Carnegie Mellon

Carnegie
Software Mellon
Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results
Software Engineering Institute

Process Maturity Profile

CMMI® For Development
SCAMPISM Class A Appraisal Results
2009 End-Year Update

March 2010
We could not produce this report
without the support of the organizations
and lead appraisers who reported their
appraisal results to the SEISM.

Our many thanks for their continuing

cooperation with our data collection
and analysis efforts.

CMMI Appraisal Program

The Software Engineering Institute is a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense and operated by Carnegie Mellon® University

® CMMI, Capability Maturity Model and Carnegie Mellon are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon University
SM SCAMPI and SEI are service marks of Carnegie Mellon University
© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 1
© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Outline

Introduction

Current Status

Community Trends

Organizational Trends

Summary And Terms used in this Briefing

How to Report your Appraisal Results to the SEI

This briefing is based solely on the appraisals reported to the SEI. It cannot be used as a source for an exact indicator of all
organizations in the world using CMMI models or appraisal methods nor can it be used for certification or verification purposes.

The SEI does not certify appraisal results or organizations. The SEI licenses SEI Partners, authorizes/certifies lead appraisers, team
leaders and high maturity lead appraisers to conduct appraisals. Neither the SEI nor any other organization is a “certifying authority”
of the results from a SCAMPI appraisal. Therefore requests to the SEI to provide information to be used for this purpose can not be
fulfilled. Information provided by the SEI, such as this briefing, is to demonstrate reported results of the use of CMMI products and
services only.

Organizations performing source selection or verification should consider performing an evaluation appraisal. For more information on
appraisal methods and for a directory of authorized lead appraisers who can perform them, visit:
http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm
© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 2
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Introduction: Purpose
Characterize the adoption of CMMI® - DEV®
Describe results from Standard CMMI Appraisal Method
for Process Improvement (SCAMPISM) v1.1/v1.2 Class A
appraisals using Capability Maturity Model® Integration
(CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS v1.1 or CMMI - DEV v1.2) *
Encourage continued reporting of results

* Organizations previously appraised against CMMI v1.0 and which have not reappraised against v1.1 or
v1.2 are not included in this report

Please visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm for additional information or

questions you may have about this briefing before contacting the SEI directly

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 3
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Introduction - 2: Briefing Contents

This briefing includes three primary sections:

1. Current Status
- Snapshot of the software community based on the most
recent appraisal, since 2002, of reporting organizations
2. Community Trends
- Global distribution of appraisals
- Growth in the number of appraisals performed
- Shifts in the maturity profile over time
3. Organizational Trends
- Analysis of Process Area (PA) satisfaction
- Time to move up in maturity based on change in maturity
level and time between appraisals

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 4
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Current Status

SCAMPI v1.1/v1.2 Class A appraisals conducted from the

SCAMPI V1.1 April 2002 release through December 2009
and reported to the SEI by January 2010

• 5,499 appraisals
• 4468 organizations
• 3,458 participating companies
• 826 reappraised organizations
• 30,227 projects
• 74.3% Non-USA organizations

Please refer to: Terms Used in this Report on page 27

Additional charts providing different views and break down of this information will be added to this briefing
as more appraisal data is reported to the SEI over time.
© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 5
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Process Maturity Profile

by All Reporting Organizations
3000

2800

2600
Number Of Organizations

53.9%
2400

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400 28.2%
1200

1000

800

600

400 6.8% 7.8%

200 0.9% 2.4%

0
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing
Managed

Based on most recent appraisal of 4468 organizations

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 6
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Process Maturity Profile (V1.2 Only)

by All Reporting Organizations
2200

2000

1800 63.0%
Number Of Organizations

1600

1400

1200

1000

800
25.2%

600

400

200 4.7% 5.2%

0.5% 1.3%
0
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing
Managed

Based on most recent appraisal of 2753 organizations

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 7
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Reporting Organization Categories

Commercial/In-house 76.8%

Contractor for
18.7%
Military/Government

Military/Government Agency 4.5%

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Number of Organizations

Based on 4468 organizations reporting an organization category

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 8
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Process Maturity Profile

by Reporting Organization Categories
100%

90%
% Of Organizations Within Category

Com m ercial/In-house = 3396

80% Contractor for Military/Government = 828

Military/Government Agency = 197

70%

60% 56.4%

48.9%
50%
43.1%

40%

31.2%
30% 26.8% 27.4%
23.4%

20%

9.4%
10% 8.1% 7.7%
5.4%
2.8% 3.6%
0.8% 1.4% 1.0% 1.0% 1.5%
0%
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing
Managed
Based on most recent appraisal of 4421 organizations reporting an organization category

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 9
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Organization Type
Based on Primary Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code

Transportation, Finance, Insurance and Real

Wholesale Trade
Communication, Electric, Gas Estate
0.1%
and Sanitary Services 5.5%
3.6%
Retail Trade Public Administration
0.3% (Including Defense)
3.2%

Fabricated Metal Products

0.2%

Primary Metal Industries

0.3%

Industrial Machinery And

Business Services
Equipment
35.0%
Services Manufacturing
0.7%
71.1% 16.3%
Electronic & Other Electric
Equipment
10.4%

Instruments And Related

Products
1.0%
Transportation Equipment
2.4%

Other Manufacturing
Health Services Industries
1.3% 1.2%
Engineering & Management
Services Other Services
24.2% 10.7%

Based on 3766 organizations reporting SIC code. For more information visit: http://www.osha.gov/oshstats/sicser.html

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 10
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Organization Size
Based on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised

1001 to 2000
2.6%
501 to 1000 2000+
5.2% 1.8%

25 or fewer
301 to 500 16.0%
6.4%

201 to 2000+
23.8%
1 to 100
201 to 300 58.2%
7.7%

101 to 200
18.0%
26 to 50
21.2%

76 to 100
8.3%
51 to 75
12.8%
Based on 4423 organizations reporting size data

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 11
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Maturity Profile by Organization Size

Based on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised

100%

90%
% of Organizations by Size

80%

70%

61.6%
60.8%

60.3%

55.5%

54.6%
60%
52.4%

51.5%

50.4%

48.8%
46.7%
50%

40.0%
39.2%

40%
31.7%

28.2%
27.7%

26.2%
30%

22.8%
22.3%
21.3%

18.3%

16.5%
20%

12.0%
11.8%
10.5%
9.4%

8.7%
8.5%
8.2%
7.6%
6.4%

6.3%

6.3%
6.0%

5.7%

5.1%
5.0%

4.9%

4.9%
4.7%

10%

3.8%
3.5%
3.3%
3.2%

2.6%
2.0%

1.8%

1.7%
1.5%

1.1%
1.0%

0.9%

0.9%
0.8%

0.7%

0.7%
0.5%
0.1%

1.3%
0%
25 or fewer 26 to 50 51 to 75 76 to 100 101 to 200 201 to 300 301 to 500 501 to 1000 1001 to 2000 2000+
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing

Based on 4423 organizations reporting size data

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 12
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

USA and Non-USA

Reporting Organization Categories

400
Commercial/In-
house 2996

617
Contractor for
Military/Government
211

USA: 100% = 1143

Non-USA: 100% = 3278

126
Military/Government
Agency 71

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

% of Organizations

Based on 1143 USA organizations and 3278 Non-USA organizations reporting an organization category

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 13
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Maturity Profile by All Reporting

USA Organizations
100%

90%

80%

70%
% of Organizations

60%

50%
474

40% 425

30%

20%
146
82
10%
15 8
0%
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing
Managed

Based on 1150 USA organizations

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 14
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Maturity Profile by All Reporting

Non-USA Organizations
100%

90%

80%

70%
% of Organizations

1933
60%

50%

40%

30% 836

20%

267
10% 157
100
25

0%
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing
Managed

Based on 3318 Non-USA organizations

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 15
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Section 2: Community Trends

Appraisals conducted through December 2009 and reported to

the SEI by January 2010

• 69 Countries reported appraisals

- most of the appraisals are from Asia and North America

• 4607 Appraisals posted on PARS

- expired appraisals are removed from PARS and replaced
with the newest reappraisal result

Please refer to: Terms Used in this Report on page 27

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 16
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Countries where Appraisals have been

Performed and Reported to the SEI

Argentina Australia Austria Bahrain Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Brazil

Bulgaria Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Czech Republic Denmark
Dominican Republic Egypt Finland France Germany Greece Guatemala Hong Kong
Hungary India Indonesia Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea, Republic Of
Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malaysia Mauritius Mexico Morocco Nepal
Netherlands New Zealand Norway Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland
Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Singapore Slovakia South Africa Spain
Sri Lanka Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Thailand Tunisia Turkey Ukraine
United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Viet Nam
* Red country name: New additions with this reporting since Sep.2009
© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 17
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Number of Appraisals Reported to the SEI

by Continent
3000

2800
2648
2600

2400

2200
Number of Appraisals

2000

1800 1727

1600

1400

1200

1000

800 709

600

400 313

200
63 39
0
Africa Asia Australia Europe North America South America

Based on 5499 appraisals

* North America includes Canada, the USA, and Mexico; South America includes Central America and the Caribbean ; Australia
includes New Zealand
© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 18
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Number of Appraisals and Maturity Levels

Reported to the SEI by Country
Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity
Number of Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Number of Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Country Appraisals Reported Reported Reported Reported Reported Country Appraisals Reported Reported Reported Reported Reported
Argentina 77 50 18 2 4 Malaysia 71 22 43 6
Australia 36 1 8 7 2 4 Mauritius 10 or fewer
Austria 10 or fewer Mexico 86 36 39 3 6
Bahrain 10 or fewer Morocco 10 or fewer
Bangladesh 10 or fewer Nepal 10 or fewer
Belarus 10 or fewer Netherlands 14 5 7 1
Belgium 10 or fewer New Zealand 10 or fewer
Brazil 144 1 71 57 1 11 Norway 10 or fewer
Bulgaria 10 or fewer Pakistan 28 1 21 4 1
Canada 59 1 16 24 5 4 Panama 10 or fewer
Chile 37 22 12 2 Peru 10 or fewer
China 1229 1 135 987 36 48 Philippines 23 2 11 8
Colombia 34 12 13 3 2 Poland 10 or fewer
Costa Rica 10 or fewer Portugal 14 5 7 1
Czech Republic 10 or fewer Romania 10 or fewer
Denmark 10 or fewer Russia 11 3 3 4
Dominican Republic 10 or fewer Saudi Arabia 10 or fewer
Egypt 43 1 22 12 2 3 Singapore 21 4 11 1 4
Finland 10 or fewer Slovakia 10 or fewer
France 168 4 98 53 1 2 South Africa 10 or fewer
Germany 76 9 37 15 1 1 Spain 180 1 108 54 3 4
Greece 10 or fewer Sri Lanka 14 2 12
Guatemala 10 or fewer Sweden 10 or fewer
Hong Kong 18 2 11 5 Switzerland 10 or fewer
Hungary 10 or fewer Taiwan 134 1 76 51 2 2
India 524 17 278 24 189 Thailand 38 12 24 1
Indonesia 10 or fewer Tunisia 10 or fewer
Ireland 11 2 4 Turkey 16 14 2
Israel 19 3 11 3 Ukraine 10 or fewer
Italy 43 19 20 United Arab Emirates10 or fewer
Japan 306 18 86 140 13 17 United Kingdom 113 3 50 35 1 4
Korea, Republic Of 165 1 55 75 15 8 United States 1582 30 564 610 23 141
Latvia 10 or fewer Uruguay 10 or fewer
Lithuania 10 or fewer Viet Nam 17 12 2 3

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 19
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Number of SCAMPI A Appraisals

Reported to SEI by Year
1600

1400 1352

TOTAL
1285
1200
Number of Appraisals

POSTED ON PARs
1029 1001
1000

842 945 939

800

600
692
600

437

400 425

186
200 230
52
85
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Based on 5499 appraisals

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 20
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Number of SCAMPI A Appraisals

Reported to SEI by Year
1600

1400 1006
338

First Appraisal
1200
Number of Appraisals

834
Reappraisal

1000 180 1014

241

598
800 109 849

760
733
437
600
96

504

400 43
186 394

200 52
23
163

1
51
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Based on 5499 appraisals

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 21
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Trends in the Community Maturity Profile

100%

90% Year Orgs

2002-2005 1112
80%
2006 1845
2007 2694
70%
2008 3454
% of Organizations

2009 4,468
60%

53.8%
48.2%
50%

41.5%
37.2%
40%

33.0%
32.9%

32.4%
32.0%

30.2%
30% 28.2%

18.3%
15.8%
20%

12.4%
9.8%
9.1%
9.1%
8.9%
7.8%

7.8%
6.8%

10%

4.5%
4.4%

3.4%
2.8%
2.4%
2.2%
1.5%
1.3%
1.1%
0.9%

0%
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing

Based on a cumulative view of the most recent appraisals of organizations up through the year indicated

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 22
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Section 3: Organizational Trends

Appraisals conducted through Dec 2009 and reported to the SEI
By Jan 2010

• 1437 Process Area (PA) profiles

- satisfaction of PAs by maturity level for organizations
appraised at levels 1 and 2

• 826 reappraised organizations

- accounting for 1,857 appraisals
- although some organizations conducted multiple
reappraisals, only the first and latest appraisals were used
in creating the charts on pages 25

Please refer to: Terms Used in this Report on page 27

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 23
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Maturity Level of
First and Latest Appraisal
100%

90%

80%

First
70%
% of Organizations

Latest

56.5%
60%

50%

40% 39.3%

31.7%
30%

22.4%
20%

11.4%
10.0%

9.2%
6.7%

5.1%
10%
4.2%

3.3%
0.2%

0%
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing
Managed
Based on 827 reappraised organizations using their first and latest appraisal

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 24
 Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Time to Move Up
55 Largest observed
value that is not
an outlier
50

40
Number of
months
to move to
next maturity
level
30 75th Percentile
26.5
24 24
20.5 20
20 18 18 19 19
Median

25th Percentile
10
5 4.5 4.5 Smallest observed
value that is not an
outlier
0
Time Period of Initial 2002 to 2005 2006 to Present All (2002 to Present)
Appraisal
Level 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 3 to 5 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 3 to 5 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 3 to 5

Orgs 12 116 25 59 6 159 24 28 18 275 49 87

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 25
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Summary
5499 appraisals have been reported to the SEI in 94 months

Outside the USA: China, Brazil, Mexico, Spain, Argentina,

France, and Malaysia reported appraisals are increasing at a
rapid rate

The appraised organization for service sector are more than

70 %

The percentage for the appraised organization unit size smaller

than 100 is increasing steadily

The percentage of Maturity level 3 organization is increasing

steadily

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 26
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Summary - 2

For organizations that began their CMMI-based SCAMPI effort in

2002 or later, the median time to move from:

• maturity level 1 to 2 is 4.5 months

• maturity level 2 to 3 is 19 months
• maturity level 3 to 4 is 24 months
• maturity level 3 to 5 is 19 months

Note:
Since the March 2009 report, the median time to move from maturity level 1
to 2 increased from 4 months to 4.5 months. the median time to move from
maturity level 2 to 3 increased from 18.5 months to 19 months. The median
time to move from maturity level 3 to 4 increased from 19 months to 24
months , the median time to move from maturity level 4 to 5 is replaced by
the information of the the median time to move from maturity level 3 to 5.
Also, for all maturity level, the 25th percentile and the 75th percentile time
frame needed to move up to next level are increasing significantly

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 27
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Terms Used in this Report

Company - Parent of the appraised entity

A company can be a commercial or non-commercial firm, for-profit
or not for-profit business, a research and development unit, a higher
education unit, a government agency, or branch of service, etc.

Organization - a.k.a. Appraised entity

The organization unit to which the appraisal results apply. An
appraised entity can be the entire company, a selected business
unit, units supporting a particular product line or service, etc.

Non-USA - Appraised entity whose geographic location is not within the United
States. The parent of the appraised entity may or may not be based
within the United States.

PARS - Published Appraisal Results webpage contains CMMI® appraisals

published at the request of the appraisal sponsor.
The link is: http://sas.sei.cmu.edu/pars/

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 28
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Report your Appraisal Results to the SEI

The briefing is only possible due to the cooperation of organizations

and individuals sending in their appraisal results to the SEI

In order to provide this information and service in the future,

it will depend on this continued cooperation

Please visit:

http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm

for forms, information, and instructions on how to report appraisals

to the SEI

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 29
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute CMMI®- DEV v1.1/v1.2 – SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Contact Information
Please visit:

http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm

and review the information provided before contacting:

SEI Customer Relations (412) 268-5800

SEI FAX number (412) 268-5758

Internet Address
[email protected]

Mailing Address
Customer Relations
Software Engineering Institute
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890

© 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University March 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 30