Pneumatic Conveying Design
Pneumatic Conveying Design
Pneumatic Conveying Design
Premium Content
Online Store
Free Software One of the most popular methods of moving solids in the chemical industry is pneumatic conveying.
Pneumatic conveying refers to themoving of solids suspended in or forced by a gas stream through
Newsletters
horizontal and/or vertical pipes. Pneumatic
Tech Q & A conveying can be used for particles ranging Sizing Systems & Software
from fine powders to pellets and bulk Measure particle, droplet & bubble size, shape and velocity.
Message Board 3 3 www.oxfordlasers.com
densities of 16 to 3200 kg/m (1 to 200 lb/ft )
Link Directories . Material Handling Systems
Find Material Handling Specialist Information & Resources
Physical Properties Dilute phase vs. Dense phase conveying Here!
www.MaterialHandlingGuide.com
Submit Article Process Vacuum Software
The specifying engineer typically has four
choice in specifying a pneumatic conveying A collection of software utilities for everyone working with
Other Resources
system. vacuum
Free Publications www.inventech.co.uk
The choice between dilute and dense phase operation is typically dependent on the solids properties. For
example, the lower velocity bulk phase operation is popular ofr highly abrasive products or for those that
degrade easily. For example, this method is popular in transporting kaolin clay.
Cyclonaire
Pneumatic Conveying
Systems Engineering &
Manufacturing
www.cyclonaire.com
Pneumatic Tube
Systems
Industry leading sales and
service. Zip Tube Systems
www.ziptubes.com
Ash Handling
Pneumatic Dense-Phase
Ash Handling Systems
from Macawber
www.macawberashhandling.com
Powder Handling
Systems
Innovative solutions to
sample, isolate, and
transfer powders
www.DDPSInc.com
Considering designing a pneumatic conveying system yourself? Probably not a good idea. There's as
much art involved as there is science and such a design should be left to professionals. Consider that even
different grades of the same material have been known to convey differently. Testing is a must (as you'll
see from the method below). Before you can even make any good judgements from the method presented
here, you need to know solid friction factor for your solids (which we'll discuss later) and the minimum
gas velocity required to move your particles. So, if you're involved in designing a system from the ground
up, seek assistance from reputatable people in the field of conveying. If you're already familiar with your
solids, the method below can be used to examine the pressure loss expected in your system. The method
presented here is very good and has been stood the test of real systems over time.
The design method presented here is based on the work of Dr. F.A. Zenz and Dr. D.F. Othmer as published
in their book "Fluidized and Fluid Particle Systems" published in 1960 (see References). This method was
presented by A. T. Agarwal of Pneumatic Conveying Consulting Services LLC in the January/February
2005 issue of Powder Handling and Processing. This method has been widely used and is generally
found to be within 10% of measured pressure losses.
Pressure losses experienced in pneumatic conveying systems are the result of the following forces:
Friction of the gas on the inside of the pipe, force required to move the solids through the pipe, forces
required to support the weight of the solid and the gases in vertical pipe runs, force required to accelerate
the solids, and friction between the solids and the inside of the pipe.
Friction losses as the result of the solids being in contact with the inside of the pipe are usually very small
and can be neglected when considering dilute phase transport.
* Please be aware that using air as a carrier gas should be investigated thoroughly. When some
powders are mixed with oxygen, they form an explosive mixture!
Nomenclature
Early is their work, Zenz and Othmer used the following equations to described the pressure losses in
horizontal and vertical pipes:
It was later concluded that the term (f p Vp/f Vg) should be replaced by the constant K (friction multiplier
for the solids conveyed) because the term was dependent upon the physical properties of the solids being
conveyed. The value for K must be back-calculated from actual pressure drop data from an existing system
or it must be determined experimentally in plant tests. This lead to the following equation for the pressure
drop for the solids in the system:
Thus, the equation used for the total system pressure loss is:
Base Equation
where:
DPacc Pressure loss due to acceleration of the solids from their "at rest" condition at the pick up
point.
DPg Frictional pressure loss of the gas
DPs Frictional pressure loss of the solids
DHg Elevation pressure loss of the gas
DHs Elevation pressure loss of the solids
DPmisc Pressure losses from miscellaneous equipment
The Base Equation is the basis for the following equations used in the pressure loss calculations. The
2
pressure loss is expressed in psi or lbs/in in the following equations.
(1)
(2)
(4)
(5)
(6)
= Estimated Misc. losses from the system
In order to determine the fanning friction factor, f, the Reynolds Number must first be calculated:
Then, the friction factor is calculated from the following equation derived from pages A-23 and A-24 of
Crane's Technical Paper No. 410:
Where e is the pipe roughness factor which can be estimated as 0.00015 for smooth pipes or 0.0005 for
shot-peened pipes.
For straight pipe runs (either horizontal or vertical) use the actual length of the pipe. For bends and other
devices, use the table below as a guide:
Solids Velocity
Solids also move at a velocity lower than the gas velocity due to drag forces. The difference between
these velocities is called the slip factor. For most course or hard solids, the slip factor is around 0.80.
For fine powders, the solids velocity can be closer to the gas velocity and a factor of 0.90 may be more
appropriate. Depending on the size of the particles, the slip factor can range from 0.70 to 0.95.
For a 90 radius bend, the solids velocity at the exit of the bend (Vp2) is around 0.80 times the solids
velocity at the inlet of the bend (Vp1). This factor can range from 0.60 to 0.90 depending of the properties
of the solids. For bends that are less than 90, the exit velocity may be expressed as:
After leaving a 90 bend, use a nominal value of 20 pipe diameters for the length of pipe needed for the
particles to accelerate back to their original velocity at the inlet of the bend.
2
In the above, m is the the solids mass flow in lb/s and A is the pipe cross sectional area in ft . Remember
that the gas density (and therefore velocity) will change throughout the system (we'll discuss this in more
detail later).
When calculating the gas velocity, reduce the gas mass flow rate by 5% for pressure systems to account
for gas leakage through a rotary valve if such a valve is used to feed the solids.
As the carrier gas moves through the system and losses or gains pressure (depending on whether the
system is a pressure or vacuum system), it's density will increases or decrease accordingly thereby
changing the velocity of the gas. The gas pressure loss equation is shown in Equation 2 above. The ideal
gas law may be employed to calculate the density of the gas throughout the system.
The method presented here can easily be set up in a spreadsheet to show the performance of your system.
It is recommend the divide the entire system into 5 to 10 ft sections for such a calculation. The exit
conditions of from section become the inlet conditions for the next and so on. Also, be sure to account for
any gas losses that are known and for any extra gas inlet points in the system. For pressure systems, start
from the end of the conveying line and return to the solids inlet point. For vacuum systems, start from the
solids inlet point and end at the blower inlet.
***Special Note: This article was requested by a visitor to this site. Do you have a request? Email me
below.
References:
Zenz and Othmer, "Fluidized and Fluid Particle Systems", Chapters 10 and 11, published by Reinhold
Publishing Corp, 1960
Agarwal, A.T., "Theory and Design of Dilute Phase Pneumatic Conveying Systems", Powder Handling &
Processing, Vol. 17, No. 1, January/February 2005
Kimbel, Kirk W., "Troublefree Pneumatic Conveying", Chemical Engineering Magazine, April 1998, page
78
First Name:
Last Name:
State:
Not USA/CAN
Position:
Choose Position
Signup Remove
Submit