The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6
At a glance
Powered by AI
Yugoslavia attempted to develop an alternative model of socialism based on workers' self-management and non-alignment during the Cold War.

Yugoslav theorists developed a Marxist critique of the Soviet Union and sought to establish a system based on workers' councils having democratic control.

Initially, Yugoslavia received aid from the Soviet Union but tensions emerged as the Soviets behaved like an imperial power in Eastern Europe. Yugoslavia eventually broke from the Soviet bloc in 1948.

7/18/2017 The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism

07.17.2017

The Life and Death of


Yugoslav Socialism
JAMES ROBERTSON

Yugoslavias self-managed socialism appeared to be a real alternative to the Soviet


model. Why did it collapse so suddenly?

D
uringtheColdWar,theSocialistFederativeRepublicofYugoslaviarepresentedto
manyaviablealternativetotheSovietmodel.Groundedbyworkplaceself-
management,theYugoslavsystemseeminglygaveworkerstherighttoexercise
democraticcontrolontheshopoor.

ThedistinctYugoslavpathtosocialismfoundadmirersaroundtheworld.In
EasternEurope,thecombinationofmarketsocialismandself-managemento eredamodelforanti-Stalinist
reformers.InthecapitalistWest,democraticsocialistshopefullyviewedtheexperimentasamorehuman
socialism.AndacrossmuchoftheThirdWorld,YugoslaviaaleadingmemberoftheNon-Aligned
MovementdemonstratedtheviabilityofathirdwaybetweenthecapitalistUnitedStatesandthe
communistSovietUnion.

InthenaldecadeoftheColdWar,however,thecountrydescendedintocrisis.Theself-managementsystem
collapsed,leavingacrippling$20billionforeigndebtinitswake.Amideconomiccrisis,republicanpoliticians
inSerbiaandCroatiabrokepartyranksandlaunchednationalistcampaignsinhopesofsalvagingwhatthey
couldfromtheircrumblingefdoms.Aseriesofbrutal1990scivilwarstorethroughCroatia,Bosniaand
Herzegovina,andKosovo.

YugoslaviatransformedfromabeaconofprogressivehopetoasymbolofBalkanbackwardnessandancient
ethnichatreds.

ButYugoslaviasproblemsdidnotbeginattheendoftheColdWarthecountrysleadersinadvertently
createdtheconditionsforthemwhentheyorganizedthisalternativesocialism.Yugoslavself-managementwas
nottheviablesystemmanyhadhoped.

The Soviet Obstacle

Y ugoslavcommunistssetoutontheirindependentpathafterbreakingwiththeSovietUnionin
1948.Thissplitwasariskyproposition;thoughtheleadershipenjoyedwidedomesticsupport,
severingtieswiththeSovietsmeantlosingvitalmilitaryaidandforeigntrade.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/07/yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-management-serbia-balkans 1/6
7/18/2017 The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism

SeparatedfromtheSoviet-alignedbloc,JosipBrozTitoandhispartyneededtoradicallyrethinktheir
revolutionsgoalsandndnewwaysofsecuringthecountrysdefenseanddevelopment.Overthecourseof
19491950,leadingpartytheorists,includingEdvardKardelj,Milovanilas,andBorisKidri,laidthe
ideologicalfoundationsforYugoslavsocialism.

First,theydevelopedaMarxistcritiqueoftheSovietUnion.YugoslavshadlittletroubleidentifyingtheSoviet
systemsdefects;indeed,dissidentleftistvoicesinandoutsideRussiahadbeenwarningofproblemssincethe
1920s.

UnderStalin,theSovietUnionhadbecomeadespoticbureaucracy.Theworkerscouncils,whichLeninonce
identiedastheembryoofcommunistgovernance,hadbeenintegratedintoahighlycentralizedstatesta ed
byanarmyofpartyoperatives.Rapidindustrialization,forcedagriculturalcollectivization,andthepurgesof
193638killedmillions.

Then,innegotiationswithotherAlliedpowersduringWorldWarII,theSovietsbehavedlikeanimperial
power,carvingouttheirsphereofinuenceandimposingtheirhegemonyacrossEasternEurope.

TheYugoslavcommunistsnoticedthesewarningsigns,but,intheturbulentconditionsofwarand
reconstruction,theyturnedablindeye.Comingtopowerattheendofthewarwithalargeandmultinational
base,thecommunistsimaginedasocialistrevolutionthatwouldmodernizethecountryandsecureits
independence.ThisprojectrequiredlargeamountsofSovietaid.

ButtensionsbetweentheYugoslavsandtheirSovietsponsorsquicklyemerged.Alongwiththepartisansin
Albania,TitosgovernmentwastheonlycommunistmovementinEasternEuropetocometopoweronawave
ofpopularstruggle,ratherthanonthebacksofRedArmytanks.AlthoughloyaltotheSoviets,theYugoslavs
weredeterminedtoremainautonomousfromMoscow.

Thiswasmostclearintherealmofforeignpolicy,wherethenewYugoslavgovernmentpursuedamoreradical
linethantheSoviets.Overtheyears194647,asStalinsoughttoallayWesternfearsandpromotetheSoviet
Unionasaconstructivepartnerinpostwarreconstruction,TitoopenlychallengedtheAtlanticpowers
interferenceinEurope.AgainstStalinsorderstheYugoslavssuppliedaidtoGreekcommunistrebelsand
threatenedwarwithItalyoverthedisputedTriesteterritory.

TheseconictsquicklydrewStalinsireandinJune1948theCommunistInformationBureauexpelledthe
Yugoslavs.

The1948splitandthesubsequentthreatsagainstYugoslaviafromtheMoscow-alignedblocconrmed
manypeoplesfearsabouttheSovietUnion.Intheyearsthatfollowed,partytheoristsrevisedtheirviewof
socialismsmotherland.Forilas,theSovietUnionwasnotasocialiststatebutastatecapitalistsystem,in
whichabureaucraticcasteruthlesslyexploitedtheworkingandpeasantclasses.

Thissystem,heargued,borestrikingsimilaritiestotheKeynesian-inspiredmonopolycapitalismthen
developingintheWest.Furthermore,asYugoslaviacouldtestify,theSovietsimposedtheirhegemonyontheir
neighboringstatesasruthlesslyastheirideologicalopponents.

TheSovietUnion,jilasconcluded,hadbecomeoneofthechiefobstaclesontheroadtoaninternational
socialistrevolution.

An Independent Path

C riticizingtheSovietUnionsbureaucratic,state-capitalistsystemnotonlygavetheYugoslavsa
MarxistjusticationforsplittingwiththeRussians,butitalsoprovidedapointofdeparture
fortheiralternative.Toavoidbureaucratizingtheirrevolution,Yugoslavtheoristsdevelopeda
socialismthatcalledforthewitheringawayofthestateandthecreationofsocietyasafree
associationofproducers.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/07/yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-management-serbia-balkans 2/6
7/18/2017 The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism

Therststepwasdecentralization.InMay1949,theparty-statecededgreaterautonomytolocalcommunal
governments,whosepowerhadbeenerodedsince1945.SloveneleaderEdvardKardeljexplainedthatthese
reformspromotedthesenseof[themasses]greaterinclusionintheworkofthestatemachineryfromthe
lowestorganstothehighest.

Greaterworkerparticipationintheeconomicspheresoonaccompaniedthispoliticaldecentralization.InJune
1950,theNationalAssemblypassedlegislationintroducingtheself-managementsystem.Allenterpriseswould
nowhaveworkerscouncilsconsistingof15to120democraticallyelectedrepresentatives,restrictedtotwo
one-yearterms.

Thenewlawaimedatdemocratizingtheworkplace,givingworkersadirectvoiceinkeymanagementdecisions.
Atthisearlystage,theworkershadlimitedpower,andauthorityattheenterpriselevelstillbelongedtostate-
appointeddirectors.Butthecouncilspowersweresettoexpandintheyearstocome.

Twoyearslater,attheSixthPartyCongress,theYugoslavcommunistsseveredthepartyfromthestate,
openingupthegovernment.Now,partycadrewouldhavetocompeteforideologicalinuenceacrossthe
di erentorgansofself-management.

Thesereformsweredesignedtopreventtheriseofthecentralized,statebureaucracythatmanybelievedhad
pervertedtheSovietrevolution.Decentralizationthroughlocalself-government,grassrootsparticipation,
workerscouncils,andamoreopenpartyculturewouldserveasthebasisforYugoslaviasindependentpathto
socialism.

A Contradictory Formation

D espitee ortstoincreaseparticipationinpoliticalandeconomicdecisionmaking,however,
Yugoslaviaexperiencedmuchsocialconict.Inthewinterof195758,minersinSlovenia
struckoverdeclininglivingconditions.Thestrikeinauguratedanewageofdiscontent,which
climaxedinthemassstudentprotestsof1968.

Thedissentbegsthequestion:whatwentwrongwithself-management?Whatpromptedworkersandstudents
toprotesttheveryinstitutionsthroughwhichtheyweresupposedtogovern?

Despitethepartytheoristsidealizedrhetoric,recentscholarshipsuggeststhattheleadershipintroducedself-
managementnottoempowerworkers,buttomoree ectivelyrationalizeanddisciplinethem.Unlikethe
SovietUnion,whichusedadministrativecommandsandmassmobilizationstoreacheconomicgoals,Yugoslav
communistssoughtlesscoerciveinstrumentstoimplementtheirpolicies.

Theworkerscouncilswereintendedtotransfereconomiccontroltotheenterpriselevel.Workerswouldnow
beresponsibleforkeepingthebooks,increasingproductivity,enforcingwagerestraints,anddecidingwhomto
layo .Inexchange,theywouldearnmoremoney,withwagessupplementedbyprotsharing.

Thisredistributionmeantthatworkershadavestedinterestintheircompanyssuccess,butitalsodemanded
thattheyparticipateinacompetitivemarket,whereeciencyandproductivitywouldberewarded.Self-
managementthereforewentintandemwithmarketreformsthatpittedworkersagainstotherenterprisesboth
inthefederationandforeignmarkets.

Thissystemhadcontradictoryresults.Ontheonehand,self-managementopenedthecountryuptothewider
world.AstheWesteagertopropupanindependentYugoslaviaprovidedaidandinvestments,tradewith
foreignmarketsourished.

Thecountryseconomicintegrationintoworldmarketsfacilitatedtheculturalexchangesthatgavesocialist
Yugoslaviaitsdynamism,asevidencedinthephilosophyofthePraxisSchool,YugoslavNewWavecinema,
artistssuchasMarinaAbramoviandRaaTodosijevi,andLaibachsmusic.

Ontheotherhand,self-managementandmarketreformsunderminedthesystemseconomicpromises.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/07/yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-management-serbia-balkans 3/6
7/18/2017 The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism

Ironically,Yugoslavworkerscouncilstendedtoempowermanagers,engineers,andwhite-collarworkersover
thelower-skilledworkingclass.Asthecouncilstookovercomplicatedaccounting,marketing,andmanagement
decisions,themoreeducatedandhigher-skilledworkersconsolidatedtheirauthority.

Combinedwiththepressuresofmarketcompetitionandacommitmenttowagedi erentialsinordertosecure
skilledlabor,self-managementactuallyincreasedinequality.GoranMusi,forinstance,notesthatwagesinthe
earlyyearsoftheplannedeconomymaintained...aratioof1:3.5....By1967,theyhadreachedadisparityof
upto1:20.

Further,anxiousnottoerodetheirpopularsupport,thecommunistleadersrejectedSoviet-style
industrializationandcollectivization.Instead,theypromotedgradualandstabilizedindustrialgrowththat
requiredthestatetorestricttheowofworkersintothefactoriesandtoconcentrateonbuildingtheexisting
laborforceseciency.

Thispreferenceforintensivegrowthproducedhighratesofunemployment.AccordingtoSusanWoodward,in
1952,theocialunemploymentrateinYugoslaviawasatleasttwopointsabovethe5percentthenconsidered
thenormalrateinWesternEurope.Thirtyyearslater,theratesurpassed15percent,rangingfrom1.5
percentinSloveniatomorethan30percentinKosovoandMacedonia.

Inequalityandunemploymentwerenotjustunfortunateside-e ects:self-managementsecacyactually
requiredthem,atleastintheshort-tomedium-term.

Core and Periphery

M oredangerously,theregionalvariationsininequalityandunemploymentreectedthe
countrysuneveneconomicdevelopment,whichgrewoutofthedi erenthistoricallegaciesof
thefederatednations.

PriortoWorldWarI,thenorthwestrepublicsofSloveniaandCroatiahadbelongedtotheAustro-Hungarian
Empireandhadbenetedfromthewidereconomicmodernizationtheempireexperiencedoverthenineteenth
century.Theserepublicsenteredthesocialistperiodwiththetoolstorapidlydeveloplightindustry.

Incontrast,thesouthernrepublicsBosniaandHerzegovina,Montenegro,Macedonia,andthesouthern
partsofSerbiahadeitherbeenpartofordependentontheOttomanEmpireandhadremainedlargely
agrarianandundeveloped.InYugoslaviassouth,socialismpromisedachancetocatchupthroughstate-led
industrialinvestment.

Thesedi erenthistoricallegaciesinfusedthepostwardebatesoverdevelopmentwiththenationalquestion,
makingeconomicdecisionsdeeplydivisive.Marketreforms,inparticular,sparkedcontroversy.

Inthesouthernrepublics,party-stateleadersfearedtheturntowardthemarketsystem.Theincipient
extractiveindustriesandheavymanufacturersinthesouthrequiredhighlevelsofstateinvestmentand,inthe
shortterm,greaterprotectionistmeasures.Theserepublicanleadersalsosupportedthefederaltaxsystem,
whichaimedtofundsouthernindustrialgrowthbyredistributingprotsfromthewealthiernorthwest.

Incontrast,leadersinthenorthwestwantedtoimplementanexport-ledgrowthmodel.Consequently,they
supportedgreatereconomicliberalizationandintegrationintoforeignmarkets.Theyalsoopposedthetaxplan,
arguinginsteadthatmoreprotableenterprisesshouldthrive,unhinderedbystateintervention.

Forthem,thesoutherndemandsforgreaterstatecontrolandcentralizedplanningsoundeddisturbinglylike
theSovietsystem.Whocouldguaranteethatsuchdemandswouldnotrecreatethebureaucraticmonoliththat
Yugoslavshadfoughtsohardtoescape?

Bytheearly1960s,themarketreformwing,withitsbaseinthenorthwest,hadwononseveralfronts.Self-
managementdeepened,andthecountryfurtherintegratedintoforeign,western-dominatedmarkets.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/07/yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-management-serbia-balkans 4/6
7/18/2017 The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism

Yugoslaviasdevelopmentpathexport-ledgrowthlargelynancedthroughwesternloanswouldprove
unstable.Inhisrecentbook,VladimirUnkovski-Koricahighlightsthelong-termweaknessesofthisstrategy:

Asexternalpressuresintensied,therepublicsclosedo againsteachothermoreandmore.Notonly
didtheythereforedevelopdi erentspecialisationswithdi erentmarketsintheColdWar,but
superpowercontestationalsomadetherepublicsaprimarysiteofthesuperpowerstrugglefor
supremacy....TheendoftheColdWarpresentedYugoslaviawithanexistentialchallengethatits
institutionaldesignprovedill-preparedtomeet,asitsdebteconomyfounditdiculttore-nance
withthethreatoftheUSSRgone.

By1989,whenAnteMarkovisreformgovernmentabolishedself-management,thecountrywasalreadyin
freefall.Cripplingforeigndebt,structuraladjustmentmeasuresenforcedbytheInternationalMonetaryFund,
andeconomiccollapseampliedthecentrifugalpullsofforeignmarkets.SlobodanMiloevisnationalist
movementinSerbiasparkedsimilarreactionarycampaignsinneighboringrepublics,breedingdistrustand
feedingseparatism.

Socialismsnalcollapseintheearly1990scamewithaseriesofdevastatingcivilwarsthatfracturedtheregion
alongethniclinesandallowedWesternmilitarypowerandcapitaltomoredeeplypenetratetheformer
federation.

Still,inrecentyearsthephenomenonofYugonostalgiahasemergedacrossthenow-independentstates,
especiallyamongyoungergenerations.Thelegacyofthecountrysindependentpathtosocialism,withits
emphasisonworkersself-management,playsakeyroleinthisretrospectivelonging.

Comparedtocivilwar,ethniccleansing,andforeignmilitaryintervention,itcomesaslittlesurprisethatpeople
lookbackfavorablyontheperiodofstability,growth,andpeaceoverwhichYugoslaviascommunistspresided.
Butthecatastrophiceventsofthe1990scannotbeseparatedfromthecontradictoryfoundationstheseleaders
built.

ThepresentcrisisoftheEuropeanUnion,whichhasbeenmostpronouncedintheBalkans,hasthrowninto
doubtthestrategiesofgrowththatmanyleadersofthepost-Yugoslavrepublicshavepursuedsincethe1990s.
Thiscrisisopensimportantopportunitiesforsocialiststoarticulateanalternativevision.Undoubtedlythe
Yugoslavexperience,withitspowerfulsymbolismofanti-imperialstruggleandopen,experimentalculture,will
informthisvision.ButthenegativelessonsoftheYugoslavpathtosocialismshouldalsobelearned.

Chiefamongtheselessonsistheroleoftheinternationaleconomicorderinlimitingthedurableandstable
growthofperipheraleconomies.Arguably,postwarYugoslavsocialistsmaneuveredasbesttheycouldwithin
theconditionssetbyaglobaleconomythatprioritizedtheinterestsofWesterncapitalisteconomies.Buttheir
compromisewiththisglobaleconomyexacerbatedthecontradictionsofYugoslavsociety.

Anygenuinestrugglefordevelopmentandself-determinationwillneedtoreckonwiththelimitationsofthe
individualnationstate.Largereconomicunitsbasedonregionalcooperationwillneedtobesought.Such
argumentsarenotuniquetotheLefttheyhavelongbeenusedintheregiontojustifytheliberalstrategyof
Europeanintegration.However,asthefateoftheSyrizagovernmentinGreecedemonstrates,theEuropean
Uniondoesnotshieldtheperipheryfromthepressuresofglobalmarkets;rather,itrestructuresthemona
Europeanplane.

DevelopmentoutsideoftheEuropeanprojectwillnecessatateaprogramofregionalcooperationandfriendship
betweenthepost-YugoslavnationsandacrosstheBalkansmorebroadly.This,inturn,willrequireanuanced
appreciationofthewaysinwhichthenationalquestionintersectswithproblemsofeconomicdevelopment.

Itwillcallforanewcommunitybroughtintobeingthroughcooperation,collaboration,andstruggleinsociety,
notthroughtop-downinitiativesbythestate.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/07/yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-management-serbia-balkans 5/6
7/18/2017 The Life and Death of Yugoslav Socialism

James Robertson is assistant professor of politics and history at Woodbury University and is a
member of the editorial board of LeftEast.

Catalyst, a new journal published by Jacobin is out now.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/07/yugoslav-socialism-tito-self-management-serbia-balkans 6/6

You might also like