Box Pushing Paper
Box Pushing Paper
Box Pushing Paper
,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDO 0DJD]LQHRI(QJLQHHULQJ7HFKQRORJ\0DQDJHPHQWDQG5HVHDUFK
<XYD(QJLQHHUV 7UDQVIRUPLQJ<RXQJ(QJLQHHUVIRU%HWWHU7RPRUURZ
D.REAR SHIELD :
Phase I
3.1.1: DESIGN DATA
Ka=0.78
0.99(1.00+0.54)2
Ka=0.3344
Hence earth pressure at top of
box=0.58x0.3344x2.10=0.404 t/sq.mt
Earth pressure at the bottom of box: ht=0.58+7.15=7.73
FIG:9: CROSS SECTION OF BOX TO BE PUSHED Earth pressure at bottom of the
box=0.3344x2.10x7.73=5.43t/sq.mt
3.1.2: DEAD LOADS Hence total earth pressure on wall=0.50(0.40+5.43)
3.1.2.1: VERTICAL LOADS x7.150=20.840t/m
Hence total load on wall=20.840x11.00=229.24T
As normally in railways, total weight of 6750kg/m in-
cluding track str.is to be taken IV.CONCLUSION AND SCOPE OF FUTUR-
Hence for total no of tracks=1x6750=6750 kg/m WORK:
Total weight of P.way on top of box unit-=6750x 11(length 4.1: CONCLUSION :
of box unit)=74250 kgs=74.25T
EARTH FILLING CUSHION: With the box pushing technique, there is no interruption
=0.575X2.1=1.208 T/mt2 to the traffic moving around.
So total UDL on top of slab of box will be=1.208x9(o/o Better quality control due to the provision of precast
width) x11=119.54T boxes.
HENCE TOTAL WEIGHT AT Quantities will be less as compared to the conventional
TOP=74.25+119.54=193.79 T method of construction.
The cost of construction is less as compared with the
4.1.2.2: LOAD ON BOTTOM SURFACE conventional method.
4.2: Future scope of work: 5.Sridharan A, (2000), Fly ash characterisation., Pro-
ceedings in AICTE ISTE shot term training program
This was done for present need, for future expansions on Ground Improvement Techniques, S.J.C.E. Mysore.,
box can be extended cast-insitu as there are no tracks, pp AS17-AS33.
thereby it can be done simpler & easier way, instead of
present box pushing technique. 6.Sridharan A, Pandian N.S., Rajasekhar C., (1996),
The present work done is on RCC box, prestressed con- Geotechnical characterisation of pond ash., Ash ponds
crete can also be done, thereby the reinforcement can be and disposal systems, Naroasa publication, pp 97-110.
reduced greatly, and cost of PSC is more.
7.Sridharan A, Pandian N.S and Srinivas Rao P., (1998),
REFERENCES: Shear strength characteristics of some Indian fly ashes.,
Ground improvement., Thomas Telford, London, U.K.
1.Narasimha Rao A.V., (1999), Characteristics of Fly
Ash and Its Application- A Brief Review., Proceedings 8.Tike G.K., Satander Kumar, Seehra S.S. and Sikdar
of the National Seminar on Fly Ash Characterisation And P.k., (1999), Utilisation of fly ash in construction of base
its Applications, I.I.Sc., Bangalore, pp 3-14. course for pavements., Proceedings of the National
Seminar on Fly Ash Characterisation And its Applica-
2.Narayanasamy P., (1999), Fly ash as pesticide in ag- tions, I I Sc, Bangalore pp 222-227
riculture., Proceedings of the National Seminar on Fly
Ash Characterisation And its Applications, I I Sc, Ban-
galore pp 162-167. 9.Vimal Kumar, Mukesh Mathur, Chandi Nath Jha and
Gautam Goswami., (1999), Characterisation of fly ash-
3.Singh R.B., Pallavi Khanna and Agarwal R.K., (1999), A multi facet resource material., Proceedings of the Na-
Fly ash utilisation in embankments with geogrids and tional Seminar on Fly Ash Characterisation And its Ap-
anchor reinforcement., Proceedings of the National plications, I I Sc, Bangalore pp 45-50.
Seminar on Fly Ash Characterisation And its Applica-
tions, I I Sc, Bangalore pp 179-186.