FZG en
FZG en
FZG en
ISSN 0350-350X
GOMABN 47, 2,129-152
Struni rad/Professional paper
UDK 620.22.05 : 621.892.094 : 620.1.05
1. Introduction
For better efficiency in transmissions, lower viscosity grades of gear oils and less oil
volumes are used. With increasing power density and extended oil drain intervals
the demands on the lubricant as a design element increase accordingly. The
introduction of lubricant properties in load carrying capacity rating requires not only
knowledge of their physical properties as e.g. viscosity, viscosity-temperature- or
Figure 3: Scuffing results in disk and gear tests Figure 4: FZG back-to-back gear test rig
goriva i maziva, 47, 2 : 129-152, 2008. 143
Metode ispitivanja... B.-R. Hoehn, P. Oster, T. Tobie, K. Michaelis
in the torque measuring clutch as the twist of a calibrated torsion shaft. The rig can
be operated either with a two speed AC motor at 1500/3000 rpm or a variable speed
DC motor between n = 100 - 3000 rpm. The gears are normally dip lubricated with a
heater and a cooling coil in the test head for temperature control. With an additional
oil supply device also spray lubrication can be applied.
3. Test Methods
For the different gear failure Table 1: Main data of test gears
modes which can be
symbol unit A-type C-type
influenced by the lubricant
type, viscosity and additive centre distance a mm 91,5
system adequate test number of teeth pinion z1 - 16
methods were developed in gear z2 - 24
close co-operation with module m mm 4,5
industry. In some cases pressure angle 20
different modifications of the helix angle 0
test methods are available face width b mm 20 14
adjusted to the specific
profile shift factor pinion x1 - 0,8532 0,1817
application. In the following gear x2 - -0,5 0,1715
often used methods are pitch diameter pinion dw1 mm 73,2
described. gear dw2 mm 109,8
tip diameter pinion da1 mm 88,8 82,5
3.1 Scuffing Load gear da2 mm 112,5 118,4
Capacity Tests material MAT - 20MnCr5 16MnCr5
A widely used test method heat treatment - - case carburized
for the evaluation of the
scuffing properties of
industrial gear lubricants is
the FZG gear oil test A/8.3/90 according to DIN ISO 14635-1 [4], which is equivalent
to other standards as IP 334 [5], ASTM D-5182 [6], CEC L-07-A-95 [7] and identical
to ISO DIS 14635-1 [8].
A-type gears are loaded stepwise in 12 load stages between a Hertzian stress of pC
= 150 to 1800 N/mm. They are operated for 15 min at a pitch line velocity of 8.3 m/s
and a starting oil
temperature of 90 0C in typical typical scuffing load stage
each load stage, under lubricant type
ISO VG non mild EP
EP
conditions of dip lubrication EP oil
without cooling. In the visual
test the gear flanks are ATF 32-46 2-4 ATF 32-46
inspected after each load
stage for scuffing marks. turbine oil 32-68 3-5 turbine oil 32-68
Failure load stage is
indicated when the faces of industrial gear oil industrial 100-
100-320 5-7
gear oil 320
all pinion teeth show a
summed total width of
transmission 100-
damaged areas which is transmission oil 100-220 -
oil 220
equal or exceeds one tooth
width. In the gravimetric test
the gears are dismounted axle oil 150-
150-220 - axle oil
and weighed to determine 220
their weight loss. From the
Table 2: Typical results of the standard scuffing test
curve of the weight loss the specific wear parameter can be evaluated as well as the
scuffing load stage which is indicated by a steep increase of the wear curve.
Table 2 shows typical results of gear lubricants in this test. It is obvious that for
industrial applications with high scuffing demands of minimum API GL3 as e.g. in
street cars or wind turbines as well as in automotive applications as e.g. in manual
transmissions of commercial vehicles with API GL4 and in hypoid rear axles with
API GL5 requirements the standard test has not sufficient discriminating power.
For automotive gear oils of API GL4 level no accepted test method is available, for
API GL 5 oils the CRC or the FZG L-42 test [9] can be used. In systematic
investigations on the standard FZG gear test rig the scuffing risk of the standard
procedure was increased by varying speed and specific load, load application and
sense of rotation. A step test A10/16.6R/90 for lubricants up to the level of GL 4 and
a shock test S-A10/16.6R/90 for discrimination between GL4 and GL5 were
developed. A-type test gears with reduced pinion face width to b = 10 mm (A10) are
used at increased speed of 16.6 m/s (16.6) and reversed sense of rotation (R), at oil
temperature of 90 C (90). In the step test load is stepwise increased until scuffing
occurs. In the shock test (S) the gears are directly loaded in the expected load stage
and PASS or FAIL is stated. A detailed description of the test procedures can be
taken from the FVA Information Sheet [10].
S-A10/16.6R/90
800
700 14
13
600
12
500
11
400
10
300 9
8
200 7
6
100
4
0 2
C1 C2 C3 G1A G3 G4 G6 G7
GL3 GL4 GL4+ GL5
Figure 5: Scuffing results for different lubricants Figure 6: Comparison of scuffing test methods
their scuffing performance the results of these tests can also be recalculated to
critical scuffing temperatures and be introduced into the DIN [11] and ISO [12]
standards of scuffing load capacity rating. On the basis of the critical scuffing
temperature, different test methods can be compared as shown in Figure 6.
the standard FZG rig must be modified with a speed reducer between driving motor
and slave gear box.
Part 1: C/0.05/90/12 Part 1 runs two times 20 h with intermediate weighing of
pinion and gear. The pitch line velocity is v = 0.05 m/s, and the oil sump temperature
is maintained at oil = 90C. This condition gave the highest wear rat es for all tested
lubricants.
Part 2: C/0.05/120/12 Part 2 runs also two times 20 h with intermediate weighing
of pinion and gear. The oil sump temperature is increased to oil = 120C with the
other parameters kept constant, to check the additive reaction at elevated
temperature.
The two parts have always to be carried out for testing a lubricant. Part 3 can be
added for more detailed information in one operating condition.
Part 3: C/0.05/90/12 or C/0.05/120/12 or C/0.57/90/12 Part 3 runs 40 h without
intermediate weighing. C/0.05/90/12: Repeating the test conditions of part 1 can
show how mechanical and chemical changes on the flank surface are relevant under
changing operating conditions. C/0.05/120/12: Repeating the test conditions of part
2 can be appropriate when the operating conditions in practice are predominantly at
a higher temperature level and the results of part 2 are not yet sufficient or have not
yet arrived at a steady state level. C/0.57/90/12: Changing the pitch line velocity to v
= 0.57 m/s, corresponding to a pinion speed of n1 = 100rpm, can show the influence
of higher speed and thus higher film thickness and better lubricating conditions on
the wear behaviour. The oil temperature of oil = 90C was chosen, because in
most cases at the lower temperature higher wear rates were found.
terminated. A detailed description of the test method can be found in [17]. Figure 8
shows examples of lubricants with different micropitting capacity.
Because of the very long running time of the standard micropitting test an additional
micropitting short test GFKT-C/8,3/90 for screening purposes was developed [18].
The test is run at dip
lubrication conditions and in
a shortened step test
procedure.
The one hour run-in in load
stage 3 is followed by 16 h
each in load stages 7 and
9. The test result is the
evaluation of the
micropitting class. When
the failure criterion of 7,5
m profile deviation is
exceeded after load stage 7
the lubricant is rated with
micropitting capacity low, if
7,5m is exceeded after
load stage 9 the rating is
micropitting capacity
medium and if the profile
deviation after load stage 9
is below 7,5 m the rating is
micropitting capacity high.
A comparison between
results of the standard test
and the short test showed
good correlation (Figure 9).
Predictions of micropitting
results from viscosity
Figure 9: Results of short and standard micropitting test
parameters or additive
content are not possible.
The experimental results of the tests can be introduced into a micropitting capacity
rating method according to Schrade [19].
Gear type C with a specified low surface roughness of Ra = 0.3 0.1 m (PT-C) are
run at a pitch line velocity of v = 8.3 m/s in torque stage 9 for low viscosity gear oils
below VG 100 and in torque stage 10 for medium and high viscosity gear oils of VG
100 or higher (9:10). The gears are dip lubricated with a constant oil temperature of
oil = 90 C (90). A cooling coil with water supply has to be mounted on the top cover
of the test gear box.
A run-in of 2 h in torque stage 6 (pC = 1100 N/mm) is followed by the test run in the
respective torque stage until the failure criterion is reached. Failure criterion is
normally 4 % pitted area on one tooth flank of the pinion. The number of load cycles
until failure is reported and compared to the life of a reference oil. Because of the
rather large scatter of pitting life, at least 3 test runs with one lubricant are required
for a statistically meaningful result. For the pitting failure life a Weibull distribution is
assumed and the load cycles for 50% (L50) failure probability are reported [20]. This
value is compared with the L50 values of reference lubricants. Figure 10 shows
results of different gear lubricants in the standard single stage test PT-C/9/90.
The result of the standard pitting test is often strongly influenced by the occurrence
of micropitting. Therefore
a practice relevant pitting
test PTX-C/10/90 was
developed using
modified test gears PTX-
C with tip and root relief
as well as lengthwise
crowning at the wheel
together with
superfinished surfaces of
pinion and wheel to
suppress micropitting.
The application test PTX-
C/SNC/90 [21] extends
N: number of test runs for each lubricant the test method to two
different load levels
Figure 10: Pitting results in load stage 9 for different lubricants dependent of the result
of the single stage test in
load stage 10. If the
mean pitting life of three runs in load stage 10 is equal or less than 15 million pinion
cycles at least two more test runs are added in load stage 9. If the result in load
stage 10 is over 15 million cycles the test is followed by additional test runs in load
stage 11.
Figure 11 shows the result of a lubricant in the application test.
Test results from the pitting test can be introduced into the ISO calculation
procedure [22] by defining a new time strength branch of the SN-curve compared to
the standard SN-curve for the non-EP oil of
same viscosity. The approach is very
conservative because the endurance level is
kept constant. Improvements are therefore
only calculated for gear pairs with limited life.
4. Summary
The standard FZG back-to-back gear test rig
and required modifications for certain tests
are described. Standard and standardized
test methods for the evaluation of lubricant
influence on scuffing, wear, micropitting and
pitting failures of gears are described. Test
results of different gear oils from the market
place and their introduction in calculation
Figure 11: Result of the application test methods are shown.
References
1. Hhn, B.-R., Michaelis, K. and Doleschel, A. Limitations of Bench Testing for
Gear Lubricants, ASTM STP 1404: Bench Testing of Industrial Fluid Lubrication,
West Conshohocken, PA, 2001.
2. Wirtz, H. Schmierstoffe und anwendungsbezogene Schmierstoffprfung, Vortrag
Technische Akademie Wuppertal, 1980.
3. Hhn, B.-R., Oster, P. and Michaelis, K. Influence of Lubricant on Gear Failures -
Test Methods and Application to Gearboxes in Practice, Tribotest journal 11-1,
September (2004).
4. DIN ISO 14635-1 Zahnrder - FZG-Prfverfahren - Teil 1: FZG-Prfverfahren
A/8,3/90 zur Bestimmung der relativen Fresstragfhigkeit von Schmierlen.
5. IP 334 Determination of Load Carrying Capacity of Lubricants, FZG Gear
Machine Method.
6. ASTM D-5182 Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Scuffing (Scoring) Load
Capacity of Oils.
7. CEC L-07-A-95 FZG Gear Machine: Load Carrying Capacity Test for
Transmission Lubricants.
8. ISO 14635-1 Gears FZG test procedures - Part 1: FZG test method A/8,3/90 for
relative scuffing load-carrying capacity of oils.
9. Winter, H. and Michaelis, K. Scoring Load Capacity of EP-Oils in the FZG L-42
Test, Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, Toronto, Oct. 18-21, 1982, SAE Technical
Paper Series 821183, S. 1 - 7.
10. FVA Information Sheet No. 243 Scuffing Test EP-Oils, Method to Assess the
Scuffing Load Capacity of Lubricants with High EP Performance Using an FZG
Gear Test Rig, November 1995.
11. DIN 3990, Teil 4 Tragfhigkeitsberechnung von Stirnrdern: Berechnung der
Fretragfhigkeit.
12. ISO DTR 13989 Calculation of Scuffing Load Capacity of Cylindrical, Bevel and
Hypoid Gears.
13. ASTM Standard D 4998-89 Standard Test Method for Evaluating Wear
Characteristics of Tractor Hydraulic Fluids.
14. DGMK Information Sheet No. 377 Method to Assess the Wear Characteristics of
Lubricants in the FZG Gear Test Rig, Deutsche Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft
fr Erdl, Erdgas und Kohle e.V., 1996.
15. Plewe, H.-J. Untersuchungen ber den Abriebverschlei von geschmierten,
langsam laufenden Zahnrdern. Diss. TU Mnchen, 1980.
16. Winter, H. and Oster, P. Influence of the Lubricant on Pitting and Micro Pitting
(Grey Staining, Frosted Areas) Resistance of Case Carburized Gears - Test
Procedures, AGMA Technical Paper 87FTM10.
17. FVA Information Sheet No. 54/I-IV Test procedure for the investigation of the
micro-pitting capacity of gear lubricants, July 1993.
18. DGMK Information Sheet: Short Test Procedure for the micropitting load capacity
of gear lubricants. 2005.
19. Schrade, U. Einflu von Verzahnungsgeometrie und Betriebsbedingungen auf
die Graufleckentragfhigkeit von Zahnradgetrieben, Diss. TU Mnchen, 1999.
20. FVA Information Sheet No. 2/IV Influence of Lubricant on the Pitting Capacity of
Case Carburized Gears in Load-Spectra and Single-Stage-Investigations, July
1997.
21. FVA Information Sheet No. 371 Practice Relevant Pitting Test, October 2003.
22. ISO DIS 6336 Calculation of Load Capacity of Spur and Helical Gears.
Authors
Bernd-Robert Hoehn, Peter Oster, Thomas Tobie, Klaus Michaelis
[email protected]
Gear Research Centre FZG, Technische Universitt Mnchen, Germany
Received
19.9.2007.