[Downloaded free from http://www.mmj.eg.net on Saturday, October 7, 2017, IP: 36.79.5.

112]

426 Original article

Effect of phototherapy on serum calcium level in neonatal

jaundice
Mohammed Hamed Bahbaha, Fathia Mohamed El Nemra,
Rania Salah El Zayata, Elham Aziz Khalid Azizb
a
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Objectives
Menoufia University, bDepartment of Pediatrics,
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of phototherapy on serum calcium level in
Tala Central Hospital, Menoufia, Egypt
neonatal jaundice.
Correspondence to Elham Aziz Khalid Aziz, Background
Department of Pediatrics, Tala Central Hospital,
Phototherapy plays a significant role in the treatment and prevention of hyperbilirubinemia
Menoufia, Egypt
Tel: +20 100 843 8672; in neonates. However, this treatment modality may result in the development of some
e-mail: [email protected] complications such as induction of hypocalcemia.
Patients and methods
Received 17 June 2014
Accepted 14 October 2014 This study included 50 full-term neonates with jaundice (25 males and 25 females) who
received phototherapy for treatment of neonatal indirect hyperbilirubinemia and 25 neonates
Menoufia Medical Journal 2015, 28:426430
(13 males and 12 females) complaining of exaggerated physiological hyperbilirubinemia taken
as control not exposed to phototherapy. Serum calcium was checked before and 48 h after
starting phototherapy. A comparative study was conducted between these groups to determine
the effect of phototherapy on serum calcium level.
Results
In the neonates of the study group, the serum bilirubin level before phototherapy was 15.48
1.94 mg/dl. However, the serum bilirubin level after phototherapy was 12.41 2.10 mg/dl. There
was highly statistically significant decrease of the serum bilirubin levels after phototherapy as
compared with serum bilirubin levels before phototherapy in the study group (P < 0.001). With
respect to the calcium level, the total serum calcium level before phototherapy was 9.36
0.29 mg/dl, whereas the serum calcium level after phototherapy was 8.58 0.76 mg/dl. There
was highly statistically significant decrease of the serum calcium levels after phototherapy as
compared with serum calcium levels before phototherapy in the study group.
Conclusion
Hypocalcemia is a common complication of phototherapy.

Keywords:
hyperbilirubinemia, hypocalcemia, phototherapy

Menoufia Med J 28:426430

2015 Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University
1110-2098

curve, depth of penetration), the distance between

Introduction
the light and the infant, the surface area treated, the
Hyperbilirubinemia is the most common abnormal
etiology of the jaundice, and total serum bilirubin
physical finding in the first week of life in neonates
and is observed in 60% of term neonates and 80% level at the onset of phototherapy [5]. However,
of preterm infants [1]. In Egypt, about 20.4% develop this treatment modality may itself result in the
jaundice yearly. Incidence of jaundice was found to be development of some complications. Among these are
higher in low birth weight neonates (35.6%) compared loose stools, erythematous macular rash, overheating,
with normal birth weight infants (16.9%) [2]. Although dehydration, damage to DNA, retinal injury, and a
most infants with jaundice are otherwise perfectly benign condition called bronze baby syndrome in
healthy, they make us anxious because bilirubin is cholestasis [6].
potentially toxic to the central nervous system [3].
Melatonin stimulates secretion of corticosterone, which
Phototherapy plays a significant role in the treatment decreases calcium absorption by bones. Phototherapy
and prevention of hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. This leads to inhibition of pineal gland by transcranial
relatively common therapy lowers the serum bilirubin level illumination, resulting in a decline in melatonin level
by transforming bilirubin into water-soluble isomers that and as a result, hypocalcemia develops [7].
can be eliminated without conjugation in the liver [4].
The aim of the work was to study the effect of
The effectiveness of phototherapy depends upon the phototherapy on serum calcium level in neonatal
type of light source used (i.e. dose, spectral emission jaundice.
1110-2098 2015 Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University DOI: 10.4103/1110-2098.163896
[Downloaded free from http://www.mmj.eg.net on Saturday, October 7, 2017, IP: 36.79.5.112]

Hypocalcemia is a complication of phototherapy Bahbah et al. 427

all data were tabulated and analyzed statistically to

Patients and methods
detect hypocalcemia as a complication of phototherapy.
This study was conducted on 50 full-term neonates
with jaundice (25 males and 25 females) who received
phototherapy for treatment of neonatal indirect Statistical data analysis
hyperbilirubinemia (exaggerated physiological Statistical presentation and analysis of the present
jaundice) and 25 neonates (13 males and 12 females) study was conducted by SPSS, V. 20. Quantitative data
complaining of physiological hyperbilirubinemia taken were analyzed by the Student t-test and paired t-test.
as controls not exposed to phototherapy. Qualitative data were analyzed by the c2-test and
Fishers exact test. The test is considered significant
Cases were selected from those admitted to neonatal when P value is less than 0.05.
ICU of Tala Hospital, and controls were selected from
outpatient clinic.

After approval of the ethical committee, informed consents Results

were obtained from the parents of the selected neonates. The study group included 50 neonates, 25 boys (50%)
and 25 girls (50%), with mean gestational age of 38.28
All cases chosen fulfilled the following criteria. 0.99 weeks and mean postnatal age 4.26 1.12 days.
There were 20 neonates (40%) delivered by normal
(1) Icteric stable neonates. vaginal delivery and 30 neonates (50%) delivered by
(2) Neonates who required management with Cesarean section (Table1).
phototherapy (exaggerated physiological jaundice).
(3) Fed with full strength formula or breast fed. There was no statistically significant difference between
both groups regarding gestational age, postnatal age,
We excluded any neonates suffering from birth sex, and mode of delivery (P > 0.05) (Table2).
asphyxia, congenital malformation, septicemia, and
hypothyroidism, infant of diabetic mother, hemolytic All cases of the study group presenting with neonatal
anemia, any newborn needing exchange transfusion, hyperbilirubinemia were managed with phototherapy
neonatal hypocalcemia, or ABO or Rh incompatibility. only and closely observed for the possibility of
developing phototherapy-induced hypocalcemia.
The neonates in the control group were babies who
had physiological neonatal jaundice managed without The serum bilirubin level among neonates of the study
phototherapy or exchange transfusion. group was 15.4 1.94 mg/dl, whereas the serum bilirubin

In contrast, patients in the studied group were placed

Table 1 Sociodemographic data of the study group
under phototherapy. The phototherapy unit used was
Variables N (%)
four blue light lamps, 20 W, which supplies spectral Age (mean SD) (days) 4.26 1.12
irradiance of 5 mW/cm2/nm at 450470 nm/cm2. Naked Gestational age (mean SD) (weeks) 38.28 0.99
neonates were placed while covering eyes and genitalia at Sex
a distance of 4550 cm from phototherapy unit and were Male 25 (50)
managed with continuous phototherapy in open bed. Female 25 (50)
The position of the baby was changed from time to time. Mode of delivery
Normal 20 (40)
Each case was subjected to detailed history taking Cesarean section 30 (60)

(gestational age, mode of delivery, detailed prenatal

and natal history, age on admission, and day of onset Table 2 Comparison between two groups regarding
of jaundice and family history of neonatal jaundice) thesociodemographic characters
and clinical examination, which included general and Variables Cases Controls Test P value
local examination with special emphasis on weight, (N = 50) (N = 25)
(mean SD) (mean SD)
length, head circumference, and manifestations of Age (days) 4.26 1.12 4.32 0.74 0.27 0.78
hypocalcemia (jitteriness, irritability, and convulsion). Gestational age (weeks) 38.28 0.99 38.72 1.06 1.77 0.08
Sex [n (%)]
Laboratory investigations were applied including total Male 25 (50.0) 13 (52) 0.02 0.87
serum bilirubin before and 48 h after phototherapy, Female 25 (50.0) 12 (48)
total serum calcium before and after 48 h after starting Mode of delivery [n (%)]
of phototherapy, blood group to infant and mother, Normal 20 (40.0) 14 (56) 1.72 0.18
reticulocytic count, and hemoglobin level. Thereafter, Cesarean section 30 (60.0) 11 (44)
[Downloaded free from http://www.mmj.eg.net on Saturday, October 7, 2017, IP: 36.79.5.112]

428 Menoufia Medical Journal

level among the neonates of the control group was

Discussion
6.6 0.79 mg/dl. There was highly statistical significant
In our study, the first group (jaundiced neonates
difference between both studied groups regarding total
treated with phototherapy as the study group
serum bilirubin level (P < 0.001) (Table3). with bilirubin level 15.4 1.94 mg/dl) included
The serum calcium level of neonates of the study
group before phototherapy was 9.3 0.29 mg/dl. Table 3 Comparison between two groups regarding
However, the serum calcium level among neonates of theresults of TSB and serum calcium before phototherapy
the control group was 9.1 1.29 mg/dl. There was no Variables Cases Controls t-test P value
statistical significant difference between both studied (n = 50) (n = 25)
(mean SD) (mean SD)
groups regarding total serum calcium level on arrival
TSB (mg/dl) 15.48 1.94 6.65 0.79 21.81 (0.000)<0.001
(P > 0.05). Serum calcium 9.36 0.29 9.18 0.90 1.29 >0.05
(mg/dl)
In the neonates of the study group, the serum bilirubin TSB, total serum bilirubin.
level before phototherapy was 15.4 1.94 mg/dl,
whereas the serum bilirubin level after phototherapy was
Table 4 Comparison between TSB and serum calcium measures
12.4 2.10 mg/dl. There was highly statistically significant before and after phototherapy treatment among cases
decrease of the serum bilirubin levels after phototherapy, as Before After
Paired P value
compared with serum bilirubin levels before phototherapy t-test
in the study group (P < 0.001) (Table4). TSB (mg/dl) 15.48 1.94 12.41 2.10 23.65 (0.000)<0.001
Serum calcium 9.36 0.29 8.58 0.76 8.27 (0.000)<0.001
With respect to the calcium level, the total serum calcium (mg/dl)
level before phototherapy was 9.3 0.29 mg/dl, whereas TSB, total serum bilirubin.
the serum calcium level before phototherapy was 8.5
0.76 mg/dl. There was highly statistically significant Table 5 The descriptive data of hypocalcemia and symptoms
decrease of the serum calcium levels after phototherapy, as among cases
compared with serum calcium levels before phototherapy Variables N = 50 [n (%)]
in the study group (P<0.001) (Table4). Hypocalcemia 13 (26)
Normal calcium 37 (74)
Neonates with hypocalcemia represented 13 cases Jitteriness 7 (14)
Convulsions 5 (10)
(26%) and those with normal calcium represented 37
cases (74%). Neonates with jitteriness represented seven
cases (14%) and those with convulsions represented Table 6 Severity of hypocalcemia in hypocalcemic neonates
five cases (10%) of hypocalcemic neonates (Table5). Variables Serum calcium N = 13 [n (%)]
level (mg/dl)
The severity of hypocalcemia in hypocalcemic neonates Mild hypocalcemia 87.5 8 (61.5)
was 61.5% mild and 38.5% severe (Table 6,Figs 1 and 2). Severe hypocalcemia Below 7.5 5 (38.5)

Figure 1 Figure 2

TSB among the study group and the control group before phototherapy. TSB and serum calcium level of neonates in the study group before
TSB, total serum bilirubin. and after phototherapy. TSB, total serum bilirubin.
[Downloaded free from http://www.mmj.eg.net on Saturday, October 7, 2017, IP: 36.79.5.112]

Hypocalcemia is a complication of phototherapy Bahbah et al. 429

50 neonates, 25 boys (50%) and 25 girls (50%) with melatonin level and corticosterone secretion [7]. In
mean gestational age 38.28 weeks. The second group addition, urinary calcium excretion is increased after
(physiological jaundiced neonates treated without exposure to phototherapy [11].
phototherapy as the control group with bilirubin
level 6.6 0.79 mg/dl) included 25 neonates, 13 boys This decrease in calcium can be explained by
(52%) and 12 girls (48%) with mean gestational age melatonin secretion [12]. Melatonin stimulates
38.7 weeks. secretion of corticosterone, which decreases
calcium absorption by bones. Phototherapy leads
In our study, hypocalcemia was assessed as a to inhibition of pineal gland by transcranial
complication of phototherapy in newborns managed illumination, resulting in a decline in melatonin level
for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. and as a result, hypocalcemia develops [7]. Cortisol
exerts a direct hypocalcemic effect by decreasing the
Before phototherapy, there was no statistically absorption of Ca and PO4 ions from the intestine
significant difference between serum calcium level by antivitamin D action and by increasing the renal
in cases (9.3 mg/dl) and in controls (9.18 mg/dl). excretion of these ions and also accelerates the bone
However, after 48 h of treatment of cases with uptake of calcium [13].
phototherapy, serum calcium level decreased
to 8.5 mg/dl, and we found highly statistically In addition, urinary calcium excretion is increased after
significant difference between serum calcium level exposure to phototherapy as shown by Hooman and
before and after exposure to phototherapy where Honarpisheh [11].
P value was less than 0.01.
The reason for a higher incidence of hypocalcemia in
This was in agreement with several previous studies. preterm infants is still unknown.

In studies by Karamifar et al. [7] and Ehsanipour Prevention of hypocalcemia in infants undergoing
et al. [6] the incidence of hypocalcemia after 48 h of phototherapy has been trialed by this research group
phototherapy was 15 and 14.4%, respectively. and others. The researchers studied 100 preterm
newborns to verify whether calcifediol (25(OH)
In addition, Jain et al. [8] noticed that 55% of preterm D3) could be useful to prevent the phototherapy-
neonates and 30% of full-term neonates developed induced hypocalcemia. Results obtained show that
hypocalcemia after being subjected to phototherapy. calcifediol is not able, anyway, to lower the increase of
the phototherapy-induced hypocalcemia in preterm
In addition, Sethi et.al. [9] noticed hypocalcemia infants. Vitamin D is therefore unlikely to play any
after 48 h of phototherapy. Sixty neonates with important role in the pathogenesis of phototherapy-
hyperbilirubinemia were included in their study. induced hypocalcemia [12]. Zecca et al. [12] also
There were 20 preterm (group A) and 20 full- found that vitamin (25(OH)D3) is ineffective in the
term (group B) neonates. Ten neonates from each prevention of hypocalcemia induced by phototherapy
group formed the control group. The study group in newborns.
neonates were managed with phototherapy, whereas
the control group neonates were not subjected to Suggestions to possibly prevent development of
phototherapy. Serum calcium levels of the two groups hypocalcemia in phototherapy-treated newborn
were studied. In all, 90% preterm neonates and 75% include either giving them oral calcium as prophylaxis
full-term neonates developed hypocalcemia after or covering their heads and occipital area using a
being subjected to phototherapy. There was a highly special hat during phototherapy, so that light effect
significant decrease in total as well as ionized calcium from phototherapy on newborns pineal gland and
levels in the study group in contrast to the control consequently melatonin decreases and hypocalcemia
group. They recommended that neonates under can be prevented [7].
phototherapy should be given supplemental calcium
to prevent hypocalcemia. No researchers demonstrated symptomatic
hypocalcemia in infants treated with phototherapy.
Mostafa et al. [10] also found hypocalcemia after
exposure to phototherapy, with a higher percentage
among the preterm neonates, as compared with full-
term neonates. Conclusion
Hypocalcemia is a complication of phototherapy.
The etiology of hypocalcemia in infants treated with However, the clinical relevance of this finding needs
phototherapy is believed to be caused by a decrease in further study.
[Downloaded free from http://www.mmj.eg.net on Saturday, October 7, 2017, IP: 36.79.5.112]

430 Menoufia Medical Journal

6 Ehsanipour F, Khosravi N, Jalali S. The effect of hat on phototherapy

Acknowledgements induced hypocalcaemia in icteric newborns. IUMS 2008; 58:2529.
Conflicts of interest 7 Karamifar H, Pishva N, Amirhakimi GH. Prevalence of phototherapy
There are no conflicts of interest. induced hypocalcemia. IJMS 2002; 4:166168.
8 Jain BK, Singh H, Singh D, Toor NS. Phototherapy induced hypocalcemia.
Indian Pediatr 1998; 35:566567.
9 Sethi, H, Saili, A, Dutta, AK. Phototherapy induced hypocalcemia. Indian
References Pediatr 1998; 77:566567.
1 Bell R, Bhutani V, Bollman L, Nisbet C, Powers R, Vanotterloo L. Severe
10 Mostafa AS, Ahmed AR, Mohamed AA. Assessment of phototherapy
hyperbilirubinemia prevention (SHP) toolkit. CPQCC 2005 [Last accessed
induced hypocalcemia. MSc, Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, Cairo,
on 2005 Oct 19].
Egypt; 2004.
2 Mansour E, Eissa AN, Nofal LM, Kharboush I, Reda AA. Morbidity and
11 Hooman N, Honarpisheh A. The effect of phototherapy on urinary calcium
mortality of low-birth-weight infants in Egypt. East Mediterr Health J 2005;
excretion in newborns. Pediatr Nephrol 2005; 20:13631364.
11:723731.
12 Zecca E, Romagnoli C, Tortorolo G. Ineffectiveness of vitamin 25(OH) D3
3 Maisels MJ. Neonatal jaundice. Pediatr Rev 2006; 27:443454.
in the prevention of hypocalcemia induced by phototherapy. Pediatr Med
4 Stokowski LA. Fundamentals of phototherapy for neonatal jaundice. Adv Chir 2003; 5:317319.
Neonatal Care 2006; 6:303312. 13 Ganong WF. In: Ganong WF. ed. Hormonal control of calcium metabolism
5 Ebbesen F, Agati G, Pratesi R. Phototherapy with turquoise versus blue and the physiology of bone. Review of medical physiology. 22th ed.
light. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88:430431. California: Lange Medical Publications; 2005. 352383.