The Mearth-North and Mearth-South Transit Surveys: Searching For Habitable Super-Earth Exoplanets Around Nearby M-Dwarfs
The Mearth-North and Mearth-South Transit Surveys: Searching For Habitable Super-Earth Exoplanets Around Nearby M-Dwarfs
The Mearth-North and Mearth-South Transit Surveys: Searching For Habitable Super-Earth Exoplanets Around Nearby M-Dwarfs
1. Introduction
It is now widely recognized that M-dwarfs are extremely advantageous targets to search for
transiting exoplanets, due to their small sizes, which greatly enhance transit depths, and
their low luminosities, which mean the habitable zones are at much shorter orbital periods
than for solar-type stars (e.g. Kasting et al. 1993; Charbonneau & Deming 2007; Kopparapu
768 MEarth
et al. 2013). For mid-to-late M-dwarfs, these factors are sufficient to allow mini-Neptune,
super-Earth and potentially even Earth-size planets to be detected from the ground, and
followed up to characterize the planetary atmospheres spectroscopically using present day
and near-future facilities such as HST, Spitzer, JWST, and ground-based large and extremely
large telescopes.
MEarth is a dedicated ground-based transit survey designed to take advantage of these
properties, operating from two sites: the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory on Mt Hop-
kins, Arizona, and Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, Chile. Each site has eight
0.4m robotic telescopes. MEarth-North has been fully operational since 2008 September,
and MEarth-South since 2014 January. MEarth has discovered one transiting planet so far,
the mini-Neptune GJ 1214b (Charbonneau et al. 2009), which orbits an M4.5 dwarf (Reid
et al. 1995) at 14.6pc (Anglada-Escude et al. 2013). This is the smallest exoplanet for which
atmospheric transmission spectra have been obtained (e.g. Kreidberg et al. 2014) by virtue
of its small (approximately 0.2 R ) and nearby host star.
2. Target stars
The MEarth survey strategy and MEarth-North target selection have been described in detail
by Nutzman & Charbonneau (2008). All of the targets for MEarth-North were drawn from
the Lepine-Shara Proper Motion catalog (LSPM; Lepine & Shara 2005), specifically a subset
of these stars with colors (and where available, astrometric, photometric or spectroscopic
distance estimates) consistent with being M-dwarfs within 33 pc from Lepine (2005).
The target list for MEarth-South is still expanding at the time of writing. The initial set
of targets were drawn from the sample of stars with measured astrometric parallaxes from the
Research Consortium on Nearby Stars (RECONS) parallax program1 , the Palomar/Michigan
State University (PMSU) spectroscopic survey (Reid et al. 1995; Hawley et al. 1996), and
the LSPM-South catalog (Lepine, private communication). For the LSPM-South, candidate
nearby M-dwarfs were selected using the color and reduced proper motion criteria from
Lepine & Gaidos 2011, except without the J magnitude limit (applying it would severely
limit the number of mid-to-late M-dwarfs selected). The 33 pc volume limit of the North
was duplicated in the Southern target selection.
Unlike most other surveys searching for planets around M-dwarfs, MEarth exclusively
targets mid-to-late types with estimated radii < 0.33 R (approximately M3 or later) because
these are by far the most advantageous targets to search for small planets near the habitable
zone. The distribution of estimated stellar radii and magnitudes for the MEarth targets is
compared with the Kepler M-dwarf sample in Figure .1. Light curves are also available for
a handful of earlier stars which lie in the same field of view as one of our targets, or due to
revisions in the stellar parameter estimates since the original target selection.
There are approximately 2000 targets meeting our selection criteria in the Northern
sample, and 1000 in the current Southern sample.
1
http://www.recons.org/publishedpi.2012.1016
J.M. Irwin et al. 769
Figure .1: Comparison of the properties of the MEarth target stars with the Kepler M-dwarfs
(parameters for the latter are from Dressing & Charbonneau 2013). Left: Distribution of
estimated stellar radii. Right: 2MASS K magnitudes.
3. Observational strategy
The MEarth targets are spread over the entire sky, meaning most of them have to be observed
individually. During normal survey operations, each telescope cycles around a set of target
stars, returning to each star at a cadence of 20 30 minutes. Exposure times are set
individually to achieve sensitivity to a desired planet size, taking multiple exposures per
visit where necessary.
Transits last 0.5 2 hours given the estimated parameters of our target stars, so only
a few data points would be gathered during each transit with this strategy. Instead, the
data are analyzed in real time, and followup observations taken immediately on any star
showing a candidate transit, while the event is still in progress (see Figure .2). This results
in a substantial improvement in sensitivity to long orbital periods, and maximizes use of
our telescope resources by allowing a lower cadence to be used to observe more targets
simultaneously. Our methods for transit detection are detailed in Berta et al. (2012).
Results from the Kepler mission indicate planets are extremely common around early-M
dwarfs (Dressing & Charbonneau 2013). Our results for mid-to-late M-dwarfs have been
shown to be consistent with the Kepler results by Berta et al. (2013), who also examined
methods to improve the survey yield by probing smaller planets at longer orbital periods.
These methods are undergoing trials at MEarth-North.
5. Stellar astrophysics
The MEarth data and real-time transit detection system are extremely sensitive to low-mass
eclipsing binaries (EBs), out to quite long orbital periods. So far, 6 new low-mass EBs have
been discovered: 4 in the Northern hemisphere (Irwin et al. 2009, 2010, 2011b, and one
770 MEarth
Figure .2: Example phase-folded light curve of a transiting planet candidate discovered using
our real-time detection method at MEarth-South. Points taken in response to the real-time
detection of the transit are shown in green and blue, and consist of two separate events on
different nights. These greatly amplified the significance of the detection and provided an
estimated orbital period of approximately 8 days.
further new system), and 2 in the Southern hemisphere (Dittmann et al., in preparation).
These systems help to constrain models of low-mass stars by providing valuable empirical
benchmarks at a wide range of orbital periods (0.77 41 days).
Rotation periods for 41 Northern stars with existing astrometric parallaxes, based on 2
years of MEarth photometry, were used to study rotational evolution in the fully convective
domain (Irwin et al. 2011a). Additional data taken since the preparation of this original
sample, the expansion to the Southern hemisphere, and recent improvements in the avail-
ability of astrometric parallax measurements allow this type of analysis to be extended to a
much larger sample of stars, which is in progress (Newton et al., in prep.).
A spectroscopic followup program has targeted many of the objects with measured
rotation periods, both in the optical to measure activity indicators (West et al., in prep.)
and the near-infrared to measure metallicities (Newton et al. 2014). These observations have
also been used to develop an empirical method based on equivalent widths of atomic lines in
the near-infrared to estimate fundamental stellar properties such as radii, calibrated using
observations of stars with interferometric angular diameter measurements (Newton et al., in
prep.).
Astrometric parallaxes were measured from MEarth data for 1507 Northern hemisphere
mid-to-late M-dwarfs (Dittmann et al. 2014), using the transit survey data where available,
and a dedicated observing program covering all other target stars at a cadence of approxi-
mately 10 days for 3 years. Many of these stars did not have previous astrometric parallax
measurements.
J.M. Irwin et al. 771
6. Data releases
Public releases of the MEarth target star light curves are made annually on September 1,
with data being released one year after being taken. At the time of writing, Data Release 3
is in the late stages of preparation, and combined with the existing Data Release 2 (released
2013 September 1) will include all light curves from the start of the Northern survey to 2013
July (the end of our 2012-2013 observing season), a total of 5 years of data. All release
materials are placed on a public web page2 .
These releases are intended to be accessible and as straightforward as possible to use.
Light curves and summary tables of target star properties are provided in ASCII format,
including tar files containing the entire release for those desiring to analyze large numbers
of objects. Details of the content and production of the light curves (including how the data
were processed) are included.
Acknowledgements. It is a pleasure to acknowledge the assistance of the staff at the Fred Lawrence
Whipple Observatory and Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in making MEarth a reality.
The MEarth Team gratefully acknowledges funding from the David and Lucile Packard Fellowship
for Science and Engineering (awarded to D.C.). This material is based upon work supported by the
National Science Foundation under grants AST-0807690, AST-1109468, and AST-1004488 (Alan
T. Waterman Award). This publication was made possible through the support of a grant from the
John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors
and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation.
References
Anglada-Escude, G., Rojas-Ayala, B., Boss, A. P., Weinberger, A. J., & Lloyd, J. P. 2013,
A&A, 551, A48
Berta, Z. K., Irwin, J., Charbonneau, D., Burke, C. J., & Falco, E. E. 2012, AJ, 144, 145
Berta, Z. K., Irwin, J., & Charbonneau, D. 2013, ApJ, 775, 91
Charbonneau, D., & Deming, D. 2007, arXiv:0706.1047
Charbonneau, D., Berta, Z. K., Irwin, J., et al. 2009, Nature , 462, 891
Dittmann, J. A., Irwin, J. M., Charbonneau, D., & Berta-Thompson, Z. K. 2014, ApJ, 784,
156
Dressing, C. D., & Charbonneau, D. 2013, ApJ, 767, 95
Hawley, S. L., Gizis, J. E., & Reid, I. N. 1996, AJ, 112, 2799
Irwin, J., Charbonneau, D., Berta, Z. K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1436
Irwin, J., Buchhave, L., Berta, Z. K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1353
2
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/MEarth/Data.html
772 MEarth
Irwin, J., Berta, Z. K., Burke, C. J., et al. 2011a, ApJ, 727, 56
Irwin, J. M., Quinn, S. N., Berta, Z. K., et al. 2011b, ApJ, 742, 123
Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P., & Reynolds, R. T. 1993, Icarus, 101, 108
Kopparapu, R. K., Ramirez, R., Kasting, J. F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 765, 131
Kreidberg, L., Bean, J. L., Desert, J.-M., et al. 2014, Nature , 505, 69
Lepine, S., & Shara, M. M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1483
Lepine, S. 2005, AJ, 130, 1680
Lepine, S., & Gaidos, E. 2011, AJ, 142, 138
Newton, E. R., Charbonneau, D., Irwin, J., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 20
Nutzman, P., & Charbonneau, D. 2008, PASP, 120, 317
Reid, I. N., Hawley, S. L., & Gizis, J. E. 1995, AJ, 110, 1838