Salient features of the Revised Guidelines for Continuous Trial of Criminal Cases

By Jose Rene G. Dondoyano May 24th, 2017

1. It applies to all newly-filed criminal cases, including those governed by Special Laws and Rules1,
in the First and Second Level Courts, the Sandiganbayan and the Court of Tax Appeals. It also
applies to pending criminal cases with respect to the remainder of the proceedings. It shall
not apply to cases under the Rule on Summary Procedure.
2. Trial shall be held from Monday to Thursday at exactly 8:30 A.M. and 2:00 P.M 2. Hearing on
motions, arraignment and pre-trial, and promulgation of judgment of decisions are in the
morning of Fridays.3
3. Motions for inhibitions based on Rule 137 shall be resolved immediately or within two
calendar days from filing.
4. Prohibited motions shall be denied outright before the arraignment without need of
comment.
5. The following are the prohibited motions:
1. Motion judicial determination of probable cause.
2. Motion for preliminary investigation filed beyond the five (5) day period in
inquest proceedings4 or when preliminary investigation is required5 or allowed
in inquest proceedings and the accused failed to participate despite due notice.
3. Motion for reinvestigation of the prosecutor who recommends the filing of the
information once the information has been filed before the court (1) if the
motion is filed without prior leave (2) when preliminary investigation is
required and has been actually conducted, and the grounds relied upon in the
motion are not meritorious, such as issues of credibility, admissibility of
evidence, innocence of the accused, or lack of due process when the accused
was actually notified, among others.
4. Motion to quash information when the ground is not one of those stated in the
rules.6
5. Motion for bill of particulars that does not conform to the rules.7
6. Motion to suspend arraignment based on grounds not stated by the rules8.
7. Petition to suspend criminal action based on prejudicial question when no civil
case has been filed9.
6. Motion for postponement is prohibited, except if it is based on acts of God, force majeure or
physical inability of the witness to appear and testify. If the motion is granted based on said
 exceptions, the moving party shall be warned that the presentation of its evidence must still
be finished on the dates previously agreed upon. A motion for postponement shall at all times
be paid with the Office of the Clerk of Court. The Branch COC shall not accept the motion
unless accompanied by the original receipt.
7. If a party fails to qualify for PAO services, the IBP shall provide free legal assistance to the party.
The IBP shall submit the list of lawyers to the Executive Judge for possible appointment as
counsel de officio in such cases.
8. Where only the civil liability is being prosecuted, the head of the prosecution office may issue
a written authority to a private prosecutor who may prosecute in the absence of the public
prosecutor.10
9. Consolidation of cases may be done even before raffling provided a motion for consolidation
accompanies the filing before the Office of the Clerk of Court. If a new case is filed involving
an accused who has been subjected to further investigation by the office of the prosecutor
over an incident involving the same subject matter as that of the already raffled information,
the new case shall be assigned directly to the court where the earlier case is pending, provided,
there is a motion for consolidation from the office of the prosecutor that accompanies its filing
in court. The proceedings already had in the old case may be adopted.
10. Archiving of cases shall be done within the period prescribed under the guidelines11. A
criminal case shall be archived only if, after the issuance of the warrant of arrest, the accused
remains at large for six (6) months from the delivery of the warrant to the proper peace officer.
Such case may likewise be archived when proceedings therein are ordered suspended for an
indefinite period because: a.) the accused appears to be suffering from an unsound mental
condition, b.) a valid prejudicial question in a civil action is invoked during the pendency of the
criminal case, c.) an interlocutory order or incident in the criminal case is elevated to a higher
court which issued a TRO or writ of preliminary injunction, d.) when the accused has jumped
bail before arraignment and cannot be arrested by the bondsman.
11. Arraignment and Pre-trial shall be set within ten (10) calendar days from date of the courts
receipt of the case for a detained accused, and within thirty (30) calendar days from the date
the court acquires jurisdiction over a non-detained accused. The setting shall be incorporated
in the commitment order or in the approval of the bail in other cases. Notices shall be sent to
the accused, his/her counsel, private complainant or complaining law enforcement agent,
public prosecutor, and witnesses whose names appear in the information for purposes of plea-
bargaining, arraignment and pre-trial.
12. In multiple cases, the court, upon personal examination of the accused may allow a waiver of
the reading of the information upon the full understanding and express consent of the accused
and his/her counsel, which consent shall be expressly stated in both the minutes/certificate of
arraignment and the order of arraignment.
13. Plea bargaining except in drug cases shall immediately proceed, provided the private
offended part in private crimes, or the arresting officer in victimless crimes, is present to give
his/her consent with the conformity of the public prosecutor. Thereafter, judgment shall
immediately be rendered in the same proceedings.
14. If the accused pleads guilty to the crime charged in the information, judgment shall be
immediately rendered, except in those cases involving capital punishment.
15. If no plea bargaining or plea of guilty, the court shall immediately proceed with the
arraignment and the pre-trial. The schedule of the trial dates, for both the prosecution and
the accused, shall be continuous and within the periods provided in the Regular Rules/Special
Rules. The trial dates may be shortened depending on the number of witnesses to be
presented.From the time of the arraignment and pre-trial, it shall be set for trial within thirty
(30) days. Trial on the merits shall be conducted for a period of six (6) months only and
promulgation of judgment is set within ninety (90) days from submission of the case for
decision for regular rules.
For drug cases, trial shall be finished not later than sixty (60) days from filing of the information.
Decision shall be rendered within fifteen (15) days from submission of case for decision.
For environmental cases, from arraignment and pre-trial, it shall be set for hearing within thirty
(30) days. Trial on the merits shall be conducted for a period of three (3) months then filing of
memoranda is within thirty (30) days and the decision shall be rendered within sixty (60) days
from the last day to file memoranda. Disposition period shall be within ten (10) months from
date of arraignment.
For intellectual property right cases, from arraignment and pre-trial, it shall be set for hearing
within thirty (30) days. Trial on the merits shall be conducted for a period of sixty (60) days
then filing of memoranda is within thirty (30) days and the judgment shall be rendered within
ninety (90) days from submission of case for decision.
16. Pre-trial shall proceed even in the absence of parties provided, they were notified and the
counsel for the accused and the public prosecutor are present. The documentary evidence for
both parties shall be marked. The pre-trial order shall immediately be served upon the parties
and counsel on the same day after the termination of the pre-trial. Courts must strictly comply
with the rules.12
17. The following shall be referred to mediation:
a. B.P Blg 22.
b. SSS Law13.
c. Pag-Ibig Law.14
d. Theft under Art. 308, RPC.
 e. Estafa under Art. 315(1), RPC, except estafa under Art. 315 (2) and (3).
f. Other forms of swindling under Art. 316, RPC.
g. Swindling of a minor under Art. 317, RPC.
h. Other deceits under Art. 318, RPC.
i. Malicious Mischief under Art. 327, RPC.
j. Libel by means of writings or similar means under Art 355, RPC.
k. Threatening to publish and offer to present such publication for a compensation under
Art. 356, RPC.
l. Prohibited publication of acts referred to in course of official proceedings under Art.
357, RPC.
m. Grave Slander (Grave Oral Defamation)- of serious and insulting nature under Art. 358,
par. 1, RPC.
n. Simple Slander ( Oral Defamation)- not of a serious and insulting nature under Art. 358,
RPC.
o. Grave Slander by Deed- of a serious nature under Art. 359, par. 1, RPC.
p. Simple Slander by Deed- not of a serious nature under Art. 359, par. 2, RPC.
q. Incriminating innocent person under Art. 363, RPC.
r. Intriguing against honour under Art. 364, RPC.
s. Libel under R.A. 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012) where the liability may be
civil in nature.
t. Criminal negligence under Title 14, RPC, where the liability may be civil in nature, and
u. Intellectual property rights cases where the liability may be civil in nature.
18. The referral of the case for mediation shall be made only after the arraignment and the pre-
trial/preliminary conference. The mediation shall be terminated within a non-extendible period
of thirty (30) calendar days. Except those case mentioned above, criminal cases under the Rule
on Summary Procedure shall not be referred to mediation.
19. Petition for bail filed after the filing of the information shall be set for summary hearing after
arraignment and pre-trial. It shall be heard and resolved within a non-extendible period of thirty
(30) days from the date of the first hearing, except in drug cases which shall be heard and
resolved within twenty (20) calendar days. The accused need not present evidence to rebut the
prosecutions evidence. Motion for reconsideration on the resolution of petition for bail shall be
resolved within a non-extendible period of ten (10) calendar days from date of submission of the
motion.
20. For First Level Courts, in all criminal cases, including those covered by the Rule on Summary
Procedure , the testimonies of witnesses shall consist of the duly subscribed written statements
given to law enforcement officers or the affidavits or counter-affidavits submitted before the
investigating prosecutor and if such are not available, testimonies shall be in the form of judicial
affidavits. The trial prosecutor may opt to dispense with the sworn statements submitted to the
law enforcement officers and instead prepare judicial affidavits or modify or revise the said sworn
statements.
21. For Second Level Courts, Sandiganbayan and Court of Tax Appeals, where the demeanor of
the witnesses is not essential, like the forensic chemist, medico-legal officers, investigators,
auditors, accountants, engineers, custodians, expert witnesses and other similar witnesses, who
will testify on the authenticity, due execution and the contents of public documents and reports,
and in criminal cases that are transactional in character, such as falsification, malversation, estafa
or other crimes where the culpability or innocence of the accused can be established through
documents, the testimonies of the witnesses shall be the duly subscribed written statements
given to law enforcement officers or the affidavits or counter-affidavits submitted before the
investigating prosecutor, and if such are not available, testimonies shall be in the form of judicial
affidavits.
22. During the pre-trial/preliminary conference, the court shall require the parties to stipulate on
the testimonies of witnesses who have no personal knowledge of the material facts constituting
the crimes, such as, forensic chemists, medico-legal officers, investigators, auditors, accountants,
engineers, custodians, expert witnesses and other similar witnesses, who will testify on the
authenticity, due execution and the contents of public documents and reports; corroborative
witnesses; and those who will testify on the civil liability. This is without prejudice to additional
direct and cross examination questions.
23. The court shall encourage the accused and the prosecution to avail of Secs. 12 and 13 and 15,
Rule 119 of the Rules of Court15.
24. In the absence of the counsel de parte, the hearing shall proceed upon appointment by the
court of a counsel de officio.
25. The offer of evidence, the comment/objection thereto, and the court ruling thereto shall be
made orally in open court on the same day after the presentation of the last witness either for
the prosecution or for the defence. The court shall ensure that the offered evidence are
submitted to court on the same day it is offered.
26. The court shall inquire from the accused his/her desire to move for leave of court to file
demurrer to evidence or to proceed in presenting his/her evidence. If the accused orally moves
for leave of court to file a demurrer to evidence, the court shall orally resolve the same. If the
motion for leave is denied, the court shall issue an order for the accused to present and terminate
his/her evidence on the dates previously agreed upon, and to orally offer and rest his/her case
on the day his/her last witness is presented. If accused insists on filing the demurrer to evidence
without leave, the previously scheduled dates for the accused to present evidence shall be
cancelled. The demurrer shall be resolved by the court within a non-extendible period of thirty
(30) calendar days from the date of the filing of the comment or lapse of the ten (10)-day period
to comment.
If the motion for leave of court to file demurrer to evidence is granted, and the demurrer to
evidence is denied, the accused shall likewise present and terminate his/her evidence, one day
apart, morning and afternoon and shall orally offer and rest his/her case on the day his/her last
witness is presented.
27. The court shall strictly adhere to the rule that a witness has to be fully examined in one (1)
day.
28. The submission of memoranda is discretionary on the part of the court which in no case shall
exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length, single-spaced, on legal size paper, using size 14 font. Its
filing is non-extendible and shall not suspend the running of the period of promulgation of the
decision.
29. Judges who conducted the trial and heard the testimonies of witnesses shall submit the case
for decision even if the transcript of stenographic notes are incomplete or missing. If the case
was heard completely by another judge, not the judge tasked to write the decision, the latter
shall direct the stenographers concerned to submit the complete transcripts within the period of
thirty (30) calendar days from date of his/her assumption to office.
30. The judge shall announce in open court and include in the order submitting the case for
decision, the date of the promulgation of its decision which shall not be more than ninety (90)
calendar days from the date the case is submitted for decision, except when the case is covered
by special Rules and other laws which provide for a shorter period.
31. A motion for reconsideration of judgment of conviction or motion for new trial under Rule
121 filed within the reglementary period of fifteen (15) days from promulgation shall be resolved
within a non-extendible period of ten (10) calendar days from the submission of the comment of
the prosecution or even in the absence of comment.
32. The physical inventory of cases and preparation of the semestral report 16 shall not suspend
court hearings.
33. All courts covered by the Revised Guidelines shall accomplish and submit a periodic report of
data in a form to be generated and distributed by the Committee.
34. Non-compliance with the Revised Guidelines, including failure to observe the timelines and
deadlines herein provided, is a ground for disciplinary action.