#121 Montefalcon VS Vazquez

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

MONTEFALCON VS VAZQUEZ

FACTS:

Dolores P. Montefalcon filed a Complaint for acknowledgment and support against


respondent Ronnie S. Vasquez before the RTC of Naga City. Alleging that her son
Laurence is the illegitimate child of Vasquez, she prayed that Vasquez be obliged to give
support to co-petitioner Laurence Montefalcon, whose certificate of live birth he signed as
father. According to petitioners, Vasquez only gave a total of P19,000 as support for
Laurence since Laurence was born in1993. Vasquez allegedly also refused to give him
regular school allowance despite repeated demands. Petitioner Dolores added that she
and Vasquez are not legally married, and that Vasquez has his own family.

ISSUE:
Whether he is obliged to give support to co-petitioner Laurence.

HELD:
YES. Article 175 of the Family Code of the Philippines mandates that illegitimate filiation
may be established in the same way and on the same evidence as legitimate children.
Laurence's record of birth is an authentic, relevant and admissible piece of evidence to
prove paternity and filiation. Vasquez did not deny that Laurence is his child with Dolores.
He signed as father in Laurences certificate of live birth, a public document. He supplied
the data entered in it. Thus, it is a competent evidence of filiation as he had a hand in its
preparation. In fact, if the child had been recognized by any of the modes in the first
paragraph of Article 172, there is no further need to file any action for acknowledgment
because any of said modes is by itself a consummated act. As filiation is beyond question,
support follows as matter of obligation.

You might also like