See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293014068

Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century

Article in Nature Plants February 2016

DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2015.221

CITATIONS READS

69 3,107

2 authors, including:

John P. Reganold
Washington State University
88 PUBLICATIONS 3,580 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by John P. Reganold on 06 March 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
 Progressing organics

To be sustainable, any farm must meet four goals: productivity, environ-

mental soundness, financial viability and social responsibility. Organic agri-
culture balances multiple sustainability benefits but can it contribute more
to safely feeding the world?

See Nature Plants 1, 15221 (2016).

Image: J. Richardson
Design: S. Witham

c 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

 REVIEW ARTICLE
PUBLISHED: 3 FEBRUARY 2016!| ARTICLE NUMBER: 15221 | DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221

Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century

John P. Reganold* and Jonathan M. Wachter

Organic agriculture has a history of being contentious and is considered by some as an inefficient approach to food production.
Yet organic foods and beverages are a rapidly growing market segment in the global food industry. Here, we examine the per-
formance of organic farming in light of four key sustainability metrics: productivity, environmental impact, economic viability
and social wellbeing. Organic farming systems produce lower yields compared with conventional agriculture. However, they are
more profitable and environmentally friendly, and deliver equally or more nutritious foods that contain less (or no) pesticide
residues, compared with conventional farming. Moreover, initial evidence indicates that organic agricultural systems deliver
greater ecosystem services and social benefits. Although organic agriculture has an untapped role to play when it comes to the
establishment of sustainable farming systems, no single approach will safely feed the planet. Rather, a blend of organic and
other innovative farming systems is needed. Significant barriers exist to adopting these systems, however, and a diversity of
policy instruments will be required to facilitate their development and implementation.

O
rganic agriculture has a history of being contentious. the latest innovations in feeding and handling livestock. Organic
Emblematic of this, and representing the prevailing attitudes farming systems range from strict closed-cycle systems that go
of many farmers and scientists in the 1970s and 1980s, are beyond organic certification guidelines by limiting external inputs
the unsympathetic words uttered in 1971by then US Secretary of as much as possible to more standard systems that simply follow
Agriculture Earl Butz: Before we go back to organic agriculture in organic certification guidelines.
this country, somebody must decide which 50 million Americans Rudolf Steiners 1924 course on biodynamic agriculture sparked
we are going to let starve or go hungry1. At the turn of the twenty- the evolution of organic agriculture in Europe1. Organic agricul-
first century, sceptics considered organic agriculture to be ideologi- ture was established in its own right in the 1930s and 1940s, being
cally driven and inefficient 2,3. They argued that organic agriculture developed in Britain by Lady Eve Balfour and Sir Albert Howard,
relies on more land to produce the same amount of food as con- in Switzerland by Hans Mueller, in the United States by J. I. Rodale
ventional agriculture and that adopting organic agriculture on too and in Japan by Masanobu Fukuoka1. By the 1970s, organic foods
large a scale could potentially threaten the worlds forests, wetlands had grown in popularity, prompting the first organic certification
and grasslands2,3. They also asserted that organic agriculture has too standards to be drafted in Europe and the United States, and com-
many shortcomings and poor solutions to agricultural problems2,4. mencing an ongoing evolution of certifiers that now includes 283
Organic agriculture is still considered by some critics as being an organic certification bodies worldwide operating in 170 countries7.
inefficient approach to food security 5,6 and a farming system that This proliferation of certifiers reflects both a complex history of
will become less relevant in the future6. sometimes competing independent standards and the demand for
Yet the number of organic farms, the extent of organically farmed access to certifiers around the world.
land, the amount of research funding devoted to organic farming and Many farms in both developed and less-developed countries
the market size for organic foods have steadily increased7. Sales of implement organic practices but are not certified organic. However,
organic foods and beverages are rapidly growing, increasing almost growers are increasingly turning to certified organic farming sys-
fivefold between 1999and 2013to US$72 billion (ref.7; Fig.1); this tems as a way to provide verification of production methods,
2013 figure is projected to double by 2018. Moreover, recent interna- decrease reliance on non-renewable resources, capture high-value
tional reports recognize organic agriculture as an innovative farm- markets and premium prices, and boost farm income. Although
ing system that balances multiple sustainability goals and will be of requirements vary slightly between certifying agencies, they pro-
increasing importance in global food and ecosystem security 810. mote soil quality, crop rotations, animal and plant diversity, bio-
Here, we review the performance of organic farming systems logical processes, and animal welfare, while generally prohibiting
in the context of sustainability metrics and global challenges, and irradiation, sewage sludge, genetic engineering, the prophylactic
examine some of the barriers to the adoption of organic farming use of antibiotics, and virtually all synthetic pesticides and fertiliz-
systems and the policies needed to overcome them. ers. Standards continue to evolve with changing technologies and
socioecological conditions; some requirements are based on scien-
Organic practices and certification tific evidence, whereas others are driven by ideology.
Organic agriculture, sometimes called biological or ecological As most certification standards originated in temperate devel-
agriculture, combines traditional conservation-minded farming oped countries, they are not always applicable in other regions, espe-
methods with modern farming technologies. It emphasizes rotating cially in less-developed countries. High demand for organic foods
crops, managing pests naturally, diversifying crops and livestock, in Europe and North America has resulted in the import of organic
and improving the soil with compost additions and animal and foods from large farms in less-developed countries7. Although pre-
green manures (Fig. 2). Organic farmers use modern equipment, mium prices for exported foods may be beneficial to farmers, the
improved crop varieties, soil and water conservation practices, and inaccessibility of many of these foods to local consumers raises

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, USA.
*e-mail: [email protected]

NATURE PLANTS | VOL 2 | FEBRUARY 2016 | www.nature.com/natureplants 1

2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

REVIEW ARTICLE NATURE PLANTS DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221

80 45
Sales, other Food, fibre and fuel for
Sales of organic food (US$billion)

70 40 human and livestock use

Sales, Europe
and consumption

Organic land area (ha 106)

60 Sales, North America 35
Global sales, no breakdown Physical methods
30
50 Organic land area
25 Crop and
40 animal Biological
20 Biological Disease health Weed controls
30 controls management management
15
20 10
Diverse
10 5 Balanced Pest
crop and
nutrient management
0 0 livestock
supply Temporal and
rotation
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
spatial patterns
Year Species, variety Diverse Hedges,
Supplementary and breed species margins
Biologically
Figure 1 | Annual global market for organic foods and land area of organic lime, organic
active soil
selection balance and other
production. Increasing sales of organic food in nominal billions of US fertilizers and habitat areas
compost
dollars (bars), broken down by contributions from North America (red),
Europe (green) and the rest of the world (orange), and increasing total
global land area under organic production in millions of hectares (blue Figure 2 | Organic management practices. The complex interactions
line)7,9698. European and North American contributions were not available among structural factors and tactical management strategies on a
for the years 1998 through 2000, shown in grey. diversified organic farm producing food, fibre and fuel for human and
livestock use and consumption. Structural factors, represented by
questions about food security and social equity. Participatory guar- circles, are the foundation of organic management, with diverse crop and
antee systems, which rely on local stakeholder verification, have livestock rotations at the centre. Tactical management decisions are used
emerged as a more locally focused alternative to traditional certifi- to supplement the structural factors and include the use of: biological
cation7, and could lead to the development of more locally relevant controls; supplementary lime, organic fertilizers and compost; hedges,
visions for the production and consumption of organic foods. margins and other habitat areas; species, variety and breed selection;
temporal and spatial patterns; and physical weed management. Figure
Sustainability of organic agriculture adapted from ref.99, 2001 Elsevier.
About 38% of Earths land cover is occupied by agriculture11.
Although agriculture provides growing supplies of food and other and wheat, which yield 28 and 27% less, respectively 17. Another
products, it is a major contributor to greenhouse gases, biodiversity meta-analysis found fruits, soybeans and oilseed to be the highest
loss, agrochemical pollution and soil degradation1214. Most of these yielding organic crops, and wheat and vegetables the lowest, yield-
environmental consequences come from arable land, which com- ing 37 and 33% less than conventional systems respectively 18. In
prises around 12% of the land cover 11. The challenge of feeding a cases where organic crop rotations depend on green manure crops,
growing population expected to reach 9to 10 billion people by 2050 food production over the whole rotation may be lower than one-to-
while protecting the environment is daunting. Adopting truly sus- one crop yield comparisons suggest 17.
tainable farming systems on a wide scale is our best opportunity for Although meta-analysis is a great tool that can describe broad
meeting this grand challenge and ensuring future food and ecosys- patterns not immediately visible in primary field research19,20, it
tem security. Concerns about the unsustainability of conventional must also be treated with caution, because no single farming sys-
agriculture have promoted interest in other farming systems, such tem or practice works best everywhere. Still, these studies1519 give
as organic, integrated and conservation agriculture810. strength to the argument that adoption of organic agriculture
According to a US National Academy of Sciences report 10, any under agroecological conditions where it performs best may close
farm, be it organic or conventional, can only be deemed sustain- the yield gap between organic and conventional systems. Under
able if it produces adequate amounts of high-quality food, enhances severe drought conditions, which are expected to increase with
the natural-resource base and environment, is financially viable, climate change in many areas, organically managed farms have
and contributes to the wellbeing of farmers and their communi- frequently been shown to produce higher yields than their conven-
ties. With the rise of organic farming in the past two decades, hun- tional counterparts21,22, due to the higher water-holding capacity of
dreds of research studies comparing different aspects of organic and organically farmed soils23. In addition, improvements in manage-
conventional farming systems have been published. This section ment techniques and crop varieties for organic systems may also
focuses on assessing such comparison studies across these four sus- close this yield gap. For example, direct selection of wheat cultivars
tainability areas. in organic systems has resulted in improved yields in organic sys-
tems when compared with indirect selection of wheat cultivars in
Production. Production includes crop and animal yield and their conventional systems24.
quality. Numerous individual studies have compared yield differ- Whereas organic systems yield less food, organic foods have
ences between organic and conventional systems. These data have significantly less to no synthetic pesticide residues compared with
been synthesized in several meta-analyses or reviews; accord- conventionally produced foods2528. Studies have also found that
ing to these studies, yield averages are 8 to 25% lower in organic children who eat conventionally produced foods have significantly
systems1519. However, with certain crops, growing conditions and higher levels of organophosphate pesticide metabolites in their
management practices, organic systems come closer to matching urine than children who eat organically produced foods29,30. In 2012,
conventional systems in terms of yields. According to one such the American Academy of Pediatrics reported that an organic diet
synthesis study, the best yielding organically grown crops or crop reduces childrens exposure to pesticides, and provided resources
groups are rice, soybeans, corn and grass-clover, which yield 6 to for parents seeking guidance on which foods tend to have the high-
11% less than conventional systems; the lowest yielding are fruits est pesticide residues31. Although these data show that organic foods

2 NATURE PLANTS | VOL 2 | FEBRUARY 2016 | www.nature.com/natureplants

2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

NATURE PLANTS DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221 REVIEW ARTICLE
a b
N added in N fixed N loss through Volatile N loss N added in N fixed N loss through Volatile N loss
manure and by lightning denitrification during senescence manure and by lightning denitrification during senescence
amendments Atmospheric amendments Atmospheric
Fertilizer N Fertilizer N
addition N deposition Biological addition N deposition Biological
Gaseous N fixation Gaseous N fixation
N loss N loss

Mineralization Mineralization
Soil Soil Soil Soil
Crop N Crop N
organic N mineral N organic N mineral N
Immobilization Crop N N export Immobilization Crop N N export
uptake in harvest uptake in harvest

Crop residue N return

Crop residue N return

Erosion N loss N runoff N leaching Erosion N loss N runoff N leaching

Figure 3 | Hypothetical nitrogen stocks and flows of two contrasting cropping systems. a,b, Cropping systems relying mainly on mineral nitrogen inputs
(a) have relatively higher nitrogen losses to air and water than cropping systems with emphasis on biological N fixation, manure and other organic matter
amendments, cover crops and perennial crops, and low reliance on mineral N fertilizer, such as organic and integrated systems (b). The width of the
arrows is relative to the size of the nitrogen flux; boxes representing nitrogen stocks are not scaled to the pool size. Figure adapted from ref.100, 2015
The National Academies100. Arrows represent nitrogen inputs (green), losses (orange) and transformations (blue).

may present some clear advantages when it comes to synthetic pes- product 49,57,58. In a meta-analysis of environmental quality param-
ticide residues, the human health impacts of pesticide exposure eters, organic farms were found to have lower nitrate leaching,
from food are not clear 26, and organically certified pesticides need nitrous oxide emissions and ammonia emissions per unit of field
to be better identified and taken into account 28. area, but higher leaching and emissions per unit product 48. Severe
At least 15 reviews or meta-analyses26,27,3244 of the scientific degradation of freshwater and marine ecosystems around the world
literature comparing the nutrition of organic and conventional is linked to excessive use of nitrogen and phosphorous fertiliz-
foods have been published in the past 15 years. Twelve of these ers12,59, leading to eutrophication of freshwater and the production
studies27,3234,3639,4144 found some evidence of organic food being of hypoxic zones in coastal waters. Lower nutrient pollution from
more nutritious (for instance, having higher concentrations of organic compared with conventional systems can be illustrated by
vitamin C, total antioxidants and total omega-3 fatty acids, and differences in their nitrogen cycling and losses (Fig.3).
higher omega-3to -6 ratios). Whether or not these are nutritionally Organic systems are usually more energy efficient than their
meaningful differences continues to be debated26,43. The other three conventional counterparts4648,51,54,58. For example, in Germany, Italy,
studies26,35,40 concluded that there were no consistent nutritional dif- Sweden and Switzerland, organic farms were found to use signifi-
ferences between organic and conventional foods. However, one of cantly less energy on a per-hectare basis than their conventional
the three studies found that conventional chicken and pork had a counterparts, and 70% of organic farms and 30% of conventional
33% higher risk for contamination with antibiotic-resistant bacteria farms had significantly lower energy consumption per unit of out-
compared with organic alternatives26. put 45. The generally lower energy use4648,54 and higher soil organic
matter 4549 of organic systems make them ideal blueprints for devel-
Environment. Reviews and meta-analyses generally support the oping methods to limit fossil fuel emissions and build soil carbon
perception that organic farming systems are more environmentally stores, important tools in addressing climate change.
friendly than conventional farming systems4558. For example, such
aggregate studies have found that organic farming systems con- Economics. Whether organic agriculture can continue to expand
sistently have greater soil carbon levels, better soil quality and less globally will primarily be determined by its financial performance
soil erosion compared with conventional systems4551. In addition, compared with conventional agriculture17,60. The main factors that
organic farms generally have more plant diversity, greater faunal determine the profitability of organic agriculture include crop yields,
diversity (insects, soil fauna and microbes, birds) and often more labour and total costs, price premiums for organic products, the
habitat and landscape diversity 4655. Most functional groups, such as potential for reduced income during the organic transition period
herbivores, pollinators, predators and producers (plants), are more (usually three years), and potential cost savings from the reduced
diverse in organic farming systems5153. Moreover, in a study cov- reliance on non-renewable resources and purchased inputs61.
ering eight western and eastern European countries, insecticides To the best of our knowledge, only one meta-analysis has ana-
and fungicides had consistently negative effects on biodiversity, lysed the financial performance of organic and conventional agri-
with insecticides also reducing the biological control potential in culture20. The analysis combines findings from 40years of studies
farming systems56. covering 55 crops grown on five continents. When actual price
As organic agriculture uses virtually no synthetic pesticides, premiums (higher prices awarded to organic foods) were included,
there is little to no risk of synthetic pesticide pollution of ground organic agriculture proved significantly more profitable (22to 35%
and surface waters46. With respect to nitrate and phosphorous leach- greater net present values) and had higher benefit/cost ratios (20to
ing and greenhouse gas emissions, organic farming systems score 24%) than conventional agriculture. When organic premiums
better than conventional farming when expressed per unit produc- were taken away, net present values (27to 23%) net returns
tion area46,49,51,57,58; however, given the lower land-use efficiency of accounting for the time value of money and benefit/cost ratios
organic farming in developed countries, this positive effect is less (8 to 7%) of organic agriculture were significantly lower than
pronounced and in some cases reversed when expressed per unit conventional agriculture20.

NATURE PLANTS | VOL 2 | FEBRUARY 2016 | www.nature.com/natureplants 3

2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

REVIEW ARTICLE NATURE PLANTS DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221

Conventional Organic

Yield Soil quality Yield Soil quality

Nutritional Minimize Nutritional Minimize

quality energy quality energy
use use

Minimize Minimize
pesticide Biodiversity pesticide Biodiversity
residues residues

Reduce Reduce
worker Minimize worker Minimize
exposure to water exposure to water
pesticides pollution pesticides pollution

Employment Employment
Profitability Profitability
of workers of workers

Ecosystem Total costs Ecosystem Total costs

services services

Figure 4 | Assessment of organic farming relative to conventional farming in the four major areas of sustainability. Lengths of the 12 flower petals
are qualitatively based on the studies discussed in this Review1523,2529,3256,58,6274 and indicate the level of performance of specific sustainability metrics
relative to the four circles representing 25, 50, 75 and 100%. Orange petals represent areas of production; blue petals represent areas of environmental
sustainability; red petals represent areas of economic sustainability; green petals represent areas of wellbeing. The lengths of the petals illustrate that
organic farming systems better balance the four areas of sustainability.

Although price premiums were 29 to 32%, breakeven premi- awarded to organic products. Price premiums and European sub-
ums necessary for organic profits to match conventional profits sidies for organic farms are often justified on the grounds that they
were only 5to 7%, even with organic yields being 10to 18% lower. compensate farmers for providing ecosystem services or avoiding
The size of organic premiums awarded, and the difference between damage to the environment.
organic premiums and breakeven premiums, were consistent dur-
ing the 40-year study period. The fact that organic premiums were Wellbeing. How well organic, conventional and other farming
significantly higher than breakeven premiums suggests that organic systems are performing in areas such as social equity (for instance,
agriculture can continue to expand even if premiums decline. The issues of gender, race, ethnicity and class) and quality of life for farm
study also found that total costs were not significantly different, but families and communities remains unclear due to limited research.
labour costs were significantly (7to 13%) higher with organic farm- Available data indicate that both organic and conventional farming
ing practices20. Although one of the successes of conventional agri- systems need to make significant progress to meet social sustain-
culture has been its ability to produce more with less labour, some ability goals10. However, organic farming has been shown to have
have found the extra labour of organic agriculture to be beneficial some sociocultural strengths, such as positive shifts in community
in providing rural employment and development opportunities62,63. economic development, increased social interactions between farm-
Few economic studies have accounted for negative externalities ers and consumers71,72, and greater employment of farm workers and
(such as environmental costs) or positive externalities (such as eco- cooperation among farmers62,63.
system services), with associated monetary values, in organic and Although organic farming often requires additional manual
conventional comparison studies. Putting a price on the negative work on the farm, it reduces the exposure of farm workers to pesti-
externalities caused by farming, such as soil erosion or nitrate leach- cides and other chemicals. Such exposure can be particularly prob-
ing into groundwater, would make organic agriculture even more lematic in less-developed countries, where illnesses and death have
profitable, given that its environmental impact is less than that of resulted from occupational and accidental exposure (due in part
conventional agriculture4558. Indeed, it has been estimated that a to the fact that it is impractical and expensive for workers to use
switch to organic production would lower the external costs of agri- safety equipment)73,74.
cultural production in the United Kingdom by 75%, from 1,514 Organic certification programmes have adopted social wellbe-
million yr1 to 385 million yr1 (ref.64). ing goals. Guidelines of the International Federation of Organic
A number of studies (for example, refs 65,66) have compared Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) stipulate that organic farmers
ecosystem services in organic and conventional farming systems. should be able to support themselves and other workers with fair
A few of these studies have accounted for the monetary value of incomes, while maintaining safe and dignified working conditions75.
ecosystem services; these studies generally show that conventional Furthermore, organically certified animals must be raised humanely
practices decrease the ability of farms to provide some economically under conditions that allow for the expression of their natural behav-
significant ecosystem services relative to organic practices6769. For iours and needs75. For example, European Union, US and Japanese
example, in a study comparing 14 organic arable fields with 15 con- rules on organic production require livestock to have access to open
ventional ones in New Zealand70, the total economic value of three air or grazing whenever possible, and that sick animals be treated as
ecosystem services (biological pest control, soil formation and the needed, even with the use of antibiotics if required7678.
mineralization of plant nutrients) in the organic fields was signifi- Organic farming can improve food security by diversifying
cantly greater at US$232ha1yr1 compared with the conventional on-farm crop and livestock operations, which diversifies income
fields at US$146ha1yr1. Factoring in such differences in economic sources and improves variety in diets79. Organic farming necessi-
comparison studies would probably make up for price premiums tates diverse crop and livestock rotations, encourages the integration

4 NATURE PLANTS | VOL 2 | FEBRUARY 2016 | www.nature.com/natureplants

2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

NATURE PLANTS DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221 REVIEW ARTICLE
of multiple farm enterprises and encourages the use of leguminous groups and food companies have a strong vested interest in the
crops for biological nitrogen fixation. By growing a higher diversity conventional agroindustrial model, command ever-greater market
of more nutrient-rich (such as vegetables) and more protein-rich power in the food system and have heavily influenced public policy
(such as legumes and meats) foods, whether for export or subsist- to favour this model10,85. The consolidation of industries, the con-
ence, a farmer has access to at least a portion of these foods. For centration of market power, and many past and current agricultural
example, following 840 small organic and non-organic farms in the policies have led to decreased agricultural diversity 10 and have dis-
Philippines, researchers found the increase in vegetable and protein incentivized agricultural innovation81.
consumption from 2000to 2007to be two to three times greater for Considerably less public and private funding has been put
the more diversified organic farmers than conventional farmers80. towards research and development for organic systems than towards
conventional systems worldwide; this has resulted in a lack of crop
Balancing sustainability metrics. Some argue that significantly and livestock breeding for organic farming conditions and a dearth
scaling-up organic land area may increase nitrogen and other nutri- of knowledge and information resources supporting organic farm-
ent limitations on yields17, and question whether the greater land ers17,19. Historically, public funding for research on organic systems
area required by organic agriculture to maintain yields counteracts has been higher in Europe than in the United States7. Moreover,
its environmental gains2,3. Probably the biggest criticism of organic research on organic agriculture in less-developed countries rep-
agriculture is its lower yields compared with conventional agricul- resents only a small fraction of the overall scientific literature on
ture4,5, a particularly salient challenge given the task of feeding a the topic17,19,52.
growing world population without further agricultural expansion13. Some farmers face infrastructure and economic barriers, which
Conversely, some contend that the environmental advantages of include certification costs and access to markets, loans and insur-
organic agriculture far outweigh the lower yields, and that increasing ance. Many areas, especially rural regions and less-developed coun-
research and breeding resources for organic systems would reduce tries, lack access to additional labour, markets for organic foods,
the yield gap16,17,24,81. Others suggest that multifunctional farming infrastructure for storage and distribution, or appropriate certifi-
systems, such as organic, coupled with more plant-based diets and cation requirements86,87. Finally, strong cultural biases against the
reduced food waste, are necessary elements of a more sustainable connotations of organic agriculture, and conventional mindsets
food system16,54,65. Sometimes excluded from these arguments is the held by some individuals and organizations, limit the spread of
fact that we already produce adequate kilocalories of food to more organic practices86,87.
than feed the world but do not provide adequate access to all indi- With these obstacles in mind, governments should focus on
viduals82. Globally, 1.9 billion adults are overweight and of these 600 creating an enabling environment for the development and adop-
million are obese83, while 793 million people are undernourished tion of not just organic but also other innovative and more sustain-
and more than 28% of children under the age of fiveare stunted due able farming systems88. These efforts must be targeted at improving
to malnourishment 82,84. agricultural performance in all four areas of sustainability and
Debates aside, although yield is an important sustainability will require a diversity of knowledge-based, legal and financial
metric, the issue is more complicated than kilograms of food per policy instruments89.
hectare. Mainstream conventional farming systems have provided Knowledge-based policy instruments are needed to create an
growing supplies of food and other products but often at the expense enabling environment for agricultural innovation, education and
of the other three sustainability goals. Environmental degradation, outreach. Specifically, policy instruments must: ensure farmer
public health problems, loss of crop variety and genetic biodiversity, and scientist engagement in research and development decision-
and severe impacts on ecosystem services have not only accompa- making; improve farmer knowledge and capacity through effective
nied conventional farming systems but have often extended well extension and outreach infrastructure, such as the use of farmer
beyond their field boundaries. Such negative externalities are not field schools and communication technologies; and enhance wom-
accounted for. ens educational and leadership opportunities90.
The performance of organic farming systems in the context of Legal instruments must play a stronger role in ensuring open and
sustainability metrics indicates that they better balance multiple competitive markets, limiting commercial influence in government
sustainability goals than their conventional counterparts (Fig. 4). and increasing transparency in the food production system. In addi-
Based on present evidence, we argue that although organic farm- tion, they are needed to reduce food waste, to improve the security
ing systems produce lower yields compared with conventional agri- of land tenure for farmers, and to develop national targets for trade
culture, they are more profitable and environmentally friendly, and policies that promote food and ecosystem security.
deliver equal or more nutritious foods with less to no pesticide resi- Financial instruments are needed to give monetary value to the
dues. In addition, initial evidence indicates that organic agriculture externalities that arise from agricultural practices and to empower
is better at enhancing the delivery of ecosystem services, other than farmers through access to capital, infrastructure and competitive
yield, as well as some social sustainability benefits. Importantly, the markets88. In developed countries, direct and indirect crop subsidies
body of research studies has been heavily biased towards developed and biofuel incentives should be replaced by targeted agro-environ-
countries, whereas studies in the less-developed world, especially in mental incentives, such as payments for biodiversity protection
tropical and subtropical climates, need to be greatly increased. and soil conservation. Some policy organizations have found that
With only 1% of global agricultural land in organic production7, raising the costs of fossil fuels, irrigation water and other limited
and with its multiple sustainability benefits, organic agriculture can resources strongly encourages more efficient farming systems91. In
contribute a larger share in feeding the world. Yet, significant barri- less-developed countries, targeted input subsidies and investment in
ers to farmers adopting organic practices remain in both developed rural infrastructure are key financial instruments. For example, sub-
and less-developed countries. sidizing organic nutrient inputs alongside mineral fertilizer inputs
for the poorest farmers can be an effective strategy for increasing
Barriers and policies yields and building soils92.
Obstacles to farmers adopting organic agriculture include power-
ful vested interests and existing policies, a lack of information and Beyond organic
knowledge, weak infrastructure and other economic challenges, More than 40years after Earl Butzs comment, we are in a new era
and misperceptions and cultural biases (Fig.5). Global and national of agriculture, as reflected in the words of current US Secretary
agribusiness corporations, agrochemical industries, commodity of Agriculture Tom Vilsack: Organic agriculture is one of the

NATURE PLANTS | VOL 2 | FEBRUARY 2016 | www.nature.com/natureplants 5

2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

REVIEW ARTICLE NATURE PLANTS DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221

to sustainable agricult
riers ure
Bar
tin g policies La c
exis k of
inf
and or
ts ma
es tio
er
nt

n
i

an
d
ste

dk
l ve

no
Production Environment

wle
erfu

dge
Pow
Legal instruments
Measures to ensure open and
Financial instruments Sustainable competitive markets

n ge s
Increased farmer access to capital agriculture Reduction of commercial influence

c c h a ll e
Elimination of crop subsidies and in government
biofuel incentives M is p
Development of national targets and trade
Use of agro-environmental incentives policies for food and ecosystem security

omi
Increased costs of scarce resources Wellbeing Economics Enhanced security of land tenure
erc

co n
Targeted input subsidies for
ep

resource-poor farmers

re
ti o

he
Investment in rural infrastructure
ns

ot
d
an

cu

nd
a
l tu re
ral tu
b ias e t ruc
s in fras
Weak

Knowledge-based instruments
Public investment in agroecological research
Farmer engagement in research and development
Outreach to improve farmer knowledge and capacity
Enhancement of women's educational and leadership opportunities
Increased transparency throughout the food chain

Figure 5 | Policy instruments for overcoming barriers to farmers adopting more sustainable farming systems. For any farm to be sustainable, it must
meet four goals, shown in the centre: (1) produce adequate amounts of high-quality food (production); (2) enhance the natural-resource base and
environment (environment); (3) be financially viable (economics); and (4) contribute to the wellbeing of farmers and their communities (wellbeing)10.
Despite the appeal of a sustainable agriculture philosophy, the task for farmers to achieve agricultural sustainability is challenging. Just because a farm
is organic does not mean that it is sustainable. However, research shows that organic farming systems better balance the four sustainability goals than
their conventional counterparts and are more likely to achieve agricultural sustainability (overlapping area). Yet, significant barriers to adopting organic
agriculture exist, including powerful vested interests and existing policies, lack of information and knowledge, weak infrastructure and other economic
challenges, and misperceptions and cultural biases. In fact, many of these same barriers exist for other innovative systems, such as agroforestry,
conservation agriculture, integrated farming and mixed croplivestock systems. A diversity of policy instruments is needed to overcome these barriers, and
can be categorized as financial, legal and knowledge-based instruments. Examples of these instruments are shown in the figure.

fastest growing segments of American agriculture and helps farmers organic and other innovative farming systems to move towards truly
receive a higher price for their product as they strive to meet grow- sustainable production systems. This is no small task, but the con-
ing consumer demand93. Moreover, organic agriculture has been sequences for food and ecosystem security could not be bigger. To
able to provide jobs, be profitable, benefit the soil and environment, make this happen will require mobilizing the full arsenal of effective
and support social interactions between farmers and consumers. policies, scientific and socioeconomic advances, farmer ingenuity
Although organic agriculture has an untapped potential role in and public engagement.
global food and ecosystem security, no one farming system alone
will safely feed the planet. Rather, a blend of organic and other inno- Received 7 September 2015; accepted 17 December 2015;
vative farming systems, including agroforestry, integrated farming, published online 3 February 2016
conservation agriculture, mixed crop and livestock, and still undis-
covered systems, will be needed for future global food and ecosys- References
tem security. For example, integrated farming systems that blend 1. Lockeretz, W. in Organic Farming: An International History (ed. Lockeretz, W.)
mostly organic with some conventional practices have been shown 18 (CABI, 2007).
2. Trewavas, A. Urban myths of organic farming. Nature 410, 409410 (2001).
to be more sustainable than conventional farming systems94,95 and
3. Emsley, J. Going one better than nature? Nature 410, 633634 (2001).
are likely to play a central role. Achieving global food and ecosys- 4. Kirchmann, H. & Thorvaldsson, G. Challenging targets for future agriculture.
tem security requires more than just achieving sustainable farming Eur. J.Agron. 12, 145161 (2000).
systems worldwide. We need to reduce food waste, improve food 5. Connor, D.J. & Mnguez, M.I. Evolution not revolution of farming systems
distribution and access, stabilize the human population, eliminate will best feed and green the world. Glob. Food Secur. 1, 106113 (2012).
the conversion of food into fuel, and change consumption patterns 6. Pickett, J.A. Food security: intensification of agriculture is essential, for which
current tools must be defended and new sustainable technologies invented.
towards a more plant-based diet.
Food Energ. Secur. 2, 167173 (2013).
Equal adherence to all four sustainability goals of production, 7. Willer, H. & Lernoud, J. (eds) The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and
environment, economics and social wellbeing does not limit but Emerging Trends 2015 (FiBL-IFOAM, 2015).
encourages farmers and researchers to innovate. The challenge fac- 8. International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for
ing policymakers is to create an enabling environment for scaling-up Development Agriculture at a Crossroads: Global Report (Island, 2009).

6 NATURE PLANTS | VOL 2 | FEBRUARY 2016 | www.nature.com/natureplants

2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

NATURE PLANTS DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221 REVIEW ARTICLE
9. De Schutter, O. Report Submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the Right to 41. Hunter, D. etal. Evaluation of the micronutrient composition of plant foods
Food (United Nations, 2010). produced by organic and conventional agricultural methods. Crit. Rev. Food
10. National Research Council Toward Sustainable Agricultural Systems in the 21st Sci. 51, 571582 (2011).
Century (The National Academies, 2010). 42. Lairon, D. Nutritional quality and safety of organic food: a review. Agron.
11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAOSTAT Online Sustain. Dev. 30, 3341 (2010).
Database (accessed August 2015); http://faostat.fao.org/site/377/default. 43. Brandt, K., Leifert, C., Sanderson, R. & Seal, C.J. Agroecosystem management
aspx#ancor and nutritional quality of plant foods: the case of organic fruits and vegetables.
12. Rockstrm, J. etal. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30, 177197 (2011).
461, 472475 (2009). 44. Palupi, E., Jayanegara, A., Ploeger, A. & Kahl, J. Comparison of nutritional
13. Godfray, H.C. J. etal. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. quality between conventional and organic dairy products: a meta-analysis.
Science 327, 812818 (2010). J.Sci. Food. Agr. 92, 27742781 (2012).
14. Amundson, R. etal. Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science 45. Gattinger, A. etal. Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming.
348, 1261071 (2015). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1822618231 (2012).
15. Stanhill, G. The comparative productivity of organic agriculture. Agr. Ecosyst. 46. Alfldi, T. etal. in Organic Agriculture, Environment, and Food
Environ. 30, 126 (1990). Security (eds Scialabba, N.E.-H. & Hattam, C.) Ch. 2 (FAO, 2002);
16. Badgley, C. etal. Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renew. Agr. www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4137e/y4137e00.htm
Food Syst. 22, 86108 (2007). 47. Kaspercyk, N. & Knickel, K. in Organic Agriculture: A Global Perspective
17. de Ponti, T., Rijk, B. & van Ittersum, M.K. The crop yield gap between organic (eds Kristiansen, P., Taji, A. & Reganold, J.) 259294 (CSIRO, 2006).
and conventional agriculture. Agr. Syst. 108, 19 (2012). 48. Tuomisto, H.L., Hodge, I.D., Riordan, P. & Macdonald, D.W. Does organic
18. Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J.A. Comparing the yields of organic and farming reduce environmental impacts? A meta-analysis of European
conventional agriculture. Nature 485, 229232 (2012). research. J.Environ. Manage. 112, 309320 (2012).
19. Ponisio, L.C. etal. Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional 49. Mondelaers, K., Aertsens, J. & Van Huylenbroeck, G. A meta-analysis of the
yield gap. Proc. R.Soc. B 282, 20141396 (2015). differences in environmental impacts between organic and conventional
20. Crowder, D.W. & Reganold, J.P. Financial competitiveness of farming. Brit. Food. J. 111, 10981119 (2009).
organic agriculture on a global scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 50. Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D. & Paoletti, M.G. Environmental impact of different
112, 76117616 (2015). agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture.
21. Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G. & Kohl, D.H. Organic farming in the Corn Belt. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30, 95124 (2011).
Science 211, 540547 (1981). 51. Lynch, D.H., Halberg, N. & Bhatta, G.D. Environmental impacts of organic
22. Lotter, D., Seidel, R. & Liebhardt, W. The performance of organic and agriculture in temperate regions. CAB Rev. 7, 117 (2012).
conventional cropping systems in an extreme climate year. Am. J.Alternative 52. Tuck, S. etal. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on
Agr. 18, 146154 (2003). biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis. J.Appl. Ecol. 51, 746755 (2014).
23. Siegrist, S., Scaub, D., Pfiffner, L. & Mder, L. Does organic agriculture reduce 53. Kennedy C. M. et al. A global quantitative synthesis of local and
soil erodability? The results of a long-term field study on loess in Switzerland. landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecol. Lett.
Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 69, 253264 (1998). 16, 584599 (2013).
24. Murphy, K.M., Campbell, K.G., Lyon, S.R. & Jones, S.S. Evidence 54. Lotter, D.W. Organic agriculture. J.Sustain. Agr. 21, 59128 (2003).
55. Crowder, D.W., Northfield, T.D., Strand, M.R. & Snyder, W.E.
of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems. Field Crop. Res.
Organic agriculture promotes evenness and natural pest control. Nature
102, 172177 (2007).
466, 109112 (2010).
25. Baker, B.P., Benbrook, C.M., Groth, E. III & Benbrook, K.L. Pesticide residues
56. Geiger, F. etal. Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity
in conventional, integrated pest management (IPM)-grown and organic foods:
and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic Appl. Ecol.
insights from three US data sets. Food Addit. Contam. 19, 427446 (2002).
11, 97105 (2010).
26. Smith-Spangler, C. etal. Are organic foods safer or healthier than
57. Skinner, S. etal. Greenhouse gas fluxes from agricultural soils under organic
conventional alternatives? Ann. Intern. Med. 157, 348366 (2012).
and non-organic management a global meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ.
27. Baraski, M. etal. Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and
468469, 553563 (2014).
lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic
58. Lee, K.S., Choe, Y.C. & Park, S.H. Measuring the environmental effects of
literature review and meta-analyses. Brit. J.Nutr. 112, 794811 (2014).
organic farming: a meta-analysis of structural variables in empirical research.
28. Pussemier, L., Larondelle, Y., Van Peteghem, C. & Huyghebaert, A. Chemical
J.Environ. Manage. 162, 263274 (2015).
safety of conventionally and organically produced foodstuffs: a tentative
59. Steffen, W. etal. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a
comparison under Belgian conditions. Food Control 17, 1421 (2006). changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).
29. Curl, C.L., Fenske, R.A. & Elgethun, K. Organophosphorus pesticide 60. Halberg, N., Sulser, T.B., Hgh-Jensen, H., Rosegrant, M.W. & Knudsen,
exposure of urban and suburban preschool children with organic and M.T. in Global Development of Organic Agriculture: Challenges and Prospects
conventional diets. Environ. Health Persp. 111, 377382 (2003). (eds Halberg, N. et al.) 277322 (CABI, 2006).
30. Lu, C. etal. Organic diets significantly lower childrens dietary exposure to 61. Zentner, R.P. etal. Effects of input management and crop diversity on
organophosphorus pesticides. Environ. Health Persp. 114, 260263 (2006). economic returns and riskiness of cropping systems in the semi-arid Canadian
31. Forman, J. etal. Organic foods: health and environmental advantages and Prairie. Renew. Agr. Food Syst. 26, 208223 (2011).
disadvantages. Pediatrics 130, e1406e1415 (2012). 62. Prihtanti, T.M., Hardyastuti, S., Hartono, S. & Irham Social-cultural functions
32. Soil Association Organic Farming, Food Quality and Human Health: A Review of rice farming systems. Asian J.Agr. Rural Dev. 4, 341351 (2014).
of the Evidence (Soil Association, 2000); http://soilassociation.org/LinkClick.as 63. Mendoza, T.C. Evaluating the benefits of organic farming in rice
px?fileticket=cY8kfP3Q%2BgA%3D agroecosystems in the Philippines. J.Sustain. Agr. 24, 93115 (2004).
33. Brandt, K. & Mlgaard, J.P. Organic agriculture: does it enhance or reduce the 64. Pretty, J.N., Ball, A.S., Lang, T. & Morison, J.I. L. Farm costs and food miles:
nutritional value of plant foods? J.Sci. Food Agr. 81, 924931 (2001). an assessment of the full cost of the UK weekly food basket. Food Policy
34. Worthington, V. Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, 30, 119 (2005).
vegetables, and grains. J.Alter. Complem. Med. 7, 161173 (2001). 65. Kremen, C. & Miles, A. Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus
35. Bourn, D. & Prescott, J. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory conventional farming systems: benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecol. Soc.
qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. 17, 40 (2012).
Critical Rev. Food Sci. 42, 134 (2002). 66. Andersson, G.K. S., Rundlf, M. & Smith, H.G. Organic farming improves
36. Williams, C.M. Nutritional quality of organic food: shades of grey or shades pollination success in strawberries. PLoS One 7, e31599 (2012).
of green? Proc.Nutr. Soc. 61, 1924 (2002). 67. Porter, J., Costanza, R., Sandhu, H., Sigsgaard, L. & Wratten, S. The value of
37. Magkos, F., Arvaniti, F. & Zampelas, A. Organic food: nutritious food producing food, energy, and ecosystem services within an agro-ecosystem.
or food for thought? A review of the evidence. Int. J.Food Sci. Nutr. Ambio 38, 186193 (2009).
54, 357371 (2003). 68. Sandhu, H. etal. Significance and value of non-traded ecosystem services on
38. Rembialkowska, E. Quality of plant products from organic agriculture. J.Sci. farmland. PeerJ 3, e762 (2015).
Food Agr. 87, 27572762 (2007). 69. stman, ., Ekbom, B. & Bengtsson, J. Yield increase attributable to aphid
39. Benbrook, C., Zhao, X., Yez, J., Davies, N. & Andrews, P. New Evidence predation by ground-living polyphagous natural enemies in spring barley in
Confirms the Nutritional Superiority of Plant-based Organic Foods (The Sweden. Ecol. Econ. 45, 149158 (2003).
Organic Center, 2008); http://organic-center.org 70. Sandhu, H.S., Wratten, S.D. & Cullen, R. The role of supporting ecosystem
40. Dangour, A.D. etal. Nutritional quality of organic foods: a systematic review. services in conventional and organic arable farmland. Ecol. Complex.
Am. J.Clin. Nutr. 90, 680685 (2009). 7, 302310 (2010).

NATURE PLANTS | VOL 2 | FEBRUARY 2016 | www.nature.com/natureplants 7

2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

REVIEW ARTICLE NATURE PLANTS DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221
71. MacRae, R.J., Frick, B. & Martin, R.C. Economic and social impacts of 88. UNCTAD Trade and Environment Review 2013
organic production systems. Can. J.Plant Sci. 87, 10371044 (2007). (United Nations Publication, 2013).
72. Grure, G., Nagarajan, L. & King, E.D. I.O. The role of collective action in the 89. Stolze, M. & Lampkin, N. Policy for organic farming: rationale and concepts.
marketing of underutilized plant species: lessons from a case study on minor Food Policy 34, 237244 (2009).
millets in South India. Food Policy 34, 3945 (2009). 90. Pretty, J. & Bharucha Z.P. Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems.
73. Eddleston, M. etal. Pesticide poisoning in the developing world a Ann. Bot. 114, 15711596 (2014).
minimum pesticides list. Lancet 360, 11631167 (2002). 91. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Policy Instruments
74. Thundiyil, J.G., Stober, J., Besbelli, N. & Pronczuk, J. Acute pesticide poisoning: to Support Green Growth in Agriculture (OECD Publishing, 2013).
a proposed classification tool. Bull. World Health Organ. 86, 205209 (2008). 92. Sanchez, P.A. Tripling crop yields in tropical Africa. Nature Geosci.
75. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements The IFOAM 3, 299300 (2010).
Norms for Organic Production and Processing, Version 2014 (IFOAM, 2014); 93. Office of Communications Agriculture Secretary Vilsack unveils vision for US
www.ifoam.bio/en/ifoam-norms organic agriculture. USDA News Release No. 0096.13 (2013); www.usda.gov/
76. USDA Agricultural Marketing Service National Organic Program Handbook wps/portal/usda/usdamediafb?contentid=2013/05/0096.xml&printable=true
(USDA, 2015); available at www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/organic/ 94. Reganold, J.P., Glover, J.D., Andrews, P.K. & Hinman, H.R. Sustainability of
handbook three apple production systems. Nature 410, 926930 (2001).
77. Council of the European Union Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007of 95. Davis, A.S., Hill, J.D., Chase, C.A., Johanns, A.M. & Liebman, M.,
28June 2007on Organic Production and Labeling of Organic Products Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and
and Repealing Regulation (EEC) No2092/91 (Official Journal of the environmental health. PLoS One 7, e47149 (2012).
European Union, 2008); http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ 96. Wachter, J.M. & Reganold, J.P. in Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food
NOT/?uri=CELEX:32007R0834 Systems (ed. Van Alfen, N.) 265286 (Elsevier, 2014).
78. Japan Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Notification No. 1608 97. Willer, H., Lernoud, J. & Kilcher, L. (eds) The World of Organic Agriculture:
Japanese Agricultural Standard for Organic Livestock Products (MAFF, 2012); Statistics and Emerging Trends 2013 (FiBL-IFOAM, 2013).
www.maff.go.jp/e/jas/specific/pdf/836_20122pdf 98. Willer, H. & Lernoud, J. (eds) The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and
79. Parrott, N., Olesen, J.E. & Hgh-Jensen, H. in Global Development of Emerging Trends 2014 (FiBL-IFOAM, 2014).
Organic Agriculture: Challenges and Prospects (eds Halberg, N. et al.) 153179 99. Stockdale, E.A. etal. Agronomic and environmental implications of organic
(CABI, 2006). farming systems. Adv. Agron. 70, 261327 (2001).
80. Bachman, L., Cruzada, E. & Wright, S. Food Security and Farmer 100. Institute of Medicine & National Research Council A Framework for Assessing
Empowerment: A Study of the Impacts of Farmer-Led Sustainable Agriculture in Effects of the Food System (The National Academies, 2015).
the Philippines (MASIPAG, 2009).
81. Reganold, J.P. etal. Transforming US agriculture. Science 332, 670671 (2011). Acknowledgements
82. Food and Agriculture Organization FAO Statistical Pocketbook 2015: World J.M.W. is supported by NSF-IGERT (0903714) and USDA-NIFA (230470).
Food and Agriculture (FAO, 2015).
83. World Health OrganizationObesity and Overweight, Fact Sheet #311(WHO,
2015); www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/ Author contributions
84. Food and Agriculture Organization, International Fund for Agricultural J.P.R. and J.M.W. contributed equally to the concept, outline and writing of the
Development & World Food Programme The State of Food Insecurity in the manuscript, including generating the figures.
World 2015 (FAO, 2015).
85. Jackson, L.L. Who designs the agricultural landscape? Landscape J. Additional information
27, 2340 (2008). Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
86. Sharifi, O. etal. Barriers to conversion to organic farming: a case study in Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.P.R.
Babol County in Iran. Afr. J.Agr. Res. 5, 22602267 (2010).
87. Constance, D. & Choi, J.Y. Overcoming the barriers to organic adoption
in the United States: a look at pragmatic conventional producers in Texas. Competing interests
Sustainability 2, 163188 (2010). The authors declare no competing financial interests.

8 NATURE PLANTS | VOL 2 | FEBRUARY 2016 | www.nature.com/natureplants

View publication stats 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved