Portal - Frame 258+500 (By Tanmay) - IRC112
Portal - Frame 258+500 (By Tanmay) - IRC112
Portal - Frame 258+500 (By Tanmay) - IRC112
258+500
1. DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE
2. MATERIAL
3. LOADING
DEAD LOAD ( DL )
Superstructure meant for 2-lane carriageway has been designed for governing effect of CWLL
loading as specifeid in IRC:6-2014 with appropriate lane reduction factor and suitable allowances
for impact so placed on the span to produce maximum stresses.
The following CWLL combination have been considered in the design. The design is then carried
out for the most critical CWLL Combination.
TEMPERATURE EFFECT
The climate condition is assumed to be "Extreme". The temperature variation of +/- 25 oC
shall be considered for the design of bearings and expansion joints. Temperature gradients given
in IRC 6:2014 has also been considered to evaluated the effect on structure due to daily changes
in temperature.
Coefficient of thermal expansion =1.2 x 10-5 as per IRC: 6-2014
4. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
SECTION PROPERTIES
uncracked sectional properties have been used for analysis. Cross sectional area of slab per meter
width has been calculated .
Deck slab has been modeled as line model and has been analysed for SIDL & Live live
For the design of Solid Slab , Moments and Shear forces has been detremined at Mid span
and Support respectively . The design of Deck Slab has been carried out by design excel sheets.
1
0
ation of +/- 25 oC
perature gradients given
ure due to daily changes
10.00
477.22
14.00
463.22
FRL = 477.22 m
GL = 467.22 m
FND. LVL. = 463.22 m
Span Arrangment:
Effective span = 10.00 m
Overall span of slab = 11.00 m
Overall width of slab = 14.00 m between cross barrier
Camber = 7.00 %(uni directional)
Wearing Coat thickness = 0.075 m
6
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for
Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Designed by: TANMAY
Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag
in the state of Uttarakhand
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS Checked by: S. RASTOGI
beff = a* a*(1 - a / L ) + b1
A = a* a* ( 1 - a / L )
b1 = 0.65 114 kN
b1 = 0.53 68 kN
b1 = 0.35 27 kN
I.F = 1.281
68.00
0.00 114.00 114.00 27.00 27.00
-0.50 4.30 1.20 3.20 1.10 0.70
0.00
Ra Rb
5.00 5.00
Fig. showing position of wheel along span
Axle Load (kN) a (m) a*a ( 1 - a / L ) b1 (m) beff beff for all axles Leff UDL (kN/m2)
7
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for
Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Designed by: TANMAY
Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag
in the state of Uttarakhand
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS Checked by: S. RASTOGI
I.F = 1.281
0.00
0.00 342.00 342.00 81.00 81.00
3.80 0.00 1.20 3.20 1.10 0.70
0.00
Ra Rb
5.00 5.00
Fig. showing position of wheel along span
Axle Load (kN) a (m) a*a ( 1 - a / L ) b1 (m) beff beff for all axles Leff UDL (kN/m2)
5.00 5.00
Fig. showing position of wheel along span
1-Class 70RW
1.93
8
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for
Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Designed by: TANMAY
Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag
in the state of Uttarakhand
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS Checked by: S. RASTOGI
Axle Load a a*a ( 1 - a / L ) b1 beff beff for all axles Leff UDL (kN/m2)
3.4 CWLL Shear Force at a distance of Effective Depth from the centre of support
I.F = 1.281
342.00
342.00 204.00 204.00 0.00 0.00
0.95 4.30 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.55
1.20
Ra Rb
10.00
Fig. showing position of wheel along span
1-Class A 1-Class A 1-Class A
Axle Load (kN) a (m) a*a ( 1 - a / L ) b1 (m) beff beff for all axles Leff UDL (kN/m2)
342.00 0.95 1.58 0.65 2.23 11.03 2.37 16.79
342.00 2.15 3.10 0.65 3.75 12.55 2.37 14.75
204.00 6.45 4.21 0.53 4.74 13.54 2.32 8.32
204.00 9.45 0.96 0.53 1.49 10.29 2.32 10.95
10.00
Fig. showing position of wheel along span
1-Class 70RW
9
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for
Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Designed by: TANMAY
Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag
in the state of Uttarakhand
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS Checked by: S. RASTOGI
1.93
Axle Load a a*a ( 1 - a / L ) b1 beff beff for all axles Leff UDL (kN/m2)
BRAKING FORCE:
As per Cl.211.2 of IRC:6-2014, the braking effect shall be assumed to have a value of 20% of the vertical loads on the first 2 lanes and 5%
of the load on the 3rd lane.
10
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for
Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Designed by: TANMAY
Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag
in the state of Uttarakhand
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS Checked by: S. RASTOGI
f = 35 o = 0.611 Rad
d = 20 o = 0.349 Rad
dsubmerged = 10 o = 0.175 Rad
i = 0o = 0 Rad
a = 90 o = 1.571 Rad
gdry = 20 KN/m3
gsat = 20 KN/m3
gsub = 10 KN/m3
2
Sin (a f )
2
2 sin(f d ). sin(f i )
Sin a . sin(a d ). 1
sin(a d ). sin(a i)
Ka =
Ka = 0.245
4. Temparature Calculation
11
Distance of c.g
Seg No. Width Height Area from corner 'x' A*x
(m) (m) (m^2 ) (m) (m^3)
1.00 0.40 0.17 0.07 0.25 0.02
2.00 0.31 0.25 0.08 0.21 0.02
3.00 0.18 0.50 0.09 0.14 0.01
4.00 0.05 0.50 0.01 0.24 0.00
5.00 0.05 0.92 0.02 0.03 0.00
6.00 0.18 0.20 0.04 0.14 0.00
0.30 0.05
= 0.18
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for
Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Designed
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration TANMAY
by:
& Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to
Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date &
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE 24/09/2015 R0
Rev.
Check for Base Pressure
1.5
0.5 HEEL TOE
L L
D A
T
Length of the footing = 7.70 m
Width of the footing = 1.00 m
Area of Footing = 7.7 m2
Section Modulus
ZT = 9.882 m3
ZL = 1.283 m3
S.N Load P Ml Hl
1 Self-Weight 1
2 SIDL1 1
3 SIDL2 1
682 1026.75
4 EP (Dry Case) + LL Surcharge LW 1
6 AAA Max. B.M + Braking -ve 0
7 AAA Max. Shear + Braking -ve 1
1 Self-Weight 1
2 SIDL1 1
3 SIDL2 1 705 396.75
4 EP (HFL)+LL Surcharge LW 1
6 70R Max. B.M+ Braking -ve 1
7 70R Max. Shear + Braking -ve 0
P = 805.5 kN
Ml = 508.05 kN-m
P/A = 104.61 kN/m^2
Ml/Zt = 51.41 kN/m^2
348.50 37.86 OK
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for
Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Designed
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration TANMAY
by:
& Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to
Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/2015
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. R0
1.5
0.5 HEEL TOE
L L
D A
T
Length of the footing = 7.70 m
Width of the footing = 1.00 m
Area of Footing = 7.7 m2
Section Modulus
ZT = 9.882 m3
ZL = 1.283 m3
S.N Load P Ml Hl
1 Self-Weight 1.35
2 SIDL1 1.35
3 SIDL2 1.75
799 1750.55
4 EP (Dry Case) + LL Surcharge LW 1.5
6 AAA Max. B.M + Braking -ve 0
7 AAA Max. Shear + Braking -ve 1.5
P = 908.7 kN
Ml = 631.89 kN-m
P/A = 118.01 kN/m^2
Ml/Zt = 63.95 kN/m^2
462.88 19.32
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for
Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Designed by: TANMAY
Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag
in the state of Uttarakhand
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS Checked by: S. RASTOGI
Job 24/09/2015
DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE Date & Rev.
Name R0
d
d = 1.380
19.32
BASE PRESSURE
160.86
318.39 462.88
d
DESIGN OF FOOTING
SNO Description unit Toe Slab Heel Slab
1 Design Length considered mm 1000.0 1000.0
2 Design Bending Moment MED KN-m 1511.6 511.6
3 Overall Depth considered D mm 1500.00 1500.00
4 Effective Depth deff mm 1380.0 1393.0
Limiting Depth of N.A xu,max
M ED 0.794 0.264
R
8 bD 2
Area of Steel Required Ast
9 f ck 4.598 R
mm2 2587.62 851.74
As t .Rqd . .(1 1 ).bd
2 fy f ck
200
9 K= 1 <=2.0 1.5 1.5 cl. 10.3.2(2) Eq. 10.3 of IRC :112-2011
d eff
Asw
17 Shear R/F ratio = 0.001
( s.b w . sin a )
Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare combination 0.48 . fck = 16.8 N/mm2
Maximum tensile stress in steel under rare combination = 300 N/mm2
Maximum Tensile stress in concrete fctm = 2.77 N/mm2
Rare Case
Quasi-Permanent Case
For Early Age For Long Term Check
unit Sagging Moment Sagging Moment Sagging Moment Remarks
SLS Moment kNm/m 1398.750 1398.750 779.000
Width of Section, b mm 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00
Depth of section , D mm 1500.00 1500.00 1500.00
Effective cover , Ceff mm 1500.00 1500.00 1500.00
Effective depth , d mm 1380.00 1380.00 1380.00
Eceff N/mm2 32308.00 14232.60 32308.00
Es N/mm2 200000.00 200000.00 200000.00
Flexural Ast Provided , As mm2/m 5366.89 5366.89 5366.89
dc 271.41 387.01 271.41
Cracked Second Moment of area , INA mm4 7672308604.13 6666897378.73 7672308604.13
section modulus, Zt = INA / dc mm3 28268575.76 17226700.41 28268575.76
section modulus, Zb = I NA / (d-dc) mm3 6920766.52 6713959.14 6920766.52
Maximum compressive stress in concrete= N/mm2 7.99 5.78 4.45 < 16.8 SAFE
M/Zt x Eceff / Es
Maximum Tensile stress in steel = M/Zb N/mm2 202.11 208.33 112.56 < 300 SAFE
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for
Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Designed
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration TANMAY
by:
& Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to
Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/2015
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. R0
CRACK WIDTH CHECK Refer Clause 12.3.4 of IRC:112-2011
Crack Width = Wk = Sr max (sm - cm) Where, Sr max = maximum crack spacing
sm = mean strain in the reinforcement
cm = mean strain in concrete between cracks
S.N Load P Ml Mt
(kN) (kN-m)
1 Self-Weight 500 -51
2 SIDL1 10 -6
3 SIDL2 10 -7
4 EP (Dry Case) 2020
6 LL Surcharge -31 660
7 AAA Max. B.M + Braking -ve 37 -90
8 AAA Max. Shear + Braking -ve 62 -90
9 70R Max. B.M+ Braking -ve 85 -102
10 70R Max. Shear + Braking -ve 65 -95
13 Temp. Rise -2
14 Temp. Fall + Active Earth Pressure 1016
S.N Load P Ml Mt
(kN) (kN-m)
1 Self-Weight 118 163
2 SIDL1 10 11
3 SIDL2 10 15
4 EP (Dry Case) 180
6 LL Surcharge -31 -134
7 AAA Max. B.M + Braking -ve 36 86
8 AAA Max. Shear + Braking -ve 61 90
9 70R Max. B.M+ Braking -ve 85 121
10 70R Max. Shear + Braking -ve 65 100
13 Temp. Rise 277
14 Temp. Fall + Active Earth Pressure -15
DESCRIPTION Units
At Bottom of Abt
Design Moments kN-m 3795.8
Design Shear Forces kN 752.5
Overall width provided mm 1000
Overall depth provided mm 1500
Check for Flexure
Effective cover provided mm 88
Effective depth provided, d mm 1413
MR from concrete =0.133*fck*b*d2 Nmm 9.29E+09
Provided Ast for "+" BM mm2 9817
Minimum Reinforcement = 0.13%btd or
mm2 2057
0.26*(fctm/fyk)*btd
Status of Section OK
Lever arm, z =({1-0.974*fy*As/
(fck*b*d)} mm 1276
VRd.c = [0.12K(80r1.fck)0.33+0.15scp]bw.d
Overall Width, bw m 1.000
z = (D - Yord) m 1.413
1.00
K = 1+ 200/d <= 2.0 1.38
r1 0.003
vmin = 0.031 K 3/2 fck 1/2 Mpa 0.296
VRd.c = KN 492
vRd.c min =(vmin + 0.15scp)bw.d KN 418
Govering VRdc= KN 492
Design Shear Capacity, Vc KN 492
Provision of Shear Reinforcement
Ultimate Applied Shear, Vuapplied kN 753
av mm 1413
b = av/2d 1.00
Vu kN 753
Design Shear Capacity, Vc kN 492
Reqirement of shear reinforcement YES
Vu-Vc (in KN) KN 260
acw 2.500
n1 0.600
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning, Rehabilitation
and upgradation to 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Designed
Project TANMAY
Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag in the state of by:
Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/2015
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. R0
Shear Reinforcement
i) Aswmax / S = 0.5*bw*acw*n1*fcd/(fywd) mm2/m 52.500
ii) 0.072 x (SQRT(fck))/fyk mm2/m 26.907
Governing Shear reinforcement mm2/m 52.500
Shear RF Due to ultimate loads, Asv/Sv =
(Vu-Vc)/(z*fywd) mm /m
2
368
Spacing mm 477
Shear Reinforcement
Diameter of bars = 12 mm
Legs = 2
Spacing = 200 mm
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning,
Rehabilitation and upgradation to 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Designed
Project TANMAY
Shoulders Configuration & Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh by:
to Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/2015
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. R0
Mulim = 0.167 x fck x b x d^2 = 465.15 kNm/m (Equation derived based on IRC:112-2011)
Ast Required:
pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }
100 bd 2 fy
= 0.001
Astreq = 1142.899 mm2/m
= 587.25 mm
Moment of Resistance of Slab is More than Design Bending Moment , HENCE SLAB IS SAFE IN BENDING
29
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to 2Lane/2Lane
Designed
Project with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag in the state of TANMAY
by:
Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Job Date &
DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE 24/09/2015 R0
Name Rev.
Provide 16 dia bar 150 mm c/c at Trans direction in top face. (Providing = 1340.41 mm^2 ) OK
VRd,c 0.12 K 80r1 f ck
0.33
0.15s cp bw d eq.1
where,
K = 1 + SQRT(200/d) 2.0 , where d is depth in mm
K = 1.46
vmin = 0.031 K fck
3/2 1/2
, fck = 35.00 N/mm2
Hence vmin= 0.323 N/mm2
scp = Concrete compressive stress in concrete at centroidal axis in the direction of axial load or prestressing
scp = NEd/Ac < 0.2 fcd where , fcd = 0.67 fck/1.5
scp = 3.13 N/mm2
Hence,
tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = Vmin + 0.15 scp = 0.7920 N/mm2 From eq.2
CHECK FOR PUNCHING AROUND VEHICLE LOAD (as per IRC:112-2011, Clause 10.4.3):
ui * d
30
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to 2Lane/2Lane
Designed
Project with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag in the state of TANMAY
by:
Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Job Date &
DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE 24/09/2015 R0
Name Rev.
where,
K = 1.46
r1 = 0.0028
fck = 35.00 N/mm2
scp = 3.13 N/mm2
gc = 1.50
31
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning, Rehabilitation and
upgradation to 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Designed
Project TANMAY
Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag in the state of by:
Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/201
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. 5 R0
Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare combination 0.48 . fck = 16.8 N/mm2
Maximum tensile stress in steel under rare combination = 300 N/mm2
Maximum Tensile stress in concrete fctm = 2.77 N/mm2
Rare Case
Quasi-Permanent Case
For Early Age For Long Term Check
unit Max Moment Max Moment Max Moment Remarks
SLS Moment kNm/m 592.800 592.800 507.500
Width of Section, b mm 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00
32
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning, Rehabilitation and
upgradation to 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Designed
Project TANMAY
Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag in the state of by:
Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/201
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. 5 R0
33
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning, Rehabilitation and
upgradation to 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Designed
Project TANMAY
Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to Rudraprayag in the state of by:
Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/201
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. 5 R0
Maximum compressive
stress in concrete= M/Zt x N/mm2 8.15 5.83 6.98 < 16.8 SAFE
Eceff / Es
Maximum Tensile stress in
steel = M/Zb N/mm2 246.24 252.87 210.80 < 300 SAFE
Crack Width = Wk = Sr max (sm - cm) Where, Sr max = maximum crack spacing
sm = mean strain in the reinforcement
cm = mean strain in concrete between cracks
34
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Designed
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to TANMAY
by:
Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/201
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. 5 R0
Y direction
X direction
B'
A' 463.220 FL
For design of return wall Load case 11.a & 11.d and their formulae given by Roark have been used.
Max. .s b = b1 x q x b^2
(t1)^2
.s a = b2 x q x b^2
(t2)^2
= 83.413 kN.m/m
= 147.399 kN/m^2
Max. .s b = b1 x q x b^2
(t1)^2
.s a = b2 x q x b^2
(t2)^2
= 5607.99 kN/m^2
= 5.608 MPa
= 452.114 kN.m/m
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Designed
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to TANMAY
by:
Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/201
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. 5 R0
= 0.0035 x 612.5
0.0035 + 0.00218
= 377.753 mm
= 435.00 x 3272
0.36 x 35.00 x 1000
= 112.9789 mm OK
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Designed
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to TANMAY
by:
Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/201
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. 5 R0
z = d - 0.416 . X
= 612.5 - 46.999
= 565.501 mm
MR = fyd . Ast . z
= 8.05E+08 Nmm
Moment of Resistance of Shaft is More than Design Bending Moment , HENCE SHAFT IS SAFE IN BENDING
Provide 16 mm dia bar @ 150 mm c/c as Horizontal steel at non earth face.
Provide 16 mm dia bar @ 150 mm c/c as Vertical steel at non earth face.
= 0.0035 x 587.5
0.0035 + 0.0022
= 362.40 mm
= 112.979 mm OK
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning, Rehabilitation and upgradation to
Designed
Project 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration & Strengthening of NH-58 from Rishikesh to TANMAY
by:
Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Date & 24/09/201
Job Name DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Rev. 5 R0
z = d - 0.416 . X
= 587.5 - 46.999
= 540.50 mm
MR = fyd . Ast . z
= 7.69E+08 Nmm
Moment of Resistance of Shaft is More than Design Bending Moment , HENCE SHAFT IS SAFE IN BENDING
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning,
Rehabilitation and upgradation to 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Designed
Project TANMAY
Shoulders Configuration & Strengthening of NH-58 from by:
Rishikesh to Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand
Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
by:
Job Date & 24/09/2015
DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Name Rev. R0
STAAD PLANE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 22-Sep-15
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER KN
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 0 13.5 0; 3 10 13.5 0; 4 10 0 0; 5 0 6.75 0; 6 10 6.75 0;
7 5 13.5 0; 8 0.7 13.5 0; 9 0 12.8 0; 10 9.3 13.5 0; 11 10 12.8 0;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 5; 2 2 8; 3 3 11; 4 5 9; 5 6 4; 6 7 10; 7 8 7; 8 9 2; 9 10 3; 10 11 6;
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
E 2.17185e+007
POISSON 0.17
DENSITY 23.5616
ALPHA 1e-005
DAMP 0.05
TYPE CONCRETE
STRENGTH FCU 27579
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
2 6 7 9 PRIS YD 1 ZD 1
1 3 TO 5 8 10 PRIS YD 1.5 ZD 1
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL CONCRETE ALL
SUPPORTS
1 4 FIXED
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE SELF WEIGHT
SELFWEIGHT Y -1 LIST ALL
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE SIDL1
MEMBER LOAD
9 UNI GY -1.57 0 0.7
6 UNI GY -1.57 0 4.3
7 UNI GY -1.57 0 4.3
2 UNI GY -1.57 0 0.7
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE SIDL2
MEMBER LOAD
9 UNI GY -2 0 0.7
6 UNI GY -2 0 4.3
7 UNI GY -2 0 4.3
2 UNI GY -2 0 0.7
LOAD 4 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE EP
MEMBER LOAD
8 TRAP Y -9.02222 0 0 0.7
4 TRAP Y -87 -9.02222 0 6.05
1 TRAP Y -144 -87 0 6.75
5 TRAP Y -87 -144 0 6.75
10 TRAP Y -9.02222 -87 0 6.05
3 TRAP Y 0 -9.02222 0 0.7
LOAD 5 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LL SURCHARGE LEFT WALL
MEMBER LOAD
8 UNI Y -14.4 0 0.7
4 UNI Y -14.4 0 6.05
1 UNI Y -14.4 0 6.75
LOAD 6 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LL SURCHARGE RIGHT WALL
MEMBER LOAD
5 UNI GX -14.4 0 6.75
10 UNI GX -14.4 0 6.05
3 UNI GX -14.4 0 0.7
LOAD 7 LOADTYPE Temperature TITLE TEMP. RISE
TEMPERATURE LOAD
2 TEMP 25 -15.7
LOAD 8 LOADTYPE Temperature TITLE TEMP. FALL
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning,
Rehabilitation and upgradation to 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Designed
Project TANMAY
Shoulders Configuration & Strengthening of NH-58 from by:
Rishikesh to Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
Job by:
Date & 24/09/2015
DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Name Rev. R0
TEMPERATURE LOAD
2 TEMP -25 4
LOAD 9 LOADTYPE Temperature TITLE ACTIVE EP FOR THE CASE OF TEMP. FALL
MEMBER LOAD
8 TRAP Y -4.51111 0 0 0.7
4 TRAP Y -43.5 -4.51111 0 6.05
1 TRAP Y -87 -43.5 0 6.75
5 TRAP Y -43.5 -87 0 6.75
10 TRAP Y -4.51111 -43.5 0 6.05
3 TRAP Y 0 -4.51111 0 0.7
LOAD 13 LOADTYPE Live TITLE AAA MAX. B.M
MEMBER LOAD
6 UNI GY -13.43 0 1.185
7 UNI GY -13.43 1.915 4.3
6 UNI GY -3.5 1.95 2.5
9 UNI GY -3.75 0 0.15
6 UNI GY -3.75 2.5 4.3
9 UNI GY -4 0.15 0.7
LOAD 14 LOADTYPE Live TITLE AAA MAX. SHEAR
MEMBER LOAD
7 UNI GY -16.8 0 0.265
2 UNI GY -16.8 0 0.7
7 UNI GY -15.7 0.265 1.67
7 UNI GY -14.75 1.67 2.635
6 UNI GY -8.32 0.29 2.61
9 UNI GY -11 0 0.7
6 UNI GY -11 2.68 4.3
LOAD 15 LOADTYPE Live TITLE 70R MAX. B.M
MEMBER LOAD
7 UNI GY -21.6 0 1.64
2 UNI GY -21.6 0 0.7
7 UNI GY -11.84 1.76 3.13
7 UNI GY -11.57 3.13 4.1
6 UNI GY -11.3 0 1
7 UNI GY -11.3 4.1 4.3
6 UNI GY -10.24 1 1.17
6 UNI GY -9.18 1.17 2.2
6 UNI GY -10.64 2.2 3.27
9 UNI GY -12.1 0 0.7
6 UNI GY -12.1 3.27 4.3
LOAD 16 LOADTYPE Live TITLE 70R MAX. SHEAR
MEMBER LOAD
7 UNI GY -16 0 0.45
2 UNI GY -16 0 0.7
7 UNI GY -13.85 0.45 1.64
7 UNI GY -11.7 1.64 2.79
6 UNI GY -9.68 0 0.57
7 UNI GY -9.68 3.5 4.3
6 UNI GY -10.7 0.57 1.54
6 UNI GY -10.41 1.54 2.31
6 UNI GY -10.7 2.73 2.91
9 UNI GY -11 0 0.7
6 UNI GY -11 2.91 4.3
LOAD 17 LOADTYPE Live REDUCIBLE TITLE BRAKING +VE
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 14
LOAD 18 LOADTYPE Live REDUCIBLE TITLE BRAKING -VE
JOINT LOAD
3 FX -14
LOAD COMB 10 EP + LL SURCHARGE LEFT WALL
4 1.0 5 1.0
LOAD COMB 11 EP + LL SURCHARGE RIGHT WALL
6 1.0 4 1.0
LOAD COMB 12 TEMP. FALL + ACTIVE EP
Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR for Redesigning,
Rehabilitation and upgradation to 2Lane/2Lane with Paved Designed
Project TANMAY
Shoulders Configuration & Strengthening of NH-58 from by:
Rishikesh to Rudraprayag in the state of Uttarakhand Checked
Client MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS S. RASTOGI
Job by:
Date & 24/09/2015
DESIGN OF PORTAL BRIDGE
Name Rev. R0
8 1.0 9 1.0
LOAD COMB 19 AAA MAX. BM + BRAKING -VE
13 1.0 18 1.0
LOAD COMB 20 AAA MAX. SHEAR + BRAKING -VE
14 1.0 18 1.0
LOAD COMB 21 70R MAX. BM + BRAKING -VE
15 1.0 18 1.0
LOAD COMB 22 70R MAX. SHEAR + BRAKING -VE
16 1.0 18 1.0
PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT ALL
FINISH