Null Constituents PDF
Null Constituents PDF
Null Constituents PDF
An introduction to Syntax
Presented by: Innovative Group
Liaqat Ali Mohsin
Yasir Subhani
Tahir Nadeem
M. Shahbaz
Faisal Mehmood
2
Null Subject
1. Nonfinite Null Subject TP
T VP
would
V TP
like
PRN T
PRO/You/
V
T
stay
to
5
Null Subject
1. Imperative Null Subject (2nd person is conceived)
1. (You) dont lose your nerve
2. Dont lose your nerve
TP
PRN T
You/
T VP
dont
V DP
lose
D N
your nerve
6
Null Subject
1. Truncated Null Subject. (informal use of English)
1. I can find my pen
TP
2. Can find my pen
PRN T
I/
T VP
Can
V DP
find
D N
My pen
7
Null Subject
1. Finite Null Subject (some languages)
1. Found in Italian Language
speaker a: Maria e` tornata?
Maria is returned? (Has Maria returned?)
speaker b: S`, pro e` tornata
Yes, pro is returned (Yes, she has returned)
8
Null Auxiliary
1. Null Auxiliary in finite clauses
1. She could have helped him
TP
2. She have helped him
TP PRN T
She
PRN T T AUXP
She
Could/
T VP VP
Aux
has have
V DP V PRN
left helped him
D N
her home
10
TP
TP
PRN T
PRN T she
she
T VP
T VP
V NP
V NP enjoyed syntax
enjoys syntax
12
NULL T
1. She does enjoy syntax. She enjoys syntax
2. Second sentence has no auxiliary but it determines mood and
tense
TP
TP TP
PRN T
PRN T PRN T she
she she
T VP
T VP T VP do+Af3sPres/Af3sPres
does
V NP V NP V NP
enjoy syntax enjoys syntax enjoy syntax
13
AFFIX HOPPING
In PF components, many morphological operations apply
One of them is Affix Hopping
At PF, an unattached affix Af is lowered onto the head of the
complement of the constituent that contains Af.
He enjoys syntax and has learned a lot (coordination is only of
similar things)
TP TP TP
T VP T VP T VP
does Af3sPres
V NP V NP
V NP
enjoy syntax enjoys syntax
enjoy syntax
14
TP
NULL T IN T
SUBJUNCTIVE PRN
she VP
CLAUSES T
/Af
V CP
wanted
C TP
that
She wanted that he
(should)have a chance PRN T
he
T VP
Should/
V DP
have
D AP
a
A N
second chance
16
TP
NULL T IN
PRN T INFINITIVE
I
CLAUSES
T VP
can
V TP
let
I can let you (to) have
my password PRN T
you
T VP
to
V DP
have
D N
my password
18
NULL T IN TP
FINITE AND
INFINITE PRN
she
T
CLAUSES
T VP
Af3sPres/
V TP
want
NULL C IN
FINITE
CLAUSES
TP
PRN T
she
T VP
V CP
She said (that) said
PRN T
she
T V
was tired
21
NULL C IN
FINITE
CLAUSES
TP
PRN T
I
T VP
/Af
V TP
I wonder wonder
PRN CP
where where
(that)she has C TP
That/
gone PRN T
she
T V
has gone
22
CATEGORY
UNIFORMITY
PRINCIPLE
CP
All constituents of the same type
belong to the same category
C
All the clauses with the same TP
force belong to same category
PRN T
I
T VP
am
V
A
feeling
thirsty
23
FORCE
INTERPRETATION
CONDITION
The clause is interpreted as force it has
There can be declarative, interrogative, exclamative and
imperative force TP
TP T
T VP
VP PRN
PRN V I T
I TP V CP
T wonder /Af
CP
/Af know
PRN
C TP
where C TP
PRN T
PRN T you
you
T VP
T VP are
are
V
V N
N hiding
hiding nuts
nuts
24
NULL C IN
INFINITE
CLAUSES
TP
(for) him to T VP
/Af
visit a doctor V CP
wanted
C TP
for/
PRN T
him
T VP
to
This example indicates Null C (for)
DP
I want (for)[Mary to come to Japan] V
visit
and [for her to see my parents] D N
a doctor
26
TP
A transitive head assigns
accusative case to noun or
PRN T
pronoun which is C I
commanded
T VP
Nominative case if C would
commanded by intransitive V CP
finite C (that, if) or Null C prefer
Null case if C commanded C TP
by null intransitive infinite For/
C PRN T
him
I would prefer for/ him to meet them (Null C & Trans V)
Every one knows that, If/ he is crazy (Null finite C) T VP
I will arrange for[PRO to see a specialist](C to
commanded by Null Intransitive infinite C) V PRN
meet them
28
EARLINESS
PRINCIPLE
TP
Operations apply as early
in a derivation as possible
PRN T
Derivation is the accusative I
case which is C T VP
commanded by transitive would
verb V CP
prefer
C TP
For/
PRN T
him
T VP
to
V PRN
meet them
29
DEFECTIVE
CLAUSES
TP
T
They believe him to be innocent PRN VP
There is no CP in this TP They
This complement clause cant be T
V
TP
coordinated with for him to believe
hurt you
PRN T
him
T
VP
to
V
be A
innocent
31
IMPENETRABILITY
CONDITION
[CP [C ] [TP You [Twerent] intended [CP [Cfor] [TP you [Tto] hurt anyone]]]]
32
BARE
NOMINALS AND
DP HYPOTHESIS
CP
The assumption that
all definite noun C TP
expressions are DPs
(including null DP T
determiners) is D N T VP
John
known as DP Af
Hypothesis V DP
admire