Lecture 10.4.1: Continuous Beams I: Objective/Scope
Lecture 10.4.1: Continuous Beams I: Objective/Scope
Lecture 10.4.1: Continuous Beams I: Objective/Scope
1: Continuous Beams I
OBJECTIVE/SCOPE
PREREQUISITES
RELATED LECTURES
SUMMARY
The advantages of continuous beams are summarised and failure modes which
result from continuity in composite beams are identified. Plastic methods may be
used to determine internal moments and forces, provided that rotation capacity is
sufficient and lateral-torsional buckling does not occur. The scope for plastic
methods is related to classification of cross-sections in terms of limiting
breadth/thickness ratios for structural steel elements in compression. Other
measures needed to ensure adequate rotation capacity are also described. Simple
values for effective width of the concrete flange are presented and expressions for
the negative resistance moment of Class 1 and Class 2 sections are given. The
application of rigid-plastic analysis to determine the distribution of bending
moments is demonstrated.
1. INTRODUCTION
Continuous beams offer the following advantages over simple construction:
These result in a smaller steel section being required to withstand specified loading.
After conceptual structural design has been done, which might possibly include
initial sizing of members based on experience or rough calculations, the designer
will wish to proceed to detailed calculations for the structure. The next stage is
therefore determination of internal moments and forces in critical regions for the
various loading cases and limit states. This is known as "global analysis" and
procedures for this, at the ultimate limit state, are discussed here and in the
following lecture.
In the early stages of loading the beam behaves substantially elastically, with the
bending moments at the supports and in the midspan region being unequal. For
example, with a continuous beam of equal spans supporting uniform distributed
loading (Figure 6), the bending moment at the supports is up to twice as large as
that at midspan. However, the plastic resistance moment of midspan regions ranges
from being larger than that at the support, sometimes by a factor as high as three, to
being smaller (not usually the case). Consequently, a large amount of deformation
can be required with redistribution being either from or to the support, the former
being the usual case. Figure 7 shows as an example a two-span continuous beam
subject to uniform distributed loading. The rotation required on each side of the
support to complete a plastic hinge mechanism clearly increases as the resistance
moment at the support (Mpl) decreases relative to that at midspan (Mpl).
In continuous composite beams therefore, the rotation capacity required at a
particular critical cross-section will depend on:
6. CLASSIFICATION OF CROSS-SECTIONS
It can be seen from the above requirements that, unlike steel structures, the
definition of a Class 1 section in terms of limiting breadth/thickness ratios is not in
itself sufficient to ensure always that enough rotation capacity will be available for
plastic analysis in composite construction. Provided, however, that the
requirements given above concerning relative lengths of spans and arrangement of
loading are satisfied, the limits on breadth/thickness ratios for a Class 1 composite
section can be taken as those for steel sections given in Eurocode 3 [1]. The limits
for Class 1 and Class 2 sections, given in Tables 1(a) and (b) of this lecture, have
been taken from Tables 4.1 and 4.2, respectively, of Eurocode 4 [2].
It is assumed that the effect of co-existent vertical shear on the bending resistance
can be neglected. When the shear force exceeds half the plastic shear resistance of
the web of the steel section, allowance should be made for its effect on the
resistance moment, as described in the previous lecture.
The cross-sections considered are shown in Figure 8(a) (for a solid slab) and Figure
9(a) (for a slab formed with profiled steel sheeting). As in positive moment regions,
an effective width is used to make allowance for in-plane shear flexibility (shear
lag) of the concrete flange.
The ratio of the effective width to the real flange width depends on many factors,
including the type of loading, the support conditions, the cross-section considered
and the ratio of beam spacing to span. In most design recommendations
(particularly for buildings), however, very simple formulae are given for effective
width, related to the span(s) of the beam and expressed in terms of a length
lo between points of contraflexure; these should be taken simply as follows:
where L is the distance between supports for the span concerned, i.e. L1 or L2 in
Figure 10, which has been taken from Figure 4.3 of Eurocode 4 [2]; this also gives
a value appropriate for a span next to a cantilever, i.e. L3.
Research on shear lag in negative-moment regions has shown that when transverse
reinforcement appropriate to the shear connector spacing is provided, the cracked
slab is able to transfer shear to longitudinal reinforcement at a distance of several
slab thicknesses on either side of the steel member. Over an internal support,
Eurocode 4 gives:
where L1 and L2 are the lengths of adjacent spans (Figure 10). Figure 10 also gives
a value appropriate to the support region of a cantilever.
To determine the negative moment of resistance, generally all properly anchored
reinforcing bars within the effective width are assumed to be stressed to their
design yield strengths fsk/s (Figure 8b). If the area of this reinforcement is Ar, then
the tensile resistance of the reinforcement, Rr, within the effective width of the slab
under negative moment is given by:
Rr = (fsk/s)Ar
At flexural failure, the whole of the concrete slab may be assumed to be cracked,
whilst all the structural steel is at its design yield strength fy/a in tension or
compression. The plastic neutral axis may be in the top flange or in the web. For
the latter case, the stresses are shown in Figure 8(b). The position of the neutral
axis is determined by considering longitudinal equilibrium.
Let Rw be the axial resistance of the web over a depth d between the flanges. Then
for a steel section with equal flanges, the plastic neutral axis will lie in the web if
Rr<Rw, whilst if Rr>Rw, the neutral axis will lie in the steel flange. For each case an
expression for the negative plastic resistance moment Mpl, can be determined by
considering the moment of each rectangular stress block about the neutral axis.
Mpl = Ma + Rr
Dr is the distance from the top of the steel beam to the centroid of the
reinforcement.
Mpl = Rs + RrDr
where Rs is the tensile resistance of the steel section. For a section of cross-
sectional area Aa,
Rs = (fy/a)Aa.
The cross-section shown in Figure 9 shows a slab formed with profiled steel
sheeting. The sheeting component is usually neglected when determining the
negative moment of resistance. For construction with profiled steel sheeting, it is
common practice to provide only a light mesh reinforcement in the slab, which, as
mentioned above, is neglected when calculating Rr. Thus if no further
reinforcement is provided (additional to the sheeting and the mesh), the negative
plastic resistance moment is given by Mpl=Ma.
Let the ratio of the negative to the positive moments of resistance in a proposed
section be . Therefore:
= Mpl/Mpl
Mpl = wf2L2
For an internal span with equal support moments (Figure 12) it can similarly be
shown that:
Mpl = wfL2/(8(1+))
9. CONCLUDING SUMMARY
Rigid-plastic analysis can be applied to continuous composite beams
provided that the rotation capacity at each plastic hinge location is sufficient
to enable the required hinge rotation to develop and lateral-torsional
buckling does not occur.
For composite beams in buildings, the requirement concerning rotation
capacity may be assumed to be satisfied when all cross-sections at plastic
hinge locations are in Class 1, and restrictions on relative length of adjacent
spans and depth of neutral axis are satisfied.
The plastic moment of resistance, in a hogging moment region, can be
determined by application of rectangular stress block theory to the structural
steel section and ductile reinforcing steel within the effective cross-section.
The effective widths of the concrete flange can be determined from
approximations of the sagging and hogging lengths of the beam.
Distribution of internal moments is dependent on the ratio of the negative
("hogging") moment of resistance to that in positive ("sagging") bending.
10. REFERENCES
[1] Eurocode 3: "Design of Steel Structures": ENV 1993-1-1: Part 1.1: General
rules and rules for buildings, CEN, 1992.
[3] Eurocode 2: "Design of Concrete Structures": ENV 1992-1-1: Part 1.1: General
rules and rules for buildings, CEN, 1992.