Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 230 views

    Assignment Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Katherine Shayne Yee
    This document outlines the judging criteria for an assignment with categories for quality, content, and timeliness. For quality, handwriting, figures, diagrams, and lack of erasures are assessed on a scale from excellent to unsatisfactory. Content is evaluated based on how well the problem and solutions are presented and organized. Timeliness considers whether the plates were submitted by the deadline. Points are allocated to each category and weighted scores are calculated to determine an overall total score.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Assignment Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Katherine Shayne Yee
    230 views2 pages
    This document outlines the judging criteria for an assignment with categories for quality, content, and timeliness. For quality, handwriting, figures, diagrams, and lack of erasures are assessed on a scale from excellent to unsatisfactory. Content is evaluated based on how well the problem and solutions are presented and organized. Timeliness considers whether the plates were submitted by the deadline. Points are allocated to each category and weighted scores are calculated to determine an overall total score.

    Original Description:

    Sample Rubrics for Assignment

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines the judging criteria for an assignment with categories for quality, content, and timeliness. For quality, handwriting, figures, diagrams, and lack of erasures are assessed on a scale from excellent to unsatisfactory. Content is evaluated based on how well the problem and solutions are presented and organized. Timeliness considers whether the plates were submitted by the deadline. Points are allocated to each category and weighted scores are calculated to determine an overall total score.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    230 views2 pages

    Assignment Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Katherine Shayne Yee
    This document outlines the judging criteria for an assignment with categories for quality, content, and timeliness. For quality, handwriting, figures, diagrams, and lack of erasures are assessed on a scale from excellent to unsatisfactory. Content is evaluated based on how well the problem and solutions are presented and organized. Timeliness considers whether the plates were submitted by the deadline. Points are allocated to each category and weighted scores are calculated to determine an overall total score.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Judging

    Criteria

    Weighted
    5 (EXCELLENT) 4-3 (AVERAGE) 2 (NEEDS IMPROVEMENT) 1 (UNSATISFACTORY) 0 (NO ASSIGNMENT DONE) Score
    Score

    Handwriting of plates Handwriting of Handwriting of plates Handwriting of plates No solution


    is consistent and is plates has some has inconsistencies and has inconsistencies and attempted.
    legibly written. inconsistencies in a is readable but not is not presentable.
    Figures drawn are certain degree and presentable. Figures are not drawn
    aesthetically is legibly written. Figures drawn are of but only line diagrams
    excellent. Figures drawn are below average are provided.
    Line diagrams are aesthetically aesthetically. Erasures are made
    provided. average Erasures are made but several times that
    Quality No erasures were Line diagrams are it is still slightly compromises the
    (40%) made. provided. presentable. presentation of plates

    Illustration adds to Few erasures are Illustration sometimes Illustration never adds
    the readers made but still adds to the readers to the readers
    understanding of the presentable. understanding of the understanding of the
    problem. Illustration adds to problem. problem.
    the readers
    understanding of
    the problem.
    Judging
    Criteria
    Weighted
    5 (EXCELLENT) 4-3 (AVERAGE) 2 (NEEDS IMPROVEMENT) 1 (UNSATISFACTORY) 0 (NO ASSIGNMENT DONE) Score
    Score

    Information of the Information of the Information of the Information of the No attempted


    problem is well problem are problem are not problem are not solution.
    presented and very presented and presented well and not presented well and not
    organized. organized. organized. organized.
    The solutions are The solutions are The solutions are not The solutions are not
    presented in presented in presented in step by presented in a step by
    complete step by almost complete step procedure but still step procedure and is
    Content step procedure. step by step can be understand by not easily understood
    (40%) All answers have procedure. readers. by readers.
    correct value. There are incorrect There are incorrect There are incorrect
    Introduces unique answers but errors answers but still shows answers and shows no
    way in showing in solution are the correct process of understanding with the
    solution but still minimal. (related the solution. topic.
    understandable by to calculator
    the reader. errors)

    Plates are submitted Plates are submitted


    Timeliness on or before beyond the
    (20%) deadline. supposed deadline.

    Score

    Weighted
    Score

    TOTAL SCORE: _____________ REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________

    You might also like