0% found this document useful (0 votes)
143 views12 pages

Tactical Decision Making

The document appears to be a slide presentation on tactical decision making and relevant costs in management accounting. Some key points covered include: - Defining tactical decision making and distinguishing it from strategic decision making. Tactical decisions have a short-term view. - Identifying relevant vs. irrelevant costs for decision making. Relevant costs are those that can be avoided by choosing one alternative over another. - Examples of tactical decisions addressed include make vs. buy, keep vs. drop a product line, and accepting vs. rejecting a special order. - The presentation provides frameworks for analyzing these decisions using differential cost analysis to determine the optimal choice. Opportunity costs are also discussed. - Students are assigned
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
143 views12 pages

Tactical Decision Making

The document appears to be a slide presentation on tactical decision making and relevant costs in management accounting. Some key points covered include: - Defining tactical decision making and distinguishing it from strategic decision making. Tactical decisions have a short-term view. - Identifying relevant vs. irrelevant costs for decision making. Relevant costs are those that can be avoided by choosing one alternative over another. - Examples of tactical decisions addressed include make vs. buy, keep vs. drop a product line, and accepting vs. rejecting a special order. - The presentation provides frameworks for analyzing these decisions using differential cost analysis to determine the optimal choice. Opportunity costs are also discussed. - Students are assigned
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

http://www.thegreatcourses.

com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/imag
e/800x600/0f396e8a55728e79b48334e699243c07/5/9/5932---
base_image_4.1424267609.jpg

ATB Tactical Decision Making:


Relevant Cost
PEMBELAJARAN AKUNTANSI
MANAJEMEN

diringkas & dituturkan kembali oleh

- ALTAF -

http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/p
hoto/children-playing-with-a-giant-
metal-globe-royalty-free-
image/57533121
2
Materi
Pokok Bahasan Referensi
ke-
1 Tactical Decision Making: HM Ch 12
Relevant Costs GN Ch 13

http://hndassignments.co.uk/solution/unit-5-management-accounting-assignment

Tipe dan tahapan pengambilan


keputusan
Sumber daya; biaya relevan
Identifikasi relevant & irrelevant costs
Variasi keputusan manajerial:
keep or drop
make or buy
special order
3
Tipe dan Tahapan Pengambilan Keputusan
1
Decision making
Tactical decision making: Strategic decision making:
Decisions that have an immediate view or limited objective in mind Memilih alternatif yg
Short run memiliki keunggulan
Small-scale action to serve a larger purpose kompetitif dlm jk panjang
Isu etik: Jika keputusan bermanfaat dlm
jk pendek tetapi tdk mendukung tujuan
stratejik jk panjang, keputusan itu
(bisa jadi) dipertanyakan

Decision model:
a set procedures that, if
followed, will lead to a
decision 6 langkah
Alternatif

Tetap produksi shaft &


bushing secara internal,
butuh sewa gudang
$480,000 Beli shaft & bushing ke
eksternal $460,000

Differential cost $20,000; plus analisis kualitatif,


dianggap beda tdk signifikan, UB pilih produce
internally
4
Sumber Daya; Biaya Relevan
2
Flexible resources: SD dibeli dlm jumlah yang dibutuhkan,
misalnya electricity utk stove
Resources Committed resources: SD dibeli/diadakan terlebih dulu
sebelum digunakan
Short run: Salary
Multiple period: leasing, bangun gedung

http://www.clipartkid
.com/images/44/clipa
rtbest-com-2JDmK0-
clipart.jpeg Baskoro, tinggal
di apartemen

Biaya yg dapat dieliminasi sebagian atau


seluruhnya dg memilih satu alternatif: avoidable
costs relevant cost
Variasi keputusan taktikal: keep or drop, make or
buy, special order (accept or not), sell or process
further
5
Identifikasi
3 Relevant vs.
Irrelevant Costs
Cynthia Ababiela
Shopiah, siswi di
Boston, akan
mengunjungi
kawannya di NY hari
minggu: mengendarai
mobil (jarak 230
miles) OR naik kereta.
Bujet terbatas, shg ia pp
perhatikan betul
biaya:

Naik kereta lbh


hemat $33.86
($137.86-$104.000)

6
http://www.brandcrowd.com/gallery/brands/pictures/picture14824209658969.png
Rekonsiliasi Biaya
Relevan
PT Amel
mempertimbangkan
mesin baru dg biaya
sewa $3,000 per tahun...
perbandingan data
situasi saat ini vs. situasi
dg mesin baru

Rekonsiliasi semua biaya


(dlm konteks differential
costs and benefits)

Ringkasan analisis diferensial:


Untung bersih dari sewa mesin baru:
Penurunan biaya DL (5.000 unit pada $ 15.000
penghematan biaya $3 per unit)
Kenaikan biaya tetap (3.000)
Penghematan biaya tahunan $ 12.000

7
Decision: Keep OR
Drop? 4
Ket: sewa gedung $20,000 utk tiga lini
produk, dan asuransi terkait dg
persediaan pada tiap lini
Lini produk Housewares (loss), di-drop
atau dipertahankan?
Identifikasi biaya2 yg dapat
dihindari relevant dan irrelevant
Biaya apa saja yang dapat dihindari
jika lini produk di-drop?

Analisis
Diferensial

Jika di-drop , UB
rugi $5,000
retained
8
Data u/ membuat shifter 8.000 unit:
Vertical Intergration
Decision: Make OR Buy?

Mountain Goat Cycles (MGC) menghadapi


pilihan membuat atau membeli shifter
(persneling). Supplier menawarkan hg shifter
$19 per unit (x 8,000 u = $152,000)
Depresiasi menjadi sunk cost (irrelevant)
karena peralatan sdh dibeli, tapi jika
peralatan dijual, NS relevant

Analisis
Diferensial

Lebih hemat MAKE

9
Dampak Opportunity Cost pada Keputusan:
Make OR Buy?
Seringkali terjadi, space u/ membuat produk (dhi.
shifter) juga digunakan u/ membuat produk lain
opportunity cost (biaya yg ditanggung (pada
make) ketika memilih buy daripada make)
Seandaikan space tsb biasa digunakan untuk membuat
new cross-country menyumbang profit $60,000 per
tahun, analisis diferensial berubah menjadi sbb.:

Analisis
Diferensial

Lebih hemat
BUY

10
http://satlantaswonogiri.com/wp-
content/uploads/2016/03/sEPED
A-cANTIX2.jpg
Special Order Decision:
Accept OR Reject?
Special order: pesanan khusus yg bukan bagian dari kegiatan
normal pendapatan. Seandaikan, MGC terima oder dari Polri, 100
sepeda gunung (dg modif), @$558. Normal selling price $698.
Perhitungan unit cost $564:
Variable MOH $12 per unit, order tdk Biaya produksi
mengubah total fixed MOH. Biaya Direct materials $ 372
tambahan u/ modifikasi $34 per unit plus Direct labor 90
Manufacturing OH 102
$2,400 stensil (agar terlihat sepeda patroli)
Unit product cost $ 564

Analisis
Diferensial

Masi untung,
ORDER diambil

11
Latihan/Penugasan
Kinerja kelompok: Research Assignment relevant
cost for public sector decision making:
Ambil satu sampel kegiatan/program di sektor publik yang mengandung
pilihan keputusan, misalnya kurikulum 2013 (K-13), bantuan tunai,
pilkada, RDK atau konsinyering, memberi subsidi atau menaikkan harga,
mendidik sendiri atau merekrut pegawai dari luar
Deskripsikan secara singkat tujuan, latar belakang, dan hal2 terkait dg
kegiatan/program tsb
Identifikasi kegiatan dan (estimasi) biaya yang timbul, jika diperlukan,
asumsi dapat dibuat
Lakukan analisis diferensial, dan ambil keputusan (opsi mana yang harus
dipilih dan dilakukan), dengan menerapkan 6 langkah seperti pada teori.
Kinerja individu Latihan soal mandiri
12-1 Model for Making Tactical Decisions
12-3 Make-or-Buy Decision
12-6 Keep-or-Drop Decision
12-8 Special-Order Decision

http://www.mklj.si/media/k2/items/cache/03f2aa6b53fcd1a6ef587
12 1a7ba6c7c7a_XL.jpg

You might also like