Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 24 views

    May 2013 1368714277 8ba15 26

    Uploaded by

    pramods_8
    This document compares wind forces on high-rise buildings as calculated by the Indian Standard IS 875-III (1987) code and the proposed draft code from 2011. Two buildings, 60m and 120m tall, were analyzed using both codes for varying wind speeds, terrain categories, and static vs. dynamic load cases. Results found that the draft code generally calculates higher wind forces, especially for rougher terrain categories and dynamic loading. The increased forces are due to changes in the K2 factors. The draft code is considered more accurate and direct to use compared to the current standard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    May 2013 1368714277 8ba15 26

    Uploaded by

    pramods_8
    24 views2 pages
    This document compares wind forces on high-rise buildings as calculated by the Indian Standard IS 875-III (1987) code and the proposed draft code from 2011. Two buildings, 60m and 120m tall, were analyzed using both codes for varying wind speeds, terrain categories, and static vs. dynamic load cases. Results found that the draft code generally calculates higher wind forces, especially for rougher terrain categories and dynamic loading. The increased forces are due to changes in the K2 factors. The draft code is considered more accurate and direct to use compared to the current standard.

    Original Description:

    may

    Original Title

    May_2013_1368714277_8ba15_26

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document compares wind forces on high-rise buildings as calculated by the Indian Standard IS 875-III (1987) code and the proposed draft code from 2011. Two buildings, 60m and 120m tall, were analyzed using both codes for varying wind speeds, terrain categories, and static vs. dynamic load cases. Results found that the draft code generally calculates higher wind forces, especially for rougher terrain categories and dynamic loading. The increased forces are due to changes in the K2 factors. The draft code is considered more accurate and direct to use compared to the current standard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    24 views2 pages

    May 2013 1368714277 8ba15 26

    Uploaded by

    pramods_8
    This document compares wind forces on high-rise buildings as calculated by the Indian Standard IS 875-III (1987) code and the proposed draft code from 2011. Two buildings, 60m and 120m tall, were analyzed using both codes for varying wind speeds, terrain categories, and static vs. dynamic load cases. Results found that the draft code generally calculates higher wind forces, especially for rougher terrain categories and dynamic loading. The increased forces are due to changes in the K2 factors. The draft code is considered more accurate and direct to use compared to the current standard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Volume : 2 | Issue : 5 | May 2013 ISSN No 2277 - 8160

    Research Paper Engineering


    A Comparative Study Of Wind Forces On High-Rise
    Buildings as Per Is 875-Iii (1987) and Proposed Draft Code
    (2011)

    Hemil M. Chauhan P.G. Student, G.E.C Dahod, Gujarat, India.


    Asst. Prof. Applied Mechanics Department, G.E.C Dahod, Gujarat,
    Manish M. Pomal
    India.
    Asst. Prof. Applied Mechanics Department, G.E.C Dahod, Gujarat,
    Gyayak N. Bhuta
    India.
    ABSTRACT The correct estimation of the wind forces acting on tall buildings is very essential for the safe design of structural
    elements. The influence of static & dynamic velocity fluctuations on the along wind loads for these structures are
    determined using Force coefficient method & Gust Factor Method respectively. In this Paper 60 m & 120 m buildings is
    analyzed using both the codes using ETABS Software v9.6 is done with variations in four Terrain Categories & Six basic wind speeds. Both codes
    are used for analysis and results (calculations of S.F, B.M & Displacements) obtained are compared and discussed.

    KEYWORDS: High rise buildings, Gust Factor Method, Along Wind Force, Comparison of codes.

    INTRODUCTION ic (Gust) pressures and shear forces. Analysis is done in ETABS Software
    Comparative study of the wind is done on a high rise buildings by using for correct and quick assessments of results.
    the Indian standard codes such as IS: 875 (Part 3) 1987 and IS Draft :
    875 (Part 3) 2011 and also using ETABS v9.6. Analytical Method given
    in the IS codes is usually acceptable for a building with regular shape
    and size mostly based on the geometric properties of the building and
    without incorporating the effects of the nearby buildings.

    Wind effects on static structures


    In the case of static structures the flow interacts only with the exter-
    nal shape of the structure. When the structure is very stiff, deflections
    under the wind loads will not be significant, and the structure is said
    to be Static. As the lowest mode frequencies are high, there is little
    energy in the spectrum of atmospheric turbulence available to excite
    resonance. The only design load parameter of importance is the maxi-
    mum load likely to be experienced in its lifetime. The parameters most
    relevant to the assessment of design loading are Influence functions,
    size parameters of the structure, load duration and assessment of load
    for design.

    Wind effects on dynamic structures


    In the case of dynamic structures, there is an additional interaction with
    the motion of the structure. When the structure is sufficiently flexible,
    the response to wind loads is significant to the design of the structure.
    The conventional approach to the analysis of dynamic response of
    lightly damped structures is by resolving the response into the natural
    modes of vibration, characterizing each normal mode as a set of model
    parameters: 1) Model shape, 2) Model mass, 3) Model stiffness and 4)
    Model damping. Using these parameters a frequency response func-
    tion can be defined that describes the dynamic characteristics of the
    structures.

    0.1 Analysis of building for variation


    Wind Zone : All six basic wind speeds.
    Terrain Category : I, II, III, and IV
    Class of Building : C
    Topography : Flat
    Wind speeds, design wind pressure, loads to the building are calculated
    using standard IS codal Provision.
    2. Building description
    Two multi storied RC buildings are considered for the study. Building
    1 has plan dimension 24m in length & 18m in breadth and height is
    considered 60m.Building 2 has plan dimension 30m in length & 24m
    in breadth and height is considered 120m.The along wind direction is
    considered along larger dimension of plan. Storey height is considered
    3m for both cases and 6m c/c bay is taken for both directions for both
    buildings.

    2.1 Static and Dynamic (Gust) pressures


    A computer programmed is prepared for finding the static and Dynam-
    GRA - GLOBAL RESEARCH ANALYSIS X 59
    Volume : 2 | Issue : 5 | May 2013 ISSN No 2277 - 8160

    gives respectively 18.73%, 17.67%, 16.08%, 15.51%, 15.58% &


    14.63% increase in base shear compared to IS Draft code.
    Comparison of 60 m building in TC 4 under dynamic analyses for
    wind speeds such as 33,39.44,47,50,55 m/s , the IS Draft code gives
    respectively 19.51%, 20.93%, 22.41%, 23.32%, 24.34% & 26.14%
    increase in base shear compared to IS Present code.
    Comparison of 120 m building in TC 2 under dynamic analyses for
    wind speeds such as 33,39.44,47,50,55 m/s , the IS Present code
    gives respectively 10.42%, 8.80%, 7.76%, 5.96%, 5.93% & 5.30%
    increase in base shear compared to IS Draft code.
    Comparison of 120 m building in TC 4 under dynamic analyses
    for wind speeds such as 33,39.44,47,50,55 m/s , the IS Draft code
    gives respectively 98.14%, 101.85%, 105.75%, 107.71%, 109.98%
    & 114.14% increase in base shear compared to IS Present code.
    Static analysis gives critical results of S.F & B.M in TC 4 for both
    buildings.
    The drastic increase in the force values is found because of the sig-
    nificant change in K2 factors calculated as per IS draft code-2011.
    3. Results and discussions The computation of along Wind Load as per the present code is
    Both buildings, in static analysis, give almost same values of shear cumbersome and difficult to program as it uses various charts.
    forces & bending moments for TC-1 & TC 2.But in TC 3 & TC 4, IS Further the present code makes use of mean hourly wind velocity,
    draft code gives higher values of S.F & B.M. which is not consistent with other International Codes. The IS draft
    Both buildings, in dynamic analysis, IS draft code gives less values code uses 3 second gust speed for computation of Gust factor (Dy-
    of shear forces & bending moments for TC-1 & TC 2.But in TC 3 & TC namic Response factor) and gives simple formulas to evaluate the
    4, IS draft code gives higher values of S.F & B.M. Gust factor and forces.
    In general, IS draft code-2011 is more accurate and more direct
    4. Conclusions than present code for estimating response parameters such as ac-
    Comparison of 60 m building in TC 2 under dynamic analyses for celeration and forces.
    wind speeds such as 33,39.44,47,50,55 m/s , the IS Present code

    REFERENCES Holmes J.D., Tamura Y. and Krishna P.(2009), Comparison of wind loads calculated by fifteen different codes and standards, for low , medium
    and high rise buildings, Proceeding of 11th | American Conference on Wind Engineering, San- Juan, Puerto Rico, June 22-26, 2009. | Suresh P.,
    Panduranga R., Rama J.S.,(2012) Influence of diagonal braces in RCC multi-storied frames under wind loads, International Journal of Civil and
    Structural Engineering, August 2012. | | B. Dean Kumar, B.L.P. Swami (2010) Wind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters, Indian Journal of Science and
    Technology, May 2010. | Swati D. Ambadkar, Vipul S.Bawner (2012) Behavior of multistoried building under the effect of wind load, International Journal of Applied Sciences and
    Engineering Research, 28 August 2012. | | | L.Halder and S.C.Dutta (2010) Wind effects on multistoried buildings: A critical review of Indian codal provisions with special references
    to American standards, Asian Journal of civil Engg. (Building and Housing) Vol.11 No.3-2010. | IS 875-PART 3(1987) Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for
    buildings and structures, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. | | IS 875-PART 3(2011) Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures,
    Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. | An explanatory handbook on Indian standard code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings & structures. | An
    explanatory handbook on proposed IS 875(part III) wind loads on buildings & structures. | | ETABS Videos and Manuals. |

    GRA - GLOBAL RESEARCH ANALYSIS X 60

    You might also like