Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 89 views

    Ugiug

    Uploaded by

    Alex Ps
    The document discusses neutrality in therapy and proposes that neutrality be understood as a state of curiosity rather than non-involvement. It argues that all language and behavior are politically laden and there is no neutral position. Describing neutrality as curiosity allows for exploration of alternative views without attachment to any single position. Linear explanations can terminate dialogue while curiosity enhances exploration of different descriptions and perspectives.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ugiug

    Uploaded by

    Alex Ps
    89 views2 pages
    The document discusses neutrality in therapy and proposes that neutrality be understood as a state of curiosity rather than non-involvement. It argues that all language and behavior are politically laden and there is no neutral position. Describing neutrality as curiosity allows for exploration of alternative views without attachment to any single position. Linear explanations can terminate dialogue while curiosity enhances exploration of different descriptions and perspectives.

    Original Description:

    XD

    Original Title

    ugiug

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses neutrality in therapy and proposes that neutrality be understood as a state of curiosity rather than non-involvement. It argues that all language and behavior are politically laden and there is no neutral position. Describing neutrality as curiosity allows for exploration of alternative views without attachment to any single position. Linear explanations can terminate dialogue while curiosity enhances exploration of different descriptions and perspectives.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    89 views2 pages

    Ugiug

    Uploaded by

    Alex Ps
    The document discusses neutrality in therapy and proposes that neutrality be understood as a state of curiosity rather than non-involvement. It argues that all language and behavior are politically laden and there is no neutral position. Describing neutrality as curiosity allows for exploration of alternative views without attachment to any single position. Linear explanations can terminate dialogue while curiosity enhances exploration of different descriptions and perspectives.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Hypothesizing, Circularity, and Neutrality Revisited:

    An Invitation to Curiosity
    Numerous discussions over the years have convicingly pointed out that it is impossible to be
    neutral with regard to language. All behavior, including language, is politically laden. Any
    particular action helps to organize and constrain the possible patterns of social interaction (15).
    Stated differently, ones behavior is always in relation to the behavior of others-we act in
    relation.
    NEUTRALITY
    Accepting our inbility to act in neutral or nonpolitical ways, the term neutrality was originally
    used to express the idea of actively avolding the acceptance of any one position as more correct
    than another. In this way, neutrality has been used to help orient the therapist toward a systemic
    epistemology. The result, however, has been that for many therapists neutrality has been
    regarded as the cultivation of a position of non involvement, of not having strong opinions, and
    of not taking responsibility when necessary- the cultivation of the cold and aloof position of a
    relativist. In order to avoid the trap of oversimplifying the idea of neutrality, I propose that we
    describe neutrality as the creation of a state of curiosity in the mind of a therapist. Curiosity
    leads to exploration and invention of alternative views and moves, and different moves and
    views breed curiosity. In this recursive fashion, neutrality and curiosity contextualize one
    another in a commitment to evolving differences, with a concomitant nonattachment to any
    particular position.
    Using some of Maturanas central concepts can assist in this linguistic revisin of the meaning
    of neutrality. Teaching, training, and therapy are language-using contexts that crate and
    orchestrate descriptions (see 8). Sometimes our descriptions suggest a linear explanation that
    takes the form of cause and effect These linear descriptions have become the everyday way to
    look at the world. This is not necesarily problematic; we easily recognize that linear thinking
    can be useful in the appropriate situation.
    For example, each time we try to explain our behavior, we typically find causal descriptions the
    most satisfying: I was angry with you. Whether this statement is true or false is of Little
    concern to most of us in our daily interaction. The criterion we generally apply in these
    situations is one of utility. At a pragmatic level, we are usually more interested in how useful
    our explanations of behavior are than in their value as truth.
    Here, utility refers to the potential for an explanation to help our world (our interactions) make
    sense to us, perhaps to help us change or at leats to understand change or lack of change. The
    problema, however, is that we have historically blurred the distinction between utility and truth.
    What is useful is what a community comes to believe is true.
    As clinicians, we should accept linear explanations as long as we do not believe them, because
    this kind of cause and effect, descriptive orientation to the world does not help us to construct a
    frame of curiosity. Linear explanations, as Bateson (1) has demonstrated, have the effect of
    terminating dialogue and conversations. Why does the Apple fall? Because of gravity. The
    description of a falling apple is explained away, constricted withing the frame of causality.
    When we asume that we have an explanation, we often give up looking for other descriptions.
    Thus, we give up a stance of curiosity because we believe we have discovered a description
    that fits; description tends to help us avoid a neutral stance in that it does not enhance our
    curiosity.
    One conclusin to be drawn from this observation is that we should avoid descriptions
    altogether. This, of course, is impossible. In practice, descriptions and explanations are
    repetitively intertwined and confounded. For example, a family therapists efforts to explain the
    process

    You might also like