Problem Based Learning
Problem Based Learning
PROBLEM-BASED
LEARNING
THE POWER OF
PROBLEM-BASED
LEARNING
A Practical How To for Teaching
Undergraduate Courses in Any Discipline
STERLING, VIRGINIA
Published in 2001 by
Stylus Publishing, LLC
22883 Quicksilver Drive
Sterling, Virginia 20166
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced in any form or
by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying, recording and information storage and retrieval, without permission in
writing from the publisher.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
CONTENTS
PREFACE viii
Barbara J. Duch
v
vi CONTENTS
Barbara J. Duch
George H. Watson
Valerie P. Hans
CONTENTS vii
Kurt Burch
Susan E. Groh
Elizabeth M. Lieux
Barbara A. Williams
INDEX 271
PREFACE
viii
P R E FA C E ix
present a series of case studies from a variety of disciplines and colleagues who
have incorporated PBL into their courses. We hope that this compilation of our
experiences will assist others in their journeys into problem-based instruction.
We would like to acknowledge the support of the many students whose
positive responses to our efforts to vitalize our teaching fueled (and continues
to fuel) our enthusiasm. We would also like to acknowledge the many faculty
who contributed to our collective experience above and beyond the chapters
in this volume. In addition, support of the University of Delaware administra-
tion (from the President and Provost to individual department chairs) was a
key factor in the transformation of our fledgling, grassroots effort into a thriv-
ing, campuswide reform. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the following
agencies and foundations, whose support helped us to extend our vision
beyond our own courses and campus: the National Science Foundations Divi-
sion of Undergraduate Education (for development of the first PBL courses in
the introductory sciences and creation of the ITUE), the U.S. Department of
Educations Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (for devel-
opment of the peer group facilitator program), the Howard Hughes Medical
Institute (for development of PBL courses in the biomedical sciences and sup-
port of peer group facilitators), and the Pew Charitable Trusts (for expansion
of PBL laterally across the disciplines).
B. J. D., S. E. G., and D. E. A.
PART ONE
INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES
Part One deals with some institutional issues associated with the adoption of
problem-based learning. Here we describe the problem-based learning effort at
the University of Delaware, discuss the role played by the faculty-led Institute
for Transforming Undergraduate Education in furthering the use of PBL on
campus, and present some ideas concerning the nature of effective adminis-
trative support for educational reform.
1
WHY PROBLEM-BASED
LEARNING?
A CASE STUDY OF INSTITUTIONAL
CHANGE IN UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION
Chapter Summary
The past decade has seen major changes in how we communicate, do
business, access information, and use technology. How we teach must
also change in order to prepare our students to cope with these new
situations: students need more than ever to be able to pose questions,
seek and find appropriate resources for answering these questions,
and communicate their solutions effectively to others. Problem-based
learning is one educational strategy that helps students build the rea-
soning and communication skills necessary for success today. This
chapter describes the basic tenets of problem-based learning and out-
lines the development of a university-wide program of problem-based
learning at one institution, the University of Delaware.
Introduction
The last several decades have seen monumental change in all aspects of our
liveshow we communicate, conduct business, access information, and use
3
4 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
small groups with a dedicated faculty tutor to learn basic science concepts in
the context of actual clinical cases. The process of problem-based instruction
(Boud & Feletti, 1997) follows:
PBL fosters the ability to identify the information needed for a particular
application, where and how to seek that information, how to organize that
information in a meaningful conceptual framework, and how to communicate
that information to others. Use of cooperative working groups fosters the
development of learning communities in all classrooms, enhancing student
achievement (Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, 1991). Students who learn concepts
in the context in which they will be used are more likely to retain that knowl-
edge and apply it appropriately (Albanese & Mitchell, 1993). They will also
recognize that knowledge transcends artificial boundaries since problem-based
instruction highlights interconnections between disciplines and the integration
of concepts.
8 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
every discipline, and over thirty courses had been transformed to incorporate
problem-based learning. Off-campus participants included K12 educators
and faculty from institutions throughout the United States and as far away as
Australia, Europe, and South Africa.
Despite the advantage of improving the undergraduate experience that
problem-based learning offers, it became clear that, for many instructors, the
adoption of PBL as a mode of instruction was a change not undertaken lightly.
Giving up the safety and authority of the podium can be unsettling for faculty
accustomed only to a traditional, teacher-centered lecture format. Attempts to
promote PBL further, therefore, would have to be accompanied by broader
efforts to change the campus culture to one more accepting of active, student-
centered, and inquiry-based learning.
Realizing that many instructors were unfamiliar with (and intimidated by)
active student-centered learning in general, a core of PBL-active faculty created,
with the support of NSFs Institution-Wide Reform program, an Institute for
Transforming Undergraduate Education (ITUE). The goals and methods of this
Institute will be discussed in more detail later by Watson and Groh (Chapter 2);
in short, faculty selected as ITUE Fellows attend workshops and programs pro-
viding them with hands-on experiences with PBL and other active learning
strategies, as well as the effective use of technology in their courses. The orga-
nizing faculty and Fellows from previous years serve as mentors to help their
colleagues negotiate this somewhat unnerving paradigm shift in teaching.
In 1997 and 1998, the first two years of the Institute, over 100 faculty Fel-
lows participatedtwice the number originally anticipated. Although the PBL
effort was based originally in the College of Arts and Sciences, ITUE helped to
spread its influence rapidly throughout the campus: teams from the political
science, biology, mechanical and electrical engineering departments, for exam-
ple, attended ITUE in preparation for transforming their undergraduate cur-
ricula. The success of the Institute led the university administration to make
ITUE an integral part of faculty development. By the summer of 2000, more
than 230 Fellows had received training through the Institute with problem-
based learning being incorporated into more than 150 courses and experi-
enced by over 4000 students.
Assisted by the creation of this Institute, visibility of the PBL effort
increased dramatically both on and off campus. By sharing their experiences
with their colleagues, Visiting Fellows from other institutions, both in the
United States and abroad, generated further interest both in problem-based
learning and in UDs approach on their own campuses. In 1997, UD was one
of only ten institutions nationwide to receive an NSF Recognition Award for
10 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
the Integration of Research and Education (RAIRE) for its leadership and
vision in research-based education, and was also singled out in the recent
Boyer report (Boyer, 1998) for its emphasis on research-based learning. The
promotion of PBL as a means of allowing students to experience the excite-
ment of discovery in the classroom, as well as in the lab, was highly praised in
both of these awards. A report commissioned by NSF in 1997 cited the Uni-
versity of Delaware in recommending problem-based learning as ideally suited
for instruction in the analytical sciences (NSF, 1997). In 1998, the University
received a grant from the Pew Charitable Trusts to support (1) the introduc-
tion of problem-based learning into large general education courses in the
social sciences and humanities, and (2) the establishment of a national elec-
tronic clearinghouse for problem-based learning. Now in the beta testing
stage, this repository of problems, teaching notes, articles, and other materials
will serve as an invaluable resource for other educators seeking to use
problem-based learning in their classrooms. In 1999, the University of
Delaware was awarded the Theodore M. Hesburgh Certificate of Excellence
in recognition of its enhancement of undergraduate teaching through the ITUE
faculty development program.
In looking for elements that have been critical to the development of the
PBL program at Delaware, one finds a critical mass of individuals committed
to the improvement of instruction; success in garnering external funding to
leverage support and provide outside validation for the effort; a mechanism
for training and mentoring other faculty in the new pedagogy; and adminis-
trative support. At Delaware, a handful of science faculty, concerned about
how well their students were learning, were drawn to PBL by its potential for
providing a richer learning experience for their students. Successful proposals
to respected national organizations not only provided financial support for the
project but even more importantly, demonstrated that this undertaking was
considered both credible and valuable in the eyes of outside experts. The ITUE
made it possible to encourage and support other faculty in making their tran-
sition to a more active, student-centered mode of instruction, helping to
change the culture of teaching and learning at the university. Finally, while this
has been a grassroots-level call for change in teaching rather than a
management-driven program, the support of the administration (which
Cavanaugh discusses in Chapter 3) has been crucial in helping to sustain the
effort.
WHY PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING? 11
Authors Biographies
Barbara J. Duch is Associate Director of the Mathematics & Science
Education Resource Center at the University of Delaware.
Susan E. Groh, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor in Chemistry and
Biochemistry and an affiliated faculty member of the University Hon-
ors Program at the University of Delaware.
Deborah E. Allen, Ph.D., is Associate Professor and Undergrad-
uate Programs Director in the Department of Biological Sciences and
an affiliated faculty member of the University Honors Program at the
University of Delaware.
References
Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of
literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine,
68, 5281.
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1997). The challenge of problem-based learning (2nd
ed.). London: Kogan Page.
Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University for
the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1998). Rein-
venting Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for Americas Research Uni-
versities. URL: http://notes.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf.
Czujko, R. (1994). Physics job market: A Statistical Overview. Announcer, 24
(4), p. 62.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning:
Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. (ASHE-ERIC Higher
Education Report No. 4). Washington, DC: George Washington University.
National Science Foundation. (1997). Curricular Developments in the Analyt-
ical Sciences. Arlington, VA: Author.
Wingspread Conference. (1994). Quality Assurance in Undergraduate Educa-
tion: What the Public Expects. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the
States.
2
FACULTY MENTORING
FACULTY
THE INSTITUTE FOR TRANSFORMING
UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION
Chapter Summary
An essential feature of educational reform on campus is commitment
from the faculty. At the University of Delaware, instructors with an
interest in making the transition to more student-centered, active
forms of learning receive support from the Institute for Transform-
ing Undergraduate Education (ITUE), a faculty-driven program that
combines instruction in pedagogy with personal mentoring by fac-
ulty who have already transformed their own teaching. This chapter
describes the goals of ITUE, how it operates, and its role in pro-
moting the adoption of problem-based learning on this and other
campuses.
13
14 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
active learning strategies. Those coming primarily for PBL saw how the Web
can be used to facilitate student learning in their courses and were empowered
both to design problems with rich on-line resources and to publish them on
the Web for their students. ITUE has continued with this two-pronged
approach to faculty development that has, in our opinion, been an essential
element in its success.
Perhaps one of the most important aspects of ITUE has been its identifi-
cation as an initiative that arose from the faculty and remains faculty-led. The
ITUE leaders are all active teaching faculty with experience in making the tran-
sition from lectures to more student-centered active learning instructional
models. As much as one can be convinced intellectually that moving to an
approach such as problem-based learning is pedagogically sound and desir-
able, taking that first step away from the lectern and surrendering even some
of the responsibility for learning to the students can be unnerving. Being able
to turn for advice and mentoring to other faculty who have already made that
transition helps to ease some of those concerns. Besides having the opportu-
nity for one-on-one consultations with the ITUE leaders, Institute Fellows are
invited to visit classroom sessions of ongoing PBL courses to get a better sense
of how these ideas play out with students. In addition, the fact that the ITUE
program came out of faculty ranks rather than as a mandate from the admin-
istration has, we feel, been a positive factor in faculty buy-in. An instructor
may make the decision to pursue the approaches espoused by ITUE freely,
rather than as a result of pressure from the top.
The administrations strong support for the educational strategies pro-
moted by ITUE has been made clear in a number of tangible ways: ITUE Fel-
lows, for example, have been awarded matching support funds from their
departments or colleges. The recently constructed Gore Hall is devoted solely
to classroom use; it contains no large lecture halls; indeed, no room holds
more than 80 people, and several classes were furnished explicitly for case
study or PBL use. Campus recruiting programs are billed as Delaware Dis-
covery Days, with a strong emphasis on the theme of discovery-based educa-
tion. An administrative orientation session for new faculty has been conducted
in part using a problem-based format.
Expanding the leadership of ITUE to include faculty members from disci-
plines outside of natural sciences has been key to sustaining interest across the
spectrum of disciplines represented at the University. Two ITUE leaders have
been added from Health Science and Sociology & Criminal Justice, both
demonstrating best practice in the use of PBL, as well as instructional tech-
nology. Expansion of the leadership team has permitted ITUE to expand and
refine its programs without burning out the founding leaders.
FA C U LT Y M E N T O R I N G FA C U LT Y 19
Another successful model that ITUE has supported focuses effort on depart-
ments seeking to transform their curricula broadly and coherently. In the first
cycle of ITUE, nine members of Biological Sciences, six members of Mechanical
Engineering, and five members of Civil and Environmental Engineering partici-
pated in ITUE activities, as well as a three-member team from Linguistics. Not
surprisingly, collaborative efforts are more likely to lead to systemic reform in
departmental curricula. Departments with at least ten ITUE Fellows over the
past four years include Political Science & International Relations (17), Biolog-
ical Sciences (14), Education (13), Sociology & Criminal Justice (10), and Con-
sumer Studies (10). Development of vertical integration of PBL through the
majors curriculum is well underway as a result in most of these units.
Since 1988, ITUE has welcomed off-campus participants; to date we have
hosted 66 Visiting Faculty Fellows from 29 institutions, including 36 SMET
faculty members. The international reach of ITUE has been a delightful sur-
prise and a tribute to the representation of PBL at UD by its practitioners at
professional conferences and via its Web presence. At this point, international
visitors have participated from Slovakia, Belgium, Mexico, Australia, and
Korea. Curriculum reform teams have been highly visible in their ITUE par-
ticipation; groups have participated from a diverse set of institutions: Col-
orado College (4), Defense Systems Management College (3), Samford Uni-
versity (6), Florida A&M University (4), Middlesex Community College (5),
North Dakota State University (6), and Universite Catholique de Louvain (8).
We have recently expanded our program to include visiting K12 Fellows,
integrating local middle and high school teachers into our week long pro-
grams, coordinated with UDs Math/Science Education Resource Center.
Creation of an active visitors program has affected ITUE in several ben-
eficial ways. First, several representatives of the UD PBL effort are regularly
solicited for on-site workshops, both nationally and internationally, for the
benefit of specific audiences. Typically, more requests are received than can
be honored because of time and travel constraints. The regular availability
of UD ITUE sessions allows participants from those institutions to travel
instead to Delaware, interact with educators from diverse institutions and
disciplines, and return to their institutions with the background and
resources needed to begin introducing PBL at their home institutions.
Optional afternoon workshops to train prospective trainers are now offered
as needed in the ITUE program.
The second benefit is for the UD faculty. ITUE attracts leading proponents
of curriculum reform and incorporation of active learning and instructional
technology at their respective institutions. UD faculty members have the oppor-
tunity to interact with interested participants beyond their own department and
20 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
campus, interested enough to make the trip to Newark, Delaware, during their
academic year break. The Visiting Fellows bring great vitality to the ITUE ses-
sions and raise the importance of ITUE in the eyes of the UD faculty as they
recognize the opportunities available to them through the local resources of
ITUE, its leaders, and established base of Faculty Fellows.
The strategy in promoting active and problem-based learning at UD has
been to target introductory-level courses, in order to develop critical habits of
mind in students as soon as possible. We also hope that early exposure to these
exciting teaching methods will stimulate student demand for more courses like
them, helping to spread the reform effort throughout the curriculum. Thus far,
over 100 lower-level courses either have been or are slated for transformation
to utilize active and problem-based learning. The recent awarding of a Pew
Charitable Trusts grant to UD to incorporate problem-based learning into
large, general education courses in the social sciences and humanities will
enhance this effort even more.
Toward this end, ITUE has supported small teams of faculty members for
development of multidisciplinary courses, especially those that would serve
nonscience majors and first-year students in meeting curricular requirements.
As originally envisioned in our project proposal to NSF, these Foundation
Courses would approach topic areas in science from a multidisciplinary point
of view, challenging students to learn by solving real-world problems or work-
ing through cases in groups or teams. A similar approach was adopted by the
University of Delaware in Spring 2000 as a key feature of the universitys new
General Education Program. First-year interdisciplinary Pathways to Discov-
ery courses are thematic, integrative courses for first-year students designed
to introduce students to the academic resources of the university and to teach
basic intellectual skills required for a successful undergraduate experience.
Many of the faculty members designing and offering courses for this initiative
have participated fully in ITUE. The widespread adoption of PBL that resulted
from the creation of ITUE framed the discussion of general education reform
and is apparent in its stated aims to ensure that every student will be able to
do the following:
5. Understand the diverse ways of thinking that underlie the search for
knowledge in the arts, humanities, sciences, and social sciences
6. Develop the intellectual curiosity, confidence, and engagement that
will lead to lifelong learning
7. Develop the ability to integrate academic knowledge with
experiences that extend the boundaries of the classroom
8. Expand understanding and appreciation of human creativity and
diverse forms of aesthetic and intellectual expression
9. Understand the foundations of U.S. society, including the significance
of its cultural diversity
10. Develop an international perspective in order to live and work
effectively in global society
Summary
In 1993, the term problem-based learning was virtually unknown on the cam-
pus of the University of Delaware. Seven years later, it has become a byword, and
the university has established an international reputation as the leader in the
development of problem-based learning in undergraduate education. At the heart
of this change in campus culture has been the Institute for Transforming Under-
graduate Education. To date, over 25 percent of the UD faculty have participated
either in PBL workshops or ITUE programs, and more than 150 courses have
been or are targeted for transformation. ITUEs efforts toward the improvement
of undergraduate education through faculty development were recognized in
1999 through the Theodore M. Hesburgh Certificate of Excellence.
What began as a search on the part of a few faculty members for a better
way to teach is changing the face of undergraduate education at UD and pro-
viding a viable model for other institutions to emulate. The initial proposal to
use PBL in a handful of courses has led to the following:
Perhaps the most important change, though, has been in attitudein the
renewed interest expressed throughout the university in the importance of
undergraduate teaching aimed at meeting the real needs of our students, in
ways that are invigorating and effective for both students and faculty.
We invite you to participate in an upcoming ITUE session!
Authors Biographies
George H. Watson is Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the Uni-
versity of Delaware.
Susan E. Groh is Assistant Professor of Chemistry and Biochem-
istry and an affiliated faculty member of the University Honors Pro-
gram at the University of Delaware.
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 2
Table 2.1. Sessions Presented during the 1997 Summer ITUE Program
Wed. Experience It Yourself Example of class structured
around a problem.
Getting StartedThe Syllabus Building the framework of your
course; elements of a good
syllabus.
The Internet as a Learning Finding information on the Web
Resource and using the Web as a
resource for student learning.
Thurs. Incorporating Active Learning Active learning and larger classes.
in the Classroom
Getting Started with Groups Why use groups? What works?
Problems and Cases: Writing Characteristics of good problems
Material for Your Course or cases; Bloom taxonomy and
higher-order thinking skills.
Internet Resources for Your
Course
Fri. Panel Discussion on Student Reexamining how we assess
Assessment students.
Assessment Strategies Nontraditional assessment
strategies to try.
Evaluation of Transformation
Projects
23
24 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
John C. Cavanaugh
Chapter Summary
Experience and research evidence demonstrate that problem-based
learning (PBL) greatly improves the teaching and learning environ-
ment. However, without appropriate support from key administra-
tors, PBL cannot emerge as a viable instructional option. This chap-
ter discusses ways administrators can help facilitate the successful
introduction of problem-based learning on campus.
Introduction
Arguably the most difficult challenge facing an academic administrator is
designing successful, sustainable curricular or pedagogical reform (Ewell,
1997). In part, this is due to faculty reluctance to change well-established habits
without extensive evidence that the proposed approach is better, and in part to
administrative reluctance to push the need for currency in view of empirical
research on the efficacy of alternative approaches. The unfortunate conse-
quence is that too often the opportunities for true innovation and improvement
of student learning are lost because of faculty and administrative proclivity to
become bogged down in seemingly endless discussion and turf protection.
27
28 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
goals for the campus as outlined by the chief executive officer or the chief aca-
demic officer in annual reports to the faculty. Ideally, well-stated goals can
then be turned over to the appropriate faculty governance group(s) for further
refinement and implementation. However, top-down strategies also run the
risk of being perceived as mandates that are simply pronouncements made
without room for discussion. For example, a chief executive officer may sim-
ply declare that the faculty will change the curriculum or change the way they
teach. In these cases, a top-down strategy may not be effective and may delay
reform efforts, and in the worst case it may completely stifle any chance of
support by the faculty.
In contrast, bottom-up strategies begin with faculty coming together in
support of an initiative that is subsequently supported by senior administra-
tors. In this case, a faculty-led initiative, such as the initial PBL initiative at the
University of Delaware described elsewhere in this book (Chapter 1), garners
support from key administrators only after it is clear that a core group of fac-
ulty are strongly committed to the change initiative, and there is a reasonable
probability of success. At this point, senior administrators may step forward
and champion the project.
The advantages of a bottom-up strategy are that there is no question of
faculty support, there usually are successful demonstrations of the new cur-
riculum or pedagogical approach, and potential faculty leadership on the ini-
tiative is likely to have emerged. There may also have been successes at procur-
ing extramural funds to support the early stages of the project. Senior
administrative support at this point makes it appear that faculty are clearly in
control of the curriculum and that success is being rewarded and encouraged.
The disadvantage is that if the support from senior administrators is too slow
in coming or is mistimed, the initial excitement and motivation of the faculty
change agents may be lost. For example, if there is an overt attempt by senior
administrators to wrest control of the project from its faculty base, either
rhetorically or in fact, then the initial success is unlikely to be sustained, and
faculty may abandon the effort.
Clearly, the best situation involves the right balance between top-down
and bottom-up strategies. For example, a faculty-led initiative to improve
student learning through PBL that enjoys early success in improving student
performance and results in significant reinvigoration among faculty for
their teaching is supported publicly by senior academic administrators.
Three key ingredients that maximize the likelihood of a successful blend of
top-down and bottom-up strategies can be identified: (1) getting the rheto-
ric right, (2) removing the barriers to innovation, and (3) making adequate
resources available.
30 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
they simply do not have the time to work on change. In such cases, an effec-
tive alternative would be to provide faculty release time from other obligations
(e.g., course, committee work) to prepare a PBL course. In short, the best
approach for designing incentives for faculty is to have a range of options that
can be tailored to the needs of individuals.
Unfortunately, no matter how flexible and individually tailored the incen-
tive system is, it may not address the most difficult issue facing early career
facultythe danger of taking risks concerning their teaching. The issue is
straightforward. Early career faculty are (in too many cases correctly) con-
cerned that adopting a new instructional approach could result in less positive
teaching evaluations than their tried-and-true (but possibly less effective)
approach. Many senior faculty exacerbate the situation by strongly dissuading
early-career faculty from attempting any innovations in their teaching for fear
that it will affect their reappointment and tenure and promotion decisions neg-
atively. Thus, many early-career faculty are risk averse when it comes to try-
ing a new approach in their teaching.
It is critical that academic administrators, especially chairs and deans,
make it very clear what the stakes are for early-career faculty. If a climate
favorable to innovation is to be established, then mechanisms must be in place
to protect early-career faculty who decide to be innovative. For example,
means by which early-career faculty receive meaningful credit for engaging in
curricular or pedagogical reform efforts could be implemented. In any case, it
is often the responsibility of academic administrators to ensure that early-
career faculty who choose to try alternative instructional approaches are not
affected negatively.
The costs of PBL include both obvious ones (e.g., faculty incentive pay,
professional development and training, consultants) and less obvious ones (e.g.,
increased course preparation time for faculty). These costs can be examined at
four levels of analysis: (1) individual, (2) department, (3) college/school, and
(4) institutional.
At the individual level, costs can be measured in terms of time spent prepar-
ing for and teaching a course, as well as in terms of financial resources, such as
merit increases or increased professional development funds as a direct result of
using a particular teaching-learning approach. For example, a faculty member
may find that preparing for a PBL course takes longer than for a traditional lec-
ture course and may risk receiving somewhat lower merit funds as a result of
changing from traditional lecture format to PBL. In addition to benefits in terms
of improved (over the long run) teaching evaluations, which in turn may lead to
higher merit increases, benefits of PBL may also accrue in terms of having access
to additional professional development or extramural funds. For example, fac-
ulty who use PBL may be eligible to receive funds to attend workshops, such as
those described by Watson and Groh (Chapter 2). Although costs and benefits
to individual faculty are both real and highly salient, they are difficult to com-
pare across individuals. Thus, most cost-benefit analyses for comparison pur-
poses are conducted at the development, college/school, and institutional levels.
Most cost analyses at the department, college/school, and institutional lev-
els focus exclusively on the actual dollars expended per full-time equivalent
(FTE) student or some similar index. Such benchmark data permit direct com-
parisons across departments and institutions and rely on common definitions
of terms. Using such indices can provide a consistent measure of costs of
instruction based on different teaching-learning methods. However, compar-
isons between traditional lecture, for example, and PBL approaches must
include all relevant aspects (e.g., faculty development, laptop computers,
teaching assistants) in order to be meaningful.
As the level of aggregation increases, the types of benefits that become
important also change. For example, at the department (and in some cases
college/school level), benefits may include overall passage rates on certification
examinations following PBL courses, summative evaluation of majors and
courses of study, number of papers and presentations made by faculty con-
cerning PBL, and the like. At the institutional level, a benefit of widespread PBL
use may be the ability to use PBL as a student (and faculty) recruitment tool in
order to uniquely position the institution in relation to its peers.
The cost-benefit analysis computed at various levels of analysis is
extremely important. In general, PBL is likely to be more costly (at least in
34 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
terms of expenditures per FTE student and faculty time) during the initial
development and implementation phases. Thus, it is essential to define specific
benefits by which PBL will be evaluated in advance. Furthermore, these bene-
fits should include both those that involve student learning (e.g., content learn-
ing, critical thinking, problem-solving skills) and those focused on faculty
(e.g., improved teaching ratings, increased motivation for teaching, scholarly
publications on teaching). The decision point at which PBL will be supported
even in the face of greater costs should also be specified in advance; otherwise,
it will be difficult to evaluate the point at which PBL is too costly even when
the benefits are clearly demonstrated. Equally important to these analyses is
the continued monitoring of the cost-benefit data over time. Ideally, costs
should stabilize or decline as faculty become more proficient at PBL and larger
sections of PBL courses are implemented.
In sum, the analysis of cost-benefit data is a key aspect of determining the
long-term viability of PBL. If the models described elsewhere in this book are
implemented, especially those describing large section PBL courses, use of
undergraduate peer tutors, and faculty-to-faculty peer mentoring, over the
long run, costs of PBL instruction should not be significantly greater than tra-
ditional lecture formats.
Achieving Sustainability
Getting a curricular or pedagogical reform underway and gaining the neces-
sary support from senior academic administrators represent only a beginning
of true change. In order to effect true change, it is essential that the change
effort be sustained over the long run. The secrets to sustainability are relatively
simple: (a) Establish an ongoing faculty development program. (b) Maintain
the right mix of incentives. (c) Create a demand for the new curriculum or ped-
agogy. (d) Generate publicity and recognition.
Of the various models of faculty development, one that has worked
extremely well at the University of Delaware is the faculty-to-faculty model
described by Watson and Groh in Chapter 2. By focusing on developing a crit-
ical mass of faculty who use PBL and having those faculty serve as peer tutors,
a self-sustaining faculty development and support program was developed.
This program creates PBL experts in every department, ultimately making
department faculty (rather than a director of a teaching center) the locus of
assistance. This is a very important shift; by focusing on departments, barriers
based on discipline-based differences in instruction are greatly reduced.
A second key to sustainability involves maintaining the right mix of incen-
tives for faculty to continue using an innovation such as PBL. Earlier in this
MAKE IT SO 35
chapter, the issues pertaining to incentives were discussed (e.g., salary, admin-
istered workloads, etc.). Too often, these incentives are created in order to get
the initiative started and are subsequently withdrawn and moved to the next
new project. A secret to sustaining a curricular or pedagogical innovation is
leaving the incentives in place and keeping them current. This latter point
involves assessing incentives periodically to make sure they reflect the set of
faculty needs at the time. For example, one popular incentive early in an ini-
tiative is support to create a course using an innovation such as PBL. At some
point, though, course development needs may significantly diminish. How-
ever, a need for advanced training in PBL techniques may emerge. Unless the
incentive system keeps pace with changing faculty needs, there is likely to be
a mismatch between incentives and need. Successful innovations manage to
maintain a match between the two by periodic review of incentives by faculty
and academic administrators.
A third critical element of sustainability involves creating a demand for the
innovation. In the case of PBL, this would entail getting and keeping students
excited about taking PBL courses. In large part, this depends on the faculty
delivering dynamic courses that provide excellent learning opportunities, but
academic advisors encouraging students to take PBL courses is also important.
When students are excited about learning through PBL, they put pressure on
departments to provide additional PBL opportunities, which helps sustain PBL.
Finally, publicity about a curricular or pedagogical innovation like PBL is
critical to keep faculty (and academic administrators) motivated. Faculty-staff
publications, department newsletters, local newspapers, and alumni magazines
all offer ways of getting the word out about an innovation. Teaching and
research awards should include opportunities for faculty who use the innova-
tion. Like anyone, faculty need to be recognized and rewarded for being will-
ing to explore new ways of doing their jobs, which in turn helps maintain the
innovation.
Documenting Outcomes
The great increase in the need to document the outcomes of curricular or ped-
agogical innovations for accreditation and other purposes means that the
appropriate data need to be collected to show the effectiveness of the inno-
vation. Such documentation includes measurement of student learning, stu-
dents critical thinking, pass rates on licensure examinations, course evalua-
tions, and faculty self-evaluation of teaching. Many examples of outcome
measures are discussed throughout this book (Part Three) (see also Mierson
& Parikh, 2000).
36 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Author Biography
John C. Cavanaugh is the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic
Affairs at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington. He previ-
ously held the office of Vice Provost for Academic Programs and
Planning at the University of Delaware.
References
Ewell, P. T. (1997). Organizing for learning. AAHE Bulletin, 50 (1), 36.
Mierson, S., & Parikh, A. A. (2000). Stories from the field: Problem-based
learning from a teachers and a students perspective. Change, 32 (1),
2127.
Seldin, P. (1998). How colleges evaluate teaching: 1988 vs. 1998. AAHE Bul-
letin, 50 (7), 37.
Shulman, L. S. (1999). Taking learning seriously. Change, 31 (4), 1017.
PART TWO
Chapter Summary
Problem-based learning is a teaching technique used in many medical
schools to facilitate learning basic science concepts in the context of
clinical cases. This model is not generally applicable to many typical
undergraduate courses for a variety of reasons, including class size.
This chapter discusses several instructional models used in medium to
large classes.
Introduction
In the early 1990s when I first became aware of problem-based learning (PBL)
in the medical school setting, I was immediately interested in it because I
believed that the process of learning in PBL most closely mimics how we ques-
tion and learn in our professional lives. I was also aware, however, that what
worked in a medical school setting might not transfer well into a typical
undergraduate setting for a variety of reasons, including intellectual maturity
and motivation level of the students. I found that in order to incorporate PBL
in undergraduate courses, it was necessary to develop models of instruction
39
40 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
that allow one faculty member to teach large numbers of typical undergradu-
ate students. There are a variety of instructional decisions that need to be
made based on several factors, including size of class, intellectual maturity of
students, course objectives, preference of instructor, and availability of under-
graduate peer tutors or graduate teaching assistants.
Instructional Models
When the early PBL reformers at the University of Delaware started to
develop their first problem-based courses, each instructor made his or her own
decisions on the best way to use problem-based instruction for their students.
At the same time, those faculty members were talking to one another, sharing
what was working in their course, what wasnt working, and brainstorming
ideas for overcoming some of the problems they encountered in adopting
problem-based techniques in their typical undergraduate classes. Out of those
discussions and early adoptions, several models of problem-based instruction
were identified and have been used by increasing numbers of faculty who
teach undergraduates in a variety of undergraduate institutions.
have a dedicated faculty tutor lead discussion, answer questions, and ensure
equal participation from all students, it is best to limit the size of each group
to four, at most five students. Johnson, Johnson, and Smith (1991) recommend
that students be assigned to groups of four in order to improve student
accountability and assure that each student gets his or her own talk time. It
is also easier to plan group activities that require the effort of four students
rather than a larger group.
In this model, only a portion of class time will be devoted to individual
group discussion, while the instructor as the floating facilitator moves from
group to group asking questions and probing for student understanding.
Other periods of time will be spent having each group report to the whole class
on the results of individual discussions. Minilectures and whole class discus-
sions will also play a role in this model, as well as other activities, such as
debates and presentation of project results or problem solutions. Using a vari-
ety of learning activities has the advantage of appealing to the diverse learning
styles of the students in the course.
The following is an example of activities in a typical class the day after the
first stage of a problem has been introduced and the students have had an
opportunity to do research on their initial learning issues:
Before introducing the second stage, the faculty member may want to sum-
marize the first stage of the problem, soliciting remarks from each student
group in terms of answers to questions and resolution of important learning
issues. The cycles between group discussion and whole-class activities will help
the instructor keep informed of what and how the groups are doing and will
also be a mechanism for timing the progress of all of the groups, ensuring that
a few groups dont get too far ahead or behind.
probe for deeper levels of understanding. Peer tutors can help incorporate an
instructional model that is closer to problem-based instruction in medical
schools. Peer tutors are especially effective in the following ways:
Just as in the medical school model, peer tutors can serve the role of group
facilitator to a larger group (six to eight students) since they will be in a posi-
tion of monitoring the group function on a regular basis. In large classes where
there are not enough tutors for each group, they can serve in a rotating or
floating facilitator role with two or three groups of four students. This role
is more difficult for peer tutors (as it is for faculty). If this model is used, it may
be desirable to script appropriate probing questions and dialogue for the peer
tutors to use as they move from group to group. This strategy, although some-
what structured, ensures that each group is effectively guided toward achiev-
ing the course instructional goals. More details about peer tutors and how to
prepare undergraduates to be successful group facilitators are found in Chap-
ter 8 of this book.
A PBL instructor will want to plan to use many teaching strategies that will
challenge students to develop critical thinking skills and communication skills
and still support them in a way that allows them to accept the challenges of
learning from themselves and their peers. When planning a PBL class, recog-
nize that it will be important to cycle through many instructional activities
that will include minilectures, whole-class discussion, and small group discus-
sion. The daily routine may be somewhat like the one mentioned under the
floating facilitator model, but the faculty member will need to limit the time
that groups spend in individual group discussion. Rather than plan for a
twenty-minute period of group discussion, it will be more successful to break
the group discussion time into two ten-minute periods with whole class dis-
cussion or a minilecture in between. More details about teaching large classes
using PBL can be found in Chapter 14.
Conclusion
Incorporating PBL into typical undergraduate courses, particularly at research
universities, is a challenge that is worth meeting in order to help undergradu-
ate students develop the lifelong learning skills that will help them succeed in
college and beyond. Many models for successfully using PBL in medium- to
large-size classes have been discussed in this chapter, and more details of these
models are discussed in Part Three of this book. Each faculty member intent
on using problem-based instruction will make many decisions based on the
size of their class, the intellectual maturity of their students, the type of course
(survey course, introductory, majors upper level), and the availability of grad-
uate or undergraduate peer tutors.
M O D E L S F O R P R O B L E M - B A S E D I N S T R U C T I O N I N U N D E R G R A D U AT E C O U R S E S 45
Author Biography
Barbara J. Duch is Associate Director of the Mathematics & Science
Education Resource Center at the University of Delaware.
References
Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (Eds.). (1997). The challenge of problem-based learn-
ing (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learn-
ing: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC
Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, DC: George Washington
University.
5
WRITING PROBLEMS FOR
DEEPER UNDERSTANDING
Barbara J. Duch
Chapter Summary
One of the keys to success in implementing problem-based learning in
undergraduate courses is the type of problem you use. This chapter
will discuss ways to find or write PBL problems if there are no sources
of them in print.
Introduction
A common complaint heard from college faculty is that their students seem to
lack the ability or motivation to go beyond factual material to a deeper under-
standing of course material. The reasons for superficial rather than deep
understanding on the part of students are many, including how we test, what
expectations we set, and what learning materials we use when we teach. This
chapter will focus on using new materials and problems in a problem-based
environment to help students achieve in-depth knowledge of the concepts cen-
tral to their understanding course material.
Standard college textbook problems in science and other disciplines tend
to reinforce the students naive view of learning because they can successfully
answer homework end-of-chapter problems through memorization of facts
and equations and using novice pattern-match problem-solving techniques.
Typical problems do not foster the development of effective problem-solving
47
48 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
and analytical skills (Heller & Hollabaugh, 1992) nor do they challenge stu-
dents to develop critical thinking skills and logical reasoning (Mazur, 1996).
In a successful PBL course, the selection of appropriate problems and material
is crucial for students to go beyond a superficial understanding of the impor-
tant concepts and principles being taught.
What will the first page (or stage) look like? What open-ended
questions can be asked? What learning issues should be identified?
How will the problem be structured?
How long will the problem be? How many class periods will it take
to complete?
52 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Many times, PBL problems are designed as multistage or multipage and may
take student groups a week or more to complete. Not all the information
needed to solve the problem is given in the problem, or chapter, or perhaps
even in the textbook. Students will need to do some research, discover new
material, and arrive at judgments and decisions based on the information
learned. The problem may have more than one acceptable answer, based on
the assumptions students make.
For example: The problem I wrote about a car crash (A Day in the
Life of John Henry is at the end of this chapter) begins by asking
students to decide what questions a police officer needs to be able to
answer in order to decide who is at fault in an accident. What mea-
surements and data need to be gathered? What physics principles will
be needed to analyze the crash scene? These questions are designed to
encourage students to talk about what they already know about car
crashes and what they have already learned about the physics
involved.
The four-page problem takes students a week to work through, as
they research and learn about momentum, accident reconstruction,
safety devices, and then they apply that knowledge to make assump-
tions and judgments about the cause of the accident.
Step 4. Write a teacher guide detailing the instructional plans on using the
problem in the course. If the course is a medium- to large-size class, a combi-
nation of minilectures, whole-class discussion, and small group work with
groups regularly reporting may be necessary (see Chapter 4). The teacher
guide can indicate plans or options of cycling through the pages of the prob-
lem interspersing the various modes of learning.
Step 5. The final step is to identify resources for students. Students need to
learn to identify and utilize learning resources on their own, but it can be help-
ful if the instructor indicates a few good sources to get them started. Many stu-
dents today will want to limit their research to the Internet, so it will be impor-
tant to guide them toward the library as well.
Conclusion
Writing problem-based learning problems may be time consuming, challenging,
and sometimes frustrating. However, the process of thinking through the learn-
ing priorities of a course and finding, adapting, or writing complex, realistic
materials to meet those learning priorities will change how an instructor views
his or her course in the future. Any magazine or newspaper article, documen-
tary, news report, book or movie that is seen will become possible material for
new problems for a course. Faculty will gain a new appreciation for the con-
cepts and principles that they teach, and the connections that should be made
to concepts in other courses and disciplines. It is always revealing to grapple
with such questions as How is the knowledge of this concept used in the world
outside the classroom? or Why do my students need to know this? or How
will my students use this knowledge in future courses? I believe that writing
PBL problems can help faculty develop into more reflective teachers.
Author Biography
Barbara J. Duch is Associate Director of the Mathematics & Science
Education Resource Center at the University of Delaware.
References
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classifi-
cation of educational goals. New York: Longman.
Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem-solving through coop-
erative grouping. Am. J. Phys., 60, pp. 637644.
Mazur, E. (1996). The problem with problems. Optics and photonics news, 7, 59.
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 5
SAMPLE PBL PROBLEM: A DAY IN THE
LIFE OF JOHN HENRY, A TRAFFIC COP
Part 1
At 13:20 on the last Friday in September 1989, a frantic call was received at
the local police station. There had been a serious automobile accident at the
intersection of Main Street and State Street, with injuries involved. Lt. John
Henry arrived at the scene ten minutes after the phone call and found that
two cars had collided at the intersection. In one car, the driver was uncon-
scious, and in the other car, both driver and one passenger were injured.
After the emergency vehicles transported the injured to the hospital,
Lt. Henrys responsibility is to investigate the accident in order to determine
whether one of the drivers (or both) are responsible. With the severity of
injury in this accident, the investigation is critical because there may be a
fatality involved.
55
56 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
house house
stop
sign
22'
POI-A B
C
ref point unimproved
Dec 7'8" shoulder
house #20
12'2"
house
What physics principles will John Henry need to use in order to help
analyze the data and answer his questions?
If two cars moving at right angles to each other collide, in what
direction do you expect the cars to be moving after the collision?
What factors will influence the direction and distance traveled after
impact?
Part 2
The sketch of the accident scene is shown in Figure 5.1. Main Street, a thor-
oughfare, has a 45 miles per hour speed limit. State Street also has a 45 miles
per hour limit but has a stop sign on either side of the road. Vehicle 2, which
weighs 5800 lbs, skidded for 24 feet before coming to a stop next to the util-
ity pole, marked Dec #20. Vehicle 1, which weighs 2060 lbs, showed no skid
marks after the impact and came to a rest next to the house on the corner.
Looking at the impact areas of the cars, it was clear to Lt. Henry that the cars
W R I T I N G P R O B L E M S F O R D E E P E R U N D E R S TA N D I N G 57
collided at right angles, hitting the front right bumper of vehicle 2 and the
front left bumper of vehicle 1. After impact, they initially were traveling in the
same direction. Lt. Henry noted that the weather was clear and sunny, the tem-
perature was 69F and the roadway was dry.
Before John Henry got any further in his analysis, he was informed that the
driver who was unconscious at the scene of the accident died at the hospital.
Can you make an educated guess about which driver died based on
the evidence so far? Justify your answer.
Why would John Henry note the weather and the condition of the
road?
Why did vehicle 1 travel further than vehicle 2?
John Henry has to determine whether the driver of vehicle 2 ran the stop sign
and/or if the driver of vehicle 1 was speeding. Outline a procedure that Lt.
Henry can use to answer these important questions. Be sure that your reason-
ing is sound, since he will have to testify in court on the evidence.
Does John Henry have all the information he needs to determine the
velocities?
Lt. Henry used a drag sled to determine that the coefficient of friction between
the tires and road was 0.60. He cannot use the drag sled to determine the coef-
ficient of friction between the tires of vehicle 1 as they roll over the roadway
and grass.
Part 3
Using your outlined procedures, find the velocities of the two vehicles just
prior to impact, and estimate the coefficient of friction between the rolling
tires of vehicle 1 and the roadway and grass. Be sure to state any assumptions
that you make and justify them.
Part 4
Lt. Henry measured the skid marks made by both vehicles prior to impact. The
skid marks for vehicle 1 were 20 feet in length and for vehicle 2 were 7 feet in
length.
How fast were both cars going just prior to hitting their brakes?
Which driver do you recommend John Henry cite in the accident?
Justify your answer, since Lt. Henry will need to make an airtight case
in court.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/escape/resourcescar.html
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/
http://www.hwysafety.org/
http://c-design.com/c-design/accrec.html
6
STRATEGIES FOR
USING GROUPS
Deborah E. Allen, Barbara J. Duch,
and Susan E. Groh
Chapter Summary
In problem-based learning, students are asked to work together to
analyze and resolve problems, and to communicate, evaluate, and
integrate information from diverse sources. Effective performance of
these group learning tasks requires the development of new skills on
the part of both the student and instructor. This chapter discusses
strategies an instructor can use to maintain functional groups in the
classroomgroups in which all members work effectively to enhance
their own and each others learning.
Introduction
A team of students had four members called Everybody, Somebody,
Anybody and Nobody. There was an important job to be done.
Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it. Anybody could have
done it, but Nobody did it. Somebody got angry about that because it
was Everybodys job. Everybody thought Anybody could do it but
Nobody realised that Everybody wouldnt do it. It ended up that
Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody
could have done. (Gibbs, 1995)
59
60 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Forming Groups
Creation of heterogeneous groups can expose students to new ideas and dis-
tribute assets and liabilities evenly (Michaelson & Black, 1994). Heteroge-
neous groups can either be selected intentionally or randomly (by counting off
on the course roster or by having students count off in class, for example).
Information for intentional selection of attributes to be balanced across groups
can be based on student records (major, year in school), or on information
provided by students (existence of special skills, desired grade in the course,
course and work schedules on- or off-campus residence, etc.). Collaborative
learning can be a particular success story for minority students (Fullilove &
Treisman, 1990; George, 1994). Felder et al. (1995), however, recommend
that minority students (ethnic minorities or women in traditionally male dis-
ciplines) not be isolated in groups, in order to reduce the possibility of the dis-
counting or devaluing of their ideas.
62 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Monitoring Groups
Instructors Role
In the early model of PBL, each faculty tutor guided a single student group.
Although the role of the well-functioning classic PBL tutor is far from easy, the
one-on-one nature of his or her interaction with a group allows for spontaneous
and informal interventions that continually fine-tune the reasoning process,
assure evenness of participation, keep the group moving forward in the prob-
lem, promote good interpersonal relationships, and help the group learn how to
direct its own learning. In all but the smallest of undergraduate classes, the
instructor must resort to other strategies, often more structured and formal, to
help optimize the functioning of the multiple-classroom groups. These strategies
include (1) having well-defined group activities, (2) using PBL problems that
allow for instructor interventions at key points (in a large class, for example, at
roughly 1015 minute intervals) to bring the class together for discussion and/or
clarification, and (3) walking around the classroom as groups work to look for
and help remedy obvious signs of group dysfunction. These signs include con-
versations that are off task; students who dont take part in the discussion or
conversely, dominate it; and physical behaviors, such as reading while others are
talking, or sitting back and slightly apart from other group members.
Ground Rules
Another way to encourage students to take ownership of their effective per-
formance as a group is to ask them to establish and enforce group ground rules
in the first week or two of class, before negative behaviors have a chance to
take root. This set of standards and expectations, written after groups have
discussed the behaviors that they will not tolerate, helps to establish norms for
group behavior. Many instructors, particularly in courses taken by students
who are new to collaborative learning, provide examples of rules of the
road that are minimally essential for good group function: (1) come to class
on time, (2) come to class prepared, (3) notify members of the group ahead of
time if class must be missed for any reason, and (4) respect the views, values,
S T R AT E G I E S F O R U S I N G G R O U P S 63
and ideas of other members of the group. Some instructors mandate that these
essential behaviors be included in the ground rules, allowing student groups to
draft additional codes of behavior they feel are necessary.
As in the world outside the classroom, rules tend to be broken or ignored
if they have no teeth. For this reason, in many PBL courses, ground rules are
not considered complete unless there are stated consequences for violators.
Some examples of consequences that student groups have drafted are to have
the instructor lower the violators grade (to zero if appropriate) for assign-
ments to which he or she didnt contribute, or to give extra assignments or
share of responsibilities to make up for missed work. Students seldom suggest
permanent or even temporary shunning of a group member, despite being
informed by the instructor that this is conceivable and would be upheld. Some
instructors perceive that their students seldom resort to imposing their own
penalties for ground rule violation, and instead distribute a description of rec-
ommended steps to take when disturbed by another group members behavior
(see Conflict Resolution). In most courses, groups are asked to sign two
copies of their ground rules and consequences, give one copy to the instructor,
and keep one in a group notebook.
Group Roles
When each student feels individually accountable for his or her own perfor-
mance, free riders are discouraged and contributors to the group effort are
rewarded. One way to promote individual accountability and lower barriers
to participation is to ask students to take on roles of responsibility in their
groups. Common strategies include formulating a role for each student in the
group and asking students to rotate the roles among group members every
week or after every problem or assignment. This discourages students from
sticking to roles that come to them easily and gives them additional experience
in those that they find more challenging.
Commonly assigned roles of responsibility include the following:
Evaluation
Allowing classroom opportunities for students to provide constructive verbal
and written feedback to individuals and their groups is another strategy for
reinforcing positive group behaviors and maximizing individual accountabil-
ity. Verbal group feedback sessions work best if scheduled at the end of each
problem (at least two to three times a semester) or whenever a group is not
functioning well. Feedback sessions typically begin with each individual in the
group stating what the group did well since the last session and how he or she
thinks the group needs to change or improve to function better. Sessions
should ideally end with each group setting goals that will help remedy any per-
ceived problems. For example, if a group tends to drift into talk about per-
sonal issues, it may decide to monitor the accuracy coach and discussion
leader roles more closely in the future to help keep the discussions on task.
After the overall functioning of the group has been discussed, many
instructors ask students to rate their individual contributions to the group
effort using written evaluation forms (see Allen & Duch, 1998 and Chapter 11
for examples of these forms). Typically, the instructor predetermines the rat-
ings criteria on these forms. Each student fills out the form in a confidential
manner, rating the effort of the other members of the group as well as him- or
herself on a scale of one to five and writing a few sentences of specific com-
ments for each individual student. Instructors then compile the average ratings
and summarize all comments to be given to each student, ensuring that stu-
dents can be candid in their comments. The results of the ratings should be fac-
tored into each students grade.
This feedback is not only an important reality check for students, but is
invaluable in helping the instructor detect the signs of a malfunctioning group.
When evidence that group members are not contributing well presents itself in
these forms, early intervention is possible. Before the first feedback session of
the course, it helps to review for the class the basic guidelines for giving good
feedback (Gibbs, 1995). That is, good feedback is specific, focuses on behav-
iors and actions rather than personality or similar personal attributes,
describes rather than criticizes or demeans, is presented as perceptions or feel-
ings rather than as absolutes, and focuses on behavior that can be controlled
or changed.
S T R AT E G I E S F O R U S I N G G R O U P S 65
Finally, larger group projects, assignments, and products may also require
feedback about the extent and nature of each group members participation to
ensure individual accountability and discourage free riders.
Group Activities
Jigsaw Grouping
In a PBL course, students gradually become accustomed to discussing learn-
ing issues within their group, doing research, and teaching each other in order
to work through a problem. For some problems, use of a jigsaw group scheme
can be an effective way to encourage students to research one point of view
or learning issue in depth with others before sharing that information with his
or her permanent (base, or home) group (Slavin, 1995). In a jigsaw group
scheme operating in a PBL context, students begin a problem in their perma-
nent group and are then assigned a new group (the jigsaw or expert group) in
which to work with others who are also gathering evidence to support a par-
ticular viewpoint or researching the same learning issues. Each individual in
the permanent, home group chooses a distinct point of view for which he or
she will become an advocate. All students now form the new (jigsaw) groups
that are specific to their point of view. In a jigsaw group, discussion focuses
on issues that will influence that groups position on the problem. Each mem-
ber of the jigsaw group is assigned learning issues to research, then shares
information and constructs evidence to support the groups viewpoint. Stu-
dents then return to their base to advocate for their jigsaw groups position.
Typically, the base groups must then reach consensus on a position with
regard to a dilemma or proposal linked to the original problem and list the
reasons for the group decision. Whole-class discussion or debate can then fol-
low, with all groups (ideally) fully prepared to provide substantive evidence
for their consensus opinion.
Assignments
In a problem-based learning course, the instructor may plan to have groups work
through a series of problems, design and implement a project related to a prob-
lem or specific concepts in the course, develop a concept map (Allen & Duch,
1998), research and develop a problem of their own, complete a homework
assignment, or a variety of additional activities. A number of decisions need to be
made in planning such activities, including how to structure an assignment so
that all group members will be involved, whether individual students or the entire
group will be responsible for a written or presentation product, and whether the
66 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Resolving Conflicts
Group ground rules, roles of responsibilities, documenting the activities of the
group and individuals within the group, and peer pressure within the group all
provide ways to help group members avoid conflict. The instructor should
communicate clearly to the class that each student is responsible for monitor-
ing the functioning within his or her group, as well as the academic standards
of the discussions, assignments, and research reported. If students are in a
group with another person who resists working as hard as the rest of the mem-
bers, then the group-monitoring methods stated previously will provide safe,
objective mechanisms through which the group can give the errant individual
truthful and direct feedback concerning his or her performance and the
groups expectations. The instructor should also make it clear to students that
she or he will assist them in dealing with group conflict, including direct inter-
vention if necessary. This intervention may take the form of a request that a
group rewrite their ground rules and consequences, or the suggestion that the
group conduct an extra feedback session, or a requirement for the group to
meet regularly with the instructor until the conflict is resolved. It is important
to remember that conflict is not entirely negative and that it is good training
for students to learn to resolve conflict and facilitate troubled groups.
S T R AT E G I E S F O R U S I N G G R O U P S 67
Conclusions
For the many faculty members who did not experience group learning as stu-
dents, undertaking an instructional shift from traditional lecture (with its
emphasis on individual learning) to group-centered problem-based learning
may be rather intimidating; the same will certainly be true for many students.
It is important, therefore, to reassure both students and faculty that the bene-
fits of cooperative learning are well documented (see Johnson, Johnson, &
Smith, 1991 & 1998). By structuring a course with group ground rules, roles
of responsibility, and individual accountability, the PBL practitioner can
greatly curtail, if not eliminate entirely, the ability of slackers to benefit
from the hard work of others in the group. Knowing that their individual
efforts will be recognized and protected gives students the freedom to take full
advantage of the power of groups in developing knowledge with and for one
another.
Authors Biographies
Deborah E. Allen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Bio-
logical Sciences at the University of Delaware and an affiliated faculty
member in the University Honors Program.
Barbara J. Duch is Associate Director of the University of
Delawares Mathematics & Science Education Resource Center.
Susan E. Groh is an Assistant Professor in the Department of
Chemistry and Biochemistry and an affiliated faculty member of the
University Honors Program at the University of Delaware.
References
Allen, D. E., & Duch, B. J. (1998). Thinking toward solutions: Problem-based
learning activities for general biology. Philadelphia, PA: Harcourt Brace.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for
all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press,
p. 148.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in
the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington,
DC: George Washington University.
Feichtner, S. B., & Davis, E. A. (1985). Why some groups fail: A survey of stu-
dents experiences with learning groups. The Organizational Behavior
Teaching Review, 9, 5873.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-
centered instruction. College Teaching, 44, 4347.
68 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., Mauney, M., Hamrin, Jr., C. E., & Dietz, E. J.
(1995). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and
retention. III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes.
J. Engr. Education, 84, 151174.
Fullilove, R. E., & Treisman, P. U. (1990). Mathematics achievement among
African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berke-
ley: An evaluation of the mathematics workshop program. J. Negro Edu-
cation, 593, 463478.
George, P. G. (1994). The effectiveness of cooperative learning strategies in
multicultural university classrooms. Journal of Excellence in College
Teaching, 51, 2130.
Gibbs, G. (1995). Learning in teams: A tutor guide. Oxford: Oxonian Rewley
Press.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning:
Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher
Education Report No. 4. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Maximizing instruc-
tion through cooperative learning. ASEE PRISM, February, 2429.
Kolb, D. (1985). LSI: Self-scoring inventory and interpretation booklet.
Boston: McBer & Co.
MacGregor, J. (1987). Intellectual development of students in learning com-
munity programs, 19861987. Washington Center Occasional Paper
No. 1. Olympia, WA: Evergreen State College.
Michaelson, L. K. (19971998). Three keys to using learning groups effec-
tively. Teaching Excellence: Toward the Best in the Academy, 9 (5).
Michaelson, L. K., & Black, R. H. (1994). Building learning teams: The key
to harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. In S. Kadel
& J. Keener (Eds.) Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher edu-
cation Vol. 2. State College, PA: National Center for Teaching and Learn-
ing Assessment, pp. 6581.
Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Factors contributing
to high attrition rates among science, mathematics, and engineering
undergraduate majors. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning. Boston, MA. Allyn & Bacon.
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. (1999). Effects of cooperative
learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and
technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 2152.
7
GETTING STARTED IN
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Harold B. White, III
Chapter Summary
The transition from traditional instruction to a problem-based
approach to learning requires many changes and, without proper
preparation, can frustrate the best intentions. Among the issues one
needs to address are preparing a syllabus that reflects revised learning
objectives, finding appropriate problems to address content, intro-
ducing students to group process and learning skills, and dealing with
the uncertainty of a different classroom strategy.
Introduction
It takes a certain amount of independence and determination to change the
way one teaches. It also takes time and involves risks. Where do instructors
acquire the commitment to get started with problem-based learning (PBL)?
Frequently, commitment grows out of the recurring frustration most instruc-
tors experience when they realize how little their students understand or
remember from a semester of charismatic lectures. If not ignored, that frus-
tration leads to reflection on what it means to teach and to learn.
Problem-based learning addresses these issues and offers an attractive alterna-
tive to traditional education by shifting the focus of education from what fac-
ulty teach to what students learn. Content remains important, but emphasis
69
70 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
shifts more to the process. For those used to lecturing, the trade-offs can intim-
idate, but the promise of greater student understanding sustains the effort.
Fundamentally, adopting PBL requires a transformation of the classroom role
of the instructor from a sage on the stage to a guide on the side (King,
1993). With that change in perspective comes the commitment to accept the
risks and take the time. However, commitment alone is insufficient. Advanced
planning is necessary to anticipate pitfalls encountered by blind enthusiasm
(McKeachie, 1986; White, 1996a).
Decisions
While circumstances may limit choices, some ways of getting started are eas-
ier than others. Occasionally, one might start by creating an entirely new
course with a PBL format, but more often, instructors will transform one of
their existing lecture-based courses into one that uses PBL. Because existing
courses are already built into the curriculum, they have an established content
and clientele, and they constitute part of the regular workload. These factors
legitimatize the effort. Most faculty choose to make the transition gradually by
introducing a problem-based exercise every week or two at first. They also
tend to start with smaller classes and courses within a major. Once comfort-
able with PBL, instructors often transform other courses they teach.
G E T T I N G S TA R T E D I N P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G 71
Finding Problems
With the exception of a few disciplines, notably medicine and business, good
PBL problems usually do not appear in textbooks. As a consequence, an instruc-
tor needs to find problems, modify textbook problems, or write new problems
that address the course content goals and learning objectives. The learning issue
matrix (White, 1996b; White, Chapter 12 of this book) provides a strategy for
selecting a set of problems that covers the course content. While having to write
problems may be necessary and seem to be a significant barrier, most instructors
find writing problems an enjoyable scholarly activity (White, 1995; Duch, Chap-
ter 5 of this book). Furthermore, because of the need, there are outlets for pub-
lishing good problems. The PBL Clearinghouse and Case Studies in Science are
two web-based opportunities, while educational journals, such as Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology Education (see electronic resources for PBL at the end of
the list of references for the URLs to these three sites) or the Journal of College
Science Teaching will accept manuscripts describing PBL problems.
Course Information
This includes basic syllabus material, such as course title, course number, pre-
requisites, credit hours, meeting time, and meeting place. Some of these items
will be influenced by a change to a PBL format. For instance, when and where
will the class meet? To provide longer time for discussion, it may be useful to
have two 75-minute classes per week rather than three 50-minute classes. It
may be worth considering nonstandard meeting times, such as 75 minutes on
Monday and Friday to distribute time for out-of-class research if this is possi-
ble at your institution. The classroom itself is quite important. A room with
tables where students can work comfortably in groups is preferable to a room
with fixed seating in a tiered auditorium. A room with lots of blackboard
space provides opportunities for effective communications within groups.
Instructor Information
As for every course, the syllabus should contain information about who the
instructor is and where, how, and when he or she may be contacted. Not only
is student communication with the instructor important in a PBL course, but
other lines of communication are important and can be established ahead of
time. E-mail newsgroups, chat rooms, and electronic class-mailing lists can be
used to facilitate student-student and intergroup communication, which can
be more important than in a typical class and may need to be structured ahead
of time.
Instructor information in a syllabus might include a statement of teaching
philosophy that relates to PBL. That information might also accompany a
friendly e-mail message to the class during the week before the semester starts.
Such a gesture can set a positive tone for the course and let the students know
something about the course as well. If the syllabus is on a course website, the
message can provide its URL. This also is a good time to get feedback from
students that might be helpful in assigning them to groups. If the course
involves teaching assistants or tutor-facilitators (Allen & White, 2000, and
Chapter 8 of this book), that information can be included with information
about the instructor.
course that uses a PBL format only part of the time to emphasize certain con-
cepts during class time, a textbook is an important reference and may be
selected for its encyclopedic character rather than its readability in independent
study. Decisions on a textbook may be driven on whether the significant learn-
ing issues are (or are not) covered and whether this fits with the course goals.
Depending on the course goals, an instructor may provide supplementary
readings in the library or eliminate them in courses where students need to find
resources for themselves. With increased use of the Internet and the enormous
variability in the quality of websites, some instructors choose to provide a list
of Internet sites that provide reliable information. In another approach, instruc-
tors direct students to websites that provide guidance in evaluating other web-
sites because students frequently equate an attractive layout with good infor-
mational quality. If one plans to make greater use of library and Internet
resources, the availability to students also must be considered. Not all students
have computers, and commuting students can be put at a disadvantage.
Course Policies
PBL affects many course policies and thus requires decisions. Group progress
and group dynamics depend strongly on full participation. Thus, absences and
tardiness disrupt a PBL class in ways that would be unimportant in a lecture
class. An instructor should have a firm attendance policy, which also is
affirmed by group guidelines. In a lecture class, individual students can do
quite well and not have to say one word in class during an entire semester.
Such silence would undermine the PBL process. There are ways for introverted
students to contribute significantly to group process. Ideally, the instructors
policies should be discussed and agreed to by all groups and appropriate con-
sequences specified for noncompliance, for example, some groups may agree
to exclude repeat offenders from group portions of examinations.
PBL also affects grading policies. What is the proper balance between indi-
vidual and group work? How much will peer evaluation contribute to indi-
vidual grades? How much are process skills valued, and how is that factored
into a grade? What constitute criteria that distinguish one level of achievement
from another?
Academic honesty creates a dilemma for some students in PBL classes.
Throughout their academic career, teachers have discouraged collaboration
with other students. Now the rules seem reversed. What constitutes academic
dishonesty? What can be shared for credit? These issues need to be discussed
and clearly defined in the course policies. Students need to know that they
G E T T I N G S TA R T E D I N P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G 75
cannot. I have developed the following activity, Stand and Deliver, that pro-
vides a visceral appreciation of the importance of teacher-to-student, student-
to-teacher, and student-to-student communication in learning.
Author Biography
Harold B. White, III is Professor of Biochemistry in the Department
of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Director of the Howard Hughes
Medical Institutes Undergraduate Biological Sciences Education Pro-
gram at the University of Delaware.
References
Allen, D. E., & White, H. B., III. (2000). Peer facilitators of in-class groups:
Adapting problem-based learning to the undergraduate setting. In
J. E. Miller, J. E. Groccia, & M. S. Miller (Eds.), Student-assisted teach-
ing: A guide to faculty-student teamwork. Bolton, MA: Anker
Publications.
78 THE POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Altman, H. B., & Cashin, W. E. (1992). Writing a syllabus. Idea Paper No. 27,
Lawrence, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and
Development.
King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teach-
ing, 4 (1), 3035.
McKeachie, W. J. (1986). Teaching tipsA guidebook for the beginning col-
lege teacher. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
White, H. B., III. (1995). Creating problems for PBL. About Teaching 47. (Dis-
tributed by the University of Delaware Center for Teaching Effectiveness,
Newark, DE. Also posted at http://www.udel.edu/pbl/cte/jan95-chem.html)
White, H. B., III. (1996a). Dan tries problem-based learning: A case study. To
Improve the Academy, 15, 7591. (also posted at http://www.udel.edu/
pbl/dancase3.html)
White, H. B., III. (1996b). Addressing content in problem-based courses: The
learning issue matrix. Biochemical Education, 24 (1): 4145.
White, H. B., III. (1997). Untimed individual/group exams, problem-based
learning. In S. Tobias and J. Raphael (Eds). The hidden curriculum: Faculty-
made tests in science. Part 2. Upper-division courses, pp. 102103. New
York: Plenum Press.
Chapter Summary
Problem-based learning (PBL), which emphasizes individual initiative
and collaborative classroom groups, may pose novel challenges to stu-
dents who first encounter it. Undergraduate peer group facilitators
help to ease this passive-to-active transition anxiety, and improve the
quality of the PBL and group experience. This chapter describes an
interdisciplinary program (which includes a university-wide course in
Tutorial Methods of Instruction) for preparing undergraduates to
function well in this peer group facilitator role.
79
80 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
school setting. Not the least of these was the need to write problems that
would be complex enough to encourage collaborative learning while remain-
ing appropriate, in terms of content and skills objectives, to an undergradu-
ate learning experience. Likewise (Engel, 1997), we had to overcome the ini-
tial skepticism of colleagues who viewed inadequate content coverage and
lack of control over the direction of students content learning as potentially
serious barriers to implementation.
Implementation challenges more intrinsic to the undergraduate setting
included insufficient resources to capture the prototype PBL model of a sin-
gle content expert serving as a dedicated tutor-facilitator for a group of up to
a dozen students. We also worried that the transition from the student pas-
sively learning from the teacher to students actively teaching each other
(Felder, 1995) was going to be difficult for our students, particularly those
fresh out of high school. In the traditional medical school model, the PBL
tutor plays a central role in easing passive-to-active learning transitional anx-
iety, guiding and supporting the students as they learn how to learn. In
short, we had a host of concerns about how a single instructor could guide
multiple groups through complex, multistage problems in this intensive man-
ner, without seriously compromising the student-centered nature of the PBL
process.
One solution to these concerns has been the use of undergraduate facil-
itators, who work with the faculty instructor to guide student groups
through the PBL cycle as it unfolds in the classroom. Since its inception, use
of the undergraduate group facilitator model has spread to courses of all
sizes and descriptions on our campus (see Chapters 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, and
19 by Kitto & Griffiths; White; Hans; Cannon & Schell; Donham, Schmieg,
& Allen; and Lieux, respectively, in this book). This prompted us to develop
a program to support the facilitators fledging efforts at teaching PBL style.
To date (four years since its inception), this campuswide, multidisciplinary
program has affected 12 courses, 85 group facilitators and over 1400 under-
graduates. Many additional undergraduate and graduate students have
served as group facilitators through programs offered in association with
individual courses.
The peer facilitator program consists of four components: a preservice
workshop, a course in Tutorial Methods of Instruction, discipline-specific
mentoring sessions with individual PBL course instructors, and formal and
informal review of facilitators performance. These basic elements of the pro-
gram are discussed more fully in later sections of this chapter, along with a
sampling of how we run the preservice workshop and a typical Tutorial
U N D E R G R A D U AT E G R O U P FA C I L I TAT O R S 81
Course-Specific Preparation
What transpires in the preparation sessions held for the PBL courses in which
the facilitators actually work with student groups varies from course to course.
In an example from an introductory biology course (the course, designed by
Allen and Donham, is described in Chapter 16 of this book) the facilitators
and course instructor meet weekly for an hour session. After an initial discus-
sion of the previous weeks course activities, facilitators lead a discussion of an
upcoming problem on a rotating basis, having written and distributed a plan
for how that problem could unfold. The plan includes timing issues (how to
intertwine the group activities led by facilitators with whole class activities led
by the course instructor), anticipated learning issues, potential conceptual pit-
falls, tips for facilitator preparation in content background, and a stockpile of
questions from which facilitators can draw when stumped about ways to stim-
ulate discussion and dig for deeper understanding. At the start of the semester,
facilitators are given a notebook containing all of the problems for the semes-
ter and several associated readings. While requiring the facilitators to search
for these resources themselves may have pedagogical merit (and is consistent
with the PBL philosophy) we assume that this would be an imposition on
their already oversubscribed schedules.
Consider each of the following situations. Check the boxes by those you
recognize in the group you are now tutoring. Circle the one you think is most
likely to interfere with the success of your group. Be prepared to talk about
the information you have used to diagnose this as a problem situation. Think
about ways to deal with the situation.
88
U N D E R G R A D U AT E G R O U P FA C I L I TAT O R S 89
as true peer facilitators in a course in which they are also enrolled as students.
Many of the facilitators, including most of those enrolled in Tutorial Methods
to date, in addition receive a small stipend ($300 for courses in which PBL ses-
sions are less frequent, and $600 for full-time service) in recognition of time
spent as a facilitator in the PBL classroom.
use) and continue to target in both course-specific meetings and the Tutorial
Methods of Instruction course. These include helping students identify and
appraise the relevancy of learning resources, prioritize the importance of learn-
ing issues, and make connections between old and new problems. We have
added another skill to this list based on our own perceptions; that is, many
undergraduate facilitators tend to have a more directive questioning style. We
have observed facilitators missing golden opportunities (from our viewpoint)
for asking questions of a more open-ended nature and leaving superficial cov-
erage of a learning issue unchallenged by the art of questioning. This may be
an area in which experience, as well as content expertise, must be drawn upon
by the well-functioning facilitator; alternatively, it may not be the most essen-
tial skill in all PBL models, particularly when time available for working
through a problem is a limiting factor.
seem to seriously impair the benefit that the floating facilitators derive from
the experiences that they do have.
True peers also seem to have a more difficult job than the near-peer facil-
itators; the facilitator often may have to deal with at least one group member
who never gave up the notion that he or she should have been chosen to be
the facilitator. Students who serve as the group facilitator in a concurrently
meeting honors section often must struggle against conveying the impression
that they have a favored or privileged status in the course, and instructors
must be careful not to give these facilitators a content understanding edge
(that will translate to a better grade) by holding separate preparatory sessions
with this focus. The feeling of accomplishment, however, that these facilita-
tors can have after a semester in this role seems to compensate for the
moments of anguish their groups can create for them. We also think these
facilitators will go on to make good workplace supervisors, particularly of
other skilled professionals.
Our experience with undergraduate facilitators in many ways parallels
the independent experience of others. Gosser and Roth (1998), for example,
use undergraduate students as workshop leaders to assist groups of stu-
dents. They too have developed a course to prepare students for their
instructional role (The Workshop Project, 2000). Their course deals with
many of the same topics found in Tutorial Methods of Instruction. There,
as here, responsibility for teaching the interdisciplinary course does not
clearly fall within a particular department; thus, faculty workloads must be
negotiated.
Conclusion
In addition to providing the means for using problem-based instruction at
the introductory level (where it can have the greatest impact in subsequent
learning), the PBL peer group facilitator program provides a natural pro-
gression for attracting good students to teaching careers. It allows them to
gain an overview of their chosen major as a capstone experience prior to
graduation. For students in introductory PBL courses, these upperclass
guides assist with the often difficult transition between the academic expec-
tations of the high school versus college experience, particularly as they
relate to the novel challenges of PBL. For faculty teaching PBL courses, the
facilitators serve as far more than a practical solution to managing multiple
groups, becoming our apprentices and allies in creating a community of
scholars in the PBL classroom.
U N D E R G R A D U AT E G R O U P FA C I L I TAT O R S 93
Authors Biographies
Deborah E. Allen is Associate Professor and Undergraduate Programs
Director in the Department of Biological Sciences and an affiliated
faculty member of the University Honors Program at the University
of Delaware.
Harold B. White, III is Professor of Biochemistry in the Depart-
ment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Director of the Howard
Hughes Medical Institutes Undergraduate Biological Sciences Educa-
tion Program at the University of Delaware.
References
Allen, D., & Duch, B. (1998). Thinking towards solutions: Problem-based
learning activities for general biology. Philadelphia: Saunders College
Publishing.
Allen, D. E., Duch, B. J. & Groh, S. E. (1996). The power of problem-based
learning in teaching introductory science courses. In L. Wilkerson and
W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher educa-
tion: Theory and practice. (New Directions in Teaching and Learning in
Higher Education 68, (4352) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Allen, D. E., & White, H. B. III. (1999). A few steps ahead on the same path:
Using peer tutors in the cooperative learning classroomA multilayered
approach to teaching. J. College Science Teaching 28, 299302.
Allen, D. E., & White, H. B. III. (2000). Peer facilitators of in-class groups:
Adapting problem-based learning to the undergraduate setting. In J. E.
Miller, J. E. Groccia, and M. S. Miller (Eds.), Student-assisted teaching: A
guide to faculty-student teamwork. Bolton, MA: Anker Publications.
Barrows, H. S. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield: Southern Illinois Uni-
versity School of Medicine.
Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University.
(1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for Americas
research universities. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advance-
ment of Teaching.
Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Fran-
cisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Engel, C. E. (1997). Not just a method but a way of learning. In D. Boud and
G. Feletti (Eds.), The challenge of problem-based learning. London, Eng-
land: Kogan Page, pp. 1727.
Felder, R. M. (1995). We never said it would be easy. Chemical Engineering
Education 29, 3233.
94 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Gosser, D. K., & Roth, V. (1998). The workshop chemistry project: Peer-led
team learning. Journal of Chemical Education 75, 18587.
Lewis, K. G., (Ed.). (1992). Teaching pedagogy to teaching assistants: A hand-
book for 398T instructors. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.
Mennin, S. P., & McConnell, T. Undated document. A guide to quality tutori-
als. Albuquerque, NM: W.H.O. Collaborating Center for the Dissemina-
tion of Community-Oriented, Problem-Based Education and the Univer-
sity of New Mexico School of Medicine.
Pross, H. (2000). Introduction to problem-based learning at Queens.
http://meds.queensu.ca/medicine/pbl/ (2000, June 30).
White, H. B., III. (1996). Addressing content in problem-based courses: The
learning issue matrix. Biochemical Education 24, 4145.
The Workshop Project. (2000). The workshop model: peer leadership and
learningA guidebook. http://www.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/~chemwksp/ulm.html
(2000, June 30).
9
ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES
IN A PROBLEM-BASED
LEARNING COURSE
Barbara J. Duch and Susan E. Groh
Chapter Summary
Moving to a student-centered, cooperative-learning format of
instruction requires rethinking how to assess student learning in
such an environment. This chapter discusses many of the decisions
faculty make concerning assessment when adopting problem-based
techniques.
Introduction
For many instructors, the decision to move to a problem-based approach to
teaching marks the culmination of a period of intensive research and fact-
finding, discussion with other faculty, and reflection on ones goals and
philosophies of teaching. Once the decision is made, however, a whole new
set of issues and concerns arise that must be addressed. Paramount among
these are questions centered on assessment: How will problem-based learning
affect how well my students are learning? How will I know how well theyre
learning? Can I use my old methods of testing in a course that may be struc-
tured in a very different way? What happens now that students are working
in groupsmust they all be graded together?
95
96 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
one to judge the extent to which students have developed higher-order thinking
skills. In order to choose appropriate methods of assessment, faculty should be
specific about what they want their students to know (content-based objec-
tives). For example, Valerie Hans (see Chapter 13) in one of her criminal jus-
tice courses lists the following two objectives:
Notice that the first objectives of both instructors ask students to perform
at Blooms lower cognitive levels of understanding (knowledge and compre-
hension) (Bloom, 1956; and Chapter 5) and could be assessed using traditional
testing methods. The remaining objectives require students to achieve higher
or deeper levels of understanding (analysis, synthesis, and evaluation) and are
more difficult to assess in a 50-minute test. Hans and Allen have each found
alternative ways to evaluate whether students have met those learning objec-
tives, as will be discussed.
A point worth emphasizing at this stage is that despite common usage, the
term assessment is not limited to a formal system of comprehensive testing in
order to make a judgment or establish grades. In addition to this type of sum-
mative process, assessment may also be formativei.e., have the aim of
providing feedback and suggestions for improvement in a more informal man-
ner. Both types of assessment have a place in a problem-based learning format.
skills that can be listed as learning objectives for students. Some of these objec-
tives were mentioned in the Introduction of this book and can prove to be a
motivating factor in why faculty choose to adopt problem-based instruction.
They include the ability to do the following:
These objectives are not necessarily linked to specific content, but are
applicable to any discipline; hence, their development is easily overlooked. Too
often, it is assumed that students will acquire these skills and be able to bring
them to bear as needed in content courses, without addressing the question of
who is responsible for their development. As one can see with some of the
higher-ordered thinking content objectives, process skills are not easily
assessed in a traditional testing format. In many cases, assessing these objec-
tives may involve formative methods.
Table 9.1 uses the Allens and Hanss course objectives shown earlier to
demonstrate how learning objectives and assessment methods can be linked to
help students understand how the instructor will evaluate whether they are
meeting those course objectives.
If process skills are valued by an instructor, then efforts must be made
both to provide training and practice in the development of such skills, and to
signal their value by including them in an assessment plan. Does this mean that
instructors must now generate two separate sets of tests and measuresone
for content objectives and another for process skills? Not at all: in fact, we
might turn this around and point out that the process of assessment provides
a very natural opportunity to bring both content and process objectives
together. Process skills can be demonstrated and assessed as an integral part of
assessing content knowledge.
An example may illustrate this better. One of us (SEG) teaches a course in
general chemistry to freshmen science majors. Among the most important
learning objectives for this course is the development of strong critical think-
ing skills: the ability to analyze a situation, to evaluate observations and pat-
terns in data in the light of fundamental principles of chemistry, to see the ram-
ifications of such principles and use them to predict behavior, and so forth.
The PBL and homework problems that students encounter in the course are
designed to stimulate and develop critical thinking; since these are group situ-
ations, though, they do not provide the best opportunity to examine an indi-
viduals critical thinking skills.
For this reason, I decided to build assessment of critical thinking skills into
the content exams by designing questions that would go beyond simple knowl-
A S S E S S M E N T S T R AT E G I E S I N A P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G C O U R S E 101
not airtight) display case can be kept at a constant 75.3% by placing within it
a saturated aqueous solution of NaCl, in contact with excess undissolved
NaCl. The question posed is for the student to present a molecular level argu-
ment to explain how this constant level of humidity may be maintained, even
when air saturated with water (100% humidity) enters the case.
To provide a thorough explanation of this practice requires more than a
knowledge of the basic idea involvedthat the presence of salt will produce
a lower humidity (i.e., vapor pressure) in the atmosphere over the solution.
Asking how this atmosphere can be maintained despite the addition of more
humid air forces the student to recognize the dynamic nature of this equilib-
rium between liquid and gaseous water, and to think about how the pertur-
bation will affect the final humidity. The concept of a saturated solution also
comes into play in explaining the role of the excess salt: as water from the
more humid atmosphere enters the case, it will ultimately dilute the saturated
salt solution and cause the humidity to gradually increase in the absence of
sufficient salt to keep the solution saturated. This question, then, builds in
elements of analysis, application, and synthesis, while still providing an
opportunity to assess comprehension of the core concept of solution vapor
pressure.
This and similar essay questions are graded using a partial credit system.
A list is made of the ideas that should show up in an exemplary answer, and a
certain number of points are assigned to each. In this way, a student who states
that the salt solution is responsible for the lower humidity in the case but is
unable to go farther, still receives credit for that fundamental knowledge (here,
3 points out of 10). Similarly, a student who explains how the more humid air
will perturb the vapor pressure equilibrium without recognizing the role of the
excess salt (the most challenging synthesis part of the question) will still
receive full marks (9 points out of 10) for getting to that stage.
Questions like this, then, provide a means for probing a students ability to
think critically within the context of a more traditional assessment method
(exams)one need not manufacture an artificial situation aimed only at assess-
ing critical thinking. The extent to which such questions are included in exams
is, of course, a matter of preference, in keeping with the instructional goals of
the course. We consider it important to provide assessment at a variety of
Bloom levels: students must have the opportunity to demonstrate basic knowl-
edge and comprehension, as well as higher order skills. To provide an example
of how this balance can be achieved, an analysis of the exam in which the
humidity question appeared was carried out to determine how many points
(out of 100) were allocated to items at different Bloom levels. To do this, the
separate components of an exemplary answer to a question were classified by
A S S E S S M E N T S T R AT E G I E S I N A P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G C O U R S E 103
Bloom level and the points awarded for specific levels in each question tallied.
For example, of the 10 points allocated to the humidity question, 2 corre-
sponded to comprehension, 3 to application, 4 to analysis, and 1 to synthesis.
The results for the exam as a whole are shown in Table 9.2.
On this exam, a student who can go no further than demonstrating sim-
ple knowledge and comprehension can still pass, although barely. Being able
to apply the concepts increases the score, but the biggest gain comes from the
demonstration of analytical thinking, in keeping with the emphasis placed on
the development of this skill in this particular course. Which areas an instruc-
tor might choose to emphasize will depend on the learning objectives for that
course.
One can imagine similar strategies to assess learning with respect to other
global skills as part of the assessment of content knowledge: using debates,
written or oral reports to reveal both content and communication skills; eval-
uating how well a group is able to function in the preparation of a project; ask-
ing students about how they obtained information for a report; or posing a
challenging search for some content-related material; and so on. Again, the
point is that both content and process can be linked and evaluated together at
assessment time.
Grading
Group learning is a central aspect of the learning experience in a PBL class, and
instructors may want to think of ways to factor it into the total grade given to
students. Some methods used by other faculty including the following:
1. How satisfied are you with this class so far this semester? (Circle
one.)
1 2 3 4 5
Very Satisfied Very Dissatisfied
2. What helps you learn in this class?
3. What hinders your learning?
4. What could you do to make this learning experience better for
you?
5. What could the instructor do to make this class better for you?
6. What specific questions/content are still unclear to you?
After receiving the feedback from students, the instructor should be sure to
respond to their comments in class. One can categorize the various sug-
gested changes that students made, and then explain how he or she plans to
alter the format of the course, or explain why he or she is not making
changes.
At the end-of-semester evaluation, it is important to ask students ques-
tions related to group work and their confidence in finding and using resource
materials in addition to more traditional questions and comments found on
departmental or college course ratings forms. A list of suggested items may be
found in the appendix of this chapter.
A S S E S S M E N T S T R AT E G I E S I N A P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G C O U R S E 105
The students point of view about the course is not the only one. The
instructor also should assess what worked well in the course and how it
could be improved. The following questions may be helpful to guide course
reflection:
Conclusions
When faculty members move from a traditional to a problem-based learning
environment, many instructional decisions need to be made, including how to
assess students learning in the course. If developing critical thinking skills,
communication skills, research skills, and other lifelong learning skills are a
priority for the instructor, then students should expect to be assessed on how
well they are meeting those learning objectives in addition to the content
objectives. Thinking about what to assess, as well as how to assess, can be a
challenge to any PBL practitioner, since this exercise makes faculty grapple
with what is important instructionally, and what is possible to accomplish in
a limited amount of time. This reflection is essential in developing reasonable
and fair assessments for students in problem-based classes.
Authors Biographies
Barbara J. Duch is Associate Director of the Mathematics and Science
Education Resource Center at the University of Delaware.
106 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
References
Albanese, M., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of lit-
erature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine
68, 5281.
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques (2nd.
ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classifi-
cation of educational goals. New York: Longman.
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (Eds.). (1997). The challenge of problem-based learn-
ing (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
Feletti, G., Saunders, N., & Smith, A. (1983). Comprehensive assessment of
final year medical students performance based on undergraduate pro-
gramme objectives. The Lancet, 3437.
Newble, D. I., & Jaeger, K. (1983). The effect of assessment and examinations
on the learning of medical students, Medical Education, 13, 263268.
Norman, G. R. (1997). Assessment in problem-based learning. In Boud, D. &
Feletti, G. (Eds.), The challenge of problem-based learning (2nd ed.). Lon-
don: Kogan Page.
Uno, G. (1999). Handbook on teaching undergraduate science courses: A sur-
vival training manual. Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing.
Vernon, D. T. A., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work?
A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68, 550563.
Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (1998). Effective grading. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 9
The following are some suggested items that may be included on an end-of-
course ratings form using the rating scale: A: strongly agree; B: agree; C: nei-
ther agree nor disagree; D: disagree; E: strongly disagree.
107
10
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
AND THE THREE CS
OF TECHNOLOGY
George H. Watson
Chapter Summary
Ready access to networked databases, on-line newspapers and jour-
nals, and other Internet resources has dramatically altered students
pursuit of information for problem-based learning. The availability of
the Internet coupled with numerous channels of electronic communi-
cation empowers student groups to work more expeditiously and more
proficiently. This chapter will highlight some examples of integrating
creative uses of on-line resources with problem-based learning.
Introduction
Today, we have access to a broad array of electronic aids and gadgets to assist
in our daily living and entertainment. The incursion of technology into our
lives seems to be growing exponentially, much like the incredible sustained
exponential growth in the power of these devices represented by Moores law.
Clearly, the world of todays undergraduate students is strikingly different
from that experienced by their professors as undergraduates. The impact of
technology on student lives is dramatic when compared to campus life during
the college days of even our newest assistant professors, although not nearly
as dramatic as for a typical tenured faculty member who may have entered
109
110 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
college more than 20 years ago. To point out just a few changes seen in the last
year or so, students now use instant messaging to chat online with their friends
down the hall and then download their favorite MP3s over the Internet to play
on their way to class. How has the rampant use of technology by our students
affected their learning?
The technologies affecting instruction and student learning can be catego-
rized as the three Cs: computation, communication, and collections. Compar-
ing my own freshman experience and the current state of affairs in these three
areas is illustrative as shown by the following reminiscences.
The power of students to calculate routinely and expeditiously in the
classroom leapt markedly in the early 1970s. In the fall of 1973, I entered
Lafayette College as a freshman physics major. That summer some of my high
school graduation money had gone toward the purchase of a shiny yellow
Pickett Model 3 Powerlog slide rule. Only later did I realize that scientific cal-
culators were appearing on the scene, albeit at a steep price$495 for an
HP45. Numerical computations in freshman physics and chemistry were
excruciating; however, this did not seem to be the case for those students for-
tunate enough to already own a calculator. I vividly recall that at the end of
my first year, the students who were still using slide rules were given an addi-
tional 15 minutes on the final examination to compensate for the computa-
tional advantage afforded by the calculator, hardly adequate compensation in
the opinions of the remaining slide rule practitioners. That summer, Com-
modore offered the first affordable portable scientific calculator, and the slide
rule had virtually disappeared from campus by the fall of 1974.
Over the past two decades, the expanding power of first calculators and
then personal computers has been phenomenal. Simple four-function calcula-
tors have given way to graphing calculators. The computing power on each
new students desktop typically has doubled over that available just two years
prior. Laptops are beginning to accompany students to their classrooms. With
the increased capability for computation, how has teaching and learning been
affected in the modern classroom?
The ability of students to communicate routinely and expeditiously has
steadily increased. In 1973, I would save up a pile of quarters so that I might
phone my girlfriend back home once per week. Handwritten letters had to suf-
fice on the remaining days. How things have changed in the communication
sector! Todays student has access to a multiplicity of channels of communica-
tion: e-mail, voice mail, chatrooms, FAX, pagers, cell phones, and instant mes-
saging. New classrooms are being wired to connect laptops to the Internet at
each seat. With the increased capability for communication, how has teaching
and learning been affected in the modern classroom?
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING AND THE THREE Cs OF TECHNOLOGY 111
with using the Web in teaching that should be emphasized specific to PBL.
Many of the following examples come from my science and technology course
for nonscience majors known as SCEN103 Silicon, Circuits, and the Digital
Revolution (see Ref. 1 for its URL).
The first few days of a PBL course are critical for the buy-in of the stu-
dents and their ultimate success in the course. Students new to PBL must be
oriented to the approach and be assured of a support system underlying the
endeavor. Numerous PBL practitioners have written eloquently on the subject
and have made their motivational material available online. With the authors
permission, much of the PBL orientation in the course syllabus may be bor-
rowed and incorporated in ones own website. Typically included is an intro-
duction to PBL and problem solving; roles and responsibilities of students,
peer tutors, and instructor; working in effectively in groups with sample
ground rules and consequences; frequently asked questions about PBL; and
forms for assessment of individual performance in groups. In my course syl-
labus (Ref. 2), I have borrowed liberally (and often verbatim) from the writ-
ings and syllabi of Deborah Allen, Barbara Duch, Susan Groh, and Elizabeth
Lieux, all colleagues at the University of Delaware. You may visit their course
websites by referring to sample syllabi at the UD PBL website (Ref. 3).
Organization of groups is also facilitated by a course website. Group
listings of individual names, e-mail addresses, links to personal homepages,
and photos are useful for getting the permanent groups started. A list of
group names and mailto: hyperlink tags including all e-mail addresses for the
group is a good way to facilitate communication with the entire group.
Often you may wish to communicate with the entire group when an indi-
vidual from a group inquires regarding an assigned problemmost e-mail
software packages permit creation of local group aliases that are helpful for
group discussion.
A number of Internet- and web-based approaches are available to facili-
tate conversations and problem solving among members of a group. News-
groups and bulletin boards served in this capacity soon after instructors began
using the Internet for teaching, but these tools suffered from limited features
and poor ease of use. Web-based group facilitation took a leap forward a few
years ago when such companies as eGroups.com began providing free access
to tools for creating chat rooms, sharing files, coordinating calendars, posting
messages, and coordinating small groups. The latest, greatest tools for elec-
tronically organizing small groups of students are provided by so-called course
management systems, such as WebCT, the CMS currently used at the Univer-
sity of Delaware. Among the many features provided by WebCT for organiz-
ing a course website, discussion groups rank high on my list. Discussion
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING AND THE THREE Cs OF TECHNOLOGY 113
groups may be created for selected students and set to either private (just the
group) or public (the entire class) depending on the objectives of the instruc-
tor. In either case, it is advisable for the instructor to be a member of each
group, thus providing the ability to monitor the progress of groups at work if
desired. Topics for discussion may be created, opened for discussion, locked
when complete, and archived for future review. Also, course management sys-
tems are easing the burden of administering collaborative webspaces.
Most students enjoy seeing their images online. Digital cameras are a con-
venient way to capture an image of a group working during class and post it
to the website after simple image editing. This is an excellent way to facilitate
learning student names early in the semester, considered by many to be an
essential ingredient of an active learning environment. (A student roster with
faces accompanying names also helps recall student names in subsequent
semesters as you pass familiar faces while crossing campus.) If group images
are being displayed on the roster page, use of thumbnail images of about 25%
of the original size is prudent to avoid undesirable delays in downloading the
page. Hyperlinks to larger image files may be made from the thumbnail
sketches. Alternatively, group identity can be initiated by way of interesting or
amusing group names. In SCEN103, student groups were asked to select a
small technology company (microcap) publicly traded on the stock market. In
this course, the company icons associated with each group were added to the
group roster page for visual interest (see Ref 4 for this example). An example
of a group roster based on thumbnail images of groups may be found at
Ref. 5. One word of cautionalthough most students seem to enjoy seeing
their images appear online, an occasional student will feel uncomfortable or
object; it is a good idea to secure student permission before publishing their
images and e-mail addresses on your course website.
Project-based learning provides many of the same benefits as problem-
based learning. Projects combined with web delivery of the final project can be
an enticing and rewarding way to disseminate project outcomes to the remain-
der of the class near the end of the semester. Students are eager to create their
own web documents with multimedia elements; of course, some are less skilled
than others, and the collaborative aspect of a web-based group project builds
on the strengths and diminishes weaknesses of the individuals involved. In
SCEN103, students research a current topic of scientific or technological rele-
vance to the course using the same methods of finding and evaluating
resources and synthesizing contributions from multiple individuals into a
coherent whole as they execute in solving PBL problems. This aspect of the
course has been well received by students (see Ref. 6 for an archive of student
projects).
114 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Bauer has her students regularly read their choice of on-line African newspa-
per; the variety of newspapers that can be selected is clearly much greater than
is typically available in a university library. Among many good directories of
on-line newspapers, I often refer to Yahoo Newspaper by Region (Ref. 9) or
E&P Media Links (Ref. 10).
PBL Clearinghouse
The Web is also an excellent venue for sharing problems designed for PBL
courses. Sample problems and curricular materials are beginning to appear
on a variety of websites. Searching online with
Summary
The use of technology in teaching does not guarantee successful outcomes
any more than the application of any other tool at our disposal. In fact,
indiscriminate use of technology for its own sake can often get in the way of
meeting course objectives. However, technology marches onward, and new
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING AND THE THREE Cs OF TECHNOLOGY 117
Author Biography
George Watson is Professor in the Department of Physics and Astron-
omy at the University of Delaware.
Website References
1. http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/scen103/
2. http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/scen103/colloq2000/syllabus.html
3. http://www.udel.edu/pbl/
4. http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/scen103/colloq2000/groups/
5. http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys345/fall1998/rosterexample/
6. http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/scen103/projects/
7. http://www.udel.edu/itue/
8. http://www.udel.edu/inst/I-challenge/
9. http://dir.yahoo.com/News_and_Media/Newspapers/By_Region/
10. http://emedia1.mediainfo.com/emedia/
PART THREE
Chapter Summary
Biotechnology: Science and Socioeconomic Issues, a sophomore-
level course, has used problem-based learning (PBL) exercises in com-
bination with traditional lectures since 1993. The PBL component of
the course has evolved continually, including reducing the size of the
groups of students, training and using honors students as group facil-
itators, reassessment of peer evaluation procedures, redistribution of
the PBL exercises more evenly throughout the semester, use of an
interactive course web page, and requiring the use of technology for
group presentations.
Introduction
Biotechnology: Science and Socioeconomic Issues is a multidisciplinary
course and, as such, is listed in three departments within the College of Agri-
culture and Natural Resources: Animal and Food Sciences, Food and
Resource Economics, and Plant and Soil Sciences. PBL was introduced in
1993 to address growing concerns about how the agricultural sciences are
121
122 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
taught. The objective of the course is to enhance the ability of both science
and nonscience majors to make informed decisions on biotechnology related
issues in agriculture. From its inception in 1989, abstract concepts and prin-
ciples were presented, but real examples and applications in agriculture were
not always offered. For many years, instructors could only speculate on
potential applications of biotechnology in agriculture. As products began to
make their way to the marketplace, the PBL exercises made it possible for us
to introduce the students to real-world problems using topics associated with
agricultural biotechnology. The PBL exercises allow the students to not only
learn about what biotechnology is and the associated controversies, but to
develop a sense of confidence in expressing their own personal opinions
related to current events.
The course was divided into four quarters, with the last quarter being
reserved for the PBL exercises. The first three quarters introduced the science,
applications, and socioeconomic issues associated with agricultural biotech-
nology. When we first started using PBL, we felt that the students needed to
have a knowledge base prior to working through the PBL exercises. Challenges
associated with this paradigm included building group rapport and collegial-
ity in a short time frame, the final four weeks of the semester. We also now
know that a knowledge base is not necessary prior to working through a PBL
exercise. Part of the purpose of the exercises is for students to gain knowledge.
Currently, the course is divided into the same three content parts; however,
the PBL exercises are distributed evenly throughout the semester. So, while the
students still do three PBL exercises, they begin group work on day two of the
course.
Model
In the beginning, we taught the course in a traditional classroom, and the
chairs were moved each class period we did a group exercise. Students did not
have assigned seats. The class was divided into three groups because we had
three instructors in the class and each facilitated a group. Advantages to this
design were the pacing of the exercises and ensuring that the expectations for
the exercise (e.g., making sure the students understand a well-designed exper-
iment) were consistent. The main drawback to this was the large size of the
groupsup to 13 students; based on reports from fellow PBL-users, this group
size was too big.
To circumvent this problem, we added an honors section to the course
with the objective of teaching the honors students to be peer facilitators for the
group work. Now the number of registered honor students determines the
THE EVOLUTION OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING IN A BIOTECHNOLOGY COURSE 123
the peer facilitators. We let the peer facilitators know that it is not their job to
answer content/knowledge questions; rather, it is the groups responsibility to
do library or Web searches for answers.
Honors students work closely with the instructors as they facilitate the
PBL class sessions. Early on, we had the honors students read through a book
that explained the concepts involved with active learning and the roles of peer
facilitators. We have found that the honors students prefer to learn facilitation
firsthand by doing rather than by reading how-to publications. While we
still read and discuss the same basic information presented in the books, it is
done in a more informal manner. Each student reads one chapter and presents
an overview of the major concepts. The honors students also work through a
classroom PBL exercise so they have a real PBL experience similar to what
the in-class groups will experience.
Two instructors are present during each of the PBL exercise days. The
instructors serve as technology troubleshooters and as resources for the peer
facilitators. The instructors roam the room and keep an ear open with regard
to whether groups are on track or not. The honors students meet weekly with
instructors and honors peers to discuss their in-class group progress. We use
these sessions to discuss conflict resolution and as group help/venting sessions.
Brainstorming through problems or challenges helps to reduce anxiety about
what is expected of them. We regularly update our course library on team
building, teamwork, and tutors; how to facilitate coming to reasonable con-
sensus; how to gather information; how to stimulate group functions; and how
to stay on task. The instructors make sure that the honors students are guid-
ing their groups toward an appropriate goal.
consider good exercise ideas. PBL exercises developed by the honors stu-
dents are no less thought provoking or sophisticated than those developed by
the instructors.
Exercise authorship stays with the students. The honors students have
developed some excellent exercises. Once a class has used a PBL exercise, the
exercise may be modified. We view the exercises as dynamic so they are
constantly modified, updated, and improved based on student (regular and
honors) use and experience. At midterm the students evaluate the class and
suggest revisions to improve the class and PBL exercises. After each PBL
exercise, the honors students are asked for ways to improve the exercise for
future use.
Students can earn bonus points by handing in popular press articles, car-
toons, or web addresses related to agricultural biotechnology. Appropriate
websites are added to the class web page. Biotechnology related cartoons are
worth a double bonus. These items (we have received as many as 247 in a
semester) are kept in a master file and serve as a source both of ideas for future
PBL exercises and as a miniresource library for exercises being used in class.
The PBL exercises vary in objective and length. Three class days are
devoted to the first and the third PBL exercises. Initially, the exercises were
broken up into four or five pieces that were handed out piecemeal as the
groups progressed through the exercise. The students, especially the facilita-
tors, did not like this format and requested that we combine all of the pieces
into a single unit and label them as day one or day two. We have used this
single-unit paradigm for the past two years and agree that it is a smoother
process for us; we dont have to photocopy a bunch of pieces and pass them
out piecemeal, and students have a clearer idea of what they are working
toward. In this way, they better understand the objective of the case. Each
exercise is handed out in a previous class period so that students have time to
read and understand their assignment. This way they can spend time during
the first PBL class meeting working on the questions and understanding what
their objective is (e.g., write an ad jingle or design an experiment). The stu-
dents have a lower frustration level when they know why they are answering
a series of preliminary questions. Some groups work faster than others at dif-
ferent points in an exercise. On these two PBL exercises, two in-class days are
spent learning and gathering material; the third day is reserved for group pre-
sentations. Ability to organize class time to access information in the pro-
vided files and via the Internet and library can reduce the out-of-class time
meetings.
The second PBL exercise is really a series of three minicases that are com-
pleted during one class period. Minicases are one paragraph long. Students
126 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Using Technology
Presentation requirements have evolved with the rest of the course. Initially,
students gave traditional presentations relying on costumed skits, the printed
page, posters, and 3-D artwork. Now students are required to use a laptop
computer and digital camera in their presentations. We have found that stu-
dents need clear directions for use of technology, as well as time limits. It is
difficult for them to summarize their work into a five-minute presentation.
While the creativity exhibited in the presentations has always been superb,
quality presentations have not been the norm, especially presentations for the
first PBL exercise. The groups learn by watching their peer groups presenta-
tions. While the first presentations are never really bad, the third presentations
are always very good. The presentations create a competitive spirit, and the
students prepare for them in a very professional manner. The instructors eval-
uate the presentations.
A USDA Challenge Grant allowed us to purchase three laptop computers
that we bring to class during the PBL exercises. The computers were intro-
duced to the class four years ago. Our course Web page has a number of infor-
mation links that the students can access during class time. Student acceptance
of the computers and willingness to use them during class time have improved
over the years. Although many think that everyone has great technology
knowledge, there are always a few students who are technophobes. The num-
ber of technophobes has become fewer each year. We spend part of one class
THE EVOLUTION OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING IN A BIOTECHNOLOGY COURSE 127
Outcomes
Assessment of the course includes traditional exams and the PBL exercises.
Each successive PBL exercise is worth a greater percentage of the total grade,
so that students have the opportunity to become familiar with the PBL
process.
One of the most difficult aspects of PBL is assessment of the group exer-
cises. Our assessment instruments have evolved from more complex to less
complex. Prior to the use of student peer facilitators, each student was given
the opportunity to provide a self-evaluation and an evaluation of the contri-
bution of each member of their group. The third and last component of the
assessment is the instructors component. Students were provided with an
assessment form (Allen & Duch, 1998) identifying eight different aspects of
group work, such as, comes prepared, completes assignments, and
answers questions in a way that promotes group understanding. Students
wrote their name and the names of each group member across the top of the
form and scored each group member in each of the eight categories reflecting
the contributions each student made. Each student also rated him or herself on
the same scale. We found that students did not seriously consider the different
roles a person might play in a group. Rather than scoring individuals higher
for some tasks and lower on others, the students scored students somewhat
uniformly and highly for all the categories.
As instructors, we found it difficult to keep track of the contributions of
individuals in large groups, and when we added the honors section, we began
128 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
to use peer tutors in smaller groups. The peer tutors became the fourth input
for group assessment (peer, self, tutor, and instructor). We adapted a peer
assessment form (Allen & Duch, 1998) that used a different ratings scale and
listed other items such as contributes relevant information, and good lis-
tener, respects others opinions. At the same time, we adapted a similar
assessment form (with categories of possible group roles and contributions)
for the peer tutors (Allen & White, 2000). The tutors were asked to evaluate
each group member using the group form, and each group member was asked
to evaluate the tutor using the tutor form. The peer tutors provided more
meaningful assessment information, and although the grades were still high,
there was a range.
In order to get students to provide a more meaningful assessment of group
work, we added one line to the form, asking students to provide an overall
numerical grade (based on 100%) for each member of their group. It was
interesting that students did not seem to consider the total of the 10 categories
as being indicative of the numerical grade they should assign each member.
The numerical grades provided us with more range, but we were not sure how
to handle differences between the two scores. We were left with hours of cal-
culations and felt there was still significant grade inflation.
Because students seemed willing to provide a more realistic grade when
asked to assign their peers a numerical score, we decided to experiment with
a simplified assessment form that directed the students to consider the man-
ner in which each group member participated and contributed, and then to
simply provide an overall numerical score (Figure 11.1). The same form and
format was used for assessment of each groups peer tutor. Students were
also told that they must justify uniformly high scores. We have used the new
assessment form for two years now. Although we still experience some grade
inflation, students are providing us with a range of grades. It takes us con-
siderably less time to summarize and calculate the grades than it did when
we had 50 pieces of information (10 categories 5 group members) for each
student. Students are required to turn in a completed assessment form during
the class period following completion of each PBL exercise.
THE EVOLUTION OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING IN A BIOTECHNOLOGY COURSE 129
Evaluation Scale. Use the following scale to numerically score each of your group
members: 7779 (C+); 8082 (B); 8386 (B); 9093 (A); 9496 (A); 97100 (A+).
Evaluation of Group Members. When evaluating the other members of your group,
consider the following: Did the person attend all class meetings, come prepared for the
discussion, and contribute to the groups discussion? Did the person ask relevant
questions and respond to the questions of others? Was the person willing to do any
work outside of class and bring relevant information back to the group for discussion?
Was the person a good listener who respected the opinions of others? Did the person
contribute to overall organization and group consensus?
Names of Group Members. Put your name on the first line Numerical Score
for your self-evaluation.
Comments:
Evaluation of Peer Tutor Group Member. When evaluating the peer tutor of your
group, consider the following: Did the person show active interest in all group members
by listening and responding to student concerns and/or problems? Did the person
facilitate use of the web page to interact with the distance members of the group? Did
the person help identify relevant issues, guide and intervene to keep the group on
track, and provide information when the group got bogged down? Did the person pose
questions back to the group rather than answer questions? Did the person help the
group refine their presentation? Did the person help the group come to consensus?
Comments:
Authors Biography
Sherry L. Kitto is Professor in the Department of Plant and Soil Sciences.
Lesa G. Griffiths is Associate Professor in the Department of
Animal and Food Science, and Associate Dean of the College of Agri-
culture and Natural Resources at the University of Delaware.
References
Allen, D. E., & Duch, B. J. (1998). Thinking towards solutions: Problem-
based learning activities for general biology. New York: Harcourt
Brace, 153154.
Allen, D. E., & White, H. B., III (2000). Peer facilitators of in-class groups:
Adapting problem-based learning to the undergraduate setting. In J. E.
Miller, J. E. Groccia, & M. S. Miller (Eds.), Student-assisted teaching: A
guide to faculty-student teamwork. Bolton, MA: Anker Publications.
12
A PBL COURSE THAT USES
RESEARCH ARTICLES
AS PROBLEMS
Harold B. White, III
Chapter Summary
Introduction to Biochemistry, a problem-based learning (PBL) course
for sophomore majors, uses a series of connected research articles as
problems and is a useful template for courses in other disciplines. In
addition to providing students with a historical perspective on their
discipline, the approach addresses many issues and skills relating to
the conduct of research that normally are not treated in textbook-
based survey courses.
Introduction
I am absolutely convinced that science is vastly more stimulating to
the imagination than are the classics, but the products of this stimu-
lus do not normally see the light of day because scientific men as a
class are devoid of any perception of literary form.
J. B. S. Haldane, 1968
While students in English classes read the works of renowned authors, play-
wrights, and poets, students in the sciences rarely read the classic articles of
their discipline. Rather, they read textbooks that condense, conceptualize,
131
132 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Model
Much of our educational system seems designed to discourage any
attempt at finding things out for oneself, but makes learning things
others have found out, or think they have, the major goal.
Anne Roe, 1953
Goals
Because Introduction to Biochemistry is not a survey course, its content goals
depend significantly on the set of articles selected as problems (White,
1996a). Thus, the content goals can vary somewhat from year to year. The
articles (problems) are vehicles for the more important process goals
(Table 12.1) that do not vary and could be achieved with a completely dif-
ferent set of articles. Although stated in the context of the discipline, these
process goals transcend the discipline and address the goals of general edu-
cation (Boyer Commission, 1998).
Tutor-Facilitators
The experience and maturity of students significantly influences how an
instructor manages a PBL course of this type. In introductory courses with
students who are not familiar with the PBL process, there are considerable
in-class demands on an instructor to address student questions and keep
multiple groups on task. This requires more structure and frequent oppor-
tunities for the whole class to deal with issues. For experienced students in
upper-level classes, such close supervision is less important. My experience
suggests that 25 students and five groups in an introductory course are
manageable. However, tutor-facilitators significantly accelerate the process
and improve the experience for students and the instructor for introductory
136 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
PBL courses with larger enrollments (Allen & White, 2000). Typically, these
facilitators are students who have taken the course before, done reasonably
well (B or better), and have good social skills.
Assignments
Assignments in a PBL class need to be challenging and reflect the goals of the
course. In order to engage students collaboratively and induce more than
superficial understanding, assignments must go beyond and be more complex
than typical end-of-the-chapter problems. Using articles as problems provides
the opportunity for some unique assignments that involve a mix of group
involvement and individual accountability (White, 2001). For example, older
articles often lack an abstract. Students as a group can read what an abstract
should include (e.g., Day, 1983), discuss this in the context of a particular arti-
cle, and then write abstracts individually.
In general, writing assignments do not work well as group assignments
because it is difficult to involve several people simultaneously. Alternatively,
assignments that involve visualization work well as group assessment strategies
for example, generating a group concept map or constructing a figure or model
appropriate for an article. Another type of assignment asks students to play the
role of an investigator who has read the article and must propose a line of inves-
tigation that elaborates or tests ideas in the article. Each group can present its
ideas to the class.
Examinations
One overriding principle guides the construction of midterm and final exami-
nations in Introduction to Biochemistrynamely, that examinations must
reflect the course goals. Consequently, there are individual and group parts to
each examination, with the individual part constituting 75% (White, 1997).
Students may bring notes, their course reader, a textbook, and any course
handouts. Because thinking takes time and the length of normal class periods
often discourages challenging questions, the examinations are longer and
scheduled in the evening. The individual part comes first and takes about two
A P B L C O U R S E T H AT U S E S R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E S A S P R O B L E M S 137
hours. Typically, the last and particularly difficult question on the individual
part serves as the question for the group part of the examination.
Given that problem-solving and conceptual understanding pervade the
course, these features figure prominently in the examinations. Sometimes 50%
or more of an examination will ask students to relate what they know or have
learned to new situations. For example, students may be asked to read and
comment on abstracts from the recent literature or interpret data from a paper
they have not read. Such examinations are rare in introductory courses, and
they generate considerable anxiety. Students recognize that they cannot study
in the usual way (e.g., cram facts) for such an examination and must concen-
trate on concepts in preparation for the unknown. To prepare students, the
syllabus clearly lays out the nature of the examinations and students can
obtain copies of old examinations on the course website (White, 2000b).
While questions involving facts and calculations appear occasionally, most
questions require a narrative or a diagram. The headaches generated by assign-
ing grades after evaluating well-written flawed responses along with poorly
constructed valid ones and everything in between, tempts one to revert to
multiple-choice examinations. However, such ordeals reveal the importance of
subjective examinations in the sciences for conveying the value of good writ-
ing skills and logical thinking ability. Because the level of difficulty of these
examinations varies from year to year, it is impossible to establish numerical
cutoff values for different grades. The average grade is a B, and students rarely
fail the course.
Outcomes
Assessment
On the first day of class, all students complete an initial anonymous question-
naire on which they report their experience and reaction to student groups in
problem-based courses, their attitudes toward science, and their prior knowl-
edge of the subject matter of the course. Among other things, they reveal
whether they have sold their textbooks from prerequisite courses and what
newspapers and magazines they subscribe to or read regularly. At the midterm,
there are formative peer-self-group-course evaluations, evaluation of tutors by
students, and evaluation of students by tutors. These three evaluations are
repeated at the end of the course and contribute up to 5% of a students grade.
In addition, all students complete a summative anonymous course evaluation
that includes questions on attitudes and course goals. These data, representing
138 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
95% of the students who have taken the course over the past six years, along
with daily attendance data and the instructors annual reflective evaluation,
provide a multiyear record to assess changes in the course.
The introduction of upper-class tutor-facilitators in 1996 had a noticeable
and persistent effect on the course (Allen & White, 2000). Attendance, which
always was near or above 90%, improved even further to better than 94%.
Coincident with the increase in attendance was a greater than 20% increase in
the number of hours students reported they spent on the class. Almost every
student disagrees with the statement, My group would have done fine with-
out a tutor.
A significant number of students have difficulty accepting the daily
responsibilities imposed by problem-based learning. Often these are good stu-
dents who are not accustomed to working in cooperative groups and feel the
academic rules have been changed. They often suggest that the course have
more lectures. Tutors-facilitators, who in many cases are converted skeptics,
can use their experience to involve recalcitrant students and get groups to
function where an instructor would lack credibility. On a scale of 1 (excellent)
to 5 (poor), students average rating of the course is 2.02 in the five years since
first using tutor-facilitators.
Compared to their other science courses, students report that Introduction
to Biochemistry requires more library research skill, more writing, a greater
amount of collaboration with classmates, more use of oral communication
skills, and more conceptualization. When asked to reflect on the course after
a year or two, many students say that learning how to read a scientific article
was the most important thing they learned.
Given that students entering Introduction to Biochemistry have little and
often mistaken knowledge about hemoglobin and sickle cell anemia, there is
no doubt that they learn a lot about these topics in the course. Nevertheless,
if content knowledge were the major goal of the course, there would be more
efficient ways for students to learn the material. The course uses content as a
vehicle to sharpen various skills students will need eventually to learn on their
own and that are not emphasized in most of the other courses they take.
Author Biography
Harold B. White, III is Professor of Biochemistry in the Department
of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Director of the Howard Hughes
Medical Institutes Undergraduate Biological Sciences Education Pro-
gram at the University of Delaware.
References
Allen, D. E., & White, H. B, III. (1999). A few steps ahead on the same path:
Using peer tutors in the cooperative learning classroomA multilayered
approach to teaching. J. College Science Teaching, 28, 299302.
Allen, D. E., & White, H. B., III. (2000). Peer facilitators of in-class groups:
Adapting problem-based learning to the undergraduate setting. In J. E.
Miller, J. E. Groccia, & M. S. Miller (Eds.), Student-assisted teaching: A
guide to faculty-student teamwork. Bolton, MA: Anker Publications.
Boyer Commission. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint
for Americas research universities. Washington, DC: Carnegie Founda-
tion. Available online at http://notes.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf.
Day, R. (1983). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Philadelphia, PA:
ISI Press.
Epstein, H. T. (1970). A strategy for education. New York, NY: Oxford Uni-
versity Press.
Epstein, H. T. (1972). An experiment in education. Nature, 235, 203205.
McNeal, A. (2000). How to read a scientific research paper.
http://helios.hampshire.edu/~apmNS/RESOURCES/HOW_READ.html
(2000, June 20).
McNeal, A. P., & Murrain, M. (1994). Drugs in the nervous systemA course
in learning to learn science. College Teaching, 42 (2), 4750.
White, H. B., III. (1992). Introduction to Biochemistry: A different approach.
Biochemical Education, 20 (1), 2223.
White, H. B., III. (1996a). Addressing content in problem-based courses: The
learning issue matrix. Biochemical Education, 24 (1), 4145.
White, H. B., III. (1996b). Dan tries problem-based learning: A case study. To
Improve the Academy, 15, 7591.
140 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Chapter Summary
This chapter describes the integration of active learning principles and
the use of technology in an undergraduate course on the criminal
courts. The project requires students to participate in teams in a plea
bargaining exercise, in which they research relevant law on the Web
and negotiate with others to resolve a hypothetical case.
Introduction
Snapping after years of abuse, a battered child kills his sleeping father. As his
defense attorney, should you employ the hotly debated battered child
defense to reduce or excuse the childs criminal culpability? As a prosecutor,
you handle the case of a college student who drove while drunk and caused a
serious automobile accident, killing a passenger in the other car. Is it more
appropriate to charge the student with vehicular homicide, manslaughter, or
even murder?
These are some of the questions my students are confronting firsthand in
problem-based learning (PBL) exercises I have created for my legal studies
141
142 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
such as identifying the pleasures and pitfalls of group work and setting up
group rules (Allen & Duch, 1998; Michaelsen, 19971998), students read the
description of a fatal accident:
Students learn that Sam Sads blood alcohol level was .23, exceeding the legal
limit, and that he was arrested by the police. They have an initial group dis-
cussion, identifying some of the legal and evidentiary issues in the case and
assessing what they will need to learn to negotiate a resolution to the case.
These small-group discussions are followed by a whole-class report, to ensure
that all students are aware of the full range of issues implicated in the case.
In the second stage of the problem, students select roles and engage in the
essential background research necessary to resolve the case. Students choose
their own roles in the negotiation. Each group must include a student repre-
senting the victim, the prosecutor, the defendant, and the defense attorney. The
roles are described in such a way as to highlight typical problems and issues in
criminal case resolution. For example, to emphasize the cost borne by families
of the incarcerated, the defendant is a young man who is the sole support of
his wife and two small children so that imprisonment will dramatically affect
his family. The surviving victim joins Mothers Against Drunk Driving
(MADD), to illustrate the role of interest groups in litigation.
The four-person groups divide into two teams for the background
research and negotiation stages. The prosecutor and victim comprise the
prosecution team, while the defense lawyer and defendant collaborate to
research and present the defense perspective. They first discuss their interests
and priorities in the negotiation and determine what they will need to know
to negotiate effectively. The prosecution teams then research Delaware state
law and sentencing guidelines, which are available online, and propose an ini-
tial set of charges to the defense team. The charging process is complex, since
the accident and its consequences could well be charged in several different
ACTIVE LEARNING AND TECHNOLOGY IN LEGAL STUDIES 145
Outcomes
Over the two years I have employed the plea bargaining negotiation, student
reactions have been generally favorable. Feedback from students is obtained
through anonymous evaluations of the pros and cons of the plea bargaining
exercise shortly after it is concluded, as well as in final course evaluations. The
majority of students (ranging from 60 to 70%, depending on the class) agree
that the plea negotiation is a valuable learning experience. Students report that
the negotiation problem improves their ability to use the Web and other
resources to find information about criminal law, expands their substantive
knowledge of criminal law and plea bargaining, and gives them good experi-
ence in cooperative teamwork. In the most recent evaluation, for example,
71% of the students said that their ability to use the Web to locate criminal
law information had improved; 79% agreed that their knowledge of criminal
law had expanded; 75% said that their knowledge of the plea negotiation
process had increased; and 65% stated that the exercise had provided them
with a good experience in cooperative teamwork. Student comments about the
positive aspects of the negotiation include: I liked applying the negotiation
process to a real problem. It made me better understand the process and the
law, while making it fun; the in-depth group collaboration, the actual
negotiation between the prosecution team and defense team because research
146 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
between prosecution and defense hits home, as does the impact of minimum
mandatory sentences on case negotiation. Judging by the papers, the exercise
successfully moves students beyond Blooms cognitive levels of knowledge and
comprehension of plea bargaining (what my students would probably have
gained through the lecturing approach) to application, analysis, and evalua-
tion levels (Bloom et al., 1956).
Adoption
There are some good reasons, then, to employ law-related PBL exercises in
classes in criminal justice and legal studies. Giving students a chance to resolve
a case themselves can be an engaging way to communicate the factors that
influence plea bargaining.
All the same, the difficulties of employing an intensive problem-based
learning experience like this one in a large class should not be underestimated.
Even with the help of a PBL-savvy teaching assistant and undergraduate teach-
ing assistants who have done the problem themselves in a prior class, I find it
difficult to monitor the progress of 25 to 30 groups and to be able to intervene
in problem groups in a timely fashion. Using law-related PBL exercises in
smaller (2540 person) classes, I have discovered that it is more feasible to
speak to every group in each session to observe their development of the prob-
lems and to provide guidance. Absenteeism is lower and is also easier to spot!
One alternative is the use of undergraduate peer tutors (Allen & White, 1999),
who receive training in PBL and are assigned to one group or a small number
of groups during a semester. The peer tutor approach allows an instructor in
a large class using PBL to keep apprised of each groups progress and to inter-
vene when necessary.
Another factor that should be considered is the instructors time. The plan-
ning and supervising of the student plea negotiation groups takes much more
time than giving a set of lectures on the topic. The assignment asks for student
input about the progress of the negotiation, which needs prompt response, and
there are the papers to mark! An instructor could adjust the assignment to
conform to the amount of time available. For example, the instructor could
prepare a response sheet with specific questions for groups to answer when
they completed the negotiation, rather than requiring each group to write a
paper. Depending on class size, class presentations might be another alterna-
tive to the group paper for reporting the results of the negotiation. Whatever
method is employed, my experience indicates that getting students actively
involved in negotiating a court case outcome increases their motivation and
the intellectual quality of their work.
148 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Author Biography
Valerie P. Hans is Professor of Sociology and Criminal Justice at the
University of Delaware.
References
Allen, D., & Duch, B. (1998). Thinking toward solutions: Problem-based
learning activities for general biology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders College
Publishing.
Allen, D. E., & White, H. B, III. (1999). A few steps ahead on the same path:
Using peer tutors in the cooperative learning classroomA multilayered
approach to teaching. J. College Science Teaching, 28, 299302.
Bloom, B. et. al. (Eds.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New
York, NY: Longmans, Green.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W., with Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating
agreement without giving in. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Greek, C., & Henry, D. B. (1997). Criminal justice resources on the Internet.
Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 8, 9199.
Hans, V. P. (1999a). Crime and punishment: Case negotiation in the criminal
justice system. PBL Problem for CRJU202: Problems of the Criminal Judi-
ciary, Fall 1999. http://www.udel.edu/soc/vhans/negotiation.html (2000,
September 15).
Hans, V. P. (1999b). Plea bargaining: Active learning in a course on the courts.
About Teaching, Fall. Newark, DE: Distributed by the Center for Teach-
ing Effectiveness, University of Delaware. (Also available online at
http://www.udel.edu/cte/aboutteach/fall99/hans.html.)
Hans, V. P., & Dee, J. L. (1991). Media coverage of law: Its impact on juries
and the public. American Behavioral Scientist, 35, 136149.
McCoy, C. (1993). Politics and plea bargaining: Victims rights in California.
Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Michaelsen, L. K. (19971998). Three keys to using learning groups effectively.
Essays on Teaching Excellence, 9 (5). Valdosta, GA: POD Network.
Neubauer, D. W. (1999). Americas courts and the criminal justice system. Bel-
mont, CA: Wadsworth.
Rubenstein, M. L., & White, T. J. (1979). Alaskas ban on plea bargaining.
Law & Society Review, 13, 367383.
14
PROBLEM-BASED
LEARNING IN LARGE
AND VERY LARGE CLASSES
Harry L. Shipman and Barbara J. Duch
Chapter Summary
When an instructor uses problem-based learning (PBL) in a large
class, some changes need to be made in the method to accommodate
the changed teaching situation. The first part of this paper will
describe some ways we have used PBL in large and very large classes.
In general, the class and course require more structure than smaller
classes. The second part of this paper is a preliminary report on a
study of the implementation of PBL in two identical classes, a large
class of 120 students and a very large class of 240 students. We found
that the method did succeed in both classes. However, the experiences
of both students and instructors were better in the smaller class.
Introduction
Many students in colleges and universities in the United States find themselves
in very large classrooms, attempting to learn whatever it is that they are sup-
posed to learn. Class size is really not considered to be a teaching issue.
Classes of 4 coexist with classes of 400 and sometimes, depending on the
institution, even larger. These courses are taught in the same departments, in
the same major fields of study, and sometimes by the same professors. For
149
150 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
many parts of the world. A reform like problem-based learning must work in
large classes if it is to have a significant impact on American higher education.
If it can only work in medical schools and in small, liberal arts colleges, such
as Swarthmore (where the largest classroom on campus seats 40 students), its
impact is limited. The primary focus of this chapter is What happens when
an instructor implements PBL in progressively larger classes?
two instructors devoted his class time exclusively to that one group, it would
be slightly dysfunctional. Final student evaluations of group performance con-
firmed that the functioning of this group was less than optimal.
Several strategies can be employed to adapt a small-class PBL technique to
a large-class situation and are discussed in more detail in Chapters 4 and 8 of
this text. Instructors can do the following:
Find Help
Many Delaware instructors using large-class PBL have a number of additional
individuals in the classroom, either undergraduate peer tutors or graduate
teaching assistants. These additional individuals can circulate around the
room, monitoring many more groups than is possible for a single instructor.
Undergraduate peer tutors are described elsewhere in this volume by Allen and
White. The authors experience so far has primarily been with graduate teach-
ing assistants (TAs), who may or may not be able to be helpful depending on
the specifics of the teaching situation.
Graduate TAs can be helpful if they have had some experience with
inquiry learning techniques, have an opportunity to get to know individual
students in the class, and clearly understand that group facilitation in the large
class is part of their job. One of us (BD) taught a physical science class in the
spring of 2000 where the majority of laboratory and discussion section teach-
ing was done by two graduate TAs. Each of these individuals taught lab and
discussion sections to the same set of 48 students and so was able to get to
know them. Both of these individuals had better than average communications
skills. The course was set up in such a way that the TAs were able to antici-
pate what was going on in the larger class. However, when TAs simply come
into the large class to deal with students and learning situations they dont
know so well, their help has been less useful.
Add Structure
Flexibility in a PBL setting diminishes as the size of the class grows. When
dealing with 250 students, or even 120, our experience based on classroom
P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G I N L A R G E A N D V E RY L A R G E C L A S S E S 153
only a few Delaware faculty who had used PBL in large classes. Now, in 2000,
there are at least a dozen. It is often not even necessary to visit someone elses
classes to benefit from their experience (though classroom visits can help). A
few encouraging words in a short conversation can make a big difference.
The item that I found the most helping and therapeutic was the fact
that we had groups. It was great to be able to have help on hand at
all times, not only from the professors but also from my peers. I dont
know if my group was an exception or not, but we have all become
extremely close. Not only do we spend time together in class, but we
spend time together outside of class now as friends too. (Female ele-
mentary teacher education major, large class)
My group did hardly anything for me. There was a lack of interest in
the group and hardly any participation except for when we needed
participation points. I tried to spur conversation and get people think-
ing, but I got hardly any response. There was only one girl in my group
who actually tried. The other two just sat there and stared out into
nothing. (Male English secondary education major, very large class)
How many students did not buy in to the concept of group work? Depend-
ing on the way we answer this question and the intensity of student disengage-
ment, the percentage ranges from 5% to just under 25%. A small minority of
studentsby any measures, less than 10%had serious problems with group
work. We asked students to assess the extent to which their peers contributed
to group work. Only 20 students in both sections (5.5%) were credited by their
fellow students with less than full participation. The students reports are con-
sistent with two classroom observations which showed 7% of students not
interacting with their groups.
A larger percentage of students reported on evaluations that group work
was not their preferred learning style. On the midsemester evaluation,
21.4% of 219 respondents explicitly asked for less group work in response
to an open-ended question. Of 283 respondents on the final evaluation,
24.3% answered that the statement I can learn the important concepts in
P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G I N L A R G E A N D V E RY L A R G E C L A S S E S 157
class with group learning was either definitely false or more false than
true. Fragmentary data on long-term trends at the University of Delaware
indicate that the percentage who do not prefer group work has significantly
decreased in the past five years. We do not have the data to determine how
many of the students who self-report an inclination against groups really
have troubles learning in groups. We can both think of examples of students
who contributed reasonably well to their groups yet told us that they really
would prefer it if we lectured more, or exclusively.
We regret that our use of group work and our explicit efforts to persuade
students that they will need group skills in their later careers only succeeded
with 7595% of our students rather than 100%. However, we are still con-
vinced that PBL and its use of collaborative groups are good ideas. Even stu-
dents who have difficulty with groups can learn from the experience. HS had
one experience with a student, Brett (a pseudonym), who had tremendous
difficulties with his group in the physical science course. His groupmates were
extremely upset when he was half an hour late to a major group presentation.
His TA reported that no two of the students in that group could work with
the third. One semester later, Brett took another course with HS that incor-
porated permanent groups. He had a completely differentand much more
positiveexperience the second time around. His groupmates credited him
with full participation, and classroom observation revealed a smoothly func-
tioning group. We are pleased that Brett was able to learn how to work in
groups in college rather than in a much less forgiving settingon the job.
Student performance on examinations confirms the previously discussed,
more subjective, data that shows that our use of PBL was a success. We used
a number of questions that had been used in previous years with the class,
which one of us (HS) has taught since 1989. Student performance in the study
year of 1999 was consistent with performance in previous years, including the
1989 time period when the course was largely lecture-based. We used some
questions from the Force Concept Inventory test. We cannot directly compare
the performance of our general-audience students with average math skills
(i.e., struggling with fractions and algebra) who studied motion for three
weeks in a course with the performance of scientists and engineers who stud-
ied force and motion for a full semester in a calculus-based course. However,
our students did substantially exceed our expectations. The number of Ds
(10), Fs (1), and withdrawals (12) is a very small fraction of the 360 students
in both sections of our course. There were no significant differences in the per-
formance of a sample of students from each section on examinations, even
when we matched a sample from each section using sex, major, and year in
school.
158 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
find it particularly interesting that the difference between the two classes per-
sists even when the IDEA system corrects its ratings for the effects of class
size, using an algorithm developed from all of the classes in its database (the
majority of which are lecture-based). We also find it interesting that two of
the dimensions on which there is a difference (Improved Student Attitude
Towards Subject and Acquiring an Interest in Learning More. . .) are pri-
marily from the affective domain.
Implications
At the current stage of data analysis, it is not possible to determine exactly
why PBL was more effective with a group of 120 than with a group of 240.
However, we can offer a number of observations. We could give the students
in the class of 120 considerably more individual attention than those in the
class of 240. In the spring of 1999, the room could hold exactly 283 students,
which meant that conditions in the class of 240 were quite crowded. The
impact of teaching the large class on the instructors time was considerably less
than is the case with the very large class.
A class of 120 students sounds like a large class and is a large class, but
when students work in groups of 4, there are 30 student groups, and it is pos-
sible for an individual instructor to give each group some attention at least
occasionally. When groups are asked to report to the large class, it is occa-
sionally possible to get students to speak in front of the large group without
feeling intimidated. Our experience in the spring of 2000, when each of us
taught a class of 120, was that we could learn many if not all students names
and, indeed, could treat them as individuals. We can deal more easily with
individual groups and be more attentive to their needs. Our perceptions are
quite consistent with the data reported for smaller classes and earlier grade
levels by Zahorik (1999).
From an administrative perspective, the issue is not just how large an indi-
vidual class is, but how many students a particular instructor is responsible for
during a given semester. During the study year (1999), the two of us were col-
lectively responsible for 360 students, and one of us had some administrative
responsibility for the laboratory for the entire course of 480 students. In the
spring of 2000, each of us was only responsible for one class of 120, with one
of us having some responsibility for the course laboratory (which again
enrolled 480 students). We both found that when we only had 120 students to
deal with in one semester we could give them considerably more attention.
Another issue is room capacity. In the class of 120, we left several rows of
seats vacant so that we could be in conversation with every single group in the
P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G I N L A R G E A N D V E RY L A R G E C L A S S E S 161
room. While we intended to leave a few vacant rows in the class of 240, we
had to fill up those vacant rows; thus, we could not gain access to some stu-
dent groups. In addition, groups that were assigned seats in the back of the
room could not move if they wished. In the class of 120, we called our seat
assignments for groups initial assignments and permitted groups to move
where they wanted. (In HSs class of 120 in the same room in the spring of
2000, about one-third of groups moved from their initial positions). In the
class of 240, we were not able to move students. The effects of the room size
and crowded conditions appeared in one student journal:
I was placed in the back of the room. Usually in large lecture classes
it is to my advantage to sit in the front where I can participate and
interact with the professor more. I found that even though I spoke to
you and Dr. Duch, [it was] to no avail[;] I could not be moved. I found
the back to be distracting and as a result my learning was not to the
fullest. I think that group work on the whole is a noble idea but not
in the lecture hall setting.
Our last observation about class size involves our reaction as instructors.
All college instructors are used to putting in overtime, and we are no excep-
tion. However, keeping track of the group assignments as students added
and dropped the course simply consumed the attention of one of us (HS) for
the first three weeks of the semester. Fortunately, BD was leading the class
during that time. During the semester, we had to intervene to help manage a
few groups, all of which were in the very large class. At the end of the study
semester (spring 1999) neither of us was willing to manage permanent
groups in a class of 240. The following fall, when HS had a class of 280
(taught in a different, larger room), he used casual groups, in order to avoid
the management problems of dealing with permanent groups. He did use
permanent groups in his other classes that academic year, which had enroll-
ments of 30 and 120. BD has used permanent groups in her classes, which
had enrollments of 120 or less.
Teaching is a sufficiently subtle and complex process that we do not
believe it is possible, on the basis of the present study, to say (for example) that
it is always all right to use PBL in a class of 120 and always not all right to
use it in a class of 240. Indeed, one of us has used PBL in a class of 280 since
this class was taught, but with casual groups rather than permanent groups.
However, we do believe that the present study suggests that class size makes a
difference when inquiry-learning techniques, such as PBL, are implemented.
The research literature indicates less of a difference when a class is taught pri-
marily by lectures.
162 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Authors Biographies
Harry L. Shipman is the Annie Jump Cannon Professor of Astron-
omy, in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University
of Delaware.
Barbara J. Duch is Associate Director of the Mathematics and
Science Education Resource Center at the University of Delaware.
References
Angelo, T., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques (2nd ed.).
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bauer, G., & Jones, E. (2000). Summary of major findings from student focus
groups on problem-based learning (PBL) experiences. Internal University
of Delaware Report.
Bracey, G. W. (1999). The ninth Bracey report on the condition of public edu-
cation. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(1), 147148, 150160, 162168.
Cashin, W. E. (1995). Student ratings of teaching: The research revisited.
IDEA Report No. 32. Manhattan, KS: Instructional Development and
Educational Assessment Center.
Cashin, W. E., & Downey, R. G. (1992). Using global student ratings for sum-
mative evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 563572.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science: From behaviorism towards
social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser and K. Tobin (Eds.), Inter-
national Handbook of Science Education (pp. 326). Boston: Kluwer.
P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G I N L A R G E A N D V E RY L A R G E C L A S S E S 163
Chapter Summary
Nurses in practice today are challenged by a variety of problematic
situations in providing healthcare. Nursing education must integrate
problem-based learning (PBL) strategies that prepare students to
approach and manage these real-life situationsultimately, resulting
in the safe, effective, and efficient delivery of care.
Introduction
To prepare students to step into professional practice, nursing educators focus
on the most common roles and responsibilities assumed by nurses in practice.
Preparation includes a foundation in the arts needed for caring in an expand-
ing and increasingly diverse world, and in the many sciences upon which
rational and systematic care is based. In addition, learning how to approach
common situations, how to make decisions, and solve problems related to
practice is critical. Application of knowledge occurs in a variety of practice
settings from the classroom and lab to in-patient and community settings.
The use of real-life problems is essential for preparing students for practice
making a strong case for the use of problem-based learning throughout the
165
166 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
curriculum. This chapter describes the rationale for integrating PBL within
nursing curricula, a brief review of the nursing literature describing the use of
PBL, and the implementation of a PBL model at the University of Delawares
Department of Nursing.
learner involvement and the need to focus on how to approach problems, the
authors describe strategies, including PATH charting, discussion section and
small group analysis of simple to complex case studies, and the integration of
case studies within large group lectures.
PATH Charting
The active learning strategy called PATH charting was developed to guide nurs-
ing students in their first nursing course, Pathophysiological Concepts. In this
three-credit didactic course of 90 to 140 students, PATH charting was taught
to help students think about assigned readings in ways that increase under-
standing and retention of the most important content. This technique used by
students in preparation for class, by teachers during class, and in small groups
in the process of analyzing case studies, actively engages students in categoriz-
ing, condensing, and connecting disease and injury-related information in ways
meaningful to them. Causal links are made within and between disease etiolo-
gies, structural and functional physiological alterations, and clinical manifesta-
tions for a selected disorder. The process of PATH charting requires learner
interest, motivation to learn how to think, and an understanding of basic
physiological concepts. It involves a series of steps including (1) the collection
of information about the disorder (often from the course textbook); (2) the cat-
egorization of information in 3 columnsetiologies that include internal or
external causes, risk factors, and precipitating factors; structural and functional
alterations at the cellular, tissue, organ, and system levels presented in a flow
diagram chronologically starting with initial changes and progressing to
include complications and/or resolution; (3) the connection (with arrows) of
column 2 alterations with associated clinical manifestationsgroupings of
signs, symptoms, and lab and diagnostic test findings. The product of the PATH
charting process is a concise, informational chart with paths of interrelated
cause-effect pathophysiological content.
In addition to the usefulness of PATH charting in preparing for PBL case
studies, students have cited its helpfulness in reviewing for course and licen-
sure exams, in learning focused history-taking and physical assessment, as well
for planning and implementing client and family education. On evaluation,
students reported an evolving sense of confidence and competence in organiz-
ing new and managing complex information, ease in visualizing a mental pic-
ture of pathophysiological relationships, preparation for more advanced con-
ceptualization required for practice, and increased understanding, recall, and
retention of content. Many students described their increased ability to sys-
tematically approach learning about health alterations (Cannon, 1998).
172 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
questions. Students evaluate the case study discussion activities as part of the
course and instructor evaluations.
Authors Biographies
Christine A. Cannon, Ph.D., R.N. is an Associate Professor at the
University of Delaware.
Kathleen A. Schell, M.S., R.N. is an Instructor of Nursing at the
University of Delaware.
References
Alavi, C. (1995). Problem-based learning in a health sciences curriculum. Lon-
don: Routledge.
American Nurses Association (1999, June). Agenda items presented at the
Annual American Nurses Association Convention. Washington, DC.
Amos, E., & White, M. J. (1998). Teaching tools: Problem-based learning.
Nurse Educator, 23, 1114.
Andrews, M., & Jones, P. R. (1996). Problem-based learning in an under-
graduate nursing programme: A case study. Journal of Advanced Nursing,
23, 357365.
Bentley, G. W., & Nugent, K. E. (1996). Problem-based learning in a home
health course. Nursing Connections, 9, 2939.
Biley, F. C., & Smith, K. L. (1998). Exploring the potential of problem-based
learning in nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 18, 353361.
Cannon, C. A. (1998). Path charting: A process and product for linking patho-
physiological concepts. Journal of Nursing Education, 37 (6): 257259.
Catalano, J. T. (1996). Contemporary professional nursing. Philadelphia: F. A.
Davis.
Creedy, D., Horsfall, J., & Hand, B. (1992). Problem-based learning in nurse
education: An Australian view. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17,
727733.
Crowe, M. (1994). Problem-based learning: A new model for graduate transi-
tion in nursing. Contemporary Nurse, 3, 105109.
Frost, M. (1996). An analysis of the scope and value of problem-based learn-
ing in the education of health care professionals. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 24, 10471053.
Gaberson, K. B., & Oermann, M. H. (1999). Clinical teaching strategies in
nursing. New York, NY: Springer.
Garbett, R. (1996). Problem power . . . problem-based learning. Nursing
Times, 92 (1), 2021.
Heliker, D. (1994). Meeting the challenge of the curriculum revolution:
Problem-based learning in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Edu-
cation, 33, 4547.
Horsburgh, M., Lynes, L., & Oliver, L. (1984). Problem based learning: An
educational strategy. New Zealand Nursing Journal, 77, 68.
P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G : P R E PA R I N G N U R S E S F O R P R A C T I C E 177
Chapter Summary
Problem-based learning (PBL) is used in both small and medium-large
sections of a two-semester Introductory Biology sequence. Our expe-
rience suggests that while class size affects the instructors choice of
classroom management strategies, students value PBL and working in
groups in both settings.
Introduction
. . . careful inspection of methods which are permanently successful
in formal education . . . will reveal that they . . . give pupils some-
thing to do, not something to learn; and the doing is of such a nature
as to demand thinking, or the intentional noting of connections; learn-
ing naturally results.
John Dewey, 1916
179
180 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Model
How PBL Works: Common Features
Instructors in both the small and larger enrollment sections introduce PBL early
in the semester to get a head start on building student acceptance. Students not
previously exposed to such a student-centered learning paradigm have legitimate
questions and concerns about the method. We find it useful, within the context
of the course syllabus, to discuss our skills objectives for the students. The list
includes skills and qualities often cited by employers as being important for
THE LARGE AND THE SMALL OF IT 181
success on the job, important for success in professional schools, and important
for students to continue learning beyond the undergraduate setting. Practice in
these skills is provided by PBL, and early acknowledgment of these goals helps
us to point out the potential value of the PBL method to students.
PBL problems support student learning in the content objectives in both
sized sections; similarly, other features of a good problem are the same in both
the large and small classes (see Chapter 5 in this volume). We like to start with
an engaging scenario described on a single page. This first page problem sce-
nario concludes with two or three divergent questions that lead students to
identify what they already know or may need to know, but do not direct them
to a solution. The pattern of activity and learning initiated by the problems
follows a similar general sequence, as summarized in Table 16.1.
At the second class period of a PBL problem, students report the results of
their investigations to their groups. Freshmen frequently report frustration
with their initial efforts. We, therefore, find a class discussion of what worked
for some students to be an effective way to insert guidance that eases frustra-
tion, and this is an appropriate strategy regardless of section enrollment size.
For example, particularly at the start of the semester, we lead discussions of
Internet search strategies, including ways of evaluating reliability of informa-
tion on the Web. This is part of a more general (and ongoing throughout the
semester) discussion of appropriate and productive resources for researching
problems.
In both small and larger enrollment sections, instructors informally mon-
itor the student presentations of learning issues and the attendant discussions.
If needed, minilectures are inserted on the spot to address general student mis-
understandings about significant issues. In general, the extent of instructor
facilitation during the PBL cycle is a decision made by considering personal
preference, the prior biology background of the students, the time point in the
semester, and the nature of the problem. If, for example, groups are asking
off-target questions that lead group activity away from the content that we
as instructors wish them to engage, the temptation is to provide directive ques-
tions that, in effect, tell the students what to research. It is sometimes difficult
for us, because of our content concerns, to keep in mind that thinking about
the problem is as important as coming up with the right answer. Too much
direction may short-circuit the thinking process and compromise our skills
objectives; too little direction in a freshman course may result in nonproduc-
tive student frustration.
The iterative process of problem reading and discussion, development of
learning issues, research outside of class, exchange of information and group
182 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
thus generating a list of common learning issues for the entire class. For these
students, an entire week is allowed for the individual research before the in-
class PBL cycle resumes.
When groups reconvene to present their information, each student is
required to submit a summary (with citations of references) of his or her
research to the instructor for grading. On the final day of a problem, groups
are chosen at random to present their ideas and solutions to the problem, and
the instructor conducts a wrap-up discussion of the problem content. This dis-
cussion helps students make connections between previous and future lecture
material and the context in which it is relevant to the real world.
In both sections, anonymous peer evaluations that count toward the grade
are used. In the small class, these are filled out twice per semester (see Allen &
Duch, 1998 for a sample evaluation form) and contribute to 10% of the final
grade. In the larger section, evaluations are filled out at the end of each of the
three problems; uniformly low evaluations are used to remove group points
from a students grade. In both sections, students draft ground rules for their
groups operation. These rules can be subsequently referred to as a reminder
of the agreement that each group member made to be good group citizens.
While peer group facilitators (discussed in more depth in Chapter 8) may
not be available in many circumstances, in our experience the use of upper-
class biology majors as peer facilitators for freshmen promotes good group
function, group cohesiveness, in-depth learning, and student satisfaction with
this transitional experience. Well-coached peer facilitators keep the group
activity on task, push students beyond their self-satisfaction level of inquiry,
help to balance student participation, and promote respect for others opinions
and contributions. A good peer facilitator becomes, for incoming freshmen, a
model for success and, as a result, can be a powerful advocate for the method
and for general satisfaction in the course.
revised, in Allen and Duch (1998). The problem begins with a scenario about
John Martin, a marine biologist who hypothesized that low iron content of
certain areas of the ocean limits productivity. He proposed that seeding the
water with iron might, therefore, help combat global warming. Several large-
scale experiments (Iron Ex) have since been conducted to test various aspects
of these assumptions. The problem evolves to engage students thinking about
the flow of energy through the biosphere, carbon and nutrient cycling, marine
ecosystems, and the photosynthetic reactions. Near the end of the problem
sequence, we ask groups to construct complementary concept maps. This in-
class activity (the assignment handout is shown in the appendix for chapter16)
culminates in oral presentations by each group of the thinking reflected in the
concept map. The maps are submitted for instructor evaluation but are used
primarily as formative feedback on student understanding of the connections
between major concepts in biology. In larger classes, concept maps can be
drawn and submitted on overhead transparencies; the instructor can then
select and show representative maps to the whole class to provide feedback,
thus alleviating the necessity to do extensive grading and written comments.
In the small-enrollment course, we also use dialogues (information about
their use is provided by Herreid, undated document on the National Center
for Case Study Teaching in Science website) and position papers as group
assignments. Group problem assessments can serve as effective formative
assessments, allowing the instructor to evaluate student understanding of
underlying concepts. If misconceptions or superficiality is suggested, there is
time for remediation.
Outcomes
For small sections of Honors Introductory Biology, student reactions are
overwhelmingly positive to the thoughtful use of PBL. End-of-course evalu-
ations from 120 students indicate that students value working in groups,
having a peer facilitator, the process of applying concepts to problems, and
if given a choice, they would take another PBL course (Table 16.3).
Responses of students to end-of-course questions in the larger sections also
have been quite favorable. When asked if they would have liked less, more,
or the same amount of PBL, 85% reported more or the same (35% would
have liked more). Students reported that they saw the greatest amount of
improvement in team skills, ability to use resources to solve problems, and
upon their ability to see real-world applications of the material covered in
the course. They report an average amount of improvement in their content
knowledge.
188 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Table 16.3. What Students Say: End-of-Course Ratings for the Small-
Enrollment Section of Introductory Biology
Ratings Question Mean Score1
The following aspects of the course were beneficial to my
learning of biology:
Working in groups 1.38
Working with a peer tutor 1.36
Application of concepts to problems 1.35
Lectures 2.70
If given the choice, I would take another class designed like 1.50
this one.
1
Responses are on the following scale: 1strongly agree to >5strongly disagree. Numbers are
the average of 120 students over several years.
Conclusion
One of the satisfactions that we as instructors have from PBL is that we get to
know our students better than we do with a traditional lecture class. By
removing ourselves from the center of classroom action, we get to observe and
listen to students during every class. This allows us insight into the structure
of their understanding of biology and gives them experience in doing what we
all know is the most effective way to learn a topicteaching it. This creates a
classroom situation in which learning naturally results.
Authors Biographies
Richard S. Donham is Associate Policy Scientist in the Mathematics
& Science Education Resource Center at the University of Delaware
and has a adjunct appointment as a faculty member in the Depart-
ment of Biological Sciences.
Florence I. Schmeig is Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences at
the University of Delaware and an affiliated faculty member of the
University Honors Program.
Deborah E. Allen is Associate Professor and Undergraduate Pro-
grams Director in the Department of Biological Sciences, and an affil-
iated faculty member of the University Honors Program at the Uni-
versity of Delaware.
References
Allen, D. E. (1993). The Geritol Solution. University of Delaware Problem-
Based Learning Website. http://www.udel.edu/pbl/ (2000, Sept. 26).
Allen, D. E., & Duch, B. J. (1998). Thinking toward solutions: Problem-based
learning activities for general biology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders College
Publishing.
190 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all
Americans. Washington, DC: Author
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan,
p. 181.
Herreid, C. F. (Undated). Dialogues as case studies. National Center for Case
Study Teaching in Science. http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/
dialogues.html (2000, Sept. 26).
National Research Council. (1996). From analysis to action: Undergraduate
education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washing-
ton, DC: National Academy Press.
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 16
DIRECTIONS FOR GROUP ASSIGNMENT
ON DEVELOPING A CONCEPT MAP FOR
THE GERITOL SOLUTION
191
192 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
certainly have gaps and flaws and can be improved. As new information is
obtained, new insights of relationships may occur to you. A concept map
should draw on the ideas of the entire group.
Here are some tips about common strategies for constructing a concept
map:
Chapter Summary
Several features of problem-based learning (PBL) are especially apt
for social science courses. With its use of open-ended problems and
student groups, a PBL course can, in itself, model political behavior
and participatory democracy. This chapter illustrates efforts to under-
score these features in a pair of upper-level courses in political science
over a seven-year period.
Introduction
In a democracy, compromise . . . lies at the heart of things because
you have to accept that people are going to have different views, espe-
cially on the most volatile matters and the most important issues.
Czech dissident upon election to Parliament in 1990
The structure and dynamics of a PBL course advance pedagogical goals and
enhance student performance. The structure and dynamics also convey polit-
ical and ethical content. This essay illustrates how the format of a PBL
course models political behavior and participatory democracy in several
ways. First, PBL problems present students with insufficient information for
193
194 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
The second key principle of PBL is that learning occurs in groups. Stu-
dent groups investigate problems by coordinating their efforts, cooperating
toward a collective goal, and collaborating in writing and presenting conclu-
sions. Indeed, PBL students participate in a four-stage cycle of learning
(Svinicki & Dixon, 1987). At each stage, group members discuss material and
receive feedback from peers and the teacher. The first stage is the problem,
for which students identify questions and apt resources for investigating those
questions. Second, students analyze the problem. Students draw on their
existing knowledge to identify which aspects of the problem they do (not)
understand. They also identify what information they require and what (poli-
cies) must exist to proceed. Third, students conduct research. Last, they pres-
ent findings to each other, other groups, the class, and perhaps the public.
Findings may provoke further research, refined policymaking, or other
actions.
Problem-oriented learning is active and applied rather than passive and
absorbed. As students engage a real-life problem, they first identify what they
do not know: these are learning issues. Some learning issues are quite basic:
Do the circumstances that concern critics of soccer balls occur often or infre-
quently? Occur in few or many places? What is a class action lawsuit? Fur-
ther questions require more sophisticated cognitive skills: What are likely con-
sequences of a boycott of soccer balls? What, if anything, do these protests
over soccer balls tell you about Asian countries, economies, culture, and laws?
What does one mean by Asian? How might you respond to the claim that
calls to boycott Asian-made soccer balls represent a form of discrimination?
As students address learning issues, they identify basic principles and concepts,
develop a stock of knowledge, integrate and organize their knowledge, and
develop critical-thinking skills. Students help teach each other because they
constantly interact in order to share information and ideas, develop and refine
points, and offer assistance.
In short, one organizes a PBL course around problems and student
groups. Open-ended problems and student groups mirror several features of
political life.
196 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
self-interest toward a broader general interest (Bohman, 1996, pp. 45). Delib-
eration occurs in two ways in PBL groups. First, the cycle of learning that
occurs within PBL groups demands public deliberation. Members must reflect
upon, share opinions about, engage other opinions, and finally form a con-
sensus about how to proceed. Second, the PBL problem requires a response,
an action aimed at addressing the problem. Again, members must deliberate
about the characteristics of the problem and potential policies intended to
solve the problem.
Discussion, deliberation, and consensus are necessary hallmarks of
democracy. Further, as diversity, participation, and equity enhance discussion
and deliberation, a more robust participatory democracy emerges. To allow
for and encourage diverse viewpoints is to encourage the value of diversity and
open debate (Sleeter & Grant, 1994, p. 129). Such diversity and debate are
essential because a democracy requires citizens who are capable of critical
thought and collective social action (Sleeter & Grant, 1994, p. 219). Such
democratic practice involves more than mere majority rule. As John Dewey
(1988, p. 365) wrote many decades ago:
personal and social problems. Such knowledge and skills greatly enhance citi-
zens as members of overlapping communities and democracies in the Infor-
mation Age of the global political economy.
own experiences. In the last few weeks of the semester we review the prior
material in light of their group experiences.
The second course, Contemporary Problems in World Politics (CPWP),
addresses a range of contemporary problems, particularly violence and
oppression. If in IO we highlight the student groups as groups, then in CPWP
we emphasize individuals in group contexts as a means to illustrate ethical
themes: the global contexts and consequences of individual choices. The PBL
group interactions model the virtues of personal expression, participation, and
deliberation as potential remedies to oppression and as fragile components of
democracy. Films and brief novels illustrate the contemporary problems. In
each source, the main character is a young adult confronting a dilemma. Mak-
ing choices is a central theme of PBL, democracy, and this course.
Problems that demand reflection and choice often spark students. In Imag-
ining Argentina, Carlos ponders how to confront the regime he suspects of
authorizing his wifes abduction and whether to join resolute mothers march-
ing outside the Argentine equivalent of the White House to protest missing
loved ones, the disappeareds presumably kidnapped by the government. In
Dawn, Elisha anguishes over whether to execute a captured British officer. In
A Man for All Seasons, Sir Thomas More weighs whether to compromise his
principles and live comfortably or to challenge King Henry VIII and risk
death. Each source asks students enduring questions: How can citizens resist
tyranny and violent oppression? What consequences follow or resistance or
acquiescence?
In one course, few would follow More to the executioner by maintaining
principles, but half would protest in Argentina or execute a British officer to
advance the cause. Spirited discussion follows about what is a good cause
because it is ground in historical events and in the students vicarious experi-
ences. Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia and massacres in Rwanda, as well as earlier
historical atrocities, become more compelling and problematic circumstances.
Depictions and subsequent questions in Elie Wiesels Night, Rigoberto
Menchus I, Rigoberto, Chinua Achebes Things Fall Apart, and Erich Maria
Remarques All Quiet on the Western Front become more harrowing for stu-
dents because they vicariously participate in the characters choices as they
decide for themselves. For example, I have asked students to apply Wiesels
political principles from Night and from his inaugural speech at the Holocaust
Museum in Washington, DC to allied strikes in Baghdad and Belgrade.
By the end of the course, we shift our attention from the books and films
to the authors and directors. Why would a Central American peasant devas-
tated by civil war bother to learn Spanish and write I, Rigoberto? Why
would Achebe write a tale of a Nigerian village in the 1880s, but craft the
PBL, POLITICS, AND DEMOCRACY 203
tale in impeccable English and classic Western literary form? Why do virtu-
ally all of the protagonists in Imagining Argentina pursue a creative hobby
or professionwhether painter, jeweler, dancer, choreographer, musician,
journalist, writerbut the antagonists are thoughtless and robotic? These
individuals are driven to express themselves, to share their experiences and
views, to participate in a wider discussion that embraces multiple, diverse
perspectives. These authors and their characters demand greater public
deliberation and wider participatory democracy. As students participate in
PBL groups, they enjoy precisely these opportunities.
Conclusion
By decentralizing the classroom, students discover the latitude to explore
ideas, form opinions, and express themselves. They also find they must engage
others and confront novel ideas. Not every student will appreciate or take
advantage of the opportunities, but they will fare no less well than in a con-
ventional course. Those who become engaged will shine because they can radi-
ate their creativity. According to course evaluations, students enjoy and value
these courses and experiences. For example: This course was very valuable
for it allowed students to participate in lectures and discussion. I gained a lot
of insight from other students viewpoints. The course required a lot of inde-
pendent discipline. . . . Ive grown (Spring, 1994). [The class] allowed stu-
dents to work through the issues on their own rather than simply presenting
conclusions to them (Spring, 1995). I enjoyed the assignments because they
allowed me to experience different perspectives rather than read about them
(Spring, 1996). I really did learn a lot in the course, not only about World
Politics, but also about interacting with people, making a point, and being
receptive to other points of view (Spring, 1997). I learned more than I
thought possible from one course (Fall, 1998). I liked the learning process
that we used. Forcing us to admit what we didnt know and understand
worked well. The group project was difficult, but I learned an exceptional
amount from it (Winter, 1999). Nonetheless, some students may be frus-
trated, particularly those who dualistically define learning as the collection
of concrete right-or-wrong facts.
Research drawn from twenty years of PBL experience conclude that PBL
has done no harm in terms of conventional tests of knowledge and that stu-
dents may show better clinical problem-solving skills. They also show that stu-
dents are stimulated and motivated by PBL as a method (Albanese &
Mitchell, 1993; Vernon & Blake, 1993; quotation in Barrows, 1996, p. 10).
Students retain information longer and recall it more quickly and accurately
204 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
(Barrows, 1984; 1996, p. 6). Thus, the foremost role of instruction should not
be to convey information, but to assist students to develop the necessary skills
to direct their own learning and to construct knowledge in ways that are
effective for them (Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1992). This conclusion reinforces
my goal to teach substance and skills.
Similarly, students valuably learn skills necessary to direct their social and
political lives in constructive and enriching directions. Students benefit from
personal experiences that illustrate collaboration over competition, participa-
tion over indifference, listening and deliberation over knee-jerk reaction, and
democracy over disillusionment or despotism. Developing these political and
ethical sensibilities is as important as fostering cognitive skills. Fortunately,
PBL methods promote political, social, and cognitive abilities.
Author Biography
Kurt Burch is Associate Professor of Political Science and Interna-
tional Relations at the University of Delaware.
References
Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of
the literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Med-
icine, 68 (1), 5281.
Barrows, H. S. (1984). A specific, problem-based, self-directed learning
method designed to teach medical problem-solving skills, self-learning
skills, and enhanced knowledge retention and recall. In H. G. Schmidt and
M. L. DeVolder (Eds.), Tutorials in problem-based learning. Maastricht,
the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief
overview. In L. Wilkerson, and W. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-
based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (pp. 312). San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1992). Cognition and curriculum. In P. W.
Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum. Old Tappan, NJ:
Macmillan.
Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bonwell, C. C. & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in
the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington,
DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human
Development.
PBL, POLITICS, AND DEMOCRACY 205
Chapter Summary
Problem-based learning (PBL) has become the central component of
a yearlong Honors general chemistry course for science majors. Real-
world, contextual problems are used to introduce concepts; students
working together find and master the information and ideas needed to
generate a solution. Whole-class discussions of the problems are sup-
plemented by minilectures, demonstrations, and other active learning
techniques.
Introduction
The main intent of general chemistry is to provide an introduction to the most
important principles and applications of chemistry. Its roots lie in descriptive
chemistry, which focuses on the physical and chemical characteristics of the ele-
ments and their compounds and stresses a practical knowledge of reactivity and
applications. Over the years, as the nature of the discipline itself has changed,
general chemistry has become more complex, with a strong emphasis on the
mathematical and theoretical aspects of the science. Rather than supplanting
descriptive chemistry, however, this more abstract material has simply been
added, with little integration of the two aspects. In addition, as the clientele
207
208 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
taking general chemistry has expanded from mostly potential chemistry majors
to a host of students from a wide range of disciplines, the desire to show the role
of chemistry in each of these areas has led to the incorporation of even more
information, resulting in a situation shared by many other survey courses
a curriculum a mile wide and an inch deep. (Lloyd, 1992)
In attempting to narrow the range of the subject somewhat, the University
of Delaware offers seven different general chemistry courses for specific sub-
sets of majors, ranging from Chemistry and the Environment aimed at fos-
tering chemical literacy in nonscience majors, to a rigorous Honors course for
chemists and chemical engineers. Honors General Chemistry 103-104 (CHEM
103-104H), the course described here, targets first-year students in the Uni-
versitys Honors Program who plan to major in a science or a branch of engi-
neering other than chemistry, biochemistry, or chemical or environmental engi-
neering. Most of the students in the class are biology (including premedical
interest) or mechanical/civil engineering majors; other disciplines represented
include physics, art conservation, athletic training and physical therapy, ani-
mal science, psychology, and even economics and political science. Present as
well are a handful of undeclared students who are searching for a major. This
course, then, addresses academically strong students with a fairly wide range
of interests who are taking general chemistry as a requirement for their cho-
sen field of study.
What do such students need to take away from a course in general chem-
istry? Defining essential topics and the balance between breadth and depth
of coverage become issues difficult to reconcile when dealing both with stu-
dents for whom this is a terminal course in chemistry (e.g., engineers) and
those (biologists) who will go on to take several more courses in the disci-
pline. In taking stock of the learning objectives I had for the students in this
course, I realized that memorizing a large body of specific chemical facts and
information was not among them; few of these students would go on to sit-
uations in which retention of such details would be important. Nor did I par-
ticularly value their ability to plug numbers into equationsof more impor-
tance was for them to understand the relationship expressed by the equation
and its implications. What I wanted them to gain from this course were (1) a
deeper (rather than superficial) understanding of the fundamental guiding
principles of chemistry; (2) the ability to recognize how one can explain the
observable properties and behavior of the material world by understanding
the behavior of matter at the atomic and molecular level; (3) the ability to
identify chemistry in action in the real world and the role it plays in other
disciplines; (4) the ability to think critically and analytically and to solve
problems; (5) the ability to learn independently by discerning when infor-
U S I N G P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G I N G E N E R A L C H E M I S T RY 209
mation is needed and where/how to find it; and (6) the abilities to commu-
nicate clearly and to work effectively with others.
Given these goals, the appeal of PBL became clear. What better way to
illustrate the importance of chemistry in the real world than by drawing on
real-world situations as a stage for introducing chemical concepts? Similarly,
using such situations as a starting point allows students to ground the abstract
theories they encounter in a more concrete and meaningful context, making
the connection between the observable macroscopic and invisible microscopic
worlds more obvious. It becomes easier for students to gain and retain a
deeper understanding of these principles when they are able to relate them to
more familiar situations. Since PBL requires students to assess their own
knowledge, to recognize deficiencies, and to remedy those shortcomings
through their own investigations, it provides them with an explicit model for
lifelong learning. In addition, the group format can teach students the power
of working cooperatively, foster the development of valuable communication
and interpersonal skills, and help establish a community of learners enriched
by the gifts of each person.
Model
Course Format and Rationale
CHEM 103-104H is a two-semester, four-credit course that includes a labora-
tory component. The typical fall enrollment is 7585 students; this drops to
4050 in the spring, since several majors require only one semester of chem-
istry. Because this is an Honors course, enrollment in the lecture section is lim-
ited to 2024 students, which results in three to four sections in the fall and
two to three in the spring. The relatively small laboratory accommodates only
1214 people, so there is no correlation between a students lecture and lab
section. Students may encounter a completely different set of classmates in lab
and in lecture, making it impossible to keep the same groups of students
together in both lab and lecture. Each lecture section meets for 50 minutes,
three days a week, with the different sections meeting back-to-back.
Several factors figured prominently in the design of this course. As men-
tioned earlier, the students in this course are mostly freshmen beginning their
college studies. They are very bright, motivated by grade pressure to do well
but as nonmajors, are often not particularly interested in chemistry, and may
even feel intimidated by it. The material they will encounter is often very
abstract and quantitative; furthermore, as an introductory course, general
chemistry deals with a wide range of seemingly disconnected concepts that
provide the basis for understanding the discipline. Many real-world situations
210 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
involving chemistry are fairly complex and bring in ideas that are well beyond
the scope of an introductory course. Given such factors, I felt that these novice
students would need a greater sense of structure and direction than they might
be able to find on their own. Without any guidance in generating learning
issues, it would become easy for them to be sidetracked by trivialities or over-
whelmed by complexityespecially since I would be the only instructor avail-
able. With five to six groups of students and a 50-minute time slot, it would
be hard for me to guarantee having enough time to spend with each group if
they encountered difficulties in moving forward.
For these reasons, it seemed to me that a model in which PBL was
blended with lecture would be more suitable to this audience than a totally
PBL format. Problems would be used to introduce concepts whenever possi-
ble, but some ideas (such as bonding theory and quantum mechanics) that
have not lent themselves as well to problems could still be dealt with through
interactive/Socratic lectures, to keep students actively involved with the mate-
rial. Similarly, problems would be constructed with a few guiding questions
to steer students in an appropriate direction, rather than leaving them com-
pletely on their own. While less student-centered than traditional PBL, this
approach helps to compensate for the lack of the dedicated tutors found in
the more traditional setting, while still giving students groups the opportunity
to chart their own course within a more restricted domain.
home on the last page, a radio newscast tells of the dilemma faced by a small
town where flooding has led to the runoff of thousands of pounds of road salt
into the reservoir.
In each case, a few questions are used to lead the students in an appropri-
ate direction. For example, in the first part they are asked to predict whether
gasoline might freeze around 5C based on its structure (which they must
find), and to determine how the main ingredient in dry gas (methanol) might
interact with gasoline and water. The deicer page asks them to pick the best
deicer among three choices and to justify their choice. The news story about
water purification asks for comments on the city officials advice, as well as
bringing in some other material related to how water is purified. The reservoir
dilemma is used to prompt a comparative examination of distillation and
reverse osmosis as means of removing the salt.
The Winter Woes problem kicks off the second semester of the course;
as a result, one of its purposes is to stimulate recollection of relevant material
covered in the first semester, such as intermolecular forces and their relation-
ship to molecular structure. This first page of the problem prompts this review,
as the students go back to reconstruct their knowledge of this area; it also
opens up a discussion of the process of solution formation and sets the stage
for a discussion of colligative properties. Colligative properties remain the
theme in the deicer story and appear again in the discussion of osmosis and
distillation. Ideas concerning the effects of temperature and pressure on solu-
bility, as well as a discussion of ways to express concentration follow from the
water purification story.
This example is one of the few cases in the course where an entire unit is
covered solely through problems. In recent practice, not all parts of the prob-
lem are used in class every year because of time constraints: going through all
four took around 10 class periods, which was more time than I felt could be
allotted to this subject. Generally, just the first and last pages are now used
with groups in class, and the other two worked into other assignments or dis-
cussions. (The deicer comparison, for example, was transformed into a lab
experiment.)
although students are not limited to those; a cartful of such books is made
available in the classroom, and the chemistry library (including Web access)
is close enough to the classroom that students can make use of it during class
if they so choose.
New chapters or topics typically begin with a problem. After the instruc-
tor provides a brief introduction to set the stage, groups of students work
through the problem either to completion or to the end of that class period. As
the students work, the instructor wanders from group to group, listening to
get a sense of how the students are approaching the problem, of misconcep-
tions that might arise, and of the general progress being made. If most groups
seem to be on the right track, the students may be asked to finish and write a
brief report or solution to the problem before the next class. If it seems that
more time will be needed, the problem is carried over to the next class. In some
cases, especially when time is tight, students may be asked to suspend work on
some questions in order to begin reporting on the initial questions. Group
work may then be resumed on the remaining questions, or we may switch
instead to a whole-class discussion of those points. Having this flexibility is
useful since, even with problems that have been used in previous semesters,
predicting how much time an individual class section will take to finish is
tricky.
Reporting may proceed in different ways. One technique that has been
quite successful has been to have each group present a summary of their solu-
tion on an overhead transparency. The realization that all of their peers will
see their work provides more incentive for them to do a good job than one
might have expected! Transparencies have the advantage, particularly when
calculations or graphs are involved, of preserving the oral report in a form
that can be easily photocopied and duplicated for the class. Students are then
free to listen to one another without scrambling to take notes during the pre-
sentations. During the reporting phase, the instructor can join in with ques-
tions to probe their understanding and to connect ideas that emerge in the
discussion with concepts that either have already been seen or will be forth-
coming.
Once a problem is finished, a new problem may be introduced to address
the next set of concepts. Alternatively, some material may be presented through
a lecture, especially in order to model particular types of calculations or analy-
ses, to deal with more abstract topics (e.g., atomic orbitals) that are difficult to
address with problems, or simply to touch on ideas that are not revealed
through the problems. Chemical demonstrations and hands-on activities are
also important components of the course and can be used as the basis for a
U S I N G P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G I N G E N E R A L C H E M I S T RY 213
Groups
During the first two weeks of a semester, students are still dropping and
adding courses; for this reason, collaborative work during this period is done
through informal groups pulled together as needed. Once the registration has
stabilized, permanent groups of four are formed and maintained for the rest of
the semester. In constructing the groups, there is an attempt to balance gender
and majors, as well as to spread out the students who report having had two
years of high school chemistry (vs. only one). This changes a bit in the spring;
since at that point more is known about many of the students, the instructor
can better distribute the stronger (and weaker) students, being mindful as well
of potential personality conflicts.
The use of groups in CHEM 103-104H is fairly standard. Information
about group work is provided in the course syllabus and discussed at the
beginning of the course. Each group is asked to meet outside of class to pre-
pare a list of ground rules and consequences (see Chapter 6 of this volume), a
copy of which, signed by each group member, must be given to the instructor.
The roles of discussion leader, reporter, recorder, and advocate/resource per-
son rotate among the group members at the start of each new problem. Twice
during the semester (midterm and at the end), group members evaluate each
persons contribution (including their own) to the group (see Chapter 6). After
the midterm report, students receive feedback from the instructor concerning
their perceived strengths and weaknesses. This feedback is a distillation of con-
structively phrased comments made by their peers and is presented as coming
from the instructor, with student contributions remaining anonymous. The
second report counts toward the course participation grade (5% of the total).
In general, group assessment and accountability is more informal in this class
214 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Assessment
Most of the assessment procedures in this class are aimed at the individual stu-
dent. The final grade is based on the items and weightings in Table 18.1.
Hour exams are blue book based and include essays, interpretation and
application questions; calculations are worked into the context of these
questions, rather having them stand alone. A periodic table and appropri-
ate constants are always provided, as are certain equations. Students have
the limited option of buying information, such as equations or formulas
that they want for their solution. The information is written into the blue
book by the instructor so that it will be noticed at grading time. At that
point, the amount of credit that would have been allotted to that piece of
information is deducted. This practice allows a student to proceed with the
remaining sections of a multipart problem and show his or her abilities to
deal with the other concepts addressed by the question. It is up to the
instructor to determine the propriety of when and what information to pro-
vide; help is limited to specific factual information, as opposed to strategies
for solving problems. Three hours are allotted for these exams, and partial
credit is used in grading.
The final exam uses multiple-choice questions, due to time constraints in
preparing course grades at the end of the semester. The hour and final exams
are coupled through a system known as point recapture, modeled after a pro-
cedure originally reported by Herschbach and Pickering (1991). The idea of
point recapture is that points lost on hour exams are not lost permanently;
they may be regained if the student is able to demonstrate mastery of that
material on the final exam. The rationale here is to encourage students to
revisit concepts they did not understand and learn them before the end of the
semester. Each part of a question on an hour exam addresses a particular con-
cept or concepts in a certain way. Once the exams have been graded, a spread-
sheet is constructed to keep track of each students score for each question or
part. Questions on the final are correlated to many of the hour exam ques-
tions, especially those for which the class average fell below 75%. They are
designed to address the same concept(s) from essentially the same direction. If
U S I N G P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G I N G E N E R A L C H E M I S T RY 215
the student demonstrates mastery by answering the final exam question cor-
rectly, the points lost on that question in the hour exam are awarded, raising
the score on that exam. The students final grade is then calculated using these
revised hour exam scores.
The laboratory component of CHEM 103-104H is integrated with the
rest of the course; assessment here is based largely on lab reports. These are
graded using a manuscript revision system (Herschbach & Pickering, 1991):
reports are accepted, accepted with minor revision, accepted with major
revision, or rejected. Each category is defined by a rubric made available
to the students. Minor revision generally encompasses a limited number of
technical (rather than conceptual) errors, whereas major revision implies
several conceptual errors or a multitude of technical problems. Each category
is awarded a set number of points. Students then have the option to revise the
reports by correcting the areas in error and resubmitting the original report;
revised reports, if done correctly, can earn back most of the points available.
This policy, like point recapture, encourages students to deal with their areas
of ignorance, rather than discounting them.
Fifteen percent of the grade is allotted to problem sets and other assign-
ments. Three problem sets of five to six questions each are assigned each
semester. Students are allowed to work on these together, provided that any
consultations with others are documented and that each student provides
solutions in his or her own words. Other assignments vary and may include
reports, web searches, or other projects. While this has not yet been used, it
is feasible to consider converting group projects graded on a check/
plus/minus scale into numerical scores to include in this category. The par-
ticipation component of the grade covers class attendance (roll is taken dis-
creetly at each class); individual participation in class (noted after each
class); and group participation (based both on peer evaluations and the
instructors assessment).
216 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Outcomes
Instructors Observations
It is impossible to declare that student understanding of general chemistry has
greatly improved since the introduction of PBL into CHEM 103-104H, in the
absence of some way to measure any changes in an objective and reliable fash-
ion. Exam questions and other means of assessment in this course are coupled
tightly to how the course plays out in class during a particular semester. Cer-
tain topics that are stressed one year may not be emphasized as heavily the fol-
lowing year, depending on what sort of discussions evolve from the problems.
Because of the point recapture grading system, it is possible to compare class
averages on similar questions from year to year; unfortunately, however,
enough data are not available from the pre-PBL period to enable any mean-
ingful comparisons. Qualitatively, it seems that student learning of fundamen-
tal concepts is not significantly different with or without PBL. Certainly, stu-
dent performances (in terms of overall course averages) since the change in
course format have been at least as good as those before the change. With
many uncontrolled factors contributing to a final grade, however, such com-
parisons have little validity.
Where the differences are more obvious, however, are in behaviors and
skills. While its hard to tell whether higher-order thinking skills have improved,
because those were not really being assessed before the introduction of PBL, I
have found that, on average, students do quite well in meeting my expecta-
tions in their answers to critical-thinking questions. I have found that the type
of exam questions that might have stumped classes from earlier years are now
being handled more easily by the majority of the class. Students seem better
able to make connections between what they are learning in chemistry and
their other classes, particularly among the biologists, and frequently bring up
such connections both in class and on exams. Their ability to work together
effectively in groups clearly improves throughout the year, as does their facil-
ity in using texts and other available resources to find information related to
the problem at hand. Perhaps the most obvious difference, though, becomes
apparent in comparing class meetings in which students are working on a
problem, with those that are predominantly lecture-based. In the former, stu-
dents need to be told when time is up and the class is over, and often a group
or two will remain and continue to work until the next class comes in to dis-
place them. When the class has been all lecture, attention flags, and students
are quite aware of quitting time! Even if it were to do nothing else, PBL assures
that students spend some time grappling with the material at hand, thinking,
and discussing.
U S I N G P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G I N G E N E R A L C H E M I S T RY 217
Student Response
Student reaction to the PBL format has been quite positive. In final course
evaluations, they comment that group work, in particular, is helpful. They
benefit from seeing that their peers often have the same questions and misun-
derstandings that they do; from being able to share scientific ideas with equals;
and from the chance to try out their ideas and interpretations without fear of
ridicule or dismissal. Groups provide a sense of community that is particularly
valued by these first-year students: many report continuing to work together
in later classes with their group and classmates from CHEM 103-104H.
The emphasis in the course on critical and conceptual thinking over mem-
orization is also valued. Discussions with students a year or two after they
have finished CHEM 103-104H almost invariably include the sentiment that
they both learned and retained a lot of information from the course. Premed-
ical students often assert that they anticipated (and/or found) no trouble with
the chemistry portion of the MCAT because of the preparation afforded them
by this course. While in the minority, a number of students do suggest that
they would have preferred a greater amount of structure in the course, with
more lecturing, more detailed working out of problems by the instructor in
class, and more assigned end-of-chapter problems. On the whole, though, the
combination of PBL and lecture used in this course seems to be quite effective.
Summary
A course format that uses a more directed form of PBL in conjunction with lec-
tures and other activities has been found to be an effective way to give first-year
students a powerful learning experience in general chemistry. Using problems to
introduce concepts provides students with a motivation for learning, as well as
the opportunity to share ideas and information with their peers. Using problems
with directed questions developed by the instructor provides a structure and
focus for the learning issues that might otherwise be lacking among this group of
novice nonmajor learners in a somewhat intimidating subject. Lecture segments
tie together issues generated in a problem with prior and future concepts, as well
as demonstrate expert strategies and ways of thinking in the field.
Author Biography
Susan E. Groh is Assistant Professor in Chemistry and Biochemistry
and an affiliated faculty member of the University Honors Program at
the University of Delaware.
218 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
References
Herschbach, D., & Pickering, M. (1991). Making grading less painful. Jour-
nal of College Science Teaching, 21, 377379.
Lloyd, B. W. (1992). A review of curricular changes in the general chemistry
course during the twentieth century. Journal of Chemical Education, 69,
633636.
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 18
WINTER WOES
Part 1
For nearly a week, the Eastern seaboard had been blasted by what weather
forecasters euphemistically called a wintery mix of snow, sleet, and freezing
rain. The resulting ice-glazed streets and sidewalks sent residents scurrying for
shovels, ice choppers, salt, sand, dirt, cat litteranything to make transporta-
tion possible.
Chris and Lee, the only two of a group of housemates left in Newark
during winter session, tried to avoid the problem for a while, until their
dwindling supply of Doritos and Diet Coke made a shopping trip impera-
tive. They gingerly made their way out to the car and, after two hours of
hacking away ice from the door and windows, managed to get in. Twisting
the key in the ignition, Chris was delighted to hear the battery turn over
immediately, and mentally posted a note of congratulations for taking
advantage of a battery sale just a few weeks earlier. The engine, however,
didnt catch for a while and, when it finally did, ran very roughly, surg-
ing and chugging.
It acts like its not getting enough gas, Lee noted. Have you added any
dry gas recently?
Huh? Chris responded.
Its some stuff that you can add to the fuel tank of the carits supposed
to keep the fuel lines from freezing up, Lee said. You just toss a bottles worth
219
220 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
in when you tank up, and it eliminates the chugging. My folks swear by itkept
our old car running forever in the winter. We can get some at the gas station.
But that doesnt make sense, said Chris the theoretician. Gasoline
doesnt freeze at these temperatures5F is cold, but that isnt enough to
freeze gasolineis it?
I think it has something to do with the gas getting wet. At least, I thought
thats why they called it dry gas. I dont knowI just know that dry gas
always worked for us. Whatever the reason, it cant hurt to try.
Questions to Consider
1. In chemical terms, what is gasoline? Given the chemical nature of
gasoline, what general expectations do you have about its freezing
point? Why?
2. Suppose some water did get into the fuel lines. How would you
expect water and gasoline to interact? Will the presence of water
change the freezing point of gasoline?
3. The chief ingredient in dry gas is methanol. How might the presence
of methanol perturb the gasoline-water system?
Part 2
After tanking up at the gas station, Chris and Lee slide down to Agway on
Main Street to pick up some salt for deicing their sidewalk. Theyve lucked
outa new shipment just came in. The board over the counter reads:
Now what? Lee said. I thought salt was salt; I didnt know there were dif-
ferent kinds! Beats me, Chris agreed. I heard the traffic guy saying some-
thing about it being too cold for salt to work. Maybe one of these other things
would work better.
U S I N G P R O B L E M - B A S E D L E A R N I N G I N G E N E R A L C H E M I S T RY 221
Questions to Consider
1. Draw up a general description of a good deicing agent for streets.
Be prepared to back up your description using chemical principles.
2. Which material do you think they should buy? How much will they
need to clear 100 feet of sidewalk? (The sidewalk is 2.5 feet wide,
covered by 1 inch of ice. Make any other assumptions you feel are
necessary.)
Part 3
Next, they headed for College Square. While waiting in the checkout line at
Pathmark, Lee picked up a copy of the Newark Post and saw the following
article:
You were right about the chlorine smell, Chris, Lee pointed out. Bet-
ter go back for some Evian; Im not drinking this stuff.
Questions to Consider
1. Do you agree with the plant managers suggestion for getting rid of
the chlorine in tap water? Explain.
2. The water purification code specifies that the chlorine content of
tap water, at the point of delivery, must be at least 1 g of Cl2 per
222 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Part 4
Driving back from their errands, Chris and Lee listen to the latest reports of
storm-related mishaps on the radio. One in particular catches their attention:
a small coastal town farther south had thought itself lucky to catch the warm
side of the most recent storm. The resulting torrential rains, however, caused
a creek retaining wall to fail. The rampaging creek, cresting a dozen feet above
flood level, washed tons of temporarily stockpiled rock salt into the towns
reservoir. Tests showed the salinity of the reservoir to be nearly 3%almost
as salty as ocean water. The news report indicated that the town was consid-
ering its options for repurifying the water, including using the facilities of a
nearby chemical plant for distilling the water. In the meantime, the local naval
base had sent the townspeople an emergency shipment of reverse osmosis
desalinators, normally stocked in life rafts, for purifying water at home.
Questions to Consider
1. Describe what would happen during distillation of the reservoir
water. What would the initial boiling point be for a sample of this
reservoir water? Why?
2. Suppose the reservoir had been contaminated by a spill of methanol
instead of salt. Would this change your answer to the first question
in any way?
3. What is meant by reverse osmosis? What is the molecular-level basis
for this process?
4. Why isnt salt water drinkable?
19
A SKEPTICS LOOK AT PBL
Elizabeth M. Lieux
Chapter Summary
The author compares lecture and problem-based learning (PBL)
teaching methods in a course for junior-level dietetics majors. Stu-
dents are shown to achieve comparable test scores on a nationally
administered exam. Student evaluations of the course are different for
PBL and lecture-based classes.
Introduction
Dietetics, like many other professions, requires a certification examination
upon completion of the four-year undergraduate program and a six- to nine-
month post-baccalaureate internship. Although undergraduate programs are
not driven to teach to the examination, for an academic program to remain
accredited students from the college or university must have an 80% pass rate
on the exam among other criteria. One of the areas of expected competence
for dietitians is an understanding of how foods are prepared and served to
large groups of people. Even though most dietitians do not practice as man-
agers of foodservice organizations, they still must have an appreciation of how
meals are planned, prepared, and delivered in a variety of settings, including
hospitals, nursing homes, university and school dining facilities, and many
other sites. For as long as I had been teaching the foodservice management
courses, the average score of University of Delaware students was above the
223
224 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Model
Problem Development
In 1994, the course included both nutrition and dietetics students and students
majoring in Hotel, Restaurant, and Institutional Management (hospitality). It
seemed important to write problems that could appeal to both groups because
they have different orientations to foodservice. Dietitians tend to view food-
service from a nutritional perspective, and hospitality students view foodser-
vice from a marketing and profit-making perspective. Problems written about
hospitals or nursing homes would not appeal to hospitality students. Problems
about fine dining or limited-service restaurants would be dismissed by dietet-
ics students. I decided to develop problems that would have some interest to
both groups (Lieux & Luoto, 2000).
Both groups needed to understand food safety, so I used a highly publi-
cized outbreak of food-borne illness in a quick service restaurant as the basis
for three problems. The first was to learn about the microorganism that
caused the illness, the second to identify methods that would have prevented
the outbreak, and the third investigated the effect of the outbreak on the com-
pany. These three problems were very successful with both groups. The dietet-
ics students, who have a strong science background, were able to teach the
hospitality students about microbiology. The hospitality students helped the
dietetics students understand how the stock market, marketing and public
relations, and franchise relationships work, and how to read and use the infor-
mation from a profit and loss statement.
With the help of a registered dietitian who manages the Child Nutrition
Program for a nearby school district, I created another set of problems around
the school lunch program. The six problems focused on menu planning, pur-
chasing, production controls, and food production methods.
Finally, there was a problem about a business and industry foodservice
account that investigated inventory control and another in a hospital setting
that explored food delivery systems.
Generally, both groups of students found the problems interesting and
learned the intended material. About three years after I began using PBL, the
hospitality program developed their own course in Quantity Food Production
226 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
and Service so their students no longer were a part of this PBL class. My class
is now offered exclusively to nutrition and dietetics students.
Outcomes
Demographics
PBL classes were limited to 36 students based on the size of the available PBL
classroom. Male students were equally divided between both sections (see
Table 19.1). The first time the class was offered twice as many hospitality
A S K E P T I C S L O O K AT P B L 227
Table 19.2. Scores on a 22-Item Pretest of Food Principles and Basic Nutrition
Year Lecture-based Problem-based
1994 Number 38 36
11.9 ( 2.4) 12.5 ( 2.6)
1995 Number 50 32
12.8 ( 2.9) 12.6 ( 2.8)
students were in LB as were in PBL, and the second time twice as many
dietetics students were in LB.
Prerequisite Knowledge
Courses in nutrition and food are taken before students enroll in Quantity
Food Production and Service. There was no statistical difference in the knowl-
edge of food and nutrition between the students in LB or PBL sections based
on a pretest administered early in the semester (see Table 19.2).
Intellectual Maturity
The Learning Environment Survey measures the maturation of the learner
based on Perrys model of intellectual and ethical development (Perry, 1970).
The PBL students had a higher level using the Perry model than did the LB stu-
dents (see Table 19.3). I believe this was because, due to scheduling incom-
patibilities, all of the Coordinated Program in Dietetics (CP) students were in
the PBL class. This group was selected for CP through a rigorous admission
process and tended to be more mature and focused than traditional students.
228 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Neither PBL nor LB increased LES scores. Both groups started at a rela-
tively low level of intellectual and ethical development and remained there.
They were in transition between the dualist position (Level 1) and the multi-
plist position (Level 3). For these students, the preference is for a teacher-
centered environment with limited discussion. They prefer to view the teacher
as the source of right and wrong answers and wish to learn what they need to
know in order to get good grades. This level of student is uncomfortable with
an unstructured environment and when forced to take responsibility for his or
her own learning. Many students know how to be successful in a lecture-based
classroom, but they find the PBL class to be anxiety producing.
Attendance
There were significantly more students coming to class in the PBL sections in
1994 than those who attended the LB section (see Table 19.4).
In 1994, students in the lecture-based class attended an average of 17.5
( 5.1) classes of 26 sessions offered (range = 626). Students in the PBL class
attended an average of 23.5 ( 1.9) classes (range = 1826). In 1995, LB stu-
dents attended an average of 23 classes of 28 offered (range = 1228). Students
in PBL attended an average of 37 classes of 40 offered (range = 3340). PBL
students are much more likely to attend class even when sessions meet three
rather than two times each week.
A S K E P T I C S L O O K AT P B L 229
In 1995, for only one question was there a significant difference between
the scores of LB and PBL students. There was, once again, no difference
between the two sections total scores in the final exam. Linear regression of
the independent variables (GPA, GPA in major, number of credits in the major,
and section) found that only GPA served as a predictor of the final exam total
score. Twenty-nine percent of the variance was accounted for by the GPA.
increased from 1994 to 1995 when requirements were added to the PBL class.
Question 6 looked at students self-rating, and here again PBL students
thought they worked harder than LB students did. I do not view more read-
ing, more other work, and working hard negatively and am encouraged by
these results.
Questions 7 through 9 looked at methods of involving students, and PBL
students reported more instances of involvement in discussion, answering their
own questions, and expressing themselves. Questions 10 through 14 addressed
communication of content and purpose. Here PBL students awarded lower
scores than LB students, both in 1994 and 1995. When I looked at these
results in 1994, I tried to do a better job in this area, and there was some
improvement in 1995. I suspect these scores will never be as high in a PBL
course as in a LB course because the students have a greater responsibility for
developing their own learning issues and conducting the research. When fac-
ulty no longer tell them everything they need to know, the students are likely
to believe they have to create the structure of the course themselves.
Questions 15 and 16 look at creating enthusiasm. PBL students believed
they were stimulated to high intellectual effort but did not believe that there
was an introduction of stimulating ideas about the subject. The last two ques-
tions were about preparing exams. PBL students were less satisfied with their
exams than LB students and thought they had to remember more details.
What may be seen from these results is a preference on the part of less
mature students for an instructor-centered course. They still would like to
learn in ways that are comfortable with less responsibility for their own
learning. They do recognize that their communication skills are greatly
improved. Along with this are greater opportunities for teacher-student dis-
cussion and self-expression. They yearn, however, for the teacher to tell them
what they need to learn and how everything fits together. We can hope that
increases in the use of active learning methods at all levels of education will
relegate using primarily lecture-based teaching methods to the scrap heap.
Then perhaps students will expect to share responsibility for their own learn-
ing with the faculty instead of expecting the instructor to shoulder most of
the burden.
true in 1995 as well. Students who had the PBL experience, however, started
challenging the registration exam in 1996 and, from then on, more and more
of the test takers would have had their Quantity Food Production and Service
as a PBL class. Only in 1995 and 1996 were scores for University of Delaware
students not above the national average. Since then, these scores have been
above the national average in foodservice management. This clearly indicates
that students are as well prepared using PBL methods of teaching as they were
using LB methods.
Quizzes are given after each problem is completed. The content of the quiz
is based on the problem and the worksheet that supports the problem. Seventy
percent of the quiz is for individual effort, but there is always one question
that is completed by the group working together.
I developed technology enrichments for the course a couple of years ago
that seem to have had a positive impact. A web page contains the syllabus and
resources for each problem. I identified a variety of Internet sites that provide
useful information. Many of the periodical articles that I had previously
placed on reserve in the library are now available through electronic reserves
in the library. I present the wrap-ups for each problem using multimedia pres-
entation software (PowerPoint). This has increased the students interest in
the information.
Deliverables for each problem are usually a written group report. For
some problems, oral reports are presented. This has helped students improve
their presentation skills. Of late, most groups elect to use PowerPoint as
their method of providing the information visually. The PBL classroom used
for this course has fine multimedia capabilities. I make a laptop computer
available, and students bring their presentations on disks they have created
elsewhere. They are developing great skill in utilizing this medium and deliv-
ering more effective presentations.
Peer tutors have been used in many semesters to work with the groups as
they develop an understanding of each problem. This has been particularly
effective when one tutor is responsible for two to three groups. The tutors are
able to communicate to students my expectations in ways that help them to
learn.
Lessons Learned
Over the years, I have gained a great deal of confidence in PBL. I find that the
students are certainly capable of learning much information on their own and
applying it to real-world situations. PBL has great advantages in helping the
students develop team skills, improve their oral and written communication
skills, and help them to think critically. Many students would still prefer that
I revert to previous teaching methods and tell them everything they need to
know. I continue, however, to believe that using active teaching methods is key
to helping the students become lifetime learners. No profession allows mem-
bers to use only the information they acquired as students. It is crucial for
members of the profession to continue to learn. I believe the PBL helps stu-
dents acquire the skills they need to continue their education on their own.
A S K E P T I C S L O O K AT P B L 235
Author Biography
Elizabeth M. Lieux is an Associate Professor in the Department of
Nutrition and Dietetics at the University of Delaware.
References
Instructional Development and Effectiveness Assessment. (1991). IDEA system,
Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University.
Lieux, E. M. (1996) The effect of teaching method on students knowledge of
quantity food production and service, course evaluations, and propensity
for participative management. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Vir-
ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Lieux, E. M., Luoto, P. K. (2000). Exploring quantity food production and
service through problems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the col-
lege years. A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Woods, D. R. (1994) Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from
PBL. Hamilton, ON: Griffith Printing Limited, Adapted from Moore and
Fitch Inventory for Learning Preference reprinted with permission.
20
PBL IN PRESERVICE
TEACHER EDUCATION
Eugene Matusov, John St. Julien,
and James A. Whitson
Chapter Summary
Two courses in the preservice elementary teacher education were
revised, initially, to develop models that might be used throughout the
program. While useful models were developed in a variety of prob-
lems within these courses, the instructors conclude that differences
between schoolish and authentic problems are more essential to the
success of problem-based learning (PBL) than are the models pro-
vided by successful PBL problems and courses.
Introduction
In this chapter, we report and discuss our experience revising two courses in
the undergraduate program in elementary teacher education. We initially
intended that these two revised courses might provide models for using PBL in
preservice teacher educationmodels that could be replicated throughout
other courses in our ETE program. Our experience leads us to conclude, how-
ever, that although effective PBL problems or courses do provide models that
might be adopted and adapted in designing other effective problems and
courses, it is a mistake to focus on these models, forms, and design structures
as the key to effectiveness in PBL.
237
238 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
students. Almost as often, though, it would be hard to see the value of those
activitiesbeyond their entertainment valuein terms of learning outcomes
that would result for their students. Moreover, when their units did include
activities that could be expected to produce some real learning benefits for
their elementary or middle school students, those activities often did not build
on one another in a progressive or coherent way to advance the students
understanding of the topic or their ability to understand comparable topics in
the social studies subjects.
Preservice teacher education students are often at a loss to understand
why plans like this will not receive the grade they feel that they deserve, and
the students feel that they are entitled to be told explicitly what they need to
do to earn an A. The directions they seek, and typically are given, often take
the form of formalistic criteria, such as the number of objectives to be stated
for each lesson in the unit; how many of these objectives should be stated in
the form of Blooms (Bloom, 1956) higher level objectives; how many dif-
ferent student grouping arrangements, or types of student activities, should be
included over the course of the unit; how many (and what types) of resources
should be included in their list of references for the unit, etc.
Of course, there is a good chance that explicit and detailed directions of
this kind will result in better units being designed by methods students. This,
however, fails to solve the problem of the methods course itself, since those
better units might be produced by students who have only learned how to
follow formalistic directions and not how to design their own units on the
basis of their own assessment of how to treat a given social studies topic in a
way that will be most beneficial for the students in their classrooms later in
their careers. This prospect can be seen, in fact, in the units that have met all
the formalistic criteria (number and variety of activities, etc.) but still fail to
add up to a coherent unit that will provide real learning benefits for the ele-
mentary school students. In these cases (and even in many cases where those
formalistic directions actually did result in better unit plans), the problem that
the preservice teacher education students were focusing on, and the problem
that motivated and organized their efforts, was the schoolish problem of
how to satisfy their professor, rather than the authentic problem of how to
design the most effective unit to promote learning by their elementary school
students.
We were able to transform this situation by revising our course using
PBL. Instead of giving them formalistic criteria for better unit plans and then
letting them focus on the schoolish problem of how to satisfy our criteria,
we let them take on, for themselves, the problem of designing their best unit
on their topic for their studentsand the constituent problem of figuring out
240 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
The rest of the two-week Sitting Disability unit followed the structure of
the Plea Negotiation problem and involved class meetings of the four special-
ist teams, their work outside of the class using Internet sources to address
questions that emerged in the teams meetings, team meetings in class for
bringing information together, and finally, reassembling the groups to design
an inclusive language arts lesson.
The unit did not work. Students complained about the work required out-
side of class (despite the fact that they did weekly miniprojects at home on a
regular basis); they asked how many questions minimum each student should
take care of and how much writing they should do in reply to the questions;
student questions were very shallow; they cut and pasted texts from suggested
Internet websites without much thinking about whether and how the texts
address their questions; they never went beyond the suggested websites; they
worried how much the group project would contribute to the final grade for
the class for each group member; their designs for inclusive lessons were not
informed by the searches they did and were reduced to tracking at best and to
low-quality drills in reading and writing at worst; and so forth. It was any-
thing but active learning. It was a somewhat torturous experience of getting
through, for them and the instructor.
Why? Why did the model work so beautifully for Dr. Hans in criminal jus-
tice and so badly for us in this course? Of course, we could focus on differences
in educational attitudes and motivation between criminal justice and education
students, and blame our students for being lazy, dull, and disinterestedPBL
was simply not for them. We know, however, that this would not be true, fair,
or productive. What makes the difference between successful PBL and its fail-
ure? We know that the answer is not in the structure of the PBL lesson, since
that was directly copied from the model of the Plea Negotiation lesson. We
could blame the instructor for ineffective implementation of a basically good
model. Our reflection on this experience, however, convinces us that a focus on
the structure of successful PBL problems, taken as models, is not the key for
understanding what will make the difference between successful and unsuc-
cessful uses of PBL.
PBL is often discussed in terms that suggest there is a choice to be made
between problem-based learning and learning that is not problem-based. We
would argue to the contrary that all learning is problem-based. The question
is not whether learning will be problem-based or not, but rather what kind of
problem will motivate and determine students learning. Will student efforts
be addressing schoolish problems (e.g., problems of figuring out how to sat-
isfy the instructors arbitrary requirements with a minimum of effort), or
authentic problems (e.g., for our preservice teacher education students, the
244 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
real problems they will be dealing with as teachers, as well asin the case of
social studies, for examplereal problems in the social world or in the history
and social science disciplines)?
In the case of the Plea Negotiation problem, both the instructors and the
students concerns centered on the plea negotiation issues. In contrast, in the
case of the Sitting Disability problem, despite the fact that the problem was
structured on the same model, the instructors and students concerns were
mutually exclusive to each other and did not consider each other as legitimate.
Of course, the instructors and students concerns are not the same and should
not be the same because the instructor is supposed to focus on guiding the stu-
dents, while the students are supposed to focus on learning and on accom-
plishing learning activities. However, the relationship between the instructors
and students concerns has to be shared, supportive, compatible, and open for
public negotiation in the class to make PBL authentic. PBL emerges from the
relationship between the instructors and students concerns in the classroom
activitiesthis relationship defines whether PBL is schoolish or authentic.
In the Sitting Disability lesson, the instructor worked against, rejected,
and overruled the students vision of how to provide sensitive guidance for
children with diverse educational needs, rather than working with students
visions of the problem. The starting point of the Sitting Disability lesson was
for the students to reject their own approach to sensitive guidance resulting in
tracking and one-on-one tutoring and, instead, to focus on the instructors
agenda of how to design inclusive guidance in this problematic situation. The
students were precluded from working on the real problem, as they under-
stood it, so instead they devoted their efforts to the schoolish problem of
satisfying the demands of their instructor.
Based on this analysis of the experience with PBL in ISRP one semester,
the instructor revised the use of PBL for the following semester, with a focus
on working with students concerns and visions rather than struggling against
them. For example, at the very beginning of the teaching practicum, the
instructor asked the students to discuss with children in their elementary
school classes what their favorite book is in their class and then to reflect on
this learning activity. The students opinions about the activity were split from
high excitement and endorsing the activity as extremely educational, to dis-
paragement of the activity as having very low educational value.
In the next class meeting, each group was asked to report on pedagogical
aspects of the activity, such as pedagogical values, classroom management,
organizational transitions, concerns and problems that they had, and the chil-
dren had had, during the favorite book activity, and their emerging relations
with the children. To their surprise, their replies fell into the two patterns that
P B L I N P R E S E RV I C E T E A C H E R E D U C AT I O N 245
fit the two groups. For example, the group that considered the activity as suc-
cessful emphasized how their children were supportive, cooperative, and col-
laborative, while the other group reported disciplinary problems.
When the activity profiles for the two groups were completed, the students
shifted their attention to why these two different patterns occurred. Initially,
some students suggested that the difference was in the children, since the activ-
ity was the same. However, many students quickly noticed that the activities
actually were not the same! In the group where the activity was successful, the
activity goals for the children centered on sharing their favorite books with
their classmates and on persuasive speech. In the group where the activity was
not successful, the activity goals for the children centered on competition and
on imposing their choices on the other children.
After the class, many students commented that they were surprised to
learn so much from the their own unsuccessful teaching activity. Students in
this activity repeated to some degree their instructors own teaching experi-
ence, described previously. At this point, they join the community of educators
learning how to design authentic PBL in their classrooms.
Outcomes
At the beginning of this project, we expected that we would see our students
designing PBL problems for the elementary school children in their practicum
and (later) student teaching placements, and that this would be the ultimate
test of our own project. Although we have seen some impressive PBL units
designed and implemented by our students in their practica, our students are
still more often designing units that would not be recognized as PBL in the
Table 20.1. Tabulated Results from Student Reflection Essays
Important Aspects of the Class Mentioned by the Students PBL, N=21 Non-PBL, N=24 P-value, T-test
1. Sharing practicum experiences, ideas, and problems 81% 88% 0.2805
2. Student wants to use the strategies learned in the class in her 57% 21% 0.0127
or his future teaching
3. Appreciation of cooperative learning and learning through 48% 17% 0.0144
collaboration
4. Discussion of educational philosophies 62% 4% 0.0051
5. Discussion of childrens active learning (including PBL) 71% 8% 0.0000
6. Diversity of views and different ways of dealing with problems 33% 25% 0.2758
7. Considering pros and cons of educational strategies, critical 24% 4% 0.0347
247
thinking
8. Focusing on shared ownership for decision making 19% 0% 0.0211
9. Value of reflection 52% 21% 0.0151
10. Discussion of problems and problematic situations 33% 8% 0.0229
11. Educational eclecticism (lets mix all educational philosophies 0% 17% 0.0214
together)*
12. Diversity of ways that students learn 24% 4% 0.0321
13. Focus on learning and not on grade 5% 4% 0.4628
14. Stressless class 24% 17% 0.2822
15. Diversity of teaching styles and techniques 76% 17% 0.0000
16. Flexible and open-minded teaching 24% 4% 0.0347
*This item indicates the students lack of understanding of educational philosophy according to the instructor. (continued)
P-value < 0.05 indicates items with statistically significant differences between the classes.
Table 20.1. Tabulated Results from Student Reflection Essayscontinued
Important Aspects of the Class Mentioned by the Students PBL, N=21 Non-PBL, N=24 P-value, T-test
17. Report a dramatic change in students perspectives, beliefs, and 52% 0% 0.0001
attitudes
18. Critique of transmission of knowledge educational approach 24% 0% 0.0106
19. Reasoning and backing up ideas and opinions in the essay 43% 0% 0.0004
20. Appreciation of learning through PBL and teaching activities in 76% 0% 0.0000
the class
248
classic sense. We do see this as a continuing challenge for our work in these
courses and the larger ETE program: i.e., the problem of using PBL within
our program more effectively in ways that will result in greater use of PBL by
our students and our graduates in their own classrooms.
At the same time, we already do see impressive positive results in other
forms. As we have revised our courses using PBL, we have found thateven
when they are not using a model of PBL problems as suchour students are
engaged in working more authentically on the real problems of curriculum and
instruction, rather than the schoolish problems of satisfying course require-
ments. In designing social studies units, students are far more engaged now
than before with the nexus of (a) social and historical problems embedded in
the social studies content, (b) the problems that will actually be experienced
by their students in the conduct of their lessons, and (c) the teachers problems
of designing experiences for students so that the elementary school students
will be progressively developing their capacities for dealing with real histori-
cal and social problems while meeting the requirements of state-mandated cur-
ricula and standards-driven testing programs.
Authors Biographies
Eugene Matusov and John St. Julien are Assistant Professors, and
James A. Whitson is Associate Professor of Education at the Univer-
sity of Delaware.
References
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classifi-
cation of educational goals. New York: Longman.
21
INTRODUCTORY PHYSICS
A PROBLEM-BASED MODEL
Barbara A. Williams
Chapter Summary
This chapter describes a model used to incorporate problem-based
learning (PBL) into a two-semester algebra-based introductory physics
course. Student reaction to the course is detailed, as well as student
achievement results.
Introduction
Introductory Physics is a two-semester Honors course for students majoring in
biology, chemistry, biochemistry, premedicine, sciences other than physics, and
unrelated disciplines. Set at the level of high school algebra and elementary
trigonometry, this course is well-suited for students who can evaluate algebraic
expressions, solve verbal mathematical problems, represent functional rela-
tions graphically, and manipulate first- and second-order algebraic equations.
Designed for freshmen and sophomores, the course in its early offerings
attracted students who postponed introductory physics until their junior year;
however, in the past two years, dramatic shifts have occurred in the enrollment
demographics. In this current year, sophomore students for the first time rep-
resent the majority. Enrollments have never exceeded 30 students because
small-sized classes are one of the attractive features of the University Honors
Program.
251
252 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Todays date_______________
Active Members
(1)___________________ (reporter) (2)___________________
(3)___________________ (4)___________________
(3)___________________ (4)___________________
through the development of the skills needed for the more complex real-world
problems they encounter later.
learning; (2) to identify and address what a student does not know or under-
stand; (3) to increase the students discussion of physics principles; (4) to
encourage the students use of logic; and (5) to develop students reasoning
skills. In order to meet these objectives, the students learning of physics is
structured around cycles of in-class activities, each of which includes a
minilecture, a conceptual assignment, real-world applications (problem and
laboratory), and an overview. Each learning cycle (Figure 21.1) encompasses
many activities that help students learnregardless of their preferred learn-
ing style. Typically, the cycle, as shown in Figure 21.1, takes more than a
week for the students to complete. To develop the learning format and the
instructional approach described here, I recommend class periods longer
than 50 minutes. This Honors physics class meets three times a week as two
75-minute sessions, plus one three-hour time block formed by scheduling the
traditional laboratory and recitation sessions together. The individual con-
ceptual homework, not shown in Figure 21.1, is completed outside of class,
precedes each minilecture, is used to monitor the reading assignment, and to
ensure that each student is prepared to participate in the group activities.
The order in which the components of the learning cycle are completed in
class varies according to the objectives of the teacher, the concept being
introduced, and the needs of the students. Overview discussions and mini-
lectures involve the whole class, whereas the conceptual assignments, exper-
iments, and the real-world problems are performed in small collaborative
groups. When a new learning unit is introduced, the learning cycle repeats,
sometimes with new starting points.
Minilecture
Real-world Applications
(Problem and Laboratory)
BEGIN
END
BEGIN
END
258
BEGIN
END
BEGIN
END
BEGIN
END
BEGIN
END
I N T R O D U C T O RY P H Y S I C S : A P R O B L E M - B A S E D M O D E L 259
Real-World Applications
Problems and the Laboratory
Opportunities for combining conceptual understanding of physics with critical-
thinking skills occur when the students encounter the real-world applications.
Whenever possible, problems and experiments relate the basic physics princi-
ples to the real worldespecially biology, medicine, and the physiology. Stu-
dents who acquire scientific knowledge in the context in which it will be used
are more likely to retain what they learn and apply that knowledge appropri-
ately (Albanese & Mitchell, 1993; Boud & Feletti, 1997). The problems devel-
oped for this class are very different from typical end-of-chapter problems or
exercises. In general, the end-of-chapter problems are too directive, supply the
relevant unknown parameters, and can be solved with little understanding.
Mazur (1996) notes that most textbook problems test mathematical, instead
of analytical, thinking skills while the more meaningful problems are those
that give students the opportunity to make assumptions and estimates and to
develop and work out models. The problems that have been developed for this
class demand that students do several things: (1) connect new knowledge to
old; (2) recognize what they know and understand and what they do not; (3)
260 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
learn concepts thoroughly enough so they can explain them in their own
words; and (4) be able to teach them to their peers.
Some examples of problems used in this course follow: students use con-
servation of energy, moment of inertia, and kinematics to design fast model
derby racers; they apply the principles of rotational dynamics to evaluate the
stability of different bicycles during braking; and Ohms law, electrical
power, and resistance must be applied to design a safe outdoor lighting sys-
tem. An example of a problem that I have used to teach kinematics is Bare
Accidents shown in Appendix 21.1. This is the first problem that students
encounter in the first learning cycle organized around kinematics. The first
two questions in the problem are open-ended, require little knowledge of
what has been taught in the course to this point, and give each student
regardless of his or her knowledge an opportunity to contribute to the group
discussion. As the students progress deeper into the problem, questions 3, 4,
and 5, they use the physics principles and skills developed through repeated
applications and encounters in homework, group assignments, whole-class
discussions, and minilecture. In question 6, the students interpret their quan-
titative responses, compare them to each other and to their intuitive predic-
tions, question 1. Most of the instructional objectives that I set for kinemat-
ics can be met in this one problem. In order to respond to questions 3, 4, and
5, the students must be able to generate qualitative graphs of motion from
written descriptions; describe motion mathematically, using the appropriate
kinematical equations; represent the motion of multiple objects on a single
qualitative graph; and know what explicit and implicit information can be
extracted from motion graphs.
The experimental investigations are open-ended and less structured than
most undergraduate teaching laboratories. Students are asked to design an
experiment that would answer a question posed to them; identify sources of
uncertainty in the data to be gathered, plan ways to minimize that uncer-
tainty, and explain reason for discrepancy in the results. Some of the experi-
mental investigations ask students to simply explain a familiar everyday phe-
nomenon. In order to explain that phenomenon, students must take data,
analyze that data, and respond to a series of questions that stage conflict
between the students perception of the physical world and basic physics prin-
ciples. Riding an Elevator (Appendix 21.2) is an example of this kind of
investigation. To experience the sensory effects of acceleration, students ride
the elevators in a 15-story high-rise dormitory. Using the data collected, they
respond to a series of questions that probe their understanding of accelera-
tion, net forces, passive forces, contact forces, weight, and Newtons three
laws of motion.
I N T R O D U C T O RY P H Y S I C S : A P R O B L E M - B A S E D M O D E L 261
Overview
During this phase of the learning cycle, the entire class becomes a single group
that reflects upon the difficulties encountered in the learning cycle. Everyone
benefits from further discussion of concepts and remaining unresolved learn-
ing issues that confront the class. I use this time to acknowledge and appreci-
ate the diversity of ideas generated by the groups to solve the physics problem
and to design their experiments. This reinforces the idea that there is a variety
of ways to solve physics problems. In addition to being a format for the entire
class to process their learning experience, the overview is used to preview and
link the next learning unit with the current one. This will help students build
an integrated and coherent view of the physical world.
Student Attitudes
Student response to various aspects of this course on final course ratings forms
has continued to remain positive. Over the past 6 1/2 years, students still feel
comfortable working in groups and still identify group work as the most
important aspect that contributed to their learning. The following are typical
comments made by students:
The question, Have the skills learned in this class made a difference in
your other academic or social situations? elicited a variety of responses. A
few of the representative response follow:
Every year, there are some students who dislike the class format and call
for more support through lecturing and more structure to the class. Typical
responses follow:
Evaluation of Instruction
To measure the effectiveness of the instructional method previously
described, I administered the Force Concept Inventory (Hestenes, Wells, &
Swackhamer, 1992) to approximately 100 students enrolled in the Introduc-
tory Physics course from fall 1993 to fall 1999. The Force Concept Inven-
tory (FCI) is an instrument designed to probe students understanding of
Newtonian mechanics and has been given to more than 2000 high school
and university students. Hestenes et al. (1992) have collected abundant evi-
dence to support their claim that the FCI is an accurate and reliable instru-
ment for evaluating instruction. Each of my physics classes were given the
FCI as a pretest before instruction and as a posttest at the end of the semes-
ter. The posttest is always administered on the last day of class, and the stu-
dents performance on this diagnostic never counts toward their final grade.
The posttest consists of the same questions as the pretest but looks different
because the questions have been reordered. The Honors physics students
pretest and posttest mean scores and their standard deviations are given in
Table 21.3.
Hestenes et al. (1992) conclude from their study that only posttest scores
are essential for evaluating effective instruction. Pretest/Posttest gains will
be large if the pretest scores were low but small if pretest scores were high
(Hestenes et al., 1992). Using their data, Hestenes et al. (1992) conclude that
below a conceptual threshold near a score of 60% on the FCI, students
understanding of Newtonian concepts is too inadequate for skillful problem
solving. If instruction is indeed effective, the results on the FCI will be nearly
the same, that is, above this threshold (Hestenes et al., 1992). How effective
was the instruction using the criterion set by Hestenes et al. (1992)? The data
in Table 21.3 shows that the posttest mean scores measured for the Honor
physics students are all above the conceptual threshold. The posttest mean
264 POWER OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
Table 21.3. Pre- and Posttest Scores for Force Concept Inventor.
Pretest Percentage Posttest Percentage
Sample N Scores (S. Dev.) Scores (S. Dev.)
1994 Honors 39.7 (16.5) 70.2 (12.0)
23
1996 Honors 39.2 (15.6) 72.4 (14.5)
21
1997 Honors 41.2 (19.7) 70.5 (16.9)
20
1998 Honors 41.0 (18.6) 79.1 (10.9)
16
1999 Honors 40.6 (14.3) 67.2 (13.4)
21
N is total number of students taking the posttests.
1995 was a sabbatical year.
scores met and exceeded the Hestenes et al. (1992) criterion for demonstrat-
ing effective instruction.
Hake (1998) uses the average normalized gain g, defined as the ratio of
the actual average gain (%post %pre) to the maximum possible average gain
(100% pre) of a class, as a rough measure of the average effectiveness of a
course in promoting conceptual understanding. The average normalized gains
for the honor physics students are between 0.45 and 0.64. These values are
consistent with the average g = 0.48 0.14 (Hake, 1998) measured for 48
other physics courses that use interactive-engagement methods and twice as
high as the average g = 0.23 0.04 measured for 14 traditional physics courses
that use little or no interactive engagement methods. Assuming that g is a valid
measure of course effectiveness as Hake (1998) does, then it appears that the
Introductory Honors Physics course is twice as effective in building basic con-
cepts as traditional physics courses. These results seem to indicate that active
group learning and connections to real-world applications did help students
learn physics and apply that knowledge appropriately as measured by the FCI.
Author Biography
Barbara A. Williams is an Associate Professor of Physics and Astron-
omy and an affiliated faculty member of the University Honors Pro-
gram at the University of Delaware.
I N T R O D U C T O RY P H Y S I C S : A P R O B L E M - B A S E D M O D E L 265
References
Albanese, M. A., and Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of
literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine,
68, 5281.
Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for pre-
clinical years. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach
to medical education. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Boud, D., and Feletti, G. (1997). The challenge of problem-based learning.
London: Kogan Page.
Gabriel, S., & Smithson, I. (Eds.) (1990). Gender in the classroom: Power and
pedagogy. Urbana, IN: University of Illinois Press.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-
thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics
course. Am. J. Phys., 66, 6474.
Hall, R., & Sandler, B. (1984). The classroom climate: A chilly one for
women? Project on the Status and Education of Women. American Asso-
ciation of Colleges, Washington, USA.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., and Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inven-
tory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141153.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning:
Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher
Education Report No. 4, Washington, USA.
Mazur, E. (1996). The problem with problems. Optics and Photonic News,
7, 59.
APPENDIX 1 TO CHAPTER 21
BARE ACCIDENTS
Barbara A. Williams
At the Albemarle Zoo, animals are free to roam in a five-square-mile park. The
visitors to the zoo are kept in cages or on trains well isolated from the animals
that roam in their simulated natural habitats. Trains have been built on bridges
over the open territories of roaming animals. Several sections of the rail system
have been built on trestle bridges that cross man-made lakes through sections of
the zoo occupied by the bear population. Unfortunately, trestle bridges should
not have been built over these sections because bears are good climbers and
intensely curious. A bear playing in the lake below a trestle decided to climb
atop the bridge. Shortly after the bear reached the top, a tourist train began to
approach the bridge. Startled by the vibrations of the track, the bear begins run-
ning on the rails. When the driver of the train sees the bear, the front of the train
is as far away from the edge of the bridge as the bridge is long. The driver makes
no attempt to change his speed because he assumes the bear will have enough
time to escape onto the elevated land off the bridge. The bear moves at constant
velocity but cannot travel at a speed equal to or greater than the trains speed.
As you work through the problem, generate a list of learning issues.
266
I N T R O D U C T O RY P H Y S I C S : A P R O B L E M - B A S E D M O D E L 267
Barbara A. Williams
Part I. Measurements
1. Select a member of the group whose weight will be monitored, and
record his or her weight when the elevator is at rest.
2. As the elevator starts to move upward and downward, describe in
detail the physical sensation you feel and where you feel it.
3. Record the maximum change in the members weight when the
elevator moves upward and downward.
4. During the ride, did the scale measure the same value it did when
the elevator was at rest?
268
I N T R O D U C T O RY P H Y S I C S : A P R O B L E M - B A S E D M O D E L 269
3. Which of the forces acting on the member does the scale measure
during the motion? Support your reasoning with physics
principle(s).
4. What is the relation between the acceleration of the person inside
the elevator and the acceleration of the elevator?
5. Determine the maximum upward and downward acceleration of the
elevator. What principle(s) do you need to use in order to answer
this question? State assumptions.
6. If placed blindfolded in the elevator, could you distinguish between
upward and downward acceleration? Explain in words.
7. How it is possible when the elevator is in motion for the scale to
measure the same value as that recorded when the elevator was at
rest?
8. If the elevator cables were to break, what would the scale read?
Explain.
9. If the elevator cables were to break, could a person save him- or
herself from serious injury by jumping up from the floor just before
the elevator hits the bottom of the shaft. Comment on the
feasibility of this suggestion.
10. For all five cases (at rest, accelerating up and down, free fall, and
moving with a constant velocity) determine the force that the
person exerts on the scale and the force that the scale exerts on the
person. How do the five values compare, i.e., rank the five cases
from maximum force to minimum force? Are your determinations
counterintuitive?
INDEX
271
272 INDEX