Topic 4 Petrophysics - Part 4
Topic 4 Petrophysics - Part 4
Dandekar
1
LESSON OUTCOME
3.1 Permeability Concepts
3.2 Types of Permeability
1
Permeability Concept
Outcomes:
Permeability
API Code 27:
A measure of the capacity of the porous medium
to transmit fluids.
2
Mathematical Expression of Permeability
First introduced by Darcy in 1856
while investigating the flow of water
through sand filters for water
purification.
Q = KA h1
h2
L
Constant of proportionality and for
viscous fluids;
permeability
k
K=
viscosity
P
kA P
q= q
L A
L
A porous medium has 1 Darcy permeability when a single phase
fluid of 1 cp viscosity that completely saturates the pores, flows
under viscous flow conditions at a rate of 1 cm3/sec across 1 cm2
cross-sectional area under a pressure gradient of 1 atm/cm.
3
Darcys Law
For one-dimensional, linear, horizontal flow through a porous
medium, Darcys Law states that:
L
q
A
dx
Dimensions of Permeability
Darcys Equation Eq 3.1
Dimensions
Eq 3.2
k = L2
4
Types of Permeability
Absolute Permeability
Effective Permeability
Relative Permeability
Absolute Permeability
P
Flowing fluid is
100% saturating
the medium
q
A
L
kA P
q= Absolute
L permeability
5
Effective Permeability
P
More than one
fluid is saturating
the medium. Only
qg
one of them is qo
mobile (flowing) qw
A L
k i A P
qi = Effective
i L permeability
Relative Permeability
P
More than one
fluid is saturating
the medium. At
qg
least two of them qo
are mobile
(flowing)
qw
A L
k ri A P
qi = Relative k
i L permeability k ri
=
k
i
6
Relative Permeability
Two phase relative permeability behavior
kro krw
0 1
Sw
Anisotropic permeability
Impact of ordered deposition
7
Anisotropic permeability
Horizontal
permeabilities
can be affected
by the
deposition
process
Anisotropic permeability
Porosity is a
non directional
property
It is isotropic
8
Interaction between porosity & permeability
Porosity vs Permeability
Porosity is
independent of grain
size. Porosity is
generally unaffected
by grain size but
permeability
increases with
increasing grain size.
9
Porosity vs Permeability
The better sorted the sand, the
higher are both the porosity and
permeability.
Porosity vs Permeability
10
Permeability
From the Darcys Law equation, permeability is
defined
q
k=
A(dP / dx)
Basic linear and radial flow can be derived
General classification of permeability
Classification Permeability Range
Very Low < 1 mD
Low 1 10 mD
Medium 10 50 mD
Average 50 200 mD
Good 200 500 mD
Excellent > 500 mD
Averaging Permeability
Permeability is seldom uniform throughout a
reservoir
Thus it is necessary to determine an average value
of permeability
Averaging techniques available:
Arithmetic Average
Reciprocal / Harmonic Average
Geometric Average
Selection of technique should be based on the
geometry of the flow system
22
11
Arithmetic Average
Parallel Flow
h1
kA =
k h i i
k1
h2
h i
Q h3
k2
k3
Harmonic Average
Series Flow
kH =
L i
Q k1 k2 k3
L /k i i
L1 L2 L3
12
Geometric Average
Random Flow
1
( h1 h2
kG = k1 k 2 k3 .......
h3
) hi
Core analysis
Discrete measurement on small scale
Routine Core Analysis (RCA) and Special Core Analysis (SCAL)
Electrical and radioactive logs
Provide average response
Neutron, sonic, density log
Well Tests (for permeability)
13
Exercise
7 ft
15 ft
4 ft
27
Fluid Potential
h1 h2 ?
u= K 3.1
l
14
Fluid Potential
The pressure at any point in the
flow path
P = g (h z ) 3.2
Or alternatively;
P
hg = + gz 3.3
P
h = + z 3.4
g
Fluid Potential
If equation 3.4 is differentiated wrt x:
dh d P
= + z 3.5
dx dx g
Hubbert Potential is defined as:
P
= + gz 3.6
Or from equations 3.5 and 3.6;
d d P dh
= + gz = g 3.7
dx dx dx
15
Darcys Equation
Darcys equation in terms of heads;
q dh k dh
u= = constant = 3.8
A dl dx
Darcys equation in terms of Hubbert potential;
q k d
= 3.9
A dx
or;
q k d P
= + z 3.10
A dx g
Darcys Equation
or;
q k d
= (P + gz ) 3.11
A dx
For horizontal flow
d
(gz ) = 0 3.12
dx
and;
q k dP
= 3.13
A dx
16
Darcys Equation
General assumptions in Darcys Equation:
Steady State Flow
Laminar Flow
Only one phase is present, occupying 100% of
porosity
No reaction between fluid & rock
Homogenous rock
33
Darcys Equation
for Linear Horizontal Flow
q k dP q
= 3.13
A dx
Separating variables
A
q k
dx = dP 3.14
A P/L
q
L q P2 k
0 A dx = P1 dP 3.15
q
(L 0) = k (P2 P1 ) 3.16
A
17
Darcys Equation
for Linear Horizontal Flow
q
(L 0) = k (P1 P2 ) 3.17
A
finally;
kA(P1 P2 )
q= 3.18
L
Darcys Equation
for Linear Horizontal Flow
Darcys Equation in field units:
Measurements in the field often quoted in field units.
A conversion is required for compatibility with Darcy
equation
Flow rate, Q- bbl/day or cuft/day
Permeability, k darcy
Thickness, h feet
Pressure, P psia
Viscosity, centipoise
Radius, R feet
Length, L - feet
36
18
Example 1:
A cylindrical core sample with a length of 20 cm and a
diameter of 4 cm is subjected to a linear flow test with a fluid
of 2cp viscosity under a flow rate of 100 cm3/hour. If the
pressure drop within the core is 3 atm, what is the
permeability of the core?
Solution 1:
P
Darcys equation for
horizontal flow:
kA( P1 P2 )
q= q
L
A
Solving for permeability,
L
qL UNITS:
k=
A( P1 P2 ) k= Darcy A= cm2
q= cm3/sec = cp
P= psi L= cm
19
Solution 1:
P= 3 atm
qL
k=
A( P1 P2 ) q= 100 cm3/hr
22
A=
L= 20 cm
cc 1hr
100 (2cp )(20cm )
hr 3600 sec
k= = 0.0295darcy
(
2 2 cm 2 (3atm ) )
k = 29.5md
Darcys Equation
for Radial Flow
Darcys equation in any s direction;
q k d
= (P + gz ) 3.19 re
A ds rw
Pw Pe
Assuming no flow in z direction;
d
(gz ) = 0 3.20
ds
rw
Equation becomes;
re
q k dP
= 3.21
A ds h
20
Darcys Equation
for Radial Flow
One dimensional flow in r direction,
so by definition
re
ds = dr 3.22 rw
Pw Pe
Therefore equation 3.21 becomes
q k dP
=+ 3.23
A dr rw
Cross-sectional area to flow:
re
A = 2rh 3.24
h
Darcys Equation
for Radial Flow
Substituting equation 3.24 in equation 3.23
q k dP
=+ 3.25
2rh dr
Separating variable and integrating,
q re dr k Pe
2h rw
= dP 3.26
r Pw
21
Darcys Equation
for Radial Flow
And finally for radial flow:
2kh( Pe Pw )
q= 3.27
ln(re rw )
Permeability of Combination
Layers
Linear Flow
n
in Parallel Beds:
k h
j =1
j j
h1
k av = n 3.28
h
h2
j k1
j =1 h3
k2
k3
22
Permeability of Combination
Layers
Radial Flow
n
in Parallel Beds:
k h
j =1
j j rw
k av = n 3.29 re r1
h
j =1
j
h1
h2
k1
k2 qT
h3 k3
Permeability of Combination
Layers
Linear Flow in Serial Beds:
n
L
j =1
j
k av = 3.30
n Lj
k1 k2 k3
j =1 k j
L1 L2 L3
23
Permeability of Combination
Layers
k1
Radial Flow in Serial P1 r1
re
Beds: rw
Pw Pe
k2
General Darcy Equation for Radial
Flow:
2k av h(Pe Pw )
qT = q = 3.31
ln(re rw ) rw
For each layer: re r1
2k1h(Pe P1 ) k1 k2
q= 3.32 h
ln(re r1 ) qT
k1 k2
h
qT
24
Radial Flow in Serial Beds
Solving Equations 3.32 and 3.33 k1
for pressure difference;
P r
k2 1
(Pe P1 ) = qln(re r1 )
1 re
3.35 rw Pw Pe
2k1h
And,
(P1 Pw ) = qln(r1 rw ) rw
3.36 re r1
2k 2 h k1 k2
qT h
Substituting in equation 3.34;
1 ln(re r1 ) ln(r1 rw )
= + ln(re rw ) 3.39
k av k1 k2
or,
ln(re r1 ) ln(r1 rw )
k av = ln(re rw ) + 3.40
k1 k2
25
Radial Flow in Serial Beds
And average permeability for radial flow in serial beds
can be expressed as;
ln(re rw )
k av = 3.41
n ln(rj rj 1 )
j =1 kj
Example 2:
What is the equivalent permeability of four beds in series, having equal
formation thicknesses for a radial system if the radius of penetrating
well bore is 6 inches and the radius of effective drainage is 2000 ft?
(Assume bed 1 is adjacent to the well bore)
26
Solution 2:
Radial System:
ln(re rw )
k av = n ln(rj rj 1 )
j =1 kj
For the system given in example:
Solution 2:
ln(2000 0.5 )
k av =
ln(250 0.5 ) ln(500 250 ) ln(1000 500 ) ln(2000 1000 )
+ + +
25 50 100 200
k av = 30.4 md
27
Permeability Measurement
P1 P2=1 atm
kAP 3.18
q=
L L
P V t q=V/t
k/
q/A
P1 V1 t1 q1
P2 V2 t2 q2
P3 V3 t3 q3 P/L
P4 V4 t4 q4
Permeability Measurement
56
28
KLINKENBERG EFFECT
Klinkenberg (1941) discovered that permeability to gas is
relatively higher than that to water
He interpreted this phenomena as slip flow between gas
molecules and solid walls
Gas molecules collide each other and to pore-walls during
traveling through the pore medium
When the pore radius approaches to the mean free path of
gas molecules, the frequency of collision between gas
molecules and solid walls increases
Therefore this additional flux due to the gas flow at the wall
surface, which is called slip flow, becomes effective to
enhance the flow rate
57
KLINKENBERG EFFECT
At low pressures the measured permeability is higher than actual.
This is due to gas slippage and referred to as Klinkenberg effect.
One of the conditions for the validity of Darcys law is the
requirement of laminar flow. At low gas pressure, in combination with
small (diameter) pore channels, this condition is broken.
At low p, gas molecules are often so far apart, that they slip through
the pore channels almost without interactions (no friction loss) and
hence, yield a increased flow velocity or flow rate.
At higher pressures, the gas molecules are closer together and
interact more strongly as molecules in a liquid.
Compared to laminar flow, at a constant pressure difference, the
Klinkenberg dominated flow will yield a higher gas rate than laminar
flow,
q klinkenberg > q Laminar
58
29
KLINKENBERG EFFECT
H2
Observed permeability
N2
CO2
kL
1/Pav
59
KLINKENBERG EFFECT
b
Observed permeability
H2
ka = k L 1 +
N2
Pav
CO2 Where;
60
30
KLINKENBERG EFFECT
Corrections to measured gas permeability due to the Klinkenberg
effect are normally moderate to small corrections, as seen for the
table below.
61
Reactive Fluids
Darcys law assumes no reaction with the formation.
62
31
Porosity vs. Permeability
Porosity is an absolute property
Permeability is a secondary property.
It is influence by a range of basic parameters; size,
shape and porosity.
The two are related but there is no simple formula
exists to quantify this relationship
Carmen-Kozeny equation:
63
Quiz 1
1. What is porosity?
2. What are the types of porosity?
3. what are the factors affecting porosity?
64
32