Materials Science & Engineering A: F. Rajabi, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, M. Eskandari, S. Khoddam
Materials Science & Engineering A: F. Rajabi, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, M. Eskandari, S. Khoddam
Materials Science & Engineering A: F. Rajabi, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, M. Eskandari, S. Khoddam
art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The present work has been conducted to study the effect of rolling parameters (strain rate and
Received 18 February 2013 temperature) on the microstructural evolutions and mechanical properties of 6061 aluminum alloy.
Received in revised form The results indicate that the predominant restoration process during rolling at 250 1C is dynamic
1 April 2013
recovery, and the driving force is not high enough to trigger dynamic recrystallization. However, primary
Accepted 5 April 2013
recrystallized grains were clearly evident in the microstructure of the specimen rolled at 350 1C.
Available online 25 April 2013
Moreover, at 450 1C not only the volume fraction of dynamically recrystallized grains is increased but the
Keywords: formation of some new precipitates is recognized. The tensile test results show that the room
Non-ferrous metals and alloys temperature strength and ductility are increased by increasing the rolling temperature in the range of
Mechanical properties
250450 1C. Moreover, at a given rolling temperature the yield strength is decreased with increasing
Microstructure
strain rate. The observed trends are explained through microstructural evolutions upon hot rolling as
well as dynamic precipitation of Mg2Si and the Fe or Cu rich particles.
& 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0921-5093/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.023
F. Rajabi et al. / Materials Science & Engineering A 578 (2013) 9095 91
2. Experimental procedure
These second phases with irregular jagged shape are Fe-rich For further clarication, the XRD patterns of the rolled speci-
precipitates, mostly with the nominal composition of Al8Fe2Si mens at 250, 350 and 450 1C (with rolling strain rate of 23 s1) are
[16]. It is anticipated that these Fe-rich phases were dynamically illustrated in Fig. 8. The XRD peaks could be identied as due to
precipitated during hot rolling at this temperature. Rolling at (Al) solid solution (labeled Al) peaks. As is observed, the rolled
4501C resulted in higher volume fraction of Mg2Si in the micro- microstructure at 250 1C mostly consisted of Al8Fe2Si, Al13Fe4,
structure. The considerable increase in quantity of Mg2Si precipi- Mg2Si, Al2CuMg, and Al4Cu precipitates (Fig. 8a). Finely dispersed
tate at 450 1C probably leads to better mechanical properties Al2CuMg and Mg2Si precipitates may hinder the easy movement of
which are obviously seen in Fig. 3. the grain boundaries thereby stabilizing the sub-grain structure
formed during rolling.
As is seen in Fig. 8b, increasing the temperature to 350 1C ends
formation of Cu-rich phase precipitates such as CuMgZn in the
microstructure. Moreover, the presence of Cu rich phases such as
CuMgZn was more clearly detected at 350 1C but intensity of the
peak dropped at 450 1C. Hence, as is expected the XRD results
conrm the precipitation of Cu-rich phases during hot rolling at
350 1C. At 450 1C, the majority of precipitates in the microstructure
are Mg2Si, Mg5Si6 Al2CuMg and Al4Cu. The precipitations can be
clearly seen in Fig. 7c. According to EDS results, precipitations are
composed of elements such as FeMgMn, Cr and Si.
Considering the above discussions, the variation of room
temperature mechanical properties of the experimental alloy after
deformation at different temperatures is attributed to the occur-
rence of dynamic precipitation as well as dynamic restoration
processes during hot rolling. As shown in Fig. 3, the room
temperature strength of the experimental alloy is increased with
increasing the rolling temperature up to 450 1C. The latter is
attributed to the occurrence of recovery at 250 1C and onset of
Fig. 5. The variations of ductility (elongation-to-fracture) with rolling temperature the DRX along with formation of new precipitations at 350 and
under strain rate of 15 s1. 450 1C.
Fig. 6. The microstructures obtained through hot rolling at different conditions: (a) T 250 1C, strain rate: 7 s1, (b) T 250 1C, strain rate: 16 s1, (c) T 250 1C, strain rate:
23 s1, (d) T 350 1C, strain rate: 7 s1, (e) T 350 1C, strain rate: 16 s1, (f) T 350 1C, strain rate: 23 s1,(g) T 450 1C, strain rate: 7 s1, (h) T 450 1C, strain rate: 16 s1, (i)
T 450 1C, strain rate: 23 s1.
94 F. Rajabi et al. / Materials Science & Engineering A 578 (2013) 9095
Fig. 8. The XRD patterns corresponding to the experimental alloy after hot rolling
with strain rate of 23 s1 at (a) T 250 1C, (b) T 350 1C, and (c) T 4501C.
4. Conclusion
Fig. 7. The scanning electron micrographs of 6061 Al alloy after hot rolling with
strain rate of 23 s-1 at (a) T 250 1C, (b) T 350 1C, and (c) T 450 1C.
In the present study, the microstructural evolutions and the
room temperature mechanical properties of the 6061 Al alloy were
The formation of substructures during recovery at 250 1C investigated upon rolling at different conditions. The results
followed by intensication of strain rate resulted in formation of indicate that the room temperature mechanical properties of the
ner sub-grains structure [2125]. This may act as barriers for alloy are signicantly inuenced by the rolling temperature in
dislocation movements, thereby affecting tensile strength level. As the temperature range of 250450 1C. It has been observed that
shown in Figs. 3 and 4, the mechanical properties of the experi- the predominant restoration processes during rolling at 250
mental alloy are improved after rolling at 350 1C. This is related to and 350 1C are dynamic recovery and dynamic recrystallization,
the occurrence of dynamic recrystallization along with formation respectively. However, the pronounced recrystallized grains are
F. Rajabi et al. / Materials Science & Engineering A 578 (2013) 9095 95
clearly seen in the microstructure of the specimens that were [9] L.D. ParyJr, W.Z. Misiolek, Acta Mater. 56 (2008) 61746185.
rolled at 450 1C. The tensile test results show that the room [10] D. Godard, P. Archambault, E. Aeby-Gautier, G. Lapasset, Acta Mater. 50 (2002)
23192325.
temperature strength and ductility are increased by increasing [11] R.D. Doherty, D.A. Hughes, F.J. Humphreys, J.J. Jonas, D.J. Jensen, Mater. Sci. Eng
the rolling temperature in the range of 250450 1C. Furthermore, A 238 (1997) 219274.
at constant rolling temperature, increasing the strain rate resulted [12] D. Neil, M. Hurleya, H. William, V. Geertruydenb, Z. Wojciech, J. Mater. Process.
in decrease of yield strength. The observed trends are explained Technol. 23 (2009) 59905995.
[13] Y.H. Kim, T.K. Ryou, H.J. Choi, B.B. Hwang, J. Mater. Process. Techol 123 (2002)
through the microstructural evolutions during hot rolling and 270276.
precipitation of the second phase such as Mg2Si and Fe or Mn [14] P. Nageswara Rao, R. Jayaganthan, Mater. Des. 39 (2012) 226233.
rich sediments. [15] D. Abolhasani, H.R. Ezatpour, S.A. Sajjadi, Q. Abolhasani, Mater. Des. 49 (2013)
784790.
[16] G. Lin, X. Zheng, W. Yang, D. Feng, P. Dashu, Acta Metall. Sin. 22 (2009)
References 110116.
[17] A. Abolhasani, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, H.R. Abedi, M.R. Rokni, Mater. Des. 34 (2012)
631636.
[1] H. Liao, Y. Sun, G. Sun, Mater. Sci. Eng A 358 (2003) 164170.
[18] L.P. Troeger, E.A. Stark Jr, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 277 (2000) 102106.
[2] R. Li, R. Li, Y. Zhao, L. He, C. Li, H. Guan, Z. Hu, Mater.Lett. 58 (2004) 20962101.
[19] M. Eskandari, A. Najazadeh, A. Kermanpur, M. Karimi, Int. J. Iron Steel Soc.
[3] J. Bray, Aluminum Mill and Engineered Wrought Prod: Physical Metallurgy,
Iran 5 (2008) 2128.
ASM, 2002.
[20] D. Marchive, Light Met. Age 41 (1983) 69.
[4] J.E. Hatch, Aluminum: Properties and Physical Metallurgy, ASM, Metals Park,
[21] Y. Lee, Y. Kwon, J. Lee, Chul Park, Sangshik KiM, Scr. Mater 42 (2000) 5156.
OH, 1983.
[22] E. Evangelista, A. Forcellese, F. Gabrielli, P. Mengucci, J. Mater. Process. Technol.
[5] Y.V.R.K. Prasad, S. Sasidhara, Hot Working Guide: ACompendium of Processing
Maps, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1997. 24 (1990) 323332.
[6] J.P. Immarigeon, R.T. Holt, A.K. Koul, L. Zhao, W. Wallace, J.C. Beddoes, Mater. [23] W. Lee, J.C. Shyu, S.T. Chiou, Scr. Mater 42 (2000) 5156.
Charact. 35 (1995) 4167. [24] T. Sheppard, G. Tutcher, Met. Sci. 14 (1980) 579584.
[7] M.V. Lancker, The Metallurgy of Aluminum Alloys, p. 258, Wiley, New York, [25] T Sheppard, G. Tutcher, Met. Technol. 8 (1981) 319323.
NY, 1967. [26] J.E. Hatch, Aluminum Properties and Physical Metallurgy, ASTM, Metals Park,
[8] J.W. Evancho, J.G. Kaufamn, Aluminum 53 (1977) 609612. 1984.