Alzaga Vs Sandiganbayan
Alzaga Vs Sandiganbayan
Alzaga Vs Sandiganbayan
FACTS:
4 Informations for violation of RA 3019 were filed against petitioners Alzaga, et al (relative to alleged
irregularities which attended the purchase of 4 lots in Batangas by the AFP-RSBS or Armed Forces of the Phils
Retirement and Separation Benefits System). Alzaga was the Head of the Legal Department during the
purchase of one of the lots. Bello succeeded Alzaga, and it was during his tenure when the other 3 lots were
purchased. Both were Vice Presidents of AFP-RSBS. Satuito was Chief of Documentation and Asst VP.
Petitioners filed their respective Motions to Quash alleging that the Sandiganbayan has no jurisdiction
over them because the AFP-RSBS is a private entity created for the benefit of its members.
ISSUE: Is the AFP-RSBS a GOCC (falling under the jurisdiction of the SB)? YES
HELD:
The AFP-RSBS was established by virtue of PD 361 in December 1973 to guarantee continuous
financial support to the AFP military retirement system, as provided for in RA 340. It is similar to the GSIS and
SSS since it serves as the system that manages the retirement and pension funds of those in the military.
The AFP-RSBS is administered by the Chief of Staff of the AFP through a Board of Trustees and
Management Group, and funded from congressional appropriations and compulsory contributions from
members of the AFP
This Court has ruled that the character and operations of the AFP-RSBS are imbued with public
interest, thus the same is a government entity and its funds are in the nature of public funds. The AFP-RSBS is
a GOCC under RA 9182, otherwise known as the Special Purpose Vehicle Act of 2002. Since AFP-RSBS is a
GOCC, the SB has jurisdiction over the persons of the petitioners.