Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.

, 7 (2012) 10338 - 10357

International Journal of
ELECTROCHEMICAL
SCIENCE
www.electrochemsci.org

Gravimetric and Electrochemical Evaluation of 1-allyl-1H-

indole-2,3-dione of Carbon Steel Corrosion in Hydrochloric
Acid

H. Zarrok1, K. Al Mamari4, A. Zarrouk2, *, R. Salghi3, B. Hammouti5,2, S. S. Al-Deyab5,

E. M. Essassi4, F. Bentiss6, H. Oudda1

1
Laboratoire des procdes de sparation, Facult des Sciences, Universit Ibn Tofail, Knitra,
Morocco.
2
LCAE-URAC18, Facult des Sciences, Universit Mohammed 1er, Oujda, Morocco
3
Equipe de Gnie de lEnvironnement et Biotechnologie, ENSA, Universit Ibn Zohr, BP1136 Agadir,
Morocco.
4
Laboratoire de Chimie Organique Htrocyclique,URAC 21,Universit Mohammed V-Agdal ,Rabat
,Morocco et Institute of Nanomatrials and Nanotechnology, MAScIR,Rabat ,Morocco.
5
Petrochemical Research Chair, Chemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University,
P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
6
Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination et d'Analytique (LCCA), Facult des Sciences,
Universit Chouaib Doukkali, B.P. 20, M-24000 El Jadida, Morocco.
*
E-mail: [email protected]

Received: 15 September 2012 / Accepted: 28 September 2012 / Published: 1 October 2012

The present paper brings report on a newly observed effect of corrosion inhibition of 1-allyl- 1H-
indole-2,3-dione (Ind1) against carbon steel corrosion, in hydrochloric acid using gravimetric and
electrochemical measurements. Ind1 inhibited the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution and
the inhibition efficiency increased with increasing concentration of this inhibitor but decreased with
increasing temperature. Polarization measurements showed the mixed type behavior of this inhibitor.
Changes in impedance parameters suggested the adsorption of Ind1 on the carbon steel surface, leading
to the formation of protective films. The high inhibition efficiency was attributed to the blocking of
active sites by adsorption of inhibitor molecules on the steel surface. It was shown that adsorption of 1-
allyl- 1H-indole-2,3-dione (Ind1) on the steel surface is consistent with the Langmuir adsorption

isotherm and the obtained standard free energy of adsorption ( Gads ) values indicate that the corrosion
inhibition of the carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl is depends on chemisorption.
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10339

Keywords: Indole, Steel, Corrosion inhibition, Polarization curves, EIS.

1. INTRODUCTION

Acid solutions are widely used in industry [1-5]. The corrosion of steel in acidic solution
receives considerable concern. Corrosion inhibitors are used to reduce the corrosion rates of metallic
materials in acidic media [5]. Organic compounds containing nitrogen, sulphur, and oxygen are usually
used as inhibitors against the corrosion of metals in acidic media [6-23].
It is generally accepted that the primary step in the protecting action of an inhibitor in the acid
metal corrosion is adsorption of the organic molecule onto the metal surface, which is usually oxide-
free. The adsorption requires the existence of attractive forces between the metal surface (adsorbent)
and the organic molecule (adsorbate). According to the type of forces, adsorption can be physisorption,
chemisorptions or a combination of both [24,25]. Physisorption is weak undirected interaction and is
due to electrostatic attraction between inhibiting organic ions or dipoles and the electrically charged
surface of metal. A peculiarity of physisorption is that the ions or dipoles are non in direct physical
contact with the metal. A layer of water molecules separates the metal from the ions or dipoles.
Physisorption involves rapid interaction between adsorbent and adsorbate but it is also easily removed
from surface with the temperature increase.
Chemisorption involves charge sharing or charge transfer from the adsorbate to adsorbent in
order to form a coordinate type of bond. The adsorbent is in contact with the metal surface. It may take
place in presence of heteroatoms (P, Se, S, N, O) with lone-pair electrons and/or electrons due to the
presence of multiple bonds or aromatic rings in the adsorbate. The organic inhibitors used generally
have reactive functional groups which can be the sites for the chemisorption process. Chemical
adsorption has a higher adsorption energy than physical adsorption and, hence, usually is irreversible.
It takes place more slowly than physisorption and the temperature dependence shows higher inhibition
efficiencies at higher temperatures [26-29]. Previous studies have shown that indole and some its
derivatives display good inhibiting effects on steel corrosion in acid solutions [30-33].
Hence, in the present study 1-allyl- 1H-indole-2,3-dione (Ind1), is selected. The choice of this
compound was based on the consideration that this compound contains many -electrons and hetero
atoms which induce greater adsorption of the inhibitor compared with other compounds organic.
By considering the remarks mentioned above, in the present work, the inhibition effect of Ind1
on the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution at 308-343K was studied using weight loss,
potentiodynamic polarisation curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) methods. The
adsorption isotherm of inhibitor on steel surface was determined. Both standard thermodynamic
parameters and kinetic parameters are calculated and discussed in detail. A probable inhibitive
mechanism is presented from the viewpoint of adsorption. The chemical structure of the studied indole
derivative is given in Fig 1.
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10340

CH2

Figure 1. The chemical structure of the studied indole compound.

2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

2.1. Materials

The steel used in this study is a carbon steel (Euronorm: C35E carbon steel and US
specification: SAE 1035) with a chemical composition (in wt%) of 0.370 % C, 0.230 % Si, 0.680 %
Mn, 0.016 % S, 0.077 % Cr, 0.011 % Ti, 0.059 % Ni, 0.009 % Co, 0.160 % Cu and the remainder iron
(Fe). The carbon steel samples were pre-treated prior to the experiments by grinding with emery paper
SiC (120, 600 and 1200); rinsed with distilled water, degreased in acetone in an ultrasonic bath
immersion for 5 min, washed again with bidistilled water and then dried at room temperature before
use. The acid solutions (1.0 M HCl) were prepared by dilution of an analytical reagent grade 37 % HCl
with double-distilled water. The concentration range of Ind1 employed was 10-6 M to 10-3 M.

2.2. Measurements
2.2.1. Weight loss measurements

The steel sheets of 1.6 1.6 0.07 cm dimensions were abraded with different grades of emery
papers, washed with distilled water, degreased with acetone, dried and kept in a desiccator. After
weighing accurately by a digital balance with high sensitivity the specimens were immersed in solution
containing 1.0 M HCl solution with and without various concentrations of the investigated inhibitor.
At the end of the tests, the specimens were taken out, washed carefully in ethanol under ultrasound
until the corrosion products on the surface of carbon steel specimens were removed thoroughly, and
then dried, weighed accurately. Duplicate experiments were performed in each case and the mean
value of the weight loss is reported. Weight loss allowed calculation of the mean corrosion rate in
mg cm-2 h-1.

2.2.2. Electrochemical measurements

The electrochemical measurements were carried out using Volta lab (Tacussel- Radiometer
PGZ 100) potentiostate and controlled by Tacussel corrosion analysis software model (Voltamaster 4)
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10341

at under static condition. The corrosion cell used had three electrodes. The reference electrode was a
saturated calomel electrode (SCE). A platinum electrode was used as auxiliary electrode of surface
area of
2
1 cm . The working electrode was carbon steel. All potentials given in this study were referred to this
reference electrode. The working electrode was immersed in test solution for 30 minutes to a establish
steady state open circuit potential (Eocp). After measuring the Eocp, the electrochemical measurements
were performed. All electrochemical tests have been performed in aerated solutions at 308 K. The
polarization curves were obtained in the potential range from -750 to -200 mV(SCE) with 1 mV s-1
scan rate. The EIS experiments were conducted in the frequency range with high limit of 100 kHz and
different low limit 0.1 Hz at open circuit potential, with 10 points per decade, at the rest potential, after
30 min of acid immersion, by applying 10 mV ac voltage peak-to-peak. Nyquist plots were made from
these experiments. The best semicircle can be fit through the data points in the Nyquist plot using a
non-linear least square fit so as to give the intersections with the x-axis.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Polarization curves

Fig. 2 shows Tafel polarization curves of carbon steel in hydrochloric acid in the absence and
presence of different concentrations of Ind1 at 308K. The associated corrosion parameters such as
Ecorr, cathodic Tafel slopes (c) and corrosion current density (Icorr) are listed in Table 1. In this case,
the inhibition efficiency is defined as follows:

I corr I corr(inh)
IEI(%) = 100 (1)
I corr

where Icorr and Icorr(inh) are the corrosion current densities for steel electrode in the uninhibited
and inhibited solutions, respectively.
It is clear that the addition of Ind1 causes a decrease in the corrosion rate, i.e. shifts the
cathodic and anodic curves to lower values of current densities. Namely, both cathodic and anodic
reactions of carbon steel electrode corrosion are inhibited by the inhibitor in acidic medium. This may
be ascribed to adsorption of inhibitor over the corroded surface of carbon steel [34]. It follows from the
date of Table 1 that the corrosion current, Icorr decreases, while IEI (%) enhances with increase in
inhibitor concentration. The decrease in the corrosion current density was observed for the Ind1,
corresponding to a maximum efficiency of 94.9% at 1 10-3 M.
Further inspection of Table 1 reveals that the presence of Ind1 does not remarkably shift the
Ecorr, therefore, the selected compound can be described as mixed-type inhibitor for carbon steel
corrosion in 1.0 M HCl, and the inhibition of the compound on carbon steel is caused by adsorption,
namely, the inhibition effect results from the reduction of the reaction area on the surface of the carbon
steel [35]. The value of c slight changed, indicates that the cathodic corrosion mechanism of steel does
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10342

not change. As it is shown in Fig. 2, cathodic currentpotential curves give rise to parallel Tafel lines,
which indicate that oxygen reduction reaction is activation controlled and that the addition of the Ind1
does not modify the mechanism of this process [36]. The results demonstrate that the oxygen reduction
is inhibited and that the inhibition efficiency increases with inhibitor concentration.

0.01
I (mA cm )
-2

1E-4 Blank
-3
10 M
-4
10 M
-5
1E-6 10 M
-6
10 M

1E-8
-0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2
E (mVSCE)

Figure 2. Polarisation curves of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl for various concentrations of Ind1.

Table 1. Polarization data of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl without and with addition of inhibitor at
308 K.

Inhibitor Conc -Ecorr -c Icorr EII

(M) (mV/SCE) (mV dec-1) (A cm-2) (%)
HCl 1 475.9 176.0 1077.8 -
10-3 402.5 220.3 55.1 94.9
Ind1 10-4 449.4 192.8 78.6 92.7
10-5 458.5 169.9 161.5 85.0
10-6 469.8 157.3 271.1 74.9

3.2. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

The impedance diagrams obtained after 0.5 h of exposure of the samples at 308K in inhibited
and uninhibited 1.0 M HCl containing various concentrations of Ind1 are shown in Fig. 3. All the
obtained plots show only one capacitive loop and the diameter of the semicircle increases with
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10343

increasing the inhibitor concentration suggesting that the formed inhibitive film was strengthened by
the addition of inhibitor [37]. The above Nyquist plots contain depressed semicircles with the center
under the real axis, such behavior characteristic for solid electrodes and often referred to as frequency
dispersion has been attributed to different physical phenomena such as roughness and inhomogeneities
of the solid surfaces [38], impurities, dislocations, grain boundaries [39], fractality [40], distribution of
the active sites, adsorption of inhibitors [41].

500 Blank
-3
10 M
-4
10 M
-5
400 10 M
-6
10 M
-Zim (Ohm cm )
2

300

200

100

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
2
Zr (Ohm cm )

Figure 3. Nyquist diagrams for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl containing different concentrations of Ind1
at 308 K.

Therefore, a constant phase element (CPE) instead of a capacitive element is used to get amore
accurate fit of experimental data set. The impedance function of a CPE is defined by the mathematical
expression given below [42]:

ZCPE = A-1 (i )-n (2)

where A is the CPE constant (in -1 Sn cm-2), is the sine wave modulation angular frequency
(in rad s-1), i2 = -1 is the imaginary number, and n is an empirical exponent
(0 n 1) which measures the deviation from the ideal capacitive bahaviour [43].
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10344

Figure 4. The electrochemical equivalent circuit used to fit the impedance measurements.

The impedance parameters such as the double layer capacitance (Cdl), the charge-transfer
resistance (Rct), the solution resistance (Rs), the constant phase element (A) and the exponent (n)
derived from Nyquist diagrams are given in Table 2. These parameters were calculated from the non-
linear least square fit of the equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 4, which has been previously used to
evaluate the inhibitor mechanism of organic inhibitor for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl [44].

Table 2. Impedance parameters for corrosion of steel in 1.0 M HCl in the absence and presence of
different concentrations of Ind1 at 308 K.

Conc Rs Rct A10-4 Cdl IERct

(M) ( cm2) ( cm2) n (sn -1cm-2) (F cm-2) (%)
Blank 1.67 29.66 0.91 0.14612 85.31 -----
10-3 3.13 624.5 0.82 0.34890 15.06 95.2
10-4 6.41 400.6 0.79 0.95070 39.88 92.6
10-5 2.08 201.8 0.79 1.45760 57.09 85.3
10-6 0.41 133.5 0.74 2.72170 84.91 77.8

Simulation of bode plot with above model shows excellent agreement with experimental data
(Fig. 5, representative example). It means that the suggested equivalent circuit model, presented in Fig.
4, could reasonably represent the charge-transfer and metal/solution interface features related to the
corrosion process of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution containing Ind1. In Table 2 the calculated C dl
derived from the CPE are also presented, by using the following equation [45]:

Cdl ( ARct1n )1/ n (3)

Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10345

103
10-3M.Z
-750 FitResult
2
(a)
10-3M.Z 10
FitResult

|Z|
101

-500
100
10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105
Frequency (Hz)
Z''

(b)

-250
-75

theta -50

0
0 250 500 750
-25
Z'
0
10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105
Frequency (Hz)

Figure 5. EIS Nyquist (a) and Bode (b) plots for carbon steel/1.0 M HCl + 10-3M Ind1 interface:
dotted lines experimental data; dashed line calculated.

Data in Table 2 shows that additional Ind1 inhibits the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl.
The inhibition efficiency increased by increasing the concentration of the studied inhibitor. The
inhibition efficiency is calculated using charge transfer resistance from equation [38]:

Rct ( inh ) Rct

IERct (%) 100 (4)
Rct ( inh )

where Rct and Rct(inh) are the charge transfer resistance values in absence and presence of
inhibitor for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl, respectively.
By increasing the inhibitor concentration the Rct values increase but Cdl values decrease. The
double layer between the charged metal surface and the solution is considered as an electrical
capacitor. The decrease in the Cdl value is due to the adsorption of the inhibitor on the steel surface,
which displace the water molecule and others ions originally adsorbed on the surface [46]. The
adsorption of the inhibitor on carbon steel surface can occur either directly on the basis of donor
acceptor interaction between the electrons (of the double bonds, pyrrolidine ring and benzene ring)
and the vacant d orbitals of steel surface atoms or interaction of them with already adsorbed chloride
ions as proposed [47]. The inhibition efficiencies calculated from ac impedance results show the same
trend as those obtained from polarization curves.
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10346

3.3. Gravimetric study

3.3.1. Effect of concentration inhibitor

The corrosion rate of carbon steel specimens after exposure to 1.0 M HCl solution with and
without the addition of various concentrations of inhibitor was calculated in mg cm-2 h-1 and the data
obtained are given in Table 3. The corrosion rate, WL (mg cm-2 h-1), IEWL of each concentration were
calculated using the following equations.

w1 w2
WL (5)
At

IEWL % 1 WL

100 (6)
WL

where w1 is the weight of the specimen before corrosion, w2 is the weight of the specimen after
corrosion (mg), A is the surface area of the specimen (cm2) and t is the final immersion time (h),
WL

and WL are the corrosion rates in absence and presence of inhibitor. The corrosion rate values (in
g m-2 h-1) decrease as the inhibitor concentrations increase, i.e. the corrosion inhibition enhances with
the inhibitor concentration. This result may be due to the fact that the adsorption amount and the
coverage of inhibitor on the carbon steel increase with the inhibitor concentration, which shields the
carbon steel surface efficiently from the medium [48]. Table 3 indicates that the IEWL% values
obtained from the weight loss measurements were slightly higher than those obtained based on other
techniques. This indicates that the adsorption of Ind1 is not strongly dependent on the potential, in
contrast to the results obtained through the polarization resistance. On the other hand, the high IEWL%
values found indicate a strong adsorption favored by the long duration of the experiments. Therefore,
the weight loss experiments confirmed the electrochemical results regarding the adsorption of this
compound on the carbon steel surface forming a protective film barrier.

Table 3. Corrosion parameters obtained from weight loss measurements for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl
containing various concentration of inhibitor at 308 K.

Inhibitor Conc WL IEWL

(M) (mg/cm2 h) (%)
Blank 1 1.070 ----- -----
110-3 0.030 97.2 0.972
510-4 0.045 95.8 0.958
Ind1 110-4 0.074 93.1 0.931
110-5 0.149 86.1 0.861
110-6 0.248 76.8 0.768
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10347

3.3.2. Effect of temperature

To evaluate the adsorption of Ind1 and activation parameters of the corrosion processes of steel
in acidic media, weight loss measurements are investigated in the absence and presence of inhibitor
and also in the range of temperature 308-343K (see Table 4). In the studied temperature range, the
corrosion rates were found to increase with the increase in the temperature for both inhibited and
uninhibited acid solutions while they decreased with the increase of inhibitor concentration for a given
temperature. The temperature dependence of the corrosion rate ( WL ) can be expressed by Arrhenius
equation:

Ea
WL A exp (6)
RT

where WL is the corrosion rate, Ea is the apparent activation energy, R is the molar gas
constant (8.314 J K-1 mol-1), T is the absolute temperature, and A is the frequency factor. The
fractional surface coverage can be easily determined from weight loss measurements by the ratio
IEWL% / 100 if one assumes that the values of IEWL% do no differ substantially from .

Table 4. Various corrosion parameters for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl in the absence and the presence
of optimum concentration of Ind1 at different temperatures after 1h.

Temp Inhibitor WL IEWL

(K) -2
(mg cm h ) -1
(%)
Blank 1.070 ----- -----
308 Ind1 0.030 97.2 0.972
Blank 1.490 ----- -----
313 Ind1 0.070 95.3 0.953
Blank 2.870 ----- -----
323 Ind1 0.238 91.7 0.917
Blank 5.210 ----- -----
333 Ind1 0.844 83.8 0.838
Blank 10.02 ----- -----
343 Ind1 2.796 72.1 0.721

The apparent activation energie (Ea) for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl with inhibitor and in the
absence of inhibitor was by using the linear regression between Ln ( WL ) and 1/T (Fig. 6), and also the
results listed in Table 5. The linear regression coefficients are close to one, indicating that the carbon
steel corrosion in HCl can be elucidated using the kinetic model.
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10348

Blank
2 Ind1

1
Ln (WL) (mg cm h )
-1

0
-2

-1

-2

-3

-4

2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3

-1
1000 / T (K )

Figure 6. Arrhenius plots of Ln (WL) vs. 1/T for steel in 1.0 M HCl in the absence and the presence of
Ind1 at optimum concentration.

Table 5. Activation parameters for the steel dissolution in 1.0 M HCl in the absence and the presence
of Ind1 at optimum concentration.

Inhibitor A Linear Ea H a Sa
(mg cm-2 h-1) regression (kJ/mol) (kJ/mol) (J/mol K)
coefficient (r)
Blank 3.0066109 0.99961 55.75 53.05 -72.49
Ind1 3.39341017 0.99955 112.19 109.49 81.66

The calculated values of the apparent activation corrosion energies in the absence and presence
of the inhibitor are 55.75 and 112.19 kJ mol-1, respectively. The higher activation energy value in the
presence of Ind1 supports the results obtained from the weight loss indicates the higher inhibition
efficiency of the inhibitor [49]. The increase in activation energy after the addition of the inhibitor to
the 1.0 M HCl solution indicates that physical adsorption (electrostatic) occurs in the first stage [50].
On the other hand, the adsorption phenomenon of an organic molecule is not considered only as a
physical or as chemical adsorption phenomenon. A wide spectrum of conditions, ranging from the
dominance of chemisorption or electrostatic effects arises from other adsorption experimental data
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10349

[51]. The higher Ea value in the inhibited solution can be correlated with the increased thickness of the
double layer, which enhances the activation energy of the corrosion process [50].
An alternative formulation of Arrhenius equation is [52]:

RT Sa H a
WL exp exp (7)
Nh R RT

where WL is the corrosion rate, h is the Plancks constant (6.626176 10-34 Js), N is the
Avogadros number (6.02252 1023 mol-1), R is the universal gas constant and T is the absolute
temperature, H a the enthalpy of activation, and Sa entropy of activation. Fig. 7 shows a plot of Ln
( WL /T) against 1/T. Straight lines were obtained with a slope is equal to ( H a /R) and intercept is
equal to (Ln (R/Nh + Sa /R))), from which the values of H a and Sa were calculated and listed in
Table 5. The positive signs of H a reflect the endothermic nature of the carbon steel dissolution
process [53]. As seen in Table 3, the values of H a were the same, and the values of Ea increased for
the corrosion of carbon steel in the presence of inhibitor, indicating that the energy barrier for the
corrosion reaction increased in the presence of inhibitor without changing the dissolution mechanism
[54,55].
The large negative value of Sa for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl implies that the activated
complex is the rate-determining step, rather than the dissociation step. In the presence of the inhibitor,
the value of Sa increases and is generally interpreted as an increase in disorder as the reactants are
converted to the activated complexes [56]. The positive values of Sa reflect the fact that the
adsorption process is accompanied by an increase in entropy, which is the driving force for the
adsorption of the inhibitor onto the steel surface.
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10350

-3
Blank
Ind1
-4
Ln (WL / T) (mg cm h K )
-1

-5
-1

-6
-2

-7

-8

-9

-10
2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3
-1
1000 / T (K )

Figure 7. Arrhenius plots of Ln (WL/T) vs. 1/T for steel in 1.0 M HCl in the absence and the presence
of Ind1 at optimum concentration.

3.3.3. Adsorption and thermodynamic considerations

The extent of corrosion inhibition depends on the surface conditions and the mode of
adsorption of the inhibitors [57]. Under the assumptions that the corrosion of the covered parts of the
surface is equal to zero and that corrosion takes place only on the uncovered parts of the surface (i.e.,
inhibitor efficiency is due mainly to the blocking effect of the adsorbed species), the degree of surface
coverage has been estimated from the weight loss techniques employed in this study as follows: =
IEWL% / 100 (assuming a direct relationship between surface coverage and inhibition efficiency) [57-
59].
The adsorption on the corroding surfaces never reaches the real equilibrium and tends to reach
an adsorption steady state. However, when the corrosion rate is sufficiently small, the adsorption
steady state has a tendency to become a quasi-equilibrium state. In this case, it is reasonable to
consider the quasi-equilibrium adsorption in thermodynamic way using the appropriate equilibrium
adsorption isotherms [60].
Basic information on the interaction between the inhibitor and the carbon steel surface can be
provided by the adsorption isotherm. In order to obtain the isotherm, the linear relation between the
values of and the inhibitor concentration (Cinh) must be found. Attempts were made to fit the values
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10351

to various isotherms including Langmuir, Hill de Boer, Parsons, Temkin, Flory-Huggins, Dahar-Flory-
Huggins and Bockris-Swinkel. By far the best fit is obtained with Langmuir isotherm. According to
this isotherm, is related to Cinh by:

Cinh 1
Cinh (8)
K ads
where Kads is the adsorption constant, Cinh is the concentration of the inhibitor and surface
coverage values () are obtained from the weight loss measurements for various concentrations.
Fig. 8 shows the relationship between Cinh / and Cinh for the indole derivative at 308K. The
correlation coefficient (R2) was used to choose the isotherm that best fit experimental data (Table 3).
The linear correlation coefficient (R2) is almost equal to one. The slope of the straight line for this
inhibitor was close to unity. Data illustrated in Fig. 8 indicated that the adsorption process obeyed
Langmuir adsorption isotherm. Longmuirs isotherm assumes that there is no interaction between the
adsorbed molecules, the energy of adsorption is independent on the surface coverage (), the solid
surface contains a fixed number of adsorption sites, and each site holds one adsorbed species.
Moreover, the essential characteristic of Langmuir isotherm can be expressed in terms of a
dimensionless separation factor, KL [61] which describe the type of isotherm and is defined by
1
KL (12)
1 K ads Cinh
If
KL > 1 unfavourable;
KL = 1 linear
0 < KL < 1 favourable;
KL = 0 irreversible;

Table 6. The values of dimensionless separation factor, KL, for Ind1 at various concentrations.

Cinh (M) KL
Ind1
-3
110 0.0028
510-4 0.0058
110-4 0.0273
110-5 0.2190
110-6 0.7371

Table 6 gives the estimated KL values for Ind1 at different concentrations. It was found that all
KL values are less than unity confirming that the adsorption process is favourable.
The equilibrium constant for adsorption process is related to the free energy of adsorption,

Gads , and is expressed by following equation:
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10352

1 Gads
K ads ( ) exp( ) (9)
55.5 RT

Where R is gas constant and T is absolute temperature of experiment and the constant value of
55.5 is the concentration of water in solution in mol L-1.
The thermodynamics parameters derived from Langmuir adsorption isotherm for the studied

compound, are given in Table 7. The negative value of Gads along with the high Kads indicate a
spontaneous adsorption process [62].

Table 7. Thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of Ind1 in 1.0 M HCl on the carbon steel at
308K.

Inhibitor Slope Kads (M-1) R2

Gads (kJ/mol)
Ind1 1.03 356591.41 0.99997 -43.02

Generally, the energy values of -20 kJ mol-1or less negative are associated with an electrostatic
interaction between charged molecules and charged metal surface, physisorption; those of -40 kJ mol-1
or more negative involve charge sharing or transfer from the inhibitor molecules to the metal surface to

form a coordinate covalent bond, chemisorption [63,64]. The value of Gads is equal to -43.02

kJ mol-1. The large value of Gads and its negative sign is usually characteristic of strong interaction

and a highly efficient adsorption [49]. The high value of Gads shows that in the presence of 1.0 M
HCl chemisorption of Ind1 may occur. The possible mechanisms for chemisorption can be attributed to
the donation of -electron in the aromatic rings, the presence of one nitrogen and two oxygen atoms in
inhibitor molecule as reactive centers is an electrostatic adsorption of the protonated indole compound
in acidic solution to adsorb on the metal surface.
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10353

0.0012

0.0009

0.0006
Cinh /

0.0003

0.0000

0.0000 0.0003 0.0006 0.0009

-1
Cinh (mol L )

Figure 8. Langmuir adsorption of Ind1 on the carbon steel surface in 1.0 HCl solution.

The value of the heat of adsorption were evaluated from the kinetic thermodynamic model [65]

1 A.C.exp Qads / RT (10)

where A is a constant, C is the inhibitor concentration, is the occupied and (1- ) is the vacant
site not occupied by inhibitor. In this equation a Qads is the heat of adsorption which is almost equal to
enthalpy of adsorption process ( H ads

). Plot of Ln [ /(1- )] against 1/T of Ind1 at 10-3 M is shown in
Fig. 9. The slope of the linear parts of the curves is equal to - H ads

/R from which the average heat of
adsorption H ads

was calculated. The value derived from Figure 9 is -63.57 kJ mol-1, the negative
value of H ads

reflect the exothermic behavior of inhibitor on the carbon steel surface. Entropy of

inhibitor adsorption ( Sads ) can be calculated using the following equation [66, 67]:

Gads

H ads

T Sads

(11)
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10354

From this equation the value of Sads is -66.72 J mol-1 K-1. The negative value of Sads might be
explained as: before the adsorption of inhibitor onto the steel surface, inhibitor molecules might freely
move in the bulk solution (the inhibitor molecules were chaotic), but with the progress in the
adsorption, inhibitor molecules were orderly adsorbed onto the steel surface, as a result, a decrease in

entropy [68]. Therefore negative value of Sads in the present investigation support the higher
adsorbability of organic compounds on the metal surface.

y = -21.337 + 7.65x

3
Ln ( / (1-))

2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2

-1
1000 / T (K )

Figure 9. Ln ( / (1- )) vs.1/T for adsorption of Ind1.

4. CONCLUSION

Ind1 acts as an excellent mixed type inhibitor for the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl
solution. Inhibition efficiency increases with increase in concentration of Ind1 but decreases with rise
temperature. The surface adsorption of the used inhibitor led to a reduction in the double layer
capacitance as well as an increase in the charge transfer resistance. The inhibition efficiencies obtained
from weight loss measurements are comparable with those obtained from polarization and
electrochemical impedance measurements. The adsorption of Ind1 follows Langmuir adsorption
isotherm. Inhibitive action is due to chemical adsorption of Ind1 on carbon steel surface and the
adsorption process is a spontaneous and exothermic process.
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10355

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Prof S. S. Al-Deyab and Prof B. Hammouti extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific
Research at king Saud University for funding the work through the research group project.

References

1. G. Trabanelli, Corrosion, 47 (1991) 410.

2. Mohammed A. Amin, Mohamed M. Ibrahim, Corros. Sci. 53 (2011) 873.
3. Ishtiaque Ahamad, Rajendra Prasad, M.A. Quraishi, Corros. Sci. 52 (2010) 303.
4. M.J. Bahrami, S.M.A. Hosseini, P. Pilvar, Corros. Sci. 52 (2010) 2793.
5. M.A. Hegazy, H.M. Ahmed, A.S. El-Tabei, Corros. Sci. 53 (2011) 671.
6. H. Zarrok, H. Oudda , A. Zarrouk , R. Salghi, B. Hammouti, M. Bouachrine , Der Pharm. Chem. 3
(2011) 576.
7. H. Zarrok, R. Salghi, A. Zarrouk, B. Hammouti, H. Oudda, Lh. Bazzi, L. Bammou, S. S. Al-
Deyab, Der Pharm. Chem. 4 (2012) 407.
8. H. Zarrok, S. S. Al-Deyab, A. Zarrouk, R. Salghi, B. Hammouti, H. Oudda, M. Bouachrine, F.
Bentiss, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 (2012) 4047.
9. D. Ben Hmamou, R. Salghi, A. Zarrouk, H. Zarrok, B. Hammouti, S. S. Al-Deyab, M. Bouachrine,
A. Chakir, M. Zougagh, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 (2012) 5716.
10. A.Zarrouk, B. Hammouti, S.S. Al-Deyab, R. Salghi, H. Zarrok, C. Jama, F. Bentiss, Int. J.
Electrochem. Sci. 7 (2012) 5997.
11. A.Zarrouk, H. Zarrok, R. Salghi, B. Hammouti, S.S. Al-Deyab, R. Touzani, M. Bouachrine, I.
Warad, T. B. Hadda, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 (2012) 6353.
12. A.Zarrouk, M. Messali, H. Zarrok, R. Salghi, A. Al-Sheikh Ali,B. Hammouti, S. S. Al-Deyab, F.
Bentiss, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 (2012) 6998.
13. H. Zarrok, A. Zarrouk, R. Salghi, Y. Ramli, B. Hammouti, S. S. Al-Deyab, E. M. Essassi, H.
Oudda, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 (2012) 8958.
14. D. Ben Hmamou, R. Salghi, A. Zarrouk, H. Zarrok, S. S. Al-Deyab, O. Benali, B. Hammouti, Int.
J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 (2012) 8988.
15. A.Zarrouk, M. Messali, M. R. Aouad, M. Assouag, H. Zarrok, R. Salghi, B. Hammouti, A.
Chetouani, J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 4 (2012) 3427.
16. D. Ben Hmamou, M. R. Aouad, R. Salghi, A. Zarrouk, M. Assouag, O. Benali, M. Messali, H.
Zarrok, B. Hammouti, J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 4 (2012) 3489.
17. H. Zarrok, H. Oudda, A. El Midaoui, A. Zarrouk, B. Hammouti, M. Ebn Touhami, A. Attayibat,S.
Radi, R. Touzani, Res. Chem. Intermed (2012) DOI 10.1007/s11164-012-0525-x
18. A.Zarrouk, B. Hammouti, H. Zarrok, R. Salghi, A. Dafali, Lh. Bazzi, L. Bammou, S. S. Al-Deyab,
Der Pharm. Chem. 4 (2012) 337
19. A.Zarrouk, A. Dafali, B. Hammouti, H. Zarrok, S. Boukhris, M. Zertoubi, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.
5 (2010) 46.
20. A.Zarrouk, T. Chelfi, A. Dafali, B. Hammouti, S.S. Al-Deyab, I. Warad, N. Benchat, M. Zertoubi,
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 5 (2010) 696.
21. A.Zarrouk, I. Warad, B. Hammouti, A. Dafali, S.S. Al-Deyab, N. Benchat, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.
5 (2010) 1516.
22. A.Zarrouk, B. Hammouti, R. Touzani, S.S. Al-Deyab, M. Zertoubi, A. Dafali, S. Elkadiri, Int. J.
Electrochem. Sci. 6 (2011) 4939.
23. A.Zarrouk, B. Hammouti, H. Zarrok, S.S. Al-Deyab, M. Messali, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 6 (2011)
6261.
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10356

24. I.L. Rozendeld, Corrosion Inhibitors, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1981.
25. S.K. Rangarajan, J. Electroanal. Chem. 82 (1977) 93.
26. G. Trabanelli, Corrosion Inhibitors, in: F. Mansfeld (Ed.), Corrosion Mechanism, Mercel Dekker,
New York, 1987, pp. 119.
27. S. Sankarapapavinasam, F. Pushpanaden, M.F. Ahmed, Corros. Sci. 32 (1991) 193.
28. F. Bentiss, M. Traisnel, M. Lagrenee, Corros. Sci. 42 (2000) 127.
29. A.Y. Musa, A.A.H. Kadhum, A.B. Mohamad, M.S. Takriff, A.R. Daud, S.K. Kamarudin, Corros.
Sci. 52 (2010) 526.
30. G. Moretti, G. Quartarone, A. Tassan, A. Zingales, Werkst. und Korr. 45 (1994) 64.
31. G. Moretti, G. Quartarone, A. Tassan, A. Zingales, Brit. Corros. J. 31 (1996) 49.
32. G. Quartarone, L. Bonaldo, C. Tortato, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 (2006) 8251.
33. M. Lebrini, F. Robert, H. Vezin, C. Roos, Corros. Sci. 52 (2010) 3367.
34. S. Xia, M. Qui, L. Yu, F. Lui, Corros. Sci. 50 (2008) 2021.
35. G.N. Mu, X.H. Li, Q. Qu, J. Zhou, Corros. Sci. 48 (2006) 445.
36. X. Li, S. Deng, H. Fu, T. Li, Electrochim. Acta 54 (2009) 89.
37. H. Amar, T. Braisaz, D. Villemin, B. Moreau, Mater. Chem. Phys. 110 (2008) 1.
38. D. Gopi, K.M. Govindaraju, L. Kavitha, J. Appl. Electrochem. 40 (2010) 1349.
39. K. Juttner, Electrochem. Acta 35 (1990) 1501.
40. F.B. Growcock, J.H. Jasinski, J. Electrochem. Soc. 136 (1989) 2310.
41. A.H. Mehaute, G. Grepy, Solid State Ionics 910 (1989) 17.
42. F. Bentiss, M. Traisnel, L. Gengembre, M. Lagrene, Appl. Surf. Sci. 152 (1999) 237.
43. R. Macdonald, D.R. Franceschetti, in: J.R. Macdonald (Ed.), Impedance Spectroscopy, Wiley, New
Youk, 1987, p. 96.
44. M. Larif, A. Elmidaoui, A. Zarrouk, H. Zarrok, R. Salghi, B. Hammouti, H. Oudda, F. Bentiss,
Res. Chem. Intermed, (2012) DOI 10.1007/s11164-012-0788-2.
45. L. Han, S.Z. Song, Corros. Sci. 50 (2008) 1551.
46. K.F. Khaled, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 (2006) 4120.
47. T. Murakawa, S. Nagaura, N. Hackerman, Corros. Sci. 7 (1967) 79.
48. T.P. Zhao, G.N. Mu, Corros. Sci. 41 (1999) 1937.
49. M. Abdallah, Corros. Sci. 44 (2002) 717.
50. R. Solmaz, G. Karda, M. Culha, B. Yazc, M. Erbil, Electrochim. Acta 53 (2008) 5941.
51. R. Solmaz, G. Karda, B. Yazc, M. Erbil, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 312 (2008)
7.
52. B. Hammouti, A. Zarrouk, S.S. Al-Deyab And I. Warad, Orient. J. Chem., 27 (2011) 23.
53. L. Bammou, R. Salghi, A. Zarrouk, H. Zarrok, S. S. Al-Deyab, B. Hammouti, M. Zougagh, M.
Errami, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 7 (2012) 8974.
54. S.S. Abd El-Rahim, S.A.M. Refaey, F. Taha, M.B. Saleh, R.A. Ahmed, J. Appl. Electrochem. 31
(2001) 429.
55. S.T. Arab, K.M. Emran, Int. J. Appl. Chem. 3 (2007) 69.
56. H. Zarrok, A. Zarrouk, B. Hammouti, R. Salghi, C. Jama, F. Bentiss, Corros. Sci. 64 (2012) 243.
57. M. Christov, A. Popova, Corros. Sci. 46 (2004) 1613.
58. B.B. Damaskin, O.A. Petrii, B. Batraktov, Adsorption of Organic Compounds on Electrodes,
Plenum Press, New York, 1971.
59. I. Langmuir, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 39 (1917) 1848.
60. R. Alberty, R. Silbey, Physical Chemistry, second ed., Wiley, New York, 1997. p. 845.
61. I.D. Mall, V.C. Srivastava, N.K. Agrwal, I.M. Mishra, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng.
Aspects 264 (2005) 17.
62. M. Scendo, Corros. Sci. 49 (2007) 373.
63. F.M. Donahue, K. Nobe, J. Electrochem. Soc. 112 (1965) 886.
64. E. Kamis, F. Bellucci, R.M. Latanision, E.S.H. El-Ashry, Corrosion 47 (1991) 677.
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 7, 2012 10357

65. G.K. Gomma, M.H. Wahdan, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 67 (1994) 16.
66. G. Avci, Colloid. Surf. A. 317 (2008) 730.
67. S.M.A. Hosseini, A. Azimi, Corros. Sci. 51 (2009) 728.
68. L. Tang, X. Li, L. Li, Q. Qu, G. Mu, G. Liu, Mater. Chem. Phys. 94 (2005) 353.

2012 by ESG (www.electrochemsci.org)