Future of Work

Technology Horizons Program
October, 2007
SR | 1092-A www.iftf.org
124 University Avenue, 2nd Floor

Palo Alto, CA 94301
650.854.6322
the amplified
acknowledgements
individual
The perspectives in this report are a result of the contributions of individuals both within and outside of the
Institute for the Future. From our signals process, to an expert workshop, to the writing and editing of the
perspectives, the Future of Work research project has truly been an exercise in tapping the wisdom of crowds.
First, we’d like to acknowledge the individuals outside of IFTF who helped populate our signals database at the
onset of this research:
Liz Gerber, Stanford Maribeth Back, FX Palo Alto Laboratory
Gil Gordon, Gil Gordon Associates Howard Rheingold, IFTF Affiliate
Gregg Zachary, New York Times Jerry Michalski, Sociate
Sally Augustin, PlaceCoach
Ming-li Chai, Herman Miller
Next, we thank the clients and experts who brought their insight and experience to our office on August 16,
2007 to preview and discuss the implications of our forecasts:
Noni Alwood, Cisco Jerry Michalski, Sociate
Sandhiprakash Binde, Intel Aaron Ross, Alloy Ventures
Ming-Li Chai, Herman Miller Jerry Sheehan, Calit2
Aryae Coopersmith, HR Forums Emily Ulrich, Steelcase
Debra Engel, IFTF Board of Trustees Maryln Walton, Herman Miller
Andy Greenhalgh, Intel Anthony Weeks
Eric Larsen, DaimlerChrysler
Ann LeCam, Disney
Kent Lockart, Disney
Finally, the research team and IFTF production staff, who took all of the signals and thoughts on implications
and brought them together in this report, a collection of perspectives on the Future of Work:
Research/Writing Production
Jamais Cascio Rachel Maguire Robin Bogott
Maureen Davis Jane McGonigal Jean Hagan
Rod Falcon Sean Ness Lisa Mumbach
Jean Hagan Mani Pande
Jess Hemerly David Pescovitz
Crystal Keeler Alex Soojung-Kim Pang
Michael Liebhold Jason Tester
Mike Love Anthony Townsend
We are excited to share this work with you and thank everyone for their hard work and dedication.
© 2007 Institute for the Future. All rights reserved. All brands and trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
ii This report is proprietary for Technology Horizons Program members. Reproduction is prohibited without written permission.
1 contents
Introduction . ......................................................................... 1
1. The Amplified Individual ................................................... 5
2. The Visible World ............................................................. 13
3. Diversity Redefined ......................................................... 23
4. Science at Work . ............................................................. 29
5. Sustainable Enterprise ..................................................... 35
6. Health as a Workplace Value............................................. 45
7. Implications..................................................................... 53
Endnotes.............................................................................. 57
FUTURE OF WORK iii

the amplified
individual
iv
1 introduction
It is not possible to write about the Future of Work without reflecting on your own organi-
zation and work experience. In many ways, this report is a product of a new way we work
at IFTF and the dilemmas we try to navigate daily. The six themes we highlight in the
report emerged as a result of IFTF’s signals process: a highly collaborative effort that brings
together experts from within and outside of IFTF who are asked to contribute signals—
developments, events, observations—that are weak indicators of larger future trends. The
process of tagging and clustering these signals allowed us to build on each other’s ideas and
synthesize them into larger themes. We used highly social, collective, improvisational, and
augmented behaviors to produce a deeper and, hopefully, better result.
As inevitably happens when working in a highly collective and augmented way, we faced
a dilemma: how do we assign authorship to a product of collective intelligence? As much as
we value the collective contributions, we also believe in the need for individual recognition.
Ultimately, this report is not a product of a faceless mass but of a group of individuals, each
bringing his or her unique knowledge and perspectives. Thus, “stewards”—people who had
ultimate responsibility for shaping each perspective—are listed as authors. It is important
to remember, however, that all the individuals listed on the cover have contributed to this
effort and we could not have done this work without all of their input.
We moved into the highly visible world at IFTF a few years ago when we migrated our
offices from Sand Hill Road, where each person had a closed office, to our current digs on
University Avenue. There are very few walls or doors in our current location except for the
doors we brought from our old office and now use as desks. Transparency is almost a given
in the new physical environment—you have to assume that whatever happens, everyone
will know right away. Between the open space environment, instant message windows on
everyone’s computers, Google Docs and signals platforms for collaborative work, Plazes,
Facebook, and other platforms for enhancing visibility many staff use, it is indeed hard—
at times nearly impossible—to be invisible. At the same time, we are working on various
ways to make our content more tangible and sensory rich: in the world of radical trans-
parency, there is a huge gap between being visible and being noticed. You may have no
choice but to be visible, but it is harder than ever to be noticed. Between navigating all the
dilemmas inherent in the world of radical visibility—what, when, and to whom you want to
make what visible—we tackle the challenge of how to make what we do more tangible and
accessible to our clients.
Diversity is one of the hardest dilemmas to navigate for everyone—individuals, societies,

and organizations, IFTF included. For as much as we say we value diversity, we inherently
want to be surrounded by “people like us.” It is just so much easier to live in a world where
everyone agrees with you. It saves time if you don’t need to do all that arguing, convinc-
ing, and cajoling. Finding people like us and sticking together along whatever dimension
of similarity we find at hand—team logos, likes, dislikes, heritage, religion, ethnicity—is
almost hardwired into our brains. So, it takes a special effort to not only bring in people
who think, work, or communicate differently, but more importantly to really hear them.
FUTURE OF WORK 1
1 INTRODUCTION
Deep diversity makes for messy organizations, as structures, processes, and incentives are bent
to accommodate non-mainstream preferences. But, if managed well, messiness often brings
with it creativity and innovation—traditional assumptions are challenged and new ways of
“seeing” emerge. But how much messiness to accept, at what points, and in what parts of the
organization—these are some of the dilemmas inherent in the world of deep diversity.
Health and sustainability are not only becoming key areas of IFTF’s work but are also becom-
ing clearly intertwined, as personal health evolves as a lens for how people experience issues
and dilemmas of sustainability. Although IFTF has been doing forecasts around sustainability,
climate change, and health for many years—almost since the founding of the Institute—we
have just now begun to realize that these are becoming a cornerstone of all of our work, just
like technology has been a cornerstone for the last 40 years. As health emerges as a key value
and brand identity, every company, whether one wants to admit it or not, is becoming a health
company. Health and sustainability are emerging as lenses for judging attractiveness of work-
places—and for thinking about personal lifestyle and career choices.
Our sixth theme is about integrating new sciences—neurosciences, biology, and mathematics—
as a part of the organizational toolkit for training, development, planning, and other areas. Al-
though we are far away from using brain scans and biological data to understand individual skills
and to put together optimal work teams, the language of neuroscience is definitely entering our
conversations. In fact, the strand of research on understanding which part of the brain is involved
in futures thinking is obviously of particular interest to us. The fact that it is closely related to
the part of the brain where memories are stored provides a scientific explanation for what we’ve
believed for many years—in order to look forward, you need to be able to look back. Understand-
ing of history and the future are closely intertwined. What other experiential or “gut feeling”
phenomena will we be able to explain using new scientific evidence? And how will we navigate
the dilemma of over-reliance on scientific evidence versus experience and instincts?
New sciences aligned to understanding management and organization dynamics is a trend for
which I have found a weak signal in my own work: I find myself increasingly drawn to reading
magazines such as Scientific American Mind. The September 2007 issue particularly drew my
attention. In an article titled “New Insights About Leadership,” authors cite evidence that the
best leaders are not necessarily the ones projecting winning charisma, sharp intelligence, and
an aura of absolute authority – these traits are not the ultimate keys to greatness. Instead, their
research suggests, “effective leaders must work to understand the values and opinions of their
followers – rather than assuming absolute authority – to enable a productive dialogue with fol-
lowers about what the group embodies and stands for and thus how it should act.” Leadership,
in their words, means the ability to “shape what followers actually want to do, not the act of
enforcing compliance using rewards and punishments.” Good leadership depends on coopera-
tion and support of constituents; it is not a top-down process. In order to gain credibility among
followers, leaders must try to position themselves among the group, rather than above it. Some
leaders have had an intuitive grasp of this idea before – how exciting to find it explored and
expanded in a quantitative setting and with the rigor of scientific analysis.
2 institute for the FUTURE

Phew–and finally a good scientific explanation for why I find it really important to place my
desk in the “bullpen,” in the middle of where the staff is, and where most of the work gets
done. On a related note, this is finally a good bit of scientific support for IFTF’s organizational
chart! It took an incredible amount of dialogue and consensus building to create–a process that
seems so sharply at odds with most traditional organizational models. The chart speaks well to
the fact that at IFTF, the Executive Director is a spokesperson for the commons and is an equal
among equals. It points out that there are many leaders in the organization and that leadership
is dynamic–different people assume leadership positions at different times and in different
contexts. For every would-be leader, there is an optimal leadership context; for every leadership
challenge, there is a perfect candidate.
—Marina Gorbis
Executive Director, Institute for the Future
FUTURE OF WORK 3
1 the amplified individual

1
the amplified
individual FROM INDIVIDUAL TO SOCIAL, COLLECTIVE,
IMPROVISATIONAL, AND AUGMENTED
New technologies of cooperation are combining to create a

generation of amplified individuals—workplace superheroes.
In some cases they will compete with traditional organizational
models; in others they will amplify capabilities of organizations
where they already work.
DILEMMA The amplified workers of the future share four important characteristics. First,
they are highly social. They use tagging software, wikis, social networks, and
other human intelligence aggregators to supplement their individual knowledge
and to understand what their individual contributions mean in the context of the
organization, giving meaning to even the most menial tasks. Amplified individuals
are highly collective, taking advantage of online collaboration software, mobile
While the value and strength communications tools, and immersive virtual environments to engage globally
of amplified individuals distributed team members with highly specialized and complementary capacities.
comes from their connection Amplified individuals are also highly improvisational, capable of banding together
with the collective to form effective networks and infrastructures, both social and professional.
intelligence of others, Finally, amplified individuals are highly augmented. They employ visualization
the need for individual tools, attention filters, e-displays, and ambient presence systems to enhance their
recognition remains. cognitive abilities and coordination skills, thus enabling them to quickly access and
Organizations will have to process massive amounts of information.
navigate the boundaries of
what is collective and what
is individual—values of the
collectives in organizations
should supercede the
personalities of individuals.
FUTURE OF WORK 5
An amplified skill set emerges. As networked amplification becomes the norm, individuals
are developing new super-individual skills that enable them to thrive in an increasingly
complex and collaborative work culture. These include:
• Mobbability—the ability to work in large groups, and to organize and collaborate with
many people simultaneously.
• Influency—knowing how to be persuasive in multiple social contexts and media spaces,

and demonstrating awareness that each context and space requires a different persuasive
strategy and technique.
• High Ping Quotient—responsiveness to other people’s requests for engagement;

propensity to reach out to others in a network.
• Protovation—fearless innovation in rapid, iterative cycles.

• Open Authorship—ease with creating content for immediate public consumption and
modification.
• Emergensight—the ability to prepare for and handle surprising results and complexity.
• Multi-capitalism—fluency in working with different capitals (e.g., natural, intellectual,

social, financial, virtual).
• Longbroading—thinking in terms of higher-level systems, massively multiple cycles,

and the very big picture.
• Signal/Noise Management—filtering meaningful information, patterns, and common-

alities from the massively multiple streams of data and advice.
• Cooperation Radar—the ability to sense, almost intuitively, who would make the best
collaborators on a particular task.
Amplified Individuals Are Highly Social

they provide and rely on social filters of information
Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card, who built a theory on the visual cues people use when searching
for information, coined the term “information foraging” in 1995. They examined the process of
search through the lens of economic calculus, defining the worth of an information source “as
the value of information gained per unit cost of processing the source.” Information foraging
works hand-in-hand with social filtering, which has been adopted as a solution to the infor-
mation overload problem. Social filtering can be defined as participation in community that,
through ranking, tagging, or adding other metadata to web content, helps make more relevant
or higher-quality information rise above the noise. This practice facilitates the processing and
synthesis of massive amounts of information. Social filtering services range from social book-
marking sites like del.icio.us, to news aggregator sites like Digg and reddit, to RSS readers that
offer “reblogging” such as Google Reader.

For a few years now, IFTF researchers have been using del.icio.us to keep a shared record of
sites that we find relevant to our content, tagged with keywords. A daily snapshot of this stream
of web activity is then automatically published on the Future/Now blog1. Since we wanted a
record of our digital research anyway, publishing it allowed us to potentially connect with other
interested parties at no cost. It was a first attempt at turning our research process inside out.
Starting in 2006, we prototyped and began using a new platform for our internal process for
collecting “signals,” expanding on the social filtering functions of del.icio.us. Signals are
events, observations, or developments suggestive of a larger trend or shift. In a signals process,
researchers and handpicked experts convene for about two weeks around a topic on our plat-
form, adding short entries and tagging them with keywords. We try to recruit experts for whom
it will be relatively easy to answer the question, “What are 10–20 important weak signals about
the future of _____?” since they are already actively reading or writing in this area.
Signals link to sources for more detailed analysis, including web content, articles, reports,
or ethnographic interviews. Once the signals have been identified, we use a variety of meth-
ods—from tag clouds and network diagrams, to face-to-face meetings of researchers—to gather Built on Drupal, an open-
signals into clusters that might tell an important story for our clients. source content manage-
The highly social signals process and platform facilitates many desirable outcomes: we can ment system, IFTF’s
signals platform allows
capture what might otherwise be ephemeral interactions with experts since they can add signals
experts and research-
on their own time; researchers on different teams and in distributed work environments have a
ers to contribute to and
virtual environment to stay abreast of each others’ insights; and, since the platform is built on
annotate signals, which
Drupal2, an open-source content management system, it encourages further experimentation. are later clustered to
identify bigger trends
and stories.
FUTURE OF WORK 7
Amplified Individuals are Highly Collective

They access and contribute to crowd intelligence
Collective intelligence, or CI for short, has been a major story since the emergence of
successful collaborative knowledge projects, like Wikipedia, and powerful prediction markets,
like the Iowa Electronic Markets. The territory is new and difficult to explore: crowds can
become easily disorganized and unfocused, or they can just as quickly turn against your
intended goals and attack with remarkable efficiency and organization. Companies often shy
away from collective intelligence tools, fearing that they’d prove more of a distraction than
a benefit. The appropriate state of mind when tapping into the new movement of collective
intelligence should be experimentation followed by critical analysis and reformulation.
An early example of collective intelligence software specifically aimed at businesses is

Competitious, a program that leverages internal CI to document and generate insight about
the competition. Competitious software invites all members of an organization to participate
in collecting, tagging, and circulating news about competitors. Individuals can contribute
to a shared competitor matrix that tracks attributes of different competitors while wiki-style
components of Competitious3 invite collective analysis. The goal? To generate bottom-up
understanding of the competitive marketplace.
While some companies have experienced trouble making use of the collective intelligence
potential of their workforce, others, like Nokia4, have found great success. What started there as
a subversive, open-source wiki established by the corporate strategy team—without permission
from IT—has grown to company-wide adoption of collaborative tools. An estimated 1,000 to
1,500 employees use these collective intelligence platforms to share information with fellow
employees. These practices have proven so successful that Nokia has invested in a company-
wide wiki, as well as a bevy of other collaborative tools. They’ve even established a “pro-ject”
team to set up on-demand collaborative platforms for specific projects and departments quickly
Competitious relies on and efficiently.
user input to generate a
Google Earth and Microsoft’s Live Search have enabled an entirely novel form of collabora-
bottom-up understand-
ing of the competitive
tion: mostly unaffiliated, distributed individuals contributing micro-efforts to a large project,
marketplace. termed “crowdsourcing” by Jeff Howe, contributing editor at Wired magazine. Online com-
munities have formed around Google
and Microsoft’s satellite imagery
services to find and analyze images
from across the globe. Examples
include military retirees taking their
guess at different sites in North Korea
and the search for computer scientist
Jim Grey, whose boat went missing
off the California coast.
Source: www.competitous.org

Amplified Workers Are Highly Improvisational
They band together quickly to create infrastructure and resources for
accomplishing tasks
It is now easier than ever to band together, perform distributed work, share ideas, and be
productive despite physical separation. It’s less and less important what country a particular
team member lives in. Indeed, new collective experience software is helping to solve the
traditional problems a globally dispersed team might pose and to overcome the isolation that
the independent worker experiences when lacking access to a central and social workplace.
More and more, individuals are banding together ad hoc to design collective experiences
without top-down direction.
A few years ago, a group of self-employed developers and writers in San Francisco created
a community office space called Hat Factory5 that allowed them to pool money and share
a workspace with friends in unrelated fields. They advertised online: “Tired of working
from coffee shops every day? Miss community and structure in your work life?” For $200
a month, independent workers have access to a variety of traditional office amenities like a
meeting room, Wi-Fi, and a projector and sound system. Since the creation of Hat Factory, the
coworking community has spread into more than fifty cites in the United States and Canada
and spans more than a dozen other countries. Although they don’t necessarily work in the
same professional fields, by banding together, coworkers get the advantage of a broadened
professional network and a social work environment that serves as a compromise between the
By banding together,
isolation of a home office and the public coffee shop. By defining and publishing roles such
coworkers at places
as the SpaceOwner, SpaceCatalyst, Coworker, or just Interested, coworkers have effectively
like the Hat Factory
created a collective experience model that can be recreated. get the advantage of a
Immersive online environments are also increasingly capable of simulating the social experi- broadened professional
ence of sharing the same physical workplace. Researchers at Stanford University’s Virtual network and a social
Human Interaction Lab and the Palo Alto Research Center are exploring the real-world social work environment that
serves as a compromise
benefits of co-habiting virtual worlds like World of Warcraft and Second Life. They report that
between the isolation of
the collective experience of a virtual environment, especially environments with 3D avatars,
a home office and the
provides significant social-emotional benefits. Players in the same world experience other
public coffee shop.
players as co-present and available to each other, yet are able to focus on
individual in-world work. The research indicates that simultaneous co-
presence does not necessarily promote active social interaction. Instead,
it creates a sense of ambient sociability. This kind of casual co-presence
may become an important tool in holding together the distributed work-
place, as it creates a thin layer of live social experience and common
ground without distracting from tasks at hand.
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/cirne/685867674
FUTURE OF WORK 9
Amplified Workers Are Highly Augmented

They use cognitive enhancement tools and hacks to accomplish complex tasks
With the unrelenting deluge of information we face every day, and with an increasingly varied
range of responsibilities and tasks, individuals frequently seek and design tools and processes
that will enhance their performance or just help them filter and make sense of everything. These
forms of augmentation range from games and visualization tools to smart drugs and “life hacks.”
Just as an athlete might use steroids to run, pedal, or swim faster, today’s student often relies on
pharmaceutical aids such as Modafinil and Ritalin—“smart drugs”—to enhance academic per-
formance. The practice is starting to become a norm. An even newer compound, called CX717,
not only improves alertness but, according to a study at the University of Surrey, “improved
performance in healthy male subjects that became impaired during 27 hours without sleep.”
Meanwhile, Helicon Therapeutics and other labs are developing compounds designed from the
get-go to increase cognitive performance and memory. As these students move from universi-
ties and into the workplace, these self-augmenting habits are coming with them.
Drugs aren’t the only way amplified individuals are augmenting themselves. Merlin Mann’s
43 Folders6 is just one of many blogs that highlights “life hacks,” a term coined by Danny
O’Brien for systems, software, and processes that a group of programmers used to manage
information and their lives. These systems are no longer reserved for infogeeks. Life hacks
are commonplace, from the “Hipster PDA” to Smart Playlists. In addition to these hacks,
visualization maps connecting related pieces of information are becoming more prevalent.
Gapminder is one example of a company seeking to “make data more accessible and easier to
use for instant visual analysis.” Gapminder creates need-based visualizations for information
systems so that the connections between ideas, people, or places aren’t just inferred—they’re
actually visible on the screen.
The Hipster PDA, one

Additionally, in the next two decades, the emerging field of augmented cognition will deliver
of many popular life technologies that autonomously measure a worker’s psychological state and react accordingly.
hacks, is nothing more Panic setting in at work? An AugCog display will help you focus on the most important tasks.
than index cards For example, DARPA is developing the CogPit, a context-aware airplane instrument panel that
and a butterfly clip. uses non-invasive brainwave monitoring to alter how much information is displayed on the
screen at any moment, and other variables.
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/leff/4269370

“ Amplified” is not “ alw ay s on. ”
The trend toward amplification is not about increasing the pressure many workers today
feel from the top down—pressure to be more productive, to log more hours at the office,
or to be “always on.” Instead, amplification has the opposite goal: it aims to free up
workers to design challenges that suit them, schedule their own hours, choose their own
offices, and build their own highly flexible work teams. In short, an amplified individual
is freed from many of the fixed time, location, and work flow constraints that typify a
traditional job. And as a result, far from being “always on,” these amplified individuals
might very well wind up end up working fewer hours, even as they produce more and bet-
ter output for the company.
This shift from fixed job to fluid and engaging work is not only about increased productivity.
It’s also part of the broader trend toward maximizing quality of life through better-de-
signed work. Early signals of this new focus on workers’ well being include The Four Hour
Work Week7, by Timothy Ferriss, a Princeton professor of entrepreneurship. It explores
how mobile digital networks and collaboration software can help individuals create a
better flow between work and everyday life—ideally enabling anyone to “escape the 9–5,
live anywhere, and outsource your life.” Semco CEO Ricardo Semler takes the notion one
step further with The Seven-Day Weekend: Changing How Work Works8, which documents
his company’s successful efforts to radically de-structure the workplace by eliminating
organizational charts, fixing job descriptions, and altering standard working hours.
In addition to innovative business theory, the field of positive psychology is a major driver
of early efforts to amplify individual workers. The future of work was a primary theme of
the 2007 Global Forum of the Gallup Institute for Global Well-Being9, where half a dozen
plenary speakers focused on the potential for new positive psychology research to harness
happiness for increased productivity and innovation at the workplace. One of the major
insights emerging out of the positive psychology research space, captured recently in
Markus Buckingham’s Go Put Your Strengths to Work10, is the importance of exercising and
amplifying personal skills and talents while outsourcing weaknesses to others.
From developing a high ping quotient and strong cooperation radar to mastering multi-
capitalism and exercising influency, it is clear that the amplified individual has an edge
not only in achieving more work-related output, but also in improving personal quality of
life. And while certain kinds of work might always involve tasks that are fixed to specific
times and places, almost all companies would benefit from experimentation in pushing
the limits of employee choice, flexibility, and ad hoc organization.
FUTURE OF WORK 11
the amplified
individual
12
2
the visible
world FROM INFORMATION OPACITY TO UBIQUITOUS
TRANSPARENCY
As networked memories proliferate, everything—people, places,

things, and processes—will be surrounded by new layers of visible
reality that challenge the way we find, create, and communicate
knowledge in the workplace.
DILEMMA Everywhere we look today, sophisticated technologies for sensing and recording
data are being embedded in our daily work. “The Spew,” as cyberpunk novelist
Neal Stephenson called this information torrent, is filling up hard drives at an his-
toric rate. According to a recent study by IDC, this year the amount of data created
As the volume of private and replicated (255 exabytes) will exceed the storage capacity available (246 exa-
and business data rises bytes) for the first time in history. This means, simply, that we’re generating tons of
exponentially, some of it information faster than we’re making hard drives to store it. In fact, corporate data
revealed purposefully and storage requirements are expected to grow fifty-fold by 2010.11
some collected automatically But information overload is nothing new. Since the dawn of computerization, large
as a part of daily activities, organizations have been challenged with managing and understanding mounting
organizations and indi- volumes of raw data. Over the next decade, however, the way we sense, under-
viduals will have to navigate stand and see the world through data will be transformed. Sensing embedded in
highly contextual notions of our communications networks and the physical world will elevate the art of self-
privacy. Privacy norms and documentation to new heights. Social computing and the semantic web will create
regulations will vary greatly new ways for people and machines to collaboratively filter and extract meaning
in different local contexts from data about our environments and ourselves. Finally, technical and conceptual
and among different groups. breakthroughs in communication and presentation will provide new ways of telling
A friend accessing informa- compelling stories about complex data to support collaborative work. Adapting to
tion about a friend online this new world of visible data will be challenging. As both people and organizations
may not be viewed as an in- reveal clouds of information about themselves, we’ll see new synergies and con-
trusion; a potential employer flicts emerge at the intersection of these data clouds. As both present behavior and
or an ex-boyfriend regularly past history become more transparent, the visible world will require new manage-
reading the same informa- ment and communication skills at every level. In fact, transparency may emerge as
tion or aggregating it with the best practice in the workplace. In the visible world, it will be impossible to hide
other visible sources, may anything, so it’s best to have nothing to hide.
be viewed as an intrusion or,
even worse, stalking.
FUTURE OF WORK 13
2 the visible world
Seeing: Self-documenting work and workers. A tectonic shift in our observational capabili-
ties, driven by ubiquitous sensing, is a key enabler of a more visible world. The workplace of the
future will likely be a place where everything is sensed and recorded—the things people write and
say, where objects are located, the flow of money down to the transaction level, etc. As the cost of
embedded sensing, computational resources, and wireless communications fall over the next decade,
and demands for accountability continue to increase, these sensory platforms will be leveraged to
document work at an unprecedented resolution. Simply by doing our work, we will create exquisitely
detailed records of it.
Key platforms will include RFID, which will allow asset and inventory tracking in near real time as
artifacts and consumable goods are moved about offices, campuses, and the larger world. Geographic
positioning, implemented through a variety of technology platforms like GPS and Wi-Fi beacons, will
allow information systems to “place-stamp” every bit of data they create, in much the same way they
time-stamp records today. Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) will provide a common
format for transaction-level detail across entire industries. The array of personal identification tech-
nologies—voiceprint, gait, and facial recognition—will allow self-documenting workplaces to draw
links between people, places, and objects.12
In addition to data related to our work, people are creating personal ecologies of visibility. From
cell phones with built-in cameras to social sites like Twitter, Last.FM, Flickr, and iMeem, self-
documentation has reached new heights. These technologies enable us to capture—and, subsequently,
share—every aspect of our lives. iMeem is a great example of the self-documenting dashboard,
allowing a user to integrate favorite personal visual and audio media, blogs, and more through the
use of playlists presented on a simple profile page. Through this self-documentation, the user
presents a handcrafted aggregation of his or her personality, visible for all to see and discover.
Knowing: People and machines making sense together. Neither people nor machines alone will
be able to absorb the torrent of sensory data that will literally infest the future workplace. To address
this challenge, we’ll see increasing innovation around information systems that combine machine
intelligence and the power of groups to collaboratively filter and analyze raw data, and transform
it into knowledge. However, tomorrow’s assistive technologies won’t simply tell us what to do,
but rather provide us with more and new ways of looking at the complex data streams produced by
people, the economy, objects, and places.

An early indicator of this shift can be seen in the financial sector. For the past decade, Professor
Peter Levin of Barnard College has studied the changing nature of commodities trading. Once
dominated by open outcry markets like the famous and intensely social pits of the Chicago
Board of Trade, there has been a steady shift to electronic trading of commodities. With this
shift from face-to-face trading based on the ticker to desktop trading from sophisticated person-
al research stations, massive new volumes of data are now at traders’ disposal every minute of
the day. Correspondingly, the style of work and skill sets of successful traders have shifted from
those able to sense the body language and mob dynamics of the pit traders, to those with the
mathematical and data literacy skills to leverage the computer-based platform. The great traders
of the future won’t be robots executing the trades determined by an all-knowing computer, but
sophisticated analysts supported by machines that summarize and make accessible massive
networked memories.13
Communicating: New modes of expression. Perhaps the most important shift in the visible
world will be the way that we communicate what’s interesting about the data we work with.
The way we model, visualize, and interact with complex information will need to change as
fast as the way we collect and analyze it. But as PowerPoint fades into the distance, what new
modes of expression will enter the future workplace?
Today’s trends in scientific visualization offer a window into the data-rich workspace of
tomorrow. Physics and structural biology are two fields in which researchers’ ability to generate
massive sets of sensory data has utterly outstripped their ability to effectively visualize that
data. As leading scholar Wayne Hendrickson of Columbia University says, “visualization is
everything” in cutting-edge biomedical research.
The challenge of visualization in the visible world will be twofold. In a workplace where
networked memories will provide infinite zoomability and instant access to excruciating detail,
information design will need to find new and compelling views of the big picture. Second, the
growing accumulation of time series data will invite us to look more deeply not just at snap-
shots of data, but also at processes that shape trends over time. Here, an increasing literacy
and toolkit for building simulations will provide a mode of expression far more effective than
eloquent writing or appealing illustration. Finally, as we reach the limits of the human nervous
system’s eye-mind circuitry, we’ll see more non-visual augmentations to data visualization.
Haptic, or tactile, technologies that let us step inside simulations and “move” data around will
provide new opportunities for conveying newly visible data.
FUTURE OF WORK 15
2 the visible world: seeing
Seeing
Persistent work leaves trails of data
In the future workplace, more and more detailed activity will be documented automatically (and
often inadvertently) as a result of embedded sensing and increased electronic communication.
Increasing demands for accountability will arise as regulators, customers, law enforcement, and
the courts gain greater awareness of these new records. These are some of the trails we’re likely to
details leave:
Taste Trails—One of the most profound impacts social networking has had thus far is the idea
of aggregating habits—listening habits, activities, interests, friends—into lists and dashboards
that can be shared and displayed. In this corner of the visible world, manual self-documentation
allows us to control our visible digital identity. Flickr is the most common example, enabling
users to upload and manage the accessibility (private, friends only, family only, or public) of the
images in their photostreams. Last.FM not only allows us to share what we’re listening to but
also provides us with comprehensive data and charts that visualize listening habits. Tracks and
artists we’d prefer to enjoy without others knowing (guilty pleasures) can be manually edited
and removed from our listening history. Through this self-documenting we have begun to create
Last.FM software a personal ecology of visibility, controlling what we share and who we allow to see it.
allows users to track
their listening habits
and view a variety of
charts on their Last.FM
homepages
Source: http://ast.fm/user/agreatnotion

Location Trails—Just as all data created by computers today is time-stamped, virtually all
of the data produced in the workplace of the future will have a location stamp as well. This
new attribute will enable us to track people, objects, or groups as they move through space, or
answer entirely new kinds of questions about place. A subset of location trails will be presence
trails created by tools like Twitter or Plazes that mix location and activity data to record what
we were doing. the
Collaboration Trails—The growing use of social software for knowledge creation and
details
manipulation—wikis, social bookmarks, and blogs—generate more and more microdata about
our work habits. As use of these tools grows, we’ll leave detailed trails of data about whom we
collaborate with, how, and when. It will be harder to erase this record as it proliferates across
networked memories. Machine intelligence will be applied to managing human relationships—
XBRL can provide the semantic context to help detect fraud in real-time, protect confidentiality,
or initiate whistle-blowing to preserve corporate ethics.
Biometric Trails—Increasingly, workers will leave trails of biological data as workplace
environments become more aware of their inhabitants. Our voices, faces, and gait will be used
to detect our presence in workplaces as well as to link and cue information. Biometric sensing
will become a powerful platform for making complex health and health-related information
more integrated and visible in the workplace as companies seek to create better workplaces. For
instance, an employee coughing or sneezing more than usual can be detected by the workplace
environment, notifying that employee’s boss that the employee may be sick and need to go
home in order to prevent an office-wide flu outbreak.
FUTURE OF WORK 17
2 the visible world: knowing/communicating
Knowing
The social evolution toward artificial intelligence
Visions of artificial intelligence as an all-knowing, centralized intelligence are rapidly giving

way to a messier reality of pattern recognition powered by abundant computing power, and the
ability of groups to create new vocabularies for building knowledge. The social web may rap-
the idly emerge as the ultimate synthesis of human and machine intelligence inside large organiza-
details tions. Some interesting examples of human-machine innovation include:
People Training Machines—Amazon’s Mechanical Turk is a computing platform that coordi-

nates the use of human intelligence to perform tasks which computers are unable to do easily,
such as interpreting certain kinds of images. One of the most popular uses of this technology,
however, is to train machines to perform more sophisticated tasks based on cues given by
humans. Increasingly, we’ll see machines that learn from social activity on the web and inside
organizational webs proactively recognize and organize information in ways that are intuitive to
human users.
Smarter Social Webs—For much of the last 15 years, large organizations deployed knowl-
edge databases in an attempt to capture and share lessons and re-usable work products. But,
unexpectedly, these databases did not supplant people as key sources of information.
Today, the social web is primarily used by groups of people for manually recording and anno-
tating information, without much intervention by machines. But over the next decade, we’ll
see more and more machine intelligence emerge to help navigate and find useful information
and knowledge within these new social webs. Reputation and ratings systems will help weigh
information, valuing contributions from higher quality sources. Social network analysis will
inform new knowledge-creating networks, and provide new ad hoc ways to organize informa-
tion. Technologies like Yahoo! Pipes, which let individuals remix RSS feeds into their own
syndicated news streams, amplify the ability of domain experts to publish and share their filters
on the torrent of data produced everyday.
Reality Mining—Platforms like MIT’s Reality Mining project illustrate how machines will
help people work together by augmenting their sociability. As sensed data about workplaces,
workers, and the work itself accumulates, time-based patterns of association will emerge that
can inform predictive models. For instance, we might be able to anticipate informal social gath-
erings at key locations to better understand how people collaborate in creative environments.

Communicating
A new literacy of data visualization
Over the last decade, PowerPoint has revolutionized the presentation of business data. Presen-
tation authoring tools have driven a democratization of high-quality data visualization akin
to what word processors and desktop publishing did earlier for written modes of communica-
tion. In many organizations, PowerPoint decks have replaced traditional written reports as the the
primary means of communicating analysis. details
Going forward, however, the challenge of effective data communication will demand new tools
and skill sets for data visualization. PowerPoint and the desktop interface will give way to new
tools for summarizing and sharing highlights of multivariate data sets. These will include:
New Desktop Tools—Trendalyzer, a tool developed by the non-profit venture Gapminder, is
a signal of a coming revolution in new desktop data visualization tools. Trendalyzer reduces
the need for viewers to interpret data on the fly and increases the effectiveness and speed of
Visualization tools
communicating complex data by breaking away from the static slide paradigm of PowerPoint like Gapminder help a
and visualizing multi-dimensional, time-series data in a continuous way. “Heat maps” are being user synthesize large
used to summarize complex quantitative data in easily understood visual forms on geographic quantities of data.
maps.
Source: www.gapmindere.org
Heat maps like this map

of Miami real estate by
Zillow summarize
complex data in visual
form on a map, putting it
into geographic context.
Source: www.zillow.com
FUTURE OF WORK 19
2 the visible world: communicating
Collaborative e-Displays—As e-displays take on more of the functionalities of paper, we’ll

see digital systems that don’t disrupt person-to-person and group collaboration practices but
support them instead. This may be one of the most important impacts of flexible displays or
e-paper: the ability to replicate the scale and interactivity of traditional paper, thus transform-
ing computers from tools that disrupt older forms of collaboration into tools that support them.
the Jeff Han, a consulting research scientist for NYU’s Department of Computer Science, has
developed a web-famous technology for multi-touch interaction surfaces. Imagine a handful of
details designers grouped around a lightboard dragging photos and sorting them into piles—except the
lightboard is a screen and the photos are digital.
Scientists today grapple with the challenge of visually presenting ever-mounting volumes of
Perceptive Pixel, information. In data rich fields like high-energy physics and structural biology, scientists are
founded by Jeff Han, engaged in an urgent search for news ways of working with and communicating data.
creates multi-touch
Immersive Haptics—The sheer complexity of data produced in protein modeling is driving
interaction surfaces
innovations in immersive haptic displays. In these environments, scientists can deal with data
that revolutionize visual
display from a viewing
through multiple sensory channels—3 D visual, auditory, and touch. By grabbing, pushing, and
screen to an interactive bending proteins, they can develop additional insights on the structure of the molecules. As
experience. MIT biologist Jonathan King has said, it is becoming clear to educators that “you need many,
many forms of visualization to understand and interact with some-
thing as complex as protein structure.”
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/14657061@N00/414716166
Researcher Jurgen
Schulze demonstrates
an interactive protein
visualization on a virtual
reality wall at UCSD’s
Calit2.
Source: www.calit2.net/~jschulze/

Artistic Visualization of the Small World—Leading scientists are beginning to question
dependence on computer-generated visualization of complex small-world structures, especially
for trying to teach or communicate findings to audiences outside their narrow areas of research.
This suggests a return of artists, who are exploring new data-rich fields like structural biol-
ogy as a subject of inquiry. Increasingly, artists are using real scientific data to create “analog”
visualizations off the screen. Some of the best examples include the knitted coral reefs created the
at the Institute for Figuring. Sculptor Mara Haseltine, daughter of prominent molecular biolo-
gist William Haseltine, used data from public protein structure databases to create her scaled- details
up “Waltz of the Polypeptides” at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island. As we
drown in raw data, graphic artists can provide skilled interpretations through representational
imagery that is not possible with the algorithmic rendering of computer graphics, re-introducing
human interpretation and storytelling into the visualization of data.
The Institute for
Figuring’s crocheted
coral reef takes a crafty
approach to analog
scientific visualization.
Source: www.www.flickr.com/
photos/84445194@N00/315169802
Sculptor Mara Haseltine

used data from public
protein structure databases
to create her scaled-up
“Waltz of the Polypeptides.”
Source: www.www.flickr.com/photos/viknanda/315753844/
FUTURE OF WORK 21
the amplified
individual
22
3
diversity
redefined FROM POLITICAL CORRECTNESS TO INNOVATION
IMPERATIVE
For decades, diversity in many global organizations has been

largely a political and social imperative. Conversations about
“diversity” usually revolved around the gender, race, or ethnic
characteristics of the workforce. In the next ten years we will see
innovation emerge as a new imperative for diversity. In the process,
what diversity means will be redefined, broadening it to include a
DILEMMA
host of new dimensions—age, skills, disciplines, and backgrounds;
cognitive, work, learning, and thinking styles; and much more.
Many companies are realizing the power of collective intelligence and the need to
Valuing diverse work styles,
be truly global and transdisciplinary. Consequently, diversity is becoming a core
media preferences, cognitive
competence for many organizations.
abilities, work environments,
in addition to traditional Diversity is at the core of what makes groups intelligent. Connective technolo-
dimensions of diversity? gies are leading to increased appreciation of the power of collective intelligence
Sounds like a recipe for and its role in the innovation process. From Wikipedia’s vast repository of user-
chaos. Navigating the thin contributed, non-expert knowledge to massively multiplayer gamers—whose play-
line between the creative ers are, together, able to solve complex problems at a fraction of the time compared
chaos that helps make an to individuals—we are seeing examples of the advantage and power of group intel-
organization innovative, and ligence and problem solving. What makes collectives truly successful, however,
order that ultimately ensures is the diversity of the group. Groups that include a variety of people with varying
things get done, is exactly knowledge, including those who are not necessarily highly skilled or “expert,” for
what this dilemma is about. example, tend to be more innovative and make better predictions than groups of
experts that are restricted only to the most renowned and traditionally intelligent.
Complex problems will require transdisciplinary approaches. With technology

bleeding into nearly all aspects of modern work, fields of study and professions are
beginning to overlap more than ever. Also, we are facing complex problems such
as global warming or global epidemics that require knowledge from combinations
of traditional disciplines. Researchers and problem solvers are called upon to work
together and to speak common languages in order to solve such problems. Univer-
sities are beginning to prepare for this call to arms by creating rich transdisciplinary
programs that allow people to study and work with specialists across a range of
fields instead of being limited to one traditional field. In order to innovate and grow,
organizations will not only have to ensure that the workforce contains a variety of
multidisciplinary teams, they will also have to hire employees with diverse back-
grounds and cognitive skills in areas such as abstract reasoning, problem solving,
communication, and collaboration.
FUTURE OF WORK 23
3 diversity redefined: DIVERSITY MAKES GROUPS INTELLIGENT
Innovation in the next decade will require skills in managing deep diversity. The United States
and Europe no longer hold a monopoly on the markets for innovation. Part of this has to do
with the exporting of manufacturing processes overseas. What was thought of as an export-
able aspect of industry now turns out to be the segment of industry around which innovation
flourishes. At the same time, organizations from resource- and infrastructure-constrained
the markets in developing countries like India and China in some areas (like mobile technologies)
are innovating at a faster pace than those from developed countries. While large global cor-
details porations struggle to figure out how to revive innovation within their existing infrastructures
and business models, lack of legacy infrastructure combined with rapidly growing markets are
fueling growth of new companies in developing countries. These companies are often able to
leapfrog established organizational models and seize market niches faster because they have
fewer legacy systems and often less regulatory oversight. Presence in areas where new com-
petitors are popping up is critical to survival, but it is not enough. The key is not just to employ
people in these locales but also to effectively integrate these local employees and local business
processes into the infrastructure of global organizations in order to remain competitive.
Diversity Makes Groups Intelligent

Prediction markets and jams
James Surowiecki, author of the best-selling book Wisdom of Crowds, argues that what makes
crowds smart is diversity. When you bring diverse sets of people with diverse lenses and points
of view together, each person in the crowd brings a little information. If all the opinions are
combined, all the erroneous information is randomized and cancels itself out. In his highly
influential book, The Difference: How the Power of Diversity creates Better Groups, Firms,
Schools and Societies, Scott E. Page, professor and director of the Center for the Study of
Complex Systems at University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, agrees that diverse groups yield
superior outcomes compared to homogenous groups. In his research, Page demonstrated that
groups displaying a range of perspectives and skill levels outperform like-minded experts. He
points out in the prologue of The Difference that, “Progress depends as much on our collective
differences as it does on our individual IQ scores.”
To leverage the power of diversity in collectives, many companies are beginning to use predic-
tion markets to enhance various aspects of their operations. Prediction markets are collective
intelligence tools where participants essentially bet on the likelihood of outcomes. For instance,
election season in the United States has made prediction markets for the candidates popular.
The idea is that the collective knowledge of the participants will drive the market up and down,
making it a more accurate predictor of outcomes than, say, a group of political pundits. Plus,
because there is usually some sort of reward at stake in a good prediction market, like money or
prestige, people tend to vote with their mind not their heart, thus generating different and gener-
ally more accurate representations than what would come from a small, homogenous group of
decision makers. Simply put, part of the accuracy is derived from participants’ investment.

Some of the most popular prediction markets on the Internet include the Iowa Electronic Mar-
ket, NewsFutures, and Intrade. Participants bet on everything from sports to politics to Harry
Potter’s fate. Inkling Markets helps organizations set up their own company-specific prediction
markets for things like book sales (O’Reilly Media) and acceptance of scientific research (Los
Alamos Lab). Another example is Hewlett-Packard BRAIN (Behaviorally Robust Aggregation
of Information) game, used for prediction in small groups. The betting game is anonymous and the
people have to back their bets with actual money. The game also assigns a behavior quotient
to all the players to summarize their risk attitude and predictive behaviors, and weighs their details
responses based on the behavior quotient. According to HP, the BRAIN game consistently
beats forecasts generated in a more traditional way.
IBM’s JAMS are another large-scale collective endeavor. For 72 hours, May 21–24, 2001, IBM
conducted an experiment in intranet diversity known as the first WORLD JAM. The company
opened up what amounted to an employee-wide Internet forum, with the typical forum struc-
ture of thread title, or topic, and threaded comments. The threads were grouped into ten content
categories, with moderators. The goal was for employees to have an open forum in which to
share ideas and concerns with each other. Anonymity allowed people to feel uninhibited in their
contributions. Because of the range of skills and experiences individuals brought to the table,
Prediction markets are
IBM was able to learn a lot about its employees while letting its employees pool their collec-
collective intelligence
tive intelligence to help each other. Today many companies are beginning to use versions of
tools where participants
JAMS to poll employees around various issues, reach corporate-wide decisions, and even aid
bet on the likelihood of
in making R&D decisions. outcomes in everything
from R&D decisions to
Nobel Prize winners.
Source: www.inklingmarkets.com
FUTURE OF WORK 25
3 diversity redefined:
complex problems will require transdisciplinary apprOacheS
Complex Problems Will Require Transdisciplinary Approaches

University programs and Calit2
In the United States, more and more universities have begun to experiment with transdisci-
plinary programs. Stanford currently has several new transdisciplinary programs, including
BioX and MediaX. BioX brings together bioscience, engineering, physics, computer science,
the and more in order to facilitate innovation and experimentation. MediaX is similar, but focuses
details on how people use technology to connect with each other and access information. The idea is
to apply insight from other fields of study to problems that were historically dissected by one
homogenous team. One of the most interesting and visionary examples of transdisciplinarity
is the California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology (Calit2) at the
University of California’s San Diego campus. (UC Irvine is also home to a division of Calit2.)
Calit2 brings together researchers from the sciences, engineering, art, design, and myriad other
disciplines to tackle large-scale societal problems. What is particularly unique about Calit2 is
the integration of art and artists into many science teams. At Calit2’s foundation is the belief
Calit2 is a groundbreak- that artists often have unparalleled foresights and insights that are relevant, prescient, and valu-
ing transdisciplinary able when envisioning and building future technologies. For example, people with the ability
program that brings to identify patterns and make sense of them through artistic visualizations and other techniques
together artists, technol- will be invaluable in helping us deal with the massive amounts of data available to us.
ogists, and scientists to
Calit2 director Larry Smarr likes to think of it as the Lab of the Future, where the projects
solve complex problems
that can’t be addressed
underway are five years ahead of today’s technology. Researcher Shannon Spanhake even calls
within a single discipline. the program “anti-disciplinary” because of the egalitarian way the program treats researchers
from across a wide range of fields. With a BS in electrical engi-
neering and a BFA and MFA in visual art, Spanhake exemplifies
the kind of transdisciplinary background that will be indispens-
able in a world that emphasizes collaboration over homogene-
ity. Spanhake created a personal pollution monitor known as
“Squirrel” which senses the level of pollution in the air around
you and sends real-time information to a mobile phone or device
via Bluetooth. The sensor can be clipped to a purse or a belt and
Spanhake hopes to make the device fashionable in the future, like
an iPod shuffle.
Of course, because this model is a fairly new one, it is not with-

out its obstacles. People trained in different disciplines commu-
nicate using the language of their particular discipline. In order
for the biologist to communicate with the electrical engineer, or
the nanotechnologist to work with the sociologist, a common
language must be developed. Furthermore, all disciplines must
learn to interface with artists. This sort of high-level communica-
tion takes time to develop but Calit2 researchers realize that the
development of a common language is possible because success
of the collaboration depends on it.
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/bw/511078977

Innovation Will Require Skills in Managing Deep Diversity
Thriving on deep diversity
For decades, most multi-national companies have used their overseas subsidiaries as sales and
technical support channels for the headquarters. In the last ten years, overseas companies, par-
ticularly IT ones, outsourced everything from customer services to software development. The
model, however, has stayed the same: innovation and design have been the prerogative of R&D the
labs in developed countries. As markets in China, India, and other developing countries grow, details
it is increasingly difficult for the headquarters to develop products that can suit the needs of a
whole different category of consumers. This will require deep understanding of local needs and
market dynamics as well as reliance on local innovation talent.
GM understands this. The company sought to reach a younger market by redesigning its Buick
LaCrosse for the Chinese market and chose Joe Qui and a team of Chinese designers to make
it happen. The new car has become so popular with the 30-something set in China that it is
slated to sell over 110,000 units this year. The success of Qiu’s design drove GM to look to
the Shanghai team for an overhaul of the American market’s LaCrosse. A team in Detroit will
design the exterior but Qiu’s team will have input into, and control of, the interior design. With
the car market in China booming, GM took advantage of an opportunity to diversify their state-
side innovation by creating a global team that had proven its ability to create something fresh
and successful.
While multi-national companies look to integrate local talent, developing countries are trying The redesigned Buick
to bring Western-educated expatriates back home. These companies are not hindered by a LaCrosse was so suc-
legacy of inefficient processes, and offer expatriates new growth opportunities back in their cessful in China that GM
plans to use the same
homeland. China’s Zhongguancun Science Park, created in 1988, is housed in the Zhongguan-
Chinese designers to
cun corridor, which has been called the “Silicon Valley of China.” Thousands of Chinese-born
work on the interior of a
IT businesses are headquartered in this zone but many multi-national companies—Intel and
new LaCross design for
Qualcomm, for example—also have R&D centers or regional offices here. Many universi- the US market.
ties and research institutions also call this zone home, rendering
Zhongguancun a truly powerful and diverse knowledge center.
Local companies have easy access to graduating science and
technology students and multi-national companies gain access
to these local stars because of their presence in an area where in-
novation is valued and encouraged.
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/chijs/133367527
FUTURE OF WORK 27
the amplified
individual
28
4 science
at work FROM EXPERIENCE AND INTUITION TO DATA AND DESIGN
We are on the brink of a new “scientification” of work. Traditional

management theory and workplace optimization have largely
been based on social sciences. Over the next decade though,
workplace science will more frequently draw from advances in
neuroscience, biology, and mathematics, enabling design based
on quantifiable information.
DILEMMA
Just as smart design differentiates products in an overcrowded marketplace, so will
smart design become integrated into various aspects of work, from workplace de-
sign to organizational processes. We will apply knowledge from math and science to
maximize creativity, foster innovation, boost productivity, and improve the quality
With the influx of data,
of life for employees. Once we understand the patterns governing such previously
the desire to make deci-
amorphous processes, we will not be leaving anything to chance. The next step will
sions based on “scientific”
be to design work processes, spaces, and interactions to achieve desired outcomes.
evidence is likely to grow. In
fact, in many cases, scien- Neuroscience gets a job. Historically, workplace psychology has been relegated
tific justification will become to human resources, a “soft” science that managers might draw on to solve problems
a requirement. However, and resolve employee conflicts. But breakthroughs in neuroscience and cognitive
in some situations science psychology are deepening our understanding of human behavior. Technologies like
may not be the right default functional magnetic resonance imaging and quantitative electroencephalography,
approach. It is good to combined with powerful computers running pattern-recognition algorithms, are
remember that the greatest opening the black box in our heads. By reverse engineering the software (mind)
athletes and musicians are that runs on our hardware (brain), scientists are developing an accurate picture
at their best when they do of mysterious mental processes and phenomena like creativity, decision making,
not calculate their moves, attention, and even happiness.
but make them instinctively. From that research, new theories are emerging that will lead to powerful organi-
Thus, balancing the need for zational applications. For example, scientists have observed that you can, in fact,
data with the appreciation “teach an old dog new tricks.” Neuroplasticity refers to the fact that the organization
for scientifically unexplained of the brain, specifically the way information is processed, is not “hard wired” into
intuition will be necessary. fixed circuits as we once thought. Scientists have also shown that, contrary to popu-
lar belief, the adult brain can grow new neurons. These findings will likely impact
how new skills are taught at work and provide a scientific basis to the importance of
exercising our brains: “use it or lose it.”
FUTURE OF WORK 29
4 SCIENCE AT WORK: NEUROSCIENCE GETS A JOB
Mathematics of work and workers. Management science attempts to use social science-based
techniques to enable better decisions. With rapid advances in data mining and analytics, com-
puter simulation, and diffusion of sensors to monitor various workplace processes, mathematics
will become an integral part of that management science.
Keith Devlin, executive director of Stanford University’s Center for the Study of Language
the and Information, has coined the term “soft mathematics” to describe math applied to indi-
details vidual people, where traditional statistics breaks down. The earliest and best examples of soft
mathematics are indeed in management science, where behavior patterns were recognized and
identified in interactions between just three or four people. “When you’ve got a recognizable,
repeatable behavior pattern, you’ve got the basis for a mathematical discipline,” Devlin says.
Drawing from the cognitive sciences, some large companies are wielding mathematical tools to
identify the best job candidates before ever meeting them. Indeed, long surveys often contain-
ing unusual questions are used to gather “biodata,” quantitative information about a person’s
background, to determine early if they might be a good fit not only for the job but also the cor-
porate culture. Completing biodata surveys may become an ongoing job requirement, perhaps
akin to annual reviews but more quantitative. Of course, the mathematization of people will
infuriate many individuals who feel that they “just don’t test well.”
Everything designed. Bringing these two disciplines—mathematics and neuroscience—into

the organizational realm will result in their growing use when designing various organizational
processes. Once we can decode and understand phenomenon, the natural impulse is to pre-
design for various desired outcomes. For example, understanding flows of people through an
office will allow us to design simulations of various types of workspaces.
In addition to physical space and organizational processes, visibility of behavioral patterns

will aid in individual skill enhancement. Researchers in industrial engineering and operations
research are moving their practice beyond the factory floor. Drawing from esoteric mathemat-
ics to develop algorithms and computer simulations to validate their theories, researchers will
tease out general “rules-of-thumb” to help managers train employees, efficiently distribute a
company’s workload, and smartly prioritize projects.

Neuroscience Gets a Job
Future thinking and problem solving
As our Foresight-Insight-Action mantra suggests, IFTF believes that a strong practice of futures
thinking is essential for a business to thrive in today’s volatile, unpredictable, complex, and
ambiguous (VUCA) world. Neuroscience is beginning to shed some light on the cognitive
activities underlying this process. the
Earlier this year, researchers from Washington University in St. Louis used fMRI scans to pin- details
point the brain region that “sees the future.” Interestingly, the process of imagining oneself in
some future event occurs in the same part of the brain from which autobiographical memories
are retrieved. The activity patterns observed by psychology professor Kathleen McDermott and
her colleagues suggest that the visual and spatial context of the future we imagine are based on
travels in our past through similar settings that we’ve stored in memory.
“It may just be that the reason we can recollect our past in vivid detail is that this set of processes
is important for being able to envision ourselves in future scenarios,” McDermott says. “This
ability to envision the future has clear and compelling adaptive significance.”
In May of 2007, UCLA research psychiatrist Dr. Jeffrey Schwartz and management consultant
David Rock hosted the First Global NeuroLeadership Summit in Italy. One of the scheduled
presenters was Mark Jung-Beeman, a Northwestern University professor at the Institute for
Neuroscience, who used fMRI and EEG technologies to study how the brain produces insight.
Along with collaborators, Jung-Beeman and Drexel University professor John Kounios ob- Comparing images of
served their subjects’ neural activity when faced with word puzzles that had “Aha!” solutions. brain activity in response
According to their experiments, the pattern of brain activity just before solving a problem using to “self-remember”
and “self-future” cues,
insight suggests three things: that they are focusing their attention inwardly, almost like closing
Washington University
their eyes; they’re mentally primed to switch to new trains of thought; and they may be actively
researchers discovered
silencing irrelevant or distracting thoughts. “We have begun to understand how the brain prepares
a complete overlap
for creative insight,” Kounios says. “This will hopefully lead to techniques for facilitating it.” between regions of the
Scientist Louis Pasteur once said that, “Chance favors only the prepared mind.” Perhaps this brain used for remem-
preparation would be good on-the-job training. bering the past and

imagining the future.
Source: www.news-info.wustl.edu/news/
page/normal/8448.html
FUTURE OF WORK 31
4 SCIENCE AT WORK: MATHEMATICS OF WORK/everything designed
Mathematics of Work
Scenario probability and hiring
Probability has long been used to estimate possible outcomes. However, Monte Carlo simula-
tions are a different approach to probability that could prove invaluable to businesses. Based on
methods created by physicists working on the atomic bomb, these stochastic, or nondeterminis-
the tic, methods emphasize random sample paths—collections of different possible scenarios—in-
details stead of outcomes alone. In his book Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in
Life and the Markets, Nassim Nicholas Taleb writes, “Monte Carlo simulations are closer to a
toy than anything I have seen in my adult life. One can generate thousands, perhaps millions, of
random sample paths, and look at the prevalent characteristics of some of their features.” 14
The simulations may seem like toys, but they are proving indispensable as tools for risk assess-
ment when it comes to everything from financial portfolios to exploration ventures. Stanford
professor Sam Savage believes that the adoption of the Monte Carlo simulations will drive
managers to take on roles equivalent to the idea of a “Chief Probability Officer.”15 Businesses
could benefit greatly when it comes to partnerships, investments, process implementation, and
more by looking at a variety of potential scenarios instead of just possible outcomes.
The application of mathematical theories, models, and algorithms has begun to revolution-
ize human resources practices as well, particularly when it comes to hiring. Every month,
more than 100,000 people apply for a job at Google. According to Laszlo Bock, the Google’s
vice president for “people operations,” the company was worried that with traditional hiring
methods they will overlook some of the best candidates. So they came up with an algorithm to
sift through the candidates. Job applicants must fill out a long survey asking questions meant to
Google uses a hiring
draw out data about your aptitude, attitude, personality, and other factors. Google’s mathemati-
algorithm, based
cians wrote custom algorithms to analyze the data and rate each applicant on a scale of zero to
on a survey of
100. Only then do humans enter the loop.
their employees, to
weed through the pile To create the questionnaire, the company had all of its employees complete a 300-question sur-
of applications vey. The answers were integrated with performance measures, resulting in a total of two million
they receive for data points. Google analyst Todd Carlisle, an organizational psychologist by training, used the
open positions. information to generate surveys for several areas, such as
engineering, sales, and finance.
University of Oklahoma psychology professor Michael

Mumford claims that these kinds of quantitative methods
to assess talent can be accurate, but should be taken with a
grain of salt.
“You have to know or at least have a hypothesis why hav-

ing a dog makes a good computer programmer,” he says.
“If you ask whether someone started a club in high school,
it is a clear indicator of leadership.”
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/laughingsquid/260176034

Everything Designed
Process and personal optimization
Researchers using mathematical models are identifying approaches to workflow that may
be ubiquitous, but not because they’re good. For example, a common policy in almost every
industry is for a single employee to follow one task from beginning to end. While this may
seem logical, the math proves that it’s actually not efficient. A better approach, according to the
UC Berkeley engineering professors Ronda Righter and Hyun-soo Ahn, may be “last-buffer, details
first-served” (LBFS), a process where employees prioritize projects that are closest to being
completed even when a project had been another employee’s responsibility.
“If you have people coming and going in a company or getting sick during the course of a large
project, there are often many unfinished tasks,” Righter explains. “Under certain circumstances,
it’s better for someone else to pick up where something was left off rather than waiting for the
first person to come back and finish it.”
LBFS may seem like common sense, but it’s often underutilized, Righter says. Take the process
a bank uses to approve a loan. Typically, one employee follows a loan from start to finish. In
reality though, there may be ways to dramatically speed things along by assigning various
components to a number of employees. Perhaps, Righter says, certain individuals may be
trained to float through the office, helping those who are bogged down at certain stages in the
approval process.
Professor Hyun-soo Ahn also conducts research on supply chain and service operation
management. To mathematically prove their rules-of-thumb theories, Righter and Ahn employ
stochastic models—mathematical models that contain random variables representing random
factors. Specifically, they look at so-called Markov chains—models of a sequence of events
where the probability of one event depends on whether the preceding event occurred or not.
“By using these models to prove theorems, we can determine that a particular workflow policy
is optimal, the best you can do in that situation,” Righter says.
In 2004, Schwartz and Rock coined the term “neuroleadership” to describe efforts to integrate
recent advances in neuroscience into the business world. Together, they draw on scientific
research, from cognitive psychology to quantum physics, to explain what they see as the
biological basis underlying certain organizational challenges. While some of their inferences
are still in the realm of theory, their efforts to bridge the gap between business and brain
science points toward a new trend in management style.
One of the most interesting focal points of their research is the way change in a company
impacts its employees and how mergers, layoffs, and other kinds of upheaval can be designed
to cause the least stress for employees. For instance, Rock and Schwartz believe that getting the
undivided attention of employees is the best way to introduce new ideas. As such, they sug-
gest an offsite meeting free of computer distractions as an ideal venue so that employees will
FUTURE OF WORK 33
4 SCIENCE AT WORK: everything designed
pay attention and focus on the new ideas presented. The next step is to present a “compelling
vision of what will occur when their new idea has been implemented” in order to encourage
the kind of insight necessary to help people alter their expectations and attitudes. Schwartz and
Rock write, “During the moment of insight, cognitive scientists believe, the brain is undergoing
a complex set of new neural connections that can help the brain enhance its mental resources
the and overcome resistance to change.” 16 The final step is the continuing process of maintaining
people’s attention and pushing them to remain focused on the new vision so that it becomes
details the context in which they make all decisions. By following this design of process, leaders will
help to essentially train their employees’ brains to think in this new context, thus lessening the
stressful transition from old to new.
Membership in online “brain fitness centers” may start as a perk, but participation in a custom-
designed mental training program could become a requirement for some jobs. SharpBrains is
a start-up that develops software tools for mental training, or “brain gyms.” The company was
co-founded by Elkhonon Goldberg, a clinical professor of neurology at New York University
School of Medicine. From the SharpBrains Web site:
The “mental muscles” we can train include attention, stress and

emotional management, memory, visual/ spatial, auditory processes
and language, motor coordination and executive functions like planning
and problem solving.
Programs that fit specific, individual needs could be personalized for employees and enterprises
based on patterns identified through the practical application of neuroscience and mathematics
in the workplace. From there, technology can even close the feedback loop, monitoring your
Neuroscientists and
brain and altering your work environment in response to best suit your “frame of mind.”
business leaders
gathered in Asolo,
Italy in May 2007 at the
first Neuroleadership
Summit.
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/velvetjam/502323210/

5
sustainable
enterprise FROM FINANCIAL BURDEN TO OPPORTUNITY
From marginal activity to core of business operations, sustainability

is evolving into a set of tools and concepts that can help generate
innovative designs, products, and practices; set priorities; or help
an organization express its deeper goals. This is a conceptual shift
as much as strategic or technological one: the enterprise of the
future may be “sustainable” in the way that today’s are “economical.”
DILEMMA
A decade ago, most companies’ sustainability programs were extensions of envi-

ronmental activities or exercises in regulatory compliance. They were often seen as
a drag on business, a necessary evil to avoid trouble from government regulators
Advocates of sustainability or environmental activists. Today, a growing number of organizations are bringing
share the rationalists’ as- sustainability from the edge to the center of their enterprise, a phenomenon that
sumption that more informa- impacts industry, organizations, and people.
tion will equal more sustain-
Of course, government mandates continue to be an important driver for corporate
able factories, workplaces,
sustainability programs in North America and Europe, and environmental disasters
households, and lives. But
in China illustrate what can happen in the absence of regulatory and enforcement
will more real-time data
mechanisms. But some companies are now working to marry sustainability and prof-
about resource use and cost
itability. For them, sustainability is no longer just about recycling; it’s about design-
and more transparency in
ing so that your process doesn’t pollute in the first place, recognizes the real cost of
energy markets and pricing
pollution, or finds a buyer for what was formerly considered “waste.” Consequently,
inspire and guide consumers
this is a fractal, multidimensional movement: arguments for “sustainability” appear
and companies to see how to
in everything from business strategy to travel to process engineering. Sustainability
shrink their energy budgets
is also becoming a concern for companies in services and knowledge work, not just
and ecological footprints?
those in extremely energy and resource-intensive fields like agriculture and manu-
Pushing too much informa-
facturing. Finally, sustainability is no longer only an organizational imperative; it’s
tion onto users may leave
becoming a personal one, as individuals begin assess their activities—everything
them less able to make
from travel to what products they use—through the sustainability lens. Indeed, one
decisions, not more.
of the most interesting things to watch is how organizational and personal sustain-
ability might interact, compete, or work together to affect workplace design, human
resources, new product and service development, and other areas.
Sustainability moves to the core of enterprise strategy. At a recent IFTF

conference, Gil Friend, President and Chief Executive Officer of Natural Logic,
Inc., said that there has been a sea change in corporate attitudes toward sustain-
ability in the last year: sustainability is no longer a dirty word in business. This
is due, in part, to growing public awareness of climate change and a sense on the
part of American businesses that they need to act to become more environmentally
responsible. Sustainability is no longer just about compliance with governmental
FUTURE OF WORK 35
5 SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE: SUSTAINABILITY MOVES TO THE CORE OF ENTERPRISE
standards, although political pressure remains a driver (some of the highest visibility govern-
ment activities are ones that mandate environmentally friendly practices—like proposals in
the United Kingdom for a national carbon credit system—or create large-scale incentives for
cleaner behavior, like carbon markets). Pressure comes from the bottom up as people begin
to pay attention to global climate change and take steps to measure their carbon footprints.
Sustainable products have evolved from trendy to mandated. Companies have begun to con-
the struct entire marketing campaigns around sustainability in order to meet increasing consumer
details demand for responsible business practices and green products.
Growing emphasis on personal sustainability. Interest in individual sustainability is grow-

ing. Consumer products that are (or claim to be) environmentally friendly are increasingly
popular, but more significant is the growing availability of products or services designed to
monitor and reduce personal energy consumption and carbon generation. “Carbon footprint”
has grown from environmental movement buzz phrase to something that more of the population
thinks about every day. Given the holistic character of personal sustainability, it is logical that
individual concerns would affect workplace behavior. A company’s environmental policy and
green benefits programs are more and more likely to factor into peoples’ decisions to join an
organization, just as they consider things like health insurance and 401(K) plans today.
Better tools for and increased rigor in the measurement of sustainability. After more
than a decade of working on sustainable business, there is now a large body of case studies—in
industries ranging from agriculture, to flooring manufacturing to tourism—demonstrating that
sustainability programs can generate value for companies. These studies show that sustainabil-
ity is no longer just an act of charity; it’s an act of economic self-interest. As Sun Microsystems
chief sustainability officer Dave Douglas puts it, “The ‘eco’ in my title is as much for econom-
ics as for ecology.” Additionally, the growth of tools to more rigorously model energy expendi-
tures and resource use by enterprises, and to measure and report these expenditures in real time,
are making it easier to benchmark company performance. These tools range from sensors that
continuously sample air and water, or monitor the energy use of individual devices rather than
buildings, to software that analyzes real-time data, compares it to historical data, and suggests
ways to improve performance.

Sustainability Moves to the Core of Enterprise
Evolution of industrial ecology
A new discipline, industrial ecology, seeks to make factories and manufacturing processes
more efficient by making manufacturing sustainable—and ultimately redefining the principles
of factory work. Many factories—particularly those in the more stringent regulatory worlds of
the United States, European Union, and Australia—are reducing the amount of pollution they the
generate in a variety of ways, by putting scrubbers on smokestacks to remove particulates, details
for instance. Other sites are being renovated to be more energy efficient and environmentally
friendly. In the United States, one of the most spectacular examples is Ford Motor Company’s
famed River Rouge. The 1920s-era complex now sports a “living roof,” a 500,000 square foot
rooftop garden that absorbs water and provides insulation, solar panels and fuel cells, and
local plants that absorb industrial toxins out of the soil. More ambitious are attempts to rede-
sign manufacturing processes to completely eliminate pollution. In the Danish industrial park
of Kalundborg, for example, an oil refinery’s flare gas heats a power plant, a drywall factory
consumes the plant’s waste gypsum, and its excess steam is used to sterilize machinery in a
pharmaceutical plant.
These efforts illustrate one notable shift in the way some engineers and companies are thinking
about manufacturing, pollution, and efficiency. Pollution reduction efforts used to be motivated
by a desire to avoid bad press or regulatory sanctions; now, however, they are embedded in a
view of industrial processes that holds that there really is no such thing as “waste,” just goods
that are used inefficiently. While industrial engineers saw pollution as an economic externality
and an unavoidable consequence of manufacturing, industrial ecologists see it as a sign of
inefficiency and poor planning.
Factory-driven industry isn’t the only place where organizations are starting to realize that
minimizing their waste stream can help maximize their profits. As sustainability comes to
the core of enterprise, companies and organizations increasingly assess every aspect of their
organization. The Zero Waste Alliance works closely with corporations in the United States to
reduce their waste streams toward a goal of producing zero waste. According to the Zero Waste
Alliance’s case studies, waste reduction has also resulted in cost savings for companies like HP,
Epson, and Xerox ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars. In fact, in March
2000, Epson Portland reached their goal of sending zero waste to landfills.
In April 2007, the University of California released a Policy on Sustainable Practices, which
covers building renovations, climate protection practices, sustainable operations, recycling and
waste management, and environmentally preferable procurement. The policy includes measures
such as only buying products rated highly in the Electronic Product Environmental Assessment
Tool (EPEAT) registry, takeback recycling in purchasing contracts, and a “ban on export and
prison labor.” The comprehensive policy takes the idea of sustainability to a new level by creat-
ing a sustainability contract that spans a variety of day-to-day functions and decision-making
practices.
FUTURE OF WORK 37
5 SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE: GROWING EMPHASIS ON personal SUSTAINABILITY
Industrial ecologists are also working to develop products that are safer to manufacture, less
toxic to use, and can be easily broken down, recycled, or restored. Several textile, carpet, and
office furniture companies have created products made only from environmentally benign
chemicals. Computer and electronics manufacturers have long struggled to create more energy-
efficient devices, both to satisfy the demands of governments and to meet rising consumer
the expectations; now they are working to eliminate long-used but toxic metals like lead and mer-
cury from their products.
details
But using more benign chemicals is only part of the drive to create sustainable products.
Companies are also under pressure to take responsibility for their products at the ends of their
lives, by developing takeback and recycling programs. In some industries, takeback programs
are fairly standard. Indeed, visionary companies like commercial flooring manufacturer
Interface see themselves as providing flooring services rather than selling carpets. In others,
such programs are still fairly restrictive, requiring that consumers upgrade to new products
before accepting old ones, or offering narrow windows of opportunity for recycling old
equipment. Goal setting and transparent reporting of the success of environmental policies
is another strategy adopted by companies like Hewlett-Packard and Dell.
In the Danish industrial

park of Kalundborg, an
oil refinery’s flare gas
heats a power plant, a
drywall factory con-
sumes the plant’s
waste gypsum, and its
excess steam is used to
sterilize machinery in a
pharmaceutical plant.
Source: www.statoil.com/StatoilCom/svg00990.nsf/Attachments/kalundborg.
jpg/$FILE/kalundborg.jpg

Growing Emphasis on Personal Sustainability
Seeking sustainable careers, company support, and sustainable workplaces
Sustainability isn’t just a concept for factories and products. The phrase “sustainable careers”
now appears in business magazines, career advice columns, job fairs, and government white
papers. In different contexts, it means two different things.
the
First, it can refer to careers that are long lived. European consulting company DIAFORA runs
workshops on “Composing a Sustainable Career,” which provide advice on developing personal details
brands, surviving during downturns, keeping skills up to date, and other traditional career-
building activities. This usage, while borrowing the term “sustainability,” does not engage with
environmental issues, or link sustainability at the individual and corporate levels.
These issues continue to be important for workers in volatile, fast-moving industries. A second,
newer use of the term sustainability, however, reflects a growing importance of environmental
issues as a factor in career choices. For example, the Sustainable Careers Institute, a nonprofit
founded in upstate New York in 2001, defined sustainable careers as “careers that contribute to
sustainability goals,” that are “viable and coherent,” “vital and meaningful,” “socially respon-
sible,” and “environmentally restorative.”
While the first meaning of sustainable careers is found in literature aimed at anxious, mid-career The Graduation Pledge
professionals, this second, more expansive meaning is found in projects aimed at younger Alliance promotes a
“Pledge of Social and
workers, particularly college students and recent graduates. The University of Waterloo in
Environmental Responsi-
Canada runs a “Sustainable Career Night” devoted to identifying jobs and industries that sup-
bility,” which states:
port sustainability. The Graduation Pledge Alliance promotes a “Pledge of Social and Environ-
“I pledge to explore and
mental Responsibility,” in which students promise to “explore and take into account the social
take into account the
and environmental consequences of any job I consider” and “to improve these aspects of any social and environmental
organizations for which I work.” A recent BT survey found that “corporate social responsibil- consequences of any job
ity (CSR) policy can be the deciding factor in whether a young professional takes up a position I consider and will try to
with the organization, with one-third believing an employer’s stance on CSR is more important improve these aspects
than the salary offered.” of any organizations for
which I work.”
Source: www.graduationpledge.org/
FUTURE OF WORK 39
5 SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE: GROWING EMPHASIS ON personal SUSTAINABILITY
The varied definitions of “sustainability” effects human resources administration as well. Just
as older workers may see a sustainable career as a bulwark against economic uncertainty while
younger workers see it as an expression of values, human resources professionals use the term
in two contrasting ways. On one side, economists working in human resource sustainability
describe their field as promoting “the capacity of organizations to create and regenerate value
the through the sustained application of participative policies and practices,” and pay little attention
to broader conceptions of sustainability.
details
Environmentally conscious HR managers and companies, in contrast, see a more direct link
between human resources and sustainability. The World Business Council for Sustainable
Development argued in a 2005 report that involving HR is essential for demonstrating a
company’s commitment to real sustainability. They note that a good track record of corporate
social responsibility is increasingly important in the war for talent.
As the best and brightest increasingly demand support for personal sustainability, a growing
number of companies are responding with programs. As Liz Gerber, a doctoral student at
Stanford’s Center for Work, Technology and Organizations, noted:
An illustration of human
resource sustainability.
Note the absence of
environmental factors.
Source: Paul J. Gollan, “High

Involvement Management and
Human Resource Sustain-
ability,” Asia Pacific Journal of
Human Resources

Businesses are seeing a demand for mass transit reimbursement,
shuttle buses, car pools, bike racks, and flexible work schedules.
Employees are increasingly interested in programs that can reduce
transportation costs.
Most companies justify these programs as “positively impacting a company’s productivity,” by the
increasing worker satisfaction and retention levels. “Companies also view their program offer-
ings as directly benefiting the companies’ sustainability efforts,” Gerber believes. Google’s per- details
sonal sustainability programs illustrate these various aims. It recently began offering subsidies to
employees who buy hybrid cars, and its employee shuttle service that is now one of the largest
public transportation systems in California. The company is also working to reduce the energy
usage of its server farms, so that employee-focused programs fit in a broader campaign to reduce
the company’s carbon footprint and energy usage; but Google also hopes to reduce the departure
of high-value employees whose options are starting to vest. Menlo Park–based Terrapass, estab-
lished in 2005 to sell carbon offsets to consumers, now has a fast-growing corporate business,
driven in part by employee requests for offsets for business travel. Work-from-home options and
flexible hours are even more basic examples of support from the corporate side.
Impact of Corporate Social Irresponsibility Not Apply for a job at Company because of
on Student Behaviour Social Irresponsibility
(Percent very likely) (Percent very likely, by region)
Not apply for job at the company

North America
Not invest in company Oceania

Speak negatively to friends/ Western Europe
family about company
Latin America
Avoid company's product/services
Participate in campaigns Eastern Europe

against company
Asia
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Percent Middle East & Africa
0 20 40 60 80
Percent
Source: Globescan
Source: Globescan
Source: Driving Success: Human Resources and Sustainable Development, 2005
FUTURE OF WORK 41
5 SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE:
BETTER TOOLS FOR AN INCREASED RIGOR IN MEASURING SUSTAINABILTY
Sustainable workplaces are another way companies can support employee demands for sustain-
ability. Designing healthy workplaces is partly an exercise in avoiding problems, but it’s also a
way to create spaces that are more inviting and better support workers. European Union office
design rules, for example, require workers to have access to natural sunlight, circulating air, and
mandate green spaces (often rooftop or terrace gardens). These are justified in part in terms of
the occupational safety, but also on the grounds that they increase worker productivity.
details Norman Foster’s Commerzbank tower, in Frankfurt, Germany (below), embodies the new, inte-
grated approach to sustainable workplaces. The building’s central core features nine four-story
“sky gardens”; all employees are within seven meters of either the gardens or a window looking
outside. The windows can be opened, allowing natural ventilation and reducing cooling costs in
the summer. (More generally, architects have discovered that despite its inhuman associations,
the skyscraper design itself can be more sustainable than low-rise office buildings.)
Norman Foster’s
Commerzbank tower
in Frankfurt, Germany
embodies the new,
integrated approach to
sustainable workplaces.
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/re-ality/808329105

Better Tools for and Increased Rigor in Measuring Sustainability
Making sustainability v-isible
There are different tools to measure the sustainability of products, but the one that best exem-
plifies the trend toward measuring sustainable performance and the one likely to be widely
adopted in the United States is the EPEAT,18 created by the Zero Waste Council with a grant
from the EPA, and managed by the Green Electronics Council. EPEAT rates computer systems the
bronze, silver, or gold based on their compliance with a list of criteria that considers environ- details
mentally sensitive chemicals, toxicity of plastics, design for “end life,” packaging, takeback
programs, and corporate performance in regard to the environment. Institutional purchasers can
use EPEAT to evaluate the environmental “friendliness” of desktops, laptops, and other elec-
tronics for offices and organizations. Manufacturers use EPEAT to measure their environmental
policy and performance against other companies and also to promote their products as environ-
mentally sound. For instance, in a recent clash with Greenpeace, Apple used the silver ranking
of their product line to contest Greenpeace’s bottom-of-the-list ranking.
While EPEAT focuses on electronics, companies looking to analyze and optimize their
environmental performance require different tools. Surya Strategies makes software called
Supply-Chain Environmental Analysis/Optimization Tool (SEAT), as well as web-based tools
that allow businesses to analyze the “footprints of business activities.”
The Dow Jones Sustainability Index measures a company’s sustainability in five areas: strategy,
financial, customer and product, governance and stakeholder, and human. From the DJSI
website19:
Corporate Sustainability is a business approach that creates long-term

shareholder value by embracing opportunities and managing risks
deriving from economic, environmental, and social developments.
Corporate sustainability leaders achieve long-term shareholder value
by gearing their strategies and management to harness the market’s
potential for sustainability products and services while at the same time
successfully reducing and avoiding sustainability costs and risks.
In the assessment, conducted by Sustainable Asset Management, they look at human capital
development, talent attraction and retention, and corporate citizenship/philanthropy as well
as environmental activities. Thus, corporate support for sustainability is not an immeasurable
fad but can provide commensurable value for employees, potential employees, investors, and
organizations alike.
FUTURE OF WORK 43
the amplified
individual
44
6
health as a
workplace value FROM INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIY
TO STRATEGIC ASSET
With new tools and access to information related to our health, peo-
ple are evolving from passive participants to active managers of
their own health. In fact, health is becoming a key filter for decision
making in people’s lives that also shapes expectations of employ-
ees, including how and where to work. As empowered “biocitizens”
enter workplaces, they will exert increasing pressure on employers
DILEMMA
to make workplaces healthy and support health as a value.
We are on the threshold of transition when it comes to our understanding and the
As health becomes a strate- delivery of health. Health costs continue to skyrocket in industrialized countries.
gic asset for organizations Populations are living longer everywhere and many more people will be living with
and growing a cost driver in chronic diseases, making health the primary focus of their lives and daily activities.
the United States, the temp- Meanwhile, advances in information, communication, and sensor technologies are
tation to promote healthy giving us more information about our environments and our own bodies, promoting
behaviors on the part of heightened awareness of risk in our environments—including workplaces, homes,
employees will grow. Navi- places of leisure—and their connection to personal health. They are also enabling
gating the fine line between us to form dispersed communities in support of common health interests such as
encouraging healthy behav- diabetes, cancer, or diseases and conditions that are not recognized or are neglected
iors—exercise, healthy eat- by the medical establishment. Such communities are ushering the age of biociti-
ing, non-smoking, etc.—and zens—informed, activist individuals who understand themselves as biological enti-
intruding upon what many ties with affinities to others who share similar genetic or biological afflictions, and
perceive as private domains who, in turn, have organized to change funding agendas, research priorities, and the
of life will be tricky. relationships among capital, ethics, science, and access to therapies.
As our understanding of health expands and new tools and treatments become
available to manage health at a personal level, people are engaging in the manage-
ment of their own health at a new level of intensity. For some it means not just
being well but being “better than well.” Such individuals use a variety of tools, sup-
plements, and latest biological information to empower themselves with enhanced
capabilities—greater endurance, vitality, greater strength. Rather than relying on
“experts” and traditional health providers like doctors, nurses, and clinics, these
individuals have a broad understanding of health and create and manage their own
personal health ecologies. In addition to traditional pharmaceutical products and
health providers, such ecologies include consumer goods, food, beauty and fitness
products, alternative medicine, supplements, and more.
FUTURE OF WORK 45
6 HEALTH AS A WORKPLACE VALUE
Health is becoming, and will continue to be, a major focus of people’s lives, whether one
has to navigate the complicated healthcare landscape in the United States, care for aging
parents, or deal with the increasing number of infectious diseases throughout the world. It
is no longer something that is given but something individuals can shape and will demand
from their employers and work environments as well as products and services they purchase.
the Every company, including those not in traditional health care and pharmaceutical businesses,
will become a health company as individuals gain more access and control over their health
details information and health becomes a filter for their decision making.
New tools and a proliferation of biodata will make information about health visible and
tangible. From the household scale to sensors that can transmit real-time data about an indi-
vidual’s physiological well being, information about our health will continue to become more
visible to us. New and old technologies will fuel the drive towards transparency. Combining the
reach of the Internet with strategically located air-quality or noise-level sensors and diagnostics
makes the causes of environmental harm far more tangible. Such technologies go a long way
toward reconfiguring debates on the environment and health, as they are doing in London and
other parts of the United Kingdom. These technologies will enable us to know more about the
world around us and receive the information in a way that is easy to synthesize and act upon.
Disease management will also change as we are able to better understand what is happening
with our bodies in real time. Developments in sensor technology will allow individuals to mon-
itor their own health in ways not yet possible. Just as diabetes patients regularly test their blood
sugar, so will individuals be able to monitor a variety of biological functions and, subsequently,
the efficacy of treatments.
Health becomes a strategic organizational value and asset. As people are bombarded with
messages and peer pressure to exercise, to eat healthy, to have balanced schedules, to not be fat,
to age successfully, and so on, health is becoming a key value in society and within organiza-
tions. A new healthism is emerging and it’s likely to be divisive, as one side will see poor indi-
vidual behavior as a risk to overall community health, and another other side will see individual
behavior as a matter of choice and privacy. Regardless of how this plays out, incentives and
disincentives—“carrots and sticks”—will become more widespread as employers and communi-
ties struggle with health care costs and the broader economic, social, and safety consequences of
unhealthy communities.
Health has traditionally been a part of the compact with workers in most European countries.
Increasingly, companies in the United States, under pressure of rising health costs, are turning
“healthy living” into a corporate value and demand adherence to such values as a part of the
contract with employees. In some ways this is reminiscent of Henry Ford’s paternalism, when
in exchange for granting workers high wages ($5/hr in 1914!), he instituted home inspections to
make sure that workers were living in hygienic conditions and pursuing “moral” lifestyles. The
justification was that these morally upstanding and clean workers would have higher productiv-
ity, thus justifying exorbitantly high wages for their time. The same is happening with health
today when some companies mandate workers’ healthy lifestyles. Healthy workers are more
productive and they decrease corporate overhead costs. Globally, corporate athletic programs,

financial incentives, even medical exams prior to employment, or discounts to employees living
healthy are all examples both of new “healthism” in the workplace and the emergence of health
as a corporate value, whether driven by health concerns, societal values, or individual demands
for health. We may yet see a world where hiring one qualified employee over another who is
equally qualified may come down to who is healthiest.
Workers will engage in multiple forms of do-it-yourself health practices. Whether by the
choice or force, individuals empowered with new levels of access to health data are taking details
more responsibility for managing their own health. People will be able to do more themselves
and build do-it-yourself health practices, turn to their social networks, and tap the collective
intelligence of new health collectives. They’ll have to look to the broader marketplace of the
global health economy, not just the health care industry, for resources and solutions to manage
their health and well being.
Several do-it-yourself (DIY) behaviors are emerging as a part of their personal health
strategies:
• Self-agency, or acting on one’s own behalf, which can be seen in the way individuals will
engage with media and health information expanding their own sense of self-efficacy.
• Self-customization, the use of products beyond their intended use and in combination
with each other, will result in user-generated health and wellness solutions.
• Self-organization, or ability to tap into the collective intelligence in social networks for
information, strategies, and practices, will shape responses to this burden of empowerment.
Indeed, individuals are quickly learning to leverage the trust in their social networks’ collective
intelligence to identify, reduce, and avoid risk. With the proliferation of online information,
affinity-based social networks quickly form to guide people through the complex healthcare
maze. Expect more patient-to-patient strategies to emerge, like disease management or self-
organizing markets from the bottom up. In the case of affinity sites and other social health
networking technologies, these collectives are not nationally exclusive. “Biocitizens”—people
banding together based on biological and health affinities—are global and their health relation-
ships easily cross borders. As these communities of interest transform into communities of ac-
tion, they will exert market influence but also pressure employers and governments for change.
Additionally, with the rise of the global health economy, biocitizens will proactively seek the
best treatment across national boundaries. Health tourism—seeking operations in other countries
that may be cheaper or of better quality than what’s available in an individual’s own country—is
not a new concept. However, due in large part to the current health care climate in the United
States, health tourism stands to create a truly competitive global health marketplace driven by
individuals making the best choices for themselves. Finding out what treatment is best and most
affordable where will become easier and easier. We will see the health care industry move from
a top-down infrastructure to one controlled by consumers from the bottom up.
FUTURE OF WORK 47
6 H
EALTH AS A WORKPLACE VALUE:
NEW TOOLS/HEALTH BECOMES A STRATEGIC ORGANIZATIONAL VALUE
New Tools and a Proliferation of Biodata Will Make Information About

Health Visible and Tangible
Personal health ecologies
As we learn more about nutrition, fitness, and other health-related issues, we are able to take
more control over the management of our health. Instead of needing to make tedious calcula-
the tions about calories and other nutritional information, we will see things like scanners for the
details grocery store that are able to compare our own dietary needs to what we’re seeing on a shelf
and help us make better decisions about what to eat.
Thinking more broadly about health—where it’s not just about nutrition or sickness, but also
about the conditions of an individual’s surrounding environment—exemplifies the development
of personal health ecologies. Feral Robotic Dogs, a project started by New York University
professor and researcher Natalie Jeremijenko, involves a do-it-yourself hack of a novelty prod-
uct: robotic dogs. The dogs were hacked and equipped with sensors that measure the levels of
certain pollutants. When unleashed outdoors, they draw together in packs like bloodhounds to
places where pollution levels are the highest. Jeremijenko worked on the project with youth in
the Bronx, New York, where they were able to really see the impact of the environment on their
health. This kind of visual representation of real data is engaging and effective in making sense
of health information. Jeremijenko also runs an environmental clinic at NYU, where students
can get “prescriptions” for things that will make them healthier in regard to their surroundings,
like the Green Light, which combines plants, LED light, and solar power in a chandelier that
improves the quality of the air in the room.
Our health records, historically one of the most out-of-our-hands aspect of personal health,
Natalie Jeremijenko’s have for decades been confined to dusty folders on doctor office shelves. Thanks to Google
Green Light combines Health, however, individuals will be able to maintain their own health records online. It will
plants, LED light, and also allow doctors and other caregivers to, with a patient’s consent, leave notes at a patient’s
solar power in a chan- “Health URL” and share information that may be valuable to other caregivers and physicians
delier that improves the
working with the same patient. The key to this is the digitization of medical data, which has
quality of the air in the
been a slow process thus far. However, with widespread user adoption, physicians would
room where it’s hung.
be forced to adjust their processes to work with the Google
system. Microsoft is also on the verge of releasing software that
allows individuals to manage their health records. This shift
in control over information is a major step in making health
information more meaningful for individuals.
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/diametrik/503826520

Health Becomes a Strategic Organizational Value
Carrots and sticks and healthy workplaces
The re-emergence of onsite health clinics in the workplace peaked in the 1970s but it’s on the
rise again, as employers look to reduce premium expenditures and cut down on the time em-
ployees spend at off-site medical appointments. But these are not like the work-injury-oriented
clinics we once saw. Today’s onsite clinics are popping up as comprehensive medical facilities the
that include everything from pharmacies to dentists to fitness centers. According to Managed details
Care Week, some employers incentivize employees to take advantage of on-site health care
instead of seeking advice and treatment outside of the company’s walls. Sometimes the on-site
center is directly engaged with a company’s insurance provider, particularly in cases where the
company actually is an insurance provider, like New Jersey–based Horizon Health.
In addition to incentives for using on-site clinics, more and more employers are using health or
fitness reimbursement programs to encourage healthy behaviors. Many companies, like Interna-
tional Data Group (owners of PC World and Macworld) offer employees a set amount of money
for fitness reimbursement each year. That money can be used to reimburse gym expenditures,
fitness equipment, and specialized programs like yoga classes. This may seem like a neat perk
to many, but for the employers it is a strategy that will not only enable more employees to pay
for the gym, but also position fitness and healthy behavior as something worthy of rewards.
Alternative medicine is also becoming more popular—and more acceptable. While traditional
United States health insurance companies have yet to cover alternative and foreign medical
practices like acupuncture, many multi-national corporations provide discounts and support for
employees who want to seek non-traditional health options.
Scott’s Miracle-Gro takes the carrots and sticks approach to another level. They link up
employees with “health coaches,” who serve as enforces of wellness on behalf of the company.
Based on information fed to them by the company’s medical specialists, the health coaches
contact employees regularly and give them advice—lose weight, see a doctor, exercise more,
etc. And the coaches are tenacious.
It wasn’t positive encouragement of healthy behavior that put Scott’s in the headlines, however.
That happened when the company fired an employee for failing a drug test. But the employee
didn’t test positive for an illicit substance, at least according to legal standards. He was fired
after a test found nicotine in his system, a violation of the company’s new smoke-free employee
policy. The employee filed a lawsuit against the company for civil rights issues that has yet to
be decided. Despite the outcome, though, it’s clear that companies will look at healthy behavior
as something to be valued. The idea of “corporate nannies” is not far-fetched, but companies
will have to work within the framework of civil rights and employment laws in their mission to
exert pressure on individuals to break harmful habits and embrace healthy behavior.
The trend toward designing healthy office spaces and buildings exemplifies the valuation of
health. Simply put, healthy workplaces make for healthier workers. Two decades ago, the idea
of a “healthy workplace” was still a novelty. At best, a healthy workplace was one that was not
obviously dangerous. But the discovery of the long-term consequences of asbestos exposure,
FUTURE OF WORK 49
6 H
EALTH AS A WORKPLACE VALUE:
HEALTH BECOMES A STRATEGIC ORGANIZATIONAL VALUE
the emergence of the concept of “sick buildings”—buildings that vent unhealthy gases or tox-
ins—and the growing cost of work-related injuries in offices (exemplified by repetitive stress
injuries) have changed that. Today, as environmental psychologist Sally Augustin, Ph.D. notes,
“There is a crush to obtain LEED [Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design] certifica-
tion for homes [constructed by commercial developers] and commercial (office) spaces.” Much
the of this awareness has been driven by the development of sophisticated air sensors, monitors,
and inexpensive field-testing equipment that makes it easier to detect workplace toxins.
details
Touting a Platinum
LEED certification,
the Genzyme Center
in Cambridge,
Massachussetts,
showcases health as
a value through its
exemplary healthy
workplace design.
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/kingdafy/723459576

Workers Will Engage in Multiple Forms of DIY Health Practices
Biocitizens emerge
Medical information on the Internet has come a long way from Web MD. Individuals have be-
gun to use new media technologies like blogs, social networking sites, and forums to construct
a patient-to-patient network of information dissemination. As the cost of health care continues
to rise and the burden of decision making falls on the individual, these communities and P2P the
strategies will only become more prevalent—and necessary.
details
A good example is user-generated content on health affinity web sites facilitated by social tech-
nologies and media such as You Tube, MySpace, and other Web 2.0 tools. Already, information
preferences have evolved away from physicians to “people like me.” This is not surprising,
since stories of shared experiences and strategies exchanged in these communities help provide
clarity in a fragmented information environment. Harnessing collective intelligence for health
and health care decisions for individuals and their families will be a key DIY practice for health
management in the future.
Outside of traditional social networking sites, health-specific sites are on the rise. DailyStrength
and Revolution Health are set up like MySpace or Facebook. But instead of profiles populated
with just taste and habit interests, users join for specific communities able to provide experi-
ential information specific to their health concerns. They input the treatments they’re currently
using, assign the treatments levels of efficacy, and include short descriptions of how those
treatments affect their lives. For instance, one user in the “Smoking Addiction” community
on DailyStrength lists both “Cold Turkey” and “Prayer” under Treatments, with “Working” in Users join health affinity
sites like DailyStrength
parentheses next to both. Users can also utilize the Journal features to update friends or simply
to connect with ther
document for themselves how things are going.
people willing to share
These collectives will not just continue to be useful to patients on an experiential level. As experiential informa-
collectives grow, so does their power, and with increased power comes the ability to influence tion specific to health
change in policy. concerns.
Source: www.dailystrenth.org
FUTURE OF WORK 51
the amplified
individual
52
7 implications
Organizational Culture and Design: Plan for Transparency

The evolution of technologies for ubiquitous, detailed, real-time reporting on everything—
product lifecycles, employees’ locations, individual tastes and preferences, online contribu-
tions, and resource use—means that almost every aspect of organizational life can be ex-
quisitely documented and tracked. Rather than anyone else telling your story, organizations
should plan for transparency from the outset in order to stay ahead. Concealing anything—
incompetent leadership, abuse and mismanagement of resources, bad labor practices,
etc.—will become increasingly difficult. Avoiding accountability will also get harder, and
moving operations somewhere else in order to avoid accountability is not likely to provide
a long-term solution. Companies that have tried to hide pollution by “outsourcing” pollut-
ing activities to subcontractors are likely to have to account for them, just as companies
whose subcontractors use child labor or engage in illegal practices are being raked over the
coals by various citizen groups that document such activities. Organizations would be well
advised to err on the side of transparency, resorting to secrecy only when absolutely neces-
sary and as a last resort. Now is the time to examine all aspects of your operations—from
human resources to manufacturing and distribution—through the transparency lens.
Tools: Physical Place Is A Part Of The Toolkit

An important outcome of the visible world will be the convergence of computational tools
and the physical workplace. Organizations need to think about how to use the physical
place itself as a part of the information toolkit along with laptops, mobile phones, and
printers. The need to manage large volumes of complex visual information will lead to
workplace designs that expand the size and scope of digital displays, while also spreading
access to “windows” on data into non-traditional spaces for computing—hallways, social
spaces like water coolers, and outdoors. Plan for workplaces that enable “progressive dis-
closure,” i.e., the ability to reveal higher-level functionality, as users are ready for them.
Physical Space: Designing for Health

Healthy workplaces are no longer just about a lack of harmful toxins. The world of fluores-
cent lights and cubicles is giving way to one of green spaces and sunlight. Biocitizens will
expect workplaces that reflect their understanding of health as a value. Spaces designed
for healthy airflow, an abundance of natural light, and more will become a great way for
companies to attract biocitizens to their organizations. Ergonomic consultations will go
from optional to mandatory as employers strive to ensure that their employees are healthy
and thus productive. Sensors and other advanced technology will help to make the “healthi-
ness” of the work environment visible to employees and employers alike. Offering incen-
tives for healthy behavior could also prove a good way to attract biocitizens, but watch
out for making such incentives coercive and thus perceived as paternalistic and intrusive.
Successful future workplace design will bring together large-scale architectural understand-
ing of the workplace community, anthropological understanding of small group dynamics,
and information science.
FUTURE OF WORK 53
7 IMPLICATIONS
Recruitment: Attracting—But Not Necessarily Hiring—The Best

Achieving the diversity required to amplify organizations means tapping into multiple intel-
ligences, multiple work styles, skills, media choices, and geographies. What makes the products
of collective intelligence successful—Wikipedia being the best example—is precisely the fact
that each person is making contributions in the area she chooses and in the manner that suits
her best. Although there are general principles for how to use the platform, the rest is left to the
individual contributor. It is likely that many of the best Wikipedia contributors would not make
great employees by traditional standards. For an organization to amplify itself, it must tap the
external network of non-employees and entice them to contribute in the areas of their expertise.
The trick is managing that process without attempting to exercise the same level of control that
an organization has over its actual employees. Thus, in addition to having strategies for recruit-
ing the best employees, organizations need to develop strategies for making themselves attrac-
tive to the best of the amplified contributors. They need to think in ways that suit these indi-
viduals rather than traditional promotions and compensation packages. In addition to monetary
rewards, such things could include connections with others, increased freedom, ability to work
on projects of their choosing, ability to publish outside, etc. Instead of hiring, the goal must be
to attract, engage, and connect amplified individuals to the organization so that they view it as
the most important and powerful node in their highly networked and distributed career paths.
Skills: Training in Visual Literacy

The only way organizations and individuals will be able to take advantage of massive amounts
of data flooding the workplace is through new types of highly sensory-rich interfaces. These in-
clude new types of artistic visualizations, simulations, and ambient and other types of sensory-
rich interfaces utilizing sound, movement, colors, etc. Just like previous generations of workers
had to be literate in text media, the next generations will need to possess visual literacy. They
will need to have the ability to present, analyze, and interact with visual information. Visual
acumen is a survival skill in the workplace in the next ten years and beyond. Younger work-
ers who have grown up in the world of video games and virtual reality will naturally be more
adept at this. However, don’t take it for granted that just because someone is younger they will
naturally possess such skills. Think about how to promote visual literacy standards for your
organization, how to identify those with best visual skills, and how to train employees beyond
proficiency in PowerPoint to become proficient in more dynamic, image-moderated collabora-
tive exploration of data.

Human Resources: Mathematicians and Neuroscientists?
Hiring practices, training, and management will increasingly draw from a deeper understand-
ing of neuroscience and complex behavioral algorithms. Already, startups have emerged that
promise to train individuals to increase their mental acuity, focus, and efficiency based on brain
science. Company-specific algorithms will be developed for software systems that vet new
applicants based on detailed questionnaires. As science comes to work, human resource manag-
ers will need to become versed in these new sciences. While most HR personnel will likely not
be scientists, they will need to be able to understand the language of these disciplines and col-
laborate with scientists in order to assess and implement some of the new tools. For example,
a manager may not know how to design Monte Carlo simulations to optimize workflow, but in
order to understand the theory behind suggested methods to increase productivity and efficien-
cy, they must be able to speak the language of mathematicians.
Leadership: Giving Voice to the Commons

Clearly the world of amplified individuals calls for a different type of leader—not the ones
who dictate and make pronouncements, not necessarily those with most charisma and unitary
vision. Rather than assuming absolute authority, effective leaders in amplified organizations
must work to understand the values and opinions of their followers to enable a productive
dialogue with followers about what the group embodies, what it stand for, and, thus, how it
should act. Good leaders of amplified organizations will need to see themselves as “speakers
for the commons”—those who are able to give voice to what the commons members, including
non-employees, want, and to provide the infrastructure and resources for accomplishing this.
It doesn’t mean the end of vision; the vision of amplified organizations is not enforced from
the top but emerges in dialogue and conversations of the members from the bottom up. It is the
vision and strategy that depend on cooperation and support of constituents.
FUTURE OF WORK 55
the amplified
individual
56
endnotes
The Amplified Individual

1 Future/Now, http://future.iftf.org
2 http://www.drupal.org
3 www.competitious.com
4 “Wikis In The Workplace,” Information Week, February 27, 2006 http://www.informationweek.com/news/
showArticle.jhtml?articleID=180207589
5 http://www.hatfactory.net
6 http://www.43folders.com
7 http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/
8 http://www.amazon.com/Seven-Day-Weekend-Changing-Work-Works/dp/1591840260
9 http://www.gallupippi.com/Content/?CI=21469
10 http://www.marcusbuckingham.com/books/gpystw.php
The Visible World

11 The Expanding Digital Universe: A Forecast of Worldwide Information Growth Through 2010.
(IDC, March 2007)
12 For more on RFID see Technology Horizons memo series SR-926A–926E.
For more on Geoweb, see Technology Horizons report SR-869, Infrastructure for the New Geography.
13 For more information on context-awareness see Technology Horizons report SR-1014, The Many Faces of
Context Awareness: Spectrum of Technologies, Applications, and Impacts (September 2006).
For more information on cooperation, see Technology Horizons report SR-851, Towards A New Literacy of
Cooperation in Business: Managing Dilemmas in the 21st Century.
Science at Work
14 Fooled by Randomness, Nassim Nicholas Taleb (Random House, NY, 2005)
15 http://www.lionhrtpub.com/orms/orms-4-06/probability.html
16 “Why Neuroscience Matters to Executives” by Jeffrey Schwartz and David Rock
(Strategy+Business, April 10, 2007)
Sustainable Enterprise
17 www.graduationpledge.org
18 http://www.epeat.net/
19 http://www.sustainability-indexes.com/06_htmle/sustainability/corpsustainability.html
FUTURE OF WORK 57
the amplified
individual
About the ...
institute for the future
The Institute for the Future is an independent, nonprofit strategic research group
with nearly 40 years of forecasting experience. The core of our work is identifying
emerging trends and discontinuities that will transform global society and the
global marketplace. We provide our members with insights into business strategy,
design process, innovation, and social dilemmas. Our research generates the
foresight needed to create insights that lead to action. Our research spans a
broad territory of deeply transformative trends, from health and health care to
technology, the workplace, and human identity. The Institute for the Future is
based in Palo Alto, California.
technology horizons program
The Technology Horizons Program combines a deep understanding of technology

and societal forces to identify and evaluate discontinuities and innovations in the
next three to ten years. We help organizations develop insights and strategic tools to
better position themselves for the future. Our approach to technology forecasting is
unique—we put humans in the middle of our forecasts. Understanding humans as
consumers, workers, householders, and community members allows IFTF to help
companies look beyond technical feasibility to identify the value in new technologies,
forecast adoption and diffusion patterns, and discover new market opportunities
and threats.
58

Future of Work

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Future of Work

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Future of Work

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the main topic of discussion in the document?

What is the main topic of discussion in the document?

What organization does the document discuss?

What organization does the document discuss?

Technology Horizons Program

124 University Avenue, 2nd Floor

Liz Gerber, Stanford Maribeth Back, FX Palo Alto Laboratory

Gil Gordon, Gil Gordon Associates Howard Rheingold, IFTF Affiliate

Gregg Zachary, New York Times Jerry Michalski, Sociate

Sally Augustin, PlaceCoach

Ming-li Chai, Herman Miller

Noni Alwood, Cisco Jerry Michalski, Sociate

Sandhiprakash Binde, Intel Aaron Ross, Alloy Ventures

Ming-Li Chai, Herman Miller Jerry Sheehan, Calit2

Aryae Coopersmith, HR Forums Emily Ulrich, Steelcase

Debra Engel, IFTF Board of Trustees Maryln Walton, Herman Miller

Andy Greenhalgh, Intel Anthony Weeks

Eric Larsen, DaimlerChrysler

Ann LeCam, Disney

Kent Lockart, Disney

1. The Amplified Individual ................................................... 5

2. The Visible World ............................................................. 13

3. Diversity Redefined ......................................................... 23

4. Science at Work . ............................................................. 29

5. Sustainable Enterprise ..................................................... 35

6. Health as a Workplace Value............................................. 45

FUTURE OF WORK iii

Diversity is one of the hardest dilemmas to navigate for everyone—individuals, societies,

2 institute for the FUTURE

4 institute for the FUTURE

New technologies of cooperation are combining to create a

• Influency—knowing how to be persuasive in multiple social contexts and media spaces,

• High Ping Quotient—responsiveness to other people’s requests for engagement;

• Protovation—fearless innovation in rapid, iterative cycles.

• Multi-capitalism—fluency in working with different capitals (e.g., natural, intellectual,

• Longbroading—thinking in terms of higher-level systems, massively multiple cycles,

• Signal/Noise Management—filtering meaningful information, patterns, and common-

Amplified Individuals Are Highly Social

6 institute for the FUTURE

Amplified Individuals are Highly Collective

An early example of collective intelligence software specifically aimed at businesses is

8 institute for the FUTURE

Amplified Workers Are Highly Augmented

The Hipster PDA, one

10 institute for the FUTURE

As networked memories proliferate, everything—people, places,

14 institute for the FUTURE

16 institute for the FUTURE

Visions of artificial intelligence as an all-knowing, centralized intelligence are rapidly giving

People Training Machines—Amazon’s Mechanical Turk is a computing platform that coordi-

18 institute for the FUTURE

Heat maps like this map

Collaborative e-Displays—As e-displays take on more of the functionalities of paper, we’ll

20 institute for the FUTURE

Sculptor Mara Haseltine

For decades, diversity in many global organizations has been

Complex problems will require transdisciplinary approaches. With technology

Diversity Makes Groups Intelligent

24 institute for the FUTURE

Complex Problems Will Require Transdisciplinary Approaches