2 = 1 does not have a boundary curve.
Intuitively, S has a boundary curve C if it is not closed, namely, it does not separate R3 into an
interior part and an exterior part. The following is an example of such an S:

2
S

Fix a direction of C. Let us then orient S by choosing a side of it as shown in the above figure.
Formally, imagine that a point moves around C along the direction we have decided. Now, watch
the points movement from the side of S we have chosen (i.e., allowing normal vectors of that side
to shoot into our eyes). We should see that the point is moving in the counterclockwise direction.
Theorem 2. Let S and C be as described earlier (with the direction of C fixed, and S oriented).
Suppose that S is the union of a finite number of smooth surfaces S1 , S2 , .., Sk . Let f1 , f2 , and f3
be functions of x, y, z that have continuous partial derivatives on each Si (1 i k). Then:
f3 f2 f1 f3 f2 f1
Z ZZ
f1 dx + f2 dy + f3 dz = dydz + dzdx + dxdy.
C S y z z x x y
Proof. We first prove the theorem for the special case where S is all monotone, namely, it is
simultaneously xy-monotone, xz-monotone, and yz-monotone. In particular, we will show that
f1 f1
Z ZZ
f1 dx = dzdx dxdy (5)
z y
ZC Z ZS
f2 f2
f2 dy = dxdy dydz
x z
ZC Z ZS
f3 f3
f3 dz = dydz dzdx.
C S y x
Then, the theorem will follow from summing up both sides of the above three equations.
Due to symmetry, it suffices to prove (5). For this purpose, suppose that S is described by
z = g(x, y), and that we oriented S by taking its upper side. Introduce h(x, y, z) = z g(x, y).
Hence, S is also described by h(x, y, z) = 0. Let Cxy be the projection of C onto the xy-plane, and
Dxy be the region in the xy-plane enclosed by Cxy .

Z Z
f1 dx = f1 (x, y, z) dx
C Cxy
f1 (x, y, z)
ZZ
(by Greens Theorem) = dxdy
Dxy y
f1 f1 z
ZZ
= + dxdy. (6)
Dxy y z y
h h h
Note that h = [ x , y , z ] is a normal vector of S. Let be the angle between the directions
of h and k = [0, 0, 1], and be the angle between the directions of h and j = [0, 1, 0]. We have:
h g z
y y y
cos = = =
|g| |g| |g|
h z
z z 1
cos = = = .
|g| |g| |g|

3
Therefore:
cos z
= .
cos y
We thus have:
f1 f1 cos
ZZ ZZ
(6) = dxdy + dxdy.
Dxy y Dxy z cos
f1 f1
ZZ ZZ
= dxdy + cos dA
y z
Z ZS Z ZS
f1 f1
= dxdy + dzdx.
S y S z
= right hand side of (5).

If S is not all monotone, we can always cut S into a set of disjoint surfaces each of which is
all monotone. Then, we can obtain Theorem 2 by applying what we have proved to each of those
surfaces. The details are omitted and serve as a good exercise for you.

Example 3. Use Stokes Theorem to calculate


Z
y dx + z dy + x dz
C

where C is the sequence of line segments: ACBA with points A = (1, 0, 0), B = (0, 1, 0), and
C = (0, 0, 1).
z

C = (0, 0, 1)

S
y
O B = (0, 1, 0)

A = (1, 0, 0)

Solution. Let S be the triangle ABC, oriented with its lower side taken. Introduce f1 (x, y, z) = y,
f2 (x, y, z) = z, and f3 (x, y, z) = x. We have:
f3 f2
= 0 1 = 1
y z
f1 f3
= 0 1 = 1
z x
f2 f1
= 0 1 = 1.
x y
(7)

4
Therefore, Stokes Theorem gives:
Z Z
y dx + z dy + x dz = (1) dydz + (1) dzdx + (1) dxdy. (8)
C S

Letting D be the projection of S onto the xy-plane, we know:


Z Z
1 dxdy = 1 dxdy = 1/2.
S D
R R
Similarly, we know S 1 dydz = S 1 dzdx = 1/2. Therefore, (8) equals 3/2.
The Stokes Theorem has another useful form. Let n = [cos , cos , cos ] be a unit normal
vector of S, coming out from the side of S we have chosen. Specifically:

is the angle between the directions of n and i = [1, 0, 0];

is the angle between the directions of n and j = [0, 1, 0];

is the angle between the directions of n and k = [0, 0, 1].

From our earlier discussion on surface integral by area, we know:


ZZ  
f3 f2 f3 f2
ZZ
cos dA = dydz
S y z S y z
ZZ  
f1 f3 f1 f3
ZZ
cos dA = dzdx
S z x S z x
ZZ  
f2 f1 f2 f1
ZZ
cos dA = dxdy.
S x y S x y

Therefore, from Theorem 2, we get:


Z
f1 dx + f2 dy + f3 dz
C
ZZ      
f3 f2 f1 f3 f2 f1
= cos + cos + cos dA.
S y z z x x y

Let us introduce a vector function f = [f1 , f2 , f3 ]. In an earlier lecture, we have defined:


 
f3 f2 f1 f3 f2 f1
curlf = , , .
y z z x x y

We thus obtain the following concise form of Theorem 2:


Z ZZ
f1 dx + f2 dy + f3 dz = curlf n dA. (9)
C S

Example 4. Let S be the hemisphere x2 + y 2 + z 2 = 1 with z 0. Orient S by taking its upper


side. Let f = [y, x, z 2 ]. Calculate S curlf n dA.
RR

Solution. We could solve this question by using the methods we learned in the lecture surface
integral by area. However, due to the special nature of the integrand function, we can apply
Stokes Theorem to convert the surface integral into a line integral, which simplifies calculation

5
significantly. The boundary curve C of S is the circle x2 + y 2 = 1 in the xy-plane, directed
counterclockwise. Hence, by (9), we have:
ZZ Z
curlf n dA = y dx + x dy + z 2 dz.
S C
ZZ
(as C is in the xy-plane) = y dx + x dy
C
ZZ
(by Greens Theorem) = 2 dxdy = 2
D

where D is the disc x2 + y 2 1 in the xy-plane.

Remark 3. Note that the Stokes theorem reveals a relationship between a 1d integral and a 2d
integral. Namely, it has the same nature as the Greens theorem (which in fact is a special case of
the Stokes theorem).

You might also like