Attachement to Civil Cover Sheet

I. (c) Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Michael K. T. Tan* Edgar Saldivar (Texas Bar No. 24038188)

Omar C. Jadwat* Trisha Trigilio (Texas Bar No. 24075179)
ACLU FOUNDATION Andre I. Segura*
IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES
125 Broad Street, 18th Floor UNION FOUNDATION OF TEXAS
New York, NY 10004 1500 McGowen Street, Suite 250
Phone: (212) 519-7848 Houston, TX 77004
Fax: (212) 549-2654 Phone: (713) 325-7011
[email protected] Fax: (713) 942-8966
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

Stephen Kang* Alina Das*

ACLU FOUNDATION WASHINGTON SQUARE LEGAL
IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT SERVICES, INC.
39 Drumm Street Immigrant Rights Clinic
San Francisco, CA 94111 New York University School of Law
Phone: (415) 343-0770 245 Sullivan Street, 5th Floor
Fax: (415) 395-0950 New York, NY 10012
[email protected] Phone: (212) 998-6467
Fax: (212) 995-4031
[email protected]

Ranjana Natarajan (Texas Bar No. 24071013)

University of Texas School of Law
Civil Rights Clinic
727 E. Dean Keeton Street
Austin TX 78705
Phone: 512-232-7222
Fax: 512-232-0800
[email protected]

*Pro Hac Vice motions forthcoming

I. Defendants

SCOTT LLOYD, Director, Office of Refugee Resettlement; JOSE GONZALEZ, Federal Field
Specialist, Office of Refugee and Resettlement; THANE BISHOP, Facility Director, BCFS
Health and Human Services SAC ICS Shelter; STEVEN WAGNER, Acting Assistant Secretary,
Administration for Children and Families; ERIC HARGAN, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services; MANUEL PADILLA Jr., Chief Patrol Agent-in-Charge, Rio
Grande Valley Sector, U.S. Border Patrol; MARIO MARTINEZ, Chief Patrol Agent-in-Charge,
Laredo Sector, U.S. Border Patrol; KEVIN McALEENAN, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection; ELAINE C. DUKE, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security,

VI. Cause of Action

Violation of the Homeland Security Act of 2002; William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims
Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008; Violation of Flores Consent Decree; Due Process
Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; Violation of the Due Process Clause of
the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; Violation of Immigration and Nationality Act;
Violation of Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 794

Brief Description:

This is an action to secure the immediate release of a 10 year old child with cerebral palsy from
the unlawful custody of federal immigration authorities and return her to her family. Petitioners
are asserting their constitutional rights.
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

R.M.H., a minor, and FELIPA DE LA CRUZ, ) Case No.

as her next friend and on her own behalf, )
)
Plaintiffs-Petitioners, )
)
vs. )
)
SCOTT LLOYD, Director, Office of Refugee ) PETITION FOR WRIT OF
Resettlement; JOSE GONZALEZ, Federal Field) HABEAS CORPUS AND COMPLAINT
Specialist, Office of Refugee and Resettlement; ) FOR DECLARATORY AND
THANE BISHOP, FacilityDirector, ) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
BCFS Health and Human Services )
SAC ICS Shelter; STEVEN WAGNER, Acting )
Assistant Secretary, Administration for )
Children and Families; ERIC HARGAN, )
Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Health )
and Human Services; MANUEL PADILLA Jr., )
Chief Patrol Agent-in-Charge, Rio Grande )
Valley Sector, U.S. Border Patrol; MARIO )
MARTINEZ, Chief Patrol Agent-in-Charge, )
Laredo Sector, U.S. Border Patrol; KEVIN )
McALEENAN, Acting Commissioner, U.S. )
Customs and Border Protection; ELAINE C. )
DUKE, Acting Secretary, Department of )
Homeland Security, )
)
Defendants-Respondents. )

INTRODUCTION

1. Plaintiffs-Petitioners R.M.H. and Felipa De La Cruz (Plaintiffs) file this petition for

writ of habeas corpus and complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief seeking R.M.H.s

immediate release from Defendants-Respondents (Defendants) custody and R.M.H.s return

to her family.

2. R.M.H. is a 10-year old girl who moved to the United States with her parents when she

was three months old. Since that time, she has lived in Laredo, Texas in the care and custody of

1
her parents, including her mother, Ms. De La Cruz. Her home with her family in United States is

the only one she has ever known.

3. R.M.H. has cerebral palsy and the cognitive development of a six-year-old child. R.M.H.

requires specialized care and consistent therapy, which her parents have provided since she was

born.

4. On October 24, 2017, R.M.H. was traveling with her 34-year-old U.S.-citizen cousin

from her home in Laredo, Texas to a childrens hospital in Corpus Christi, Texas for necessary

gallbladder surgery. U.S. Border Patrol agents stopped the vehicle transporting R.M.H. at an

interior immigration checkpoint in Freer, Texas. Despite being informed of R.M.H.s scheduled

surgery, the agents detained them at the checkpoint for approximately 30 minutes before

allowing them to proceed. As they left the checkpoint, a Border Patrol agent said that agents

would be following the vehicle transporting R.M.H., and that after the girl was released from

the hospital she would be processed for deportation.

5. Border Patrol agents followed R.M.H. to the hospital and then shadowed her every move

at the hospital. But rather than permit R.M.H. to return to her family once she was discharged

after surgery, as her doctors had recommended, the agents arrested R.M.H. directly from her

hospital bed, without a warrant, for the purpose of initiating removal proceedings to deport her

from the United States.

6. The agents then designated her an unaccompanied child and transferred her to the

custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). Since that time, R.M.H. has been in

ORR custody at the BCFS Health and Human Services SAC ICS Shelter in San Antonio,

Texasmore than 150 miles away from her family home. Absent an order from this Court,

2
R.M.H. will remain in ORR custody, and separated from her family, unless and until ORR deems

her parents adequate sponsors and chooses to reunify her with them.

7. While in custody, R.M.H. has suffered numerous harms. Rosa Maria has always been

under the care of her parents. Her medical condition requires constant attention, and she is

completely dependent on her mother. At home, Rosa Maria receives both specialized and

ongoing services at her elementary school and her mothers care and support, including home-

based therapy she needs to thrive. Without her mother and supportive community of services, her

health and developmental progress will suffer.

8. Defendants forcible separation of R.M.H. from her family also has inflicted serious

psychological and emotional injury on her, Ms. De La Cruz, and her entire familyas would the

sudden and forcible removal of any young child from a stable and loving family environment.

Ms. De La Cruz in particular has been deprived of her freedom to provide care and custody of

her child.

9. R.M.H. has resided in the United States since she was three months old in her parents

care and custody, which U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and ORR knew at the

time of her arrest, transfer, and detention. The government arrested R.M.H. while she was

seeking necessary medical care, thereby separating her from family members who have cared for

R.M.H. her entire life. The government cannot render R.M.H. an unaccompanied child merely by

virtue of her arrest by CBP, and ORR cannot keep her in its custody knowing that she has been

forcibly removed from her existing custodial relationship.

10. Moreover, at no point has the government even suggested that R.M.H.s parents are unfit

to provide for her care and custody or provided any hearing to determine their fitness prior to

3
arresting R.M.H. and separating her from her family. Nonetheless, ORR continues to retain

custody of R.M.H., pending its assessment of whether R.M.H.s parents are suitable custodians.

11. Defendants arrest, transfer, and ongoing detention of R.M.H. violate the Homeland

Security Act of 2002, the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, the Flores

Consent Decree, the Rehabilitation Act, and the fundamental rights to liberty and family integrity

protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Because R.M.H.s continued

detention and separation from her family violate the U.S. Constitution and statutory law,

Plaintiffs request that this Court order R.M.H.s immediate release to the family that has loved,

cared, and provided for her since she was born.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

12. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs petition for a writ of habeas

corpus and their complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief pursuant to Art. I, 9, cl. 2 of the

United States Constitution; 28 U.S.C. 2201; 28 U.S.C. 2241; 28 U.S.C. 1331; 28 U.S.C.

1343; 28 U.S.C. 1361; and 5 U.S.C. 702. This action arises under the Fifth Amendment to

the United States Constitution; the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA); the Homeland

Security Act of 2002 (HSA); the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection

Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), 8 U.S.C. 1232; the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 794; the

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq.; and Paragraph 24B of the class action

consent decree entered in Flores v. Reno, Case No. 85-cv-4544-RJK(Px) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 17,

1997) (Exh. A).

13. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. See Braden v. 30th Judicial

Circuit Court of Kentucky, 410 U.S. 484, 493-94 (1973). Venue is also proper in this Court

4
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(e) because a Defendant in the action resides in this District, and a

substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in this District.

PARTIES

14. Plaintiff-Petitioner R.M.H. is a 10-year old girl who moved to the United States with her

parents when she was three months old. She has cerebral palsy and the cognitive development of

a six year old child. R.M.H. was arrested by CBP agents in October 2017 while recovering from

necessary gallbladder surgery at a childrens hospital and transferred to the custody of ORR. She

is currently detained in an ORR-contracted shelter in San Antonio, Texas. Prior to her detention,

she lived in the care and custody of her parents in Laredo, Texas, where she has lived almost her

entire life.

15. Plaintiff-Petitioner Felipa De La Cruz is R.M.H.s mother and legal guardian. She has

provided for the care and custody of R.M.H. since birth. She resides in Laredo, Texas with the

rest of R.M.H.s family.

16. Defendant-Respondent Scott Lloyd is the Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement

(ORR). ORR is the government entity that is directly responsible for Plaintiffs detention. Mr.

Lloyd is a legal custodian of R.M.H. and sued in his official capacity.

17. Defendant-Respondent Jesse Gutierrez is a Federal Field Specialist for ORR, who serves

as the approval authority for the transfer, detention, and release of children in ORR custody in

the San Antonio area. Mr. Gutierrez is a legal custodian of R.M.H. and is sued in his official

capacity.

18. Defendant-Respondent Thane Bishop is the Facility Director of BCFS Health and Human

Services SAC ICS Shelter in San Antonio, Texas, where R.M.H. is currently in custody. Mr.

Bishop is a legal custodian of R.M.H. and sued in his official capacity.

5
19. Defendants-Respondent Steven Wagner is an Acting Assistant Secretary of the

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the head of HHSs Administration for

Children and Families (ACF). ACF has responsibility for ORR. Mr. Wagner is a legal

custodian of R.M.H. and sued in his official capacity.

20. Eric Hargan is the Acting Secretary of HHS, the agency of which ACF and ORR are part.

He is a legal custodian of R.M.H. and sued in his official capacity.

21. Manuel Padilla is the Chief Patrol Agent-in-Charge of the Rio Grande Valley Sector of

the U.S. Border Patrol. He directs and supervises Border Patrol agents and other employees in

this Sector, which includes Nueces County and Corpus Christi. Mr. Padilla is sued in his official

capacity.

22. Mario Martinez is the Chief Patrol Agent-in-Charge of the Laredo Sector of the U.S.

Border Patrol. He directs and supervises Border Patrol agents and other employees in this Sector,

which includes Duval County and the Border Patrol Station in Freer, Texas and its checkpoint.

Mr. Martinez is sued in his official capacity.

23. Kevin McAleenan is the Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection

(CBP). The U.S. Border Patrol, which arrested R.M.H. and transferred her to ORR custody, is

part of CBP. Mr. McAleenan is sued in his official capacity.

24. Elaine C. Duke is the Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security

(DHS), of which CBP and the Border Patrol are part. Secretary Duke is responsible for the

enforcement of the immigration laws. Secretary Duke is sued in her official capacity.

6
 FACTUAL BACKGROUND

R.M.H.s Life in the Care and Custody of Her Family

25. R.M.H. is a 10-year-old girl with cerebral palsy. R.M.H. has the cognitive development

of a six year old child. Ms. De La Cruz is her mother. R.M.H. is currently detained by ORR at a

shelter in San Antonio, Texasalone and more than 150 miles from her mother and family.

26. When R.M.H. was only three months old, her parents brought R.M.H. to Laredo, Texas,

seeking a better life for her and her family.

27. R.M.H. lives in a loving household with a supportive family that cares for her deeply.

R.M.H. lives with her mother, father, two sisters, and grandfather. She plays with her sisters,

who are 9 and 13 years old, every day. Her father works to provide for his family, and Ms. De La

Cruz stays at home to care for her daughters. Ms. De La Cruzs father (R.M.H.s grandfather)

has been a legal permanent resident of the United States for many years.

28. R.M.H. has known only Laredo, Texas as her home. Since she coming to the country

with her parents as a baby, R.M.H. has never left the United States. Like any other child in the

United States who is fully immersed in American culture, she speaks English and considers

herself American.

29. R.M.H. is a thriving grade school student at J.C. Martin, Jr. Elementary School in Laredo,

where she enjoys being with her friends in a supportive environment. Her school ensures that she

receives the care she needs for her disabilities. At her school, R.M.H. receives therapy sessions

and regular evaluations by counselors in special education classes.

30. R.M.H.s medical condition requires constant attention, and her mother plays a

paramount role in ensuring she receives appropriate treatment. She has never been left alone and

has always been under her parents guardianship and care.

7
31. In Laredo, R.M.H. receives critical medical and developmental services. When she was

an infant, R.M.H.s pediatrician in Laredo immediately noted her cerebral palsy and

recommended physical therapy to increase her strength and coordination. Ms. De La Cruz

enrolled her in a program called Proyecto Nios, which provides various services for children

like R.M.H. until the age of three, including dental care and physical therapy. After that, Ms. De

La Cruz enrolled R.M.H. at the J. Zaffirini Elementary School, a public school that provided

special education, therapy, and care for R.M.H. until the age of seven.

32. When R.M.H. was an infant, doctors told Ms. De La Cruz that she would be unable to

enjoy life and would essentially live in a vegetative state. However, with Ms. De La Cruzs

constant care, support, and attention to her physical and emotional needs, and provision of home-

based therapy, R.M.H. has become a joyful young girl with a constant smile on her face.

33. R.M.H.s weekly routine involves going to school five days a week, where she receives

special-education classes, therapy sessions, and other services. Her mother picks her up from

school with her sisters every day. At home, R.M.H. plays with her sisters outside before dinner

each night. When their father arrives, they play with him a bit before finally going back to bed.

34. Ms. De La Cruz provides physical therapy to R.M.H. herself. Ms. De La Cruz creates

games to help R.M.H. improve her strength and coordination, using play-based therapy

techniques that therapists have taught her since R.M.H. was first diagnosed.

35. R.M.H. also sees a pediatrician every month, for regular follow up care, blood work, and

vaccines. She receives both general and specialist medical care.

R.M.H.s Arrest by Defendant CBP While Seeking Necessary Surgery at a Childrens

Hospital

36. Last year, R.M.H. began experiencing pain in her stomach. The pain continued off and

on, while Ms. De La Cruz took her to see a pediatrician throughout the year. But recently, the

8
pain worsened. Following an X-ray examination, doctors advised Ms. De La Cruz that R.M.H.

needed gallbladder surgery.

37. Despite her efforts, Ms. De La Cruz could not find a surgeon who could perform the

surgery in Laredo. R.M.H. needed to be transferred to the Driscoll Childrens Hospital in Corpus

Christi, a premier hospital 150 miles from Laredo that provides necessary care for children

throughout the Texas border region.

38. Through her social worker, Ms. De La Cruz arranged for R.M.H. to be transferred to

Driscoll Childrens Hospital through a transport service for children with special needs. Ms. De

La Cruz could not travel with her daughter. As a result, Ms. De La Cruz sent R.M.H. with her

cousin, Aurora Cantu, who is 34 years old and a U.S. citizen. At the hospitals instruction, Ms.

De La Cruz provided a signed, notarized letter authorizing R.M.H. to travel with her cousin. She

also obtained a letter authorizing the transport service to bring R.M.H. to Driscoll. She provided

both letters to Ms. Cantu.

39. The transport vehicle arrived for R.M.H. and her cousin at around 2:00 AM on October

24, 2017. Her surgery was scheduled for later that morning. During the trip to Corpus Christi, her

mother remained in close communication with R.M.H. and her cousin by phone.

40. During the journey, the vehicle approached a checkpoint and was stopped for questioning

by Border Patrol agents. The Border Patrol agents asked for everyones papers. Both the driver

and Ms. Cantu provided their identity documents. The agents asked for R.M.H.s papers, and Ms.

Cantu told them that she did not have any with her. As a 10-year-old child, R.M.H. does not

carry documentation of her identity. During this time, there was never any indication that R.M.H.

was in danger, at risk of being trafficked, or the victim of any crime.

9
41. Ms. Cantu informed the agents that they were on their way to Corpus Christi for

R.M.H.s surgery and provided the corresponding documents. The agents then ordered that the

driver pull the vehicle over. The agents took Ms. Cantus documentation and went back to a

trailer-style office.

42. When the agents returned, they asked Ms. Cantu for the names of R.M.H.s parents. Ms.

Cantu informed the agents that R.M.H. lives with her parents in Laredo, Texas. Ms. Cantu

provided that information, and the agents told them that they could proceed. However, the agents

told the driver in English that they would follow the vehicle and that when the girl was

released from the hospital she would be processed for deportation.

43. Border Patrol agents held R.M.H. and Ms. Cantu at the checkpoint for approximately 30

minutes.

44. A Border Patrol agent followed R.M.H. the entire way to the hospital. Once they arrived

there, the agent parked his truck and sat in the waiting room just two seats away from R.M.H.

and her cousin. When R.M.H. was transferred to the next floor, the agent followed them and

again sat nearby.

45. This original agent was then replaced by two other Border Patrol agentsboth men

from Corpus Christi. The new agents did not say a word to Ms. Cantu when they arrived.

46. When R.M.H. was then taken to have her vital signs and weight taken in preparation for

surgery, the agents followed her and Ms. Cantu. They remained present in R.M.H.s room while

her vital signs were taken.

47. A nurse then arrived with a bed to transport R.M.H. for surgery. The agents followed

R.M.H. until reaching the operating room. At this point, R.M.H. was dressed in a hospital gown.

10
48. The agents stood outside the door while R.M.H. was waiting for surgery. Whenever the

door would open, the agents would peek inside to ensure that R.M.H. was still there. Once the

cousin exited the waiting room, the agents asked her if R.M.H. had gone into surgery.

49. At this point, Ms. Cantu asked the agents what would happen to her and R.M.H. During

the conversation, the agents appeared confused and indicated that they believed she was

R.M.H.s mother.

50. Ms. Cantu informed the agents that she was her cousin and that R.M.H.s mother was

waiting for them to return home to Laredo. Ms. Cantu informed the agents that she was solely

accompanying R.M.H. with her mothers permission.

51. The agents then asked Ms. Cantu for her documents. After calling what appeared to be

their supervisor, the agents said that Ms. Cantu would not need to worry and told her that she

could leave if she wanted. They then informed her that the girl was going to be deported.

Given that R.M.H. was alone in the operating room, Ms. Cantu could not and did not want to

leave her there alone.

52. The agents told Ms. Cantu that Ms. De La Cruz had two options. She could either agree

for R.M.H. to be removed from the United States through voluntary departure or she could stay

and be held in detention.

53. While R.M.H. was in surgery, several attorneys from the hospital arrived and informed

the agents that they could not be in the hospital. The agents had not registered and were not

permitted to be present. The agents refused to leave, telling the hospital officials that they had to

stay because the girl was going to be deported.

54. Following the surgery, R.M.H.s surgeon informed Ms. Cantu that R.M.H. was

experiencing pain from the operation and would need to stay at least until the next day. R.M.H.

11
was transferred to the seventh floor, where she was provided with her own recovery room. The

agents followed and stationed themselves outside of R.M.H.s door.

R.M.Hs Transfer to ORR Custody

55. On Wednesday, October 25, 2017, the day after she entered the hospital, R.M.H. was

discharged. Her discharge papers stated that: Rosa Hernandez is a post-operative patient with

cerebral palsy and developmental delay. In the best interest of the patient, it is recommended that

the patient be discharged to a family member that is familiar with her medical and psychological

needs. The patient will need to follow up with her primary care physician in three days and in my

. . . office in Laredo, Texas on November 2, 2017.

56. Yet as soon as she was discharged, Border Patrol placed her into custody, arresting

R.M.H. directly from her hospital bed in her recovery room.

57. On information and belief, the CBP agents did not obtain a warrant for R.M.H.s arrest

even though the Immigration and Nationality Act permits warrantless arrests only where a

person is likely to escape before an arrest warrant can be obtained. 8 U.S.C. 1357(a)(2).

Given that R.M.H. has a disability and was recovering from surgery at the time, there was no risk

that she would escape before a warrant could be obtained.

58. Moreover, CBP guidance on sensitive locations limits the authority of CBP to pursue

enforcement actions at hospitals. CBP agents must seek written approval by supervisory

officials, including the Chief Patrol Agent, prior to undertaking enforcement actions at hospitals,

absent exigent circumstances involving national security, terrorism, or threats to public safety. 1

1
See Memorandum from David V. Aguilar, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Enforcement
Actions at or Near Certain Community Locations at 1-2 (Jan. 18, 2013), available at
https://foiarr.cbp.gov/streamingWord.asp?i=1251.
12
59. On information and belief, the CBP agents did not obtain written approval by a

supervisory official before following R.M.H. to her surgery appointment and arresting her at the

hospital.

60. Although a CBP spokesperson stated in the news media that CBP was required to arrest

R.M.H. for deportation, 2 recent guidance by the Department of Homeland Security makes clear

that agents retain the authority not to seek the deportation of individuals they encounter on a

case-by-case basis, and sets forth proceduresspecifically, consultation with senior CBP

officialsfor the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. 3

61. CBP has issued a Notice to Appear against R.M.H. The Notice to Appear is a charging

document that initiates immigration court proceedings to remove a noncitizen from the United

States.

62. R.M.H. is currently in ORR custody and is being detained at BCFS Health and Human

Services SAC ICS Shelter in San Antonio, Texas, more than 150 miles away from her family

home in Laredo.

63. On information and belief, ORR was aware when it took custody of R.M.H. that she had

been living in the care and custody of her parents in the United States.

2
Scott Neuman & John Burnett, 10-Year-Old Girl Is Detained By Border Patrol After
Emergency Surgery, NPR, http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/10/26/560149316/10-
year-old-girl-is-detained-by-ice-officers-after-emergency-surgery (statement by CBP
spokeperson Dan Hetlage that [t]he agent is wrong if he lets her go. We dont have the
discretion.).
3
See Memorandum from John Kelly, Secretary of Homeland Security, Enforcement of the
Immigration Laws to Service the National Interest at 4 (Feb. 20, 2017),
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/17_0220_S1_Enforcement-of-the-
Immigration-Laws-to-Serve-the-National-Interest.pdf.
13
64. ORR is currently aware that R.M.H. lived in the continuous care and custody of her

parents in the United States for approximately ten years before being arrested at the hospital by

Border Patrol agents and transferred to ORR.

65. Since Wednesday, October 25, 2017, R.M.H. has remained in the shelter separated from

her parents. It was not until Saturday, October 28, 2017, that she was finally able to see her

father, who visited her at the shelter. She has yet to see her mother.

66. R.M.H.s parents have requested that ORR release R.M.H. to their custody. However,

ORR will not release R.M.H. to her parents custody unless and until R.M.H. parents

demonstrate that they satisfy ORRs suitability assessment criteria for the sponsors of

unaccompanied children, and ORR deems them to be adequate custodians. ORR typically takes

several weeks or months to make such an assessment.

The Harm of R.M.H.s Arrest and Detention on R.M.H. and Her Family

67. The arrest, transfer, and detention of R.M.H. in ORR custody have severely impacted

R.M.H. and her family.

68. The ORR shelter where R.M.H. is held is not an appropriate setting for R.M.H.s care.

69. Cerebral palsy refers to a group of permanent neurological disorders of movement

caused by an injury to the brain prior, during, or soon after birth. See Decl. of Dr. Marsha Griffin

5. 4 The impact of the brain injury (i.e., any deficiencies in motor and cognitive functioning)

worsens significantly if left untreated. Id. 8. 5 Proper treatment of cerebral palsy includes, but is

not limited to, consistent physical (gross motor), occupational (fine motor), speech, and/or

4
See also Peter Rosenbaum et al. A Report: the Definition and Classification of Cerebral Palsy,
109 Dev. Med. Child Neurol. Suppl. 1, 8-14 (2007).
5
See also Vykuntaraju KN, Cerebral Palsy and Early Stimulation 164 (2014) (The natural
history of untreated CP is one of . . . deterioration.); James R. Gage et al., The Identification and
Treatment of Gait Problems in Cerebral Palsy 469 (2009) (explaining that the natural history of
untreated cerebral palsy is typically characterized by worsening).
14
educational/cognitive therapy. Id. 9-14. 6 These therapies are particularly important throughout

childhood, when brain and overall growth development occurs in spurts. Id. 8. During these

growth spurts, even a child whose functioning has stabilized may experience new problems in

gait and other motor functions. Id. Assistive devices, such as orthotics and other braces, are often

necessary not only to improve mobility but to prevent deformities that arise following growth

spurts in childhood. Id. 15. Medications and surgical procedures may also be required to correct

misalignments and muscular problems. Id. 16. 7

70. Educational accommodations and related services are also required in schools so that

children with cerebral palsy receive an appropriate education. Id. 17. 8 Access to appropriate

doctors, therapists, and teachers thus all play a critical role in the care of children with cerebral

palsy. Id. 18. R.M.H. was receiving such services through her school, including special

education classes and therapy sessions.

71. [N]o individual plays a greater role in the treatment of cerebral palsy than the parent or

guardian of the child. Id. Congress provided access to early intervention programs for

children through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which provides

parents with access and training on how to incorporate therapy into their day-to-day care and

child-rearing activities. Id. 19. Family involvement has been demonstrated to have a positive

impact on outcomes for children with cerebral palsy. Id. 18-23. Moreover, [f]amily

6
See also Cerebral Palsy Foundation, Cerebral Palsy Foundation Fact Sheet (July 2015),
http://yourcpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/CPF_FactSheet.pdf.
7
See id.
8
See Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), Pub. L. 108-
446 (2004).
15
management and coping have been shown to be beneficial in protecting and improving health

status of children with [cerebral palsy]. 9

72. The harms of taking R.M.H. out of her home, school, and medical environment are thus

four-fold. First, R.M.H. has lost the caretakerMs. De La Cruzwho is most familiar with

R.M.H.s treatment needs, and who generally coordinates her medical care and therapy

appointments. Second, R.M.H. has been taken from school, which provides her with special-

education classes, physical therapy, and other services in a supportive environment. Third,

R.M.H. has been separated from her medical team, which disrupts her specialized and ongoing

therapies. Fourth, the emotional hardship and stress that the separation imposes on both R.M.H.

and her parents undermines successful health outcomes for R.M.H.

73. For children with cerebral palsy, separation from family, medical team, and school

therapists causes special and serious harms. See Grffin Decl. 24 (describing the heightened

fear of separation and anxiety of children with cerebral palsy and family role in managing care

of children with cerebral palsy), 25-28 (describing how family separation causes significant

harm to physical wellbeing of a child with cerebral palsy and how detention prevents families

from ensuring children with disabilities receive mandated therapeutic services from their medical

team and school). Given the limited health reserve of most children with CP [cerebral palsy],

parental loss or separation can have grave impact on the childs overall prognosis and health

trajectory with resultant acute decline which would have otherwise been potentially delayed.

Decl. of Dr. Rachel Vandermeer 16.

74. Because R.M.H. has also just undergone surgery, the harm to her wellbeing is

particularly acute. See id. 8 (describing the parents critical role in the post operation period in

9
See Wanid Duangdech et al, A Causal Model of Health Status of Children with Cerebral Palsy.
21(4) Pac. Rim. Int. J. Nurs. Res. 291, 301 (Oct.-Dec. 2017).
16
managing pain, noting that [c]hildren who have cerebral palsy are most often unable to readily

communicate pain verbally and that medical providers heavily rely on the parent to assess the

childs pain and [u]ntreated pain can lead to acutely worsening spasticity, agitation and

seizures); 10 (children with cerebral palsy are at high risk of acute respiratory

decompensation related to viral and bacterial illness in public spaces); 14-15 ([a]ny child

with neurological impairment is at high risk for worsened feeding related issues in the post op

period and problems related to poor wound healing); Griffin Decl. 30 (describing how

[f]amily separation and detention following a surgical procedure on a child with a physical and

cognitive disability is particularly harmful in light of the specialized challenges of pain

management, wound care, and the need to adapt ongoing therapy).

75. R.M.H.s family has been severely impacted by her arrest and detention as well. Ms. De

La Cruz and R.M.H.s father have been distraught since agents first threatened R.M.H. at the

checkpoint and began following her. Ms. De La Cruz has been unable to see her daughter,

provide her with care, feed her, or simply hold her during this frightening time.

76. Ms. De La Cruz cannot sleep. She often stays up until 4 AM, nervous and stressed about

her daughters future. She just wants her back. She cannot talk about R.M.H. without breaking

down in tears. Her heart is broken.

77. R.M.H.s sisters are also suffering without her. One of her sisters calls out for R.M.H. in

the middle of the night while she sleeps. This has been a nightmare for them. Their family has

been torn apart.

LEGAL BACKGROUND

78. Defendants authority to detain minors who are facing possible removal is proscribed by

the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (HSA), the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims

17
Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (TVPRA), and the Flores Consent Decree. Under the

HSA, an unaccompanied child is defined as a child under the age of 18 with no lawful status in

the United States, and with respect to whom (i) there is no parent or legal guardian in the United

States; or (ii) no parent or legal guardian in the United States is available to provide care and

physical custody. 6 U.S.C. 279(g)(2).

79. The HSA transferred responsibility for detained unaccompanied children from the

former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to the Department of Health and Human

Services, of which ORR is a part. 6 U.S.C. 279(b)(1)(A).

80. The Flores Consent Decree applies to all children apprehended by the U.S. Department

of Homeland Security (DHS) and placed in detention, whether or not they are

unaccompanied. 10 Flores Consent Decree 1, 4, 10, Case No. CV 85-4544-RJK(Px) (C.D.

Cal. Jan. 17, 1997) (attached as Exh. A) (providing that the agreement covers all minors who

are detained in the legal custody of the INS); see also Flores v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 898, 905-06

(9th Cir. 2016).

81. Paragraph 11 of the Flores Consent Decree requires that the government place a minor in

the least restrictive setting appropriate to the minors age and special needs . . . . Flores 11.

Moreover,

[w]here the [agency] determines that the detention of the minor is not required
either to secure his or her timely appearance before the [agency] or the

10
Flores binds the INS and the Department of Justice, as well as their agents, employees,
contractors, and/or successors in office. The INSs powers over immigration custody generally
were transferred to DHS in 2002. Homeland Security Act 402, Pub. L. 107-296 (H.R. 5005), 6
U.S.C. 202. Immigration custody of unaccompanied children was vested with ORR, where
these responsibilities remain today. Id. 279(a); Bunikyte v. Chertoff, 2007 WL 1074070, at *2
(W.D. Tex. 2007). Moreover, the Homeland Security Act includes explicit savings provisions
specifying that the Flores Consent Decree remains in effect as to the agencies inheriting the INS
former responsibilities. See Pub. L. 107-296 462(f)(2), 1512(a)(1), 1512(c).
18
 immigration court, or to ensure the minors safety or that of others, the [agency]
shall release a minor from its custody without unnecessary delay . . . .
Flores 14. Flores establishes a preference for release to a parent, legal guardian, adult

relative or an adult individual or entity designated by the parent or legal guardian as

capable and willing to care for the minors well-being, over placement in a licensed

facility or release to another entity. Id.

82. Moreover, the Flores Consent Decree prohibits the government from holding minors in a

secure DHS or DHS-run detention facility unless the minor meets a set of specific criteria related

to certain criminal violations or safety concerns. See Flores 21.

83. R.M.H. does not meet the criteria under Flores for detention in a secure detention facility.

CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Violation of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and William Wilberforce Trafficking
Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008
Defendants Lack of Statutory Authority to Transfer and Detain R.M.H. in ORR Custody

84. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in all preceding paragraphs

as though fully set forth herein.

85. Defendant CBP separated R.M.H. from her cousin and prevented her return to her parents

when it apprehended R.M.H. and transferred her to ORR custody as an unaccompanied child.

86. Defendant ORR continues to separate R.M.H. from her parents, cousin, and other family

members by continuing to detain her.

87. Defendants authority to detain minors who are facing possible removal is proscribed by

the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (HSA) and the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims

Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (TVPRA). The HSA provides ORR with the authority

19
to detain unaccompanied children. 6 U.S.C. 279(g)(2). The TVPRA authorizes federal

agencies like CBP to transfer unaccompanied children into ORR custody. 8 U.S.C.

1232(b)(1) & (b)(3).

88. The HSA and the TVPRA do not authorize the federal government to knowingly and

forcibly separate a child from parents in the United States who were already providing her with

care and physical custody.

89. At the time of R.M.H.s apprehension and transfer to ORR custody, both CBP and ORR

knew that she was living in the United States under the care and custody of her parents, who

were available to provide care and custody of her. See 6 U.S.C. 279(g)(2).

90. R.M.H. is not and has never been an unaccompanied child.

91. Defendant ORR has acted unlawfully by keeping R.M.N. in its custody despite knowing

that she was not an unaccompanied child under the relevant statutes.

92. ORR lacks any legal authority to keep R.M.H. in its custody.

SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Violation of Flores Consent Decree

93. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in all preceding paragraphs as

though fully set forth herein.

94. Plaintiffs seek the Courts review and an order to remedy violations of R.M.H.s rights

under the Flores Consent Decree pursuant to Paragraph 24B of the Consent Decree (attached as

Exh. A). Paragraph 24B provides that [a]ny minor who disagrees with the [agencys]

determination to place that minor in a particular type of facility . . . may seek judicial review in

any United States District Court with jurisdiction and venue over the matter to challenge that

placement determination . . . .

20
95. Defendants have violated and continue to violate R.M.H.s rights under the following

paragraphs of the Flores Consent Decree:

Paragraph 11: requiring the government to place a minor in the least restrictive
setting appropriate to the minors age and special needs . . . .

Paragraph 14: requiring that the government release a minor to the minors parent
unless the detention of the minor is . . . required either to secure his or her timely
appearance before the INS or the immigration court, or to ensure the minors
safety or that of others.

96. Defendants CBP and ORR have violated Paragraphs 11 and 14 of the Flores Consent

Decree by transferring R.M.H. to and detaining R.M.H. at an ORR-contracted shelter, rather than

releasing her immediately to her parents or another family member.

THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Violation of the Right to Family Integrity

97. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in all preceding paragraphs

as though fully set forth herein.

98. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that no person . . . shall be

deprived of . . . liberty . . . without due process of law. U.S. Const., amend. V.

99. Plaintiffs have a fundamental and reciprocal liberty interest in family integrity, which is

protected by both substantive and procedural due process.

100. R.M.H. has been in the care and custody of her mother since she was born.

101. At no point have Defendants found that R.M.H.s mother is unfit to care for her. Nor did

Defendants provide a prompt hearing to determine the fitness of R.M.H.s mother prior to

R.M.H.s arrest, transfer, and detention.

102. By transferring and detaining R.M.H. in ORR custody, without any hearing to determine

the ability of her mother to provide for her care and custody, Defendants have deprived R.M.H.

21
of the care of her mother, Ms. De La Cruz, and Ms. De La Cruzs freedom to provide such care,

in violation of their fundamental due process rights.

FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Arbitrary Detention

103. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in all preceding paragraphs

as though fully set forth herein.

104. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that no person . . . shall be

deprived of . . . liberty . . . without due process of law. U.S. Const., amend. V.

105. The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment permits civil detention of individuals

only where it is reasonably related to the governments interests in preventing flight risk or

protecting the community from danger.

106. R.M.H. is neither a flight risk nor does she pose a danger to public safety. She is a 10-

year old child with serious medical needs who has lived in a stable home with her family her

entire life.

107. For these reasons, R.M.H.s continued detention violates the Due Process Clause.

FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Violation of Immigration and Nationality Act
Unlawful Warrantless Arrest

108. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth

herein.

109. The Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1357(a)(2), limits Defendants

warrantless arrest authority to situations where there is probable cause of removability and the

person is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for [her] arrest. Id.

22
110. R.M.H. was detained by Border Patrol agents without a warrant and without any

determination that she was likely to escape.

111. R.M.H. was not a flight risk. She is 10 years old, has cerebral palsy, and at the time of her

arrest was incapacitated while in the process of seeking necessary medical care.

112. By arresting R.M.H., Defendants took away her liberty in violation of 8 U.S.C.

1357(a)(2) and without any lawful authority. She continues to be detained without any lawful

authority.

SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Violation of Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 794
Discrimination in Federal Programs or Activities

113. Plaintiffs incorporate the allegations of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth

herein.

114. DHS, CBP, and ORR are federal agencies and as such are covered entities for purposes

of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 794. As such, DHS, CBP, and ORR are

prohibited from discriminating against any qualified individual with a disability. 29 U.S.C.

794(a).

115. R.M.H. is, and was at all times pertinent hereto, a qualified individual with a disability.

116. R.M.H. has cerebral palsy, which is a disability under the Rehabilitation Act. See 28

C.F.R. 35.108(b)(2) & (d)(2)(iii)(G); 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(j)(3)(iii).

117. CBP violated Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 794, by discriminating

against R.M.H. because of her disability, and by failing to provide R.M.H. reasonable

accommodations of her disability.

118. At all times relevant hereto, DHS, CBP, and ORR were aware that R.M.H. has cerebral

palsy and as a result requires medical treatment and therapies. DHS, CBP and ORR were also

23
aware that R.M.H. lived with and was in the continuous legal and physical custody of her parents

in Laredo, Texas.

119. Despite knowing the foregoing facts, including that R.M.H. has cerebral palsy, CBP

officers took her into custody immediately upon her release from the hospital and transferred her

physically to ORR custody in San Antonio, where she remains to this day. CBP also took her

into custody notwithstanding her medical providers express recommendation that she be

released back to the custody of her family. ORR continued to hold her in its custody rather than

releasing her back to her family. As a result, DHS, CBP and ORR prevented R.M.H. from

receiving additional medical and disability-related care at the direction of her mother.

120. DHS, CBP, and ORR undertook the foregoing actions with full knowledge of, and with

deliberate indifference to, R.M.H.s disability.

121. As a direct result of CBP and ORRs actions, R.M.H. has suffered and continues to suffer

physical injury, emotional distress, and mental pain and anguish.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Wherefore, Plaintiffs respectively request that the Court:

1. Declare R.M.H.s transfer to and continued detention in ORR custody to be in violation

of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection

Reauthorization Act of 2008, the Flores Consent Decree, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Due

Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment;

2. Declare Plaintiffs arrest by CBP to be in violation of the Immigration and Nationality

Act, 8 U.S.C. 1357(a)(2), and the Rehabilitation Act;

3. Enjoin Defendants from detaining R.M.H. and order Defendants to release R.M.H. to the

custody of her parents immediately;

24
4. Award attorneys fees and costs; and

5. Grant any further relief that the Court deems proper.

DATED: October 31, 2017 /s/_Edgar Saldivar_________________

Michael K. T. Tan* Edgar Saldivar (Texas Bar No. 24038188)

Omar C. Jadwat* Trisha Trigilio (Texas Bar No. 24075179)
ACLU FOUNDATION Andre I. Segura*
IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT ACLU FOUNDATION OF TEXAS, INC.
125 Broad Street, 18th Floor 1500 McGowen Street, Suite 250
New York, NY 10004 Houston, TX 77004
Phone: (212) 519-7848 Phone: (713) 325-7011
Fax: (212) 549-2654 Fax: (713) 942-8966
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected]

Alina Das*
Stephen Kang* WASHINGTON SQUARE LEGAL
ACLU FOUNDATION SERVICES, INC.
IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT Immigrant Rights Clinic
39 Drumm Street New York University School of Law
San Francisco, CA 94111 245 Sullivan Street, 5th Floor
Phone: (415) 343-0770 New York, NY 10012
Fax: (415) 395-0950 Phone: (212) 998-6467
[email protected] Fax: (212) 995-4031
[email protected]

Ranjana Natarajan (Texas Bar No. 24071013)

University of Texas School of Law
Civil Rights Clinic
727 E. Dean Keeton Street
Austin TX 78705
Phone: 512-232-7222
Fax: 512-232-0800
[email protected]

*pro hac vice application forthcoming

25
 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Edgar Saldivar, hereby certify that on October 31, 2017 true and correct paper copies of this
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Complaint for Declaratory Injunctive Relief were
delivered to the Court and paper copies of all pleadings were mailed to all Defendants.

Dated: October 31, 2017 Respectfully Submitted:

/s/ Edgar Saldivar
Edgar Saldivar

26
Exhibit A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
 C.V. & BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

NAME: Rachel Jean Vandermeer, MD POSITION TITLE

Assistant Professor of Pediatrics
Pediatric Palliative Medicine

EDUCATION/TRAINING
DEGREE
INSTITUTION AND LOCATION MM/YY FIELD OF STUDY
(if applicable)

Saint Edwards University B.S.

summa cum 05/2007 Biochemistry
Austin Texas laude
University of Texas Medical Branch MD
06/2012 Medicine
Galveston Texas cum laude
The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical
School 06/2015 Pediatric Residency
Austin Texas
The University of Texas Health Science Hospice and Palliative
Center at San Antonio 06/2016 Medicine Fellowship,
San Antonio Texas Pediatric Track

A. Personal Statement
One hundred years ago children diedfrequently. Today we live in a society where childhood death is so
uncommon that pediatricians most often do not even know how to enter a dying childs room let alone broach
such a conversation with the family. My parents are pastors. I spent my entire childhood and adolescence in
the rooms of the dying, the broken, and the abandoned. My parents could rarely fix the problem, but simply
through presence and a few words of encouragement and validation, my parents did bring healing. As an
intern on the wards, I quickly learned that what my parents taught me was possibly more important that what I
learned in medical school. When my fellow residents and my attendings backed out of a babys room, I sat
down and simply listened to the crying mother. Four years later, I completed both a pediatric residency and a
fellowship in hospice and palliative medicine; I am now a pediatrician and a healer. Palliative medicine is the
opportunity to return to the sacred art of medicineto enter the intimacy of the private home and fulfill our roles
as witness.

My main clinical interest is the primary care of children with medical complexity, especially children with
neurologic impairment. I am currently an inpatient palliative physician but also spend time providing primary
care at a complex care clinic. The integration of palliative and primary care allows providers to guide families
on sometimes long and arduous, but always beautiful journeys. My research focuses on the moral function of
physicians in society and the doctor role as it relates to the physician understanding of self. At this time, I am
engaged in qualitative research analyzing recurrent themes found in brief physician narratives that have been
collected via survey. The goal of the project is to assess how physicians describe being a doctor and if that
description is moral in nature. I also participate in both adult and pediatric hospice and palliative medicine
fellow education and I am involved in pediatric palliative curriculum development.

B. Positions and Honors

Positions:_______________________________________________________________________________

07/2016-present Assistant Professor of Pediatrics

5
Honors:_________________________________________________________________________________

Saint Edwards University

2003-2007 Honors Program Student
2004 Saint Edwards University First Year Chemistry Award
2007 Honors Thesis Award
2007 Biochemistry Student of the Year

University of Texas Medical Branch

2011-2012 Honors Research Program Student
Graduated from program April 2012, summa cum laude
May 2012 Basic Sciences or Humanities Selectives Essay Award
Bestowed by the Osler Scholars of the John P. McGovern Academy of Oslerian Medicine

The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School

Aug 2012 Resident of the Month
April 2013 Resident of the Month
June 2015 Karen Teel Award of Excellence

C. Academic Contributions:

Research______________________________________________________________________
Saint Edwards University
2005-2007 The Origin Determination of Central Texas Chardonnay Wines with Gas Chromatograph-
Mass Spectrometry
Preceptor: Dr. Henry Altmiller
Funding: Welch Research Scholarship
Description: The purpose of this project was to both qualify and quantify the changes in
chemical composition of a range of wines from one or two regions in Texas using a simplified
extraction method and gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry. Although this research did not
identify a dependable lab extraction protocol, the research does suggest that 2-phenyl-ethanol
might be an origin indicator molecule.
Poster Presentation: American Chemical Society National Conference in Chicago Illinois, March
2007.

Fall 2006 Ha Elegiyah: Remembering the Holocaust with Yitzhak Katzenelson

Preceptor: Dr. Kelley Coblentz-Bautch
Description: Exploration of writer Yitzhak Katzenelsons last and paramount work, The Song of
the Murdered Jewish People, in the context of his lifes achievements as a Hebraist and poet.
Oral Presentation: Saint Edwards University Honors Thesis Symposium,
December 2006.

Spring 2007 Chiam N. Bialik: The Modern Jewish Mythmaker

Preceptor: Dr. Kelley Coblentz-Bautch
Description: Declared the national poet of the Jewish people, Chaim N. Bialik (1873-1934) was
a Hebraist who rejuvenated the culture of Judaism and considerably spurred the Jewish lingual
transition to Modern Hebrew. This essay specifically considers Bialiks interpretation of the
significance and role of Jewish myths in Judaism by focusing on his own analysis and use of
Jewish myths.
Poster Presentation: Saint Edwards University Symposium on Undergraduate Research and
Creative Expression, April 2007.

6
University of Texas Medical Branch
2011-2012 First, Do No Harm: the Jewish Physician during the Holocaust
Preceptor: Dr. Howard Brody
Description: A discussion highlighting the experiences of doctors interned at Auschwitz
and how an understanding of their role as physician in the death camps better
elucidates the physician identity.

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

2015-2016 Outpatient Pediatric Palliative Medicine: Complex Lives, Comprehensive Services
Advisors: Drs. Glen Medellin, Jennifer Healy, Sandra Sanchez-Reilly
Description: A demographic study that outlines the complexity, as well as technology
dependence, of patients enrolled in an outpatient pediatric palliative care clinic.
Poster Presentation: Center to Advance Palliative Care National Seminar 2015 in San Antonio
Texas, November 2015
Oral Presentation: 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice
and Palliative Nurses Association Annual Assembly in Chicago Illinois, March 2016

2016-Current A Doctor IsQualitative Analysis of Physician Narrative on "Being a Doctor.

Description: Various oaths and medical codes exist and over the last half century there has
been an increased focus on medical oath taking in terms of medical education. This study
attempts to compare practicing physicians self-description with more formally articulated oaths
currently in place. Physicians at various levels of training and years of practice are asked to
complete a brief online survey regarding self-identity. The responses will be analyzed in bulk to
identify core and recurrent themes related to physician professionalism and identity.

2017-Current Applying the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale to Pediatrics

Description: Currently no dyspnea scale exists for pediatric patients and adult dyspnea scales
cannot be easily adapted to preverbal or nonverbal children. The Respiratory Distress
Observation Scale (RDOS) has been validated in non-communicative adults. This is a
prospective chart review aimed at validating a modified RDOS in pediatric patients to better
assess and treat end of life symptoms.

Quality Improvement______________________________________________________________________
The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School
2013 Tracheostomy Shared Decision Making Module Development
Role: Team Member
The overall goal of this project was to implement a tracheostomy shared decision making tool at
Dell Childrens Medical Center. As a part of background data collection, my main role was
obtaining family narratives regarding tracheostomy procedure experiences, pre- and post-
tracheostomy.

2013- 2015 Spiritual Care Improvement Project

Role: Team Leader
A resident run project to facilitate value-centered discussions between physician and patient
and to encourage resident physicians to play a larger role in spiritual support.

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

2015-2016 Self Care Education Impact on Pediatric Resident Burnout
Role: Team Member
A fellow project to assess resident burnout with a burnout assessment scale both before and
after self-care education and intervention.

7
2017-Current Child Life Involvement in Adult Palliative Care Consultation Service
Role: Team Leader
A project aimed at improving adult palliative patients child family members access to
developmentally appropriate anticipatory guidance regarding death and dying as well as
bereavement support.

Presentations____________________________________________________________________________
Jan 2016 Management of the Dying Child
UTHSCSA Pediatric Grand Rounds

Feb 2016 Outpatient Pediatric Palliative Medicine: Complex Lives, Comprehensive Services
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Annual Assembly 2016

May 2016 Inpatient Pediatric Palliative Care

University Hospital Primary Palliative Care Education Series

July 2016 Better Palliative Care is Good Primary Care: The Palliative Care Medical Home
Pedi Hope 2016

Oct 2016 Surrogate Decision Making

UTHSCSA Geriatric Grand Rounds

Nov 2016 Making Critical and Emergency Medical Decisions for Children in Foster Care
-Panel member
2016 Child Welfare Judges Conference

Jan 2017 Hello, Goodbye and I love You: Perinatal Palliative Care
UTHSCSA Geriatric Grand Rounds

July 2017 Border Medicine in our Hospitals: Providing Palliative and Complex Care for the Undocumented
Patient Population
Pedi Hope 2017

Aug 2017 Surrogate Decision Making

San Antonio Geriatric and Palliative Education Symposium 2017

Oct 2017 Caring For Immigrant Children: Opportunities and Challenges

Texas Pediatric Society

Oct 2017 The Shared Patient, Family and Physician Journey: A Shared Decision Making Model
University Hospital Primary Palliative Care Education Series

Oct 2017 Border Medicine in our Hospitals: Providing Palliative and Complex Care for the Undocumented
Patient Population
UTHSCSA Pediatric Grand Rounds

Upcoming Presentations

March 2018 When Daddy is Dying: Facilitating Family Centered Adult Goals of Care Discussions
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Annual Assembly 2018

8
Other Responsibilities_____________________________________________________________________

Fall 2016-present University of Texas Health and Science Center at San Antonio Medical School
Admissions Committee
-Interview medical school applicants on a weekly basis and review applicants with the
committee

9
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

R.M.H. et al., Case No.

Plaintiffs-Petitioners, DECLARATION OF DR. MARSHA

GRIFFIN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-
vs. PETITIONERS' PETITION FOR A WRIT
OF HABEAS CORPUS AND COMPLAINT
SCOTT LLOYD et al., FOR DECLARATORY AND INJfINCTIVE
RELIEF AND IN SUPPORT OF
Defendants-Respondents. PLAINTIFFS.PETITIONERS'
EMERGENCY MOTION FOR A
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

DECLARATION OF DR. MARSHA GRIFFIN

I, Dr. Marsha Griffin, declare and state the following:

1. My name is-Marsha Griffin. I am a practicing pediatrician and the Directgr of the

Division of Child and Family Health at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
School of Medicine. I also serve as co-founder and Director of Community fo.r Children,
Iniorporated, a nonpro fit organization that addresses the needs for compassionate care of
children in South Texas.

2. I received my medical degree from the University of Texas Health Science Center at San
Antonio (UTHSCSA) in 2003 and completed my residency in general pediatrics at
Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, and UTHSCA in 2006. Prior my medical
career, I completed graduate studies in the theo"logy of social justice at United
Theological Seminary in New Brighton, Minnesota. A full C.V. is attached to this
declaration.

3. My area of expertise is in general pediatrics, which includes the care and coordination of
treatment for children with neurological and developmental disabilities like cerebral
palsy. These children are considered'omedically complex" requiring multiple sub-
spegialists and a general pediatrician, who knows the family and patient's support system
well and the intricate history of the child, and who can assist the family in care
coordination. In the past, I have made home visits to follow up with these children to
lessen the disruption and complexity of transporting these often medically fragile
children.
 4. I submit this declaration to describe the impact of cerebralpalsy on children, the role of
family in coordinating the necessary treatment and medical care of this disability, and the
harms associated with family separation and detention of a child with cerebral palsy.

Background Cerebral Palsv. Prognoses" and Treatment

5. Cerebral palsy refers to a group of permanent neurological disorders of movement caused

by a brain injury or malformation that occurs prior, during, or soon after birth. Cerebral
palsy is the most common pervasive motor deficiency among children in the United
States.

6. Depending on the nature of the injury and subsequent development of the brain, a child
with cerebral palsy may face a range of impairment to gross and fine motor functioning;
cognitive functioning; and speech, vision, and auditory development. As a child
develops, cerebral palsy may be associated with spinal and muscular growth deformities,
seizure disorders, and other medical conditions related to or complicated by the
underlying neurological disorder.

7. Cerebral palsy often has a substantial impact on a child's life skills at every stage of
development, depending on its severity. Children with cerebral palsy miss or experience
significant delays in major development milestones. For example, cerebral palsy is often
diagnosed well after birth when a child demonstrates an inability to sit up on her own or
crawl at the expected age range for those skills. These challenges may continue to impact
the child throughout her life, affecting her mobility, ability to feed or dress herself,
communication, leaming, and-g,thr life skills

8. Ceqebral palsy is considered a non-progressive disorder because the underlying brain

injury itself does riot worsen over time. However, the impact of the brain injury-
development deficiencies in motor and cognitive functioning, and related medical
conditions-worsens significantly if left untreated. For example, some children with
untreated cerebral palsy may face increased spasticity (contraction of the muscles) and
chronic pain in their affected limbs as they grow over time. Periods of rapid growth
(growth spurts) often exacerbate these problems as cerebral palsy may cause bone growth
to outmatch the growth of certain muscles or tendons in the body, requiring surgical
intervention. Untreated, a child with cerebral palsy will generally lose the motor
functioning skills she once had and face a range of physical deformities and chronic pain
that will impair her ability to overcome the underlying neurological injury.

9. Proper treatment of cerebral palsy may include, but is not limited to, consistent and
specialized pediatric physical, occupational, speech, educational/cognitive, and
recreational therapy.

10. Pediatric physical therapy involves development of gross motor skills, overall strength
and endurance, balance and coordination, motor control and planning, pain relief,
flexibility, gait mechanics and orthotics training.
11. Pediatric occupational therapy involves development of fine motor skills, sensory
integration, cognitive endurance, hand firnction, visual-spatial awareness, hand-eye
coordination, and development of life skills.

12.Pediatric speech therapy involves the promotion of expressive and receptive speech,
which may be hampered in children with cerebral palsy by injuries to the speech centers
of the brain and/or by the resulting physical oral weakness that may result over time due
to the injury.

13. Educational/cognitive therapy involves specialized therapy to develop a child's cognitive

skills, including a child's learning needs as well as general sequencing abilities, analysis,
and executive planning functions. Not every child with cerebral palsy will also have a
resulting cognitive disability, but those who do require educational/cognitive therapy to
help with intellectual development.

14. Recreational therapy (play therapy) often incorporates many of these skills in play,
including the inclusion of targeted games and interactive activities at home or at the
playground or gym. Because therapy for cerebral palsy should begin as soon as cerebral
palsy is suspected, and continued throughout the child's grown and development,
recreational therapy is particularly important for young children who are unable to
tolerate other forms of therapy.

15. In addition to therapy, many children with cerebral palsy also require assistive devices,
such as orthotics and other braces. These assistive devices are often necessary not only to
improve mobility"but to prevenl, fleformities that arise following growth spurls in
childhood.

16. As;;t6d above, mddications (particularly for the treatment of spasticity or related
ailments such as seizure disorders) and surgical procedures may also be required to
correct misalignments and muscular problems as a child with cerebral palsy develops.
Lack of regular therapy will increase the need for these interventions. Development
pediatricians, pediatric physiatrists, pediatric neurologists, and pediatric surgeons all play
a role in monitoring development of children with cerebral palsy and determining when
and what interventions are necessary.

17. Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), children with cerebral
palsy are generally provided with educational accommodations, special education, and/or
related services (which can include physical, occupational, and speech therapy) when
they enter an educational setting. These services are critical to ensuring that children
with cerebral palsy receive an appropriate education. These services are often school-
based and thus schools provides an important setting by which children receive the
therapy they need to ensure age-appropriate development and milestones are reached.
Role of Family Members in the Treatment and Care of Children with Cerebral Palsv

18. Access to appropriate doctors, therapists, and teachers thus all play a critical role in the
care of children with cerebral palsy. But no individual plays a greater role in the
treatment of cerebral palsy than the parent or guardian of the child. Regular therapy
sessions at school or in hospital sessions provide importance guidance and opportunities
for skills building and learning in children, but the efficacy of these sessions depends on
carry-over to daily activities and play at home. Only the parent or guardian of a child can
ensure that the child continues the lessons of therapy at home.

19. Congress acknowledged this fact by ensuring the availability of "early intervention"
programs for children through the IDEA, which provides parents and guardians with
access and training on how to incorporate therapy into their day-to-day care and child-
rearing activities. When a child is first diagnosed with development delays, early
intervention programs ensure that children not only receive necessary therapeutic
services, but also that the parents learn how to carry over those services in their daily
caretaking activities. Parents and guardians are encouraged to involve all family
members who interact with the child to adopt those skills. Siblings and cousins often play
a siguificant role in encouraging and participating in therapeutic activities with children
' who have cerebral palsy.

20. Parents and guardians also play aparticularly important role in helping children with
cerebral palsy manage their physical environments and adapt to necessary life skills.
Because children with cerebral palsy experience limitations in gross and fine motor skills
affecting one or more limbs of tbgirlody, they often rely on parents to help them learn to
feed and dress themselves, manage doors and bathrooms and other physical spaces, and
prepqp for school and after-school activities. Because a majority of children with
cerebrafpalsy experlence chronic pain, parents and guardians are also critical to:helping
their children with daily pain management, often through stretching, massage, and other
forms of care. Parents and guardians are necessary partners to a child's ability to fulfill
her goals for independence, and one-on-one attention is a critical part ofthis process.

21. Parents and guardians also play a critical role in managing the medical and professional
therapeutic care of a child with cerebral palsy. Parents and guardians must schedule
regular appointmenls with development specialists, therapists, evaluators, and orthotists
to ensure regular and consistent care for their children. Each appointment involves
follow-up care and attention that only a parent can provide.

22.Parcnts and guardians are also in the best position to monitor the emotional health of their
children with cerebral palsy. Emotional distress, depression, and other psychological
harms can have a particularly acute impact on children with cerebral palsy, impairing
their ability to follow through on necessary therapeutic interventions.

23. Because of the important role that parents and guardians play in the oare of children with
cerebral palsy, it is unsurprising that numerous studies have demonstrated that active
family involvement has a positive impact on outcomes for children with cerebral palsy.
Harms of Familv Separation and Detention on Children with Cerebral Palsy

24.ltis impossible to overstate the harms of separating a childwith cerebral palsy from her
family. Most children with cerebral palsy have a heightened fear of separation and
anxiety in new situations and these can be expressed in a vast variety of behaviors, which
can be misinterpreted. The children often have limited ability to express their pain and
fears. A medical provider unfamiliar with her history may over prescribe or under
prescribe pain medication, or may misguidedly prescribe psychotropic medications to
calm a child, who is actually having severe pain. Having a supportive family, who can
recognize and correctly interpret the child's behavior, can alleviate these fears and
anxieties through known specific calming techniques for their child. Separating a child
with post-surgical pain can intensiff the anxieties and fears and could potentially lead to
devastating consequences.

25. Family separation presents a significant harm to the physical wellbeing of a child with
cerebral palsy. When a child with cerebral palsy loses her or primary caretaker, she loses
the person who is most familiar with and who generally coordinates her medical care and
therapy appointments. This is the individual who understand what types of therapy are
most effective for this child, how to provide that therapy in a home setting, when the
child may be experiencing chronic pain, how to soothe the child and when to bring the
child to the attention of medical professions. Because cerebral palsy affects a child's
everyday life functions, being forcibly deprived of one's primary caretaker with no
transition plan in place can result in immediate physical harm to the child and, over time,
will have a-lasti4g adverse imp?c{ on her condition.

26. Fagily separation causes significant emotional hardship and stress upon both child and
parent, immediately undermining the emotional wellbeing of the child and parent and
causing long-term adverse impacts on the family as a whole. Emotional hardship and
stress can cause negative impacts on a child's ability to manage necessary therapy and to
cope with the chronic pain and limitations that come with cerebral palsy. These emotional
stressors are no doubt compounded by being placed in restrictive setting without a loved
one there.

2T.Detention of children with cerebral palsy is also problematic because it separates the
child from the two other settings---educational and medical/therapeutic-where she has
individuals who are familiar with her specialized needs and are able to help ensure her
proper development.

28. Schools are required by law to provide reasonable accommodations to children with
disabilities along with related services to ensure a free and appropriate education.
Children typically receive an individualized mandate speci$ing how an educational
setting will provide the necessary education and therapeutic needs in the school setting.
Thrusting a child with a disability into a restrictive setting managed by individuals who
are unfamiliar with her specific needs places her at great risk of physical, educational,
 and emotional injury-precisely the problems an individualized mandate is designed to
avoid.

29.The treatment of cerebral palsy generally requires a team approach-requiring doctors

who are familiar not only with the child's current stage of development but with what has
and has not worked in the past to help the child manage her disability and related
complications. Depriving a child with cerebral palsy of access to medical professionals
who are familiar with her medical history puts her health at risk.

30. Family separation and detention following a surgical procedure on a child with a physical
and cognitive disability is particularly harmful. Children who experience surgery are
often in a precarious physical and emotional state, and require the care of their family
members and medical team to ensure a proper recovery. Children with cerebral palsy may
have to experience multiple surgeries in their lifetime, and depending on the severity of
their motor and cognitive limitations, are particularly dependent on family to ensure care
for wounds and the prevention of injury following a surgical intervention. Complications
from surgeries may also impair a child's ability to follow through on necessary therapies
she would usually have as treatment for her cerebral palsy, requiring the intervention of
family and medical professions to adapt those treatments as necessary.

Dated: October 30,2017

Brownsville, Texas
 CURRICULUM VITAE

Marsha R. Griffin, MD, FAAP

University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine
Department of Pediatrics
2102 Treasure Hills Blvd, Harlingen, Texas 78550
[email protected]
956-296-1537 (office); 956-832-8255 (cell)

EDUCATION

M.D. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA) May 2003
School of Medicine, San Antonio, TX

United Theological Seminary, graduate studies in Social Justice Issues 19951998

New Brighton, MN

B.A. University of Texas Pan American, Psychology/Biology May 1976

Edinburg, TX

Southwestern University, Pre-Med/Biology 1969-1970

Georgetown, TX

Texas Womans University, Communication 1968-1969

Denton, TX

RESIDENCY TRAINING

Pediatric Resident University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 2005-2006
San Antonio, TX
Pediatric Resident Baylor College of Medicine 2004-2005
Houston, TX
Pediatric Internship Baylor College of Medicine 2003-2004
Houston, TX

CURRENT ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS

Professor/Clinical Department of Pediatrics

University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine 2016-present

Director Division of Child and Family Health

Department of Pediatrics
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine 2016-present

Director Community for Children: At the Border and Beyond 2006-present

International Elective in Community Pediatrics,
Department of Pediatrics
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 2006-2016
Regional Academic Health Center

Clinical Assistant Department of Pediatrics 20062013

Professor University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Regional Academic Health Center

7
Adjunct Associate Department of Pediatrics 2013-2016
Professor University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Regional Academic Health Center

Adjunct Doctoral Department of Counseling, Leadership, Adult Education, and School 2015-present
Faculty Psychology in the College of Education, Texas State University

PREVIOUS NON-ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS

General Pediatrician Brownsville Community Health Center (BCHC) 2006-2016

Chief of Pediatrics Brownsville, TX 2011-2016

Details: Responsible for the fiscal management, procurement of supplies, and oversight of all medical staff (including four
pediatricians, nurse practioner, physician assistant, and eight certified medical assistants). Provided both outpatient and inpatient care
for children in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas, one of the most medically underserved regions of the United States.
Approximately 70% of the children in the BCHC clinic are indigent patients. Another 30% receive Medicaid or SCHIP.
Approximately 90% of my patients parents speak only Spanish. Appointed as medical director for BCHC Campus Care Clinic in
April 2010, serving the indigent students in the local independent school district. Prior to appointment as Chief of Pediatrics in 2011,
served as a general pediatrician on the staff of BCHC, beginning in 2006. In 2011, created the These Bones Wont Heal: the Fracture
Fund and solicited funds to provide on-going funding for indigent patients to cover the cost of orthopedic care for simple fractures.
Resigned as Chief of Pediatrics in 2014 to devote time to special projects focusing on immigration and advocacy for human rights.

Co-Founder & MedicoLegal Partnership for Children/RioGrande Valley (MLPC) 2007-2016

Medical Director Brownsville Community Health Center/Brownsville, TX
Details: Initiated and organized the development of the first two operational medical-legal partnerships (MLP) in Texas, located in
San Antonio and Brownsville. As Medical Director of MedicoLegal Partnership for Children Rio Grande Valley. Maintain the
partnership between Brownsville Community Health Center and Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Inc. and promote MLP among all the
physicians and staff of the clinic. Participate in MLP activities on the state and national level, including service to the medical
advisory committee for the National Center for Medical Legal Partnership.

TEACHING

Director Community for Children: At the Border and Beyond 09/2006-present

Details: Created a 4-week elective rotation for medical students and residents, designed as the core international health and
community pediatrics curriculum for the Department of Pediatrics focused on the border of Mexico and Texas, UTHSCSA. The
curriculum has eight primary objectives: rights of the child; social determinants of disease and health; clinical care in resource-poor
regions; the impact of poverty, violence and immigration; advocacy; cultural humility; fostering a culture of compassion among
physicians and professional development. The CfC curriculum is addressed through didactics, community outreach, advocacy
projects, tailored Spanish-language classes, guided reflection and individual development counseling. The rotation is offered two
times per year with an average of 16 students and residents annually. Working with the community based organizations, the students
and residents expand the organizations outreach, research and advocacy within the local community.

Clinical Adjunct Associate Professor Third-Year Pediatric Clerkship 09/2006-2016

Details: Hands-on and didactic instruction for pediatric third- year medical students in pediatric patient care issues. Train three to four
students each academic semester.

RECENT HONORS
2015 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Special Achievement Award
2015 Texas Pediatric Societys Central American Refugee Humanitarian Award
2014 Migrant Health Network 30 Clinicians Making a Difference Presented to clinicians from the U.S. and abroad who have
dedicated their lives to migrant health
2012 American Academy of Pediatrics Local Heroes Award Presented at the AAP Annual Meeting, New Orleans
2011 White House Initiative Champions of Change Awarded to Brownsville Community Health Center/Texas RioGrande Legal
Aid for Medical-Legal Partnership

8
RECENT GRANTS
Proctor and Gamble - $9,960 01/01/17-12/31/17
Community for Children A Program for Physicians-in-Training Developing Leaders Capable of Creating Positive Systemic
Change
Details: Co-authored grant to support leadership development for medical trainees participating in Community for Children (CforC).
The grant will fund travel of nine medical students and residents to present their advocacy work at national conferences. In addition,
one outstanding fellow will receive intensive mentoring from CforC faculty, accompanying them to national meetings addressing
human rights issues, enabling this fellow to dialogue with the highest levels of American Academy of Pediatrics leadership.
Information about Community for Children is available at www.communityforchildren.org.

American Academy of Pediatrics/CATCH Implementation Grant - $12,000 04/2013-03/2014

Details: Co-authored grant and was one of 13 proposals of 108 applications funded. Grant was to implement Bikes for Tikes a
monthly health promotion program supervising bicycle rides along the City of Brownsville's new Hike & Bike trails, designed for
children (6-12 yrs) and their families. Funds were used to purchase bicycles for the project and integrated into the Citys recreation
department. Helmets were donated.

American Academy of Pediatrics- Mentorship and Technical Assistance Grant; $1,855 11/2010-11/2011
Details: Co-authored grant to obtain funds to support participation of professional meeting facilitator/evaluator at the inaugural
meeting of Texas MLP.

American Academy of Pediatrics, 2007 CATCH Residency Training Funds; $10,000 03/2007-01/2009
Details: Co-Principal Investigator for development, implementation, and evaluation of curriculum for Community for Children
International Elective.

SELECT PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

Fabreau G, Griffin M, Kimball SL, Marlin RP, Rashid M, Scales D, Shah SK, (2017 June) Advocating for Change and Responding to
Political Shifts: Policy Implications of the Recent Canadian and U.S. Elections. North American Refugee Health Conference,
Toronto, Canada.

Linton JM, Griffin M, Shapiro AJ, Childrens Health in Crisis: Sustaining Short- and Long-Term Health of Unaccompanied Children
Seeking Safe Haven. Children & Youth Services Review Unaccompanied Children, pending publication.

Griffin M, (2017 March) Undocumented Immigrant Children: Supporting their Health and Development. Grand Rounds Presentation,
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

Livingston JM, Griffin M, Developing professional identities and fostering resilience in medical students and residents:
Transformative learning on the Texas-Mexico border. In T. Carter, C. Boden-McGill, & K. Peno (Eds.), Transformative learning in
professional contexts: Building resilient professional identities for work-based practice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing,
pending publication.

Linton JM, Griffin M, Shapiro AJ, AAP COUNCIL ON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS. Detention of Immigrant Children. Pediatrics.
2017; 139(5): e20170483.

Linton JM, Griffin M, Shapiro AJ. AAP policy says no child should be in detention centers or separated from parents. AAP News,
March 13, 2017.

Griffin M, Linton JM. Crossing into a deeper understanding of care for immigrant patients. AAP Voices Blog. August 22, 2016.

Griffin M, (2016 October) Undocumented Immigrant Children: Supporting Their Health and Development. Presidential Plenary
Presentation at the American Academy of Pediatrics Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.

Griffin, M., Seifert, M., Son, M, Livingston, J., & Fisch, S. (2015 October). Childrens Lives on the Texas/Mexico Border: A
Pediatrician-led Community Response to Toxic Stress. Poster presentation at AAP Annual Conference, Washington, DC.

Griffin, M., (2015 March) Immigration and the Militarization of the Texas/Mexico border: Its effect on the health of children and
families. Presentation to medical students from Stritch School of Medicine Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL.

9
Griffin, M., (2015 March) Immigration and the Militarization of the Texas/Mexico border: A Violation of Human Rights. Presentation
to law students from Loyola University Chicago School of Law, Brownsville, TX.

Griffin, M., (2015 March) Childrens Lives on the Border: The Effect of Chronic Stress on Children in our School: A Resource Guide
for Texas School Nurse Organization. Presentation to Texas School Nurse Organization Region One, Edinburg, TX.

Livingston, J., Griffin, M., Brooks, A., Son, M., Monserrat, C (2014). Transforming privilege in marginal spaces: Teaching medical
students on the Texas-Mexico Border. In A. Nicolaides, & D. Holt (Eds.), Spaces of transformation and transformation of spaces:
Proceedings from the XI International Conference on Transformative Learning, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York
City, (pp. 347-354). Athens, GA: University of Georgia.

Livingston, J., Griffin, M., Brooks, A., Monserrat, C., & Son, M. (2014 October). Transforming privilege in marginal spaces:
Teaching medical students on the Texas/Mexico border. Paper presented at the XI International Transformative Learning Conference,
Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City.

Griffin, M., Son, M., & Shapleigh, E. (2014). Childrens lives on the border. Pediatrics, 133(5), e1118-e1120.

Griffin, M., & Seifert, M. (2014 February). Childrens lives on the border: Strategic doing. Summit meeting and workshops for 50
representatives from community-based organizations, legal institutions, schools, churches, and synagogue, UTHSCSA Regional
Academic Health Center/Community for Children, Harlingen Cultural Arts Center, Harlingen, TX.

Livingston, J., Griffin, M., Monserrat, C., & Coryell, J. (2013 November). Preparing compassionate leaders: A novel approach in
medical education. Paper presented at American Association for Adult and Continuing Education, Lexington, KY.

Griffin, M., Son, M., Livingston, J., & Monserrat, C. (2012 October). Advocacy for childrens health and social justice on the
Texas/Mexico border. Poster presented at the AAP Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

Griffin, M. (2012 February). Social justice and medicine: Opportunities and challenges along the border. Presentation to the
National Board of Directors, Migrant Health Promotion, February 2012, Weslaco, TX.

Griffin, M. (2012 January). Roots of advocacy: Call to service among the poor. Presentation to Union Theological Seminary
graduate students, Brownsville, TX.

Griffin, M. (2011 October). Top five things a woman needs to know about health care. Panel discussion including female physicians
and lawyers about important legal issues impacting women and family health care, Regional Academic Health Center, UTHSCSA,
Harlingen, TX.

Griffin, M., Livingston, J., Cass, A., Gutnik, L., & Stroik, J. (2011 July). Community-based advocacy training: Strategies and tools
for preparing pediatricians to meet the future. Poster presentation at AAP Future of Pediatrics Conference, Chicago, IL.

Griffin, M., Son, M., Fisch, S., Livingston, J., Monserrat, C., & Seifert, M. (2009 February). Community for Children: At the border
and beyond. Workshop presentation at the AAP Future of Pediatrics Conference, Anaheim, CA.

SERVICE -Medical

Board Member, Migrant Clinician Network 2016-present

Member, Medical Advisory Committee, National Center for Medical Legal
Partnership 2010-2011
Member, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2003-present
Member, AAP Council on Community Pediatrics 2010-present
Member, AAP Special Interest Group on International Medicine 2010-present
Member, AAP Special Interest Group on Immigrant Child Health 2014-present
Co-Chair, AAP Special Interest Group on Immigrant Child Health 2015-present
Member, Texas Pediatric Society 2006-present

Fluent in English, Proficient in Spanish

10