11.1 Rubric Project Met 2017-20181
11.1 Rubric Project Met 2017-20181
11.1 Rubric Project Met 2017-20181
GROUP MEMBERS
NO NAME Report Video/Oral Overall
(50) (50) (100)
1. NOR KHAIRUNNISA NAJWA BINTI MAZLAN
2. DARREN KAH WEI SHENG
3. NUR FADHILA SHAFIKA BINTI YUSOP
4. MOHD SHAFIQ BIN MASKAZA
5. HEW MEI SHI
Signature:
_____________________________________
PANEL: ENGR. DR. NASRUL FIKRY CHE PA
DATE :
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN
SEMESTER 1, SESI 2017/18
GROUP MEMBERS
NO NAME Report Video/Oral Overall
(50) (50) (100)
1. TAN KE XI
2. CHIN YIN YING
3. NUR FARAHIDA BINTI MOHD SHAMSUDDIN
TAN
4. THEVAGAR DEWAR A/L MURUGAN
5. KHAIRUNNISA BINTI MAT IZAHAM
Signature:
_____________________________________
PANEL: ENGR. DR. NASRUL FIKRY CHE PA
DATE :
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN
SEMESTER 1, SESI 2017/18
GROUP MEMBERS
NO NAME Report Video/Oral Overall
(50) (50) (100)
1. KARTIGESAN A/L MURUGAYA
2. FRANCIS CHANG FOOK ANN CADACIO
3. ZURIANI BINTI MOHAMAD TARMIDI
4. MOHD ADAM BIN YEGGE
5. NURSHAQINAH BINTI AB JALAL
Signature:
_____________________________________
PANEL: ENGR. DR. NASRUL FIKRY CHE PA
DATE :
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN
SEMESTER 1, SESI 2017/18
GROUP MEMBERS
NO NAME Report Video/Oral Overall
(50) (50) (100)
1. MUHAMMAD ADIB BIN ABIDI
2. SITI AMIRAH BINTI ABDUL LATIFF
3. ATI PUSPA BINTI ISHAK
4. NAZ SUZIEHA BINTI WAN LONG
5. PUTERI NUR AMALINA BINTI ZULKIFLI
Signature:
_____________________________________
PANEL: ENGR. DR. NASRUL FIKRY CHE PA
DATE :
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN
SEMESTER 1, SESI 2017/18
GROUP MEMBERS
NO NAME Report Video/Oral Overall
(50) (50) (100)
1. CELINE NG
2. NOR ADIBAH BINTI NORDIN
3. RIDZUAN HAZIQ BIN MOHD AMIN
4. NUR AFIQAH AMIRAH BINTI NOR HASHIM
5. AMIR HAMZAH BIN ABD RASHID
Signature:
_____________________________________
PANEL: ENGR. DR. NASRUL FIKRY CHE PA
DATE :
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN
SEMESTER 1, SESI 2017/18
GROUP MEMBERS
NO NAME Report Video/Oral Overall
(50) (50) (100)
1. MOHAMAD ALIF HAKIMI BIN HAMDAN
2. KOH SZE YEEN
3. AHMAD WAHIDEE BIN HALID
Signature:
_____________________________________
PANEL: ENGR. DR. NASRUL FIKRY CHE PA
DATE :
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN
SEMESTER 1, SESI 2017/18
GROUP MEMBERS
NO NAME Report Video/Oral Overall
(50) (50) (100)
1. TEH JIAN HONG
2. AMIRA FARHANAH BINTI ZULKIFLI
3. JENICA R JAMES MAJANAU
4. MASITAH BINTI SALIH LUDIN
5. ZATY HAZWANIE BINTI ABD RAIS
6. AZWEEN ADLEENA BINTI ABDUL NASIR
Signature:
_____________________________________
PANEL: ENGR. DR. NASRUL FIKRY CHE PA
DATE :
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN
SEMESTER 1, SESI 2017/18
GROUP MEMBERS
NO NAME Report Video/Oral Overall
(50) (50) (100)
Signature:
_____________________________________
PANEL: ENGR. DR. NASRUL FIKRY CHE PA
DATE :
WRITTEN REPORT TOTAL SCORE: /50 VIDEO/ORAL PRESENTATION TOTAL SCORE: /50
CATEGORY
Written report rubric scoring scale 20 17 15 12
Teamwork is
A = Research well done, exceeded minimum standards VIDEO Fresh idea on video Teamwork is less almost absent. No
B = Research well done, few minor omissions, met standards Teamwork is shown,
CREATIVITY & and Team Work is shown and coordination
preparation needed
C = Adequate minimum standards TEAMWORK clearly shown during
a couple more
preparation shown in the
D = Little evidence or major flaws SKILLS preparation for the /rehearsal is lacking video. Videos look
rehearsals (video).
(20) Video. (in video) like individual
E = No evidence patch work.
10 8 6 4
** If plagiarism is detected, reduction of mark will be imposed (max: 0 mark given) Shows a full
understanding of the
Shows a good Shows a good Does not seem to
CONTENT/ topic. Demonstrates
A B C D E SUBJECT material insight with
understanding of understanding of understand the
Introduction, Background of research & Table of Content the topic with parts of the topic, topic very well.
KNOWLEDGE new ideas. ABLE to
detail. ABLE to conveys connection. Unable to answer
A brief introduction on the topic discussed 10 8 6 4 0 (Video) & accurately answer all
answer almost all of Able to answer some the questions on
DURING Q/A questions with
Literature review & Analysis/discussion the questions about of the questions on the topic
(10) substantial
A detailed background study on the concept of the information and
the topic. the topic. presented.
material/topic given. material.
Detail product material knowledge (which cover 5W1H 10 8 6 4
Often mumbles,
concept at best), also on reason of why the product is Speaks clearly and Speaks clearly and
Speaks clearly and cannot be
chosen for dedicated material. distinctly (100-95%) distinctly most of the
distinctly (100-95%) understood
SPEAKS all the time and time (94-85%) and
Detail analysis on topics discuss e.g. advantage/ CLEARLY, WELL mispronounces no
all the time but
often mispronounces
OR/AND often
disadvantage, recent scientific work, material properties 25 20 15 10 0 mispronounces one mispronounces
ORGANIZE & words. Effective words. Some
or two words. word. No
etc. COLLABORATE transition from
Evidence of team
evidence of
evidence of team
Mechanical/chemical/physical behaviour of material (In Video) speaker to speaker/
work, rather
teamwork. Some
work, no
(10) or make references overview transition
analysed. to next/previous
smooth transition
with ref. to next/
transition made to
Images/charts/graph will be an added advantage for topic.
with reference.
previous topic.
next/previous
speaker/topic.
clear report explanation. 5 4 3 1
Full attention and Not paying
Conclusions ATTITUDE
not chit-chatting Shown evidence of
Shown some
attention at all.
Learning outcome and brief summarization of the topic DURING
with others. Ask attention and ask
evidence of attention
Talking with
5 4 3 2 0 relevant questions to few question (some friends and dont
discussed. PRESENTATION
other groups are not related) just
but not asking any
bother bout other
(5) question at all.
References/Bibliography/Appendix presentation to know to show attention. group
Complete list of referencing (Alphabetically arrange) 5 4 3 2 0 more (genuine). presentation.
5 4 3 2
Related figures/tables/picture
General attire not
Structure/Formatting Casual business
Business attire, very Casual business appropriate for
attire, but wore
No typographical error Spelling, grammar, ATTIRE & TIME professional look. attire. Whole group audience (jeans, t-
5 4 3 2 0 sneakers/ wrinkled
Overall Formatting sentence structure KEEPING Presentation is presentation is
attire. Whole group
shirt, shorts, etc).
(5) within allotted time within 2 min of Too short or too
is within 3-4min of
( 1 min). allotted time long (>5min) of
allocated time.
allocated time.
** 5 marks will be deducted overall (Video) if view in blendspace not exceeded 100