SRC 2ND Sem 2016-2017 (New)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region III
DIVISION OF CITY SCHOOLS
City of San Jose del Monte
District V
SAN RAFAEL (BBH) ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
City of San Jose del Monte

2016 2017
(Second Semester)

MIRIAM A. ZAMORA
Principal III
Enrollment

1900

1878
1880
1867

1860 1855

1840 1835

1820

1800
MALE
1777
1780 FEMALE

1760 1752

1740

1720

1700

1680
SY 2014 - 2015 SY 2015 - 2016 SY 2016 - 2017

The graph shows that there is a slight increase of


male enrollees and decrease of female enrollees
from SY 2014-2015 to SY 2015-2016, however in
SY 2016-2017 recorded an increase in enrolment
for male and decrease of enrolment in female.
This implies that schools enrolment is
unpredictable.
1583
1455
1600

1400

1200 SEVERELY WASTED


WASTED
1000
NORMAL

800 OVERWEIGHT
OBESE
600

400

200 6 33 16 1 7 28 10 2

0
MALE FEMALE

In School Year 2016


2017 3% or total of 103 pupils
fall outside the normal health
status. Feeding program should
be continuously done by the
school to help lessen the rate of
undernourished and over
nourished children
INVENTORY OF BOOKS S.Y. 2016-2017
TRAININGS ATTENDED
18

16
16

14

12

10

8
7 7 TEACHERS
6 6
6
5
4
4
3
2
2
1 1

Most of the trainings attended by our


teachers were about EPP subject.
CANTEEN
532,065.00

1,069,202.00
MOOE

809,530.00 FEEDING- DONORS

The fund used from October 2016 February


2017 comes from the MOOE, Canteen Funds and
from the great help of Stakeholders and donors.
CATEGORY NAME OF STUDENT RANK COACH
PRESCON
Collaborative and Desktop Yuan Bibbo Navoa 2nd Place Jellyson Dela Cruz
Publishing(English)
Collaborative (Filipino) Kyle Carlo C. Esmale 2nd Place Jellyson Dela Cruz
Collaborative (English) Gwyneth A. Samson 2nd Place Onasis Manlapaz
Jim Kristian Andrei S.
Collaborative (English) Bayombon 2nd Place Onasis Manlapaz
1st Place
Radio Broadcasting Technical Hadaza Lana (Regional) Onasis Manlapaz
Collaborative (English) Hara Ezra Lana 2nd Place Onasis Manlapaz
Radio Broadcasting Technical Hadaza Lana 1st Place (NSPC) Onasis Manlapaz
DIVISION BOOK FESTIVAL
Poem Interpretation Khaleb Paul Abiela 4th Place Jessica F. Ignacio
Speling Bee Mark Christian M. Portes 1st Place Riza Florinda F. Evangelista
Quiz Bee Daey Mae Alburo 2nd Place Rosalyn L. Vilanoche
Readathon Don Gilbert A. Dumali 3rd Place Charito A. Dumali
Mr. & Ms Webster Yuan Bibbo Navoa 4th Place Rowena I. Ballingasa
Zayne Escutin 5th Place
Reader's Theater Dyreen Ruth N. Gumaod 3rd Place Ronald Cris Q Lactawan
Nicole S. Cervantes
Wilzaira S. Cortez
Tricia Aneliese A. Felicia
Armingail Gadugdog
DIVISION SCIENCE FAIR
Odyssey of the Mind Dayreen Ruth Gumaod 5th Place Brigida N. Lorenzo
Sci-Art Anfer Jyno T. Domingo 9th place
Neil Ahki Francisco 10th Place Antonio B. Domingo
Improvisation of Science Inst.
Joyce J. Villamor 5th Place
Aids (Teacher Category)
Merlita B. Quintana 6th Place
UNIT MEET
CHESS Klent Daryll F. Prado 3rd Place Roy Cuacoyes
Danielle Angela H. Roco 3rd Place Rita T. Molina
DIVISION MEET
BADMINTON Hillary Barquilla
3rd Place Ralph David Gacosta
Michaella Balasa
Mitch John Davad
3rd Place Cenon C. Dela Cruz
Huldreich M. Dela Cruz
Ace M. Astejada Doubles
Emel Lincuna
Jericho T. Ferrer CHAMPION
TABLE TENNIS Sandara T. Sarcia CHAMPION Cenon C. Dela Cruz
VOLLEYBALL BOYS 3rd Place Gilbert D. Dumali
VOLLEYBALL GIRLS 2nd Place Antonio B. Domingo
PARALYMPICS
Track and Field (Male Category) Mark Jovel Ordonez 1st Place Digna Parcon
Track and Field (Female
Maxine Librado 1st Place Digna Parcon
Category)
ALIVE
1st Place(
Mohammad Dimalanta Lorna Cabuhat
LOGO MAKING CONTEST Division)
QUIZ BEE Mohammad Dimalanta
3rd Place Lorna Cabuhat
Mary Ann Dimalanta
25
22

20 15

16 MALE
12 13 15
15
FEMALE
14
10 10 9
8 9 10 TOTAL
5 9 7 8
5 8
3 5 5

0 TOTAL
1
KINDER FEMALE
GRADE 1
GRADE 2
GRADE 3 MALE
GRADE 4
GRADE 5
GRADE 6

The graph shows the number of drop-outs from


June to March 2017 by grade level from
Kinder to Grade 6 (Male and Feale)
PHIL-IRI results shows an
improvement in the pupils literacy.
More pupils have moved from
instructional level to independent in
both English and Filipino. However,
there are still pupils who fell under
frustration level. Reading interventions
should be given priority and attention.

ENGLISH ORAL (POST-TEST)


Grade Non-Reader Frustration Instructional Independent Total
Level M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
GR2 7 5 12 54 40 94 93 100 193 91 111 202 245 256 501
GR3 13 5 18 103 69 172 102 138 240 48 69 117 266 281 547
GR4 13 8 21 98 82 180 123 105 228 60 55 115 294 250 544
GR5 17 10 27 97 58 155 158 131 289 41 69 110 313 268 581
GR6 0 0 0 88 57 145 154 140 294 36 63 99 278 260 538
PERCENTAGE
GR2 3 2 2 22 16 19 38 39 39 37 43 40 100 100 100
GR3 5 2 3 39 25 31 38 49 44 18 25 21 100 100 100
GR4 4 3 4 33 33 33 42 42 42 20 22 21 100 100 100
GR5 5 4 5 31 22 27 50 49 50 13 26 19 100 100 100
GR6 0 0 0 32 22 27 55 54 55 13 24 18 100 100 100

SUMMARY
PERCENTAGE %
Grade NR FRUS INS IND Grade NR FRUS INS IND

GR2 GR2 2 19 39 40
12 94 193 202
GR3 GR3 3 31 44 21
18 172 240 117
GR4 GR4 4 33 42 21
21 180 228 115
GR5 GR5 5 27 50 19
27 155 289 110
GR6 GR6 0 27 55 18
0 145 294 99

289 294
300
240
250 228
193202
200 172 180 SUMMARY NR
155
145 SUMMARY FRUS
150
117 115 110
99 SUMMARY INS
94
100 SUMMARY IND

50 18 21 27
12
0
0
GR2 GR3 GR4 GR5 GR6
ENGLISH SILENT (POST-TEST)
Grade Non-Reader Frustration Instructional Independent Total
Level M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
GR2 7 5 12 46 29 75 95 95 190 99 125 224 247 254 501
GR3 12 5 17 102 72 174 108 135 243 44 69 113 266 281 547
GR4 14 12 26 98 85 183 114 93 207 68 60 128 294 250 544
GR5 17 10 27 65 56 121 173 133 306 50 77 127 305 276 581
GR6 0 0 0 112 77 189 112 108 220 54 75 129 278 260 538
PERCENTAGE
GR2 3 2 2 19 11 15 38 37 38 40 49 45 100 100 100
GR3 5 2 3 38 26 32 41 48 44 17 25 21 100 100 100
GR4 5 5 5 33 34 34 39 37 38 23 24 24 100 100 100
GR5 6 4 5 21 20 21 57 48 53 16 28 22 100 100 100
GR6 0 0 0 40 30 35 40 42 41 19 29 24 100 100 100

SUMMARY
PERCENTAGE %

Grade NR FRUS INS IND Grade NR FRUS INS IND

GR2 GR2 2 15 38 45
12 75 190 224

GR3 GR3 3 32 44 21
17 174 243 113

GR4 GR4 5 34 38 24
26 183 207 128

GR5 GR5 5 21 53 22
27 121 306 127

GR6 GR6 0 35 41 24
0 189 220 129

350
306
300

243
250
224 220
207
190 189 SUMMARY NR
200 183
174 SUMMARY FRUS
SUMMARY INS
150 128 127 129
121 SUMMARY IND
113

100 75

50 26 27
12 17
0
0
GR2 GR3 GR4 GR5 GR6
FILIPINO ORAL (POST-TEST)
Grade Non-Reader Frustration Instructional Independent Total
Level M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
GR2 6 4 10 30 24 54 81 65 146 127 164 291 244 257 501
GR3 9 4 13 70 48 118 118 129 247 69 100 169 266 281 547
GR4 12 5 17 90 71 161 123 109 232 69 65 134 294 250 544
GR5 1 2 3 60 38 98 176 121 297 70 113 183 307 274 581
GR6 0 0 0 56 23 79 135 102 237 87 135 222 278 260 538

PERCENTAGE
GR2 2 2 2 12 9 11 33 25 29 52 64 58 100 100 100
GR3 3 1 2 26 17 22 44 46 45 26 36 31 100 100 100
GR4 4 2 3 31 28 30 42 44 43 23 26 25 100 100 100
GR5 0 1 1 20 14 17 57 44 51 23 41 31 100 100 100
GR6 0 0 0 20 9 15 49 39 44 31 52 41 100 100 100

SUMMARY
PERCENTAGE %
Grade NR FRUS INS IND Grade NR FRUS INS IND

GR2 GR2 2 11 29 58
10 54 146 291
GR3 GR3 2 22 45 31
13 118 247 169
GR4 GR4 3 30 43 25
17 161 232 134
GR5 GR5 1 17 51 31
3 98 297 183

GR6 GR6 0 15 44 41
0 79 237 222

297
300 291

247
250 232 237
222

200 183
169
161 SUMMARY NR
146 SUMMARY FRUS
150 134
SUMMARY INS
118
SUMMARY IND
98
100
79

54
50

13 17
10
3 0
0
GR2 GR3 GR4 GR5 GR6
FILIPINO SILENT (POST-TEST)
Grade Non-Reader Frustration Instructional Independent Total
Level M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
GR2 0 0 0 26 17 43 100 82 182 110 166 276 236 265 501
GR3 9 4 13 71 57 128 114 129 243 72 91 163 266 281 547
GR4 11 5 16 80 55 135 123 101 224 80 89 169 294 250 544
GR5 0 0 0 57 33 90 178 135 313 71 107 178 306 275 581
GR6 0 0 0 85 48 133 133 140 273 60 72 132 278 260 538

PERCENTAGE
GR2 0 0 0 11 6 9 42 31 36 47 63 55 100 100 100
GR3 3 1 2 27 20 23 43 46 44 27 32 30 100 100 100
GR4 4 2 3 27 22 25 42 40 41 27 36 31 100 100 100
GR5 0 0 0 19 12 15 58 49 54 23 39 31 100 100 100
GR6 0 0 0 31 18 25 48 54 51 22 28 25 100 100 100

SUMMARY
PERCENTAGE %
Grade NR FRUS INS IND Grade NR FRUS INS IND

GR2 GR2 0 9 36 55
0 43 182 276
GR3 GR3 2 23 44 30
13 128 243 163
GR4 GR4 3 25 41 31
16 135 224 169
GR5 GR5 0 15 54 31
0 90 313 178

GR6 GR6 0 25 51 25
0 133 273 132

350
313

300
276 273

243
250
224

200 SUMMARY NR
182 178
163 169 SUMMARY FRUS
SUMMARY INS
150 135 133 132
128 SUMMARY IND

100 90

43
50
13 16
0 0 0
0
GR2 GR3 GR4 GR5 GR6
500

454
450

390 396
400

350
323
308
294 299
300
327 GRADE-II
278 GRADE-III
250
GRADE-IV
218
180 GRADE-V
200 180
171 GRADE-II
162
168 133 GRADE II
150 139
120 110
112 111
100 101
97 78
53 48 58
50 36 43
10
0
PRE POST PRE POST PRE POST
NUMERATES NEARLY NUMERATES NON NUMERATES

This graph contains the result of pre and


post test of project AN. It shows the increase in
the number of numerates and nearly numerates
and the decrease of non-numerates. It further
implies that learners' performance in
Mathematics has improved.
STAKEHOLDERS ATTENDANCE TO
SCHOOL ACTIVITIES
80% 76%
69%
70%
59% As shown in the graph
60% 57%
2810 or 76% of the stakehoders
50% shown their support during
40% meetings.
30%

20%

10%

0%
Co-Curricular Extra Curricular Meetings Assemblies

STAKEHOLDERS'
CONTRIBUTION The graph depicts the
(October-March 2017) amount contributed by the
500,000.00 457,525.00 stakeholders during the
400,000.00 Brigada Eskwela period and in
300,000.00 the contest held. This donation
200,000.00 144145.75
was spent for the continuous
100,000.00 school improvement project.
0.00
BRIGADA CONTESTS

STAKEHOLDERS' CONTRIBUTION

NUMBER OF HOURS
RENDERED Stakeholders involvement
17122 in the school activities is seen
18000
16000 in this graph. A total of 4,278
14000 volunteers have rendered their
12000 services during the BRIGADA
HOURS

10000
ESKWELA period. For the
8000
6000 contest theyve spent 76
4000 hours.
2000
76
0
BRIGADA CONTEST

NUMBER OF VOLUNTEERS
LEARNER-TEACHER RATIO
50
45 45
45
42 42

40 39 39

35

30
26
25

20

15

10

0
KINDER GRADE I GRADE II GRADE III GRADE IV GRADE V GRADE VI

LEARNER-TEACHER RATIO

As far as the learner


teacher ratio is concerned
for S.Y. 2016-2017, the
enrolment of kindergarten
is below the
recommended pupil-
teacher ratio which is 35.
The rest are above the
limit.
LEARNER-CLASSROOM RATIO
60

49
50
45
42 45
42
40 39 39

30

20

10

0
KINDER GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6

Learner-classroom ratio is figured out in this graph. It shows that the


population of Kinder to Grade 3 is bigger than the recommended number of
learners per classroom which is 35. This resulted to apply shifting of classes.
Grade 4 to Grade 6 average learners per room is 43 which is found to be above
the standard class size of 40 only.
LEARNER-TOILET RATIO
60

51
50

40
LEARNER

30

20

10

0
1

For learner-toilet ratio, the graph clearly shows that there are enough
toilets to contain all learners.
LEARNER-SEAT RATIO
S.Y. 2016-2017
1.2

1
In the case of
learner-seat ratio, for
0.8
this school year, there
are adequate seats for
0.6
all learners.

0.4

0.2

0
1
BRIGIDA N. LORENZO
ANTONIO B. DOMINGO
ROSALINDA M. MARQUEZ
CENON C. DELA CRUZ
MARISSA B. SEPE

MIRIAM A. ZAMORA
Principal III

You might also like