Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 34 views

    Agriculture, Food, and Health Are Not On "The List"!

    Uploaded by

    Chef Jem
    The document discusses several topics: 1) It argues that agriculture, food, and health are not within the enumerated powers granted to Congress in the US Constitution, and thus any federal interference in these areas is unlawful. 2) It questions whether legislators are responsible for children's health or if individuals have always taken responsibility for their own health. 3) It concludes that any health issues facing America must be addressed at the local community level rather than through federal government intervention, as health is not an area the government is constitutionally authorized to regulate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Agriculture, Food, and Health Are Not On "The List"!

    Uploaded by

    Chef Jem
    34 views6 pages
    The document discusses several topics: 1) It argues that agriculture, food, and health are not within the enumerated powers granted to Congress in the US Constitution, and thus any federal interference in these areas is unlawful. 2) It questions whether legislators are responsible for children's health or if individuals have always taken responsibility for their own health. 3) It concludes that any health issues facing America must be addressed at the local community level rather than through federal government intervention, as health is not an area the government is constitutionally authorized to regulate.

    Original Description:

    The Lawful limitations of the United States Government according to the Organic Laws

    Original Title

    Agriculture, Food, And Health Are Not on "the List"!

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses several topics: 1) It argues that agriculture, food, and health are not within the enumerated powers granted to Congress in the US Constitution, and thus any federal interference in these areas is unlawful. 2) It questions whether legislators are responsible for children's health or if individuals have always taken responsibility for their own health. 3) It concludes that any health issues facing America must be addressed at the local community level rather than through federal government intervention, as health is not an area the government is constitutionally authorized to regulate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    34 views6 pages

    Agriculture, Food, and Health Are Not On "The List"!

    Uploaded by

    Chef Jem
    The document discusses several topics: 1) It argues that agriculture, food, and health are not within the enumerated powers granted to Congress in the US Constitution, and thus any federal interference in these areas is unlawful. 2) It questions whether legislators are responsible for children's health or if individuals have always taken responsibility for their own health. 3) It concludes that any health issues facing America must be addressed at the local community level rather than through federal government intervention, as health is not an area the government is constitutionally authorized to regulate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 6

    1

    Agriculture, Food and Health Are Not On "The List"!


    Virtually all the powers (apparently) delegated to Congress
    are listed at Article I, 8, clauses 1-16.

    Original Publishing Date: May 7, 2015 -

    "All (the Constitution of September 17, 1787) authorizes the


    federal government to do over the (United States[1]) falls into four
    categories:

    Military defense, international commerce & relations; Immigration


    & naturalization; Domestically, create a uniform commercial
    system: weights & measures, patents & copyrights, money based
    on gold & silver, bankruptcy laws, mail delivery & some road
    building; and with some of the amendments, secure certain civil
    rights ...

    If its on the list, Congress may make laws about it.[2] But if its
    NOT on the list, Congress usurps power & acts unlawfully when it
    interferes.

    Agriculture is not on the list! Food is not on the list! Health is not
    on the list![3]

    There are endless good-intended causes among the "organic"


    agricultural, natural health and real food movements today that
    champion different Rights for people to choose life-styles,
    practices and pursuits of happiness for themselves. However,
    people are naturally free to choose for themselves. There is not a
    need to petition government for any of the natural Rights that are
    already ours! Resources that are put into campaigns at the
    federal level will be better spent educating the public about
    nullification of any "law" that is "not on the list"!

    ***
    May 8, 2015 -
    2

    Just posted at Dr. Brownstein's

    Thank You Dr. B!

    I can see that Save the Children is doing a good work and is
    probably able to produce believable reports. I've heard similar
    assessments on the health ranking of Americans among that of
    the rest of the world. I can understand how you can say "demand
    more from our legislators". Surely the plight of all children's poor
    health is humanity's cry for rethinking.

    Are the legislators responsible for children's health? For those


    who think so I'd ask have Americans always looked to the
    legislators for their health needs? Of course not! If Save the
    Children can show how they respond to malnourishment by
    supporting the distribution of goat milk where it is needed in
    Kenya (an excellent all-inclusive source of nourishment, BTW)
    why would we want to look to legislators when the FDA has
    launched a veritable war on raw milk across the u.s. of A.?
    Besides food, health as well as agriculture are not the Lawfully
    delegated business of Congress (as my blog article shows).

    Therefore I am convinced that any health issues (in light of


    America's poor health rating) must be rethought from the
    perspective of self responsibility. My personal thought is that
    "community health" requires the community to rethink this on a
    local level. The fact that health is not on "the list" of delegated
    powers in the federal Constitution (of September 17, 1787) means
    that neither the federal government nor the state governments (by
    way of their extension) have any lawful responsibilities for our
    health! In fact there is plenty of evidence indicating that
    government is incapable of guiding the people toward greater
    health. (The government's anti-fat campaign is probably their
    most outstanding health disaster!) People can disagree but I still
    say this needs rethinking![4]
    3

    ***
    May 9, 2015 -

    Just serendipitously found the following "Thought for the


    day" (from the Online Omraam community) that's harmonious with
    my comment posted (above) at Dr. B's.

    "... we see ... people, involving themselves in public affairs: they


    give their opinions on society, the life of their country and world
    events ..."[5]

    ***
    July 19, 2015 -

    Just posted the following comment at Jon Barron's "Baseline of


    Health" site in response to his current article:

    Politics and Nutrition Dont Mix -

    Thank you, Jon!

    Your reporting is certainly outstanding! (I intend to post and


    promote links to this.) Although the overall focus is "Politics and
    Nutrition" the report offers additional substance that deserves the
    public's recognition. Personally I really appreciate your
    acknowledgement of the very important nutritional difference in
    having "grass fed" animal products (rather than the grain-fed
    variations)!

    I definitely agree that "Politics and Nutrition Dont Mix" - however


    my conclusion is based on another perspective (that I think
    deserves to be better known in addition to the fact you and others
    have presented re: government's nutritional ignorance).
    4

    My conclusion: government is not authorized to concern itself with


    any of this subject matter! I've reported on this:
    http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=2252051

    Briefly: agriculture, food, nutrition, health, etc. are all subject


    matters that are simply not within the delegated "Powers" that
    were granted to Congress in any of the four foundational Organic
    Laws of the United States of America. IMO, all representatives
    need to know the limitations of their authority:

    http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=2265823

    Would you be willing to consider adding the perspective of the


    Organic Laws in your "conversation" on "Politics and Nutrition"?

    ***
    October 14, 2017 - More regarding the "Constitution" -

    I find an element of humor in the notions of what is "constitutional"


    and what is "unconstitutional". The humor comes from the
    perspective that the constitution (of September 17, 1787) was
    never "adopted". Indeed the constitution has a birth date, has
    been referred to a zillion times and has been "preserved,
    protected and defended"[i] yet in a number of ways it is possibly
    "the greatest show on earth" when it is realized that no one has
    actually adopted it with a written oath to "protect" it![ii]

    Most all of people's references to the "constitution" (whether


    "constitutional" or "unconstitutional") is based on a grand
    assumption of it being the "supreme law"[iii]. This assumption (of
    what the constitution means) was made possible by way of a
    certain semantic deception regarding "the Land". That was
    accomplished by not disclosing this elementary fact of
    fundamental Law: all government's jurisdiction is proprietary
    based! That means the federal government is limited in its Lawful
    authority to what it actually owns and it does not Lawfully extend
    5

    into the several states - unless the state clearly granted certain
    defined land/s to the exclusive legislation of the United States
    government. Naturally this limitation also pertains to private
    property and to Individual men, women and children who are not
    on federal lands.
    --
    [i] What actually is being preserved, protected and defended?
    Does the "constitution of the United States" refer to the parchment
    or to the territory of the "United States"? In any case "the
    Constitution is limited to federal territory that has nothing to do
    with you and your life." See: "You Are The Commander In Chief"
    by Ed Rivera at:
    http://edstudents.angelfire.com

    Also at this linked webpage: "So few people have actually read
    the Constitution that it is not widely known that the President of
    the United States of America must take an oath to support that
    Constitution and the President of the United States must take an
    oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the
    United States."
    [ii] "There is no record that any President has ever sworn or
    affirmed an oath to support the Constitution for the United States
    of America." - Ed Rivera

    [iii] http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/6/supreme-law

    ***********^***********
    Final Notes:

    [1] Replaces "the Country at large". A most essential key in


    knowing exactly where the Constitution of September 17, 1787
    can arguably be enforced comes by understanding the proper
    context of this Constitution - with the other three Organic Laws!

    [2] The enforceable of these laws are limited to what Congress


    owns. This is called proprietary jurisdiction and it has been
    6

    discussed at my "Son of Truth of Self" CureZone Blogs under


    several titles regarding the four Organic Laws.

    [3] https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2015/05/03/nullification-
    the-original-right-of-self-defense/

    [4] http://blog.drbrownstein.com/u-s-mothers-and-childrens-
    health-rank-last-in-the-western-world/#comment-25330

    [5] http://www.prosveta-usa.com/changing-the-world-on-what-
    condition-the-young-can-achieve-this_2015-05-09

    ***********^***********
    Keywords:

    Constitution, government, United States, usurpation, Agriculture,


    Food, Health, nullification, Organic Laws, rights, freedom, pursuit
    of happiness, children, goat milk, raw milk, delegated powers,
    Politics, Nutrition, grass fed animal products, Congress, United
    States of America, representatives, authority, supreme law,
    federal territory, President

    You might also like