Forte (1988) : New Approaches To The Linear Analysis of Music
Forte (1988) : New Approaches To The Linear Analysis of Music
Forte (1988) : New Approaches To The Linear Analysis of Music
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
University of California Press and American Musicological Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Journal of the American Musicological Society.
http://www.jstor.org
Introduction
y "linearanalysis"I referto the broadspectrumof approachesto
the study of music--especiallyrefractoryor unusualmusic, such
as much of the music of the late nineteenth century and early
twentiethcentury--approacheswhich emphasizethe contributionof
large-scalehorizontalconfigurationsto musical form and structure
and which may place local harmonicsuccession,diminutions,and
other musicalcomponentsof smallerscale in a subsidiarycategory.
From the contemporaryperspective, linear analysis can be seen
developingas a majorarea of activity and interest among scholars
today, especiallytheorists. A numberof recent publicationsrepre-
sentingdiversepointsof view and interests,such as those by Baker,
Berry, Forte, Lewin, Meyer, Morgan, Rothstein, and Williamson,
provideamplewitnessto the centralityandimportanceof the topic. It
is this burgeoninginterest which the present article addresses,not
primarilyas a survey of what even now comprisesa rathercomplex
arrayof orientationsand motivations,but ratheras a presentationof
recent originalwork, which I hope will exemplifythe advantagesas
well as shortcomingsof linearapproachesto the study of music.
Of course,the fountainheadof this approachto analysisresidesin
the writingsof Heinrich Schenker,althoughno doubt that eminent
personagehas turned over many times in his final resting place in
responseto some of the uses to which his conceptshave been applied
posthumously (see Beach 1985, especially 288-93). Indeed, it is
difficult to pick up a recent professionaljournalor book without
finding an article which has musical illustrations that contain
Schenkerianbeams, slurs, and other notationalapparatus.
Although the linear graph is the hallmarkof the contemporary
linearapproach,no uniformityeitherof analyticalintentionor result
can yet be detectedin the literature,as we can see from such recent
analyticalapplicationsof graphingproceduresas those in Ayrey 1982
and Wilson 1984. And while new kindsof lineargraphsare servinga
diversityof analyticalends, olderand morestablemethodsare being
illustrated.Althoughsyntacticrulesthatgovernthe constructionof
the analyticalgraphsmay be inferredfromthe analyses,I will not
attemptto formalizeanalytical
procedure in thisarticle,butpostpone
thatsubjectto a subsequentpublication.
Rite of Spring,Introduction
Stravinsky:
In orderto supplya historicalcontextfor my linearanalysisof the
openingof Stravinsky'sRiteofSpring,I wouldlike to spenda moment
on an earlierpublishedlinearanalysisof that music by Roy Travis.
The basis of Travis'sanalysis,which he makesquite explicit, is
providedby Schenker-derived linearand harmonicconceptsas trans-
mittedthroughthe writingsof the late Felix Salzer.Thus, for Travis,
the openingmusic of TheRiteof Springrepresentsa "prolongation" of
what he regardsas a "tonic"sonority(fromthe bass up) Ab-Db-C.
Examplei reproducesTravis'smaingraphof the excerptfrom The
Riteof Spring.The basic linearfeaturesof the analysisare extracted
and shown at the lower right of the graph as the succession of
descendingthirdsin descantand bass that prolongwhat Travis calls
a "tonic-sonority" from its initialstatementuntil its restatementand
confirmationat the end of the passage.
In one specific sense, this analysisis difficultto evaluate, since
Travis has alreadyreducedout a good deal of the melodic detail,
beginningwith the "e-minor"triadin the very firstmeasure,without
telling us why. However, the largeoutline of his analysisis clear:a
seriesof descendingthirdsprolongsthe upper-voicec"until it arrives
at d', at which point it proceedsby step to its finaldestination,c'.
In similarfashion, the two lower constituentsof Travis's"tonic-
sonority"areprolongedthrougha seriesof descendingthirds,arriving
at their destinationvia a finalstepwisemotion. These prolongational
motions in their entiretyform a "contrapuntal structure"in Travis's
language.
There arises a basic question about this contrapuntalstructure,
namely:how does the substructureof the bassrelateto the rest of the
music?Put moresimply, why has the analystextractedthis particular
successionof thirdsfromthe overallchromaticdescentand not some
other?
Beforeproceeding,I offera reminderto the effectthatthe workof
Pietervan den Toornhasprovidedbothimportanttheoreticalbasesas
well as convincingmusical evidence from which a new linear ap-
proach to Stravinsky'smusic may be attempted. Indeed, van den
Toorn's own analysesare, in large part, linear, althoughto charac-
AII
I
C.S. C.S. ---
Tonic-sonoritydefin
a contrapuntal st
fills the space of an o
Example 3
Stravinsky, Petrushka,"Chez Petrushka," Analytical Graph
Diatonic(T1of 8-23) 419 (11. 3, 6, 7)
+ A]
Octatonic(8-28) [E WholeTone/Octatonic516 5-16: (0, 1, 3, 4, 7)
1,3,
Petrushka,SecondTableau,"ChezPetrushka"
Stravinsky:
5 Neither 8-23, the diatonic octad, nor 8-28, the octatonic octad, contains
tetrachord 4-19. Because the other large-scale harmony, one that has prominent
surface manifestations throughout Petrushka,is the whole-tone octad, 8-21, I under-
stand the linear projection of 4-19 here to refer to it rather than to one of a number
of other theoretically possible but quite "abstract"octads.
Wagner:Preludeto Tristan
. . the upper voice moves from the opening a to a" of bar 17. The
connectionbetween these two points is formed by the g#' of bar 3
makingan ascentin a stepwisemotionconsistingof four groupsof three
notes each until the terminala' is reached.
6 Mitchell
I967. AfterMitchell'sanalysisof the TristanPrelude,surelythe best
knowncontemporaryanalyticalstudy of that musicappearsin Boretz 1972. For an
exhaustiveand characteristially Gallic chase of the Tristanchord in supportof an
elaboratelyconditionalphilosophyof "relativism," see Nattiez 1985.The combatant
to enter this arenamost recently is Wagnerexpert Robert Bailey. Of particular
interestis his essay, "AnAnalyticalStudyof the Sketchesand Drafts,"Bailey 1985,
113-46.
1 5 10
I\ \A T/ N
2
d2 f$2
Example 5
Wagner, Prelude to Tristan, Linear Graph, continued (Mitchell)
S- to c$, bar - -
45--
17 20
-" f
'-'"r "
1L
"'
"
'"--"-
Now, for all the masterful technique that Mitchell brings to bear
upon this work and for all the trenchant observations he makes and
the interesting questions he raises, it is still possible to consider viable
alternative readings, readings which bring out certain features indig-
enous to this music that are missing from Mitchell's reading.
I will also venture to be critical of Mitchell's general approach and
point out that it represents an unreflective Schenkerian orthodoxy
insofar as the major constituents of the linear structures (represented
by open noteheads in the conventional way on the graphs, Examples
4 and 5) are directly referable to an assumed tonality of A
major/minor. Thus, he sees the large-scale descant of bars 1-17 as
governed by the octave relation between scale degree i, as a, the
opening pitch of the cello, and its counterpart, a", played by the first
violin in bar 17. In similar fashion, the primary goal of the large-scale
descant motion of bars 17-24 is c#"' in bar 24, the third of the major
tonic of the entire Prelude, in Mitchell's view (Example 5). This
mono-tonal orientation has been questioned by several authors, and I
now add my objection to theirs, for reasons which will become clear
in the sequel.
First, however, a brief comment or two on Benjamin Boretz's
lengthy and very influential study of the Prelude (and other parts of
the opera) would seem to be in order at this point. While it is true that
Boretz's approach is essentially linear, most convincingly evident in
the long linear graph of the entire Prelude which he presents in his
Example Ioa, his approach differs markedly in methodological ap-
proach from Mitchell's, primarily with respect to the structural
"background" of the music, which, in Boretz's view, is a non-
traditional construct (with respect to tonality) that he describes as a
"partitioning" of the total chromatic into mutually exclusive
tetrachords of the "diminished-seventh"type. Despite the apparently
radically different approach, Boretz's analysis shares with Mitchell's a
major flaw: it exhibits an overly rigid adherence to a background
model which determines virtually every aspect of the interpretation of
the foreground and thereby loses contact with certain important and
Example 6a
Wagner, Prelude to Tristan, Linear Graph, bars i-17
1 6 9 16 17
t t t t t
AT A'T7 A A' A A&A
7 Compare Boretz (1972, 162), where the two verticals are described as "exact,
balanced, simple inverses of one another." Although it is evident from the analytical
graph, I should point out that I regard the Tristan chord as a self-standing musical
object, not dependent for its meaning upon a resolution to some other sonority, such
as the "French Sixth" which succeeds it. Judging from extensive musical evidence,
this was the view taken by many composers who quoted Wagner's chord, often in
pristine form, a striking instance of which occurs in the Scriabin work discussed later
in this article.
8 See
Bailey (1985, I29 and 290), and Boretz (1972, 172, Example 5), where the
author displays the first linear projection of A as well as the second, F#-A-C-E, but
apparently failed to discover the subseqent occurrences, probably due to his
overriding commitment to a particular "model"of the large-scale structure, namely,
". .. a simple partitioning of the (twelve) pitch-class 'octave' by the (o 3 6 9) construct
and its complementary mutually pitch-class exclusive transpositions (i 4 7 io) and (2
5 8 11). . ." (p. I72).
9
For some aspects of this graph, in particularthe connection from a to g' in the
descant, symbolized by the Schenkerian dotted-slur notation (coupling), I am
indebted to Professor Stephen Hefling of Case Western Reserve University.
glance
t t
AIL.
A &A' A A'
Example 6c
Wagner, Prelude to Tristan, Linear Graph, bars 29-35
29 33 34
death A4690(TI)
0) Vn.I WW
Hn glance
,
L .
10--%"Y
. +o,
AT1
Example6d
Wagner,Preludeto Tristan,LinearGraph,bars62-66
A 6 8 112(TO)
62 64 66
deliverance
LL
, " -L .
, - i~ -- - - M-- T. -
,,:7
t T t To To tTt
AtT7 tA' ATo At At AtT0 tA'T7 At
Example7
InterlockingFormsof the TristanChord
2-3-3 428
A' 3-3-2
Example8
Formsof the TristanChordand their IntervallicPatterns
19 25
25A
33 2-3
f 3
A' 2
Example 9
Wagner,Preludeto Tristan, of OpeningMusic
VerticalOrganization
4-18
A
r4-18
4-18
5 4 3
16
4 4
6- 6
6 6 4 4
4-27 4-25 4-25 4-27
10
Following contemporary practice, the numbers in the interval successions
represent interval classes. Thus, in bar 25 of Example 8, the first interval above the
bass, formed by A andf#, spans 9 semitones. This number is by convention reduced
to its numerical inverse, modulo 12, which is 3. This corresponds to the traditional
equivalence of major sixth and minor third.
I"The number of basic interval patterns varies according to the interval construc-
tion of the pitch-class set. Pitch-class set 4-27 has associated with it ten distinct basic
interval patterns, four of which are represented on Table I.
TABLE I
of A andA', IntervalSuccessions,
Permutations
Circular
andBasicIntervalPatterns
(Bip)
A A'
Circular Intervals Bip Circular Intervals Bip
Permutation Permutation
Example io
The Tristan Chord in Vertical and Horizontal Configurations
2 17 22 23 79
6 44
mationcrof T2 of A.12
FourthSonata,FirstMovement
Scriabin:
12
For an extensive, complex, and suggestive treatment of transformationsapplied
to pitch relations see Lewin 1982-83.
13 See Baker 1986, 195-202 for a discussion of the relation between this sonata and
the Fifth Sonata. As will be apparent from the graph, Example 8, my reading of the
form of the first movement differs from Baker's, but does not contradict his, which
takes into account the second movement (see Baker 1986, 196-97). In particular, I
regard the first 35 bars of the first movement as a miniature, self-contained sonata
form, the parts of which are clearly demarcated by differential forms of the octatonic
set, to be explained below.
Examplei i
Scriabin,FourthSonata,FirstMovement
Andante 63
~con voglia
ru to
A 4 4f. ,"I L I I 9 C
O?,p-" . , ,
'" -
fi' 91.I' /7
.05k
Y-9 T
I
My Examples I2a through I2d show that the linear analysis of the
descant is straightforward,with reduction determined by register and
voice membership as the principal analytical strategy. To illustrate,
the motion d#"-g#"-c#"' over the first three bars appears as the
uppermost linear strand on Example I2a, while the return to the inner
voice d#" and e#"in bar 3 is a momentary digression that prepares the
f#" of bar 4. As a further illustration of this procedure, consider bars
7 and 8 (Example I2a), where the descending leap from d#" to fx is
construed as a motion to the alto voice, with the continuity of the
uppermost voice then restored by the stepwise ascent to cx" on the
downbeat of bar 8. The graph interprets this chromatic note as a
lower neighboring tone to d#" of bar 7.
In order to simplify the discussion of this rathercomplicated series
of graphs, I will comment first upon the broad outline of the descant,
then say something about the melodic inner voice, and finally offer
general remarks on the bass line over the span of the excerpt.
The descant throughout consists of successive and interlocking
forms of tetrachord 4-2 3. In this context I regard 4-2 3 as essentially
non-tonal, since it does not operate within a traditional tonic-
dominant tonality, but instead interacts with another structure indig-
enous to this work which I will explain in a few moments. Still,
because of its luxuriant fifths 4-2 3 must be regarded as the archetypi-
cal diatonic tetrachord, and I will designate it as the representative of
that harmonic area without assigning it tonal significance in the
traditional sense.
3 4-23:
T1(7-31): 11 10 2 8 1
b) bars 9-19
9 13 14 15 16
1368 81013 57100
12
4-19
11 10 2 4 5 10
9 1124
Dv 22 23 26 27 28
2
1 3 4 6 7 9 10 (1 3 4 6
4 6 7 9100
7-31:
To(7-31): 0 10 1 9 7 9
d) bars 29-35
29 32 35
35810
8 1013
S31368
* 10) 0 2 3 5 6 8
0 8 6
TABLE 2
Forms of 4-2 3
o 2 5 7 4 6 9 II 8 10 I 3
3 6 8 5 7 1O o 9 2 4
II
2 4 7 9 6 8 I 3 5
II Oo0
3 5 8 Io 7 9 0 2 II I 4 6
TABLE 3
Formsof 4-23 in Descantof Scriabin's
FourthSonata,firstmovement
4-23 T Invar.
Exposition
Theme I
Level 2: 8 Io I 3
Level 3: I 3 6 8 T517 [1,3,8]
Theme 2
Level 2: 5 7 o
Level 3: 0 2
io
5 7 T715 [5,7,0]
Reprise
Level 2: 8 1o I 3
Level 3: I 3 6 8 T517 [1,3,8]
The reader may have noticed that I have avoided specifying the
content of stratum i, the "Urlinie"of the excerpt. One very strong
candidate for this honor would be the single pitch a#", which is very
prominent in the upper voice throughout the excerpt and even more
so in the reprise of the short movement, which begins just where
Example I2d leaves off. I would then select d#" as the other
component of the Urlinie, for both pitches perform special roles in the
music. They serve as boundary elements, for example, in the first
section, and they link themes one and two, when a#" becomes b6"in
bar 14. In the return to the opening music at bar 35, both a#" and d#"
are fundamental, as can be seen from the graph, Example I2d.
The inner voice, the alto, if you will, makes a very subtle and
important contribution to the progression of the music. From the
standpoint of structural analysis, it provides a major clue to the other
fundamental constituent of this music, the octatonic set 8-28. From
the music-structural standpoint it provides a measure of connection
between the outer-voice linear strands in descant and bass. By "inner
voice" I mean specifically the ascending figures which appear at
regular temporal intervals throughout the excerpt: in bars 7-8 (Exam-
ple 12a), I5-I6 (Example I2b), I8-19 (Example 12b), 22-23 (Example
i2c), 26-27 (Example I2c), 28-29 (Example I2c), and 32 (Example
I2d).
Bas :
To: o 1 3 4 6 7 9 10 B
o :O 9 7 9 22
TI: I 2 4 5 7 8 iO Ii II O 2 8 I II 2 4 5 10 I
T2: 2 3 5 6 8 9 II o 2 o 6 8 29
Inner voice:
To: o 1 3 4 6 7 9 10 7 9 10o 15
4 6 7 9 10 0 22
1 3 4 6 7 9 10 26
4 5 7 8 io II 5 7 8 I
TI: i 2
1o II 2 7
2 4 5 7 8 io 8
T2: 2 3 5 6 8 9 II o o 2 3 5 6 8 32
TABLE 5
The Tristan Chord in Scriabin's Fourth Sonata, first movement
5 3 8 T2
II
5 9 2 T2
II
8 2 6 Ii T2
o10 4 8 I T1
7 I 5 10 T,
6 o 4 9 To
Conclusion
Yale University
LIST OF WORKSCITED
ABSTRACT