Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 316 views

    GRP Piping - Stress Analysis

    Uploaded by

    ghkashyap1
    This document provides guidance on performing stress analysis of a GRP piping system in Caesar II. Key inputs needed are GRP pipe parameters, piping routing plans, analysis parameters, and vendor data. The modeling process in Caesar II involves selecting the ISO 14692 code, inputting material and pipe properties from vendor data sheets, defining load cases for various operating conditions, and ensuring proper modeling of bends, tees and buried piping. Both stresses and loads should be checked, as stresses in GRP piping often exceed 90% of allowable limits.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    GRP Piping - Stress Analysis

    Uploaded by

    ghkashyap1
    316 views5 pages
    This document provides guidance on performing stress analysis of a GRP piping system in Caesar II. Key inputs needed are GRP pipe parameters, piping routing plans, analysis parameters, and vendor data. The modeling process in Caesar II involves selecting the ISO 14692 code, inputting material and pipe properties from vendor data sheets, defining load cases for various operating conditions, and ensuring proper modeling of bends, tees and buried piping. Both stresses and loads should be checked, as stresses in GRP piping often exceed 90% of allowable limits.

    Original Description:

    GRP/FRP piping analysis

    Original Title

    GRP Piping -Stress Analysis

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides guidance on performing stress analysis of a GRP piping system in Caesar II. Key inputs needed are GRP pipe parameters, piping routing plans, analysis parameters, and vendor data. The modeling process in Caesar II involves selecting the ISO 14692 code, inputting material and pipe properties from vendor data sheets, defining load cases for various operating conditions, and ensuring proper modeling of bends, tees and buried piping. Both stresses and loads should be checked, as stresses in GRP piping often exceed 90% of allowable limits.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    316 views5 pages

    GRP Piping - Stress Analysis

    Uploaded by

    ghkashyap1
    This document provides guidance on performing stress analysis of a GRP piping system in Caesar II. Key inputs needed are GRP pipe parameters, piping routing plans, analysis parameters, and vendor data. The modeling process in Caesar II involves selecting the ISO 14692 code, inputting material and pipe properties from vendor data sheets, defining load cases for various operating conditions, and ensuring proper modeling of bends, tees and buried piping. Both stresses and loads should be checked, as stresses in GRP piping often exceed 90% of allowable limits.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    For performing the stress analysis of a GRP piping system following inputs are required:

    GRP pipe parameters as shown in Fig. 1.


    Pipe routing plan in form of isometrics or piping GA.
    Analysis parameters like design temperature, operating temperature, design pressure,
    fluid density, hydro test pressure, pipe diameter and thickness etc.

    Fig. 1

    Above table is an example for a 6 GRP pipe as an example. Kindly make changes to line size as
    required.
    Few tips:

    1) Depend of vendor data.

    2) Use proper support span, a conservative estimate is 3M span between supports.

    3)Use pad under pipe .These pads are usually made up of the same pipe and hence adjust the CL of
    the pipe properly.

    4)Support of valves directly and not "close by".

    5) Follow vendor's recoemmendations for guide span and stops.

    Imp:

    Get your vendor finalised at an early stage of project.


    Get the designers to plan for lower support spans from the beginning of project.

    Modelling in Caesar II:

    Once all inputs as mentioned above are ready with you open the Caesar II spread sheet. By
    default Caesar will show B 31.3 as governing code. Now refer to Fig. 2 and change the
    parameters as mentioned below:

    Fig. 2
    Change the default code to ISO 14692.
    Change the material to FRP (Caesar Database Material Number 20) as shown in Fig.
    2. It will fill few parameters from Caesar database. Update those parameters from
    vendor information.
    Enter pipe OD and thickness from vendor information.
    Keep corrosion allowance as 0.
    Input T1, T2, P1, HP and fluid density from line list.
    Update pipe density from vendor information sheet, if vendor does not provide
    density of pipe then you can keep this value unchanged.
    On the right side below the code, enter the failure envelop data received from vendor.
    Enter thermal factor=0.85 if pipe is carrying liquid, enter 0.8 if the pipe carries gas.
    After you have mentioned all the highlighted fields proceed modelling by providing
    dimensions from the isometric/piping GA drawing. Add supports at proper location
    from isometric drawing.
    Now click on environment button and then on special execution parameter. It will
    open the window as mentioned in figure 3.
    Now Refer Fig. 3 and change the highlighted parts from available data.

    Enter the GRP/FRP co-efficient of thermal expansion received from vendor


    Calculate the ratio of Shear Modulus and Axial modulus and input in the location.
    In FRP laminate keep the default value if data is not available.
    After the above changes click on ok button.
    While modelling remember to change the OD and thickness of elbows/bends.

    Modelling of Bend and Tee Connections:

    Modelling of bends is a bit different as compared to CS piping. Normally bend


    thicknesses are higher than the corresponding piping thickness. Additionally you have
    to specify the parameter, (EpTp)/(EbTb), which is located at the Bend auxiliary
    dialogue box as shown in Fig. 4. This value affects the calculation of the flexibility
    factor for bends.
    When you click on SIF and Tee box in Caesar II spreadsheet, you will find that only
    three options (Tee, Joint and Qualified Tee) are available for you as shown in Fig. 4.
    Each type has their own code equation for SIF calculation. Use the proper connection
    judiciously. It is always better to use SIF as 2.3 for both inplane and outplane SIF to
    adopt maximum conservative approach.

    Load Cases for Analysis:

    ISO 14692 informs to prepare 3 load cases: Sustained, Sustained with thermal and Hydro test.
    So accordingly the following load cases are sufficient to analyse GRP piping system

    1. WW+HP .HYDRO
    2. W+T1+P1 ..OPERATING-DESIGN TEMPERATURE
    3. W+T2+P1 ..OPERATING-OPERATING TEMPERATURE
    4. W+P1 ..SUSTAINED

    The expansion load cases are not required to create as no allowable stress is available for
    them as per the code.

    While preparing the above load cases you have to specify the occasional load factors for each load
    case in load case options menu as shown in Fig. 5. ISO 14692 considers hydro test case as an
    occasional case. In higher versions of Caesar II software (Caesar II-2016 and Caesar II-2017) these
    load factors are taken care by default. So you need not enter the values. The option of these value
    entry will be available only if you define the stress type as occasional for those software versions.

    The default values of occasional load factors are 1.33 for occasional case, 1.24 for operating
    case and 1.0 for sustained case. This occasional load factors are multiplied with system
    design factor (normally 0.67) to calculate the part factor for loading f2.

    For aboveground GRP piping the above load cases are sufficient. But if the Line is laid
    undeground then two different caesar II files are required. One for sustained and operating
    stress check. And the other for hydrotesting stress check as the buried depth during
    hydrotesting is different from the original operation. Also buried depth may vary in many
    places. So caesar II modelling should be done meticulosly to take care exact effects.

    For buried modelling one need to split the long lengths into shorter elements to get proper results.
    Element length of 3 m or less is advisable. Sometimes buried model contains slope, Those sloved are
    required to model properly to get accurate results.

    Both stress and load data need to be checked for GRP piping. Normally the stresses are more than
    90% (Even sometimes it may be as high as 99.9%).

    You might also like