Folklore of Old Testament

FOLK-LORE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT
MACMILLAN AND CO., Lil\fITED

LONDON BOMBAY CAl,CU'fTA MADR,\S
MELBOURNE
'fHE MAC1',1ILLAN COMPANY

NEW YOI~l( BOSTON CHICAGO
D.'\LLAS SAN FRANCISCO
TI-IE M.\.CMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, I_,Tn.

TORONTO
-
STUDIES IN COMPARATIVE RELIGION

LEGEND AND LAW
BY
S1R JAMES GEORGE FRAZER

HON. D.C. L., OXFORD; HON. I_J.. D., Gl,ASGO\V; HON. l,l'fT.D,, DURIIAl\1
FELLO\V OF 'fRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE
IN THREE VOI~UMES
VOL. I
MACMJI,J_,AN ANJ) CO., f,IMI'I'Ef)

ST. MAR'I'IN'S S'J'lll~J<:'I', J,C)NJ)C)N
1918
COPYRIGHT
S.<\NC1'AE TRINITATIS APUD CANT.<\BRIGIENSES
COLLEGIO VENERABILI
l\I.<\GNIS l\IAGNORUl\I INGENIORlTl\I INCUNAEULIS
SPLENDIDO Ll'f1'ER.<\RU1\1 DOC'fRIN:\RUl\IQUE J,Ul\IINI
TU'l'O VIR()RUl\I DocroI<UlVI .<\DVERSUS FORTUNAE TJl\IPEST.<\'l'ES
POR1'UI .<\C PERFUGIO
P:\R\"UI"Ul\l l'l<O TAN1'IS IN i\IE COI"LATIS EENEFICIIS i\TUNUSCUI,Ul\I
PIO GR.<\TOQUE :\Nll\10
l\IOR'l'AI"IS Il\ll\IOIZ'l~ALI OFF'ERO

PREFACE
MODERN researches into the early history of man, conducted
on different lines, have converged with almost irresistible
force on the conclusion, that all civilized races have at some
period or other emerged from a state of savagery resembling
more or less closely the state in which many backward races
have continued to the p1esent time ; and that, long after the

majority of men in a community have ceased to think and

act like savages, not a fe\v traces of the old ruder modes of
life and thought survive in the habits and institutions of the
people. Such survivals are included under the head of folk-
lore,' which, in the broadest sense of the word, may be
said to embrace the whole body of a people's traditionary
beliefs and customs, so far as these appear to be due to the
collective action of the multitude and cannot be traced to
the individual influence of great men. Despite the high
moral and religious development of the ancient Hebrews,
there is no reason to suppose that they formed an exception
to this general law. They, too; had probably passed through
a stage of barbarism and even of savagery; and this prob-
ability, based on the analogy of other races, is confirmed by
an examination of their literature, which contains many
references to beliefs and practices that can hardly be ex-
plained except on the supposition that they are rudimentary
survivals from a far lower level of culture. It is to tl1e
illustration and explanation of a few such relics of ruder
times, as they are preserved lil{e fossils in the Old Testa-
ment, that I .have addressed myself in the present work.

Vll

VIII FOLK-LORE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT
Elsewhere I have had occasion to notice other similar sur-

vivals of savagery in the Old Testament, such as the sacrifice
of the firstborn, the law of the uncleanness of women, and
the custom of the scapegoat; but as I am unwilling to
repeat what I have said on these topics, I content myself
with referring readers, who may be interested in them, to
my other writings.
The instrument for the detection of savagery under
civilization is the comparative method, which, applied to the
human mind ' enables us to trace man's intellectual and
'
moral evolution, just as, applied to the human body, it

enables us to trace his physical evolution from lower forms
of animal life. There is, in short, a Comparative Anatomy
of the mind as well as of the body, and it promises to be
no less fruitful of far-reaching consequences, not merely
speculative but practical, for the future of humanity. The
application of. the comparative method to the study of
Hebrew antiquities is not novel. In the seventeenth century
the method was successfully employed for this purpose in
France by the learned French pastor Samuel Bochart, and
in England by the learned divine John Spencer, Master of
Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, whose book on the
ritual laws of the ancient Hebrews is said to have laid the
foundations of the science of Comparative Religion. In our
own age, after a lapse of two centuries, the work initiated
by these eminent scholars and divines was resumed in Cam-
bridge by my revered master and friend William Robertson
Smith, and the progress which the study made during his
lifetime and since his too early death is due in large measure
'
to the powerful impulse it received from his extraordinary
genius and learning. It has been my ambition to tread in
the footsteps of these my illustrious predecessors in this
department of learning, and to carry on what I may be
allowed to call the Cambridge tradition of Comparative
-
Religion.
PREFACE
IX
It is a familiar truth that the full solution of any one

problem involves the solution of many more ; nay, that
nothing short of omniscience could suffice to answer all
the questions implicitly raised by the seemingly simplest
inquiry. Hence the investigation of a point of folk-lore,
especially in the present inchoate condition of the study,.
naturally opens up lines of inquiry which branch out in
many directions ; and in following them we are insensibly
drawn on into wider and wider fields of inquiry, until the
point from which we started has almost disappeared in the
distance, or, to speak more correctly, is seen in its proper
perspective as only one in a multitude of similar phenomena.
So it befell me when, many years ago, I undertook to inves-
tigate a point in the folk-lore of ancient Italy; so it has
befallen me no\v, when I have set myself to discuss certain
points in the folk-lore of the ancient Hebrews. The
examination of a particular legend, custom, or law has in
some cases gradually broadened out into a disquisition
and almost into a treatise, But I hope that, apart
from their immediate bearing on the traditions and usages
of Israel, these disquisitions may be accepted as contri-
butions to the study of folk-lore in general. That study
is still in its infancy, and our theories on the subjects with
which it deals must probably for a long time to come be
tentative and provisional, mere pigeon-holes in which tem-
porarily to sort the multitude of facts, not iron moulds in
which to cast them for ever. Under these circumstances a
candid inquirer in the realm of foll{-lore at the present time
will state his inferences with a degree of diffidence and
reserve corresponding to the difficulty and uncertai11ty of
the matter in hand. This I have always e11deavot1red to
do. If a11ywhere I have forgotten the caution which I
recommend to others, and have expressed myself with
an appearance of dogmatism which the evidence does
not warrant, I would request the reader to correct all such
x FOLK-LORE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT
particular statements by this general and sincere profession

of scepticism.
Throughout the present inquiry I have sought to take
account of the conclusions reached by the best modern
critics with regard to tl1e composition and dates of the
various books of the Old Testament; for I believe that
only in the light of these conclusions do many apparent
discrepancies in the sacred volume admit of a logical and
historical explanation. Quotations are generally made in
the words of the Revised English Version, and as I have
occasionally ventured to dissent from it and to prefer a dif-
ferent rendering or even, in a very few places, a different
reading, I wish to say that, having read the whole of the
Old Testament in Hebre\v attentively, \.Vith the English
Version constantly beside me, I am deeply impressed by the
wonderful felicity with which Translators and Revisers alike
have done their work, combining in an extraordinary degree
fidelity to the letter with justice to the spirit of the original.
In its union of sc1upulous accuracy with dignity and
beauty of language the .
English Revised
.
Version of the Old
Testament is, as a translation, doubtless unsurpassed and
probably unequalled in literature.
:rhe scope of my work has obliged me to dwell chiefly .
on the lower side of ancient Hebrew life 1evealed in the
Old Testament, on the traces of savagery and superstition
whjch are to be found in its pages. But to do so is not
to ignore, far less to disparage, that higher side of the
Hebrew genius which has manifested itself in a spiritual

religion and a pure morality, and of which the Old Testa-
ment is the imperishable monument. On the contrary,
the revelation of the baser elements which . underlay the
civilization of ancient Israel, as they underlie the civilization
of modern Europe, serves rather as a foil .to enhance by
contrast the glory of a people which, from such dark depths
of ignorance and cruelty, could rise to such bright heights
, , ...
.. .
', .
PREFACE
Xl
of wisdom and virtue, as sunbeams appear to shine with a

greater effulgence of beauty when they break through the
murky clouds of a winter evening than when they flood the
earth from tl1e serene splendour of a summer noon. The
annals of savagery and superstition unhappily compose a
large part of human literature ; but in what other volume
shall we find, side by side with that melancholy record,
psalmists who poured forth their sweet and solemn strains
of meditative piety in the solitude of the hills or in green
pastures and beside still waters ; prophets who lit up their
beatific visions of a blissful future with the glow of an im-
passioned imagination ; historians who bequeathed to distant
ages the scenes of a remote past embalmed for ever in the
amber of a pellucid style? These are the true glories of
the Old Testament and of Israel; these, we trust and
believe, \vill live to delight and i11spire mankind, when the
crudities recorded alike in sacred and profane literature shall
have been purged away in a nobler humanity of the future.
J. G. FRAZER.
I BRICK COURT, TE1\1PLE, LONDON,

26th May 1918.
vor,. i
PART I
THE EARLY AGES OF THE WORLD
CHAPTER I
THE CREATION OF MAN
!'AGE
Two different accounts of the creation of man in Genesis . 3
The Priestly and the Jehovistic narratives . . 4
The Jehovistic the more prirnitive . . . 5
Babylonian and Egyptian parallels . . . 5
Greek legend of the creation of man out of clay . . 6
Australia11 and Maori stories of the creation of man out of clay 8
Tahitian tradition : creation of woman out of n1an's rib . 9
Similar stcries of the creation of woman in Polynesia . IO
Similar l{aren and Tartar stories . . 10
Other stories of the c1eatic1n of man in the Pacific II
Melanesian legends of the creation of nlen ot1t of clay 12
Stories of the c1eation of man in Celebes . 12
Stories told by tl1e Dyaks of Borneo . . 14
Legend told by the natives of Nias . . 15
Stories told by tire natives of the Philippines . 16
Indian legends of
the creation of man . . 17
Cheremiss story of the creation of man . 22
African stories of the creation of man 22
American stories of the creation of man . . . . 24
Our first parents moulded out of red clay . . . 29
Belief of savages in the evolution of man out of lower animals . 29
American Indian stories of the evolution of men out of animals . 29
African and Malagasy stories of the evolution of men . . 32
Evolution of n1en out of fish in Africa and Borneo . . 33
Descent of men from trees and animals in the Indian Archipelago 34
Descent of n1en from animals in New Guinea . 36
l)escent of men fro1n fisl1 and grubs in the Pacific 40

XIII
xiv FOLK-LORE JN THE OLD TESTA1'11ENT
l'AGE
Evolution of men out of animals in At1stralia 41

Evolutionary hypothesis of Empeclocles

44
Creation or evolution ? 44
CHAPTER II
THE FALL OF' !VIAN
l. Tl1e Nan-ative i1Z Ge1iesis

The temptation an<l tl1e fall, the woman and tl1e ser11ent . 45
The two trees . . . . . 46
The Tree of Life ancl the Tree of Death . . 47
The Creator's good intention frt1strated by the serrJent . 48
The serpent's selfish motive for deceiving the woman . 49
Widespread belief in tl1e im1nortalit)' of serpents . 49
Story of the Fall, a story of the origin of death . . 51
2. The Story of the Pe1-ve1-tcd llfessage

Hottentot story of the Moon and the hare . . 52
Busl1man story of the Moon and the ha1e . . 53
Nandi story of the Moon and the dog . . . 54
Hottentot story of the Moon, the insect, and tl1e hare . 55
Bush1nan story of the Moon, the tortoise, and the hare . 56
Louyi story of the Sun and Moon, the cha111eleon and the 11are 57
Ekoi story of God, the frog, and the duck . . 58
Gold Coast story of God, the sl1eep, a11cl the goat . 58
Ashantee story of God, the sheep, and the goat . . 59
Al<:amba story of God, the chameleon, and the th1usl1 . 61
Togoland story of God, the dog, and the frog . . 62
Calabar story of God, the dog, and the sheep . . 63
Bantu star)' of God, the chameleon, and the lizard . 63
The misca1riage of the message of immortality . . 65
3. T/1e Story of the Cast Ski1z

Supposed i1nmortality of ani1nals that cast their sl<:ins . 66
How men n1issed im1nortality and serpents, etc., obtained it 66
Belief that 1nen formerly cast their skins and lived for ever 68
Belief that me11 used to rise from the dead after three days 71
How men missed immortality and the Moon obtained it . 73
Bahnar story how n1en used to rise fro111 the dead . 73
Rivalry between men and serpents, etc., for immortality . 74
4 The Co111posite Sto17 of the Perverted Message aiitf the Cast .S'kin
Galla story of God, the blt1e bird, and tl1e serpent . . . 74
Stories of the Good Spirit, men, and serpents . . . .
75
5. Co1zclusion
Original form of the story of the Fall of Man 76
CONTENTS xv
CHAPTER III
THE MARK OF CAIN
PAGE
The theory that the mark was a tribal badge 78
Homicides sl1unned as infected . . 79
Attic law concerning homicides . . 80
Seclusion of murderers in Dobu . . 80
Belief in the infectiottsness of homicides in Africa .. 81
Earth supposed to spurn tl1e homicide . . . 82
Wanderings of the nlatricide Alcmaeon . . . 83
Earth offended by bloodshed and appeased by sacrifice . 84
The homicide's mark perhaps a danger-signal to others . 85
The mark perhaps a protection against the victim's ghost . 86
Ceremonies to appease the ghosts of the slain . . 86
Seclusion of murderer through fear of his victim's ghost . 88
Fear of ghosts of the mu1dered, a motive for executing murderers 89
Protection of executioners against tl1e ghosts of their victims . 89
Bodily marks to protect people against ghosts of the slain . 91
Need of guarding warriors against the ghosts of tl1e slain . . 92
Various modes of guarding warriors against the ghosts of the slain 93
Faces or bodies of manslayers painted in diverse colours . . 95
The mark of Cain perhaps a disguise agai11st the ghost of Abel . 98
Advantage of thus interpreting the mark . . . . 100
The blood rather than the ghost of Abel prominent in the 11arrative IOI
Fear of leaving blood of man or beast uncovered . . . IOI
Superstition a crutch of morality . . . . 103
CHAPTER IV ,
THE GREA1' FLOOD
I. Jntrodttctz'on
Huxley on the Great Flood 104
The present essay a study in folk-lore 105
Bearing of flood stories on problems of origin and diffusicin 106
2. The Babylonian Stoiy ef a Great Flood

Babylonian tradition recorded by Berost1s 107
110
Nicolaus of Damascus on the flood
Modern discovery of the original Babylonian story I 10

III
The Gilgamesh epic
I 12
Journey of Gilgamesh to Ut-na1)isl1tin1
Ut-naJJishtim's sto1y of the Great Flood 113
'l'he buillling of the ship the e111barkation the sto1111 I 14

XVI

1'"0LK-LORE IN THE OLD TESTA1WENJ'
' PACiE
The sending forth of tl1e clove and the raven the landing I 16
Other fragmentary versions of the Babylonian story . l 18
Sumerian version of the flood story . . 120
The flood story borrowed by the Semites fro111 the Sumerians 124
The scene of the story laid at Sht1rippal{ on the Et1phrates 124
3. The Hebi-e;u Stoiy of a Great Flood

The story in Genesis . . . . . . 125
The story compounded of two different narratives . . 130
The Priestly Document and the Jehovistic Document . . 131
Late date a11d ecclesiastical character of the Priestly Doct1111ent . 131
Its contrast with the J ehovistic Document . . 134
Verbal clifferences between the Priestly and the J el1ovistic Documents 136
Material diffe1e11ces between the clocume11ts in tl1e flood story . 137
The J ehovistic document the older of the t\\o . . . 139
Dependence of the Helirew on the Babylonian story of the flood . 140
Fanciful additions made to the flood story in later times . . 143
4. A11cient Greek Stoi-ies of a Great Floo,l
Deucalion and Pyrrha 146
The grounding of the ark on Parnassus 148
Aristotle and Plato on Deucalion's flood 148
Ovid's rhetorical account of the flood 149
Athenian Jegencl of Deucalion's flood . . . . 151
Tl1e grave of Deucalion and the Water-beari11g Festival at Athens 152
Story of Deucalion's flood at Hierapolis on the Euphrates . 153
Water festival and prayers at IIierapolis . . . . 154
Deucalion, the ark, and the dove . . . . 154
Phrygian story of a flood associated with I{ing Nan11acus. . 155
Noah's flood on coins of Apamea Cibotos in Phrygia . . 156
Greek traditions of three great floods. The flood of Ogyges . 157
Dates assigned by ancient authorities to the flood of Ogyges . 158
Tl1e flood of Ogyges ancl the vicissitudes of tl1e Copaic Lake . 160
Tl1e ruins of Gia on a stranded island of tl1e lake . . 161
The flood of Dardanus. Home of Dardanus at Pheneus . . 163
Alternations of the valley of Pheneus between wet and dry . 164
The water-mark on tl1e mountains of Pl1eneus . . .
165
Samothracian story of great flood consequent 011 opening of Darda11elles . 167
The San1othracian story partially confirmed by geology . . 168

The Samothracian story probably a speculatio11 of an early philosopher 170
Story of Deucalion's flood perhaps an inference from. the configuration of
Thessaly . . . . . . .
171
The Vale of Tempe . . . . . .
172
The Gree!,; flood stories probably niytl1s of observation . .
174
5. Other Europea11 Stories of a Great Flood
Icelandic story of a deluge of blood
Welsh story of a_ flood . .
174
175
CONTENTS
XVll
PAGE
Lithuanian story of a great flood . 176 -
Flood story told by the gipsies of Transylvania . 177

Vogul story of a great flood . . . i78
Relics of the flood in Savoy . . 179
6. Supposed Pe,rsia1t Sto1ies of a Gr-eat Flood
Sttpposed traces of a flood story in ancient Persian literature 179

The sage Yima and his blissful enclosure . . 180

7. Ancient I1idt"an Stories of a Great Flood
The story in the Satapatha Bra!t111a11a. Manu and tlie fish

The sto1y in the llfahabha1ata . . . .
The story in the Sanscrit Pzera1ias

. . ..
8. ll:fode11i I1zdia11 Stories of a Great Flood
Stories told by the Bhils and l(amars of Ce11tral India . 193

Stories told by the Hos and l\f11nclas of Bengal . . 195
Stories told by the Santals of Bengal . . . 196
Stories told by the Lepchas of SiJ,him and tribes of Assam 198
Shan story l>f a great flood . . . . 199
Tradition concerning the Vale of Cash111eer 204
Geological confirn1ation of the tradition . 205
Tl1e tradition p1obably a 111ytl1 of obse1vation 206
9 Sto1ies of a G1eat Flood i"1t Easte111 Asia

Stories told by the Karens and Sing1)hos of B11rn1a 208
Story told by the Bahnars or Bannavs of Cochin China 209
Stories told by the aborigines of the Malay Penins11la 211
Sto1y told by the Lolos of So11ther11 China 212
Cl1inese tradition of a great flood 214
A Chinese emperor on Noah's floocl 215
Kamchadale story of a great flood 216
1\-fongolian story of a great flood . 217
lo. Sto1ies oj a G1eat fi'lood iii the I1tdia11 A 1lhipe!ago
Stories told by the Battas of Sumatra 217

Stories told by the natives of Nias and E11gano 219
Stories told by the Dyaks of Borneo 220
Stories told l1y the natives of Celel)es 222
Stories told by the natives of Ceram and Rotti 223
Story told l>y the natives of Flores 224
Stories told ]Jy the Philippine Isla11ders 225
Stories t<>l<l by the wild tribes of I<'or111osa 225
Story tolcl liy the A11clan1an Isla11ders 233

XVlll FOLK-LORE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT
l l. Sto1-ies ef a G1-eat fi'/ood i11 Az1st1-a!ia

PAGE
Story told by the l{urnai of Victoria . . . 234
Stories told by other tribes of Victoria . , . . 235
Stories told by tl1e alJorigines of Sot1th Australia ancl Queensland 236
l 2, Stories ef a Gi-eat Flood i11 Nero Gui11ea aizd ll:felanesia

Stories told by the natives of New Gt1inea 237
R. Neuhat1ss on stories of a flood in New Guinea 238
Fijian story of a great floocl 239
Melanesia11 story of a g1eat flooli 240
13. Stories ef a Great Flood i1z Poly11esia a1zd ll1icro1zesia

Wide cliffusion of such stories in the Pacific 241
Tahitian legencls of a great flood 242
Hawaiian legends of a great flood 245
Mangaian story of a great flood 246
Samoan traclitions of a great flood 249
Maori stories of a great flood 250
Story of a great flood told by the Pele\v lsla11ders -
?5~
.)
14. Stories ef a G1eat Flood z'n Soztth A111erica

Stories told by the Indians near Rio de Janeiro . . 254
Story told by the Caingangs of Southern Brazil . . 256
Sto1y told by the Carayas of Brazil . . . 257
Story told by the Ipurina of the Purus River . . 259
Story told by otl1er Indians of the Purus Ri,'er . . 260
Story told by tl1e Jibaros of the U1Jper Amazon . . 260
Story told by the l\1uratos of Ecuador . . . 261
Story told by the A1a11canians of Chili . . 262

Story told by the Ackawois of British Guiana . 263

Story told by the Arawalcs of British Guiana . 265
Story told by the Macusis of British Guiana . 265
Stories told by the Indians of the Orinoco . 266
Stories told by the Mt1yscas or Chibchas of Bogota 267
Geological evidence as to the valley of Bogota . 268
Story told by the Canaris of Ecuador- . . , 268
Stories told by the Pert1vian Indians . . 269
Story told by the Chirig11anos of Bolivia . . 272
Story told by the Fuegians . . . 273
l 5 Stories ef a Gieat Flood i1z Ce1ztral A111erica and Mexico

Stories told by the Indians of Panama and Nicaragua . .
l\fexica11 tradition of a great flood . . .
Michoacan legend of a great flood . . ..

Story of a great flood in the Popol Vieh . . .

Story told by the Huichol Indians of Mexico . ,
xix
. . .. -
PAGE
Stories told by the Cora Indians of Mexico 279
Story told by the Tarahumares of Mexico 280
Story told by the Caribs of the Antilles 281
'
16. Ston"es ef a Great Flood in North At1te1ica.
Story told by the Papagos of Arizona . . . 281
Stories told by the Pimas . . . . . 282
Story told by the Zu'iii Indians of New Mexico . . . 287
Stories told bl the Californian Indians . . . . . 288
Story told by the Natchez of the Lower Mississippi . . 291
Story told by the Mandan Indians . . . 292
Annual l\1andan ceremonies commemorative of the flood . . 293
Story told by the Cherol{ee Indians . . . . 294
Story of a Great Flood wiclely spread an1ong the Algonquins . 295
Story told by the Montagnais Indians of Canada . . . 295
Story told by the Crees . . . . . . 297
The Algonqttin story told in full by the Chippeways . . 297
An Ojibway version of the same story . . . . 301
Another Ojibway version of the same story . . . 305
Another Ojibway ve1sion of the same story . . . 307
Another version of the same story told by the Blacl,foot Indians . 308
Another version of the same story told by the Otta\vas . . 308
Another version of the same story told by the Crees . . 309
Another version of the same story told by the Dogrib and Slave Indians . 310
Another version of the same story told by the Hareskip. I11dians . 310
Stories of a Great Flood told by the Tinneh Indians . . 312
Stories told by the Tlingit Indians of Alaska . . . 316
Story told by the Haida Indians of Qt1een Charlotte Islands . 319
Story told by the Tsimshian Indians of British Columbia . . 319
Story told l)y the Bella Coola Indians of British Columbia . 320
Story told by the Kwakit1tl Indians of British Colt1111bia . . 320
Story told by the Lillooet Indians of British Colun1bia . . 321
Sto1y told by the Thompson Indians of British Columbia . 322
Story told by the l(ootenay Indians of British Columl)ia . . 323
Stories told by the Indians of Washington State . . . 323
Story tolcl by the Indians of the Lower Columbia River . . 325
Stories told by the Eskimo and Greenlanders . . . 326
l 7. .)tories ef a C1eat Flood i;z .4fiica
General absence of flood stories in Africa 329

Reported traces of such stories . . . 329
Stories of a Great Flood reported in East Africa . 330
18. The Geogiaphical Dijfitsio1i ef Flood Sto1iej

Absence of flood stories in a great part of Asia . 332
Rarity of flood stories in Ettrope . 333
Absence of flood stories in Africa . 333
xx FOLK-LORE IN THE OLD TES'J'AMENT
I'AGE
Presence of flood stories in the India11 Archipelago, New Gui11ea, A11stralia,

l'vlelanesia, Polynesia, ancl America . 333
The Hebrew flood story clerived from the Bal)ylonian 334
Most other flood stories apparently incle1Je11dent of tl1e BalJylonian 3:34
Gree!;: floocl stories not borrowed fro1n tl1e Babylonia11 335
A11cient Indian story probably inclepe11dent of the Babylonian 335
Wicle diffusion of the Algonqt1in story in Nortl1 An1erica . 337
Evidence of difft1sion in South America and I'olynesia . 338
I 9. The Ori'gi1i of Sto1ies of a Great Flood

Old theory of a universal del11ge SllJJported by evidence of fossils . 338
Survivals of the theory of a universal deluge in the nineteenth century 340
Stories of a Great Flood interpreted as solar, lunar, or stellar myths 341
Evidence of geology against a unive1sal deluge . . . 342
Philosophical theories of a universal prin1eval ocean . . 343
Many florJd stories probably ren1iniscences of real events . . 343
.l\f emorable floods in Holland . . . . . 344
Floods cat1sed by earthquake waves in the Pacific . . . 347
Some floocl stories in tl1e Pacific probably re1niniscences of earthquake
waves . - . . . . . 351
Inundations caused by heavy rai11s . . . . 352
Babylonian sto1y explained f)y annujll i11undatic>r1 of the E11phrates ,alley 353
Suess's theory of a flood caused by an earthq11ake and a typhoon . 356
Objections to the tl1eory. . . . . . 356
Diluvial traditions partly legendary, l)a1tly niythical . . 359
Myths of ol>servation based on geological configuration and fossils 360
All flood stories probably co1nparatively recent . . . 360
CHAPTER V
THE 1"0\VER OF BABEL
The Tower of Babel and the confusion of tongues . 362

Later Jewish lege11cls as to the Tower of Babel . '. 364
Tl1e Tower of Babel probably a 1eminisce11ce of a temple-tower . 365
Two such rt1ined ten1ple-to\vers at Babylon , . 365
Tl1e 1nouncl of Babil, fornierly a temple of l'vlarduk . . '366
Inscriptio11s of Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar at Babil 367
The inound of Birs-Nimrud, formerly a ten1ple of Nebo . 369
Inscriptio11 of Nebuchadnezzar at Birs-Nin1rud . . 370
Ruined ten11)le-tower at U 1 of the Chaldees . . 371
Inscription of Nal)onidus at Ur . . . 372
''fhe tem1)le-to\ver at Ur perhaps seen by Abraha111 . 373
Theories as to the pri111itive langt1age of mankind 374
Experimental attempts to determine the primitive language
African stories like tl1at of the Tower of Babel
375
377
I
. CONTENTS
XXt
Story told by the Anals of Assam

' ' ' . .
rAGE
378
Story told of the pyramid of Cholula in J\.fexico .
. Story told by tl1e Toltecs of Mexico .
379
382
Karen and Milcir versions of the Tower of Babel 383
. Admiralty Islands' version of the To\ver of Babel
383
Stories as to the origin of the diversity of tongttes in Greece, Africa,
Assam, A11stralia, and America .
PART II
THE PATRIARCHAL AGE 1
CHAPTER,, I
THE COVEN1\NT OF ABRAHAivl
The Patriarchal Age described in Genesis 391

God's covenant with Abraham . . 392
Ifebrew covenant by cutting a sacrificial victim in two . 392
Similar Greek modes of ratifying oaths . . 393
Similar nlodes of swea1ing
,, among the Scythians . 394
Similar ceremonies at peacemaking in East Africa . . . 394
Ceremonies at peacemaking in Soutl1 Africa . . . . 397
Similar ceremonies among tribes of Assam . . . . 398
Two theories of the cere1nonies, the retri!Jutive and the sacramental or
purificatory . . . . .. . . 399
The retributive theory implied in some cases . . . . 399
Ceremony at peacemal;;ing among tl1e Awo1ne of Calabar . . 400
Retributive theory confirn1ed by Greek and Roman practice . . 401
Retributive theory illustrated by an Assyrian inscription . . ; 401
Simila1 sacrifices and imprecations in the ritual of barbarotts tribes

. 402
The slaughter of the victim syn1bolizes the fate of the perjttrer . 407
Tbe sacramental or purificatory theory . . . . 408
Bisection of victims in pu1ificatory ce1emonies . . . 408
The purificatory theo1y confirmed by a modern Arab rite . 409
Similar rites observed by Chins, l{oryal<s, and gipsies . . 410
Significance of the passage between the pieces of the victitn . 41 I
Robertson Smith's sacramental interpretation of the Hebre\v rite . 412
The interpretation confir1ned by savage ~itt1als . . . 413
Half-skeleton of lJisectecl human body fot1ncl at Gezer . . 416
The half-;.skeleton prol1ably a relic ofht1111an sacrifice . . 417
Alternative explanations, the pt1rificatory and the covena11tal, of tl1e bisec-
tion of hu1nan victims . . . . .
The purificatory or lJrotective expl:111atio11 of the rile . .
Discovery of another half-skeleton of a !1t11na11 vicli111 at Gezer .

xxii FOLK-LORE IN TIIE OLD TES'TAfi1ENT
The half-skeleton not explicable as a fot111dation sacrifice . 421
Covenantal explanation of half-skeletons confir1ned !Jy Wachaga practice 422
Retributive theory of Hebrew rite confir1ned by Wacliaga parallel 424
Retributive and sacra111ental theories co111plementary 425
Theory of vicarious sacrifice in n1odern Syria . 425
Vicariot1s aspect of bisected victims in ritt1al . 428
CHAPTER II
1'HE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB OR ULTI!';IOGENITURE
I. T1-aces ef Ulti1tzoge11itztre i1t Israel
The character of Jacob 429

His alleged frauds on his brother and father 43
Theory tl1at Jacob, as the yot1nger son, \vas the heir 431
Traces of jt1nior right or ultimogeniture in patriarchal history 431
Traces of t1ltimogeniture in the history of Davie] 433
2. Ulti111oge1iit111e in EitJ'o}e
Borot1gh English in England 433

Ultimogeniture in France 436
Ultimogeniture in Friesland ancl Germany

437
Ultimogeniture in R11ssia 438
Ultimogeniture in Hungary 439
3. T/ze Qztestion ef th Origi1z ef Ulti111ogt?1zit11re

Blackstone on the origin of Borot1gh English 439
Ulti111ogeniture among the Turks and Mongols 441
4. Ulti1110,[{e11itzt1e itt Souther11 Asia

Tl1e Lusl1ais of Assa111, their migratory cultivation . . . 442
Youngest son a chief's heir among the Lushais . . . . 444
Ultimogeniture in private families among the Lushais . . . 445
Ultimoge11iture among the Angamis of Assam . . . . 445
Ultimogenit11re among the Naga tribes of Jl;Ianip11r . . . 446
Ultimogeniture an1ong the Meitheis of Assam . . . . 448
Ultimogeniture among the l{achins or Sing)Jhos of B11rma . . 449
Systems of ownership dependent on systems of agriculture . . 450
Economic advance from migratory agriculture and communal ownership to
pern1anent agriculture and individual ownership . . . 45 I
The Kachins practise both migratory and permanent agriculture . . 452
Ultimogeniture among the l{achins of China . . . . 454
Ultimogeniture among the Shans of China . . . . 455
Ultimogenit11re among the Chins . . . . 456
Co1npron1ise between ultimogeniture and 1)rimogeniture amo11g the Hkamies 457
CONTENrs
XXlll
PAGE
. Ultimogeniture among the Lolos of China '
458
Heirship of youngest daughter among the Khasis and Ga;os of A~sam
0

l\1other-kin among the Khasis . 458

Youngest daughter the heir among the l{hasis

.
459
460
Why daughters ratl1er than sons are heirs among the Khasis
The Garos .
461
462
Mother-kin among the Garos . . . .
463
Heirship of the youngest dat1ghter among the Garos . . 464
Original home of Mongolian trilJes 1)ractising ultimogenit11re 465
Ultin1ogenitt1re among the l\Irus . . . . 466
The Hos or Larka Coles of Bengal . . . 467
Ulti1nogeniture and 1-)rimogeniture among the Ifos . . 469
The Bhils of Central India . 470
Ultin1ogeniture a111ong the Bhils . . . . 471
Ultimogenitt1re among the Badagas of Sot1thern India . 472
Traces of ultin1ogeniture in the l\falay region and Georgia 472
5. Ulti111oge1zit111e i1z North-Ea.(/ern Asia

Ultimogeniture among the Yt1kaghirs 473
Ultimogenitu1e among the Chukchee 475
Ultimogeniture among the l{o1yal.;:s 476
6. Ulti111Qge11it111e in Africa
Ra1ity of t1ltin1ogeniture in Africa 476
Rigl1ts of youngest sons an1ong the Bogos, Sul.;:s, and Turl<anas 477
Ultimogenitt1re among the Ibos of Southern Nige1ia 477
Ultimogeniture a1nong the Ba-Ngoni of Mozambiqt1e 479
Why some chiefs are relt1ctant to see their g1andsons 480
\Vhy youngest sons are prefe1red as heirs 481

Why youngest dat1gl1ters are preferred as heirs 482
Preference for youngest sons natt1ral among pastoral trilJes 482
Ultin1ogeniture tends to pass into primogeniture . 484
8. Ulti111ogeniture a11d J11s P1i111ae Noctis

Theory of the illegitimacy of the eldest child . . 485
Robert Plot on Borough English . . . 485
Plot's e1roneous interpretation of ll:fa1cheta 1111elien1111 . 486
Plot's theory rejected by modern historians of English la\\' 487
J{ing Even us a11d the so-called jus pri111ae 11octis in, Scotland 488
'fhe legislation of Evenus a fa])le . . . 490
The fable ]Jorn of a misi11ter1)retation of the 111e1lhet . 491
Mode1n legal at1thorities 011 the 111e1chet . ' . . 492
No evidence of the so-callee! ;'its pri111ae 11octis i11 B1itai11 . 495
Survival of the 111erhet in the highla11ds (Jf Scotla11cl . 495
xxiv FOLJ(-LORE JN THE OLD TESTAMENT
PAGE
African parallel to the merchet . 495

The so-called jus pri111ae 1zoctis equally falJulous on the Conti11ent 496
Misapprehension of the real jus p1i11zae 1zoctis . . 497
The ''Tobias Nigl1ts '' enjoined lJy the Catholic Cl1urch . 497
The story of Tobias and his wife Sarah . . . 498
The 1en1ission of the ''Tobias Nights'' the real/us p1i111ae 1zoctis 501
Lawsuit between .'\.bbeville and the Bishop of A1niens . 501
S11rvival of'' Tobias Nights'' in modern E11rope. . 503
The practice of continence after marriage older than Christianity 505
Continence for several nigl1ts after marriage in Vedic India . 505
Continence after n1arriage i11 no11-Aryan tril1es of India . . 507
Continence after marriage in hill tribes of Assam and Burma 508
Contine11ce after marriage in the Indian Archipelago and New Guinea 509
Continence afte1 n1arriage amo11g the aborigi11es of Australia . 512
Continence after marriage in African tribes . . . 51 3
Continence afte1 n1arriage an1ong

American Indians . . 514
1'he function of bridesn1en and bridesmaids 516
'' Tobias Nights'' probably borrowed fron1 paganism . 516
The ''Tobias Nights'' an interpolation in The Book ef Tobit 517
Continence after 1narriage p1obably based on fear of demons 519
Precautions against de1nons at marriage in many lands . 520
Precautions at the marriage of widowers and widows . 523
Mock marriages of widowers and widows in India . 525
No real evidence of alleged seignorial right in Europe . 530
Ultimogeniture not derived from alleged seignorial right . 530
Slight ground fo1 such a derivation an1ong the Lolos . 531
Marco Polo on the defloration of virgi11s in Tibet . 532
Liberty accorded to Lolo brides after marriage . . 533
Defloration of brides co11ld not explain ultimogeniture . 534
9. Ulti11zoge1ziture and Polyga111y

Ulti1nogeniture traced to preference for youngest wife in a polygamous
family . . . . . . 534
The theory not supported by the evidence . . 535
The first wife the chief wife of a polygamous family in West Africa 536
The first wife the chief wife in Central and East Africa .
' first. wife the chief wife in South Africa
540
The 544
In some l(afi1 tribes a chiefs principal wife not the first wife . .
547
Superi~rity of a later wife explained by chiefs reluctance to see his grand-
. child . . . .

548
S11ggested explanation of this rel11ctance . . . .
548
'' G1eat wife,'' '' Right-hand wife,'' ''Left-hand wife'' in Kafir tribes
551
In I(afir law s11ccession regulated Ly primogeniture . .
553
In India tl1e first wife of a polygamous family generally the chief wife
In other parts of Asia the first wife generally the chief wife ..
554
556
In the Indian Archipelago the first wife generally the chief wife
557 .
Among the American Indians the first wife generally the chief wife
.S59
CONTENTS xxv
A111ong the Esl,itno a11d Greenla11ders the first \Vife ge11erally tl1e chief \vife 56 I
111 polygamollS ft1111ilies generally tl1e first wife tl1e cl1ief \Vife . . 561
Te11cle11cy of i)olyga1ny to favo11r pri111ogenitl1re . . . 562
I o. [liti111oge11itzt1e a111i I1ifa11tici1ie
Ulti111ogeniture a11d tl1e l{illi11g of tl1e firstborn
The two custon1s l)rO])a])]y 11ncon11ected .
I 1. Sztpe1stitio11s abo11t J'01111gest chil1i1e11

Sl11Jerstitio11s aliout you11gest cl1ilclre11 ir1 111a11y lancls

Youngest sc111s in 1it11al a1no11g the AJ,il,11y11 .

Y 011ngest sons i11 ritual a111ong tl1e 'l'aiyals of Formosa

ADDENDA
PART I
THE EARLY AGES OF THE WORLD
V<>I ,. l
CHAPTER I
THE Cl~EATION OF MAN
ATTENTIVE readers of the Bible can hardly fail to remark Two

a striking discrepancy between the two accounts of the different
, accounts of
creation of man recorded 1n the first and second chapters of thecreation
ma~ in
Genesis. In the first chapter, we read how, on the fifth day 8fenes1s.
0
of creation, God created the fishes and the birds, all the
creatures that live in the water or in the air; and how on
the sixth 'day he created all terrestrial animals, and last of
all man, whom he fashioned in his own image, both male and
female. From this narrative V1Te infer that man was the last
to be created of all living beings on earth, and incidentally
we gather that the distinction of the sexes, which is char-
acteristic of humanity, is shared also by the divinity ; though
how the distinction can be reconciled with the unity of the
Godhead is a point on which the writer vouchsafes us no
information. Passing by this theological problem, as perhaps
too deep for human comprehension, we turn to the simpler
question of chronology and take note of the statements that
God created the lower animals first and human beings after-
wards, and that the 11uman beings consisted of a man and a
woman, produced to all appearance si111ultaneously, and each
of them reflecting in equal measure the glory of their divine
'
original. So far we read in the first chapter. But when we

proceed to peruse the second chapter, it is somewhat discon-
certing to come bolt on a totally different and, indeed, con-
tradictory account of the same mo1nentous transaction. For
here we learn with surprise that God created ma11 first, tl1e
lower animals next, and wo1nan last of all, fasl1ioning her as
a mere afterthought out of a rib which 11e abstracted from
3
4 THE CREATION OF MAN PAR'f I
man in his sleep. The order of merit in the two narratives

is clearly reversed. In the first narrative the deity begins
with fishes and works steadily up through birds and beasts
!
i to man and woman. In tl1e second narrative he begins
l'
with man and works down\vards th1ough the lower animals

I
'
I
to woman, who apparently marks the nadir of the divine
'
I
I
workmanship. And in this second version nothing at all is
'
said about man and woman being made in the image of God.
vVe are simply told that ''the Lord God formed man of the
dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath
1
of life ; and man became a living soul." Afterwards, to
relieve the loneliness of man, who \Vandered without a living
companion in the beautiful garden which had been created

for him, God fashioned all the birds and beasts and brought
them to man, apparently to amuse him and keep him com-
pany. Man looked at them and gave to them all their
names; but still he was not content with these playmates,
so at last, as if in despair, God created woman out of an
insignificant portion of the masculine frame, and introduced
2
her to man to be his wife. ,
The two The flagrant contradiction between the t\vo accounts is

different
accounts
explained very simply by the circumstance that they are
are derived derived from two different and originally independent docu-
10
fdr.r:,,m
111erentt" ments, which were afterwards combined into a single book
documents, by an editor, who pieced the two narratives together
the Priestly
and the
"th t l t k.
w1 ou a ways a 1ng pains to so ten or f h
armontze
Jehovistic. their discrepancies. The account of the creation in the
first chapter is derived from what is called the Priestly
Document, which was composed by priestly writers during
or after the Babylo11ian captivity. The account of the
creation of man and the animals in the second chapter is
derived from what is called the Jehovistic Document, which
was written several hundred years before the other, probably
in the ninth or eighth century before our era. 8 The differ-
ence between the religious standpoints of the two writers is
manifest. The later or priestly writer conceives God in an
abstract form as withdrawn from human sight, and creating
all things by a simple fiat. The earlier or Jehovistic writer
conceives God in a very concrete form as acting and speak-
I Genesis ii. 7. 2
Genesis ii. 18-24. 3
See below, pp. 131 sqq.
CHAP. I
THE CREATION OF MAN
5
~ng like a man, modelling a human being out of clay, plant-
tng a garden, walking in it at the cool of the day, calling to
the . man ~nd wo1nan to come out from among the trees
beh1~d which they had hidden themselves, and making coats
of :kin to replace the too scanty garments of fig-leaves with
which our abashed first parents sought to conceal their
1
nakedness. The charming naivety, almost the gaiety, of
the earlier narrative contrasts with the high seriousness of
the later ; though \Ve cannot but be struck by a vein of
sadness and pessimism ru11ning under the brightly coloured
picture of life in the age of innocence, which the great
Jel1ovistic artist has painted for us. Above all, he hardly
attempts to hide his deep contempt for woman. The late-
ness of her c1eation, and the irregular and undignified
manner of it made out of a piece of her lord and master,
after all the lower animals had been created in a regular
and decent manner sufficiently mark the lovv opinion he
held of her nature; and in the sequel his misogynism, as we
may fairly call it, takes a still darker tinge, when he ascribes
all the misfortunes and sorrows of the human race to the
2
credulous folly and unbridled appetite of its first mother.
Of the tvvo narratives, the earlier or Jehovistic is not The
. b l h . h . c lk l Jehovistic
on 1y the more p1cturesqt1e ut a so t e. rte er tn io - ore, narrative
retaining many features redolent of primitive simplicity th~ ~~re
pr1m1t1ve of
which have been carefully effaced by th~ later writer. the t\vo.
Accordingly, it offers more points of comparison with the
childlike stories by which men in many ages and countries
have sought to explain the great mystery of the beginning
of life on earth. Some of these simple tales I will adduce
in the following pages.
The Jehovistic writer seems to have imagined that God Babylonia11
. . h d and
moulded the first man out of c1ay, JUst as a potte1 m1g t o, Egyptian
or as a child moulds a doll ottt of mud ; a11d that having paiallels.
l<:neaded and patted the clay into the proper shape, tl1e deity
animated it by breathing into the mouth and nostrils of tl1e
figure, exactly as the prophet Elisha is said to have restored
to life the dead cl1ild of the Shunammite by lying on him,
and putting his eyes to the cl1ild's eyes and his mottth to
the child's mouth, no doubt to impa1t his b1eath to the
1 Genesis ii. 7'.9 ; iii. 8-10, 2 I. 2 Ge11esis iii.
6 T/IE CREATION OF MAN PA!l'f I
corpse ; after which the child sneezed seve11 times and

opened its eyes. 1 To the Hebrews this derivation of our
species from the dust of the ground suggested itself all the
more naturally because, in their language, the word for
''ground'' (adamah) is in form the feminine of the word for
''man'' (ada1n). 2 From various allusions in Babylonian
literature it would seem that the Babylonians also conceived
3
man to ha\:e been moulded out of clay. According to
Berosus, the Babylonian priest, \vhose account of creation
has been preserved in a Greek version, the god Bel cut off
his O\vn head, and the other gods caught the flo\ving blood,
mixed it with earth, and fashioned men out of the bloody
paste; and that, they said, is why men are so wise, because
4
their mortal clay is tempered with blood divine. In
Egyptian mythology Khnoumou, the Father of the Gods, is
5
said to have moulded men out of clay on his potter's wheel.
Greek So in Greek legend the sage Prometheus is said to have
legend of
the creation moulded the first men out of clay at Panopeus in Phocis.
of men out When he had done his work, some of the clay \Vas left over,
of clay by
Prome- and might be seen on the spot long afterwards in the shape
theus. of two large boulders lying at the edge of a ravine. A
Greek traveller, who visited the place in the second century
of our era, thought that the boulders had the colour of clay,
6
and that they smelt strongly of human flesh. I, too, visited
the spot some seventeen hundred and fifty years later. It is
1
2 Kings iv. 34 sq. Among the sique, Les 011gi1zes (Paris, 1895), p.
Nilotic Ka virondo, of British East 128, compare 157.
Africa, it sometimes happens that a 6 Pausanias x. 4. 4. Compare
person supposed to be dead sneezes and Apollodorus, Bibliotheca, i. 7. l; Ovid,
revives. In such a case the sneeze is lleta1norph. i. 82 sq. ; Juvenal, S'at.
taken as a sign that the spirit, which xiv. 35. According to another versio11
had go11e away on a jot1rney, has re- of the tale the creation took place not
turned to its body. See ] ohn Roscoe, at Panopeus, but at Iconium in Ly-
The Northern Ba1ztze (Cambridge, caonia. See below, p. l 5 5. It is said
1915), p. 288. that P.rometheus fashioned the animals
2
S. R. Driver and W. H. Bennett as well as men, giving to each kind of
in their commentaries on Genesis ii. 7'. beast its proper nature. See Philemon,
3
I-I. Zimmern, in E. Schrader's Die quoted by Stobaeus, Florilegiu1J1, ii. 27.
Keilinsch17:ften u11d das A lte Testa- The creation of man by Prometheus is
1ne1zt 3 (Berlin, 1902), p. 506; Paul figured on ancient works of art. See
Dhor1ne, La Religio11 Assy10-Babyloni- ]. Toutain, Ettedes de Mythologze et
enne (Paris, 1910), p. 75. d' Histoire des Religions Antiques( Paris,
4 Eusebius, Chronicon, ed. A. I 909 ), p. I 90. The late Greek rheto-
Schoene, vol. i. (Berlin, 1875) col. 16. . rician Libanius confessed that, though
6
(Sir) Gaston l\1aspero, Histoire he knew that all human bodies were
A11cienne des Peuples de !'Orient Clas- moulded out of the same clay, he did
CHAP. I
THE CREA1ION OF MAN 7
a forlorn little glen, or rather hollow, on the southern side The sc~ne
of the hill of Panopeus, below the long line of ruined but of the
"11 legend
st1 statel~ walls and towers which crowns the grey rocks of
the summit~ It was a hot day in late autumn the first
of November and after the long rainless summer of Greece
tl1e little glen was quite dry ; no water trickled down its
bushy sides, but in the bottom I found a reddish crumbling
earth, perhaps a relic of the clay out of which Prometheus
modelled our first parents. The place was solitary and
deserted : not a human being, not a sign of human
habitation was to be seen ; only the line of mouldering
towers and battlements on the hill above spoke of the busy
life that had lqng passed away. The whole scene, like so
many else in Greece, was fitted to impress the mind with a
sense of tl1e transitoriness of man's little bustling existence
on earth compared with the permanence and, at least, the
outward peace and tranquillity of nature. The impression
was deepened when I rested, in the heat of the day, on the
summit of the hill under the shade of some fine holl)'-oaks,
and surveyed the distant . prospect, rich in memories of the
past, while the sweet perfume of the wild thyme scented all
the air. To the south the finely cut peak of Helicon peered
over the low intervening ridges. In the west loomed the
mighty mass of Parnassus, its middle slopes darkened by
pine-woods like shadows of clouds brooding on the mountain
side ; while at its skirts nestled the ivy-mantled walls of
Daulis overhanging the deep glen, whose romantic beauty
accords so well with the loves and sorrows of Procne and
Philomela, which Greek legend associated with tl1e spot.
Northwards, across the broad plain to \vhich the steep bare
hill of Panopeus descends, the eye rested on the gap in the
hills through which tl1e Cephissus winds his tortuous \vay to
flow under grey willows, at the foot of barren stony hills,
till his turbid waters lose themselves, no longer in the vast
reedy swamps of the now vanished Copaic Lake, bt1t in a
dark cavern of the limestone rock. Eastward, clinging to
--------------------------------
not know who had mottlded the1n ; sic, 1904). Accorcling to IIesiod
l1owever, he was content to acce1)t the ( Woik:; aizcl Dii;1s, 60 oqq. ), it was t.he
traditional ascriptio11 of ottr c1eation tcJ smitl1-gocl I-Iepl1aestt1s \Vho, at tl1e Lid-
l)romethe11s (l,il>anit1s, 01c1t. xxv. 31, ding ot Zetts, 111ot1lclecl tl1e first \\'l)tJ1an
v<Jl, ii. I) 552, ed. l{. l<'oerste1, J_,ei1J- ottl cif r1111ist c;1rtl1.
8 THE CREATION OF MAN PART I
the slopes of the bleak ra11ge of whicl1 tl1e hill of Panopeus

forms part, were the ruins of Chaeronea, the birthplace of
Plutarcl1 ; and out there in tl1e plain was fought the fatal
battle which laid Greece at tl1e feet of Macedonia. There,
too, in a later age, East and West met in deadly conflict,
whe11 the Roma11 aimies under Sulla defeated the Asiatic
hosts of Mithridates. Such was the landscape spread out

before me on one of those farewell autumn days of almost

pathetic splendour, when the departing summer seems to
linger fondly, as if loth to resign to winter the enchanted
mountains of Greece. Next day the scene had changed :
su1nmer was gone. A grey November mist hung low on
the hills which only yesterday had shone resplendent in the
sun, and under its melancholy curtai11 the dead flat of the
Chaeronean plain, a wide, treeless expanse shut in by
desolate slopes, wore an aspect of chilly sadness befitting the
battlefield where a nation's freedom was lost.
Australian We cannot doubt that such rude conceptions of the
and Maori
stories of k H
origin of mankind, common to Gree s, ebrews, a y onians, B b I
thecreation and Egyptians, were handed down to the civilized peoples of
of nlen
of clay. out . b h b b
ant1qu1ty y t e1r savage or ar arous 1ore1at ers. r r h C
erta1n yI
stories of the same sort have been recorded among the
savages and barba1ia11s of to-day or yesterday. Thus the
Australian blacks in the neighbourhood of Melbourne said
that Pund-jel, the Creator, cut three large sheets of bark with
his big knife. On one of these he placed some clay and
worked it up with his knife into a proper consistence. He
then laid a portion of the clay on one of the other pieces of
bark and shaped it into a human form ; first he made the
feet, then the legs, then the trunk, the arms, and the head.
Thus he made a clay man on each of the two pieces of bark ;
and being well pleased with his handiwork, he danced round
them for joy. Next he took stringy bark from the eucalyptus
tree, made hair of it, and stuck it on the heads of his clay
men. Then he looked at them again, was pleased with his
work, and again danced round them for joy. He then lay
do\vn on them, blew his breath hard into their n1ouths their
.
11oses, and their navels ; and presently they stirred, spoke,
'
1
and rose up as full-grown me11. The Maoris of New Zealand
1
R. Brough Smyth, The ,4.borigines of Victoria (Melbourne, I 878), i. 424.
CHAP. l
THE CREATION OF MAN
9
say that a certain god, variously named Tu Tiki and Tane
took red riverside clay, kneaded it with hi; own' blood int~
a likeness or image of himself, with eyes, legs, arms, and all
complete, in fact, an exact copy of the deity ; and having
perfected the model, he animated it by breathing into its
mouth and nostrils, whereupon the clay effigy at once came
to life and sneezed. '' Of all these things," said a Maori, in
relating the story of man's creation, ''the most important is
the fact that the clay sneezed, forasmuch as that sign of
the power of the gods remains with us even to this day in
order that we may be re1ninded of the great work Tu accom-
plished on the altar of the Kauhanga-nui, and hence it is
that when men sneeze the words of Tu are repeated by
those who are present'' ; for they say, ''Sneeze, 0 spirit of
1
life." So like himself was the man whom the Maori Creator
Tiki fashioned that he called him Tiki-ahua, that is, Tiki's
2
likeness.
A very generally received tradition in Tahiti was that Tahitian
the first human pair was made by Taaroa, the chief god. !~~~~t!~~ 0:
They say that after he had formed the world he created man of man out
out of red earth, which was also the food of mankind until ~i ~~~:~d
bread-fruit was produced. Further, some say that one day out of .
man's rib.
Taaroa called for the man by name, and when he came he
made him fall asleep. As he slept, the Creator took out one
of his bones (ivi) and made of it a woman, whom he gave
to the man to be his wife, and the pair became the pro-
genitors of mankind. This narrative was taken down from
the lips of the natives in the early } ears of the mission to 1
Tahiti. The missionary who records it observes: '' This

al\vays appeared to me a mere recital of the Mosaic account
of creation, which they had heard from some European, and
I never placed any reliance on it, although they have re-
peatedly told me it was a tradition arnong tl1em before any
foreigner arrived. Some have also stated tl1at tl1e \vo1nan's
1 Lieut. - Colonel W. T~. Gudgeon, I 882 ), IJJJ. 2 I sq. The name of the
'' Maori J{eligion,'' Joztr1tal ef the J>o(J1 - Creator va1ies i11 tl1e three versio11s : in
nesian .)ociety, vol. xiv. (1905), JJp. tl1e first it is Tt1, in the seco11cl Til{i,
125 .rq. ; I<.. 'faylor, 7e I!.~a a !VIazti, i11 tl1e tl1ird 1'a11e. Tl1e reel colour of
or Neiu Zeala1icl a1t1l its I1thabit111t!s, tl1e clay, and the J;:11eadi11g of it witl1
Sec(1n<l Eclition (Lonclon, 1870), IJ tl1e gocl's blocid, are 111entioned 011ly l>y
I I 7. Cc>mJJare I~. Shcirtl111cl, llfi101i Tttylor, <l grJo<l at1lhc.i1ity.
~ I{. 1'aylcir, /, ,.
il'e/1~i:1'.011 anti flfytholo.i:y (Lci11clo11,
10 THE CREA TJON OF MAN PART I
name was I vi, which would be by them pronounced as if

written Eve. I vi is an aboriginal vvorcl, and not 011ly signifies
a bone, but also a widow, and a victim slain in war. N otwith-
' standing the assertion of the natives, I a1n disposed to think
that Ivi, or Eve, is tl1e or1ly aboriginal part of the story, as
1
fa1 as it respects the mother of the human race." However,
Similar the same tradition has been recorded in other parts of Poly-
stories a: to nesia besides Tahiti. Thus the natives of Fakaofo or Bow-
thecreat1on f
of woman ditch Island say that the first man was produced out o a
in other
parts of
stone. After a time he bethought him of making a woman.
Poly11esia. So he gathered earth and moulded the figure of a woman
out of it, and having done so he took a rib out of his left
side and thrust it into the earthen figure, \Vhich thereupon
started up a live woman. He called her Ivi (Eevee) or
''rib'' and took her to wife, and the whole human race sprang
2
from this pair. The Maoris also are reported to believe
that the first woman was made out of the first man's ribs. 3
This wide diffusion of the story in Polynesia raises a doubt
whether it is merely, as Ellis thought, a repetition of the
Biblical narrative learned from Europeans.
Similar However, the story of the creation of the first woman
story_ of thfe out of a rib of the first man meets us elsewhe1e in forms so
creation o
woman closely resembling the Biblical account that they can hardly
1
tKold by tl
arens o fe be independent of it. Thus the Karens of Burma say that
Burma. God '' created man, and of what did he form him ? He
created man at first from the earth, and finished the work of
creation. He created woman, and of what did he form her?
He took a rib from the man and created the woman." Again
they say, ''He created spirit 01 life. How did he create
spirit? Fatl1er God said : ' I love these my son and daughter.
I \Vill bestow my life upon them.' . He took a particle of
his life, and breathed it into their nostrils, and they ca1ne to
life and were men. Thus God created man. God made
food and drink, rice, fire and water, cattle, elephants and
1
William Ellis, Polynesia1i Re- 2
George Turner, Sanioa a Hu11dred
searches, Second Edition (London, Years ago and long bifo1e (Lonclon,
1832-1836), i. 110 sq. Ivi or iwi is 1884), pp. 267 sq .
. the regular word for ''bone'' in the 3
J. L. Nicholas, Nar1ative of a
various Polynesian languages. See Voyage. to New Zealand (London,
E .. Tregear, The Maori - Polynesia1i 1817), 1. 59, who writes, ''and to add
Comparative Dictio1zary (W elli11gton, still n1ore to this strange coincidence,
New Zealand, 1891), p. 109. , the general term for bone is Hevee. ''
'
CHAP. l THE CREATION OF MAN II
1
. birds.'' The suspicion that we have here to do with missionary
or at all events European influence, is confirmed, if not raised
to a certainty, by other traditions current among the Ghaikos,
a branch of the Karens. For the Ghaikos trace their genea-
logy to Adam, and count thirty generations from him to the
building of a great tower and the confusion of tongues.
According to them ''in the days of Pan-dan-man, the people
determined to build a pagoda that should reach up to heaven.
The place they suppose to be somewhere in the country of
the Red Karens, with whom they represent themselves as
associated until this event. When the pagoda was half way
up to heaven, God came down and confounded the language
of the people, so that they could not understand each other.
The11 the people scattered, and Than-mau-rai, the father of
the Ghaiko tribe, came west, \vith eight chiefs, and settled in
2
the valley of the Sitang." Again, the Bedel Tartars of Tartar
S1'b er1a
h ave a trad'1t1on
h G d fi d h storyofthe
t at o at rst ma e a man, w o creation of
lived quite alone on the earth. But once, \Vhile this solitary woman out
1 h d 'l
s ept, t e ev1 touc e h d h'
IS b h b t of the first
reast ; t en a one gre\v ou man's rib.
from his ribs, and falling .to the ground it grew long and
3
became the first woman. Thus these Tarta1s have deepened
the cynicism of the writer in Genesis by giving the devil
4
a hand in the creation of our common mother. But to return
to the Pacific.
In Nui or Netherland Island, one of the Ellice Islands, Other
' . . d l f d stories of
they say that the god Aul1al1a made mo e s o a man an thecreation
a woman out of earth and when he raised them up they of man _in
' the Pacific.
came to life. He called the man Tepapa and the woman
Tetata. 5 The Pelew Islanders relate that a brother and
sister made men out of clay kneaded with the blood of
various animals, and that the cha1acters of tl1ese first me11
t J{ev. I~. B. Cross, ''On tl1e 1884), i. 360.
J(are11s, '' Joit1'1zal ef the A 111e1'ica1z 4 I11 Na111<Jluk, one of tl1e Caroline
Oriental .S'ociety, vol. iv. No. z (New Jsla11ds, there is a story of a n1an who
York, 1854), pp. 300 sq. 1'he trans- in the early age of tl1e world \vas
lations from tl1e l{aren are by the c1eatec} Ollt of tile rib of a n1an and
]\ev. F. Mason, D. D. married the clat1gl1ter <Jf tl1e Creator.
2 J{ev. F. Mason, D.D., '' 011 See 1\1 itx Girscl111e1, '' l)ie l(aroli11en-
J)wellings, Worl<s of Art, etc., (Jf the insel N a111olt1k l\11Cl il1re Be\voh11er' ,,
Karcns, '' Jo1trnal qj' the // .riatic -'>'ociety Baessler-Aichiv. ii. (l,ei1Jsic ancl Berlin,
of Jferzgal, N. S. xxxvii. ( I 868) PlJ 19r2) JJ. r87.
o G. 'l't1rne1, ,)'a11101i (Lo11clo11, 1884),
163 sq. .
3 W. J\a(J)off, AttJ' .s1:bir1~e11 (I~ei1Js1c, PIJ 300 sq.
and of their descendants were determi11ed by the characters

of the animals whose blood had been mingled with the
primordial clay ; for instance, men who l1ave rat's blood in
them are thieves, men \vho have serpent's blood in them are
1
sneaks, and men who have cock's blood in them are brave.
Melanesian According to a Melanesian legend, told in Mota, one of the
legends ?f Banks' Islands the hero Qat moulded men of clay, the red
the creation '
of men out clay from the marshy riverside at Vanua Lava. At first he
of red clay. made men and pigs just alike, but his brotl1ers remonstrated
with him, so he beat down the pigs to go on all fours and
made man walk upright. Qat fashioned the first woman out
of supple twigs, and when she smiled he knew she was a living
2
woman. A somewhat different version of the Melanesian
story is told at Lakona, in Santa Maria. There they say
that Qat and another spirit (vui) called Marawa both made
men. Qat constructed them out of the wood of dracaena-
trees. Six days he worked at them, carving their limbs and

fitting them together. Then he allowed them six days to

come to life. Three days he hid them away, and three days
more he worked to make them live. He set them up and
danced to them and beat his drum, and little by little they
stirred, till at last they could stand all by themselves. Then
Qat divided them into pairs and called each pair husband and
wife. Marawa also constructed men out of the wood of a
tree, but it was a different tree, the tavisoviso. He likewise
worked at them six days, beat his drum, and made them
live, just as Qat did. But when he saw them move, he dug
a pit and buried them in it for six days, and then, vvhen he
scraped away the earth to see \Vhat they were doing, he
found them all rotten and stinking. That was the origin
3
of death. The natives of Malekula, one of the New
Hebrides, give the name of Bokor to the great being who
kneaded the first man and woman out of clay. 4
Stories ~f The inhabitants of N oo-hoo-roa in the Kei Islands say
the creation h h . ' '
of 1nan in t at t e1r ancestors were fashioned out of clay by the supreme
1
the I?dian I<.ubary, ''Die Religion der
]. esians, pp. 157 sq.
Arch1- p I ,, . A B . ' All. .
1 e auer, in . ast1an s erle1. aus 4 Rev. T. Watt Leggatt, '' Malekula,
~~ago. Volks- u1zd Me1zschenkunde (Berlin New Hebrides,'' Report o/ the Fourth
To~adja i888),2
i. 3, 56. ' lVIeetingef the Australasian Associatz"on
version in R. H. Codrington, The Melan- .for the Advance1nent of Science, held at
Celebes. . esians
3
(Oxford, 1891), P 158. Hobart, Tas11zania, z'n January I892
R. H. Codrington, The fife/an- (Hobart, 1893), pp. 707 sq.
CHAP, I
THE CREATION OF MAN 13
god, D~oadlera, who breathed life into the clay figures. 1
According to the Bare'e-speaking Toradjas of Central Celebes
~her~ were at first no human beings on the .earth. Then
1 Lai, the god of the upper world, and i Ndara, the goddess
of the under world, resolved to mal(e men. They committed
the task to i Kombengi, who made two models, one of a man
and the other of a woman, out of stone or, according to others,
out of wood. When he had done his work, he set up his
models by the side of the road which leads\ from the upper
to the under world, so that all spirits passing by might see
and criticize his workmanship. In the evening the gods
talked it over, and agreed that the calves of the legs of the
two figures were not round enough... So Kombengi went to
work again, and constructed another pair of models which he
again submitted to the divine criticism. This time. the gods
observed that the figures were too pot-bellied, so Kombengi
produced a third pair of models, which the gods approved
of, after the maker had made a slight change in the anatomy
of the figures, transferring a portion of the male to the female
figure. It now only remained to make the figures live. So
the god Lai returned to his celestial mansion to fetch eternal
breath for the man and \voman ; but in the meantime the
Creator himself, whether from thoughtlessness or haste, had
allowed the common wind to blow on the figures, and they
drew their breath and life from it. That is why the breath
2
returns to the wind when a man dies.
The aborigines of Minahassa, in the north of Celebes, The

say that two beings ea e 11 d W 1
ai an W k
ang o an d W ang1 Minahassan
version in
were alone on an island, where grew a coco-nut tree. Celebes.
Said Wailan Wangko to Wangi, '' Remain on earth while
I climb up the tree." Said Wangi to Wailan Wangko,
'' Good." But then a thought occurred to Wangi, and he
climbed up the tree to ask Wailan Wangko why he, Wangi,
should remain down there all alone. Said Wailan Wangl<:o
to Wangi, '' Return and take earth and make two images, a
man and a woman." Wangi did so, and both images were
1 C. M. Pleyte, '' Ethnogra1)hische 2 N. Adriani en Alb. C. l(ruijt,
Beschrijving der Kei-Eilanclen,'' Tijd- De ll1i1'e' e - .rp1ekc1i1le Torac{fci'.r z1111t
schrift van het Nedcrlaiidslh Aa1,drifl:s- l/!Ii1l1lcn-Celcbes (Batavia, 19 I 2-19 r 4),
kundi;; G'enootJchap, Twcede Serie, i. 3, 245 sq.
x. (I 893) P 564.
14 THE CREATION OF MAN J'AR'f I
I
men who could inove but not speak. So Wangi swarmed

up the tree again to ask Wailan Wangko, ''How now? The
two images are made, but they cannot speak." Said Wailan
Wangko to Wangi, ''Take this ginger and go and blow it
on the skulls and the ears of these two images, that they
may be able to speak; call tl1e man Adam and the woman
1
Ewa." In this narrative the names of the man and woman
betray Christian or Mohammedan influence, but the rest of
the story may be abo1iginal.
Stories of The Dyaks of Sakarran in British Borneo say that the
thecreation first man was made by two large birds. At first they tried
of 1nan told . d
by the to mal<e men out of trees, but 1n vain. Then they hewe
Dyaks of them out of rocks, but the figures could not speak. Then
Borneo. h d fi d
they moulded a . man out of damp eart an 1n use into
his veins the red gum of the kumpang-tree. After that
they called to him and he answered ; they cut him and
blood flowed from his wounds, so they gave hirp the name
2
of Ta11nah Kumpok or ''moulded earth." Some of the Sea
Dyaks, however, are of a different opinion. They think that
a certain god named Salampandai is the maker of men. He
hammers them into shape out of clay, thus forming the
bodies of children who are to be born into the world.
There is an insect which makes a curious clinking noise at
night, and when the Dyaks hear it, they say that it is the
clink of Salampandai's hammer at his work. The story
goes tl1at he was commanded by the gods to make a man,
and he made one of stone ; but the figure could not speak
and was therefore rejected. So he set to work again, and
made a man of iron ; but neither could he speak, so the gods
would have none of him. The third time Salampandai
made a man of cla}', and he had the power of speech.
Therefore the gods were pleased and said, '' The man you
have made will .do well. Let him be the ancestor of the
human race, and you must make others like him." So
Salampandai set about fashioning human beings, and he is
still fashioning them at his anvil, working a\.vay with his
1
N. Graafland, De Minahassa i. 299 sq. Compare the Lord Bishop
(Rotterdam, 1869), i. 96 sq. of Labuan, ''On the Wild Tribes of
2
Horsbt1rgh, quoted by H. Ling the North - West Coast of Borneo ''
Roth, The Natives ef Sarawak and of '
Transactz"ons of the Ethnological Society
British North Borneo (London, 1896), of Lo1idon, New Series, ii. (1863) p. 27.
,
. CHAP. I
tools in unseen regions. There he hammers out the
clay babies, and when one of them is finished he brings
i~ to the gods, who ask the infant, '' What would you
like to handle and use ? '' If the child answers '' A sword ''
'
the gods pronounce it a male ; but if the child replies, '
'' Cotton and a spinning-wheel," they pronounce it a
female. . Thus they are born boys or girls, according to their
1
O\vn wishes.
The natives of Nias, an island to the south-west of The
Sumatra, have a long . poem descriptive of the creation creation of
' man as told
which they recite at the dances performed at the funeral of by the
a chie( In this poem, which is arranged in couplets after n<1;tives
N1as.
of
the style of Hebrew poetry, .the second verse repeating the
idea of the first in somewhat different language, we read
how the supreme god, Luo Zaho, bathed at a celestial spring
which reflected his figure in its clear water as in a mirror,
and how, on seeing his image in the water, he tool<. a handful
of earth as large as an egg, and fashioned out of it a figure
like one of those figures of ancestors which the people of
Nias construct, Having made it, he put it in the scales and
weighed it; he weighed also the wind, and having weighed
it, he put it on the lips of the figure which he had made ;
so the figure spoke like a man or like a child, and God gave
him the name of Sihai. But though Sihai was like God in
form, he had no offspring ; and the world was dark, for as
yet there was neither sun nor moon. So God meditated,
and sent Sihai down to earth to live there in a house made
of tree-fern. But while as yet he had neither wife nor
child, he one day died at noon. However, out of his moutl1
grew two trees, and the trees budded and blossomed, and
the \Vind shook the blossoms from the trees, and blossoms
fell to the ground a11d from them ar.ose diseases. And from
Sihai's throat grew a tree, from which gold is derived ; and
from his heart grew another tree, from which me11 are
descended. Moreover, out of his right eye came the sun,
2
and out of his left eye came the moon. In this legei1d the
idea of creating man in his own image appears to have been
1 I~dwin lI. (}omes, .S'e1;e1ztee11 YcarJ' 2 II. S11ndern1an, .Die /1zsel Nias
amon,t; the S'ecz JJyak.r ef Bor1z1:0 (L<J11- 1t111l di1: Jl.f1'.rJio1z clmelbst (Bartnen,
<lrJ11, I 9 I I), tJ I 97, corn IJare \J. I 74 1905), IJIJ 65 sqq., 200 sqq.
16 THE CREATION OF MAN l'AR1.' I
suggested to the Creator by the accident of seeing his O\Vn

likeness reflected in a crystal spring.
Story of The Bila-an, a wild tribe of Mindanao, one of the Philip-
thecreation pine Islands relate the creation of man as follows. They
of man told ' .
by the say that in the beginning there was a certain being named
!3ilah-an
Ill t e
Melu l
of a size so huge that no known thing ca11 give any
Philippine idea of it ; he was white in colour, and had golden teeth,
Islands. and he sat upon t h e c1ou d s, occupying
a 11 th e space a b ove.
Being of a very cleanly habit, he was constantly rubbing
himself in order to preserve the whiteness of his skin un-
sullied. The scurf which he thus removed from his person
he laid on one side, till it gathered in such a heap as to
fidget him. To be rid of it he constructed the eartl1 out of
it, and being pleased with his \vork he resolved to make
two beings like himself, only much smaller in size. He
fashioned them accordingly in his own likeness out of tl1e
leavings of the scurf whereof he had moulded the earth, and
these two were the first human beings. But while the
Creator was still at work on them, and had finished one of
them all but the nose, and the other all but the nose a11d one
other part, Tau Dalom Tana came up to him and demanded
to be allowed to make the noses. After a heated argument
with the Creator, he got his way and made the noses, but i11
applying them to the faces of our first parents he unfortun-
ately placed them upside do\vn. So \Varm had been the
discussion between the Creator and his assistant in regard
to the noses, that the Creator quite forgot to finish the other
part of the second figure, and went away to his place above
the clouds, leaving the first man or the first woman (for we
are not told \Vhich) imperfect; and Jau Dalom Tana also
went away to his place below the earth. After that a heavy
rain fell, ~nd the two first of human kind nearly perished,
for the rain _ran off th~ tops of their heads into their up-
turned nostrils. . Happily the Creator perceived their p'light
and coming down from the clouds to the rescue he took off
their nose~ and replaced them right end up.1
Another A variant of the foregoing legend told by the Bila-an
Bila-an h I h b
version of runs t us. n t e eginning four beings, two male a11d two
the story. 1
Fay-Cooper Cole, The Wild Tribes
of Davao Dz"strict, Mindanao (Chicago, 1913), pp. 135 sq. (Field 1Y.lusez1111
of Natural History, Pub!z"catio1z z70.)
CHAP. I
.female, lived on a small island no bigger than a hat. Neither
trees nor grass grew on the island, but one bird lived on it.
So the four beings sent the bird to fetch some earth the
fruit o~ the rattan, and the fruit of trees. When it bro~ght '
the art1~les, Melu, who was one of the two male beings, tool<
the earth and moulded it into land, just as a woman moulds
pots ; and having fashioned it he planted the seeds' in it, and
they grew. But after a time he said, '' Of \vhat use is land
without people?'' The others said,'' Let us make wax into
people." They did so, but whe11 the waxen figures were set
near the fire, they melted. So the Creators perceived that
they could not make man out of wax. Not to be baffled,
they resolved to make him out of dirt, and the two male
beings accordingly addressed themselves to the task. All
went \Vell till it came to fashioning the noses. The Creator
who was charged with this operation put the noses on upside
down, and though his colleague Melu pointed out his mis-
take, and warned him that the people would be drowned if
they went about with their noses in that position, he refused
to repair his blunder and turned his back in a huff. His
colleague seized the opportunity and the noses at the same
instant, and hastily adjusted these portions of the human
frame in the position which they still occupy. But on the
bridge of the nose you can see to this day the print left
1
by the Creator's fingers in his hurry.
The Bagobos, a pagan tribe of South-Eastern Mindanao, Bagobo
h b
say that 1n t e eg1nn1ng a certain D t d th story of the
1wa a ma e . . e sea creatioi1 of
and the land, and planted trees of many sorts. Then he man.
took two lumps of earth, shaped them like human figu1es,
and spat on them ; so they became man and \voman.
The old man was called Tuglay, and the old wo1nan, Tugli-
bung. They married and lived togetl1er, ar1d the old man
made a great house and planted seeds of different kinds,
2
which the old woman gave him.
The Kumis, who inhabit portions of Aiakan and the Inclian
. ld C . L lerrends of
Chittagong hill tracts in eastern In d ia, to apta1n ew1n th~c1ea.tio11
the following story of the creation of man. God made the of n1an.
world and the trees and tl1e creeping thi11gs first, and afte1
I J<'ay-C:o()i>crCole, op. cit. Pl) I 36.rq. Mytl1s,'' Jo11111a! of ,./111e1iciz1t fi'o/k-!01e,
~ J,11ura Watson Bcrtcllict, '' Bag<)l)o xxvi. (1913) ]J. 15.
VOL. I c
'
Kun1i story that he made one man and one woman, forming their bodies
how God
created of clay, but every night, when he had done his work, there
man with came a great snake, which, while God was sleeping, devoured
~:istance the two images. This happened t\vice or thrice, and God
of a dog. was at his wits' end, for he had to work all day, and could
not finish the pair in less than twelve hours; besides, if he
did not sleep, ''he would be no good," as the native narrator
observed with some show of probability. So, as I have
said, God was at his wits' end. But at last he got up early
one morning and first made a dog and put life into it ; and
that night, when he had finished the images, he set the dog
to watch them, and when the snake came, the dog barked
and frightened it away. That is why to this day, when a
man is dying, the dogs begin to howl ; but the Kumis think
that God sleeps heavily nowadays, or that the snake is
bolder, for men die in spite of the howling of the dogs. If
God did not sleep, there would be neither sickness nor
death ; it is during the hours of his slumber that the snake
1
comes and carries us off. A similar tale is told by the
Khasi Khasis of Assam. In the beginning, they say, God created
;:~s~~~.of man and placed him on earth, but on returning to look at
the work of his hands he found that the man had been
destroyed by the evil spirit. This happened a second
time, whereupon the deity created first a dog and then a
man ; and the dog kept watch and prevented the devil
from destroying the man. Thus the work of the deity
Korku 2
was preserved. The same story also crops up, with a
version of
the tale. slight varnish of Hindoo mythology, among the Korkus, an
aboriginal tribe of the Central Provinces of India. Accord-
ing to them, Rawan, the demon king of Ceylon, observed
that the Vindhyan and Satpura ranges were uninhabited,
and he besought the great god Mahadeo to people them.
So Mahadeo, by whom they mean Siva, sent a crow to find
for him an ant-hill of red earth, and the bird discovered
such an ant-hill among the mountains of Betul. Thereupon
the god repaired to the spot, and taking a handful of the red
1
Captain T. H. Lewin, Wild Races The Khasis, Second Edition (London,
ef South - Eastern India (London, 1914), p. 106. Compare A. Bastian,
1870), pp. 224-226.
Volkerstiimnie am Brahniaputra und
2 verwandtschaftli"che Nachbarn (Berlin,
Lieut.-Colonel P. R. T. Gurdon I l 883), p. 8.
. .
. CHAP. 1
earth he fashioned out of it two images, in the likeness of
a man and a woman. But no sooner had he done so than
two fiery horses, sent by Indra, rose from the earth and.
trampled the images to dust. For two days the Creator
persisted in his attempts, but as often as the images were
made they were dashed in pieces by the horses. At last
the god made an image of a dog, and breathed into it the
bieath of life, and the animal kept off the fiery steeds of
Indra. Thus the god was able to make the two images of
man and woman undisturbed, and bestowing life upon them,
he called them Mula and Mulai. These two became the
ancestors of the Korku tribe. 1
A like tale is told, with a curious variation, by the Munda

. . . a b or1g1na
M un d as, a pr1m1t1ve . . 1 tr1'b e o f Ch ota N agpur. Th ey the
version
tale.of
say that the Sun-god, by name Singbonga, first fashioned

. two clay figures, one meant to rep1esent a man and the other
a \Voman. But before he could endow the figures \Vith life,

the horse, apprehensive of what in future he might endure
at their hands, trampled them under its hoofs. In those
days the horse had wings and could move about much faster
than now. When the Sun-god found that the horse had
destroyed his earthen figures of men, he first created a spider
and then fashioned two more clay figures like those which
the horse had demolished. Next he ordered the spider to
guard the effigies against the horse. Accordingly the spider
wove its web round the figures in such a way that the horse
could not break them again. After that, the Sun-god im-
parted life to the two figures, which thus became the first
2
human beings.
A story of the same sort, in fuller form and with Santal
material variations, is told by the Santals of Bengal. They ~~~7ti~~ t~;

say that in the beginning there was a certain Thal<:ur Jiu. man.
There was no land visible, all was covered with water.
Then Thakur Jiu's servants said to him, ''How shall we
create human beings?'' He replied, '' If it be so desired,
1 R. V. Russell, The Tribes and (Banl<ipore, 1916) pp. 201 sq. Tl1e
Castes of the Central P1ovinceJ of I1idia writer adds in a note, '' 'l'he Bir-l16rs
(London, 1916), iii. 551 sq. and the Ast11s of Cl1C1ta Nagpur st1bsti-
tt1te the clog for the s1)ider. 1'11e dog
Sarat Chandra Roy, '' Tl1e Divine
2 wot1lcl liar!< at tl1e hlJrse and frighten
Myths rJf the Mt1n(las,'' Joztr1ial of the hin1 away \vl1enever lie atte111ptecl to
Biha1 a1zrl OriJsa /(r;sea1lh .S'ociety, ii. ~lJJ\Jfl)ttcl1 tl1e cl:1y figt11cs. ''
20 THE CREATION OF MAN PAR1' I
we can create them." They then said, ''If you give us a

blessing (or the gift), we shall be able to do so." Thakur
Jiu then said, '' Go, call Malin Budhi. She is to be found
in a rock cave under the water." When she came, she
How the received the order to form two human beings. Some say
clayimages
were
she made them of a kind of froth which proceeded from a
trampled supernatural being who dwelt at the bottom of the sea, but
tDo ay-
piehces by
orse. others say she made them of a stiff clay. Thakur Jiu was
a spectator of what \vas being done. At length Malin
Budhi made the bodies of two human beings, and laid them
out to dry. In the meantime Day-horse (Singh Sadom)
passed that way, and trampling them under foot destroyed
them. After an interval Thakur Jiu demanded of Malin
Budhi \vhether she had prepared the figures. Slie replied,
'' I made them, but I have many enemies." Thakur Jiu
inquired who they were, and she answered, ''Who but Day-
horse? '' Thakur Jiu then said, ''Kick the pieces into the
'
Sora Nai and the Samud Nai." At this point the reciter
of the story chants the following staves::-
'' Oh ! the Day-horse. Oh ! the Day-horse,
The Day-horse has gone to the n'ver Gang,
The Day-horse has floated to the Sora Sea,
Oh ! the Day-horse.''
The Thakur ] iu then said to Malin Budhi, '' I again give you a
creation of
t\vo birds. blessing ; go, make two human beings." Having prepared
them, she went to Thakur Jiu, who said, ''Well, have you
got them ready?'' She replied, ''They are ready; give
them the gift of life." He said, ''Above the door-fra1ne is
the life (or spirit) of birds ; do not bring that. Upon the
cross-beam is the life of human beings; bring it." So she
went, but being low of stature she could not reach the
cross-beam ; hence she brought the birds' life from above the
door. No sooner had she given the birds' life to the figures
than they flew up into the heavens, where they continued to
course about, whether for twelve years or for twelve months
is doubtful. The names of the birds were Has and Basin.
At length the desire to breed came upon them, and they
went to Thakur Jiu and said, ''You gave us being, but we
cannot find a place on which to rest.'' He answered, '' I
will prepare a place for you."
CH:At>. I
Living in the water were Sole-fish, Crab, Prince Earth- Theraising

worm, and Lendom Kuar. Thakur Jiu called them and oftheearth
ordered them to raise the earth above the water. Sole-fish ~~~e~~ the
said, '' I will raise the earth above the water," but though
he tried and tried again, he could not do it. Then Crab
came and said, '' I will do it," but he also failed. Prince
Earth-worm then came and undertook to accomplish it. So
he ducked his head under water and swallowed earth and
the earth passed through him and catne out at the other '
end ; but when it fell on the surface of the water, it imme-
diately sank to the bottom again. Then Prince Earth-
worm said, ''Within the water resides Prince Tortoise; if we
fasten him at the four corners with chains, and then. raise
the earth on his back, it \vill remai11 and not fall into the
water again." So Prince Earth-\vorm secured Prince Tor-
toise with chains and raised the earth on his back, and in a
short time there was an island in the midst of the waters.
1
Thakur Jiu then caused a kara1n tree to spring up, and at
2
the foot of the kara11i tree he caused sz'ro11i grass to grow.
3
He then caused dhobi grass to spring up, after which he
covered the earth with all kinds of trees and herbs. In
this manner the earth became firm and stable.
Then the birds Has and Hasin came and alighted on Human
the kara1n tree, and afterwards made their nest among the ~~~~~!d
sz'ro11i grass at its foot. There the female laid two eggs, out of
and Raghop Buar came an d ate t h em. A gain s e at . h l "d birds' eggs.
other two eggs, and again Raghop Buar came and devoured
them. Then Has and Hasin went to Thal{ur Jiu and
informed him that Raghop Buar had twice eaten their
eggs. On hearing this Thakur Jiu said, '' I shall send
some one to guard your eggs." So, calling Jaher-era, he
committed the eggs of the two birds to her care. So well
did she perform her task that the fen1ale was allowed
to hatch her eggs, and from the eggs emerged two human
beings, a male and a female ; their names were Pilchu
Haram and Pilchu Budhi. These were the parents of man-
kind. Here the reciter of the story bursts out into song as
follows:-
-- ---------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 Adi1ia co1-difolia, fiook. f. Bentl1. 2 A1tdrof!oJ:o1t 1111t1'1:cat11s, Retz.
3 C)11101l111t dalty/011, I.'c1s.
'' Hae, hae, two human beings,

Hae, hae, are born zn the water,
Hae, hae, how can I bri1zg the11z up .'2
Hae, hae, where can .l place the1n ?
My mother gave 1ne bz.rth among the sirom grass,
My father had hzs dwelli1zg at the karma tree foot.'' 1
Creation This Santai story of the origin of man combines the

and principles of creation and evolution, for according to it man-
evolution
combined kind is ultimately derived from t\VO images, which were
in the modelled in human form out of froth or damp clay, but
Santai
story. were afterwards accidentally transformed into birds, from
. whose eggs the first man and woman of flesh and blood
were hatched. ,
Cheremiss The Cheremiss of Russia, a Finnish people, tell a story
story_ of the of the creation of man which recalls episodes in the Toradjan
creation of
man. and Indian legends of the same event. They say that God
moulded man's body of clay and then went up to heaven to
fetch the soul, with which to animate it. In his absence he
set the dog to guard the body. But V.'hile he was away the
Devil drew near, and blowing a cold wind on the dog he
seduced the animal by the bribe of a fur-coat to relax his
guard. Thereupon the fiend spat on the clay body and be-
slavered it so foully, that when God came back he despaired
of ever cleaning up the mess and saw himself reduced to the
painful necessity of turning the body outside in. That is
why a man's inside is now so dirty. And God cursed the
dog the same day for his culpable neglect of duty. 2
African Turning now to Africa, we find the legend of the creation
shtories r of mankind out of clay among the Shilluks of the vVhite
0
t e creation
of man. Nile, who ingeniously explain the different complexions of
~~~Iuk the various races by the differently coloured clays out of
version of which they were fashioned. They say that the creator Juok
the tale. I
moulded a 1 men out of earth, and that while he was engaged
in the work of creation he wandered about the world. In
the land of the whites he found a pure white earth or sand,
and out of it he shaped white men. Then he came to the
land of Egypt and out of the mud of the Nile he made red
'
I Rev. A. Campbell, D.D., ''The 2
Jean N. Smirnov, Les Popzelations
Traditions of the Santals,'' The Journal Fz"n1zoises des Bassi1zs de la Volga et de
efthe Biharand 01-issaResearchSociety, la Ka11ia, Premiere Partie (Paris, I 898),
ii. (Bankipore, 1916) pp. 15-17. p. 200.
CHAP. I
THE CREATION OF .MAN 23
or brown men. Lastly, he came to the land of the Shilluks
and finding there black earth he created black men out of it'.
The way in which he modelled men was this. He took a
lump of earth and said to himself, ''I will make man , but he
must be able to walk and run and go out into the fields, so
I will give him t\vo long legs, like the flamingo." Having
done so, he thought again, '' The man must be able to culti-
vate his millet, so I will give him two arms, one to hold the
hoe, and the other to tear up the weeds." So he gave him
two arms. Then he thought again, ''The man must be able
to see his millet, so I will give him two eyes." He did so
accordingly. Next he thought to himself, ''The man must
be able to eat his millet, so I will give him a mouth." And
a mouth he gave him accordingly. After that he thought
within himself, ''The man must be able to dance and speak
and sing and shout, and for these purposes he must have a
tongue." And a tongue he gave him accordingly. Lastly,
the deity said to himself, '' The man must be able to hear the
noise of the dance and the speech of great men, and for that
he needs two ears." So two ears he gave him, and sent
him out into the world a perfect man. 1 The Fans of West The Fan
Africa say that God created man out of clay, at first in the ;~~s!~~r;.r
shape of a liza1d, which he put in a pool of water and left
there for seven days. At the end of the seven days God
cried, '' Come forth," and a man came out of the pool instead
2
of a lizard. The Ewe-speaking tribes of Togo-land, in West The. Ewe
Africa, think that God still makes men out of clay. When ;~~s~~~r;:
a little of the water with which he moistens -the clay remains
over, he pours it on the ground, and out of that he makes
the bad and disobedient people. When he wishes to make
a good man he makes him out of good clay ; but when he
wishes to make a bad man, he employs only bad clay for .
the purpose. In the beginning God fashioned a man and
set him on the earth ; after that he fashioned a woman.
The two looked at each other and began to laugh, where-
3
upon God sent them into the world.
1 W. Hofmayr, ''Die Religion cler (Berlin, 1913), ii. 18.
Schilluk,'' Aiithropos, vi. (1911) pp. a JakolJ S[Jicth, Die E1he-St1i'111111e,
I 28 sq. Material z111 ./(11111ie deJ Ei11e - Volkes
in De11tsch- logo (l~erlin, 1906), pp.
2 Glinter Tessmann, Die JYangwe 828, 840.

American The story of the creation of mankind out of clay occurs

stories of
tl1ecreation also in America, both among the Eskimo and the Indians,
of man. from Alaska to Paraguay. Thus the Eskimo of Point
Eskimo
\'ersions of Barrow, in Alaska, tell of a time when there was no man in
the story. the land, till a certain spirit named d se lu, who resided at
Point Barrow, made a clay man, set him up on the shore to
1
dry, breathed into him, and gave him life. Other Esl{imo
of Alaska relate how the Raven made the first woman
out of clay, to be a companion to the first man ; he fastened
water-grass to the back of the head to be hair, flapped his
\vings over the clay figure, and it arose, a beautiful young
Califo1nian \voman. 2 The Acagchemem Indians of California said that
!~~\:~of a powerful being called Chinigchinich created man out of
thecreatio11 clay which he found 011 the banks of a lake ; male and
of nlan. fem ale created he them, and the Indians of the. present day
3
a1e the descendants of the clay man and woman.

l\1aidu

According to the Maidu Indians of California the first
version
of tl1e
man and woman were created by a mysterious personage
story. named Earth-Initiate, who descended from the sky by a rope
made of feathers. His body shone like the sun, but his face
was hidden and never seen. One afternoon he took dark
red earth, mixed it with water, and fashioned t\vo figures,
one of them a man and the other a woman. He laid the
man on his right side and the woman on his left side, i11 his
house. He lay thus and sweated all that afternoon and all
that nigl1t. Early in the morning the woman began to
tickle him in the side. He kept very still and did not laugh.
By and by he arose, thrust a piece of pitch-wood i11to the
ground, and fi1e burst out. The t\vo people were very white.
No one to-day is so white as they were. Their eyes were
pin!<:, their hair was blacl\:, their teeth shone brightly, and
they were very handsome. It is said that Earth-Initiate did
11ot finish the hands of the people, because he did not know
how best to do it. The coyote, or prairie-wolf, who plays a
great part in the myths of the Western Indians, saw the
I Repo1t ef the Inter11ationa! Ex- logy, Part i. (Washington, 1899) p.
peditio1z to Point Barrozo (Washington, 454.
1885), p. 47. 3
Father Geronimo Boscana, ''Chi-
2 E.W. Nelson, ''Tl1e Eskimo about nigchinich, '' appended to [A. Robin-
Bering Strait,'' Eighteenth An1tztal Re- son's] Life i1z Californza (New York,
port of the Bu1eau ef A11t~rica1z Ethno- 1846), p. 247.
'
- - - -

CHAP. I
'
people and suggested that they ought to have hands like his.
11
But Earth-Initiate said, No, their hands shall be like 1nine."
Then he finished them. When the coyote asked \Vhy their
hands were to be like that, Earth-Initiate answered, '1 So
that, if they are chased by bears, they can climb trees." The
first man \Vas called Kuksu, and the first woman was called
Morning-Star Woman. 1
The Dieguefio Indians or, as they call themselves, the The

. wh o occupy th e extreme sout h -weste1n corner
K awa k ipa1s, . creation
f
o man
of the State of California, have a myth to explain how the according
r to the
wor ld in its present iorm and the huma11 race were created. Dieguefio
Tl1ey say that in the beginni11g there was no eartl1 or solid Ind!ans _of
. b 1 .
1an d , not h 1ng ut sa t water, one vast primeval ocean. But Cal1forn1a.
under the sea lived two brothers, of whom the elder was
named Tcaipakomat. Both of them l<:ept their eyes shut,
for if they had not done so, the salt water would have
blinded them. Afte1 a while the elder brother came up to
the surface and lool<:ed about him, but he could see nothing
but water. The younger brother also came up, but on the
\vay to the surface he incautiously opened his eyes, and the
salt water blinded him; so when he emerged he could
see nothing at all, and therefore he sank bacl{ into the
depths. Left alone on the face of the deep, the elder
brother now undertool<: the task of creating a habitable earth
out of the waste of waters. First of all he made little red
ants, which produced land by filling up the water solid with
their tiny bodies. But still tl1e world \Vas dark, for as yet
neither sun nor inoorr had been created. Tcaipakomat now
caused certain blacl{ birds with flat bills to come into being ;
but in the darkness the bi1ds lost their way and could not
fi11d 'vhere to roost. Next Tcaipakomat took three kinds
of clay, red, yellow, and blacl<:, and thereof he.1nade a round
flat thing, which he tool<: in 11is hand and thre\V up against
the sky. It stucl<: there, and begi11ning to shed a dim ligl1t
became the moon. Dissatisfied with the fair1t illumination
of this pallid orb, Tcaipakomat tool<: mo1e clay, moulded it
into another round flat disc, and tossed it t1p against the
other side of the sky. It stuck tl1ere and became the sun,
1 J:Zrila11<l ]{ l)ixo11, '' Maiclt1 l\1yt11s,'' Mit111al lli.rlo1J xvii. }'art ii. (New
1,
/J1tllct1'1i f!f the A111e1icci11 ll11tsczt111 ef Yc>rl(, I 902 ), p]J. 39, 4 I sq.
lighting up everything with his beams. After that Tcaipa-

komat took a lump of light-coloured clay, split it pa1tly up,
and made a man of it. Then he took a rib from the man
and made a woman of it. The woman thus created out of
the man's rib was called Sinyaxau or First Woman (from
siny, '' woman," and axau, '' first''). From this first man
and woman, modelled by the Creator out of clay, mankind
is descended. At first people lived at a great mountain
called Wikami. If you go there and put your ear to the
ground, you will hear the sound of dancing; it is made by
the spirits of all the dead people footing it away. For when
people die, they go back to the place where all things were at
1
first created, and there they dance, just as live folks do here.
The Hopi The Hopi or Moqui Indians of Arizona similarly believe
story_of the that in the beginning there was nothing but water every-
creat1on of
man. where, and that two de1t1es, apparently goddesses, both
named Huruing Wuhti, lived in houses in the ocean, one of
them in the east, and the other in the west ; and these t\vo
by their efforts caused dry land to appear in the midst of
-
the water. Nevertheless the sun, on his daily passage across
the newly created earth, noticed that there was no living
being of any kind on the face of the ground, and he brought
this radical defect to the notice of the two deities. Accord-
ingly the divinities met in const1ltation, the eastern goddess
passing over the sea on the rainbow as a bridge to visit her
western colleague. Having laid their heads togetl1er they
resolved to make a little bird ; so the goddess of the east
made a wren of clay, and togetl1er they chanted an incanta-
tion over it, so that the clay bird soon came to life. Then
they sent out the wren to fly over the world and see whether
he could discover any living being on the face of the earth ;
but on his return he reported that no such being existed.
anywhere. Afterwards the two deities created many sorts
of birds and beasts in like manner, and sent them forth to
inl1abit the world. Last of all the two goddesses made up
their mind to create man. Thereupon the eastern goddess
took clay and moulded out of it first a woman and after-

T. T. \V"ater111an, The Religious
1 sity of California Publications in
Practices ef the Dieguei'io Indiaiis (Ber- At1ie1ican Archaeology a1id Ethnology
keley, 1910), pp. 338 sq. ( U11iver- vol. viii. No. 6.) '

' ' ' .. '
. CHAP. I ' ' ' '
THE CREATION OF MAN
wards a man; and the clay man and woman were brought
to life just as the birds and beasts had been so before them. 1
The Pima Indians, another tribe of Arizona, allege The
that the Creator took clay into his hands, and mixing creation
h h of man
it wit t e sweat of his own body, kneaded the whole according
into a lump. 1'hen he blew upon the lump till it began tP~1rnas the d
an
to live and move and became a man and a woman. 2 A Natchez.
priest of the Natchez Indians in Louisiana told Du Pratz
''that God had kneaded some clay, such as that which
potters use, and had made it into a little man ; and that
after examining it, and finding it well formed, he blew
upon his worl{, and forthwith that little man had life, grew,
acted, walked, and found himself a man perfectly well
shaped." As to the mode in which the first woman was
created, the priest frankly confessed that he had no informa-
tion, the ancient traditions of his tribe being silent as to any
difference in the creation of tl1e sexes ; he thought it likely,
however, that man and woman were made in the same way.
So Du Pratz corrected his erroneous ideas by telling him the
tale of Eve and the rib, and the grateful Indian promised to
3
bruit it about among the old men of his tribe.
The Michoacans of Mexico said that the great god Stories ~f
the creation
Tucapacha first made man and woman out of clay, but that of man told
when the couple went to bathe in a river they absorbed so by ~he
Indians of
1nuch water that the clay of \vh1ch they \Vere composed all Mexico,
fell to pieces. To remedv
this inconvenience the Creator Peru, and
Paraguay.
applied himself again to his task and moulded them afresh out
of ashes, but the result was again disappointing. At last,
not to be baffled, he made the1n of metal. His perseverance
was rewarded. The man and woman were now perfectly
watertight ; they bathed in the river without falling in pieces,
4
and by their union they became the progenitors of 1nankind.
l H. I{. Voth, The T1-aditio1zs of of the vast Contz'1ze11t a1td Isla1zds o/.
the Hopi (Chicago, l 905), pp. 1 sq. A11ze1ica, translated into English by
(Field Colu11zbian Jlfuseu11t, Pztblica- Capt. J. Stevens (London, I 725-1726),

tion, 96) . iii. 254 ; Brasseur de Bot1rbot1rg, Hi.r
toi1e 1les Natio11s civi!isle.r dzt llfexiq11e
2 H. H. Bancroft, The Nati1Je l?a1es
et de !'A 11ze1iq11e- Ce1it1a!e (l)a1is, I 8 57-
of the Paciji,c States (Lonclon, l 87 5- I 8 59 ), iii. 80 sq. ; co1111)are id.' i. _54
1876), iii. 78. .rq. A siinilar sto1y of the s11ccess1ve
3 Le I'age du Pratz, The .llistory of cieatio 11 of tl1e !1u111an race 011t of
Louisiana (Lonclon, 1774), p. 330. materials is told i11 the l'opol vl1h.
4 A. cle I-Ierrera, G'e1zeral Hi"Jtory See below, J). 276.
According to a legend of the Peruvian Indians, which was

told to a Spanish priest in Cuzco about half a century after
the conquest, it was in Tiahuanaco that the human race \Vas
restored after the great flood which had destroyed them all,
except one man and woman. There in Tiahuanaco, which
is about seventy leagues from Cuzco, ''the Creator began to
raise up the people and ,nations, that are in that region,
making one of each nation of clay, and painting the dresses
that each one was to wear. Those that were to wear their
l1air, with hair ; and those that were to be shorn, with hair
cut; and to each nation was given the language that was to
be spol(en, and the songs to be sung, and the seeds and food
that they were to sow. When the Creator had finished paint-
ing and making the said nations and figures of clay, he gave
life and soul to each one, as well men as women, and ordered
that they should pass under the earth. Thence each nation
1
came up in the places to \vhich he ordered them to go."
The Lengua Indians of Paraguay believe that the C1eator, in
the shape of a beetle, inhabited a hole in the earth, and that
he formed man and woman out of the clay which he threw
up from his subterranean abode. At first the two were
joined together, '' like the Siamese twins," and in this very
inconvenient posture they were sent out into the wo1ld,
'
where they contended, at great disadvantage, with a race of
powerful beings whom the beetle had previously created.
So the man and \Voman besought the beetle to separate
them. He complied with their request and gave them the
power to propagate their species. So they became the
pa1ents of mankind. But the beetle, having created the
\vorld, ceased to take any active part or interest in it. 2 We
are reminded of the fanciful account which Aristophanes, in
the Sy1nposiu11z of Plato, gives of the original condition of
mankind ; how man and woman at first were knit together
in one composite being, with two heads, four arms, and four
legs, till Zeus cleft them down the middle and so separated
3
the sexes.
1 Christoval de Molina, ''The Fables 2
W. Barbrooke Grt1b, An Unk11own
and Rites of the Yncas, '' in Na17at1"ves People iiz an Unk11ow11 Land (London,
of the Rites a1zd Laws of the Y1zcas, 1911), jJp. 114 sq.
translated and edited by (Sir) Clements 3
Plato, Sy1nposium, pp. I 89 n-
I{. Markham (London, 1873), p. 4. 191 D.
CHAP. I
It is to be observed that in a number of these stories the our first
clay out of which our first parents were moulded is said to parents
h b d moulded
ave een re . The colour was probably intended to explain out of red
the redness of blood. Though the Jehovistic writer in Genesis clay.
omits to mention the colour of the clay which God used in
the construction of Adam, we may perhaps, without being
very rash, conjecture that it was red. For the Hebrew word
for man in general is adam, the word for ground is adamah,
and the word for red is ado1n ; so that by a natural and
almost necessary concatenation of causes we arrive at the
conclusion that our first parent was modelled out of red
earth. If any lingering doubt could remain in our mind on
the subject, it would be dissipated by the observation that
do\vn to this day the soil of Palestine is of a dark reddish
brown, '' suggesting," as the \vriter who notices it justly
remarks, '' the connection between Adam and the ground
from which he was taken ; especially is this colour noticeable
when the soil is newly turned, either by the plough or in
1
digging." So remarkably does nature itself bear witness to
the literal accuracy of Holy Writ.
Hovvever, it is noteworthy that in regard to the origin of Many
. . h h h f
the h uman species many savages reject t e ypot es1s o believethat savages
creation in favour of the theory of evolution. They believe, man was

. h . l h . "b l . not created
1n fact, t at men 1n genera , or t eir own tr1 espeop e 1n but evolved
particular, have been developed out of lower forms of animal 011 toflower
. . . l l l forms of
life. The theory o f evo1ut1on 1s part1cu ar y popu ar among animal life.
totemic tribes who imagine that thei1 ancestors sprang from Am~rican
Indian
their totemic animals or plants, but it is by no means con- stories
fined to them. For example, some of the Californian Indians, evo of t het.
1u 1011
in whose mythology the coyote or prairie-wolf is a leading of m~n out
. k h h d d d f
personage, thin t at t ey are escen e rom coyo es. t At of animals.
first they walked on all fours ; then they began to have some
members of the human body, one finger, 011e toe, one eye,
one ear, and so on ; then they got two fingers, two toes, t\vo
eyes, t\VO ears, and so forth ; till at last, p1ogressing f1om
period to period, they became perfect hu1nan beings. Tl1e
loss of their tails, which they still deplore, was produced by
2
the habit of sitting upright. Si1nilarly Darwin thought that
1 ]{ev. T. C. Wilson, Peasa1zt Life iii 2 II. I<. Sl'.hoolcraft, .!11dia11 7?i/i,'s
the Joly Land(Lori<lon, 1906), lJ 189. of tlte U11ite1t .~'tatej, iv. (Pl1il<1tlel1Jl1i~1,
THE CREATION OF MAN PART I
cc the tail has disappeared in man and the anthropomorphous

apes, owing to the terminal portion having been injured by
friction during a long lapse of time; the basal and embedded
portion having been reduced and modified, so as to become
1
suitable to the erect or semi-erect position." The Turtle
Iroquois clan of the Iroquois think that they are descended from real
story. mud turtles which used to live in a pool. One hot summer
the pool dried up, and the mud turtles set out to find another.
A very fat turtle, waddling after the rest in the heat, was
much incommoded by the weight of his shell, till by a great
effort he heaved it off altogether. After that he gradually
developed into a human being and became the progenitor of
2
Choctaw the Turtle clan. The Crawfish clan of the Choctaws are in
story. . like manner descended from real crawfish, \Vhich used to live
underground, only coming up occasionally through the mud
to the surface. Once a party of Chocta\vs smoked them out,
taught them to speak the .Choctaw language and to walk on
two legs, and made them cut off their toe nails and pluck
the hair from their bodies, after which they adopted them
into the tribe. But the rest of their kindred, the crawfish,
3
Osage are crawfish under the ground to this day. The Osage
story. Indians universally believed that they were descended from
a male snail and a female beaver. A flood swept the snail
down to the Missouri and left him high and dry on the bank,
\vhere the sun ripened him into a man. He met and married
a beaver maid, and f.rom the pair the tribe of the Osages is
descended. For a long time these Indians retained a pious
reverence for their animal ancestors and refrained from hunt-
ing beavers, because in killing a beaver they killed a brother
of the Osages. But when white men came among them and
offered high prices for beaver skins, the Osages yielded to the
temptation and took the lives of their furry brethren.4 The
1856) pp. 224 sq.; compare id., v. the Bureau ef Eth1zology (Washington,
2 I 7. The descent of some, not all, I 883), p. 77
Indians from coyotes is n1entioned also 3 1
by Friar Boscana, in [A. Robinson's] Geo. Catlin, Letters and Notes on

Lift in Califor1zia (New York, 1846), the Ma1zners, Custo1ns, and Condition
p. 299, of the North Ameri,an I1zdz'a1zs Fourth
1 Charles Darwin, The Descent of Edition (London, 1844), ii. 1~8.
Man, Second Edition (London, 1879), 4
M. Lewis and W. Clark, Travels
p. 60. to the Source of the Mz'ssoztri Rz'ver
2
E. A. Smith, ''Myths of the (London, 1815), i. 12 (vol. i. pp. 44
Iroquois,'' Seco1zd Atznual Report ef sq. of the London reprint, 1905).
CHAP. I THE CREATION OF MAN 31
Carp cla11 of the Ootawak (Ottawa) Indians are descended Ottaw~
from the eggs of a carp which had been deposited by the fish story.
on the banl<:s of a stream and 'varmed by the sun.1 The Crane
clan of the Ojibways are sprung originally from a pair of Ojibway
cranes, which after long wanderings settled on the rapids at story.
the outlet of Lake Superior, where they were changed by
the Great Spirit into a man and woman.2 The members of
t\vo Omaha clans were at first buffaloes and lived under Omaha
water, which they splashed about, making it muddy. And story.
at death all the members of these clans went back to their
ancestors the buffaloes. So when one of them lay a-dying,
his friends used to wrap him up in a buffalo skin with the
hair outside a11d say to him, '' You came hither from the
animals and you are going back thither. Do not face this
\vay again. When you go, continue wal~ing." 3
The Haida Haida
Indians of the Queen Charlotte Islands believe that long ago story.
the raven, who is the chief figure in the mythology of North-
Western America, took a cockle from the beach and married it;

the cockle gave birth to a female child, whom the raven took
to wife, and from their union the Indians were produced.~
Speaking of these Indians, a writer who lived among them
tells us that '' their descent from the crows is quite gravely
affirmed and steadfastly inaintained. Hence they never will
kill one, and are always annoyed, not to say angry, should
we whites, driven to desperation by the crow-nests on every
side of us, attempt to destroy them. This idea likewise
accounts for the coats of black paint with which young and
old in all those tribes constantly besmear themselves. The
crow-like colour affectionately reminds the Indians of their re-
5
puted fore[athers, and thus preserves the national tradition."
The Delaware Indians called the rattlesnake their grand- Dela\\'are
. story.
father and would on no account destroy one o f t h ese rept1 1es,
believing that were they to do so tl1e whole race of rattle-
snal<:es would rise up and bite them. Under the influence
1 Lettres Edijia11tes et Curie11.ves, I 884), JJp. 229, 233
Nouvelle i<:<lition, vi. (Paris, 178 I) 4G. M. J)a\vson, Report 011. the
P l 71. Qz1ee1z Cha1,lotte Js/a111/s (J\1ontreal,
2 L. I{. Morgan, Ancie11t .S'o1iety r 880 ), p11. l 491i sq. ( G'eolo.i,ri'cal .S'tt7"Vl:;J'
(I,on<lon, 1877), p. 180. of Ctina1la ).
3 J. Owen Dorsey, '' Omal1a S~cic> 6 I<'rancis l)oole, Q111:e1t Cha1lotte
lcigy, '' J'hirtl A1z1tztal ./1'epo1't. q/ the /.v/11111/J, e<litccl by J0!111 \V. Lynclo11
Bureazt of Ethriology (Wasl11ngton, (l,onclcin, 1872), 1) 136.

of the white man, however, their respect for their grandfather

the rattlesnake gradually died away, till at last they killed
him without compunction or ceremony whenever they met
him, The writer who records the old custom observes that
he had often reflected on the curious connexion which
'
appears to subsist in the mind of an Indian between man
and the brute creation ; '' all animated nature," says he, '' in
whatever degree, is in their eyes a great whole, from which
1
they have not yet ventured to separate themselves." Ho\v-
ever, the title of grandfather, which these Indians bestowed
on the rattlesnake, hardly suffices to prove that they believed
themselves to be actually descended from the creature; it
may have only been a polite form of address intended to
soothe and gratify the formic;lable reptile. Some of the
Peruvia11 Indians of Peru boasted of being descended from the puma
story. or American lion ; hence they adored the lion as a god, and
appeared at festivals, like Hercules, dressed in the skins of
lions with the heads of the beasts fixed over their own.
'
Others claimed to be descended from condors and attired
themselves in great black and white wings, like that huge
2
bird.
African and The Wanika of East Africa look upon the hyena as one
Malagasy

stories of their ancestors or as associated in some way with their
of the origin and destiny. The death of a hyena is mourned by
evolution
of men out the whole people, and the greatest funeral ceremonies which
of a11in1als. they perform are performed for this brute. The wake held
over a chief is as nothing compared to the wake held over a
hyena; one tribe alone mourns the death of its chief, but
all the tribes unite to celebrate the obsequies of a hyena. 3
Some Malagasy families claim to be descended from the
babacoote (Lichanotus brevicaudatus), a large lemur of grave
appeara11ce and staid demeanour which lives in the depth
of the forest. When they find one of these creatt1res dead,
Rev. John Heckewelder, ''An
1 2
Garcilasso de la Vega, First Part
Account of the History, Manners, and if the Royal Co1n11tentaries if the Y11Las,
Customs of tl1e Indian Nations, who translated and edited by (Sir) Clements
once inhabited Pennsylvania and the R. M~rkham (London, 1869-1871), i.
Neighbouring States,'' Transactions ef 323, II. I 56,
the Historical a11d Literary Co11z111ittee
ef the America11 Philosophical .'lociety 3
Charles New, Life, WanderingJ,
(Philadelphia, r8r9), pp. 245, 247, a11d Labours in EaJfern Africa
248, (London, I 87 3), p. I 22.
' '
CHAP. I
THE CREATION OF MAN
'
33
. ?is huma? d~sc~ndants b11ry it solemnly, digging a grave for.
~t, wrapping 1t .1n a shroud, and weeping and lamenting over
its carcase. A doctor who had shot a babacoote was accused
by the inhabitants of a Betsimisaraka village of having killed
'' one of their grandfathers in the forest," and to appease their
indignation he had to promise not to skin the animal in the
village but in a solitary place where nobody could see him.1
Many of the Betsimisaraka believe that the curious nocturnal
animal called the aye-aye ( Cheiro112ys madagascari'e1zsi's) ''is
the embodiment of their forefathers, and hence will not touch
it, much less do. it an injury. It is said that when one is
discovered dead in the forest, these people make a tomb for
it and bury it with all the forms of a funeral. They think
that if they attempt to entrap it, they will surely die in
2
consequence." Some lVialagasy tribes believe themselves
descended from crocodiles and accordingly they deem the
ferocious reptiles their brothers. If one of these scaly
brothers so far forgets the ties of kinship as to devour a
man, the chief of the tribe, or in his absence an old man
familiar with the tribal customs, repairs at the head of the
people to the edge of the water, and summons the family
of the culprit to deliver him up to the arm of justice. A
hook is then baited and cast into the river or lake. Next
day the guilty brother, or one of his family, is dragged
ashore, formally tried, sentenced to death, and executed.
The claims of justice being thus satisfied, the erring brother
is lamented and buried like a kinsman ; a mound is raised
3
over his grave, and a stone marks the place of 11is head.
Amongst the Tshi-speaking tribes of the Gold Coast in Stories
West Africa the Horse-mackerel family traces its descent ~~~fu~ion
from a real horse-mackerel \V horn an ancestor of theirs once of men out
of fish told
I Father Abina!, '' Croyances fabu- 2 G. A. Shaw ''The Aye-aye,'' The in :-Vest .
. ' d ,,, i\fr1ca and
leuses des Malgaches, '' Les MisJioti.r A1zta1za1za1zvo A1z1iual a11 ll-fau1ii;asca1- B .
. .. (A . ' )
llfa,r;azz1ze, vo 1. 11. ntananar1 vo, l 8 9 6 , orneo.
Catholiques, xii. (1880) p. 526; G. H.
Smith, ''Some Betsimisaral'a S111)er- PIJ 201, 203 (IZeprint of tl1e Second
stitions, '' The A 11ta1iana1ivo A1z1iual Fou1 N11mbers). Co1111Ja1e A. van
and Jl,fada,![ascar Ma,l{azi1zt, No. 10 Gennep, Tabo11 et Tott!111is11te a Jl.fada-
(Antftnanarivo, 1886), P 239; H. W. gasca1, p11. 28 l sq.
3 Father Abina!, '' Croyances fabt1-
J_,ittle, Madagascar, its .f.liJtory and
l'eople (T.c1nclon, 1884), PP 321 s_q. ; Jeuses cles Malgaches, '' Le.r llfi.>.rions
A. van Gcnnef), 7'aboit et 7'ott!1111s11te Catholiq11e.r, xii. (1880) IJ 527; A. van
a ,'Yfada,r:aJtar ( I)aris, 1904), l)fJ. 214 Gen11ep, 7/ibote et 7ott!111is111e a llfr11la-
,i;njc1ir, 11JJ. 2 8 l sq.
J'qq.
D
VOL. I
34 THE Cl~EATION OF MAN PART I
took to wife. She lived with him happily in human shape

on shore, till one day a second \vife, whom the man had
married, cruelly taunted her with being 11othing but a fish.
That hurt her so much that, bidding her husband farewell,
she returned to her old home in the sea, \vith her youngest
child in her arms, and never came back again. But ever
since the Horse-mackerel people have ref1ained from eating
horse-mackerels because the lost wife and mother was a fish
1
of that sort. Some of the Land Dyaks of Borneo tell a
similar tale to explain a similar custom. '' There is a fish
which is taken in their riv.ers called a puttin, \Vhich they
would on no account touch; under the idea that if they did
they would be eating their relations. Tl1e tradition respect-
ing it is, that a solitary old man went 011t fishing and caught
a puttz"rt, which he dragged out of the \Vater and laid down
in his boat. On turning round, he found it had changed
into a very pretty little girl. Conceiving the idea she would

make, \vhat 11e had long wished for, a charming wife for his
son, he took her home and educated her until she \Vas fit to
be married. She consented to be the son's wife, cautioning
11er husband to use her well. Some time after their marriage,
however, being out of temper, he struck her, when she
screamed, and rushed away into the water ; but not without
leaving behind her a beautiful daughter, who became after-
2
Kaya11 \vards the mother of the race." The l(ayans of Borneo
story ~f thef thinl< that the first man and woman vvere born from a tree
evolution o ' . '
men 011t of which had been fertilized by a creeper swaying backwards
a tree. and forwards in the wind. The man was named Kaluban
Gai and the \voman Kalubi Angai. Hovvever, they were
incomplete, for they had no legs, and even the lower half of
their trunks was wanting, so that their entrails protruded.
Nevertheless they married and became the progenitors of
3
mankind. Thus the Kayans suppose the human race to
1 (Sir) A. B. Ellis, 7'he Tshi-speaking Coast of Borneo,'' Transactio1zs ef the
Peoples ef the Gold Coast ef West Africa Ethnological Society ef London, New
(London, I 887), pp. 208 - 21 I. A Series, ii. (London, 1863) pp. 26 sq . .
sin1ilar tale is told by another fish Such stories conforn1 to a well-known
fatnily who abstain from eating the type which may be called the Swan.
species of fish (appei) from which they maiden type of story, or Beauty and
tal<e their name (A. B. Ellis, op. cit. the Beast, or Cupid and Psyche.
pp.211sq.). 3
Ch. ~ose and W. McDougall, The
2 The Lord Bishop of Labuan, ''On
!.agan Tnbes efBorneo (London, I 912 },
the Wild Tribes of the North- West II. I 38.
- -1 ' - .
. CliAP. I ..
THE CREATION OF MAN
35
have been ~irectly . evolved from plants without passing
through the intermediate stage of animals.
Members of a clan in Mandailing, on the west coast of Stories of
Sumatra, allege that they are descended from a tiger and at the descent
. . ' of men
t he present day, when a tiger 1s shot, the women of the clan from
are bound to offer betel to the dead beast. When members animals in
1 Sumatra.
o f t h 1s c an come upon the tracks of a tiger, they must, as
a mark of homage, enclose them with three little sticks.
Further, it is believed that the tiger will not attack or
lacerate his kinsmen, the members of the clan. 1 The Battas
or Bataks of Central Sumatra are divided into a number of
clans which have for their totems white buffaloes, goats, wild
turtle-doves, dogs, cats, apes, tigers, and so forth ; and one of
the explanations which they give of their totems is that
these creatures were their ancestors, and that their own
souls after death can tra11smigrate into the animals. 2
Some of the natives of Minahassa, a district at the north- Stories of
eastern extremity o f C e1eb es, b e l"1eve t h at t h ey are d escended of
themen
descent
from apes, and that the parent stock of these animals still '.rom Apes
inhabits the woods of Menado 'toowah, or Old Menado, an Celebes. 1
island which rises out of the sea in the shape of a conical

mountain. The old inhabitants of Menado, a town on the
mainland of Celebes, stoutly affirmed that the apes on that
island were their forefathers. In former times they used to
send offerings of rice, bananas, and so forth, every year to their
simian ancestors in the woods, but afterwards they found it
more convenient to place their offerings on a raft of bamboo
stems and then, in the darkness of night, illuminated by the
glare of torches, to let the frail bark drift down the river amid
a hubbub of noises and the clamour of multitudinous voices
wishing it good speed. A similar belief in their descent from
these apes is cherished by the inhabitants of Tanawangko,
another town of Minahassa distant somewhat farther from the
ancestral island. These people sometimes repair to_ the island
H. I:Zis, ''De Onderafdeeling l{lein
1 Sumatra,'' 1l;jdschrijt van het Neder-
Mandailing ()eloe en J>ahantan en hare la1tdsch Aard1-ijkJk11ndig Ge1iootschap,
Bevolking met uitzonclering van de Tweecle Serie, iii. Afc1eeling, l\1eer
Oelc>es, '' Bi;"dra,E{e1i tot de Taal- Land- t1itgelJreide Artikelen, No. 2 ( .l\111ste1-
ett Volkenkunde vatt Nederl111i1/Jlh- dam, I 886 ), PI) 311 sq. ; 1:1~., op. lit.,
I1zdit!, xlvi. (1896) ]J. 473 'fweedc Se1ic, iv. Afclecl1ng Meer
2 J. 13. N et1mann, '' II et l>an_e en uitgebreide ArtiJ,ele11, No. 1 (A111ste1-
J3ila - stroomgcbicc1 op het c1l~1n<1 cla1n, 1887), flIJ 8 .1q.
THE CREATION OF MAN I'AR'f I
for the purpose of felling timber, and it is said that, rather

than chase away or injure the apes which infest the forest,
they suffer the thievish animals to steal their rice, bananas,
and clothes, believing that sickness or death would be tl1e in-
evitable consequence of any attempt to defend their property
1
against the monkeys.
Stories of In Amboyna and the neighbouring islands the inhabitants
the descei t of some villages aver that they are descended from trees,
1
of men ..
from trees such as the Capelle1zz"tl molucca1ta, which had been fert1l1zed
an?
an1ma1s by the Pandz"on Haliaetus. Others claim to be sprung from
in the pigs, octopuses, crocodiles, sharks, and eels. People will not
Moluccas. burn the wood of the trees from which they trace their
descent, nor eat the flesh of the animals which they regard
as their ancestors. Sicknesses of all sorts are believed to
2
result from disregarding these taboos. Similarly in Ceram
persons who think they are descended from crocodiles, ser-
pents, iguanas, and sharks will not eat the flesh of these
3
animals. Many other peoples of the Molucca Islands enter-
4
tain similar beliefs and observe similar taboos.
Stories of The Bukaua of North-Eastern New Guinea appear to
the descent trace their descent from their totemic ani1nals. Thus the
~:o:en inhabitants of one village will not eat a certain sea-fish (z"ngo),
~niNmals
1n ew
because they allege that they are all descended from it.
G11inea. Were one of them to eat the fish, they believe that the
doom of all the villagers would be sealed. Another clan
revere white parrots as their totems, and never eat the
bird, though they are glad to deck themselves with its
feathers. If they see other people eating a white parrot,
they are grieved, sprinkle themselves with ashes in tol<:en of
sorrow for the death of the bird, and expect compensation
from the murderers. If one of themselves ate a white
parrot, he would suffer from sore eyes. The members of a
particular family refuse to eat pig, because they owe their
existence to a so\v, which farrowed babies and little pigs at
5
the same birth. Similarly some of the natives of Astrolabe
1 N. Graafland, De llfinahassa (Rot- (Dordrecht, I 87 5), p. r 52.
terdam, r869), i. 8 sq. 3
J. G. F. Riedel, op. cit. p. r22.
2 J. G. F. Riedel, De sluik- en 4
J. G. F. Riedel, op. cit. pp. 253,
kroeshaiige rassen tusscheiz Selebes e1t 334, 34r, 348, 4r2, 4r4, 432.
Papzta (The Hague, r886), pp. 32, 5
Stefan Lehner, '' Bukaua,'' in
6r ; G. W. W. C. Baron van Hoevel!, R. Net1hauss, Deutsch Neu-Gztinea
Ambon en ineer bepaaldelijk de Oeliasers (Berlin, r911), iii. 428.
CHAP. I
Bay in Northern New Guinea believe that they are de-
scended from a crocodile, which a human ancestress of their~
brought forth along with a twin girl. Hence they refuse
to eat the flesh of crocodiles, and they tell a long story
about the vicious behaviour of their crocodile forefatl1er. 1
A somewhat different accour1t of the origin of man is Story of
given by the Marindineeze> a tribe who occupy the dreary > of the origin
man
monotonous treeless flats on the southern coast of Dutch told by the
New Guinea, not far from the border of the British territory dlV!arin-
1neeze o
r
They say that one day a crane or stork (dik) was busy Du~chNe\v
k. fi h f h
ptc tng s out o t e sea. He threw them on the beach, Guinea

where the clay covered and killed them. So the fish were
no longer anything but shapeless lumps of clay. They were
cold and warmed themselves at a fire of bamboos. Everv J
time that a little bamboo burst with a pop in the heat, the
lumps of clay assumed more and more the !ihape of human
beings. Thus the apertures of their ears, eyes, mouth, and
nostrils were opened, but as yet they could not speak, they
could only utter a murmuring sound. Their fingers were
still joined by rnembranes like those in the wings of bats.
However, \vith a bamboo knife they severed the membranes
and threw them into the sea, where they turned into leeches.
When the nature spirit (de1na) sa\v the human beings, he
was wroth, and enviously asked the crane, why he had
besto\ved life on these creatures. So the crane ceased to
peck at the fish and pecked at a log of wood instead ; and
that is why his beak has been bent ever since. At last,
while the first men were sitting round the fire, a big bamboo
burst with a louder crack than usual, which frightened the
people so that they gave a loud shriek, and that was the
beginning of human speech. You may still hear shrieks of
the same sort at the present day, when in time of sickness
the descendants of these first parents are sitting by the fire
and throwing bamboos into it, in order that the cracl<ling
and popping of the bamboos in the flames may put the
spirit of disease to flight. Every time a bamboo bursts
with a pop, all the people sl1ot1t and load the demon with
curses. And this Papuan narrative of the descent of man
1 Otto Dempwolfl~ ''Sagen und l\1:[ircl1en aus Dilbili,'' 1Ji1tj'.(/e1-A1chiv
i. (I91 I) 1)1) 63-66.
THE CREATION OF ll:!AN l'ART I
usually winds up with the words, ''So the stork or crane

1
(di'k) bestowed life on us."
Another A somewhat different version of the story is told by other
version of members of the tribe. They say that before the first human
the Marin-
dineeze pair appeared on earth, there were spirits (de1nas) residing
st~rf of the at Wegi near Kondo-miraaf which is near the extreme
or1g1n of ' .
man. south-eastern corner of the tribal territory. Now the spirits
owned a dog and a bird (diegge), which may be presumed
to be the same crane or stork (dik, diek) \vhich figures in
the former version. One day the dog, snuffi11g about, was
attracted by the scent to a certain spot, and there with his
paws he scraped a hole in the ground, from which the first
human pair, a man and a woman, came forth. They
. possessed all animal instincts, but their minds were very
imperfectly developed. They lived like beasts, without
experience and without feeling the need of communicating
with each other b)r speech. As for the necessaries of !ife,
they received them from the spirits. Roaming about one
day they came to a river, and in their ignorance of the
nature of water they wall(ed straigl1t into it and might have
been drowned, if the bird had not flown to their rescue and
drawn them out of the stream. That is how they came to
be acquainted with water; but still they were ignorant of
fire. Their l(nowledge of that element they acquired from
watching a fire which the spirits had kindled to warm them-
' selves at in cold weather; and it was the astonishment our
first parents felt at the sight of the devouring flames, and
the alarm they experienced at the loud crackling of the
bamboos in the heat, which elicited from them the first cry
of fear and wonder and so unloosed their tongues. Hence-
forth they could speak. The hole from \vhicl1 these
ancestors of mankind emerged on that memorable day has
1 Jos. Viegen (Pastoor te Merauke), Nederla1zdsch'..l1zdie, lxix. (1914) p.
'' Oorsprongs- en afsta1nmingslegenden 37 5. There seems to be some doubt
van den Marindinees (Zuid Niew- as to the identification of the bird
Guinea),'' Tf:jdschrift va1i het Ko1zin- which plays so important a part in the
klijk Nederla1zdsch Aardrijkskundig legend. The natives call it dz'k (diek).
Genootschap, Tweede Serie, xxix. According to Pastor Viegen, it is a
(1912) pp. 137, 145 sq.; A. J. Goo- crane ; Mr. Gooszen describes it as a
szen, ''De Majo-mysterien ter Nieuw- stork or crane ; Mr. 0. G. Heldring
Guinea's Zi1idkust,'' Bijd1age11 tot de (see tl1e reference in the next note)
Taal- Land- en Volke11kunde van calls it a stork (ooievaar, p. 466).
CHAP. I THE CREATION OF MAN 39
~on.tinued ~o ?e a hole ever since ; but water has gathered
in it, and it is now the . sacred .pool of Wegi. Even in
se~sons of the greatest drought the water in that pool never
fails ; and all the animals and plants about it, every thing
that runs or flies or grows there, is holy. 1
The legend which in one or other of these versions the The origin
Marindineeze
. .
tell to account for the origin of the human man .
represented
()f
species is said to be represented dramatically by them at at t~e

the mysteries or rites of initiation which they celebrate every d~arin-
1neeze
year, and on the celebration of which they apparently mysteries.
believe the fertility of the land, of man, and of beast to be
dependent. Thus the story that the bird picked the first
human beings from the water in the lil<:eness of fish and threw
them on the beach, is acted by an initiated man who comes
hopping along on two sticks, picks up the novices one by
one and throws them into the sacred enclosure. There
they must lie motionless; they are stripped of all their orna-
ments, and coated from head to foot with a thick layer
of clay; more than that, lumps of clay are thrust into
their mouths by initiated men, and these they have after-
wards to spit out into holes dug in the ground. This scene
of the mysteries seems to recall either the clay which is
said to have covered our fishy ancestors when they \Vere first
cast on the beach, or the earth from which they emerged
when the dog had scraped away the soil from above them.
The subsequent stages of the mysteries consist for the most
part in a series of lessons designed to initiate the novices .
successively into the various occupations of ordinary life, of
which like newborn babes or their ancestors \vhen they first
'
emerged from the water or the earth, they a1e presumed to
2
be entirely ignorant.
1 0. G. Heldring, '' Bij<lrage tot de .1ch1-ijt van het Ko1zi11klijk Necle1-!a11cisclz
ethnografische l<ennis der Mariende- Aar1"lrijkJku1zdig Genootscl1ap, T\veede
Anim,'' J'ijdschrift voor Indische Taal- Serie, xxix. (19r2) PP 147 .qq.; 0.
Land- en Volkenkztnde, Iv. (I 9 I 3) p. G. Heldri11g, '' Bijdrage tot cl~ ethno-
429 sq.; A. J. Gooszen, ''De Majo~ grafische l<e11nis dcr l\1arie11cle-Anim, ''
mysterien ter Nieuw-Guinea's Zuid- Ti;jdsclirift voor J11dislhe Taal- La11d-
kust,'' Bi_jdragen tot de Taal- La11d- e1t e11 Volke11k1t11de, Iv. (I 9 I 3) Pl) 440
Volkenk1J1ide va1i Nederlandsch-lrtdie, sqq. A. J. Gooszen, ''De l\Iajo-
'
mysterien te1 Nieu\V - G111nea . 'z1s ,111c -
lxix. (1914) PP 375 sq.
]{ust '' 11iid1-aoe1i tot tie Taal- La1tti- en
~ Jos. Viegen, '' Oors1)rongs- .en ' " 0 1 J. 1
afsta1r1mingslegenden van <len Mar1n- Volke11k1trtde z1a1t N1'dt:1lt111ciJc11- 111 le,
<1inees (Zuid Niet1w-(;t1inea),'' J'i/'d- Jxix. (1914) I)P 366 sqq. The 11a111e
THE ClrEATION OF MAN PAR'f l
Stories Again, in Ponape, one of the Caroline Islands, '' the dif-
of the
descent of ferent families suppose themselves to stand in a certain relation
men from to animals, and especially to fishes, and believe in their descent
fish and
grubs in from them. They actually name these animals 'mothers';
the Pacific. the creatures are sacred to the family and may not be injured.
Great dances, accompanied with the offering of prayers, are
performed in their honour. Any person who killed such an
animal would expose himself to contempt and punishment,
certainly also to the vengeance of the insulted deity." Blind-
ness is commonly supposed to be the consequence of such a
1
sacrilege. Tl1e Samoans have a tradition that the first two
men were developed out of two grubs, vvhich were produced
through the rotting of a convolvulus torn up by its roots.
But the transformation of the grubs into men was carried
out by two divine beings under the direction of Tuli (a species
of plover), who was himself the son of the great god 1angaloa
of the Skies. When the two men had received all their
human limbs and features complete at the hands of the
deities, they dwelt i11 the land where they had been formed,
but being both males they could not continue the species.
However, it cha11ced that one day, while he was fishing, one
of the two ~n received a mortal hurt from a little fish and
died ; whereupon the great god Tangaloa caused the dead
man to be changed into a woman and to be brought to life
again. So the man and the woman married and became
2
the parents of mankind. This Samoan story of the origin
of man combines the processes of evolution and creation ;
of the initiatory rites or mysteries is therefore, the foremost duty of the

Mayo (ll:fajo). They are described Mariende tribes to celebrate tl1e rites
most fully by Mr. Heldring, whose every )'ear, though not in the same
description is based, partly on personal group of villages two years run11ing. ''
observation, but mainly on information At the same time he points out the
furnisl1ed by a native Government in- great part which the dran1atic repre-
terpreter, who attended all the cere- ?entation of the creation myth plays
monies in the villages to the east of 1n the mysteries. 1'he pa1allelism
the Marau River (pp. 443 sq.). Mr. between the i11yth and tl1e ritt1al is
Heldring lays stress on the importance drawn out most fully by Pastor Viegen.
which the natives attach to the per- 1
formance of the rites as a means to Dr. Hahl, '' Mittheilu11gen i.iber
ensure the fertility of man and beast as Sitten t1nd rechtliche Verhaltnisse at1f
well as of the land (p. 460). ''All Ponape,'' Etlznolo.l{isches Notizblatt,
accounts,'' he tells us, ''agree that the vol. ii. Heft 2 (Berlin, 1901), p. 10.
holding of the Mayo rites is always 2
Rev. Jolin B. Stair, Old Samoa
follo\ved by good harvests. It is, (Lo11don, 1897), pp. 213 sq.
.CHAP, I .
THE CREATION OF MAN
.
for while it represents . the first men as developed out of

grubs, it attributes their final perfection to the formative
acti~n of divine beings. .
Some of the aborigines of Western Australia believe that Stories
their ancestors were swans ducks or various other species of of the_ .
~ ' ' evolution
water-fowl before they were transformed into men. 1 The of men out
Dieri tribe of Central Australia who are divided into totemic of animahls
' among t e
clans, explain their or1g1n by the following legend. They aborigines
say that in the beginning the earth opened in the midst of ~ustralia.
Perigundi Lake, and the totems (1nurdus or madas) came
trooping out one after the other. Out came the crow, and
the shell parakeet, and the emu, and all the rest. Being as
yet imperfectly formed and \vithout members or organs of
.sense, they laid themselves down on the sandhills which
surrounded the lake then, just as they do now. It was a
bright day, and the totems lay basking in the sunshine, till
at last, refreshed and invigorated by it, they stood l.lp as
human beings and dispersed in all directions. That is why
people of the same totem are now scattered all over tl1e
country. You may still see the island in the lake out of
2
\vhich the totems came trooping long ago. Another Dieri
legend relates how Paralina, one of the Mura-Muras or
mythical predecessors of the Dieri, perfected mankind. He
was out hunting kangaroos, when he sa\v four incomplete
beings cowering together. So he \Vent up to them, s1noothed
their bodies, stretched out their limbs, slit up their fingers
. and toes, formed their mouths, noses, and eyes, stuck ears
on them, and blew into their ears in order that they might
hear. Having perfected their organs and so produced man-
kind out of these rudimentary beings, he went about making
men everywhere. 3 Yet another Dieri tradition sets forth
how the Mura-Mura produced the race of man out of a
species of small black lizards, which may still be met with
under dry bark. To do this he divided the feet of the
lizards into fingers and toes, and, applying his forefinger to
the middle of their faces, created a nose ; lil{ewise he gave
1 Captain G. Grey, A Vocabulaiy Soieth-East A11st1alia (Lonclo11, 1904),
of the Dialects of Sott!h Weste11i pp. 476, 779 .rq.
Au.rtralia, Second J<;dition (London, a A. W. I-Iowilt, op. (it. IJP. 476,
1840), J)p, 29, 37, 61, 63, 66, 71. 780 .rq.
~ A. W. Ilowitt, Ni1ti11e 71-ibeJ o/
42 THE CREA TJON or- MAN l'AR'f I
them human eyes, mouths, and ears. He next set one of

them upright, but it fell down again because of its tail ; so
he cut off its tail, and the lizard then walked on its hind legs.
1
That is the origin of mankind.
Arunta

The Arunta tribe of Central Australia similarly tell ho\v
:~r:~~n in the beginning mankind was developed out of various rudi-
evolutionof rnentary forms of animal life. They say that in those days
men out of two b e111gs
rudi- ea 11 ed u1zganzbz
TT 'k Uta,
1 t h at 1s,
'' out o f not h"1ng,''
me11tary or '' self-existi11g," dwelt in the western sk)' From their
creatures. b
lofty abode they could see, far a\vay to the east, a nurn er
of inapertwa creatures, that is, rudimentary human beings or
incomplete men, whom it 'was their mission to make into
real men and women. For at that time there were no real
men and women ; the rudimentary creatures (inapertwa)
were of various shapes and dwelt in groups along the shore
of the salt water which covered the country. These embryos,
as we may call them, had no distinct limbs or 01gans of
sight, hearing, and smell ; they did not eat food, and they
presented the appearance of human beings all doubled up
into a rounded mass, in which only the outline of the different
parts could be vaguely perceived. Corning do\vn from their
home in the western sky, armed with gieat stone knives,
the U1zgambz"kula took hold of the embryos, one after the
other. First of all they released the arms f rorn the bodies,
then making four clefts at the end of each arm they fashioned
hands and fingers ; afterwards leg~ feet, and toes \Vere
added in the same way. The figure could now stand ; a
nose was then moulded and the nostrils bo1ed \Vith tl1e
fingers. A cut with the knife made the mouth, which was
pulled open several times to re11der it flexible. A slit on
each side of the face separated the upper and lower eyelids,
disclosing the eyes, \vhich already existed .behi11d them ; and
a few strokes more completed the body. Thus out of the
rudimentary c1eatures were formed men and women. These
rudirne11tary creatures or embryos, we are told, ''were in
1S. Gason, ''The l'v1anners and Jl,fura-Mitra (Mooranioora) as a Good
Ct1stoms of tl1e Dieyerie tribe of Aus- Spirit instead of as one of the nlythical
tralian Aborigines,'' in J. D. Woods's J;iut more or less huma11 predecesso1s
Native Tiibes of Sout!t Aztstralia (Ade- of tl1e Dieri in the countr)' See A.
laide, 1879), p. 260. This write1 W. Howitt, Native Tribes of South-
n1ade the n1istake of regarcling the East Aiestralia, pp. 47 5 sqq.
'
. - -_. - . -
CHAP. I . THE CREATION OF MAN .. 43 .
reality stages in the transformation of various. animals and
plants into ~uman beings, and thus. they were. naturally,
when made into human beings, intimately associated with
the particular animal or plant, as the case may be, of which
they were the transformations in other words each in-
'
dividual of necessity belonged to a totem the name of which
was of course that of the animal or plant of which he or she
was a transformation.'' Howeve1, it is 11ot said that all the
totemic clans of the Arunta \Vere thus developed; no such
tradition, for example, is told to explain the origin of the
itnportant Witchetty Grub clan. The clans which are known,
or said, to have originated out of embryos in the way
described .are the Plum Tree, the Grass Seed, tl1e Large
Lizard, the Small Lizard, the Alexandra Parakeet, and the
Small Rat clans. When the Unga1nbikula had thus fashioned
people out of these totems, they circumcised tl1em all, except
the Plum Tree men, by means of a fire-stick. After that,
having done the work of creation or evolution, the Unga11z-
bikula turned themselves into little lizards which bear a
1
name meaning ''snappers-up of flies."
This Arunta tradition of the origin of man, as Messrs. The
'll h h d d 1 b ''
Spencer an d G I en, w o ave recor e it, JUSt y o serve, is tradition Aruilta
of considerable interest ; it is in the first place evidently a of the.

. evolution
crude attempt to describe the or1g111 of human be111gs out of n1an
of non-human creatures who were of various forms ; some of c~mpared
. with that
them \Vere representatives of animals, others of plants, but 1n of the
p I 1 OSO-
all cases they are to be regarded as intermediate
.
stages in Ghr~ ek
the transition of an animal or plant ancestor into a human pl1er E1n-
2
individual who bore its name as that of his or her totem." IJedocles.
In a sense these speculations of the Arunta on their own
3
origin may be said, lil<e a similar myth of tl1e Samoans, to
combine the theory of creation with the theory of evol11tion ;
for while they represent men as developed out of much
simpler forms of life, they at the same time assume tl1at this
development was effected by the agency of .two po,ve1ful
beings, whom so far we may call creato1s. It is \veil kno\vn
1 (Sir) Baldwin Spencer and F. J. (Sir) 13alclwin S1)e11cer ~111d }<'. J.
2
Gillen, Native 1ribes of Ce1itral Ai1s- Gillen, Native 7iilies ef C'e11t111! A 11s-
/1alia (Londo11, 1899), ]Jp. 388 J'q. ; t1at1:li, JJJJ. 39 I -~'/
com1Jareiid., No1the111 71ibeJqj' C'e11t1al
AuJt1alia (London, 1904), 11. I 50. 3 AlJl)VC, jl. 40.
that at a far higher stage of culture a crude form of the

evolutionary hypothesis was propounded by the Greek
philosopher Empedocles. He imagined that shapeless lumps
of earth and water, thrown up by the subterranean fires,
developed into monstrous animals, bulls with the heads of
men, men with the heads of bulls, and so forth ; till at last,
these hybrid forms being gradually eliminated, the various
1
existing species of animals and men were evolved. The
theory of the civilized Greek of Sicily may be set beside the
similar theory of the savage Arunta of Central Australia.
Both represent gropings of the human mind in the dark
abysses of the past; both were in a measure grotesque
anticipations of the modern theory of evolution.
'fhe The foregoing examples may serve to illustrate two very
opinions of
n1ar1kind different views which primitive man has taken of his o\vn
divided origin. They may be distinguished as the theory of creation
between
the tl1eory and the theory of evolution. According to the one, the
of creation human race was fashioned in its present form by a great
and the
theory of artificer, whether a god or a hero ; according to the other, it
evolution. was evolved by a natural process out of lower forms of
animal or even vegetable life. Roughly speaking, these two
theories still divide the civilized world between them. The
partisans of each can appeal in support of their vie,v to a
large consensus of opinion ; and if truth were to be decided
by \veighing the one consensus against the other, with
Ge1zesz'.s in the one scale and The Orz'gz"n of Species in the
other, it might perhaps be found, wl1en the scales were finally
trimmed, that the balance hung very even between creatior1
and evolution.
1 E. Zeller, Die Philosophz'e der re1un1 1zatztra, v. 837 sqq. Anotl1er
Griechen, i. 4 (Leipsic, 1876), pp. 718 ancient Greek pl1ilosopl1er, Anaxi-
sq.; I-I. Ritter und L. Preller, Hz'storia mander of Miletus, thot1gh t that 111en
Philosophiae G1ae,ae et Latinae ex were developed out of fishes. See
.fo11tizt111 locis co1itexta 5 ( Gothae, I 87 5}, Plutarcl1, Symposiztnz, viii. 8. 4; Cen-
PJJ. 102 sq. ; H. Diels, Die F1a,;n1e11te sorinus, De die natali, iv. 7 ; I-I. Diels,
tier Vorsok1atike1, 2 i. (Berlin, I 906 ), op. cit. i. r 7.
pp. 190 sqq. Compare Lucretius, De
CHAPTER II
THE FALL OF MAN
I. The Narrative i1z Genesis

WITH a few light but masterly strol<es the Jehovistic writer The
depicts for us the blissful life of our first parents in the :;r:ii~ti;~11
happy garden which God had created for their abode. There of 1-Ian in
every tree that was pleasant to the sight and good for food Genesis.
grew abu11dantly; there the animals lived at peace with man
and with each other ; there man and woman l<ne\v no shame,
because they knew no ill : it was the age of innocence.1
But this glad time was short, the sunshine was soon clouded.
From his description of the creation of Eve and her intro-
duction to Adam, the writer passes at once to tell the sad
story of their fall, their loss of innocence, their expulsion
from Eden, and the doom of labour, of sorrow, and of death

pronounced on them and their posterity. In the midst of

the garden grew the tree of the knowledge of good and evil,
and God had forbidden man to eat of its fruit, saying, '' In
the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." But
the serpent was cunning, and the woman weak and credulous :
he persuaded her to eat of the fatal fruit, and she gave of it
to her husband, and he ate also. No sooner had they tasted
it than the eyes of both of them were opened, they l<new
that they were naked, and filled with shame and confusion
they hid their nakedness under aprons of fig-leaves: the age
of innocence was gone for ever. That woeful day, when the
heat of noon was over and the shadows were growing long
in the garden, God walked there, as was his wont, in the
l Genesis ii. 8-2 5.
45
THE FALL OF MAN PART I
cool of the evening. The man and woman heard his foot-
steps,1 perhaps the rustling of the fallen leaves (if leaves
could fall in Eden) under his tread, and they hid behind
the trees, ashamed to be seen by him naked. But he called
them forth from the thicket, and learning fro1n the abashed
couple how they had disobeyed his command by eating of
the tree of knowledge, he flew into a towering passion. He
cursed the serpent, condemning him to go on his belly, to
eat dust, and to be the enemy of manki11d all the days of
his life : he cursed tl1e ground, condemning it to bring forth
thor11s and thistles : he cursed the woman, condemning her
to bear children i11 sorrow and to be in subjection to her
husband : he cursed the man, condemning him to wring his
daily bread from the ground in the sweat of his brow, and
finally to rett1rn to the dust out of \vhich he l1ad been taken.
Having relieved his feelings by these copious maledictions,
the irascible but really kind-hearted deity relented so far as
to make coats of skins for the culprits to replace their scanty
aprons of fig-leaves, and clad in these new garments the
shamefaced pair retreated among the trees ; wl1ile in the
west the st1nset died away, and the shadows deepened on
2
Paradise Lost. _
TI1e tree In this account everything hinges on the tree of the

of the
k11owledge
l<nowledge of good , and evil : it occupies,.
so to say, the
of good centre of the stage in the great tragedy, with the man and
andd ehvil
an t e tree woman and the talking serpent grouped round it. But
of life. when we look closer we perceive a second tree standing side
by side with the other in the midst of the garden. It is a
very remarl<able tree, for it is no less than the tree of life,
whose fruit confers immortality on all who eat of it. Yet
in the actual story of the fall this wonderful tree plays
no part. Its fruit hangs there on the boughs ready to be
plucked ; unlike the tree of knowledge, it is hedged .about
by no divine prohibition, yet no one thinks it worth while to
taste of the luscious fruit and live for ever. The eyes of the
actors are all turned on the tree of knowledge; they appear
1 Genesis iii. 8, ''they heard the Hebrew word for sound (S\p) is am-
sound of the Lord God walking in the
biguous ; it may signify either '' sot1nd ''
garden.'' The ''sound'' is clearly that or ''voice.''
of his footsteps, not of his voice, as -
the English version translates it. Tl1e 2
Genesis iii.
. ' ' - ' - . . ' . , ' . . -.-
CHAP. II . . . TlfENARQATfV.E IN GENESIS.
- : . . .- ' . - ' . - . .' -.
' '
47
-' '
not to see the tree of life. Only, when all is over does God
bethink himself of the wondrous tree standing ther~ neglected
with all .its infinite possibilities, in the midst of the garden ;
and fearing lest man, who has become like him in knowledge
by eating of the one tree, should become like him in im-
mortality by eating of the other, he drives him from the
garden and sets an angelic squadron, with flaming swords,
to guard the approach to the tree of life, that none hence-
forth may eat of its magic fruit and live for ever. Thus,.
while throughout the moving tragedy in Eden our attention
is fixed exclusively on the tree of knowledge, in the great
transformation scene at the end, where the splendours of Eden
fade for ever into the light of common day, the last glimpse
\Ve catch of tl1e happy garden shows the tree of life alone lit
1
up by the lurid gleam of brandished angelic falchions.
It appears to be generally recognized that some confusion We may
has crept into the account of the two trees, and that in the shupp?seht at 1n t e
original story the tree of life did not play the purely passive original
d t h form of the
an d spectacu Iar part ass1gne o it 1n t e existing narrative. narrative
.Li\.ccordingly, some have thought that there were originally there were
two different stories of the fall, in one of which the tree of ~w~r~ee~i
knowledge figured alone, and in the other the tree of life Life and a
alone, and that the two stories have been unskilfully fused ~::~h~f and '
into a single narrative by an editor, who has preserved the that was
man
one nearly intact, while he has clipped and pared the other allowed to
almost past recognition. 2
It may be so, but perhaps the r;;r~~f0~he
solution of the problem is to be sought in another direction. Life but
The gist of the whole story of the fall appears to be an ~~r~~~~~n
attempt to explain man's mortality, to set forth how death the Tree

came into the word. 1 I h t
t is true t at man 1s no sat "d t o of Death.
have been created immortal and to have lost his immortality

through disobedience; but neither is he said to have been
created mortal. Rather we are given to t1nderstand that
the possibility alike of immortality and of mortality was
open to him, and that it rested wit~ ~im. wl1i~l1 h~ woul?
choose ; for the tree of life stood \Vtthin his ~each, its fruit
was not forbidden to him, he had only to stretch out his
hand, take of the fiuit, and eating of it live for eve1.
Co11t111e1zta1y 011 Ge1zesis (Edinb111gh~
I (;enesis iii. 22-24.
2 J. Skinner, C1itilal and Exegetical I 910 ), PIJ 52 sq., 94.
THE FALL OF MAN PAR'f I
Indeed, far from being prohibited to eat of the tree of life,

man was implicitly permitted, if not encouraged, to partake
of it by his Creator, who had told him expressly, that he
might eat freely of every tree in the garden, w\th the single
1
exception of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
Thus by planting the tree of life in the garden and not pro-
hibiting its use, God apparently intended to give man the
option, or at least the chance, of immortality, but man missed
11is ,chance by electing to eat of the other tree, '''hich God had
warned him not to touch under pain of immediate death.
This suggests that the forbidden tree \Vas really a tree of
death, not of knowledge, and that the mere taste of its
deadly fruit, quite apart from any question of obedience or
disobedience to a divine command, sufficed to entail death
on the eater. The inference is entirely in keeping with
God's warning to man, '' Thou shalt not eat of it : for in
the day that thou eatest the1eof thou shalt surely die." 2
Accordingly we may suppose that in the original story
there were t\vo trees, a tree of life and a tree of death ; that
it \Vas open to man to eat of the one an~ live for ever, or
to eat of the other and die ; that God, out of good will to
his creature, advised man to eat of the tree of life and
warned 11im not to eat of the tree of death ; and that man,
misled by the serpent, ate of the wrong tree and so forfeited
the immortality which his benevolent Creator had designed
for him.
This At least this hypothesis has the advantage of 1estoring
hypothesis the balance between the two trees and of rendering the
sets the .
character whole narrative clear, simple, and consistent. It dispenses
~r!~~or with the necessity of assuming two original and distinct
in a nlore stories which have been clumsily stitched together by a
amiable
light by
h
bate ing editor. B h
ut t e hypothesis is further reco1nmended
making jt by another and deeper consideration. It sets the character
probable h C .
that he of t e reator in a far more amiable light : it clears him
intended entirely of that suspicion of envy and jealousy not to say
to confer . . d d' h '
the boon of ma 11gn1ty an CO\var ice, w ich, on the strength of the
!mmorth~l-
ity on 1s
narrative in Genesis, has so long rested like a dark blot
1 Genesis ii. 16 sq., ''And the Lord ledge of good and evil, thou shalt 11ot
God comn1anded the man, saying, Of eat of it : for in the day that thou
every tree of the garden thou mayest eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.''
freely e\l,t ; lJut of tl1e tree of the !<now- 2 Genesis ii. 1 7.
'
''
'
'
J'
'
'
.1
:~
CHAP. II
THE NARRATIVE IN GENESIS
49
on his reputation. For according to that narrative, God creature
grudged . man the possession both of knowledge and of man, and
l' was ~nly
i~morta ity ; he desired to keep these good things to ~rus~rated
himself, and feared that if man got one or both of tl1em in ~is
h e wou 1d be the equal . amiable
of his maker, . a thing not to be intention
suffered at any price. Accordingly he forbade man to eat by t~e . f
cunning o
of the tree of knowledge, and when man disregarded the theserpent.
command, the deity hustled him out of the garden and
closed the premises, to prevent him from eating of the other
tree and so becoming immortal. The motive was mean, and
the conduct despicable. More than that, both the one and
the othei are 11tterly inconsistent with the previous behaviour
of the deity, who, far from grudging man anything, had
done all in his power to make him happy and comfortable,
by creating a beautiful garden for his delectation, beasts and
birds to play with, and a woman to be his wife. Surely
it is far more in harmony both with the tenor of the narra-
tive a11d with the goodness of the Creator to suppose, that
he intended to crown his kindness to man by conferring
on him the boon of immortality, and that his benevolent
intention \Vas only frustrated by the wiles of the serpent.
But we have still to ask, why should the serpent practise In the
this deceit on man ? what motive had he for depriving the origint~I
. narra 1ve
human race of the great privilege which the Creator had the
'
planned for them ? Was his interference purely officioll,.S ? :::_~fi~~tlor
or had he some deep design behind it? To these questions beguiling
. . G . f . h
the n::i.rrat1ve 1n enesis urnis es no answer. Th t
e serpen \vasthe woman
g ains nothing by his fraud ; on the contrary he loses, foi he probably

. to~eat
is cursed by God and condemned thenceforth to crawl on men of
his belly and lick the dust. But perhaps his conduct was ~he boon of
1n1mortal-
not so wholly malignant and purposeless as appears on the ity and to
surface We are told that he was more subtle than any confei it on
serpents,
beast of the field ; did he really shovv his sagacity by which are
blasting man's prospects without improving his own? ~ e ~~;P~~e~Y
may suspect that in the original story he justified his ~o be
reputation by appropriating to hi1nself the blessing of wl1ich ~~~~~:~ 1
he deprived our species ; in fact, that while he persuaded they ca~t

I h h . lf t their
our first parents to eat of the tree o f d eat 1, e tm~e. a .e <1ndtl1ereb.y sl<1ns
of the tree of life and so lived for ever. The suppos1t1on 1s re11e\v their
. I t yo11 t11.
not so extravagant as 1t may seem. n no a iew savage

.VOL. I E
50 THE FALL OF MAN PAR'!' I
stories of the origin of death, which I will relate immediately,

we read that serpents contrived to outwit or intimidate
man and so to secure for themselves the immortality which
was meant for him ; for many savages believe tl1at by
annually casting their skins serpents and other animals
renew their youth and live for ever. Tl1e belief appears to
have been shared by the Semites ; for, according to the

ancient Phoenician writer Sanchuniathon, the serpent was
the longest-lived of all animals, because it cast its skin and
1
so renewed its youth. But if the Pl1oenicians held this
view of the serpent's longevity and the cause of it, their
neighbours and. kinsfolk the Hebrews may well have done
the same. Certainly the Hebrews seem to have thought
2
that eagles renew their ,youth by moulting their feathers;
and if so, why not serpents by casting their skins? Indeed,
the notion that the serpent cheated man of immortality by
getting possession of a life-giving plant \vhich the higher
powers had destined for our species, occurs in the famous
Gilgamesh epic, one of tl1e oldest literary monuments of
the Semitic race and far more ancient than Genesis. In it
we read how the deified Ut-napishtim 1evealed to the hero
Gilgamesh the existence of a plant \vhich had the miraculous
power of rene\ving youth and bore the name ''the old man
becomes young'' ; how Gilgamesh procured the plant and
boasted that he would eat of it a11d so renew his lost youth;

1
Sanchuniathon, quoted by Euse- moulting of its feathers. Con1pare
bius, Praeparatio Evangel1:i, i. r o, Ka.I J. Morgenstern, '' 011 Gilgames-Epic,
7ro"Xvxpo11iwra.ro11 0 icrri11 ou ,611011 rt/) xi. 27 4-320,'' Zeitschrift fiir A ssyrio-
iKov6,E11011 ro ')'fipa.s 11Eci!Ei11. Here logi'e, xxix. (r9r5) p. 294, '' Baethgen
'Yfipa.s is used in the sense of '' old quotes a tradition from Bar Hebraeus,
or cast sl<in, '' as in Aristotle, Histor. that when the eagle grows old he casts
A1timal.- vii. r 8 (vol. i. pp. 600 a- off his feathers and clothes himself
6or b, of Im. Bekker's Berlin edition), with new ones. Rashi, con1menting on
who discusses the subject at length. this same verse, is even more specific.
The use of 'Yfipa.s (''old age'') in the He says that from year to year the
sense of ''cast skin '' is a clear indica- eagle casts offhis old wings and featl1ers
tion that the Greeks shared the wide- and puts on new, and thereby renews
spread belief in the renewal of an his youth constantly.'' Strictly speak-
animal's youth by the casting of its ing, the bird referred to in this passage
skin. of the Psalms (i;f~) is not the eagle but
2 the g~eat griffon-vulture, which abounds
Psalm ciii. 5, ''Thy youth is re- in ~alestine. See H. B. Tristram,
newed like the eagle.'' The com-
The Natural Hi'story of the Bible,
mentators rightly explain the belief in
Ninth Edition (London, r898), pp.
the renewal of the eagle's youth by the I 72 sqq.
CHAP. II .
THE NARRATIVE IN GENESIS
51
how, b:fore h~ could do so, a serpent stole the magic plant
.froin him, while he was bathing in the cool water of a well
or. brook ; and how, bereft of the hope of immortality,
Gilgam~sh sat down and wept. It is true that nothing is
1
?ere. said about the serpent eating the plant and so obtain-
ing immortality for himself; but the omission may be d\le
merely to the state of the text, which is obscure and
defective, and even if the poet were silent on thi~ point, the
parallel versions of the story, which I shall cite, enable us to
supply the lacuna with a fair degree of probability. These
parallels further suggest, though they cannot prove, that in
the original of the story, which the Jehovistic writer bas
mangled and distorted, the serpent was the messenger sent
by God to bear the glad tidings of immortality to man,
but that the cunning creature perverted the message to
the advantage of his species and to the ruin of ours. The
gift of speech, which he used to such ill purpose, was lent
him in his capacity of ambassador from God to man.
To sum up, if we may judge from a comparison of the The story
versions dispersed among many peoples, the true o~iginal ~~ ~::~~ 1
story of the Fall of Man ran somewhat as follows. The its original
benevolent Creator, after modelling the first man and ~~0~~~-an
woman oqt of mud and animating them by the simple ti~n.of the
. . h . h d 1
process o f .bl owing into t eir mout s an noses, p ace d th or1g1n of
e deatli. . .
happy pair in an earthly paradise, where; free from care and
toil, they could live oq the sweet fruits of a delightful
garden, and where birds and beasts frisked about them in
fearless security. As a crowning mercy. he planned for our
first parents the great gift of immortality, but resolved to
make them the arbiters of their own fate by leaving them
free to accept or reject the proffered boon. For that purpose
he planted in the midst of the garden two wondrous trees
that bore fruits of very different sorts, the fruit of the one
1 P. Jensen, Assyrisch-Babylonische L. W. l{ing, Babylonia1i Religi'o1i a1id
llfythen und Epen (Berlin, 1900), pp. Magi'c (London, 1899), pp. 173 sq.
2 51 sqq. ; R. F. Harper, Assyrian and Tl1e first, so far as I l<now, to point
Babylonian Lz'terature (New York, out the parallelism betwee11 this l)assage
1901), pp. 361 sq.; P. Dhorme, Choix and the narrative in Genesis was l{abbi
de Textes Religieux Assyro-Babyloniens Julian Morgenstern. See his instructive
(Paris, 1907), pp. 3 I I sqq.; A. Ungnad article, ''On Gilgames-Epic, xi. 274-
und H. Gressmann, Das Gilga11tesch- 320,'' ZeitJchrift.fiir Assy1iolo<fiie, xxix.
Epos (C}ottingen, 191 l), pp. 62 sq.; ( 1915) jJ]J. 284 sqq.
THE FALL OF MAN I' AR'!' I
being fraught with death to the eater, and the other with
life eternal. Having done so, he sent the serpent to the
man and woman and charged hi1n to deliver this message :
''Eat not of the Tree of Death, for in the day ye eat thereof
ye shall surely c;lie ; but eat of the Tree of Life and live for
ever." Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of
the field, and on his way he bethought him of changing the
message ; ~o when he came to the happy garden and found
the woman alone in it, he said to her, ''Thus saith God :
Eat not of tl1e Tree of Liie, for in tl1e day ye eat thereof
ye shall surely die ; but eat of the Tree .of Deatl1, and live
for ever." The foolish \Voman believed him, and ate of the
fatal fruit, and gave of it to her husband, and he ate also.
But the sly serpent himself ate of the Tree of Life. That
is why men have been mortal and serpents immortal ever
since, for serpents cast their skins every year and so renew their
youth. If only the serpent had not pe1verted God's good
message and deceived our first mother, we should have been
immortal instead of the serpents ; for like the serpents we .
should have cast our skins every year and so renewed our
youth perpetually.
That this, or something like this, was the original form
of the story is made probable by a comparison of the
following tales, which may conveniently be arranged under
two heads, '' The Story of tl1e Perverted Message '' and '' The
Story of the Cast Skin."

2. Tlte Story of the Perverted Message

Hottentot Like many other savages, the Namaquas or Hottentots
st~r:y offthe
associate the phases of the moon with the idea of i1timor-
or1g1n o . ' . .
tal1ty, the apparent waning and waxing of the luminary
death : the
~~~1.~~d being understood by them as a real process of alternate
disinte~ration and reintegration, of decay and growth repeated
perpetually. Even the rising and setting of the moon is
interpreted by them as its birth and death. 1 They say that
once on a time the Moon wished to send to mankind a
message of immortality, and the hare undertook to act as
I C. J. Andersson, Lake Nganzi, tl1e~am~quas do not say, like ourselves,
Second Edition (London, 18 56), p. 328 that 1t rises and sets, but that 'it dies
note 1, ''When speaking of the moon, and is born again.' ''
CH. II THE .S'TORY OF THE PERVERTED MESSAGE
53
messenger. So the Moon charged him to go to men and
say, '' As I die and rise to life again, so shall you die and
rise to life again." Accordingly the hare went to men but
either out of forgetfulness or malice he reversed the me;sage
and said, '' As I die and do not rise to life again, so you
shall also die and not rise to life again." Then he went
back to the Moon, and sl1e asked him what he had said.
He. told her, and when she heard how he 'had given the
wrong message, she was so angry that she threw a stick at
him which split his lip. That is why the hare's lip is still
cloven. So the hare ran away and is still running to t_his
day. Some people, however, say that before he fled he
cla\ved the Moon's face, \Vhich still bears the marks of the
scratching, as anybody may see for himself on a clear
moonlight night. But the Na1naquas are still angry with
. the hare for robbing them of immortality. The old men
of the tribe used to say, '' We are still enraged with the hare,
because he brought such. a bad message, and we will not
eat him." Hence from the day when a youth comes of age
and takes his place among the men, he is forbidden to eat
hare's flesh, or even to come into contact \vith a fire on
which a hare has been cooked. If a man breaks the rule,
he is not infrequently banished the village. However, on

the payment of a fine he may be readmitted to the
1
community.
A similar tale, with some minor differences, is told by Bushman
. h h M r
the Bushmen. A ccord 1ng to t em, t e oon 1ormer y sat 1 "d story of the
origin of .
to men ''As I die and come to life again, so shall ye do ; death : the
' . . l h b h ll .
when ye die, ye shall not dte a toget er ut s a rise again. . ,, Moon and
the haie.
But one mat1 would not believe the glad tidings of immor-
tality, and he would not consent to hold his tongue. For
his mother had died, he loudly lamented her, and nothing
could persuade him that she would come to life again. A
heated altercation ensued between him and the Moon on
this .painful subject. , ''Your mother's asleep," says . the
Moon. '' She's dead," says the man, and at it they \vent
I Sir J. E. Alexander, Expeditz'on 13leel{, Rey11ard the fi'ox z"1t Soltth Afiila
of Discove1y itito the Inte1io1 of Afiica (London, 1864), PI) 71-73; Th. IIahn,
(London, 1838), i. 169; C. J. Anders- Tsu1ii- II Goa11t, tlte ~'11pre111e Bein,;
sc>n, Lake Nga11ii, Secon(l Edition if the J(hoz'-J(hqi (Lo11don, I 88 I),
(London, 1856), PI) 328 sq.; W ..II. I. P 5 2
54 THE FALL OF MAN PAR1' I
again, hammer ~nd tongs, till at last the Moon lost patience
. and struck the man on the face with her fist, cleaving his
mouth with the blow. And as she did so, she cursed him
saying, ''His mouth shall be always lil<e this, even when
he is a hare. For a hare he shall be. He shall spring
away, he shall come doubling back. The dogs shall chase
him, and when they have caught him they shall tear
him in pieces. He shall altogether die. And all men,
when they die, shall die outright. For he would not agree
with me, w}J.en I bid him not to weep for his mother, f0r
sh~ would live again. . ' No,' says he to me, ' my mother will
not live again.' Therefore he shall altogether become a
hare. And the people, they shall altogether die, because he
contradicted me flat when I told him that the people would
do as I do, returning to life after they were dead." So a
righteous. retribution overtook the sceptic for his scepticism, .
for he was turned into a hare, and a hare he has been ever
since. But still he has human flesh in his thigh, and that
is why, when the Bushmen kill a hare, they will not eat that
portion of the thigh, but cut it out, because it. is human flesh.
And still the Bushmen say, ''It was on account of the hare
that the Moon cursed us, so that we die altogether. If it
had not been for him, we should have come to life again
when we died. But he would not believe what the Moon
1
told him, he contradicted her flat." In this Bushman
version of the story the hare is not the animal messenger
of God to men, but a human sceptic who, for doubting
the gospel of eternal life, is turned into a hare and involves
the whole human race in the doom of mortality. This may
be an older form of the story than the Hottentot version,
. in which the hare is a hare and nothing more.
Nandi The Nandi of British East Africa tell a story in \vhich
story of the h . . f d h . fi .
origin of t e or1g1n o eat ts .re erred to the ill-humour of a dog,
death: the who brought the tidings of immortality to men but not
Moon and b . . d .h . , ' '
the dog. eti:g receive wit the deference due to so august an
embassy, he changed his tune in a huff and doomed ' mankind
.
to the sad fate to which they have ever since been subject.
1\V. H. I. Blee]{ and L. C. Lloyd, the hare's thigh which the Bushmen
Speci111e11s of Bush1nan Folklore (Lon- cut out is believed to be the musculzes
don, 191 I), pp. 57-65. The part of biceps fanzoris. .
CH. II . THE STORY OP THE PERVERTED MESSAGE, 55
The story runs thus. . When the first men lived upon the
e~rtl1, .a ~og came to them one day and said, '' All people
will die like the Moon, but unlike the Moon you will not
return to life again unless you give me some milk to drink
out of your gourd and beer to drink through your straw.
If you do this, I will arrange for you to go to the river when
..you die and to come to life again on the third day." But
the people laughed at the dog, and gave him some milk and
beer to dr.ink off a stool. The dog was angry at not being
served in the same vessels as a human being, and though
he put his pride in his pocket and drank the milk and beer
from the stool, he went away in high dudgeon, saying, '' All.
people will die, and the Moon alone will return to life."
That is why, \vhen people die, they stay away, whereas \vhen

the Moon goes away she comes back again after three days'
absence. If only people had given that dog a gourd to
drink milk out of, and a straw to suck beer through, we
should all have risen from tl1e dead, like the moo11, after
1
three days. In this story nothing is said as to the person-
age who sent the dog with the message of immortality to
men ; but from the messe11ger's reference to the Moon, and
from a comparison with the parallel Hottentot story, we
may reasonably infer that it was the Moon who employed
the dog to run the errand, and that the unscrt1pulous
animal misused his opportunity to extort privileges for
himself to which he was not strictly entitled.
In these stories a single messenger is engaged to carry In some
d h r 1 f h
the momentous message, an t e iata issue o t e mission the originstories of
is set down to the carelessness or malice of the missionary. of death

Ho\vever, in some narratives of the origin of death, t\vo ~~sengers
messengers are despatched, and the cause of death is said to appear.
have been the dilatoriness or 111isconduct of the messenger
who bore the glad tidi11gs of immortality. There is a
Hottentot story of the origi11 of death which is cast in this Hottentot
. story of the
form. They say that once the Moo11 sent an insect to men oiigin of
with this message '' Go thou to men a11d tell them, ' As I death : the
' . d d . . , ,, Moon, the
die, and dying live, so ye shall also die, a11 y1ng 11ve. insect, and
The insect set off with this 1nessage, but as he crawled the hare.
along, the hare came leaping after him, and stopping beside
I A. C. I-Iollis, 7'he Nantii (Oxford, 1909), p. 98.
him asked, '' On what errand art thou bound ? '' The insect
answered, '' I am sent by the Moon to men, to tell them that
as she dies, and dying lives, they also shall die, and dying
live." The hare said, ''As thou art an awkward runner,
let me go." And away he tore with the message, while the
insect came creeping slowly behind. When he came to men,
the hare perverted the message wl1ich he had officiously
taken upon himself to deliver, for he said, ''I am sent by
the Moon to tell you, 'As I die, and dying perish, in the
same manner ye shall also die and come wholly to t1.n end.' ''
Then the hare returned to the Moon, and told her what he
had said to me11. The Moon was very angry and reproached
the hare, saying, '' Darest thou tell the people a thing which
I have not said ? '' With that she took a stick and hit him
over the nose. That is why the hare's nose is slit down to
1
this day.
Tati The same tale is told, with some slight variations, by the
~~~~1:t~he Tati Bushmen or Masarwas, who inhabit the Bechuanaland
origin of Protectorate,- the Kalahari desert, and portions of Southern
~~:~~on, Rhodesia. The me'"n of old time, they say, told this story.
thetortoise, The Moon wished to send a message to the men of the early
~:~e.the race, to tell them that as she died and came to life again, so
- they would die, and dying come to life again. So tl1e Moon
called the tortoise and said to him, '' Go over to those men
there, and give them this message from me. Tell them that
as I dying live, so they dying \vill live again." Now the
tortoise \Vas very slow, and he kept repeating the message
to himself, so as not to forget it. The Moon was very vexed
\Vith his slowness and with his forgetfulness ; so she called
the hare and said to her, '' You are a swift runner. Take
this message to the men over yonder: 'As I dying live again,
so you will dying live again.''' . So off the hare started, but
in her great haste she forgot the message, and as she did not
wish to show the Moon that she had forgotten, she delivered
the message to men in this way, '' As I dying live again, so
you dying will die for ever.'' Such was the message delivered
by the hare. In the meantime the tortoise had remembered
the message, and he started off a second time. '' This time'' ,

1
W. H. I. Bleek, Reynard the Fox in .S'outh Africa (London, 1864),
pp. 69 sq.

...,, - . .
CH. It THE STORY

. OF THE
PERVERTED
. . MESSAGE
. ..
. . 57
. ~ . .
said he to himself, '' I won't forget.'' . He came to the place

where the men were, and he delivered his message. When
the men heard it they were very angry with the .hare, who
was sitting at some. distance. She was nibbling the grass
after her race. One of the men ran and lifted a stone
and threw it at the hare. It strucl< her right in the mouth
and cleft her upper lip; hence the lip has been cleft ever
since. That is why every hare has a cleft upper lip to this
daY:, and that is the end of the story.1
In a story told by the A-Louyi tribe of the Upper Louyistory
Zambesi,
.
the messengers of death and of life respectively are of.t~e
or1g1n o
f
the chameleon and the hare. They say that Nyambe, whom death:
they identify with the sun, used to dwell on earth with his ~~~ s~:on
\Vife N asilele, whom they identify with the moon. But tJ:ie chame- '
leon and
Nyambe 1et1red to heaven from fear of men. Whenever he the hare.
carved wood, men carved it also; when he made a wooden
plate, so did they. After he had \vithdrawn to the sky, it

happened that Nyambe's dog died. He loved the animal,

and said, '' Let the dog live." But his wife said, ''No, I
\von't have it. He's a thief." Nyambe still persisted.
''For my part," said he, ''I love my dog." But his wife
said, '' Throw him out." So they threw him out. By
and by Nyambe's mother-in-law died, and his wife said
to him, ''Let her live," just as Nyambe himself had said to
her about his dog. But Nyambe answered,'' No, let her die
and be done with it. I said to you that my dog should live,
and you refused. It is my wish that your mother should die
for good and all." So die she did for good and all. After
that the husband and wife sent two messengers, a chameleon
and a hare, to men on the earth. To the chameleon they
said J ''When thou art come to men, say to them, 'Ye shall
live'; but as for thee, 0 hare, when thou art come to men,
say to them, ' Ye shall die once for all.' '' The chameleon
and the hare set off with their messages. Now the chameleon,
as he went, kept constantly turning about, but the hare ran.
So the hare arrived first, and said that men should die
once for all. Having delivered his message, the hare
returned. That is why, when men die, they die once for
1 l{ev. S. S. Dornan, ''The Tati guage,'' Joi111ial ef the Royal At1th10-
Bushmen (Masarwas) and their Lan- pological J11stit11te, xlvii. (1917) I) 80.
THE FALL OF MAN PAR"!' I
1
all. From this Louyi, legend it \Vould appear that human
mortality resulted from a domestic jar in heaven, the deity
falling out with his wife over his dead dog and mother-in-
law. From such seemi11gly trivial causes may flow such
momentous consequences.
Ekoi story The Ekoi of Southern Nigeria, on the border of the
of the
origin of Cameroons, attribute human mortality to the gross mis-
death : conduct of a duck. It happened in this way. The
God, the
frog, and sky-god Obassi Osaw one day thought to himself, ''Men
the duck. fear to die. They do not know that perhaps they may
come to life again. I \vill tell them that sometimes such
a thing may happen, tJ:ien they will have less dread of
death." So he stood up in his house in the sl<y, and
called a frog and a duck before him. To the frog he said,
''Go to earth and say to the people, 'When a man dies, it
is the end of all things ; he shall never live again.''' To the
duel< he said, ''Go tell the earth foll< that if a man dies he
may come to life again." He then led them a little way
and showed them the road, saying, ''Take my message.
Duck, you may go to the left hand. Frog, keep to the
right." So the frog kept on to the righ't, and when he came
'
to the earth he delivered his message of death to the first
men he m.et, telling them that when they died it would be
an end of them. In due time the duck also reached the

earth, but happening to arrive at a place where the people

were making palm oil, she fell to gobbling it up and forgot
all about the message of immortality which the good god
had charged her to deliver to mankind. That is why we
are all mortal down to this day. We are bound to go by
the message of the frog ; we cannot go by the message of
the duck, which never reached us. 2
Gold Coast The story of the two messengers is related also by the
story of the
oiigin of negroes o f th G
e o Id C t d . h . h
oas , an tn t e11 ve1s1on t e two messen-
death: gers are a sheep and a goat. The following is the form in
~~d~heep, which the tale was told by a native to a Swiss missionary at
and the
goat.
Akropong. In the beginning, when sky and earth existed,
1E. Jacottet, .ft'tudes sur les langues ~oon respectively, see E. J acottet, op.
du Haut-Za1nbeze, Troisieme Partie czt. p. l l 8, note a.
Textes Louyi (Paris, 1901), pp. 116'
sq. As to the identification of Ny- 2
P. Amaury Talbot, I1z the Shadoiv
ambe and Nasilele with the sun and ef the Bush (London, 1912}, p. 229.
CH. 11 THE STORY OF THE PEJ.?VERTED MESSAGE
.
59
b~t there were as ye_t no men on earth, there fell a great
rain, and soon after it had ceased a great chain was let down
from heaven to earth with seven men hanging on it. These
men had been created by God, and they reached the earth
by means of the chain. They brought fire with them and
cooked their food at it. Not long afterwards God sent a
goat from heaven to deliver the following message to the
seven men, '' There is something that is called Death ; it
will one day kill some of you ; but though you die, you will
not perish utterly, but you will come to me here in heaven."
The goat went 11is \vay, but when he came near the town he
lit 011 a bush \Vhich seemed to him good to eat; so he lingered
there and began to browse. When God sa\v that the goat
lingered by the way, he sent a sheep to deliver the same
message. T.he sheep went, but did not say what God had
commanded her to say ; for she perverted the message and
said, '' When you once die, you perish, and have no place to
go to." Afterwards the goat came and said, ''God says, you
will die, it is true, but that will not be the end of you, for
you will come to me.'' But the men answered, ''No, goat,
'
, God did not say that to you. What the sheep first reported,

1
by that we shall abide." In another version of the story,
also told at Akropong, the parts of the goat and the sheep
are inverted ; it is the sheep that bears the good tidings and
loiters by the way to browse, and it is the goat that bears
the evil tidings, and is the first to deliver them. The story
ends \vith the melancholy reflection that ''if only the sheep
had made good speed with her message, man would have
died but returned afte1 death ; but the goat made better
'
speed with the contrary message, so man returns no

2
more."
In an Ashantee version of the story the t\vo messengers Ashantee
. f h story of the
are also a sheep and a goat, and the perversion o t e message oiigin of
of immortality is ascribed sometimes to the one animal and death:
. h l God, the
sometimes to the other. The Ashantees say t at ong ago sheep, and
men were happy, for God dwelt among them and talked the goat.
with them face to face. , 1--Iowever, these blissful days did
. not last for ever. One unlucky day it chanced that some
I J. G. Christaller, '' Negersage~ von z'sclie .5pralhe1i, i. ( 13erlin, I 887-88) I) 5 5
(ler Goldkliste,'' Zeitschrift fu1' Afr1ka1i- 2 J. G. Christaller, op. cit. p. 58.
'
60 THE FALL 01' fi:fAN PAR'l' I
women were pounding a mash \vith pestles in a mortar,

while God stood by looking on. For some reason they
were an11oyed by tl1e presence of the deity and told
him to be off; and as he did not take himself off
fast enough to please them, they beat him with their
pestles. In a great huff God retired altogether fiom the
world and left it to the direction of the fetishes ; and still to
this day people say, ''Ah, if it had not been for that old
woman, how happy we .shot1ld be ! '' However, God was
very good-11atured, and even after 11e had gone up aloft, he
sent a kind message by a goat to men on earth, saying,
''There is something which they call Death. .E-Ie \vill kill
so1ne of you. But even if you die, yott vvill not perish com-
pletely. You will come to me in heaven." So off the goat
set \Vith this cheering intelligence. But before he came
to the town, he saw a tempting bush by the wayside, and
stopped to bro\vse on it. \Vhen God looked down from
heaven and saw the goat loitering by the way, he sent off a
sheep with the same message to carry the joyful ne\VS to
men \vithout delay. But the sheep did not give the message
aright. Far from it: she said, ''God sends you word that
you \Vill die, and that will be an end of you." When the
goat had finisl1ed his meal, he also trotted into the town and
delivered his message, saying, ''God sends you word that
you will die, certainly, but that will not be the end of you,
for you \viii go to him." But men said to the goat,
''No, goat, that is not what God said. We believe that
the message \vhicl1 the sheep brought us is the one which
God sent to us." That . unfortunate misunderstanding
\Vas t~e beginning of death among men. 1 However,
in another Ashantee version of tl1e tale the parts played
by the sheep and goat are reversed. It is the sheep
who brings the tidings of immortality from God to men,
but the goat overruns hi1n, and offers them death instead.
In their innocence men accepted death with enthusiasm,
not knowing what it was, and n::i.turally they have died ever
2
since.
In a version of the story which is told by the Akamba
1
E. Perregaux, Chez les Achanti (Neuchatel, 1906), pp. 198 sq.
2
E. Perregaux, op. cit. p. 199.
CH. II THE STORY OF THE PERVERTED MESSAGE 61
of British East Africa the two gospel messengers are a Akamba 1

chameleon and a thrush, whom God sent out together to st~~ofthe
. . . or1g111 of
fi n d peop1e who died one day and came to life the next and death:
to bear the glad tidings of immortality to men So off' they God, the
chameleon,
set, the chameleon leading the way, for in those days he was and the
h h d ht d
a very ig an m1g y person 1n eed. As they went along, thrush.
what should they see but some people lying lil<e dead by
the wayside. The chameleon went up to them and said
softly, ''Ni.we, niwe, niwe." But the thrush asked him testily
what he was making that noise for. The chameleon mildly
ans\vered, ''I am only calling- the people wl10 go forward and
.then come back," and he explained to the thrush that these
seemingly dead' folk would rise from the dead, just as he
himself in walking lurches backward and forward before he
takes a step. This argument from analogy, which might
have satisfied a Butler, had no effect on the sceptical thrush.
He derided the idea of the resurrection. Undeterred by
this blatant infidelity tl1e chameleon persisted in calling to
the dead people, and sure enough they opened their eyes
and listened to l)im. But the thrush rudely interrupted
him and told the dead people that dead they were and
dead they would remain, nothing could bring them to life.
With that he flew away, and though the chameleon stayed
behind and preached to the corpses, telling them that he
had come from God on purpose to bring them to life again,
and .that they were not to believe the lies of that shallow
sceptic the thrush, they turned a deaf ear to his message ;
not one of those dead corpses would so much as budge. So
the chameleon returned crestfallen to God and -reported the
failure of his mission, telling him ho,v, when he preached
the. glad tidings of resurrection to the corpses, the thrush
had roared hin1 down, so that the corpses could not hear a
word he said. Thereupon God cross-questioned the thrush,
who stated that the chameleon had so bungled the message
that he, the thrush, felt it to be h~s imperative duty to
interrupt him. The simple-minded deity believed the lyi11g
thrush and being ve1y angry with the honest chameleo11 he
very slow, lurching this way and that, as he does dow11 to

this very day. But the thiush he piomoted to the office of
62 THE FALL 0.f' MAN PAR1' I
wakening men from their slumber eve1y morning, which he

still does punctually at 2 A.M. before the note of any other
bird is heard in the tropical fo1est. 1
Togoland In all these versions of the story the message is sent

st~rf of the from God to men, but in another version, reported from
or1g1n of .
death:
.
Togoland 1n West Af . h d t h
rica, t e message 1s espa c e d f rom
God, the 1nen to God. They say that once upon a time men sent a
dog, and . Id 11
the frog. dog to God to say that when they died they \VOU 1 {e to
come to life again. So off the dog trotted to deliver the
message. But on the way he felt hungry and turned into a
house, where a man was boiling magic herbs. So the dog sat
down and thought to himself, ''He is coo]{ing food." Mean-
time the frog had set off to tell God that when men died
they would prefer not to come to life again. Nobody had
asked him to give that message ; it \Vas a piece of pure
officiousness and impertinence on his part. However, away
he tore. The dog, who still sat hopefully watching tl1e hell-
broth brewing, saw him hurrying past the door, but he
thought to himself, ''When I have had something to eat, I
will soon catch froggy up." However, froggy came in first,
and said to the deity, '' When men die, they would prefer
. not to come to life again." After that, up comes the dog,
and says he, '' When men die, they \vould like to come to
life again." God was naturally puzzled, and said to the dog,
'' I really do not understand these two messages. As I heard
the frog's request first, I will comply with it. I \vill not do
what you said." That is the reason why men die and do not
come to life again. If the frog had only minded his own busi-
ness instead of meddling with other people's, the dead woulcl
all have come to life again to this day. But frogs come to life
again when it thunders at the beginning of the rainy season,
after tl1ey have been dead all the dry season while the Har-
mattan wind was blowing. Then, while the rain falls and the
thunder peals, you may hear them quacking in the marshes.2
Thus we see that the frog had his own private ends to serve

C. W. Robley, Eth11ology of A-

1
bluish-black back, and a buff-coloured
Kanzba and other.East African Tribes breast. Its Luganda name is nJ101zza
(Cambriclge, 1910), pp. 107-109. The and its Swahili name k1tr11111bizi.
bird's native name is'ito1oko or sz'otoroka.
~r. Muller, ''Die Religionen Togos
2

It is a small bird of tl1e thrush tribe in E1nzeldarstell11ncren '' Anthro"os 1i
( Cossypha i11zolae11s ), with a blacl{ head, :: ' . '../" ,
(1907) l) 203.
ca.11 THE STORY OF THE PERVERTED MESSAGE
. . I
in distorting the message. He gained for himself the

immortality of which he robbed mankind.
In Calabar . a somewhat different version of the same Calabar
widespread story is told. The messengers are a dog and a st~~ of the
sheep, and they go backwards and for1vards between God ~~~ ~ : f
1 0
and men. They say that for a long time after the creation God, the '
dog, and
o f t h e wo11d there was no death in it. At last, however a the sheep.
man sickened and died. So the people sent a dog to G~d
to ask him what they should do \vith the dead man. The
dog stayed so long away that the people grew tired of \vaiting
and sent off a sheep to God with the same question. The
sheep soon returned, and reported that God said, ''Let the
dead man be buried." So they buried him. Afterwards the
dog returned also and 1eported that God said, '' Put warm
ashes on the dead man's belly, and he will rise again."
However, the people told the dog that he came too
late; the dead man was alre~dy buried according to the
instructions of the sheep. . That is why men are buried
when they die. But as 'for the dog, he is driven from
men and humiliated, because it is through his fault that we
1
all die.
In these stories the origin of death is ascribed to the Bantu
blunder or wilful deceit of one of the two messengers. How- st~r~ offthe
or1g1n o
ever, according to another version of the story, vvhich is widely death:
current among the Bant tribes of Africa, death was caused, ~hoa~;~~n,
not by the fault of the messenger, but by the vacillation of and the.
God himself, who, after deciding to make men immortal, lizard.
changed his mind and resolved to mal<:e or leave them.
mortal ; and unluckily for manl<:ind the second messenger,
who bore the message of death, overran the first messenger,
who bore the message of immortality. 111 this form of the tale
the chameleon figures as the messenger of life, and the lizard
as the messenger of death. Thus the Zulus say that in the
beginning U nkulunkulu, that is, the Old Old 011e, sent the
chameleon to men with a message, saying, ''Go, chameleo11,
go and say, Let not men die." The chameleon set out, but
it crawled very slowly and loitered by tl1e way to eat the
purple berries of the ubukwebezane sl1rub or of a rnulberr)'
1 '' Calal)ar Stories,'' Journal of the Africa1t .S"ociet;', No. I8 (J a1111ary I 906 ),
P 194.
THE FALL OF 1lfAN PAR'f !
tree; however, some people say that it climbed up a tree

to bask in the sun, filled its belly with flies, and fell fast
asleep. Meantime the Old Old One had thought better of
it and sent a lizard post-haste after the chameleon with a
very different message to men, for he said to the animal,
'' Li~ard, when you have arrived, say, Let men die." So the
lizard ran, passed the dawdling chameleon, and arriving first
among men delivered his message of death, saying, ''Let,
men die." Then he turned and went bacl{ to the Old Old
One who had sent him. But after he \Vas gone, the chame-
leon at last arrived among men with his joyful news of
immortality, and he shouted, saying, ''It is said, Let not
men die ! '' But men answered, ''Oh ! we have heard the
word of the lizard; it has told us the word, 'It is said, Let
men die.' We cannot hear your vvord. Th1ough the \vord
of the lizard, men will die." And died they have ever since
from that' day to this. So the Zulus hate tl1e lizard and

kill it whenever they can, for they say, '' This is the very
piece of deformity which ran in tl1e beginning to say that
men should die." But others hate and hustle or kill the
chameleon, saying, ''That is the little thing vvhich delayed
to tell the people that they should not die. If he had only
told us in time, we too should not have died ; our ancestors

also would have been still living; there would have been no
diseases here on earth. It all comes from the delay of the
1
chameleon."
The same story is told in nearly the same form by otl1er
1 H. Callaway, T'he Religiozts Syste1n Reyna1d the Fox in Soztth Africa
ef the Amazztlu, Part i. (Springvale, (London, 1864), p. 74; D. Leslie,
Natal, etc., 1868) pp. l, 3 sq., A1lzong the Zul1ts and A111ato11gas,
Part ii. (Springvale, Natal, etc., Second Edition (Edinburgh, 1875), p.
1869) p. 138; Rev. L. Grout, Zztlu- 209; F. Merensky, Beit1i'ige zu1 .!Cen1zt-
land, or Lift atttong the Zztlzt-Kqfirs niss Siid-A.frikas (Berlin, 187 5), p.
(Philadelphia, N.D.), pp. 148 sq.; 124; F. Speckmann, Die Her111anns-
Dt1dley Kidd, The Esse1ztzal Kafir burger 1Wissio1z in A.frika (Hern1anns-
(London, 1904), pp. 76 sq. Con1pare burg, 1876 ), p. 164. According to
A. F. Gardiner, Narrative o.f a Jour1zey Callaway, the lizard is hated inuch
to the Zoolu Country (London, 1836), more than. the chameleon and is in-
pp. 178 sq.; T. Arbousset et F. variab~y killed. On the other hancl,
Daumas, Relation rt'u1z voyage d'ex- ~ccord1ng to A~bousset and Daun1as,
p!oratio1z azt Noid-Est de la Colo1zie d1t It was the grey lizard that bro11ght tl1e
Cap de Bo1zne-Esperance (Paris, 1842), message of life, and the chameleo11
p. 472 ; Rev. F. Shooter, The Kafi1s that brought the niessage of death ;
o.f Natal and the Zulu Country (Lon- hence the chameleon is hated, b11t the
don, l 8 5 7), p. I 59 ; W. H. I. Bleek, harmless grey lizard beloved.
.
CH. 11 THE STORY OF THE PERVERTED MESSAGE 65

'
Bantu tribes such as the Bechuanas,1 the Basutos,2 the Wide
Br1t1sh East Africa. It 1s found, in a slightly altered form, story of the

th
even among e H ausas, wh o are not a Bantu peop1e. 6 chameleon
To and the
this day the Baranga and the N goni owe the chameleon a lizard.
grudge for having brought death into the world by its dilatori-
ness. Hence, when they find a chameleon slowly climbing
on a tree, they tease it till it opens its mouth, whereupon
they throw a pinch of tobacco on its tongue, and watch with
delight the creature writhing and changing colour from
orange to green, from green to black in the agony of death ;
for so they avenge the great wrong which the chameleon did
to mankind. 7
Thus the belief is \videspread in Africa, that God at one T~e fatal
time purposed to make mankind immortal, but that the ~~~~~r
benevolent scheme . miscarried through the fault of the
messenger to whom he had entrusted the gospel message.
I J. Chapman, T1avels in the I1zte1z"or them, ' All of you know that the moon
of South Africa (London, 1868), i. 47. dies and rises again, b11t human bei11gs
2 E. Casalis, The Basutos (London,
will die and rise no more.' Tl1ey say
1861), p. 242; E. Jacottet, 7/ze that from that day human beings com-
Treasury of Ba-suto Lore, i. (Morija, menced to die.'' This is probably
Basutoland, 1908) pp. 46 sqq. Ac- only an abridged forn1 of the story of
cording to the Basutos it was the grey the two messages sent to man by the
liza1d that was sent first with the Moon through the liza1d and the
message of i1nmortality, and the cha- chameleon.
6 J. G. Christaller, ' ' N egersagen
meleon that was sent after him with
the message of mortality. Con1pare von der Goldktiste, '' Zeitsc/zrift fiir
Afrika11ische Sp1ache1t, i. (Berlin,
above, p. 64, note.
1887-1888) p. 61. In this Hausa ver-
3 Henri A. Junod, Les Chants et les
sion the message sent by God to men
Contes des Ba-ro1tga (Lausanne, N. D.), through the chameleon is as follows,
p. 137; id., Les Ba-Rong~ (Neu- ''When a man dies, you 1n11st touch
chatel, 1898), pp. 401 sq. ; id., The him witl1 bread, ancl he will rise agai11. ''
Life of a South African T1ibe (Neu- This message the chameleon faithfully
chatel, 1912-1913), ii. 328 sq. delivered, but men refused to accept
4 W. A. Elmslie, Aniong the Wild it because the lizard, 011trunni11g the
Ngoni (Edinburgh and London, 1899), chameleon, had brought them this
P 70. word, ''When a man dies, you 1nust
. ,,
5 See Captain W. E. R. B~rrett, bury l 11m.
''Notes on the Customs and Beliefs of 7 I-I. A. J u11od and W. A. Elmslie,
the Wa-giriama, etc., of British East !lee.; see above, notes 3 and 4 The
Africa,'' Journal of t~e J(oyal Anthro- particular species of lizard wl1ich accord-
pological Jnstitzete, xl1. (1911) P 37, ing to the Thonga (Baranga) outran the
,, The Wa-Sania believe that formerly chameleon and b1ought tl1e message of
human beings did not die until one day death, is a large animal with a blue
a lizard (Dibleh) appeared and said to head.
F
VOL. I
66 THE FALL OF MAN PART I
The Story of the Cast Skz"n

Savage Many savages believe that, in virtue of the power of

belief that periodically casting their skins, certain animals and in
animals
which cast particular serpents renew their youth and never
d
ie. H Id
o -
their skin~ ing this belief, they tell stories to explain how it came about
renew their . h b f
youth and that these creatures obtained, and men missed, t e oon o
never die. immortality.
various Thus, for example, the Wafipa and Wabende of East
stories of Africa say that one day God, whom they name Leza, came
how men
missed the down to earth, and addressing all livi11g creatures said, '' Who
gift of im- wishes not to die ? '' Unfortunately man and the other
mortality
and animals were asleep; only the serpent was awake and he
~:rJe1~~rds promptly answered, ''I do." That is why men and all other
obtained it. animals die.. The. serpent alone does not die of himself.
He only dies if he is killed. Every year he changes his
1
skin, and so renews his youth and his strength. In like
manner the Dusuns of British North Borneo say that when
'
the Creator had finished making all things, he asked, '' Who
is able to cast off his skin ? If any one can do so, he shall
not die." The snake alone heard and answered, '' I can."
For that reason down to the present day the snake does not
die unless he is l{illed by man. The Dusuns did not hear
the Creator's question, or they also would have thrown off
their skins, and there would have been no death. 2 Similarly
the Todjo-Toradjas of Central Celebes relate that once upon
a time God summoned men and animals for the purpose of
determining their lot. Among the various lots proposed by
the deity was this, '' We shall put off our old skin." Un-
fortunately mankind 011 this momentous occasion was repre-
sented by an old woman in her dotage, who did not hear the
tempti11g proposal. But the animals which slough their skins,
such as serpents and shrimps, heard it and closed with the
3
offer. Again, the natives ofVuatom,an island in the Bismarck.
Archipelago, say that a certain To Konokonomiange bade
t\vo lads fetch fire, promising that if they did so they should
1Mgr. Lechaptois, AuJc: Rz"ves du Royal Anthropologi'cal Institute, xliii.
Tanga1iika (Algiers, 1913), p. 195. (1913) p. 478.
2
Ivor fl. N. Evans, ''Folk Stories 3
N. Adriani en Alb. C. Kruijt, De
of the Ten1passuk and Tuaran Districts Bare' e-sprekende Torad;'a' s van Jl,fidden-
British North Borneo,'' Journal of th; Celebes (Batavia, 1912-1914), ii. 83,
CHAP, II
THE STORY O]i' THE CAST SKIN
11ever die, b~t that, if they refused, their bodies would perish,
though their shades or souls would survive. They would
not hearken to ~im, so he cursed them, saying, '' What ! you
would all have lived! Now you shall die, though your soul
shall live. But the iguana ( Goniocephalus) and the lizard
( Varanus z'ndz'cus) and the snake (Enygrus), they shall live,
they shall cast their skin and they shall live for evermore.''
When the lads . hea,rd that, they' wept, for bitterly they rued
their folly in not going to fetch the fire for To Konokono-
miange.1
The Arawaks of British Guiana relate that once upon a south
time the Creator came down to earth to see how his creature Am~rican'
stories of
man was getting on. But men were so wicked that they how men
tried to kill him ; so he deprived them of eternal life and ~ f'ssedf .the
1
. g1 t o 1m-
bestowed it on the animals which renew their skin, such as mortality,
serpents, lizards, and beetles. 2
A somewhat different version :~~ents,
of the story is told by the Tamanachiers, an Indian tribe of lizards, and
h 0
t e rinoco. Th h f 'd' h r beetles
ey say t at a ter res1. 1ng among t em io~ obtained it.
some time the Creator took boat to cross to the other . side
of the great salt water from which he had come. Just as he

was shoving off from the shore; he called out to them in a.
changed voice,'' You will change your skins," by which he
meant to say, ''You will renew your youth like the serpents
and the beetles." But unfortu11ately an old woman, hearing
these words, cried out '' Oh ! '' in a tone of scepticism, if not
of sarcasm, which so annoyed the Creator that he changed
his tune at once and said testily, ''Ye shall die." That is
3
why we are all mortal.
The people of Nias, an island to the west of Sumatra, Niasian
. b . story of
say that, when the earth was create d, a ce1ta1n eing was how men
sent down from above to put the finishing touches to the ~issed. the
gift of 1m-
work. He ought to have fasted, but, unable to withstand n1ortality, .
the pangs of hunger ' he ate some bananas. The choice of serpents
and
food was very unfortunate, for had he only eaten river crabs, obtained it.
men would have cast their skins like crabs, and so, renewing
their youth perpetually, would never have died. As it is,
death has come upon us all through the eating of those
1 Otto Meyer, '' Mythen und Erzah- 2 R. Schomburgk, f(eisen i1iB1itisch-
lungen von der Insel Vt1atom (Bis- Guiana (Leipsic, 1847-1848), ii. 319.
marck-Archipel, Siidsee),'' A1ithropo:i,
v. (1910) p. 724. . 3 l:t. Schombttrgl,, op. cit. ii. 320.

68 THE FALL OF MAN PART I
1
bananas. Another version of the Niasian story adds that
''the serpents on the co11trary ate the crabs, \vhich in the
opinion of the people of Nias cast their skins but do not
die ; therefore serpents also do not die but merely cast their
2
skin.'' '
Samoan In this last version the immortality of serpents is ascribed

story of to their having partal<en of crabs, \vhich by casting their
how men
missed the skins renew their youth and live for ever. The same belief
gift of im-
mortality.
in the immortality of shell-fish occurs in a Samoan story of
the origin of death. They say that the gods met in council
to determine what should be the erid of man. One proposal
was that men should cast their skins like shellfish, and so
renew their youth. The god Palsy moved, on tl1e contrary,
that shellfish should cast their skins, but that men should
die. While the motion was still before the meeting a shower
of rain unfortunately interrupted the discussion, at1d as the
gods ran to take shelter, the motion of Palsy was carried
unanimously. That is why shellfish still cast their skins
3
and men do not.
Some Thus not a few peoples appear to believe that the happy
peoples
believe
privilege of immortality, obtainable by the simple process of
that periodically shedding the skin, was once within reach of our
formerly
men cast species, but that through an unhappy chance it was trans-
their skins ferred to certain of the lower creatures, such as serpents,
and lived
for ever. crabs, lizards, and beetles. According to others, however,
men were at one time actually in possession of this priceless
boon, but forfeited it through the foolishness of an old \Voman.
Melanesian Thus the Melanesians of the Banks' Islands and the New
~~2':;!n Hebrides say that at first . men never died, but that \vhen
ceased to. they advanced in life they cast their skins like snakes and
renew their b d . .
youth by era s, an came out with youth renewed. After a time a
cas~ing. woman, growing old, went to a stream to change her skin
their skins. . '
according to some; she was the mother of the mythical or
legendary hero Qat, according to others, she was Ul-ta-
marama, Change-skin of the world. She threw off her old
1 H. Sundermann, Die Insel Nias 3
George Brown, D.D., Melanesians
und die JYfissz'on daselbst (Barmen, and Polynesians (London, 1910), p.
1905), p. 68; E. Modigliani, U1z 365; George Turner, Sa11zoa a Hun-
viaggi'o a Nias (Milan, 1890), p. 295. dred }'ears ago and lo11g before (Lon-
2
A. Fehr, Der Niasser 1'111 Lebe1t don, 1884), pp. 8 sq.
und Sterben (Barmen, 1901), p. 8.
CHAP, II THE STORY OF THE CAST SKIN
skin in the water, and observed that as it floated down it

caught again:st a stick. Then she went home, where she had
left ~er child. But the chi.ld refused to recognize her, crying
that its mother \Va'S an old \Voman, not like this young stranger.
So. to pacify the child she went after her cast integument
and put it on. From that time mankind ceased to cast
1
their skins and died. A similar story of the origin of death A similar
is . told in, the Shortlands Islands 2 and by the Kai ' a Papuan st~r~ of the
or1g1n of
tribe of north-eastern New Guinea. The Kai say that at first death told
men d i'd not d'ie b ut renewe d t h eir yout h . When t h eir old of the Kai
by New
brown skin grew wrinkled and ugly, they stepped i11to water, Guinea.
and stripping it off got a new, youthful white skin instead.
In those days there lived an old grandmother with her g1and-
child. One day the old woman, weary of her advanced
years, bathed in the river, cast off her withered old hide, and
returned to the village, spick and span, in a fine new skin.
Thus trartsformed, she climbed up the ladder and entered
her house. But when her grandchild saw her, he \vept and
squalled, and refused to believe that she was his granny.
All her efforts to reassure and pacify him proving vain, she
at last went back in a rage to the river, fished her wizened
old skin out of the \vater, put it on, and returned to the
house a hideous old hag again. The child was glad to see
his granny come back, but she said to him, '' The locusts
cast their skins, but ye men shall die from tl1is day forward."
3
And sure enough, they have done so ever since. The same Similar
. h . . 1 . .
story, wit some tr1v1a variations, 1s to . ld b t'
y na ives o f th story told
e by the
Admiralty Islands. They say that once on a time there was natives of
an old woman, and she was frail. She had two sons, and ~~mi1alty
they went a-fishing, while she herself went to bathe. She Islands.
stripped off her wrinkled old skin and came forth as young
as she had been long ago. When her sons came from the
fishing they were astonished to see her. The one said, ''It
is our mother'' ; but the other said, ''She may be your
1nother, but she shall be my wife." Their mother overheard
1 R. H: Codrington, The Melan- R'a1t1zibalen der Salo11io-I1zsel1z (Dres-

esians (Oxford, 1891), p. 265; W. den-Blasowitz, 1903), l) 148.
Gray, ''Some Notes on the Tannese,''
I1tte11iationales Arlhiv jitr Etl1tto- 3 Cl1. J(eysser, ''Aus de1n Leben der
J(aileute,'' in R. N et1hat1ss's Dez1tsclt
graphie, vii. (I 894) p. 232.
2 C. I<.i!Jbe, Zwei Jah1e te11ter den Ne11-Gui1zea (Berlin, 1911), iii. 161 sq.
.
. THE FALL OF MAN PART t
them and said, ''What were you two saying?'' The two
said,'' Nothing! We only said that you are our mother.''
'' You are liars'' she retorted '' I heard you both. If I had
' '
had my way, we should have gro\vn to be old men and
.
women, and then we should have cast our skin and been
young men and young women. But you have had your way.
We shall grow old men and old women, and then we shall
die.'' With that she fetched her old skin, and put it on, and
became an old woman again. As for us, her descendants,
we grow up and we grow old. But if it had not been for
those two young scapegraces, there would have been no end
1
of our days, we should have lived for ever and ever.
A similar Still farther away from the Banks Islands the very same
st~rf of the story is repeated by the To Koolawi, a mountain tribe of
or1g1n of
death told Central Celebes.
A s reporte d b h
y t e D h
utc miss1onar1es
by a tribe who discovered it, the Celebes version of this widely diffused
in Celebes. h d l 'k
tale runs thus. In the olden time me11 a , 1 e serpents
and shrimps, the po\ver of casting their skin, whereby they
became young again. N O\V there was an old woman who had
a grandchi'ld. Once upon a time she went to the water to
bathe, and thereupon laid aside her old sl<in a11d hung it up
on a tree. With her youth quite restored she returned to
the house. But her grandchild did not know her again, and
would have nothing to do with his gra11dmother ; he l<ept
on saying, ''You are not my grandmother; my grandmother
was old, and you are young." Then the woman \Vent back
to the water and drew on her old skin again. But ever since
that day men have lost the power of renewing their youth
2
and must die.
A variant A variant form of the Melanesian story is told in Anei-
1
oMf e1he .
anes1an tyum, one of the New Hebrides. There they say that once
story. an old. man took off his skin before he began to work in his
garden. He then looked young. But one day his two
grandchildren, finding his skin folded away, pierced it through,
making many holes therein. When the old man put it on
again he shivered with cold, and seeing the holes in his skin
he said to his grandchildren, ''I thought we should live for
1
Josef Meier, '' M ythen und Sagen De Bare'e-spreke1zde To1aqja' s va11
der Admiralitatsinsulaner,'' A1ithropos -!'!idden-Celebes (Batavia, 1912-19l4),
'
iii. (1908) p. 193 ' 11. 8 3
2
N. Adriani en Alb. C. Ktuijt,
CHAP, II
THE STORY OF-THE CAST SKIN 71
ever and cast. ou.r skins and become young again ; but as
you have done this we shall all die." Thus death came into
1
the world.
Another Melanesian tradition ascribes the introduction A diff~rent
of death to purely economic causes. In the days when Melanesian
h d h k . story of the
men c ange t eir s ins and lived for ever, the permanence origin of
of property in the same hands was found to be a great in- death.
convenience; it bore very hard on the heirs, who were per-
petually tantalized by the prospect of an inheritance to which
it was legally and physically impossible that they should ever
succeed. All this time Death had resided either in a
shadowy underground region called Panoi or by the side of
a volcanic ve11t in Santa Maria, it is not quite certain which;
but now in answer to the popular demand he was induced
to come abroad and show himself. He was treated to a
handsome funeral of the usual sort ; that is to say, he was
laid out on a board and covered with a pall, a pig was killed,
and the mourners enjoyed a funeral feast and divided the
property of the deceased. Afterwards, on the fifth day,
the conch shell was blown to drive away the ghost. In
short, nothing was left undone to soothe and gratify the feel-
ings of the departed. So Death returned down the road to
the underground region from which he had emerged ; and all
2
mankind have since followed him thither.
While some peoples have supposed that in the early ages Some
of the world men were immortal in virtue of periodically h:~~~:sthat
casting their skins, others have ascribed the same high men on
'l 1 h f
privi ege to a certain unar sympat y, in consequence o torisefro1n earth used
which mankind passed through alternate states of growth the dead_

after three
and decay, of life and death, cor1espond1ng to the phases of days, as
the moon ' without ever coming to an end. 011 this view, .
1
tl e moon
appears to
though death in a sense actually occurred, it was speedily do in tl1e
repaired by resurrection, generally, it would seem, by resur- sky.
rection after three days, since three days is the period between
the disappearance of the old moon and the reappea1ance of
the new. Thus the Mentras or Mantras, a shy tribe of
savages in the jungles of the Malay Peninsula, allege that i11
the early ages of the world men did not die, but only gre\v
I William Gunn, 7'he Gospel i1z 2 ]{. 11'. Co<lri11gton, The 11fel1i11-
esi1l110 (Oxforcl, 1891), PP 265 Slj
.F1,etit1ia (l,c111<lon, 1914), fJp. 217 J''/
thi11 at the waning of the moon and then waxed fat again
as she \Vaxed to the full. Thus there was no check whatever
on the population, which increased to an alarming extent.
So a son of the first man brought this state of things to his
father's notice, and asked 11im what was to be done. The
first man, a good easy soul, said, ''Leave things as they are'' ;
but his younger brother, who took a more Malthusian view
of the matter, said, ''No, let men die like the banana, leaving
their offspring behind." The question was submitted to the
Lord of the Underworld, and he decided in favour of death.
Ever since then men have ceased to renew their youth like
1
the moon and have died like the banana. In the Caroline
Islands it is said that in the olden time death \vas unknown, or
rather it was only a short sleep. Men died on the last day of
the waning moon and came to life again on the appearance of
the new moon, just as if they had \vakened from a refreshing
slumber. But an evil spirit somehow contrived that when
2
men slept the sleep of death they should wake no more:
The Wotjobaluk, a tribe of south-eastern Australia, related
tl1at when all animals were men and women, some of them
died and the moon used to say, ''You up again," \vhereupon
they came to life again. But once on a time an old man
said, ''Let them remain dead''; and since then nobody has
ever come to life again, except the moon, \vhich still con-
3
tinues to do so down to this very day. The Unmatjera and
Kaitish, two tribes of central Australia, say that their dead
used to be buried either in trees or unde1ground, and that
after three days they regularly rose from the dead. The
Kaitish tell how this happy state of things came to an end.
It was all the fault of a man of the Curlew totem who found
'
some men of the Little Wallaby totem in the act of burying
a man of that ilk. For some reason the Curlew man flew
into a passion a11d kicked the corpse into the sea. Of
course after that the dead man could not come to life again,
and that is why nowadays nobody rises from the dead after
1
D. F. A. Hervey, ''The l\1entra 2 Lettrts, Edijiantes et Citriez1ses,
T1aditions, '' Joze1nal ef the Straits Nouvelle Edition, xv. (Pa1is, I 781)
Branch ef the Royal Asiatz'c Society, pp. 305 sq.
No. 10 (December, 1882), p. 190;
W. W. Skeat and C. 0. Blagden, 3
A. W. Howitt, Native Tribes ef
Paga1z Races ef the 1Wala;1 Peninsula Soztth-East Australia (London, 1904),
(London, I 906), ii. 337 sq. pp. 428 sq.

CHAP. II THE STORY OF THE CAST SKIN 73

thre~ da~s, as. everybody used to do long ago. 1 . Though
nothing 1s said about the moon in this narrative of the
origin of death, the analogy of the preceding stories makes
it probable that the three days, during which the dead used
to lie in the grave, were the three days during which the
moon lay ''hid in her vacant interlunar cave." The Fijians
also associated the possibility, though not the actual enjoy-
ment, of human immortality with the phases of the moon.
They say that of old two gods, the Moon and the Rat, dis-
cussed the proper end of man. The Moon said, '' Let him
be like me, who disappear awhile and then live again." But
2
the Rat said, '' Let man die as a rat dies." And he prevailed.
The U potos of the Congo tell ho\v men missed and Upoto
the l\tloo11 obtained the boon of immortality. One day God, hstory of
ow me11
whom they call Libanza, sent for the people of the moon and missed the
the people of the earth. The people of the moon hastened !:;~a~ft~m
to the deity, and were re\varded by him for their . alacrity. and the
'' Because," said he, addressing the moon, '' thou earnest to me ~~~i~ied it.
at once when I called thee, thou shalt never die. Thou
shalt be dead for but two days each month, and that only
to rest thee ; and thou shalt return with greater splendour."
But when the people of the earth at last appeared before
Libanza, he was angry and said to them, '' Because you
came not at once to me when I called you, therefore you
3
will die one day and not re\ ive, except to come to me."
1
The Bahnars of eastern Cochin China explain the im- Bahnar

'th
mortality o f pr1m1t1ve man ne1 er Y e P ases o b th h f th story of
e 11ow men
moon nor by the custom of casting the skin, but apparently u_sed to
. . h rise from
by the recuperative virtue of a certain tree. They say t at the dead
in the beginning when people died, they used to be buried by ?eing
' buried at
at the foot of a tree called Long Blo, and that after a time tl1e foot of
t hey always rose from the dead, not as infants, but as full- a certain
tree.
gro\vn men and women. So the earth was peopled ve1y
fast 1 and all the inhabitants formed but one great town
u11d er the presidency of our first parents. In time men
multiplied to such an extent that a certain li:ard cou~d n~t
tal<:e his walks abroad without somebody tread111g on his tail.
I (Sir) Bale! win Sj)encer a11c1 F. J. Fi_j1:a11s, Second :E:ditio11 (Lontlon,
Gillen, No1thern 7'ribcJ ef G'ent1al 1860), i. 205.
:i M. l,i11tleman,LesUpotos(I31ussels,
Ait.rtralia (I.,oncl<>n, 1904), jJjJ. 513 sq.
2 'fhomas Williams, l'i;"i a11ci the I 906 ), !J}l 2 3 sq.
74 THE FALL OF MAN PAR1' I
This vexed him, and the wily creature gave an insidious hint
to the gravediggers. '' Why bury the dead at the foot of the
Long Bio tree ? '' said he ; '' bury them at the foot of Long
Khung, and they will not come to life again. Let them die
outright and be done with it.'' The hint was taken, and
1
.from that day men have not come to life again.
Rivalry for In this last story, as in many African tales, the instru-
~mmbotrtal-
1ty e wee11
ment of bringing death among men is a lizard. We may
men and conjecture that the reason for assigning the invidious office
~~:~t::: to a lizard was that this animal, like the serpent, casts its.
their skins, skin periodically, from which primitive man might infer, as
such as
serpents he infers with regard to serpents, that the creature renews its
andlizards. youth and lives for ever. Thus all the myths \Vhich relate
how a lizard or a serpent became the maleficent agent of
human mortality may perhaps be referred to an old idea of
a certain jealousy and rivalry between men and creatures
which cast their skins, notably serpents and lizards; we may
suppose that in all such cases a story was told of a contest
bet\.veen man and his animal rivals for the possession of im-
mortality, a contest in which, whether by mistake or guile,
the victory always remained with the animals, who thus
became immortal, \vhile mankind was doomed to mortality. .
4. The Co11zpost'te Story of the Perverted 1lfessage and

the Cast Skz'rt
!~~~s In some stories of the origin of death the incidents of
combine the perverted message and the cast skin are combined.
~~:idents Thus the Gallas of East Africa attribute the mortality of
of the man and the immortality of serpents to the mistake or malice
~e:~~;:d of a certain bird which falsified the message of eternal life
and th7 entrusted to him by God. The creature which did this
cast skin. t . .
Galla story grea wrong to our species 1s a black or dark blue bird, with
of God and a white patch on e.ach wing and a crest on its head It
the blt1e '
bircl. perches on the tops of trees and utters a wailing note like
the bleating of a sheep ; hence the Gallas call it holawaka
or ''the sheep of God," and explain its appa1ent anguish by
the following tale. Once upon a time God sent that bird to
Guerlach, '' Mceurs et Superstitions des sauvages Ba-hnars ''Les Missi~ons
1

Catho!iques, xix. (1887) p. 479. . '
cR. II THE PERVERTED MESSAGE AND CAST SKIN
. . .
75
tell men that they should not die, ~ut that w4en they grew
old and weak they should slip off their skins and so renew
their ~outh. In order to authenticate the message God gave
the bird a cres.t to serve . as the badge of his high office:
W :11, off the bird set to deliver the glad tidings of immor"'
tal1ty to man, but he had not gone far before he fell in with
a snake devouring carrion in the path. The bird looked
longingly at the carrion and said to the snake ''Give me
.
some of the meat and blood, and I will tell you God's
'
message." '' I don't want to hear it," said the snake tartly,
and continued his meal. But the bird pressed him so to
hear the message that the snake rather reluctantly consented.
'' The message,'' then said the bird, '' is this. When men
grow old they will die, but when you grow old you will cast
your skin and renew your youth." That is why people grow
old and die, but snal{es crawl out of their old skins and
renew their youth. But for this gross ..perversion of the
message God punished the heedless or wicked bird with a
painful internal malady, from which he suffers to this day ;
1
that is why he sits wailing on the tops of trees. Again, the
Melanesia11s, who inhabit the coast of the Gazelle Peninsula Melanesian
.tn N ew B ritain,
. . say t h at T o K am b"inana, t h e Goo d, Spir1t,
. . story of To
Kambin-

loved men and wished to make them immortal. So he called anaand To

. Korvuvu.
his brother To Korvuvu and said to him, ''Go to men and
take them the secret of immortality. Tell them to cast their
skin every year. So will they be protected from d~ath, for
their life will be constantly renewed. But tell the serpents
'
that they must thenceforth die." However, To Korvuvu

acquitted himself badly of his task ; for he commanded men
to die, and betraye.d to the serpents the secret of irnmor-
tality. Since then all men have been rnortal, but the serpents
2
cast their sl{ins every year. and never die. A similar story Annamite
of the origin of death is told in Annarn. They say that ~~Jc of
Ngoc hoang sent a messenger from heaven to men to say h?ang and
his message
that 1,.vhen they reached old age tl1ey sh ou Id ch ange th eir tc> men.
skins and live for ever, but that when serpents grew old tl1cy
must die. The messenger came down to earth and said,
rightly e11ough, '' When man is old he sl1all cast his skin ;
Miss A. Werner, '' 'fwo (;aJla
I
2 P. A. J{leintitschen, Die 1~1/Jte11-
Lc!gc11cls, '' 1Vla11, xiii. (I 9 I 3) PJJ. 90 bt!W(J/t1ze1 de1 (,'azelleh1ilbi11.rel (Ililtrttp
J'fJ bei JVIli11ster, N.l>.), IJ 334

but when serpents are old they shall die and be laid in
coffins." So far so good. But unluckily there happened
to be a brood of serpents \vithin hearing, and when they
learned the doom pronounced on their kind, they fell into
a fury and said to the messenger, ''You must say it over
again and just the contrary, or we will bite you." That
frightened the messenger, and he repeated his message,
changing the words thus, '' When the serpent is old he shall
cast his skin ; but when man is old he shall die and be laid
in the coffin." That is why all creatures are now subject to
death, except the serpent, who, when he is old, casts his skin
1
and lives for ever.
5. Conclusion
In its Thus, arguing from the analogy of the inoon or of
~~~~n~e animals which cast their sl<:ins, the primitive philosopher 11as
Hebrew inferred that in the beginning a perpetual rene\val of youth was
story of
FallofManthe h
eit er appo1nte d b b I b f, th h
y a enevo ent eing or e uman species
probably or was actually enjoyed by them, and that but for a crime, an
related how
theserpent, 'd bi d
acci ent, or a un er it wou Id h b
ave een enjoye d b h
y t em
by eating for ever. People who pin their faith in immortality to the cast
of the Tree . .
of Life, skins of serpents, lizards, beetles, and the like, naturally look
11
ohbtabi ed on these animals as the hated rivals who have robbed us of
t e oon
of in1n1or- the heritage which God or nature intended that \Ve should
tality for
11is species. possess ; consequently they tell stories to explain how. it
came about that such low creatuies contrived to oust us
from the priceless possession. Tales of this so1t are widely
diffused throughout the world, and it would be no matter for
surprise to find them among the Semites. The story of the
Fall of Man in the third chapter of Genesis appears to be an
ab1idged version of this savage myth. Little. is wanted to
complete its resemblance to the similar myths still told by
savages in many parts of the world. The principal, almost tl1e
only, omission is the silence of the narrator as to the eatincr
:::. of
the fruit of the tree of life by the serpent, and the conseqt1ent
attainment of immortality by the reptile. Nor is it difficult
to account for the lacuna. The vei11 of rationalism which
'
runs through the Hebre\v account of creation and has stripped
'
1
A. Landes, ''Contes et Legendes Excursions et Reconnaissa1zces, No. 25
Annamites,'' Cochi1zchi'1ze fra1ifaise, (Saigon, 1886) pp. 108 sq.
CHAP. II CONCLUSION 77
it of many grotesque features that adorn or disfigure the

corresponding Babylonian tradition, could hardly fail to find
a stumbling-block in the alleged immortality of serpents ;
and the redactor of the story in its final fo1m has removed this
stone of offence from the path of the faithful by the simple
process of blotting out the incident entirely from the legend.
Yet the yawning gap left by his spo11ge has not escaped the
commentators, who look in vain for the part which should have
been played in the narrative by the tree of life. If my
interpretation of the story is right, it has been left for the
comparative method, after thousands of years, to supply the
blank in the ancient canvas, and to restore, in all their
primitive crudity, the gay barbaric colours which the skilful
11a11d of tl1e Hebrew artist had softened or effaced.
CHAPTER III

THE MARK OF CAIN
Mark set WE rec:i.d in Genesis that- wl1en Cain had murdered his
by God on brother Abel he was driven out from society to be a fugitive
Cain.
and a vagabond on earth. Fearing to be slain by any one
who might meet him, he remonstrated with God on the
hardness of his lot, and God had so far compassion on him
that he ''set a mark upon Cain, lest any fi11ding hitn should
1
kill him." What was the marl<: that God put on the first
murderer? or the sign that he appointed for him?
The tl1eory That we have here a reminiscence of some old custom
~~kt1:as a observed by manslayers is highly probable ; and, though we
tribal cannot hope to ascertain what the actual mark or sign \Vas,
~:~=in- a comparison of the customs observed by manslayers in
adequate. otl1er parts of the world may help us to understand at least
its general significance. Robertson Smith thought that the
mark in question was the tribal mark, a badge which every
member of the tribe \Vore on his person, a11d \Vhich served to
protect him by indicating that he belonged to a community
2
that would avenge his murder. Certainly such marks are
I Genesis iv. 8-15 (Authorized Ver- either imprinted on his body or at all
sion). The Revised Version renders : events close! y attached to his person.
''and the Lord appointed a sign for 2 W. Robertson Smitl1, Kinship and
Cain.'' The former rendering, which Marriage in Early Arabia, New Edi-
I have adopted, appears to be de- tion (London, 1903), p. 25 I. B. Stade
manded by the context, as Principal has argued that the mark was the
J. Skinner observes in his commentary tribal mark of the l{enites, of whom
on Genesis (p. 1 I o). The most literal he believes Cain to have been the
translation \vould be ''set a sign to (or eponymo11s ancestor ; furtl1er, he holds
for) Cain.'' Modern commentators on that it had a religious as well as a tribal
Genesis (Dillmann, Driver, Bennett, significance, stamping the Kenites as
Skinner, Gunkel, Ryle) are rightly worshippers of Jehovah. From a
agreed that the mark \vas intended for variety of indications he concludes that
the protection of Cain, and that it was the mark was probably tattooed on the
78
. . I
CHA}>. III
THE MARK OF CAIN
79
forehead of the t1ibesmen. See B. Exegeticat Con1.111entary 011 Ge1zesis

Stade, ''Das Kainszeichen,'' Zeitschrift (Edinburgh, 1910), pp. I I I sqq ..
.fiir die alttestame11tliche WisJe11scha.ft, 1 W. l{obertson Smith, I.e .
xiv. (1894) pp. 250-318; id., Biblisc~e 2 J. G. Frazer, Tote111is111 and Exo-
7'heolo1:,rie des A lte11 J'esta111e1its, I. ,r;aniy (Londo11, 1910), i. 28 sq., iv.
(TUt1ingen, 1905) PJJ. 42, 146. But 197 .>qq.
tl1e view is <>pen to serious objections. 3 Ge11esis iv. 10-12 (Revised Ver-
Sec Principal J. Skinner, Critical a1td sion).
80 THE MARK OF CAIN PAR'f I
others. On this view it is intelligible that a homicide

should be shunned and banished the country, to which his
presence is a continual menace. He is plague-stricken,
surrounded by a poisonous atmosphere, infected by a
contagion of death; his very touch may blight the earth.
Attic la\v

Hence we can u11derstand a certain rule of Attic law. A
concerning
banished homicide who had been banished, and against whom in his
homicides. absence a second charge had been brought, was allowed to
return to Attica to plead in his defence; but he might not
set foot on the land, he had to speak from a ship, and even
the ship might not cast anchor or put out a gangway. The
judges avoided all contact with the culprit, for they judged
1
the case sitting or standing on the shore. Clearly the
intention of tl1is rule of law was to put the manslayer in
quarantine, lest by touching Attic earth even indirectly
th1ough the anchor or the gangway he should blast it. For
the same reason, if such a man, sailing the sea, had the
misfortune to be cast away on the country where his crime
had been perpetrated, he was allowed indeed to camp on
the shore till a ship came to take him off, but he was
expected to keep his feet in sea - water all the time, 2
evidently in order to counteract, or at least dilute, the
poison which he was supposed to instil into the soil.
Seclusion The quarantine which Attic law thus imposed on the
of mur- manslayer has its counterpart in the seclusion still enforced
derers in
Do bu. on murderers by the savages of Dobu, a11 island off the
south-eastern extremity of New Guinea. On this subject
a missionary, who resided for seventeen years in the island,
writes as follows: ''War may be waged against the relatives
of the wife, but the slain must not be eaten. The person
who !<:ills a relation by marriage must never after partake
1 Demosthenes, Oral. xxiii. 77 sq., We may therefore safely dismiss as
pp. 645 sq. ; Aristotle, Co1isti"tutio1z ef unauthorized the statement of Hella-
Athens, 57; Pausa11ias, i. 28. I I ; _Tulit1s dius that the ship cast anchor.
Pollux, 01zo11zastico1z, viii. I 20; He!la- 2
. Plato, Laws, ix. 8, p. 866 c D. In
dius, quoted by Photius, Bibliotheca, p. ancient Greece, for a different reason,
535a, lines 28 sqq., ed. Im. Bekker w~en a man died of d1opsy, his
(Berlin, .1824). Tl1e rule which for- children were made to sit with their
bade the ship to cast anchor or to pt1t feet in water until the body was burnt
out a gangway is mentioned only by (Plutarch, De sera nit11{i1zis v111dicta,
Pollux. But Pollux had access to 14). Compare The 3fagic Art and
excellent at1thorities, and the rtile the Evoluti"on ef K1:1igs, i. 78 (The
bears the stamp of genuine antiquity. Golden Bozegh, Third Edition, Part i.).
CHAP. III
THE MARK OF CAIN 81
of the general food or fruit from his wife's village H'
.fi 1 . is
wi e .a one must cook his food. If his wife's fire goes out
s~e is not allowed to take a .fire-stick from a house in her
village. . The penalty for breaking this tabu is that the
husb~nd dies of blood-poisoning! The slaying of a blood
relatio~ places an even stricter tabu on the slayer. When
the chief Gaganumore slew his brother (mother's sister;s
son) he was .not allowed to return to his own village,
but had to build a village of his own. He had to have a
separate lime-gourd and spatula; a water-bottle and cup of
his own ; a special set of cooking pots ; he had to get his
drinking cocoanuts and fruit elsewhere; his fire had to be
kept burning as long as possible, and if it went out it could
not be relit from another fire, but by friction. If the chief
were to break this tabu, his brother's blood would poison
his blood so that his body would swell, and he would die a
terrible death." 1
In these Dobuan cases the blood of the slain man is Beliefinthe
supposed to act as a physical poison on the slayer, should :~!~~t~~us
he venture to set foot in, or even to hold indirect corhmuni- homicides

cation h, t h e vi'11 age o f h'1s v1ct1m.
wit H'1s sec1us1on is t here- illustrated
by Kikuyu
fore a precaution adopted in his own interest rather than in notions. .
that of the community which he avoids ; and it is possible
that the rules of Attic law in the matter of homicide ought
to be similarly interpreted. Ho\vever, it is more probable
that the danger was believed to be mutual; in other words,
that both the homicide and the persons with whom he came
into contact were thought liable to suffer from blood-poison-
ing caused by contagion. Certainly the notion that a man-
slayer can infect other people \Vith a maligna11t virus is held
by the Akikuyu of British East Africa. They thinl< that if
a man who has killed another comes and sleeps at a village
and eats with a family in their hut, the persons with whom
he has eaten contract a dangerous pollution (thahu), which
might prove fatal to them, were it not removed in time by
a medicine-man. The very skin on which the homicide
slept has absorbed the taint and might infect any one else
1 Rev. W. E. Bromilow, ''Some for the Advanct111ent. of Sl1e11ce held at
manners and customs of the Dobuans B11:sba11e, I909 (Brisbane, 1910), P
of S.I:. I~:tj)Ua," li'epoi-t of the J'z11c!fth 478.
llleeti11,i; of the ,411stralasia1z AsJociatio11
VOL. I G
82 THE MARK OF CAIN PART I
who slept on it. So a medicine-man is called in to purify

1
the hut and its inmates.
Similar Similarly among the Moors of Morocco a manslayer '' is
notions considered in some degree unclean for the rest of his life.
as to
unclean- Poison oozes out from underneath his nails ; hence anybody
ness and who drinks the water in which he has washed 11is hands will
infectious-
ness of fall dangerously ill. The meat of an animal which he has
homicides killed is bad to eat, and so is any food which is partaken
among the
Moors of of in his company. If he comes to a place where people are
Morocco. diggi11g a well, the water will at once run avvay. In the
Hiaina,

I was told, he is not allowed to go into a vegetable
garden or an orchard, .nor to tread on a threshing-floor or
enter a granary, nor to go among the sheep. It is a common,
although not universal, rule that he must not perform the
sacrifice at the Great Feast vvith his own hands ; and in some
tribes, mostly Berber-speaking ones, there is a similar prohibi-
tion with reference to a person who has killed a dog, which
is an unclean animal. All blood which has left the veins is
2
unclean and haunted by ;nun'' (jinn).
In the But in the Biblical narrative of the murder of Abel the
Biblic~l
narrative o
f blood of the murde1ed man is not the only inanimate obj' ect
the murder that is personified. If the blood is represented as crying
of Abel the 1
earth as . a ou , d th h d h
e ea1t 1s represente as opening er mout to h
3
well as the receive the blood of the victim. To this personification of
blood is h
personified. t e eart
h A h l ffi .
esc y us o ers a parallel, for he speaks of the
ground drinl<ing the blood of the murdered Agamemnon. 4
But in Genesis the attribution of personal qualities to the
earth seems to be carried a step further, for we are told that
the murderer was'' cursed from the ground''; and that \vhen
he tilled it, the land would not yield him her strength, but
that a fugitive and a wanderer should he be in the world.
The earth The implication apparently is that the earth, polluted by
:~p:eosed blood and offended by his crime, would refuse to allow the
polluted by seed sown by the murderer to germinate and bear fruit nay
bloodshed ' '
and to
1
spurn the C. W. Robley, '' l{ikuyu Custo111s 2
Ed ward Westermarck, The lJ:foorish
guilty from and Beliefs,'' Journal of the Royal Conception of Holiness (Helsingfors,
her bosom. Anthropological Institute, xl. (1910) 1916), pp. 130 sq. ~
p. 431. I have already cited this and
3 Genesis iv.
more evidence to the same effect in l l.
Psyche's Task, Second Edition (London, 4 Aeschylus, Choephor. 63 (58), a1'
1913), pp. 115 sqq.
al&, r' fK7roOe11 U7r0 x0011os rpotpou.
CHAP, III
THE MARK OF CAIN 83
that it would expel him from the cultivated soil on which he
had hitherto prospered, and drive him out into the barren
wilderness, there to roam a houseless and hungry vagabond.
Th~ concept~on of earth as a personal being, who revolts
against the sin of the dwellers t1pon it and spurns them from
fu.er bosom, is not foreign to the Old Testament. In Leviticus
\Ve read that, defiled by human iniquity, ''the land vomiteth
1
out her inhabitants ''; and the Israelites are solemnly warned
to keep God's statutes and judgments, ''that the land vomit
not you out also, when ye defile it, as it vomited out the nation
that was before you." 2 .
The ancient Greeks apparently entertained similar notions Ancient
as to the effect of pollt1ting earth by' the shedding of human ~;:~~
blood, or, at all events, the blood of kinsfolk ; for tradition of the .
. . wanderings
to Id h ow t h e matr1c1de 4.1\.lcmaeon, haunted by the ghost of of the
his murdered mother Eriphyle, long wandered restlessly over matricide
Alcmaeon.
the world, till at last he repaired to the oracle at Delphi, and
the priestess told him, that '' the only land whither the aveng-
ing spirit of Eriphyle would not dog him was the newest
land, which the sea had uncovered since the pollt1tion of his
3
mother's blood had been incurred ;'' or, as Thucydides puts
it, '' that he \vould never be rid of his terrors till he had
found and settled in a country which, when he sle\v his
mother, the sun had not yet shone on, and which at that
time was not yet dry land ; for all the rest of the earth had
4
been polluted by him." Following the directions of the
oracle he discovered at the mouth of the Achelous the small
)
and barren Echinadian Islands which, by washing down the

soil from its banks, the river was supposed to have created
since the perpetration of his crime; and there he took up his
abode. 5 According to one version of the legend, the murderer
had found rest for a tirne in the bleak upland valley of
Psophis, among the solemn Arcadian mountains, but even
I Leviticus xviii. 25. (flome1, Iliad, vi. 20 r ), after he had .

2 Leviticus xviii. 28, com1)are xx. 22.
accidentally slain his brothe1 (Apo!lo-
dorus Bibliotheca, ii. 3. I), may !1ave
3 Pausanias viii. 24. 8.
consi;ted lil.::e the Ecl1i11aclian Islancls,
4 Thttcydides ii. 102.
of new l~nd formed by alluvial soil and
.
1
5 Thucydides ii. 102 ; l ausan1as
but lately recoverecl from the sea. See
viii. 24. 7-9. Miss J. E. Harrison has
ingeniously cc)nject11red that the ~leJan her J'1'ole,r.;011ze11a to tl1:e. St1r1ly ef G_reek
Jt!eli,g1"o1t, Seconcl Ecl1t1on (Ca111br1clge,
plain in Cilicia ( !Ieroclotus v1. 9 5),
I 908 ), p[J. 220 sq.
over which .13ellerophon wat1dered
THE MARI< OF CAIN l'ART I
there the ground refused to yield its increase to the

matricide, and he was fo1ced, lil(e Cain, to resume his weary
1
wanderings.
Belief The belief that the earth is a powerful divinity, who is
entertained defiled and offended by the shedding of human blood and
by some
tribes of
.
must be appeased by sacrifice, prevails, or prevai e 1 d t"ll
i
Upper
Senegal,
lately
'
among.
some tribes of Upper Senegal, who exact
that the expiation even for wounds which have merely caused blood
e~thdisdb
011en e y
to flow without loss of life. Thus at Laro, in the country of
bloodshed the Bobos, ''the murderer paid two goats, a dog, and a cock
andmt1stbe to t h e ch"1ef of th e vi"11 age, wh o 011ere
appeased cc d th em in sacr1"fi ce. t o
by sacrifice. the Earth on a piece of wood stuck in the ground. N oth1ng
Beliefs and h c. 'l
customs of was given to t e 1ami y o t e v1ct1m. f h All th "11
e v1 agers,
the Bobos. including the chief, afterwards partook of the flesh of the
sacrificial victims, the families of the murderer and his
victim alone being excluded from the banquet. If it was
an affair of assault and wounds, but blood had 11ot

been shed, no account was taken of it. But when blood
had been spilt, the Earth was displeased at the sight, and
therefore it was necessary to appease her by a sacrifice.
The culprit gave a goat and a thousand co\vries to the chief
of the. village, who sacrificed the goat to the Earth and
divided the cowries among the elders of the village. The
goat, after being offered to the Earth, was also divided
among the village elders. But the injured party tl1rough-
out the affair was totally forgotten and received nothing
at all, and that, too, logically enough. For the intention
was not to compensate the injured party for his wrong
at the cost of the wrongdoer, but to appease the Earth,
a great and redoubtable divinity, who was displeased at
the sight of bloodshed. In these circumstances there was
nothing for the injt1red party to get.. It sufficed that the Earth
was pacified by eating the soul of the goat that had been sacri-
2
ficed to her ; '' for '' among the Bobos, as among the other
blacks, the Earth is esteemed a great goddess of justice." 3
Similar . . Among tl1e N ounoumas, another tribe of Upper Senegal,
beliefs and h
customs of t e customs and beliefs in regard to bloodshed were simila1.
the Neu-
noumas 1
Apollodorus, Bibliotheca, iii. 7. 5, 2 L. Tauxier, Le Noir du Soitdan
concerni11g ye110,l1171s lifi ucrrepo11 ri)s yi)s lii' a.vro11
bloodshed. d<f>6oov KT II.. (Paris, 1912), p. 64.
3 L T . op. cit.
p. 7 3
. aux1e1,
CHAP. III
THE MARK OF CAIN 85
'
A murderer was banished for three years, and had to pay

a heavy fine in cowries and cattle, not as a blood-wit to the
family, of his victim, but to appease the Earth and the other .
local divinities, who had been offended. by the, sight of spilt
blood. The ox or oxen were sacrificed to the angry Earth
by a priest who bore the .title of the Chief of the Earth and
' .
the flesh, together with the cowries, was divided among the
elders of the village, the family of the murdered man. receiv-
ing nothing, or at most only a proportionate share of the meat
and money. In the case of brawls where no life had been
taken, but blood had flowed,' the aggressor had to pay an ox,
a sheep, a goat, and fou1 fowls, all of \\rhich were sacrificed
to pacify the anger of the local deities at the sight of blood-
shed. The ox was sacrificed to the Earth by the Chief of
the Earth in presence of all the elders of the village ; the
sheep was sacrificed to the River; and the fowls to the Rocks
and the Forest. As for the goat, it was sacrificed by the
chief of the village to his private fetish. If these expiatory
sacrifices were not offered, it was believed that the gods in
their wrath would slay the culprit and all his family. The
'
Chief of the Earth received as his due the intestines, hide,

head, horns, and one shoulder of the sacrificial ox ; the rest
of the ox and the remaining victims were divided between
the chief of the village, the headmen of the various wards,
and the elders. Every one carried off his portion of flesh to
l1is own house and ate it there. In some places the assailant
had also to pay a fine in cowries proportioned to the serious-
1
ness of the wound 'vhich he had inflicted. ,
The foregoing facts suggest that a mark put on a Thus the
. d . .1 r h. t n1ark on a
homicide might be 1ntende pr1mari y, not. ior is pro ec- homicide
tion but for the protection of the persons \\'ho met him, might be a
' . danger-
lest by contact with his pollution they should defile ~hem- signal to
selves and incur the wrath of the god whom he had offei1ded, warnothers
or of the ghost by whom he was haunted ; in sh~rt, the away.
mark might be a danger-signal to warn people off, like the
2
special garb prescribed i11 Israel for ,lepers.
However, there are other facts which tend to show that the
I J.,. Tauxier, Le No1:r dtt Sottda1i, i'd., pp. 100 sq., 227, 228, 239 sq.,
flp. i76-r78. I<'or more eviclence of 263, 264, 290, 313~315, 352.
expiatory sacrifices offerecl to ap1)ease
tl1e ang.er of r:(trth at blo<J<lsl1ccl, see . 2 I~evitict1s xiii. 45
86 THE MARK OF CAIN PAR'f I
But other murderer's mark was designed, as the story of Cain implies,
facts go to for the benefit of the murderer alone, and further that the
prove that
the mark real danger against which it protected him was not tl1e
~:;,~gned anger of his victim's kinsfolk, but the wrath of his victim's
for the ghost. Here again, as in the Athenian customs already men-
benefit of
the tioned, we seem to touch the bed-rocl( of superstition In
murderer Attica. Plato tells us that according to a very ancient
himselfby
protecting Greel( belief the ghost of a man who had JUSt
b een I ek.11 d
h~m~g~in~t was angry with his slayer and troubled him, being enraged
his v1ct1m s . b h h
ghost. at the sight of the homicide stalkII1g freely a out In Is, t e
Ancient
Greek
ghost's '
old familiar
.
haunts ; hence it was needful .
for the
belief that homicide to depa1t from l1is cot1ntry for a year until the
the1a1n
as man wrath of the ghost 11ad cooled down, nor might he return
g.hostof
was wroth before sacrifices had been offered and ceremonies of purifica-
with his
slayer. tion performed. If the victim chanced to be a fore1gner,
the slayer had to shun the native land of the dead man as
well as his own, and in going into banishment he had to
1
follow a prescribed road; for clearly it would never do to let
hirn rove about the country with the angry ghost at his l1eels.
Kikuyu Again, we have seen that among the Al(ikuyu a murderer
cerenlony
to appease is believed to be tainted by a dangerous pollution ( thahu)
theghostof which he can communicate to other people by contact.
~~:,rdered That .this pollution is connected with his victim's ghost
appears from one of the ceremonies which are performed to
expiate the deed. The elders of the village sacrifice a pig
beside one of those sacred fig-trees which play a great part
in the religious rites of the tribe. There they feast on the
more succulent parts of the animal, but leave the fat,
intestines, and some of the bones fbr the ghost, who is
supposed to come that very night and devour them in the
lil(eness of a wild cat; his hunger being thus stayed, he
considerately refrains from returning to the village to trouble
the inhabita11ts. It deserves to be noticed that a Kikuyu
homicide incurs ceremonial pollution (thahu) only th1ough
the slaughter of a man of his ow11 clan ; there is no
ceremonial pollution incurred by the slaughter of a man of
another clan or of another tribe. 2
'
1
Plato, Laws, ix. 8, pp. 86 5 D- 2
C. W. Hobley, '' J{ikuyu Cttstoms
866 A ; Demosthenes, Orat. xxiii. pp. and Beliefs,'' Jo1t111al of the Royal
643 sq.; Hesychius, s.v. a'lrPtavriu.6s. Anthropologi'cal Instz!ute, xl. (I 910)
CHAP. III
THE MARK OF CAIN
I)P 43 g sq. As to the sanctity .of the 1 J.

Roscoe, 7'/te No1the11t Ba11tu
fig-tree (11tu,E['lt111u) among the Al<1kt1yu, (Can1bridge, 1915), p. 171.
see M. W. fl. J~eech, '' Tl1e sacred . ,,
fig-tree of tl1e A-l<il{t1yu of East Afr1ca, 2 J. Roscoe, 7'/te No1the11t Ba11t11,
Ma1i, xiii. (I 9 I 3) pp. 4-6. P 190.
88 7'.HE MARI{' OF CAIN PAR'f I
who is himself a murderer, or who has at some ti1ne killed a

man in battl~, takes the murderer to a stream, where he
washes him all over. He then kills a goat, cooks the meat,
and puts a piece of it on each of four sticks ; after which he
gives the four pieces to the murderer to eat in turn. Next
he puts four balls of porridge on the sticks, and these also
the murderer must swallow. Finally, the goat-skin is cut into
strips, and one strip is put on the neck, and one strip round
each of the wrists of the homicide. This ceremony is per-
formed by the two men alone at the river. After the per-
formance the murderer is free to return home. It is said
that, until this ceremony is performed, the ghost cannot take
its departure for the place of tl1e dead, but hovers abot1t the
murderer. 1 . .
customs Among the Boloki of the Upper Congo a homicide is

observed not afraid of the ghost of the man whom he has killed, when
by a Boloki
murderer his victim belongs to any of the ne1ghbour1ng tow11s, because
th~1sm? 11
!fY, the area within which Boloki ghosts can travel is extremely
v1ct1m s
ghost. limited ; but murder, which in that case he might commit
with an easy mind, assumes a much more serious complexion
when it is perpetrated on a man of the same town, for then
he knows himself to be within striking distance of the ghost.
The fear of ghostly vengeance no\.v sits heavy on him. There
are unfortunately no rites by the observance of which he
could allay these terrors, but in default of them he mou1ns
for his .victim as though he were a brother, neglecting his
toilet, shaving his head, fasting, and lamenting with torrents
2
of crocodile tears. Thus the symptoms of sorrow, \vhich
the ingenuous European might take for signs of genuine
repentance and . remorse of conscience, are nothing but
shams intended to deceive the ghost.
Among the Once more among the Omaha Indians of North America
om1ah.asthef
sec USIOil 0
a murderer,

whose life was .
spared by the kinsmen of his
a murderer v1ct1m, had to observe certain stringent regulations for a
seems to d h h d f
springfrom per10 w 1c var1e rom two to four years. He must walk
a.fea: ~f , barefoot, and he might eat no warm food nor raise his voice
his v1ct1m s l k d H ' '
ghost. nor oo aroun e had to pull his robe about him and
to keep it tied at the neck, even in warm weather ; he might
1
J. Roscoe, The Northern Bantu, 2
John H. Weeks, An1ong Cottgo
pp. 279 sq.
Cannibals (London, 1913), p. 268.
CHAP. III THE MARK OF CAIN -
not let it hang loos~ or fly open; He might not move his
h~nds about, but 'had to keep them close to his budy. He
might. not comb his hair, nor allow it to be blown about by
t~e wind. No one would eat with him, and only one of his
1{1ndred was allowed to remain with him in his tent. When
the tribe \vent hunting, he was obliged to pitch his tent about
a quarter of a mile from the rest of the people, ''lest the
ghost of his victim should raise a high wind which might
1
cause damage." The reason here alleged for banishing the
murderer from the camp probably gives the key to all the
similar restrictions laid on murderers and manslayers among
primitive peoples ; the seclusion of such persons from society
is dictated by no moral aversion to their crime: it springs
purely from prudential motives, \vhich resolve themselves
'
into a simple dread of the dangerous ghost by which the
homicide is supposed to be pursued and haunted.
This fear of the wrathful ghost of the slain is probably The fear of
at the root of many ancient customs observed in connexion ~~et~:osts
with homicide ; it may well have been one of the principal murdered
motives for inflicting capital punishment on murderers. For :% ~~:e
if such persons are dogged by a powerful and angry spirit, motive_ for
. h k h d h , fi 11 . t
w h ic ma es t em a anger to t etr e ows, soc1e y can murderers. exec11t1ng
obviously protect itself very simply by sacrificing the mur-

derer to the ghost ; in other words, by putting him to death:
But then it becomes necessary to guard the executioners in Necessity
, . h h . f h . - . . d for p1otect-
the1 r turn against t e g osts o t etr v1ct1ms, an various ing execu-
precautions are adopted for this purpose. For example, tion_ers
against the
among the Bakongo, of the Lower Congo, when a man h as ghosts of
been executed for murder his body is burnt to ashes. ''By t~ei~
' v1ct1ms.
reducing the body to ashes they believe that they thereby Precau-
destroy his spirit, and thus prevent the spirit from seeking ~;~~~~~~n
2
revenge by bewitching his executioners." At Porto Novo, tioners in
. h bi' t" d t d
on the coast of Guinea, t e pu ic execu toner use o ecor- Burma. Africa and
ate tl1 e walls of his house with the jawbones of his victims
in order to prevent their ghosts from troubling him at nigh~.
8
At Issini, on the Gold Coast, executioners used to remain

I Rev. J. Owen l)orsey, ''Omaha tive 11akon,l[O (London, 1914), PP 62 sq.
Sociology,'' Thi"rd A1t1tual f(ejiort of a Father Baudin, '' Feticlleurs ou
the l!u1eau of Eth1tolo,gy (Washington, ministres religie11x des Negres cle la
G11inec, ''Les ll1issio11s Catholi"q11es, xvi.
l 884), 1) 369. . .
2 Jolin II. Weelcs, A11ton,i;the P1i11tt (1884) )J. 332.
THE MARK OF CAIN PART I
in seclusion for three days after doing their office ; during

that time they lived in a hut built for the purpose at a dis-
tance from the village. When the three days were up, they
proceeded to the place of execution, and there called thrice
1
by name on the criminal whom they had put to death. The
invocation was probably supposed to protect the executioners
against the ghost of their victim. Another mode of effecting
the same purpose is to taste of his blood ; this has been
customary with executioners on the Lower Niger in West
Africa, and among the Shans of Burma. The alleged inten-
tion of the custom is to prevent the executioner from being
affected by a kind of homicidal madness or other\vise con-
2
tracting a fatal illness ; but these effects are in all prob-
ability believed to be wrought by the ghost of the slain man,
who has entered into and taken possession of the body of
'
his slayer, and the motive for tasting of his blood is to bring
about a reconcilement between the slayer and the slain by
3
establishing a blood covenant between them. Among the
The Tupi Tupi Indians of Brazil a man who had publicly executed a
Indians
invited a prisoner had to fast and lie in his hammock for three days,
conde1nned without setting foot on the ground ; further, he had to make
man to
avenge incisions in his breast, arms, and other parts of his body,
himself and a black powder was rubbed into the wo_unds, \vhich left
before his
death, and indelible scars so artistically arranged that they presented
the execu- the appearance of a tight-fitting garment. It was believed
tioner had
to cut that he would die if.he did not observe these rules and draw
nlarks on
his O\Vn
blood from his own body after slaughtering the captive. 4
body, I G. Loyer, ''Voyage to Issini on (Paris, 1837), pp. 134-141 (H. Ternaux-
perhaps tl1e Gold Coast,'' in T. Astley's New . Compans, Voyages, relations, et mt!-
for the Ge1ieral Collection of Voyages a1zd tnoires origina11x po11r servii- a l' his-
satisfaction Travels, ii. (London, 1745) p. 444.
of the toire de la dt!couve1-te de !'A 11zt!rique ;
2 Major A. G. Leonard, The Lower the original of Gandavo's work ;vas
ghost. Niger and its T1ibes (London, 1906), published in Portuguese at Lisbon in
pp. 180, I 81 sq. ; Mrs. Leslie Milne, I 576) ; J. Lery, Historia 1zavigatio1zis
Sha1zs at Home (London, 1910), p. i1z Brasiliam, qz1ae et America dicitur
192. (1586), pp. 183-194; The Captivity of
3 See further Psyche's Task, Second
Hans Stade of Hesse, z"n A.D. I547-
Edition (London, I 9 I 3), pp. I I 7 sqq. I555, a1no1zg the Wild Tribes of Eastern
4. F. A. Thevet, Les Si1zgularitez de
Brazil, translated by A. Tootal (I.on don,
la France A1zta1ctique, az1trement 1874), pp. 155-159; J. F. Lafitat1,
nom1nt!e A11zeriq11e (Ant\verp, 1558), Mceztrs des Sauvages A111eriquains
pp. 74-76 ; id., Cos11zographz"e Uni- (Paris, 1724), ii. 292 sqq.; R. Southey,
verse/le (Paris, 1575), pp. 944 [978] Hz"story of Brazil, i.2 (London, 1822)
SfJ, ; Pero de l\1agalhanes de Gandavo,
P. 232. Compare G. Friederici,
Histoire de la p1-ovince de Sa1zcta- Cruz ''Uber eine als Couvade gedeutete
CHAP. III
THE MARK OF CAIN
-
' 91
The fear o.f. his victim's ghost is not indeed mentioned by
our auth~r1t1es as the motive for practising these customs ;
but that 1t was the real motive is not only suggested by the
analogy of the West African customs, but is practically
proved by a custom which these same Brazilian Indians
observed before the execution. They formally invited the
doomed man to avenge his death, and for this purpose they
supplied him with stones or potsherds, which he hurled at
his guards, while they protected themselves against the
missiles with shields made of hide. 1 The form of the invi-
tation, which ran thus, '' Avenge your death before your
decease," clearly implies a hope that if a man had thus satis-
fied his thirst for vengeance in his lifetime, his ghost would
not trouble them after death. But to make assurance doubly
sure the executioner secluded

himself, and observed the
curious precautions which I have described. The drawing
of blood from his own body, which was regarded as essential
2
to the preservation of his life, may have been intended to
satisfy the ghost's demand of blood for blood, or possibly to
form a blood covenant with him, while the permanent marks
left on the slayer's body would be a standing evidence that
_he had given satisfaction to his victim and made his peace
with him. Could any reasonable ghost ask for more?
This interpretation of the marks on the executioner's The Yabin1
body is confirmed by the following custom. Among the ~~r~o':i~~=
Y abim on the north-eastern coast of New Guinea, when the foreheads
' l
kinsmen of a murdered man have accepted a boo -wit who haved . of persons
instead of avenging his death they take care to be marked accepte~ a

' blood-\vlt
with chalk on the forehead by the relatives of the murderer, for the
''lest the ghost should trouble them for failing to avenge his mku_rder of_
, 3 a 1nsman,
death, and should carry off their pigs or loosen their teeth.' the mark is
supposed
Widergeburtszeremonie bei den Tupi,'' .f(aisei- - f,Vilhel11zs-La1zd u1zd de1z Bis- to prevent
Globus, Jxxxix. (1906) PP 59-63, ntarck-Ai-chipel (Berlin, 1897), p. 99; the ghost
who interprets the incised marks on B. Hagen, [hzter de1z Papztas (Wies- fron1 _
the executioner's body as intended baden, 1899), p. 254. In the same troubling
to disguise him from his vic~i~'s gh~st. tribe , at the conclusion of 11ostilities, them.
As to marks made witl1 this intention tl1e bravest of the victors puts a chalk
see below, pp. 92 sqq. mark on the brows of the vanqttished
'' i11 order that they tnay not be exposecl
l J. Lery, op. cit. p. 185. to the caprice of the ghosts.'' See H.
2 I>, de Magalhanes de Gandavo, Zah11, '' l)ie Jabin1,'' i11 I~: Netthaus.~'.s
op. cit. p. I 39 De11t:;ch Nc11- G11i1zea (Berlin, 19 I I), 111.
3 K. V ctter, in Nachric!tte1z z'iber 318.
92 THE MARK OF CAIN PART l

!11 this custom it is not the murderer but the kinsmen of his
victim who are marked, but the principle is the same. The
ghost of the murdered man naturally turns jn fury on his
heartless relatives who have not exacted .blood for his blood;
But just as he is about to s\voop down on them to loosen
their teeth, or steal their pigs, or make himself unpleasant
in other ways, he is brought up short by the sight of the
white mark on their black or coffee-coloured brows. It is
the receipt for the payment in full of the blood-wit ; it is the
proof that his l{insfolk have exacted a pecuniary, though not
a sanguinary, compensation for his murder; with this crumb
of consolation he is bound to be satisfied, and to spare 11is.
family any molestation in future. The same mark might
obviously be put for the same purpose on the murderer's
.brows to prove that he had paid in cash, or whatever may be
the local equivalent for cash, for tlie deed he had done, and
that the ghost therefore had no further claim upon him. Was
the mark of Cain a mark of this sort? Was it a proof that he
had paid the blood-wit? Was it a receipt for cash down?
Not only It may have been so, but there is 'still another possibility
murderers
but to be considered. On the theory which I have just indic-

warriors ated it is obvious that the mark of Cai11 cot1ld 011ly be put
who have
slain on a homicide when his victim was a man of the same tribe

enemies or community as himself, since it is only to men of the same
have to
guard t1ibe or community that compensation for hornicide is paid.
themselves But the ghosts of slain enemies are certainly not less dreaded
against the
ghosts of than the gl1osts of slain friends ; and if you cannot pacify
their

victims.
them with a sum of money paid to their kinsfolk, what are

you to do with them ? Many plans have been adopted for
the protection of warriors against the spirits of the men
\Vhom they have sent out of the \vorld before their due time.
Apparently one of these precautions is to disguise the slayer
so that the . ghost may not recognize him ; another is to
render his person in some way so formidable or so offensive
that the spirit will not meddle with him. One or other of
these motives may explain the following customs, which I
select frorn a large number o.f similar cases. 1
Among the B?--Y aka, a Bantu people of the Congo Free
1
. For more examples see Taboo and Psyche's Task, S~cond Edition (London,
the Perils of the Soul, pp. IS 7 sqq. ; 1913), pp. 120 sqq.

. CHAI', III
. THE MARK OF CAIN
93
State, :'a man who has been.. killed in battle is supposed to Precau-
send his soul to avenge his death on the person of the man tions taken
W 0
h k 'll
1e d h' h
1m ; it e latter, however, Can escape the venge- Ba-Yaka, by the
ance of the dead by wearing the red tail-feathers of the. Thonga,
parrot i? his hair, and painting his. forehead red." 1 The ~:~utos
Thonga of south-eastern Africa believe that a man who has aghainst trhe
. . g osts o
killed an enemy In battle IS exposed to great danger from men slain
h.1s v1ct1m
' s g h ost, who haunts him and may drive him mad. in battle
To protect himself from the wrath of the ghost, the slayer
must remain in a state of taboo at the capital for several
days,' during which he may not go home to his wife, and
must wear old clothes and e<;it with special spoons off special
plates. . In former times it was customary to tattoo such a
man between the eyebrows, and to rub in medicines into the
incisions, so as to raise pimples and to give him the appear-
2
ance of a buffalo when it frowns. Among the Basutos
'' warriors who have killed an enemy are purified. The
chief has to wash them, sacrificing an ox in the presence of
the whole army. They are also anointed with the gall of
the animal, \vhich prevents the ghost of the enemy from
3
pursuing them any farther."
Among the Wawanga, of the Elgon district in British ~recau-
f . . f.
East A rica, a man on returning rom a ra1 , on w 1c 'd h' h h tions
e b the taken
has killed one of the enemy, may not enter his hut until he .J;a_wanga
, . h l k
has taken cows dung and rubbed 1t on t e c 1ee s o t e ghosts of f h against the
women and children of the village, and has purified himself slain .
by the sacrifice of a goat, from whose fore h ea . d h .
e cuts a strip enemies.
of skin and wears it round his right wrist fo1 the next four
days. 4
Among the Bantu tribes of Kavirondo, in British ~recau-
.
East Africa, when a man has 1<1lled a foe in att e e by the . b l h tions taken
shaves his head on his return home, and his friends rub a B~ntu
.. , h' tr1besof
medicine, which generally consists of cows dung, over . is Ka:iro11do
body to prevent the spirit of the slain man from troubling against the
gl1osts of
I E. Torday and T. A. Joyce, d u Basu t oIan d , '' L es slain .
d'un m1ss1on11a1re
. ... ( 8 6 ) enemies.
''Notes on the Ethnography of the Missions Catholiqzees, xxv111. I 9 p.
'Ba-Yaka,'' Journal ef the Anthropo- 37 I
logical Institute, xxxvi. ( l 906) PP
50 sq. . 4 I-Ion. l{enneth R. Dundas, ''The
2 Ifenri A. Junod, The Life ef a Wawanga and other tribes of the Elgon
S'outh African 7'ribe (Neuchatel, 1912- District l3ritish East Africa,'' Jounial
1913), i. 453 .rq. . . of the Royal A 11tl11opolo,!{ical Z1zstit11te,
s l''ather l'orte, ''Les rem1n1scences xliii. (1913) i1. 47.
94 THE MAR/( OF CAIN
hjm. 1 In these cases the cow's dung may serve either to

Precautions wipe off the ghost or to disgust and repel him. Among the
taken by
the Nilotic
Ja-Lt10, . a Nilotic tribe of Kavirondo, the warrior who ha:;
tribes of slain a foe in battle shaves his head three days after his
Kavirondo
against the return from the fight , and before he enters his village he
ghosts of must hang a live fowl, head uppermost, round his neck j
:~~~ies. then the bird is decapitated and its head left hanging round
his neck. Soon after his return a feast is made for the slain
2
man, in order that his ghost may not haunt his slayer.
According to another account the ceremonies observed on
such occasions by the Nilotic tribes of Kavirondo are as
follovvs. ''When a warrior kills another in battle, he is
isolated from his village, lives in a separate hut some four
days, and an old woman cooks his food and feeds him like a
child because he is forbidden to touch any food. On the
fifth day he is escorted to the river by another man, who
washes him ; a white goat is killed and cooked by the
attendant, who feeds the man with the meat ; the goat-skin
is cut into strips and put upon the man's wrists and round
his head, and he returns to his ternporary home for the night.
The next day he is again taken to the river and washed,
and a white fowl is presented to him. He kills it and it is
cooked for him, and he is again fed with the meat. He is
then pronounced to be clean and may return to his home.
It sometimes happens that a warrior spears another man in
battle, and the latter dies from the wound some time after.
When death takes place, the relatives go to the warrior and
tell him of the death, and he is separated at once from the com-
munity t1ntil the ceremonies above described have been per-
formed. The people say that the ceremonies are necessary in
order to release the ghost of the dead man, which is bound to
the warrior who slew him, and is only released on the fulfil-
ment of the ceremonies. Should a warrior refuse to fulfil the
ceremonies, the ghost will ask, ' Why don't y0u fulfil the cere-
monies and let me go?' Should a man still reft1se to comply,
the ghost will take him by the throat and strangle him." 3
1
Sir H. Johnston, The Uga1tda Protectorate, ii. 794 ; C. W. Hobley,
Protectorate (Lo don, I 902), ii. 7 43 Eastern Uganda, p. 20.
sq. ; C. W. Hobley, Eastern Uganda
(London, 1902), p. 20. 3
J. Roscoe, The Northern Bantu
2 Sir H. Johnston, The Uganda (Cambridge, 1915), p. 289

CHAP. Ill
THE MARK OF CAIN
95
We have seen that among the Nilotic tribes of Kavirondo The
a very similar ceremony is observed by a murderer for the inte.ntion of
d . . . purificatory
a~o~e p~rpose o f f reeing himself from the ghost of his ceremonies
victim, which otherwise haunts him.1 The close resemblance observed
assigned for

it, set in the clearest lig' ht the essential purpose whether
. murderers
of the purificatory ceremonies observed by a homicide whether or warriors,
h e i. s a warrior
. d h . ~ is to free
or a mur erer: t at purpose is simply to the slayers
rid the man of his victim's ghost, which will otherwise be his from the
d
un oing. Th f .
e intention o putting strips of goat-skin round the slain.ghosts of
his head and wrists may be to disguise him from the ghost.
A similar custom is observed by other tribes of East Africa
on a variety of occasions, which will be noticed later on. 2
Even when no mention is made of the ghosts of the slain
by our authorities, we may still safely assume that the purifi-
catory rites performed by or for warriors after bloodshed are
intended to appease or repel or deceive these angry spirits.
Thus among the Ngoni of British Central Africa, when a Some
victorious army approaches the ro.;ral village, it halts by the ~~~:;aint
bank of a stream, and all the warriors who have killed the faces or
. h . b d' d . h h"
enemies smear t . eir o ies an arms \vit w ite c ay, ut manslayers 1 b bodies of
those who were not tl1e first to dip their spears in the blood in various
of the victims, but merely helped to despatch them, whiten colours.
their right arms only. That night the manslayers sleep in
the open pen with the cattle, and do not venture near their
O\Vn homes. In the early morning they wash off the white
clay from their bodies in the river. The witch-doctor attends
to give them a magic potion, and to smear their persons with
a fresh coating of clay. This process is repeated on six
successive days, till their purification is complete, Their
heads are then shaved, and being pronounced clean they are
3
free to return to their own homes. Amoi1g the Borana
Gallas, when a war-party has . returned to the village, the
victors who have slain a foe are washed by the women
with a mixture of fat and butter, and their faces are painted
red and white. 4 Masai warriors, who have killed bar-
barians in a fight, paint the right half of their bodies red and
1 See above, pp. 87 sq. 4 Ph. Paulitschke, Eth11og1aphie
2 See below, vol. ii. PIJ 7 sqq. Nord-ost-Afrikas: die t11aterielle Cul-
3 Donalcl I<'raser, Winnz"1i.r; a Prz"1ni-
tur der Da1zt1kil, Gall1i unll So111til
tive l'eople (I_,on<lo11, 1914), PP 39 sq. (Berlin, 1893), p. 258.
THE MARI< OF. CAIN PART I
1
the left half white. Similarly a Nandi, who has slain a
man of another tribe, paints one side of his body red, and
the other side' white ; for four days after the slaughter
he is deemed unclean and may not go home. He must
build a small shelter by the river and live there; he may not
associate with his wife or sweetheart, and he may only eat
porridge, beef, and goat's flesh. At the end of the fourth
day he must purify himself by drinking a strong purge made
from the segetet tree, and by drinking goat's milk mixed
2
with bullock's blood. Among the Wagogo, of German East
Africa, a man who has killed an enemy in battle paints a
red circle round his right eye and a blac]( circle round his
3
left eye.
In some Amo11g the Thompson Indians of British Columbia it
;r~~~~~f used to be customary for men who had slain enemies to
North blacken their faces. If this precaution were neglected, it
~~erica was believed that the spirits of their victims would blind
4
customary them. A Pima Indian who slew one of his hereditary foes,
for a
manslayer the Apaches, had regularly to undergo a rigid seclusion and
t~ blacken purification, which lasted sixteen days. During the whole
his face,
paintit red,
f h . h . h h 1 1
o t at time e m1g t not tot1c meat or sa t, nor oo at a k
0
plaster
'.
his.head
blazing fire, nor speak to a human being. He lived alone
with mud. in the woods attended by an old woman, who brought him
his scanty dole of food. He kept his head covered almost
the whole time with a plaster of mud, and he might not
5
touch it with his fingers. A band of Tinneh Indians, who
had massacred a helpless party of Eskimo at the Copper
River, considered themselves to be thereby rendered unclean,
and they observed accordingly a number of curious restrictions
for a considerable time afterwards. Those who had actually
shed blood were strictly prohibited from cooking either for
themselves or for othe1s ; they might not drink out of any
' .
I A. C. Hollis, The jl:fasai (Oxford, vol. ii., Anthropology, i. [Part] iv.
1905), p. 353. ([New York], April 1900) p. 357.
2 A. C. Hollis, The Nandi' (Oxford, 5
H. H. Bancroft, Native Races ef
1909), p. 74 :he Paci.fie States (London, 187 5-1876),
3 Rev. H. Cole, ''Notes on the 1. 5'53 ; Capt. Grossman, cited in Ninth
Wagogo of German East Africa,''. Annual Report efthe Bureau ofEthno-
Journal ef the Aiithropologzcal Instz'. logy (Washington, 1892), pp. 475 sq.;
tute, xxxii. (1902) p. 314. I<'. Russell, ''The Pima Indians,''
4 J. Teit, ''The Thompson Indians Twenty-Sz'xth Aiznual Report ef the
of British Columbia,'' Memoi"rs ef the !Jureau ef American Ethnology (Wash-
An1en'ca11 Museum ef Natural History, ington, J 908), pp. 204 sq.
CHAP.' III
THE fifARK OF CAIN
97
dish nor smoke out of any pipe but their own they might
eat. no boiled flesh, bqt only flesh that was raw' or had been
broiled at a fire or dried in the sun ; and at every meal,
before ~hey would taste a morsel, they had to paint their
faces with red ochre from the nose to the chin and across
the cheeks almost to the ears. 1
Among the Chinook Indiar1s of Oregon and Washington In other
a man who had killed another had his face painted black tribes it is
h custo1I1ary
wtt grease and charcoal, and wore rings of cedar bark for
round his head, his ankles, l(nees, and wrists After five hombicides
' to lacken
days the black paint was washed off his face and replaced or tattoo
b y re d . D urtng
h t not sIeep nor even their
th ese fi ve d ays h e mtg or to faces
lie do\vn ; he might not look at a child nor see people eating. blacken the
At the end of his purification he hung his head-ring of cedar ;~~;e of
bark on a tree, and the tree was then supposed to dry up.2 bodies.
Among the Eskimo of Langton Bay the killing of an
Indian and the killing of a whale were considered to be
equally glorious achievements. The man who had killed an
Indian \Vas tattooed from the nose to the ears ; the man who
had killed a whale was tattooed from the mouth to the ears.
Both heroes had to refrain from all worl( for five days, and
from certain foods for a whole year ; in particular, they
might not eat the heads nor the intestines of animals. 3
Among the Southern Massim of .British New Guinea a
warrior who has slain a man remains secluded in his house
for six days. During the first three days he may eat 011ly
roasted food and must cool( it for himself. Then he bathes
4
and blackens his face for the remaining three days. When
a party of Arunta, in Central Australia, are returr1ing from a
rnission of vengeance, on which they have taken the life of
an enemy, they stand in fear of the gl1ost of their victim,
who is believed to pursue them in the lil(eness of a small
bird uttering a plaintive cry. I,;-or some days after their
retu;n they will not speak of their deed, and continue to
paint themselves all 'over with powdered cl1arcoal, and to
I S. Hearne, Joierney fro11i Pri11ce 3 V. Stefa11sson, ll1y Life with the
of Wales's fi'ort in Eiudso1z's Bay to tlie Eski1110 (London, 1913), p. 367.
No1"thern Ocea11 (Lonclo11, 1795), Pl)
204-206. 4 C. G. Selig1I1ann, J'he l11e!a1zesians
2 F'ranz }{<)as, Chi'1iook 71:xts (Wash- of Britislt Ne1v G1ei11ea (Ca1nbridge,
ington, 1894), IJ 258. 1910), 1)1) 563 ;q.
VOL. I If
THE MARI< OF CAIN PART I
decorate tl1eir foreheads and noses with green twigs. Finally,

they IJaint their bodies and faces witl1 bright colours, and
.become free to tall<: of the affair ; but still of nights
they must lie awake listening for the plaintive cry of
the bird in which they fancy they hear the voice of their
1
victim.
111 Fiji In Fiji any one who had clubbed a human being to
manslayers
were
death in war was consecrated or tabooed. He was smeared
painted red red by the king with turmeric from the roots of his hair to
all over. his heels. A hut was built, and in it he had to pass the
next three nights, during which he might not lie down, but
must sleep as he sat. Till the three nights had elapsed he
.1night not change his garment, nor remove the turmeric, nor
2
enter a 11ouse in which there was a woman.

That these
rules were intended to protect the Fijian warrior from his
victim's ghost is strongly suggested, if not proved, by another
Fijian custom. When these savages had buried a man alive,
as they often . did, they used at nightfall to make a great
uproar by means of batnboos, trumpet-shells, and so forth,
for the purpose of frightening away his ghost, lest he should
attempt to return to 11is old home. And to render his house
unattractive to 11im they dismantled it and clothed it with
everything that to their thinking seemed most repulsive. 3
Some So the North American Indians used to run through the
peoples
forcibly
village \vith . hideous yells, beati1ig on the fur11iture, walls,
expel the and roofs of the 11uts to drive away the angry ghost of an
ghosts of 4
the slain. enemy whom they had just tortured to death. A similar
custom is still observed in various parts of New Guinea and
5
the Bismarck Archipelago.
Thus the mark of Cain may have been a mode of dis-
I (Sir) Baldwin Spencerand F. J. Gil- 4 Charlevoix, Hz'stoire de la Nouvelle
len, Natz've Tribes ef Central Australia France (Paris, 1744), vi. 77, 122 sq.;
(Lo11don, 1899), pp. 493-495; iz'd., J. F. Lafitau, Mmu1s des Sauvages
Northe1n Tribes ef Cent1,al Aitstralz'a Ameriqitains (Paris, 1724), ii. 279.
(London, 1904), pp. 563- 568. The Compare W. H. Keating, Narrative
writers st1ggest that the practice of ef an Expedition. to the Source ef St.
painting the slayers black is meant to Peter's River (London, 1825), i. 109.
render them invisible to tl1e ghost. 5
R. E. 'Guise, '' On the tribes
2 T. vVilliams, Fi_ji and tlie Fijia1zs, inhabiting the n1outh of the Wanigela
SecondEdition(London, 1860), i. 55 sq. River, New Guinea,'' Journal ef the
8 .T ohn Jackson, quoted by Captain Anthropological Instz'tute, xxviii. (I 899)
J. E. Ersl<ine, Jour1zal ef a Cruise pp. 213 sq.; J. L. D. van der Roest,
among the I$lands ef the Western '' Uit het !even der bevolking van
Pafific (London, 1853), p. 477. Windessi,'' Ti_jdschrift voor Indz'sche
CHAP. III
THE MARK OF CAIN
99
guising a h.omicide, or of rendering him so repulsive or The mark
formidable tn appearance that his victim's ghost would of Cain
either not. know him or at least give him a wide berth~ ~~~~~ave
Elsewhere I have conjectured that mourning costume in niode o_f
general was originally a disguise adopted to protect the ~r~~:~~~~e
surviving relatives from tl1e dreaded ghost of the recently a!5a~ns.this
1 . victims
departed. Whether that be so or not it is certain that the ghost,
l" d d h '
. iv1ng o sometimes tsgu1se t emselves to escape the notice disguising either by
of the dead. Thus in the western districts of Timor, a large him 0~ by

ts 1an d o f t h e .I n d tan
A re h tpe
1ago, before the body of a man himrendering
for-
is coffined, his wives stand weeping over him, and their midable
"11 1
v1 age gossips must a so be present, ''all \vith loosened hair repulsive. and
in order to make themselves unrecogniza,ble by the nitu ~;i~ainly

2
(spirit) of the dead." Again, among the Herero of South- peop1e
West Africa, when a rnan is dying he will sometimes say to !~:e~~mes
a person whom he does not lil<:e, ''Whence do you come ? disguise
I d o not w1s h t o see you h ere, '' an d so saying
h e presses t h e from
themselves
the
fingers of his left hand together in such a way that the tip ghosts of
the dead.
of the thumb protrudes between the fingers. ''The person
spoken to, now knows that the other has decided upon
taking him away (okzttuaerera) after his death, which means
that he must die. In many cases, however, he can avoid
this threatening danger of death. For this purpose he
hastily leaves the place of the dying man, and looks for an
onganga (i.e. 'doctor,' 'm~gician '), in order to have himself
undressed, washed, and greased again, and dressed with other
clothes. He is now quite at ease about the threatening of
death caused by the deceased; for, says he, 'Now, our father
does not know me' (Na11zbano tate ke ndyi z). He has no '
3
longer any reason to fear the dead." .
Taal- Land- en Volkenku1zde, xl. (1898) 142, 145

pp. 157 sq.; H. von l{osenberg, Der I J. G. Frazer, ''On certain Burial
Malayischt Archipel (~eipsic, 187~), P Customs as illttstrative of the Primitive
461 ; K. Vetter, '' U?er papua~1sche Theory of the Soul,'' Journal rj the
l{echtsverhaltnisse, '' 1n Nachrzchten Anthropological Institztte, xv. (I 886)
iiber /(aiser Wilhelms-Land und den P 73
Bis11tarck-Archipel (Berlin, 1897), P 2 J. G. F. Riedel, ''Die Landschaft
Dawan ocler West-Timor,'' Deutsche
94 ; B. I-Iagen, U1zter den P~puas
(Wiesbaden, I 899), .P 266 ; Stefa~ Geogiaphische Bliitter, x. 286.
Lehner '' I3ukaua '' in R. Neuhauss s 3 f{ev. G. Viehe, ''Some Ct1ston1s
' ' ...
Dezetsch Neu-Guinea (Berlin, 19 I I), 111. of the Ovaherero,'' (Sottth Africa1t)
Follt-lore Jo11r11al, i. (Capetown, 1879)
44 ; C~eorge J3r<JWn, D. D., 1Vfela1zesians
and l'olynesians (l,ondon, 1910), PP PP 5 1 sq.
roo THE MARll OF CAIN PAR'f I
The h1ark In like manner we may suppose that, when Cain had
~~a;a~:ve been marked by God, he was quite easy in his mind, believ-
be~n ing that the ghost of his murdered brother would no longer
fa~~:~! ~n recognize and trouble him. What the mark exactly was
0
his face or which the divinity affixed to the first murderer for his
body after .
the fashion protection, we have no means of knowing; at most we can
adopted by hazard a co11jecture on the subject. If it is allowable to
homicides .
in savage judge from the similar practices of savages at the present
tribes. day, the deity may have decorated Cain with red, black, or
white pai11t, or perhaps with a tasteful combination of these
colours. For example, he may have painted him red all
over, like a Fijian ; oi white all over, like a N goni ;
or black all over, like an Arunta ; or one half of his
body red and the other half white, like the Masai and
the N andi. Or if he confined his artistic efforts to
Cain's countenance, he may have painted a red circle round
his right eye and a black circle round his. left eye, in the
Wagogo style; or he may have embellished his face from
the nose to the chin, and from the mouth to the ears, with
a delicate shade of vermilion, after the manner of the Tinneh
Indians. Or he may have plastered his head with mud, like
the Pimas, or his whole body with cow's dung, like the
l(avirondo. Or again, he rnay have tattooed him from
the nose to the ears, like the Eskimo, or between the eye-
brows, like the Thonga, so as to raise pimples and
give him the appearance of a frowning buffalo. Thus
adorned the first Mr. Smith for Cain means Smith 1 may
have paraded the waste places of the earth without the .
least fear of being recognized and molested by his victim's
ghost. '
This . This explanation of the mark of Cain has the advantage
exfplhanationk
otemar of relieving the Biblical narrative fiom a manifest absurdity
of Cain For on the usual interpretation God affixed the mark to Cain
relieves the
Biblical
d h' fi h 'I
1n or er to save 1m rom uman assa1 ants, apparently
narrative forgetting that there was nobody to assail him, since the
from a h h
manifest eart was as yet in abited only by the murderer himself and
absurdity. his parents. Hence by assuming that the foe of whom the
I T. K. Cheyne, in Encyclopaedia S. R. Driver, and Ch. A. Briggs,
Biblz'ca (Edinburgh, I 899- 1903), i. Hebrezu and Englz'sh Lexicon (Oxford,
col. 620, s. v. ''Cain'' ; F. Brown, I 906 ), P 88 3, s. v. l'P
CHAP. III
THE MARK OF CAIN IOI
first murdere~ went i? fear was a ghost instead of a living

man, we avoid the irreverence of imputing to the deity a
grav~ I.apse of memory little in keeping with the divine
omniscience. Here again, therefore, the comparative method
approves itself a powerful advocatus Dei.
To this explanation of the mark of Cain it may be In the

objected, with some show of reason, that the ghost of the ~:;~t~!e it
murdered Abel is nowhere alluded to in the Biblical is rather
t . d. t h. h the blood
narra ive, accor ing o w ic 1t was 11ot the ghost, bt1t the than the
blood, of his victim which endangered the murderer by calling ghost of the
1 r . murdered
a ou d f rom t he groun d 1or vengeance. It 1s true that the Abel whicl1
conception of blood thus endowed with a voice and with a cries for
. r d'ffi
t h 1rst 1or vengeance 1 ers from the conception of a ghost, vengea11ce.
being a simpler and possibly a more primitive idea; yet in

practice it perhaps made little material difference to the
manslayer whether he believed 11imself to be pursued by
the bloody phantom or only by the dolorous voice of his
victim's blood shrieking after him. Still it cannot be denied
that in the Old Testament it is the actual blood, and not the
ghost, of the murdered person which figures prominently in
the references to manslaughter and to the retribution which
should overtake the slayer. Thus in the Priestly Document
we read, with regard to homicide, that'' blood, it polluteth the
land: and no expiation can be made for the land for the
blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that
1
shed it." The notion seems to have been, that so long as Fear of
the blood lay exposed to t h e air an . d h d leavi11g
a not run away or blood
soaked into the ground, it continued to call aloud for uncovered
.
vengeance on the murdere1, but t h at its mout cou h Id b 011 t11e
e grolind.
stopped and its voice stifled by a handful of earth. Hence
Job, looking for death and passionately appealing agai11st
the injustice of his fate, cries out in his agony, '' 0 earth,
2
cover not my blood, and let my cry have no resting place."
And in denouncing the wrath of God on Jerusalem for all
the innocent blood shed in the city, the prophet Ezel<:iel ex-
claims ''Woe to the bloody city, to the caldron \vhose rust is
therei~, and whose rust is not gone out of it ! bring it out
piece by piece i no lot is fallen upon it. I~'or her blood is -in
1 Numbers xxxv. 33. 2 Job xvi. I 8.
I02 THE MAR/i' OF CAIN PAR'f I
the midst of her; she set it upon the bare rock ; she poured
it not on the ground to cover it with dust ; that it might
cause fury to co1ne up to take vengeance, I have set her
1
blood upon the bare rock, that it should not be covered."
Here it is mentioned as a great aggravatio11 alike of the
guilt and of the danger of Jerusalem, that the blood shed in
her midst still weltered in clotted pools, like rust, on her
rocky surface instead of being mercifully covered with dust
or allowed to soak into the ground ; for so long as it lay
there festering in the sun, the multitudinous voices of the
slain would ascend up to heaven, clamouring in a doleful
2
chorus for vengeance on their slayers. The belief that
unavenged human blood cries aloud from the ground is still
held by the Arabs of Moab. A Bedouin of that country told

a preaching friar that ''the blood cries from the earth, and it
3
continues to cry until the blood of an enemy has been shed."
The dreacl So scrupulous indeed were the ancient Hebrews about
of Un
covered leaving blood of any sort exposed to the air, that the
blood, Levitical law commands the hunter or fowler to cover
whether of
man or of up with dust the blood of the beast or fowl which he
4
beast. has poured out on the ground. The precept may well
embody a traditional usage based on an ancient belief that
animals, like men, acknowledged the obligation of avenging
the death of their l{ind on their murdere1 or his kinsfolk,
and that consequently if their blood was left uncovered, it
would cry aloud to all beasts or birds of the same sort to
exact retribution from the guilty hunter or fowler \vho had
spilt it on the ground. At all events similar notions as to
the practice of blood revenge by animals and birds are
common amo11g savages in modern times, 5 and they may
well have prevailed among the Semites in antiquity, though
we need not suppose that they were consciously present to
Even the the mind of the author or editor of Leviticus. It would
blood of
beasts appear that in the opinion of some savages not only may
may be
I Ezekiel xxi v. 6-8. by 1unning thro21gh the soil.
supposed
to cry 2 So Aeschylus tells tis that '' venge- 3 A. Jaussen, Coz1tu1nes des Aiabes
alottd for ful gore sets hard and will not run a11 pays de Moab (Paris, 1908), p. 227.
vengeance. away.'' See Choephor. 65 (59), TlTa.s 4 Levitictis xvii. 1 3. .
<f>ovos 'trE'TrTJ'YEP ou ota.pp6oa.v, with the 5 For examples I may refer the
commentaries of Paley and Verra!! in reader to Spirz"ts of the Corn and of the
their editions. The words ou ota.pp6oa.v Wild, ii. 204 sqq. (The Golde1z Boug-Ji,
imply that the blopd will not disappear Third Edition, Part v. ).
CHAP. III
THE MARK OF CAIN
103
the blood of animals cr}r to heaven for vengeance but

if its cry is not answered, the slayer of tJ..i.e beast m~y be
compelled, like Cain, to roam an outlaw from land to land
for t?e rest of his life. Thus in a legend of the Waboungou,
a tribe of German East Africa, we hear of a skilful hunter
who one day killed an elephant with his arrows. Thereupon a
mysterious personage called the Great Sultan appeared to him
and said, ''The smell of spilt blood has reached even to me.
That blood calls for vengeance. If you do not bring me the
bones of the elephant, there can be no peace betwee11 us.
I will tell all the Sultans to drive you from their countries, so
that you will henceforth fi11d no place where to build a hut."
But the obstinate hunter reft1sed to bring the bones of the
elephant to the Great Sultan. Therefore the Sulta11 drove
him from his kingdom, and the wretch went roving from land
to land tili the day of his death. 1
We may smile if we please at these quaint fancies of These
vengeful ghosts, shrieking gore, and Earth opening her mouth fa~a),i~~may
to drink blood or to vomit out her guilty inhabitants ; never- haveserved
h 1 . . b bl h h d h .
t e ess 1t 1s pro a e t at t ese an many ot er notions purpose a useful
equally unfounded have served a useful pu1pose in fortifying in the.
. .r b h d . . 'd f evolt1t1on of
the respect for human l11e y t e a vent1t1ous al 0 . super- morality by
stitious terror. The venerable framework of society rests on reinforcii~g
. . . thesmct1ty
many pillars, of \\'h1ch the most solid are nature, reason, and of human
justice ; yet at certain stages of its slo\v and laborious con- life.
struction it could ill have dispensed with the frail prop of
2
superstition. If the day should ever come \Vhen the great
edifice has been carried to completion and reposes in simple
majesty on adamantine foundations, it will be possible, with-
out risk to its stability, to cut away and destroy the rotten
timbers that shored it up in the p1ocess of building.
. .
IMgr. Lechaptois, Aitx Rives du evolution the fundamental instit11tions of

Tanganika (Algiers, 1913), pp. 194 sq. society (government, p1ivate property,
marriage, and the secu1ity of .h11man
2 In Psyche's Task (Second Edition, life) have receivecl from st1perstition,
1913) I have attempted to illustrate t~e that is, from the purely in1aginary and
s11pport which in the course of their baseless fears of 1na11kind.
CHAPTER IV
1
'l'I'IE GREAT FLOOD
I. I11troduction

The WHEN the Council of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Huxley
lecture. invited me to deliver the annual Huxley lecture, I gratefully
accepted the invitation, esteeming it a high honour to be thus
associated with one for whom, both as a tl1inker and as a man,
I entertain a deep respect, and with whose attitude to\vards
the great problems of life I am in cordial sympathy. His
own works will long keep his memory green ; but it is fitting
that our science should lay, year by year, a wreath on the
grave of one of the most l1onou1ed of its exponents.
Huxley's Casting about for a suitable subject, I remembered
essay on
the Great that in his later life Huxley devoted some of his well-
Flood. earned leisure to examining those traditions as to the
early ages of the wo1ld which are reco1ded in the
Book of Genesis ; and accordingly I thought that I might
appropriately take or1e of them for the theme of my dis-
course. The one which I have chose11 is the familiar story
of the Great Flood. Huxley hi1nself discussed it in a11
instructive essay \vritten with all the charm of his lucid and
2
incisive style. His aim was to show that, treated as a
record of a deluge \vhich overwhel1ned the whole world,
dio\vnir1g almost all men arid animals, the story conflicts
with the plain teaching of geology and must be rejected as
a fable. I shall not attempt either to reinforce or to criticize
his arguments and his conclusions, for the simple reason that
1 The part of this chapter which stitute of Great Britai11 and' Ireland,
deals with the ancient flood stories of November, 1916.
Babylonia, Palestine, and G1eece, was 2
'' Hasisadra's Adventt1re,'' Col-
delivered as tl1e annual Huxley lecture lected Essays, vol. iv. (Lo11don, 1911),
before the l~oyal Anthropological In- pp. 239-286.
CHAP. IV
INTRODUCTION
. 105
.I am no geologist, and that for me to express an opinion The present
on such a matt~r would be a mere impertinence. I have ~xamina-
h
approac e d th b fj t1on of
e su Ject rom a different side, namely, from diluvial .
that of tradition. It has long been known that legends of ~raditions.
fl . . 1s a study 1n
a. great ood, 1n which almost all men perished, are \Videly c_ompara-
d1ffuse~ over the world ; and accordingly what I have tried ~~~~-lore.
to do 1s to collect and compare these legends, and to inq.uire
what conclusions are to be deduced from the comparison.
In short, my discussion of the stories is a study in com-
parative folk-lore. My purpose is to discover how the
narratives arose, and how they came to be so widespread
over the earth; with the question of their truth or falsehood
I am not primarily concerned, though of course it can11ot be
ignored in considering the problem of their origin. The
inquiry thus defined is not a novel one. It has often been
attempted, especially in recent years, and in pursuing it I
have made ample use of the labours of my predecessors,
some of whon1 have discussed the subject with great learning
and ability. In particular, I would acknowledge my debt
to the eminent German geographer and anthropologist, the
late Dr. Richard Andree, whose monograph on diluvial
traditions, like all his writings, is a model of sound learning
and good sense, set forth witl1 the utmost clearness and
1
conciseness.
I R. Andree, Dz"e Flzttsage1t (Brt1ns- characterized by the union of accurate
wick, 1891). Other notal)le discussions learning and good sense. On the
of the sa1ne then1e in recent years are otl1er hand, the works of Usener,
the following: H. U sener, Die Si11ijl1tt- Bi.iklen, a11d Gerland are vitiated
sagen (Bonn, 1899); ici., ''Zu den by tl1eir fancift1l ancl improbable
Sintfluthsagen,'' Rlei11e Sch1ifte1z, iv. theories as to the origin of the
(Berlin, 1913) pp. 382-396; l'vI. legends in solar or lunar 111yths. But
Winternitz, Die Flutsage11 des A lte1-- in spite of this defect Gerland's t1eatise
thunzs u1zd der Natzervij/kei (Vienna, is valuable for the nt11nber of parallel
1901) (rep1inted from ll:fz'ttheilunge11 lege11ds which the at1thor's etl1nological
der a11thropolo,g-ische11 Cesellschaft z:1z learning has collected from many races.
Wien, vol. xxxi.); E. Bi.iklen, ''Die Among earlier disct1ssions of tl1e sa1ne
Sintflutsage, Verst1ch eine1 neuen Er- then1e inay be n1entioned Philipp Butt-
klarung,'' Archiv fi'ir J(eligio1zswisse11- 1nann, '' UelJer de11 Mytl1os der Sii11d-
schaft, vi. (1903) pp. 1-61, 97-150; l1ut,'' Jlfytholo,i;tts (.l~e1lin, 1828-1829),
G. Gerland, Der Mythus von der .')z'1it- i. 180-214; F'1ans:ois Lenorn1ant, Les
jlut (I~onn, 19 I 2 ). Of tl1ese worl<s, Orz;g-1:11e:; de l'HiJtoi1e d'api-eJ !a Bible,
that of Winternitz contains a useftt! de la G'1-t!atio1t cie l' J0111111e ate Dtfltt,i;e
list of flood legends, with references to (I)aris, 1 880 ), l)P 382 49 I ; (Si1)
the authorities and a full a11alysis of I-Ienry. Il. l Ic>\Vorth, 7/te Jllf1111111oth
tl1e ]Jrinci1Jal incide11ts in the lege~cl?. a11d the l'/001! (I,<)J1<l<Jn, 1887).
l,ike tl1c treatise of l{ .t\11clrce, 1t ts
106 THE Gl?EAT FLOOD 1' All'!' I
or the Apart from the intrinsic interest of such legends as pro-

:;:~1;krities fessed records of a catastrophe \vhich destroyed at a blow
which almost the whole human race, they deserve to be studied
obtain
bet\veenthe for the sake of the11 bearing on a general question \V IC
h. h
is
custom7 at present warmly debated among anthropologists. That
and beliefs
of races
. 1 h d t 'k'
question 1s, How are we to exp ain t e numerous an s r1 1ng
in different similarities which obtain between the beliefs and customs
parts of the h
\vorld, of races inhabiting distant parts of the world ? Are sue
some are
probably
rese1nblances due to the transmission of the customs and
to be ex- beliefs f1om one race to another, either by immediate
plained by contact or through the medium of i11tervenin(! peoples ? Or
in depend- ~
ent origi11, have they arisen independently in many different races
t111d others
by tra 115 _
h
through the similar working of t e human mind un er d
1nission of similar circumstances ? Now, if I may p1esume to offer an
the customs
aiid beliefs opinion on this much-debated problem, I would say at once
from one that, put in the form of an antithesis between mutually
race to
another. exclusive views, the question seems to me absurd. So far
as I can judge, all experience and all probability are in
favour of the conclusion, that both causes have operated
extensively and powerfully to produce the observed simi-..
larities of custom and belief among the various races of

mankind : in other words, many of these resemblances are
to be explained by simple transmission, with mo1e or less of
modification, from people to people, and many are to be
explained as having originated independently through the
similar action of the human mind in response to similar
environment. If tl1at is so and I confess to thinl<:ing that
tl1is is the only reasonable and probable view--it will follow
that in attempting to account for any particular case of
resemblance which may be traced between the customs and
beliefs of different races, it would be futile to appeal to the
ge11eral principle either of transmission or of independent
origin ; each case must be judged on its own merits after an
impartial scrutiny of the facts and referred to the one or
the other principle, or possibly to a combination of the two,
acco1ding as the balance of evidence inclines to the one
side or to the other, or hangs evenly between them.
This general conclusion, which accepts the two prin-
ciples of transmission and independent origin as both of
the1n true a11d valid within certain limits, is confirrned by
CH. rv BABYLONIAN STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD
107
~he .. particular investigation of diluvial traditions. For This

It IS Certain that legends of a great flood are found ~onclusion
d. d 1s con-
ISperse among many diverse peoples in distant regions firmed by
of the earth, and so far as demonstration . in such matters a sc7utii;iy
bl of d1luv1al
IS possi e, it can be demonstrated that the similarities traditions.
which undoubtedly exist between many of these legends
are due partly to direct transmission from one people
to another, and partly to similar, but quite independ-
ent, experiences either of great floods or of phenomena
which suggested the occurrence of great floods, in many
different parts of the world. Thus the study of these
traditions, quite apart from any conclusions to which it may
lead us concerning their historical credibility, may serve a
useful purpose if it mitigates the heat with which the con-
troversy has sometimes been carried on, by convincing the
extreme partisans of both principles that in this as in so
many other disputes the truth lies wholly neither on the one
side nor on the other, but somewhere between the two.
2. The Babylonian Story o.f a Great fttood

Of all the legends of a Great Flood recorded in literature, The oldest
by far the oldest is the Babylonian or rather the Sumerian ; ~ig;e~tof
for \Ve now know that, ancient as was the Babylonian version Flood is :he
. . h B b l . f h .
of the story, it was derived by t e a y onians rom t etr or rather Babylonian
still more ancient predecessors, the Sumerians, from whom Sumerian.

the Semitic inhabitants of Babylonia appear to have derived
the principal elements 0f their civilization.
The Babylonian tradition of the Great Flood has been The
. f Babylonian
known to Western scholars from t h e time o ant1qu1ty, since tradition of
it was recorded by the native Babylonian historian Berosus, the flood as
. . fi h
\vho composed a history of his country 1n the rst a o Berosus.If f 1elated by
the third centt1ry before our era. Berosus wrote in Greel< and
his work has not come down to us, but fragments of it have
been preserved by later Gree!< historians, and among these
fragments is fortunately his account of the deluge. It runs
1
as follows :
The great flood took place in the reign of Xisuthrus,
I EuselJit1s, Ch1-onicorum Libel' G'raecort1111, eel. C. M.i.iller, ii. ( l)aris,
Prio1-, ec.l. A. Schoene (Berli11, 1875), 1878) jJp. 501 .rq. Et1sel)it1s l1ad 11ot
coll. 19 .rqq. ; fi'rt1grt1t1zta Eiistr11ilo1-11111 the origin~1l \\'C>rl;. of Jlerost1s before
108 THE GREAT FLOOD 1' AR'!' I
How the tenth l(ing of Babylon. No;v the god Cronus appeared
Xisuthrus,
tenth King to him in a dream and war11ed him that all men would be
of Babylon, destroyed by a flood on the fifteenth day of the month
with his
family and Daesius, which was the eighth month . of the Macedonian
animals, 1
calendar. Therefore the god enjoined him to \vrite a
was saved
from the history of the world from the beginning and to bury it for
flood in a 2
safety in Sippar, the city of the Sun. Moreover, he was to
great ship.
build a ship and embark in it with his kinsfolk and friends,
and to lay up in it a store of meat and drink, and to bring
living things, both fowls and four-footed beasts, into the
ship, and when he had made all things ready he vvas to set
sail. And when he asked, '' And whither shall I sail?'' the
him. He copied from J t1lius Africant1s, to have occurred. For tl1ough the
who copied from Alexander Polyhistor ori:Ur of the months in tl1e lYiacedonian
(a contemporary of St1lla in the first calendar was the san1e ever}'Wl1ere,
centt1ry B.c.), \vho copied from ..A4pollo- their dates fell differently in different
dorus, who may have copied from places. See The DJ'i1zg Goel, p. l l 6,
Berosus himself. See C. Miiller, n. 1. In one passage (A1at1ts, 53)
Fragme1zta Hz'ston'.co1u11z G1aecoru11z, Plutarch tells us that the J\Iacedonian
ii. 496. Even the original Greek text month Daesit1s was equivalent to the
of Eusebit1s is lost and is known only Attic month Anthesterion, whicl1
through an Armenian translation, of 1oughly correspo11ded to our Febrt1ary.
which a Latin version is printed by Bt1t elsewhere he says that the battle
A. Schoe11e and C. Jl,1tiller, !lee. A of Granicus was fought in the Jl,1ace-
Greek version of the Babylonian legend donian month Daesius (Alexa1zde1, 16)
is preserved in the cl1ronicle of the and the Attic month Thargelion
Christian writer Georgit1s Syncellt1s, ( ['a1nillzts, 19), which \Vas approxi-
who lived at tl1e end of the eighth and 1nately eqt1ivale11t to our May.
the begi11ning of the ninth centt1ry.

The Greek version of Syncellt1s is 2 Ke:\euO"aL ofiv oia "fpaaTwv 7J'avTwv
printed side by side with the Latin cipxas KaL EO"a Kal TEAEVTCtS opu~avTa
translation of Eusebius's version in Oe'ivai v 7J'OAEL 1J:\lov ~L11'11'apois. The
A. Schoene's edition of Et1sebit1s's Greek is ]Jeculiar anrl ambiguous.
Chroni,le and in C. Jl,1Uller's F1ag111e11ta opu~avTa, ''having dug,'' migl1t mean
Historicoru11t Graecont111, /!cc. either that he was to bt1ry the recorcl
1 L. Ideler, Ha1zdbztch der 111athe-
in tl1e g1ound or to dig it up. -Tl1e
111atische1z 111zd technischen Chronologie corresponding word in the Armenian
(Berlin, 1825), i. 393, 402 sq. ; W. version of Eusebit1s is said to be
Smith, Dictio11ary of G1eek and Ro111a11 equally a1nbigt1ot1s. I have preferred
Antiquities, Third Edition (London, the former sense as mo1e appropriate
1890-1891), i. 338 sq., s.v. '' Calen- and as confirmed by the sequel (see
dar.'' 1'he date is probably derived beJo,v,p. 109). ~L11'11'apois is a correction
from Berosus himself, who, writing in of Scaliger for tl1e nianuscri1Jt reading
Greek under the Macedonian empire, ~L0"11'apois. In modern times many
would naturally use the lYiacedonian thot1sands of clay tablets, co11taining
calendar. However, we cannot say at records of legal transactions, have been
what time of the year the month Daesius fot1nd in the ancient Babylonia11 city
fell at Babylon in the titne of Berost1s, of Sippar. See lYiorris Jastrow, Thi:
and consequently \Ve do not J,nO\V at what Religion of Babylonia a111i A So')'ri11
time of tl1e year he st1pposed the delt1ge (Bostor1, 1898), p. 10.
Clf. IV
BABYLONIAN STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD 10<)
god answered him, ''To the gods; but first thou shalt pray
fo~ all good thing~ to men." So he obeyed and built the
ship, and tl1e length of it was five furlongs 1 and the breadth
of. it was two furlongs ; and \Vhen he 'had gathered all
tl11ngs together he stored them in the ship and embarked
his children and friends. And when the flood had come
and immediately abated, Xisuthrus let fly some of the birds.
But as they could find no food nor yet a place to rest,
they came back to the ship. And again after some days
Xisuthrus let fly the birds ; and they returned again to the
ship with their feet daubed \Vith clay. A third time he let
them fly, and they returned no more to the vessel. Then
Xisuthrus perceived that the land had appea1ed above the
water ; so he parted some of the seams of tl1e ship, and
looking out he saw the shore, and drove the ship aground
on a mountain, and stepped ashore with his wife, and his
daughter, and the helmsman. And he worshipped the
ground, and built an altar, and when he had sacrificed to
the gods, he disappeared with those who had disembarked
from the ship. And when those who had remained in
the ship saw that he and his company returned not, they
disembarked lil{ewise and sought him, calling him by name.
But Xisuthrus himself was nowhere to be seen. Yet a voice
from the air bade them fear the gods, for that he himself for
his piety \vas gone to dwell with the gods, and that his wife,
and his dauahter
b and the helmsman partook of the same
l .
honour. And he commanded them that they should go to

Babylon, and take up the scriptures which they had buried,
and distribute them among men. Moreover, he told them
that the land in which they stood was Armenia. And when
they heard these things, they sacrificed to the gods and
journeyed on foot to Babylon. But of the ship that grounded
2
on the mountains of Armenia a. part remains to this day,
1 The Armenian text of Eusel)ius rocky slope, at a height of over I 3,000
stretches the length of the ship to feet, an isolated log, which he ht1mor-
fifteen furlongs, or nearly t\VO miles, ously proposed to identify as one of
which seems exorl,itant when we con- the timbers of Noah's ark. See (Lord)
sider the state of the ship bt1ildi11g James Bryce, Tra1zscaz1casia a1id
industry in the days before tl1e flood. Ararat, Fourth Edition (I,ondon,
No modern dock could !1olcl st1cl1 a I 896 ), p. 280. In this work (pp.
vessel. 211 sqq.) Lord Bryce l1as disct1ssed at
2 When I.ore! Bryce ascended l\1ount length the traditional association of
Ararat in I 876, he fo11nd, on <i. b11,re Mo11nt Ararat with Noah's flood.
.
I 10 THE GREAT l'LOOD PAR'!' I
and some people scrape the biturnen off it and use it in

charms. , So when they were come to Babylon they dug up
the scriptures in Sippar, and built many cities, and restored
the sanctuaries, and repeopled Babylon.
Nicolaus of According to the Greek historian Nicolaus of Damascus,
Damascus
on the a contemporary and friend of Augustus and of Herod the
flood. Great, ''there is above Minyas in Armenia a great mountain
called Baris, to which, as the story goes, many people
fled for refuge in the flood and were saved ; they say too
that a certain man, floating i11 an ark, g1ounded on the
summit, and that remains of the timbers 'were preserved for
a long time. The man may have been he who was recorded
1
by Moses, the legislator of tl1e Jews." Whether Nicolaus
of Damascus drew this information from Babylonian or
Hebrew tradition, may be doubted ; the reference to Moses
seems to show that he was acquainted with the narrative in
Genesis, which he may easily have learned through his
patron Herod.
l\1ode1n For many centuries the Babylonian tradit'ion of a great
~~s~~;ery flood was known to Western scholars only through its
original preservation in the Greek fragments of Berosus ; it was re-
Babyloniafn
version o served for modern times to recover the original Babylonian
the flood version from the long-lost archives of Assyria. In the
of the course o f t hose excavations
story in
ruins at N'1neveh , wh'IC h \Vere one o f t h e
Nineveh. glories of the nineteenth century and which made an epoch
in tl1e study of ancient history, the English explorers were
fortunate enough to discover extensive remains of the
library of the great king Ashurbanipal, who reigned from
668 to 626 B.C. in the splendid sunset of the Assyrian
empire, carrying the terror of his arms to the banks of the
Nile, embellishing his capital with magnificent structures,
and gathering within its walls from far and near a vast
literature, historical, scienti(ic, grammatical and religious, for
2
the enlightenment of his people. The literature, of which
I Nicolaus Damascenus, quoted by qui circa Bariin sunt. '' The reading
Josephus, Antiq11it. Jt1d. i. 3, 6 ; Minyas is retained by C. Miiller and
Frag111e1ita Historicoru11i Graecoru1n, defended by A. Reinach, Noe San
ed. C. l\1iiller, ii. 415, Frag. 76. For gariou (Paris, 1913), pp. 47 sqq.
Minyas some scholars would substitute
Milyas in the text, comparing Pliny, 2
Morris Jastrow, 77te Religio1i of
Nat. Hist. v. 147, '' Attingit Galatia BabyloniaandAssyria(Boston, U.S.A.,
et Pa11iphyli'ae Cabalia1n et Afilyas I 898), p. 43.
CH. IV
BABYLONIAN STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD III
.
~ gr~at p~rt was borrowed from Babylonian originals, was

1nscr1bed 1n cuneiform characters on tablets of soft clay
. ~hich were afterwards baked hard and deposited in th~
library. Apparently the library was arranged in an upper
story of t.he palace, which, in the last sack of the city,
~ollapsed 1n the flames, shattering the tablets to pieces in
its fall. Many of them are still cracked and scorched by
the heat of the burning ruins. In later ages the ruins were
ransacked by antiquaries of the class of Dousterswivel who l
sought among them for the buried treasures not of learning

but of gold, and by their labours contributed still further
to the disruption and disintegration of the precious records.
To complete their destruction the rain, soaking through the
ground every spring, saturates them with water containing
chemicals, which form in every crack and fissure crystals
that by their growth split the already broken tablets into
minuter fragments. Yet by laboriously piecing togethei: a
multitude of these fragments George Smith, of the British
Museum, was able to recompose the no\v famous epic of
Gilgamesh in twelve cantos, or rather tablets, the eleventh
of which contains the Babylonian story of the deluge. The
great discovery was announced by Mr. Smith at a meeting
of the Society of Biblical Archaeology on December the
1
3rd, I 872.
It was ingeniously conjectured by Sir Henry Rawlinson The
that the tvvelve cantos of the Gilgamesh epic corresponded epic.
Gi!gamesh
to the twelve signs of the zodiac, so that the CO!frse of the
poem followed, as it were, the course of the sun through the
'
twelve months of the year. The theory is to some extent
confirmed by the place assigned to the flood legend in the
eleventh canto ; for the eleventh Babylonian month fell at .
the height of the rainy season, it was dedicated to the storm-
god Ramman, and its name is said to signify '' month of the
curse of rain." 2 Be that as it may, the story as it stands is
I George Smith, Tlte Cltaldean _Ac- and Edinburgh, 1885), i. 47; l\f.
count of Genest"s, a new editio11 revised Jastrow, Reli"g-io11 of Babylo1tia a1zd
and corrected lJy A. I-I. Sayce (IJondon, Assyria (Boston, 1898), pp. 463, 484,
1880), l)p. I sqq. . . 5 10; id,, Hebrew a1zd Babylo11ia1z
2 E. Schracler, Jfie Cit1ieifor11t In- i1'fyths (Lonclon, 1914), p. 325 note 1
.rcriptions a1td the Old Te;;ta11te11t, trans- According to Sch1ader, '' t11e A!,kadian
latecl ~JY O. C. Whitehouse (Lonclon nan1e of the month, iti as1i segi =As-
112 l'HE CREA T FLOOD l'AR'f I
an episode or digressio11 destitute of all organic connexion

1
with the rest of the poem. It is introduced as follows:
The The lrero of the poem, Gilgamesh, has lost his dear friend
jou1ney of 2
Engidu by death, and he himself has fallen grievously sick.
Gilgamesh
to consult Saddened by the past and anxious for the future, he resolves
his deified 3
a11cestor
to seek out his remote ancestor Ut-napishtim, son of Ubara-
Ut- Tutu, and to inquire of him how mortal man can attain to
napishtim.
eternal life. For surely, he thought, Ut-napishtim must l(now
the secret, since he has been made like to the gods and now
dwells somewhere far away in blissful immortality. A weary
and a perilous journey must Gilgamesh accomplish to come
at him. He passes the mountain, guarded by a scorpion
man and woman, where the sun goes down: he traverses a
dark and dreadful road never trodden before by mortal man :
he is ferried across a wide sea : he crosses the Water of
Death by a narrow bridge, and at last he enters tl1e presence
syrian ara~ airat zu1zni, signifies 'month in H. Gressn1ann's A lto1ientalische

of the curse of rain,' i. e. ' month of the Texte u1zd Bilder z111n A !ten Testa-
judgment of the Flood.' '' Further nie11te (Tiibingen, 1909), i. 50 sqq.;
correspondences between the cantos A. Ungnad und H. Gress1nann, Das
and the inonths are noted by Professor Gilga111esch- Epos (Gi:ittingen, 191 r),
Jastrow, !I.cl. pp. 52 sqq. ; R. W. Rogers, Cu11ei-
I For translations or sumn1aries of jo111t Parallels to the Old Testa-
the deluge legend, see Eberhard ment (Oxford [1912]), JJp. 90 sqq.
Schrader, The Citneifornt Inscriptz"oizs Of these worlcs the translations of
and the Old Testa11ze1it, translated by Jensen, Dhorme, and Rogers are
Rev. Owen C. Whitehouse (London accompanied by the original Baby-
and Edinburgh, 1885-1888), i. 46 lonian text printed in Roman cl1a1-
sqq. ; l\1. Jastrow, The Religion ef acters. The version i11 tl1e text is
Bab31!01zia a1zd Assyria (Boston, l 898), based on a comparison of these various
Pl) 495 sqq. ; id., Hebrew and Baby- renderings.
loniaiz Tiaditions (London, 1914), 2
pp. 325 sqq. ; L. W. Ki11g, Babylon- The nan1e is said to be St1merian,
ia11 Religion and Mythology (London, meaning '' Enki (Semitic Ea) is
1899), pp. 127 sqq.; P. Jensen, Creator.'' See A. Ungnad und H.
Assy1?sch - Babylo1tz"sche lVIythen und Gressmann, Das Gilganiesch-Epos, pp.
Epen (Berlin, 1900), pp. 229 sqq. ; 7 5 sq. The name was formerly read
W. Muss-Arnolt, in R. !<', Harper's as Eabani.
Assyrian a1td Babylonz"an Lz"terature 3
The name is said to mean ''He
(New York, 1901), pp. 350 sqq.; saw (uta, ut) life,'' in the sense of'' He
H. Zin1mern, in E. Schrader's Die found life.'' See H. Zimmern, in E.
Keili11sch1ifte11 und das Alte Testame11t, Schrader's Die Kez"linschriften ztnd das
Dritte i\uflage (Berlin, 1902), pp. 544 Alte Testament 3, p. 545 note 2. Com-
sqq. ; Alfred J eren1ias, Das Alte Testa- pare P. Jensen, Assyrisch-Babylonische
11ze11t i11z Lichte des A !ten Orie11ts, lV.fythen und Epe1z, p. 466; A. Ungnad
Zweite Auflage (Berlin, 1906), pp. 228 und H. Gressmann, Das Gilga111esch-
sqq. ; P. Dhorme, Choix de Textes Epos, p. So. The name was formerly
Religiettx Assyro-Babyloniens (Paris, read as Par-napishtim, Per-napishtim,
J907), pp. roo Jqq. ; Artl1ur U11gnad, or Ts!t-11apishtim.
CH, IV
BABYLONIAN STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD 113
'
1
of Ut-napishtim. But when he puts to his great ancestor
the question, how man may attain to eternal life, he receives
a discouraging reply: the sage tells him that immortality
is 11ot for man. Surprised at this answer from one who had
been a man and was now himself immortal, Gilgamesh
naturally asks his venerable relative to explain how he had
contrived to evade the common doom. It is in answer to
this pointed question that Ut-napishtim tells the story of the
great flood, which runs as follows : -
U t-napishtim spoke to him, to Gilgamesh : '' I \vill reveal Ut-. .
to thee, 0 Gilgamesh, a hidden word, and the purpose of ~e~l;shtiin
2
the gods will I declare to thee. Shurippak, a city which Gilgamesh

. the story of
thou knowest, which lies on the bank of the Euphrates, that the great
3
city was old ; and the gods within it, their heart prompted flood.
4
the great gods to send a flood. There \vas their father
5
Anu, their counsellor the warrior Enlil, their messenger
Ninib, their prince Ennugi. The Lore\ of Wisdom, Ea, sat Gilgamesl1
6 is warned
also with them, he repeated their word to the hut of reeds, by the god
saying '0 reed hut reed hut 0 wall, wall, 0 reed hut I<~<i: to .
' ' ' bu1lcl a ship
hearken, 0 wall attend. 0 man of Shurippak, son of and save
himself
1 As to the journey, narrated in the Keilinschrifte1z und das A lte Testa- in it
111ent, p. 546, note 6 ). This wo11ld
ninth and tenth cantos of the poem, 3
see M. Jastrow, The Religion of Baby- assign the wickedness of the city as the
lonia and Assyria, pp. 487-492; ca11se of its destruction by the flood.
L. W. King, Babylonian Religion and But the s11ggested reading and render-
Mythology, pp. 165-171; A. Ungnad . ing have not been accepted by later
und H. Gressmann, Das Cilga1nesch- editors and translators.
Epos, pp. l 34-139 4 Q 1 ''the gocls the1eof induced ~h~
2 Or ''decision'' (M. Jastrow, IZ. great gods to bring a cyclone over tt
W. Rogers), ''secret'' (P. Jensen, A. (lVI. J astrow, Hebrew a1zd Babyloniaiz
Jeremias, P. Dhorme, A. Ungnad), Traditions, p. 326 ).
''mystery'' (W. Muss-Arnolt). The 6 Or Illil, less correctly Elli!. The
same Assyrian word (pirishtzt) occurs name was formerly read Bel (so Jensen
again twice towards the end of the ancl Dhorme, and formerly Jastrow).
canto. See below, pp. l 17, l 18. It may Enlil is tl1e Sumerian name of the god,
be connected with the Hebrew verb Bel is his Semitic name. Together
parash ('7'1_~), ''make distinct, declare,'' with Anu, the Father of the Gocls, and
with which the lexicographers compare Enl<i (the Semitic Ea), he 111ade 111? the
the Assyrianpardsie. See W. Gesenius, highest trinity of the a11cient S11mer~a~s.
Hebraisches u11d Ara1naisches Ha11d- See L. w. J{ing, Babylo1zian Relzg1011
wiirterbuch 14 bearbeitet von F. Bul1l aizti JVIythology, p. r 4 ; A .. U ngnad
' '
(Leipsic, 1905), p. 604. T~e '.' pur- und I-I. Gressmann, Das Czlga111escl1-
pose'' or ''decision '' in q11est1on is the Epos, p. 76.
resolve of the gods to l1ring a flood 6 Or perha1)s rather ''fence.'' So
upon the world. Dhorme translates it '' haie de roseau.t'. ''
3 J-I. Zimmern proposed, by a slight
As to the htit or \\'all of reeds, see
change of reading, to translate '' th~t
below, p. I 22.
city was not pio11s ,, (E. Scl1ra<ler, Die
I
VOL. I
THE GREAT FLOOD l'All'l' I
I 14
Ubara-Tutu, pull down thy house, build a shi1J, forsal(e thy

possessions, take heed for thy life ! Thy gods abandon,
save thy life, bri11g living seed of every kind into the ship.
As for the ship which thou shalt bt1ild, well planned must be
its dimensions, its breadth and its le11gtl1 shall bear propor-
1
tions each to each, and thou shalt launch it in the ocean.'
I took heed and spal(e u11to Ea, my lord, saying, 'The
cotnmand, 0 my lord, wl1ich thou hast given, I will honour
and \vill fulfil. But how shall I mal(e a11s\ver unto the city,
the people and the elders tl1ereof?' Ea opened his mouth
and spake, and he said unto me his servant, 'Thus shalt
thou answer and say unto them : Because Enlil hates me,
no longer may I abide in your city nor lay my head on
Enlil's earth. Dow11 into the deep sea must I go with Ea,
The my lord, to dvvell.' '' So Ut-napishtim obeyed the god Ea
building of
the ship. and gathered together the wood and all things needful for
the building of the ship, and on the fifth day he laid do\vn
the 11ull. In the shape of a barge he built it, and on it 11e
set a house a 11undred and tvventy cubits 11igh, a11d he
divided the house into six stories, and in eacl1 sto1y he
made nine rooms. Water-plugs he fastened within it ; the
outside he daubed with bitumen, and the i11side he caull(ed
with pitch. He caused oil to be brought, and he slaughte1ed
oxen and lambs. He filled jars \vith sesa1ne-wine and oil
and grape-wine; he gave the people to dri11l\: lil<e a 1iver
and he made a feast like to the feast of tl1e N evv Year.
The ladi11g And when the ship was ready he filled it with all that he had
of silver, and all that he had of gold, and all that he had ot
of the ship
and the
embarka- living seed. Also he brought up into the ship all his family
tion.
and his household, the cattle of the field likewise and the
beasts of the field, and tl1e handicraftsmen : all of them
he biought in. A fixed time the sun-god Shamash had
appointed, saying, '''At eventide the lord of darl\:ness \vill
send a heavy rain. Then enter thou into the ship and sht1t
thy door.' The time appointed drevv near, and at eventide
the 101d of darkness sent a heavy rain. Of the storm, I
The saw the beginning, to look upon the storm I was afraid. I
beginni11g
of the entered into the ship and shut the door. To tl1e pilot of
storm. 1
Or ''On a level \vith the deep, prb- 326). '' . . . the ocean, cover it'witl1
vide it with a covering'' (M. Jastruv., a roof'' (R. W. Rogers). Similarly A.
Hebreu 1 and Babylonian 11aditio11s, l) Ungnad (Das Gi!ga111esch-Epos, p. 53).
CH. IV
BABYLONIAN STORY OF A GREA1' FLOOD 115
the ship, even to Puzur-Amurri, the sailor, I committed the

1
(floating) palace and all that therein was. When the early
dawn appeared there came up from the horizon a black
2
cloud. Ramman thundered in the midst. thereof, the gods
3 4
Mujati and Lugal went before. Like messengers they
passed over 1nountain and land; Irraga:l 5 tore away the
ship's post. There went Ninib and he made the storm to
burst. The Anunnaki lifted up flaming torches, with the
. brightness thereof they lit up the earth. The whirl\vind of
2
Ramman mounted up into the heavens, and all light was
turned into darkness." A whole day the tempest raged,
'
and the waters rose on the mountains. '' No man beheld

his fellow, no more could men know each other. In heaven
the gods were afraid of the deluge, they drew back, they The fear
climbed up into the heaven of Anu. The gods crouched ~:1~0~r;;;n
like dogs, they cowered by the walls. Ishtar cried out like the gods.
a woman in travail, loudly lamented the queen of the gods
with her beautiful voice : 'Let that day be turned to clay,
6
when I commanded evil in the assembly of the gods!
Alas, that I commanded evil in the assembly of the gods,
that for the destruction of my people I commanded battle !
That which I brought forth, where is it? Lik~ the spawn
7
of fish it filleth the sea.' The gods of the Anunnaki wept

with her, the gods were bowed down, they sat down weeping.
1 The shi1J is so called because of und H. Gressmann, Das Gilgameslh-
its many stories and apartments. The Epos, p. 78.
Assyrian word here employed (ekallzt) 4 A minor deity, the herald of the
is the same with the ordinary Hebrew gods. His name means '' I<.ing,'' a
word for a palace or temple(~~'\) hekal). title bestowed on l'viardul{. Hence
See E. Schrader, The Cuneifornt In- some translato1s render it by '' Marduk ''
scriptions and the Old Testa1nent, i. in the present passage. See A. Ungnad
56 ; P. Dhorme, Choix de _Textes und H. Gressmann, Das G'i!ga111esch-
It'elz;E[ieux Assyro-Babyloniens'. p. I 09, Epos, p. 78.
note 96; Fr. Brown, S. R. Driver, and 5 Irragal or Irrakal is '' tl1e Great
Ch. A. Briggs, Hebrew and English Irra, '' the god of pestilence, more
Lexicon (Oxford, 1906), JJ. 228. commonly l{nown as N e1gal. See
2 So L. W. J{ing ancl A. Ungnad
A. Ungnad 11nd If. Gressma11n, Das
(Das GilcranteJch-Epos, p. 56). Others Gilga1t1esch-Epos, p~J. 77, 78.
6 So Jensen, Dhorn1e, a11d Jast1ow
read '' Adad '' (so Jensen, Jeremias,
and formerly Ungnad). Ramman or (IIebreiv a1id.Babylo1zia11 T111ciitio11s, p.
Adad was the god of thunder and, 331). Others tra11slate, ''The former
storms. His name is written AN. IM. time (that is, the old race of 111an) has
See A. Ung11ad 11nd I-I. Gressmann, been turned into clay, beca11se,'' etc.
7 Or '' because of tl1e An1111naki ''
Das Citga1nesch-Epos, p. 79 . . . ,,
:i A 1ninor deity, afterwards 1clent1fied (P. Dhor111e), ''over tl1e A n11nna1{!
will1 NalJu (Nebo). See A. U11gnatl (W. Musti-Arnolt).
I 16 THE GREAT FLOOD l'ART I
Their lips we1e pressed together. For six days and six
nights tl1e wind blew, and tl1e deluge and the tempest over-
The e11d of whelmed the land. When the seventh day drew nigh, then
the storm
and the
ceased the tempest and the delue-e~
and the sto1m, which had
sinking of fought like a host. Then the sea grew quiet, it went down ;
the se~l. the hurricane and the deluge ceased. I looked upon the
1
sea, there was silence come, and all mankind was turned
back into clay. Instead of the fields a swamp lay before
2
me. I opened the window and the light fell upon 1ny
cheek; I bowed myself down, I sat down, I wept, over my
cheek flowed my tears. I looked upon the world, and
3
The ship behold all was sea. After twelve (days ?) an island arose,
grounds on
l\1ount to the land Nisir the ship made its way. The mount of
4
Nisi1. Nisir held the ship fast and let it not slip. The first day,
the second day, the mountain Nisir held the ship fast: the
third day, the fourth day, the mountain Nisir held the ship
fast : the fifth day, the sixth day, the 1nountain Nisir held
Tl1e dove the ship fast. When the seventh day drew nigh, I sent out
sent forth
fro1n the a dove, and let her go forth. The dove flew hither and
ship. thither, but there was no resting-place for her, and she
returned. Then I sent out a swallow and let her go forth.
The swallow flew hither and thither, but there was no resting-
The raven place for her, and she returned. Then I sent out a raven
sent forth
fron1 the and let her go forth. The raven flew a\vay, she beheld the
ship. 5
abatement of the waters, she ate, she waded, she croaked,
The disen1- but she did not return. Then I brought all out unto the
barkation
and the four winds, I offered an offering, I made a libation on the
sacrifice. peak of the mountain. By sevens I set out the vessels,
IOr ''and cried aloud'' (so L. W. meaning, ''to guard, keep, preserve'' ;
l{ing, \V. Muss-Arnolt, and doubtfully so that l\1ount Nisir \vould be ''the
A. Jeremias). l\iount of Salvation or Deliverance.''
~ ''The swamp reached to the roofs'' See E. Sch1ader, The C2tneifor111
(so P. Dhorrne), '' Like a roof the Inscr1ptio1zs a1zd the Old Testa111ent,
plain lay level'' (R. W. Rogers). translated by 0. C. Wl1itehouse
3
''Double hours'' (so P. Jensen (London and Edinburgh, r885), i. 54.
and H. Zimmern). Dhorme thinks tl1at Similarly in Gree], legend, Deucalion
the nu1n ber refers to distance : the is said to have dedicated an altar to
island appeared twelve miles or leagues Zeus the Deliverer on the rnountai11
(?) away. This interpretation is now where he landed after the great flood.
accepted by M. J astrow (Hebreiu and See below, p. 148.
Babylo1zia1z T1aditio1zs, p. 332). 5
So P. Jensen, H. Zimmern, P.
4 If Haupt and Delitsch are right,
Dhor1ne, and A. Ungnad. ''She drew
the na1ne Nisir is derived from the near'' (l{. W. Rogers). ''She came
same roor as the Ifebrew 11asar (i~;) near '' ( L. W. I\:.ing ). ! --
CH. Iv BABYLONIAN STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD
117
under them I heaped up reed, and cedar-wood, and myrtle.1

The gods smelt the savour, the gods smelt the sweet savour.
The. gods gathered like flies about him that offered up the
sacrifice. Then the Lady of the gods drew nigh, she lifted
up the great jewels which Anu had made according to her
wish. She said, ' Oh ye gods here, as truly as I will not
forget the jewels of lapzs lazuli which are on my neck, so
truly will I remember these days, never shall I forget them!
Let the gods come to the offering, but Enlil 2 shall not come
to the offering, for he took not counsel and sent the deluge,
and my people he gave to destruction.' Now when Enlil 2 Anger of
dre\v nigh, he saw the ship; then was Enlil wroth. He ~~1 J a~ the
2 0
was filled with anger against the gods, the Igigi (saying), escape
'Who then hath escaped with his life? No man shall live ~~~s~tin1
after the destruction.' Then Ninib opened his mouth and
2
spake, he said to the \Va.rrior Enlil, 'Who but Ea could have

done this thing? For Ea l<noweth every matter.' Then Ea

opened his mouth and spal<e, he said to the warrior Enlil,2
3
' Thou art the governor of the gods, 0 warrior, but thou
\vouldst not take counsel and thou hast sent the deluge!
On the sinner visit his sin, and on the transgressor visit his
transgression. But hold thy hand, that all be not destroyed !
and forbear, that all be not confounded ! Instead of sending
a deluge, let a lion come and minish mankind ! Instead of
4
sending a deluge, let a leopard come and minish mankind !
Instead of sending a deluge, let a fa1nine come and waste
the land! Instead of sending a deluge, let the Plague-god
5
come and slay mankind ! I did not reveal the purpose of
6
the great gods. I caused Atrakhasis to see a dream, and
I Or ''incense'' (so L. W. King). sense of'' wise.'' See P. Jensen, Assy1--
2 Or'' Bel.'' So M. Jas'trow, L. W. isch-Babylonische Mythe11 und Epen,
l{ing, IJ. Jensen, and P. Dhorme. p. 320; P. Dhor111e, C/ioix de Textes
See above, p. I I 3, note 6 ie!i oie11x Ass1110-Babylonie1ts, p. I I 7.
'' er
3 Or '' 'I'hou wise one among the 4 The meaning of the Assyrian word
gods'' (so \V. Muss-Arnolt, I-I. Zim- ( barbarzt) here translatecl '' leopard '' is
mern, A. Jeremias, I'. Dl1orme, A. Ung- tincertain. Ungnad and Rogers render
nad, IZ. W. Rogers). This rendering cer- ''wolf''; Jeremi<1s prefe1s a panther,
tainly gives more point, as P. Dhorme Jastrow a jackal, ~nd IvI11ss-Arn~~t .a
ol)serves to what follows : ''Yott so tiger. The rencler1ng ''leopard 1s
wise, y~t to be so rash and unjust . strongly defendecl by P. Dhorme.
as to send tl1e del11ge ! '' The dot1btful 5 01 ''secret.'' See above, l) I I 3
1\ssyrian wor<l is abkafltt, wl1ich, accorcl- o '' The very prt1clent one,'' a name
ing t<J J)elitscl1, means '' commancler,'' or title a1)11lied to U t-napisl1tim. See
'' ;.ttlcr, ''!Jut according to otl1ers has the below, JJJJ. I I 8 sq.

I I8 THE GREAT FLOOD PAR'I' I
1 2
thus he heard the purpose of the gods.' Thereupon Enlil
Appease, arrived at a decision, and he went up into the ship. He
n1ent of took my hand and brought me forth, he brought my wife
Enlil and
his reco11- forth, he made 11er to kneel at my side, he turned towards
ciliation
\Vith Ut- us,3 he stood between us, he blessed us (saying), 'Hitherto
11apishtim. hath Ut-napishtim been a man, but no'v let Ut-napishtim
and his wife be lil{e unto the gods, even us, and let Ut-
napishtim dwell afar off at the mouth of the rivers!' Then
they took me, and afar off, at the mouth of the rivers, they
made me to dwell."
Frag111e11t Such is the long story of the delt1ge interwoven into
of another the Gilgamesh epic, with which, to all appearance, it had

vers1011
of the originally no connexion. A fragment of another version of
Babylonian the tale is preserved on a broken tablet, \vhich, lil{e the
flood story,
in which tablets of the Gilgamesh epic, was found among the ruins of
the hero is
called Ashurbanipal's library at Nineveh. It contains a part of the
Atrakhasis. conversation which is supposed to have taken place before
the flood between the god Ea and the Babylo11ian Noah,.
who is here called Atrakhasis, a name which, as \Ve saw, is
incidentally applied to him in the Gilgamesh epic, though
elsewhere in that version he is named not Atrakhasis but
Ut-napishtim. The name Atrakhasis is said to be the
I Or ''secret.'' See above, p. I I 3. ''came to his senses'' (so A. J eremias
2 Or ''Bel.'' So M. Jastrow, L. W. and formerly M. J astrow), '' tl1en they
King, P. Jensen, W. Muss-Arnolt, too]{ his co11nsel '' (P. Jensen and P.
H. Zimmern, A. J eremias, and P. Dhorme), and ''Now ta],e counsel for
Dhorme. Ungnad and Rogers read him'' (so A. Ungnad, R. W. Rogers,
''Ea'' instead of Enlil (Bel). But the and now M. Jastrow, in Hebrew and
sense given by the former reading is Babylo11ian T1-aditz'o1zs, p. 334). This
incomparably finer. Enlil (Bel) is at last rendering (''Now ta!,e counsel for
first enraged at the escape of Ut- him'') puts the words in the mouth of
11apishtim and his fa1nily, but, moved the preceding speaker Ea : so under-
by Ea's eloquent pleading on their stood, they are at once feeble and
bel1alf, he experiences a revulsion of otiose, whereas 11nderstood to refer to
feeling, a11d entering tl1e ship he the sudden revulsion of feeling in
111agnanimously ta!,es Ut-napishti1n by Enlil (Bel), tl1ey are eminently in place
tl1e hand and leads him forth. The and add a powerful stroke to the
dra1natic situation thus created is picture. ,
'
worthy of a great literary artist, and

ren1i11ds 11s of the famous' 111eeting of 3
Or '' turned t1s face to face '' (W.
Achilles and Pria1n in Homer, ''His 1'v1uss-Arnolt), ''turned us toward each
hand he placed in the old man's hand, other'' (R. W. Rogers), ''touched our
and pusl1ed hi1n gently away'' (Iliad, face'' (P. Dhorme), ''touched 011r fore-
xxiv. 508). The phrase rendered heads'' (A. Ungnad, M. Jastrow, in
''arrived at a decision'' (so L. W. Heb1-ezv a11d Babylonz'a11 Tradz'tions,
King, \V. Muss-Arnolt, and apparently P 334), ''touched our shoulder'' (P.
H. Zimmern) is variously translated Jensen). .

CH. IV BABYLONIAN STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD
119
Babylonian original which in Berosus's Greek version of

the deluge legend is represented by Xisl1thrus.1 Jn this
~ragment the god Ea commands Atrakhasis, saying, ''Go
in and shut the door of t~e ship. Bring within thy corn,
t~y goods and thy possessions, thy (wife?), thy family, thy
kinsfolk, and thy craftsmen, the cattle of the field, the beasts
2
of the field, as many as eat grass.'' In his reply the hero
says that he has never built a ship before, and he begs that
a plan of the ship be drawn for him on the ground, which
he may follo\v in laying down the vessel. 3
Thus far the Babylo11ian versions of the flood legend Fragment

date only from the time of Ashurba11ipal in the seventh ofai_iother
r . ven1on
century b e1ore our era, a11d might therefore conceivably be of the
of later origin than the Hebre\v version and copied from it. Babylonian
. .. flood story,
However, conclusive evidence of the vastly greater antiquity in which
of the Babylonian legend is furnished by a broken tablet, ~~::i~;~
which \Vas discoveied at Abu-Habbah, the site of the ancient Atrakhasis.
city of Sippar, in the course of excavations undertaken by
the Turkish Government. The tablet contains a very
mutilated version of the flood story, and it is exactly dated ;
for at the end there is a colophon or note recording that the
tablet was \Vritten on the twenty-eighth day of the month
Shabat11 (the eleventh Babylonian month) in the eleventh
year of King Ammizaduga; or about I 966 B.C. Unfortun-
ately the text is so fragmentary that little information can be
1 Atrakhasis, '' tl1e ve1y Prudent 2 ''As ma11y as eat grass.'' So P.
One,'' in the inverted form Khasis-atra Jensen, A. Jeremias, A. Ungnad, and
is identified witl1 Xisuthrus by E. R. W. Rogers. Others render simply,
Schrader, I-I. Zimmern, P. Dhor1ne, '' all l{inds of herl1s,'' understanding the
and A. U ngnad. See E. Schrader, The words as a direction to Atrakhasis to
Cztneifor11t I11scriptio1ts and the Old tal;:e on board a s11pply of vegetables.
7'esta11ze1it, i. 56 ; JI. Zimn1ern, in E. So P. Dhorme and M. Jastrow.
3 P. Jensen, Assyrisch-Babylo11i.rclze
Schrader's Die I<eilinschriften ztnd das
Alte Testantent, Dritte Aufiage, PP ll1ythen und Epen, pp. 255, 257 ;
532, 551; P. Dhorme, Choix. tie A. Jeremias, Das A lte Testa111e11t ini
l'extes religiez1x Assyro-Babylonietts, Lichte des alte1z 01ients, 2 p. 233; P.
Dl1orme, Clzoix de Textes religieux
pp. 119 note 106, 132 ~ote ;. A. 63
U ngnad, in I-I. Gress111ann s r1 !torient- A.rsyro-Babylonieizs, PJJ. I 26 sq. ; A.

Ungna<l, in H. Gressmann's Alto1ie11tal-
alische l'exte ztnd Bilder zz111t .tJ !te1z
r t 16 46 note 4 ische Texte z111d Bildei z11111 rllte11 Tes-
Testa11ze11te, I. 39 no e , '
A. Ung11ad und I-I. G1ess1nann, Das ta111ente, i. 57 ; A. Ungnad und H.
Gressmann, Das Gi{za111esch-Epos, p.
G'iZE[arrte.rclz-Epos, 11p. 59, 7 4 sq. As to
69 ; R. W. Rogers, C1t11eifo111i Paral-
the name t\traJ;:hasis, see ft1rther P.
lels to tlze Old Testa111e11t, pp. I 03 sq. ;
J e11sen, A.1s31riJch-/Jabylo11isclte 1VIJ1the1i
M. Jastrow, Heb1eiu and Baby/011ia1i
ttnd .Epe1z, 11p. 276 sq. ; I-I. Usener,
7/aditioizs, pp. 343345
Die .';i1itjl11t;age11, 11. I 5
I20 THE GREAT FLOOIJ I'ART I
extracted frotn it ; but tl1e name of Atral<hasis occurs in it,

together with references to the great rain and apparently to
the ship and the ent1ance into it of the people who were to
1
be saved.
Fragn1e11t Yet another very ancient version of the deluge legend
of anot~er
very anc1e11 t came to light at Nippur in the excavations conducted by
ver;;ion the Unive1sity of Pennsylvania. It is written on a small
of tl1e d f h
Babylonian fragme11t of unbal<ed clay, and on the groun o t e sty e o
1 f
flood story writing a11d of the place where the tablet \vas fou11d it is
found at I
Nippur. dated by its disc9verer, Professor H. V. Hilprecht, not ater
than 2 1 oo B.C. In this fragme11t a god appears to announce
that he will cause a deluge which will sweep away all man-
kind at once ; and he \varns the person whom he addresses
to build a great ship, with a strong ioof, in \vhich he is to
save his life, and also to bring into it the beasts of the field
2
a11d the birds of 11eaven.
Frag1ne11t All these versions of the flood story are \\'ritten in the
of another Semitic language of Babylonia and Assyria ; but another
veryancie11t

version fragmentary versio11, found by tl1e American excavators at
of tl1e Nippur and recently deciphered, is w1itten in Sumerian, that
Babylonian
flood story is, in the non-Semitic language of the ancient people \vho
\Vritte11 appear to have preceded the Semites in I1abylonia and to
in the
Sumerian 1 L. W. l(ing, Babylonia1z Religion 574); and accordingly R. W. Rogers
language a11d JVf;1thology, pp. r24-r26; P. Jen- and 1\1. Jastrow date the king roughly
about sen, Assy1isch-liab;1lonische Mythe11
2100 B. C.
at r Soo B. c. According to the latest
zt1zd Epe1z, pp. 289, 29 r ; I-I. _Zimmern, calculation, based on elaborate as-
in E. Schrader's Die .!Ceilinschriften tronomical data, the yea1 of Ammi-
zt1zd das Alte Tesla11ze1zt, 3 p. 552; P. zaduga's accession is now assigned
Dhor111e, Choix de Textes 1e!igiezrx by Mr. L. W. l(ing to the year 1977
Assy10-Bab;1!01ziens, pp. I 20-r 2 5 ; A. fl, c., and in this dating ordinary stt1d-
Ungnad, in H. Gressmann's Altorie1zt- ents may provisionally acquiesce. See
alisc/1e Texte zt11d Bilder zunz A lte1z L. W. l(ing, A Histo1y ef Baby!o1z
Testa11ze1zte, i. 57 sq. ; A. Ungnad und (London, 1915), pp. 107 sqq.
I-I. Gress1nann, Das Gilganzesch-Epos,
pp. 5 sq., 69 sq. ; R. vV. l{ogers, 2 A. U ngnad t1nd H. Gressmann,
Cttneifo1-111 Pa1-a!!els to the Old Testa- Das Gilga111est/1-Epos, pp. 6, 73 ; R.
11ze11t, PI). 104 - 107; 1\1. Jastrow, W. Rogers, Cztneijor111 Parallels to
Hebrew aJztl Babylo1zz'an Traditio1zs, the Old Testa11zent, pp. 108 sq. ; M.
I)p. 340 sq. The date of l{ing Ammi- Jastrow, Hebreiv and Babylo1zia1z T1-a-
zaduga, tl1e tenth monarch of the first ditions, pp. 342 sq. These scholars
Bal)ylonian dy11asty, is variously given i11cline to date tlie tablet later than
as 2100 R.c. (so H. Zimmer11) or 2100 B.c. ''The tablet ma}' well be
some\vhat later tlian 2000 B.c. (so A. as old as Professor Hilprecht argues,
Ungnad, Das Gilga111esch-Epos, p. 5). bt1t the st1ggestion of a date so late as
Professor Ed. l\ieyer assigns the l,ing's tlie early Kassite period ( l 700 B. c.)
reign to the years r8r2- 1792 B.c. ca11 hardly be excluded'' (R. W.
( Gesch ithte des A lte1-t1t11z.<, 2 i. 2. p. l{ogers, op. cit. p. l 08 ).
CH, IV
BABYLONIAN STORY OJ<' A GREAT FLOOD 121

have founded in the lower valley of the Euphrates that
Babylonian. The city of Nippur, where the Sumerian

version of the deluge legend has been discovered was the
holiest and. perhaps the oldest religious centre in th~ country,
and the city-god Enlil was the head of the Babylonian
pantheon. The tablet which records the legend would seem,
from the character of the script, to have been written about
the time of the fainous Hammurabi, king of Babylon, that
is, about 2 I oo B.C. But the story itself must be very much
older ; for by the close of the third millennium before our
era, when the tablet was inscribed, the Sumerians as a
sepaiate race had almost ceased to exist, having been
absorbed in the Semitic population, and their old tongue was
already a dead language, though the ancient literature and
sacred texts embalmed in it were still studied and copied by
the Semitic priests and scribes. 2 Hence the discoveiy of a
St1meriai1 version of the deluge legend raises a presumptio11
that the legend itself dates f1om a time anterior to the
occupation of the Euphrates valley by the Semites, \Vho
after their immigration into the country appear to have
borrowed the story from their predecessors the Sumerians.
It is of interest to obse1ve that the Sumerian version of the
flood story formed a sequel to an account, unfortunately
very fiagmentary, of the c1eation of man, according to which
men were created by the gods before the animals. Thus
the Sumerian story agrees with the Hebrew account in
I The tablet containing the Sume1ian 2 L. vV. King, ''Recent Babylonian
version of the story was first read by Resea1cl1 and its Relatio11 to Hebrew
Dr. Arno Poebel, of the Johns 1-lo]Jkins Studies,'' Chu1ch Qua1terly Review,
Unive1sity, in 1912. See A. Poebel, No. 162, Jan11a1y 1916, pp. 274, 275.
''The Babylonian Story of the Creation As to the elate of Ham111t1rabi (about
and the Earliest I-Iisto1y of the World,'' 2100 B.c.) see Principal J. Sl,inner,
The 1111eseu111 Jottrna!, l)l1iladelpl1ia, Co11111ie1ztary 011 Ge11esis (Edinbt1rgh,
June l 9 l 3, PIJ 41 sqq. ; id., in U1i1- 1910), p. xiv note t; S. R. Driver,
versity ef Pen11sylvania, P1tblicatio11s of l'he Book ef Ge1zesis,IO (London, 1916),
the Babylo11ia1z Sectio11 of the U111'.ve1'sit;1 p. I 56 ; l{. l{ittel, Geschi,hte des Volkes
111useu111, vol. iv. No. I (Philaclelphia, Isiael, 2 i. (Gotha, 1912), p. 77; L.
1914), j)jJ. 7-70; M. Jastrow, Hebrew W. l{ing, A Histo1y ef Babylo11 (Lon-
a11d Bab;1lonit11z T1adz"tio11s, }Jp. 335 clon, 1915), pp. 111, 320, \vl10 assig11s
.rqq. ; L. W. J{ing, ''Recent ~abylo the king's reign to 2123-2081 B.C .
nian J{esearch and its Relation to A later date (1958-1916 B.C.) is
IIe ])rew Stt1<lies,'' Ch1t1th Q11a1te1ly assigned to Ha111n1t1ra b1., s reign
. 1JY I) ro-
/i!ez1iew, N<). 162, Jan11ary 1916, j)j). fessor I~d. Meyer ( Gesch i,h tc des A lte1--
271 .rqq. t11111s, 2 i. 2, jJ. 557).
122 THE GREAT 1,-'LOOD PAR1' I
Ge11esis, in so far as both of them treat tl1e creation of man

and the great flood as events closely connected with each
other in the early history of the world ; and further the
Su~erian narrative agrees \vith the Jehovistic against the
Priestly Document in representing the creation of man as
antecedent to the creation of the animals. 1
In this Only tl1e lo\ver half of the tablet on which this Sumerian
Sumerian
.
version
Genesis was inscribed h as as yet come to I"tg ht, b ut et1ough
the he10 remains to furnish us with the main outlines of the flood
Ziudsuddu
is warned
z
story. From it we learn that Ziugiddu, or rather tu su u,-d dd 9
by Ea 0 ~ was at once a king and a priest of the god Enki, the

the coming
deluge and
. h 1 f h S
Su1ner1an deity who \vas t e equ1va ent o t e em1t1c a; E 3
escapes in daily he occupied himself in the god's service, prostrating

a ship, <lfte1 h
which he himself in humility and constant in his observance at t e
10
" rships
the gods
shrine. To reward him for his piety Enki informs him that
and is at the reqt1est of Enlil it has been resolved in the council of
~~i~:~~~~ the gods to destroy the seed of mankind by a rain-storm.
mortality. Before the hol'y man receives this timely warning, his divine
f1-iend bids him tal<e his stand beside a wall, saying, ''Stand
by the wall on my left side, and at the wall I \vill speak a
word with thee." These words are evidently connected with
the curious passage in the Semitic versio11, \Vhe1e Ea begins
his warning to Ut-napishtim, '' 0 reed hut, reed hut, 0 \Vall,
wall, 0 reed hut hearken, 0 wall attend." 4 Togetl1er the
parallel passages suggest that the friendly god, \Vho might
not directly betray the resolution of the gods to a mortal
man, adopted the subterfuge of whispering it to a wall of
reeds, on the other side of which he had first stationed
Ziudsuddu. Thus by eavesdropping the good man learned
the fatal secret, while his divine patron was able afterwards
to protest that he had not revealeq. the counsel of the gods.
The subterfuge reminds us of the \vell-known story, how the
I See above, pp. I sq. regularly interposed between the layers
2
So Mr. IJ. W. King would read of bric!,, at intervals of four or five
the name (Church Qua1te1ly Review, feet, in order to protect tl1e earthen
No. 162, January 1916, p. 277). inass fro1n disintegration. So well
3 L. W. l{ing, Babylonia1i Religz'on known is this to the modern Arabs,
and llythology, p. 14. See above, that they give the name of B11itanyya
p. I 13, note 5 . or ''reed niats '' to ancient mo11nds in
4 Above, p. I I 3. With reference to which this mode of constr11ctio11 is dis-
the collocation of reeds ancl wall, it is cernil1le. See W. K. Loftus, 71ai1e!s
well to remen1ber that in a11cient Baby- and Researches in Chaldaea andS11sia11a
lonian b11ildings mats macle of reed were (London, 1857), p. 16_8.
CH. IV BABYLONIAN STORY OF A GR.!iAT FLOOD 1
23

servant of King Midas detected the ass's ears of his master

and, unable to contain himself, whispered the secret into ~
hole in the ground and filled up the hole with earth ; but a
be~ of reeds grew up on the spot, and rustling in the wind, pro-
claimed to all the \vorld the king's deformity. 1 The part of the
tablet which probably described the building of the ship and
Ziudsuddu's embarkation is lost, and in the remaining portion
we are plunged into the midst of the deluge. The storms
of wind and rain are described as raging together. Then
the text continues : ''When for seven days, for seven nights,
the rain-storm had 1aged in the land, \vhen the great boat
had been carried away by the wind-stor1ns on the mighty
waters, the Sun-god came forth, shedding light over heaven
and earth." When the light shines into the boat, Ziudsuddu
prostrates himself before the Sun-god and sacrifices an ox
and a sheep. Then follows a gap in the text, after which
we read of Ziudsuddu, the !Zing, prostrating himself before
the gods Anu a11d Enlil. The anger of Enlil against men
appears now to be abated, for, speaking of Ziudsuddu, he
says, '' Life like that of a god I give to him," and '' an eternal
soul like that of a god I create for him," which means that
the hero of the deluge legend, the Sumerian Noah, receives
the boon of immortality, if not of divinity. Further, he is
given the title of '' Preserver of the Seed of Mankind,' 1 and
the gods cause him to d\vell on a mountain, perhaps the
I Ovid, Meta111orphoses, xi. 174 sqq. iii. No. 6 (September, 1893), p. 104,
Parallels to the story are found, witl1 2 l 8 (sto1y told at l(on, in Mirzapur);
trifii11g variations of detail, in Ireland, Ghula1n Mt1hammad, Festivals a11d
Brittany, Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece, Folklore of Gilgit (Calcutta, 1905), pp.
India, a11d among the Mongols. See I l 3 sq. (Me111oirs o/ tlte Asiatic Society
Grimm's Household Tales, translated ef Bengal, vol. i. No. 7); Bernard
by Ma1garet I-Iunt (London, I 884}, ii. Jlilg, Moizgolische lVIii1-che1z-Sc1111111lu1z,!f
498 ; Patrick l(ennedy, Lege1zdary (Innsbruck, 1868), No. 22, lJP. 182
fl'ictions of the .Irish Celts (London, sqq.; Sagas Jro11i the Far East (Lon-
1866}, pp. 248 sqq.; Alfred de Nore, don, 1873}, No. 21, pp. 206 sqq. In
Coz1t111nes, fifythes et Traditions des some versions of the sto1y the l'ing's
Provinces de Fra1ice (l)aris and Lyons, ears are those of a horse or a goat
1846), pp. 219 sq.; 'vV. S. Karad- instead of an ass. In the Gilgit \'er-
schitscl1, VijlkJ11tii1che1z rler S'erben sion tl1e ki11g's feet, not his ears, are
(13erlin, 1854), pp. 225 sqq.; Adolf sl1aped like those of an ass. Benfey
Strausz, Die Bttlga1'en (Leipsic, 1898), thought that tl1e story was borrowed
PI). 2 50 sqq.; Bernhard Scl11niclt, l>y the East fro1n tl1e West. ~ee
(,'1-iechische ,1!/iirthe1z, .sa,l(en 111tll Vo!ks- Theodor Benfey, J'a11tschata11tra (Le1p-
. .. t l
!eirie1- (J,eipsic, 1877), p11. 70 sq., 2.24 sic, l 8 59 ), 1. p. xx11, no e .
.rq.; North 11dia1z Note:; a11d Q11i:1-zes,
124 T.liE GREAT FLOOD PAR'!' I
1nountain of Dil1nun, though tl1e 1eading of the name is

uncertain. Tl1e end of the legend is wanting.
Resen1- Thus in its principal features the Sumerian version of
blance
of the
the deluge legend agrees with the rnuch longer and more
Sumeria11 circumstantial version preserved i11 the Gilgamesh epic. In
version of
the flood
both a great god (Enlil or Bel) resolves to destroy mankind
story to by flooding the earth with rain ; in botl1 another god (Enki
the versio11
in the or Ea) warns a man of the coming catastrophe, and the man,
Gilgan1esh accepting the admonition, is saved in a ship; in both the

epic.
flood lasts at its height for seven days ; in both, when the
deluge has abated, the man offers a sacrifice and is finally
raised to the rank of the gods. The only essential difference
is in the name of the hero, who in the Sumerian version is
called Ziudsuddu, and in the Se1nitic version Ut-napishtim
or Atrakhasis. The Sumerian name Ziudsuddu resembles
the name Xisuthrus, \vhich Berosus gives as that of the hero
who was saved from the flood ; if the two names aie really
connected, we have fresh ground for admiring the fidelity
with which the Babylonian historian followed the most
ancient documentary sources.
The The disco;rery of this very interesting tablet, with its
~;:~~~Y combined accounts of the creation and the deluge, renders it
borrowed highly probable that the narratives of the early history of
~~~~estory the world which we find in Genesis did not originate with
deluge the Semites, but were borrowed by them from tl1e older
fron1 the
s 11merians. civilized people whom, some thousands of years before ot1r
era, the wild Semitic hordes, swarming out of the Arabian
desert, found in possession of. the fat lands of the lower
Euphrates valley, and from \vhom the descendants of these
pri111itive Bedouins gradually learned the arts and habits of
ci\'ilization, just as tl1e northern barbarians acquired a varnish
of culture through their settlement in the Roman empire.
The scene The va1ious fragmentary versions, Babylonian and
?f ttllie story Sume1ian, of the deluge story confirm the conclusion that
1n le .
Gilgamesl1 the legend circulated independently of the Gilgamesh epic,
epic laid at h' I h I
Shurippal{ into w 1c 1 t e poet oose y 1nserte
I d it as an episode. In
on the the epic the original scene of the disaster is laid, as we saw,
Euphrates. h .
at t e city o f Sh . k h
urrppa on t e Euphrates. Recent excava-
tions of the German Oriental Society 11ave revealed the site
of the ancient city. The place is at the hill of Fara, to the
CH. IV THE HEBREW STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD 125
north of U ruk ; and the remains which ha\Te come to light

there seem to show that Shurippak was among the very
oldest Sumerian settlements yet discovered ; for the inscribed
clay tablets which have been excavated on the spot are of a
very archaic character, and are believed to have been written
1
not much later than 3400 B.C. The site is now a long way
from the sea. and at some distance from the Euphrates ; but
we know that in the course of ages the river has repeatedly
changed its bed, and that the sea has retreated, or rather that
the land has advanced, in consequence of the vast quantities of
soil annually washed down by the Euphrates and the Tigris. 2
Apparently the ancient city perished, not by water, but by
fire; for the ruins are buried under a thick layer of ashes.
After the co11flagration the greater part of the hill seems to
have remained desolate, though a small town existed on the
spot duri11g the Sumerian and Accadian periods. From
about the time of Hammurabi, that is, from about 2 I oo B.c.
onward, the very name of Shurippak vanishes from Baby-
3
lonian history. ' Thus the story of the great flood which
destroyed the city cannot have originated later than the end
of the third millennium before Christ, and it may well have
been very much older. In the Sumerian version of the
deluge legend Shurippak is named, along with Eridu, Larak,
and Sippar, as cities before the flood ; but in the frag-
mentary state of the text it is impossible to say \vhether or
4
not it was the city of Ziudsuddu, the Sumerian N oah.
3. The Hebrew Story of a Great Flood

The ancient Hebrew legend of a great flood, as it is Tl1e
5 Hebrew
recorded in the book of Genesis, runs thus : story of the
'' And the Lord saw !!tat the wickedness of 112an ivas great flood i_n
Genesis.
1 A. U ngnad und H. Gressmann, gart und Berlin, 1909) pp. 398 sq.
Das Gilga111esch-Epos, pp. 190 sq. 3 A. Ungnad t1nd I-I. Gressmann,
2 T. H. Huxley, '' Hasisadra's Das Gilga1nesch-Epos, p. 191.
Adventure,'' Collected Essays, vol. iv. 4 A. Poebel, in The University of
(London, 1911) PP 25o sq.; Eduar? Pennsylva11ia, Pztblicatio11s of the
Suess, The Ji'ale of the Earth, i. Babylo11ia11 Sectio11. of the [hzive1sity
(Oxford, l 904) PP 24 sq. ; G. l\ias- Museu111, vol. iv. No. l (Pl1ilaclelphia,
pero, Histoire Ancienne de_s jJeitpl~s ~e 1914), pp. 18, 44.
l' Orient Classique, Les 011gznes (I ar1s,
0 Genesis vi. 5-ix. l 7, Revised Ver-
1895), PI> 55 2 ;q. ; E.d. Meyer,
2
G"eschichte ties Alte1t1111ts, i. 2. (Stutt- s1on.
126 THE GREAT FLOOD I'AR'f I
i11 tlie earth, and that every i111agination of the thoughts of his
heart ivas 01zly evil continually. And it J'epe1zted the Lord that
he Jtad nzade 11zan on the earth, and it g1'ieved hi1n at his hea1't.
And the Lord said, I will destroy 11zan ivho1tt I have created
fro1n the face ef the ground, botlz 1nan, and beast, and creeping
thing, and fowl of the air; far z't repe1zteth me that I have
'
1nade them. But Noah fou1td g1'ace in the eyes of the Lord.
Noah, , '' These are the generations of Noah. N oal1 was a
warned by
God of the
righteous man a11d perfect in his generations : Noah \Valked

coming with God. And Noah begat tl1ree sons, Shem, Ham, and
deluge,
builds an Japheth. And the earth was corrupt before God, and the
ark. earth was filled with viole11ce. And God saw the earth, and,
behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his \vay
upon the earth. And God said unto Noah, The end of all
flesh is come before me ; for the earth is filled with violence
through them ; and, behold, I will destroy them witl1 the
earth. Make thee an ark of gopher wood ; rooms shalt thou
make in the arl<, and shalt pitch it within a11d without \vith
The con- pitch. And this is how thou shalt make it: the length of.
struction
of the ark.
the ark three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits,
and the height of it thirty cubits. A light shalt thou mal<e
to the ark, and to a cubit shalt thou finish it upward ; and
the door of the ark shalt thou set in the side thereof; with
lower, second, and third stories shalt thou make it. And I,
behold, 1 do bring the flood of waters upon the earth, to
destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under
heaven ; every thing that is in the earth shall die. But I \viii
establish my covenant with thee; and thou shalt come into
the ark, thou, and thy sons, and thy wife, and thy sons' wives
The with thee. And of every livirig thing of all flesh, two of
animals to
be taken every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive
into the with thee ; they shall be male and female. Of the fowl after
ark.
their kind, and of the cattle after their l<ind, of every creeping
thing of the ground after its l<ind, two of every sort shall
come unto thee, to keep them alive. And take thou unto
thee of all food that is eaten, and gather it to thee ; and it
shall be for food for thee, and for them. Thus did Noah ;
according to all that God commanded him, so did he.
''And the Lord said u1zto Noah, Co1ne thou and all tliy
house i11to the a1'k , for thee have I seen riglzteous befo1-e tJte
CH. IV THE HERRE W STORY OF A GREAT r-..LOOD 127
i'n this generati'on. Of every clean beast thou shaft take to thee
1
sei en and seven, the male and his female ; and of the beasts.
that are not clean two, the 1nale and hz's female; of the fowl
also of the az'r, seven and seven, male and female : to keep seed
alive upo1z the face of all the eartlz. For yet seven days, a1zd
I will cause z't to rain upon the earth forty days and forty
nights; and every living thz"ltg that I have 11zade will I destroy
from off the face of the grou1zd. And Noah did accordz'ng ztnto
all tliat tlze Lord co11z11zanded him. And Noah was six hundred
years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth. And
Noah 1.vent in, and lzis sons, and his zvzfe, and lzz's sons' wives Noah, his
witlz him, into the ark, because or the waters o+ the flood Q+ fa m 1biy, and
'.! '.! '.I t11e easts
clean beasts, and of beasts that are not clea1z, a11d of fowls, and enter into
of every thing that creepeth upon the ground, there zvent in two the ark.
and two unto Noalz into tlte ark, male and female, as God
co11z11zanded Noah. And it ca11ze to pass after the seven days,
that the waters of the flood were upo1z the earth. In the six
hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the
seventeenth day of the month, on the same day were all the
fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of
heaven were opened. And the raz'n was upo1z the earth forty

days a1zd forty nights. In the selfsame day entered Noah, and
Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's
wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, i11to the
ark ; they, and every beast after its kind, and all tl1e cattle
after their kind, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon
the earth after its kind, and every fowl after its kind, every
bird of every sort. And they went in unto Noah into the
ark l two and two of all flesl1, wherein is the breath of life.
And they that we11t in, went in male and female of all flesh,
as God commanded him : and the Lo1-d shut hz'11z in. And
the flood \vas forty days upon the earth ; aJzti the zvaters Duratio11
d 't z;+,t b
increased, and bare up t e ar1c:, a1z z was 2.f zip a. o,;e .1ie of tlie
h .l . t' a11c! tiepth
earth. And the waters prevailed, and inc1eased gieatly flood.

upon the earth; and the ark \vent upon the face of tl1e
waters. And the waters prevailed exceedi11gly upo11 tl1e ea1th;
and all the high rnountains that were t1nde1 the \Vl1ole 11eaven Destru~tiL111
~ b' d d' :l I1 , t ., . . -1 . or,11111re
were cove1ed. li1ftee11 cu its u1Jwar le t e \V<l ets IJtcvat ' 011 eartl1.
and the 1~ountains were covered. And all flcsl1 died tl1at
inovcd upon the earth, both fo\vl, a11d cattle, a11d beast, ancl ,
128 THE G.lrEAT FLOOD PAR't' I
every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every
man : all iti whose nostrils was the breath of the spz'rit of life,
of all that was z'n the dry land, dz'ed. And eve1y livz'1zg thz'ng
was destroyed whz'ch was upon the face of the ground, both
11tan, and cattle, and creepz'1zg thi1zg, and fowl of the heaven ;
and they were destroyeti fro1n the earth: and Noah 011/y was
left, and they that were with hz'm in the arl~. A11d the waters
prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.
Cessation ''And God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and
of the all tl1e cattle that were with him in the ark : and God made a
rain .and
asst1age- wind to pass over the earth, and the waters assuaged ; the
ment of
the \Vaters.
fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven \Vere
stopped, a1zd the rain fro1n heaven was restrained, and the
zvaters returned fro1n off the earth co1ztz'1tually : and after the
end of an hundred and fifty days the waters decreased.
111e ark And the ark rested in the seventh inonth, on the seventeenth
0
Arrro~ndt s
011
day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat. And the
ra1a .
waters decreased continually until the tenth montl1 : in the
tenth month, on the first day of the month, were tl1e tops of
the mountains seen. And it ca1ne to pass at the end of forty
days, that Noalz opened the ivindoz.v of the ark whiclz he hari
Noah sends 1nade: and he sent fortlt a raven, a11d i'-t went forth to and
out a
raven a11d .I '
+ro, until the wate1's were dried u-n
1
:r J+ro1n oil'
'.U
the ea"th.
.
A1zd
a dove. he sent farth a dove .front hi1n, to see if the waters ivere abated
frotn off the face of the grozt1zd , but the dove found 110 rest
for the sole of her foot, and she retur1zed unto hi111 to tlze ark,
for the waters were on the face of the whole ea1th : a1zd he
put fort!i his hand, and took her, and brought her in unto him
i1zto the ark. And he stayed yet other seven days; and agai11
he sent forth the tiove oztt of the ark; anti the doz1e ca11ze itt
to hi11z at eventide; and, lo, in lzer 11zouth an olive leaf p!ztckt
off: so Noah k11ew that the wate1s were abated fro1n off the
earth. And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent fo1'th
the tlove , and she returned not again u11to hi111 a1zy 111ore.
And it came to pass in tl1e six hundred and first year, in
the first month, the first day of the month, the waters \Ve1e
dried up from off the earth: and Noah re1noved the t:overing
of the ark, and looked; and, behold, the face of the grou11d was
dried. And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth
day of the month, \Vas the earth dry.
CH. IV
THE HEBREW STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD 129

''And God spake unto Noah, saying, Go forth of the ark Noah his
thou, and tl1y wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with fan1i1;, and
thee B r h . the beasts
ring iort with thee every li\ ing thing that is with come forth
1
th~~ of all flesh, both fowl, and cattle, and every creeping ~r~;1 the
tl1i11g that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed
abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon
the earth. And Noah went forth ' and his sons , and his. wife ,
and his sons' wives \Vith him : every beast, every creeping
thing, and every fo\vl, whatsoever moveth upon the earth,
after their families, went forth out of the arl<. Anti Noalz
b1J.ilded art altar u1zto the Lord; a11d took o.f ~very clea1z beast,
artd o.f every clean .fowl, and ojfereci bztrnt ojferz"rtgs on the
altar. And the Lord s1nelled tlze sweet savoztr; and the Lorti
J'az"d z"n hz"s heart, I ivill not again curse the grou11d any 1nore
for man's sake, for tlzat the z"11zagination o.f 11zan's heart z'.; evz"l
fro1n hzs yoztth ; neither wz"fl I again s11zite any 1nore every
thi1tg livz"ng, as I have done. f!Vhile the eartlt re1naineth,
seedtinze and harvest, and cold a1zd heat, and su1n11zer and
winter, and day and night s!tall not cease. And God blessed God blesses
Noah and his sons, and said unto tl1em, Be fiuitful, and Nh_oah and
is sons.
multiply, and. replenish the earth. And the fear of you and
the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the eartl1, and
upon every fowl of the air; with all wherewith the grot1nd
teemeth, and all the fishes of the sea, into you1 11and are they
delivered. Every moving thing that liveth shall be food
for you ; as the green herb have I givei1 you all. But flesh
with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not
eat. And surely your blood, the blood of your lives, will I

require ; at the hand of every beast will I require it: and at
the hand of man, even at the hand of every man's brother,
will I require the life of man. Whoso sheddeth man's blood,
by man shall his blood be shed : for in the image of God
made he man. And you, be ye fruitful, and 1nt1ltiply ;
bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply the1ein.
''And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with 11i1n, Gotl n1aJ,es
. h t "tl1
saying, And I, behold, I esta bl is my covenan wi you, ail \vitl1 No<ll1d a covc11a11t
with your seed after yot1 ; and witl1 every living 'creature a11d 11is
SOllS,
that is with you, the fowl, the cattle, and eve1y b east o f tl1e
earth with you ; of all that go out of tl1e arl<, even ev~ry
beast of the earth. And I will establisl1 iny covenant with
VOIJ, I 1(
130 THE GREAT FLOOD PAI~'!' I
you; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters
of the flood ; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy
the earth. And God said, This is the tol(en of the covenant
which I make between me and you and every living creature .
The bow in that is with you, for perpetual generations : I do set my bow
the cloud. in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant be-

tween me and the earth. And it shall come to pass, when

I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in
the cloud, ancl I will remember my covenant, which is
between me and you and every living creature of all flesh ;
and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all
flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud ; and I will lool<:
upon it, that I 1nay remember the everlasting covenant
between God and every living creature of all flesh that is
upon the earth. And God said unto Noah, This is the token
of the covenant which I have established between me and all
flesh that is upon the earth."
The story In this account of the deluge Biblical critics are now
~~ gi:n~~i~d ag1eed in detecting the presence of two originally distinct
is corn- and partially inconsistent narratives, which have been
~~~~~~~o combined so as to present the superficial appearance of a
disti!1ct and single homoge11eous story. Yet the editorial task of uniting
fn~r~: i ~ent them has been performed so clumsily that the repetitions
11
narratives. and inconsistencies left standing in them can hardly fail to

attract the attention even of a careless reader. In repro-
ducing the text of the legend f1om the English Revised
Version I have distinguished the two stra11ds of the com-
posite narrative by printing them in different types; the
analysis thus exhibited is the one now generally accepted by
. 1 ' '
cr1 ties.
1 W. Robertson S1nith, The Old Century Bible) ; W. H. Bennett and
Testament iii the Jewz'sh Ch1t1-clz 2 W. F. Adeney, A Biblz'cal Introduc-
(London and Edinburgh, I892), pp. tz'o1i 5 (London, 1908), pp. 27 sqq. ;
329 sq. ; E. l(autsch und A. Socin, S. R. Driver, The Book o.f Genesis 10
Die Genesis, 111it ausserer U1iterschei- (London, 19I6), pp. 85 sqq. ; z'd.,
du1zg der Qztellensch1iften 2 (Freib11rg Introd11ctio11 to the Literature o.f the
i. B., I89I), 1~1). II sqq.; E. l{a11tsch, Old Testament~ (Edinburgh, 1913), p.
Die heilige Schrift des Alten Testa- I4 ; K. Budde, Geschichte der alt-
111.ents iibeisetzt ztnd herausgegeben hebraischen Litteratur (Leipzig, I906 ),
(Freiburg i. B. und Leipzig, I894), pp. 47 sqq. ; H. Gunkel, Genesis uber-
pp. 6 sqq. ; J. Estlin Car1)enter ancl setzt und erklart 3 (Gottingen, 19IO),
G. Harford-Battersby, The Hexateuch. pp. 59 sqq.; J. SJ,inner, Critical and
(London, 1900), ii. 9 sqq. ; W. H. Exegetical Co11z111entary on Genesis
Bennett, Genesis, pp. I 35 sqq. (The (Edinburgh, I9IO), pp. 147 sqq. ;
CH. IV THE HEBREW STORY OF A CREA T FLOOD 131
. Of the two versions of the legend thus artificially corn- One of the
bined, the one, printed in ordinary Roman type is derived ~arra!ives
f h ' 1s denved
rom w at the cr1t1cs call the . Priestly Document or from the
Code (usually desig11ated by the letter P) the other Prie~tly
' 1 Code and
printed in 1tal1c type, is derived from what the critics the other
Call th e J eh ov1s
t"IC or J a h w1st1c
Document (usually des1g- . from the .
Jehovistic
nated by the letter J), which is characterized by the (Jahwistic)
. document.
use o f th e. d iv1ne name J ehoval1 (J ahweh, or rather
Yahweh). The two documents differ conspicuously . in
character and style, and they belong to different ages ; for
while the Jel1ovistic narrative is probably the oldest, the
Priestly Code is now ge11erally ad1nitted to be the latest, of Difference
the four principal documents \.vhich have been united to tbhetwteeri e \\"O
form the Hexateuch. The Jehovistic document is believed documents
t o h ave b een wr1"tten in J u d ea 1n t h e ear1y times
f h and
o t e probable their
Hebrew monarchy, probably in the ninth or eighth century dates.

before our era ; the Priestly Code dates from the pe1iod
after the year 5 86 B.C., when Jerusalem was taken by
Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, and the Jews were carried
away by him into captivity. Both documents are in their
form historical, but while the J ehovistic write1 displays a
genuine interest in the characters and adventures of the men
and women whom he describes, the Priestly writer appears Theecclesi-
to concern himself with them only so far as he deemed them ~~~~~~terof
instruments in the great scheme of Providence fo1 conveying the history
to Israel a knowledge of God and of the religious and social f~c:~ed
institutions by which it was his gracious will that the Chosen Priest~y
. 1 h
People should regu ate t e1r 1ves. l" Th h' h'
e 1story w 1c h h Code
e explained is
writes is sacred and ecclesiastical rather than secular and by the cir-
cun1st~1nces
civil ; his preoccupation is with Israel as a church rather ?f the_ age
than as a nation. Hence, while he dwells at comparative it~n was \vliich
length on the lives of the patriarchs and p1ophets to whom composed.
the deity deigned to reveal himself, he hur1ies over whole
generations of common mortals, whom he barely me11tions
by name, as if they were mere links to connect one 1eligious
epoch with another, mere packthread on which to string at
rare intervals the splendid jewels of revelation. His attitude
A. T. Cha1)man, J1ztrod11ltio1i to
.r11i Ge11esi> (Ca111 li1idge, I 9 I 4 ), !J[1. 96 .rqq. ;
the ]Je11lateitch (Cambridge, 191 I), IJP M. Jastrow, E-lebi,;iu a11cl Baby/011i1111
74-8 I ; II. I~. I<.ylc, 7'he Book of Traditio11s(Ll1nd011, I 9I4),1111. 348 sqq.
132 THE GREAT FLOOD PART I
to the past is sufficiently explained by the circumstances of

the times in which he lived. Tlhe great age of Is1ael was
over ; its independence .was gone, and with it the hopes of
worldly prosperity and glory. The rosy dreams of empire,
which the splendid reigns of David and Solomon had con-
jured up in the hearts of tl1e people, and \vhich may have
lingered for. a wl1ile, like morning clouds, even after the
disruption of the monarchy, had lo11g ago faded in the
clouded evening of the nation's day, under the grim reality
of foreign domination. Ba11ed from all the roads of purely
mundane ambition, the i1repressible idealism of the national
temperament now found a vent for itself in another direction.
Its dreams took a different cast. If earth was shut upon
it, heaven was still open ; and lil\:e Jacob at Bethel, with
enemies behind him and before, the dreamer beheld a ladder
stretching up beyond the clouds, by. which angelic hosts
might descend to guard and comfort the forlorn pilgrim.
In short, the leaders of Israel sought to console and com-
pensate their nation for the humiliations she had to endure
in the secular sphere by raising her to a position of sup1e-
macy in the spiritual. For this purpose they constructed or
perfected an elaborate system of religious ritual designed to
forestall and engross the divine favour, and so to make Zion
the holy cit:y, the joy and centre of God's kingdom on earth.
With these aims and ambitions the tone of public life became
more and more clerical, its interests ecclesiastical, its pre-
dominant i11fluence priestly. The king was replaced by
the high priest, who succeeded even to the purple robes and
1
golden crown of his predecessor. The revolution which
thus substituted a line of pontiffs for a line of temporal
rulers at Jerusalem, was like that which converted the Rome
of the Ccesars into the Rome of the medi~val Popes.
'The It is this movement of thought, this current of religious
Priestly
Code deals aspirations setting strongly in the direction of e<;:clesiasticism,
rather with which is reflected, we may almost say arrested and crystal-
the formal
side of lized, in the Priestly Code.

The intellectual and moral
religion limitations of the movement are mirrored in the correspond-
than with
its deeper ing limitations of the writer. It is the formal side of
problems. religion in which alone he is really interested ; it is in the
.
1
W. Robertson Smith, The Old Testa1nent i1i the Jewish Church, 2 p. 445.
CH. IV . THE HEBREW STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD 133

details of rites and ceremonies, of ecclesiastical furniture and

ga.rments, that he revels with genuine gusto. The deeper
side of religion is practically a sealed book for him : its moral
and spiritual aspects he barely glances at : into the profound
problems of immortality and the origin of evil, which have
agitated inquiring spirits in all the ages, he never enters.
With his abso1ptio11 in the minuti~ of ritual, his indifference
to pu1ely secular affairs, his predilection for chronology and
genealogy, for dates and figures, in a word, for the dry bones
rather than the flesh and blood of history, the priestly
histo1ian is like one of those monkish chroniclers of the
Middle Ages who looked out on the great world through
the narrow loophole of a cloistered cell or the many-tinted
glass of a cathedral window. His intellectual horizon was
narrowed, the atmosphere in which he beheld events was
coloured, by tl1e medium through which he saw them. Thus
the splendours of the Tabernacle in the wilderness, invisible
to all eyes but his, are as if they had loomed on his heated
imagination through the purple lights of a rose-window or
the gorgeous panes of some flamboyant oriel. Even in the
slow processes or sudden catastrophes which have fashioned
or transformed the material universe he discerned little more
than the signs and \Vonders vouchsafed by the deity to
herald new epochs of religious dispensation. For him the
work of creation was a grand prelude to the institution of
1
tl1e sabbath. The vault of heaven itself, spangled \Vith
glorious luminaries, was a magnificent dial-plate on \vhich
the finger of God pointed eternally to tl1e co11ect seasons of
2
the feasts in the ecclesiastical calendar. The deluge, which
swept away almost the \.vhole of manl<ind, was the occasion
which the repentant deity tool< to establish a covenant \.Vith
the mise1able survivors ; and t}:le rainbow, glo\vi11g in iri-
descent radiance agair1st the murl<y storm-cloud, was nothing
but the divine seal appended to tl1e covena11t as a gt1a1antec
of its ger1uine and irrevocable character.B
1 Genesis ii. I sq. so1ne circ11111sta11ce. Tl1e co111111011est
2 G . . Tl1c IIc!JrC\V UJJIJlicatio11 is to tl1e .r1ic11:d .rcaso11:r of
enes1s 1. I 4.
worcl l1ere translalecl '' seaso11s '' tl1c ecclesi~1stic~1l year, \vh1ch are f1xcll
(c'!P,it:l) '' ilppears never (certainly not liy tl1e niolJJl '' ( l'ri11c'.irinl SJ.;:i1111cr, i11
in l') to lie 11secl of ll1e nalt1ral seaso11s I1is C1i1i,1tl a111l E.1.~'ft1',cr! Co111111e11t1i1:1'
<Jf tl1e year, li11t alwa)'S oi a li111c cc)n- 26 ).
011 C'e11e.ri>, [l
vcntilJnally agrccll tlJJ011, 01 lixecl liy :J Genesis ix. 8- 17.
134 THE GREAT FLOOD l'AR'l' I
Legal bent For the p1iestly historian \Vas a lawyer as well as

of tl1e
\vriter ; 11is an ecclesiastic, and as st1ch he tool( great pains to prove
.1ns1stence
. ~
that the friendly relations of God to his people rested

on
covenants. on a strictly legal basis, being authe11ticated by a series
of contracts into which both parties entered with all due
formality. I-Ie is never so much in his element as \vhen
he is expounding these covenants ; he never wearies of
recalling the long series of Israel's title-deeds. Nowhe1e
does this dryasdust antiquary, this rigid ritualist, so sensibly
relax his no1mal severity, nowhere does he so nearly unbend
and thaw, as when he is expatiating on the congenial subject
of contracts and conveyances. , His masterpiece of historical
narrative is acknowledged to be his account of the negotia-
tions into which the wido\\'ed Abraham entered with the
sons of Heth in order to obtain a family vault in which to
1
bury his wife. The lugubrious nature of the transaction
does not damp the professional zest of the narrator ; and the
picture he has drawn of it combines the touches of no mean
artist with the minute exactitude of a practised conveyancer.
At this distance of time the whole scene still passes before
us, as similar scenes may have passed before the eyes of the
w1iter, and as they may still be witnessed in the East, when
two well-bred A.l\.rab sheikhs fence dexterously over a point
of business, while they observe punctiliously the stately forms
and courtesies of Oriental diplomacy. But such pictures are
rare _indeed in this artist's gallery. . Landscapes he hardly
attempted, and his portraits are daubs, lacking all indivi-
duality, life, and colour. In that of Moses, \Vhich he labou1ed
most, the great leader is little more than a lay-figure rigged
out to distribute ecclesiastical upholstery and millinery. 2
High Very different are the pictures of the patriarchal age
litera1y
q11ality bequeathed to us by the author of the. Jehovistic document.
of the In purity of outline, lightness and delicacy of touch, and
Jehovistic
document . warmth of colouring, they are unsurpassed, perhaps un-
. equalled, in literature. The finest effects are produced by
the fewest strokes, because every stroke is that of a master
who knows instinctively just what to put in and what to
leave out. Thus, while his whole attention seems to be
1 Genesis xxiii.
2
W. Robertson Smith, The Old Testa111ent in the Jewislt l'h11rch, 2 p. 4o9.
'
given to the human figures in the foreground, who stand out

frotn the canvas with lifelike truth and solidity, he contrives
simultaneously, with a few deft, almost imperceptible touches,
to indicate the landscape behind them, and so to complete
a harmonious picture. which stamps itself indelibly on the
memory. The scene, for example, of Jacob and Rachel at
the well, with the flocks of sheep lying rot1nd it in the noon~
tide heat, is as vivid in the writer's words as it is in the
colours of Raphael.
And to this exquisite picturesqueness in the delineation Naive
of human life lie adds a charming narvety, an antique :1~~r~fs~~
simplicity, in his descriptions of the divine. He carries us of tte
back to the days of old, when no such awful gulf was sup- ~~~~~stic
posed to yavvn between man and the deity. In his pages
we read how God moulded the first man out of clay, as a
1
child shapes its mud baby ; how he walked in the garden
in the cool of the evening and called to the shamefaced
2
couple who had been skulking behind trees ; how he made
coats of skin to replace the too scanty fig-leaves. of our first
3
parents; how he shut the door behind Noah, when the
4
patriarch had entered into the ark ; how he sniffed the
5
svveet savour of the bu1ning sacrifice ; how he came down
6
to look at the tower of Babel, apparently because, viewed
from the sky, it was beyond his reach of vision ; ho\v he
conversed with Abraham at the door of his tent, in the heat
7
of the day, under the shadow of the whispe1ing oaks. In
short, the whole work of this delightful writer is instinct
with a breath of poetry, with something of the freshness and
fragrance of the olden time, which invests it with an ineffable
8
and immortal charm.
1 Genesis ii. 7. Part iv. chap. xv., ''Sacred Oal;:s and
2 (;enesis iii. 8 sq. Terebintl1s. ''
3 Genesis iii. 2 I. 8 As t0 tl1e two doct1111ents, the
4 Genesis vii. I 6. Je11ovistic (J) ancl the P1iestly (l'), see

0 Genesis viii. 2 l. \V. IZobertson S1nith, 771e Ol1l Je.rta-
G Genesis xi. 5 and 7. 1nent i1z t/ze Jeivis!t Ch111ch, 2 Pl) 319
7 Genesis xviii. l sqq. In tl1e sqq., 381 oqq., 442 oqq.; J. I<;stli11
English ~uthorized Version. the trees Car1Jenter anci G. 1Iarfcird-13attersby,
have disapr;earecl from the p1ctt1re a11cl The Hexate111h, i. 33 .rqq., 97 sqq.,
I 2 l sqq. ; E. l(autscl1, Die heil1ge
been replaced by plains. 'fhey . are
rightly restored in the IZevis:d Version, Sch1-i(t
, de; A!te11 Te.rfa111c11ts (l''reib111g
thot1gh the correct re11cler1ng of the i. 1~. 11ncl Lei1Jzig, l 894), ii. 150 .rqq.,
l 88 sqq. ; \V. II. l{e1111ett, Ge11c.ri;,
IIelJrew wore} is perha]JS rather '' tere-
l>it1ths '' tl1an '' oal{s. '' Sec below, pp. 9 sqq., 22 .>qq., 34 :;qq.; vV. II.
THE CREA T FLOOD PART I
Verbal In the composite narrative of the Great Flood which we

differe11ces
bet\vee11 the pos?ess in Genesis, tl1e separate ingredients contributed by
Jehovistic tl1e J ehovistic and the Priestly documents respectively are
a11d the -
Priestly distinguishable fro1n eac;:h other both by verbal and by
documents. mate1ial differences. To take the ve1bal differences first,
the most striking is that in the Hebrew original the deity is
t1niformly designated, ir:i the J ehovistic document by the
name of Jehovah (jahiveh ), and in the Priestly document by
the name of Elohz'nz, which in the English version are
rendered respectively by the words '' Lord '' and '' God." In
representing the Hebrew jeftovah (jahweh) by ''Lord," the
English translators follow the practice of the Jews, \Vho, in
reading the Scriptures aloud, uniformly substitute the title
Adonaz or'' Lord'' for the sacred name of Jehovah, wherever
they find the latter written in the text. Hence the English
reader may assume as a general rule that in the passages of
the English version, whe1e the title ''Lord'' is applied to the
Bennett and W. F. Adeney, A Bz"b!ica! been carried out at a late1 date, per-
I1zt1od1tct1.'on, 5 pp. 20 sqq. ; S. R. haps about 400 B.c. See J. Estlin
Driver, Introductioiz to tlze Lite1ature Carpenter and G. Harford-Battersl)y,
of the O!d Testa1ne1zt,9 pp. 10 sqq., The Hexateuch, i. r76 sqq. ; W. H.
116 sqq. ; id., Tlze Book of Ge1iesis,10 Bennett and F. W. Adeney, op. cit.,
Introduction, pp. iv. sqq. ; l{. Budde, pp. 56 sqq. Besides the Priestly Cocle
Geschichte der a!thebrais,heiz Litteratztr, (P) and the J ehovistic document (J),
pp. 45-65, 183-205; J. Skinner, the two main constituents of tl1e
Critz'cal aizd Exe;;'etz'ca! Com11tenta1y on Hexateuch are Deuteronomy (tl1e D of
Genesis, pp. xxxii-lxvii; H. Gunkel, the critics) and the Elohistic doc11ment
Ge1zesis iibersetzt ztnd erk/a1t 3 (Gottin- (tl1e E of the critics). Of these, the
gen, 1910), pp. lxxx sqq., xcii sqq. ; Elohistic is the older ; it is generally
A. T. Cha1)man, Introdztctio1z to tlze believed to have been composeq in
Pe1ztateztch (Cambridge, 191 r), pp. 50 Northern Israel not very long after tl1e
sqq., 207 sqq. ; R. Kittel, Geschichte J ehovistic document, perha1Js early in
des Vo/kes Israel 2 (Gotha, r909-r9r2), tl1e eighth century B.c. In style and
i. 273-333, ii. 398 sqq. ; H. E. Ryle, character it is akin to tl1e J ehovistic
7'/ze Book of Ge1zesis (C:ambriclge, r9r4), doc111nent, but the writer is not so
J)p. xviii sqq. Critics seem generally great a literary artist, though his reli-
to agree tl1at the Priestly Code is gious and moral standpoint is somewhat
tl1e fra111eworl{ into which tl1e three more advanced. Unlike the J ehovistic
otl1er main constitt1ents of the I-Iexa- writer, he uses the divine name Elohi111
teucl1 ha\e been fitted, anrl tl1at it for God instead of Jehoval1. It is
was sul1stantially '' tl1e boo!{ of the generally believed that the main part
law of Moses'' which was publicly of Deuteronomy is ''the boo!{ of the
promt1lgated by Ezra at Jert1salen1 in law'' whicl1 was found in the temple at
444 B.C. and accepted by the people Jerusalem in 62r B.C. and formed the
as the basis of a ne1v reformation basis of Josiah's rl!forn1ation (2 Kings
(Nehemiah viii.). But the wor}{ of xxii. 8 sqq. ). On these matters the
combini11g the Priestly Code with the reacler will find the evidence stated ancl
otl1er docume11ts, so as to form our discussed in the works mentioned at
p1esent 1-Iexateuch, appears to have tl1e beginning of this note.
CH. rv THE HEBREW STOJ?.Y OF A GREAT FLOOD 137
.
deity, the name Jehovah stands for it in the written or printed

1
Hebrew text. . But ii1 the narrative of the flood and t11rough-
out Genesis the. Priestly writer avoids the use of the name
Jehovah and substitutes for it the term Elohi1n which is the
. '
ordinary Hebrew word for God ; and his reason for doing so
is that according to him the divine name Jehovah was first
2
revealed .by God to Moses, and therefore could not have been
applied to him in the earlier ages of the world. On the other
hand, the J ehovistic writer has no such theory as to the
revelation of the name Jehovah ; hence he bestows it on the
deity >vithout scruple from the creation on\vards.
Apart from this capital distinction between the documents,
there are verbal differences which do not appear in the
English translation. Thus, 011e set of words is used for
'' male and female'' in the J ehovistic document, and quite a
3
different set in the Priestly. Again, the words translated
'' destroy'' in the English version . are different in the two
4
documents, and similarly with the vords which the English
5 6
translators represent by ''die'' and ''dried."
But the material differences between the Jehovistic and Material
1y narratives
th e P riest "11 k bl d
are st1 more remar a e, an as t ey h differences
bet\veenthe
amount in some cases to positive contradictions, the proof Jehovistic
and the
that they emanate from separate documents may be regarded Priestly
as complete. Thus in the J ehovistic narrative the clean narratives
. 1 d" . .
an1ma s are ist1ngu1s e h d f h 1 d h"l
rom t e unc ean, an w 1 e seven oftheflood.
Their dis-
of every sort of clean animals are admitted to the ark, crepanhcies
as to t e
only a pair of each sort of unclean animals is suffered to animals.
7
enter. On the other hand, the Priestly writer makes 110
1 See E. Kautsch, in Encyclopcedz"a sometimes translated ''give tip the
.. 3320 sqq., s.v. ''N ames '' ;
B z"bl"zca, II. ghc>st. ''
A. T. Chapman, Introduction to the o :l"JQ in J (viii. I 3), t:i.:;i; in P (viii.
Pentateuch, pp. 5I sq. I 4). All tl1e foregoing and otl1er
2 Exoclus vi. 2 sq. verbal diffe1ences between tl1e t\vo
3 iT;lrf':I) rtii:e in J (vii. 2 ), n.ti?.~l i~J documents. are noted by 1)1incipal J.
in P (vi. 19, vii. 9. 16). SJ,i11ner i11 his C'1itzcal a11d Exer:etical
'
4 nnr.i
TT
in J (vi. 7, vii. 4, 23), nJ:!IU T
in Co111111e1ztary 011 Ge11esis, p. I 48. Co111-
P (vi. 13, 17, ix. I I, 15). The former pare }]. (}t1nkel, Ge11esis 1ibe1set:::t 111111
word means properly ''blot ot1t,'' as it e1kla1t a (Got ti11gen, 191 o ), p. 1 38.
is rendered in the margin of the Englisl1 1 Genesis vii. 2, co1111)are viii. 20.
'
I~evised Version ; the latter is the Tl1e tlebre\v pl1rase ( :i;it? :"!?~) in vii.
ordinary 1-Iebrew word for ''destroy.'' 2 is co1n111only 1111de1stoocl to mean
5 nlr.i in J (vii. 22), ll)~ in J> (vi. I 7, seven pa1'1s ; bt1t in accor<lance with
vii. 21 ). The former is the <>rclinary I-Iebrew idio111 it can cinly mean seve11
IIel)rew wore! fc)r ''die''; the latter is i111ii'vi"1i11als of each sort, as my teacl1er
THE CREA T FLOOD PART I
such invidious distinction between the animals, but admits

them to the ark 011 a footing of perfect equality, thot1gh at
the same time he impartially limits them all alil<e to a single
couple of eacl1 sort. 1
T.he explanati~n of this discrepancy
is that in the view of the Priestly writer the distinction be-
tween clean Rnd t1nclean animals was first revealed by God
2
to Moses, and could not therefore have been l<novvn to his
predecessor Noah; whereas the J ehovistic vvriter, untroubled
by any such theory, narvely assumes the distinction betvveen
clean and unclean animals. to 11ave been fatniliar to mankind
from the earliest times, as if it rested on a natural difference
too obvious to be overlooked by anybody.
Discrep- Another serious discrepancy between the t\vo \Vriters
~~~~eenthe relates to the duration of the flood. In the Jehovistic narra-
3
Jehovistic tive the rain lasted foity days and forty nights, and after-
and the
Priestly wards Noah passed three weeks in the ark before the water
writers as had subsided enough to let him land. 4 On this reckoning
to the
duration of the flood lasted sixty-one days. On tl1e other hand, in the
the flood. Priestly narrative it was a hundred and fifty days before the
water began to si11k,5 and the flood lasted altogether for
. twelve months and ten days. 6 As the Hebrew months were
lunar, twelve of them would amount to three hundred and
fifty-four days, and ten days added to them would give a
7
solar year of three hundred and sixty-four days. Since the
Priestly writer thus assigns to the duration of
~ .
the flood the
approximate length of a solar year, we may safely assume
that he lived at a time when the Jews were able to correct the
serious error of the lunar calendar by observation of the sun.
Again, the two writers differ from each other in the
and friend, the Rev. Professor R. H. 4-20.

l(ennett, has kindly pointed out to me 3 Genesis vii. i2, 17.
in a letter. See Gesenius' Hebrew 4 Genesis viii. 6- l 3.
Gra11i11tar as edited and enlarged by E. 6 Genesis viii. 3.
R"autsch, Second English Edition, re- 6 Genesis vii. l l compared with viii .
vised by A. E. Cowley (Oxford, 1910), 14.
p. 436, l 34 q. The phrase, as was to 7 S. R. Driver, The Book of Ge1zesis, IO
be expected, is rightly understood by p. 85 ; J. Skinner, Critical and Exe-
W. Robertson Smith ( 7'he Old Testa- getical Co1n11ient~ry on Gene.>is, pp:
11ze1zt i1z the Jew1~sh Church, 2 p. 329), 167 sqq. ; H. Gt1nkel, Genesis uber-
and Principal J. Sl{inner ( Co11i1nenta1y setzt und erklart, 3 pp. 146 sq. ; A. T.
on Genesis, p. l 52). . Chapman, I1ztrodttction to the Penta-
1 Genesis vi. 19 sq., vii. 15 sq.
teuch, p. 79; H. E. Ryle, The Book
2 Leviticus xi. ; Deuteronomy xiv. of Ge1zesis, p. l l 3.
CH. Iv THE HEBREW STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD 139
causes which they allege for the flood ; for vvhereas the Discrep-
J e~ovistic writer puts it down to rain only, 1 the Priestly ancy as to
the cause of
writer speaks of subterranean waters bursting forth as well the flood.
as of sheets of water descending from heaven. 2
Lastly, the J ehovistic writer represents Noah as building Discrep-
an altar and sacrificing to God in giatitude for his escape ancy ~s ~0
3 the bu1ld1ng
from the flood. The Priestly writer, on the other hand, of an altar.
makes no mention.
either of the altar or of the sacrifice
'
no a:;_ct ~he
011er1ng o
f
doubt because frotn the sta11dpoint of the Levitical law, which sacrifice.
he occupied, there could be no legitimate altar anywhere but
in the temple at Jerusalem, and because for a mere layma11
like Noah to offe1 a sacrifice would have been an unheard-of
imp1opriety, a gross encroachment on the rights of the clergy
which he could not for a moment dream of imputing to the
respectable patriarch.
Thus a comparison of the J ehovistic and the Priestly Acompari-
t . 1 fi h 1 . f h
narra 1ves strong y con rms t e cone us1on o t e critics t at the two. . h son of
the two were originally independent, and that the J ehovistic narratives
. cons1'd era bl y t h e o ld er. F or t h e Je h ov1stic
1s . . writer
. . c1ear1y confirms
1s of the flood
ignorant of the law of the one sanctuary, which forbade the the .
conclusion
offering of sacrifice anywhere but at Jerusalem ; and as that tl1at the
law vvas first clearly enunciated and enforced by King Josiah JehdoPvi~tic
a11 r1est1y
in 62 I B.C.,. it fo!lO\VS that the J ehovistic document must documents
have been composed some time, probably a long time, before ~r~~~nally
that date. f'or a like reason the Priestly document must indepen-
. b bl 'd
h ave b een compose d some time, pro a y a consi era e time, that thebl dent, a11d
after that date, since the writer implicitly recognizes the law Jehovistic
. . b h f . 1s the older
of the one sanctuary by re f using to impute a reac o 1t to ~fthe two.
Noah. Thus, whereas the J ehovistic writer betrays a certain
archaic simplicity in artlessly attributing to the earliest ages
of the world the religious institutions and phraseology of his
own time, the Priestly writer reveals the reflection of a later
age, which has worked out a definite theory of religious
evolution and applies it rigidly to history.
A very cursory comparison of the Hebrew with the
Babylonian account of the Deluge may suffice to convince us
that the two narratives are not independent, but that one of
them must be derived from the other, or both from a co1nmon
1 Genesis vii. 12. 2Genesis vii. I I, co1111Ja1e viii. 2.
3 Genesis viii. 20 sq.
'
THE GREAT FLOOD ,PART I
Tl1e original. The points of resemblance between the two are far
Hebrew
and the too numerous and detailed to be accidental. In both narra-
Babylo11iar1tives the divine powers resolve to destroy manl<:ind by a
stories of
the flood great flood ; in both the secret is revealed beforel1and to a
resemble man by a god, \vho directs him to build a great vessel, in
each other
too closely which to save himself and seed of every kind. It is probably
to be inde- 110 mere accidental coincidence that in the Babylo11ian story,
pendent.
as reported by Berosus, the hero saved from the flood was
the tenth King of Babylon, and that in the I-Iebrew story
Noah was the tenth man in descent from Adam. I11 both
narrative~ the favoured man, thus warned of God, builds a
huge vessel in several stories, mal<:es it water-tight \vith pitch
or bitumen, and takes into it his family and animals of all

sorts: in both, the deluge is brought about in large measure
by heavy rain, and lasts for a greater or less number of days:
in both, all mankind are drowned except the hero and his
family: in both, the man sends forth birds, a raven and a
dov~, to see whether the water of the flood has abated: ln
,
both, the dove after a time returns to the ship because it

could find no place in which to rest : in both, the raven does
not return : in both, the vessel at last grounds on a mountain:
in both, the hero, in g1atitude for his rescue, offers sacrifice
on the mountain : in both, the gods smell the s\veet savour,
and their anger is appeased.
In the So much for the general resemblance between the Baby-
Hebre\v l '
stoiy the onian story as a whole and the Hebrew story as a
Jehovi~tic whole. But if \Ve take into account, the separate elements
11arrat1ve f h H b . .
agrees more o t e e rew story, we shall see that the Jehov1st1c
closely than narrative is in closer agreement than the Priestly with the
the Priestly B b l
narrative
.
a y on1an. Al'k . h J h . . .
l e in t e e ov1st1c and 1n the Babylonian
with the
Baby1011ian
narrative special prominence is given to the number seven.
story. In the Jehovistic version, Noah has a seven days' warning
of the coming deluge: he takes seven of every sort of
clean animals with him into the ark: he allows intervals of
seven days to ela1)se bet,veen the successive despatches of
the dove from the ark. In the Babylonian version the flood
lasts at its greatest height for seven days ; and the hero sets
out the sacrificial vessels by sevens on the mountain. Again,
alike in the Jehovistic anc:I the Babylonian version, special
mention is made of shutting the ,door of the ship or ark
CH. IV. THE HEBREW STORY OFA GREAT FLOOD 141
when the man, his family, and the animals have entered into
it: in both alike' we have the pic~uresque episode of sending
forth the raven and the dove from the vessel, and in both
alike the offering of the sacrifice, the smelling of it by the
gods, and their consequent appeasement. On the otl1er hand,
in .certain particulars the Priestly narrative in Genesis
approaches more closely than the J ehovistic to the Baby-
lonian. Thus, in both the Priestly and the Babylonian
version exact directions are given for the construction of the
vessel : in both alike it is built in several stories, each of
which is divided into numerous cabins: in both alike it is
made water-tight by being caulked with pitch or bitumen :
in both alike it grounds on a mountain ; and in both alike
on issuing from the vessel the hero receives the divine
blessing.
But if tl1e Hebrew a11d Babylonian narratives are closely The
related to each otl1er, how is the relation to be explained? sHtebrewf ory o
The Babylonian can11ot be derived from the Hebrew, since the flood
it is older than the Hebrew by at least eleven or twelve ~~~~a~~:~
centuries. Moreover, ''as Zimmern has remarl{ed, the very ultimately
essence o f t h e B l"bl"ica1 narra t'ive presupposes a country l'ra bl e, from

derived
like Babylonia, to inundations ; so that it cannot be doubted Babylonia;

that the story was 'indigenous in Babylonia, and transplanted ~u:b~:s
1
to Palestine.''' But if the Hebrews derived the story of were . d
acc1ua1nte
the great flood from Babylonia, when and how did they do \vith it long
so? We have no information on the subject, and the question bBebore t~e
a y1on1an
can only be answered conjecturally. Some scholars of repute captivity.
have supposed that the Jews first learned the legend in
Babylon during the captivity, and that the Biblical narrative
is consequently not older than the sixth century before our
era. 2 This view might be tenable if we only possessed the
Hebrew version of the Deluge legend in the Priestly recension ;
for the Priestly Code, as we saw, was probably composed
during or after the captivity, and it is perfectly possible that
the writers of it acquired a l<:nowledge of the Babylonian
tradition either orally or from Babylonian literature during
their exile or perhaps after their return to Palestine ; for it
I S. R. Driver, Th!!BookefGenesi's, 10 by E. Schracler, 7'/1e C1r11eifor111 111-
I) 107. .
:;cription; a1zd the Old 7est1i111c11t, i.
2 This i.<;, or was, tl1e op1n1on of 5 5. 1'hc vie\v is rightly iejected l)y
J.'. llaupt and Fr. Dclitsch, as reported Schracler.
T.f.IE GREAT FLOOD !'ART I
is reasonable to suppose that the i11timate relations which the

conquest established between the two countries may have led
to a certain diffusion of. Babylonian lite1ature i11 Palestine,
and of Jewish literature in Babylonia. 011 this view some
of the poi11ts in which the Priestly narrative departs from the
Jehovistic and approximates to the Babylonian may con-
ceivably have been borrowed directly by the Priestly writers
from Babylonian sources. Such points are the details as to
the construction of the ark, and in particular the smearing of
it with pitch or bitumen, which is a characteristic product of
1
Babylonia. But that the Hebrews we1e acquainted with the
story of the great flood, and that too in a form closely akin
to the Babylonian, long before they were carried away into
captivity, is abundantly proved by tl1e J el1ovistic narrative in
Genesis, which may well date from the ninth century before
our era and can hardly be later than the eighth.
HO\V and Assuming, then, that the Hebrews i11 Palestine \Vere
1
wl en the familiar from an early time with the Babylonian legend of
Hebre\VS
learned the the deluge, we have still to ask, how and when did they
sfltordy of
oo we o tdhe learn it? Two answers to the question have been given.
not l<now. On the one hand, it has been held that the Hebrews may
have brought the legend with them, when they migrated
from Babylonia . to Palestine about two thousand years
2
before Christ. On the other hand, it has been suggested
that, after their settlement in Palestine, the Hebrews may
have borrowed the story from the native Canaanites, who in
their turn may have lear11ed it through the medium of
Babylonian literature sometime in the second 1nillennium
<
3
before our era. Which, if either, of these views is the true
one, we have at present no mea11s of deciding.
1 Herodotus i. l 79, \Vith the note above, p. I 2 l, note 2.
in George Rawlinson's translation 3
H. Gressmann, in Das Gz'lga111esth-
(Fourth Edition, vol. i., London, 1880, Epos iibei-setzt u1zd erkliirt von A.
p. 300). Ungnad und H. Gressmann, p. 220.
... 011.t~is theory see Principal J. Skinner,
2 This is the view of Professor M. Crztzcal ~nd Exe.g-etical Commentary
Jastrow (Hebrew a?td Babylonian Tra- on Genesis, p. x, who objects to it
ditions, pp. l 3 sqq. ), who identifies that '' there are no recognisable traces
Abrahan1's contemporary, Amraphel, of a specifically Canaanite medium
l(ing of Shinar (Genesis xiv. 1), with having been interposed between the
Ha1nn1urabi, J(ing of Babylon, thl1s Babylonian originals and the llebrew
dating Abraham and his migration accounts of the Creation and the Flood
from Babylonia to Palestine about 2100 such as we may surmise in the case of'
B.C. As to Hammurabi's date, see the Paradise myth.''
cH.1v 1'HE HEBREW STORY OF A GREAT FLOOD

143
I 11 later times Jewish fancy tricked out the story of the Fa11ciful
flood with many new and often extravagant details designed a?ditions
f made by
apparen tl Y t o sat1s y the curiosity or tickle the taste of a the Jews to
degeperate age, which could not rest satisfied with the noble tlie story ?f
i f h the flood in
s1mp 1c1ty o t e narrative in Genesis. Among these tawdry late1times.
or grotesque additions to the ancient legend we read how
men lived at ease in the days before the flood, for by a
single sowing they reaped a harvest sufficient for the needs
of forty years, and by their magic arts they could compel the
sun and moon to do them service. Instead of nine months
children \Vere in their mothers' \vombs only a few days, and
immediately 011 their birth could walk
and talk and set even
the demons at defia11ce. It was this easy luxurious life that
led men astray and lured them into the commission of those
sins, especially the sins of \vantonness and rapacity, which
excited the wrath of God an.cl determined him to destroy the
sinners by a great flood. Yet in his 1nercy he gave them
due warning; for Noah, instructed by the deity, preached to
them to mend their ways, threatening them with the flood as

the punishment of their iniquity ; and this he did for no less
than one hundred and twenty years. Even at the end of
that period God gave mankind another \Veek's grace, during

which, strange to say, the sun rose in the west every morning
and set in the east every night. But nothing could move

these wicked men to repentance ; they only mocked and

jeered at the pious Noah \vhen they sa\v him building the
ark. He learned how to mal{e it from a holy book, which The book
had been give11 to Adam by the angel Raziel and which ~a~~=l~ngel
contained within it all kno\vledge, human and divine. It
was made of sapphires, and Noah enclosed it in a golden
casket when he took it with him into the arl{, wl1ere it served
him as a time-piece to distinguish night from day ; for so
long as the flood prevailed neither the sun nor tl1e moo11 shed
any light on the earth. Now the deluge was caused by the
male waters from the sky meeting the female \vaters \vhich
issued forth from the ground. The holes in the sky by
which the upper waters escaped were made by God when
he removed two stars out of the constellation of the Pleiades ;
and in order to stop this torrent of rain God had afterwards
to bung up the two 11oles with a couple of stars borrowed
144 THE GREAT FLOOD PAJ{'[' I
'
.
from tl1e constellation of the Bear. That is why the Bear

runs after the Pleiades to this day: she wants her children
bacl(, but she v.rill never get them till after the Last Day.
The When the ark was ready, Noah p1oceeded to gather
animals
taken i11to the animals into it. They came trooping in such numbers
the arl{, that the patria1ch could not tal(e them all in, but
had to sit at the door of the ark and make a choice ; the
animals wl1ich lay down at the doo1 he took in, and the
animals which stood up he shut out. Even after t11is prin-
ciple of natural selection had been rigidly enforced, the
number of species of reptiles which were taken on board
was no less than three hundred and sixty-five, and the
number of species of birds thirty-two. No note was taken,
at least none appears to have been recorded, of the number
of ma1n1nals, but many of them were among tl1e passengers,
as we shall see presently. Before the flood the unclean animals
far outnumbered the clean, but after the flood the proportions
1
were reversed, because seven pairs of each of the clean sorts
\Vere preserved in the arl(, but only two pairs of the unclean.
One creature, the rel11z, was so huge that there \Vas no room for
it in the ark, so Noah tethered it to the outside of the vessel, and
Og, l{ing the animal trotted behind. The giant Og, king of Bashan, was
of Bashan,
on the top also much too big to go into the ark, so he sat on the top of
of the ark; it, and in that way escaped with his life. With Noah himself

Falsehood
and in the ark were his wife N aamah, daughter of Enosh, and
Misfortune his three sons ,and their wives. An odd pair who also found
in the ark.
refuge in the ark were Falsehood and Misfortune. At first
Falsehood presented himself alone at the door of the ark,
but was refused a passage. on the ground that there was no
admission except for married couples. So he went away,
and 1neeting with Misfortune induced her to join him, and
the pair were received into the ark. When all were aboard,
and the flood began, the sinners gathered some seven hundred
thousand strong round about the ark and begged and prayed
fo be taken in. When Noah sternly refused to admit them,
they made a rush at the door as if to break it in, but the
wild beasts that were on guard round about the ark fell upon
them and devoured some of them, and all that escaped the
beasts were drowned in the rising flood. A whole year the
1
But see above, p. I 37, note 7
ark floated on the face of the waters ; it pitched and tossed

on the heaving billows, and all inside of it were shaken up
like lentils in a pot. The lions roared, the oxen lowed, the
wolves howled, and the rest bellowed after their several
sorts. But the great difficulty with which Noah had to
struggle in the ark was the question of victuals. Long after- The diffi- .
wards his son Shem confided to Eliezer the servant of cult~ of
' . feeding the
Abraham, the trouble his father had had in feedirtg the animals in
whole menagerie. The poor man was up and down, up and the ark.
down, by day and by night. For the daylight animals had
to be fed by day and the nocturnal animals by night ; and
the giant Og had his rations served out to him through a
hole in the roof. Though the lion suffered the whole time
from a fever, which kept him comparatively quiet, yet he
was very surly and ready to fly out on the least pro-
vocation. Once when Noah did not bring him his dinner
fast enough, the noble animal gave him such a blow \vith his
paw that the patriarch was lame for the rest of his natural
life and therefore incapable of serving as a priest. It was on
the tenth day of the month Tammuz that Noah sent forth
the raven to see and report on the state of the flood. But
the raven found a corpse floating on the water and set to
work to devour it, so that he quite forgot to return and hand
in his report. A week later Noah sent out the dove, which
at last, on its third flight, brought back in its bill an olive
leaf plucked on the Mount of Olives at Jerusalem ; for the
Holy Land had not been ravaged by the deluge. When he
stepped out of the ark Noah w,ept to see the widespread
devastation wrought by the flood. A thank-offering for his
delivery was offered by his son Shem, for the patriarch him-
self was still suffering from the effects of his encounter with
1
the lion and could not officiate in person.
From another late account we learn some interesting 1Aate 110
t hei.
1e\v1s11
particulars as to the internal arrangements of the arl<: and version of
the distribution of the passengers. The beasts and cattle
the flood
story.
were battened down in the hold, tl1e middle deck was occupied
by the birds, and the promenade deck was 1eserved for Noah
and his family. But the men and the women were l..:ept
strictly apart. The patriarch and his sons lodged in the east
1 I,. (}inzberg, 7Yte Lege1tds of the Jews, i. (Philatlelphia, I 909) PP I 51- I 67
VOL.I L
THE GREAT FLOOD PAR'I' I
end of the ark, and his wife and his sons' \Vives lodged in
the west end; and between them as a barrier was interposed
the dead body of Adam, which was thus rescued from a
watery grave. This account, which further favours us with
the exact dimensions of the ark in cubits and the exact
day of the \veek and of the month when the passengers
got aboard, is derived from an Arabic manuscript found in
the library of the Convent of St. Catherine on Mount Sinai.
The author would seem to have been an Arab Christian,
who flourished about the time of the Mohammedan con-
1
quest, though the manuscript is of later date.
4. Ancient Greek Stories of a Great Flood

Greek Legends of a destructive deluge, in which the greater
legend of part of mankind perished, meet us in the literature of ancient
:0~ ~~ as Greece. As told by the mythographer Apollodorus, the
0
Apollo- story runs thus : '' Deucalion was the son of Prometheus.
dorus.
How He reigned as king in the country about Phthia and married
Deucalion Pyrrha, the daughter of Epimetheus and Pandora, the first
andPyrrha,
, warned by woman fashioned by the gods. But when Zeus wished to
Zeu~
coming
of the destroy the men of the Bronze Age, Deucalion by the advice
flood, saved of Prometheus constructed a chest or ark, and having stored
themselves
in an ::\rk, in it what was needful he entered into it with his wife. But
and Zeus poured a great rain from the sky upon the earth and
~~;e:~~~~ washed down the greater part of Greece, so that all men
the worl~ perished except a fe\v, who flocked to the high mountains
bythro\v1ng
stones near. Th h .
en t e mot1nta1ns in . Th . I
essay were parted, and a 11
over their the world beyond the Isthmus and Peloponnese was over-
shoulders. I I ' d
\V 1e me .
B ut D 1 . h k fl .
euca ion 1n t e ar , oat1ng over t e sea h
for nine days and as many nights, grounded on Parnassus,
and there, when the rains ceased, he disembarked and
sacrificed to Zeus, the God of Escape. And Zeus sent
I Studz"a Si1iaz"tica, No. viii., Apo- high. It was Friday the 17th of
crypha Arabica, edited and t1anslated March or, accordi11g to others, of May,
into English by Margaret Dunlop . when the body of Adam was brought
Gibson (London and Cambridge, into the ark ; and all the passengers,
1901 ), pp. 23-30, with the Editor's both animal and human, got on boa;d
Introduction, pp. vii sqq. According the next day. The flood fell, and
to this account the arl{ was 300 c11bits Noah and his company quitted the ark,
long by 50 cubits broad and 30 cubits on a day in Nisan (April).
CHAP. rv GREEK STORIES OF A CREA T FLOOD 147
Hermes to him and allowed him to choose 'vhat he would
- '
and he chose men. And at the biddi11g of Zeus he picked
up stones and threw them over his head and the stones
'
which Deucalion threw became men and the stones which
! ' '
Pyrrha threw became women. 1'hat is why in Greek people

are called laoz" from laas, ' a stone.' '' 1
In this form the Greek legend is not older than about Hellanicus
the middle.
of the second century before our era
the time andDPindar
on eu-
when Apollodorus wrote, but in substance it is much more calion's
ancient, for the story was told by Hellanicus, a Greek flood.
historian of the fifth century B.C., who said that Deucalion's
ark drifted not to Parnassus but to Mount Othrys in
2
Thessaly. The other version has the authority of Pindar,
who wrote earlier than Hellanicus in the fifth century B.C. ;
for the poet speaks of Deucalion and Pyrrha descending
fro1n Parnassus and creating the human race afresh out of
3
stones. According to some, the first city which they
founded after the great flood was Opus, situated in the fertile
Locrian plain between the mountains and the Euboic Gulf.
But Deucalion is reported to have dwelt at Cynus, the port of Deucalion's
Opus, dista11t a few miles across the plain ; and there his ~~:1~sa~n
\Vife's tomb was sho\vn to travellers down to the beginning the Euboic
of our era. Her husband's dust is said to have rested at Gulf.
4
Athens. The coast of Locris, thus associated with traditions
of the great flood, is rich in natural beauties. The road runs
at the foot of the mountains, which are of soft and lovely
outlines, for the most part covered with forest ; while the lo\v
hills and glades by the sea are wooded with pines, plane-
trees myrtles lentisks and other trees and shrubs, their
, ' '
luxuriant verdure fed b abundant springs. Across the blue
waters of the gulf the eye roa1ns to the island of Eubcea,
with its winding shores and long line of finely cut mountains
standing out against the sky. The home of Deucalion \vas
on a promontory jutting into the gulf. On it, and on the '
istl1mus which joins it to the land, may still be seen the
mouldering ruins of Cynus : a line of fortification \Valls, built
of sandstone, runs round the edge of the height, and the
1 Apollodor11s, J)i"b!iotheca, i. 7. 2. 3 Pinclar, Oly111p. ix. 64 sqq.
2 Scholiast on I'in<lar, O!y111p. ix.
64 ; Jra,E{11te1ita Eiisto1-i1or1;11t G1ae- Stral)o, ix.
1 4. 2, P 425, Cll.
cor1t11t, e<l. C. Mill Ier, i. 48. Cas11t1 bo11.

THE CREA T FLOOD l' AR'J' I
summit is crowned by the remains of a 1nediceval tower.

1
The ground is littered with ancient potsherds.
Deucalion's It is said that an ancient city on Parnassus was over-
~:~1;a;~id whelmed by the rains whicl1 caused the deluge, but the
to have inhabitants, guided by the howling of \Valves, found their
~~ nded way to the peaks of the mountain, and when the flood had
011
Parnassus .subsided they descended and built a new city, which they
and on a
mountain called Lycorea or Wolf-to\vn in gratitude for t e gut ance
h 'd
in Argolis. of the \Volves. 2 Lucian speal<:s of Deucalio11's ark, \vith the
solitary survivors of the hu1nan race, grou11ding on what was
afterwards the site of Wolf-town, while as yet all the rest
3
of the world was submerged. But according to anothe1
account, the mountain to which Deucalion escaped was a
peak in Argolis, which was afterwards called N emea from
the cattle which cropped the greensward 011 its grassy slopes.
There the hero built an altar in 11onour of Zeus the Deliverer,
4
who had delivered hin1 from the great flood. Tl1e mountain
on which he is said to have alighted is probably the table-
mountain, now called Phouka, whose bioad flat top to\vers
high above the neighbouring hills a11d forms a conspicuous
5
. landmark viewed from the plain of Argos.
Mega1ian The Megarians told ho\v in Deucalion's flood Megarus,
story of
the flood. son of Zeus, escaped b}' swimming to the top of Mou11t
Gerania, being guided by the cries of some cranes, which
. flew over the rising waters and from \vhich the 1nountain
Aristotleon afterwards received its r1ew name. 6 Accordi11g to Aristotle,
tl1e flood. wrr't'1ngr.1n
. th e 1ourt
r h century B.C., t h e ravages o f t h e d e1t1ge
in Deucalion's time were felt most sensibly ''in ancier1t
Hellas, which is the country about Dodona and the rive1
Achelous, for that river has changed.its bed in rnany places.
I11 those days the land was inhabited by the Selli and the
people who were then called Greeks ( Graikoi) but are now
7
named Hellenes." Some people thought that the sanctuary
1 Ludwig Ross, Wa1zdent1zgen i1z the Apesas of the ancients (Pausanias,
Grierhenla1zd (I-Ialle, 1851), i. 94 sq. ii. 5. 3, with the note in my com-
2 p at1san1as,
. x. 6 . 2. 1nentary), wl1icl1 again apj)ears to be
3 Lucian, Ti111on, 3. Else,vhere he connected with Zeus Aplzesios (De-
refers to the arl( and to the creation of liverer), to whom De11calion l111ilt an
men out of stones (De Saltatio1ze, 39). altar on the i11ountain.
4 Ety111ologicu1n llagnu1n, p. I 76, 6 Pa11sanias, i. 40. 1 (Gera11ia from,
s.v. 'A<jJE<rios, referring to the Second geranoi, ''cranes'').
Book of Arrian's Bithy1ziaca. 7 Aristotle, Jl.:feteorolog. i. I 4, p.
5 The modern Pho11l(a seems to be 352, ed. Im. Bekker (Berlin, 1831).
ClIAP. rv GREEK STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 149
of Zeus at Dodona was founded by Deucalion and Pyrrha, who

dwelt among the Molossians of that country. 1 In the fou1th
century B.C. Plato also mentions, without describing, the Plato on
flood which took place in the time of Deucalion and Pyrrha, the flood.
and he represents the Egyptian priests as ridiculing the
Greeks for believing that there had been only one deluge,
2
whereas there had been many. The Parian chronicler, who
drew up his chronological table in the year 26 5 B.c.,3 dated
Deucalion's flood one thousand two hundred and sixty-five Deucalion's
years before his own time; according to this calculation ~ood dated
4
. Ill 1539 B,C,
. t l1e catac1ysm occurred 1n the year I 5 39 B.C.
At a later age the Roman poet Ovid decked out the Ovid's
tradition of the gieat flood in the pinchbeck rhetoric which rhetorical
accou11t of
betrayed the decline of literary taste. He tells us that Deucalion's'
Jt1piter, weary of the wickedness and impiety of the men of Jfioo?up1ter
the Iron Age, resolved to destroy the whole of mankind at resolves to
one fell swoop. His first idea \Vas to overwhelm them under ~~~~:l the
the flaming tht1nderbolts vvhich he brandished in his red men of the
right hand ; but on reflection he laid these dangerous ~~ ~ ~;~d.
0
weapons aside, lest the upper air and heaven itself should .
catch fire from the great conflagration which they would
kindle on earth ; and in tl1is prudent resolution he was con-
firmed by an imperfect recollection of an old prophecy that
the whole world, sky and eartl1 alike, was destined to perish

in a grand and final combustion. Accordingly he decided

on the safer course of turning on the celestial taps a11d
drowning the whole wicked race under the tremendous I
shower bath. So he shut up tl1e North Wind in the cave
of Aeolus, to prevent him from sweeping the murky clouds Desc1iption
from the blue sky, and he let loose the South Wind, \vho dofe1the uge.
flew abroad, rigged out in all the stage properties calculated
to strike terror into the beholder. He flapped his dripping
wings : his dreadful face was veiled in pitchy blacl{ness :
mists sat on his forehead, his beard was soal(ing wet, a11d
water ran down from his hoary hair. In his train t11e sl(y
lowered, thunder crashed, and the rainbow sho11e in spangled
glory against the dark rain-clouds. To help the sl<:y-god in
1 J>Jt1tarch, Pyrrh1ts, I. (Berlin, 1825-1826), i. 380 sqq.
2 I>Jato, Ji'111aeus, PIJ 22A, 2311. 4 fofa1111or l'ariz1111, 6 J'qq., in Ji1a,f{-
:J L. I(leler, /Ia11rlb1tclt cler 1t1athe- 111e1tt<i I:li.l'to1i1011111t Graeco111111, e(l. C.
mat1'schen u11d tech11ische11 Ch1011ologie Mllller, i. 542.
THE GREAT FLOOD PAR'!' I
his onslaught on mankind his sea-blue brother Neptune

summoned an assembly of the rivers and bade them roll in
flood over the land, while he himself fetched the earth a
swashing blow with his trident, causing it to qual<e like
a 'jelly. The fountains of the great deep were now opened.
The deluge poured over the fields and meadows, whirling
away trees, cattle, men and houses. Far and wide nothi11g
was to be seen but a shoreless sea of tossing, turbid water.
The farmer no\V ro\ved in a shallop over the field v. here he
1
had lately guided the oxen at the plough-tail, and peering

down he could discern his crops and the roof of his farm-
house submerged under the waves. He dropped his anchor
on a green meadow, his keel grated on his own vineyard, a11d
'
he fished for trout in the tops of the tall elms. Seals novv
lolled and sprawled where goats had lately nibbled the
herbage, and dolphins gambolled and plunged in the vvoods.
When at last nothing remained above the waste of waters
but the t\VO peaks of Parnassus, toppling over the heaving
Deucalion billows and reaching up above the clouds, Deucalion and his
~:r~sa~s~is. wife drifted in a little boat to the mountain, and la11ding
adored the nymphs of the Corycian cave and the prophetic
goddess Themis, who managed the business of the oracle
before it was taken over by Apollo. A righteous and god-
fearing man was Deucalion, and his wife was just such
another. Touched with compassion at the sight of the
honest pair, the sole survivors of so many thousands, Jupiter
now dispersed the clouds and the deluge, revealing the blue
sky and the green earth to each other once more. So
Neptune also laid aside his trident, and summoning the
bugler Tiiton, his back blue with the growth of the purple-
shell, he ordered him to sound the '' Retire." The bugle1
obeyed, and putting the shell to his lips he blew from his
puffed cheeks such a blast that at the sound of it all the
waves and rivers fell back and left the land high and dry.
This was all very well, but what were Deucalion a11d Pyrrha
to do nov.1, left solitary. in a desolate world, where not a
sound broke the dreadful silence save the melancholy lapping
On the of the waves on the lonely shore? They shed some natural
advice
the of
Delphic t ears, an d th en w1p1~g
th em away t h ey reso1ved to consu Jt
oracle the oracle. So, pacing sadly by the yellow turbid waters of
CHAP. IV GREEK STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD
the Cephisus, they repaired to the temple of the goddess. Deucalion

The sacred edifice presented a melancholy spectacle' its walls and c1eate
Pyrrha
still overgrown with moss and sea-weed, its courts still deep n1ankind
l n s l"1me , an
d na t ura11 y no fi re ft amed or smou1dered on the afresh out
o f s t ones.
defiled altars. However, the goddess was fortunately at
home, and in reply to the anxious inquiries of the two sup-

pliants she instructed them, as soon as they had quitted the
temple, to veil their heads, unloose their robes, and throw
behind their backs the bones of their great pare11t. This
strange answer bewildered them, and for a long time they
remained silent. Pyrrha was the first to find her voice, and
when at last she broke silence it was to declare respectfully
but firmly that nothing would induce her to insult. her
mother's ghost by flinging her bones about. Her husband,
more discerning, said that perhaps by their great parent the
goddess meant them to understand the earth, and that by
her bones she signified the rocks and stones embedded in the
ground. They \Vere not very hopeful of success, but nothing
else occurring to them to do, they decided to make the attempt.
So they carried out the instructions of the oracle to the letter,
and sure enough the stones which Deucalion threw turned
into men, and the stones which Pyrrha threw turned into
1
women. Thus was the earth repeopled after the great flood.
Any one who compares the laboured ingenuity of this
account of the deluge with the majestic simplicity of the
corresponding narrative in Genesis is in a position to
measure the gulf which divides great literature from its
tinsel imitation.
In his account of the catastrophe Ovid so far followed Other .
. . . D . d p h n1ou11ta111s
ancient Greek trad1t1on as to represent euca1ion an yrr a associated
landing on the peak of Parnassus. Later Roman vvrite1s with .
Deucal1on s
carried the pair much further afield ; one of them landed flood.
2
the voyagers on Mount Athos, and another conveyed them
3
as far as Mount Etna.
Various places in Greece, as \Ve have seen, claimed the Atl1e11ian
. d . . l legend of
honour of having been associate in a part1cu ar manner l)et1calio11's
with Deucalion and the great flood. Among the claimants, fioocl.
t O~icl, Meta11zorphoses, i. 125-415 i. 9 sq.).

The fish sticking in the tops of the 2 Servit1s, on Virgil, Ellog. vi. 41.
cln1s arc l>orrowcd from I-Iorace (Odes, 3 Ifyginus, Ji'ab11ltie, 153.
THE CREA T FLOOD PAl{1' I
as might have been expected, were the Athenians, who,

plu~ing themselves on the vast antiquity fron1 which tl1ey
had inhabited the land of Attica, had no mind to be left out
in the cold \vhen it came to a questio11 of Deucalion and the
deluge. They annexed him accordingly by the simple ex-
pedient of alleging that when the clouds gathered dark on
Parnassus and the rain came do\vn in torrents on Lycorea,
where Deucalion reigned as l(ing, he fled for safety to Athens,
and on his arrival founded a sanctuary of Rainy Zeus, and
1
offe1ed thank-offerings for his escape. In this brief form of
the legend there is no mer1tion of a ship, and we seem to be
left to infer that the hero escaped on foot. Be that as it
may, he is said to have founded the old sanctuary of Olympian
Zeus and to have been buried in the city. Down to the
second century of our era the local Athenian guides pointed
The with patriotic pride to the grave of the Greek Noah near the
grave of
Deucalion later and far statelier temple of Olympian Zeus, \vhose ruined
at Athens. columns, towering in solitary grandeur above the modern
city, still attract the eye from far, and bear silent but eloquent
2
witness to tl1e glories of ancient G1eece.
Festival of Nor was this all that the guides had to sho\v in memory
the Water-
bearing at of the tremendous cataclysm. Within the great precinct
Athens in overshado\ved by the vast temple of Olympia11 Zeus they led
honour of
the victims the curious traveller to a smaller precinct of Olympian Ea1th,
of the flood. where they pointed to a cleft in the ground a cubit wide.
Down that cleft, they assured him, the waters of the del11ge
ran away, and down it every year they threw cakes of \vheaten
3
meal kneaded with honey. These cal(es would seem to 11ave
been soul-cal(es destined for the consumption of the poor
souls \vho perished in the great flood ; for we kno\v t11at a
commemoration service or requiem mass was celebrated every
year at Athens in their honour. It was called the Festival
4
of tl1e Water-bearing, which suggests that charitable people
1 l1fa111101' Pariuin, 6 sq., in His- Mag1iu1n, p. 7 7 4, s. v. ol5po<f>opla ;
toricorzt111 Graecorzt11i Frag111enta, ed. Hesychius, s.v. vl5po<f>6pta. Tl1e festival
C. l\1i.iller, i. 542. fell at the new nioon in the month of
2 Pat1sanias, i. l 8. 8. The tomb of Anthesterion (P!utarch, I.e.). Co111pare
Deucalion at Athens is mentioned also the Scholiasts on Aristophanes, Achar-
by Strabo, ix. 4. 2, p. 425, ed. Casau- 1zian.s, 1076, and on Frogs, 218;
bon. At1gust Mommsen, 1'este der Stadt
3 p . . 8
ausan1as, 1. I . 7. Athe1z i11t Altertzen1 (Leipsic, 1898),
4 Plutarch, siella, I 4; Ety11zologicum
pp. 424 sq.
CHAP. IV GREEK STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 1 53
not only thre\v cakes but poured water down the cleft in the.
grot1nd to slake the thirst as well as to stay the hunger of
the ghosts in the nether world. .
Another place where the great flood was commemorated Story of
by a similar ceremo11y was Hierapolis on the Euphrates fiDeudcalilodn's
oo to at
There down to the second century of our era the ancient Hierapolis
Semitic deities . were worshipped in the old way under a ~:;:ates
transparent disguise imposed on them, like modern drapery
on ancient statues, by. the nominally Greek civilization
which the conquests of Alexander had spread over the East.
Chief among these aboriginal divinities was the great Syrian
goddess Astarte, who to he1 Greek worshippers masqueraded
under the name of Hera. Lucian has bequeathed to us a
very valuable description of the sanctuary and the strange
1
rites performed in it. He tells us that according to the
general opinion the sanctuary was founded by Deucalion, in
wl1ose time the great flood took place. This gives Lucian
occasio11 to relate the Greek story of the deluge, which
according to 11im ran as follo\vs. The present race of men,
he says, are not the first of human kind ; there was another
race which perished wholly. We are of the second breed,
which multiplied after the time of Deucalion. As for the
folk before the flood, it is said that they were exceedingly
wicked and lawless ; for they neither kept their oaths, nor
gave hospitality to strangers, nor respected suppliants, where-
fore the great calamity befell them. So the fountains of the
deep were opened, and the rain descended in torrents, the
rivers swelled, and the sea spread far over the land, till there
was nothing but water, water every\vhere, and all men per-
ished. But Deucalion \vas the only man who, by 1eason of
his prud.ence and piety, survived and formed the li11l<: between
the first and the second race of men ; and the way in which
he was saved \Vas this. He had a great ark, and i11to it he
entered with his wives and children ; and as he was entering
there came to him pigs, and horses, and lions, and serpents,
and all other land animals,all of them in pairs. He received
them all, and they did him no harm ; i1ay, by God's help
there was a great friendship between them, and they all sailed
1 f)e dea .Sy1ia. The 1noclern of this tre<1tise rests, in iny jt1dg1nent,
sce1)licis111 as tc> L11cia11's authorsl1iJJ 011 no firn1 fot111dation.
154 THE GREAT FLOOD I' Al~'l' I
in one ark so long as the flood prevailed on the earth. Such,

says Lucian, is the Greek story of Deucalion's deluge; but
the people of. Hierapolis, he goes on, tell a marvellous thing.
Thecl1asm They say that a great chasm opened in their count1y, and all
;~~!ivedthe the water of the flood ran away down it. And when that
water of happened, Deucalion built altars and founded a holy temple
the flood. of Hera beside the chasm. '' I have seen the chasm," he
proceeds, ''and a very small one it is under the temple.
Whethe1 it was large of old and has been reduced to its
present size in course of time, I know not, but what I saw is
Water undoubtedly small. In memory of this legend they perform
festival at 1 b
Hierapolis the fo lowing ceremony ; twice a year water 1s roug t rom
h f
in n1en1ory the sea to the temple. It is brought not by the priests only,
of the flood. d
but by all Syria and Arabia, ay and from beyon tl1e
Euphrates many men go to the sea, and all of them bring
water. The water is poured into the chasm, and though the
chasm is small yet it receives a migl1ty deal of water. In
doing this they say that they corn.ply with tl1e custom which
Deucalion instituted in the sanctuary for a memorial at once
Prayers 1
of calamity and of mercy.'' Moreover, at the north gate
offered
from the of the great temple there stood two tall columns, or rather
tops of t\VO obelisks, each about three hundred and sixty feet high ; and
obelisks at
Hierapolis. twice a year a man used to ascend one of them and remain
for seven days in that airy situation on the top of the obelisk.
Opinions differed as to why he went there, and what he did
up aloft. Most people thought that at that great height he
was within hail of the gods in heaven, who were near enough
to hear distinctly the prayers which he offered on behalf of
the whole land of Syria. Others, however, opined that he
clambered up the obelisk to signify how men had ascended
to the tops of mountains and .of tall trees in order to escape
from the waters of Deucalion's flood. 2
Deucalion, In this late Greek version of the deluge legend the
theark, and
tJ1e dove.
bi t th B b 1 ffi .
resem ances o e a y on1an version are su c1ently c ose ; I
1
L11cian, De dea Syria, 12 sq. In tion is correct the name Sisythes may
the opening words of this passage (ol be, as scholars suppose, a variant of
,v wv 7roX:>..oi l:..evKaXlwva rov 1:i<TvfJea Xisuthrus, the name of the hero in
ro lpov et<Ta<TfJaL :>..i-yov<Ti) tl1e name Beros11s's Greek version of the flood
1:L<TvfJea is an e1nendation of Butt- legend. See above, pp. 107 sqq. ;
mann's for the MS. reading 1:KvfJea. and H. Usener, Die Si1itjlittsagen, PIJ
See Ph. Buttmann, Mythologus (Berlin 47 sq.
1828-1829), i. 191 sq. If the emenda'. 2 Lucian, De dea Syria, 28.
CHAP. IV GREEK STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 155
and a still nearer trait is supplied by Plutarch, who says
that Deucalion let loose a dove from the ark in order to
judge by its return or its flight whether the storm still con-
1
tinued or had abated. In this form the Greek legend of
the great flood was unquestionably coloured, if not moulded,
by Semitic influence, whether the colours and the forms were
imported from Israel or from Babylon.
But Hierapolis on the Euphrates was not the only place Phrygian
in Western Asia which Greek tradition associated with the legendof
. a flood
de1uge o f D eucal1on. There was, we are told, a certain associated
Nannacus, king of Phrygia, who lived before the time of with King
. Nannacus.
Deucal1on, and, foreseeing the coming catastrophe, gathered
his people into the sanctuaries, there to weep and pray.
Hence ''the age of Nannacus '' became a proverbial ex-
2
pression for great antiquity or loud lamentations. Accord-
ing to another account N annacus or Annacus, the Phrygian,
lived over three hundred years, and when his neighbours,
apparently tired of the old man, inquired of the oracle how
much longer he might be expected to live, they received the
discouraging reply that when the patriarch died, all men would
perish with him. So the Pl1rygians lamented bitterly, \Vhich
3
gave rise to the old proverb about ''weeping for Nannacus."
The Greek satyric poet Herodas puts the proverb in the
mouth of a mother, who brings her brat to the school-
master to receive a richly deserved thrashing; and in so
doing she refers sorrowfully to the cruel necessity she was
under of paying the school fees, even though she were to
''weep like N annacus." 4 When the deluge had swept a\vay Afte1 the
the whole race of mankind, and the earth had dried up again, ! a n~ind
00
Zeus commanded Prometheus and Atl1ena to fashion images aie said to

!1ave bee11
of mud, and then summoning the winds he bade them breathe created
into the mud images and make them live. So the place \Vas affieshdout
0 111U at
called Iconium after the images (ei/r:ones) which were made Ico11ium.
there. 5 Some have thought tl1at the patriarchal Nannacus
or Annacus was no other tl1an the Biblical E11och or
Hanoch 6 who lived before the flood for tl1rec hu11dred
' 3 Ste11l1a11us Byzantius, s. v. 'IKoviov.
1 Plutarcl1, De sollertici a1ii11iali1ttJ1, '
I 3 4 1-Ierodas, fofi11tes, iii. ro.

2St1iclas, s. v. N avvaKo~ ; Zcnobit1s, 0 Ste11l1anus 11yzantit1s, J'.V. 'lKoviov.
C1J1tt. vi. ro; l\facarit1s, C'e1zt. ii. 23,
Ii ;ii l[l,
viii. 4; A11ostolit1s, (:c1tt. xv. 100.
THE CREA T FLOOD PATl"f I
and sixty-five years' and was then removed from the world
1
in a mysterious fashion. But against tl1is identification
it is to be said that the name N annacus would seem to be
genuine Greek, since it occurs in Greek inscriptions of the
island of Cos. 2 .
The story Another city of Asia Minor which appears to have

of Noah's
flood boasted of its connexion with the great flood was Apamea
1e presented Cibotos in Phrygia. The surname of Cibotos, which the city
on coins of 3
Apamea assumed, 'is the Greek word for ,chest or ark ; and on coins
Cibotos of the city, minted in the reigns of Severus, Macrinus, and
in Pl1rygia.
Philip the Elder, vve see the ark floating on water with two
passengers in it, whose figures appear from the waist upwards ;
.beside the ark two other human figures, one male and the
other female, are represented standing; and lastly, on the
top of the. chest are perched two birds, one of them said to
be a raven and the other a dove carrying an olive-branch.
As if to remove all doubt as to the identification of the
legend, the name Noe, the Greek equivalent of Noah, is
inscribed on the ark. No doubt, the two human figures
represent Noah and his wife twice over, first in the ark, and
4
afterwards outside of it. These coin types prove unques-
tionably that in the third century of our era the people of
Apamea were acquainted with the Hebrew tradition of the
Noachian deluge in the form in which the story is narrated in
the Book of Genesis. They may easily have learned it from
,their Jewish fellow-citizens, who in the first century before
our era were so numerous or so wealthy that 011. 011e occasion
they contributed no less than a hundred pounds weight of
1 Genesis v. 23 sq. Tl1e identifica- 732, No. 885.
tion, first st1ggested by Ph. Buttman 3
(Mytho!ogus, Berlin, 1828-1829, i. 175 Strabo, xi. 6. 3, and 8. I 3, pp.
sqq., I 87 sq.), is accepted by E. Babel on. 569, 576, ed. Casaubon; Pliny, Nat.
See E. Babelon, '' La tradition Phry- Hist. v. 106. Adolphe Reinach pre-
gienne dt1 Delt1ge,'' Revue de!' Hz'stoi1e ferred to suppose that the name is a
des .Re!i'gz'ons, xxiii. (1891) p. 180. native Asiatic word assimilated by
Buttmann even identified Aeacus, the popular etymology to a Greek one.
righteous hero of Aegina, with Nannacus He compared Kibyra, I\:ibyza, I\:ybistra,
and Enoch. and Kybela. See his Not! Sangaiz'ozt
2 H. Collitz t1nd F. Becl1tel, Sa11znz-
,(Paris, 1913), pp. 38 sq.
lung der grzechz'sche1z Dia!ekt-I1zschrif- 4 Barclay V. IIead, Historia Nze-
te1z, iii. 1. (Gottingen, 1899), p. 342, 11zoru1rt (Oxford, 1887), p. 558; E.
Inscr. No. 3623 c. 5 I ; G. Ditten- Babelon; ''La tradition Phrygienne du
berger, Sy/loge Inscriptionzt1n G1ae- Deluge,'' Revzte de l'Hz'stoi1e des Re-
carunz,2 (Leipsic, 1898-1901 ), ii. p. ligio1zs, xxiii. ( 1891) pp. I 80 sq.
.
gold to be sent as an offering to J erusalem.1 Whether

at Apamea the tradition of the deluge was purely Jewish in
origin, or whether it was grafted upon an old native legend of
a great flood, is a question on which scholars are not agreed. 2
Though the deluge associated with the name of Deucalion Greek
was the most familiar and famous it was not the only one tradition
' recorded
recorded by Greek tradition. Learned men ' indeed , dis- three great .
t 1ngu1s
l1ed b et\veen t h ree such great catastrophes, which had floods 1n
the days of
befallen the world at different epochs. The first we are told Ogyges,
th e t'1me o f 0 gyges, t h e second 1n
t oo l<: p 1ace 1n . ' the time
. ' Deucalion,
of and
Deucalion, and the third in the time of Dardanus. 3 Ogyges Dardanus
or Ogygus, as the name is also spelled, is said to have founded ~f:~;~ Of
and reigned over Thebes in Boeotia, 4 which, according to the the three,
the flood
learned Varro, was the oldest city in Greece, having been associated
built in antediluvian times before the earliest of all the with the
nan1e of
5
floods. The connexion of Ogyges with Boeotia in general Ogyges,
and \vith Thebes in pa1ticular is further vouched for by the ~~~te~:
6 7
name Ogygian \vhicl1 was bestowed on the land, on the city, was
Yet the Athenians, jealous of the ~~PJe ~~~
8 0
and on one of its gates.
superior antiquity which this tradition assigned to their earliest.
hated rival, claimed the ancient Boeotian hero as an aboriginal
.
1 Cicero, Pro Fiacco, 28. We know favour of an aboriginal flood legend
from Josephus (Antiqztit. Jud. xii. at Apan1ea appear to me to carry little
3. 4) that Antiochus the Great issued weight, 1esting rather on a series of
orders for transplanting two tl1ousand clot1btf11l co1nbinations than on any
Jewish families from l\1esopotamia ancl solid evidence.
Babylonia to Lydia and Phrygia, and 3 N 011nus, . Dt:onys. iii. 202- 2 l 9 ; '
for settling the1n there as colonists on Scholiast on Plato, Ti111aezts, p. 22 A.

very liberal terms. This may well have That the deluge of Ogyges \Vas prior
been the origin of tl1e] ewish settlement to the delt1ge of Deucalion is affir111ecl
at Apan1ea, as E. J3aLelon has pointed also by .l\.ugustine (De ciz1itate Dei,
out (''La tradition Phrygienne dt1 xviii. 8) and Servius (on Virgil, Ellog.
Delucreb , '' l?evzee de !' Histoire de la vi. 41 ), neither of \vl10111, however,
lt'eligio1z, xxiii. (1891) pp. 177 sq.). mentions the cleluge of Darda11us.
2 The view that t11e flood legend of 4 Pausanias, ix. 5. I ; Servius, on
Apamea was l)u1ely J ewisl1, witl1ot1t Vi1gil, Ec!og. vi. ,41, ''sttb 'S'J'g-e,
any basis of local tradition, is main- rege Jlteba1zor11111. ''
tained l.>y E. J3aLelon ('' La trl1dition 5 V<lrro, }( ei-11111 11'11stica1-1t111, iii. I.
Phrygienne clu Delttge,'' f.'evzte de o St1al10, ix. 2. I 8, )). 407, ed.
l' IIistoire des Religio11s, xxiii. {I 89 I) Casa11lion ; Stc1Jl1a11us l~yz<1nti11s, j', v.
IJP 174-183). On the other l1and tl1e Botwrla.
composite cl1aracter of the A1Ja1nean 7 l'attsanias, ix. 5. I ; i\1Jollonit1s
legend is maintainecl lJy II. Usener Rl1oclit1s, A1;i;v11a11t. iii. I l 78 ; Fes-
(!Jie S'i1ztjlzttsa,i:e11, 1Jl1 48- 50) and t tis, I>e vc1-bo111111 J1:!?'11 !fi11zt io11e, -~ z.
aclv<Jcated, witl1 a great array of learn- '' Ogygia,'' Jl. i79, eel. C. 0. l'vliiller.
8 E11ritJicles, l'hoe11i.1sa1:, I I I 3 ; l':tt1-
ing, !Jy AclcJljJhe 1<.einach in his treatise
Nol .~an,i;a1io1t (J.>aris, i913). I con- sanias, ix. 8. 5 ; Scl1(>li<1st on 1\11c>llo-
fess that the argume11ts aclclucecl in 11ius 1Zl1<Jtlit1s, ,1J1-go111111t. iii. I i78.
THE GREAT FLOOD ' PAR'!" I
of their country j I one tradition clescribes Ogyges as a king

2
of Attica, and another represents him as the founde1 and
3
king of Eleusis. So great was the devastation wrought in
Attica by the flood that the country remained without kings
4
from the time of Ogyges down to the reign of Cecrops. If
\Ve may trust the description of a rhetorical poet, the whole
earth \Vas submerged by the deluge, even the lofty peaks of
Tl1essaly were covered, and the snowy top of Parnassus itself
5
Various was lashed by the snowy billows. With regard to the date
~;:~ned of the catastrophe, some writers of antiquity profess to give
by ancient us more or less exact information. The learned Roman
writers to 11 h
the flood of scholar Varro te s us t at t e h B
oeot1an Th b b
e es was u1 t 1
Ogyges. about two thousand one hundred years before the time when
he \Vas writing, which was in or about the year 3 6 B.C. ; and
as the deluge, according. to him, took place in the lifetime of
Ogyges but after he had founded Thebes, we infer that in
Varro's opinion the great flood occurred in or soon after the
6
Julius year 2 136 B.c; Still more precise is the statement of Julius
Africa11us
on the date Africanus, a Christian author who drew up a chronicle of the
of Ogyges' world fron1 the Creation do\vn to the year 2 2 I A.D. He
flood.
affirms that the deluge of Ogyges happened just one thousand
and twenty years before the first Olympiad, from which
the Greeks dated their exact recl(oning ; and as the first
Olympiad fell in the year 7 76 B.C., we arrive at the year
I 796 B.C. as the date to which the Christian chronicler
ieferred the great Ogygian flood. It happened, he tells
1 Africanus, quoted by Eusebius, 6
Rerzt11i Rusticarze111, iii.
, Varro,
Praeparatio E11angelz"ca, x. 10. 4. I. 3. In his preface to this treatise
2 Scholiast on Plato, Ti1naeus, p.
on agriculture (bk. i. eh. i.) Varro
22 A. indicates that it was written in his
3 Africanus, quoted by Eusebius,
eightieth year ; and as he was born in
P1aeparatio Eva1tgelz"ca, x. I o. 7 ; I 16 B.c., he must have been composi11g
Et1sebius, Chro1zic., ed. A. Schoene, the worl;: in qt1estion in or abot1t 36 B.c.
\ol. ii. p. r 7 ; Isidorus Hispalensis, From Arnobius (Adve1sus Gentes, v. 8)
Orz"g-i"1zes, xiii. 22. 3. Some said that we learn that Varro reckoned less than
the hero Eleusis, from whom the city two thousand years from Deucalion's
tool;: its nan1e, was a son of Ogygus flood to the consulship of Hirtius ancl
(Pausanias, i. 38. 7). Pansa in 43 B.c., which seems to sho\v
4 Africanus, quoted by Eusebius, that he dated Deucalion's flood ft1lly a
Praeparatio Evangelica, x. I o, 9. hundred years later than that of Ogyges.
Among the authorities cited by Afri. . Compare the commentary of Meursi11s
canus (in Eusebius, op. cit. x. 10. 5) on Varro, printed in J. G. Schneider's
are the Attic historians Hellanitus and edition of the S<riptores Rei Rusticae
Philochorus. Vete~es Lati1zz" (Leipsic, r 794_ 1 7 9 6),
6 Nonnus, Dionys. iii. 206-208.
vol. 1. part 2, p. 491.
us, in the reign of Phoroneus, king of Argos. He adds

for our further information that Ogyges, who survived the
deluge to which he gave his name, was a contemporary
of Moses and flourished about the time when that great
prophet led the children of Israel out of Egypt ; and he
clinches his chain of evidence by observing that at a time
when God was visiting the land of Egypt with hailstorms
and other plagues, it was perfectly natural that distant parts
of the earth should simultaneously feel the effects of the
divine anger, and in particular it was just and right that
Attica should smart beneath the rod, since according to some
people, including the historian Theopompus, the Athenians
\Vere in fact colonists from Egypt and therefore shared the
1
guilt of the mother-country. According to the Church Eusebius
. . E b" h fl d . h
h 1stor1an use 1us, t e great oo 1n t e time o . f 0 on the
gyges dates of
occurred about two thousand two hundred years after the tl1e floods
of Ogyges
Noach1an deluge and two hundred and fifty years before the and
2
similar catastrophe in the days of Deucalion. It would seem Deucalion.
indeed to have been a point of honour with the early
Christians to claim for the flood recorded in their sacred
books an antiquity far more venerable than that of any
flood described in mere profa11e writings. We have seen
that Julius African us depresses Ogyges from the age of
Noah to that .of Moses ; and Isidore, the learned bishop of
Seville at the beginning of the seventh century, heads his
list of floods with the N oachian deluge, while the second
and third places in order of time are assigned to the floods
of Ogyges and Deucalion respectively ; according to him,
Ogyges was a contemporary of the patriarch Jacob, while
Deucalion lived in the days of Moses. The bishop was,
so far as I am . aware, the first of many writers who have
appealed to fossil shells imbedded in remote mountains as
2
witnesses to the truth of the Noachian tradition.
1 Julius African us, quoted by Euse- Clynton, Fastz' Hellenici, i. (Oxforcl,
bius, Praepai-atio Eva11gelica, x. 10. 1834) PP 5-8.
That the deluge of Ogyges happened 2 Eusebit1s, Ch101zit., ed. A. Scl1oe11e,
in the reign of Phoroneus, king _of vol. i. col. 7 I.

Argos, is mentioned also ]Jy tl1e Chris- 3 Isidort1s l{ispalensis, 011gi111:s,
tian writers Tatian ( Oratio ad Craecos, xiii. 22, '' c11j11; i11dici1;,111 hacte1111s
p. 150, eel. J. C. 'f. Otto) and Clement vide1111ts i1t lapidib11s, q11os i1t 1e111otij
of .t\lexan<lria (Sti-0111. i. 2 I I 02, lJ 111011tibttJ' co11c/1i.1 et ostrei.I' ro11,1eto.r, saepe
379, eel. l'otter). Co1npare I-I. l 1ynes etia111 cavatos aq1Jis vi;ere sole11ttJJ', ''
160 THE GREAT FLOOD PAI{1' I
The story If Ogyges was originally, as seems probable, a Boeotian

of
of the flood
Ogyges rather t h an an A tt1c
h ero, t h e story o f t h e d e1uge 1n
h 1s
t 1me

pe:~aps may well have been suggested by the vicissitudes of the
: :h~ated Copaic Lake which formerly occupied a large part of Central
1
annt1al Boeotia. 1 For, having no outlet above ground, the lake

vicissitudes
ofthe depended for its drainage entirely on subte1ranean passages
Copaic or chasms which the water had hollowed out for itself in the
Lake.
course of ages through the limestone rock, and according as
these passages were clogged or cleared the level of the lake
rose or fell. In no lake, perhaps, have the annual changes
Yearly been more regular and marked than in the Copaic ; for while
changes of
the Copaic in winter it was a reedy mere, the haunt of thousands of
Lake in wild fowl, in summer it was a more or less marshy plain,
modern
times. where cattle browsed and crops were 5own and reaped. So
well recognized were the vicissitudes of the seasons that
places on the bank of the lake such as Orchomenus, Lebadea,
and Copae, had summer roads and winter roads by \vhich
they communicated with each other, the winter roads follo\v-
ing the sides of the hills, while the summer roads struck
across the plain. With the setting in of the heavy autumnal
rains in November the lake began to rise and reached its
greatest depth in February or March, by which time the
mouths of the emissaries were completely submerged and
betrayed their existence only by swirls on the surface of the
mere. Yet even then the lake presented to the eye anything
but an unbroken sheet of water. Viewed from a height, such
as the acropolis of Orcl1omenus, it appeared as an immense
fen, of a vivid green colour, stretching away for miles and
miles, overgro\vn with sedge, reeds, and canes, through which
the river Cephisus or Melas might be seen sluggishly oozing,
\vhile here and there a gleam of sunlit \Vater, especially
towards the north-east corner of the mere, directed the eye
to what looked like ponds in the vast green swamp. Bare
grey mountains on the north and east, and the beautiful
wooded slopes of Helicon on the south, bounded the fen.
In spring the water began to sink. Isolated brown patches,
where no reeds grew, were the first to show as islands in the
mere; and as the season adva11ced they expanded 1nore and
more till they met. By the middle of summer great
l Ed. Meyer, Geschichte des Alte1th11111J,. ii. (Stuttgart, 1896) p. 194.
stretches, especially in the middle and at the edges, were

bare. In the higher parts the fat alluvial soil left by the
retiring waters was sown by the peasants and produced crops
. of corn, rice, and cotton ; while the lower parts, overgrown
by rank grass and weeds, were grazed by herds of cattle and
swine. In the deepest places of all, the water often stagnated
the whole summer, though there were years \vhen it retreated
even from these, leaving behind it only a bog or perhaps a
stretch of white clayey soil, perfectly dry, which the summer
heat seamed with a network of minute cracks and fissures.
By the end of August the greater part of the basin \Vas
generally dry, though the water did not reach its lowest
point till October. At that time what had lately been a fen
was only a great brown expanse, broken here and there by
a patch of green marsh, where reeds and other water-plants
grew. In November the lake began to fill again fast.
Such was the ordinary annual cycle of changes in the An
L k d d h unusually
Copatc a e 1n mo ern times, an we ave no reason to extensive
suppose that it was essentially different in antiquity. But inundation
at all times the water of the lake has been liable to be raised ~o~~c
above or depressed below its customary level by unusually Lakeh may ave
heavy or scanty rainfall in winter or by the accidental clog- given rise
ging or opening of the chasms. As we read in ~ncient ~~ ~~= ~~~
authors of drowned cities on the margin of the lake, so a of Ogyges.
modern traveller tells of villagers forced to flee before the
rising flood, and of vineyards and corn-fields seen under
water. 2 One such inundation, more extensive and de-
structive than any of its predecessors, may have been
associated ever after with the name of Ogyges.
Among the dead cities whose ruins are scattered The rui~s
. of the city
in and around the wide plain that was once tl1e Copa1c and palace
Lake' no11e is more re1narkable or excites our curiosity more of Gla in a
deserted
keenly than one which bears the modern name of Goulas or and now
l . ll A Pl111
.1. st1anded
Strabo, ix. 2. I8, P 407, eel.
1 247; anc .especi~ Y, . ppson, isla11d of
Casauboi1 ; Pausanias, ix. 24. 2. '' De1 l(opa1s-See 1n Gr1echenland und the Copaic
seine U mgebt1ng, '' Zeitschrift de1 I~ake.
2 On the Co1)aic LaJ,e in antiquity Gesellschaft fur E11ik1tnde ztt Be1li11,
see the excellent account in Strabo, xxix. ( 1894) \)p, 1-90. I have allowed
ix. 2. l 6-18, pp. 406 sq. Compare myself to qttote from the clescri11tion of
Pausanias, ix. 24. I sq. For moclern the lal'e in 111y co1n111entary on Patt
accounts of it see C. Ne11n1ann ttnd J. sanias (vol. v. lJP I 10 sqq. ), \vhere I
l'artsch, Phy;ikalisrhe Geographie vo11 have cited the 111oclern literatt1re on the
(,'rieche11la111i (13reslau, I 88 5), PP 244- subject.
M.
VOL. I
162 THE GREAT FLOOD PAR'f I
'
Gla. Its ancient na1ne and history are alike unknown : eve11
legend is silent on the subject. The extensive remains
occupy th~ broad summit of a low rocky hill or tableland
which rises abruptly on all sides from the dead flat of the
surrounding country. When the lake was full, the place
must have been an island, divided by about a mile of shallow
and weedy water from the nearest point in the line of cliffs
which formed the eastern shore of the lake. A fortification
wall, solidly built of roughly squared blocks of stone, encircles
the whole edge of the tableland, and is intersected by four
gates flanked by towers of massive masonry. Within the
fortress are the ruins of other structures, including the remains
of a great palace constructed in the style, though not on the
plan, of the prehistoric palaces of Mycenae and Tiryns. The '
fortress and palace of Gla would seem to have been erected

in the Mycenaean age by a people al<in in civilization, if not
in race, to the builders of Tiryns and Mycenae, tl1ough less
skilled in the science of military engineering ; for the
walls do not exhibit the enormous stones of Tiryns, and
the gates are arranged on a plan far less formidable to an
assailant than the gates of the two Argive citadels. The
scanty remains of pottery and other domestic furniture on
the plateau appear to indicate that it was occupied only for
a short time, and the traces of fire on the palace point to tl1e
conclusion that its end was sudden and violent. Everything
within the place bears the imprint of a single plan and a
single period : there is no trace of an earlier or a later settle-
ment. Created at a blow, it would seem to hav.e perisl1ed
at a blo\v and never to have been inhabited again. In its
solitude and silence, remote from all human habitations .
looking out from its grey old walls over the vast Copaic '
plain to the distant mountains which bound the horizon on
all sides, this mysterious fortress is certainly one of the most
1
impressive sights in Greece. '
Was Gia Can it be that this ancient and forgotten town, once
the city of
Ogyges lapped on all sides by the waters of the Copaic Lake, was
before he the home of the legendary Ogyges, and that he forsook it
founded
Thebes?
'
1 For a fuller accot1nt of the place, my comn1entary on Pausanias (vol. v.
which I have described from personal pp. I 20 sqq. ).
observation, I may refer the reader to
CHAP. Iv GREEK STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 163
perhaps in consequence of an inundation, to migrate to the

higher and drier site which.was afterwards known as Thebes?
The hypothesis would go some way to explain the legends
which gathered round his memory ; but it is no more than
a simple guess, and as such I venture to hazard it.
The theory which would explain the great flood of The third
Ogyges
by an extraordinary inundation of

the Cop. aic Lake great.flood
' associated
1s to some extent supported by an Arcadian parallel. We with the
have seen that in Greek legend the third great deluge was nDamde of
ar anus,
associated with the name of Dardanus. Now according to who is said
. t D d t fi t . d k'
one accoun , ar anus a rs re1gne as a 1ng 1n rca 1a, been driven. A d' to have
but was driven out of the country by a great flood which by it from
' Arcadia
submerged the lowlands and rendered them for a long time and to
unfit for cultivatio11. The inhabitants retreated to the have fled
to Samo
mountains,. and for a while made shift to live as best they thrace.
might on such food as they could procure ; but at last, con-
cluding that the land left by the water was not sufficient to
support them a11; they resolved to part ; some of them re-
mained in the country with Dimas, son of Dardanus, for
their king; while the rest emigrated under the leadership of
1
Dardanus himself to the island of Samothrace. According Dardanus
. . h' h h R V
to a G ree k tra d 1t1on, w 1c t e oman arro accepte , t e have been d h is said to
2
birthplace of Dardanus \Vas Pheneus in north Arcadia. The born at
. hl 'fi r 'f h C
p 1ace is h 1g y s1gn1 cant, 1or, 1 we except t e opa1c area, which, . Pheneus,
no valley in Greece
is known to have been ~
from antiquity lying in
av~
subject to inundations on so vast a scale and for such long encircledby
eriods as the valley of Pheneus. 3 The natural conditions mhasouna1tains,
P ways
in the two regions are substantially alike. Both are basins been
1n a l'1mestone coun t ry w1'th ou t any ou tfl ow a b ove groun d : subject inunda- to
both receive the rain water which pours into them from the tions.
surrounding mountains : both are drained by subterranean
channels which the water. has worn or which earthquakes
have opened through the rock ; and whenever these outlets
are silted up or otherwise closed, what at other times is
a plain becomes converted for the time being into a lake.
But \vith these substantial resemblances are combined some
striking differences between the two landscapes. For while
1 Dionysius I-Ialicarnasensis, Anti- 3 C. Neumann 1111d J. 11 artsch,

quitates lromanae, i. 61. Physikali.rche c;eo,r;1aphie VOit Grieche1t-
2 Servi us, on Virgil, Aen. iii. 167. land (Bresla11, 1885), p. 252.
THE GREAT FLOOD l'Al{'J' I
the Copaic basin is a vast stretch of level ground little above

sea-level and bounded only by low cliffs or gentle slopes,
the basin of Pheneus is a narrow upland valley closely shut
in on every. side by steep frowning mountains, their upper
slopes clothed with dark pine \voods and their lofty summits
capped with snow for many months of the year. The river
whicl1 drains the basin through an underground channel is
the Ladon, the most romantically beautiful of all the rivers
of Greece. Milton's fancy dwelt on ''sanded Ladon's lilied
banks '' ; even the prosaic Pausanias exclaimed that there
1
was no fairer river either in Greece or in foreign lands ;
and among the memories which I brought back from
Greece I recall none with more delight than those of
the days I spent in tracing the river from its birthplace in
the lovely lake, first to its springs on the far side of the
mountain, and then down the deep wooded gorge through
which it hurries, brawling and tumbling over rocks in sheets
of greenish-white foam, to join the sacred Alpheus. Now
the passage by which the Ladon makes its way underground
frorn the valley of Pheneus has been from time to time
blocked by an earthquake, with the result that the river has
ceased to flow. When I was at the springs of the Ladon in
I 89 5, I learned from a peasant on the spot that three years
before, after a violent shock of earthquake, the water ceased
to run for three hours, the chasm at the bottom of the pool
was exposed, and fish were seen lying on the dry ground.
After three hours the spring began to flow a little, and th1ee
days later there was a loud explosion, and the \vater burst
forth in immense volume. Similar stoppages of the river
have been reported both in ancient and modern times; and
whenever the obstruction has been permanent, the valley of
Pheneus has been occupied by a lake varying in extent
and depth with the more or less complete stoppage
Alterna- of the subterranean outlet. According to Pliny there had
tionsofthe been down to his day five changes in the condition of the
valley of
Pheneus valley from wet to dry and from dry to wet, all of them
2
bettweednd
wean ry caused
by earthquakes. In Plutarch's time the flood rose.
in ancient so high that the whole valley was under water, which pious
and modern fi lk
times. o
'b d h h
attr1 ute to t e somew at belated wrath of Apollo at
1 Pausanias, viii. 25. I 3. 2 Pliny, Nat. Eiist. xxxi. 54.
.
Hercules, who had stolen the god's prophetic tripod from

Delphi and carried it off to Pheneus about a thousand 'years
1
before. However, later in the same century the waters had
again subsided, for the Greek traveller Pausanias found the
bottom of the valley to be dry land, and knew of the former
2
existence of the lake only by tradition. At the beginning
of the nineteenth century the basin was a swampy plain, for
the most part cove1ed with fields of wheat or barley. But
shortly after the expulsion of the Turks, through neglect of
the precautions which the Turkish governor had taken to
keep the mouth of the subte1ranean outlet open, the channel
became blocked, the water, no longer able to escape, rose in
its bed, and by I 8 30 it formed a deep lake about five miles
long by five miles wide. And a broad lal<:e of greenish-blue
water it still was when I saw it in the autumn of I 895, with the
pine-clad mountains descending steeply in rocky declivities
or sheer precipices to the \vater's edge, except for a stretch of

level ground on the north, where the luxuriant green of vine-

yards and maize-fields contrasted pleasingly with the blue of
the lake and the sombre green of the pines. The whole
scene presented rather the aspect of a Swiss than of a Greek
landscape. A few years later and the scene was changed.
Looking down into the valley from a pass on a July after-
noon, a more recent traveller beheld, instead of an expanse
of sea-blue water, a blaze of golden corn \vith here and there
a white point of light showing where a fustanella'd reaper
was at his peaceful toil. The lake had disappeared, perhaps
for ever ; for we are told that measures have now been taken
to keep the subterranean outlets permanently open, and so
to preserve for the corn the ground whicl1 has been won
3
from the water.
A permanent mark of the height to which the lake of The water-
. . d h" h ll
Pheneus attained 1n former days an at w 1c , to a appeai- 111ark on the
111ountains
ance, it must have stood for many ages, is engraved o.n the at Phe11 eus.
sides of the mountains which enclose the basin. It is a
I Plutarch, De sera n1emi1zis vin- 144 - 146; J. ff. BaJ,e1 - Pe11oyre,
dicta, 12. '' Pheneus and the Pl1eneatiJ,e,''
2 l'ausanias, viii. 14. 1-3.
Jo1ernal of Helle111'c S!tt(lies, xxii.
a C. Neumann und J. Partsch, (I 902) ])]J. 228 - 240. }<'or ft11ther
Physikalische Geographi'e vo1z Grieche1z- cletails I n1ay refer tl1e r<~acler llJ 111y
land, pp. 252 sq. ; A. Philip[JSon, com1nentary 011 Pat1sa11ias ( vcJI. iv. pp.
Der l'elopo11nes (Berlin, 1892 ), ]Jp. 230 .fqtj., 262 ;q., 287 Sljtj)
166 THE GREAT r'LOOD PAR'I' I
.
'
sharply drawn line r11nning round the contour of the mountains
at a. uniform level of not less than a hundred and fifty feet
above the bottom of tl1e valley. The trees and shrubs
extend down the steep slopes to this line and tl1ere stop
abruptly. Below the line the rock is of a light-yello\v colour
and almost bare of vegetation ; above the line the rock is of
a much darker colour. The attention of travellers has been
drawn to this conspicuous mark from antiquity to the pre-
sent day. The ancient traveller Pausanias noticed it in the
second century of our era, and he took it to indicate the line
to which the lake rose at the time of its highest flood, when
1
the city of Pheneus was submerged. This interpretation has
been qt1estioned by some modern writers, but there. seems
to be little real doubt that the author of the oldest extant
guide-book to Greece was substantially right ; except that
the extremely sharp definition of the line and its permanence
for probably much more than two thousand years appear to
point to a long-continued persistence of the lake at this high
level rather than to a mere sudde11 and temporary rise in a
time of inundation. ''It is evident," says the judicious
traveller Dod \vell, ''that a temporary inundation could not
effect so striking a difference in the superficies of the rock,
the colour of which must have been changed from that of
2
the upper parts by the concreting deposit of many ages."
Theseint1n- In a valley which has tht1s suffered so many alternations
dations of
the valley between wet and dry, between a broad lake of sea-blue \vater
of Pheneus 1 Pausanias, viii. l 4. l. Leake, Ti-avels i1z the J}fo1ea (London,
lend . . 2 E. Dodwell, Classical and Topo- 1830), iii. 147 sqq. ; E. Pouillon
probab1l1ty graphical Tour through Greece (London, Boblaye, Reche1-ches Geog1-aplzz'qz1es sur
to the story 1819), ii. 436. This is the view also les rztines de la Moree (Paris, 1835),
~f the f of the latest writer on the subject, Mr. p. l 53 note 2 ; E. Curtius, Peloponnesos
Do:i,~~nus. Baker - P~noyre. See his article, (Gotha, 1851), ii. 188 sq.; \V. G.
''Pheneus and the Pl1eneatike,'' Jour- Clar I<, Peloponnesz1s (London, l 8 58),
nal ef Hellenic Studz'es, xxii. ( l 902) pp. 3 I 7 sq. The height of the water-
pp. 23 l sqq. The German geologist, line has been variously estimated.
Mr. A. Philippson, took the line to Dodwell and Curti11s p11t it at several
marl< the level to which the lake iose hundreds of feet ; W. G. Clar], g11essed
in 1830 (Der Peloponnes, p. 146). that it might be about fifty feet above
But as the lake suddenly fell again in the level of the lal<e when he saw it.
1834, it seems hardly possible that a I ro11ghly estin1ated the line by the eye
flood lasting for only a few years should at 200 or 300 feet above the lake, the
have scored its record so deep on the level of which was probably lower than
sides of the mountains. As to the at the time of W. G. Clark's visit.
water-line see further Sir William Gell, Mr. Baker-Pe11oyre's estin1ate of the
Narrative ef a Joztrney iii the Morea 11eight is l 50 feet above the bottom of
(London, ,1823), p. 374; .\V. M. the valley.
CHAP. 1v GREEK STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 167
and broad acres of yellow corn, the traditions of great floods

cannot be lightly dismissed ; on the contrary everything
combines to confirm their probability. The story, therefore,
that Dardanus, a native of Pheneus, was compelled to emi-
grate by a great inundation which swamped the lowlands,
drowned the fields, and drove the inhabitants to the upper
slopes of the mountains, may well rest on a solid foundation
of fact. And the same may be true of the flood recorded
by Pausanias, which rose and submerged the ancient city of
1
Pheneus at the northern end of the lake.
From his home in the highlands of Arcadia, the emigrant According
Dardanus is said to have made his way to the island of accottn to one t th
e
2
Samothrace. According to one account, he floated thither great flood
on a ra f t ; 3 b ut accor d ing
to anot her version o f t he 1egen d, overtook
Dardanus
the great flood overtook him, not in Arcadia, but in Samo- in Samo-
h . f1 d k' d 'f .
t race, an d h e escape d on an in ate s in, ri ting on t e v.hence he h thrace,
face of the waters till he landed on Mount Ida, where he escaped to

c d d .
1oun e Dardania or Troy. 4 C . l . f S
ertain y, the natives o amo- samo- Mount Ida.
thrace, who were great sticklers for their antiquity, claimed tra thrda~i_an
1t1on
to have had a deluge of their own before any other nation of a great
on earth. They said that the sea rose and covered a great floodd cause y
b
part of the flat land in their island, and that the survivors thebursting
retreated to the lofty mountains which still render Sarno- ~~:~:rs
thrace one of the most conspicuous features in the northern whic11 till
. 1 . 'bl . 1 th
A egean and are p 1atn y v1s1 e in c ear wea er rom roy. divided thef T 5 then had
As the sea still pursued them in their retreat, they prayed Black Sea
. from the
to the gods to deliver them, and on being saved they set up Mediter-
landmarks of their salvation all round the island and built ranean.
altars on \vhich they continued to sacrifice down to later ages.
And many centuries after the great flood fishermen still

occasionally drew up in their . nets the stone capitals of
columns, which told of cities drowned in the depths of the
l Pausanias, viii. I 4. I . an1l Ro111a1z Geography, ii. 901, s.v.
2 Dionysius Halicarnasensis, Anti- '' Samothrace. '' Seen fro111 the 11eigh-
llouring island of Imbros, the 111ighty
qui'tates I-tonianae, i. 6 I. 3.
mass of Samothrace rises fro111 the sea
3 Scholiast on Plato, Tz'11zaeus, p. like the sicle of a Norwegian mot1ntain,
22 A. wl1ich indeed it closely resembles \Vl1en
4 Lycophron, Cassand1-a, 72 sqq:, the clot1ds and 1nists Jiang low 011 it in
with the scholia of Tzetzes ; Scl1ol1a winter. See Alan G. Ogilvie, ''Notes
<>n Homer, Iliad, xx. 2 I 5 (p. 558, ed. on tl1e (~eogra1>l1y of l111bro~,'' The
Im. Bekker, Berlin, 1825). Geographical Jo11r1za!, xlviii. (I 9 I 6) p.
6 W. Smith, Dictio11a1y of Gi-eek 144.
168 THE GREAT. FLOOD PAR'I' I
sea. The causes which the Sa1nothracians alleged for the

inundation were very re1narkable. The catastrophe hap-
. pened, according to them, not tl1rough a heavy fall of rain,
but through a sudden and ext1aordinary rising of the sea
occasioned by the bursting of the barriers which till then
had divided the Black Sea from the Mediterranean. At
that time the enormous volume of water dammed up behind
these barriers broke bounds, a11d cleaving for itself a passage
through the opposi11g land created the straits which are now
known as the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles, through which
the waters of the Black Sea have ever since flowed into the
Mediterranean. When the tre1nendous torrent first rushed
through the new opening in the dam, it washed over a great
part of the coast of Asia, as well as the flat lands of
1
Samothrace.
The Samo- Now this Samothracian tradition is to some extent con-
thracian firmed by modern geology. ''At no very distant period,"
tradition
partially we are told, ''the land of Asia Minor was continuous with
confirmed
by geology, that of Europe, across the present site of the Bosphorus,
which forming a barrier several hundred feet high, which dammed
proves that
the Black up the waters of the Black Sea. A vast extent of eastern
"
Sea was Europe and of western central Asia thus became a huge
once really
separated reser\oir, the lowest part of the lip of which was probably
from the situated so1ne\vl1at more than 200 feet above the sea-level,
Mediter-
ranean by along the preser1t southe1n watershed of the Obi, which flows
a barrier into the Arctic Ocean. Into this basin, the largest rivers of
of land.
Europe, such as the Danube and the Volga, and what were
then great rivers of Asia, the Ox us and Jaxartes, \Vith all the
intermediate affiuents, poured their \vaters. In addition, it
received the overflow of Lake Balkash, then mucl1 larger ;
and, probably, that of the inland sea of Mongolia. At that
time, the level of the Sea of Aral stood at least 60 feet

higher than it does at present. Instead of the separate

Black, Caspian, and Aral seas, there was one vast Ponto-
Aralian Mediterranean, which must have been prolonged into
arms and fiords along the lower valleys of the Danube, and
the Volga (in the course of which Caspian shells are now
1 Diodorus Siculus, v. 47. Among torian, \Vas their archaic dialect, of
the proofs of the great antiquity of the which many examples survived in their
San1oth1acians, according to tl1is his- religious ritual down to his ti111e.
CHAP. IV GREEK STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD
found as far as the Kuma), the Ural, and the other affluent
rivers while it seems to have sent its overflow northward
.
through the present basin of the Obi." 1 '
This enormous
'
reservoir or vast inland sea, bounded and held up by a high
natural dam joining Asia Minor to the Balkan Peninsula,
appears to have existed down to the Pleistocene period; and
the erosion of the Dardanelles, by \vhich the pent-up waters
at last found their way into the Mediterranean, is believed
to have taken place towards the end of the Pleistocene period
2
or later. But man is now known for certain to have inhabited
Europe in the Pleistocene period ; some hold that he inhabited
it in the Pliocene or even the Miocene period. 3 Hence it
seems possible that the inhabita11ts of Eastern Europe should
have preserved a traditional memory of the vast inland
Ponto-Aralian sea and of its partial desiccation through the
piercing of the dam which divided it from the Mediterranean,
in other words, through the opening of the Bosphorus and
the Dardanelles. If that \Vere so, the Samothracian tradition
1
T. H. Huxley, ''The Aryan becomes the number of those who re-
Question,'' Collected Essays, vol. vii. gard then1 as the \vorl;: of tl1e hands
(London, 1906) pp. 300 sq. and brain of Pliocene nJan. It is also
2 T. H. Huxley, '' Hasisadra's maintained that flints, similar in shape
Adventure,'' Collected Essays, vol. iv. and chipping, have been discovered in
(London, 19 l l) pp. 27 5, 276. deposits of Miocene and even of
3 Sir Charles Lyell, The Student's Oligocene age. If it be proved that
Elements ef Geology, Third Edition st1ch are of human origin, then we
(London, 1878), pp. 128 sqq.; A. de must extend still further the period
Quatrefages, Tlie Hitma1i Species covered by the antiquity of man.
(London, 1879), pp. 142-153; Sir There is not a single fact known to me
John Lubbock (Lord Avebury), Pre- which mal;:es the existence of a human
historic Ti1nes, Fifth Edition (Lon(lo11 form in the Miocene period a11
and Edinbu1gh, I 890), pp. 422 sqq. ; impossibility.'' Professor Sollas sums
\V. J. Sollas, Ancient Hunters (Lon- up his conclusion (p. 85) as follows:
don, 1915), pp. 59-86; Arthur Keith, ''We have seen that the order
The Antiquity ef Man (London, of succession in tin1e of fossil re-
1915), pp. 509-511, H. F. Osborn, mains of the l\fa111n1alia and especially
Men ef the Old ,)tone Age (London, of apes a11d men st1ggests that ma11, i11
1916), p. 60. Of these writers, Pro- the strictest se11se, Ho1110 Sapie1is, is a
fessors Keitl1 and Osborn definitely creature of Pleistocene tin1e ; <lS we
pronounce in favot1r of man's existence look backwards into the past we lose
in the Pliocene period ; indeed Pro- sight of hi1n l)efore the close of tl1at
fessor Keith admits the possibility of a age and encou11ter i11 11is place for111s
still greater antiqt1ity of the human specifically an(] even generically dis-
species on earth. IIe says (IJ 5 I l ), tinct ; that othe1 species of tl1e ht11nan
'' The ht1man origi11 of eoliths is still fa1nily n1ight 11ave alreacly co111e i11to
being called in question, bt1t the more existence in tl1e l'li<)cene e1)ocl1 seems
these sl1a1Jecl flints of I>Jiocene date are 1)ossi])]e, 1Jt1t scarcely in the Miocene,
investigate(] arid di.>ct1sscd, the greater and still less in tl1e Oligoce11e e11och. ''
170 THE GREAT FLOOD PAR"f I
might be allowed to contain a large element of historical

truth in regard to the causes assigned for the catastrophe.
On the On the other hand geology seems to lend no support to
other hand, the tradition of the catastrophe itsel( For the evidence_ tends
geology
proves that to prove that the st1ait of the Dardanelles was not opened
the break-
iiig of the suddenly, like the bursting of a dam, either
b h
y t e -pressure
barrierwas of the water or the shock of an earthquake, but that on the
not cata- 11 b 1 f
strophic but contrary 1t was created gradua y y as ow p1ocess o erosion

gradually which mt1st have lasted for many centuries or even thousands
effected
by a slow of years ; for the strait '' 1s boun e
d d b d.
y un 1stur eb d Pl .
eis-
proc_ess of tocene strata forty feet thick, through which, to all appear-
eros1on. 1
ance, the present passage has been quietly cut." Thus the
lo\vering of the level of the Ponto-Aralian sea to that of the
Mediterranean ca11 hardly have been sudden and catastrophic,
accompanied by a vast inundation of the Asiatic and Euro-
pean coasts; afore probably it \Vas effected so slowly and
gradually that the. total amount accomplished even in a
generation would be imperceptible to ordinary observers or
even to close observers unprovided ivith instruments of pre-
Hence cision. I-Ience, instead of assuming that Samothracian
~:~~a~~~o- tradition preserved a real memory of a widespread inunda-
story of tion consequent on the opening of the Dardanelles, it seems
~o~~a!as safer to suppose that this story of a great flood is nothing
probably but the guess of some early philosopher, who 1ightly divined
11ot a
genuine the origin of the straits without being able to pictu1e to
tradition, himself the extreme slowness of the process by which nature
but n1erely
the specu- had excavated them. As a matter of fact, the eminent
lation of physical philosopher Strata, who succeeded Theopl1rastus as
some early -
pl1ilo- head of the Peripatetic school in 2 8 7 B.C., actt1ally main-
sopher. ,
tained this view on purely theoretical grounds, not alleging
it as a tradition which had been handed doivn from antiquity,
but arguing in its favour from his observations of the 11atural
,
features of the Black Sea. He pointed to the vast quantities

of mud annually washed down by great rivers into the Euxine,
and he inferred that but for the outlet of tl1e Bosphort1s tl1e '
basin of that sea would in time be silted up. Further, he
conjectured that in former times the same rivers had forced
for themselves a passage through the Bosphorus, allowing
1
T. H. Huxley, '' Hasisadra's Adventure,'' Collected EJays, vol. iv.
(London, 1911) p. 281.
their collected waters to escape first to the Propontis, and

then from it through the Dardanelles to the Mediterranean.
Si1nilarly he thought that the Mediterranean had been of old
an inland sea, and that its junction with the Atlantic was
effected by the dammed up water cutting for itself an opening
1
through the Straits of Gibraltar. Accordingly we may con-
clude that the cause which the Samothracians alleged for the
great flood was derived from an ingenious speculation rather
than from an ancient tradition .
. There are some grounds for thinking that the flood story Like the
which the Greeks associated with the names of Deucalion Sam~-
. thrac1an
and Pyrrha may in like manner have been, not so much a story of the
f l
reminiscence o a rea event, as an inference founded on the story.of flood the
observation of certain physical facts. We have seen that in Deucalion's

one account t h e mountains o . f Th . b flood \Vas
essaly are said to have een perhaps an
parted by the deluge in Deucalion's time, and that in another i11ference
account the ark, with Deucalion in it, is reported to have ~~~:in
drifted to Mount Othrys in Thessaly. These references physical
f~1cts.
seem to indicate Thessaly as the original seat of the legend; The
and the indication is greatly strengthened by the view which legend _or.
the ancients too k o f t h e causes t h at h a d mou ld ed t h e natura1 flood
Deucal1011
was s
features of the country. Thus Herodotus relates a tradition a~sociated
that in ancient times Thessaly was a great lake or inland ~~~ssaly,
sea shut in on all sides by the lofty mountains of Ossa and whic_h_ 'vas
' trad1t1on-
P elion, Olympus, Pindus, and Othrys, through which there ally said to
was as yet no opening to allow the pent-up waters of the have been
once a great
rivers to escape. Afterwards, according to the Thessalians, lake, till
"d h th k
t h e sea-go d P osei on, w o causes ear qua es, ma e an cleft an d Poseidon
outlet for the lake through the mountains, by cleaving the ope11ing for
. T h h h" h h
narrow gorge of empe, t roug \V ic t e river eneus the gorge p the\vaterin
has ever since drained the Thessalian plain. The pious of Te171pe.
historian intimates his belief in the truth of this local tradi-
tion. ''Whoever believes," says he, ''that Poseidon shakes
the earth, and that chasms caused by earthquakes are his
handiwork, would say, on seeing the gorge of tl1e Peneus,
that Poseidon had made it. For the sepa1ation of the
mountains, it seems to me, is certai11ly the effect of an eartl1-

1 Strabo, i. 3. 4, PJ). 49- 50, et!. i. 24; E. I-I. l3t1nbt1ry, Eiz"Jtor;1 of

Casaubon. Compare Sir Charles J,yell, ,411cie11t G'eograph;1 2 (I,011(\on, 1883),
l'1i11cip/eJ o.f Geo!og;1 12 (I,ondo11, 187 5), i. 658 J''f
THE GREAT FLOOD l'AR'f I

1
quake.'' The view of the father of history was substantially
2
accepted by later writers of antiquity, though one of them
would attribute the creation of the gorge and the drainage
of the lake to the hero Hercules, among whose beneficent
labours for the good of mankind the construction of water-
3
works on a gigantic scale was commonly reckoned. More
cautiot1s or more philosophical authors contented themselves
with referring the origin of the defile to a simple earthquake,
without expressi11g any opi11ion as to the god or hero who
4
may have set the tremendous disturbance in motion.
The Yet we need not wonder that popular opinion in this
~~;~~=~~r~f 1natter should incline to the theory of divine or heroic agency,
of Tempe for in truth the natural features of the pass of Tempe are
::t~~~IIy well fitted to impress the mind with a religious awe, with a
~uggest the sense of vast primordial forces which, by the gigantic scale of
idea that
the gorge
h . . h 1
t eir operations, present an overw e ming contrast to t e h
had
originated
puny labours of man. The traveller who descends at morn-
in some ing into the deep gorge from the west, may see, far above
great cata- him, the snows of Olympus flushed vvith a golden glow under
strophe;
whereas the beams of the rising sun, but as he pursues the path do,vn-
gleologyth
S lOWS
t
a , wards the summits of the mountains disappear from view,
liI{etheDa_r- and he is confronted on either hand only by a stupendous
danelles 1t ll f h h
was cre~ted wa o mig ty precipices s ooting up in pro igious gran eur
d d
by t?e slow and approaching each other in some places so near that they
eros1<MJ. of
water. almost seem to meet, barely leaving room for the road and
river at their foot, and for a strip of blue sky overhead. The
cliffs on the side of Olympus, which the traveller has con-
stantly before his eyes, since the road runs on the south or
right bank of the river, are indeed the most magnificent and
striking in Greece, and in rainy weather they are rendered
still more impressive by the waterfalls that pour down their
sides to swell the smooth and steady current of the stream.
The grandeur of the scenery culminates about the middle of
the pass, where an enormous crag rears its colossal form high

in air, its soaring sum1n1t crowned \Vith the ruins of a Roman
castle. Yet the sublimity of the landscape is tempered and
softened by the richness and verdure of the vegetation. In
I He1odotus, vii. I 29. 4
Strabo, ix. 5. 2, p. 430, ed.
2 Philost1atus, Inza,E[. ii. I 4. Casaubon ; Seneca, Nat11r. Qieaest. vi.
3 Diodorus Sict1lus, iv. r 8. 6. 25. 2,
some parts of the defile the cliffs recede sufficiently to leave
little grassy flats at their foot, where thicl(ets of evergreens
-the laurel, the myrtle, the wild olive, the arbutus, the agnus
castus are festooned with wild vines and ivy, and variegated
with the crimson bloom of the oleander and the yellow gold
of the jasmine and laburnum, while the air is perfumed by
the luscious odours of masses of aromatic plants and flowers.
Even in the narro\vest places the river bank is overshadowed
by spreading plane-trees, which stretch their roots a11d dip
their pendent boughs into the stream, their dense foliage
forming so thick a screen as almost to shut out the sun.
The scarred and- fissured fronts of the huge cliffs themselves
are tufted with dvvarf oaks and shrubs, wherever these can
find a footi11g, their verdure contrasting vividly with the bare
white face of the lirnestone rock; \vhile brea](s here and there
in the mountain wall open up vistas of forests of great oaks
and dark firs mantling the steep declivities. The overarching
shade and soft luxuriance of the vegetation strike the traveller
all the more by contrast if he comes to the glen in hot
summer weather after toiling through the dusty, sultry plains
of Thessaly, without a tree to protect him from the fierce
rays of the soutl1ern sun, without a breeze to cool his brow,
and with little variety of hill and dale to relieve the dull
1
monotony of the landscape. No wonder that speculation
should have early busied itself with the origin of this grand
and beautiful ravine, and that primitive religion and science
alike should have ascribed it to some great primeval cata-
clysm, some sudden and tremendous outburst of volcanic
energy, rather than to its true cause, the gradual and age-
2
long erosion of vvater.
I E. Dodwell, Classical a1id topo- xliv. 6; Pliny, Nat. Hist. iv. 3 I ;
graphical Tour throitgh Greece (London, Catullus, !xiv. 28 5 sqq. ; Ovid, llfeta-
1819), ii. 109 sqq. ; Sir William Gell, 1norph. i. 568 sqq. Of these descrip-
The Itinerary ofGreece (London, I 8 I 9 ), tions that of Aelian is the most copious
pp. 27 5 sqq. ; W. M. Leake, Travels and most warmly coloured. I-le dwells
in Northern Greece (London, 1835), iii. with particular delight on the luxuri-
390 sqq. ; C. Bursian, Geographie von ance of the vegetation.
Griechen!and (Leipsic, 1862-1872), i. 2 ''That Olympus and Ossa were
58 sqq. ; Christopher Wordsworth, torn asunder and the waters of the
Greece, Pi'ctorial, Descriptive, and Thessalian basin pottred forth, is a very
llistorical, New Edition, revisecl by ancient notion, and an often cited 'con-
I-I. F. Tozer (London, 1882), pp. 295 fir111ation ' of Deucalion's flood. It
sqq. For ancient descriJ)tions of Tempe has not yet ceased to be in vogue,
see Aelian, Var. Hist. iii. I ; Livy, apparently becat1se those wl10 entertain
He11ce the Hence- we may with so1ne confidence conclude that the
story 0 r . cleft in the Thessalian mountains, which is said to have been
Det1cal1on s
flood may rent by Deucalion's flood, was no other than the gorge of
not ~ea Tempe. Indeed, without being very rash, we may perhaps
genuine
tradition, go farther and conjecture that the story of the flood itself
~u!~~r~f was suggested by the desire to explain the origin of the deep
observa- and nar1ow defile. For once men had pictured to them-
tion. selves a great lake dammed in by the circle of the Thessalian
mountains, the thought would 11aturally occur to them, what
a vast inundation must have followed the bursting of the
dam, when the released water, rushing in a torrent through
the newly opened sluice, swept over the subjacent lowlands
carrying havoc and devastation in its train! If there is any
truth in this conjecture, the Thessalian story of Deucalion's
flood and the Samothracian story of the flood of Dardanus
stood exactly on the same footi11g: both were mere inferences
drawn from the facts of physical geography: neither of them
contained any reminiscences of actual events. In short, both
were what Sir Edward Tylor has called myths of observation
1
rather than historical traditions.
5. Other European Storz'es of a Great Flood

Fewdil11vial Apart from the ancient Greek stories of a great flood, it
legends in is remarkable that very few popular traditions of a universal

Europe.
or widespread deluge have been recorded in Europe. An
Icelandic Icelandic version of the tradition occurs in the Younger
story of a
deluge of Edda, the great collection of ancient Norse myths and legends
blood in which was put together by Snorri Sturluson about 1222 A.D. 2
whicl1 the
giants were We there read how the god Bor had three divine sons, Odin,
drowned. Wili, and We, and how these sons slew the giant Y mir.
From the wounds of the dying giant there gushed such a
stream of blood that it 'drowned all the other giants except
one, named Bergelmir, who escaped with his wife in a boat,
.
it are not aware that modern geological vol. iv. pp. 28 I sq.).
investigation has conclusively proved 1
(Sir) Edward B. Tylor, Researches
that the gorge of the Peneus is as typi- i1zto the Early History of Mankind
cal an example of a valley of erosion (London, 1878), pp. 306 sqq.
as any to be seen in Auvergne or in 2
Encyclopcedia Britan1iz'ca, Ninth
Colorado'' (T. H. Huxley, '' Hasis- Edition, vol. vii. (Edinburgh, I 877)
adra's Adventure,'' Collected Essays, p. 649, s.v. ''Edda.''
CH. 1v EUROPEAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 175
'
and from whom tl1e later race of giants is descended. After- But this
wards the sons of Bor tool< the carcase of the giant y mir story is
r. h" d h ld rather
an d 1as 1one t e wor out of lt, for down to that time the cosmogonic
world, as we see it now, did not exist. Out of his flowing td~lan. 1 uv1a1,
blood they made the ocean, the seas, and all waters ; out of and
his flesh the earth ; out of his bones the mountains ; out of ~~~embles
his teeth and broken bones the rocks a11d stones ; and out Babylonian
of his skull the vault of the sky, \vhich they set up on four ~~::~~~ny
horns, with a dwarf under each horn to prop it up. 1 How- byBerosus.
ever, this Norse tale differs from the Babylonian, the Hebrew,
and the Greek in dating the great flood before the creation
1
of the world and of mankind ; it hardly therefore belongs to
2
. the same class of legends. In it the formation of the world
out of the body and blood of a giant has been compared .to
the Babylonian cosmogony recorded by Berosus, according
to which the god Bel made the world by splitting a giantess
in two and converting one half of her into the earth and the
other half of her into the sky, after which he cut off his own
head, and from the flo\ving blood mingled with earth the
3
other gods moulded the human race. Tl1e resemblance
between the two cosmogonies is fairly close, but whether, as
some think, this proves a direct Babylonian influence on the
4
Norse legend may be doubted.
A Welsh legend of a deluge runs thus.. Once upon a Welsh
time the lake of Llion burst and flooded all lands, so that Iegden d of
a e1uge.
the whole human race was drowned, all except Dwyfan and
'
Dwyfach, who escaped in a naked or mastless ship and re-
peopled the island of Prydain (Britain). The ship also

contained a male and a female of every sort of living
creature, so that after the deluge the animals were able to
5
propagate their various kinds and restock tl1e world.
I Die . Edda, iibersetzt und mit der dezttsche1t llfytholo,l[l'"e, 5 p. 20.
Erlauterungen begleitet 11on Karl Sim. 3 Et1sebius, Ch1onico1z, ed. A.
rock, Achte Auflage (Stuttgart, 1882), Schoene, vol. i. col. I 6.
p. 253 ; J. Grimr11, Deutsche Mytho- 4 Et1gen Mogk, '' Mythologie,'' in
logie,4 i. (Berlin, 1875) pp. 463 sqq. I-I. Patil's Gr111zdriss der Ger111a1zi.1che11
In this Norse legend the word trans- Philologi"e, 2 iii. (Strasburg, I 900) p.
lated ''boat'' (lt'"tdr) is obscure; it might 377.
also n1ean ''cradle.'' See I(. SimrocJ,, 6 Edward Davies, The J,fytholo,zy
Handbuch der deutsche1z Jrfytholo,gie, atzd Rites of the liritish D1'"ltids (Lon-
Flinfte Auflage (Bonn, 1878), pp. don, 1809), p. 95; (Sir) John Rhys,
20 .rq. Celtz"c Folklo1e, TVelsh a11d Jrfa11:x:
2 Compare K. Simrock, Handbiech (Oxford, I 90 I), ii. 429 (referring ta the
l'HE GREAT FLOOD l'ART I
Litl1uania11 A Lithuanian story of a great flood is also reported.

story of a
great flood. One day it chanced that the supreme god Pramzimas was
lool<:ing out of a window of his heavenly house, and survey-
ing the world fro1n this coign of vantage he could see nothing
but war and injustice among mankind. The sight so vexed
his righteous soul that he sent two giants, Wandu and Wejas,
down to the sinful earth to destroy it. Now the two giants
were no other than Water and Wind, and they laid about
them with such hearty good will, that after twenty nights
and twenty days there was very little of the world left stand-

ing. Tl1e deity now looked out of the windo\v again, to see
how things were progressing, and, as good luck would have
it, he was eating nuts at the time. As he did so, he threw
down the shells, and one of them happened to fall on the
top of the highest mountain, where animals and a few pairs
of human beings had sought . refuge from the flood. The
nutshell came, in the truest sense of the word, as a godsend;
everybody clambered into it, a11d floated about on the surface
of the far-spreading inundation. At this critical juncture
the deity looked out of the window for the third time, and,
his wrath being now abated, he gave orders for the wind to
fall and the water to subside. So the remnant of mankind
were saved, and they dispersed over the earth. Only a single
couple remained on the spot, and from them the Lithuanians
are descended. But they were old a11d, naturally a good
deal put out by their recent experience ; so to comfort them
God sent the rainbow, which advised them to jump over the
bones of the earth nine times. The aged couple did as they
\Vere bid ; nine times they jumped, and nine other couples
sprang up in consequence, the ancestors of the nine Litht1-
1
anian tribes.
late Triads, iii. I 3 and iii. 97). Sir called Dwyfan and . Dwyfach, these
John Rhys adds (pp. 440 sq.) : '' From names being borne both by the springs
the names Dwyfan and Dwyfach I infer themselves and the rivers flowing from
that the writer of Triad iii. I 3 has de- them.''
veloped his universal deluge on the 1
J. Grimm, Deutsche Mytlzologi:e,4
basis of the scriptural account of it, for i. 480 sq., referring to Dzieje starozytne
those names belonged in all probability narodu litezvskiego, przez Th. Narbutta
to wells and rivers : in other terms, (Wilno, 1835), i. 2. According to H.
they were the names of water divinities. Usener (Die Sintjlietsagen, p. 3) the
At any rate there seems to be some genuineness of this l,ithuanian lege11d
evidence that two springs, whose waters is not above suspicion.
flow into Bi!-la. Lake, were at one time
CH. iv EUROPEAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 177
.The gipsies of Transylvania are reported to tell the fol- Story of a
lowing legend of a deluge. There was a time they say when great flood
. ' ' told by
n_ien lived for ever, and knew neither trouble nor cold, neither the gipsies
sickness nor sor1ow. The earth brought forth the finest of Tra_n-
. . . . sylvan1a.
fruits : flesh grew on many trees, and milk and wine flowed
in many rivers. Men and animals lived happily with each
other, and they had no fear of death. But one day it hap-
pened that an old man came into the country and begged
a cottager to give him a night's lodging. He slept in the
cottage and was well entertained by the cottager's wife.
Next day, on taking his leave, the old man gave his host a
small fish in a little vessel, and said, ''Keep this fisl1 and do
not eat it. In nine days I will return, and if you give me
the fish back, I will reward you." Then away he went.
The housewife looked at the little fish and said to her
husband, ''Goodman, ho\v would it be if we roasted the fish?''
Her husband answered,'' I promised the old man to give him
back the fish. You must swear to me to spare the fish and
to keep it till the old man returns." The wife swore, saying,
'' I will not kill the fish, I will keep it, so help me God l ''
After two days the woman thought, ''The little fish must
taste uncommonly well, since the old man sets such store on
it, and will not let it be roasted, but carries it with him about
the world." She thought about it a long time, till at last
she took the little fish out of the vessel, and threw it on the
hot coals. Hardly had she done so than the first flasl1 of
lightning came down from heaven and strt1ck the woman
dead. Then it began to rain. The rivers overflowed tl1eir beds
and swamped the country. On the ninth day the old man
appeared to his host and said, '' Thou hast kept thine oath
and not killed tl1e fish. Tal<:e thee a wife, gather thy kins-
folk together, and build thee a boat in which ye can save
yourselves. All men and all living things must be drowned,
but ye shall be saved. Take with thee also animals and
seeds of trees and herbs, that ye may afterwards people the
earth again." Then the old man disappeared, and the man
did as he was bidden. It rained for a whole year, and
nothing was to be seen but water and sky. After a year the
water sank, and the man, with his wife and l<:insfolk, and the
animals, disembarked. They had now to work, tilling and
VOLi N
THE GREAT FLOOD I' AI<'!' I
sowing the earth, to gain a living. Their life was now labour
and sorrow, and worse than all came sicl<:11ess and death.
So they multiplied but slowly, and many, many thousands
of years passed befo1e ma11kind was as numerous as they had
1
The been before the flood, and as they are now. The incident
incident of of the fish in this story reminds us of tl1e fish which figures
the fish in 2
the story prominently in the a11cient Indian lege11d of a great flood ;
has its
analogy in
and accordingly it seems possible that, as Dr. H. von
3
the ancient Wlislocl<:i believes, tl1e ancestors of the gipsies brought the
sItnory o t h e lee-end with them to Transylvania from tl1eir old hotne in

dianf ~
flood. India.
Vogul story A story of a great flood has also been 1ecorded among
~~~d~reat the Voguls, a people of. the Finnish or U grian stocl<:, >vho
inhabit tl1e country both on the east and the west of the
Ural Mountains, and who therefore belong both to Asia and
4
Europe. 'The story runs thus. After seven years of drought
the Great Woman said to the Great l\1an, ''It has rained
elsewhere. How shall we save ourselves? The other giants
are gathered in a village to take counsel. What shall \Ve
do? '' The Great Man answered, '' Let us cut a poplar in.
two, hollow it out, and tnake two boats. Then we shall
weave a rope of willow roots five hundred fathoms long.
We shall bury one end of it in the earth and fasten the other
to the bow of our boats. Let every man with children em-
bark in the boat \Vith his family, and let them be covered in
with atarpaulin of cowhide, let victt1als be made ready for
seven days and seven nights and put under the tarpaulin.
And let us place pots of melted butter in each boat." Having
thus provided for their own safety, the two giants ran about
the villages, urging the inhabitants to build boats and weave
ropes. Some did not know how to. set about it, and the
giants showed them how it should be done. Others preferred
to seek a place of refuge, but they sought in vain, and the
Great Man, to whom they betook themselves because he \Vas
their elder, told them that he knew no place of refuge large
enough to hold them. '' See,'' said he, '' the holy water >vill
1 H. v. Wlislocki, Vom wandernden 3 Op. cz't. p. 269.
Zigeztnervolke (Hamburg, 1890), pp. 4Encyclopll!dz'a Brita1znicq, Ninth
267-269. Ed't' .. 8 , s. v., '' S'b
i ion, xx11. . ; '' J.
i er1a
Deniker, Tl1e Ra1:es ef lYian (Londo11,
2 See below, pp. 183 sqq. 1900), p. 35 I.
CHAP. rv PERSIAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 179
'
soon be on us; for two days we have heard the rumble of

its waves. Let us embark without delay." The earth was
soon submerged, and the people who had not b~ilt boats
perished in the hot water. The same fate befell the owners
of boats whose ropes were too short, and likewise those who
had not provided themselves with liquid butter wherewith to
grease the rope as it ran out over the gunwale. On the
seventl1 day the water began to. sink, and soon the survivors
set foot on dry ground. But there were neither trees nor
plants on the face of the earth ; the, animals had perished ;
even the fish had disappeared. The survivors were on the
point of dying of hunger, when they prayed to the great
god N umi-tarom to create anew fish, animals, trees, and
1
plants, and their prayer was heard.
Some curious relics of the great flood are still pointed Relics of
S avoy. H ere an d th ere a h uge Iron
out 1n or b ronze ring
the great
flood ,
may be seen fixed into a steep rock in some apparently inac- pointed out
cessible position. Tradition runs tl1at when the \Vater of the in Savoy.
deluge had covered all the low-lying parts of Savoy, such
persons as were lucky enough to own boats fastened them to
these rings, which afforded them a temporary security. There
are three of these rings in the Mont de Saleve, \vhich over-
looks Julien in the Baute-Savoie, and the1e is another in the
mountains of Voirons. Again, in the Passo del Cavallo there
is a well-known stone bearing great hoof-marl(s. These,
the peasants say, were made by a horse, for which Noah
could find no room in the ark. When the flood rose, the
animal leaped on to this rock, which was the highest he
could see ; and as fast as the drowning people tried to
clamber up it, the horse beat them off, till the water over-
2
whelmed him also.
'
6. Supposed Persian Stories of a G1-eat Flood
Some scholars have held that in ancient Persian litera-
ture they can detect the elements of diluvial traditio11s.
1 Frans:ois Lenormant, Les Origines d' Et/111ographie, vol. i. PJJ. 12 sq.
de t' Histoire d'ap1es ta Bible: de ta
Creation de t' Ho1nnze au Deluge (Paris, 2 Estella Canziani, Cost11111c.r, 71a-
1880), pp. 455 sq., c4uciti~g J,~1cien ,ditio11s a11d .S'o11.~"S ef ,S/zz1ri)' ( J,ondo11,
Adam in Reviee de l 1hilolog1e et 191 I), jJ. 98.
180 THE CREA T FLOOD PAR'f I
A11cient Thus in the Bundahis, a Pahlavi work on cosmogony,

Persian
tradition mythology, and legendary history, we read of a conflict
of a flood which the angel Tistar, an embodiment of the bright star
which
overspread Sirius, wa.ged with the Evil Spirit apparently in the early
the world, ages of the world. When the sun was in the sign of Cancer,
apparently
before the the angel converted himself successively into the forms of a
appearance man, a horse, and a bull, and in each form he produced rain
of man on
earth. for ten days and nights, every drop of the rain being as big
as a bowl; so that at the end of the thirty days the water
stood at the height of a man all over the world, and all
noxious creatures, the breed of the Evil Spirit, were drowned
in the caves and dens of the earth. It is the venom of these
noxious creatures, diffused in the water, which has made the
1
sea salt to this day. But this story has all the appearance
of being a cosmogonic myth devised to explain why the sea
is salt ; it is certainly not a diluvial tradition of the ordinary
type, since nothing is said in it about mankind ; indeed \Ve
are not even given to understand that the human race had
come into existence at the time \vhen the angelic battle with
2
the principle of evil took place.
Another Another ancient Persian story recorded in the Zend-
ancient
Persian Avesta, has sometimes been adduced as a diluvial tradition.
story relates We read that Yima was the first mortal with whom the
how the
gods Creator Ahura Mazda deigned to converse, and to whom
resolved the august deity revealed his law. For nine hundred winters
to destroy
most living the sage Yima, ,under the divine superintendence, reigned
creatures over the world, and during all that time there was neither
by a severe
winter and cold wind nor hot wind, neither disease nor deatl1 ; the earth
deep sno\v,
and ho\v, was replenished with flocks ar1d 11erds, with men and dogs
warned by and birds, and with red blazing fires. But as there was
them, the
sageYima neither disease nor death mankind and animals increased at
took refuge 1 Pahlavi Texts, translated by E.W. Iranian scholar, Fr. Spiegel (Erdnische
from the
threatened West (Oxford, 1880), pp. 25-28 (Sacred Alte1thu11iskunde, i. 48) and of R.
calamity in Books ef the East, vol. v.) ; Fr. Andree, Die Flutsagen, p. 15, who
a blissful Spiegel, Erdni"sche Alterthunzskunde says, ''This seems to me so clear and
enclosure, (Leipsic, 1871-1878), i. 479-481. As simple, that I cannot understand how
into which to Tistar or Tistrya, the angel of Sirius, any one can here assume Semitic influ-
he gathered see The Zend-Avesta, Part ii., trans- ence.'' 'Franc;ois Lenormant also treats
the seeds lated by J. Darn1esteter (Oxford, 1883), the story as a cosmogonic myth, which
of _men, of pp. 92 sqq. (Sacred Books ef the East, has no reference to humanity and no
animals, vol. xxiii. ).
and of fire. connexion with the Biblical narrative
2
(Les 01igi"11es de l' Hi>toi1e il'apii!s la
This is also the view of the eminent Bible, pp. 430 sqq. ).
CHAP. IV PERSIAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 181
such an alarming rate that on two occasions, at intervals of

three hundred years, it became absolutely necessary to enlarge
the earth in order to find room for the surplus population.
The necessary enlargement was successfully carried out by
Yima with the help of t\VO instruments, a golden ring and
a gold-inlaid dagger, which he had received as insignia of
royalty at the hands of the Creator. However, after the
third enlargement it would seem that either the available
space of the universe or the patience of the Creator was
exhausted ; for he called a council of the celestial gods,
and as a result of their mature deliberations he informed .
Yima that '' upon the material wo1ld the fatal winters are
going to fall, that shall bring the fierce, foul frost ; upon the
material world the fatal winters are going to fall, that shall
make snow-flakes fall thick, even an aredvz' deep on the
highest tops of mountains. And all the three sorts of beasts
shall perish, those that live in the wilderness, and those that
live on the tops of the mountains, and those that live in the
bosom of the dale, under the shelter of stables." Accord-
ingly the Creator warned Yima to provide for himself a
place of refuge in which he could find safety from the
threatened calamity. He was told to make a square
enclosure (Vara), as long as a riding-ground on every side,
and to convey into it the seeds of sheep and oxen, of men,
of dogs, of birds, and of red blazing fires. '' There thou
shalt establish dwelling places, consisting of a house with
a balcony, a courtyard, and a gallery. Thither thou shalt
bring the seeds of men and women, of the greatest, best, and
finest kinds on this earth ; thither thou shalt bring the seeds
of every kind of cattle, of the greatest, best, and finest kinds
on this earth. Thither thou shalt bring the seeds of every
kind of tree, of the greatest, best, and finest kinds on this
earth; thither thou shalt bring the seeds of every kind of
fruit the fullest of food and sweetest of odour. All those
'
seeds shalt thou bring, two of every kind, to be kept in-
exhaustible there, so long as those men shall stay in
the enclosure (Vara). There shall be no humpbacked,
none bulged fo1ward there ; no impotent, no lunatic ; no
poverty, no lying ; no meanness, no jealousy ; no decayed
tooth, no leprous to be confined, nor any of the brands
182 TIE GREAT FLOOIJ f'AlcT I
wherewith Angra Mainyu stamps the bodies of mortals."

Yima obeyed the divine command, and made the enclosure,
and gathered into it the seeds of men and animals, of trees
and fruits, the choicest and the best. On that blissful abode
the sun, moon, and stars rose only once a year, but on the
other hand a whole year seemed only as one day. Every
fortieth year to every human couple were born two cl1ildren,
a male and a fernale, and so it was also with every sort of
cattle. And the men in Yima's enclosure lived the happiest
1
life.
Bttt this In all this it is hard to see any vestige of a flood story.
story is not
strictly a The destruction with which the animals are threatened is to
traditi.011 be the effect of severe winters and deep snow, not of a
of a flood.
deluge ; and nothing is said about repeopling the world
after the catastrophe by means of the men and animals \vho
had been preserved in the enclosure. It is true that the
warning given by the Creator to Yima, and the directions
to bestow himself and a certain number of animals in a
place of safety, resemble the warning given by God to
Noah and the directions about the building and use of the
ark. But in the absence of any reference to a deluge vve
are not justified in classing this old Persian story with
2
diluvial traditions.
..
1 The Zend-Avesta, Part i., trans- as the first dead and the l<ing of the
' lated by J. Darmesteter (Oxford, 1880), dead over whon1 he rules in a iegion
PP- I 1-20 (Sacred Books of the East, of bliss, and of old myths about the
vol. iv.) ; Fr_ Spiegel, Er1~nische end of the world. The world, lasting
Alterthumskunde, i. 478 sq. a long yea1 of twelve millenniums, was
2 In this opinion I am supported by
to end by a dire winter, like the Eddie
the autl1ority of Fr. Spiegel (Ert2nz"sche Fimbul winter, to be followed by an
Alterthu11zsku1zde, i. 479). On the other everlasting spring, when men, sent back
hand the story is treated as a variation to earth from the heavens, should enjoy,
of the Babylonian flood legend by Fr. in an eternal earthly life, the sa1ne happi-
Lene1mant (Les Origines de l' Hz".rtoz"re ness that they had enjoyed after their
d'apies la Bible: de la Cieation de death in the realm ofYima. But as in
l'Hom1ne azt Deluge, Paris, 1880, p. the definitive form wl1ich was taken by
430), and by M. Winternitz (Dz"e Flut- Mazdean cosn1ology the world was n1ade
sagen, pp. 328 sq.). According to James to end by fire, its destruction by \Vinter
Darn1esteter (The Zend-Avesta, Part i., was no longer the last incident of its
Oxford; 1880, pp. IO sq.) ''the tale in life, and therefore, the Var of Yima,
the first part refers to Yima as the first instead of remaining, as it was origin-
man, the first king, and the founder of ally, the paradise that gives back to
civilisation ; the tale in the second part earth its inhabitants, came to be nothing
is a comlJination of the mytl1s of Yin1a, more than a sort of Noah's ark.''

CHAP. xv INDJAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 18
3
7. Ancient Indian S'torz"es of a Great Flood

. No legend of a great flood is to be found in the Vedic The story
hymns, the i:nost ancient literary monuments of India which ofif adgreat
oo occurs
appear to have been composed at various dates between 1500 in the later
and I OOO B.C., while tl1e Aryans were still settled in the l~tansctrit 1 era ure
Punjab and had not yet spread eastward into the valley ?f.India;
. h l . .
o f t h e G anges. B ut in t e ater Sanscrit literature a well- recorded
1t 1s first
marked story of a deluge repeatedly occurs in forms which in the

. . . Satapatka
combine a general resemblance with some variations of Brakmana,
detail. The first record of it meets us in the Sata"atha which is
. . . ':l' probably
Brahmana, an important prose treatise on sacred ritual, not later
which .
is believed to have been written not long before the t~atnhthe
SIX
rise of Buddhism, and therefore not later than the sixth ce11tury
century before Christ. The Aryans then occupied the B.c.
upper valley of the Ganges as well as the valley of the
Indus ; but they were probably as )'et little affected by the
ancie11t civilizations of Western Asia and Greece. Certainly
the great influx of Greek ideas and Greel< art came centuries
1
later with Alexander's invasion in 3 26 B.C. As related in
'
the Satapatha Brahmana_ the story of the great flood runs

as fallows : -
'
''In the morning they brought to Manu water for wash- The story
ing, 3ust
1 h b fi
as now a sot ey are wont to ring water or was ing flood in the h" ofthegreat
the hands. When he was washing himself, a fish came into Satapatka
his hands. It spake to him the word, 'Rear me, I \Vill save ~Irakmana.
l'v. anu,
thee ! ' 'Wherefrorn \Vilt thou save me?' ' A flood \vill carry warned by
away all these creatures: f1om that I will save thee!' 'Ho\v ~i:~~1;aves
am I to rear thee ? ' It said, ' As long as we are small, there from the
is great destruction for us : fish devours fish. Thou wilt first ~~~~in a
keep me in a jar. When I outgrow that, thou wilt dig a pit
and keep me in it. When I outgrow that, thou wilt take
1 The h11perial Gazetteer of I1zdia, have been composed between 800 and
The Indi'an Et1ipire (Oxford, 1909), 500 n. c. See, i11 aclclition to the fore-
i. 402 sqq., 4 I 7 sq. (W. Crooke}, ii. going autl1orities, A. Weber, Akade111-
206 sqq., 229 sq. (A. A. Maccloncll). ische Vorlesun,i;111z iiber I1idische Lite1a-
The Satapatha Brah111a11a bclo11g to a tu1geslhicl1te (Berli11, 1876), pp. 12 sqq.;
series of priestly treatises on ritual ~ncl J. Eggeli11g, The .)atapatha B1ah111a1za,
theology, whicl1 form the most a11c1ent r~1rl i. (Oxforcl, 1882) Introduction,
body of Sanscrit prose literature ; they JJp. i. sqq. (The Sa,1ed Books of the
are, however, a goocl deal later tl1a11 East, vol. xii. ).
the Vedic hymns, ancl are 1Jelieved to
'
Tl:IE GREAT Jt'LOOD PA!{'f I
me down to the sea, for then I shall be beyond destruction.'

It soon became 'a g!tas!ta (a large fish); for that grows largest
of all fish. Thereupon it said, ' In such and such a year that
flood will come. . Thou shalt then attend to me by preparing
1
a ship; and when the flood has risen thou shalt enter into
the ship, and I will save tl1ee from it.' After he had reared
it in this wav l
he took it down to the sea. And in the same
year which the fish had indicated to him, he attended to the
2
advice of the fish by preparing a ship; and when the flood
had risen, he entered into the ship. The fish then swam up
to him, and to its horn he tied the rope of the ship, and
by that mea11s he passed swiftly up to yonder northern
mountain. It then said, 'I have saved thee. Fasten the
ship to a tree ; but let not the \Vater cut thee off, whilst
thou art on the mountain. As the water subsides, thou
mayest gradually descend ! ' Accordingly he gradually de-
scended, and hence that slope of the northern mountain is
called ' Manu's descent.' The flood then swept away all

these creatures, and Manu alone remained here.

How after ''Being desirous of offspring, he engaged in worshipping
the flood
Manu and austerities. During this time he also performed a paka-
obtained a sacrifice : he offered up in the waters clarified butter, sour
daugl1ter
through milk, whey, and curds. Thence a woman was produced in
sacrifice. a year : becoming quite solid she rose ; clarified butter
gathered in her footprint. Mitra and Varuna met her.
They said to her, ' Who art thou ? ' ' Manu's daughter,' she
replied. 'Say thou art ours,' they said. 'No,' she said, 'I am
the daughter of him who begat me.' They desired to have a
share in her. She either agreed or did not agree, but passed
by them. She came to Manu. Manu said to her, 'Who
art tl1ou?' 'Thy daughter,' she replied. ' How, illustrious
one, art thou my daughter?' he asked. She replied, ' Those
offerings of clarified butter, sour milk, whey, and curds, which
thou madest in the waters, with them thou hast begotten
me. I am the blessing : make use of me at the sacrifice !
If thou wilt make use of me at the sacrifice thou wilt become
. l
rich in offspring and cattle. Whatever blessing thou shalt

1
''Build a ship then and worship 2
Manu had built a ship, and wor-
''
me '' (Max Mi.iller) ; '' Thou shalt, shipped the fish'' (Max Muller) ; ''he
therefore, construct a ship and resort constructed a ship and resorted to hin1 ''
to me'' (J. Muir). (J. Muir).
CHAI'. rv INDIAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 185
invoke through me, all that shall be granted to thee ! ' He

accordingly made use of her as the benediction in the middle
of the sacrifice; for what is intermediate between the fore-
offerings and the after-offerings, is the middle of the sacrifice.
With her he went on worshipping and performing austerities,
wishing for offspring. Through her he generated this race, '
which is this race of Manu ; and whatever blessing he invoked

through her, all that was granted to him.'' 1
The next record of the flood legend in Sanscrit literature The story
meets us in the Mahabharata, the vast Indian epic, which in floftld1 e_great
I 00 Ill the
the form in which we now possess it, is about eight times as Maha-
long as the Ili"ad and Odyssey put together. The nucleus of bharata.
this huge compilation may date from the fifth century before
Christ ; through successive expansio11s it attained its present
,enormous bulk in the early centuries of our era. The evi-
dence of inscriptions proves that by the year 5 oo A.D. the poem
2
was complete. As told in the epic, the legend runs thus:-
,, There was a great sage [ri'shi] Manu, son of Vivasvat,
majestic, in lustre equal to Prajapati. In energy, fiery How the

vigour,
prosperity, an d austere 1ervour
r h e surpassed b ot h ascetic
Manu sarre"
his father and his grandfather. Standing with uplifted arm, rescued a
. B d . h t" d .
on one fioot, on t h e spacious a ar1, e prac 1se intense was warned fish, and
austere fervour. This direful exercise he performed, with by it. of the

. d d . h . k.
h ts head ownwards, an \Vtt unwtn 1ng eyes, or ten deluge, fi coming
tl1ousand years. Once, when, clad in dripping rags, with

matted hair, he was so engaged, a fish came to him on
the banks of the ChirinI, and spake : ' Lord, I am a small
fish; I dread the stronger ones, and from them you must
save me. For the stronger fish devour the weaker; this has
been immemorially ordained as our means of subsistence.
Deliver me from this flood of apprehension in which I am
sinking, and I will requite the deed.' Hearing this, Manu,
1 The Satapatha Brdh1nana, trans- Texts, vol. i. Third Edition (London,

lated by Julius Eggeling, Part i. 1890), pp. 182-184; 1c1. Usener, Die
(Oxford, 1882) pp. 216-219 (The Si1itjl1et:ia,l{e11, pp. 26 sq. (Ad. \Veber's
Sacred Books of the East, vol. xii.). Ge1man translation).
For other translations of the legend 2 A. A. Macdonell, '' Sans\,rit
see F. Max Miiller, H1:sto1y of Sa1zscrz"t Literature,'' in Th1! I111pe1ial Gazetteer
Literatzere (London and Eclinburgl1, of India, The I1tliia1i E111pi1e (Oxford,
1859), pp. 425-427; ill. India, what 1909), ii. 234 sqq. ; lf. Oldenberg,
ca1z z't teach us? (Lonclon, I 892) PJJ. Die Literat1er lies alte1t I11die1t (Stt1tt-
1 34 sqq. ; J. Muir, Origi1ial ,sanskrit gart and Berlin, 1903), ]Jp. 146 sqq.
filled with compassion, took the fish i11 11is hand, and bring-
ing him to the water threw him into a jar bright as a moon-
beam. In it the fish, being excellently tended, grew ; for
Manu treated him like a son. After a long time he became
very large, and could not be contained in the jar. Then,
seeing Manu, he said again : ' In order that I may thrive,
remove me elsewhere.' Manu then took him out of the jar,
' brought him to a large pond, and threw him in. There he
continued to grow for very many yea1s. Although the pond
was tvvo yqj'anas long, and one yo;"ana broad, the lotus-eyed
fish found in it no room to move ; and again said to Manu :
' Take me to Ganga, the dear queen of the ocean-monarch ;
in her I shall dwell ; or do as thou thinkest best, for I must
contentedly submit to thy authority, as through thee I have
exceedingly increased.' 1V1anu accordingly took the fish and
threv\7 him into the river Ganga. There he waxed for some
time, when he again said to Manu : 'From my great bulk I
cannot move in the Ganga ; be gracious and remove me
quickly to the ocean.' Manu took him out of the Ganga;
and cast him into the sea. Althougl1 so huge, the fish \\'as
easily borne, and pleasant to touch and smell, as Manu
carried him. When he had been thro\vn into the ocean he
said to Manu : 'Great lord, thou hast in every way preserved
me: now hear from me what thou must do \vhen the time
arrives. Soon shall all these terrestrial objects, both fixed
and moving, be dissolved. The time for the purification of
the worlds has now arrived. I therefore inform thee what
How, on is for thy greatest good. The period dreadful for the universe,
t!1e advice
of the fish, moving an
d fi d h
xe , as come. Mal<:e for thyself a strong ship,
Man11 with a cable attached ; embark in it with the seven sages
embarked
in a ship [rzshzs ], a11d stow in it, carefully preserved and assorted, all
with the seeds which have been described of old by Brahmans.
seven sages Wh b l d . h .
and many en em ar <e 1n t e ship, look out for me : I shall come
kinds of
seeds.
recognizable by my horn. So shalt thou do , I greet thee and
depa1t. These great waters cannot be crossed over without
me. Distrust not my word.' Manu replied, ' I shall do as
thou hast said.' After taking mutual leave they departed
each on his ow11 way. Manu then, as enjoined, taking with
him the seeds, floated on the billowy ocean in the beautiful
ship. He then thought on the fish, which, knowing his
CHAP. rv INDIAN .S'TORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 187
desire, arrived with all speed, distinguished by a horn. How Man11

When Manu saw the horned leviathan lofty as a mountain tie_d the
r . , ' ' ship's cable
h e iastened the ships cable to the horn. Being thus attached, to the horn
the fish dragged the ship with great rapidity, transporting it ~~~~::s~e
across the briny ocean which seemed to dance with its waves fish towed
d h d h
an t un er wit its waters. T the ship to
ossed by the tempests, the the peak of
ship whirled lil<e a reeling and intoxicated woman. Neither Himavat.
the earth, nor the quarters of the world appeared ; there was
nothing but \Vater, air, and sky. In the world thus con-
founded, the seven sages [rishis ], Manu, and the fish were
beheld. So, for very many years,. the fish, unwearied, drew
the ship over the waters; and brought it at length to the
highest peak of Himavat. I-le then, smiling gently, said to
the sages, 'Bind the ship without delay to this peak.' They
did so accordingly. And that highest peak of Himavat is
still known by the name of N aubandhana (' the Binding of
the Ship'). The friendly fish (or god, anz1nzsha) then said How the
to the sages, 'I am the Prajapati Brahma, than whom nothing ~:~ealed
higher can be reached. In the form of a fish I have delivered itself as
you from this great danger. Manu shall create all living ~~~~!_~~i
beings, gods, demigods [asuras], men, with all worlds, and all and .
appointed
things moving and fixed. By my favour and through severe Manu to
austere fervour, he shall attain perfect insight into his creative 1c_r~ate all
. , 1v1ng
work, and shall not becom.e bewildered. Having thus spoken, beings.both
the fish in an instant disappeared. Manu, desirous to call men. gods and
creatures into existence and bewildered in his work, performed
a great act of austere fervour; and then began visibly to
create all living beings. This which I have narrated is
1
known as the Matsyaka Purai:ia (or ' Legend of the Fish')."
In this latter version Manu is not a common man but a
great seer, who by his religious austerities and the favour of
the Supre1ne Being is promoted to the dignity of Creator of
the world and of all living things, including gods and men.
The same legend is repeated, with minor variations, in Thestory_of
- tl1e flood 1n
the later class of Sanscrit books known as the P ura'1jas. tlieSanscrit
These are epic works, didactic in characte1 a11d sectarian in Pura~as.
purpose, generally designed to recommend the worsl1ip of
1 J. Muir, 011ginal .sa11s/.'.1it Te.xts, German translatio11 of the passage in

vol. i. Thircl f~<lition ( JJondon, I 890 ), H. Usener's Die Si1rtjl11tsage1t (Bonn,
pp. 199-201. Compare l'I. Jacobi's 1899), JJp. 29-31.

188 THE GREAT J<LOOD PAR'J' I
Visl1nu, though so1ne of tl1em inculcate the religion of Siva.

So far as they deal with the legends of ancient days, they
derive their materials mainly from the Mahabha1-ata. The
V ayu PuraJ!a, which may be the oldest of them, is believed
1
to date from about 320 A.D. In the Matsyu (''Fish'')
P1trat.za the legend of the deluge runs thus :.-
'I'I1estoryof ''Formerly a heroic king called Manu, the patient son of
tlieflood in the Sun, endowed with all good qualities, indifferent to pain
tl1e M at.ryu
Pu1al/a. and pleasure, after investing his so11 with royal authority,
practised intense austere fervour, in a certain region of
Malaya (Malabar), and attained to transcendent union with
the Deity (yoga). When a million years had elapsed,
Brahma became pleased and disposed to besto\v a boon,
which he desired Manu to choose. Bowing before the father
of the world the monarch said, ' I desire of thee this one
'incomparable boon, that \vhen the dissolution of the universe
arrives I may have the power to preserve all existing things,
whether moving or stationary.' 'So be it,' said the Sot1l of
all things, and va11ished on the spot; when a great shower
of flowers, thrown down by the gods, fell from the sky.
:wrant1saves Once ~s, in his hermitage, Manu offered the oblatio11 to the
ais fish and h
warned Manes, t ere 1e r ll h l
upo11 is . hands, a ong with some water, a
byit.ofthe S'apharI fish (a carp), which the kind-hearted king perceiving,
~~~~~g strove to preserve in his water-jar. In one day and night
the fish grew to the size of sixteen fingers, and cried, 'Pre-
serve me, preserve me.' Manu then took and threw him
into a large pitcher, where in one night he increased three
cubits, and again cried, with the voice of one distressed, to
the son of Vivasvat, 'Preserve me, preserve me, I have sought
refuge with thee.' Manu next put him into a well, ana
when he could. not be contained evep in that, he was thrown
into a lake, where he attained to the size of a YO.Jana ; but
still cried in humble tones, ' Preserve me, preserve me.'
When, after being flung into the Ganga, he increased there
also, the king threw him into the ocean. When he filled the

entire ocean, Ma11u said, in terror, 'Thou art some god, or
thou art Vasudeva ; how can any one else be like this ?
\Vhose body could equal two hundred thousand YO.Janas?
1
A. A. Macdonell, ''Sanskrit ef Indi"a, The Indza1z Enzpire (Oxford,
Literature,'' in The Imperial Gazetteer 1909), ii. 236 sq.
\
CHAP. IV INDIAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD i8g
Thou art recognised under this form of a fish, and thou

tormentest me, Kesava ; reverence be to thee, Hrishikesa,
lord of the world, abode of the universe ! ' Thus addressed,
the divine Janardana, in the form of a fish, replied : ' Thou
hast well spoken, and hast rightly known me. In a short
time the earth with its mountains, groves, and forests, shall
be submerged in the waters. This ship has been constructed He is told
by tl1e company of all the gods for the preservation of the ~ 0 emb~rk
Ill a ship
vast host of living creatures. Embarking in it all living ,,ith all
creatures, both those ene-endered
~
from moisture and from living
creatures
eggs, as well as the viviparous, and plants, preserve the1n ~lldplants,

f rom ea1amity. Wh en d riven
b y t h e blasts at the end of Ill orde1
to save
1
the yuga, the ship is swept along, thou shalt bind it to this them '.rom

h orn o f mine. Th en at t h e c1ose o f t h e d 1ssolut1on
. thou the flood.
shalt be the Prajapati (lord of creatures) of this wo1ld, fixed

and moving. When this shall have been done, thou, the
omniscient, patie11t sage [rishz"], and lord of the Manvanta1/a 2
shalt be an object of \Vorship to the gods.' 2nd. Adhyaya :
Suta said : Being thus addressed, Manu asl\:ed the slayer of
the Asura, 'In how many years shall the (existing) Man-
2
vantara come to an end ? And how shall I preserve
the living creatures ? or ho\v shall I meet again with
thee ? ' The fish answered : ' From this day forward a
drought shall visit the eartl1 for a hundred years and more,
with a tormenting famine. Then the seven direful rays of
the sun, of little power, destructive, shall rain burning char-
coal. At the close of the yuga the submarine fire shall burst
forth, while the poisonous flame issuing from the mouth of
Sankarshana (shall blaze) from Patala, and the fire from
Mahadeva's third eye shall issue from his forehead. Thus
kindled the world shall become confounded. When, con-
sumed in this manner, the earth shall become like ashes, the
aether too shall be scorched \vith heat. Then the world,
together with the gods and planets, shall be destroyed. The
seven clouds of the period of dissolution, called Samvartta,
Bhimanada, Drona, Chari\)a, Balahal\:a, Vidyutpataka, and
Sonambu, produced from the steam of the fire, shall inundate
1 A great mundane period. See ~ 43 sqq.

Muir, Original .S'anscrit 7exts, vol. 1. 2 A great mundane }Jeriod, vastly
Third Edition (London, 1890), pp. longer than a y11ga. See J. l\iuir, /.1.
TEiE GRh'A T J>"LOOD PAR'!' 1
the earth. The seas agitated, and joined togetl1er, shall

reduce these entire three worlds to 011e ocean. Taking this
celestial ship, embarking on it all the seeds, and th1ot1gh
contemplation fixed on 1ne fasteni11g it by a ro1Je to my
horn, thou alone shalt remain, protected by my power, \vhen
even the gods are burnt up. The su11 and moon, I 13rahma
. with the four worlds, the holy river N armada [N erbudda],
the great sage Markauc;Ieya, Mahadeva, the Vedas, the
Pura9a, \vitl1 the sciences, these shall remain with thee at
the close of the Manvantara. The world having thus become
one ocean at the end of the Chakslt1tsha manvantara, I shall
give currency to the Vedas at the commencement of thy
creation.' SU.ta continued: Having thus spoken, the divine
Being vanished on the spot; while Manu fell into a state of
The deluge contemplation (yoga) induced by the favour of Vasudeva.
~~:gucome, When the time announced by Vasudeva had arrived, the
dra\vs all predicted deluge took place in that very manner. Then
creatures
into the
f
Janardana appeared in the form , o a borne fish ; t e cl ( h
ship. serpent) Ananta came to Manu in the shape of a rope.
Then he who was skilled in duty (z:e. Manu) drew towards
himself all creatures by contemplation (yoga) and stowed
them in the ship, which he then attached to the fish's hor11
by the serpent-rope, as he stood upo11 the ship, and after he
had made obeisance to Janardana. I shall now declare the
PuriiJJa which, in answer to an enquiry fron1 Manu, was
uttered by the deity in the form of the fish, as he lay in a sleep
of contemplation till the end of the universal inu11dation :
Listen.'' The Matsya PuriitJa says nothing more about the
progress and results of the deluge.1
Another ancient Indian work of the same class, the
Bhagavata Purii~a, gives the same story with variations as
follows;;-
2
The story '' At the close of the past Kalpa there occurred an occa-
of the flood
in the sional dissolution of the universe arising from Brahma's
Bh.iigavata nocturnal repose ; in which the Bhurloka and other \.vorlds
Purana.
l J. Muir, Ancient Sanscrit Texts, years. At the end of each such period
vol. i. Third Edition (London, 1890), the universe was supposed to collapse
pp. 205-207. and to remain in a state of dissolution
for a night of the same length, till the
2 A Kalpa was counted a day of the Creator awoke from his sleep and
great god Brah1na. It was eqt1ivalent created the world anew. See J. Mt1ir,
to a period of 4,320,000,000 human op. cit. i. 43 sqq.
'
CHAP. IV INDIAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD
. were submerged in the ocean. When the creator, desirous

of rest, had under the influence of time been overco1ne by
sleep, the st1ong Hayagriva coming near, carried off the
Vedas which had issued from his mouth. Discovering this
deed of the prince of the Danavas, the divine Hari J the Lord J
took the form of a S'apharI fish. At that time a certain
great royal sage [1-zshz'], called Satyavrata, who was devoted
to Narayana, practised austere fervour, subsisting on \vater.
He was the same who in the present great Kalpa is the son
of Visvasvat, called S'raddhadeva,1 . and was appointed by
Hari to the office of Manu. Once, as in the river Kritamala How the
he was offering the oblation of water to the Pitris [~ncestral sage Satyad-
' vrata save
spirits], a S aphari fish came into the water in the hollow of a fish and
his hands. The lord of Dravi4a, Satyavrata, cast the fish in ~;sitwt:::;ned
his hands with the water into the river. The fish very rescue
. . 1 . d h "f: 1 1
piteous y crie to t e merct u <:tng, '. Wh d h b d himself
y ost t ou a an on from the
me poor and terrified to the monsters who destroy their coming
. d d . h' .
l<:1n re 1n t ts river? ' [S h 1 h fi h deluge
atyavrata t en too<: t e s from embarking by
the river, placed it in his waterpot, and as it gre;v larger and in. a ship
with plants
larger, threw it successively into a larger vessel, a pond, and seeds.
various lakes, and at length into the sea. The fish objects
to be left there on the plea that it would be devoured ; but
Manu replies that it can be no real fish, but Vishnu himself;
and with various expressions of devotion enquires why he
had assumed this disguise.] The god replies : ' On the
seventh day after this the three worlds Bhurloka, etc., shall
sink beneath the ocean of the dissolution. When the universe
is dissolved in that ocean, a large ship, sent by me, shall
come to thee. Taking with thee the plants and variot1s seeds,
surrounded by the seven sages [rishis ], and attended by all
existences, thou shalt embark on the great ship, and sl1alt
without alarm move over the one dark ocean, by the sole
light of the sages [rishzs]. When the ship shall be vehemently
shaken by the tempestuous wind, fasten it by the gieat serpent
to my horn for I shall come near. So long as the night of
Brahma lasts,. I shall draw thee witl1 the sages [rtshz'.r] and
the ship over the ocean.' [The god then disa1)pea1s after
promising that Satyavrata shall practically knovv 11is .great-
ness and experience his kindness, and Satyavrata a;va1ts the
t Mailtl is calle(l S'raddhadeva in the ll.lahabh,i1ata also.''
'
THE CREA T FLOOD PAJt'f I
predicted events.] Then the sea, augmenting as the great

clouds pou1ed do\vn their waters, \Vas see11 overflo,ving its
shores and everywhere inundating the earth. Meditating on
the injunctions of the deity, Satyavrata beheld the arrival of
the ship, on which he embarked with the 13rahmans, taking
along with him the various kinds of plants. Delighted, the
Munis said to him, ' Meditate on Kesava ; he will deliver us
from this danger, and grant us prosperity.' Accordingly
when the king had meditated on him, there appeared on the
ocean a golden fish, with one horn, a million yo;anas long.
Binding the ship to his horn with the serpent for a rope, as
he had been before commanded by Hari, Satyavrata landed
Madhusudana. [The hymn follows.] When the king had
thus spoken, the divine primeval Male, in the form of a fish,
moving on the vast ocean declared to him the trutl1 ; the
celestial collection of Pura9as, with the Sankhya, Yoga, the
ceremo11ial, and the mystery of the soul. Seated on the ship
with the sages [rishz"s], Sat)ravrata heard the true doctrine of
the soul, of the eternal Brahma, declared by the god. vVhen
Brahma arose at the end of the past dissolution, Hari restored
to him the Vedas, after slaying Hayagriva. And King
Satyavrata, master of all knowledge, sacred and profane,
became, by the favour of Vish!}u, the son of Vivasvat, tl1e
1
Manu in this Kalpa."
Story of the Yet another ancient Indian ve1sio11 of the deluge legend
fiAood_ in the meets us in the Agni" Purana: it runs thus:-
gni
Purii1Ja. '' Vasishtha said : ' Declare to me Vishuu, the cause of
Ho\vdl\!Iafinuh the creation, in the form of a Fish and his other incarnations ;
save a s
and was and the Puranic revelation of Agni, as it was originally heard
~~i::~c~~e from VishQu.' Agni replied : ' Hear 0 Vasishtha, I shall
from the relate to thee the Fish-incarnation of Vishnu and his acts
. - '
~~~~:gin when so incarnate for the destruction of the wicked, and pro-
a ship. tection of the good. At the close of the past K alpa there
occurred an occasional dissolution of the universe caused by
Brahma's sleep, when the Bhurloka and other worlds were
inundated by the ocean. Manu, the son of Vivasvat, prac-
tised austere fervour for the sake of \Vorldly enjoyment as
well as final liberation. Once ' when he was offerina . ~
the
1
J.
Muir, Anci"ent Sansk,,,;t
, ,,.,exts
L , vol 1" Th"rd
1 Ed"1t1on
(Lon d 011, r 890 ),
pp. 209 sq.
CHAP. IV INDIAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD
' 193
libation of water to the Pitris [ancestral spirits] in the river
Kritamala, a small fish came into the water in the hollow of
his hands, and said to him . when he sought to cast it into
the stream, ' Do not throw me in, for I am afraid of alligators
and other monsters which are here.' On hearing this Manu
,
threw it into a jar. Again, \vhen grown, the Fish said to
him, ' Provide me a large place.' Manu then cast it into a
larger vessel (?). When it inc1eased there, it said to the
king, ' Give me a wide space.' When, after being thrown
into a pond, it became as large as its receptacle, and cried
out for greater room, he flung it i11to the sea. In a moment
it became a hundred thousand yq;a11as in bulk. Beholding
the wonderful Fish, Manu said in astonishment: ' Who art
thou ? Art thou VishQu ? Ado1ation be paid to thee, O
NarayaQa. Why, 0 Janardana, dost thou bewilder me by thy
illusion ? ' The Fish, which had become incarnate for the
welfare . of this world and the destruction of the wicked, when
.
so addressed, replied to Manu, who had been intent upon its

preservation : 'Seven days after this the ocean shall inundate
the world. A ship shall come to thee, in which thou shalt
place the seeds, and accompanied by the sages [rz'shis] shalt
sail during the nigl1t of Brahma. Bind it with the great
serpent to my horn, when I arrive.' Having thus spoken the
Fish vanished. Manu awaited the promised period, and
embarked on the ship when the sea over:fl.o\ved its shores.
(There appeared) a golden Fish, a million yq;anas long, with
one horn, to which Manu attached the ship, and heard from
the Fish the Matsya Purii1Ja, which takes away sin, together
with the Veda. Kesava then slew the Danava Hayagriva
who had snatched a\vay the Vedas, and preserved its mantras
1
and other portions."

8. Moder1z Indian Stories of a G1'eat Flood
The Bhils a wild jungle tribe of Central India, relate Story of a

. ' . (d'l1 b ) h 0 d g1eat flood
that once upon a time a pious man 10 z , w use to told by tl1e
wash his clothes in a river, was warned by a fish of the ~hils of
. fi d h' tl t Central
approach of a great deluge. The fi sh in orme 1m 1a , India.
out of gratitude for his humanity in al\vays feeding the
1 J. Muir, Ancient Sa1iskrit Texts, vol. i. Third Edition (Lo11don, 1890),
pp. 21 I sq.
VOL. I 0
194 THE GREAT FLOOD l'ART I
fish, he had come to give him this warning, and to

urge him to prepare a large box in which he inight
escape. The pious man accordingly made ready the box
and embarked in it with his sister and a cocl{. After
the deluge Rama sent out his messenger to inquire i11to the
state of affairs. The messenger heard the cro\ving of the
cock and so discovered the box. Thereupon Rama had the
box brought before him, and asked the man who he was and
how he had escaped. The man told his tale. Then Rama
made him face in turn north, east, and 'vest, and swear that
the woman with him \Vas his sister. The man stuck to it
that she was indeed his sister. Rama next turned him to
the south, whereupon the man contradicted his former state-
ment and said that the woman was his wife. After that,
Rama inquired of him who it was that told ,him to escape,
and on lear11ing that it was the fish, he at once caused the
fish's tongue to be cut out for his pains ; so that sort of fish
has been tongueless ever since. Having executed this judg-
ment on the fish for blabbing, Rama ordered the man to
repeople the devastated world. Accordingly the man mar-
ried his sister and had by her seven sons and seven daughters.
The firstborn received from Rama the present of a horse,
but, being unable to ride, he left the animal in the plain and
went into the forest to cut wood. So he became a wood-
man, and woodmen his descendants the Bhils have been

1
from that day to this. In this Bhil story the warning of
tl1e coming flood given by the fish to its human benefactor
resembles the corresponding incident in the Sanscrit story
of the flood too closely to be independent. It may be
questioned whether the Bhils borrowed the story from the
. Aryan invaders, or whether on the contrary the Aryans
may not have learned it from the aborigines whom they en-
countered in their progress through the country. In favour
of the latter view it may be pointed out that the story of
the flood does not occur in the most ancient Sanscrit litera-
ture, but only appears in books written long after the settle-
ment of the Aryans in India.
1
The Ethnographical Survey of the by Captain C. E. Luard (Lucknow,
Central India Agency, Monograph II., 1909), p. 17.
The Jungle lnbes of Malwa, compiled
CHAP. 1v INDIAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD
195
. The Ka~~r~, a small J?ravidian tribe of the Raipur Dis- Story of a

tr1ct and adjoining States, in the Central Provinces of India great flood
t e 11 th e 10r 11 f ' told by the
owing story o a great flood. They say that in Kamars of
the beginning God created a man and woman, to whom in the c;entral
h Id h"ld
t eir o age two c l ren were born, a boy and a girl. But India. Prov111ces,
God sent a deluge over the world in order to drown a jackal

\vhich had angered him. The old couple heard of the coming
deluge, so they shut up their children in a hollow piece of
wood with provision of food to last them till the flood should
subside. Then they closed up the trunk, and the deluge
came and lasted for twelve years. The old couple and all other
living things on earth were drowned, but the trunk floated on
the face of the waters. After twelve years God created two
birds and sent them to see \vhether his enemy the jackal had
been drowned. The birds fle\v over all the corners of the
world, and they saw nothing b,ut a log of wood floating on
the surface of the water. They perched on it, and soo11
heard low and feeble voices coming from inside the log. It
was the child1en saying to each other that they had only
provisions for three days left. So the birds flew away and
told God, who then caused the flood to subside, and taking
out tl1e children from the log of wood he heard their story.
Thereupon he brought them up, and in due time they were
married, and God gave the name of a different caste to every
child who was born to them, and from them all the inhabit-
1
ants of the world are descended. In this story the incident
of the two birds suggests a reminiscence of the raven and the
dove in the Biblical legend, which may have reached the
Kamars through missionary influence.
The Hos or Larl<:a Kols, an aboriginal race who inhabit Story of a
0
Singbhum, in south-western Bengal, say that after the woild f~::I'l~~ t~~
was first peopled mankind grew incestuous and paid no heed Hos and
. . h k Mundas of
either to God or to their betters. So S1rma T a oor, or Bengal.
Sing Bonga, the Creator, resolved to destroy them all, and he
carried out his intention, some say by water, others say by
fire. However, he spared sixteen people, and from them
2
presumably the present race of mortals is descended. A
1 R. V. l{ussell, Tribes atzd Castes J-fodest1m (i1npro1Jerly called l(olehan),''
of the Ce1ztral Provinces of I1idia Joztnial ofthe Asiatic .Society of 15e1zgal,
(London, 1916), iii. 326 sq. ix. (Calct1tta, 1840) Part ii. p. 798.
2 Lieut. Tickell, ''Memoir on the
THE CREA T .fa'LOOJJ PAR'l' 1
fuller version of this legend is reported to be current among

the Mundaris or Mundas, a tribe of Kols akin to the Hos,
who inhabit the tableland of Chota N agpur to the north of
Singbhum. According to the Mundas, God created manl{ind
out of the dust of the ground. But soon mankind grew
wicked; they would not wash themselves, or work, or do any-
thing but dance and sing perpetually. So it repented Sing
Bonga that he had made them, and he resolved to destroy
them by a great flood. For that purpose he sent down a
stream of fire-water (Sengle-Daa) from heaven, and all men
died. Only two, a brother and a sister, were saved by hiding
under a tz.ril tree ; hence the wood of a tiril tree is black
and charred with fire to this day. But God thought better
of it, and to stop the fiery rain he created the snake Lurbing,
which puffed its soul up into the shape of a rainbow, thereby
holding up the showers. So when the Mundaris see a rain-
bow they say, '' It will rain no more. Lurbing has destroyed
1
the rain."
Story of a The Santals, another aboriginal race of Bengal, have also
great fire- a legend that in the early ages of the world almost the \vhole
f!ood told
by the human race was destroyed by fire from heaven. There are
Santals of
Bengal. various traditions concerning this great calamity. Some say
that it occurred soon after the creation of the first man and
woman. Others assign it to a lat~r period, and mention
different places as the scene of the catastrophe. Different
reasons, too, are alleged for the visitation. Some say it was
sent by God as a punishment for the sins of the people ;
others affirm that two discontented members of the Marndi
tribe invoked the vengeance of the Creator Thakur upon
those who had offended them. The account which dates the
event immediately after the creation makes no reference to
the causes which operated to bring it about. It runs as
1 R. Andree, Die Flzetsagen, pp. 25 cover a trace, and it appears incom-
sq., citing N ottrott, Die Gossnerische patible with their tradition of the origin
Mission u1zter den Kohls (Halle, 1874), of different races. Ldrbeng is in their
p. 59. However, compare Colonel E. language a serpent, properly a water-
T. Dalton, Descriptive Ethnology of snake, and the name is poetically given
Bengal (Calcutta, 1872), pp. 188 sq.: by them to the rainbow, and by a
I
''It has been said that the Hos and simple reasoning on cause and effect,
Mundas, like the Karens, have a tradi- they say 'the serpent stops the rain,'
tion of the destruction of the human but it requires stronger i1naginative
race, all but two persons, by deluge, powers than I possess to eliminate from
but of this I have not been able to dis- this a tradition of the deluge.''
CHAP. r.v INDIAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD r97
follows. When Pilchu Haram and Pilchu Budhi, the first

man and woman, had reached adolescence it rained fire-rain
' .
for seven days and seven nights. They sought refuge from
the burning liquid in a cave in a rock, from which, when the
flood was over, they came forth unscathed. Jaher-era then
came and inquired of them where they had been. They
answe1ed, '' We \Ve1e underneath a rock." The following
verse, we are told, completes the description:-
'' Seven ,days and seve1z 1zights it rained.fire-rai1z,
Where 'lVere yozt, ye two hu1nan beings:
Where did you pass the ti11ze .'l ''
The other Santa! story, which explains the fire-flood by Another

the discontent of the Marndi tribe, is as follows. When the Srantalstotry
o a grea
different social distinctions and duties were assigned to the fire-flood.
various tribes, the Marndis were overlooked. Two members
of the tribe, by name Ambir Singh and Bir Singh, who
d\velt on Mount Here, were ince11sed at the slight thus put
upon their fellows, and they prayed that fire from heaven
might descend and destroy the other tribes. Their prayer
was answered : one half of the cot1ntry was destroyed, and
one half of the populatio11 perished. The house in which
Ambir Singh and Bir Singh lived was of stone, with a door
of the same mate1ial. It. therefore resisted the fire which
was devastating the cou11try far and \vide, and the two inmates
escaped unhurt. At this point the reciter of the tale sings
the following verses:-
'' Thou art shut in with a sto1ze door,
A11zbir Singh, thou art shut z"n 'lvith a sto11e door,
Ambir Singh, the country is bztrni1zg,
A 11zbz"r ~'>ingh, the country is bur1zt up.''
When Kisku Raj heard of what had happe11ed, he inquired

\vho had done it. They told hi1n it was the work of Ambir
Singh and Bir Singh. He at once ordered them i11to his
presence and asked why they had brought such a disaster
upon the people. They answered, '' In the distribution of
distinctions and offices all \Vere considered but ourselves."
To that Kisl<u l{aj replied, ''Yes, yes, do not act thus, and
you also shall receive an office." Then they caused the fire
to be extinguished. So Kisku Raj, addressi11g thern, said,

THE Gli'EAT 1'1-00D PAR'l' I
'' I appoint you treasurers and stewards over all the property
and possessions of all kings, princes, and nobles. All the
rice and the unhusl<ed 1ice will be under your charge. From
your hands will all the servants and dependents receive their
daily portion." Thus was the fire-flood stayed, and tl1us did
the Marndi tribe attain to its present ranl<.
A third Yet a tl1ird Santal version of the fire-flood story has it
Santa! that, while the people were at Khojl<aman, their iniquity rose,
version of
the fire- to such a pitch that Thakur Jiu, the Creator, punished them
flood story. by sending fire-rain upon earth. Out of the whole race t\vo
individuals alone escaped destruction by hiding in a cave on
1
Mount Harada ta.
Lepeha and The Lepchas of Sikhim have a tradition of a great flood
Tibeta11 during which a couple escaped to the top of a mountain
stories of a 2
flood. called Tendong, near Darjeeling. Captain Samuel Tur11er,
who went on an embassy f1om India to the court of the
Teshoo Lama at the close of the eighteenth century, reports
that according to a native legend Tibet \Vas long ago almost
totally inundated, until a deity of the name of Gya, \vhose
chief temple is at Durgeedin, tool< compassion on the sur-
vivors, drew off the waters through Bengal, and sent teachers
to civilize the wretched inhabitants, who were destined to
repeople the land, and \vho up to that time had been very
3
Stories of little better than monkeys. The Singphos of Assam relate
a flood that once on a time mankind \Vas destroyed by a flood
told b)' the
Singphos because they omitted to offer the p1oper sacrifices at the
and Lushais slaughter of buffaloes and pigs. Only two men Khun litane-
~Ass~. ' ~
and Chu liyang, with their wives, \Vere saved, and being
appointed by the gods to dwell on Singrabhum hill, they
became the progenitors of the present human race. 4 The
Lushais of Assam have a legend that the l<ing of the water
demons fell in love with a \voman named N gai-ti (Loved One),
but she rejected his addresses and ran away; so he pursued

1
Rev. A. Campbell, D.D., '' 1'11e the Teshoo Lanta z"n Tibet, contai11i1ig
Traditions of the Santals, '' The Journal a Na1rative ef a Joz1111ey t h1011g/1
of the Biltar and Orissa Research Boota1i and part of Tibet (London,
Society, ii. (Bankipore, 19 l 6) pp. 23-2 5. l 800), p. 224. Durgeedin is perha1Js
2
Sir Joseph Hooker, Hi111alaya1i Darjeeling. If that is so, tl1e lege11llS
Jourizals (London, 1891), chapter v. briefly recorded by Hooke1 and Turner
p. 86 (Minerva Library edition). may coincide.
3 Ca1}tain Samuel Turner, An Ac- 4
A. Bastian, Die Voelker des Oest-
count of aii E11zbassy to tl1e Co111t ef lichen Asie1i, i. (Leipsic, 1866) JJ. 87.
CHAP. IV INDIAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 199
her, and surrounded the whole huma11 race with water on the
top of a hill called Phun-lu-buk, which is said to be far away
to the north-east. As the water continued to rise, the people
took Ngai-ti and threw her into the flood, \vhich thereupon
receded. In flowing away, the water hollowed out the deep
valleys and left standing the high mountains which \Ve see
to this day ; for down to the time of the great flood the
1
. earth had been level. Again, the Anals of Assam say that Sto1y of a
once upon a time the whole world was flooded All the bflood y the
told
people were drowned except one man and one woman, who Anals of
ran to the highest peak of the Leng hill, where they climbed Assam.
up a high tree and hid tl1emselves among the branches.
Tl1e tree grew near a large pond, whicl1 was as clear as tl1e
eye of a crow. They spent the night perched on the tree,
and in the morning, what was their astonishment to find
that they had been changed into a tiger and a tigress ! '
Seeing the sad plight of the world, the Creator,' \vhose name
is Pathian, sent a man and a woman from a cave on a hill
to repeople the drowned world. But on emergi11g from the
cave, the couple were terrified at the sight of the huge tiger
and tigress, and they said to the Creator, '' 0 Father, you
have sent us to repeople the world, but we do not think that
we shall be able to carry out your intention, as the whole
world is under water, and the only spot on which we could
make a place of rest is occupied by two ferocious beasts,
which are waiting to devour us ; give us strength to slay
these animals." After that, they killed the tigers, and lived
happily, and begat man)' sons and daughters, and from them
2
the drowned world was repeopled.
A long story of a great flood is told by the Ahoms of Sh~1n story
. of a great
Assam, a branch of the great Shan race of Indo-Ch1na, from flood told
which their ancestors crossed over the Patkoi mou11tains by the
Ahoms of
3
about 122 8 A.D. to settle in their present abode. The Assa111.
Ahom, or rather Shan, legend runs as follows:-
Long, long ago there were many worlds beneath the sky,
I Lieut. -Co!cJnel J. Shakes12ear, The 3 Ce1zsi1s of .11ttiia, I89I, Assa111, by

Lztshei Ji'uki Clans (London, i912), P E. A. Gait (Shillong, 1892), IJ 280.
Co1npare Colonel I). l{. Gurdon, ''The
95 Origin cJf the AhlJn1s,'' Jo111-1za! ef t/1e
2 Lieut. -Colonel J. Sl1alces1Jear, Tlie Royal Asi'at1:c .!:ioliety /01' I9I3 (Lo11-
Litshei Kuki Cla1ts, pp. I 76 sq. don, 1913), IJP 283-287.
200 THE GREAT FLOOD PAR'l' I
Ho\v by but in the world of men, the middle \vo1ld, there was as yet
neglecting no race of kings (the Sha11s). Tl1e eartl1 was lil<e a wild
to offer
sacrifices, mountainous jungle. 011 a time, bamboos cracked and
the Shans
excited the
opened, and from them came forth animals. They lived in
wrath of deep forests, far from the hau11ts of 1nen. T11ereafter, a king
the storm-
and queen from heaven, Hp1-po an k d H d
p1-mot; came own
god.
to earth and found their \vay to Mo11g-hi on the Cambodia
River's banks. They were tl1e ancestors of the l<ingly race
of Shans. But a time came when they made no sac1ificial
offerings to their gods. Therefore the sto1m-god, Li11g-
la\vn, was angry at their impiety, and he sent down great
cranes to eat tl1em up. The cranes came, but could 11ot eat
all the people up, because there were so many of them.
Then the storm-god sent do\vn great ta\vny lions, but they
too found more Shans than they could devour. Next he
ser1t down great serpents to s\vallow the whole impious
race ; but all the. people, from palace to hamlet, from the
oldest to the youngest, attacked the serpents witl1 their
swords, and killed them. The storm-god \Vas enraged, he
snorted threateningly, and the battle was 11ot over.
How there Tl1e old year passed, and from the first to the third
was a very
great
month of the new year, which was the nineteentl1 of the
drought cycle, 'there was a great drought. In the fourtl1 month
and the
people (Ma~ch, well on in the dry season) the parched earth cracked
died. open in wide seams, and many people died of thirst and
'
famine. But in whatever country they were, there they

must stay. There was no water, and they could not pass
from one country to another. The \vater dried up in the
deepest ponds and in the. broadest rive1s ; wl1ere elephants
had bathed, the people now dug wells for drinking water.
What had been their watering-places, where many people
11ad gathered together like swarms of bees in their search
for water, now stank with the bodies of the dead.
Ho\v the Then Ling-lawn, the storm-god, called his counsellors-
:~~~~-;\~~ Kaw-hpa and Hseng-kio, old Lao-hki, Tai-long and. Bak-
the long, and Ya-hseng-hpa, the smooth talker, and many others.
water-god At h" h h d . .
to warn the . IS court t ey gat ere together. Entering his palace
sage Lip- they bowed dow11 to worship. Over the head of the god
long of b ll .
the coming was an um re a, widely spread and beautiful as a flower.
flood. They talked together in the language of men (Shan), and
CHAP. Iv INDIAN STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 201
they took counsel to destroy the human race. '' Let us

send for Hkang-hkak," said they. He was the god of
streams and of ponds, of crocodiles at1d of all water animals.
Majestically came he in, and the storm-god gave him in.:.
strt1ctions, saying, '' Descend \Vith the clouds. Tarry not.
Straightway report to Lip-long the distinguished lord."
Soon thereafter the \Vater-god Hkang-hkak appeared Ho,\ the
before the sage Lip-long, who had been consulting his sage built
a raft on
chicken bones. The omens \Vere evil. When the sage which to
came d own f rom h 1s . h ouse, t h e s ky was dry as an oven. save If him-
.d
se an a
He kne\V that some great calamity was itnpending. On co\v from
mee t tng
th e wa t er-go d , t h ere1ore,
r t h e sage was not surprise
. d the flood.
to hear him say that Ling-lawn, the storm-god, was about
to send a flood to overwhelm the earth. . The divine mes-
senger declared that the people of every land would be
destroyed, that trees \Vould be uprooted and houses sub-
merged or float bottom up on the water. Even great cities
\Vould be overwhelmed. None could escape. . Every living

thing would be drowned. But against the coming of the

flood the sage was commanded to make a strong raft, bind-
ing it firmly together witl1 ropes. A cow, too, he was to
take with him on the raft, and though all things else should
be destroyed, yet would he and the CO\V. escape. He might
not even warn his loving wife and dear children of the coming
destruction.

Musing on the \vater-god's sad instructions, the sage went Ho'v the
home\vard with bowed head in deep dejection. . He caught }e:~~~e at
up his little son in his arms and \vept aloud, He longed to the sage for
building
tell his eldest son, but he feared the cruel vengeance of t h e the raft.
gods. Too sore at heart to eat, he went down in the morn-
ing hungry and bent to the river's bank. There he toiled
day by day, gathering the parts of his raft and firmly bind-
ing them side by side. Even his own wife and children
jeered at his finished but futile task. Frorn house to house
the scoffers mocked and railed. ''Quit it, thou fool, thou
ass," they cried ; '' if this come to tl1e ear of the gove1nors,
they will put thee out of tl1e way ; if it come to the ear of
the king, he will command thy death." Over the great
kingdoms ther1 reigned Hkun Chao and Hl{un Chu.
A few days more and the flood catne, sweeping on and
202 THE CREA T FLOOD PART I
How tl1e increasing in violence like the onward rush of a forest fire.
flood came Fowls died in their coops. The c1ying of .children was
and
destroyed hushed in death. The bellowing of bulls and the trumpet-
~~~~ J~~;ig ing of elephants ceased as they sank in the water. There
the sage was confusion and destruction on every side. All animals
and
cow. the f
were swept away, and the race o men pe11s e . h d Th ere vvas
no one left in the valleys or on the mountains. Tl1e strong
raft, bearing the sage Lip-long and the covv, alone floated
safe upon the water. Drifting on, he saw the dead bodies
of his wife and children. He caught and embraced them,
and let them fall back again into the water. As he cast

them from him into the deep he wept bitterly; bitterly

did he lament that the storm-god had not given him
leave to warn them of the impending doom. Tl1us perished
the kingly race (the Shans). Paying their ferry-hire, their
spirits passed over. to the mansions of heaven. There they
heard the reverberations of the celestial drums. They
c;ame by tens of thousands, and eating cold crab they \Vere
refreshed. When they reached the spirit-world they looked
round and said, '' Spirit-land is as festive and charming as a

city of wine and women."

How the But now the stench of dead bodies, glistering in the
stortndl-god sun, filled the earth. The storm-god Ling-lawn sent down
sen own
thefire-god serpents innumerable to devour them, but they could not, so
~~edic;f many were . the corpses. The angry god would have put
the serpe11ts to death, but they escaped by fleeing into a
cave. Then he sent down nine hundred and ninety-nine
thousand tigers, but even they could make little head\vay
in the consumption of the corpses and retired discomfited.
More angry than ever, the god hurled showers of thunder-
bolts at the retreating tigers, but they too fled into caves,
growling so fiercely that the very sky might have fallen.
Then the storm-god sent down Hsen-htam and H pa-hpai,
the god of fire. As they descended, riding their horses,
they viewed all the country round. Alighting on a moun-
tain they could see but three elevations of land. They sent
forth a great conflagration, scattering their fire everywhere.
The fire swept over all the earth, and the smoke ascended
in clouds to heaven.
When he saw the fire coming, the sage Lip-long snatched
I
up a stick and knocked do\vn the cow at one blow. With How the
his sword he ripped up her belly and crawled in. There he sage
escaped
saw seed of the gourd plant, white as leavened bread. The fron1 the
fire swept over

the dead cow, roaring as it went
When it fir e andd
p1ar1te t 11e
\Vas gone, L1p-lor1g came forth, the only living man beneath seeds of a
the sun. He asked the great \vater-god Hkang-hkak what gour wonddro~is
vine.
he should do, and tl1e god bade him plant the seed of the
gourd on a level plot of ground. He did so, and one gou1d-
vine climbed up a mountain and was scorched by the fierce
rays of the sun. Another vine ran downward, and, soaked
in the water of the flood, it rotted and died. A third vine,
springing upwards with clinging tendrils, twined about the
bushes and trees. News of its rapid gro\vth reached the
ears of Ling-la\vn, the storm-god, and he sent down his
gardener to care for the vine. The ga1dener made haste
and arrived in the early inorning at cocJ<:-crow. He dug
about and manured the vine. He trailed up its branches
with his own hand. When the rainy season came, the vine
gre\v by leaps and bounds. It spread far and wide, coiling
itself like a serpent about the shrubs and trees. It blossomed

and bore fruit, great gourds such as no man may see again.
Then Ling-lawn, the rain-god, sent down Sao-pang, the How fron1
g od of the clear sky, to prepare the eartl1 for human habita- othfehgour?st at vine
tion. From him went forth waves of heat to dry up what n1a11kind,
remained of the flood. When tl1e earth was dry once more ~~;;;~and
and fit for habitation, the storm-god threw thunderbolts to plants 'vere
. . b l
break the gourds 1n pieces. A o t struc an k d b k restored to
ro e open life.
a gourd. The people within the gourd cried out, ''What is
this ? a bolt from a clear sky ; let us go forth to till the
land.'' Stooping low, they came forth. Again, another
bolt struck another gourd, breaking it open, and the Shans
therein said, '' What shall we do, lord?'' He replied, '' You
shall come forth to rule many lands." Thus tl1e thunder-
bolts struck gourd after gourd, and fro1n them came rivers
of water, animals, both tame and wild, domestic fo\vls and
birds of the air, and every useful plant. So was the earth
1
filled again with life in all its varied forms.
According to another version of the Shan legend, the Ano~her
. d version of
persons who survived the deluge were seven men an seven tl1e s11a11
1 W. W. Cochrane, The Sha1is, i. (l~a11goon, 1915) I)IJ 121-125. legeiid.
women, who were more 1ighteous tl1an their neigl1bours and

escaped deatl1 by cra\vling into the dry shell of a gigantic
gourd, which floated on the face of the waters. On emerging
from this ark of safety, they were fruitful and replenished the
1
drowned earth.
Tradition The secluded Alpine valley of Cashmeer, which by its
that the delight[ul climate and beautiful scenery, at 011ce luxuriant
~~~~m~~r and sublime, has earned for itself the title of the J<:=.a1thly
was once Paradise of India, is almost completely surrounded by the
occupied
by a great lofty mountain-ranges of the Himalayas, their sides belted
lake, and
that the
with magnificent forests, above which extend rich Alpine
\vater was pastures close up to the limit of eternal snow. A native
drainebd h tradition, recorded by the early chroniclers of Cashmeer,
a\vay yt e
interposi- relates that the ,vhole of the valley was once occupied by a
t~snh~~. great lak~. One of the oldest of these annals, called the
Nila1nata Pura1Ja, claims to give the sacred legends regarding
the origin of the country, together with the special ordin-
ances which Nila, the lord of the Cashmeerian N agas, laid
down for the regulation of its religious worship and cere-
monies. In this chronicle, which may date from the sixth
or seventl1 century of our era, we read how at the begin-
ning of the present Kalpa, or great era of the world, the
valley was filled by a lake called Satisaras, that is, the Lake
of SatI. Now in tl1e period of the seventh Manu, a certain
dernon named Jalodbhava or ''water-born," resided in the
lake and caused great distress to all neighbouring countries
by the devastations which he spread far and wide. But it
so happened that the wise Kasyapa, the father of all N agas,
went on pilgrimage to the holy places of northern India, and
there he learned of the ravages of the demon from his son
Nila, the king of the Cashmeerian N agas. The sage pro-
mised to punish the evil-doer, and accordingly 1epaired to
the seat of the great god Brahman to implore his help. His
prayer was granted. At Brahman's command, the whole
host of gods set off for the lake and took up their posts on
the lofty peaks of the N aubandhana Mountain, overlool<ing
the lake ; that is, on the very same mountain on which,
according to the Mahabharata, Manu anchored his ship after
the great flood. But it was vain to challenge the dem~n to
1
,
W. W. Cochrane, The Shans, i. 120.

single combat ; for in his own element he was invincible, and

he was too cu11ning to quit it and come forth. 111 this
dilemma the god Vishnu called upon his brother Balabhadra
to drain the lake. His brother did so by piercing the moun-
tains with his \veapon, the ploughshare ; the water drained
ai.vay, and in the dry bed of tl1e lake the demon, now ex-
posed to t.he assaults of his enemies, was attacl{ed by Vishnu,
and after a fierce combat was slain by the deity with his
i.var-disc. After that King Kasyapa settled the land of
Cashmeer, \vhich had thus been born of the waters. The
gods also took up their abode in it, and the various goddesses
adorned the country in the shape of rivers. 1 And a land of
rivers and lakes it has been from that day to this. The
same legend is told in a briefer form by the Cashmeerian
chronicler Kalha9a, i.vho wrote in the middle of the twelfth
century of our era, and whose work displays an extremely
accurate k110\vledge both of the topography of the valley and
of the popular legends still current among the natives. 2 And
the same story is told, in nearly the same form, by the

Mohammedan writers Beddia and Dien : 3 it is alluded to,
in a Buddhistic setting, by the famous Chinese pilgrim of
the sixth century, Hiuen Tsiang, who lived as an honot1red
4
guest for two full years in the happy valley ; and it sur-
5
... vives to this day in popular tradition.
Now there are physical facts which seem at first sight to There _is.
. , . I I 1 . l . geolog1cal
support the belief that in comparative y ate geo ogica tim~s evidei1ce
the valley of Cashmeer was wholly or in great part occupied tl1at the
\alley of
by a vast lake ; for undoubted lacustrine deposits are to be Cashmeer
6
seen on some of the tablelands of the valley. Moreover, was 0 ?cde
occup1e
''the aspect of the province confirms the trutl1 of the legend, by a Jake.
the subsidence of the waters being distinctly defined by
horizontal lines on the face of the mountains : it is also not
I (Sir) M. A. Stein, Kalha~za's Raja- Stein, op. cz"t. vol. i. p. 5 (Book i.
taraitgit.ti, a Ch101zicle ef the .f(z"ngs ef 25-27 of the J(ajatara1igi11i); as to
Kafntir, translated wz"th an Introduc- l{all1al).a a11d his chronicle, see id. vol.
tion, Cont11zenta1y a1zd Appendices i. Int1odt1ction, pp. 6 sqq., vol. ii. PIJ
(Westminster, 1900), ii. 388 sq. 366 jqq. .
Compare M. Winternitz, Die fi'lutsagen 3 C. Freiherr von 1-Iiigel, Kasch111ir
des Alterthunzs tend der Naturvblker, zt1zd das J(eicli de1 Siek, ii. (Stuttgart,
p. 307 n. 3, As to t?e Ni"la~na~~ 1840) P!J 16 sq.
Purana, see M. A. Stein, op. czt. 11. 4 M. A. Stei11, op. cit. ii. 355, 389.
6 M. A. S te1n,. op. tzt.
. 11.
.. 3 89 .
376 sqq.
2 As to the Jegencl see M. A. 6 M. A. Stein, ov. cit. ii. 389 sq.
2o6 THE GREAT FLOOD l' AR'!' I
at all unlikely to have been the scene of some g1eat co11-

vulsio11 of nature, as indications of volcanic action a1e not
unfrequent : hot springs are numerous : at particular seasons
the ground in various places is sensibly hotter tl1an the
1
atmosphere, and earthquakes are of comrno11 occurrence."
Are we then to suppose that a tradition of the occupation of
the Vale of Casl1meer by a great lake has survived among
the inhabitants from late geological times to the present
day ? It is true that in Cashmeer the popular local tradi-
tio11s appear to be peculiarly tenacious of life and to outlive
the written traditio11s of the learned. From the experience
gained on his antiquarian tours, Sir Marc Au1el Stein is
convinced that, when collected with caution and critically
sifted, these local legends may safely be accepted as supple-
ments to the topographical information of our \vritten
records ; and their persistence he attributes in large measure
to the secluded position of the valley and to the naturally
conservative habits of life and tl1ought, which mountain
barriers and consequent isolation tend e\'erywhere to foste1
in Alpine countries. Certai11ly for ages Cash1neer remained,
like Tibet, a hermit land, little known to the outer world
and jealously exclusive of strangers. The army of Alex-
ander, on its victorious

march through India, passed almost
within sight of the gates of Cashmeer ; yet the great captain,
thirsting for new worlds to conquer, seems to have heard no
whisper of the earthly paradise that lay beyond these sno\V-
2
capped mountains.
Yet tl1e Yet we 1nay reasonably doubt whether any memory of
;tory of the an event so remote as the comparative desiccation of the
iormer
existence of valley of Cashmeer should survive in human traditio11 even
the lake
is ~o~ 1 '" Moorcroft and G. Trebeck, take always much care to keep a strong
pr,? a Yan T1avels in the Hi11talaya1z P1ovinces oF hold upon the entrances and roads
1n1erence . . ~
from the Hz1t1/usta1z a1td the Pan;ab; z"1z Ladakh leading into it. In consequence it is
nattiral a1zd Kash11tir; in Peshawar, Kabztl, very difficult to have any com1nerce
features Ktt1zduz, a1zd Bokhara (London, 184r), \Vith them. I11 former times they 11sed

of the 11. 09.
I to allow one or two fo1eigners to enter
country 2 M. A. Stei11, op. cz"t. ii. 35 r, 385.
their country, pa1tic11larly Jews, but at
than a 1\.s to the exclusiveness of the Cash- present they do not allow any Hindt1
genuine meerians in the Middle Ages, the great whom they do not know personally to
tradition. Arab geographer Albirttni, in his work ent~r, much less other people.'' See
on India, writes as follows: ''They are Alb1runi's India, English Edition, by
particularly anxious about the natural D1. Edward C. Sachau (London, 1888),
strength of their country, and therefore i. 206.
CHAP. IV INDIAN STORIE.)' OF A GREAT FLOOD
207
under circumstances so favourable to its preservatio11. . It is

far more lil(ely that the legend O\~res its origin to a natural
inference, based partly on observation of the general features
of the country, partly on a knowledge of the drainage opera-
tions, ~hich within the memory of man have extended the
area of arable land and reduced the area covered by lakes
and marshes. ''To any one, hovvever ignorant of geology,
but acquainted with the latter fact," says Sir Marc Aurel
Stein, ''the picture of a vast lake originally covering the
whole valley might naturally suggest itsel( It would be
enough for him to. stand on a hillside somewhere near the
Volur, to look down on the great lake and the adjoining
marshes, and to glance then beyo11d towards tl1at narrow
gorge of Baramula where the mountains scarcely seem to
leave an op~ning. It is necessary to bear in mind the
singular flights of Hindu imagination as displayed in the
Pura1JaS, Miihiitmyas and similar texts. Those acquainted
with them will, I think, be ready to allo\v that the fact of
that remarkable gorge being the single exit for the drainage
of the country might alone even have sufficed as a starting-
1
point for the legend."
Thus we may fairly conclude that, like the Sarnothracian sucl1stories
legend of a great flood caused by the bursting of the Black fu:dnish no
ev1 ence
Sea and its consequent union \vith the Mediterranean, the of human
. h "d
Cashmeer legend furnrs es no ev1 ence o f h d tradition
uman tra 1t1on dating froin
stretching bac]( into the mists of geological time, but is remote_
. ll" b h
simply the shrewd guess of 1nte 1gent o serv.ers, w o use eras.d geolog1cal
their wits to supplement the evidence of their eyes. How-

ever it is to be observed tl1at the Cashmeer story hardly
'
falls under the head of flood legends, since it recounts the
desiccation rather than the inundation of a mountai11 basin.
No doubt if the event really happened as it is said to have
done, it must have caused a tremendous flood in the low-
lands beyond the valley; but as the disastrous consequences
can only have concerned other people, the Cashrneerians
naturally say nothing about it.
I M. A. Stein, op. cit. ii. 390.
2o8 THE GREAT FLOOD PART I
9. Stories o.f a G1,eat Flood i1z Eastern Asia

Stories of According to the Karens of Burma the ea1th was of old
a great . deluged with water, and two brotl1ers saved the1nselves f1om
flood told
by the the flood on a raft. The waters rose till they reached to
,S tngp OS
I~arenhsand heaven when the younger brother saw a mango-tree l1anging
I
or Ching- down from the celestial vault. With great presence of mind
pBaws of
urma.
he clambered up it and ate of tl1e fruit, but the flood, suddenly
subsiding, left him suspended in the tree. Here tl1e narrative
breal{s off abruptly, and we are left to conjecture how he
1
extricated himself from his perilous position. The Chingpaws
or Singphos of Upper Burma, Jil{e their brethren in Assam,
have a tradition of a great flood. They say that when the
deluge came, a man Pawpaw Nan-chaung and his sister
Cha11g-hko . saved them.s,elves in a large boat. They had
with them nine cocl{s and nine needles. After some days
of rain and storm they threw overboard one cock and one
needle to see whether the waters were failing. But the cock
did not crow and the needle was not heard to strike bottom.
They did the same thing day after day, bt1t with no better
result, till at last on the ninth day the last cock crew and
the last needle was heard to strike on a rock. Soon after

the brother and sister were able to leave their boat, and they
wandered about till they came to a cave inhabited by two
elves or fairies (nats), a male and a female. The elves bade
them stay and make themselves useful in clearing tl1e jungle,
Ho\v the tilling the ground,. hewing wood, and drawing water. Tl1e
hun1a11
race was
brother and sister did so, and soon after the sister gave bi1th -
restored to a child.. While the parents were away at wo1k, the old
after tl1e
destruction elfin woman, who was a \vitch, used to mind the baby ; and
ca11sed by whenever the infant squalled, the horrid wretch would threaten,
the great
flood. if it did not stop bawling, to make mince meat of it at a place
where r1ine roads met. The poor child did not understand
the dreadful threat and persisted in giving tongue, till one
day the old witch in a fury snatched it up, hurried it to the
meeting-place of nine roads, and there hewed it in pieces,
and sprinkled the blood and strewed the bits all over the
1
Rev. E. B. Cross, '' On the p. 304, quoting Mr. Mason (the Rev.
Karens,'' .fourna! of the Anierican F. Mason, D.D.).
Oriental Society, vol. iv. no. 2 (1854),
CHAP. tv STORIES OF A FLOOD IN EASTERN ASIA 209

roads and the country round about. But some of the titbits
she carried back to her cave and made into a savoury curry.
Moreover, she put a block of wood into the baby's empty
cradle. And when the mother came back from her work in
the evening and asked for her child, .the witch said, '' It is
asleep. Eat your rice." So the mother ate the rice and
curry, and then went to the cradle, but in it she found
nothing but a block of wood. When she asked the witch
where the child was, the witch replied tartly, '' You 11ave eaten
it." The poor mother fled from the house, and at the cross-
roads she wailed aloud and cried to the Great Spirit to give
her back her child or avenge its death. The Great Spirit
appeared to her and said, '' I cannot piece your baby together
again, but instead I will make you the mother of all nations
of men." And then from one road there sprang up the Shans,
from another the Chinese, from others the Burmese, and the
Bengalees, and all the races of 1nankind ; and the bereaved
mother claimed them all as her children, because they all
1
sprang from the scattered fragments of her murdered babe.
The Bahnars, a primitive t1ibe of Cochin China, tell how Story of a
once on a time the kite quarrelled with the crab, and pecked ~~:tb~~~1~
the crab's skull so hard that he made a hole in it, which may ~ahn~rs of
. d
b e seen d own to t h ts very ay. T h' .. . Cochin
o avenge t 1s injury to China.
his skull, the crab caused the sea and the rivers to swell till
the waters reached the sky, and all living beings perished
except two, a brother and a sister, who were saved in a huge
chest. They took with them into the chest a pair of every
sort of animal, shut the lid tight, and floated on the waters
for seven days and seven nights. Then the brother heard a
cock crowing outside, for the bird had been sent by the spirits
to let our ancestors know that the flood had abated, and that
they could come forth from the chest. So the brother let
all tl1e birds fly away, then he let loose the animals, and
1 (Sir) J. George Scott and J. P. Major C. R. lVIacgregor, who travelled
I-Iardiman, Gazetteer ef Upper Bitrma through the co11ntry of the Singphos.
and the Shan ,)tates (l{angoon, 1900- See his article, '' J011rney of the Ex-
1901 ), Part i. vol. i. pp. 417 sq. For pedition under Colonel \Vooclthorpe,
a somewhat fuller version of the legend I{. E., fro111 Upper Assan1 to the Ira-
see Ch. Gilhodes, '' Mythologie et I{e- wa di and ret11rn over tl1e Patkoi
ligion des Katchins (Birmanie),'' A1i- l{ange,'' P1-oceedi1zgJ ef the Royal Geo-
thropos, iii. (1908) pp. 683-686. 'fhe ,1{1aphiral So,iet;1, New Series, ix.
story has also been briefly recorded by (1887) p. 23.
p
VOL I
last of all he and his sister \Valked out on tl1e dry land.
They did not l<now how they were to live, for they had
eaten up all the rice that was stored in the chest. However,
a black ant brought them two grains of rice: the brother
planted them, and next morning the plain was covered with
1
a rich crop. So the brother and sister were saved.
Story of a A legend of a deluge has been recorded by a French
great flood
told by tl1e missionary among the Bannavs, one of the savage t1ibes
Ba11navs of which inhabit the mountains and tablelands between Cochin
the san1e

region. China, Laos, and Cambodia. . ''If you ask them respecti11g
the origin of mankind, all they tell you is, that the father of
the human race was saved from an immense inundation by
means of a large chest in which he shut himself up; but of
the origin or creator of this father they know nothing. Their
traditions do not reach beyond the Deluge ; but they will tell
you that in the beginning one grain of rice sufficed to fill a
saucepan and furnish a repast for a whole family. This is
a souvenir of the first age of the world, that fugitive period
of innocence and happiness which poets have called the
2
golden age." The tradition is probably only an abridged
form of the deluge legend which, as we have just seen, is
recorded by another French
missionary among tl1e Bahnars,
who may be supposed to be the same with the Bannavs.
As to tl1e racial affinity of the tribe, the missionary ' \Vrites :
''To what race do the Bannavs belong? That is the
first question I asked myself on arriving here, and I must
confess that I cannot yet answer it ; all I can say is,
that in all points they differ from the Annamites and
Ch?nese; neither do they rese1nble . the Laotians or Cam-
bodians, but appear to have a common origin with the Cedans,
Halangs, Reungao, and Giarare, their neighbours. Their
countenances, costumes, and belief are nearly the same ; and
the language, although it differs in each tribe, has yet many
\vords common to all ; the construction, moreover, is perfectly
.
1 .
Guerlach, '' Mceurs et supersti- Gesellschafl fiir Erdkunde zze Berlin,
tions des sauvages Ba-hnars '' Les i. (I 866) p. 42.
lVIissio1zs Catholiques, xix. (Lyons, 2
Henri Mouhot, T1-avels itz the Cen-
1887) p. 479. Compare Combes in tral Pa1ts of Indo-Chz'na (Sia11t), Canz-
A1t1zales de la Propagation de la Foi bodia, and Laos {London, 1864), ii. 28
xxvii. {1855) pp. 432 sq. ; A. Bastian' sq., quoting the letter of a French mis
''.~eitraf:!e zur l{en~tniss der Gebirgs: sionary, M. Comte, who lived an1ong
stamme 1n l{an1bod1a,'' Zeitschrift der these savages for several years.
CHAP. rv STORIES OF A FLOOD IN EASTERN ASIA 211
identical. I have not visited the various tribes of the

south, but from all I have heard I conclude that these
observations apply to them also, and that all the savages
inhabiting the vast country lying between Cochin China, Laos,
and Cambodia, belong to the same great branch of the
1
human family." .
The Benua-J akun, a primitive aboriginal tribe of the Story of a

Malay Peninsula, in the State of Johor say that the around great flood
' b told by the
on which we stand is not solid, but is merely a skin covering Benua-
an abyss of \vater. In a11cient times Pirman that is the Jakhun ~f
' 1o or, 1n
deity, broke up this skin, so that the world was drowned the Malay
an d d t d .
es roye b y a great fl oo d . H owever, Pirman had Pe11insula.
created a man and a woman and put them in a ship of

pulaz \vood, which was completely covered over and had no
opening. In this ship the pair floated and tossed about for
a time, till at last the vessel came to rest, and the man and
woman, nibbling their way through its side, emerged on dry
ground and beheld this our world stretching away on all
sides to the horizon. At first all was very dark, for there
was neither morning nor evening, because the sun had not
yet been created. When it grew light, they saw seven small
shrubs of rhododendron and seven clumps of the grass called
sambau. They said oi1e to another, '' Alas, in what a sad
plight are we, without either children or grandchildren ! ''
But some time afterwards the woman conceived in the calves
of her legs, and from her right calf came forth a male, and
from her left calf came forth a female. That is why the
offspring of the same womb may not marry. All mankind
2
are the descendants of the two children of the first pair.
In Kelantan, a district of the Malay Peninsula, they .say Another
that one day a feast was made for a circumcision, and all storyt oflf a
grea ooc. 1
manner of beasts were pitted to fight against one another. told in tl1e
. 1 h
There were fights between e ep ants, an d fi h b t Malay
g ts e ween Peniiisula.
buffaloes, and fights between bullocks, and fights between

goats ; and at last there were fights between dogs and cats.
And .when the fights took place between dogs and cats,
I M. Comte (missionary), quoted by of Johore, '' Jou1-1ial <!f the lizdia1t A 1-chi-
H. Mouhot, Travels in the Ce1ztral pelago, i. (I 847) p. 278 ; W. W. Skeat
Parts of Indo-China (Sz'a1n), Ca1nbodia, and C. 0. Blagde11, Pacf{atz J(ates o/"
and Laos, ii. 25. the Malay l'e11z'11J'ttl1i (Lon cl on, I 906 ),
2 J. l{. Logan, ''The. Orang Bintta ii. 355-357.
~12 THE GREAT FLOOD l'Al<'f I
a great flood came down fiom the mountains, and over-

whelmed the people that dwelt in the plains. And they
were all drowned in that flood, save only some two or three
menials who had been sent up into the hills to gatl1er fire-
'
wood. Then the sun, moon, and stars \Vere extinguished,
and there was a great darkness. And \vhen light returned,
there \vas no land but a great sea, and all the abodes of men
1
had been over\vhelmed.
The The legend of a great flood plays an important part in
Lolos, an
aboriginal
the traditionary lore of the Lolos, an aboriginal race \vho
race of occupy the almost impregnable mountain fast11esses of
Southern
Cl1ina. Yunnan and other provinces of South-Western China, whe1e
they have succeeded in maintai11ing their independence
against the encroachments of the Chinese. A robust and
warlil(e people, they not only make raids into Chinese terri-
tory for the purpose of levying blac](mail and carrying off
prisoners, whom they hold to ransom, but they actually.
maintain a large population of slaves entirely composed of
Chinese captives. Yet in spite of their hostility to the
Chinese, with whom they never intermarry, they appear to
belong to the same race ; at least they speak a monosyllabic
language of extreme simplicity, \vhich belongs to the Tibeto-
Burman branch of the Tibeto-Chinese family. They are
so far from being savages that they have .even invented
a mode of writing, pictographic in origin, in which they
have recorded their legends, songs, genealogies, and religious
ritual. Their manuscripts, copied and recopied, 11ave been
handed do\vn from generation to generation. 2 They bear
family surnames, which are said always to signify a plant or
an animal ; the members of each family believe that they
are descended from the species of animal or plant whose
11ame they bear, and they will neither eat nor even touch it.
These facts suggest the existence of totem ism among the
.
1
Walter Skeat, Fables and Folk- A1zth1opologi.'cal Institute, xxxiii. (I 903)
tales fro11z a1z Eastern Forest (Cam- pp. 96, 98 sqq. Their script is
bridge, 1901), pp. 62 sq. arranged in vertical columns, which
2
E. C. Baber, ''China, in some of are read from left to right, instead of,
its Physical and Social Aspects,'' P10- as in Chinese, from right to left. As
ceedings ef the Royal Geographical to the affinity of the Lolo language
Society, N.s., v. (1883) p. 445; A. with Chinese, see E. A. Gait in Cens11s
I-Ienry, ''The Lol(>S and other Tribes ef l11dia, I9I I, vol. i. Part i. (Cal-
of W ester11 Cl1ina,'' Jou17zal of the cutta, 1913) pp. 329 sq.
CHAP. rv STORIES OF A FLOOD IN EASTERN ASIA
213
Lolos. At the same time the Lolos believe in patriarchs Their

who now live in the sky, but who formerly dwelt on earth1 Iegen~s of
h . . long-l1ved
w ere t h ey attained to the great ages of six hu11dred and patriarchs,
sixty and even nine hundred and ninety years thereby oftheorigin
' of death,
surpassing Methusaleh himself in longevity. Each family, and of a

em b racing th e persons unite
d b y a common surname, pays great flood
. its devotions to a particular patriarch. The most famous of
these legendary personages is a certain Tse-gu-dzih, who
enjoys many of the attributes of divinity. He it was who
brought death into the world by opening the fatal box \Vhich
contained the seeds of mortality ; and he too it \Vas who
caused the deluge. The catastrophe happened thus. Men
were wicked, and Tse-gu-dzih sent down a messenger to
them on earth, asking for some flesh and blood frorn a mortal.
No one would give them except only one man, Du-mu by
name. So Tse - gu - dzih in wrath locked the rain - gates,
and the \vaters mounted to the sky. But Du-mu, who
complied with the divine injunction, was saved, together with
his four sons, in a log hollowed out of a Pieris tree ; and
with them in the log were likewise saved otters, wild ducks
and lampreys. From his four sons are descended the
civilized peoples who can write, such as the Chinese and the
Lolos. But the ignorant races of the world are the descend-
ants of the wooden figures whom Du-mu constructed after
the de] uge in order to repeople the drowned earth. To this
day the ancestral tablets which the Lolos worship on set days
of the year and on all the important occasions of life, are
ma(]e out of the same sort of tree as that in which their great
forefather found safety from the \vaters of tl1e deluge ; and
nearly all the Lolo legends begin with some refeience to him
or to the great flood. In considering the origin of this flood
legend it should be mentioned that the Lolos generally keep a
Sabbath of rest every sixth day, when ploughing is forbidden,
and in some places \Vomen are not allowed to sew or wash
clothes. Taken together with this custom, the Lolo tradi- TI1e~~ Lolo
. h fl d b
tions of the patriarchs and of t e oo appear to e ray seem to t trad1t1ons
Christian influence ; and Mr. A. Henry may well be right in bet1:iy.

. f N . . . . Chr1st1an
referring them all to the teaching o esto11an missionaries ; i11flue11ce.
for Nestorian churches existed in Yunnan i11 tl1e thirteenth
century when Marco Polo travelled in tl1e cou11t1y, and the
214 THE Gl?EAT FLOOD PAR'f I
Nestorian Alopen is said to 11ave arrived in China as early

1
as 635 A.D.
Chinese The Chinese have a tradition of a great flood which
tradition happened in the reign of the emperor Yao, who reigned in
of a great
flood. the twenty-fourth century before our era. In his distress the
emperor addressed his prime n1inister, saying, '' Ho ! Pre-
sident of the Four Mountains, destructive in their overflow
are the waters of the inundation. In their vast extent they
embrace the hills and overtop the great heights, threatening
the heavens with their floods, so that the lower people groan
and murmur! Is there a capable man to \Vhom I can assign
the correction of this calamity ? '' All the court replied to
the emperor, saying, '' Is there not Khwan? '' But the
emperor answe1ed, ''Alas! how perverse is he ! He is dis-
obedient to orders, and tries to injure his peers.'' The prime
minister rejoined, ''Well, but try whether he can accomplish
the work." So the emperor employed Khwan, and said to
him, ''Go, and be reverent ! '' Thus put on his mettle
Khwan worked assiduously for nine years, but he laboured
in vain, for at the end of the nine years the work was still
unaccomplished, the floods were still out. Yet did his
son Yu afterwards cope successfully with the i11undation,
accomplishing all that he had undertaken and showing
2
The his superiority to other men. This Chinese tradition has
tradition
seems to
been by some people forcibly identified with the Biblical
contain the

account of the N oachian deluge, but in truth it hardly belongs
rem1n1s-
cence of to the class of diluvial legends at all, since it obviously
a local records merely a local, though widespread, inundation, not a
inundation
caused by 1
the Yello\V A. Henry, ''The Lolos and other part of Tartary lived under the spirit11al
River. . Tribes of Western China,'' Jozernal ef jurisdiction of bisl1ops who were sent
the Anthropological I1zstitztte, xxxiii. thitl1er Ly the N estoria11 pontiff. See
(1903) pp. 103, lOS sq. As to the further Gibbon, Decline a?td Fall ef the
spread of Nestorian Christianity among Ro111an En1pi1-e, eh. xlvii. (vol. vi, pp.
the Tartars on the bo1ders of Cl1ina, 68 sqq., London, 1838), \vho says (p. 70)
see J. L. l'vfoshein1, Ecclesiastical His- that '' uncler the reign of the caliphs,
tory (London, 1819), ii. 372 sqq. the Nestorian church was diffused from
According to that historian (pp. 373 Cl1ina to J erusalen1 and Cyprus ; and
sq.) it is certain that the 111onarchs of their numbers, witl1 those of the
the Karit nation, '' whicl1 makes a J acobites, were computed to surpass
larg~ part of the empire of the Mogul, the Greek and Latin communions.''
and 1s by some denominated a province 2 The Sacred Boo/..s ef China, trans-
of the Turks, and by others a tribe of lated by James Legge, Part i. (Oxford,
Tartars,'' embraced Christianity in the 1879) pp. 34 sq., 49 (The Sacred Books
tenth century, and that a considerable ef the East, vol. iii.).
CHAP. IV STORIES OF A FLOOD IN EASTERN ASIA 215
universal cataclysm in which the greater part of manl{ind
perished. The event it describes may well have been a real
flood caused by the Yellow River, a great and ~ery rapid
stream, partially enclosed by artificial and ill-constructed
banks and dykes, \Vhich in modern times have often bt1rst
and allowed the water .to spread devastation over the
sur1~ounding country. Hence the river is a source of per-
petual anxiety and expense to the Chinese Goveinment ; and
it is the opinion of a modern obser\'er that a repetition of
the great flood of Yao's time might still occur and lay the
most fertile and populous plains of China under water. 1
That the Chinese were totally unacquainted with tradi- 'fhat the
tions of a universal deluge may be affirmed on the 11igh Chhineseave no
authority of a Chinese emperor. In the ninth century of traditions
our era an Arab traveller, named Ibn-Wahab, of Koraishite ~~r~a~ni
origin, of the family of Habbar Ben el-Aswad, made his clel~&"e was
. . pos1t1vely
way by sea from Bassorah to India and thence to China. affirmed by
Arrived there, he sought an intervie\V with the Chinese a Chinese
. . Emperor
emperor, a 1leg1ng as part of his credentials that he was of i11 a disct1s-
the family of tl1e Prophet Mohammed. The emperor caused :~~~:~~~ 1
inquiries to be instituted on this point, and being satisfied as traveller.

to the truth of the allegation, he admitted the traveller to
his presence and held a l9ng conversation witl1 him through
an interpreter. The Arab has recorded at some length
what passed between him and his august i11terlocutor.
Amongst other things the emperor asked him, through the
interpreter, whether he could recognize his Lord, that is to
say, the Prophet Mohammed, if he should see him. '' How
, can I see him?'' said the Arab, ''he is with God." ''I do
not mean it literally," replied the emperor, ''but in a repre-
sentation." The Arab answered tl1at he could. The
emperor . then ordered a box to be brought ; and when it
was before him ' he took a casket out of it, and said to the
.
interpreter, ''Show him his Lord." The Arab looked.

''And I saw," he tells us, '' in the casket, the images of the
prophets. My lips muttered benedictions upon tl1em. . The
king did not know that I knew them ; hence, he said to
John Francis Davis, The Chinese

1 fogy, Twelfth Eclition (Lo~do11, 187 5)
(London, 1845-1851), i. 137, 14osq.; i. 10 sq. ; I{. Anclrce, Die Fl11tsagi:1t
Sir Charles Lyell, Pri1tciples ef Geo- }Jp. 35-38.
216 THE GREAT i'.LOOD PAR1' I

the interpreter, 'Ask him why he moves his lips.' He in-

terrogated 1ne, and I answered him that I was pronouncing
benedictions upon the prophets. He asked me further how
I recognized them, and I told him that I knew them by
the attributes with \vl1ich they were represented. 'This,'
I exclaimed,' is Nuh in the ark; he has been saved \vith
those \.Vho were with him whilst God submerged the \vhole
earth, and all that was on it.' He smiled and said, 'It is
N uh, as thou sayest, but it is not true that the whole earth
\vas inundated. The flood occupied only a part of the
globe, and did not 1each our country. Your traditions are
correct, as far as that part of the earth is
concerned which
you inhabit ; but we, the inhabitants of China, of India, of
es-Sind, and other nations, do not agree with your accou11t ;
nor have our forefathers left us a tradition agreeing with
yours on this head. As to thy belief that the \Vhole earth
was covered with water, I must remark that this would be
so remarkable an event that the terror would keep up its
recollection, and all the nations would have handed it down
to their posterity.' I endeavoured to answer him, and to
bring fo1th arguments against his assertion in defence of my
1
statement.'' The Arab has not reported the arguments
with \vhich he maintained the truth of the N oachian
tradition, but we may surmise that they did not succeed in
shaking the incredulity of the sceptical emperor.
Kan1chad- The Kamchadales have a tradition of a great flood
ale story
of a great which covered the whole land in the early days of the world.
flood. A remnant of the people saved themselves on large rafts

made of tree-trunks bound together; on these they loaded

their property and provisions, and on these they drifted
1 El-Mas'udi's Historical E1zcyclo- acknowledged Noah to be a great
jtl!dia, e1ztz'tled '' llfeadows oj' Gold and prophet, but the refe1ences in the
.ltfi1ies of Genis,'' translated from the Koran to the deluge and the ark,
Arabic by Alois Sprenger, i. (London, though frequent enough, are all com-
1841) pp. 335 sq. Compare Ancient paratively slight and cursor}' See
Acco1e1zts ef India a1zd China by Two The Koran, chapters vii., x., xi., xxiii.,
llfoha1n111eda1z T1avellers, who went to xxvi., xxix., !iv., lxxi. ; The Qur' ti11,
those parts i1z the 11i'1zth century, trans- translated by E. H. Palmer (Oxford,
lated from the Arabic by Eusebius 1880), Part i. pp. 144 sq., 200 sq.,
Renaudot (London, I 733), pp. 54 sq.; 207-210, Part ii. pp. 66, 94, 119, 255
John Pinkerton, Gene1al Collection of sq., 302-304 (The Sacred Books ef the
Voyages a1zd Travels (London, 1808- East, vols. vi. and ix.).
1814), vii. 204 sq. Moham1ned
CHAP. IVc
FLOOD IN THE INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO 217
about, dropping stones tied to straps instead of anchors in

order to preve11t the flood from sweeping them away out to
sea. When at last the water of the deluge sank, it left the
people and their rafts stranded high and dry on the tops of
the n1ountains. 1 .
In a Chinese Encyclopaedia there occurs the following Mongolian

passage: ''Eastern Tartary. In travelling from the shore story or a
great flood.
of the Eastern Sea toward Che-lu, neither brooks nor ponds
are met with in the country, although it is intersected by
mot1ntains and valleys. Nevertheless there are found in the
sand very far away from the sea, oyster-shells and the shields
of crabs. . The traditio11 of the Mongols who inhabit the
country is, that it has been said from time immemorial that
in remote antiquity the waters of the deluge flooded the
district, and when they retired, the places where they had
been made their appearance covered with sand." 2
I o. Stories of a Great Flood z'n the Indian Archipelago

The Battas or Bataks of Sumatra say that in the Story of a

b eg1nn1ng o f time
t h e eart h reste d on t h e h ead , or rat h er on great ftoo(l
told by the
the three horns, of Naga Padoha, a monster who is described Battas or
. . h h f b .
as a serpent with t e orns o a cow, ut w o appears to h Bataks of
Sumatra.
have been also provided with hands and feet. When Naga
Padoha grew weary of supporting the earth on his horns, he
shook his head, and the earth sank into the water. Tl1ere-

upon the high god Batara Guru set about 1ecovering it

from the watery abyss. For that purpose he sent down his
daughter Puti..:orla-bulan ; indeed she requested to be de-
spatcl1ed on this beneficent mission. So down she came,
riding on a white owl and acco1npanied by a dog. But she
found all the nether world so covered with water that there
was no ground for the soles of her feet to rest upon. In
this emergency hei' divine father Batara Guru came to the
rescue of his child, and let Mount Bakarra fall from heaven
to be an abode for her. It may be seen in tl1e land of the
1 G. W. Steller, Beschreibu11g von Edition (London, 1878), pp. 328 sq.,
de1n Lande Ilat1ztschatka (Frankfort referri11g to Me111oires co11le1-11a11t les.
ancl Leipsic, 1774), p. 273. Chi1101's, vol. iv. 11. 48 I, an(] to G.
2 (Sir) .E:. I~. Tylor, J(esearches i1ito Kle1nn1, Allge111ei11e Cttlfttl' Gejlhichte,
the Early History of Ma11kind, 'fhird vi. 467.
218 THE GREAT FLOOD !'ART I
Battas to tl1is day, and from it gradually sprang all the rest
of the habitable earth. Batara Guru's daughter had after-
wards three sons and three daugl1ters, from whom the whole
of mankind are descended, but who the father of them all
may have been is not revealed by tl1e legend. The restored
earth was again suppo1ted on the horns of N aga Padoha ;
and from that time for\vard tl1ere has been a constant
struggle between him a11d Batara Guru, the monster always
trying to rid himself of his burden, and the deity alwa;'s
endeavouring to prevent him from so doing. Hence come
the frequent earthquakes, which shake the world in general
and the island of Sumatra in particular. At last, \vhen the
monster proved obstreperous, Batara Guru sent his son
1
Layang-layang ma11di (which means the diving swallow )
to tie Naga Padoha's hands and feet. But even when he
was thus fettered, the monster continued to shake his head,
so that earthquakes have not ceased to happen. And he
will go on shal<:ing himself till he snaps his fetters. Then
the earth will. again si11k into the sea, and the sun will
approach to \Vithin an ell of this our world. The n1en of
that time will, according to their merit, either be transported
to heaven or cast into tl1e flaming cauldron in which Batara
Guru torments the wicked until they have expiated their
sins. At the destruction of the \vorld, the fire of the
cauldron will join with the fire of the sun to consume the
2
material universe.
Another A less g1andiose version of the Batta belief, which in the
versio11 of
tl1e Batta preceding form unites the reminiscence of a universal 1lood
story. with the prophecy of a future destruction of the earth by
water and fire, is recbrded by a modern traveller, who visited
the Battas in thei1 mountain home. According to him, the
people say that, when the earth grew old and dirty, the
Creator, whom they call Debata, sent a great flood to destroy
every living thing. The last human pair had tal{en refuge
on the top of the highest mountain, and the waters of the
deluge had already reached to their knees, when the Lord of
All repented of his resolution to make an end of mankind.
So he took a clod of earth, kneaded it into shape, tied it to

1 In German, die Taucherschwalbe.
Kawi - Spiache auf tier Inset Java
2
. W. von Humboldt, Uber die (Berlin, 1836-1839), i. 239-241,
CHAP. IV FLOOD JN THE INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO 219
a thread, and laid it on the rising flood, and the last pair
stepped on it and were saved. As the descendants of the
couple multiplied, the clod ir1creased in size till it became the
earth which we all inhabit at this day. 1
The .natives of Nias, an island to the west of Sumatra ' Story o r a
say that in days of old there was a strife between the moun- great flood
o f th eir
t ains country as to wh"1c h of them was the highest.
. told by the
natives of
The strife vexed their great ancestor Balugu Luomewona, Nias.
and in his vexation he went to the window and said, '' Ye
mountains, I will cover you all ! '' So he took a golden
comb and thre\v it into the sea, and it became a huge crab,
which stopped up the sluices whereby the waters of the sea
usually run away. The consequences of the stoppage \Vere
disastrous. The ocean rose higher and higher till only the
tops of two or three mountains in Nias still stood above the
heaving billows. All the people who with their cattle had
escaped to these mountains were saved, and all the rest were
drowned. That is how the great ancestor of the islanders
settled the strife between the mountains ; and the strife is
2
proverbial among his descendants to the present day.
The natives of Engano, another island to the west of Story of a
Sumatra, have also their story of a great flood. Once on a f~~tb~~%~
time, they say, the tide rose so high that it 0\ erflowed the natives of
1
island and every living being was drowned, except one Engano.
woman. She owed her preservation to the fortunate circum~
stance that, as she drifted along on the tide, her hair caught
in a thorny tree, to which she was thus enabled to cling.
' When the flood sank, she came down from the tree, and saw
with sorrow that she was left all alone in the world. Be-
ginning to feel the pangs of hunger, she wandered inland in
the search for food, but finding nothing to eat, she returned
disconsolately to the beach, where she hoped to catch a
fish. A fish, indeed, she saw; but when she tried to catch
it, the creature glided into one of the corpses that were float-
ing on the water or \veltering on the shore. Not to be
1 J. Freiherr von Brenner, Besitch Volke11kitnde, xxvi. (1880) p. 115; II.
bei den /(aitnibalen .5"u 11tat1aJ (Wurz- St1nclermann, Die /11sel Nias (I3armen,
b urg, 1 8 94 ), p. 2 I 8 I 905 ), IJ[J. 70 sq. According to the
latter writer it was i1ot Balt1gt1 Lt10-
2 L. N. I-I. A. Chatelin, ''Gods- mewona bt1t his wife, Silewe i1azarata,
dienst en l1ijgeloof der Niassers,'' Ti.j1l- who cat1Sell the floocl by throwi11g her
schrift voor Indische Taal- ~a111l- e1t golden corn b into the sea.
220 THE GREAT FLOOD l'AI{1' I
balked, the \Voman picked up a stone and strucl<: the corpse

a smart blow therewith. But the fisl1 leaped from its
hiding-place and made off in the direction of the interior.
The woman followed, but hardly had she taken a few steps
when, to her great surprise, she met a living man. When
she asked him what he did there, seeing that she herself
was the sole survivor of the flood, he answered that some-
body had knocked on his dead body, and that in consequence
he had returned to life. The woman now related to him
her experiences, and together they resolved to try whether
they could not restore all the other dead to life in like
manner by knocking on their corpses with stones. No
sooner said than done. The drowned men and \Vomen
revived under the l<:nocks, and thus was the island repeopled
1
after the great flood.
Story of a The !bans or Sea Dyaks of Sarawak, in Borneo, are fond
great flood
told by the of telling a story which relates how the pr~sent race of men
Sea Dyaks survived a great deluge, and .how their ancestress discovered
of Borneo.
the art of making fire. The story runs thus. Once upon a
time some Dyak women \Vent to gather young bamboo shoots
for food. Having got them, they wall<:ed througl1 the jungle
till they came to what they took to be a great fallen tree.
So tl1ey sat down on it and began to pare the bamboo shoots,
when to their astonishment the trunk of the tree exuded
drops of blood at every cut of their knives. Just then up
came some men, who saw at once that what tl1e women \Vere
sitting on was not a tree but a gigantic boa-constrictor in a
state of torpor. They soon killed the serpent, cut it up, and
carried the flesh home to eat. \Vhile they were busy frying
the pieces, strange noises were heard to issue from the ft}'ing-
pan, and a torrential rain began to fall and never ceased fall-
ing till all the hills, except the highest, were submerged and
the world was drowned, all because these wicked men had
killed and fried the serpent. Men and animals all perished
in the flood, except one won1an , a dog, a rat ' and a few small
creatures, who . fled to the top of a very high mountain.
There, seel<ing shelter from the pouring rain, the woman
I 0. L. Helfrich, '' Nadere bijdrage ke1ikunde van Nederlandsch-Indie, lxxi.
tot cle kennis van bet Engganeesch, '' (1916) pp. 543 sq.
Bijdrage1i tot de Taal- Land- e1t 'Vol- ~
CHAP. Iv FLOOD IN THE INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO 221
noticed that the dog had found <I: warm place under a creeper; How the
for the creeper was swaying to and fro in the wind and was art ~f
warmed 'by rubbing against the trunk of the tree. She took ~~k~~! .
the hint, and rubbing the creeper hard against a piece of ~~~~~ered
wood she produced fire for the first time. That is how the friction of
art of making fire by means of the fire-drill was discovered aaga1ns c~eeptera
after the great flood. Having no husband the woman took tree.
the fire-drill for her mate, and by its help sl1e gave birth to

a son called Simpang-impang, who, as his name implies,

was but half a man, since he had only one arm, one leg,
one eye, one ear, one cheek, half a body, and half a nose.
These natural defects gave great offence to his playmates the
animals, and at last he was able to supply them by striking "
a bargain with the Spirit of the Wind, who had carried off
some ri.ce which Simpang-impang had spread out to dry.
At first, when Simpang-impang demanded compensation fo1
this injury, the Spirit of the Wind flatly refused to pay him
a farthi11g; but being vanquished in a series of contests with
Simpang-impang, he finally co11sented, instead of paying him
in gongs or other valuables, of which indeed he had none, to

make a whole man of hirn by supplying him with the missing
parts and members. Simpang-impang gladly accepted the
proposal, and that is \:vhy mankind have been provided with
the usual number of arms and legs ever since. 1
Another Dyak version of the story relates how, when Another

Dyak story
the flood began, a certain man called Trow made a boat out of a great
of a large wooden mortar, which had hitherto served for flood and
pounding rice. In this vessel he embarked with his wife, a ~!~::pling
dog a pig a fowl, a cat, and other live creatures, and so of thhe
' ' eart .
launched out on the deep. The crazy ship outrode the storm,
and when the flood had subsided, Trow and his wife and the
animals disembarked. How to repeople the earth after tpe
destruction of nearly the entire human race was now the
problem which confronted Trow ; and in order to grapple
with it he had recou1se to polygamy, fashioning for him-
I Rev. J. Perham, in Journal ef, th.e McDougall, The Paga11 T1-i'bes ef Bo11zeo
Straits Branch ef the Royal Asiatic (London, 1912), ii. 144-147. This
Society No. 6, December I 880 (Singa- Dyal< st(Jry of the floocl is told n101e
pore, ~ 88 I), pp. 289-29 I ; H. Ling briefly by Leo Nyual<, '' Religi(>US rites
l{oth, 7/te Natives ef Sarawak a1id and customs of tl1e Iban or Dyaks
BritiJh Noith J]or11eo (Lonclon, 1896), of Sa1awal<,'' ,411th1opos, i. (1906) ]>.
i. 301 sq. ; Charles fiose a11cl Willia1n 17.
222 THE GREAT FLOOD PAR"f I
self new wives out of a stone, a log, and anything else

that came to hand. So he soon had a large and flourish-
ing family,. who learned to till the ground and became the
1
Ot-Danom a.ncestors of various Dyak tribes. The Ot-Danoms, a tribe
story of a of Dutch Borneo in the valley of the Barito, tell of a great
great flood.
deluge which drowned many people. Only one mountain
peak rose above the water, and the few people who were
able to escape to it in boats d\velt on it for three months,
till the flood subsided and the dry land appeared once
2
more.
Story of a The Bare'e-speaking Toradjas of Central Celebes also tell
great flood of a flood which once covered the 11ighest mountains, all
told by
the Bare'e- but the summit of Mount Wawo mPebato, and in proof
speakdi?-g
T ora 1as o1
of their story they point to the sea-shells which are to
Celebes. be found on the tops of hills two thousand feet and more
above the level of the sea. Nobody escaped the flood except
a pregnant woman and a pregnant mouse, who saved them-
selves in a pig's trough and floated about, paddling with
a pot-ladle instead of an oar, till the waters sank do\vn
and the earth again became habitable. Just then the
woman, looking about for rice to sow, spied a sheaf of rice
hanging from an 11prooted tree, which drifted asho1e on the
spot where she was standing. With the help of the mouse,
who climbed up the tree and brought down the sheaf, she
was able to plant rice again. But before she fetched down
the sheaf, the mouse stipulated that as a recompense for her
services mice should thenceforth have the right to eat up
part of the harvest. That is why the mice come every year
to fetch the reward of their help from the fields of ripe rice ;
only they may not ~trip the fields too bare. As for the
woman, she in due time gave birth to a son, whom she took,
for want of another, to be her husband. By him she had a
son and daughter, who became the ancestors of the present
3
race of mankind. In Minahassa, a district of northern ,
1 H. Ling Roth, The Natives of
II, 151, .
Saiawak aitd Britz'sh North Borneo 3 N. Adriani en Alb. C. Kruijt,
(London, 1896), i. 300, quoting C. T. De Bare'e-sprekende Torad_ja's van.
C. Grant, A Tour a111ongst the Dyaks Midden Ceiebes (Batavia, 1912-1914), .
of Sa1awak (London, 1864), p. 68, i. 20, 247, ii. 258, iii. 386. The .
2
C. A. L. M. Schwaner, Borneo, narrative, as told. in these passages,
Besch1i;'ving vaiz het Stroonzgebied van presents some trifling variations. Thus,
den Barito (Amsterdam, 1853-1854), in one passage the woman is already .
CHAP. IV FLOOD IN THE INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO 223
Celebes, there is a mountain called La11kooe, and the natives A reminis-

say that on the top of that mountain the dove which Noah c~nc:ofthe
B1bl1cal
sent out of the ark plucked the. olive-branch which she story in
1
brought back to the patriarch. The story is clearly due to Minahassa.
Mohammedan or Christian influence. In a long Malay
poem, taken down in the island of Sunda, vve read how
Noah and his family were saved in the ark from the great
flood, which lasted forty days, and during the prevalence
of which all mountaiqs were submerged except Goonoong
Padang and Goonoo11g Galoonggoong. 2
The Alfoors of Ceram, a large island between Celebes Story of a
and New Guinea, relate that after a great flood, which over- great fflood
a11d o the
whelmed the whole world, tl1e mountain Noesakoe appeared repeopling
above the sinking tide, its sides clothed with great trees, of ~!f~ebwo:~~
which the leaves were shaped like the female organs of Alfoo!s of
generation. . Only three perso11s survived on the top of the Ceram.
mountain, but the sea-eagle brought them tidings that other
mountain peaks had emerged from the waters. So the three
persons went thither, and by means of the remarkable leaves
3
of the trees they repeopled the world. The inhabitants of Story of a
Rotti, a small island to the south-west of Timor, say that in ~~~;~~~~~
former times the sea flooded the earth, so that all men and natives of
animals were dro\vned and all plants and herbs beaten down Rotti.
to the earth. Not a spot of dry ground was left. Even
the high mountains were submerged, only the peak of Laki-
mola, in Bilba' still rose solitary over the waves. On that
mountain a man and his wife and children had taken refuge.
After some months the tide still came creeping up and up
the mountain and the man arid his family were in great
. '
a mother at the time of the flood and l{leuzenarij op den Goenoeng Padang, ''
saves her son along with herself in tl1e Ti:fdschrift voor I11d1"sche Taal- Land-
pig's trough. In others it seems that e11 Volkenku11de, Iv. (1913} PIJ 332-
the mouse did not escape with the 334.
woman in the trough, but appeared 3 A. Bastian, Die C11ltu1lii11der des
opportunely just at the lime when its a/ten A111erica (Berlin, 1878), i. 509
help was wanted. 11. I ; I~. Andree, Die Flzetsage11, p.
3 I ; G. Gerland, Der J..fyth11s vo11 de1
1 J. G. F. Riedel, ''De Mina?asa Sin(/lut, p. 63, referring to P. v. Crab,
in 182 5, '' Ti;"dschrift voor I11d1s~?.e De MolttkJche E1"/a11tle11 (Batavia,
Taal- Land- e11 Volkenkz111de, xv111. 1862), pp. 212 sq. Compare P. Four-
(1872} p. 491. nier, ''De z11idl{t1st van Ceram,'' J'i.fd-
2 C. M. Pleyte, '' De Patapaiin sch1ift voor I111li.r1!1e Taal- La11d- e~t
Adjar soeka ri'!si, anders gezegd de Volke11k11nde, xvi. (1866} lJ 153.
t 224 THE CREA T .I''LOOD PAR'f I
'
'
fear, for th'ey thougl1t it would soon reach them. So they

' prayed the sea to return to his old bed. The sea answered,
I '' I will do so, if you give me an animal whose hairs I cannot
'
'
count." The man thereupon heaved first a pig, then a goat,
' then a dog, and then a hen into the flood, but all in vain ;
.'
the sea could number the hairs of every one of them, and it
still came 011. At last he threw in a cat : this was too much
for the sea, it could not do the sum, and sa:nk abashed
accordingly. After that the osprey appeared and sprinkled
'
'' some dry earth on the waters, and the man and his \vife
'
and children descended the mountain to seek a ne\v home.

Thereupon the Lord commanded the osprey to bring all
' kinds of seed to the man, such as maize, millet, rice, beans,
pumpkins, and sesame, in order that he 1night sow them and
live with his family on the produce. Tl1at is tl1e reason
why in Rotti, at the end of harvest, people set up a sheaf of
J\nn11al rice on the open place of the village as an offering to Mount
festival of
thanks-
Lakimola. Everybody cooks rice, and brings it with betel-
giving to nuts, coco-11uts, tobacco, bananas, and breadfruit as an obla-
Mount
Lakimola. tion to the mountain ; they feast and dance all kinds of
dances to testify their gratitude, and beg him to grant a good
harvest next year also, so that the people may have plenty
1
to eat. I
Story of a The N ages, in the centre of the East Indian island

great flood
told by the of Flores, say that Dooy, the forefather of their tribe,
natives of was saved in a ship from the great flood. His grave
!:<'lores.
is under a stone platform, which occupies the centre
of the public square at Boa Wai, the tribal capital.
The harvest festival, which is attended not only by the
villagers but also by people from far and near, takes place
I
round this grave of their great ancestor. The people
dance round the grave, and sacrifices of buffaloes are offered.
The spirits of all dead members of the tribe, wherever they
may be, whether in the air, or in the mountains, or in the
caves and dens of the earth, are invited. to attend the -
festival and are believed to be invisibly present at it. On
this occasion the civil chief of the tribe is gorgeously
arrayed in golden jewellery, and on his head he wears the
I J F angg1'd aeJ,
. '' R ott1neesche
. Verhalen,'' Bi"jdragen. tot de Taal- Land- en
Volkenkztnde va1z Neder/a1idsch-Indie, Iviii, (I 90 5) pp. 427 sq.
' '
. CHAP. tv FLOOD IN THE.INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO 225
golden model of a ship with seven masts in memory of the

escape of their great ancestor from the flood. 1
Stories of a great flood are told also by some of the Stories of a
wild tribes of Mindanao, one of the Philippine Islands One great flood
told by the
such tale 1s said to be current among the Atas of the Davao Philippine
District, who are supposed to be descendants of an invad- Islanders.
ing people that intermarried with the Negritoes and other
aboriginal tribes. Their legend of the deluge runs thus.
The greatest of all the spirits is Manama, who made the first
men from blades of grass, weaving them together until they
assumed the human form. In this manner he created eight
persons, male and female, who later became the ancestors of
the Atas and all the neighbouring tribes. Long afterwards
the water covered the whole earth, and all the Atas were
drowned except two men and a woman. The waters
carried them far away, and they would have perished if a
great eagle had not come to their aid. The bird offered to
carry them on its back to their homes. One of the men
refused., _but the other man and the woman accepted the
2
offer and returned to Mapula. Another version of the
story is told by the Mandayas, another wild tribe of the same
district, who inhabit a rugged, densely wooded region,
where the mountains descend almost to the \vater's edge,
forming high sheer cliffs at their base. They say that
many generations ago a great flood happened, which
drowned all the inhabitants of the world except one preg-
nant woman. She prayed that her child might be a boy.
Her prayer was answered, and she gave birth to a boy
whose name was Uacatan. When he grew up, he took his
mother to wife, a11d from their union all the Mandayas are
3
descended.
Further stories of a great flood are current among the Stories of a
. . ' . . d great flood
wild tribes which occupy the cential inounta1ns an eastern told by
coasts of Formosa and as these tribes apparently belong th.e wild
' tribes of
Fo1mosa.
I G. Beker, '' Het oogst- en offer- . 2Fay-Coo11er Cole, The TJTi/1i Tribes
feest bij den Nage-stam te Boa Wai ef Davao Distrt"ct, ll:fi11da1zao (Chicago,
(Midden-Flores),'' B[jdragen tot de r 91 3 ), i1. l 64 ( Fiel1i .'VI1tse1t11z of Nat111al
Taal-Land- en Volkettkunde van Neder- History, P1eblicatio11 I70).
landsch-Indie, lxvii. ( 1913) pp. 623
sqq. 'l'he brief reference to the flood 3 Fay-Cooper Cole, op. cit. pp. 165,
occurs on page 625. l 73
VOL. I Q
226 THE GREAT FLOOD PAilT I
1
by race and language to the Malayan family, their traditions
of a deluge may appropriately find a place here, though the
large island which is their home lies off the coast of China.
The stories have been recorded by a Japanese gentleman,
Mr. Shinji Ishii, who resided for some years in Formosa for
the sake of studying the natives. He has very kindly
placed his unpublished manuscripts at my disposal for the
purposes of this work.
Tl1e Ami One of the tribes which inhabit the eastern coast of
tribe of
Formosa. Formosa are the Ami. They are supposed to have been
the last to arri've in this part of the island. Unlike the
rest of the aborigines, they trace the descent of blood and
property through their mothers instead of through their
fathers, and they have a peculiar system of age-grades, that
is, they classify all members of the tribe in a series of ranks
2
according to their respective ages. Among these people
Mr. Ishii discovered the story of a great flood in several
different versions. One of them, recorded at the village of
Kibi, runs as follows : -
Ami story In ancient times there existed the god Kakumodan
of a great Sappatorroku and the goddess Budaihabu. They descended
flood.
to a place called Taurayan, together with two children, the
boy Sura and the girl Nakao. At the same time they
brought with them a pig and a chicken, which they reared.
But one day it happened that two other gods, named Kabitt
and Aka, were hunting near by, and seeing the pig and the
chicken they coveted them. So they went up to the house
and asked Kakumodan to give them the creatures, but
having nothing to offer in exchange they met with a flat
refusal. That angered them, and to avenge the affront they
plotted to kill Kakumodan. To assist them in carrying out
this nefarious design they called in a loud voice on the four
sea-gods, Mahahan, Mariyaru, Marimokoshi, and Kosomatora,
1
C. Imbault-Huart, L' Ile For11zose, present abode. See C. Imbault-
Histoire et Description (Paris, 1893), Huart, op. cit. p. 261.
p. 255. From a compa,rison of the
Formosan language with that of the 2
Shinji Ishii, '' The Island of For-
natives about Manila, it has been mosa and its Primitive Inhabitants,''
suggested that the ancestors of the pp. l 3, 20; reprinted from The Trans-
Formosans may have migrated from actz'ons ef the Japan Society, London,
the . Philippine Islands on their way xiv. (1916). As to age-grades, see
from the Malay Archipelago to their below, vol. ii. pp. 3 I 8 sqq.
CHAP. 1v FLOOD IN THE INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO 227

who readily consented to bear a hand. ''In five days from

now,'' they said, '' when the round moon appears, the sea .
will mal<:e a booming sound : then escape to a mountain
where there are stars." So on the fifth day, without waiting
for the sound, Kabitt and Al<:a fled to the mountain where
there were stars. When they reached the summit, the sea
suddenly began to make the sound and rose higher and
higher, till soon Kakumodan's house was flooded. But
Kakumodan and his wife escaped from the swelling tide, for
they climbed up a ladder to the sky. Yet so urgent was
the danger and so great their haste, that they had no time
to rescue their two children. Accordingly, when they had
reached their place of safety up aloft, they remembered
their offspring, and feeling great anxiety on their account
they called them in a loud voice, but no voice answered.
However, the two children, Sura and Nakao, \Vere not
drowned. For \Vhen the flood overtook them, they em-
barked in a wooden mortar, which chanced to be lying in
the yard of the house, and in that frail vessel they floated
safely to the Ragasan mountain. The brother and sister
now found themselves alone in the \Vorld; and though they
feared to offe11d the ancestral gods by contracting an in-
cestuous marriage, they nevertheless became man and wife,
and their union was blest with five children, three boys and
two girls, whose names are recorded. Yet the pair sought
to mitigate or avert the divine wrath by so regulating their
conjugal intercourse that they came into contact with each
other as little as possible ; and for that purpose they inter-
posed a mat between them in the marriage bed. The first
grain of millet was produced from the wife's ear during her
first pregnancy, and in due time husband and wife learned
the proper ritual to be observed in the cultivation of that
cereal.
At the village of Baran a somewhat different version of Another
..
the story was recorded by M r. I s h 11. A d' t th' 1 tt version of
ccor 1ng o ts a er the Ami
version the great flood was due not to a rising of the sea, flood story.
but to an earthquake, followed by the bursting forth of hot
subterranean waters. They say that at that time the moun-
tains crumbled down, the earth gaped, and from the fissure a
hot spring gushed forth, which flooded the whole face of the
228 T.f.!E GREAT FLOOIJ l'AR1' I
Ho\v t\VO earth. Many people were drowned ; indeed few living thi11gs
sisters and
a brother
survived the ravages of the inundation. However, t\vo sisters
escaped in and a brother escaped in a wooden mo1tar, which floated
a wooden
mortar. with them southvvard along .the coast to a place called
Rarauran. There they landed and climbed to the top of

Mount Kab11rugan to survey the country round about. Then
they separated, the sisters going to the so11th and the brother
to the west, to search for a good land ; but finding none they
returned once more to I~arauran. Again they ascended the
mountain, and the brother a11d his younger sister reached the
summit, but the elder sister was so tired that she remained
behind half-way up. When her brother and her younger
sister searched for her, they found to their sorrow that she

was turned into a stone. After that they desired to return

to their native land, from which they had drifted in the
wooden mortar. But when they came to examine the mortar,
they found it so.rotten and leaky that they dared not venture
to put to sea in it again. So they wandered away on foot.
One day the forlorn wanderers \Vere alarmed by the sight of
smoke rising at a distance. Expecting nothing less than a
second eruption and a second flood, they hurried away, the
brother taking his sister by the hand to hasten her steps.
But she was so weary with wandering that she could not go
a step farther and fell to the ground. So there they were
forced to stay for many days. Meantime the symptoms
which had alarmed them had ceased to threaten, and they
resolved to settle on the spot.
How the But they were now all alone in the land, and they re-
world was
re peopled flected with apprehension on the misery of the childless old
after the age which seemed in store for them. In this dilemma, as
great flood.
there \Vas nobody else for them to marry, they thought they
had better marry each other. Yet they felt a natural delicacy
at doing so, and in their perplexity they resolved to submit
their scruples to the judgment of the sun. So next morning,
when the sun was rising out of the sea, the brother inquired
of it in a loud voice whether he might marry his sister. The
sun answered, apparently without hesitation, that he might.
The brother was very glad to hear it, and married his sister
accordingly. A few months afterwards the wife conceived,
and, with her husband's help, gathered china-grass, spun it

'
into yarn, and wove the yarn into clothes for the expected
baby. But when her time ca1ne, to the bitter disappointment
of both parents, she was delivered of two abortions that were
neither girl nor boy. In their vexation they tore up the
baby-linen and threw it, \Vith the abortions, into the river.
One of the abortions swam straight down the river, and the
other swam across the river ; the one became the ancestor
of fish, and the other the ancestor of crabs. Next morning
the brother inquired of the moon why fish and crabs should
thus be born from human pare11ts. The moon made answer,
''You two are brother and sister, and marriage between you
is strictly prohibited. As neither of you can find another
spouse, you must place a mat between you in the marriage
bed." The advice was accepted, and soon afterwards the
wife gave birth to a stone. They were again painfully sur-
prised, and said, ''The moon is mocl(ing us. Who ever
heard of a woman giving birth to a stone ? '' In their im-
patience they were about to heave the stone into the river,
when the moon appeared and cl1ecked them, saying, ''Although
it is a stone, you must take great care of it." They obeyed
the injunction and kept the stone very carefully. Afterwards
tl1ey descended the mountain and settled in a rich fat land
called Arapanai. In time the husband died, and the wife
was left with no other companion than the white stone to
which she had given birth. But the moon, pitying her loneli-
ness and grief, informed the woman that soon she would have
a companion. And sure enough, only five days later, the
stone swelled up, and four children came forth from it, some
of them wearing shoes and others barefooted. Those that
\Vore shoes were probably the ancestors of the Chinese.
A third version of the Ami . story was recorded by Mr. A third
Ish11 at the v1'11 age o f p o I(po k . L'k
1 e th e prece d'1ng versions,
version
the Aini of
it relates how a brother and sister escaped in a wooden story.
mortar from a destructive deluge, in \vhich alinost all living
beings perished ; how they landed on a high mountain,
married, begat offspring, and founded the village of Pol(pol(
in a hollow of the hills, where they thought they \vould be
. secure against another deluge. .
The Tsuwo a tribe of head-hunters in the mountainous
interior of For~osa, have also a story of a great flood, which
230 THE Gl?EAT J.iLOOD l'ART I
Story of a they told to Mr. Ishii at the village of Paichana. When their
great flood ancestors were living dispersed in all directions, the1e occt1rred
told by the . .
rsuwo of a mighty inundation \vhereby plain and mountains al1l<:e were
Forniosa. covered with water. Then all the people fled and took refuge
on the top of Mount Niitaka-yama, and there they stayed
until the flood subsided, and the hills and valleys emerged
once more from the watery waste. Afte1 that the survivors
descended in groups from the mountains and tool<: their
several ways over the land as chance or inclination pro1npted
them. They say that it was while they dwelt on the
top of the mountain, during the great flood, that they first
conceived the idea of hunting for human heads. At first
they resorted to it simply as a pastime, cutting off the head
of a bad boy and hoisting it on the point of a bamboo, to
the great amusement of the bystanders. But afterwards,
'vvhen they had descended from tl1e mountain and settled in
separate villages, the young men of each village took arms
and went out to decapitate their neighbours in grim
earnest. Tl1at, they say, was the origin of tl1e practice of
head-hunting.
How fire The Tsuwo of the same village also tell how they obtained
was re-
covered
fire during the great flood. For in their hurried retreat to the
after the mountain they had no time to take fire with them, and for a
great flood.
while they were hard put to it by the cold. Just then some.
one spied a sparkle like the twinkling of a star on the top of
a neighbouring mountain. So the people said, ''Who will go
thither and bring fire for us?'' Then a goat came forward and
said, ''I will go and bring bacl<: the fire." So saying, the noble
animal plunged into the swelling flood and swam straight
for tl1e mou11tain, guided by the starlike twinkling of the fire
on its top. The people awaited its return in great anxiety.
After a while it reappeared from out the darkness, swimming
with a burning cord attached to its horns. Nearer and nearer
it drew to the shore, but at the same time lower and lower
burned the fire on the cord. Would the goat reach the
bank before the flame had burned itself out? The excite-
ment among the people was intense, but none dared to dive
into the angry surges and swim to the rescue of the ani1nal.
Tired with its long and strenuous exertions, the goat swam
more and more feebly, till at last it drooped its head, the
water closed over it, and the fire was out. After that the
people despatched a taoron (?) on the same errand, and it
succeeded in bringing the fire safe to land. So pleased were
the people at its success, that they all gathered round the
animal and patted it. That is why the creature has such a
shiny skin and so tiny a body to this day.
Further, the Tsuwo of. the same village relate how the How the
great flood was drained by the disinterested exertions of a greatdfi~odd
was ra1ne
wild pig, and how the natural features of the country were away, and
art1'fi c1a
11y mou ld ed wh en all the water had run away. They country
how the
say that they tried various plans for draining the wate1', but 1eceived its
11 "l 1 "ld r d "d
a 1n vain, unt1 a arge w1 pig came 1orwar and sa1 , '' I form present
will go into the water, and by breaking a bank in a lower reach thereafter.
of the river, I may cause the flood to abate. In case I should
be drowned in the river I would beg you, of your kindness, to
care for my orphan children, and to give them potatoes every
day. If you consent to this proposal, I am willing to risk
my life in your service." The people gladly closed with this
generous offer; the pig plunged into the water, and swimming
with the current, disappeared in the distance. The efforts
of the animal were crowned with success, for very soon after-
\vards the water of the flood suddenly sank, and the crests
of the mountains began to appear above it. Rejoiced at
their escape, the people resolved to make a river with the
help of the animals, apparently for the purpose of preventing
a recurrence of the great flood. As they descended from
Mount Niital<:a-yama, where they had taken refuge, a g1eat
snake offered to act as their guide, and by gliding straight
do\vn the slope he hollowed out a bed for the stream. Next
thousands of little birds, at the word of command, came each
with a pebble in its beak, and by depositing the pebbles in
the channel of the river they paved it, as we see it to this
day. But the banks of the river had still to be formed, and
for this purpose the services of the animals were enlisted. By
treading with their feet and working with a will all together,
they soon fashioned the river banks and valleys. 'fhe only
bird that did not help in this great work was the eagle;
instead of swooping down he flew high in air, and as a
punishment he has never since been allowed to drinl<: of the
river water, but is obliged to slake 11is thirst at the puddles
232 THE CREA T FLOOD PAR'f I
in the hollow trunks of trees. In this way the valleys and

rivers were fashioned, but there was as yet no plain. Then
the goddess Hipararasa came from the south and made a
plain by c1ushi11g the mountains. She began in the south
and worked up along the western pa1t, levelling the moun-

tains as she went. But when she came to the central range
she was confronted by an angry bear, which said, ''We are
fond of the mou11tains. If you mal(e them into a plain,
we shall lose our dwelling-places." With that he bit and
wounded the child of the goddess. Surprised by thisi
attacl{, the goddess desisted frorn her work of destruction
in order to tend her wounded child. Meantime the earth

hardened, so that not even the power of God could level

the mountains. That is why the central range still stands
in Formosa.
Stories of a The Bunun, another tribe in the interior of Formosa,
great flood
told by the whose territory borders on that of the Tsuwo to the east,
Bunun of tell stories of a great flood in which a gigantic snake and
Formosa.
crab figure prominently. They say that once upon a time,
in the land where their ancestors lived there. fell a heavy
rain for many days, and to make matters worse a huge snal{e
lay across the river, blocking up the current, so that the
whole land was flooded. The people escaped to the top of
the highest mountain, but such was the strength of the rising
tide that they trembled at the sight of it. Just then a crab
appeared opportunely and cut the body of the snake clean
through with its nippers. So the flood soon subsided ; but
many people were drowned and few survived. In another
version of the Bunun story the cause of tl1e flood is related
somewhat differently. A gigantic crab tried to devour a
big snake, clutching it fast in its nippers. But the snake
contrived to shake off its assailant and escape to the sea.
At once a great flood occurred; the waves washed the
mountains, and the \Vhole world was covered with water.
The ancestors of the Bunun took refuge on Mount Usabeya
(Niitaka-yama) and l\tiount SlJ.inkan, where they made shift
to live by hunting, till the water subsided and they returned
to their farmer abode. There they found that the.ir fields
and gardens had been washed a\vay; but fortunately a stalk
of millet had been preserved, the seeds were planted, and 011
. CHAP. Iv FLOOD IN THE INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO 233

the pro.duce the people subsisted. They say that many

mountains and valleys were formed by the great flood, for
.
before that time the land had been quite flat. .
The primitive inhabitants of the Andama11 Islands, in Story of a
the Bay of Bengal, have a legend of a great flood which great flood
' told by
may be related here, though their islands do not strictly the natives
belong
.
to the Indian Archipelago. They say that some. of the
~dam~
time after they had been created, men grew disobedient and Islands.
regardless of the commands wl1ich the Creator had given
them at their creation. So in anger he sent a great flood
which covered the whole land, except perhaps Saddle Peak
where the Creator himself resided. All living creatures,
botl1 men and animals, perished in the waters, all save two
men and two women, who, having the good luck to be in a
canoe at the time when the catastrophe occurred, contrived
to escape with their lives. When at last the waters sank,
the little company landed, but they found themselves in a
sad plight, for all other living . creatures were drowned.
Ho\vever, the Creator, whose name was Puluga, kindly helped
them by creating animals and birds afresh for their use.
But the difficulty remained of lighting a fire, for the flood How
had extinguished the flames on every hearth, and all things ~b~~f~~~
were of course very damp. Hereupon the ghost of one fire after
of their friends, who had been drowned in the deluge, the deluge.
opportunely came to the rescue. Seeing their distress he
flew in the form of a kingfisher to the sl<y, v. here he found
1
the Creator seated beside his fi1e. The bi1d made a dab at
a burning brand, intending to carry it off in his beal< to l1is
fireless friends on earth, but in his haste or agitation he
dropped it on the august person of the C1eator himself, who,
incensed at the indignity and smarting with pain, hurled the
blazing brand at the bird. It missed the mark and wl1izzing
past him dropped plump from the sl<y at the very spot whe1e
the four people were seated moaning and shiveri11g. That
'
is how mankind recovered the use of fire after the great
flood. When they had warmed thetnselves and had leisure
to reflect on what had happened, the four survivors began to
murmur at the Creator for his destruction of all the rest of
mankind ; and their passion getting the better of them they
even plotted to murder him. Frotn this itnpious attempt
234 THE GREAT FLOOJJ l'ART I
they were, however, dissuaded by the Creator himself, who

told them, in very plain language, that they had better not
try, for he was as hard as wood, their arrows could make no
impression on him, and if they dared so much as to lay
a finger on him, he would have the blood of every mother's
son and daughter of them. This dreadful threat had its
effect : they submitted to their fate, and the mollified Creator
condescended to explain to them, in milder terms, that men
had brought the great flood on themselves by wilful dis-
obedience to his commands, and that any repetition of the
offence

in future would be visited by him with condign
punishment. That was the last time that the Creator ever
appeared to men and conversed with them face to face ; since
then the Andama11 Islanders have never see11 him, but to
1
this day they continue to do his will with fear and trembling.

I I. Stories of a Great Flood in Australia

Story of a The Kurnai, an aboriginal Australian tribe of Gippsland,
great flood
told by the in
v1ctor1a,
. say t h at a long time
h
ago t ere was a very grea t
Kurnai of flood ; all the country was under water, and all the black
Victoria.
people were drowned except a man and two or three women,
who took refuge in a mud island near Port Albert. The
water was all round them. Just then the pelican, or Bunjil
Borun, as the Kurnai call the bird, came sailing by in his
canoe, and seeing the distress of the poor people he went to
help them. One of the women was so beautiful that he fell
in love. with her. When she would have stepped into the
canoe, he said; '' Not no"v, next time'' ; so that after he had
ferried all the rest, one by one, across to the mainland, she
was left to the last. Afraid of being alone with the ferry-
man, she did not wait his return on his last trip, but swam
ashore and escaped. However, before quitting the island,
she dressed up a log in her opossum rug and laid it beside
Why the fire, so that it looked just like herself. When the pelican
pelicans d r h h
are now arrive to rerry er over, e called, '' Come on, now." The
black and log made no reply, so the pelican flew into a passion, and rush-
white.
E. H. Man, On the Aboriginal
I I1zdi"a, I90I, vol. iii. The Anda111an
Inhabi"tants ef the Andanzan Islands a1zd Nicobar Islands (Calcutta, 1903),
(London, N.D. ), pp. 98 sq. Compare P 63.
Sir Richard C. Temple, in Census of
CHAP. IV A GREAT FLOOD IN AUSTRALIA 235
i~g up to wl1at he took to be the woman, he lunged out with
1 his foot at her and gave the log a tremendous kick. Natur-
ally he only hurt his own foot, and what with the pain and
the chagrin at the trick that had been played him, he was
very angry indeed and began to paint himself white in order
that he might fight the husband of the impudent hussy who
had so deceived him. He was still engaged in these warlike
preparations, and had only painted white one half of his
black body, when another pelican came up, and not knowing
what to make of such a strange creature, half white and half
black, he pecked at him with his beak and killed him. That
is why pelicans are now black and white ; before the flood
1
they were black all over.
According to the aborigines about Lake Tyers, in Story of a
V 1c th e way 1n
. t or1a, wh"ic h t h e great fl oo d came a b out was great
told byflood
the
this. Once upon a time all tl1e water in the world was aborigines
swallo\ved by a huge frog, and nobody else could get a drop ~y~r~ki:
to drink. It was most inconvenient, especially for the fish, Victoria;
how a frog
. who flapped about and gasped on the dry land. So the swallowed
animals laid their heads together and came to the conclusion all the d
water an
that the only way of making the frog disgorge the waters was made
was to tickle his fancy so that he should laugh. Accord- It. ~ 0 disgorge
ingly they gathered before him and cut capers and played
pranks that would have caused any ordinary person to die
of laugl1ing. But the frog did not even smile. He sat there
in gloomy silence, with his great goggle eyes and his swollen
cheeks, as grave as a judge. As a last resort the eel stood up
on its tail and wriggled and danced about, twisting itself into
the most ridiculous contortions. This was more than even
the frog could bear. His features relaxed, and he laughed .
till the tears ran down his cheel<s and tl1e water pou1ed out
of his mouth. However, tl1e animals had now got more
than they had bargained for, since the waters disgorged by
the frog swelled into a great flood in which many people
perished. Indeed the whole of mankind \vould have been

A. W. rlowitt, in R. Brough
t
the ancestors of the l{11r11ai turnecl i11to
Smyth's Abo1-i:i;i1ies ef Victoria. (Mel- ~J.nimals, birds, re1itiles, and ~sl1es.
bourne and Londc>n, 1878), 1. 477 See A. W. IIowitt, ''The .Terae1l, or
sq. ; id., Native Tribes of .S'o1tth-East Initiation Ceremonies of the I<.urnai
Aust1-alia (1,on<lon, 1904), p. 486. Tribe,'' Jo1tr1111 l of tlze ./l 1zt/z111pologilal
It is sairl that after tl1e (]eluge so1ne of I11stitztte, xiv. (1885) p. 314.
THE GREAT FLOOD PAR1' I
d1owned, if the pelican had not gone about in a canoe

1
picl<i11g up the survivors and so saving thei1 lives.
Other Another legend of a deluge current among the aborigines
!t~~~~ ~~Id of Victoria relates how, 1nany long ages ago, the Creator
hy t~e. Bundjel was very angry with black people because they did
~~~;~;:;i~ evil. So he caused the ocean to swell by the same process
and South by which Strepsiades in Aristophanes supposed that Zeus
Australia. 2 1
1nade rain to fall from the clot1ds ; and in the rising flood al '
black people were drowned, except those whom Bundjel loved

and catching up fro1n the water fixed as stars in the sky.
Nevertheless one man and one \:Yoman escaped the deluge
by climbing a high tree on a mountain ; so they lived and
3
became the ancestors of the present human race. The
N arrinyeri of South Australia say that once on. a time a
man's two wives ran a\:vay from him. He pursued them to
Encounter Bay, and there seeing them at a distance he cried
out in anger, '' Let the waters arise and drown them." On
'
that a terrible flood swept over the hills and overtaking the
fugitives overwhelmed them, so that they died. To such a
height did the waters rise that a certain man named N epelle,
who lived at Rauwol<e, was obliged to drag his canoe to the
top of the hill which is now called Point Macleay. The
de11se part of the Milky Way is said to be his canoe floating
4
in the sky.
Story of a The natives about Mount Elliot, on the coast of Queens-
great flood
told by the land, say that in the time of their forefathers there happened
natives of a great flood, which drowned most of the1n ; only a few
Queens-
. land. were saved who contrived to escape to the top of a very
high mountain, called Bibbiringda, which rises inland from
the northern bay of Cape Cleveland. 5
I R. Brot1gh Smyth, Abori"gi'nes of 4 Rev. G. Taplin, ''The Narrinyeri,"
Vz"ctona, i. 429 sq. ; E. M. Curr, The in J. D. Woods, Natz"ve J?ibes ef
Australian Race (Melbourne and Lon- Soztth Attstralia (Adelaide, I 879 ),
don, 1886-1887), iii. 547 sq. Com- ' p. 57.
pare The Magic Art and the Evolution 6 E. M. Curr, The Australz"a1z Race,
ef I(z"ngs, i. 292 sq., where part of the ii. 450. For some other references to
legend is given from Miss Mary E. B. floods in the,traditions of the At1stralian
Howitt's Folklo1e a1zd Legends ef some aborigines, see A. Oldfield, ''The
Victo1ian Tribes (in manuscript). Aborigines of Australia,'' Transactz'o1zs
2 Aristophanes, Clouds, 373. of the Eth11ologi."cal Society of London,
New Series, iii. (London, 1865) pp.
3 R. Brough Smyth, Abon"gi"nes of 234 sq. ; E. M. Curr, The Australian
Victoria, i. 429. Race, iii. 420.
. .
ca;.1v FLOOJJ IN NEW GUINEA AND MELANESIA 237
'
. I 2. Storz'es of a Great Flood in New Guinea and

Melanesza
In the Kabadi district of British New Guinea the natives Stori~s of a
have a tradition that once on a time a certain man Lohero great flood
~d~the
and his younger brother were angry with the people about natives of
them, and they put a human bone into a small stream. ~~:ea.
Soon the great waters came forth, forming a sea, flooding all
the low land, and driving the people back to the mountains,
till step by step they had to escape to the tops of the highest
peaks. There they lived till the sea receded, when some of
them descended to the lo\vlands, while others remained on
the ridges a11d there built houses and formed plantations.1
The Valmans of Berlin Harbour, on the northern coast of
New Guinea, tell ho\v one day the wife of a very good man
saw a great fish s\vimming to the bank. She called to her
husband, but at first he could not see the fish. So his wife
laughed at him and hid him behind a banana-tree, that he
might peep at it through the leaves. When he did catch
sight of it at last, he was horribly afraid, and sending for his
family, a son and two daughters, he fo1bade the1n to catch
and eat the fish. But the other people took bow and arrow
and a cord, and they caught the fish and drew it to land.
Though the good man warned them not to eat of the fish, .
they did it notwithstanding. When the good man saw that,
he hastily drove a pair of animals of every sort up into the
trees, and then he and his family climbed up into a coco-nut
tree. Hardly had the wicked men consumed the fish than
water burst from the ground witl1 such violence that nobody
had time to save himself. Men and animals were all drowned.
When the water had mounted to the top of the highest tree,
it sank as rapidly as it had risen. Then the good man
came down from the tree witl1 his family and laid out new
2
plantations.
The natives of the Mamberano Rive1, in Dutch New
Guinea, are reported to tell a story of a great flood, caused
by the rising of the river, which overwhelmed Mount Vanessa,
1 J.
Chalmers ancl W. vVyatt Gill, giose Anschaut1ngen t1nd Gebrat1c!1e der
Work and Adventu1e in New Giti1iea Bewol111er von Berli11!1afe11 (Deutscl1-
(London, 1885), p. 164. Neuguinea),'' G/obtts, lxxviii. (1900)
2 P. Chr. Schleiermacher, '' Reli- p. 6.
THE GREAT FLOOD PART I
and from which only one man and his wife escaped, together
\vith a pig, a cassowary, a l{angaroo, and a pigeon. 'fhe
man and his wife became the ancestors of tl1e present race
of men ; the beasts and birds became the ancestors of the
existing species. The bones of the drowned animals still
1
lie on Mount Vanessa.

R.Neuhat1ss On the subject of deluge legends in N e\v Guinea the

~~ :~~~~ following remarks of a judicious and well-informed \vriter
in New deserve to be borne in mind. ''New Guinea," he says, ''is
Guinea. the classic land of earthquakes, and ten years never pass
without the occurrence somewhere of a tremendous convul-
sion, such as the sinking of whole districts or the inroad of
destructive flood-waves. Thus, for example, the sea is said
to have formerly reached to the top of Saddle Mountain.
Stories of a flood are therefore common in New Guinea, and
have originated in the country itself under the impression
of these natural phenomena. Now the Papuan hears the
Biblical story of the flood, in \vhich his fancy is particularly
taken by the many great animals, of each of which a pair
was saved. The terrestrial animals of his own country are
hardly worth the saving, and the birds can escape from the
flood without the help of man. But since in the Biblical
flood large animals were sa;ved, of which pictures are shown
to the native, animals which afford much better eating than
wretched rats and mice, the black man modifies his O\vn
flood legends accordingly. It cannot surprise us, therefore,
that legends with a Biblical colouring alread)' existed in
New Guinea when the first mission settled there in 1886;
for the neighbourhood of the Malay Archipelago, where
missionaries had been much longer resident, facilitated the
importation of the stories. Besides, a mission had been
established in the island of Rook as early as about the
middle of the nineteenth century ; and Rook has been in
constant communication with the mainland of New Guinea
by means of the neighbouring Siassi Islands. The Bis1narck
Archipelago also, where missionaries have long been at
work, deserves to be considered with reference to the im-
1 Max Moszkowski, '' Die Volker- lagerten Inseln,'' Zeitsch1-ift far Ethno-
stiimme am Ma1nberamo in Holland- logie, xliii. (I 9 I I) pp. 340 sq.
ischen N eugt1inea und auf vorge-
cH. rv FLOOD IN NEW GUINEA AND MELANESIA 239
portation of Biblical stories into Northern New Guinea
(Kaiser-Wilhelmsland) ; for a perpetual intercourse of ideas
is kept up between the two countries by the seafaring Siassi
1
and Tami."
The Fijians have a tradition of a great deluge, which Fijian

they call Walavu-levu : some say tl1at the flood was 'partial, tradition of
. . l h a great
oth ers t h a t 1t was un1versa . T e way in \vhich the cata- flood.
strophe came about was this. The great god N dengei had
a monstrous bird called Turukawa, which used to wake
him punctually by its cooing every morning. One day
his two grandsons, whether by accident or design, shot
the bird dead with their bows and arrows, and buried the
carcase in order to conceal the crime. So the deity overslept
himself, and being much annoyed at the disappearance of his
favourite fowl, he sent out his messenger Uto to look for it
everywhere. The search proved fruitless. The messenger
reported that not a trace of the bird was to be found. But
a second search was more successful, and laid the guilt of the
murder at the door of the god's grandsons. To escape the
rage of their incensed grandfather the young scapegraces
fled to the mountains and there took refuge with a tribe of
carpenters, who willingly undertook to build a stockade
strong enough to keep N dengei and all his catch polls at
bay. They were as good as their word, and for three months
the god and his minions besieged the fortress in vain. At
last, in despair of capturing the stockade by the regular
operations of war, the baffled deity disbanded his army and
meditated a surer revenge. At his command the dark clouds How the
gathered and burst, pouring torrents of rain on the doomed ~ogengei
earth. Towns, hills, and mountains were sub1nerged one caused a
. h h . ht_deluge,and
after the other ; yet for 1ong t h e re b e1s, secure 1n t e eig peoplewere
of their town looked down with unconcern on the rising tide saved in
' . canoes or
of waters. At last \vhen the surges lapped their wooden great
walls and even washed through their fortress, they called for bowls.
help to a god, who, according to one account, instructed
them to form a float out of the fruit of the shaddock ; accord-
ing to others, he sent two canoes for their use, or taught
1 R. N cuha11ss, Deietsch Nezt- C11i1zea 111an New Guinea, in which l1e has
(13erlin, 1911), i. 414. 1'he writ~r's tra veiled widely.
observations apply particularly to Gcr
. 240 THE GREAT FLOOD PART I
them how to build a ca11oe for themselves and thus ensure

their O\:\'n safety. It was l~okoro, .the god of carpenters,
who with his foreman Rokola came to their rescue. The
pair sailed about in two large double canoes, picki11g up the
drowning people and keeping the1n on board till the flood
subsided. Others, however, will have it that tl1e survivors
saved themselves in large bowls, in which they floated about.
Whatever the minor variations may be in the Fijian legend,
all agree that even the highest places were covered by the
deluge, and that tl1e remnant of the human race \vas saved
in some ki11d of vessel, which was at last left high and dry
by the receding tide on the island of Mbengha. The number
of persons who thus survived the flood \Vas eight. Two
tribes were completely destro:yed by the waters; one of them
consisted entirely of women, the mernbers of the other had
tails like those of dogs. Because the survivors of the flood
landed on their island, the natives of Mbengha claimed to
rank highest of all the Fijians, and their chiefs always acted
a conspicuous part in Fijian history: they styled themselves
''Subject to 11eaven alone'' (Ngali-duva-kz"-langz'). It is said
that formerly the Fijians always kept great canoes ready for
use against another flood, and that the custom was only dis-
1
continued in modern times.
l\1elanesian The Melanesians of the New Hebrides say that their
~~~?'t ~~:d. great legendary hero Qat disappeared f1om the world in a
f1om which deluge. They show the very place from which he sailed
the
Qat hero away on h"1s 1ast voyage. I t 1s
. a b roa d 1a l<:e 1n
. t h e centre
escaped in of the island of Gaua. In the days of Qat the ground now
a canoe. b h k
occupied y t e la e was a spacious plain clotl1ed with
forest. Qat felled one of the tallest trees in the wood and
proceeded to build himself a canoe out of the fallen trunk.
While he was at work on it, his brothers would come and
jeer at him, as he sat or stood there sweating away at his
1 Thomas Williams, Fiji and the the Islands of the Western Pacific
Fijians (London, 1860), i. 252; (London, 1853), pp. 244 sq. ; Berthold
Horatio Hale, United States Exploring Seeman, Viti~ an Account of a Gover11-
Expedition, Ethnography a1td Philolo!fY me1zt llfisJion to the Vi'tian or Fijia11
(Philadelphia, 1846), p. 55 ; Charles Islands in the years I86o-I86I (Cam-
Wilkes, Nairative of the United States bridge, 1862), pp. 394 sq. The
Exploring Expedz'tzon, New Edition mytl1ical cattse of the flood, namely the
(New York, 1851), iii. 82 sq. ; J. E. slaughter of the god's favourite bird, is
Erskine, Journal ef a Crui'se a111ong told in detail only by the last writer.
CH. xv. FLOOD IN POLYNESIA AJVD MICRONESIA
unfinished canoe in the shadow of the dense tropical forest.

'' How. will you ever get that huge canoe through the thick
woods to the sea?'' they asked him mockingly. ''Wait and
see," was all he deigned to ans\ver. When the canoe was
finished, he gathered into it his wife and his brothers and all
the living creatures of the island, down to the smallest ants,
and shut himself and them into the vessel, which he provided
with a covering. Then came a deluge of rain ; the great
hollow of the island was filled with water, which burst through
the circle of the hills at the spot where the great waterfall
of Gaua still descends seaward, with a thunderous roar, in a
veil of spray. There the canoe swept on the rushing water
through the barrier of the hills, and driving away out to sea
was lost to view. The natives say that the hero Qat tool<:
away the best of everything with him when he thus vanished
from sight, and still they look forward to his joyful return.
When Bishop Patteson and his companions first landed on
Mota, the happy natives took him for the long-lost Qat and
his brethren. And some years afterwards, when a small
trading vessel was one day seen standing in for the island of
Gaua and making apparently for the channel down which
the water of the great cascade flo\VS to mingle with the sea,
the old people on the island cried out joyfully that Qat was
come again, and that his canoe knew her own way home.
But alas! the ship was cast away on the reef, and Qat has
1
not yet come home.
I 3. Stories of a Great Floocl i1z Polynesia and Mz'cronesia

Legends of a great flood in which a multitude of people Stories of a
. . l d great flood
perished are told by the t1at1ves of those groups of 1s an s iii the
which under the general names of Polynesia and Mic1onesia islands ?f

. . l f ,, the Pacific.
are scattered widely over the Pacific. ''The pr1nc1pa acts,
we are told, '' are the same in the traditions prevailing among
the inhabitants c)f. the different groups, although tl1ey differ
in several mi11or particulars. . In one group the accounts
R. I-I. Codrington, 7/ie Me!anesia1ts
I
in the canoe ; bt1t it is certain tl1at tl1e
(Oxford, 1891), pp. 166 sq. Tl1e story is older tha11 any i<nowledge of
writer adcls, ''It is Iil<ely now that Noah's arl;: a1n<111g the 1)e<>])Ic.''
the story will be told <>f eight J)ersons
R
VOl,. I
THE GREAT FLOOIJ PART I
state, that in ancient times Taaroa, the pri11cipal god (accord-

ing to their mythology, the creator of the world), being angry
with men 011 account of their disobedience to his will, over-
tur11ed the world into the sea, when tl1e earth sanl<: in the
waters, excepting a fe\v aurzts, or projecting points, which,
remaining above its surface, constituted the p1incipal cluster
, of islands. The memorial preserved by the inhabitants of
Eimeo states, that after the inundation of the land, when the
water subsided, a man landed from a canoe near Tiataepua,
'
in their island, and erected an altar, or nzarae, in honour of
1
his god."
Tahitian In Tahiti the legend ran as follows. Tahiti was destroyed
story flof ad by the sea : no man, nor hog, nor fowl, nor dog survived.
great oo ,
from which Tl1e groves of trees and the stones were carried away by the
(:~:~~:~ wind. They were destroyed, and the deep was over the land.
and wife), But two persons, a husband and a wife, were saved. When
~i7~t~~~e the flood came, the wife tool<: up her young chicken, her
animals, young dog, and her kitten ; the husband took up his young
were saved
on a high pig. [These \Vere all the animals formerly known to the
mountain. natives; and as the term .fanaua,' young,' is both singular and
plural, it may apply to one or more than one chicken, etc.].
The husband proposed tl1at they should take refuge on Mo11r1t
Orofena, a high mountain in Tahiti, saying that it was lofty
and would not be reached by the sea. But his wife said that
the sea would reach to Mount Orofena, and that they had
better go to Mount 0 Pitohito, where they \vould be safe
from the flood. So to Mount 0 Pitohito they went ; and
she was right, for Orofena was overwhelmed by the sea, but
0 Pitohito rose above the waste of waters and became their
abode. There they watched ten nights, till the sea ebbed,
and they saw the little heads of tl1e mountains appearing
above the waves. When the sea retired, the land remained
without produce, without man, and the fish \Vere putrid in
the eaves and holes of the rocks. They said, '' Dig a hole
for the fish in the sea." The wind also died away, a'1d when
all was calm: the stones and the trees began to fall from the
heavens, to which they had been carried up by the wind.
For all the trees of the land had been torn up and \vhirled
1
W. Ellis, Poly1iesian Researches, Second Edition (London, 1832-1836),
i. 386 sq.
CH. tv FLOOD IN POLYNESIA AND MICRONESIA 243

aloft by the . hurricane. The two looked about, and the
1
woman said, ' We two are safe from the sea, but deatl1, or
hurt, comes now in these stones that are falling. Where
shall we abide?'' So the two dug a hole, lined it with grass,
and covered it over with stones and earth. Then they crept
into the hole, and sitting there they heard with terror the
roar and crash of the stones falling down from the sky. By

and by the rain of stones abated, till only a few stones fell
at intervals, and then they dropped one by one, and finally ,
ceased altogether. The woman said, '' Arise, go out, and see
whether the stones are still falling." But her husband said,
'' Nay, I go not out, lest I die." A day and a night he
waited, and in the morning he said, '' The \Vind is truly dead,
and the stones and the trunks of trees cease to fall, neither
is there the sou11d of the stones." They went out, and like
a small mountain was the heap of fallen stones and tree
trunks. Of the land there remained the earth and the rocks,
but the shrubs were destroyed by the sea. They descended
from the mountain, and gazed with astonishment: there were
no houses, nor coco-nuts, nor palm-trees, nor bread-fruit, nor
hibiscus, nor grass : all '.-vas destroyed by the sea. The two
dwelt together. The woman brought forth two children;
one was a son, the other a daughter. They ,grieved that
there was no food for their children. Again the mother
brought forth, but still there was no food ; then the bread-
fruit bore fruit, and the coco-nut, and every other kind
of food. In three days the land \-Vas covered with food ;
and in time it swarmed with men also, for from those two
persons, the father and the mother, all the people are
1
descended.
In Raiatea one of the Leeward IslaBds in the Tahitian Raiatean
. . ' h 1 f h l'
group, trad1t1on ran that s ort Y a te1 t e peop 1ng o f th story of a
e great flood,
world by the descendants of Taata, the sea-god Ruahatu fron1 whi?l1
. h d h f a 111an, his
was reposing among groves o f co1a1 in t e ept s o ocean, wife, and
when his repose was rudely interrt1pted. 1
A fisherman, cl ild \Vere
saved on a11
paddling his canoe overhead, in ignorance or forgetfulness isla11d.
of the divine presence, let down his hool(s arnong the branch-
ing corals at the bottom of the clear transluce11t water, and
they became entangled in the hair of the sleeping god.
I W. Ellis, E'oly11esia1i f(esea1-cl1es, i. 387-389 .

244 THE GREAT FLOOD PART l
With great difficulty the fishermar1 wrenched the hooks out

of the ambrosial locks and began pulling the1n up hand-over-
hand. But the god, enraged at being disturbed i11 his nap,
came also bubbling up to the surface, and popping his head
out of the water upbraided tl1e fisl1erman for his impiety, and
threatened in revenge to destroy the land. The affrighted
fisherman prostrated himself before the sea-god, confessed
his sin, and implored his forgiveness, beseeching that the
judgment denounced might be averted, or at least that he
himself might escape. Moved by his penitence and impor-
tunity, Ruahatu bade him return home for his wife and child
and go with them to Toamarama, a small island situated
within the reefs on the eastern side of Raiatea. There !1e
was promised security amid the destruction of the surround-
ing islands. The man hastened home, and taking with him
his wife and child he repaired to the little isle of refuge in
the lagoon. Some say that he took with him also a friend,
who was living under his roof, together \Vith a dog, a pig,
and a pair of fowls; so that the refugees numbered four
souls, together with the only domesticated animals which
were then known in the islands. They reached the harbour
of refuge before the close of day, and as the sun set tl1e
waters of the ocean began to rise, and the inhabitants of the
adjacent shore left their d\vellings and fled to the moun-
tains. All that night the waters rose, and next morning
only the tops of the high mountains appeared above the
widespread sea. Even these were at last covered, and all
the inhabitants of the land perished. Afterwards the waters
retired, the fisherman and his companions left their retreat,
took up their abode on the mainland, and became the pro-
genitors of the present inhabitants.1
The coral The coral islet in which these forefathers of the race
isle where r d fi fi
the ioun re uge rom the great flood is not more than two feet
ancestors at the highest above the level of the sea so that it is difficult
of the '
h1iman to understand how it could have escaped the inundation,
race found while the lofty mountains which tower up thousands of feet
refuge fron1
the flood. from the adjacent shore were submerged. This difficulty,
however, presents no stumbling-block to the faith of the
natives ; they usually decline to discuss such sceptical doubts,
1
W. Ellis, Polynesi'an Researches, i. 389-391.
. .
CH. Iv FLOOD lN POLYNESIA AND MICRONESIA

245
and point triumphantly for confirmation of their story to the
coral, shells, and other marine substances which are occa-
sionally found near the surface of the ground on the tops of
their highest mountains. These must, they insist, have been
deposited there by the waters of the ocean when the islands
1
were submerged.
It is significant, as we shall see later on, that in these In these
Tahitian legends the flood is ascribed solely to the rising of Tahitian .
legends the
the sea, and not at all to heavy rain, \vhich is not even flood is
mentioned. On this point the Rev. William Ellis to whom asc r,ibed
' so1e y to
we owe the record of these legends, makes the following the rising
observations: ''I have frequently conversed with the people ~~:~~ ~~~
on the subject, both in the northern and southern groups, fall of rain.
but could never learn that they had any accounts of the
windows of heaven having been opened, or the rain having
descended. In the legend of Ruahatu, the Toamarama of
Tahiti, and the Kai of Kahinarii in Ha\aii, the inundatio11
is ascribed to the rising of the waters of the sea. In each
account, the anger of the god is considered as the cause of
the inundation of the world, and the destruction of its
inhabitants." 2
When Mr. Ellis preached in the year I 8 2 2 to tl1e Hawaiian
.
natives o f H . . h b.
awaii on t e su Ject o f N h' d ]
oa s e uge, th legend of
ey greatflood.a
told him of a similar legend which had been handed

down among them. '' They said they were informed by
their fathers, that all the land had once been overflowed by
the sea, except a small peak on the top of Mouna-Kea,
where two human beings were preserved from the destruction
that overtook the rest, but they said they had never before
heard of a ship, or of Noah, having been always accustomed
3
to call it kai a Kahz'ndrii (sea of Kahinarii)."
A somewhat later version of the Hawaiia11 legend runs Anoth.~r
'k . . h' h t t Hawa11an
thus. ''A tradition of the fl oo d l i ew1se exists, w ic s a es legend ofa
that all the land, except the summit of Mauna-kea, was over- greatftood.
flowed by copious rains and risings of the waters. Some of
the inhabitants preserved themselves in a canoe, which finally
rested upon that mountain ; after which the waters fell, an?
the people went forth, and again dwelt in the lai1d. This
1 w. Ellis, f.Joly1iesia1z J?esearches, 2 W. J<;JJis, op. cit. i. 392 sq.

I, 39 I '

:1 W. Ellis, op. cit. iv. 441 sq
I
.
flood is called Kaiakahnialii, the great deluge of Hinaliz:'' 1
In this later version there are two not unimportant variations

from the earlier. First, the deluge is said to have been partly
caused by rain, whereas in the earlier version there is no
mention of rain, and in it the flood is attribt1ted to the rising
of the sea alone. Second, in the later version the survivors are
reported to have saved themselves in a canoe, whereas in the
earlier version no canoe is mentioned, the survivors being
merely said to have escaped to the mountain. In both points
the later version agrees with the Biblical legend and has
probably been influenced by it.
Mangaia, Mangaia, one of the Hervey Group, is an island vvhich
one of the
Hervey rises from deep water as a iing of live coral. The unbrol<en
Islands. reef which surrou11ds it is covered by the sea at half tide.
Inward from this ring of live coral rises a second ring of
dead coral, from one to two miles vvide, which falls away
perpendicularly on the landward side, thus forming a sort of
cyclopean wall which runs right round the island. The
interior of the island is composed of dark volcanic rock and
red clay, which.descend in low hills from a flat-topped centre
known as the Crown of Mangaia. There is no lagoon. The
streams, after fertilizing thousands of taro plantations, find
their way to the sea by subterranean channels through the
2
inner ring of dead coral. Such is Mangaia at the present
time. But the natives say that it was not always so.
Originally, if we may believe them, the surface of the island
was everywhere a gentle uniform slope from the centre to
the sea without a single hollow or valley. The process by
which the island was transformed into the present shape is
said to have been as follows. .
Storyofthe Aokeu, a son of Echo, disputed warmly with Ake who
transfor-
mation of
h Id r h
s ou per1orm t e most wonderful thing. Ake's home is
Mangaia the ocean, and his constant employment is to tread down
into its fl .
present its oor1ng ; thus he ever deepens its vast basin, and enables
shape it to hold more of his favourite element. Ake was confident
through a
contest that he could easily beat Aokeu, who was ignobly born of
bhetweedn f
t ego s o
the continual drippings of purest water from
the stalactite
the sea anrl
the rain. . James .~ackson Jarves, History of
1
Rev. W. Wyatt Gill, Life i1z the
2
the Hawazza1z or Sandwiclz Islands Southern Isles (London, N.D., preface
(Boston, I 843), p. 28. dated 1876), pp. 7 sq.
. ea. IV . FLOOD IN POLYNESIA AND MICRONESIA 247
roof of a narrow cavern. His name means ''Red Circle
and he is so called because after heavy rains the wat~r
washes do\vn the red clay and tinges the ocean round the ..
island with a crimson band.
. To make sure of success Ake summoned to his help How the
l~aka, the god of the winds, who drove a fearful hur1icane sea-god
. attacked
over sea an d 1and, as 1f he would bury the island ir1 the the island.
depths. The two twin children of the blustering storm-god
also lent their aid. One of them, Tikokura, is seen in the
line of huge curling, foaming billo\vs, which break in thunder
on the reef, threatening to dash the solid coral itself ii1to shivers.

Tl1e other tvvin-child of the wind-god. is Tane-ere-tue; he

manifests himself in the great storm-wave, \vhich is rarely
seen, but never without striking terror i11to the beholder.
011 rushed these mighty monsters, secure of victory.
They swamped the rocks near the sea to the height of a
hundred feet above the level of the sea. In proof of it you
may see to this day numberless clam and other shells, as
well as ''coral-borers'' (ungakoa) imbedded in the solid rock,
which is burrowed and worn, even at its higl1est points, into
a thousand fantastic shapes by tl1e action of the sea.
Meantime, Aokeu on his side .had not been idle. He How the
caused the rain his favourite element to fall in sheets for ~~~~~~
five days and nights withot1t intermission. The red clay out the
. h d
an d sma11 stones were was h ed d own into t e ocean, 1s- the island. valleys of
colouring its waters a long way from the land. On every

side the channels deepened until the nar1ow valleys were
formed ; but still the wind howled and the rain poured
incessantly, till the deep valleys, \valled in on the seaward
side by perpendicular rocks, where the principal taro-grounds
may now be seen, gradually assumed their present dimensions.
The flat summit of the central hill, Rangimotia, the C10\vn of
Mangaia, alone rose above tl1e \vater, to mark the original
height of the island.
At the outset Rangi, the first ruler of Mangaia, had bee11 Ho\v Ra11gi
' . l. h and a fe\v
warned of the desperate strife of the ele1nents w 11c \vas people
about to take place and with his few people, a\vaited at escaped
' ' from the
Rangimotia the issue of the contest. Witl1 deep conce1n he flood on tl1e
saw on the one hand the wild ocea11 coveri11g the belt of top of lt.
d mour1ta1n.
rocks which su1rounds the island, and, on tl1e other han ,
THE GREAT FLOOD !'ART I
a vast lake of fresh water rising rapidly and rushing

tumultuously to meet the advancing ocean. Everywhere an
immense expanse of water met the eye of l~angi, save only
the long narrow strip of level soil upon which he and his
people tiemblingly stood. Already the rising tide lapped
tl1eir feet. What if it sl1ould rise a little higl1er? Rangi
resolved to appeal to the great god Rongo to save him and
his beloved island from destruction. To reach the temple
(11za1'ae) of the god, \vhich faced the rising sun, Rangi had to
wade through the waters, which reached to his chin, along a
ridge of hills to a point called Teunu, lying due east. Just
the1e is a spot called ''the standing-place of Rongo," because
that god hearkened to his grandson's prayer, and looking at
the war of ,,waters the flood from the land 1neeting and
battling \Vith the flood from the sea he cried, '' It is enough
(A tira) ! '' The eye of Vatea, the Sun, opened at the same
moment above the scene of conflict; the god sa\v and pitied
manl<:ind. Then the sea sullenly sank to its former level: the
rain ceased to fall: the waters of the interior were drained a\vay;
and the island assumed its present agreeable diversity of hill
and vale. Hence the proud title of the high god of l\!Iangaia,
''Rongo, the warder-off of mad billows'' (Rongo aJ'ai kea).
Victory Mankind were saved, and the land became better adapted
of the
rai11-god. than ever to their abode. Aol<eu, lord of rain, was ack11ow-
ledged victor ; for the ocean had expended its fury in vain
on the rocky heights near the sea, they still stood firm, and
in vain had the twin-sons of the wind-god sought to storm
tl1e heights of the island. But the turbid floods, rushing
do,vn from the hills, flowed far away into the ocean, every-
where marking their triumphant progress with the red clay
of the mountains of Mangaia. So real was this war of the

elements to the men of former days that they disputed as
to the route \Vhich Rangi took in wading through the flood
to the temple of Rongo, some holding that he took the
straight road, others that he followed a more circuitous path
to avoid a dip in the hills. 1
This story of a great flood is interesting, because it
appears to be a simple myth invented to explain the peculiar
physical features of the island. Had the w1iter who records
1
Rev. W. Wyatt Gill, Life iii the Southern Isles, pp. 79-83.
,
CH. IV FLOOD IN POLYNESIA AND MICRONESIA 249
the tale not also described the aspect of the island, with This
which he was familiar, we should probably have failed to Mangaian
h 1 1 1
perceive t e pure y oca or1g1n of the story, and might have flood is a story of a
been tempted to derive it. from. some distant source perhaps ~yth
intended to
even to find in it a conft1sed reminiscence of Noah and the explain the
ark. It is allowable to, conjecture that many other stories ~o1rmdof the IS~.
of a great flood could similarly be resolved into merely local

myths, if we were better acquainted with those natural features
of the country which the tales were invented to explain.
A somewhat different story of a great flood is told in Another
Rakaanga, an outlying island of the Hervey Group They story oflf ad
great oo
say that once 011 a time a certain chief named Taoiau was told in
. grea tl y incense
d w1th h is
peop1e !Orr b . another of
not ringing him the tl1e Hervey
sacred turtle. So in his wrath he roused all the mighty Islands.
sea-gods, on \vhose good-will the islands depend for their
existence. Amongst them in particular was one who sleeps
at the bottom of mid-ocean, but who on that occasion, moved
by the king's prayer, stood up in anger like a vast upright

stone. A dreadful hurricane burst forth; the ocean rose and
swept over the \vhole island of Rakaanga. The few in-
habitants of those days escaped destruction by taking refuge

on a mound, which was pointed out to the missionary who

has recorded the tale. There was no mountain to \vhich they
could fly for safety, since the island is a low atoll covered
with forests of coco-nut palms. The n1emorable event was
1
long known as ''the overwhelming of Taoiau."
In Samoa it is, or used to be, a universal belief that of Sa1n.o~n
. d d" . dd trad1t1ons
old the fish swam w h ere t h e 1an d now 1s ; an tra 1t1on a s of a great
that when the waters abated, many of the fish of the sea were flood.
left on the land and were afterwards cha11ged i11to stones.
Hence, they say, in the bush and on the mountains there are
stones in plenty which were once sharks and other inhabit-
ants of the deep. 2 According to another Samoan tradition
the only survivor of the deluge was a certain Pili, who was
either a man or a lizard, and by marriage with a bird, the
3
stormy petrel, begat offspring whose na1nes are recorded.
The natives of N anumanga or Hudson's Island, in the South Na11u-
n1<1ngan
1 Rev. W. Wyatt Gill, Life i1t the 11e.ria (London, I 861 ), pp. 249 sq. story of a
3 W. v. Biilo\V, '' Sa111oanische great flood .
.5'outhe1-1t I.rles, pp. 8 3 sq. ; as to the
island, ib. p. 12. Schopf11ngssage 11nd U 1gescl1ichte,''
2 G. 'f11r11cr, Ninetec11 J7ea1-.r i11 Poly- Globus, lxxi. (1897) P 377
THE GREAT Ji'LOOD PAR'r I
Pacific, also tell of a deluge, and ho\v it was dispelled by the

sea-serpent, who, as a woman, married the earth as a man, and
1
by him became the ancestress of the present race of mortals.
Maori The Maoris of New Zealand have a long legend of the
~!J~~~. of a deluge. They say tl1at when men multiplied on the earth
and there \Vere many great tribes, evil prevailed everywhere,
the tribes quarrelled and made war on each other. The
worship of the great god Tane, who had created man and
woman, was neglected and his doctrines openly denied. T\vo
great prophets, indeed, there were who taught the true doctrine
concerning the separation of heaven and earth, but men scoffed
at them, saying that they were false teache1s and that heaven
and earth had been from the beginning just as we see them
How a novv. The names of these two wise prophets were Para-
grfeat. flood whenua-mea and Tupu-nui-a-uta. Tl1ey continued to preach
o rain \Vas
caused till the tribes cursed them, saying, '' You two can eat the
~~n~~~i~~~ words of your history as food for you, and you can eat the
of two heads of the words of that history." That grieved tl1e p10-
~~:~:~s~d phets, when men said tl1e wicl(ed words '' Eat the heads,"
the1nselves and they grew angry. So they took their stone axes and
and others'
from it on cut down trees, and dragged the trunks to the source of the
a raft. Tohinga River, and bound them together \Vith vines and
ropes, and made a very \Vide raft. Moreover, tl1ey built a
house on the raft, and put much food in it, fern-root, and
sweet potatoes, and dogs. Then they recited incantations
and prayed that rain might descend in such ab11ndance as
would convince men of the existence and power of the god
Tane, and would teach them the need of worship for life and
for peace. After that the two prophets em barl(ed on the
raft, along with two men called Tiu and Reti and a \voman
11a1ned Wai-puna-hau. But there \Vere other women also on
the raft. Now Tiu was the priest on the raft, and he prayed
and uttered incantations for rain. So it rained in torrents for
four or five days, and then the priest repeated incantations
to make the rain cease, and it ceased. But still the flood rose;
next day it reached the settlement, and on the following day
the raft was lifted up by 'the waters, and floated down tl1e River
Tohinga. Great as a sea was now the inundation, and the
1
G. Turner, Sanioa, a hundred years ago and long before (London, 1884),
p. 288. .
.
CH. tv FLOOD IN POLYNESIA AND MICRONESIA . 251
raft drifted to and fro on the face of the waters. When

they had tossed about for seven moons, the priest Tiu said
to his companions, ''We shall not die, we shall land on the
earth'' ; and in the eighth month he said moreover '' The
. '
sea has become thin; the flood has begun to subside.'' The
two p1ophets asked him, '' By what do you know?'' He
answered, ''By the signs of my staff.'' For he had kept his
altar on one side of the deck, and there he performed his
ceremonies, and repeated his incantations, and observed his
staff. And he understood the signs of his staff, and he said
again to his companions, ''The blustering winds of the past
1noons have fallen, the winds of this month have died away,
and the sea is calm." In the eighth month the raft no longer
rolled as before ; it now pitched as well as rolled, so the
priest knew that the sea was shallo\v, and that they were
drawing near to land. He said to his companions, ''This is
the moon in which we shall land on dry earth, for by the
signs of my staff I k11ow that the sea is becoming less deep.''
All the while they floated on the deep they repeated incanta-
tions and performed ce1emonies in honour of the god Tane.
At last they landed on dry earth at Hawaiki. They thought
that they might find son1e of the inhabitants of the world still
alive, and that the earth would look as it had looked before
the flood. But all was changed. The earth was cracked and
fissured in some places, and in others it had been turned
upside down and confounded by reason of the flood. And
not one soul was left alive in the world. They \vho came
forth from the raft were the solitary survivors of all the tribes
of the earth. When they landed, tl1e first thing they did was
to pe1form ceremonies and repeat incantations. They wor- Ho": on
. h d ll h
shipped Tane, and the Heaven (Rang1), and Re ua, an a t e from thelanding
g ods' and as they vvorshipped them they offered them seaweed, the
raft after
flood
a length of the priest's two thumbs for each god. Each god they
was worshipped in a different place, and for each there was worshipped
the gods
an altar where the incantations were recited. The altar was and macle
a root of' grass a shrub, a tree, or a flax-bush. These were fif~e ?Y
' r1ct1011.
the altars of the gods at that time ; and now, if any of the
people of the tribes go near to such altars, the food they ha:e
eaten in their stomachs will swell and kill tl1em. The chief
priest alone may go to such holy spots. If comn1on folk
252 THE GREAT FLOOD

!'ART I
were to go to these sacred places and afterwards cook food

in their village, the food would l<ill all who ate it. It would
be cursed by the sin of the people i11 desecrating the sanctity
of tl1e alta1s, and the punishment of the eaters would be death.
Whe11 the persons who were saved on the raft had performed
all the ceremor1ies needful for removing the taboo under which
they laboured, tl1ey procured fire by friction at one of the
sac1ed places. And with tl1e fire the priest kindled bundles
of grass, and he put a bundle of burning grass on each altar
beside the piece destined for the god ; and the priests pre-
sented the seaweed to the gods as a thanl<-offering for the
rescue of the people from the flood and for the preservation
1
of their lives on the raft.
Otl1er Other Maori stories of a g1eat flood associate the cata-
. Mao1i
stories of a strophe with a certain legendary hero called Tawhaki. They
great flood say that once upon a time two of his brothers-in-la\v attacked
associated
with the and \.vounded him and left him for dead. But he recovered
name of from his wounds and quitted the place where his wicked
the hero
Tawhaki. b1others-in-la\.v lived. Away he went with all his own \:varriors
and their families, and he built a fortified village upon the top
of a very lofty mountain, wl1ere he could easily defend himself,
and there they all dwelt secure. ''Then he called aloud to
the gods, his ancestors, for ievenge, and they let the floods
of heaven descend, and the earth \Vas overwhelmed by the
\vaters and all human beings perished, and the name given
to that event was 'The overwhel1ning of the Mataaho,'
and the \vhole of that race perished." 2 Some say that
Tawhalci was a man, who went up to the top of
a mountain, and, having there transfigured himself by
putting off his earthly raiment and put on a garment of
lightning, was worshipped as a god, and all the tribes
chanted incantations and offered sacrifices to him. In his
divine character he once, in a fit of anger, stamped on
the floor of heaven, so that it cracked and the celestial
waters burst through and flooded the earth.3 Others say
1
John White, The Ancie1it Hi'story Mythology (London, 1855), pp. 60
of the Maori (Wellington and London sq.
I887-I889), i. I72-I78. I have much . 3 John White, The A 1zcient History
abridged the original legend. A briefer of the Maori, i. 55; R. Taylor, Te
version is recorded by the same writer Ika A Maui, or New Zeala1zd and its
(op. ci't. i. I 80 sq.). Inhabitants, Second Edition (London,
2
Sir George Grey, Polynesia1i I870), pp. IOI, I 15 note+.
CH. IV FLOOD IN POLYNESIA AND MICRONESIA

253
that ~t was Ta":'haki's. mother who caused the deluge by
weeping so copiously that her tears, falling on the earth
inundated it and drowned all men.1 '
In Micronesia as well as Polynesia the story of a great Micro-

flood has been recorded. The Pelew Islanders say that once nesianstory
of a great
on a time a man went up into the sky, whence the gods with flood told
their shining eyes, which are the stars look down every by the
' Pelew
night upon the earth. The cunning fellow stole one of these Islanders.
bright eyes and brought it home with him, and all the money
of the Pelew Islanders has been made out of that starry eye
ever since. But the gods were very angry at the theft, and
down they came to earth to reclaim their stolen property and
to punish the thief. They disguised themselves in the like- How the
ness of ordinary men, and begged for food and lodging from gd?ds..
1sgu1se
d
door to door. But men were churlish and turned them away as men,
without a bite or a sup. Only one old woman received them :ia;:~~:~,
kindly in her cottage, and set before them the best she 11ad and how
to eat an d d k
r1n . S h h she was
o w en t ey went away they warned saved from
the old woman to make a raft of bamboo ready against the tl1e flood
next full moon, and when the night of the full moon came on a raft.
she was to lie do\vn on the raft and sleep. She did as she
was bidden. Now with the full moon came a dreadful storm
and rain, and the sea rose higher and higher, and flooded the
islands, rent the mountains, and destroyed the abodes of
men ; and people knew not how to save themselves, and they
all perished in the rising flood. But the good old dame, fast
asleep on the raft, was borne on the face of the waters and
drifted till her hair caught in the boughs of a tree on the top
of Mo11nt Armlimui. There she lay, while the flood ebbed
and the \vater sank lower and lower down the sides of the
mountain. Then the gods came down frotn. the sky to seek
for the good old woman whom they had taken 11nder their
protection, but they found her dead. So they summoned
one of their women-folk from heaven, and she entered into
the dead body of the old woman and made her live. After
that the gods begat five children by the resuscitated old
wife, and having done so they left the earth and returned to
heaven the goddess who had kindly reanimated the corpse
of the ~ncient dame also went back to her mansion in tl1e
1 John Wl1 ite, J'he A1icient .Eiistory of the lliao1i, i. I I 3 sq.
sky. But the five child1en of the divine fathers and the
human mother repeopled the Pele\v Islands, and from them
1
the present inhabitants are descended.
I 4. Stories of a Great Flood in .S'o1ttlt A 111erica

Story of a At the time of their discovery the Indians of Brazil, in
great flood
told by the the neighbourhood of what was afterwards Rio de Janeiro,
Indians of had a legend of a universal deluge in which only two
Brazil.
brothers with their wives were saved. According to one
account, the flood covered the whole earth and all men
perished except the ancestors of those Indians, \vho escaped
2
by climbing up into high trees ; others, 11owever, thought
3
that the survivors were saved in a canoe.
The story As reported by tl1e Frencl1man Andre Thevet, who
athsetorldd_by
n 1ans travelled in Brazil about the middle of the sixteenth century,
about Cape the story related by the Indians about Cape Frio ran thus.
Frio. A certain great medicine-man, by name Sommay, had two sons
called Tamendonare and Ariconte. Tamendonare tilled the
ground and was a good father and husband, and he had a
wife a11d children. But his brother Ariconte cared for none
of these things. He busied himself only with war, and his
one desire was to subdue neighbouring peoples and even his
own righteous brotl1er. One day this truculent warrior,
returning from a battle, brought to his peaceful brother the
amputated arm of a slain foe, and as he did so he said
proudly to his brother, ''A way \Vith you, coward that you
are. I'll have your wife and children, for you are not strong
enough to defend them." The good man, grieved at his
brother's pride, answered with stinging sarcasm, ''If you are
as valiant as you say, why did not you bring the whole car-
cass of your enemy ? '' Indignant at the taunt, Ariconte
1 Karl Semper, Die Palau-I1zseln 53 sq.
(Leipsic, 1873), pp. 195 sq. Accord- 2 J.Lery (Lerius), Histoiia Nttvi-
ing to another version of the story the gationis iii Brasiliant, quae et A 111erica
anger of the gods was kindled, not by dicitur (1586), p. 238 [wrongly num
the theft of one of their eyes, but by bered 220].
the mt1rder of one of their number. 3 The Captivity of Hans Stade of
The rest of the story agrees substantially Hesse, in A.D. I547I555, anzo11g the
with the one given in the text. See Wild Tribes of Easter1t Brazil, trans
J. Kubary, ''Die Religion der Pelauer, '' lated by Albert Tootal and annotated
in Adolf Bastian's Allerlei aits Volks- by (Sir) Richard F. Burton (London,
und Menschenkunde (Berlin, 1888), i. tl1e Hakluyt Society, 1874), p. 148.
.
CHAP. rv A GREAT FLOOD IN SOUTH AMERICA

255
threw the arm at the door of his brother's house. 1 At the
same moment the village in which they dwelt was trans-
ported to the sky, but the two brothers remained on earth.
Seeing that, in astonishment or anger Tamendonare stamped How the
on the ground so. forcibly that a great fountain of water flood was
. . caused by
sprang f rom 1t and rose so high that it out-topped the hills a quarrel
and seemed to mount above the clouds , and the water con- between
t\VO
tinued to spout till it had covered the \Vhole earth. On brothers,
I d h
perce1v1ng t 1e1r anger, t e two brothers hastened to ascend the and how
the highest mountains, and there sought to save themselves brothers

b'1ng th e trees, a 1ong wit
b y c11m h t h eir
wives.
and their
Tamendonare \\"ives
climbed one tree, called pindona, of which the French esc<1 p~d
frotn 1t by
traveller saw t\vo sorts, one of them with larger fruit and climbi11g
leaves tl1an the otl1er. In his flight from the rising flood he trees .
.dragged up one of his wives with him, while his brother

\vith his wife climbed another tree called geniper. While
.,
they were all perched among the boughs, Ariconte gave
some of the fruit of- the tree to his wife, saying, ''Break off
some of the fruit and let it fall." She did so, and they
perceived by the splash that the water was still high, and .
that it was not yet time for them to descend into the valley.
The Indians believe that in this flood all men and women
were drowned, except the two brothers and their wives, and
that from these two pairs after the deluge there came forth
two different peoples, to wit, the Tonnasseares, surnamed
Tupinambo, and the Tonnaitz Hoyanans, surnamed Tominu,
who are at perpetual feud and war with each other. The
Tupinambo, wishing to exalt themselves ai1d to make them-
selves out better than their fellows and neighbours, say, ''We
are descended from Tarnendonare, while you are descended
from Ariconte," by which they imply that Tamendonare
1
was a better man than Ariconte.

A some\vhat different version of the same legend was A11other

.t
recor d e d b y t h e Jesui s d V
1mon e asconce os. 11 In i"t only version
of the

a single family is said to have been saved, and no mention Brazilian

.
is made of the bad brother. 0 nee upon a t 1me, so runs e th story.
tale there was a clever medicine-man or sorcerer named

'
Tamanduare. To him the great god Tup1 revealed the .
1 Anclre Thevet, La Cos1nographie U1iiverselle (Paris, 1575), ii. 914 sq.
[wrongly numlierecl for 947 sq.].
THE GREAT FLOOD I' A l<'l' I
coming of a great flood wl1icl1 would swamp the earth, so

that even the high trees and 1nountains would be submerged.
Only one lofty peak would rise above the waters, and on its
top would be found a tall palm-t1ee with a f1uit like a coco-
nut. 'fo that palm the sorcerer \\'as warned to turn for
refuge with his family in the hour of need. Without delay
Tamanduare and his family betool< themselves to the top of
the lofty peak. When they were safely there, it began to
rain,. and it rained and rained till all the earth was covered.
The flood even crept up the mountain and washed over the
summit, and the man and his family climbed up i11to the
palm-tree and remained in the branches so long as the
inundation lasted, and they subsisted by eating the fruit of
the palm. When the water subsided, they descended, and
being fruitful they proceeded to repeople the drowned and
1
devastated world.
Story of a The Caingangs, or Coroados, an Indian tribe of Rio
great flood
told by the
1 h
Grande do Su, the most sout erly provi11ce of Brazil, ave h
Caingangs, a tradition of a great flood \vhich covered the whole earth
or
Coroados, inhabited by their forefathers. Only the top of the coastal
ofso.uthern range called Serra do Mar still appeared above the water.
Brazil.
The members of three Indian tribes, namely the Caingangs,
the Cayurucres, and the Carnes, swam on the \vater of the

flood to\vard the mountains, holding lighted torches between
their teeth. But the Cayurucres and the Carnes grew weary,
they sank under the waves and were drowned, and their
souls went to dwell in the heart of the mountain. However,
the Caingangs and a few of the Curutons made shift to reach

the mountain, and there they abode, some on the ground,

and some on the bra11ches of trees. Several days passed,
and yet the water did not sink, and they had no food to eat.
They looked for nothing but death, when they heard the
song of the saracuras, a species of waterfowl, which flew to
them with baskets of earth. This earth the birds thre\v into
the water, which accordingly began slowly to sink. The

1 Carl Teschauer, S.J., '' Mythen (referring to Sirnarn de Vasconcellos,
und alte Vollssagen aus Brasilien, '' Noticias curiosas do Brasi'l, p. 52);
Anthropos, i. (1906) p. 738; Maxi- ]. G. Mtiller, Geschichte der Amerika
milian Prinz zu Wied-Neuwied, Reise nischen Ur1eligionen (Bale, 1867), P
nach Brasilie1i i1t den Jahre1i I8I5 bis 267.
I8I7 (Frankfort, 1820-1821), ii. 59
CHAP. Iv . A GREAT FLOOD IN SOUTH AMERICA 257
people cried to the birds to hurry, so the birds called the
ducks to their help, and working together they soon cleared
ehough room and to spare for all the people, except for such
as had climbed up the trees : these latter were turned into
monkeys. When the flood subsided, the Caingangs de-
scended and settled at the foot of the mountain. The
souls of the drowned Cayurucres and Carnes contrived to
burrow their way out from the bowels of the mountain in
which they were imprisoned; and when they had crept forth '
they kindled a fire, and out of the ashes of the fire one of
'
the Cayurucres moulded jaguars, and tapirs, and ant-bears,
and bees, and animals of many other sorts, and he made
them live and told them what they should eat. But one of
the Carnes imitated him by fashioning pumas, and poisonous
snakes, and wasps, all in order that these creatures should
fight the other animals which the Cayurucres had made, as
1
they do to this day.
A story of a great flood is told also by the Carayas, Story of a
a tribe of Brazilian Indians, \Vho inhabit the valley of the r~;:~~~~~
Araguaya River, which, with the Tocantins, forms the most Cara1as of
. b . f h
easter1y of t h e great sout h ern tr1 utar1es o t e A mazon. Brazil.
The tribe is said to differ from all its neighbours in manners

and customs as well as in physical characteristics, while its
language appears to be unrelated to any other known lan-
2
guage spoken by the Indians of Brazil. The Caraya story
of a deluge runs thus. Once upon a time the Carayas
were out hunti11g wild pigs and drove the animals into their
dens. Thereupon they began to dig them out, killing each
pig as it was dragged forth. In doing so they came upon
a deer; then a tapir, and then a white deer. Digging still
deeper, they laid bare the feet of a man. Horrified at the
discovery, they fetched a mighty magician, who knew all
the beasts of the forest, and he contrived to draw the man
.out of tl1e earth. The man thus unearthed was named
Anatiual and he had a thin body but a fat paunch. He
I C. 'feschauer, S.J., ''Die Cain- 16 sq.).

gang oder Coroados-Indianer in1 brasi- 2 P. Ehrenreich, Beitrdge zur Vol-
lianischen Staate I<.io Grancle clo Sol,'' kerk1t11de lirasilie1ts (Berlin, I 89 I), PP
3, 9 ( Ve1-ojfentlic/11tnge1i azts de11i ko1iig- '
A11thropos, ix. ( 1914) pp. 32 .>q. 'fhe
Caingangs or C~oroaclos were formerly liche1i !Vf1tse1111t fi1- Viilke1-kzt1tcie, vol.
known as the Guayanas (op. cit. l)P, ii. Heft I /2 ).
VOI,, I s
now began to sing, '' I am Anatiua. Bring me tobacco to

smoke." But the Ca1ayas did not understand what he said.
They ran about the wood, and came back with all kinds of
flowers and fruits, .which they offered to Anatiua. But he
refused them all, and pointed to a man who was smoking.
Then they understood him at1d offered him tobacco. He
took it and smoked till he fell to the ground senseless. So
they carried him to the canoe and brought him to the village.
There he awoke from his stupor and began to dance and
sing. But his behaviour and his unintelligible speech
frightened the Carayas, and they decamped, bag and bag-
gage. That made Anatiua very angry, and he turned him-
self into a great piranha and followed them, carrying with
him many calabashes full of water. He called to the
Carayas to halt, but tl1ey paid no heed, and in his rage
he smashed one of the calabashes which he was carry-
ing. The water at once began to rise, but still the Carayas
pursued their flight. Then he broke another calabash, and
then another and another, and higher and higher rose the
water, till the whole land was inundated, and only the
mountains at the mot1th of Tapirape River projected above
the flood. The Carayas took refuge on the two peaks of
that range. Anatiua now called all fish together to drag
the people down into the water. The ;'ahu, the pintado, and
the pacu tried to do .so, but none of them succeeded. ' At
last the bz'cudo (a fish with a long beak-like snout) contrived
to scale the mountain from behind and to tear the Carayas
dovvn from its summit. A great lagoon still marks the spot
where they fell. Only a few persons remained on the top
of the mountain, and they descended when the water of
1
P. Ehren- the flood had run away. On this story the writer \vho
reich on the
Caraya
d k h
recor s 1t remar s t at '' t oug h h
1n general regu ar y 1 1
flood story. recurring inundations, as on the Araguaya, do not give
rise to flood stories, as Andree has rightly pointed
' Ehrenreich, Beitriige zur Vol- the Carayas were guided by an animal
1 P.
kerku11de Brasilie1ts (Berlin, 1891), pp. ('' MaiJori, o pri1neiro bichu, das erste
40 sq. Compare id., Die Mythen und oder oberste, ausgezei'chnetste Tier'').
Legenden der Siidamerikanischen Ur- See W. Kissenberth, ''Uber die haupt-
volker (Berlin, 1905), p. 28 (Supple- sachlichsten Ergebnisse der Araguaya
ment to vol. xxxvii. of the Zez'tschrift Reise,'' Zez'tschnft fur Ethnologz'e,
fur Ethnologz'e). According to another xliv. (1912) p. 49.
account, in their escape to the mountains
.
.c!1AP.1v A GREAT FLOOD IN SOUTH AMERICA 259

1
out, yet the local conditions are here favourable to the crea-
tion of such a story. The traveller, who, after a long voyage
between endless low river-banks, suddenly comes in sight of
the mighty conical mountains on the Tapirape River, tower-
ing abruptly from the plain, can easily understand how the
Carayas, who suffer much from inundations, came to tell
their story of the flood. Perhaps on some occasion when
the inundation rose to an unusual height, these mountains
may really have served as a last refuge to the inhabitants

of the surrounding district." And he adds, '' As in most
South Ameiican legends of a flood, this particular flood is
said to have been caused, not by rain, but by the breaking
of vessels full of water." 2
The Ipurina, a warlike tribe on the Purus River, oi1e of Story of a
h t h'
t e grea rivers w ic h ft ' h U A f great
ow into t e pper mazon rom the told by the flood
south, tell of a destructive deluge of hot water. They say Ipuri.na of
that formerly there was a great kettle of boiling water in. the ~:r:~:er
sun. About it perched or flut1;&red a countless flock of
storks. Some of the birds flew over the world collecting
everything that mouldered or decayed to throw it into the
I
kettle. Only the hard, indestructible parukuba wood they
left alone. The storks surrounded the kettle and waited
till something appeared on the surface of the boiling water,
whereupon they snapped it up. Now the chief of the storks,
indeed the creator of all birds, was Mayuiuberu. When the
water in the kettle was getting low, he cast a round stone
into it. The kettle was upset, the hot liquid poured down
on earth and burned everything up, including the woods
and even the water. Mankind indeed survived, but of the
vegetable world nothing escaped but the cassia. The
ancestor of the Ipurina was the sloth. He climbed the
cassia-tree to fetch down the fruits, for men had nothing
else to subsist upon. On ea1th it was very darl<, for the

sun and moon were hidden. . The slot~ plucked tl1e fruit
and threw down the kernels. The first kernel fell on hard
I R. Andree, Die Flutsageiz, p. 146, formation of st1ch a tradition. The
'' A local event, such as the i11unda- periodical rise of the Nile, and. ~he
tion of a river in special circumstances, mighty S\velling of the Abyss1n1an
may give rise to the tradition of a rivers, have never occasioned flood

flood ; whereas regularly 1ect1rr1ng in- legends.''
undations, which may be expected at 2 P. Ehrenreicl1, Beit1-iige z111' VOl-
definite seasons, are no cattse for the kerkie1ide Brasilietis, p. 4 I.

earth, the second i11 water, the third in deep water, and so
on. At the fall of the first kernel, the sun appeared again,
but still very small, hardly an inch across ; at the fall of the
second, it was larger ; at the fall of tl1e third, it measured a
span across; and so on until it expanded to its present
dimensions. Next the sloth begged Mayuruberu to give
him seeds of useful fruits. So Mayuruberu appeared with a
great basketful of plants, and the I purina began to till their
fields. He who would not work was eaten by Mayuruberu.
Every day Mayuruberu received a man to devour. Thus
the world gradually became such as it is at the present
1
time. The kettle still stands in the sun, but it is empty.
Story of a Again, the Pamarys, Abederys, and Kataushys, on the
great flood
told by
river Purus, relate that once on a time people heard a rumbling
other above and below the ground. The sun and moon, also, turned
I11dians
of the red, blue, and yellow, and the wild beasts mingled fearlessly

river with men. A month later they heard a roar and saw dark-
Purus.
ness ascending from . the earth. to the sky, accompanied by
thunder and heavy rain, which blotted out the day and the
earth. Some people lost themselves, some died, \vithout
knowing why ; for everything was in a dreadful state of con-
fusion. The water rose very high, till the earth was sunl<
beneath the water and only the branches of the highest trees
still stood out above the flood. Thither the people had fled for
refuge, and there, perched among the boughs, they perished
of cold and hunger ; for all the tirne it was dark and the rain
fell. Then only Uassu and his wife were saved. When
they came down after the flood they could not find a single
corpse, no, not so much as a heap of bleached bones. After
that they had many children, and they said one to the other,
'' Go to, let us build our houses on the river, that when the
water rises, we too may rise with it." But when they saw
that the land was dry and solid, they thought no more about it.
2
Yet the Pamarys build their houses on the river to this day.
Sto1y of a The Jibaros, an Indian tribe on the ~pper waters of the
great flood
told by the
Amazon, in the territories of Peru and Ecuador, have
Jibaros of also a tradition, more or less confused, of a great deluge
the Upper
Amazon. 1 P. Ehrenreich, Beitriige zur Vol- und Volkssagen aus Brasilien,'' Att
kerku1zde Brasiliens, pp. 7 I sq. thropos, i. (1906) p. 739
2
Carl Teschauer, S.J., '' Mytben
CHAP. Iv A GREAT FLOOD IN SOUTH AMERICA 2
61
which happened long ago. They say that a great cloud

fell from heaven, which turned into rain and caused the
death of all" the inhabitants of the earth; only an old man
and his two sons were saved, and it was they who re-
peopled the earth after the deluge, though how they contrived
to do so without the assistance of a woman is a detail about
which our authority does not deign to enlighten us. How-
ever that may be, one of the two sons who survived was
cursed by his father, and the Jibaros are descended from
him. The curse may be a reminiscence of the story of Noah
and his sons recorded in Genesis, of which the J ibaros may
have heard through missionaries. The difficulty of propa-
gating tl1e human species \Vithout the help of the female sex
would seem to have struck the acuter minds among the
Jibaros, for according to some of them the survivors of the
deluge were a man a11d a woman, who took refuge in a cave
on a high mountain, together with samples of all the various
species of the animal kingdom. This version provides, with
commendable foresight, for the restoration of animals as well
as of men after the great flood. Yet another version of the
story told by the Jibaros solves the problem of population
in a more original manner. Nobody, they say, escaped the
flood but two brothers, who found refuge in a mountain which,
strange to tell, rose higher and higher witl1 the rise of the
waters. When the flood had subsided, the two brothers
went out to search for food, and on their return to the hut
what was their surprise to find victuals set forth ready for
them! To clear up the mystery, one of the brothers hid
himself, and from his place of concealment he saw two parrots
\Vith the faces of women enter the hut and prepare the meal.
Darting out from his ambush he seized one of the birds and
married it or her and from this marriage sprang three boys
' . 1
and three girls, who became the ancestors of the J 1baros.
The Muratos a branch of the Jibaros in Ecuador, have Sto1y of a
' h g1eat flood
their own version of the deluge story. They say t at once told by the
on a time a Murata Indian went to fish in a lagoon of the lVIuratos of
. b . d Ecuador.
Pastaza River ; a small crocodile swa 1lo,ve d h 1s ait, an
I Dr. Rivet, ''Les Indiens Jibaros,'' i(lentical with the Canari story of a
L'Anthropologi'e, xix. (1908) pp. 235 flood. See belo\\1 1 l)P 268 .1q.

sq. 'fl1e last of these versions is clearly
THE GREAT Ji'.LOOJJ PART I
the fisherman killed the you11g animal. The crocodile's

mother, or rather the mother of crocodiles in general, was '
angry and lashed the water with her tail, till the water over-
flowed and flooded all the neighbourhood of the lagoon. All
the people were drowned except one man, who climbed a
palm-tree and stayed there for many days. All the time it
' was as dark as night. From time to time he dropped a
fruit of the palm, but he always heard it splash in the water.
At last one day the fruit which he let fall dropped with a
simple thud on the ground ; there was no splash, so he knew
that the flood had subsided. Accordingly he descended from
the tree, built a house, and set about to till a field. He was
without a wife, but he soon provided hirnself with one by
cutting off a piece of his own body and planting it in the
g1ound ; for from the earth thus fertilized there sprang up a
1
woman, whom he married.
Story of a The i11cident of a moving mountain, whicl1 meets us
great flood
told by the in the Jibaro story of the flood, recurs in another Indian
Ara.u- narrative of the great catastrophe. The Araucanians of
canians of
Chili. Chili have a tradition of a great deluge, in which only a few

persons were saved. These fortunate survivors took refuge
on a high mountain called Thegtheg, the thundering,
or the sparkling, which had three points and possessed the.
property of floating on water. '' From hence," says the
Spanish historian, '' it is inferable that this deluge was in
consequence of some volcanic eruption, accompanied by

terrible earthquakes, and is probably very different from that

of Noah. Whenever a violent earthquake occurs, these
people fly for safety to those mountains \vhich they fancy to ,
be of a similar appearance, and which of course, as they sup-
pose, must possess the same property of floating on the
water, assigning as a reason, that they are fearful after an
earthquake that the sea will again return and deluge the
world. On these occasions, each one takes a good supply of
provisions, and wooden plates to protect their heads from
being scorched, provided the Thegtheg, \vhen raised by the
waters, should be elevated to the sun. Whenever they are
told that plates made of earth would be much more suitable
for this purpose than those of wood, which are liable to be
1
Dr. Rivet, ''Les Indiens JibMos,'' L'A11thropologie, xix. (1908) pp. 236 sq.
CHAP. tv A GREAT FLOOD IN SOUTH AMERICA 263
burned, their usual reply is, that their ancestors did so before
them.'' 1
. The Ackawois of British Guiana tell a story of the Story of a

great flood which is enriched by a variety of details. They great flood
. . . . . told by the
say t h at in the beg1nn1ng of the world the great spirit Ackawois
Makonaima created birds and beasts and set his son Sigu oGf ~ritish
1 u1ana.
to rue over them. Moreover, he caused to spring from
the earth a great and very wonderful tree, which bore a
different kind of fruit on each of its branches, while round
its trunk bananas, plantains, cassava, maize, and corn of all
kinds grew in profusion ; yams, too, clustered round its
roots ; and in short all the plants now cultivated on earth
flourished in the greatest abundance on or about or under
that marvellous tree. In order to diffuse the benefits of the
tree all over the world, Sigu resolved to cut it down and
plant slips and seeds of it everywhere, and this he did with
the help of all the beasts and birds, all except the brown
monkey, who, being both lazy and mischievous, refused to
assist in the great work of transplantation. So to keep him
out of mischief Sigu set the animal to fetch water from
the
stream in a basket of open-work, calculating that the task
would occupy his misdirected energies for some time to come.

In the meantime, proceeding with the labour of felling the
miraculous tree, he discovered that the stump was hollow
and full of water in which the fry of every sort of fresh-water
fish was s\vimming about. The benc;volent Sigu determined
to stock all the rivers and lakes on earth with the fry on so

liberal a scale that every sort of fish should swarm in every
water. But this generous intention was unexpectedly frus-
trated. For the water in the cavity, being connected with Ho\v the
th e great reservoir somewhere in the bowels of the earth, flood
cause dwas
began to overflow ; and to arrest the rising flood Sigu by ~h~
. b k Th" h d cur1os1ty of
covered the stump with a closely woven as et. is a the brown
the desired effect. But unfortunately the brown monl<:e)', n1onkey.
tired of his fruitless task, stealthily returned, and his curiosity
being aroused by the sight of the basket turned upside do\vn,
' he imagined that it must conceal something good to eat.
So he cautiously lifted it and peeped beneath, and out poured
1 J.
Igtiatius Molina, The Geographical, Natteral, and Civil History of Ch1:1i
(London, 1809), ii. 93 sq.
THE CREA T .l''LOOD PAR'f I
the flood, sweeping the monkey l1imself away and inundating

the whole land. Gathering the rest of the anirr1als together
Sigu led them to the highest poi11t of the country, where grew
some tall coco-nut palms. Up the tallest of these trees he
caused the birds and climbing animals to ascend; and as for the
animals that could not climb anc.i were not amphibious, he shut
them up in a cave with a very narrow entrance, and having
sealed up the mouth of it \vith wax he gave the animals inside
a long thorn with which to pierce the wax and so ascertain
when tl1e water had subsided. After taking these measures for
the preservation of the more helpless species, he and the rest
of the creatures climbed up the palm-tree and ensconced them-
selves among the branches. During the darkness and storm
which fallowed, they all suffered intensely from cold and
hunger ; the rest bore their sufferings with stoical fortitude,
but the red howling monkey uttered his anguish in such
horrible yells that his throat swelled and has remained dis-
tended ever since ; that, too, is the reason why to this day
How the he has a sort of bony dru1n in his throat. Meanwhile Sigu
sinking of from ti1ne to time let fall seeds of the palm into the water
the flood
was to judge of its depth by the splash. As t11e water sank, the
~~e~~~!~Y interval between the dropping of the seed and the splash in
of seeds . the water grew longer; and at last, instead of a splash, the
~~\~:!;~ listening Sigu heard the dull thud of the seeds striking the
soft earth. Then he knew that the flood had subsided, and
he and the animals prepa1ed to descend. But the trumpeter-
bird was in such a hurry to get down that he flopped straight
into an ants' nest, and the hungry insects fastened on his legs
and gnawed them to the bone. That is why the tiumpeter-
bird has still such spindle shanks. The other creatures pro-
fited by this awful example and came down the tree cautiously
and safely. Sigu now rubbed two pieces of wood together to
make fire, but just as he produced the first spark, he happened
to look away, and the bush-turlcey, mistaking the spark for a fire-
fly, gobbled it up and flew off. The spark burned the greedy
bird's gullet, and that is why turkeys have red wattles on
their throats to this day. The alligator was standing by at
the time, doing no harm to anybody; but as he was for some
reason an unpopular character, all the other animals accused
him of having stolen and swallowed the spark. In order to
. CHAP. IV A GREAT FLOOD IN SOUTH AMERil'A 265
.
recover the spark from the jaws of the alligator Sigu tore
out the animal's tongue, and that is why alligators have no
tongue to speak of down to this very day. 1
The Arawaks of British Guiana believe that since its Storyofthe
creation the world has been t\vice destroyed once by fire destruction
' of the
and once by flood. Both destructions 'vere brought on it world by
by Ai.omun Kandi, the great ''Dweller on High," because of ~~~~~~Id
the wickedness of mankind. But he announced beforehand by the

th e coming t h d h d h Ara\vaks
ea astrop e, an men w o accepte t e warning of British
prepared to escape from the great fire b)' digging deep into Gt1ia11a.
a sand-reef and there making for themselves a subterranean
chamber with a roof of timber supported on massive pillars
of the same material. Over it all they spread layers of earth
and a thick upper coating of sand. Having carefully removed
everything combustible from the neighbourhood, they retired
to this underground dwelling and tl1ere stayed quietly till the
roaring torrent of flame, which swept across the earth's sur-
face, had passed over them. Afterwards, when the destruc-
tion of the world by a deluge was at hand, a pious and wise
chief named Marerewana was informed of the corning flood
and saved himself and his family in a large canoe. Fearing
to drift away out to sea or far from the home of his fathers,
he had made ready a long cable of bush-rope, with which he
tied his bark to the trunk of a great tree. So 'vhen the
waters subsided he found himself not far from his former
2
abode.
The Macusis of British Guiana say that in the beginning Story of a
. . ,, H h great flood
the good spirit Makuna1rna, whose name means e w o told by the
works in the night'' created the heaven and the earth. M~~usis of
' Br1t1sh
When he had stocked the earth with plants a11d trees, he Guiana.
came down from his celestial mansio11, climbed up a tall tree,
and chipped off the bark with a big stone axe. The cl1ips
fell into the river at the foot of the tree and \Vere changed
into animals of all kinds. When he had thus provided for
the creation of ani1nals, the good spirit next created man ;
and when the man had fallen into a sound sleep he awoke to
find a woman standing at his side. Afterwards tl1e evil spirit
1 Rev. W. H. Brett, The Indian 1883), IJIJ 379-381.
Tri.bes of Guia11a (London, I 868), pp.
378-384; (Sir) Everard F. im Thu1n, 2 Rev. \V. II. Brett, The .T1t1lia11
A1nongthe I11dia11s of G11ia1za (IJondo11, T1-ibes of Giti1111a, pp. 398 sq.
266 THE GREAT FLOOJJ l'AR'l' I '
'
got the upper hand on earth ; so the good spirit Makunaima

sent a great flood. Only one man escaped in a canoe ; he
se11t out a rat to see whether the water had abated, and the
rat returned with a cob of maize. When the deluge had
retreated, tl1e man repeopled the earth, like Deucalion and
1
Pyrrha, by throwing stones behind him. In this story the
special creation of woman, the mention of the evil spirit, and
the incident of the rat sent out to explore the depth of the
flood, present suspicious resemblances to the Biblical narrative
and may be due to missionary, or at all events European,
influence. Further, the mode in which, after the flood, the l I
'
'
I
survivo1s create mankind afresh by throwing stones behind I
I
!
them, resembles so exactly the corresponding incident in the I
''
l
Greek story of Deucalion and Pyrrha, that it is difficult to I
'
regard the two as independent. '
'
I
Stories of a Legends of a great flood are current also among the '
'
great flood
Indians of the Orinoco. On this subject Humboldt observes:
l
current 1j
among the '' I cannot quit this first chain of the mountains of Encam- j
i
Indians ,,
1
of the arada without recalling a fact which was not unknown to -";
' .
'
i
Orinoco. Father Gili, and which was often mentioned to me during I
our stay among the missions of the Orinoco. The aborigines

of these countries have preserved a belief that at the time of
the great flood, while their fathers were forced to betake !
themselves to canoes in order to escape the general inunda-

tion, the waves of the sea broke against the rocks of
Encamarada. This belief is not found isolated among a
single people, the Tamanaques; it forms part of a system of
11istorical traditions of which scattered notices are discovered I
I
among the Maypures of the great cataracts, among the '''
'
'
Indians of the Rio Erevato, which falls into the Caura, and
among almost all the tribes of the Upper Orinoco. When
the Tamanaques are asked how the human race escaped this
'
great cataclysm,' the Age of Water,' as the Mexicans call it,
'
they say that one man and one woman were saved on a high '
moutain called Tamanacu, situated on the banks of the

Asiveru, and that on casting behind them, over their heads,
the fruits of the Mauritia palm, they saw springing from the
kernels of these fruits men and women, who repeopled the
1
.. Richard Schomburgk, Reisen iii Britz'sch-Gzeiana (Leipsic, 1847-1848),
II. 319, 320.

CHAP. IV A GREAT FLOOD IN SOUTH AMERICA

1
earth." T?is they did in obedience to a voice which they
heard speaking to them as they descended the mountain full
of sorrow at the destruction of mankind by the flood. The
fruits which the man threw became men, and the fruits
which the \Voman threw became women. 2
The Muyscas or Chibchas of Bogota, in the high Andes Story of a
of _Colombia, say that long ago their ancestors offended f~~tb~~~~
Ch1bchachum, a deity of the second rank, \vho had hitherto Muyscas or
spec1a
b e~n the1r 1 patron an d protector. T o punish them, Chibchas
of Bogota.
Ch1bchachum created the torrents of Sopo and Tibito, which,
pouring down from the hills, flooded the whole plain an.cl
rendered cultivation impot>sible. The people fled to the
mou11tains, but even there the rising waters of the inundation
threatened to submerge them. In despair they prayed to
the great god Bochica, \vho appeared to them seated on a
rainbow and holding a golde11 wand in his hand. ''I have
heard your prayers," said he, '' and I \vill punish Chibchachum.
I shall not destroy the rivers which he has created, because
they will be useful to you in time of drought, but I will 0pen
a passage for the waters." With these words he threw his
golden wand at the mountain, split it from top to bottom
at the spot where the river Funzha now forms the famous
waterfall of Tequendama. So all the waters of tl1e deluge
flowed away do\vn this new opening in the circle of moun-
tains which encloses the high upland tableland of Bogota,
and thus the plain became habitable again. To punish
Chibchachum, the great god Bochica condemned him to bear
on his shoulders the whole weight of the ea1th, which before
that time was supported on massive pilla1s of \vood. When
the weary giant tries to get a little ease by shifting his burden
3
from one shoulder to another, he causes an earthquake.
This tradition is in so far well founded as the evidence
I Alexandre de l-ll1mboldt, Voyage to1ia de !as J}fisio1zej de los Lla11os de
aux regions equinoxiales du Nouvetzzt Casanare y los 1ios Ori11oco y Meta)
Contine1zt, i. (Paris, 1814) pp. 238 sq. was written in I 736 bl1t 11ot printed
2 R. Schomburgk, Reisen i1z till I 88 3 at Bogota. See A. Ernst,,
Britisch-Gztiana, ii. 320. The Acha- '' Ueber einige weniger bel.;:an11te
guas of the Upper Orinoco are reported Sprachen aus der Gege11d des Meta
to have a legend of a great flood, from und oberen Orinoco,'' Zeitsthrift fur
which one of their ancestors escaped Ethnologie, xxiii. (I 89 I) J). 6.
on a high mountain. The authority 3 H. Ternaux-Co1n1Jans, Ejsai s111
for the statement is a Jesl1it Father l' a1zcie1t Ctt11di1za111a1ca (Paris, N. D.),
named Juan Ilivero, whose work (His- pp. 7 sq.
Geological of geology appears to prove that for ages the mountain-girt

~~~~e::icee plain of Bogota \Vas occupied by a lal<:e, and that the pent-up
valley of waters at last found vent and flo>ved away tl1rough a fissure
~~!~ta was suddenly cleft by a great earthquake in the sandstone rocks.
occupied The cleft in the rocky dam may be seen to this day. It is
by a lake. near the meeting of the rivers Bogota and Muno. Here the
wall of sandstone is broken by a sort of natural gateway
formed by a beetli11g crag on one side and a mass of
shattered, crumbling rocks on the other. The scene is one
well fitted to impress the mind and excite the itnagination
of primitive man, \vho sees in the sublime works of nature
the handiwork of awful and mysterious beings. The sluggish
current of the taw11y river flows in serpentine windings
towards the labyrinth of rocks and cliffs where it takes its
leap into the tremendous abyss. As you near the fall,

and the hollow sound of its tumbling waters grows louder
and louder, a great change comes over the landscape.
The bare monotonous plain of Bogota is left behind, and
you seem to be entering on enchanted land. On every side
rise hills of varied outline mantled to their tops with all the
luxuriant vegetation of the tropics, from the grasses whicl1
carpet the ground to the thickets and tall forest trees which
spread over the whole a dense veil of green. At their foot
the river hurries in a series of rapids, between walls of rock,
to the brink of the fall, there to vanish in a cloud of mist
and spray, lit up by all the gay colours of the rainbow, into
the dark and dizzy chasm below, while the thunderous roar
of the cataract breaks the stillness of the lonely hills. The
cascade is thrice as high as Niagara; and by a pardonable
exaggeration the river is said to fall perpendicularly fro1n
1
the temperate to the tropical zone.
Story of a The Cafiaris, an Indian tribe of Ecuador, in the ancient
r~;::~~~~~. kingdom of Quito, tell of a great flood from which two brothers
Caiiaris of escaped to a very high mountain called Huaca-yfian. As
Ecuador. the waters rose, the hill rose with the~, so that the flood
never reached the two brothers on the summit. \Vhen the
\Vater, sank and their store of provisions was consumed, the
1 Fr. von Hellwald, Die Erde und Reclus, Nouvelle Geographie Univer-
ih1e Volker, Dritte Auftage (Berlin and se/le, xviii. (Paris, 1893) pp. 251 sq.,
Stuttgart, 1884), pp. 213 sq.; Elisee compare pp. 274 sq.
'
CHAP. IV A GREAT FLOOD IN SOUTH AMERICA 269
brothers descended and sought their food in the hills and

valleys. They built a small house, where they dwelt, eking
out a miserable subsistence on herbs and roots, and suffering
much from hunger and fatigue. One day, after the usual
weary search, they returned home, and there found food to
eat and chicha to drink without knowing who could have
prepared or brought it. This happened for ten days, and
after that they laid their heads together to find out who it
was that did them so much good in their time of need. So
the elder brother hid . himself, and presently he saw two
macaws approaching, dressed like Caftaris. As soon as the Themacaw
birds came to the house, they began to prepare the food wife.
which they had brought \vith them. When the man saw
that they were beautiful and had the faces of \Vo men, he came
forth from his hidi11g-place; but at sight of him the birds
were angry and flew away, leaving nothing to eat. When
the younger brother came home from his search for food,
and found nothing cooked and ready as on former days, he
asked his elder brother tl1e reason, and they were both very
angry. Next day the younger brother resolved to hide and
watch for the coming of the birds. At the end of three

days the two macaws reappeared and began to prepare the

food. The t\VO men waited till the birds had finished cooking
and then shut the door on them. The birds were very angry
at being thus trapped, and while the two brothers were
holding the smaller bird, the larger one escaped. Then the
two brothers took the smaller macaw to wife, and by her
they had six sons and daughters, from whom all the Cafiaris
are descended. Hence the hill Huaca-yfian, where the
macaw lived as the wife of the brothers, is looked upon as a
sacred place by the Indians, and they venerate macaws and
1
value their feathers highly for use at their festivals.
The Indians of Huarochiri, a province of Peru in the Andes Story of a
. . h Id 1 great flood
to the east of Lima, say that once on a time t e wor near y told by the
1 Christoval de Molina, ''The Clements MarJ,ha111 (1-IaJ,luyt Society, PI ed".1vian
Fables and Rites of the Y ncas, '' in L on d on, 190 8) , PP 30 sq In th's
1
n ians.
The Rites and Laws of the Y1zcas, latter version of the story the mountain
translated ancl edited by (Sir) Clements is called Gt1asano, and the two macaws
R. Markham (Lon(lon, Halcluyt Society, are rationalized into \vomen. With
1 87 3 ), PP 8 sq. Com~are Pedro the Canari story co1npare the Jibaro
Sarmiento de Gamboa, Hzsto1-y of the story (above, p. 261).
Incas, translated and edited by Sii:
- - _,
1'/E GREAT FLOOIJ PART I
came to an end altogether. It happened thus. An Indian

was tethering his llama in a place where there was good
pasture, but the animal resisted, showing sorrow and moan-
ing after its manner. The master said to the llama, ''Fool,
why do you moan and refuse to eat? Have I not put you
where there is good food ? '' The llama answered, '' Mad-
man, what do you know about it ? Lear11 that I am not
sad without due cause; for within five days the sea will rise
and cover the whole earth, destroying all there is upon it."
Wondering to hear the beast speak, the man asked whether
there was any way in which they could save themselves.
The llama bade him take food for five days and to follo\v
him to the top of a high mountain called Villca-coto, betwee11

the parish of San Damian and the parish of San Geronimo
de Surco. The man did as he was bid, carrying the load of
food on his back and leading the llama. On reaching the
top of the mountain he found many kinds of birds and
animals there assembled. Hardly had he reached this place
of refuge when the sea began to rise, and it rose till the
water flooded all the valleys and covered the tops of the hills,
all but the top of Villca-coto, and even there the waves
washed so high that the animals had to crowd together in
a narrow space, and some of them could hardly find foothold.
The tail of the fox was dipped in the flood, and that is why
the tips of foxes' tails are black to this day. At the end of
five days the waters began to abate, and the sea returned to
its former bounds ; but all the people in the world \Vere
drowned except that one man, and from him all the nations
1
of the earth are descended.
Another A similar story of the flood is told by the Indians of
Peruvian
story of a Ancasmarca, a province five leagues from Cuzco. They say
great flood. that a month before the flood came, their sheep displayed
much sadness, eating no food by day and watching the stars
by night. At last their shepherd asked them what ailed
them, and they answered that the conjunction of stars fore-
shadowed the coming destruction of the world by water. So
the shepherd and his six children took counsel, and gathered
together all the food and sheep they could get, and with
1
Francesco de Avila, ''Narrative,'' in Rites a1zd Laivs ef the Yncas, translated
and edited by (Sir) Clements R. Markham, PlJ 132 sq.
CHAP. IV A GREAT- FLOOD IN SOUTH AMERICA 271
these they betook themselves to the top of an exceeding

great mountain called Ancasmarca. They say that as the
water rose, the mountain still rose higher, so that its top was
never submerged; and when the flood sank, the mountain
sank also. Thus the six children of that shepherd returned
to repeople the province after the great flood. 1
The Incas of Peru had also a tradition of a deluge. Story of a
They said that the water rose above the highest mountains great flood
i told by the
in the world, so that all people and all created things perished. Incas of
No living thing escaped except a man and a woman, who Peru.
floated in a box on the face of the waters and so were saved.
When the flood subsided, the wind drifted the box with the
two in it to Tiahuanacu, about seventy leagues from Cuzco.
There the Creator commanded them to dwell, and there he
himself set to work to raise up the people who now inhabit
that country. The way in which he did so was this. He
fashioned each nation out of clay and painted on each the

dresses they were to wear. Then he gave life and soul to

every one of the painted clay figures and bade them pass
under the earth. They did so, and then came up at the
various places where the Creator had ordered the different
nations to dwell. So some of them came out of caves, others
issued from hills, others from fountains, and others from the
trunks of trees. And because they came forth from these
various places, the Indians made various idols (huacas) and
places of worship in memory of their origin ; that is why the
2
idols (huacas) of the Indians are of diverse shapes.
The Peruvian legends of a great flood are told more Herrera
. h S . h h" . H r 11 on the
summarily by t e pants istor1an. errera as 10 ows. Peruvian
'' 1'he ancient Indians reported, they had received it by traditio11
of a great
tradition from their ancestors, that many years before there flood.
were any Incas, at the time when the country was very
populous, there happened a great flood, the sea breaking
out beyond its bounds, so that the land was covered with
1 Christoval de Molina, ''The Fables deluge compare Garcilasso de la Vega,
and Rites of the Yncas,'' in T/1e Rites First Part ofthe Royal Co111111e11ta1ies of
and Lauis of the Yncas, translated and the J'1zcas, translated by (Sir) Clements
. edited by (Sir) Clements I<.. Markham, R. Marl{ham (London, Hakluyt Society,
I 869-187 I), i. 7 I ; J. de 1\costa, Nat-
PP 9 sq.
ural a1zd Moial Histo1y of the Indies
2 Christoval de Molina, op. cit. pp. (London, I-Iakl11yt Society, 1880), i. 70
4 sq. As to the Inca tradition of the sq.
THE GREAT FLOOD l' AR'J' I
water, and all the people perished. To this the Guancas,

inhabiting the vale of Xauxa, and the natives of Chiquito
in the province of Collao, add, that some persons remained
in the hollows and caves of the highest mountains, who again
peopled the land. Others of the mountain people affirm,
that all perished in the deluge, only six persons being saved
on a float, from whom desce11ded all the inhabitants of that
country. That there had been some particular flood may be
1
credited, beca11se all the several provinces agree in it."
Story of a The Chiriguanos, a once powerful Indian tribe of south-
great flood eastern Bolivia, tell the following story of a great flood.
told by the
Chirigua11os They say that a certain potent but malignant supernatural .
ot Bolivia. being, named Aguara-Tunpa, declared war against the true
god Tunpaete, the Creator of the Chiriguanos. His motive for
this declaration of war is unknown, but it is believed to have
been pure spite or the spirit of contradiction. In order to
vex the true god, Aguara-Tunpa set fire to all the prairies
at the beginning or middle of autumn, so that along with
the plants and trees all the animals perished on which in
those days the Indians depended for their subsistence; for
as yet they had not begun to cultivate maize and other
cereals, as they do now. Thus deprived of food the Indians
nearly died of hunger. However, they retreated before the
flames to the banks of the rivers, and there, while the earth
around still smoked from the great conflagration, they made
shift to live on the fish which they caught in the water.
Seeing his human prey likely to escape him, the baffled
Aguara-Tunpa had recourse to another device in order to
accomplish his infernal plot against mankind. He caused
torrential rain to fall, hoping to drown the whole Chiriguano
How t\vo tribe in the water. He very nearly succeeded. But happily
babes were
saved from the Chiriguanos contrived to defeat his fell purpose. Acting
the flood on a hint given them by the true god Tunpaete, they lool{ed
on a mate
leaf. out for a large mate leaf, placed on it two little babies, a boy
and a girl, the children of one mother, and allowed the tiny
ark with its precious inmates to float on the face of the
water. Still the rain continued to descend in torrents ; the
1 Antonio de Herrera, The General Indies, translated into English by Capt.
History ef the vast Co1iti11e11t and Islands John Stevens, Second Edition (London,
. of America co1111no11ly called the Wf!st J740), iv. 283.
.. .
. C.:~ IV. F:LOOI> IN CENTRAL AMERICA AND MEXICO 273

floods rose and spread over the face of the earth to a great
depth, and all the Chiriguanos were drowned; only the two
babes on the leaf of mate were saved. At last, however,
the rain ceased to fall, and the flood sank, leaving a great
expanse of fetid mud behind. The children now emerged
from the ark, for if they had stayed there, they would have
perished of cold and hunger. Naturally the fish and other
creatures that live in the water were not drowned in the great
flood ; on the contrary they throve on it, and were now quite
ready to serve as food for the two babes. But how were the
infants to cook the fish \Vhich they caught? That was the
rub, for of course all fire on earth had been extinguished
by the deluge. However, a large toad came to the rescue of .
the two children. Before the flood had swamped the whole How fire
earth, that prudent creature had tal{en the precaution of ;:~~vered
secreting himself in a hole, taking with him in his mouth after the
some live coals, which he contrived to keep alight all the time flood.
of the deluge by blowing on them with his breath. When
he saw that the surface of the ground was dry again, he
hopped out of his hole with the live coals in his mouth,
and making straight for the two children he bestowed on
them the gift of fire. Thus they were able to roast the
fish they caught and so to warm their chilled bodies. In

ti1ne they grew up, and from their union the whole tribe of
1
the Chiriguanos is descended.
The natives of Tierra de! Fuego, in the extreme south Story of a
. . d b t f great flood
of South America, tell a fantastic an o scure s ory o a told by the
great flood. They say that the sun was sunk in the sea, F11egians.
that the waters rose tumultuously, and that all the earth was
submerged except a single very high mountain, on which a
2
few people found refuge.
Stori~s of a Great Flood z"n Ce11tral A11terica

and Me%zco
The Indians about Panama ''had some notion of Noah's Stories of a
. h d d in great flood
flood 1 and said that when it appene one man escape a told by the
2 T Biid es '' JVIce11rs et co11t{1mes Indians of
Bernardino de Nino, Misionero
1 . g ' . . ,_, 1 <' 't!tt! Panama
.r! Ch trzgua11a
Franciscano, EtnograJ'a des Fue'g1ens,'.' B11llet.z,1zs_. .. ''e a_ ,Jo_.1., 1 and
(La Paz, Bolivia, 19l2), p[J. 131-133, d' Anthro"'olo<'te
r "
de f ,l11s, T11.11s1en1e N', .
1 1ca1agua.
Serie, vii. (l'aris, r884) IJ 181.
compare p. 67. T
VOL. I
274 THE Gl?EAT FLOOD PAR'f I
canoe with his wife and children, from \vhom all rnanl<ind
1
afterwards proceeded and peopled the world." The Indians
of Nicaragua believed that since its creation the world had
been destroyed by a deluge, and that after its destruction the
2
gods had created men and animals and all things afresh.
Mexican ''The Mexicans," says the Italian historian Clavigero,
tradition
of a great ''with all other civilized nations, had a clear tradi~ion, thot1gh
flood. somewhat corrupted by fable, of the creation of the world,
of the universal deluge, of the confusion of tongues, and of
the dispersion of the people; and had actually all these
events represented in their pictures. They said, that when
mankind were over\vhelmed with the deluge, none \Vere pre-

served but a man named Coxcox (to whom others give the
name of Teocipactli), and a woman called Xochiquetzal, who
saved themselves in a little bark, and having after\.vards got
to land upon a mountain called by them Colhuacan, had
there a great many children ; that these children were all
born dumb, until a dove from a lofty tree imparted to them
languages, but differing so much that they could not under-
stand one another. The Tlascalans pretended that the men
who survived the deluge were transformed into apes, but
recovered speech and reason by degrees." 3
Mexican In the Mexican manuscript known as the Codex Chi11zal-
tradition
of a great popoca, which contains a history of the ki11gdoms of Culhuacan
flood 1
contained A. de Herrera, The General Hz's- whether all men were drowned in the
in the tory of the vast Continent and Islands flood, and whether tl1e gods (teotes) had
Codex of America, translated by Captain John escaped on a mot1ntain or in a canoe ;
Ckimal- Stevens, iii. 414. Herrera's authority he only opined that being gods they
popoca. seen1s to have been Pascual de Anda- could not be drowned.
goya. See Pascual de Andagoya, 3 F. S. Clavigero, The History of
Narratz've of the Proceedz'ngs of Ped- Mexz'co, translated from the original
rarias Davz'la z'1z the Provz'nces of Italian by Ch. Cullen (London, 1807),
Tierra Fir1ne or Castilla de! Oro (Hal;:- i. 244. Compare J. G. MUiler,
luyt Society, London, 1865), p. 14. Ceschz'chte der Anzerikanischen Urreli-
2 G. F. de Oviedo y Valdes, Histoire gio1zen2(Bale, 1.867), pp. 515 .rq.; H. J;l
de Nica1agzta (Paris, 1840), pp. 21 sq., Bancroft, The NativeRacesof the Palijic
in H. Ternaux - Compans's Voyages, ,)tates(London, 187 5-1876), iii. 66, who
Relations et ilfe1noires originaux pour says, ''In 1nost of the painted mant1-
servir a l'hz'stot're de la dfcouverte de scripts supposed to 1elate to this event,
l'A1nerique. This tradition was elicited a kind of boat is represented floating
by Franc;ois de Bobadilla, Provincial of over the waste of water, and containing
the Order of Mercy, in an interview a man and a woman. Even the Tlas-
which he had with some Indians at the ca!tecs, the Zapotecs, the Miztecs, and
village of Teola in Nicaragua, tl1e 28th the people of l\1ichoacan are said to
Septemb~r I 528. On being qt1estioned, have had such pictures.''
the Indian professed not to know
ea. rv , FLOOD IN CENTRAL AMERICA AND MEXICO 275
and Mexico from the creation downwards, there is contained
an account of the great flood .. It runs thus. The world
had existed for four hundred years, and t\vQ hundred years,
and three score and sixteen years, when men were lost and
drowned and turned into fishes. The sky drew 11ear to the
water; in a single day all was lost, and the day of N ahui-
Xochitl or Fourth Flower consumed all our subsistence (all
. that there was of our flesh). And that year was the year
of Ce-Calli or First House; and on the first day, the day of
Nahui-Atl, all was lost. The mountains themselves were
sunk under the water, and the water remained calm for fifty
and two springs. But towards the end of the year Titlaca-
huan had warned the man Nata and his wife Nena, saying,
''Brew no more wine, but hollow out a great cypress and
enter therein when, in the month of To<_roztli, the water shall
near the sky." The11 they entered into it, and when
Titlacahuan had shut the door of it, he said to him, ''Thou
shalt eat but one sheaf of maize, and thy \vife but one also."
But when they had finished, they came forth from there, and
the water remained calm, for the log moved no more, and
opening it they began to see the fishes. Then they lit fire
by rubbing pieces of wood together, and they roasted fishes.
But the gods Citlallinicue and Citlallotonac at once looked
down and said, '' 0 divine Lord, what fire is tl1at they are
making there? wherefore do they thus fill the heaven \vitl1
smoke?'' Straightway Titlacahuan Tetzcatlipoca came
down, and he grumbled, saying, ''What's that fire doing
here?'' With that he snatched up the fishes, split their
1
tails, modelled their heads, and turned them into dogs.
In Michoacan, a province of Mexico, the legend of a Michoacan
. "d
deluge was also preserved. Th e natives sa1 t at w en e h h th legend of a
great flood.
flood began to rise, a man named Tezpi, with his \vife and
children, entered into a great vessel, tal<ing with the1n animals
and seeds of diverse kinds sufficient to restocl< the world
after the deluge. When the waters abated, the man sent
forth a vulture, and the bird fle'vv away, but finding corpses
to batten on it did not return. Then the man let fly other
' The Nati11e Races ef the I'atific .S'tates,
t Brasseur de Bourbourg, Histoire
des Nations Civilist!es du Mexique et de iii. 69 Jq. As to the Co,lex Chi11za!-
I' A 111!1-ique Cent1-a!e (Paris, I 8 5 7- popo1a see II. I I. IJancr<ift, of. cit. \',
1859 ), i. 425-427; I-I. II. Bancroft, 192 sqq.
THE CREA T .fi'LOOD PA!l'f I
birds, but they also came not back. At last he sent forth a
1
humming-bird, and it retu1ned with a green bough in its beak.
In this story the messenger bi1ds seem clearly to be reminis-
cences of the raven and the dove in the N oachian legend, of
which the Indians may have heard through missionaiies.
Story of a The Popol Vuh, a bool<: which contains the legendary
great flood h h
. told in the history of the Quiches of Guatemala, describes ow t e gods
Popol Vuh, made seve1al attempts to create mankind, fashioning them
the sacred .
book of the successively out of clay, out of wood, and out of maize. But
QGuiches of none of their attempts were successful, and the various races
uatemala. .
moulded out of these diverse materials had all, for different
reasons, to be set aside. It is true that the \vooden race of
men begat son$ and daughters and multiplied upon the earth,
but they had neither heart nor intelligence, they forgot their
Creator, and they led a useless life, like that of the animals.
Even regarded from the merely physical point of vie\v, they
were very poor creatures. They had neither blood nor fat,
their cheeks were wizened, their feet and hands were dry,
their flesh was languid. '' So the end of this race of men
was come, the ruin and destruction of these wooden puppets;
they also were put to death. Then the waters swelled by
the will of the Heart of Heaven, and there was a great flood
which rose over the heads of these puppets, these beings
made of wood.'' A rain of thick resin fell from the sky.
Men ran hither and thither in despair. They tried to climb
up into the houses, but the houses crumbled away and let
them fall to the ground: they essayed to mount up into the
trees, but the trees shook them afar off: they sought to

enter into the caves, but the caves shut them out. Thus was
accomplisl1ed the ruin of that race of men : they \Vere all
given up to destruction and contempt. But they say that
the posterity of the wooden race may still be seen in the
little monkeys which live in the woods ; for these monkeys
are very like men, and like their wooden ancestors their f\esl1
is composed of nothing but wood. 2
1. A. de Herrera, The General Hi"s H. H. Bancroft, The Native Races Of

tory of the vast Conti1zent and Islands the Pacijic States, iii. 66 sq.
ef An1e1ica, translated by Captain John 2 Brasseur de Bourbourg, Popol Vuh,
Stevens (London, I 725- I 726), iii. le Liv1e Sacre et les Mythes de l'Anti
254 sq.; Brasseur de Bourbourg, His- quite Americaine, avec les livres
toire des Nations Civilisees du lVlexique heroiques et hi'storiqites des Qui'chts
et de l' A 11ie1ique Ce1itrale, iii. 81 ; (Paris, 1861), pp. 17-31; 1-I. I-I. Ban-
CH. IV FLOOD IN CENTRAL AfifERICA AND MEXICO 277
The Ht1ichol Indians, who inhabit a mountai11ous region The
near Santa Catarina in Western Mexico have also a legend Hu~chol 01
of a deluge. By blood the tribe is related to the Aztecs, ~~~~=
the creators of that semi-civilized empire of Mexico which
the Spanish invaders destroyed ; but, secluded in their moun-
tain fastnesses, the Huichols have always remained in a state
of primitive barbarism. It was not until 172 2 that the
Spaniards succeeded in subduing them, and the Franciscan
missionaries, who followed the Spanish army into the moun-
tains, built a few churches and converted the wild Indians to
Christianity. But the conversion was hardly more than
nominal. It is true that the Huichols observe the principal
Christian festivals, which afford them welcome excuses for
lounging, guzzling, and swilling, and they worship the saints
as gods. But in tl1eir hearts they cling to their ancient
beliefs, customs, and ceremonies : they jealously guard their
country against the encroachments of the whites : not a
single Catholic priest lives among them ; and all the churches
1
are in ruins.
The Huichol story of the deluge runs thus. A Huichol Huichol
was felling trees to clear a field for planting. But every ~~;It~~:a.
morning he found, to his chagrin, that the trees which he
had felled the day before had gro\vn up again as tall as ever.
It \Vas very vexatious and he grew tired of labouri11g in
vain. On the fifth day he determined to try once more and
to go to the root of the matter. Soon there rose from the
ground in the middle of the clearing an old woman with a
staff in her hand. She was no other than Great-grandmother
Nakawe, the goddess of earth, who makes every green thing
to spring forth from the dark underworld. But the man did
croft, The Native ](aces ef the Pacific Ablie Brasse11r de Bourbourg contains
State;, iii. 44-47. ThePopol Vi1his said the Quiche text with a French transla-
to have been discovered by aDon1i11ican tion, dissertatio11, and notes. 'fhe
Father, Francisco Ximenes, who was original manuscri1Jt is s11pposed to
curate of the little Inclian town of l1ave been written by a Quiche Indian
Chichicastenango, in the highlands of in the latter part of the sixteenth
Guatemala, at the end of the seven- cent11ry. See F. Max l\'Iiiller, Selected
teenth or begin11ing of the eighteenth EssaJ'S 01z Lang11age, llfythol1>gy and
centt1ry. The mant1script, containing J(eligio1z ( Lonclo11, I 88 I), ii. 3 7 2 sqq ;
a Quiche text with a Spanish transla- I-I. H. Bancroft, op. cit. iii. 42 sqq.
tion was found by Dr. C. Scherze1
'
and published by hirn at Vienna in
. ICarl L11n1l1oltz, U11k11oiv1i llfexico
I 8 57. 'l'he editio11 published !Jy the (London, 1903), ii. 22 sq.
not k11ow her. With her staff sl1e pointed to the south,
north, west, and east, p.bove and below ; and all the trees
which the young man had felled immediately stood up
again. Then he understood how it came to pass that in
spite of all his endeavours the clearing was always covered
Wa1ned by \vith trees. So he said to the old woman angrily, '' Is it you
a godd~ss, who are undoing my work all the time?'' ''Yes'' she
a man 1s '
saved from said, '' because I wish to talk to you." Then she told him
thbe flood iri that he laboured in vain. '' A great flood," said she, ''is
a ox.
coming. It is not more than five days off. There will
come a wind, very bitter, and as sharp as chile, which will
make you cough. Make a box from the salate (fig) tree, as
long as your body, and fit it with a good cover. Take with
you five grains of corn of each colour, and five beans of each
colour; also take the fire and five squash-stems to feed it,
and take with you a black bitch." The man did as the
woman told him. On the fifth day he had the box ready
and placed in it the things she had told him to take with
him. Then he entered the box with the black bitch ; and
the old woman put on the cover, and caulked every crack
with glue, asking the man to point out any chinks. Having
made the box thoroughly water-tight and air-tight, tl1e old
woman tool{ her seat on the top of it, with a macaw perched
on her shoulder. For five years the box floated on the face
of the waters. The first year it floated to the south, the
second year it floated to the north, the third year it floated
to the west, the fourth year it floated to the east, and in
the fifth year it rose upward on the flood, and all the
\vorld was filled with water. The next year the flood began
to abate, and the box settled on a mountain near Santa
Cantarina, where it may still be seen. When the box
grounded on the mountain, the man took off the cover
and saw that all the world was still under water. But
How the the maca\vs and the parrots set to work with a will : they
world was
fashioned pecked at the mountains with their beaks till they had
and hollowed them out into valleys, down which the water all
repeopled
after the ran away and was separated into five seas. Then the land
flood. began to dry, and t1ees and grass sprang up. The old
\Voman turned into \Vind and so vanished away. But the
man resumed the work of clearing the field which had been

CH. 1v FLOOD IN CENTRAL AMERICA AND ME.-YICO 279
interrupted by the flood. He lived with the bitch in a cave

?oing forth .to his labour in the morning and returning horn~
in the evening. But the bitch stayed at home all the time.
Every evening on his return the man found cakes baked
ready against his coming, and he was curious to kno"" \vho
it was that baked them. When five days had passed, he
hid himself behind some bushes ne"1r the cave to watch. He
saw the bitch tal<:~ off her skin, hang it up, and kneel down
in the likeness of a woman to grind the corn for the cakes.
Stealthily he drew near her from behind, snatched the skin
a\vay, and threw it on the fire. '' Now you have burned my
tunic ! '' cried the woman and began to whine like a dog.
But he took water mixed with the flour she had prepared,
and with the mixture he bathed her head. She felt refreshed '
and remained a woman ever after. The two had a large

family, and their sons and daughters married. So was the
world repeopled, and tl1e inhabitants lived in caves.1
The Cora Indians, a tribe of nominal Christians whose Story of a
country borders that of the Huichols on the west, teli a f~fttb~~~~
similar story of a great flood, in which the same incidents Co1'.1
occur of the woodman who was warned of the coming flood ;~~;~co.
by a \voman, and \vho after the flood cohabited with a bitch
transformed into a human wife. But in the Cora version of
the legend the man is bidden to take into the ark with him
the woodpecker, the sandpiper, and the parrot, as well as the
bitch. He embarked at midnight when the flood begap.
When it subsided, he waited five days and then sent out the
sandpiper to see if it were possible to walk on the ground. '
The bird flew back and cried,'' Ee-wee-wee!'' from which the
man understood that the earth was still too wet. He waited
five days more, and then sent out the woodpecl<:er to see if the
trees were hard and dry. Tl1e woodpecl<:er tl1rust his beak
deep into the tree, and waggled his head from side to side ;
but the wood was still so soft witl1 the wate1 that he could
hardly pull his beak out again, and when at last with a violent
tug he succeeded he lost his balance and fell to the ground.
So when he returned to the a1l< l1e said, '' Chu-ee, chu-ee ! ''
The man took his meaning and waited five days more, after
which he sent out the spotted sandpiper. By this time tl1e
1 (~. J,tl!Dl1oltz, U1tl<ltOW1l L~ft!Xll'O, i. I 9 I -I 93.
THE CREA T FLOOD PART 1
mud was so dry that, when the sandpiper hopped about, his
legs did not sink into it; so he came back and reported
that all was well. Then the man ventured out of the ark,
stepping very gingerly till he saw that the land was dry and
1
flat.
Another In another fragmentary version of the deluge story, as
version of
the Cora
told by the Cora Indians, the survivors of the flood would
flood story. seem to have escaped. in a canoe. When fhe waters abated,
God sent the vulture out of the canoe to see whether the
earth was dry enough. But the vulture did not return,
because he devoured the corpses of the drowned. So God

was angry with the vulture, and cursed him, and made him
black instead of 'vhite, as he had been before ; only the tips
of his wings he left white, that men might kno\v what their
colour had been before the flood. Next God commanded
the ringdove to go out and see whether the earth was yet
dry. The dove reported that the earth was dry, but that
the rivers were in spate. So God ordered all the beasts to
drink the rivers dry, and all the beasts and birds came and
drank, save only the weeping dove (Paloma llorona), which
would not come. Therefore she still goes every day to drink
water at nightfall, because she is ashamed to be seen drink-
2
ing by day ; and all day long she weeps and wails. In
!3iblical these Cora legends the incident of the birds, especially the
influence 1 d h 1 fl
on the Cora vu ture an t e raver1, seems c yarly to re ect the influence
legends. of missionary teaching.
Story of a A somewhat different story of a deluge is told by the
great flood Tarahumares, an Indian tribe who inhabit the mountains of
told by the
Taraht1m- Mexico farther to the north than the Huichols and Caras.
~:sxi~~. The greater part of the Tarahumares are nominal Christians,
though they seem to have learned little more from their
teachers than the \vords Sefior San Jose and Maria Santis-
sima, and the title of Father God (Tata Dios), which they
I C. Lumholtz, U1zk1zoiv1z Mexico, ence of the flood he lets both the bird
ii. 193 sq. ; K. Th. Preuss, Die and the bitch out of the ark twice at
Nayarit-Expedition, i. Die Religz'o1z intervals of three days, to see whether
der Cora-.lndia1zer (Leipsic, 1912), pp. the earth is yet dry. In the text I
277 sqq. In the Cora version recorded have followed Mr. Lumholtz's version.
by Mr. K. Th. Preuss the man takes
into the ark with him only a bitcl1 and 2 K. Th. Preuss, Die Nayarit-Ex-
a Sch1-eivogel, whatever species of bird pedition, i. Die Religio1z der Cora
that may be; and during the preval- Indianer, p. 201.
. . ,
CHAP. IV A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 281
apply to their ancient deity the sun-god. 1 They say that

when all the world was water-logged, a little boy and a little
girl climbed up a mountain called Lavachi (gourd) to the

south of Panalachic, and when the flood subsided the two
came down again. Tl1ey brought three grains of corn and
three beans with them. So soft were the rocks after the
flood that the feet of the little boy and girl sank into them,
and their footprints may be seen there to this day. The two
planted corn and slept and dreamed a dream, and afterwards
they harvested, and all the Tarahumares are descended from
2
them. Another Tarahumare version of the deluge legend
runs thus. The Tarahumares \Vere fighting among them-
selves, and Father God (Tata Dz'os) sent much rain, and all
the people perished. After the flood God despatched three
men and three women to repeople the earth. They planted
corn of three kinds, soft corn, hard corn, and yellow corn,
3
and these three sorts still grow in the country.
The Caribs of the Antilles had a tradition that the Story of a
Master of Spirits, being angry with their forefathers for not ~~:-tb~~~~
presenting to him the offerings which were his due, caused Caribs of
such a heavy rain to fall for several days that all the people ~~tilles.
were drowned : only a few contrived to save their lives by
escaping in canoes to a solitary mountain. It was this
deluge, they say, which separated their islands from the
mainland and formed the hills and pointed rocks or sugar- /
4
loaf mountains of their country.
I 6. Storz'es of a Great Flood i1z North America

The Papagos of south-western Arizona say that the Story of a
. great flood
Great Spirit made the earth and all l1v1ng creatures before told by tl1e
l C. Lun1l1ollz, Unk1zow1z ftfexico, tl1e angels. Papagos of
2 C. Lumholtz, U11!.:11oi1.1n JJ1exico,
Arizona.
i. 295 sq. However, we lea1n from
Mr. Lun1holtz that the Taral1t1mares i. 298.
celebrate the Christian feasts in their 3 C. Lt1mholtz, U11k1zown ftfexii:o,
own way, and have some knowleclge i. 298 sq.
of the devil. Accorcling to them the 4 De la Borde, '' !~elation de
enemy of manlcind is a one-eyed man l'Origine, Mcet1rs, Cot1stt11nes, l\e-
with a big beard, who plays the guitar ligion, G.t1erres et Voyages des Caraibes
and would like very mttch to go to sauvages cles Isles Antilles de l' Ame1-
heaven, but is j)revented frc)m doing iqt1e, '' ]J. 7, in J(c,11cil iie diveJ'j' Voy-
so by the shan1a11s. In heaven ~he age.> Jaits e11 .1_jiiq1tc et e11 !' r1111e1iq11e
J<ather God ( 7'ata J)z'os) l1as nothing q111: 1z'o11t poi11t estd e11101e fttbli'ez (l'tiris,
!Jetter to clo than ((; rt1n foot-races with I 684).
282 1 HE GREAT FLOOD PART I
he made man. Then he came down to earth, and digging

in the ground found some potter's clay. This he took back
with him to the sky, and from there let it fall into the hole
which he had dug. Immediately there ca111e out the hero
Montezuma, and with his help there also issued forth all
the Indian tribes in order. Last of all appeared the wild
Apaches, who ran away as fast as they were created. Those
first days of the world were happy and peaceful. The sun
was then nearer the earth than he is now: his rays made all
the seasons equable and clothing superfluous. Men and
animals talked together : a common language united them
in the bonds of brotherhood. But a terrible catastrophe put
an end. to those golden days. A great flood destroyed all
flesh wherein was the breath of life: Montezuma and his
friend the coyote alone escaped. For before the waters
began to rise, the coyote prophesied the coming of the flood,
and Montezuma tool<: warning, and hollowed out a boat for
himself, and kept it ready on the top of Santa Rosa. The
coyote also prepared an ark for himself; for he gnawed
down a great cane by the river bank, entered it, and caulked
it witl1 gum. So when the waters rose, Montezuma and the
coyote floated on them and were saved ; and when the flood
retired, the man and the animal met on dry land. Anxious
to discover how much dry land was left, the man sent out
the coyote to explore, and the animal reported that to the
west, the south, and the east there was sea, but that to the
north he could find no sea, though he had journeyed till
he was weary. Meanwhile the Great Spirit, with the
help of Montezuma, had restocked the earth with men and
1
animals.
Story of a The Pimas, a neighbouring tribe, related to the Papagos,

great flood
told by the
say that the earth and mankind were made by a certain
Pim as. Chiowotmahke, that is to say Earth-prophet. Now the
Creator had a son called Szeukha, who, when the earth began
to be tolerably peopled, lived in the Gila valley. In the
same valley there dwelt at that time a great prophet, whose
name has been forgotten. One night, as the prophet
slept, he was wakened by a noise at the door. When he
opened, who should stand there but a great eagle? And'
1 H. H. Banc1oft, The Native Races ef the Pacific States, iii. 7 5 sq.
CHAP. IV A GREAT FLOOD JN NORTH AMERICA 283
the eagle said, '' Arise, for behold, a deluge is at hand." But
t~e prophet laughed the eagle to scorn, wrapt his robe about
h~m, and slept again. Again, the eagle came and warned
him, but again he would pay no heed. A third time the
long-suffering bird warned the prophet that all the valley of
the Gila would be laid waste with water, but still the foolish
man turned a deaf ear to the warning. That same night
came the flood, and next morning there was nothing alive to
be seen but one man, if man indeed he was ; for it was
Szeukha, the son of the Creator, who had saved himself by
floating on a ball of gum or resin. When the waters of the
flood sank, he landed near the mouth of the Salt River and
d\velt there in a cave on the mountain; the cave is there to
this day, and so are the tools which Szeukha used when he
lived in it. For some reason or other Szeukha was very
angry with the great eagle, though that .bird had warned
the prophet to escape for his life from the flood. So with
the help of a rope-ladder he climbed up the face of the cliff
\Vhere the eagle resided, and finding him at home in his
eyrie he killed him. In and about the nest he discovered
the mangled and rotting bodies of a great multitude of
people whom the eagle had carried off and devoured. These
he raised to life and sent them away to repeople the
1
earth.
Another version of the Pima legend runs as follows. Another

In the early days of the world the Creator, whom the Indians ~~:s~i~~f
call Earth Doctor, made the earth habitable by fashioning legend.
. d The Pima
the mountains, the water, the trees, the grass, and the wee s ; story of
he made the sun also and the moon, and caused them to creation.
pursue their regular courses in the sky. When he had thus
prepared the world for habitation, the Creator fashioned all
manner of birds and creeping things ; and he rnoulded images
of clay, and commanded them to become animated human .
beings, and they obeyed him, and they increased and multi-
plied, and spread over the eaith. But in time the increase
of population outran tl1e means of subsistence; food and even
water became scarce, and as sicl<ness and death were as yet
unl{nown, the steady multiplication of the species was attended
by ever growing famine and distress. In these ci1cumstances

l I-I. II. Bancroft, 7'hc Native A.'aces of the Pa,iji, States, iii. 78 sq.
THE CREA T FLOOD l' 1\R'f l
the Creator saw nothing for it. but to destroy the creatures
he had made, and this he did by pulling down the sky on
the earth and crushing to death the people and all other
living things. After that he restored the broken fabric of
the world and created mankind afresh, and once more the
human race increased and multiplied.
How Elder It was during this second period of the \Vorld that the
Brother earth gave birth to one who has since been known as Siuuhu
1esolved
to destroy or Elder Brother. He came to Earth Doctor, that is, to the
mankind
by a great
Creator, and spoke roughly to him, and the Creator trembled
flood, before him. The populatio11 was now increasing, but Elder
Brother shortened the lives of the people, and they did not
overrun the earth as they had done before. However, not
content witl1 abridging the natural term of human exist-
ence, he resolved to destroy mankind for the second time
altogether by means of a great flood. So he began to fashion
a jar, i11 which he intended to save himself from the deluge,
and when the jar should be finished, the flood would come.
He announced his purpose of destruction to the Creator, and
the Creator called his people together and warned them of
the coming deluge. After describing the calamity that would
befall them, he chanted the following staves : -
'' Weep, 1ny ztnjortztnate people I
All this yozt 'lvz'll see take place.
Weep, 1ny unfortunate people ,I
For the 'lvaters will over1vhel11z the land.
Weep, my unhappy relatz'ves I
You will learn all.
The waters will overwhel1n the 1nountaz"ns.''
Ho\v the Also he thrust his staff into the ground, and with it bored a
coyote \Vas h l . h h
saved from o e rig t t rough to the other side of the earth. Some
the flood on people took refuge in the hole for fear of tl1c coming flood,
a log, and
Elder . and others appealed for help to Elder Brother, but their
B~other in appeal was unheeded. Yet the assistance which Elder
a Jar.
Brother refused to mankind he vouchsafed to the coyote or
prairie wolf; tor he told that animal to find a big log and
sit on it, and so sitting he \Vould float safely on the surface
of the \Vater along with the drift\vood. The time of the
deluge was now come, and accordingly Elder Brother got
into the jar which he had been making against the great
CHAP, IV A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 285
day ; and as he closed the opening of the jar behind him he
sang-
''Black house I Black house I hold me safely in~
Black house I Black house I hold me safely zn,
As I ;ourney to and fro, to and fro.''
And as 11e was borne along on the flood he sang-

'' Ru11nz1zg water, running water, herein resounding,
As on the cloztds I am carried to the sky.
Runni1zg water, running water, herei1z roari11g,
As on the cloitds I a?JZ car1'ied to the sky.''
The jar in which Elder Brother ensconced himself is How Elder

called by him in the sone-~
the Black House, because it was Brother
landed
made of black gum. It bobbed up and down on tl1e face of after the
the waters and drifted along till it came to rest beyond ~~~!on
Sonoita, 11ear the mouth of the Colorado River. There the Mou11tain.
jar may be seen to this day ; it is called the Black Moun-
tain, after the colour of the gum out of which the jar was
moulded. On emerging from the jar Elder Brother sang-
'' Here I conze forth I Here I co11ze forth I
With 1nagic powers I enzerge.
Here I co11ze forth .1 Here I co111e forth I
With 11zc1gzc powers I e11zerge.
I stand alo1ze I Alone I

Who will acco11zpany 1ne .~
My staff and nzy crystal
They shall bide with 11ze.''
The Creator himself, or Earth Doctor, as the Indians call How the
. 1
him, a so escape d d . b l . h. 1f . h.
estruct1on y enc os111g tmse in ts escapedCreator
reed staff which floated on the surface of the water. The fron1 the
' . d h fl d r h 1 h' h
coyote, too, survive t e great oo ; 1or t e og on w ic reed, and flood in a
he had taken refuge floated southward with him to the place son1e
people
where all the driftwood of the deluge was gathered together. were saved
Of all the birds that had been before the flood only five of in holes in
. . k the eartl1.
different sorts survived ; they clung with their bea s to the
sky till a god took pity on them and enabled thein to make
nests of down from their O\.vn breasts, and in these nests tl1ey
floated on the waters till the flood went down. Among the
birds thus saved from the delt1ge were tl1e flicl<:e1 and the
vulture. As for the human race, some people were saved in

the deep hole which the Creator had bored with his staff; and
others were saved in a similar hole which a powerful person-
age, called the South Doctor, had in like manner made by
thrusting his cane into the earth. Yet others in their distress
resorted to the Creator, but he told them that they came too

late, for he had already sent all whom he could save down
the deep hole and through to the other side of the earth.
Howothers However, he held out a hope to them that they might still
wereturned be saved if they would climb to the top of Crooked Moun-
to stone on .
the top of tain, and he directed South Doctor to assist the people in
Crooked
Mountain.
their flight to this haven of refuge. So South Doctor led
the people to the summit of the mountain, but the flood rose
apace behind them. Yet by his enchantments did South
Doctor raise the mountain and set bot1nds to the angry \vater ;
for he traced a line round the hill and chanted an inca11tation,
which checked the rising flood. Four times by his incanta-
tions did he raise the mountain above the waters ; four times
did he arrest the swelling tide. At last his power was
exhausted ; he could do no more, and he threw his staff into
the water, where it cracked with a loud noise. Then turning,
he saw a dog near him, and sent the animal to see how high
the tide had risen. The dog turned to\vards the people a11d
said, '' It is very near the top." At these words the anxious
watcl1ers were transformed into stone; and there to this day
you may see them standing in groups, just as they \Vere at
the moment of transformation, some of the men talking, some
of the women cooking, and some crying. 1 .
Pima story This Pima legend of the flood contains,. moreover, a11
of the
marvellous episode which bears a certain reminiscence to an episode in
yo 11th who tl1e Biblical narrative of the great catastr.ophe. In Genesis
consorted
with we read how in the days immediately precedi11g the flood,
h~ma 11
'' the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men and
wives . '
and had they bare children to them ; the same were the mighty men
chhildrbe~
t em e1ore
by which were of old, the men of renown." 2 In like manner
the flood. the Pimas relate that w.hen Elder Brother had determined to
destroy mankind, he began by creating a handsome youth,
1 Frank Russell, ''The Pima In- the text I have consiclerably abridged
clians,'' Twenty-Sz'xth A1znztal Report the story.
ef the Bureau of A11te1ica1z Ethnology
(Washington, I 908), pp. 206-213. I11 2 Genesis vi. 4.
CHAP. IV A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 287
whom he directed to go among the Pimas, to wed their

women, and to beget children by them. He was to live
with his first wife ''until his first child was born, then leave
her and go to another, and so on until his purpose was accom-
plished. His first wife gave birth to a child four months
after marriage and conception. The youth then went and
took a second wife, to whom a child was born in less time
than the first. The period was yet shorter in the case of the
third wife, and with her successors it grew shorter still, until
at last the child was born from the young man at the time
of the mar1iage. This was the child that caused the flood
which destroyed the people and fulfilled the plans of Elder
Brothe1. Several years were necessary to accomplish these
things, a11d during this time the people were amazed and
frightened at the signs of Elder Brother's power and at the
1
deeds of his age11t." How the child of the young man's last
wife caused the flood is not clearly explained in the story,
'
though we are told that the screams of the sturdy infant

2
shook the earth and could be heard at a great distance.
Indeed, the episode of the handsome youth and his many
wives is, like the corresponding episode in the Biblical narra-
tive, fitted very loosely into the story of the flood. It may
be that both episodes were originally independent of the
diluvial tradition, and that in its Indian form the tale of the
fair youth and his human spouses is a distorted reminiscenc~
of missionary teaching.
The Indians of Zufii, a pueblo village of New Mexico, Story of a
fl d
re 1ate t h at once upon a time a great oo compe e t em told bJ- thell d h great floocl
to quit their village in the valley and take refuge on a lofty I11~i.a~s of
and conspicuous tableland, which towers lil{e an island from ~~~~in
the flat, with steep or precipitous sides of red and \Vhite Mexico.
sandstone. But the waters rose nearly to the summit of the
tableland, and the Indians, fearing to be s\vept off tl1e face
of the earth, resolved to offer a human sacrifice in order to
appease the angry waters. So a youth and a maiden, the
children of two Priests of the Rain, were dressed in their
finest robes, decked with many p1ecious beads, and tl1rown
into the swelling flood. Iminediately the wate1s began to
recede, and the youth and maiden were turned into sto11e.
2 Frank l{t1ssell, op. ,it. r>. 2 ro.
l }<rank l{ussell, op. cit. JJ. 209.
THE GREAT FLOOD l'ART I
You may still see them in the form of two great pinnacles
1
of rock rising from the tableland.
Story of a The Acagchemem Indians, near St. Juan Capistrano in
great flood
told by the California, ''were not entirely destitute of a l<nowledge of
Acag- the universal deluge, but how, or from whence, they received
chemem
Indians of the same, I could never understand. Some of their songs
California. refer to it ; and they have a tradition that, at a time very
remote, the sea began to swell and roll in upon the plains,
and fill the valleys, until it had covered the mountains ; and
thus nearly all the hu1nan race and animals were destroyed,
excepting a few, who had resorted to a very high mountain
which the waters did not reach. But the songs give a more
distinct relation of the same, and tl1ey state that the
descendants of Captain Ouiot asked of Chinigchinich venge-
ance upon their chief that he appeared unto them, and
said to those endowed with the power, ' Ye are the 011es to
achieve vengeance ye who cause it to rain ! Do this, and
so inundate the earth, that every living being \vill be destroyed.'
The rains commenced, the sea was troubled, and swelled in
upon the earth, covering the plains, and rising until it had
overspread the highest land, excepting a high mountain,
where the few had gone with the one who had caused it to
rain, and thus every other animal was destroyed upon the
face of the earth. These songs were supplications to
., Chinigchinich to dro\vn their enemies. If their opponents
heard them, they sang others in opposition, which i11 sub-
stance ian thus: 'We are not afraid, because Chinigchi11icl1
does not wish to, neither will he destroy the world by anotl1er
inundation.' Without doubt this account has reference to
the universal deluge, and the promise God made, that there
2
should not be another."
Story of a The Luisefio Indians of Southern California also tell of
great flood
told by the a great flood which covered all the high mountains and
Luisefio drowned most of the people. But a fe\v were saved, who
l11dians of
California. took refuge on a little knoll near Bonsall. The place was
1 Mrs. l\1atilda Coxe Stevenson, (Washington, 1904), p. 61.
''The Religious Life of the Zuni 2 Father Friar Geronimo Boscana,
Child,'' Fifth Annual Repo1t of the '' Chinigchinich, an Historical Ac-
Bttreau of Eth1zology (\Vashington, count, etc., of the Acagchemem
1887), p. 539 ; id., ''The Zuni In- Nation,'' appended to [A. Robinson's]
dians,'' T111e1ity-Thi1d A nnteal Repo1t Life in California (Ne\\' York, 1846),'
of the Bztreau <if A11ie1ican Ethnology pp. 300 sq.
CHAP. IV
A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 289
called Mora by the Spaniards, but the Indians call it Katuta.
Only the knoll remained above water when all the rest of the
country was inundated. The survivors stayed there till the
flood went down. To this day you may see on the. top of
the little hill heaps of sea-shells and seaweed, and ashes, and
stones set together, marking the spot where the Indians
cooked their food. The shells are those of the shell-fish
which they ate, and the ashes and stones are the remains of
their fire-places. The writer who relates this tradition adds
that '' the hills near Del Mar and other places along the coast
have many such heaps of sea-shells, of the species still found
on the beaches, piled in quantities.'' The Luisefios still
sing a Song of the Flood, in which mention is made of the
knoll of Katuta. 1
An Indian woman of the Smith River tribe in California Story of a
gave the following account of the deluge. At one time r~:~~~~~
there came a great rain. It lasted a long time and the SJ?ith
water kept rising till all the valleys were submerged, and the ~~7~ns of
Indians retired to the high land. At last they were all swept California.
away and drowned except one pair, wh? escaped to the .
highest peak and were saved. They subsisted on fish, which
they cooked by placing them under their arms. They had
no fire and could not get any, as everything was far too wet.
At last the water sank, and from that solitary pair all the
Indians of the present day are descended. As the Indians
died, their spirits took the forms of deer, elks, bears, snakes,
insects, and so forth, and in this way the earth was repeopled
by the various kinds of animals as well as men. But still
the Indians had no fire, and they looked with envious
eyes on the moon, whose fire shone so brightly in the
sl<y. So the Spider Indians and the Snake I11dians laid
their heads together and resolved to steal fire from the
moon. Accordingly the Spider Indians started off for the
moon in a gossamer balloon, but they took the precaution to
fasten the balloon to the earth by a rope which they paid
out as they ascender]. When they arrived at the moon, the
Indians who inhabited the lunar orb looked asl<:ance at the
1 Constance (}o<ldard dt1 Bois, The ll[J. 1I6, I 57 ( U1iiv1:1'oitJ' of C11l1fo111ia

A'e/1gion of the Luise/lo Indians qf J>11bl1'cati'o1t.1 ,.1111e17'1a1i A1chaeology
iii
.S"outher1t G'a!ifor1tia (Berkeley, 1908), a11,f Et/1110!0,ij)', vol. viii. No. 3) .
VCJI,, I u
THE GREAT FLOOD PAR"f I

newcomers, divining their e1rand. To lull their suspicions

the Spider Indians assured them that they had come only to
gamble, so the Moon Indians were pleased and proposed to
begin playing at once. As they sat by the fire deep in the
game, a Snake Indian dexterously climbed up the rope by
which the balloon was tethered 41 and before the Moon Indians
}{new what he was about he had darted througl1 the fire and
escaped down the rope again. When he reached the earth,
he had to travel over every rock, stick, and tree ; everythi11g
he touched from that time forth contained fire, and the hearts
of the Indians were glad. But the Spider Indians were long
kept prisoners in the moon, and when they were at last
released and had returned to eartl1, expecting to be \velcomed
as the benefacto1s of the human race, ungrateful men killed
them lest the Moon Indians should wish to take vengeance
1
for the deceit that had been practised on them.
Story of a . The Ashochimi Indians of California say that long ago
great flood
tolrl by the
there was a mighty

flood which prevailed over all tl1e land
Ashochimi and drowned every living creature save the coyote alone.
Indians of
California. He set himself to restore the population of the world as
follows. He collected the tail-feathers of owls, hawks, eagles,
and buzzards, tied them up in a bundle, and journeyed with
them over the face of the earth. He sought out the sites of
all the Indian villages, and wherever a wigwam had stood
before the flood, he planted a feather. In due time .the
feathers sprouted, took root, and flourished greatly, at last
turning into men and \vomen ; and tht1s the world was
2
repeopled. .
Story of a The Maidu Indians of California say that of old the

great flood
told by the
Indians abode tranquilly in the Sacramento Valley, and were
Maiclu happy. All on a sudden there was a mighty and swift
Indians of
California. rushing of waters, so that the whole valley became ,like the
Big Water, \vhich r10 man can measure. The Indians fled
for their lives, but many were overtaken by the waters and
drowned. Also, the frogs and the salmon pursued swiftly
after them, and they at~ many Indians. Thus all the Indians

perished but two, who escaped to the hills. But the Great
Man made them fruitful and blessed the.m, so that the world
' ,
l Stepl1en Powers, Tribes of Califor1zia (Washington, 1877), pp. 70 sq.

2
S. Powers, Tribes of California, p. 200.
CHAP. Iv A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 291
w~s soon repeo?led. From these two there sprang many

tribes, even a mighty nation, and one man was chief over all
this nation a, chief of great renown. Then he went out on
a knoll, overlooking the wide waters, and hel(new that they
covered fertile plains once inhabited by his ancestors. Nine
sleeps he lay on the knoll \vithout food, revolving in his mind
the question, 'I-low did this deep water cover the face of the
world?' And at the end of nine sleeps he was changed, for
no'v no arrow could wound him. Though a thousand Indians
should shoot at him, not one flint-pointed arrow would pie~ce
his skin. He was like the Great Man in heaven, for none
could slay him henceforth. Then he spoke to the Great Ma11,
and commanded him to let the water flow off from the plains
\vhich his ancestors had inhabited. The Great Man obeyed ;
he rent open the side of the mountain, and the water flowed
1
away into the Big Water.
According to Du Pr51-tz; the early French historian of Tradition

L ou1s1ana, t h e tra d'1t1on
o f a great fl oo d \Vas current among flood
of a great
the Natchez, an Indian tribe of the Lower Mississippi. He among the

te 11 s us t h at on t h ts . su b'3ec t h e quest;one
. d t h e guard'tan o f Natchez.
the temple, in which the sacred and perpetual fire was kept
with religious care. The guardian replied that ''the ancient
word taught all the red men that almost all men were
destroyed by the waters except a very small number, who
had saved themselves on a very high mountain; that he
knew nothing more regarding this subject except that
these few people had repeopled the earth." And Du Pratz
adds, ''As the other nations had told me the same thing,
I was assured that all the natives thought the same regarding
. this event, and that they had not preserved any memo1y of
Noah's ark, which did not surprise me very much, since the
Greeks, with all their knowledge, were no better informed,
a11d we ourselves, were it not for the Holy Scriptures, might
2
perhaps know no more than they." Else,vhere he 1eports
the tradition somewhat more fully as follows. ''They said
that a great rain fell on the earth so abundantly and during
such a long time that it was completely covered except a
very high mountain wl1ere some men saved the1nselves ; that
1 S. J'owers, T1ibes of Califa1111:a, p. 290.
2 IJe J'age clll l'ratz, /Iistoi1e 1le la LottiJia11e (l'aris, I 758), iii. 27 sq,
all fire being extinguished on the earth, a little bird named

Cotiy-otiy, which is entirely red (it is that which is called in
Louisiana the cardinal bird), brought it from heaven. I
understood by that that they had forgotten almost all the
1
history of the deluge."
Story of a The Mandan Indians had a tradition of a great deluge
great flood in which the human race perished except one man, who
told by the
Mandan escaped in a large canoe to a mountain in the west. Hence
Indians. the Mandans celebrated every year certain rites in memory
of the subsidence of the flood, which they called Mee-nee-1'0-
ka-ha-sha, '' the sinking down or settling of the waters." The
time for the ceremony was determined by the full expa11sion
of the willow leaves on the banks of the river, for according'
. to their tradition ''the twig that the bird brought home was
a willow bough and had full-grown leaves on it'' ; and the
bird which brought the willow bough was the mou1ning- or
turtle-dove. These doves often fed on the sides of their
earth-covered huts, and none of the Indians would destroy
or harm them ; even their dogs were trained not to molest
the birds. In the Mandan village a wooden structure was
carefully preserved to represent the canoe in \vhich the only
man was saved from the flood. '' In the centre of the Mandan
village," says the painter Catlin, '' is an open, circular area of
a hu11dred and fifty feet diameter, l<:ept always clear, as a
public ground, for the display of all their feasts, parades, etc.,
and around it are their \vigwams placed as nea1 to each other
as they can well stand, their doors facing the centre of this
public area. In the middle of this ground, which is trodden
like a hard pavement, is a curb (somewhat like a large hogs-
head standing on its end) made of planks and bound with
hoops, some eight or nine feet high, which they religiously pre- .
serve and protect from year to year, free from mark or scratch,
and which they call the 'big canoe': it is undoubtedly a
symbolic representation of a part of their traditional his-
tory of the Flood ; which it is very evident, from this and
numerous other features of this grand ceremony, they have
in some way or other received, and are here endeavouring to
1 John R. Swanton, India1i Tribes Institzttz.on, Bureau of Anzerican Eth-
of the Lowei Mississippi Valley a1zd Ad- nology, Bulletin 43), quoting Dumont,
jacent Coast ofthe Gulfof JVIexico(Wash- Mc!nt. sur la Louisiane, i. 163-164.
ington, 1911), p. 177 (S1nithsonian

CHAP. IV
perpetuate by vividly impressing it on the minds of the whole
nation. This object of superstition, from its position as the
very centre of the village, is the rallying-point of the whole
nation. To it their devotions are paid on various occasions
of feasts and religious exercises during the year."
On the occasion when Catlin 'vitnessed the annual cere- Annual
mony commemorative of the flood, the first or only man ~~r~~ony
(Nu-1nohk-1nuck-a-nah) who escaped the flood was personated Mandan
by a mummer dressed in a robe of white wolf-skins, which ~~~:esmo
fell back over his shoulders, while on his head he wore a rative of
.d f , . . . the flood.
sp 1en d 1 covering o two ravens sl<:1ns and in his left hand
he carried a large pipe. Entering the village from the
prairie he approached the medicine or mystery lodge, which
he had the nleans of opening, and which had been strictly '
closed during the year except for the performance of these
religious rites. All day' long this mummer went through the
village, stopping in front of every hut and crying, till the
owner of the hut came out and asked him who he was and
what was the matter. To this the mummer replied by
relating the sad catastrophe which had happened on the
earth's surface through the overflowing of the waters, saying
that ''he was the only person saved from the universal
calamity ; that he landed his big canoe on a high mountain
in the west, where he 11ovv resides ; that he had come to open
the medicine-lodge, which must needs receive a present of
some edged tool from the owner of every wigwam, that it
may be sacrificed to the water ; for he says, ' If this is 11ot
done, there will be another flood, and no one will be saved,
as it was with such tools that the .big canoe was made.'''
Having visited every wigwam in the village during the day,
and having received from each a hatchet, a l{nife, or other
edged tool, he deposited them at evening in the medicine
lodge, where they remained till the afternoon of the last day
of the ceremony. Then as the final rite they were thrown
into a deep pool in the river from a banl{ thirty feet high in
presence of the whole village ; ''from whence they can never
be recovered, a11d where they were, undoubtedly, sacrificed to
the Spirit of the Water." Amongst the ceretnonies obse1ved
at this spring festival of the Mandans was a bull dance
danced by men disguised as buffaloes and intended to proct11e
294 THE GREAT FLOOD PAR'!' 1
Bull da11ce a plentiful supply of buffaloes in the ensuing season ; f u1ther,

for tKe
multiplica-
the young men underwent voluntarily a series of excruciating
tion of tortures in the medicine lodge for the purpose of commend-
buffaloes. h r h
ing themselves to the Great Spirit. But ow iar t ese quaint
and ghastly rites were connected with the commemoration of
the Great Flood does not appear from the accounts of our
1
authorities.
Import- This Mandan festival went by the name of 0-kee-pa and
ance
ascribed was ''an an11ual religious ceremony, to the strict observance
by tl1e of which those ignorant and superstitious people attributed
Mandans
to tl1e not only their enjoyment in life, but their very existence; for
celebration traditions, their only history, instructed them in the belief
of the
festi\al. that the singular forms of this ceremor1y produced the
buffaloes for their supply of food, and that the omission of

this annual ceremony, with its sacrifices made to the \vaters,

would bring upon them a repetition of the calamity which
their traditions say once befell them, destroying the whole
human race, excepting one man, who landed from his canoe
Tl1e on a high mountain in the West. This tradition, however,
.tradition
of a great was not peculiar to the Mandan tribe, for amongst one
flood hundred and twenty different tribes.
that I have visited in
\Videly '
spread North and South and Central America, not a tribe exists
among the that has not related to me distinct or vague traditions of
India11s of
North, such a calamity, in which one, or three, or eight pe1sons were
South, and saved above the waters, on the top of a high mountain.
Central
A1nerica. Some of these, at the base of the Rocky Mountains and in
the plains of Venezuela, and the Pampa del Sacramento in
South Americ~, make annual pilgrimages to the fancied
summits \vhere the antediluvian species were saved in canoes
or otherwise, and; under the mysterious regulations of their
1nedicine (mystery) men, tender their prayers and sacrifices
to the Great Spirit, to ensure their exemption from a similar
2
catastrophe."
Cherokee The Cherokee Indians are reported to have a tradition
story of a
great flood. that the water once prevailed over the land until all mankind
l Geo. Catlin, Letters and Notes oiz (Coblenz, 1839-1841), ii. 159 sq.,
the Ma1zne1s, Custonzs, aizd Condition 172 sqq.
ef the North A1nerican I11dia1zs, Fourth
Edition (London, 1844), i. 155 sqq., 2 George Catlin, 0 Kee-Pa, a Re-
Letter 22 ; 11aximilian Prinz zu Wied, ligious Cere111ony; and other CustotllJ" ef
Reise in das In1zere No1d-A11zerica the Mandans (London, l 867), pp. I sq.
I
CHAP. tv A GREAT F.LOOD IN NORTH AMERICA
295

were ~rowned except a single family. The coming of the

calamity was revealed by a dog to his master. For the
sagacious animal went day after day to the banks of a river
where he stood gazi11g at the water and howling piteously'.
Being re~uked by his master and ordered home, the dog
opened his mouth and warned the man of the danger in
which he stood. '' You must build a boat '' said he '' and
' '
put in it all that you would save ; for a great rain is coming
that will flood the land." The animal concluded his predic-
tioi1 by informing his master that his salvation depended on
throwing him, the dog, into the water ; and for a sign of
the truth of what he said he bade him look at the back
of his neck. The man did so, and sure enough, the back of
the dog's neck was raw and bare, the flesh and bone appeai::-
ing. So the man believed, and following the directions of
the faithful animal he and his family were saved, and from
them the whole of the present population of the globe is
1
lineally descended. ,
Stories of a great flood are widely spread among Indians Stories of a

of the great Algonquirt stock, and they resemble _each other ~~~~~Yfioo~
in some details. Thus the Delawares, an Algonquin tribe prevalent
whose home was about Delaware Bay, told of a deluge which ::~~~s the
submerged the whole earth, and from which few persons of the .
~~Uln
escaped alive. They saved themselves by taking refuge on stock.
'
the back of a turtle, which was so old that his shell was The
. Delaware
mossy like the bank of a rivulet. As they were floating thus version.
forlorn, a loon flew their way, and they begged him to dive
and bring up land from the depth of the waters. The bird
dived accordingly, but could find no bottom. Then he fle\v
far away and came back with a little earth in his bill.
Guided by him, the turtle swam to the place, where some
dry land was found. There they settled and repeopled the
2
country.
The Montagnais, a group of Indian tribes in Canada who
I I'Ienry R. Schoolcraft, Notes p1z IJeople, to com1Jro111ise certain diffi-
the Iroqttois (Albany, 1847 ), pp. 358 culties which had arisen bet\veen separ-
sq. The tradition [JUrports to have ate parts of the Cherol.;ee r1ation and
been obtained in the summer of 1846 the government.''
from ''Mr. Stand Watie, a res1Jectable
and intelligent chief of that tribe, who 2 D. G. Brinto11, 7'/1e Le1111pe a1td
was attending at the seat of govern- their Lege11ds (l'l1ilaclc Iphia, I 88 5),
ment, as one of the delegates of his l) I 34
1
Story of a also belong to the great Algonquin stock, told a11 early
~~~;~~~~~ Jesuit missionary that a certain mighty being, whom they
Montag11ais called Messou, repaired the world after it had been ruined by
Indians of t h e great fl oo d .
Canada. Th ey sat"d t h at one d ay M essou wen t ou t
to hunt, and that the wolves which he used instead of hounds
entered into a lake and were there detained. Messou sought
them everywhere, till a bird told him that he saw the lost
wolves in the middle of the lake. So he \vaded into the
water to rescue them, but the lake overflowed, covered the
earth, and overwhelmed the world. Greatly astonished,
Messou sent the raven to search for a clod of earth out of
which he might rebuild that element, but no earth could the
raven find. Next Messou sent an otter, which plunged into
the deep water, but brought back nothing. Lastly, Messou
despatched a musk-rat, and tl1e rat brought back a little soil,
which Messou used to refashion tl1e earth on which we live.
He shot arrows at the trunl{s of trees, and the arrows were
changed into branches: he took vengeance on those who
had detained his wolves in the lake; and he married a musk-
2
rat, by \vhich he had children, who repeopled -the world.
Ano~her In this legend there is no mention of men ; and but for
~~r;~~
11
the part played in it by the animals we might have supposed
l'viontagnais that the deluge took place in the early ages of the world
story. before the appearance of life on the earth. However, some
two centuries later, another Catholic missionary tells us that
the Montagnais of the Hudson Bay Territory have a tradition
of a great flood which covered the \vorld, and from \vhich
four persons, along with animals. and birds, escaped alive on
3
a floating island. Yet another Catholic missionary reports
the Montagnais legend more fully as follows. God, being
angry with the giants, commanded a man to build a large
canoe. The man did so, and when he had embarked in it,
tl1e \vater rose on all sides, and the canoe with it, till no land
was any\vhere to be seen. Weary of beholding nothing but
a heaving mass of water, the mah threw an otter into the
1 F. W. Hodge, Handbook of An1eri- This story is repeated, somewhat more
can I11dia1is North of.11:lexico (Washing- briefly, by the Jesuit Charlevoix in his
ton, 1907-1910),. i. 933, s.v. ''Mon- Histoi"re de la Nouvelle F1-ance (Paris,
tagnais. '' 1744), vi. 147.
2 Re.latio1is des J!suites, I 643, p. 13 3 Mgr. Tacl1e, in Annales de la Pro-
(Canadian reprint, Quebec, . 1858). pagatio11 de la Foi, xxiv. (1852) p. 336.
CHAP. rv A CREA T FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 297

flood, and the animal dived .and brought up a little earth.

The man took the earth or mud in his hand and breathed
on it, and at once it began to grow. So he laid it on the
surf~ce of the water and prevented it from sinking. As it
continued to grow into an island, he desired to know whether
,
it was large enough to support him. Accordingly he placed a
reindeer upon it, but the animal soon made the circuit of the
island and returned to him, from which he concluded that the
island was not yet large enough. So he continued to blow on
it till the mountains, the lakes, and the rivers were formed.
1
Then he disembarked. The same missionary reports a Cree story
deluge legend current among the Crees, another tribe of the ~~~~~
Algonquin stock in Canada; but this Cree story bears clear
traces of Christian influence, for in it the man is said to have
sent forth from the canoe, first a raven, and second a wood-
pigeon. The raven did not return, and as a punishment for
his disobedience the bird was changed from white to black ;
the pigeon returned with his claws full of mud, from \Vhich
the man inferred that the earth was dried up ; so he
2
landed.
The genuine old Algonquin legend of the flood appears The old
to have been first recorded at full length by a Mr. H. E. ~~~~q~~7ct
MacKenzie, who passed much of his early life with the i11 full
Salteaux or Chippeway Indians, a large and powerful branch ~it:;eway
of the Algonquin stock. He communicated the tradition to Indiaiis.
Lieutenant W. H. Hooper, R.N., at Fort Norman, near Bear
Lake, about the middle of the nineteenth century. In sub-
stance the legend runs as fallows. .
Once upon a time there were certain Indians and among How the'.
d . .
t h em a great me 1c1ne-man name d w k t h
1s- ay- c ac .h W"th mecticine-
1 man Wis-
them also were a wolf and his two sons, who lived on a foot- kay-tchacl1
.
1ng o f 1nt1macy
. . wit. h t h e h uman b e1ngs.
. wts- 1<ay- t ch ac h 1weilt
1unting
called the old wolf his brother and the young ones his witl1 tlie
.. I \Volves.
nephews ; for he recognized all animals as his relations. n
the winter time the whole party began to starve ; so in order
to find food the parent wolf announced his intention of
separating with his children from the band. Wis-l<ay-tchach
offered to bear him company, so off they set together. Soon
I Mgr. F'ara11cl, in A1111ales de la pp. 388 sq.
2 Mgr. I<araucl, op. cit. p. 387.
l'ropagcitio11 de la 1 'oi, xxxvi. (I 864)
1
THE GREAT FLOOD l'ART I
they came to the track of a moose. The old Wolf and the
medicine-man Wis (as we may call him for short) stopped
to smoke, while the young wolves pursued the moose. After
a time, the young ones not returning, Wis and the old Wolf
set off after them, and soon found blood on the snow, whereby
they knew that the moose was killed. Soon they came up
with the young wolves, but no moose was to be seen, for the
young wolves had eaten it up. They bade Wis make a fire,
and when he had done so, he found the whole of the moose
restored and already quartered and cut up. The young
\Volves divided the spoil into four portions ; but one of them
retained the tongue and the other the mouffie (upper lip),
which are the chief delicacies of the animal. Wis grumbled,

and the young wolves gave up these dainties to him. When

they had devoured the whole, one of the young wolves said
he would make marrow fat, which is done by breaking up
the bones very small and boiling them. Soon this resource
was. also . exhausted, and they all began to . hunger again.
So they agreed to separate
..
once more. This time Old Wolf
went off witl1 one of his sons, leaving Wis and the other
young wolf to hunt together.
How the The story now leaves the Old Wolf and follows the
yhourfr~wodlf, fortunes of Wis and his nephew, one of the two young
t e r1en
ofWis-kay-. \volves. The young wolf killed some deer and brought them
' ~~:~~iled home in his stomach, disgorging them as before on his
and arrival. At last he told his uncle that he could catch no
devoured
by water~ more, so w 1 h 1 ..
1s sat up al nig t ma <ing med1c1ne or using
Iy11xes. enchantments. In the morning he bade his nephew go
a-hunting, but warned him to be careful at every valley and
hollow place to throw a stick over before he ventured to
jump himself, or else some evil would certainly befall him.
So away \vent the young wolf, but in pursuing a deer he
forgot to follow his uncle's directions, and in attempting to
leap a hollow he fell plump into a river and was there .killed
and devoured by water-lynxes. What kind of a beast a
water-lynx is, the narrator did not know. But let that be.
Enough that the you11g wolf was killed and devoured by
these creature~. After waiting long for his nephew, Wis set
off to look for him, and coming to the spot where the young
wolf had leaped, he guessed rightly that the animal had

CHAP. IV A GRE.rf T FLOOD JN NORTH AMERICA 299

neglected his warning and fallen into the strea1n. He saw a

kingfisher sitting on a tree and gazing fixedly at the water.
Asked what he was looking at so earnestly, the bird replied
that he was lool<:ing at the skin of Wis's nephew, the young
wolf, which served as a door-in.at to the house of the water-
lynxes ; for not content with killing and devouring the
nephew, these ferocious animals had added insult to injury
by putting his skin to this ignoble use. Grateful for the in-
formatio11, Wis called the l<:ingfisher .to him, combed the
bird's 11ead, and began to put a ruff round his neck; but
before he had finished his task, the bird flew away, and that
is \vhy down to this day kingfishers have only part of a ruff
at the back of their head. Before the kingfisher flew a\vay, ,
he gave Wis a parting hint, that the water-lynxes often came
ashore to lie on the sand, and that if he wished to be revenged
on them he must turn himself into a stump close by, but
must be most careful to keep perfectly rigid and on no
account to let himself be pulled do\vn by the frogs and snakes,
\vhich the water-lynxes would be sure to send to dislodge
'
him. On receiving these directions Wis returned to his

camp and resorted to enchantments; also he provided all
things necessary, among othe1s a large canoe to hold all the
animals that could not swim.
Before daylight broke, he had completed his preparations How Wis-
and embarked all the aforesaid animals in the big canoe. ~~l~~c~:~h
He then paddled quietly to the neighbourhood of the lynxes, \vater-lynx,
. , d atld h<JW
and having secured the canoe behind a promontory, he 1ande , the great
transformed himself into a stump, and awaited, in that flood rose
thereafter.
assumed character, the appearance of the water-lynxes.
Soon the black one crawled out and lay down on the sand ;
and then the grey one did the same. Last of all the \vhite
one, which had killed the young wolf, popped his head out
of the ~ater, but espying the stump, he gre\v suspicious, and
called out to his brethren that he had never seen that stump
before. They answered carelessly that it must have been
always there; but the wary white lynx, still suspicious, sent
frogs and snakes to pull it down. Wis had a seve1e st1uggle
to keep himself upright, but he succeeded, and tl1e wl1ite
lynx, his suspicions no\v quite lulled to rest, lay down to
sleep on the sand. Wis waited a little, then resuming his
natural shape he took his spear and crept softly to the white
lyrix. He had been warned by the l{ingfisher to strike at
the animal's shadow or he would assuredly be balked ; but
in his eagerness he forgot the injunction, and stril{ing full
at his adversary's body he missed his mark. The creature
rushed towards the water, but Wis had one more chance and
aiming this.time at the lynx's shadow he wounded grievously
the beast itself. However, the creature contrived to escape
into the river, and the other lynxes with it. Instantly the
"water began to boil and rise, and Wis rnade for his canoe
as fast as he could run. The water continued flowing,
until land, trees, and hills were all covered. The canoe
floated about on the surface, and Wis, having before taken
on board all animals that could not swim, nov;r busied him-
self in picking up all that could swirn only for a short time
and were now struggling for life in the water around 11im.
How with But in his enchantments to meet the great emer-
~~~ a~~~~a gency, Wis had overlooked a necessary condition for the

dived into restoration of the world after the flood. He had no earth,
the \Yater,
Wis-J;:ay- not even a particle, which might serve as a nucleus for the
tchach new lands which were to rise from the waste of waters. He
restored
the earth now set about obtaining it. Tying a string to the leg of a
after the loon he ordered the bird to try for soundings and to persevere
great flood.
in its descent even if it should perish in the attempt; for,
said he, ''If you are drowned, it is no matter: I can easily
restore you to life." Encouraged by this assurance, the bird
dropped like a stone into the water, and the line ran out
fast. When it ceased to run, Wis hauled it up, and at the

end of the line was the loon dead. Being duly restored to
life, the bird informed Wis that he had found no bottom.
So Wis next despatched an otter on the same errand, but he
fared no better than the loon. After that \Vis tried a beaver,
which after being drowned and resuscitated in the usual way,
reported that he had seen the tops of trees, but could sink no
deeper. Last of all Wis let down a rat fastened to a stone ;
down \Vent the rat and the stone, and presently the line
slackened. Wis hauled it up and at the end of it he found
the rat dead but clutching a little earth in its paws. Wis
had now all that he wanted. He restored the rat to
life and spread out the earth to dry; then he blew upon - '

CHAP. 1v A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 301
it till it swelled and grew to a great extent. When he

though: it large enough, he sent out a wolf to explore, but
tl1e animal soon returned, saying that the world was small.
Thereupon Wis again blew on the earth for a long time, and
then sent forth a crow. When the bird did not return Wis
concluded that the \vorld was now large enough for all ;. so '
he and the ani1nals disembarked from the canoe. 1
A few years later, in September I 8 5 5, a German traveller Another
obtai11ed
..
another version of the same legend from an old vthersiotn of
e s ory
031bway \voman, the mother of a half-caste. In this Ojibway told by an
version the story turns on tl1e doings of Menaboshu,. a great ~t~:~~
primeval hero, who, if he did not create tl1e world, is
generally believed by the Ojibways to have given to the
earth its present form, directing the flow of the rivers,
moulding the beds of the lakes, and cleaving the mountains
into deep glens and ravines. He lived on very friendly
terms with the animals, whom he regarded as his kinsfolk
and \vith whom he could converse in their own language.
Once he pitched his camp in the middle of a solitary wood.
The times were bad ; he had no luck in the chase, though
he fasted and hungered. In his dire distress he went to the How the
\Volves and said to them, ''My dear little brothers, will you ~~~aboshu
give me something to eat?'' The wolves said, ''That we made
'11 '' h h" f
w1 , and t ey gave 1m o t eir 100 h r d H fi d . d friends
e oun 1t so goo the wolves. with
that he begged to be allowed to join them in the chase, and '

they gave him leave. So Menaboshu hunted with the wolves,
camped with them, and shared their booty.
This they did for ten days, but on the tenth day they Ho\v the
h d
came to a cross-road . Th e wo1ves w1s e to go one way, the friend little wolf,
and Menaboshu wished to go another, and as neither would of Mena

. M b
give way, 1t was resolved to part company. But ena os u drowned. h boshu, was
said that at least the youngest wolf must go with him, for he
loved the animal dearly and called him 11is little brother.
The little wolf also would not part from him, so the two
went one way, while all the rest of the wolves went the
other. Menaboshu and the little wolf camped in the middle
of the wood and hunted together, but sdmetimes tl1e little
wolf hunted alone. Now Menaboshu was anxious fo1 the
1 Lieut. W. II. Ilooper, R. N., Ten Month.r a11tong the 7i:'!t.r ef the T11.r/..'i
(I..ondon, 1853), pp. 285-292. In the text I have somewhat abr1clgc<l tl1e legend.
safety of the little wolf, and he said to him, '' My dear little
brother, have you seen that lake which lies near our camp to
the west? Go not thither, never tread the ice on it! Do
you hear? '' This 11e said because he knew that his worst
enemy, the serpent-king, dwelt in the lake and would do
an){thing to vex him. The little wolf promised to do as
Menaboshu told him, but he tho11ght within himself, ''Why
does Menaboshu forbid me to go on the lake? Perhaps he
thinks I might meet my brothers the wolves there! After
all I love my brothers t '' Thus he thought for two days,
but .on the third day he went on the lake and roamed about
on the ice to see whether he could find his brothers. But
just as he caqie to the middle of the lake, the ice broke, and
he fell in ahd was drowned.
How All that evening Menaboshu waited for his little brother,
~s~~::~~l~u but he never came. Menaboshu waited for him the next
lake, where day, but still he came not. So he waited five days and five
the
wolflittle
had h ts.
ntg Th en h e b egan to weep an d wa1'I , an d h e cr1e
d so
been killed loud after his little brother, that his cries could be heard at
~the
serpent- the end of the wood. All the rest of the melancholy winter
king. he passed in loneliness and sorrow. Well he knew who had
killed his brother ; it \\'as the serpent-king, but Menaboshu
could not get at him in the winter. When spring came at
last, he went one bright wcrrm day to the lake in which his
little brother had perished. All the long winter he could not
bear to visit the fatal spot. But now on the sand, where the

snow had melted, he saw the footprints of his lost brother,
and when he saw them he broke into lamentations so loud
that they were heard far and near.
How The serpent-king heard them also, and curious to kno\v.
11
~~::~ u what was the matter, he popped his head out of the water.
t~eserpent- '' Al1, there you are," said Menaboshu to himself, wiping away
king. the tears with the sleeve of his coat, ''you shall pay for your
misdeed." He turned himself at once into a tree-stump and
stood in that likeness ,stiff and stark on the water's edge.
The serpent-king and all the other serpents, who popped out
after him, looked about very curiously to discover who had
been raising this loud lament, but they could discover nothing
but the tree-stump, which they had never seen there before.
As they were sniffing about it, ''Take care," said one of them,
CHAP. rv A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 3o3
'' there's more there than meets the eye. Maybe it is our
foe, the sly Menaboshu, in disguise." So the serpent-l(ing
comtnanded one of his attenda11ts to go and search the
matter out. The gigantic serpent at once coiled itself round
the tree-stump and squeezed it so hard, that the bones in
Menaboshu's body cracked, but he bore the agony with stoical
fortitude, not betraying his anguish by a single sound. So
the serpents we1e easy i11 their minds and said, ''No, it is
not he. We can sleep safe. It is only wood!'' And the
day being warm, they all lay down on the sandy beach of
the lake and fell fast asleep.
Scarce!)' had the last snake closed his eyes, when Mena- How
boshu slipped from his ambush, seized his bow. and arrows, Mk.1edte
e nabohshu
11
and shot the serpent-king dead. Three also of the serpent- serpent-
king's sons he despatched with his arrows. At that the other ~~~gflo~~w
serpents awoke, and glided back into the \vater, crying, rose,. and
''Woe! woe! Menaboshu is among us! Menaboshu is kill- ~~:~~shu
ing us ! '' They made a horrible noise all over the lake and from it ~o a
lashed the water with their long tails. Those of them who mountain.
had the most powerful magic brought forth their medicine-
bags, opened them, and scattered the contents all around on
the banks and the wood and in the air. Then the water
began to run in whirlpools and to swell. The sky was over-
cast with clouds, and torrents of rain fell. First the neigh-
bourhood, then half the earth, then the whole world was flooded.
Frightened to death, Menaboshu fled away, hopping from
mountain to mountain like a squirrel, but finding no rest for
the soles of his feet, for the swelling waves followed him
everywhere. At last he escaped to a very high mountain,
but soon the water rose even over its summit. On the top
of the mountain gre\v a tall fir-tree, and Menaboshu climbed
up it to its topmost bough. Even there the flood pursued
him and had risen to his mouth, when it suddenly stood still.
In this painful position, perched on the tree-top and How ,vitl1
surrounded by the heaving waters of the flood, Menaboshu ~ ~1 ~;~~1-~{.
1
remained five days and five nights, wondering how he could \vhich
. b' d I dived
escape. At last he saw a soI1tary 1r , a oon, sw1mm1ng on tlie water, into
the face of the water. He called the bird and said, '' Brotl1er l\Ie11~bosl111
'If: I d b d d th d th restored
loon, thou ski u tver, e so goo as to tve 111to e ep s eartli after tile
and see whether thou canst find any earth, without which I the ttoott.
cannot live.'' Again and again the loon dived, but no earth
co11ld he find. Menaboshu was almost in despair. But next
day he saw the dead body of a drowned musk-rat drifting
towards him. He caught it, tool<: it in his hand, breathed
on it, and brought it to life again. Then he said to the rat,
''Little brother rat, neither you nor I can live without earth.
Dive into the water and bring me up a little earth. If it be
only th1ee grains of sand, yet will I make so1nething out of
it for you and me.'' The rat dived and after a long time
reappeared on the surface. It was dead, but Menaboshu
caught it and examined its paws. On one of the fore-paws
he found two grains of sand or dust. So he took them,
dried them on. his hand in the sun, and blew them away
over the water. Where they fell they grew into little islands,

and these united into larger ones, till at last Menaboshu was
able to jump do\vn from the tree-top on one of them. On

it he floated about as on a raft, and helped the other islands to

grow together, until at last they formed lands and continents.
Then Menaboshu walked from place to place, restoring nature
to its former beauty and variety. He found little roots and
tiny plants which he planted, and they grew into meadows,
shrubs; and forests. Many of the dead bodies of animals
had drifted ashore. Menaboshu gathered them and blew on
them, and they came to life. Then he said, '' Go each of
you to his own place." So they went all of them to their
places. The birds nested in thy trees. The fishes and
beavers chose for themselves the little lakes and rivers, and
the bears and other four-footed beasts roamed about on the
dry land. Moreover, Menaboshu walked to and fro with a
measuring-line, determining the length of the rivers, the depth
of the lakes, the height of the mountains, and the form of the
lands. The earth thus restored by Menaboshu was the first
land in the world to be inhabited by the Indians ; the earlier
earth which was overwhelmed by the flood was inhabited 011ly
by Menaboshu and the wolves and the ,serpent-king and his
satellites. So at least said the old Ojibway woman who told
'
the story of the flood to the German traveller. 1
I J.G. I\:.0111, Kitscki Ganii oder (Ojibway) story of the deluge is given
Erziiklungen votn Obern See (Bremen, by an old traveller in a very concise
1859), i.. 321-328. The Chippeway form as follows : ''They describe a
CHAP; IV
A GREAT FLOOD IN JyORTH AMERICA
Another version of the same story has been recorded Another

more briefly, with minor variations among the Ojibways of version of
south t 0
. -:as ern ntario. I '
t runs thus. N enebojo was living the same
story told
with his brother in the woods. Every day he went out hunt- b)'..the
h" Oi1bways
ing, w ile his brother stayed at home. One evening when of south-
he returned he noticed that his brother was not at home e0aster~
' ntar10.
so he went out to look for him. But he could find him In this

nowhere. Next morning he again started in seaich of his ;~:s~~e~o

brother. As he walked by the shore of a lake what should is called
. fi . . ' .
h e see b ut a k ing sher sitting on a branch of a tree that Nenebojo.
d1ooped over the water. The bird was looking at so1nething

intently in the water belo\v him. ''What are you looking
at?'' asked Nenebojo. But the kingfisher pretended not to
11ear him. Then N enebojo said again, '' If you will tell me
vvhat you are looking at, I \vill make you fair to see. I will
paint your feathers.'' The bird gladly accepted the offer,
and as soon as Nenebojo had painted his feathers, the king-
fisher said, '' I am looking at N enebojo's brother, \vhom the
\Vater-spirits have killed and whose skin they are using as a

door-flap." Then Nenebojo asked again, ''Where do these

water-spirits come to the shore to sun themselves ? '' The
kingfisher answered, ''They always sun themselves over there
at one of the bays, where the sand is quite' dry."
Then Nenebojo left the kingfisher. He resolved to go How ..
over to the sandy beach indicated to him by the bird, and ~~~~~~~ .
there to wait for the first chance of killing the watei-spirits. \vater-lions
He first pondered what disguise he should assume in order ~~~dt~~se.
to approach them unawares. Said he to himself, ''I will
change myself into an old rotten stump." No sooner said
than done ; the transformation was effected by a long rod,
which Nenebojo always carried with him. When the lions
came out of the water to sun themselves, one of them noticed
the stump and said to one of his fellows, ''I never sa\v that
old stump there before. Surely it can't be N enebojo." But
the lion he spoke to said, ''Indeed, I have seen that stu1np
before." Then a third lion came over to peer and tnake
deluge, when the waters spread over kenzie, Vo;1ages fi'o111 1Jfo11t1eal t/11011,1;!1
the whole earth, except the highest t!te Co11ti11e11t o/. No1t/1 .4111<'1i111, Lo11-
mountains, on the tops of which they clon, 1801, 1). cxviii).
})reserved themselves'' (Alexander Mac-
VOL. I x
THE Gl~EAT FLOOD f'AR1' I
sure. He brol<e a piece off and saw that it was rotten. So

all the lions we1e easy in tl1eir minds and lay down to sleep.
When N enebojo thot1ght they were fast asleep he struck
them on their heads with his stick. As he struck them the
water. rose from the lake. He ran away, but the waves
pursued him. As he ran he met a woodpecker, who showed
11im the way to a mountain where grew a tall pine-tree.
Nenebojo clirnbed up the tree and began to build a raft. By
the time lie had finished the raft the \vater reached to his
nee!{. Then he put on the raft two animals of all the kinds
that existed, and witl1 them he floated about.
How, with When they had drifted for a while, Nenebojo said, ''I
~~et~;Ip believe that the \vater will never subside, so I had better
musk-rat, 1nake land again." Then he sent an otter to dive to the
~=~:~~~he bottom of the water and fetcl1 up some eartl1 ; but the otter
earth after came back \Vithout any. Next he sent the beaver on the same
the flood.
errand, but again in vain. After that N enebojo despatched
the musk-rat to bring up earth out of the water. When the
musk-rat returned to the surface 11is paws were tightly closed.
On opening them Nenebojo found some little grains of sand,
and he discovered other grains in the mouth of the musk-rat.
. So he put all the grains together, dried them, and then ble\v
them into the lake with the horn which he used for calling
the animals. In the lake the grains of sand formed an

island. N enebojo enlarged the island, and sent out a raven
to find out how large it was. But the raven never returned.
So N enebojo decided to send out the ha \V k, the fleetest of
all birds on the wing. After a while the hawk returned, and
being asked whether he had seen the raven anywhere, he said
he had seen him eating dead bodies by the shore of the lake.
Then N enebojo said, '' Henceforth the raven will never have
anything to eat but what he steals." Yet another interval,
and N enebojo sent out the caribou to explore the size of the
island. The animal soon returned, saying that the island was
not large enough. So N enebojo blew more sand into , the
water, and when he had done so he ceased to make the
1
earth.
I Paul Radin, Some llfyths and Tales vey, Memoz'r .;8). Compare id. pp.
of the O;'ilnua of South-eastern 01ztario 22 sq. The lions of this tale are clearly
(Ottawa, 1914), pp. 19-21 (Canada, mythical animals, like the water-lynxes
Depart1ne1zt of Mi1tes, Geological Sur- and the serpents of the preceding tales.
CHAP. IV
A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA
.. The same story is told, with variations, by the Timagami Another

Ojtbways of Canada. They speak of a certain hero named version of
N b } the same
ene uc, w 10 was the son of the Sun by a mortal woman. story told
One day, going about with his bow and arrows he can1e to a b:l'. the .
' T1magam1
~reat lake with a beautiful sandy shore, and in the lake he saw Ojib,vays
lions. They were too far off to shoot at, so he waited till, ~~~~~ada.
feeling cold in the water, the lions came ashore to sun and dry version
th emse1ves on t h e sandy beach. In order to get near them isthecalledhero
unseen, he took some bircl1-bark from a rotten stump, rolled Nenebuc.

it into a hollow cylinder and set it, like a wigwam, near the
shore. Then he ensconced himself in it, making a little loop-
hole in the bark, througl1 which he could see and shoot the
lions. The lions were curious as to this new thing on the
shore, and they sent a great snal<:e to spy it out. The snake
coiled itself round the cylinder of bark and tried to upset it,
but it could not, for N enebuc inside of it stood firm. Then
the lions themselves approached, and Nenebuc shot an arrow
and wounded a lioness, the \\'ife of the lion chief. She
\Vas badly hurt, but contrived to crawl away to the cave in
which she lived. The cave may be seen to this day. It is
in a high bluff on the west shore of Smoothwater Lake.
Disguised in the skin of a toad, and pretending to be a
medicine-woman, Nenebuc was admitted to the presence of
the \Vounded lioness in the cave; but instead of healing
her, as he professed to do, he thrust the point of the arrow
still deeper into the wound, so that she died. No sooner did
she expire than a great torrent of water poured out of the
cave, and the lake began to rise. ''That is going to flood
the world and be the end of all things," said N enebuc. So
he cut down trees and made a raft. And hardly \vas the

raft ready, when the flood was upon him. It rose above the
trees, bearing the raft with it, and whereve1 he looked he
could see nothing but \vater everywhere. All l<:inds of
animals were swimming about in it ; they made for his raft,
and he took them in. For he wished to save them i11 orde1
that, when the flood subsided, the earth sl1ould be stocl<:ed
with the same kinds of animals as before. They stayed
with him on the raft for a long while. After a time 11e made
a rope of roots, and tying it to the beaver's tail, he bade 11im
dive down to the land below the \vater. The beaver dived,
THE GREAT .F'LOOJJ !'AR'!' I
but came up again, saying that he could find no bottom.

Seven days afterwards Nenebuc let the musk-rat try whether
he could not bring up $Orne earth. The musk-rat plunged
into the water and remained down a long time. At last he
came up dead, but holding a little earth in his paws. Nene-
buc dried the earth, but not entirely. That is why in some
places there are swamps to this day. So the animals again
1
roamed over the earth, and the world was remade.
Another The Blackfoot Indians, another Algonquin tribe, who
version of used to range over the eastern slopes of the Rocky Moun-
the same
story told tains and the p1airies at their foot, tell a similar tale of the
by the great primeval deluge. '' In the beginning," they say, ''all
Blackfoot
Indians the land was covered with water, and Old Man and all the
animals were floating around on a large raft. One day Old
Man told the beaver to dive and try to bring up a little
' mud. The beaver went down, and was gone a long time,
but could not reach the bottom. Then the loon tried, and
the otter, but the water was too deep for them. At last the
musk-rat dived, and he was gone so long that they thought
he had been drowned, but he finally came up, almost dead;
and when they pulled him on to the raft, they found, in one
of his pa\vs, a little mud. With this, Old Man formed the
2
\Vorld, and afterwards he made the people."
An Ottawa The Ottawa Indians, another branch of the Algonquin
3
version of stock, tell a long fabulous story, which they say has
the story ..
of the great been handed down to them from their ancestors. It
flood. contains an account of a deluge which overwhelmed the
whole earth, and from \vhich a single man, by name Nana-
4
boujou, escaped by floating on a piece of bark. The

missionary who reports this tradition gives us no further
particulars concerning it, but from the similarity of the name
Nanaboujou to the names Nenebojo, Nenebuc, and Mena-
1 F. G. Speck, Mytl1s a1zd Folk-lore It is therefore the equivalent of the
ef the Timiska111z'ng Algonqztin and ''water-lynxes'' in another versibn of
Ti1naga111i Ojibwa (Ottawa, 1915), the story (above, pp. 298 sqq. ).
pp. 28 sq., 34-37 (Canada, Depart- 2 G. B. Grinnell, Blackfoot Lodge
ment of Mi11es, Geological Survey, Tales (London, 1893), p. 272.
Memoir 7I). The name Nenebuc 3
F. W. Hodge, Handbook ef Ameri-
is clearly equivalent to Nenebojo can Indians North ef Mexico {Washing-
and l\fenaboshu in the preceding ver- ton, 1907-1910), ii. 167 sq.
sions of the tale. The word which 4 Clicteur, in Annales de l' Associa-
Mr. Speck renders by ''lion'' is ex- tio1z de la Propagatio1z de la 1'oi, iv.
plained by him to mean '' giant-lynx.'' (1830), pp. 477 sq.
CHA~. IV A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA
309
boshu, we may surmise that the. Ottawa version of the
deluge legend closely resembled the Ojibway versions which
have already been narrated.1
Certainly similar stories appear to be widely current Cree
among the Indian tribes of North-Western Canada They version,of
the story
are .not confined to tribes of the Algonquin stock, but of the great
occur also among their 11orthern neighbours, the Tinnehs flood.
or Denes, who belong to the great Athapascan family, the
most widely distributed of all Indian linguistic families in
North America, stretching as it does from the Arctic
coast far into Mexico, and extending from the Pacific
to Ht1dso11's Bay, and from the Rio Colorado to the mouth
2
of the Rio Grande. Thus the Crees, who are ah Algon-
3
quin tribe, relate that in the beginning there lived an old
magician named Wissaketchak, who wrought marvels by his
enchantments. However, a certain sea monster hated the
old man and sought to destroy him. So when the magician
was paddling in his canoe, the monster lashed the sea with
his tail till the waves rose and engulfed the land. But
Wissaketchak built a great raft and gathered upon it pairs
of all animals and all birds, and in that way he saved his
o\vn life and the lives of the other creatures. Nevertheless
the great fish continued to lash his tail and the water con-
tinued to rise, till it had covered not only the earth but the
highest mountains, and not a scrap of dry land was to be
seen. Then Wissaketchal<: sent the diver duck to plunge
into the water and bring up the sunken earth ; but the bird
could not dive to the bottom and was drowned. Thereupon
Wissaketchak sent the musk-rat, which, after remaining long
under water, reappeared with its throat full of slime. Wissa-
ketchak tool<: the slime, moulded it into a small disk, and
placed it on the water, where it floated. It resembled the
nests which the musk-rats make for themselves on the ice.
By and by the disk swelled into a hillocl<:. Then Wissa-
ketchak blew on it, and the more he blew on it the more it
swe11ed, and being bal<:ed by the sun it became a solid mass.
As it grew at1d ha1dened, Wissaketchal<: sent forth the
1 See above, pjl. 301 .rqq. ii. 754 sq.

2 I<'. W. Hoclge, /andbook o/ At11e1i- 3 F. W. IIoclge, Ha11dbook o/ A111eri-
can /1tdia1is North o/Mexico, i. 108 sqq., ca1i I1i1iia11s North of kfexico, i. 359.


animals to lodge upon it, and at last he himself disembarked
and tool{ possession of the land thus created, which is the
1
Dogrib world we now inhabit. A similar tale is told by the Dogrib
2
and .slaver and Slave Indians, two Tinneh tribes, except that they give
version o
the story the name of Tchapewi to the man who was saved from the
oftf thde great great flood ; and they say that when he was floating on the raft
00
with couples of all sorts of animals, which he had rescued, he
caused all the amphibious animals, one after the other, includ-
ing the otter and the beaver, to dive into the water, but none
of them could bring up any earth except the m11sk-rat, who
dived last of all and came up panting with a little mud in
his paw. That mud Tchapewi breathed on till it gre\v into
the earth as we now see it. So Tchapewi replaced the
animals on it, and they lived there as before ; and he
3
propped the earth on a stout stay, making it firm and solid.
4
Hareskin The Hareskin Indians, another Tinneh tribe, say
version of that a certain Kunyan which means Wise Man once
the story of '
the great upon a time resolved to build a great raft. When his
flood. sister, who was. also his . \vife, asked him why he would
build it, he said, ''If there comes a flood, as I foresee,
we shall take refuge on the raft." He told his plan to
other men on the earth, but they laughed at him, saying, '' If
there is a flood, we shall take refuge on the trees." Never-
theless the Wise Man made a g1eat raft, joining the logs
together by ropes made of roots. All of a sudden there
1 Emile Petitot, Traditio1zs Indi- created men and horses out of dirt.
e1znes dtt Canada Nord-ouest (Paris, See Robert H. Lowie, The Assz'1zi-
I 886), pp. 472-476. In this tale the boine (New York, 1909), p. 101
\Vizard's name Wissaketchak seems (A11thropological Pape1s of the Anzeri-
clearly identical witl1 the name Wis- can llfztse1111z of Natztral Histo1y, vol.
kay-tchach of the Chippeway legend iv. Part i.). AccordiI1g to this account,
(above, p. 297). A similar tale is the flood preceded the creation of
told by the Assiniboins, a tribe of the mankind. But as the story is appar-
Siouan or Dacotan stock, who are ently much ab1idged, \Ve may perhaps
closely associated with the Crees. suppose that in the full version the
They say that forn1erly, when all the human species were said to have been
earth was flooded with water, the drowned in tl1e flood and afterwards
Tricl{ster, whom they call Inktonfni, created afresh out of mud by the
sent animals to dive for dirt at the Trickster.
bottom of tl1e sea, but no creature 2
F. W. Hodge, Handbook of A111eri-
could bring up any. At last he sent ~~n Indians Noith of Mexz'co, i. 108 sq.,
the musk-rat, and the rat came up II. 754.
,
dead, but with dirt in its claws. So 3
E. Petitot, op. cit. pp. 3 r 7. 3 19
the Trickster took the dirt and made 4
F. \V. I-lodge, Handbook of A111eri-
the earth out of it. Afterwards he ca1z India1zs No1th of llfexi,o, ii. 7 54.
CHAP. IV
A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 31 I
came a flood such that the like of it had never been seen
before. The water seemed to gush forth on every side.
Men climbed up in the trees, but the water rose after them,
and all were drowned. But the Wise Man floated safely on
his strong and well-corded raft. As he floated he thought
of the future, and he gathered by twos all the herbivorous
animals, and all the birds, and even all the beasts of prey
he met \vith on his passage. '' Come up on my raft," he
said to them, '' for soon there will be no more earth."
Indeed, the earth disappeared under the water, and for a
long time nobody thought of going to look for it. The first
to plunge into the depth was the musk-rat, but he could find
no bottom, and when he bobbed up on the su1face again he
was half drowned. '' There is no earth ! '' said he. A second '
time he dived, and when he came up, he said, '' I smelt the
smell of the earth, but I could not reach it." Next it came How the
to the turn of the beaver. He dived and remained a long :;~et~an
time under \Vater. At last he reappeared, floating on his help of the
back, breathless and unconscious. But in his paw he had ~~~~r,
a little mud, which he gave to the Wise Man. The Wise dived into
. d .d the \Yater,
M an pace
l d t h e mu d on t h e water, b reat h e d on 1t, an sa1 , restoredthe
'' I would there were an earth again ! '' At the same time earth after .
. it had been
he breathed on the handful of mud, and lo ! it began to destroyed
g row. He put a small bird on it ' and the patch of mud flood. in the great
grew still bigger. So he breathed, and breathed, and the
mud grew and grew. Then the man put a fox on the float-
ing island of mud, and the fox ran round it in a single day.
Round and round the island ran the fox, and bigger and
bigger grew the island. Six times did the fox make the
circuit of the island, but when he made it for the seventh
time, the land was complete even as it was before the flood.
Then the Wise Man caused all the animals to disembark
and landed them on the dry ground. Afterwards he himself
disembarked \vith his wife at1d son, saying, ''It is for us that
'
this earth shall be repeopled." And repeopled it was, sure
enough. Only one difficulty remained witl1 which the Wise
Man had to grapple. The floods were still out, a11d how to
reduce them was the question. The bittern saw the difficulty
and came to the rescue. He swallowed the whole of the
water, and then lay lil<e a log on the banl<, with his belly
swollen to a frightful size. This was more than the Wise

Man had bargained for ; if there had been too much water
befo1e, there was now too little. In his emb"arrassment the
Wise Man had recourse to the plover. '' The bittern,'' he

said, '' is lying yonder in the sun with his belly full of water.
Pierce it.'' So the artful plover made up to the unsuspect-
ing bittern. '' My grandmother," said he, in a sympathizing
tone, ''has no doubt a pain in her stomach." And he passed
his hand softly over the ailing part of the bittern as if to
soothe it. But all of a sudden he put out his claws and
clawed the S\vollen stomach of the bittern. Such a scratch
he gave it ! There was a gurgling, guggling sound, and out
came the \Vater from the stomach bubbling and foaming. It
flowed away into rivers and lakes, and thus the world became
1
habitable once more.
Tinnel1 Some Tinneh Indians affirm that the deluge was caused
~~:s~~:rof by a heavy fall of snow in the month of September. One
of the deat old man alone foresaw the catastrophe and warned his
flood. fellows, but all in vain. ''We will escape to the mountains,"
said they. But they were all drowned. Now the old man
had built a canoe, and when the flood came, he sailed about
in it, rescuing from the water all the animals he fell in with.
Unable long to support this n1anner of life, he caused the
beaver, the otter, the musk-rat, and the arctic duck to dive
into the water in search of the drowned earth. Only the
arctic duck came back with a little slime on its claws; and
the man spread the slime on the water, caused it to grow by
his breath, and for six days disemba1ked the animals upon
it. After that, when the ground had grown to the size of a
great island, he himself stepped ashore. Other Tinnehs sa)'
that the old man first sent forth a raven, which gorged itself
on the floating corpses and came not back. Next he sent
forth a turtle-dove, which flew twice round the world and
returned. The third time she came back at evening, very
tired, with a budding twig of fir in her mouth. 2 The influ-
ence of Christian teaching on this last version of the story is
manifest.
'
1E. Petitot, Tra1/itions Indie11nes Dindjit! (Paris, I 876), p. So.
du Ca1iada No1d-01test, pp. I 46- I 49. 2
E. Petitot, Mono"'oraphie des Detie-
Compare i'd., 1Wo11og1aph1'e des Dene- Di11djit! (Paris, 1876), p. 74.
CI-IAP. IV
The Tinneh Indians in the neighbourhood of Nulato tell Another
a story of a great flood which happened thus. In a populous Tinneh
ttl h l'
se ement t ere 1ved a rich youth and his four nephews. greatfiood. story of a
Far away across the sea there dwelt a fair damsel, whom
many men had wooed in vain. The rich young man resolved
to seek her ha11d, and for that purpose he sailed to 11er village
across the sea with his nephews in their canoes.' But she
would not have him. So next morning he was preparing to
return home. He was already in his canoe down on the
beach ; his nephews had packed up everythi11g, and were
about to shove off from the shore. Many of the villagers
l1ad come out of their houses to witness the departure of the
stra11gers, and among them was a woman with her baby in
her arms, an infant not yet weaned. Speaking . '
to her baby,
the fond mother said, ''And what of this little girl? If they
want a little girl, \vhy not take this one of mine?'' The
rich young man heard the \vords, and holding out his paddle
to the \Voman, he said, ''Put her upon this, the little one you
speak 0'' The woman put the baby on the paddle, and the
young man dre\v the child in and placed it behind him in the
canoe. Then he paddled away and l1is nephews after him.
Meanwhile the girl whom he had asked to marry him came
down to get water. But as she stepped on the soft mud at
the v,rater's edge she began to sink into it. ''Oh ! '' she cried,
'' here I am sinking up to my knees." But the young man
answered, ''It is your own fault." She sank still deeper and
cried, ''Oh ! now I am in up to my waist ! '' But 11e said
again, '' It is yot1r own fault.'' Deeper yet she sank and
cried, ''Oh ! I am in up to my neck!'' And again he
answered, ''It is your own fault." Then she sank down
altogether and disappeared.
But the girl's mother saw what happened, and angry at How the
the death of her daughter, she brought down some tame ~~~!;,as
brown bears to the edge of the water, and laying hold of and I1c1\v a
. ta1'l s s h e sa1'd to t hem, '' R atse
t h e11 . a st1ong \Vln
. d '' ; fior th us )'Oung ma11
and a girl
she hoped to drown the young man who had left her daughter esca~d
. b d. h
to perish. The bears now egan to 1g t e ottom 1n a ury, b . f fro111 1t,
making huge waves. At the same time the \Yater rose exceed-
ingly and the billows ran high. The young man's four
nephews were drow11ed in the storm, and all the inhabitants
of that village perished in the waters, all except the mother

of the baby and her husband ; these two were the only people
that survived. But the young man himself escaped, for he
possessed a magical white stone, and when he threw it ahead
it clove a smooth passage for his canoe through the angry
water; so he rode out the storm in safety. Still all around
him was nothing but the raging sea. Then he took a harpoon
and threw it and hit the crest of a wave. Soon after he
found himself in a forest of spruce-trees. The land had
been formed again. The wave he struck with his harpoon
had become a mountain, and rebounding from the rock the
harpoon had shot up into the sky and there stuck fast. The
harpoon is there to this day, though only the medicine-men
I ~
can see it. . After that the young man turned to the baoy
girl behind him in the canoe. But he found her grown into
a beautiful woman \vith a face as bright as the sun. So he
married her, and their offspring repeopled the dro\vned earth.
But the man and the woman who had been saved from the
waters in his wife's village became the ancestors of the people
1
beyond the sea.
Sarcee The Sarcees, another Indian tribe belonging to the great
;~:s:~~r;r Tinneh stock, were formerly a po\verful nation, but are now
of the great reduced to a few hundreds. Their reserve, a fine tract of
flood. prairie land, adjoins that of the Blacl{feet in Alberta, a little
south of the Canadian Pacific Railway. They have a tradi-
tion of a deluge which agrees in its main features with that
of the Ojibways, Crees, and other Canadian tribes. They
say that when the world was flooded, only one man and
woman were left alive, being saved on a raft, on which they
also collected animals and birds of all sorts. The man sent
a beaver down to dive to the bottom. The creature did so
and brought up a little mud, which the man moulded in his
hands to form a ne\v \vorld. At first the world was so small
that a little bird could walk rot1nd it, but it l{ept growing
bigger and bigger. '' First," said the narrator, '' our father .
took up his abode on it, then there were men, then women,

then animals, and then birds. Our father next crea-ted the
.
1 Rev. J. Jette, '' 011 Ten'a I<'olk- 3 I z sq. In the text I have sligl1tly
lore, '' Jo1t11ial of the J(oyal A 1zth1opo- abridged the story..
logica! Instit11te, xxxviii. (I 908) pp.
CHAP. IV A CREA T FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA
rivers, the rnountains, the trees, and all the things as we now
see them." At the conclusion of the story the white man,
who. ~ep()rts it, observed to the Sarcees that the Ojibway
trad1t1on was very like theirs, except that in the Ojibway
tradition it \vas not a beaver but a musk-rat that brot1ght up
the earth from the water. The remark elicited a shout of
approval from five or six of the tribe, \vho were squatting
around in the tent. ''Yes ! yes ! '' they cried in chorus.
''The man has told you lies. It was a musk-rat! it was a
musk-rat I'.' 1
A different story of a great flood is told by the Loucheux Story of a
or Dindjies, the most northerly Indian tribe of the great .grledatbfloohd
to yt e
Tinneh family which .stretches from Alaska to the borders Loucheux
of Arizona. They say that a certain man, whom they call ~rt~~ed~~s,
the Mariner (Et1-oetchokren), was the first person to build a Tinneh
.
canoe. 0 ne d ay, roe k rng h"rs canoe f:rom s1"d e to s1"d e, h e Indians.
sent forth such waves on all sides that the earth \Vas flooded
and his canoe foundered. Just then a gigantic hollo\v straw
came floating past, and the man contrived to scramble into
it and caulk up the ends. In it he floated about safely till
the flood dried up. Then he landed on a high mountain,
where the hollow stra\v had come to rest. There he abode
many days, wherefore they call it the Place of the Old Man
to this day. It is the rocky peak which you see to the right
of Fort MacPherson in the Rocky Mountains. Farther
down the Yukon River the channel contracts, and the water
rushes rapidly between two high cliffs. There the Mariner
took his stand, straddlewise, with one foot planted on each
cliff, and with his hands dipping in the water he cat1ght the
dead bodies of men as they floated past on the current, just
as you might catch fish in a bag-net. But of living men he
could find not one. The only live thing within sight \vas a
raven, who, gorged with food, sat perched on the top of a lofty
roe!<: fast asleep. The Mari11er climbed up the rocl-::, surprised 1'he
the raven in his nap, and thrust him without more ado into ~~it~1:r
a bag, intending to mal(e short work of Master Raven. But rave11.
1 l(ev. E. F. Wilso11, '' I{eport 011 Bri'tish Associati'o1z fo1 the Adva1ice-
the Sarcee Indians,'' in '' Fot1rth 11ze11t ef Scie1zce, held at Bath i1t
Report of the Committee on the North- Septe111be1 I888 (Lonclcin, 1889 ), p.
Western Tribes of Canada,'' in Report 244.
ef the Fifty e1;g-hth Meeti"n,f{ of the
THE G.REAT FLOOD l';\J<'I' I
the raven said, '' I beg and ent1eat that you will not cast me
down from this rock. f'or if you do, be sure that I will
cause all the me11 who yet survive to disappear, and you will
find yourself all alone in the world." Undeterred by this
threat, the man let the raven in the bag drop, and the bird
was dashed to pieces at the foot of the mountain. However,
the words of the raven came true, for though the man travelled
far and wide, not a single living wight could he anywhere
discover. Only a loach and a pike did he see sprawling
on the mud and warming themselves in tl1e sun. So 11e
bethought him of the raven, and returned to the spot where
the mangled body, or rather the bones, of the bird lay bleach-
ing at the foot of the mountain. For he thought within
himself, ''Maybe the raven will help me to, repeople the
earth." So he gathered the scattered bones, fitted tl1em
together as well ,as he could, and by blowing on them
caused the flesh and the life to return to them. Then the
man and the raven \Vent together to the beach, where the
loach and the pike were still sleeping in the sun. '' Bore a
hole in the stomach of the pike," said the raven to the man,
'' and I will do the same by the loach." The man did bore
a hole in the pike's stomach, and out of it came a crowd of
men. The raven did like\vise to the loach, and a multitude
of women came forth fro1n the belly of the fish. That is
1
how the world was repeopled after the great flood.
Story of a In the religion and mythology of the Tlingits or Thlin-
great flood l<:eets, an i1nportant Indian tribe of Alaska, Yehl or the
told by
tl1e Tlingit Raven plays a great part. He \Vas not only the ancestor of
Indians of
Alaska. . the Raven clan but the creator of men ; he caused the plants
to grow, and he set the sun, moon, and stars in their places.
How Yel1l But he had a wicl<:ed uncle, who had murdered Y ehl's ten
or the
raven had elder brothers either by drowning them or, according to
a wicked others, by stretching them on a board and sawing off their
uncle who
caused the heads with a knife. To the commission of these atrocious
flood, and
how the
crimes he was instigated by the passion of jealousy, for he
raven had a young wife of whom he was very fond, and he knew
escaped
from it. that according to Tlingit law his 11ephews, the sons of his
. sister, wot1ld inherit his widow whenever he himself should
1 E.
Petitot, Traditions Indz'ennes Compare id., Monographie des Dene.
du Canada Nord-ouest, pp. r 3, 34-38. Di1id;'il (Paris, 1876), pp. 88 sq.
'
CitAP. IV A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA
depart fro1n this vale of tears: So when Yehl grew up to

~anhood, his affectionate uncle endeavoured to dispose of
him as he had disposed of his ten elder brothers, but all in
vain. For Yehl was not a common child. His mother had
conceived him through swallowing a round pebble which she
found on the shore at ebb tide ; and by. means of anotl1er
stone she contrived to render the infant invulnerable. So
when his uncle tried to saw off his head in the usual way,
the knife made no impression at all on Yehl. Not dis-
couraged by this failure, the old villain attempted the life of
his virtuous nepl1ew in other ways. In his fury he said,
'' Let there be a flood," and a flood there was which covered
all the mountains. But Yehl assumed his wings and feathers,
which he could put off and on at pleasure, and spreading
his pinions he flew up to the sky, and there remained hang-
ing by his beak for ten days, while the water of the flood
iose so high that it lapped his wings. When the water sank,
he let go and dropped like an arrow into the sea, where he
fell soft on a bank of seaweed and was rescued from his
perilous position by a sea otter, which brought him safe to
land. What happened to manki11d during the flood is not
1
mentioned in this version of the Tlingit legend.
Another Tlingit legend tells ho\V Raven caused a great Another
flood in a different way. He had put a \Voman under the ~~~~fa
world to attend to the rising and falling of the tides. Once flood.
he wished to learn about all that goes on under the sea, so ~~:n
he caused the woman to raise the water, in order that he caused the
might go there dry-shod. But he thoughtfully directed her ~~s~~;~nd
to heave the ocean up slowly, so that when the flood came me11 to life
. after\vards.
people might have time to load their canoes with the nec~s-
sary provisions and get on board. So the ocean rose
gradually, bearing on its surface the people in their canoes .
.t\.s they rose up and up the sides of the mountains, they
could see the bears and other wild beasts wall<ing about on
the still unsubmerged tops. Many of the bears swam out to
the canoes, wishing to scramble on board ; then the people
I H. J. fiolmberg, '' Ethnograph- Die J'linkit. I11dianer (Jena, 188 5),
ische Skizzen iiber die Volker cles pp. 253-257. The versions recorded
R11ssischen Amerika,'' Acta Societatis by tl1ese two writers are inclepende11t
S'cientiarztnt 1''e111zicae, iv. (II elsing- and differ i11 so1ne det<tils fr<J111 each
fcirs, 1856) IJJJ. 332-336; A11rel J(ra11se, other.
318 THE Gl?liAT FLOOD 1' AR'f I
who had been wise enough to take their dogs with thern were
ve1y glad of it, for the noble anirnals l<ept off the bears.
Some people landed 011 the tops of the mot1ntains, built
\Valls round them to dam out tl1e water, and tied their canoes
on the inside. Tl1ey could not tal<e much firewood up with
them ; there was not room for it in the canoes. It was a
very anxious and dangerous time. Tl1e survivors could see
trees torn up by the roots and swept along on the rush of
the waters ; large devil-fish, too, and other strange creatures
floated past on the tide-race. When the water subsided, the
people followed the ebbing tide down the sides of the moun-
. tains; but the trees were all gone, and having no firewood
they perished of cold. When Raven came back from under
the sea, and saw the fish lying high and dry on the moun-
tains and in the creeks, he said to them, '' Stay there and be
turned to stones." So stones they became. And when he
saw people coming down he would say in like manner,
''Turn to stones just \vhere you are." And turned to stones
they were. After all mankind had been destroyed in this way,
Raven created them afresh out of leaves. Because he made
this new generation out of leaves, people know that he must
have turned into stone all the men and women \Vho survived
the great flood. And that, too, is why to this day so many
people die in autumn with the fall of the leaf; when flo\vers
and leaves are fading and falling, we also pass away like them. 1
Another According to yet another account, the Tlingits or Kolash,
Tlingit
story of a as the Russians used to call them, speak of a universal
great flood. delt1ge, during which men were saved in a great floati11g ark
which, when the water sank, grounded on a rock and split
in two ; and that, in their opinion, is the cause of the diversity
. of languages. The Tlingits represent one-half of the popu-
lation, which was shut up in the ark, and all the remaining
peoples of the earth represent the other half. 2 This last
legend may be of Christian origin, for it exhibits a sort of
. blend of Noah's ark with the tower of Babel.
I John R. Swanton, Tli1zgit Myths Russischen Amerika, '' Acta Soci'etatis
. a1zd Texts (Washington, 1909), pp. Scientiarum Fennicae, iv. (Helsingfors,
I 6 sq., I 8, 418 (Bureazt ef A1nerican 1856), pp. 345 sq. ; T. tle Pat1ly,
Ethnology, Bulletin 39). Description Eth1zograjhiqzte des peztples
2 H. J. Holmberg, '' Ethnograph de la Russie (St. Petersburg, 1862),
ische Skizzen Uber die Volker des Peuples de l' A11zeri'que Russe, p. 14.

ClIAP. 1v A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA
The Haida Indians of Queen Charlotte Islands say that Story of a

'' very iong ago there was a great flood by which all men great flood
tcld~the
and animals were destroyed, with the exception of a single Haida
raven. This creature was not, however, exactly an ordinary ~~~~:n
bird, but as with all animals in the old Indian stories Charlotte
possessed the attributes of a I;iuman being to a great extent. Islands.
His coat of feathers, for instance, could be put on or taken
off at will, like a garment. It is even related in one version
of the story that he was born of a woman who had no
husband, and that she made bows and arrows for him.
When old enough, with these he killed birds, and of their
skins she sewed a cape or blanket. Tl1e birds were the little
snow-bird with black head and neck, the large black and red,
and the Mexican woodpeckers. The name of this being was
Ne-kil-stlas. When the flood had gone down Ne-kil-stlas
looked about, but could find neither companions nor a mate,
and became very lonely. At last he took a cockle (Cardiu1n
Nuttalli) from the beach, and marrying it, he constantly
'
continued to brood and think earnestly of his wish for a com-
panion. By and by in the shell he heard a very faint cry,
like that of a newly born child, which gradually became
louder, and at last a little female child was seen, which
growing by degrees larger and larger, was finally married
by the raven, and. from this union all the Indians were
1
produced and the country peopled."
The Tsimshians, an Indian tribe who inhabit the coast Story of a
of British Columbia, opposite to the Queen Charlotte Islands, f~~~~ot~~
have a tradition of a great flood which \Vas sent by heaven Tsin1sl1ian
as a pun1s . hment fior t h e 1"11 -b eh av1our
o f man. F'1rst, a 11 Indians
British of
people, except a few, were destroyed by a flood, and after- Columbia.
wards they were destroyed by fire. Before the flood the
earth was not as it is now, for there were no mountains and
.no trees. These were created by a certain Leqa after the
2
deluge. Once when a clergyman, in a sermon preached at
Observatory Inlet, referred to the gieat flood, a Tsimshian
1 G. M. Dawson, 1-!eport on the the Co1n1nittee on tl1e North- \Vestern
Queen C!ta1!otte Js!a11d.r, I878 (Mc>n- Tribes of the Dominion of Canada,''
treal, 1880), pp. 149B sq. ( Geolo,i:i,al Repo1,t ef the ]<1jt;1-e1;fht/1 llfeeti11g ef
.S'111vey ef Ca11ada). the Ji1itish AsJo,iatio11 )01 the Adva11ce-
111e11t ef "~'ci1:11ce, !1e!1i at Bath i11 Sep-
2 F. Boas, in '' I;'ourth l{eport of te111ber I888 (Londo11, 1889), p. 239.
THE GREAT Ii'LOOJJ PAR'!' I
320
chief among his hearers told him the following story.

''We have a tradition about the swelling of the water a
long time ago. As you are going up the river you will
see the high mountain to the top of which a few of our
forefathers escaped when the \\'aters rose, and thus were
saved. I3ut many more were saved i11 their canoes, and
were drifted about and scattered in every direction. The
waters we11t do\vn again ; the canoes rested on the land,
and the people settled themselves in tl1e various spots
whither they had been driven. Thus it is the Indians are
found spread all over the country; but they all understand
the same songs and_ have the same customs, which shows
1
that they are one people."
Story of a The Bella Coola Indians of Britis~ Columbia tell a different
great flood story of the flood. They say that the great Masmasalanich,
told by the
Bella Coola who made men, fastened the earth to the sun by a long rope
~~~ii~~s of in order to keep tl1e two at a proper distance from each other
Colun1bia. and to prevent the earth from sinl<ing into the sea. But
one day he began to stretch the rope, and the conseque11ce
naturally was that the earth sank deeper and deeper, and the
'
water rose higher and higher, till it had covered the whole
earth and even the tops of the mountains. A terrible storm
broke out at the same time, and many men, who had sought
safety in boats, were drowned, while others were driven far
away. At last Masmasalanich hauled in the rope, the earth
rose from the waves, and mankind spread over it once more.
It was then that the diversity of tongues arose, for before the
2
flood all men had been of one speech.
Story of a The Kwakiutl, who inhabit the coast of British Columbia
great flood
told by the to the south of the Bella Coola, have also their legend of a
Kwakiutl deluge. ''Very long ago," they say, ''there occurred a great
Indians
British of fl d d h" h h
oo , ur1ng w 1c t e sea rose so as to cover everything
Columbia. with the exception of three mountains. Two of these are
very high, one near Bella-Bella, the other apparently to the
north-east of that place. The' third is a low but p1ominent
hill on Don Island, named Ko-Kwus by the Indians; this
they say rose at the time of the flood so as to remain above
1R. C. Mayne, Four Years iJt Vilxftla Indianer, '' Original-Mz'ttheil
British Colun1bia (London, 1862), unge1t aus der Eth1zologiscl1en Abthei-
PP 27 3 .<q. lung der Ko1ii,!{lithen lVIuseen ztt Berlin,
2 F. Boas, '' Mittheilttngen tibe1 die i. (Berlin, 1885-1886) pp. 178 sq.
CHAP. rv A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 321
the water. Nearly all the people floated away in various

directions on logs and trees. The people living where Kit-
Katla now is, for instance, drifted to Fort Rupert, \Vhile the
Fort Ruperts drifted to Kit-Katla. Some of the people had

small canoes, and by anchoring them. managed to come
down near home when the water subsided. Of the Hailtzuk
there remained only three individuals: two men and a woman,
with a dog. One of the men landed at I<a-pa, a second at
another village site, not far from Bella-Bella, and the woman
and dog at Bella-Bella. From the marriage of the woman
\vith the dog, the Bella-Bella Indians originated. When the
flood had subsided there \Vas no fresh water to be found, and
tl1e people were very thirsty. The raven, ho\vever, sho\ved
them how, after eating, to chew fragments of cedar (Thuya)
wood, \vhen \Vater came i11to the mouth. The rave11 also
advised them vvhere, by digging in the ground, they could
get a little water ; but soon a great rain came on, very heavy
and very long, which filled all tl1e lal<es and rivers so that
they have never been dry since. The ~rater is still, however,
in some way understood to be connected with the cedar, and
the Indians say if the1e we1e no cedar trees there would be
1
no water. The converse would certainly hold good."
The Lillooet Indians of Britisl1 Columbia say that in Story of a
former times, while they lived togetl1er around Green Lake f~~'l~~o~~
and below it on the Green River, there came a great and Lillooet
. h. h d 11 h 1 ] d . fl Indians of
contin11ous rain, w ic ma e a t .e a <es an rivers over O\V British
their ba11l<:s and deluge the su1rounding country. A ma11 Columbia.
called Ntcineml<in had a very large canoe, in vvhich he took
refuge with his family. The other people fled to the moun-
tains, but the \vater soon covered them too ; and .in their
distress the people begged Ntcineml<in to save at least their
children in his canoe. B11t the canoe \vas too small to hold

all the children, so Ntci11.eml<in took one cl1ild from eacl1

family, a male from 011e, a, female frotn the next, and so on .
. 1 George M. Da\vson, ''Noles ancl V<JI. v. ( i\1011treal, 888), Section ii.

I
()bservations on the l(wakiool I'eoplc l)JJ. 84 sq. 1'his legencl \vas obtained
of tl1e Northern l)art of Vanco11ver lJy Jl.11. J)awson in 1878 fro111 II111n-
Island and acljaccnt Coasts, rnade tsl1it, tt chief cJf tl1e IIailtzul.;: divisio11
c] 11ring the S11mmer .of I 88 5, '' . ;ro- cif the J(,val.;:iool (l{\v;1].;:i11tl), at J(tl-j.l<l
ceedin.l{s a11d Tia1zsa1t1011J of the lto;1a! (ICiJJ.;:ite, vi!lt1ge of cl1arts), Yeo Islantl,
.S'ociety of Ca11ada for the Year I887, Milbanl.;: SounLl .
V(JL. I y
322 TIIE GREAT FLOOD PAR1' I

But still the rain fell and the water rose till all the land was
submerged, except the peak of the high mountain called Split
(Ncikato), which rises on the west side of the Lower Lillooet
Lake, its pinnacle consisting of a huge precipice cleft in two
fro1n top to bottom. The canoe drifted about on the flood

until the waters sank and it grounded on Smimelc Mountain.
Each stage in the sinking of the water is marked by a flat
te1race on the side of the mountain, which can be seen there
1
to this day.
Story of a The Thompson Indians of British Columbia say that
great flood
told by the once there was a great flood which covered the whole country,
Thompson except the tops of some of the highest mountains. The
Indians of
British Indians thinl<, though they are not quite sure, that the flood
Columbia. was caused by three brothers called Qoaqlqal, who in those
days travelled all over the country working 1niracles and trans-
forming things, till the transformers were themselves trans-
formed into stones. Be that as it may, everybody was drowned
in the great flood except the coyote and three men ; the coyote
survived because he turned himself into a piece of wood and
so floated on the water, and the men escaped with their lives
by embarking in a canoe, in which they drifted to the

N zukeski Mountains. There they were afterwards, with
their canoe, transformed into stones, and there you may
see them sitting in the shape of stones down to this day.
As for the coyote, when tl1e flood subsided, he was left high
and dry on the shore in the likeness of the piece of wood
into which, at the nick of time, he had cleverly transformed
himself. So he now resumed his natural. shape and looked
about him. He found he was in the Thompson River
country. He took trees to him to be his wives, and from
him a.nd the trees together the Indians of the present day
are descended. Before the flood there were neither lakes
nor streams in the mountains, and therefore there were no
fish. When the waters of the., deluge receded, they left
lakes in the hollows of the mountains, and streams began to
flow down from them towards the sea. That is why we
now find lakes in the mountains, and fish in the Iakes. 2
1 James Teit, ''Traditions of the 2 James Teit, Traditions ef the
. Lillooet Indians of British Columbia,'' Thonipson Rz'ver Indians ef Britz'sh
Jounial ef Anierican l'olk-lore, xxv. Colt1111bia (Boston and New York,
(1912) P 342. 1898), pp. 19, 20. Compare id., ''The
CHAP, IV A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 323
Thus the deluge story of the Thompson River Indians
appears to have been invented to explain the presence of
lakes in the mountaii:is ; the primitive philosopher accounted
for them by a great flood which, as it retired, left the lakes
behind it in the hollows of the hills, just as the ebbing tide
leaves pools behind it in the hollows of the rocks on the
sea-shore.
The Kootenay Indians, who inhabit the south-eastern Story of a
part o f B
rit1s h C 1 b' h great
o um ta, say t at once upon a time a chicken- told b the flood
hawk (Acczpiter Cooperz") forbade his wife, a small. grey bird, Kootfnay
a cert ain
t o b a th e 1n 1a k e. Q ne d ay, a f ter p1c
k'1ng b err1es
. Indians
British of
on the mountain in the hot sun, she was \varm and weary, Columbia.
and seeing the lake so cool and tempting she plunged into .
it, heedless of her husband's warning. But the water rose, a
giant rushed forth, and ravished the bird, or rather the
woman ; for in these Indian tales no sharp line of distinction

is drawn between the animal and the human personages.
Her angry husband came to the rescue and discharged an
arrow which strucl<: the giant in the breast. To be revenged,
the monster swallowed all the waters, so that none remained
for the Indians to drink. But the injured wife plucked the
arrow from the giant's breast, and the pent-up waters gushed
forth and caused a flood. The husband and his \vife took

refuge on a mountain, and remained there till the flood sub-
sided. In another version of this Kootenay story, a big fish

takes the place of the giant and is killed by the injured
husband ; the spouting blood of the fish causes the deluge,
and the man, or the hawk, escapes from it by climbing up a
tree. The scene of the story is laid on the Kootenay River
1
near Fort Steele.
Legends of a great flood appear to have been current Stories of a
.
among the Indian tri b es o f W as h 1ngton tate. S Th h great flood
us t e told by the
indians of
Thompson Indians of British Colum-
. . fi h d Washing-
A ssoczatzo1z 01 t ze A va1zce11zent of toii State.
bia,'' p. 338 (Memoirs of the Anierican Science, Edi1zbu1-gh 111eet1"11g, I892). The Twana
Mztseu1n of Natztral History, The Jesup The chicken-ha;vk (A,cipiter Coope1i) version of
North Pacific Expedition, April, 1900). is a very important character in the tales the story.
1 A. F. Chamberlain, '' IZeport on of the l(ootenay Inliians. I-Ie accom-
the Kootenay Indians of Soutl1-caste1n lJanies the coyote i11 his search for tl1e
British Columbia,'' in Ez~rhth !report st1n, and in a iage he tl1rows that
of the Comniittee on the North- Wester1z anin1al into the fire. See A. F'.
Tribes of Canada, pp. 3r sq. (sepa~~te Chamberlain, op. 1it, p. 33.
reprint from the l1'eport of the Brztzsh
THE GREAT 1'7-00/J l'A I<'I' I
324
Twanas, on Puget Sound, say that 011cc 011 a ti1ne tl1c JJcoplc
were wicked and to pu11ish them a great flood came, which
overflowed all the land except one mour1tain. The peorjle
fled in their canoes to the highest mountain in their country
- a peak of tl1e Olympic range and as the water rose
above it they tied their canoes witl1 long ropes to the highest
tree but still the \Vater rose above it. Then some of tl1e
' .
canoes broke from their moorings ar1d clrifted a way to the
west, where the descendants of the persons saved in them
no\v live, a tribe who speak a language like that of the
Twanas. That, too, they say, is why the present nurnber of
the tribe is so small. In their language this mountain is
called by a name which means '' Fastener," because they
fastened their canoes to it at that time. They also speak of
1
a pigeon whic_h went out to view the dead.
The The Clallam Indians of Washington State, whose country
Clalla111 adjoins that of the Twanas, also have a tradition of a flood,
version of
the story. but some of them believe that it happened not more than
a few generations ago. Indeed about the year r 8 7 8 an old
man asserted that his grandfather had seen the man \:vho
\vas saved from the flood, and that he was a Clalla1n Indian.
Their Ararat, too, is a different mountain from that on wl1ich
the Twana Noah and his fellows found refuge. The Lum mi
Indians, who live near the northern boundary of Washington
State, also speak of a great flood, but no pa1ticulars of tl1eir
tradition are reported. The Puyallop Indians, near Tacoma,
say that the deluge oversp1ead all the country except one
high mound near Steilacoom, and this mound is still called
by the Indians ''The Old Land," because it was not sub-
merged.2
Story of a '' Do you see that high mountain over there ? '' said a11
great flood old Indian to a mountaineer about the year r 860, as they
on tl1e
Cascade were riding ac1oss the Cascade Mou11tains. '' I do," was the
Mountains.
reply. ''Do you see that grove to tl1e right?'' the Indian
next asked. '' Yes," answered the white man. '' Well," said

I Rev. l\:Iyron Eels (Shokomish, Repo1t ef the S11zithsonz"an Institutio1i

\Vashington Territory), ''Traditions of far 887, p. 674. '
the Deluge a111ong the Tribes of the 2 Rev. M. Eels, ''Traditions of the
North - West,'' The A11zerican Antz"- Del11ge among the Tribes of the North-
quana1z, i. (I 87 8- I 879) p. 70 ; id., \Vest,'' The Anzerican Antiquarian, i.
\
''The Twana, Chernak um, and l(lallam (1878-1879) p. 70. -
Indians of Washington Territory,''
'
CHAP. Iv A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AMERICA 325
the Indian, ''a long time ago there was a flood, and all the
cou11try was overflowed. There was an old man and his
family on a boat or raft, and he floated about, and the wind
blew him to that mountain, where he touched bottom. He
stayed there for so1ne time, and then sent a cro\v to hunt for
. land, but it came back without finding any. After some
time it brought a leaf from that grove, and the old man was
glad, for he knew tl1at the \Vater \\as abating." 1

When the earliest missionaries came among the Spokanas, Story of a
Nez Perces,
and Cayuses, who, with the Y akimas '
used to great fiothod
among e
inhabit the eastern part of vVashington State, they found Spokanas,
that these Indians had their own tradition of a great flood, ~ne~Perces,
in which one man and his wife were saved on a raft. Each Cayuses.
of these three tribes, together with the Flathead tribes, had
its own separate Ararat on which the survivors found
2
refuge.
The story of a great flood is also told by the Indians of Story of a
Washington State who t1sed to inhabit the lower course of~~~~~~~~
the Columbia River and speak the Kathlamet dialect of Katl1J:imet
Chinook. 3
In one respect their tale resembles the Algon- ~~~~;~~gof
quin legend. They say that a certain maiden \Vas advised tl1e Lo,~er
Columbia
by the blue-Jay to marry tl1e panther, who was an elk- I~iver.
hunter and tl1e chief of his to\v11 to boot. So away she hied
to the panther's town, but when she came there she married
the beaver by mistake instead of the panther. When her
husband the beaver came back from tl1e fishing, she went
do\vn to the beach to n1eet him, and he told her to tal<e up
the trout he had caugl1t. But she found that they were not
really trout at all, but only \villow branches. Disgusted at
the discovery, she ran away from him, and finally married
the panther, \vhom she ougl1t to have married at first. Thus
deserted by the wife of his bosom, the beaver wept for five
days, till all the la11d \Vas flooded with his tears. The 11ouses
were overwhelmed, and the animals tool< to their canoes.
When the flood reached nearly to tl1e sl<y, tl1ey bethought
them of fetching up eartl1 from the depths, so tl1ey said to
the blue-jay, '' Now dive, blue-jay ! '' So tl1e blt1e-jay dived,
I J{ev. M. Eels, op. cit. l) 7 I. 3 Fra11z Boas, IIti111!hook ef A 111c1i1a11

I1idia1i f,a11,i;11a.i;1:s, i. ( \Vasl1 i11gto11,
2 J{ev. 1\1. I~cls, op. ,it. i1. 7 I. 191 I) jl. 563.
but he did not go very deep, for his tail remained sticking
out of the water. After that, all the animals tried to. dive.
First the mink and next the otter plunged into. the vasty
deep, but came up again without having found the bottom.
Then it came to the turn of the musl<:-rat. He said, '' Tie
the canoes together.'' So they tied the canoes together and
laid planks across them. Thereupon the musk-rat threw off
his blanket, sang his song five times over, and without more
ado dived into the water, and disappeared. He was down
a long while. At last flags came up to the surface of the
water. Then it became summer, the flood sa.nk, and the
canoes with it, till they landed on dry ground. All the

animals jumped out of the canoes, but as they did so, they
knocked their tails against the gunwale and broke them off
short. That is why the grizzly bears and the black bears
have stumpy tails down to this day. But the otter, the
mink, the musk-rat, and the panther returned to the canoe,
picked up their missing tails, and fastened them on the
stumps. That is why these animals have still tails of a
decent length, though they were broken off short at the
1
flood. In this story little is said of the human race, and
how it escaped from the deluge. But the tale clearly
belongs to that primitive type of story in which no clear
distinction is drawn between man and beast, the lower
creatures being supposed to think, speal(, and act like
human beings, and to live on terms of practical equality
\vith them. This community of nature is implicitly indicated
in the Kathlamet story by the marriage of a girl, first to a
beaver, and then to a panther ; and it appears also in the
incidental description of the beaver as a man with a big
2
belly. Thus in describing ho\v the animals su1vived the
deluge, the narrator may have assumed that he had suffi-
ciently explained the survival of mankind also.
Stories of a In North America legends of a great flood are not
great flood
among the
confined to the Indian tribes ; they are found also among
Eski1no the Eskimo and their kinsfolk the Green landers. At Oro-
of Alaska.
wignarak, in Alaska, Captain Jacobsen was told that the
1 Franz Boas, Kathlamet 7 exts Bitlletin 26) .

(Washington, 1901) pp. 20-25, 252 2 Franz Boas, Kathla1net Te:rts,
sq. (B11reau ef A111erica1z Ethnology, p. 20 .

CHAP. IV A GREAT FLOOD IN NORTH AME'RICA 327
Eskimo have a tradition of a mighty inundation which
simultaneously with an earthquake, swept over the land s~
rapidly that only a few persons were able to escape in their
skin canoes to the tops of the highest mountains.1 Again, the
Eskimo of Norton Sound, in Alaska, say that in the first
days the earth was flooded, all but a very high mountain in
the middle. The 'vater came up from the sea and covered
the whole land except the top of this mountain. Only a few
animals escaped to the mountain and were saved; and a few
people made a shift to survive by floating about in a boat
and subsisting on the fish they caught till the water subsided.
As the flood sank and the mountains emerged from the
water, the people landed from the canoe on these heights,
and gradually followed the retreating flood to the coast.
The animals which had escaped to the mountains also
2
descended and replenished the earth after their kinds.
Again, the Tchiglit Eskimo, who inhabit the coast of Stoi-y of a
O C great flood
the A retie cean from Point Barrow on the west to ape told by the
Bathurst on the east, tell of' a great flood which broke over Tchiglit
the face of the earth and, driven by the wind, submerged Eskimo.
the dvvellings of men. The Eskimo tied several boats
together so as to form a great raft, and on it they floated
about on the face of the great waters, huddling together for
warmth under a tent which they had pitched, but shivering in
the icy blast and watching the uprooted trees drifting past
on the waves. At last a magician named An-odjium, that
is, Son of the Owl, threw his bow into the sea, saying,
. '' Enough, wind, be calm ! '' After that he threw in his ear-
3
rings ; and that sufficed to cause the flood to subside.
The Central Esl<:in10 say that long ago the ocean Cen~ral
suddenly began to rise and continued rising until it had ~~~~T~~ a
inundated the whole land. The water even cove1ed the tops great flood.
of the mountains, and the ice drifted over them. When the
flood had subsided, the ice stranded and ever since fo1ms an
ice-cap on the top of the mountains. Many shell-fisl1, fish,
1 A. Woldt, Captai'1t Jacobse1i' s Reise can Etl11iology, Part i. (Washi11gton,

an der Nordwestkiiste A1nerika's z88I- 1899) p. 452.
z883 (Leipsic, 1884), p. 252.
2 E. W. Nelson, ''The Eskimo 3 :f!:.
Petitot, T1-adit1:01ts I111lie1111es
about Bering Strait,'' E~l{hteentli du Ca11ada No1d-oztest (Paris, 1886),
Annita! J.!epo1t of the Bu1eau ef Atrteri- PIJ 6 lq.
THE (;REA 7' FLOOIJ PAR'J' I
seals, and whales were left higl1 and dry, a11d thei1 shells
and bones may be seen there to this day. Many 1':sl<imo
were then drowned, but many others, who had taken to their
1
boats whe11 the flood began to 1:ise,,. were sa ved.
Story of a With iegard to the Greenlanders their historian Crantz
great flood
told by the tells us that 11
almost all heathen nations l<now something of
Green- Noah's Flood, and the first missionaries found also some
lanclers.
pretty plain traditions among the Greenlanders ; namely,
that the world once overset, and all mankind, except one,
were drowned ; but some we1e turned into fiery spirits. The
only man that escaped alive, afterwards smote the ground
with his stick, and out sprang a woman, and these two re-
peopled the world. As a proof that the deluge once over-
flo\ved the whole earth, they say that many shells, and relics
of fishes, have been found far within the land where men
could 11ever have lived, yea that bones of \Vhales have been
2
found upon a higl1 mountain." .Similar evidence in support
of the legend was adduced to the traveller C. F. Hall by the
Innuits or Eskimo with whom he lived. He tells us that
11
tl1ey have a tradition of a deluge \vhich they attribute to
an unusually high tide. On 011e occasion \vhen I was speak-
ing with Tookoolito conce1ning her people, she said, Innuits
1
all thi11k this earth once covered with wate1.' I asked 11er
\vhy they thought so. She ans\vered, Did you never see
1
little stones, like clams a11d such things as live in the sea,
a\vay up on mountains?''' 3
An Eski1no An Eskimo man once informed a traveller, that he
theory as
to the had often \Vondered \vhy all tl1e mammoths are extinct.
extinction He added that he had learned the cause from Mr.
of tl1e
ma1nmoth. Whittal<er, the 1nissionary at Herschel Island. The truth
is, he explainecl, that when Noah entered into the ark and
invited all the animals to save themselves from the flood by
following his example, the sceptical mammoths declined to
accept the kind invitation, on the ground that they did not
believe there \Vould be mucl1 of a flood, and that even if
there were, they tl1ought their legs long enough to keep their
heads above water. So they stayed outside and perished in
1 Franz Boas, ''The Central Es- 2 David Crantz, History ef Green-
kimo,'' in Sixth An1i1tal Report ef the la1zd (London, 1767), i. 204 sq.
Buieazt ef Eth1zology (Washington, 3 C. F. Hall, Life i1Jith the Esq1ti-
1888), pp. 637 sq. n1aitx (London, 1864), ii. 318.
CH. rv STORIES OF A GJ?EAT FLOOD IN AFRICA
their blind unbelief, but the caribou and the foxes and the
\Volves are alive to this day, because they believed and were
1
saved.
I 7. Stories of a Great Flood in Afrz'ca

It is curious, that while legends of a universal flood are Absence of
widely spread over ma11y parts of the world they are hardly stories of a
' great floocl
to be found at all 1n Africa. Indeed, 1t may be doubted in Africa.
\Vhether throughout that vast continent a single genuinely
native tradition of a great flood has been recorded. Even
traces of such traditions are rare. None have as yet been
discovered in the literatu1e of ancient Egypt. 2 I11 Northern Reported

G u1nea, ld h d' traces of
we are to , t e1e 1s '' a tra 1t1on of a great deluge such stories
which once overspread the face of the whole earth ; but it in Gui11ea
1s coup1e d WI th so muc h t h at 1s
marve l l ous an d 1mag1nat1ve,
. . . and on
Congo. the
that it can scarcely be identified \Vith tl1e same event recorded

3
in the Bible." As the missionary who reports this gives
no details, \Ve cannot judge hovv far the tradition is native
and how far borrowed from Eu1opear1s. Another missionary
has met \vith a reference to a great flood in the traditions of
the natives of the Lovver Congo. ''The sun and moon once
met together, they say, and the sun plastered some mud
over a part of the moon, and thus covered up some of the
light, and that is why a portion of the moon is often in
shadow. When this meeting tool< place there \Vas a flood,
and the ancie11t people put their por1iclge (lztlrzt) sticks to
their backs and turned into monkeys. The present race of
people is a nevv creation. Another statement is that when
the flood came the men turned into monl<eys, and the women
into lizards : and tl1e mor1key's tail is the man's gun. 011e
would tl1inl< f101n this that the transformation took place, i11
their opinion, in very recent times ; but the Co11go native
has no legend concerning tl1e i11t1ocluction of tl1e gu11 into
their co11ntry, nor any ru1nou1s of tl1e time when 11u11ti11g
and fighting were carried on witl1 spears, shielcls, bovvs a11d
1
arrows, and knives." ' Tl1e Bapedi, a I1as11to t1ibe of South
I V. Stefansson, lVIy Life with the 3 Rev. J. L. \Vilso11, lf1i;ste111 .-lj1ic1l
E.r/.:i1110 ( I,ondon, I 9 I 3 ), JJ. 42 2. (Lo11clor1, 1856), Jll' 229 .1q.
~ ScJ I an1 infor1nec] liy l'r<ifessor W. 4 John I I. \Vecl,s, ./ 111rJ11,r; the l'ri111i-
M. l<'li11ders l'etrie. tive B1zlo11,i;o (l,<ir1llr111, 1914), 11. 286.

Repo1ted Africa, are said to have a legend of a great flood which

1
traches of.
sue sto11es
destroyed nearly all mankind. The experienced missionary
in Soutl1 Dr. Robert Moffat maqe fruitless inquiries concerning legends
Africa. of a deluge among the natives of Soutl1 Africa ; one native
who professed to have received such a legend from his fore-
fathers was discovered to have learned it from a missionary
named Schmelen. '' Stories of a similar kind," adds Dr.
Moffat, '' originally obtained at a missionary station, or from
some godly traveller, get, in course of time, so mixed up and
metamorphosed by heathen ideas, that they look exceedingly
2
like native traditions." After recording a legend as to the
formation of Lake Dilolo in Angola, in which a whole village
with its inhabitants, its fowls, and its dogs is said to have
perished, Dr. Livingstone remarks, ''This may be a faint
tradition of the Deluge, and it is remarkable as the only one
3
I have met with in this country." My experienced mission-
ary friend, the Rev. John Roscoe, who spent about twenty-
five years in intimate converse with the natives of Central
Africa, particularly the Uganda Protectorate, tells me that
he has found no native legend of a flood among the tribes
with which he is acquainted.
Traditio11s Traditions of a great flood have, however, been discovered
of a gre~1t
flood by German writers among the natives of East Af~ica, but the
reported stories are plainly mere variations of the Biblical narrative,
in East
Africa. which has penetrated to these savages through Christian or
possibly Mohammedan influence. One such tradition has
been recorded by a German officer among the Masai. It
runs as fallows : -
Version Tum bainot was a righteous man whom God loved. He
of the
Hebrew married a wife Naipande, who bore him three sons, Oshomo,
story of a Bartimaro, and Barmao. When his brother Lengerni died,
great flood
told by Tumbainot, in accordance with Masai custom, married the
the Masai widow Nahaba-logunja, whose name is derived from her high
of East
Africa. narrow head, that being a mark of beauty among the Masai.
'
She bore her second husband three sons ; but in consequence
of a domestic jar, arising from her refusal to give her husband
. 1 A. Merensky, Beitriige zur Kennt- 1842), pp. 126 sq.
niss Sud-Afit'kas (Berlin, 1875), p.
124. . 3 David Livingstone, Missionary
2 Robert Moffat, llfissionary Labours Travels and Researches t'n .S'outh Africa
and Scenes itt Southern Africa (London, (London, 1857), p. 327.
.
CH. IV STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD IN AFRICA 331

a drink of milk in the evening, she withdrew from his home-
stead and set up one of her own, fortifying it with a hedge
of thorn-bushes against the attacks of wild beasts. In those
days the world was thickly peopled, but men were not good.
On the contrary they were sinful and did not obey God's
commands. Ho,vever, bad as they were, they refrained from
murder. But at last, one u11lucky day, a certain man named
Nambija knocked another man named Suage on the head.
This was more than God could bear, and he resolved to
destroy the whole race of mankind. Only the pious Tum-
bainot found grace in the eyes of God, who commanded him
to build an ark of wood, and go into it, with his two wives,
his six sons, and their wives, taking with him some animals.
of every sort. When they \Vere all safely aboard, and Tum-
bainot had laid in a great stock of provisions, God caused it
to rain so heavily and so long that a great flood took place,
and all 1nen and beasts were drowned, except those which
\Vere in the ark ; for the ark floated on the face of the waters.
Tumbainot longed for the end of the rain, for the provisions
in the ark began to run short. At last the rain stopped.
Anxious to ascertain the state of the flood, Tumbainot let a
dove fly out of the ark. In the evening she came back tired,
so Tumbainot knew that the flood must still be high, and
that the dove could 11ave found no place to rest. Several
days later he let a vulture fly out of the ark, but before doing
so he took the precaution to fasten an arrow to one of its
tail-feathers, calculating that if the bird perched to eat, it
would trail the arrow behind it, and that the arrow, hitching
'
on to something as it was dragged over the g1ound, would

stick fast and be lost. The event answe1ed his expectation,
for in the evening the vulture returned to the ark without
the arrow and the tail-feather. So Tumbainot inferred that
the bird had lighted on carrio11, and that the flood must be
abating. When the water had all run away, tl1e ark grounded
on the steppe, and men and animals dise111 ba1ked. As he
stepped out of the arl<:, Tumbainot saw no less than four
rainbows, one in each of the four quarters of the sl<y, and he
1
took them as a sign that the wrath of God was over.
Another version of the flood stor)' is reported by a
I M. Merl<er, Die Afasai (Berlin, 1904), l)[J. 265-267.
332 THE GREAT FLOOD I'AR'f I
A11other German missionary from the same region. I-Ie obtained it

1
versiot of at the 1nission-Station of Mkulwe , on the Saisi or Momba
the 1-lebre\v
story of a river, about twenty miles from wl1ere the river flows into
~;;~~t!~od Lal<e Rukwa. His informant professed to have had it from
from East his grandfather, and stoutly asserted that it was a genuine
Africa.
old tradition of the country and not bo1rowed from foreigners.
His statement was corroborated by another truth-loving
native, who only differed from his fellow in opining that the
African Noah se11t out two doves instead of one. The story
runs thus:- .
Long ago, the rivers came down in flood. God said to

the two me11, ''Go into the ship. Also take into it seeds of
all sorts and all animals, 1nale and female." They did so.
The flood rose higl1, it overtopped the mountains, the ship
floated on it. All animals and all men died. When the
water diied up, the man said, '' Let us see. Perhaps the
water is not yet dried up." He sent out a dove, she came
back to the ship. He \Vaited and sent out a ha\vk, but she
did not return, because the water was dried up. The men
went out of the ship, they also let out all animals and all
1
seeds.
I 8. The Geographical Dijfusio1z of Flood Stories

Geogra- The foregoing survey of diluvial traditions suffices to
phical
diffusio11 ofprove that this type of story, whether we call it legenda1y
stories of a or mythical, has been widely diffused throughout the world.
great flood.
Before we inquire into the relation in which the traditions
stand to each otl1er, and the cause or causes which have
given rise to them, it may be well to recapitulate briefly the
regions in which they have been found. To begin with Asia,
we have found examples of them in Babylonia, Palestine,
Syria, Phrygia, ancient and modern India, Burma, Cochin
China, the l\1alay Peninsula, and l{amtchatl<a. Roughly
speal<ing, therefore, the traditions prevail in Southern Asia,
Absence ?f and aie conspicuously absent from Eastern, Central, and
floodstor1es N
in Eastern,
h
ort ern A
s1a. I 1 I 1 h ;
t 1s part1cu a1 y remarkab e t at neither
Central, of the great civilized peoples of Eastern Asia, the Chinese
and
Northern
Asia. Alois lfaml)erger, '' Religii:ise Vberlieferungen und Gebr~it1cl1e der Land-
1
schaft Mlculwe (Deutscl1-0st- Afrilca),'' A1ztlzropos, iv. (1909) p. 304.

CHAP. IV DIFFUSION OF FLOOD STORIES 333
and the Japanese, should, so far as I ki1ow, have preserved
in their voluminous and ancient literatures any native legends
of a great flood of the sort we are here considering, that is,
of a universal inundation in which the \Vhole or the greater
,part of the human race is said to have pe1ished.
In Europe native diluvial traditions are much rarer than Rarity of
in Asia, but they occurred in ancient Greece and have been ~ooEdstories
' 1n urope.
reported in Wales, and among the Lithuanians, the gipsies
of Transylvania, and the Voguls of Eastern Russia. The
Icelandic story of an inundation of giant's blood hardly
conforms to the general type.
In Africa, including Egy1)t, native legends of a great 1\frica.
flood are conspicuously absent ; indeed no single clear case
of one has yet been reported.
In the Indian Archipelago we find legends of a great 1'11e Indian
flood in the large islands of Sumatra, Bo1neo, and Celebes, ~~~~ipel
and among the lesser islands in Nias, Engano, Ceram, Rotti,
and Flores. Stories of the same sort are told by the native
tribes of the Philippine Islands and Formosa, arid by the
isolated Andaman Islanders in the Bay of Bengal.
In the vast islands, or continents, of New Guinea and Ne\v
Australia we meet with some sto1ies of a great flood, and AGuinteaI"
us ra 1a,
legends of the same sort occur in the fiinge of smaller isla11ds and
kno\vn as Melanesia, which sweeps in a great arc of a circle Melanesia.
1ound New Guinea and Australia on the north and east.
Passing still eastward out into the Pacific, we discover Poly11esia

diluvial traditions widely spread among the Polynesians who ~l'1.d1crones1a.
.
occupy the scattered and for the most part small islands of
that great ocean, from Hawaii on the north to New Zealand
on the south. Among the Micronesians a flood legend has
been recorded in the Pelew Islands.
In America, South, Central, and North, diluvial traditions i\merica,
are very widespread. They have been found from Tierra ~~~~~~1
del Fuego in the south to i-\laska in the north, and in a11d Nortl1.
both continents from east to west. Nor do they occur only
among the Indian tribes ; examples of them have been
reported among the Eskimo from Alasl<a on the west to
Greenland on the east.
Such being in general the geographical diffusion of the
traditions we have next to ask, how are they related to each
334 THE GREAT FLOOD T'AR1' I
Ho\v a1e otl1er? Are they all genetically connected with each other,
1 or are they distinct and independent? In other words, are
tfil e dvario'.1s
oo stories
related to they all descended from one common original, or have they
eacll other? originated independently in different parts of the world ?
All the Formerly, under the influence of the Biblical tradition,
stories of a inquirers were disposed to identify legends of a great flood,
great flood
cannot be wherever found, with the familiar N oachian deluge, and to
1r~;et~e suppose that in them we had more or less corrupt and
Heb1ew apocryphal versions of that great catastrophe, of which the
~~~~~;:~~eh only true and authentic record is preserved in the Book of
derived Genesis. Such a view can hardly be maintained any longer.
from a
Babylon- Even when we have allowed for the numerous corruptions
ian, or and changes of all kinds which oral tradition necessarily
rather
Sumerian suffers in passing from generation to generation and from
original. land to land through countless ages, we shall still find it
difficult to recognize in the diverse, often quaint, childish,
or grotesque stories of a great flood, the human copies
of a single divine original. And the difficulty has been
greatly increased since modern research has proved the
supposed divine original in Genesis to be not an original

at all, but a comparatively late copy, of a much older Baby-

lonian or rather Sumerian version. No Christian apologist
is likely to treat the Babylonian story, with its strongly
polytheistic colouring, as a primitive revelation of God to
man ; and if .the theory of inspiration is inapplicable to the
original, it can hardly be invoked to account for the copy.
But may Dismissing, therefore, the theory of revelation or inspira-
the Baby-
lo11ian, or
tion as irreconcilable with the known facts, we have still to
rather inquire, whether the Babylonian or Sumerian legend, which
Sumerian,
story be is certainly by far the oldest of all diluvial traditions, may
the source not be the one from which all the rest have been derived.
of all the
"others? The question is one to which a positive answer can hardly
be given, since demonstration in such matters is impossible,
and our conclusion must be formed from the consideration
of a variety of probabilities which different minds will
estimate differently. It is no doubt possible to analyse all
the stories into their elements, to classify these elements, to
count up the number of them \vhich the various versions
have in common, and from the sum of the common elements
found in any one narrative to calculate the probability of its
being a derivative or original version. This, in fact, has been
done by one of my predecessors in this department of research,1
but I do not propose to repeat his calculations: readers with
a statistical and mathematical turn of mind may either con-
sult them in his work or repeat them for themselves from the
data submitted to them in the foregoing pages. Here I shall
content myself with stating my general conclusion, leaving
tl1e reader to verify, correct, or reject it by reference to the
evidence with which I have furnished him. Apart, then, Apart
from the Hebrew legend, which is unquestionably derived ~~~::~~
from the Babylonian, and from modern instances which missionary
h 'b't 1 f I .
ex i 1 c ear traces o ate missionary or at a events there seems 11 teaching,
Christian influence, I do not think that we have decisive to be

groun d s 1orr .
tracing any o f t h e d'l i uvia. 1 tra d'itions
. to t h e no goodfor
ground
Babylonian as their original. Scholars of repute have, tracing any
indeed, maintained that I
both the ancient Greel\: and the ~~~~e.
ancient Indian legends are derived from the Babylonian ; stories,th except e
they may be right, but to me it does not seem that the Hebrew
resemblances between the three are sufficient to justify us ~:~ ~ a 0
in assuming identity of origin. No doubt in the later ages loniin_or

. . h G k
o f ant1qu1ty t e ree s were acqua1nte . d b h h h B b
ot wit t e a y- origirial.Sumerian
Ionian and the Hebrew versions of the deluge legend, but

their own traditions of a great flood are much older than
the conquests of Alexander, which first unlocked the treas-
uries of Oriental learning to western scholars ; and in their
earliest forms the Greek traditions exhibit no clear marks of
borrowing from Asiatic sources. In the Deucalion lege11d, Theancient
for example, which comes nearest to the Babylonian, only ~~~~of
Deucalion and his wife are saved from the flood, and after a flood
it has subsided they are reduced to the necessity of miracu- ~~~~~e~o
lously creating mankind afresh out of stones, while nothing pe11dent of
. . b h . f . 1
at all is said a out t e restoration o an1ma s, w 1c must Ionian. h' h the Baby-
presumably have perished in the waters. This is very

different from the Babylonian and Hebrew legend, \.vhich
provides for the regular propagation both of the human
and the animal species after the flood by taking a sufficient

number of passengers of both sorts on board the ark.

Similarly a comparison of the ancient India11 with the
Babylonian version of the legend brings out serious dis-
1 M. Winternitz, Die F!utsagen, pp. 3 I 2-333.
1'11J;; l7 !1'/~'A 7' 1,1.< J()/J 1'1\I{'/' I
l)isere1i- c1epancies between tl1em. Tl1e ini1;1c11!011s fi.<>h \vl1icl1 fig11rcs

<ll\Cll'S
so pro1ni11ently in all the a11cie11t I11ciic-1r1 versio11s 11<1s 110
lict\\'t~c11 tl1e

<1lll'IC!ll obvious pa1allel in the Baby lonia11 ; tl1ough sornc; scholars
I11cli:1n :111Ll
tl1t ar1cic11t
have i11geniously a1gued that tl1e deity, incarnate in a fish, who
BalJylo11i:111 \varns Man11 of tl1e comi11g deluge in the Indian legend, is a
sto1ies of a
great flood.
duplicate of Ea, tl1e god who similarly \va1ns Ut-napishtitn in
the Babylonian legend, for there seems to be no doubt that
Ea vvas a water deity, conceived and represe11ted partly in
1
11uman at1d partly in fish form. If tl1is suggested parallel
between tl1e two legends could be made out, it vvould certainly
forge a strong link between thern. On the other hand, in the
oldest Indian forn1 of tl1e story, that in the Satapatha Brah-
1nana, Manu is represented as the solitary s11rvivor of the
great flood, and after the catastrophe a woman has to be
miraculously created out of the butter, sour milk, \vhey and
curds of his sacrifice, in order to enable him to continue the
species. It is only in the later versions of the story that
Manu takes a large assort1nent of animals and plants with
him into the ship ; and even in them, though the sage
appears on shipboard surrounded by a band of brother sages
whom he had rescued from a watery grave, nothing whatever
is said about rescuing his vvife and children. The omission
betrays a lac!.;: not only of domestic affection but of common
prudence on tl1e part of the philosopher, and contrasts forcibly
vvith the practical foresight of his Babylonian counterpart, who
under the like distressing circumstances has at least the con-
solation of being surrounded by the family circle on the
stormy waters, and of kno\ving that as soon as the flood has
subsided he will be able, with their assistance, to provide for
1 Fr. Lenor1nant, Les Orz~ri1ies de cl1aracter of the god is illustrated from
l'Histoi1e 1l'ap1i':s la Bible: De lei Babylonian 111onu1nents. Beros11s speal{s
Crt'atio1z de l' Ho11t111e azt Delztge (Pa1is, of this cleity under tl1e name of Oannes,
1880), pp. 424 sqq.; M. Winternitz, and describes his ampl1ibio11s form
Die Flzttsai;eiz, p. 328. As to the nearly as it is figured in Babylonian
aq11eous and fishy nature of Ea in art ; he tells 11s tl1at Oannes appeared
Ba\Jylonian mythology, see l\>I. J astrow, from the Red Sea, that is, from tl1e
I.!el~E[ion of Bab;,lo1zia a;zd Assyrz~a, ~ersian G11lf'. and ~fter passing the day
l)P I 36 sq. ; P. Dhorme, La Relig1:01i 111 conversation \VIth men, whom he
Assy10-Bab;1lo1iie1z1ze (Pa1is, I 910 ), pp. taught the elements of civilization re-
73 sq.; a11d especially Alfred Jeretnias, .
tired at sunset to tl1e sea. See Berosus '
'' Oannes-Ea,'' in \V. H. l{oscher's T' '
1n 11a,r;111enta Historicorztnt Graecorunz,
A tts.fiilzilic!tes Lexiko1z der Grieclzische1i ed. C. l\1Uller, ii. 496 sq. ; Eusebius,
ztnd Riinzisclze1z ilf:;1thologie, iii. 577 C'hi'onic., ed. A. Schoene, vol. i. col.
sqq., where the half-h11nian, half-fisl1 J4.


.
the continuance of the human race ~ the ordinary processes

of nature. . In this curious difference between the two tales
is it fanciful to detect the contrast bet\veen the worldly
prudence of the Semitic mind and the dreamy asceticism
1
of the Indian ?
On the whole, then, there is little evidence to prove that On the
the ancient Indian and Greek legends of a flood are derived wBhole , t~e
aby1on1an
from the corresponding Babylonian tradition. When we story seems
remember that the Babylonians, so far as we know, never ~!~:,~:~~
succeeded in handing on their story of a deluge to the spread
Egyptians, with whom they were in direct communication ;~~~~~h
. for centuries, we need not wonder if they failed to transmit Christian
. to t h e more d'1stant G ree l{S an d I n d"tans, wit
1t . h wh om d own or Moham
medan
to the days of Alexander the Great they had but little influence.
intercourse. In later ages, through the medium of Christian
literature, the Babylonian legend has indeed gone the round
of the world and been echoed in tales told under the palms of
coral islands, in Indian wigwams, and amid the Arctic ice and
2
snow ; but in itself, apart from Christian or Mohammedan
agencies, it would seem to have travelled little beyond the
limits of its native land and the adjoining Semitic regions.
If, among the many other diluvial traditions which we ~ide.
. . l k b r . 'd f d
h ave passe d 1n review, we oo a out 1or ev1 ence o er1va- of the . d1ffus1on
tion from a common source, and therefo1e of diffusion from Algon.quin

. story in
a single centre, we cannot fail to be struck by the manifest North
tokens of such derivation and diffusion in the Algonquin America.
3
stories of North America. The many flood legends recorded
among different tribes of that widely spread stock resemble
each other so closely that we cannot but regard them as
mere variations of one and the same tradition. Wl1ether
1 The theory of the dependence of pp. l 33 sqq.) and more hesitatingly
the Indian on the Babylonian legend by R. Andree (Dz"e Flz1tsage11, pp. l 7
was maintained by Eugene Bournouf sqq. ).
and Frani;:ois Lenormant (Les Origines 2 For traces of tl1e lege11d, in its
de l 'Ifistoire d' apres la Bible : De la Christian forn1, an1ong barbarous and
Creation de l' Ho1n1ne au Deluge, Paris, savage tribes see above, p. 195 (l(a1nars),
1880, pp. 423 sqq.) and more recently p. 223 (Minahassa11s), I'P 245 sq.
by M. Wir1ternitz (Die fi'lutsagen, PIJ (Hawaiians), pp. 265 sq. (l\1acusis),
327 sq.). Professor H. Oldenberg also pp. 27 5 sq. (Michoacan I11diar1s), p.
inclines to it (Die Literatur des A/ten 280 (Cora lnclians), p. 297 (Cree
I1zdien, Stuttgart and Berlin, 1903, p. Indians), p. 312 (Ti11neh Indians),
47). On the other hand the theory pp. 328 sq. (I<:sl<in10), [Jp. 330 sq.
was rejected by F. Max Mliller (l1zdza, (Masai).
what can z"t teach us? Lonclon, 1892, . 3 Above, IJlJ 295 sqq.
VOL. I z
.
THE GREAT FLOOD PAR'f I
in the original story he incident of the various animals

diving into the water to fetch up earth is native or based
on a reminiscence of the birds in the Noachian story, which
has reached the Indians through white men, may be open to
question.
Evidence of Further, we have seen that according to Humboldt a
diffusion
in South
general resemblance may be traced between the diluvial
1
America traditions among the Indians of the Orinoco, and that
and
Polynesia.. according to William Ellis a like resemblance prevails among
2
the Polynesian legends. It may be that in both these regions
the traditions have spread from local centres, in other words,
that they are variations of a common original.
Independ- But when we have made allowance for all such cases of
ent deluge
legends. diffusion from local centres, it seems probable that there still
remain deluge legends which have originated independently.
..
19. The Origin of Stories of a Great Flood

The old We have still to ask, What \Vas the origin of diluvial
theory of a
universal traditions? how did men come so commonly to believe that
deluge was at some time or other the earth, or at all events the whole
supported -
inhabited portion of it, had been submerged under the waters
by the
evidence of a mighty flood in which almost the entire human race
of marine
fossils perished? The old answer to the question was that such a
found catastrophe actually occurred, that we have a full and authentic
inland.
record of it in the Book of Genesis, and that tl1e many
~egends of a great flood which we find scattered so widely
among mankind embody the more or less imperfect, confused
and distorted reminiscences of that tremendous cataclysm. 3
A favourite argument in support of this vie\v v.ras dra\vn fro1n

marine shells and fossils, which \Vere supposed to have bee11
left high and dry in deserts and on mountain-tops by the
. retiring waters of the Noachian deluge. Sea-shells found
on mountains were adduced by Tertullian as evidence that
the waters had once covered the earth, thougl1 he did
1 Above, p. 266. universal delt1ge, preferring to suppose
2 Above, pp. 24 I sq. that the flood covered the limited a1ea
to which the human race bad then
3 This, for example, '''as the view spread. See his book, Tlie Testi111ony
of the Scotch geologist Hugh Miller, of the Rocks (Edinburgh, 1857), PP
though he rejected the theory of a 267 sqq.
CHAP. IV ORIGIN OF STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 339
not expressly associate them with the flood recorded in

1
Genesis. When e-xcavations made in 1517, for repairing
the city of Verona, brought to light a multitude of curious
petrifactions, the discovery gave rise to much speculation,
in which Noah and the ark of course figured conspicu-
ously. Yet they were not allowed to pass unchallenged ; The theory
for a philosophical Italian 11aturalist, Fracastoro, was bold ~~;~:=~a1:
enough to point out difficulties in the popular hypothesis. naturalist
'' Th a t inun
d a t"ion, h e o b served , was too transient
con- F1acastoro.
: it
sisted principally of fluviatile waters ; and if it had trans-
ported shells to great distances, must have strewed them
over the surface, not buried them at vast depths in the
interior of mountains. His clear exposition of the evidence
would have terminated the discussion for ever, if the passions
2
of mankind had not been enlisted in the dispute." Towards
the end of the seventeenth ce11tury the field of geology \Vas Long -
.inva d e d b y an army o f t h eo1og1ans, . . d . I 1 prevalence
recru1te in ta y, of the
Germany, France, and England, \vho darkened counsel and diluvial
th~of
left confusion worse confounded. '' Henceforward, they who fossil
refused to subscribe to the position, that all ma1ine organic deposits.
remains were proofs of the Mosaic deluge, were exposed to
the imputation of disbelieving the whole of the sacred writings.
Scarcely any step had been made in approximati11g to sound
theories since the time of Fracastoro, more than a hundred
years having been lost, in writing down the dogma tl1at
organised fossils were mere sports of nature. An additio11al
period of a century and a half \Vas now destined to be co11-
sumed in exploding the 11ypothesis, that organised fossils
had all been buried in the solid strata by Noah's flood.
Never did a theoretical fallacy, in any branch of science,
interfere more seriously with accurate observation a11d the
systematic classification of facts. In recent times, we may -
attribute our rapid progress chiefly to the careful determina-
tion of the order of succession in mine1al masses, by means
of their different organic contents, and their regula1 super-
position. But the old diluvialists were induced by thei1
1 Tertt1llian, De Pallio, 2, ''Muta- fluitasse. ''
vit et tofus orbis aliqua11do, aquis
07r11iibzes obsilus: adhul 11zaris conchae 2 Sir Cl1arles Lyell, Tlte J>11:11cip!es
et bucci11ae pe1eg1i11a1ztur iii 111011tibie>, of Geolo,y, T\velfth ELlitio11 (Lo11don,
cupie1ztes Plato11i proba1e et1"a11e aidua 1875), i. 31.
340 THE GREA 1' FLOOJJ PART I
system to confound all the groups of strata together, referring

all appearances to one cause and to one brief period, not to
a variety of causes acting throughout a long succession of
epochs. They saw the phenomena only, as they desired to
see them, sometimes misrepresenting facts, and at other
times deducing false conclusions from correct data. In short,
a sketch of the progress of geology, from the close of the
seventeenth to the end of the eighteenth century, is the
history of a constant and violent struggle of new opinions
against doctri11es sanctioned by the implicit faith of many
1
generations, a11d supposed to rest on scriptural authority."
Survivals The error thus stigmatized by Sir Charles Lyell died
of the
theory of a hard. Less than a century ago, when William Buckland
universal was appointed Reader in: Geology at Oxford, he could still
deluge
among assure his hearers, in his inaugural address to the University,
geologists that ''the grand fact of an universal del11ge at 110 very
in the
nineteenth remote period is proved on grounds so decisive and incon-
century. trovertible, that had we never heard of such an event from
. Scripture or any other Authority, Geology of itself must
have called in the assistance of some such catastrophe to
2
explain the phenomena of diluvial action." And within
our own lifetime another eminent geologist wrote and
published as follows : '' I have long thought that the na1ra-
tive in Genesis vii. and viii. can be understood only on the
supposition that it is a contemporary journal or log of an
eye-witness incorporated by the author of Genesis in his
work. The dates of the rising and fall of the water, the
note of soundings over the hill-tops when the maximu1n was
attained, and many other details, as well as the whole tone
of the narrative, seem to require this supposition, which also
removes all the difficulties of interpretation which have been
8
so much felt.'' But if the story of the flood in Genesis
is the contemporary log-book of an eye-witness, how
are we to explain the remarkable discrepancies it contains
with regard to the duration of the flood and the number of
the animals admitted to the ark ? Such a theory, far from
solving the difficulties that beset the narrative, would on
I Si1 Charles Lyell, Principles of of the Earth (London, 1905), p. 244.
Geology, Twelfth Edition, i. 37 sq. 3
(Sir) John William Dawson, The
Story of the Earth altd Man Sixth
2 Quoted by W. J. Sollas, The Ag-e ' .
Edition (Lonclon, 1880), p. 290 note*
CHAP. rv ORIGIN OF STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 341
the contrary render thein altogether inexplicable, except on
a supposition alike injurious and unjust either to the veracity
or to the sobriety of the narrator. 1
Nor need we linger long over another explanation of Stories of a
flood stories which has of late years enjoyed a good deal of great ~ood
. . sometimes
popularity In Germany. On this view the story of the flood interpreted
has really nothing to do with water or an ark it is a myth 1asunar,
solar,
or
relating to the sun or the moon or the stars, or all three of stellar
myths.
I In a later work (The Meeting tion of animal life, took place at c. B.c.
Place ef Geology a1zd Histor;1, Second 2500 or 3000.'' The theory of. Sir
Edition, London, 1895, pp. 121 sqq.) Joseph Prestwich, to which Professor
Si1 J. W. Dawson still attempted to S. R. Driver he1e refers, was tl1at long
maintain the literal accuracy of the after the appearance of palaeolithic
narrative in Genesis, supporting it by man a great part of western, central,
what he represented as the testimony and southern Europe, and portions of
of geology. On this it may suffice to northern Africa were temporarily sub-
quote the observations of the late Pro- merged, and that in the vast inundation,
fessor S. R. Driver (The Boqk t?f'Genesz"s, which lie s11pposes to have been of
Tenth Edition, p. 103 note 1 ): ''Sir short duration, some species of animals
]. W. Dawson, in his lifeeting Place ef (as the hippopotamus in S'icily) be-
Geology and History ( 1894), extending, came extinct in the regions \vhich
as it seems, this tl1eory of Professor they fo1n1erly inhabited. The geo-
Prestwich, speaks very confidently (pp. logical evidence on which Sir Joseph
88 f., 130, 148 f., 154 f., 204, 205) of a Prestwich based his tl1eory consisted
great subn1ergence, and accompanying of the \vide diff11sion of what he called
'diluvial catastrophe,' which took place ''rubble drift'' and the deposit of fine
shortly after the close of the glacial earth known as loess, together with
period, and destroyed palaeolithic man, the discovery of many bones of hetero-
and which is identified by him (pp. geneous ani1nals accumulated on heights
155, 205) with the Deluge of Noah. or in caves and crevices, to which, on
An eminent English geologist, Canon 11is view, the animals either fled for
T. G. Bonney, Emerit11s Professor of refuge from the iising flood or were
Geology at University College, Lon- swept after death by the retiring waters.
don, and an ex-President of the Geo- To this temporary submerge11ce of a
logical Society, who has examined Sir considerable part of the Old \Vorld he
J. W. Dawson's a1guments, permits would refer the Biblical story of the
me, however, to say that he considers flood and similar traditions. See (Sir)
this identification to be altogetl1er un- Joseph Prestwich, On Certai1z Phe110-
tenable : he is aware of no eviclence 111ena belo11,l{'ing to the Close of t/ze Last
showing that ' a vast region' of either Geological Period a11d on their Bea1i1zg
Europe or Asia was submerged at the upo1z the Traditio1z ef tlze Flood (Lon-
age spoken of; and even s11pposing don, 1895). The tl1eory has been ex-
that it were so submerged, the flood an1ined and rejected by the Rev. Pro-
thus produced would be many tho11sand fessor T. G. Bonney, who concl11des
years before the time at which, accord- his examination with the worcls : '' Tl1e
ing to the Biblical chrr.lnology, the idea of a 11niversal deluge, or even of
Deluge will have taken place. He closely con11ected b11t local ?eluges ?n
adds that he is acquainted with no a large scale, can11ot, I th111k, claim
geological indications favo11ring tl1e any real sup]JC>rt fron1 .geology.'' See
supposition that a sulimergence, em- T. G. Bo11ney, '' Science and the
bracing certainly Asia, and including Flood,'' 7/ze Exposito1, J 11ne I 903,
in particular Armenia (the 'mo1111tains l)P 456-472.
of Ararat'), and causi11g great destrt1c-
342 THE GREAT FLOO.!J P AJ{'f' I
the1n together ; fo1 the lear11ed men who have made this
surprising discove1y, while they are united in rejecting the
vulgar terrestrial interpretation, are by no means agreed
among themselves as to all the niceties of their high celes-
tial theory. Some of them will have it that the ark is
1
the sun ; another thinl<:s that the ark was the moon, that
the pitch with which it was caulked is a figurative expression
for a lunar eclipse ; and that by the three stories in which
the vessel was built we must understand the phases of the
lunar orb.2 The latest advocate of the lunar theory seeks to
reconcile all contradictions in a higher unity by embarking
the human passengers on board the moon, while he leaves
the animals to do the best they can for tl1emselves among
3
the stars. It would be doing such learned absurdities too
much honour to discuss them seriously. I have noticed
them only fo1 the sal<:e of the hilarity with \vhich they are
calculated to relieve the tedium of a grave and prolonged
discussion.
1'he But when we have dismissed these fancies to their
testin1ony
of geology appropriate limbo, we are still confronted with the question
is opposed of the origi11 of diluvial traditions. Are they true or false?
to the
theory that Did the flood, which the stories so persistently describe, really
our pla11et happen or did it not? Now so far as the narratives speak
has ever
bee11 of floods which covered the whole world, submerging even
covered the highest mountains and drowning almost all men and
with water
cluring tl1e 1 H. Usener, Die Si1itflz1tsage1z myth.
period of (Bonn, 1899); id., '' Zu den Sint- 2 E. Boklen, ''Die Sintftutsage,''
1nan's ftutsage11,'' .lilei11e Schrifte11, iv. (1913) Archiv fur Religio1zS'lvisse1zschaft, vi.
residence pp. 382-398; H. Zimmern and T. 1(. (1903) PlJ 1-61, 97-150.
on earth. Cheyne, in E11cyclopaedia Biblica, s.v. 3 G. Gerland, Der Mytlzus von der
''Deluge,'' vol. i. coll. 1058 sq., 1063 Sintjlztt (Bonn, I 9 I 2 ), pp. I l 7 sqq.
sq. ; H. Zimmern, in E. Schracler's This work contains tl1e ripe result of
Die Keili1zscl1riften ttnd das A lte the author's reflection after many years
Testa111e1it (Berlin, 1902), pp. 555 of incubation. In an earlier and less
sq. The solar theory of diluvial mat11re work he seems to have $hipped.
t1aditions appea1s to l1ave been first Noah on board the sun and his wife on
broached by a German scholar Schir- botird the moon, while he distributed
ren in a worlc called Wanderu1zge1z Shem, 11am, and Japhet and their
der Neztseelander, p11blished in 1856, wives, somewhat at haphazard, among
which I have not seen. Compare the stars. See his exposition in Th.
G. (;erland, in Th. \Vaitz's Antliro- \Vaitz's Anthropologie der Naturviilker,
polo.f{ie der Natztrvolker, vi. (Leipsic, vi. (Leipsic, 1872) pp. 269 sqq. But
I 872), pp. 270 sqq. So far as I am Professor Gerland expresses himself in
aware, the late Professor T. l{. Cheyne both his works so indistinctly that I
is the only English scholar who has cannot feel sure of having grasped his
interpreted the deluge legend as a solar meaning correctly.
CHAP. IV ORIGIN OF STORIES OF A CREA T FLOOD 343
ani1nals, we may pronounce with some confidence that
they are false; for, if the best accredited testimony
,,,
of modern geology can be trusted, no such cataclysm ' '
'
''
'.
has befallen the earth during the period of man's '
'
' -'
--.~
'
abode on it. Whether, as some philosopheis suppose,

a universal ocean covered the whole surface of our planet
long before man had appeared upon it, is quite a different
question. Leibnitz, for example, imagined the earth ''to Philosophi-
have been originally a burning luminous mass, which ever ea! theories
. . . h b of a
s111ce its creation as een undergoing refrigeration. When universal
the outer crust had cooled down sufficiently to allow the ocean primeval
vapours to be condensed, they fell, and formed a universal before the
ocean, covering the loftiest mountains, and investing the ~f~:U~nce
1
whole globe." A similar view of a universal primeval ocean,
formed by the condensation of aqueous vapour while the
originally molten matter of the planet gradually lost its heat,
follows almost necessarily f1om the celebrated Nebular Hypo-

thesis as to the origin of the stellar universe, which \Vas first
2
propounded by Kant and after\vards developed by Laplace.
Lamarcl<, too, '' was deeply impressed with a belief prevalent
amongst the older naturalists that the primeval ocean in-
vested the \vhole planet long after it became the habitation
3
of living beings." But such speculations, even if they
might have occurred to primitive man, are to be clearly
distinguished from stories of a delt1ge which destroyed the
majority of mankind, for these stories presuppose the exist-
ence of tl1e human race on the earth and therefore can hardly
4
refer to a time earlier than the Pleistocene period.
But though stories of such tremendous cataclysms are Many
. 1 f b 1 . . "bl d . d d b bl
almost certain y a u ous, it is possi e an 1n ee pro a e floods maystories of
that under a mythical husk many of them may hide a l<ernel con'.ai_n
of truth ; tl1at is, they may contain reminiscences of inu11da- ~:~~~~s~r
tions which really overtook particular districts, but which in real, but
d" f l d" . h b
passing through the me ium o popu ar tra it1on ave een 11niversal, local, 11ot
inunda-
1 Sir Charles Lyell, P1inczples of water would see1n to l1ave l)een .~re- tions.
Geology, Twelfth Edition, i. 39 ceded by a tiniversal ocean of bo1l111g
2 T. H. Huxley, '' Geological lava. See W. J. Sollas, The Age of
form,'' Collected EssaJ1.r, iv. 320 the Eaitlz (Lor1don, 1905), IJP. 5 sq.
sqq. ; (Sir) J. W. Dawson, Tlie Story 3 Sir Cha1Ies J,yell, l"1i11ciples of
of the Earth aitd !11'a11 6 ( J,ondon, Geolo._f[y, 'f,velfth Eclition, ii. 2 56.
1880), lJJJ. 4, 8, 12, 14 .rq., 17. On
this !1y1Jotl1esis, the 11nive1sal ocean of 4 See above, lJ 169.
344 THE GREAT FLOOD PART l
Many magnified into world-wide catastrophes. The records of the
instances
of memor-
past abound in instances of great floods which have spread
able floods havoc far and wide ; and it would be strange indeed if the
i11 Holland.
memory of some of them did not long persist among the
descendants of the generation which experienced them. For
examples of sucl1 disastrous deluges we need go no farther
than the neighbot1ring country of Holland, which has suffered

from them again and again. In the thirteenth century ''the
low la11ds alo11g the Vlie, often threatened, at last .sank in
the waves. The German Ocean rolled in upo11 the" inland
The origin Lake of Flevo. The stormy Zuyder Zee began its existence
of the
ZuyderZee. by engulfing thousands of Frisian villages, with all their
population, and by spreading a chasm between l<:indred
peoples. The political, as well as the geographical, con-
tinuity of the land was obliterated by this tremendous deluge.
The Hollanders were cut off from their relatives in the east
by as dangerous a sea as that which divided them from their
1
Anglo- Saxon brethren -in Britain." Again, early in the
sixteenth century, a tempest blowing from the north, drove
the waters of the ocean on the low coast of Zealand more
rapidly than they could be carried off through the Straits of
Dover. The dyl<:es of South Beveland burst, the sea swept
over the land, hundreds of villages were overwhelmed, and a
tract of country, torn from the province, was buried beneath
the waves. South Beveland became an island, and the
stretch of water which divides it from the continent has ever
since been known as '' the Drowned Land." Yet at low tide
the estuary so formed can be forded by seafaring men who
know the ground. During the rebellion which won for
Holland its national independence, a column of Spanish
troops, led by a daring officer, Colonel Mondragon, waded
across the ford by night, with the water breast high, and
relieved a garrison which was beleagured by the rebels in
2
the city of Tergoes.
The grea!t Again, ''towards the end of the year I 57 o, still another
flood of
1570 in and a terrible misfortune descended upon the Netherlands.
Holland. An inundation, more tremendous than any which had yet
. '
1 J. L. Motley, The Rise ef the 2
J. L. Motley, The Rise of the
Dutch Republic, Histo1ical Introduc- Dutch Republic, Part iii. chap. viii.
tion, vi. vol. i. p. 35 (London, 1913). vol. ii. pp. 3 74 sqq. (London, 19~3).

'
been recorded in those annals so prolific in such catastrophes,

now swept the whole coast from Flanders to Friesland. Not
the memorable deluge of the thirteenth century, out of which
the Zuyder Zee was born ; not that in which the waters of
the Dollart had closed for ever over the villages and churches
of Groningen ; not one of those perpetually recurring floods
by which the inhabitants of the Netherlands, year after year,
were recalled to an anxious remembrance of the watery
chaos out of \vhich their fatherland had been created, and
into which it was in daily danger of resolving itself again,
l1ad excited so much terror and caused so much destruction:
A continued and violent gale

from the north-west had long
been sweeping the Atlantic waters into the North Sea, and
had now piled them upon the fragile coasts of the provinces.
The dykes, tasked beyond their strength, burst in every
direction. The cities of Flanders, to a considerable distance
inland, were suddenly invaded by the waters of the ocean.
The whole narrow peninsula of North Holland was in
imminent danger of being swept away for ever. Between
Amsterdam and Meyden, the great Diemer dyke was broken
through in twelve places. The Hand-bos, a bulwark formed
of oaken piles, fastened with metal clamps, moored with iron
anchors, and secured by gravel and granite, was snapped to
pieces like packthread. The 'Sleeper,' a dyke thus called,
because it was usually left in repose by the elements, except
in great eme1gencies, alone held firm, and prevented the
consummation of the catastrophe. Still the ocean poured
in upon the land with terrible fury. Dort, Rotterdam, and
many other cities were, for a time, almost submerged. Along
the coast, fishing vessels, and even ships of larger size, were
floated up into the country, where they entangled themselves
in groves and orchards, or beat to pieces tl1e roofs and walls
of houses. The destruction of life and of property \Vas
enormous throughout the maritime provinces, but in Fries-
land the desolation was complete. There nearly all the
dykes and sluices were dashed to fragments ; tl1e cou11try,
far and wide, converted into an angry sea. The steeples
and towers of inland cities became islands of the ocea11.
Thousands of human beings were swept out of existence in
a few hours. Whole districts of te11itory, \vith all tl1eir
villages, farms and churches, were rent from their places,

borne along by the force of the waves, sornetimes to be
lodged in another part of the country, sometimes to be
entirely engulfed. Multitudes. of men, women, children, of
horses, oxen, sheep, and every domestic animal, were strug-
gling in the waves in every direction. Every boat, and
every article which could serve as a boat, were eagerly seized
upon. Eve1y house was inundated ; even the graveyards
gave up their dead. The living infant in his cradle, and the
long-buried corpse in his coffin, floated side by side. The
ancient flood seemed about to be renewed. Everywhere, upon
the tops of trees, upon the steeples of churches, human beings
were clustered, praying to God for mercy, and to their fellow-
men for assistance. As the' stc1rm at last was subsiding,
boats began to ply in every direction, saving those who were
still struggli11g in the water, picking fugitives from roofs and
tree-tops, and collecting the bodies of those already drovvned.
Colonel Robles, Seigneur de Billy, formerly much hated for
his Spanish or Portuguese blood, made himself very active
in this humane work. By his exertions, and those of the
troops belonging to Groningen, many lives were rescued, and
gratitude replaced the ancient animosity. It was estimated
that at least twenty thousand persons were destroyed in the
province of Friesland alone. Throughout the Netherlands,
one hundred thousand persons perished. The damage done
to property, the number of animals engulfed in the sea, were
1
almost incalculable."
In n1any On these and other occasions the floods which have laid
stories tl1e
flood is great tracts of Holland under water have been caused, not
I said to have by heavy rains, but by risings of the sea. Now it is to be
beencaused b
by the
d h . fi d'l . l d' .
o serve t at 1n not a ew 1 uv1a tra 1t1ons the cause alleged
risirig of the for the deluge is in like manner not the fall of rain but an
sea. Sucl1 . . f h
t;iles are

1ncurs1on o t e ocean. Thus we have found a rising of the
~~:1~~~fi~~ ~ea assig11ed. as the cause of th~ flood by t_he natives of the
2 3 4
where islands of Nias, Engano, Rott1, Formosa, Tahiti, 6 Hawaii,'7
0
earthquake-
\Vaves are
1 J. L. Motley, The Rise of the 2 Above, p. 219.
known to
be very Dutch Repteblic, Part iii. chap. v. vol. 3 Above, p. 219.
destructive. ii. pp. 285-287. These events took 4 Above, p. 223.
place on the first and second of 6 Above, p. 227.
November 1570. So sho1t a time 6 Above, pp. 242 sqq.
sufficed to catlse so great a rtlin. 7 Above, p. 245.
CHAP. Iv ORIGIN OF STORIES OF A GREAT .fi'LOOD 347
1 2
Ral<aanga, and the Pelew Islands, by Indian tribes on the
west coast of America from Tierra del f~uego in the south
3
to Alaska in the north, and by Eskimo on the shores of
4
the Arctic Ocean. The occurrence of such stories far and
wide on the coasts and among the islands of the Pacific is
very significant, for that ocean is subject from t\me to time
to great earthquake-waves, which have often inundated the
very coasts and islands where stories of great floods caused
by the rising of the sea are told. Are we not allowed, nay
compelled, to trace some at least of tl1ese stories to these
inundations as their true cause? All the probabilities seem
to be in favo11r of a causal rather than of an accidental con-
nexion between the two things.
To tal<e instaces of such earthqual{e-waves in the Great
P ac1'fi c, we may notice
h d df 1 1 h' l h earthquake-
t e rea u ea am1t1es w tc 1 . ave waves at
repeatedly overtaken Callao, the seaport of Lima in Peru. Callao in
1687
One of the most fearful of which we have any account '
happened on the 2oth of October 1687. The earthquake
'' began at four in the morning, with the destruction of several
publick edifices and houses, whereby great numbers of persons
perished ; but this was little more than a presage of what
\Vas to follo\v, and preserved the greatest part of the inhabit-
ants from being buried under the ruins of . the city. The
shock was repeated at six in the morning with such im-
petuous concussions, that whatever had withstood the first,
was now laid in ruins ; and the inhabitants thought them-
selves very fortunate in being only spectators of the general
devastation from the streets and squares, to which they had
directed their flight on the first warning. During this second
concussion the sea retired considerably from its bounds, and
returning in mountainous waves, totally overwhelmed Callao,
and the neighbouring parts, together with the miserable
inhabitants." u The same wave which submerged the city
carried ships a league into the cou11try, and drowned man
6
and beast for fifty leagues along the shore.
1 Above, p. 249. translated from tl1e original S1)anish by
2 Above, p. 253. Jol1n Adams, Fifth Edition (London,
3 Above, pp. 262, 270, 271, 273, l 807), ii. 82.
288, 313 sq., 317 sq., 320, 327.
4 AlJove, p. 327. o Sir Cl1arles Lyell, The Pri11cip!es
r, I)cJn c;eorge Jua11 <tn(l I)on A11- efGeolocliY, Twelfth Edition ( Lo11don,
tonio de Ulloa, Voyageto.S'ozttlt At11e1ita, 1875), ii. 157.
THE GREAT FLOOD PAR'!' I
(i1e<lt Again, on the 28th of October I 7 46, Callao was over-

eaithquake- whelmed by another earthquake and another sea-wave. ''At
waves at
Callao in half: an hour after ten at night, five hours and three quarters
1746
before the full of the moon, the concussions began with such
violence, that in little more than tl1ree minutes, the greatest
part, if not all the build~gs, great and small, in the whole
city, were dest1oyed, burying under their ruins those inhabit-
ants who had not made sufficient haste into the streets and
squares; the only places of safety in these terrible con-
vulsions of nature. At length the horrible effects of this
shock ceased : but the tranquillity was of short duration ;
concussions returning \Vith such frequent repetitions, that the
inhabitants, according to the account sent of it, computed
two hundred in the first twenty-four hours. . . . The fort of
Callao, at the very same hour, sunk into the like ruins ; but
what it suffered from the earthqual<:e in its buildings, \Vas
inconsiderable, when compared with the terrible catastrophe
which followed ; for tl1e sea, as is usual on such occasions,
receding to a considerable distance, returned in mountai11ous
waves foaming with the violence of the agitation, and sud-
denly turned Callao, and the neighbouring count1y, into a sea.
This was not, however, totally performed by the first swell
of the waves; for the sea retiring further, returned with still
more impetuosity; the stupendous water covering both the
\Valls and other buildings of the place; so that whatever had
. escaped the first, was no\v totally over\vhelmed by those
terrible mountains of waves ; and nothing remained except
a piece of the wall of the fort of Santa Cruz, as a memorial
of this te1rible devastation. There \Vere then twenty-three
ships and vessels, great and small, in the harbour, of which
nineteen were absolutely sunk, and the other four, among
which was a frigate called St. Fer11zin, carried by the force
of the waves to a great distance up the country. This terrible
inundation extended to other ports on the coast, as Cavallos
and Guanape ; and the towns of Chancay, Guara, and the
valleys della Baranca, Sape, and Pativilca, . underwent the
same fate as the city of Lima. The number of persons who
perished in the ruin of that city, before the 3 I st of the same
month of October, according to the bodies found, amounted
to I 300, besides the maimed and wounded, many of which

CHAP. IV ORIGIN OF STORIE.5' OF A GREAT FLOOD 349

' .
lived only a short time in torture. At Callao, where the
number of inhabitants amounted to about 4000, two hundred
only escaped ; and twenty-t\vo of these by means .of the
above-mentioned fragment of a wall. According to an
account sent to Lima after this accident, a volcano in Lucanas
burst forth the same night and ejected such quantities of
water, that the whole country was overflowed ; and in the
mountain near Patas, called Conversiones de Caxamarquilla,
three other volcanoes burst, discharging frightful torrents of
1
water." From the last part of the foregoing account it
appears that a flood of water may be caused by the eruption
of a volcano alone.
More recent observations have proved that the oceanic These
'
disturbances set up by great earthquakes are not necessarily earthquake-
\vaves are
limited to a short stretch of coast, but that they may sometimes
be propagated in the form of huge waves across the ~~~~~~~~ed
whole breadth of the Pacific. For example, on the wide areas
. d .
2 3 r d o f D ecem b er I 8 5 4, S 1mo a 1n
J d d of the
apan was evastate Pacific,
by an earthquake, and the waves to which it gave rise
crossed the North Pacific Ocean and bioke on the coast
of California. Again, a violent shock of earthquake

occurred near Arica, on tl1e coast of Peru, on the I 3th
of August 1 868, and .the agitation which it created in
the sea was felt north and south along the west coast of
America; the waves rose in wild turmoil for several days
about the Sand,vich Islands, and broke '
on the Samoan
Islands, the east coast of Aust1alia, New Zealand, and the
Chatham Islands. The French frigate Nereide, bound at the
time for Cape Horn, encountered in latitude 5 1 S. great
packs of jagged icebergs, freshly brol.;:en off, which the mighty
flood had set free as it penetrated beneath the Antarctic ice.
Again, during the earthquake which befell Iquiqt1e ii1 Peru
on the 9th of May I 8 7 7, the Pacific Ocean rose in great
waves on the opposite coast from Kamtchatka and Ja pan in
the north to New Zealand and the Chatham Islands in tl1e
south. At the Samoan Islands the waves \Vere fiom six to
'
twelve feet high ; in J apa'n the sea rose and fell fio1n five to
ten feet l in New Zealand the .waves varied from three to
l Ulloa, Voya,r;e to So11th Ai1te17'ca, translated 1Jy Jol111 Acla111s, li'iftl1 Eclition
(I,ondon, 1807), ii. 83 sq.
350 PART I
1
twenty feet in height. Indeed, on the coasts of South
America and Japan these earthquake waves are often more
destructive and therefore more dreaded than the earthquakes
2
themselves. In Japan, which is subject to very frequent
movements of the earth, regular calendars of earthquakes are
kept, and from them we learn that the eastern coasts of the
country have often been devastated by sea waves which have
carried off from one thousand to one hundred thousand of
the people. On the night of I 5th June I 896, for example,
such a wave swept over the north-west coast of Nipon for
a length of seventy miles, causing a loss of nearly thirty
thousand lives. At one place four steamers were carried
inland, whilst a hundred and seventy-six vessels of various
sorts lined the foot of the hills. Indeed, the ancient capital
of Japan, which once numbered a million of inhabitants and
included the palace of a Shogun, had to be abandoned in
consequence of the inundations which broke over it from the
sea in the years I 369 and I 494. The site is now occupied
by tl1e quiet village of Kamakura, sheltered by sand dunes
and crooked pines. Only a gigantic bronze image of Buddha,
fifty feet high, cast more than six centuries ago, rises in
solemn majesty and peace to attest the grandeur that has
3
passed away.
In the On coasts where the shock of an earthquake is commo11ly

Pa~ific accompanied or followed by an inroad of the sea, it is natural
native
traditions that the first impulse of the natives, on feeling the concussion,
of floods
may often
should be to take refuge on a height where they may be safe
4
e1nbody

from the dreaded rush of the water. Now we have seen
reminis-
cences of
that the Araucanian Indians of Chili, who have a tradition of
the_ devas- a great deluge at1d fear a repetition of the disaster, fly for
tat1on r h h r 1 1 h
caused by saiety to a mountain w en t ey 1ee a v10 ent s ock of earth-
5
earthquake- quake; and that the Fijians, who have likewise a tradition
waves.
1 Eduard Suess, The Face Of the the waters, and this is so well known
Earth, translated by Hertha B. Sollas, i. to pn;cede the inrush of large waves,
(Oxford, 1904) pp. 18 sq. ; John Milne, that many of the inhabitants in South
Earthquakes and other Earth Move- ~merica have used it as a timely ,varn-
11ients (London, 1886), pp. 168-170. 1ng to escape towards the hills and
2 J. Milne, Earthqztakes and other save themselves from the terrible re-
Earth Moveinents, p. 166; id., Seis- action which, on more than one occa-
molo._i{y (London, 1898), p. 191. , sion, has so quicl;:ly followed'' (J.
3 J. Milne, Seisniology, pp. 191-193. Milne, Earthqztakes and other Earth
4 ''The first movement which is Move1ne1its, p. l 66 ).
usually observed is a drawing back of 5 Above, p. 262.
CHAP. Iv ORIGIN OF STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 351
,,.
of a calamitous flood, used to keep canoes in readiness against
the recu1rence of a similar inundation. 1 Taking all these
facts into account we may accept as reasonable and probable
the explanation which the distinguished American ethnologist,
Horatio Hale, gave of the Fijian tradition of a deluge. Com-
menting on the statement that the Fijians formerly kept canoes
ready against a repetition of the flood, he writes as follows : -
''This statement (which we heard from others in the It is thus
same terms) may induce us to inquire \vhether there might that Horatio
.
not have been some occurrence in the actual history of the Hale
}an d s t o give
is
rise to t h'is tra d 1t1on,
an d t h e custom here texplained
h. F ...
e 111an
mentioned. On the 7th of November I 837, the Pacific tradition of
. a great
0 cean was t raverse d f rom east to west by an immense wave, flood.
which, taking its rise with the shock of an earthquake in
Chili, was felt as far as the Bonin Islands. At the Sandwich
Islands, according to the account given by Mr. Jarvis in his
History, p. 2 I, the water rose, on the east coast of Hawaii,

twenty feet above high-water mark, inundated the low lands,
swept away several villages, and destroyed many lives.
Similar undulations have been experienced at these islands
on several occasions. If we suppose (what is no way im-
probable) that, at some time withi11 the last three or fou1
thousand years, a wave of twice this height crossed the ocean,
and swept over the Vitian [Fijian J Islands, it must have
submerged the whole alluvial plain on the east side of Viti-
levu, the most populous part of the group. Multitudes would
no doubt be destroyed. Others would escape in their canoes,
and as Mbengga is a mountainous island, in the neighbour-
hood of this district, it would naturally be the place of refuge
2
for many."
A similar explanation would obviously apply to the A si1nilar
other legends of a great flood recorded in the islands of the explanati n1ay app1y
on
Pacific, for all these islands have probably suffered in lil<e to other
manner from the invasion of huge earthquake-waves. 3 At ~~~~:toiies
3 This is the view also of the e1ninent l'a.cific.
1 Above, p. 240. llo\\ever, it is to
be observed that the cause assigned by Austrian geologist, I'rofessor E. Suess.
.the Fijians for the flood seems to have 1-Ie says, ''That acco1111ts <)f great
been heavy rain rather tha11 a rising of floods sl1011](] ])e 1net \vitl1 even in tl1e
the sea. most remote isla11cls is, I tl1ink, ren-
2 lioratio 1-Iale, U11ite1l States Ex- dered easily intelligilile 11y tl1e i11for-

plor1:n!( Exped1:tio11, Eth110,i:raphy a11d mat1011 concern111g se1sn11c sea-waves
J.>hi!o!ogy (Philadelphia, 1846), P 55 which has Lec11 collected witl1in tl1e last
352 THE GREAT FLOOJJ PAR1' I

least, in the present state of our knowledge, it seems safer

to accept provisionally the view of the eminent American
ethr1ologist than to adopt the theory of an eminent German
ethnologist, who would explain all these Polynesian traditions
1
as solar, lunar, and stellar myths.
Other flood If some of the traditions of a great flood caused by a
stoiies nlay rising of the sea may thus rest on an historical basis, there
e1nbody
reminis- can be no reason why some of the traditions of a great flood
~~~~:~ caused by heavy rain should not be equally well fourtded.
inundations Here in England we who live in flat parts of the country
caused
heavy raiiby are f;am11iar wit
. h loca 1 fl oo d s pro d uce d b y t h'
1s cause ; not
1
1nany years ago, for example, large tracts of Norfolk, includ-

ing the city of Norwich, were laid under water by a sudden
and violent fall of rain, resembling a cloudburst. A similar
cause inundated the low-lying parts of Paris a few years ago,
creating anxiety and alarm not only among the inhabitants,
but among the friends of the beautiful city in all parts of
'
the world. It is easy to understand how among an ignorant

and unlettered population, whose intellectual horizon hardly
extends beyond the limits of their vision, the memory of a
similar catastrophe, orally transmitted, might in the course
of a few generations grow into the legend of a universal
deluge, from which only a handful of favoured individuals
had contrived in one way or another to escape. Eve11 the
tradition of a purely local flood, i11 which many people had
been drowned, might unconsciously be exaggerated into vast
dimensions by a European settler or traveller, who received
it from savages and interpreted it in the light of the Noachian
deluge, with which he himself had been familiar from child- -
l1ood. For instance, we have seen that stories of a great

flood are reported to be told by the Indians of Guiana. On
this subject it is well to bear in mind the caution given us
by Sir Everard F. Im Thurn, who knows these Indians well.
, ''The calamity to which an I11dian is perhaps most exposed
is to be driven from 11is home by a sudden rise in the river
decade or so. ln some of tl1ese tradi- and of the lower parts of great river
tions it is expressly stated that the flood valleys '' (The Face ef the Earth, i.
was produced by the sea. Such seismic 20).
floods are, according to our present 1
G. Gerland, in Th. Waitz's Anthro-
knowledge, only lil,ely to occur in the po!ogie der f\7aturvo'lker, vi. (Leipsic,
case of islands, of low-lying coast-land, 1872) pp. 269 sqq.
CHAP. 1v ORIGIN OF STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD '
353
and consequent flooding of the whole forest. His way to
escape is to get into his canoe with his family and his live
stock, and to seek temporarily some higher ground, or, as
sometimes happens, if none such can be found, the whole
party lives as best they may in the canoe until the waters
disappear from the face of the earth. It is well known how
in all countries the proverbial 'oldest inhabitant' remembers
and tells of the highest flood that ever happened. When
therefore the Indian tells in his simple language the tradition
of the highest flood which covered all the small world known
to him, and tells how the Indians escaped it, it is not difficult
'
to realise that the European hearer, theologically prejudiced
in favour of Noah, his flood, and his ark, is apt to identify
the two stories with each other, and with many similar stories
1
from many parts of the world.''
In this manner it has been proposed to explain the The
. an d H eb rew' tra d"itions
B a b y lonian . o f a great fl ood b y the and
Babylonian
inundations to which the lower valley of the Euphrates and Heb~~w

1s
T 1gris annua 11y expose d b y t h e h eavy rains
d l . trad1t1ons
an me ting of a great
snows in the mountains of Armenia. '' The basis of the flood have
been thus
story," we are told, '' 1s the yearly phenomenon of the rainy explained
and stormy season which lasts in Babylonia for several months
and during which time whole districts in the Euphrates
Valley are submerged. Great havoc was caused by the rains
and storms until the perfection of canal systems regulated
the overflo\v of the Euphrates and Tigris, when what had
been a curse was converted into a blessing and brought about
that astonishing fertility for which Babylonia becan1e famous.
The Hebrew story of the Deluge recalls a particularly
destructive season that had made a profound impression,
and the comparison with the parallel story found on clay
tablets of Ashurbanapal's library confirms this view of the
2
local setting of the tale."
On this hypothesis, the great flood \Vas brot1ght about Tl1is vie\v
. d 3 . I accords
by an unusually heavy fa II o f rain an snow; it was on Y \vitJ1 the
alleged
1 (Sir) Everard F. Im Thurn, An101ig 3 Sir Francis Y 011ngl111s !1ancl has, cause of
the I1idians of Guiana (Lonclo11, 1883), from perso11al observl1tion, s11ggested tl1e flood,
l) 37 5. to me that tl1e reg11larly 1eeur1ing
2 M. Jastrow, .l-Iebrew a11d Baby- effects of rain and sno\v 1nay have
!01ii'an T1'a(litio11s (Lonclon, I 9 I 4), pp. lJeen accidentally aggravated by the
37 sq.; compare id., pp. 322 sq. , bursting of a cla1n which 11ad been
VOL. I 2A
an extraordinary case of an ordinary occurrence, and the

widespread devastation which it wrought in the valley im-
printed it indelibly on the memory of the survivors and of
their descendants.
In favour of this view it may be said
that in the Babylonian and the oldest form of the Hebrew
1
tradition the only alleged cause of the deluge is heavy rain.
The theory The theory may also be supported by the dangerous
is~so
supported inundations to which the country is still yearly lia e
bl
by the through the action of the same natural causes. When
~;;::~tions Loftus, the first excavator of the ancient city of Erech,
to which arrived in Baghdad, on the 5th of May I 849, he found the
the valleys
of the
h l l . . f h h
w o e popu at1on in a state o t e utmost appre ens1on an d
EudphTr~te~ alarm. In consequence of the rapid melting of the snows
an 1gr1s
are still on the. Kurdish mountains, and the enormous influx of water
subject. from the Euphrates through the Seglawiyya canal, the Tigris
had risen that spring to the unprecedented height of twenty-
two and a half feet; which was about five feet above its
highest level in ordinary years and exceeded the great rise
of I 8 3 I, when the river broke down the walls and destroyed
no less than seven thousand dwellings in a single night, at
a time when the plague was committing the most fearful
ravages among the inhabitants. A few days before the
arrival of the English party, the Turkish pasha of Baghdad
had summoned the whole population, as one man, to guard
against the general danger by raising a strong high mound
com,pletely round the \Valls. . Mats of reeds were placed
outside to bind the earth compactly together. The water
was thus prevented from devastating the interior of the city,
though it filtered through the fine alluvial soil and stood
several feet deep in the cellars. Outside the city it reached
to within two feet of the top of the bank. On the side of
forn1ed by a landslip in the mountains. then the plains of the Punjab were
He writes : '' In the Hi1nalayas there flooded. I thought a big mountain
is often a mountain slide which blocks slip of this kind in the Armenian ranges
up a rive1 for some time and forms a might have caused the Flood, and the
lake till this temporary dam suddenly bursting of the dam might have coin-
gives way and the pent-up waters rush cided with heavy rains.'' His letter is
down and cause a flood in the plains dated Mill Cottage, Wimbledon Com-
below. I have known the Indus rise mon, S.W., January 7th, 1917.
40 feet near Gilgit, at the back of 1
Above, p. l 39,. and below, pp.
Kashmir, through one of its tributaries 357 sq.
having been blocked in this way, and
the river the houses alone, many of them very old and frail,
prevented the ingress of the flood. It was a critical juncture;
Men were stationed night and day to watch the barriers.
If the dam or. any of the foundations had failed, Baghdad
must have been bodily washed away. Happily the pressure
was \vithstood, and the inundation gradually subsided. The
country on all sides for miles was under water, so that there
was no possibility of proceeding beyond the dyke, except in
'the boats which were established as ferries to keep up com-
munication across the flood. The city was for a time an
island in a vast inland sea, and it was a full month before
the inhabitants could ride beyond the walls. As the summer
advanced, the evaporation from the stagnant \Vater caused
malaria to such an extent that, out of a population of
seventy thousand, no less than twelve thousand died of
fever. 1
If the floods caused by the melting of the snow in the ?imilar_
. . h d h . . . h . 1nundat1ons
A rmen1an mountains can t us en anger t e c1t1es in t e river probably
valley down to modern times, it is reasonable to suppose occ~r~d in
that they did so in antiquity also, and that the Babylonian antiquity.
tradition of the destruction of the city of Shurippak in such
an inundation may be well founded. It is true that the city
appears to have ultimately perished by fire rather than by
2
water ; but this is quite consistent with the supposition that
at some earlier time it had been destroyed by a flood and
afterwards rebuilt.
However, the theory which would explain the Baby- Ye~ Eg_ypt,
H b d' f
Ionian and e rew tra 1t1on o a great oo . ft d b h . d which ts
y t e 1nun a- similarly
tions to which the country is annually exposed, may be flooded
every year,
combated by an argument drawn from the analogy of Egypt. has no
For Egypt from time immemorial has been similarly subject atradition great
of
to yearly inundations ; yet it has never, so far as we know, flood.
either evolved a flood legend of its own or accepted the
flood legend of its great Oriental rival. If annual floods
sufficed to produce the legend in Babylonia, why, it may
be asked, did not the same cause produce the same effect
in Egypt?
To meet this difficulty a different explanation of the
1 W. K. Loftus, Travels a1id Re- (London, 1857), PP 7 sq.
2
searches in Chalrlaea and Susiana Above, P 125.

'
Suess's Babylonian story has been put forward in rece11t years by

theory an eminent geologist, Professor Eduard Suess of Vienna.
that the
Babylonia11 Regarding the regular annual changes in the basin of the
flood was
caused or Euphrates as insufficient to accot1nt for the legend, he has
aggravated recourse to irregular or catastrophic causes. He points out
by an
earthquake that ''there are other peculiarities of the Euphrates valley
and a which may occasionally tend to exacerbate the evils attendant
typhoon.
on the inundations. It is very subject to seismic disturb-
ances; and the ordinary consequences of a sharp earthquake
shock might be seriously complicated by its effect on a broad
sheet of water. Moreover the Indian Ocean lies within the
region of typhoons ; and if, at the height of an inundation,
a hurricane from the south-east swept up the Persian Gulf,
driving its shallow 'vaters upon the delta and damming back
the outflow, perhaps for hundreds of miles up- stream, a
diluvial catastrophe, fairly up to the mark of Hasisadra's,
1
might easily result.''
In support Thus Professor Suess would supplement and reinforce
of this h . . 1
theory he t e comparative y sow an 1 d 1 f . b
gent e pressure o rain y t e h
appeals to sudden and violent shock of an eartl1quake and the bursting
theHebrew
tradition. f h d f h
o a typ oon ; an in support o t ese two catastrop 1c h'
causes he appeals to two. features in the Hebrew version of
the flood story ; or rather to-
one feature which actually occurs
in that version, and to another which he would import into
it by altering the text so as to suit his hypothesis. We
will consider each of his arguments separately.
He First, in regard to the earthquake, Profes.sor Suess points
:~;f~~es out that in the Hebrew narrative one cause alleged for the
earthquake delt1ge is the breaking out of subterranean waters. 2 ''This
caused sub- . f . . f f
terranean rising o great quant1t1es o water rom the de,ep," he says,
water to '' is a phenomenon which is a characteristic accompaniment
burst forth. .
of earthquakes 1n the alluvial districts of great rivers. The
subterranean wate1 is contained in the recent deposits of the
g1eat plains on both sides of the stream, and its upper limit
rises to right and left above the mean level of the river its
elevation increasing in proportion to the distance from ' the
1
T. H. Huxley, '' 1-Iasisadra's length in his work, The Face of the
Adventure,'' Collected Essays, iv. 246 Earth, vol. i. (Oxford, 1904) pp.
sq. Thus clearly and concisely does 17-72.
Huxley sum up the theory which Pro-
fessor E. Suess expounds at great 2 Genesis vii. I I, viii. 2

CHAP. xv ORIGIN.OF STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 357
.river. What lies beneath this limit is saturated and mobile ;

the ground above it is dry and friable. When seismic
oscillations occur in a district of this kind the brittle upper
layer of the ground splits open in long clefts, and from these
fissures the underground water, either clear or as a mt1ddy
mass, is violently ejected, sometimes in great volumes, some-
times in isolated jets several yards high." 1 For example, Instances
the young alluvial land about the Danube in Wallachia was oftsbucht ou urs s
rent by an earthquake in I 8 3 8, and from the fissures water of sub-
many p I aces i:iat h oms h"tg h . Th e same t h'1ng terranean
spou t ed ou t 1n water
happened when the alluvial plain of the Mississippi, a little during
. earth-
be Iow t h e confluence of the Ohio, was convulsed by an earthquakes.
quake in January I 8 I 2: the water that had filled the sub-
terranean cavities forced a passage for itself and blew up the
earth with loud explosions, throwing up an enormous quan-
tity of carbonized wood in jets from ten to fifteen feet high,
while at the same time the surface of t.he ground sank, and
a black liquid rose as high as a horse's belly. Again, in
January I 86 2 a violent shock of earthquake affected the
whole region south of Lake Baikal,. and in particular the
delta of the river Selenga which flows into the lake. In
the town of Kudara the wooden lids of the fountains were
shot into the air like corks from champagne bottles, and
springs of tepid water rose in places to a height of more
than twenty feet. So terrified were the Mongols that
they caused the Lamas to perform ceremonies to appease
the evil spirits which, as they imagined, were shaking the
2
earth.
On this it is to be observed that the reference to sub- But the
reference
terranean waters as one cause of the deluge occurs only 1n to sub-
the Hebrew version of the legend, and even there it is found terran:an
. \vater 1n
only in the later I)riestly narrative : it does not occur tn the tl1e Hebrew
earlier Jehovistic narrative, nor in the still earlier Babylonian seemstraditioii b
to e
version ; 3 nor finally, is it found in the original Sumerian a late
' addition.
I E. S11ess, The Face of the Earth, translates '' tl1e A111111nal<i ca11secl floocls
i. 3 r. to rise,'' s111)1)osing the r\nun11al.;:i to be
i E. Suess The Face of the Earth, ''the spirits of the dee1), c>f the great
i. 3 I sq. ' subterranean wate1s '' ( T'/ze fi'ace of the
a Professor Suess, indeed, discovers Eaith, i. 3 I). B11t the l)etter transla-
a reference to s11bterranean waters in a tion of that j)assage seen1s to be '' tl1e
passage of the Babylonian legend which, Anunnal<i lifted 111) flan1i~g torcl1es ;
following Professor Paul I-Iaupt, he (so P. Jensen, A. Jeren11as, L. 'W .

THE GREAT FLOOD PAR'l' I

legend from which both the Babylonian and the Hebrew

stories are derived. Accordingly it may be dismissed as a
' late addition to the legend on which it would be unsafe to
build any hypothesis.
Suess's So much for the earthquake; next for the typhoon,
theory
that the
which Professor Suess would also extract from the Biblical
flood \\as narrative. He supposes that while the valley of the Euphrates
~:~~~d by was .still rocking under an earthquake, a great sea-wave,
a typhoon driven by a hurricane up the Persian Gulf, suddenly swept
rests on an . . h l d 1
alterationof over t e an , comp et1ng t e
h d f h
estruct1on o t e . oome d d
the Hebrew cities and their miserable inhabitants. This tremendous
text, which ffi h 1 b 1 h 1
is not e ect e produces very s1mp y y a ter1ng t e vowe -points
accepted by of the Hebrew text in two passages so as to read '' the
modern ,1
scholars. flood from the sea '' instead of ''the flood of waters.' The
textual change, it is true, is very slight, for it extends only to
the vowel-points and leaves the consonants unaffected. But
though the vowel-points form no part of the original text
of the Scriptures, having been introduced into it not
earlier than the sixth century of our era, they are not
to be lightly altered, since they represent the traditional
pronunciation of the sacred

words, as it had been handed
down with scrupulous care, generation after generation, by a
guild of technically trained scholars, the Massorets, as they
were called, who ''devoted themselves to preserving not only
the exact writing of the received consonantal text, but the
exact pronunciation and even the musical cadence proper to
every word of the sacred text, according to the rules of the
2
synagogal chanting." Hence the proposed emendatio11 in
the two verses of Genesis has been rightly rejected by the
King, W. Muss-Arnolt, M. J astrow, P. Testa111e1zt in theJewish Chztrch, Second

Dhorme, A. Ungnad, l~. W. Rogers). Edition (London and Edinbt1rgh, I 892 ),
See above, p. I I 5. Hence the ieference p. 58. As to tlie l\1assorets and their
must be to some phenomena not of water work, see W. R. Smith, op. cit. pp.
but of light, perhaps to flashes of light- 58-60. On the other hand Renan
ning, as Jensen and Dhorme suggest. while he agreed as to the date of th~
See P. Jensen, Assy1z'scl1-Babylonische in_troduction of the vowel-points, in-
Mythen u1zd Epen, p. 580; P. Dhorme, clined to attribute their invention, not
Choz"x de Textes Religieux Assyro- to the Massorets, but to a class of
Babyloni'ens, p. I 10. doctors called Saboreans, who resided
1 Genesis vi. I 7 and vii. 6, reading in Babylonia rather than 1in Palestine.
0:9 for c:i;i (niiyani for 1nayi11i). See E. Renan, Histoire Generate des
Langues Sen1itiques, Premiere Partie 5
2 W. Robertson Smith, The Old {Paris, 1878), pp. I 70 sq,
CHAP, Iv ORIGIN OF STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 359
.
1
best recent scholars, and with it the appeal to the Hebrew
text for evidence of the marine origin of the great flood must
be dismissed as unfounded. .
It does not of course follow that Professor Suess's theory It seems

is false because the arguments by which he supports it are ;~~~'lble
feeble. Fortunately for the world many a sound conclusion that the
is reached from inadequate or even totally irrelevant pre- :~~~ ~v~:n.
1
mises, otherwise it is to be feared that for most men the caused by

chances of ever arriving at the truth would be infinitesimal. ~~~ ~y
1
If the Biblical narrative rests, as seems probable, on a basis irregular

of fact, it is quite possible that the great flood which .it ~rno~~~tas
describes may actually have. been produced by an earthquake causes.
or a typhoon, or by both combined. But the theory that
it was so produced derives extremely little support from the
only authorities open to us, the Hebrew, Babylonian, and
Sumerian traditions ; hence it hardly amounts to more than
a plausible conjecture. On a simple calculation of chances,
it seems likely that the catastrophe was brought about
by forces which are known to act regularly every year on
the Euphrates valley, and to be quite capable of producing
widespread inundations, rather than by assumed forces which,
though certainly capable of causing disastrous floods, are not ,
historically known to hav.e ever done so in that region ; for,
apart from the supposed references in Semitic tradition, I
am aware of no record of a Babylonian deluge caused either
by an earthquake-wave or by a typhoon.
On the whole, then, there seems to be good reason for J\1any .
thinking that some and probably many diluvial traditions ~~~r:~ns
are merely exaggerated reports of floods which actually are
occurred, whether as the result of heavy rain, earthquake- ~~~~~~~
waves, or other ,causes. All such traditions, therefore, are atedreports
of real
partly legendary and partly mythical : so far as they pre- floods; b11t
serve reminiscences of floods which really happened, they are others seem
"b . l d l h" h to be purely
legendary ; so far as they d escr1 e un1versa e uges w 1c mythical.
never happened, they are mythical. But in our survey of
diluvial traditions we found some stories which appear to be
1 A. Dillmann, H. G11nkel, ancl J. the Hebrew text (Biblia I:lebraita,
Skinner, in their commentaries, ex- l'art i., Leipsic, 1905, p. 8) I{. IZittel
plicitly; S. R. Driver, W. H. Bennett, cuts the !{not by rejecting the words
a11<l lI. E. Ryle, in their commentaries, cg as a gloss, tl111s eraclicating the last

implicitly. In his critical edition of trace of an arg11111ent for a typhoon.
THE GREAT FLOOD , PAR1' I
purely mythical, that is, to describe inundations which never
took place. Such,_ for example, are the Samothracian and

Thessalian stories of great floods which the Greeks associated
with the names of Dardanus and Deucalion. The Samo-

thracian story is probably nothing but a false inference from
-
the physical geography of the Black Sea and its outlets, the
Bosphorus and Dardanelles: the Thessalian story is probably
nothing but a false inference from the physical geography of
t_he mountain-ringed Thessalian basin a11d its outlet, the gorge
1
of Tempe. In like manner the stories which describe the
miraculous desiccation of the upland valleys of Cashmeer and
Bogota are probably nothing but false_ inferences from the
2
- natural configuration of these mountain-girt basins. Such
stories, therefore, are not legendary but purely mythical :
they describe catastrophes which never occurred. They are
examples of that class of mythical tales which, with Sir
Edward Tylor, we may call myths of observation, since they
aie suggested by a_ true obse1vation of nature, but err in their
3
interpretation of it.
Among the Ano~her set of diluvial traditions, of which we have found
:~:~:~~f examples, also falls into the class of myths of obse1vation.
floods may These are the stories of a great flood which rest on the
be classed b f fi 1 r d
those which o servat1on o marine oss1 s ioun on mountains or in ot er h
?riginate places remote from the sea. Such tales, as we saw, are told
~~!~:vation by the Mongolians, the Bare'e-speaking people of Celebes,
of n:iar~ne the Tahitians, and the Eskimo and Greenlanders. 4 Being
fossils 1n .
inl_and

based on the false assumption that the sea must formerly
regions. have risen above the heights where the fossils are now found,
they are n11staken inferences, or mytl1s of observation ;
whereas if they had assumed the former depression of these
heights under the level of the sea, they woiild have been
tiue inferences, or anticipations of science.
No reason Thus, while there is reason to believe that many diluvial
to think
that any traditio11s dispersed throughout the world are._ based on re-
diluvial miniscences of catastrophes which actually occurred, there
tradition is
older than is no good ground for holding that any such traditions are
a few older than a few thousand years at most ; \vherever they
thousand
1
years. See above, pp. 167 sqq., 171 sqq. into the Ea1-ly Hz'story of Mankitid,
2 See above, pp. 20 5 sqq., 2 68. Third Edition (London, 1878), pp.
3
306 sqq. .
(Sir) Edward B. Tylor, Researches 4
Above, pp. 217, 222, 245, 327 sq.
c1rAr. rv ORIGIN OF STORIES OF A GREAT FLOOD 361
appear to desc1ibe vast changes in the pl1ysical configuration

of the globe, which must be refer1ed to more or less remote
epocl1s of geologic time, they probably embody, not the
record of conte1nporary vvitnesses, but the speculation of
1nuch later thinl.;:ers. Co1npared 'vith tl1e great natural
featu1es of our planet, man is but a thing of yeste1day, and
11is memory a dream of tl1e nigl1t.

'
CHAPTER V

THE TO\VER 01'' BABEL
'
Theauthors AMONG the problems \vhich beset any inquiry into the early
of Genes.is history of mankind the question of the origin of language is
say nothing .
as to the at the same time one of the most fascinating and one of the
origin of
language,
most difficult. The writers whose crude speculations on
but they human origins are embodied in the early chapters of Genesis
~?'P:~in the have given us no hint as to the mode in which they sup-
diveisity of posed man to have acquired the most important of all the
tongues. endowments which mark him off from the beasts the gift
of articulate speech. On the contrary they seem to have
assumed that this priceless faculty was possessed by him
from the beginning, nay that it was shared with him . by the
animals, if we may judge by the example of the talking
serpent in Eden. However, the diversity of languages
spoken by the various r;:i.ces of men naturally attracted the
attention of the ancient Hebrews, and they explained it by
the fallowing tale.
Thestoryof In the early days of the world all mankind spoke the
~~eB~~~er same language. Journeying from the east as nomads in one

1
. a11d the huge caravan, they came to the great plains of Shinar or
confusion l
oftongues. Baby on1a, and there they settled. They built their houses
of bricks, bound together with a mortar of slime, because
stone is rare in the alluvial soil of these vast swampy flats .
.But not content with building themselves a eity, they pro-
posed to construct out of the same materials a tower so high
that its top should reach to heaven ; this they did in order
to make a name for themselves, and also to prevent the
1 Genesis xl. 2, c1~.t.? literally, ''from east.'' But see Principal J. Skinner,
the east.'' The words are sometimes Comnze1ztary on Genesis, p. 225.
translated '' eastward'' or '' in the
362 '
CHAI'. V THE TOWER OF BABEL
citizens from being scattered over the face of the whole

earth. For when any had wandered from the city and lost
his way on the boundless plain, he would look back west-
ward and see afar off the outline of the tall tower standing
up dark against the bright evening sky, or he would look
eastward and behold the top of the tower lit up by the last
rays of the setting sun. So he;would find his bearings, and
guided by the landmark would retrace his steps homeward.
Their scheme was good, but they failed to reckon with the
jealousy and power of the Almighty. For while they were
building away with all their might and main, God came
down from heaven to see the city and the tower which
men were raising so fast. The sight displeased him, for he
said, '' Behold, they are one people, and they have all one
language ; and this is what they begin to do : and now
nothing will be withholden from them, which they purpose
to do." Apparently he feared that when the tower reached
the sky, men would swarm up it and beard him in his den,
a thing not to be thought o( So he resolved to nip the
great project in the bud. '' Go to," said he to himself, or to
his heavenly counsellors, '' let us go down, and there confound
their language, that they may not understand one another's
speech." Down he went accordingly and confounded their
language and scattered them over the face of all the earth.
Therefore they left off to build the city and the tower ; and
the name of the place was called Babel, that is, Confusion,
because God did there confound the language of all the
1
earth.
I Genesis xi. 1-9. Compare Jose- by B. Stade that in the original narra-
phus, Antiquit. Jitd. i. 4. 3, o 0 r67roS tive tl1e deity, or his messenger, first
v cji rov 7rvpyov c[iK006.'Y}<rav,11Dv BafSv\wv went clow11 to earth and after inspect-
KaAELTaL oia r+,v <rvyxv<riv TOV 7rEpt r+,v ing the city and tower returned to
oiaAEKTOV 7rpWT011 Evapyovs. 'EfSpa'ioi ')'ap heaven a11d reported wl1at he had seen
r+,11 <rvyxv<riv Baf3\ Ka\ov<riv. In this to the celestial council. . T-he cot1ncil
passage the awkwarcl and scarcely then deliberated on his report, and,
grammatical words rov 7rEpt r+,11 the case being dee111ecl seriot1s, the
oia\EKrov 7rpwro11 evapyovs have tl1e deity as chairman n1ovecl that tl1ey
appearance of a gloss added by a should go clown in a body and .con-
scribe to define r+,v <rvyxv<riv. ~l'he fot1nd the language of n1en. The
plural ve1bs in Genesis xi. 7 ( '' Let us resolution was carried unttnin1ously
go down and confound '' :i??~1 :"!'.].')J) and executed on tl1e spot. On this
suggest that God was conceived to be theory, the polytheistic colot11ing of
not alone but surrounded by inferior the story in its 01iginal for111 was toned
gods or a11gels. It has been argue~! down by the I-Icbrew narrator, wl10
THE TOWER O.F' BABEL l'AR'l' I
Later On the plai11 stuff of this narrative later Jewish tradi-

Je\vish tion has embroidered a rich band of picturesque details.
legends as
to the From them we learn that the enterprise of the tower
Tower of
Babel. was flat rebellion against God, though the rebels were not

at one in their aims. Some wished to scale heaven and
there wage war with the Almighty in person, or set up
their idols to be worshipped in his stead ; others limited
their ambition to the more modest scheme of damaging the
celestial vault by showers of spears and arrows. Many,
many years was the tower in building. It reached so high
that at last a bricklayer took a whole year to ascend to the
top with his hod' on his back. If he fell down and broke
his neck, nobody minded for the man, but everybody wept
for the brick, because it would take a whole year to replace
it on the top of the tower. So eagerly did they work, that
a woman would not interrupt her task of brickmal(ing even
to give birth to a child; she would merely tie the baby in
a sheet round her body and go on moulding bricks as if
nothing had happened. Day and night the work never
slackened ; and from their dizzy height they shot heaven-
\>vard arrows, which returned to them dabbled with blood ;
so they cried, ''We have slain all who are in heaven.'' At
last the long-suffering deity lost patience, and turning to the
seventy angels who encompass his throne, he proposed that
they should all go down and confound the language of men.
No sooner said than done. The misunderstandings which
consequently arose were frequent and painful. One man,
for example, would ask for mortar, and the other would hand
him a brick, whereupon the first, in a rage, would hurl the
bricl( at his mate's head and kill him. Many perished in

this manner, and the rest were punished by God according
to the acts of rebellion which they had meditated. As for
the unfi.Rished tower, a part of it sank into the earth, and
another part was consumed by fire ; only one-third of it
remained standing. The place of the tower has never lost
its peculiar quality. Whoever passes it forgets all he knows. 1
struck out the express mention of the schrift .fur die alttesta11ientliche Wissen-
council of gods or angels, though he scha.ft, xv. (I 89 5) pp. I 57 sqq.
inadvertently left a trace of them in 1 Louis Ginzberg, The Legmds of
the plural verbs of verse 7. See B. the Jews, i. (Philadelphia, 1909) pp.
Stade, ''Der Thurm zu Babel,'' Zez't- 179 sq.
CHAP. V THE TOWER OF BABEL
.
The scene of the legend was laid at Babylon, for Babel is The Tower
only the Hebrew form of the name of the city. The popular of Babel
f , probably a
d er1vat1on rom a Hebrew verb balal (Aramaic balbel) ''to reminis-
confuse''
.
is erroneous; the true meaning '
as shown by the form cencefofh
one o t e
in which the name is written in inscriptions, seems to be '' Gate temple-
o [ G o d '' (B -b z B-b 1 ) 1
a -z or a -ztu . Th e commentators are prob- to\\ers of
Babylonia.
ably right in tracing the origin of the story to the deep
impression produced by the great city on the simple minds
of Semitic nomads, who, fresh from the solitude and silence
of the desert, were bewildered by the hubbub of the streets
and bazaars, dazzled by the shifting kaleidoscope of colour
in the bustling crowd, stunned by the din of voices
jabbering in strange unknown tongues, and overawed by
the height of the buildings, above all by the prodigious
altitude of the temples towering up, terrace upon terrace,
till their glistering tops of ei1amelled bi-ick seemed to touch
the blue sky. No wonder that dwellers in tents should
imagine, that they who scaled the pinnacle of such a
stupendous pile by the long winding ramp, and appeared at
last like moving specks on the summit, must indeed be near
2
the gods.
Of two such gigantic temples the huge mouldering Two such
remains are to be seen at Babylon to this day, and it is rtuined
O\vers a t
probable that to one or other of them the legend of the Babylon.
Tower of Babel was attached. One of them rises among
the ruins of Babylon itself, and still bears the name of
Babil ; the other is situated across the river at Borsippa,
some eight or nine miles away to the south-\vest, and is
IE. Schrader, The Cuneifor11t In- than the one below it, so as to present
scriptio1is a?td the Old Testa1nent the appearance of a gigantic staircase
(London and EdinlJurgh, 1885-1888), on all four sides. A ramp wot1nd
i. l 12 sqq.; S. R. Driver, The Book round the wl1ole building, leading up
ef Genesis, Tenth Edition, p. I 36, to the comparatively small flat summit,
on Genesis xi. 9 ; J. Sl<inner, Co1n11zen- on which stood tl1e shrine of the gocl.
tary on Genesis, l)P 210, 227, on The native Babylonian name for st1ch
Genesis x. 10, xi. 9; H. E. Ryle, a structure was zikl:ztrat or ziggztrat.
The Book of Genesis, p. 148, on Genesis, See G. Perrot et Ch. Cl1ipiez, Histoi1e
xi. 9 ; Fr. Brown, S. R. D1iver, and de l' /l 1-t da1is l' A 11tiqz1itt!, ii. (Paris,
Ch. Briggs, Hebrew a1zd E1igiish Lexz"con 1884) pp. 379 sqq.; M. Jastrow, The
(Oxford, 1906), p. 9'3 Religio1i ef Bab;1!011ia a11d Assyria
(Boston, I 898), pp. 6 I 3 sqq. ; (Sir)
' These temples were b11ilt in solid
2 Gaston Mas1Jero, .1Iistoi1'e A1zcie111ze
quadrangular blocks of bricks, one on des peuples de l' Orie11t Classique, Les
the top of the other, each block smaller Origz'11es (Paris, I 895), pp. 627 sqq.
366 T1E TO WEI? OF JIAJIJil, l'AR"J. I
known as Birs-Nimrud. The ancient name of the temple in

the city of Babylon was E-sagil : it was dedicated to Marduk.
The ancient name of the tern ple at Borsippa was E-zida : it
was dedicated to Nebo. Scholars are not agreed as to which
of these ancient edifices was the original Tower of Babel ;
local and Jewish t1adition identifies the legendary tower with
1
tl1e ruins of Birs-Nimrud at Borsippa.
The mound The mound of Babil, once the temple of the chief Baby-
of Babil,
formerly lonian god Bel or Marduk, is now merely an oblong mass
the temple composed chiefly of unbaked brick, measuring about two
of Bel or
Marduk. hundred yards in length on the longer northern and southern
faces, and rising to a height of at .least one hundred and ten
feet above the plain. The top is broad and flat, but uneven
and broken v.rith heaps of rubbish. While the solid core of
the structure was built of crude or sun-dried bricks, its outer
faces were apparently coated with walls of burnt bricks, some
of which, inscribed with the name of King Nebuchadnezzar,
2
have been found on the spot. From Herodotus we learn
that the temple rose in' a series of eight terraces or solid
.
towers, one on the top of the other, with a ramp winding up
on the outside, but broken about half-way up by a. landing-
place, where there were seats for the iest qnd refreshment of
3
persons ascending to the summit. In the ancient St1merian
1 George Rawlinson, The History of Diodorus Siculus ii. 9; Strabo xvi. i. 5.
Herodot1ts, Fourth Edition (London, p. 738, ed. Casaubon. Herodotus's
1880), ii. 573 sqq. ; E. Schrader, description of the temple-to\ver, rising
Cuneifornz Inscriptions and the Old in terraces, one above the other, is
Testame11t, i. 106 sqq. ; Principal J. confirmed by a boundary-stone of the
Skinner, Co1nmentary 01z Genesis, lJp. time of Merodach-baladan I., on which
228 sq. ; H. Gun],el, Genesis 1:tbersetzt is figured just such a te1nple. tower,
u1zd er~lart 3 (Gottingen, 1910); pp. built in stories, or stepped stages, set
96 sq. 011e upon the other, with the emblen1
2 George Ra,vlinson, The Histoiy of of Nabu at the foot of the tower. See
He1odotzts, Fourth Edition (London, L. 1 W. King, History of Bab.y/011
1880), ii. 576 sq. ; G. Perrot et Ch. (London, 1915), pp. 78 sq. The
Chipiez, Histoire de l' A17 daizs l' Anti. German excavator of Babylon, Mr. R.
q1eite, ii. 399 sq. Koldewey, would set the evidence of
He1odotus and of the monuments at
3 Herodott1s i. I 8 I. As to the defiance by reconstructing the temple
remains of the temple, see R. Kolde- on a single stage (op. cit. pp. 194 .fq.
wey, The Excavations at Babylon, with Fig. I 19), but his view is rightly
translated by Agnes S. Johns (London, set aside by Mr. L. W. King, who
1914), pp. 18::; sqq. ; L. W. King, observes that ''there is no reason to
Histo1y of BabJ 1lon (London, 1915), reject the interp1etation that has so
pp. 73 sqq. By the beginning of our long been accepted of t11e famot1s de-
era. the building seems to have been scription of the tower that is given by
almost as ruinous as it is now. See Herodotus'' (op. cit. p. 81 ).
language the tern pie was called E -tern en - an - ki or '' The

House of the Foundation of Heaven and Earth.'' 1 Towards
the end. of the seventh century before our era the temple had .

fallen into disrepair, if not into ruins, but it was then restored
by King Nabopolassar, who reigned 625~604 B.C. In an
inscription, which has been preserved, the king describes
himself as '' the i;estorer of Esagila and Ezida," and records

the restoration of Esagila or Etemenanl<i as follows : -
''As for Etemenanl<i, the temple-tower of Babylon, which Inscription
before my time had become weakened and had fallen in, ~~I~s~~~:
Mardt1k the lord commanded me to lay its foundation in I<.ing of
the heart of the e,arth (and) to raise its turrets to heaven. !~~~~~~~
Baskets, spades (?), and U.RU. I made out of ivory, ushu the .
. restoration .

and 1tzzs1nakanna wood ; I caused the numerous workmen of Ete-

assembled in my land to carry them .. . I set to work (?) ; I rnenanki,
. ~t~e- 1
made bricks, I manufactured burnt bricks. Like the down- tower of
pour of heaven, whicl1 cannot be measured, like the massive Babylon.
flood, I caused the Arahtu to carry bitumen and pitch.
With the co-operation of Ea, with the insight of Marduk,
with the wisdom of N abu and N isaba, in the broad under-
standing with which the god, my creator, had endowed me,
with my great ingenuity(?), I came to a decision; I gave
orders to the skilled workmen. With a nz"1zdanaku measure
I measured the measurements of the aba ash-lam(?). The
architects at first made a survey of the ground plot (?).
Afterwards I consulted Shamash, Ramman, and Marduk ; to
my heart they gave decision, they .sanctioned the measure-
ments, the great gods by decree indicated the later stages of
the work. By means of exorcism, in the wisdom of Ea and
.Marduk, I cleared away that place, (and) on the original site
I laid its platform-foundation ; gold, silver, stones from
mountain and sea in its foundation I set * * * goodly oil,
sweet-smelling herbs, and * * * I placed underneath the
bricks. . An image of my royalty carrying a dupshikku I
constructed; in the~ platform-foundation I placed it. Unto
Marduk, my lord, I bowed my neck; I arrayed myself in
my gown, the robe of my royalty. Bricl<s and mortar I
l R. F. Harper, Assyri"an and Co1n111entary on Cenesij, p. 228 ; H.

Babylonian Literatiere (New Yori{, Gunkel, Genesis iibersetzt tt1id erkt,~rt, 3
1901 ), p. I 37 ; Principal J. Skinner, P 97
T.f/E TOWER

OF IIABEL ..
PAR'.f I
carried on my head, a dupshz"kku of gold and silver I wore ;

and Nebuchadrezzar, the first-born, the chief son, beloved of
my heart, I caused to carry mortar mixed with wine, oil, and
(other) products along with my workmen. Nabushumlisher,
his twin brother, the offspring of my own flesh, the junior,
my darling, I ordered to take a basket and spade (?) ; a
dupshz'kku of gold and silver I placed (on him). Unto
Marduk, my lord, as a gift, I dedicated him. I built the
temple in front of Esharra with joy and rejoicing, and like
a mountain I raised its tower aloft; to Marduk, my lord,
as in days of old, I dedicated it for a sight to be gazed at.
'' 0 Marduk, my lord, look with favour upon my goodly
deeds ! At thy exalted command, which cannot be altered,
let the performance of my hands endure for ever! Like the
bricks of Etemenanki, which are to remain firm for ever, do
thou establish the foundation of my throne for all time !
0 Etemenanki, grant blessing to the king who has restored
thee! When Marduk with joy takes up his abode in
thee, 0 temple, recall to Marduk, my lord, my gracious
1
deeds ! ''
Inscrip- Again, the temple was further repaired and adorned by
tions of
Nebucl1ad- Nabopolassar's son and successor, Nebuchadrezzar the Second,
nezzar, the Nebuchadnezzar of the Bible. To these restorations the
King of
Babylo11, great king repeatedly refers in his inscriptions. Thus he
recordir1g says::-
tl1e
restoration ,,The temples of Babylon I rebuilt and restored. As
of the for E-temen-an-ki (house of the foundation of heaven and
temple-
to\ver of earth) with burnt brick and bright ugnu-stone I raised on
Babylon. high its turrets. To the rebuilding of Esagila my heart
incited me ; I held it constantly in mind. I selected the
best of my cedar trees, which I had brought from Mount
Lebanon, the snow-capped forest, for the roofing of E-kua,
the shrine of his lordship, and I decorated with brilliant gold
the inner sides of the mighty cedar trunks, used in the roof-
ing of E-kua. I adorned the under side of the roof of cedar
with gold and precious stones. Concerning the rebuilding
of Esagila I prayed eve.ry morning to the king of the gods,
I R. F. Harper, Assyria1z
and Keilinschriftlz'che Bibliothek, heratts-
Babylonian Literature (New Yorlc, gegeben von Eberhard Schrader vol.
1901), pp. 131 133. Compare iii. 2. Halfte (Berlin, I 890 ), pp. ~ sqq.
1
the lord of lords." Again, in another Babylonian inscrip-
tion King Nebuchadrezzar II. says: ''In Esagila, the
majestic shrine, the temple of heaven and earth, the dwelling-
place of royalty, I decorated with shining gold E-kua, the
shrine of th~ lord of the gods, Marduk, Bab-Hili-shud, the
home of yarpanit, (and) Ezida in Esagila, the shrine called
' the king of the gods of heaven and earth,' and I made
(them) to shine like the day. E-temen-an-ki, the temple-
tower of Babylon, I made anew.'' 2 Again, in another
inscription the king declares : '' Esagila, the temple of heaven
and earth, the dwelling-place of the lord of the gods Marduk,
and E-kua, his shrine, I adorned with shining gold like a
wall. Ezida I built anew, and \\'ith silver, gold, precious
stones, bronze, palm-wood, cedar-wood I completed its con-
struction. E-temen-an-ki, the temple-tower of Babylon, I
built and completed, and with burnt brick and shining ugnu-
stone I raised on high its turrets." 3
The huge pyramidal mound, to which the Arabs give Themound
the name of Birs-Nimrud, is a solitary pile rising abruptly ~i!~~<l,
from the vast expanse of the desert some eight or nine miles near
fro1n the ruins of Babylon. Roughly speaking, the mound ~~1:'!~~
forms a rectangular oblong, measuring about six hundred ruins of a
. h temple-
and fifty feet on the long sides and four hundred feet on t e tower
short sides. The height of its summit above the plain is dedicated
about one hundred and fi fty-three 1eet. r T h d"
o t e or 1nary to Nebo.
observer at the present time it presents the appearance rather

of a natural hill crowned by a ruin than of a structure
reared by the hand of man. Yet there appears to be no
doubt that the great mound is wholly artificial, being built
entirely of bricks, which have to some extent solidified into
a single mass. Thirty-seven feet of solid brickwork, looking
like a tower, stand exposed at the top, while below this
the original building is almost hidden under the masses of
rubbish which have crumbled down from the upper portion.
1 R. F. Harper, Assyiian and ' rlarper, Assyrza11 aizd Babylo11ia1z
Babylonian Lz"terature, p. 137 Com- Lz"teratitre, p. I 44
pare f(eilinschriftlz"che Bibliothek, her-
ausgegeben von E. Schrader, iii. 3 J(eili1zsch1iftliche Bibliothek, her-
2. I-Iiilfte (Berlin, 1890), pp. 14 sqq. ausgegeben von E. Schrader, iii.
2 Keili1zschriftliche Bibliothek, her- 2. rliilfte (Be1lin, l 890 ), p. 53 ; R. F.
ausgegeben von E. Schrader, iii. Ilarper, Assy1ia11 a11d Babylo1ti1111
2. Iliilfte (Berlin, 1890), p. 47; R. F. Lite1ature, p. l 5 l.
VOL. I 2B
37 THE TOWER OF IJAJJEL
PAR'l' I
The whole structure, however, is deeply channelled by ex-

posure to the rain, and in places the original brickwork is
sufficiently exposed to reveal the true character and plan of
the edifice. From the researches carried, on by Sir Henry
Rawlinson in the year I 8 54 it appears that the temple, like
that of Bel or Marduk in Babylon, was built in a series of
receding stages, seven in number, which rose one above the
other in a sort of oblique pyramid to a height of about one
hundred and fifty-six feet above the plain. The grand

entrance was on the north-east, where stood the vestibule, a

separate building, of which the remains prolong the mound
very considerably in this direction. Sucl1 are the moulder-
ing ruins of E-zida, the great temple of Nebo (Nabu), whose
shrine probably occupied the summit of the pyramidal or
tower-lil{e structure. In its present form the edifice is chiefly
the work of King Nebuchadnezzar (Nebuchadrezzar the
Second), whose name appears exclusively on 'the bricks com-
1
posing it, and on the cylinders deposited at its angles. The
modern name of Birs-Nimrud preserves in a slightly altered
form the first syllable of Borsippa, the ancient name of the
2
city which stood he1e.
.
Inscription On two of the cylinders found by Sir Henry Rawlinson
of
Nebuchad- at the angles of the temple is engraved an inscription, in

11ezzar, which King Nebuchadnezzar (N ebuchadrezzar I I.) records
King of
Babylon, his restoration of the edifice, which had fallen into ruins

recording before his time. The inscription runs thus : -

the

restoration '' Behold now the building named ' the Stages of the
of the Seven Spheres,' which was the wonder of Borsippa, had been
temple-
tower at built by a former king. He had completed forty-two aJ1zmas
Birs-
Nimrud
(of the height), but he did not finish its head. From the
lapse of time it had become ruined ; they had not taken care
of the exits of the waters, so the rain and wet had pene~rated
into the brickwork : the casing of burnt bricks had bulged
out, and the terraces of crude bi::ick lay scattered in heaps;
(then) Merodach, my great lord, inclined my heart to repair
the building. I did not change its site, nor did I destroy its
foundation platform ; but in a fortunate month, and on an
c;eorge Rawlinson, The History
1
~ H. V. Hi!precht, Exploratio1zs t"n
of HerodottJ.s, Fourth Edition (London, Bible Lands durz"ng the Nineteentk
1880), ii. 581-586. Ce1ttury (Edinburgh, 1903), p. 43.
CHJ\P, V THE TOWER OF BABEL 37r
auspicious day, I undertook the rebuilding of the crude;.brick
terraces, and the burnt-brick casing (of the temple). I
strengthened its foundation, and I placed a titular record in
the part that I had rebuilt. I set my hand- to build it up
and to finish its summit. As it had been in ancient times ,
so I built up its structure; as it had been in former days,
thus I exalted its head. Nebo, the strengthener of his
children, he who ministers to the gods (?), and Merodach, the
supporter of sovereignty, may they cause my work to be
established for ever ! May it last "through the seven ages !
May the stability of my throne and the antiquity of my
empire, secure against strangers and triumphant over many
foes, continue to the eRd of time!'' 1
From this record we learn that the ancient Babylonian

king, who began to build the great temple-tower at Borsippa,
had left it incomplete, wanting its top. It may have been the
sight of the huge edifice in its unfinished state which gave
rise to the legend of the Tower of Babel.
However, there were many more such temple-towers in Ruined
ancient Babylonia, and the legend in question may have temple- to,ver at
been attached to any one of them. For example, the Uru (Ur
remains of such a tempi~ still exist at Dru, the Ur of the ~fh~~~ees).
Chaldees, from which Abraham is said to have migrated to
Canaan. 2
The place is now known as Mu~ayyar or Muge-
yer ; it is situated on the right bank of the Euphrates about
3
a hundred and thirty-five miles south-east of Babylon. A
series of low mounds, forming an oval, marl<s the site of the
ancient city. The country all around is so flat that often
during the annual flood of the Euphrates, from March till
June or July, the ruins form an island in a great marsh and
' .
can only be approached by boat. Groves of date- palms
here line the banks of the river and extend in unbroken
succession along its course till it loses itself in the waters of
the Persian Gulf. Near the northern end of the site rise the
remains of the temple-tower to a height of about seventy
1 George Rawlinson, The History Halfte (Berlin, l 890), Pl) 53, 55 ;
of Heiodotus, Fourth Edition (London, R. F. J~Iitr1)er, Assy1ia1t aizd Baby-
1880), ii. 586. Merodach is another lonz'aii Literature, pp. l 50 sqq.

way of spelling the name of Marduk, 2 Genesis xi. 3 l.
the great god of Babylon. For other
translations of the inscri1)tion, see 3 E1zcyc!opaetlia Biblica, iv. coll.
Keili1zJchrijtliche Bibliothek, iii. 2 5231 sqq., s.v. ''Ur of the Chaltlees.''
THE TO WEl?

01'~ BABEL PAR1' I
, feet. The edifice is a rectangular parallelogram, in two

stories, with the larger sides facing north-east and south-
west, each of them measuring about two hundred feet in
length, while the shorter sides ineasure only one hundred
arid thirty-three feet. As in all similar Babylonian build-
ings, one angle points almost due north. The lower story,
twenty-seven feet high, is supported by st1ong buttresses ;
the upper story, receding from thirty to forty-seven feet from
the edge of the first, is fourteen feet high, surmounted by
about five feet of brick rubbish. The ascent was on the
north-east. A tunnel driven into the mound proved that
the entire edifice was built of sun-dried bricks in the centre,
with a thick coating of massive, partmlly burnt bricks of a
light red colour with layers of reeds between them, the whole,
to a thickness of ten feet, being cased with a wall of inscribed
kiln-burnt bricks. Inscribed cylinders were discovered at
the four corners of the building, each standing in a niche
formed by the omission of a single brick in the layer. Sub-
sequent excavations seem to prove that commemorative
inscriptions, inscribed on cylinders, were regularly deposited
by the builders or restorers of Babylonian temples and
1
palaces at the four corners of the edifices.
Inscription The inscriptions on the cylinders found at Ur record the
of Nabon-
idus, King restoration of the temple-tower by Nabonidus, the last lzing
of Babylon, of Babylon ( 5 5 5-5 3 8 B.C.), and give us in outline a history
recording
the of the ancient edifice. One of them runs as follows : -
restoration '' Nabonidus, King of Babylon, patron of Esagila and
of the
temple- Ezida, who fears the great gods, am I.
tower of
Ur.
''As for E-lugal-(?)-si-di, the temple-tower of E-gish-
shir-gal, which is in Ur, which Ur-uk, a former king, had
built, but had not completed Dun-gi, his son, completed
its construction. From the inscriptions of Ur-uk and Dun-gi,
his son, I learned that Ur-uk had built this temple-tower,
without completing it, and that Dun-gi, his son, had com-
pleted its construction. This temple-tower was now old,
and upon the old platform-fo11ndation which Ur-uk and
Dun-gi, his son, had built, I undertook the reconstruction of

1
W. K. Travels and
Loftus, Eilprecht, Explorations of Bible Lands
Researches in Chaldaea and Stesiana 1luring the Nineteenth Century (Edin-
(London, 1857), pp. 127 sqq.; H. V. burgh, 1903), pp. 171 sqq.
CHAP.V THE TOWER OF BABEL 373
this temple-tower, as of old, with bitumen and burnt brick

and for Sin, the lord of the gods of heaven and earth th~
' '
king of the gods, the god of gods, \vho inhabit the great /
heavens, the lord of E-gish-shir-gal, which is in Ur, my lord,
I founded and built (it).
'
'' 0 Sin, lord of the gods, king of the gods of heaven

and earth, the god of gods, who inhabit the great heavens,
upon thy joyful entrance into that temple may the good done
to Esagila, Ezida (and) E-gish-shir-gal, the temples of thy
great divinity, be established on thy lips !
''And do thou implant the fear of thy great divinity in
the heart of its people, that they may not sin against thy
great divinity, (and) like the heavens may their foundations
stand fast! '
. ''As for me, Nabonidus, King of Babylon, save me from

sinning against thy great divinity ! A life of far-distant
days grant me as a present! And as regards Belshazzar,
the first-born son, my offspring, do thou implant in his heart
the fear of thy great divinity ! May he not fall into sin !
1
May he be satisfied with fulness of life ! ''
From this inscription we learn that the name of the city The
was Ur, and that the temple was dedicated to Sin, the ~~~~e~t
Babylonian moon-god. Further we are informed that King Ur may
. . h have been
U r-uk or U rengur, as his name should rather be spelt, w o seen by
built the temple-tower, left it unfinished, and that the edifice Abraham.
was completed by his son, King Dungi. The reign of King
Ur-uk or Urengur is variously dated about 2700 B.C. or
2
2 300 B.c. In either case the foundation of the temple pre-
ceded, perhaps by hundreds of years, the date which is usually
1 R. F. I-Iarper, Assy1ian a?td another mistake in speaking of Bel-
Babyloni'an Literature, pp. I 57 sq. shazzar as king. However, a cunei-
Compare Keilinschrijtliche Bibliothek, form inscription, recently deciphered by
herausgegeben von E. Schrade1, iii. 2. Dr. T. G. Pinches, see1ns to show that,
Halfte (Berlin, 1890), pp. 95, 97 in the twelfth year of the reign of King
Belshazzar, the king's son, is no doubt Nabonidus, his son Belshazzar was
the Belshazzar spoken of in the Book associated with him in the royal power.
of Daniel (chapter v. ), though the writer See 7'he Athena:1t111, May 1916, p. 255.
of that boolc appears to have been mis- 2 H. V. I-Iilprecht, Exploratio1is in
taken in representing Belshazzar as a Bible Lanls, p. 174 (who dates the
son of Nebuchadnezzar. See S. I{. foundation of the te1nple abot1t 2700
Driver, The Book of Daniel(Cambridge, 'B.C.); Ed. Meyer, Geschichte des Alter-
1905), pp. xxviii, 1-lii, 60 sq. Till titnts,2 i. 2 (St11ttgart and Be1lin, 1909),
lately it was supposed that the author p. 49 5 ( wl10 elates the Icing's reign
of the Boole of. Daniel committecl 2304-2287 B.C.).
'

374 THE TOWER OF BABEL l'AR'I' I
1
assigned to the birth of Abraham ; so that if the patriarch
really migrated from Ur to Canaan, as Hebrew tradition
relates, this very building, whose venerable ruins exist on the
spot to this day, dominating by their superior height the
flat landscape through which the Euphrates winds seaward,
must have been familiar to Abraham from childhood, and
may have been the last object on which his eyes rested
when, setting out in search of the Promised Land, he took a

farewell look backward at his native city disappearing behind
its palm groves in the distance. It is possible that in the
minds of his descendants, the conspicuous pile, looming dim
and vast through the mists of time and of distance, may have
assumed . the gigantic proportions of a heaven-reaching
tower, from which in days of old the various nations of
the earth set out on their wanderings.
Theories The authors of Genesis say nothing as to the nature of
as to the
primitive the common language which all mankind spoke before the
language confusion of tongues, and in which our first parents may be
of
manki11d. supposed to have conversed with each other, with the ser-
pent, and with the deity in the garden of Eden. Later
ages. took it for granted that Hebrew was the primitive
language of mankind. . The fathers of the Church appear to
have entertained no doubt on . the subject ; and in modern
times, when the science of philology was in its infancy,
strenuous, but necessarily abortive, efforts were made to
deduce all forms of human speech from Hebrew as their
original. In this naYve assumption Christian scholars did
not differ from the learned men of other religions, who have
seen in the language of their sacred writings the tongue not
only of our first forefathers but of the gods themselves. The
first in modern times to prick the bubble effectively was
Leibnitz, who observed 'that '' there is as much reason for
supposing Hebrew to have beeh the primitive language of
mankind, as there is for adopting the view of Goropius, who
published a work at Antwerp, in 1 5 So, to prove that Dutch
1 On the strength of the identification The Book of Genesis, Tenth Edition,
of Amraphel, l{ing of Shi11ar (Genesis . pp. xxviii sq. ; Principal J. Skinner,
xiv. l} with Hammurabi, l{ing of Baby- Co11imentary 01i Genesis, pp. xiv sq.
lon, some modern scholars are disposed Mr. L. W. King . dates Hammttrabi's
to make Abraham a contemporary of reign 2123-2083 B.c. (History of
Hammurabi, and therefore to date him Babylon, London, 1915, p. 320). See
about 2100 B.c. See S. R. Driver, above, p. 1 2 l note 2.

'
CHAP. V; THE TOWER OF BABEL 375
'
was the language spoken in Paradise." 1 Another writer

maintained that the language spoken by Adam was Basque ;
while others, flying clean in the face of Scripture, introduce.cl
the diversity of tongues into Eden itself, by holding that
Adam and Eve spoke Persian, that the language of the
serpent was Arabic, and that the affable archangel Gabriel
discoursed with our first parents in Turkish. Yet another
eccentric scholar seriously argued that the Almighty ad-
dressed Adam in Swedish, that Adam answered his Maker
in Danish, and that the serpent conversed with Eve in
2
French. We may suspect that all such philological theories
were biassed by the national prejudices and antipathies of
the philologers who propounded them.
Attempts have been made to arrive at the primitive Attempts
language of mankind by the experimental method. The ~i~;t:~~
first recorded experiment of this nature is said to have been primitive
made by Psammetichus, King of Egypt. Desirous of learn- ~~nguage
ing what race of man was first created or evolved, he had mankind_
. by exper1-
recourse to the following device. He took two newborn ment.
babes, selected at haphazard, and gave them in charge to a Theexperi-
. h , . , . h . l l h men t of
goatherd wit strict injunctions to rear t em 1n a one y ut, Psamme-
where they were to be fed on goat's milk and never to hear tKic_hus,1ng o
f
a word of human speech; for the sagacious monarch cal- Egypt.
culated that, left to themselves, uncontaminated by oral
intercourse with others, the children would in due time yield
to the promptings of nature and break out into the primeval

language of our first forefathers. The result seemed to
justify his prevision. For when two years had passed, it
chanced that one day the goatherd opened the door of the
solitary b.ut as usual to give the two children their daily meal
of goat's mill<:, and no sooner did he do so than the two
little ones ran at him, holding out their hands and crying
'' Bekos '' ! At first he said nothing, but when the same
thing happened day after day, he reported the matter to tl1e
king, who on making inqt1iries discovered that bekos was the
Phrygian word for bread. On the strength of that discovery,

King Psammetichus concluded that the Phrygians were the
1 Quoted J1y F. Max l\1iiller, Lec- primitive langt1age of manJ,i11d, see F.
tztres 01z the .S'11'e1zce of La1~i;1ta,[[e, Sixth Max l\'lliller, op. cit. i. 145 .rqq.

Ellition (I,c>nclon, 1871), i. 149 As
to tl1e thec>ry t11<lt IIebrew was tl1e 2 }<'. Max !Vllillcr, op. cit. i. 149
THE TOWER OF BABEL PART I
'
most ancient race of mankind, and that the Egyptians must

1
accordingly yield to them the coveted palm of antiquity.
Such is the tale as told by the Greek historian Herodotus.
We may suspect that it is not an Egyptian but a Greek
story, invented to flatter Gieek vanity by humbling the pride
of the Egyptians and transferring the crown of remotest eld
2
from their brows to those of a race akin to the Grecian. A
later rationalism, accepting the truth of the anecdote, disputed
the conclusion drawn from it, by arguing that bekos was
nothing but a natural imitation of the bleating of the goats,
whose voices the children heard and \Vhose milk they imbibed
Experi- 3
daily. The experiment is said to have been repeated in
~:e~~r~:k later ages by several monarchs, including the German emperor
4
theSecond, Frederick the Second and the Mogul emperor Akbar Khan.
Akbar
Khan, and Of h 1 . .
t e atter potentate 1t IS to Id h. .
t at, anxious to 1s- d'
James IV. cover the true religion, and perplexed by the contradictory
~~otland. claims of the rival systems, he hit upon the follo\\Ting device
for solving the problem. He took thirty young children
'
and caused them to be brought up by persons who were
'
strictly forbidden to converse with their youthful charges ;

for he was resolved to adopt the religious faith of that
people whose language the infants should spontaneously speak,
being apparently satisfied in his own mind that the. religion
thus authenticated by the voice of nature could be none
other than the true one. The result of the experiment was

to confirm the philosophic Mogul in his scepticism ; for the
children, we are informed, spoke no particular language, and
the emperor accordingly continued to be, of no particular
5
religion. In our own country James IV. of Scotland
is reported to have shut up two children with a dumb
woman in the island of Inchkeith, desiring to know what
language the children would speak when they came to the
age of perfect speech. Some say that they spoke good
1 Herodotus ii. 2. itself.
2 See A. Wiedemann, Herodots 3
Scholiast on Apollonius Rhodius,
Zweites Bulli (Leipsic, 1890), p. 45,
Argonaitt. iv. 262. '
who points out that even ifthe anecdote
4 J. C. F. Baehr, in his edition of
had bee11 historical, the Egyptians
n1ight still have claimed the prize of Herodotus (Leipsic, 1856-1861), vol.

superior ant1qu1ty, since bek is an 11, pp. 43 I sq,
Egyptian word meaning '' oil,'' and is 6
Samuel Purchas, Purclzas His Pz'l-
also a late name for the land of Egypt gn'11ies {London, 1625-1626), v, 51t>.
CHAP. V THE TOWER OF BABEL 377
Hebrew, but the chronicler seems to have had doubts on the
1
subject.
Stories which bear a certain resemblance to the legend Stories like
of the Tower of Babel are reported among several African the legend
. ~~
tribes. Thus, some of the natives of the Zambesi, apparently Tower of
in
the neighbourhood of the Victoria Falls '

''have a tradition !3abA~l.told
111 1r1ca
which may refer to the building of the Tower of Babel, but about
it ends in the bold builders getting their crowns cracked by fr~~a :0who 1
the fall of the scaffolding.'' 2 The story thus briefly referred climb up to
to by Dr. Livingstone has been more fully recorded by a heaven.
Swiss missionary. The A-Louyi, a tribe of the Upper Louyi
Zambesi, say that formerly their god Nyambe, whom they story.
identify with the sun, used to dwell on earth, but that he
afterwards ascended up to heav.en on a spider's web. From
his post up aloft he said to men, '' Worship me." But men
said, '' Come, let us kill Nyambe." Alarmed at this impious
threat, the deity fled to the sky, from which it would
seem that he had temporarily descended. So men said,
'' Come, let us make masts to reach up to heaven." They
set up masts and added more masts, joining them one to
the other, and they clambe1ed up them. But when they
had climbed far up, the masts fell down, and all the men on
the masts were killed by the fall. That was the end of
them. 3 The Bambala of the Congo say ''that the Wan- Barnbala
gongo once wanted to know what the moon was, so story.
they started to go and see. They planted a big pole
in the ground, and a man climbed up it with a second
pole which he fastened to the end ; to this a third
was fixed, and so on. When their Tower of Babel had
reached a considerable height, so high in fact that the whole
population of the village was carrying poles up, the erection
suddenly collapsed, and they fell victims to their ill-advised
curiosity. Since that time no one has tried to find out what
the moon is." 4 The natives of Mkulwe, in German East Mkulwe
Africa, tell a similar tale. According to them, men one day story.
1 Robert Lindsay of Pitscottie, The 3 E. Jacottet, 11tudes sur les langues
Chronicles of Scotland (Edinburgh, du Haiet-Za11zbeze, Troisierne Partie,
1814), i. 249 sq. Textes Louyi {Paris, l 901 ), p. l l 8.
2 David Livingstone, Mi"ssio1zary 4 E. Torday, Ca111p a1td Tra11ip i1t
J'ravels a1id Resea1ches in Sottth Afrila A.frica1z Wilds {London, 1913), pp.
{London, 1857), p. 528. 242 sq.
.
378 THE TOWER OF BABEL PAR'!' I
said to eacl1 other, '' Let us build high, let us reach the
moon ! '' So they rammed a great tree into the earth,
and fixed another tree on the top of it,, and another
on the top of that, and so on, till the trees fell down
and the men were killed. But other men said, '' Let us not
give up this undertaking," and they piled trees one on the
'top of the other, till one day the trees again fell down and
the men were killed. 'fhen the people gave up trying to
Ashantee climb aloft to the moon. 1 The Ashantees have a tradition
story.
that God of old dwelt among men, but that, resenting
an affront put on him by an old woman, he withdrew

in high dudgeon to his mansion in the sky. Disconsolate
at his departure, mankind resolved to seek and find
him. For that purpose they collected all the porridge
pestles they c~uld find and piled them up, one on the
top of the other. When the tower thus built had nearly
reached the sky, they found to their dismay that the supply
of pestles ran short. What were they to do? In this
dilemma a wise man stood up and said,'' The matter is quite
simple. Take the lowest pestle of all, and put it on the top,
and go on doing so till we arrive at God." The proposal
was carried, but when they came to put it in practice, down
fell the tower, as indeed you might have expected. How-
ever, others say that the collapse of the tower was caused by
the white ants, which gnawed away the lowest of the pestles.
In whichever way it happened, the communication with
heaven was not completed, and men were never able to
ascend up to God.2:
Anal story The Arial clan of the Kul<i tribe, in Assam, tell of an
ofaman d b
who tried attempt ma e y a man to climb up into the sky, in order to
to climb up recover his stolen property. The story is as follows. Once
to heaven. upon a time there was a very pious man whci devoted much
time to worshipping God, and he had a pet bitcl1. Envious
of his noble qualities, the sun and moon resolved to rob him
of his virtue. In pursuit of this nefarious design, they pro-
mised to give him their virtue, if only he would. first entrust
them with his. The unsuspecting saint fell into the trap,
Alois I-famberger, '~ Religiose
1
(1909) p. 304.
Uberlieferungen ttnd Gebrauche der 2- E. Perregaux, Chez les Achanti
Landschaft Mkulwe,'' Anthropos, iv. (Neuchatel, 1906), p. 200.
CHAP. V THE TOWER OF BABEL 379
and the two celestial rogues made off with his virtue. Thus
defrauded, the holy man ordered his dog to pursue and catch
the thieves. T}fe intelligent animal brought a long pole and
climbed up it to reach the fugitives, and the saint swarmed
up the pole behind his dumb friend. Unfortunately he
ascended so slowly that, before he reached the sky, the white
ants had eaten away' the lower end of the pole, so he fell
down and broke his neck. But the bitch was more agile ;
before the white ants had gnawed through the wood, she
had got a footing in the sky, and there the faithful animal
is to this day, chasing the sun and moon round and round
the celestial vault. Sometimes she catches them, and when
she does so, the sun or moon is darkened, which Europeans
call an eclipse. At such times the Anals shout to the bitch,

'' Release ! Release ! '' meaning, of course, that she is to let

go the sun or moon. 1
A story like the Biblical narrative of the Tower of The
Babel is told of the great pyra1nid of Cholula in Mexico, f{~~~i~~
1
the vastest work of aboriginal man in all America. This Cholula in

colossal fabric, on which the modern traveller still gazes Mexico.
with admiration, stands near the handsome modern city of
Puebla, on the way fro1n Vera Cruz to the capital. In form
it resembles, and in dimensions it rivals, the pyramids of
Egypt. Its perpendicular height is nearly two hundred feet,
and its base is twice' as long as that of the great pyramid of
Cheops. It had the shape common to the Mexican teocallz"s,
that of a truncated pyramid, facing witn its four sides. the
cardinal points and divided into four terraces. Its 01iginal
outlines, however, have been effaced by time. and the weather,
while its surface is now covered by an exuberant g1owth of
shrubs and trees, so that the huge pile presents the aspect of
a natural hill rather than of a mound reared by human labour.
The edifice is built of rows of bricks baked in the sun and
cemented together with mortar, in \vhich are stuck quantities
of small stones, potsherds, and fragments of obsidian knives
and weapons. Layers of clay are interposed between the
courses of brick. The flat summit, which comprises more
than an acre of ground, commands a superb prospect over
I Lieut. -Colo11el J. Sha],espear, The Lzeshei Iueki Cl1i1is (Lo11don, I 9 I 2 ),
IJIJ 183 sq.

THE TOWER OF BABEL PART I
the broad fertile valley away to the huge volcanic mountains

v.rhich encircle it, their lower slopes covered with grand forests,
their pinnacles of porphyry bare and arid, the highest of them
1
crowned with eternal snow.
Story of A legend concerning the foundation of this huge monu-
the
foundation ment is recorded by the Dominican friar Pedro de los Rios.
of the It runs as follows. Before the great flood, which took place
pyramidal
temple of four thousand years after the creation of the world, this
Cholula. country was inhabited by giants. All who did not perish in
the inundation were turned into fishes, except seven who took
refuge in caves. When the waters had retired, one of the seven,
by name Xelhua, surnamed the Architect, came to Cholula,
where, in memory of the mountain of Tlaloc, on which he and
his six brothers had found safety, he built an artificial hill in
the shape of a pyramid. He caused the bricks to be made
in the province of Tlalmanalco, at the foot of Mount Cocotl,
and in order to transport them to Cholula he set a line of
men on the road, who passed the bricks from hand to hand.
It was his purpose to raise the mighty edifice to the clouds, but
the gods, offended at his presumption, hurled the fire of heaven

down on the pyramid, many of the workmen perished, and the

building remained unfinished. Afterwards it was dedicated
2
to the great god Quetzalcoatl. It is said that at the time of
the Spanish conquest the inhabitants of Cholula preserved with
great veneration a large aerolite, which according to them was
the very thunderbolt that fell on the p}'ramid and set it on fire. 3
Another1 .A similar tradition, differing somewhat in details, is

version of
the story related by the Spanish historian Duran, who wrote in I 5 79.
told by ''In the beginning," says he, ''before the light and sun were
Durar1, a
Spanish created, the earth was in darkness and gloom, void of all
historian.
created things, quite flat, without hill or dale, encircled by
water on every side, without ~rees and without any other
created thing. As soon as the sun and the light were born
in the . east, some men appeared there, ungainly giants who
.
1 W. H. Prescott, History of the 2

Brasseur de Bourbourg, op. cit. i.
Conquest o.f lJ.fexico (London, 1901 ), 301 sq. Compare W. H. Prescott,
ii. 5 sqq. ; Brasseur de Bourbourg, op. cit. iii. 365 ; (Sir) Edward B.
Histoire des Nations civilisees dzt Tylor, Anahuac, pp. 276 sq. ; H. I-I.
Mexique et de l'A1nenque- Centrale Bancroft, The Native Races . of tl1e
(Paris, 1857-1859), i: 299 sqq. ; (Sir) Pacific States, iii. 67 sq., v. 206.
Edward B. Tylor, Anahzeac (London 3
.
1861), pp. 274 sq. ' (Sir) E. B. Tylor, Anahuac, p.
277.
possessed the land. Wishing to see the rising and the setting
of the sun, they agreed to go in search of it; so dividing into
two bands they journeyed, the one band toward the west, and
the other towar.d the east. So they journeyed till they were
stopped by the sea. Thence they resolved to return to the
place from which they had set out : so they came back to
the place called lztac~ulin inemini'an. Not knowing how
to reach the sun, and charmed with its light and beauty, they
decided to bt1ild a tower so high that its top should reach the
sky. In their search for materials with which to carry out
their design they found a clay and a very sticky bitumen with
which they began in a great hurry
to build the tower .
When they had reared it as high as they could, so high that
it is said to have seemed to reach the sky, the lord of the
heights was angry and said to the inhabitants of heaven,
'Have you seen hovv the inhabitants of the earth have built
a to\ver so high and so proud to climb up here, charmed
as they are with the light and beauty of the sun ? Come,
let us confound them ; for it is not meet that the people of
the earth, who live in bodies of flesh, should mix with us.'
In a moment, the inhabitants of heaven, setting out towards
the four quarters of the world, overthrew as by a thunderbolt
the edifice which the men had built. After that, the giants,
scared and filled with terror, separated and scattered in all
1
directions over the earth."
In this latter tradition the traces of Biblical influence The story
appear not only in the dispersal of the builders over the face ~!:~~ation
of the earth, but also in the construction of the tower out of of the
clay and bitumen ; for while these are the materials out of ~;:1J~~aof
which the Tower of Babel is said to have been built, bitumen betrays
b . h Biblical
seems never to have been used y the Mexicans for sue a infiuei1ce.
2
purpose and is not found anywhere near Cholula. ''The
history of the confusion of tongues seems also to have existed
in the country, not long after the Conquest, having very prob-
ably been learnt from the missionaries ; but it does not seem
1 Diego Duran, Historia de !as Indias French by Brasse11r de Bourbourg,
de Nueva-Espana y Islas de Tierra Histoire des Natio1zs cz"1;i/1:stcs dze
Fi1-11ze, i. (Mexico, I 867) pp. 6 sq Afexique et de !' A111t!riq11e- Ce11t1ale, i.
With the accidental 01nission of a line 433 sq.
( '' los unos ca111ina1on hacia Ponente,
los otros hdci1i Oiiente ''), the passage 2 (Sir) Edward ]J. Tylor, A11ah11a,,
has bee11 extracted and tra11slated i11to p. 277.
THE TOWER OF BABEL PAR"I' I
to have been connected with the Tower-of-Babel legend of

Cholula. Something like it at least appears in the Gemelli
table of Mexican migrations, reproduced in Humboldt, where
a bird in a tree is sending down a numb.er of tongues to a
1
crowd of men standing below.'' On the strength of these
suspicious resemblances Tylor may be right in condemning
the legend of Cholula ''as not genuine, or at least as partly
2
of late fabrication."
Story like A like suspicion . of spuribusness, or at all events of
tliat of the assimilation to Biblical traditions, must apparently rest on
To\ver of
Babel a legend ascribed to the Toltecs of Mexico. '' Ixtlil-xochitl
10
ahscriT'bedl
t e o tees
writes of this tradition as follows : They say that the \vorld
of Mexico. was created in the year Ce Tecpatl, and this time until the
deluge they call Atonatiuh, \vhich means the age of the sun
of water, because the world was destroyed by the deluge.
It is found in the histories of the Toltecs that this age and
first w<9rld, as they term it, lasted seven hundred and six-
teen years ; that man and all the earth were destroyed by
great showers and by lightnings from heaven, so that
nothing remained, and the most lofty mountains were
covered up and submerged to the depth of caxtol1noletltli,
or fifteen cubits, and here they add other fables of how men
came to multiply again from the few who escaped the
destruction in a toptlipetlacalz'; which word very nearly
signifies a closed chest ; and how, after multiplying, the
men built a zacualz' of great height, and by this is meant a
very high tower, in which to take refuge \Vhen the world
should be a second time destroyed. After this their tongue
became confused, and, not understanding each other, they
went to different parts of the world." 3 In this legend the
coincidences with the Biblical narratives of the flood the
ark, the tower of Babel, and the confusion of tongues seem '
. too numerous to be accidental.
1 (Sir) Edward B. Tylor, Anahttac, (London, 1901), iii. 365note18,
p. 277. As to this Mexican picture, 2
see further H. H. Bancroft, Native (Sir) Edward B. Tylor, Anahuac,
Races of the Pacific States, iii. 68 note, P 277.
who st1ongly suspects the genuineness ..
3
H. H. Bancroft, The Native Races
of the legend based on certain Aztec of the Pacijic States, v. 19-21, refer-
paintings. The authenticity of these ring to '' Relaciones '' in Lord Kings-
traditions is questioned also by Pres- borough's Antiqui'ties ef Mexi'co, vol.
cott, History of the Co1iquest of Mexico
ix. pp. 321 sq.
A similar verdict may be pronounced, with even less Karen

hesitation, on a tale told by the Karens of Burma a tribe version of
. 1 l' . ' the story of
wh o d isp ay a pecu 1ar aptitude for borrowing Christian the To,ver
legends and disguising them with a thin coat of local colour. of Babel.
Their edition of the Tower of Babel story, as told l;>y the
Gaikho section of the tribe, runs as follows. '' The Gaikhos
trace their genealogy to Adam, and make thirty generations
from Adam, to the building of the Tower of Babel, at which
time they say they separated from the Red Karens. . . . In
the days of Pan-dan-man, the people determined to build a
pagoda that should reach up to heaven. . The place they
suppose to be somewhere in the country of the Red Karens,
with whom they represent themselves as associated until this
event. When the pagoda was half way up to heaven, God
.came down and confounded the language of the people, so
that they could not understand each other. Then the people
scattered, and Than-mau-rai, the father of the Gaikho tribe,
came west, with eight chiefs, and settled in the valley of the
1
Sitang."
The Biblical story of the Tower of Babel and the con- Mikir
'
f us1on f t I
o . ongues reappears a so among th e M'k' f version of
1 1rs, one o tlie story of
the many Tibeto-Burman tribes of Assam. They say that the Tower
. d ays o f o Id t h e d escen d ants
1n . o f R am were m1g . h ty men, of Babel.
and growing dissatisfied with the mastery of the earth they
aspired to conquer heaven. So they began to build a tower
which should reach up to the skies. Higher and higher rose
the building, till at last the gods and demons feared lest these
giants should become the masters of heaven, as they already
were of earth. So they confounded their speech, and scattered
them to the four corners of the world. Hence arose all the
2
various tongues of mankind. Again, we find the. same old Version of .
story, in a slightly disguised form, among the Admiralty ~~et~~ory
Islanders. They say that the tribe or family of the Lohi To\ver of
. l h
numbered one hundred and thirty sous and ad 1or t e1r by the r h . Babel told
chief a certain Muikiu. This Muikiu said to his people, ''Let Admiralty
, h
us build a house as h1g as eaven. h ,, S h b . .
o t ey u1 1t it, a11 d Islanders.
when it nearly reached the sky, there came to them from

1F. Mason, D. D., ''On dwellings, 2 Edward Stack, 7ne l1:fiki1s, editecl,
works of art, laws, etc. of the Karens,'' arranged, ancl supplemented by Sir
Journal of the Asiatz'c Socz't:ty of Bengal, Charles Lyall (Lonclon, 1908), p. 72 .
New Series,xxxvii. (1868) PIJ 163, 164.
THE TO WEI~ ()!,~ IJA!Jl~L I' AJ{'l' I
Kali a man named Po Awi, who forbade tl1em to go on with

the building. Said he to Muil<:iu, '' Who told you to build
so high a house?'' Muikiu answered, '' I am master of our
people the Lohi. I said, ' Let us build a house as high
as heaven.' If I had had my way, our houses should have
'
been as high as heaven. But now, thy will is done, our

houses will be low." So saying he took water and sprinkled
it on the bodies of his people. .Then was their language
confounded ; they understood not each other and dispersed
into different lands. Thus every land has now its own
speech.1 There can be little doubt that tl1is story is merely
an echo of missionary teaching.
Greek and Not a few peoples have attempted to explain the
African diversities of human speech without reference to a Tower
traditions
as to the of Babel or similar structures. Thus the Greeks had
~~~gin of a tradition that for many ages men lived at peace,
diversity of without cities and without laws, speaking one language,
tongues. , and ruled by Zeus alone. At last Hermes introduced
diversities of speech and divided mankind into separate
nations. So discord first arose among mortals, and Zeus,
offended at their quarrels, resigned the sovereignty and com-
mitted it to the hands of the Argive hero Phoroneus, the first
2
king of men. The Wa-Sania of British East Africa say
that of old all the tribes of the earth knew only one language,
but that during a severe fami11e the people went mad and
wandered in all directions, jabbering strange words, and so
3
Explana- the different languages arose. , A different explanation of
tdi?n ~ ~he. the diversities of language is given by the Kachcha N ae-as
1vers1 ties ~ '
oflanguage a hill tribe of Assam. According to them, at the creation
~~:en by all men were of one race, but they were destined soon after-
Kachcha wards to be broken up into different nations. The king of
Nagas of
Assam.
h h.
t e men t en on eart h h d .
a a daughter named S1toyle. She
was wondrous fleet of foot, and loved to roam the jungle the
1 Josef Meier, '' Mythen und Sagen 2
!Iyginus, Fabul. 143 The lege11d
der Admiralitiitsinsulaner,'' Anthropos, appears not to be mentioned by any
ii. ( 1907) pp. 9 3 3 sq. The legend is extant Greek author.
reported in the 01iginal language, with
a literal interlineal translation into 3 Captain W. E. H. Bar1ett, ''Notes
German, which is not very clear. I on the Customs of the Wa-Giriama,
have tried to represent the general etc., of British East Africa,'' Journal
sense, but do not feel sure that I have of the Royal Anthropological Institttte,
grasped the exact meaning. xli. (191 I) p. 37,
livelong day, far from home, thereby causing much anxiety

to. her parents, who feared lest she should be devoured by
wild beasts. One day her father conceived a plan for keep~
ing her at home. He sent for a basket of linseed and )
upsetting it on the ground he ordered his daughter to put

the seeds back, one by one, into the basket, counting them
as she did so. Then thinking that the task he had set her
would occupy the maiden the whole day, he withdrew. But
by sunset his daughter had counted all the seeds and put
them back in the basket, and no sooner had she done so
than away she hurried to the jungle. So when her parents
returned, they could find no trace of their missing daughter.
After searching for days and days, however, they at last
came across a monster python lying gorged in the shade of
the trees. All the men being assembled, they attacked the
huge reptile with spear and sword. But even as they struck
at the snake, their appearance changed, and they found them-
selves speaking various dialects. The men of the same speech
now drew apart from the rest and formed a separate band,
and the various bands thus created became the ancestors of
1
the different nations now existing on earth. But what
became of the princess, whether she was restored to her
sorrowing pare11ts, or whether she had been S\vallowed by
the python, the story does not relate.

The Kukis of Manipur, another hill race of Assam, Other
r
account 1or t h e d"1vers1ty
o f 1anguages 1n t h eir tr1"b es b y stories
explain tothe
saying, that once on a time the three grandsons of a certain diversity of
chief were all playing together in the house, when their ~~ffli~s the
father bade them catch a rat. But while they were busy Kukis of
. 1 h dd 1 . .
hunting the an1ma , t ey were su en y smitten wit a con- and theh Assam
fusion of tongues and could not understand each other, so Encou~ter

Bay tnbe
the rat escaped. The eldest of the three sons now spoke of South
the Lamyang language ; the second spoke the Thado lan- Australia.
guage ; and as for the third, some say that he spoke the
Waiphie language, but others think it was the Manipur
tongue which he spoke. At all events the three lads
2
became the ancestors of three distinct tribes. The En-
1 C.A.Soppitt,AShortAccountefthe the Valley ef Mitn1iipore and ef the
KachchaNdga(Empto)tn"bez"ntheN01-th Hill Tribes (Calcutta, 1859), p. 56
Cachar Hil/s(Shillong, 1885), pp. 15 sq. (Selectz"ons fi'o11z the Records ef the
2 Major W. McCulloch, Accou1zt ef Gove1-nment ef I11dz"a, No. xxvii. ).
VOL. I 2C
THE TOWEi? OF IJABE"L PAR'!' I
counter Bay tribe of South Australia trace the origin of

languages to an jll-tempered old woman, who died long ago.
. Her name was W urrt1ri, she lived towards the east, and
generally, walked about with a big stick in her hand. to
scatter the fires round which other people were sleeping.
When at last she died, her people were so glad to be rid of
her, that they se11t messengers in all directions to announce
the good news of her death. Men, women, and children

accordingly assembled, not to mourn but to rejoice over the
decease and to celebrate it by a cannibal banquet. The
Raminjerar were the first who fell upon the corpse and com-
menced to devour the flesh ; and no sooner did they do so
than they began to speak intelligibly. The other tribes to
the eastward, arriving later, ate the contents of the intestines,
which caused them to speak a language slightly different. Last
of all came the northern tribes, and having consumed the in-
testines and all that remained of the corpse, they spoke a lan-
1
guage which differed still more from that of the Raminjerar.
Stories to The Maidu Indians of California say that down to
~f;~:~~Yt:~ a certain time everybody spoke. the same language. But
tongues once, when the people were having a burning, and everything
~~1!eby was ready for the next day, suddenly in the night every-
tribes of body began to speak in a different tongue, except that each
American
Indians. husband and wife talked the same language. That night
the Creator, whom they call Earth-Initiate, appeared to a
certain man named Kuksu, told him what had happened,
ahd instructed him how to proceed next day when the
Babel of tongues would commence. Thus prepared, Kuksu
summoned all the people together, for he could speak all
the languages. He taught them the names of the different
animals and so forth in their various dialects sho\ved
'
them how to cook and to hunt, gave them their laws, and

appointed the times for their dances and festivals. Then he
called each tribe by name, and sent them off in different
directions, telling thGm where they were to dwell. 2 We
1 H. E. A. Meyer, ''Manners and 204 sq. .
Customs of the Aborigines of th.e En- 2
Roland B. Dixon,'' Maidu Myths,''
counter Bay Tribe, South Australia,'' Bulleti'n of the American Museum of
in The Native Tribes of South Aus- Natural Hi'story, xvii. Part ii. (New
tralia, with an Introductory Chapter York, 1902) pp. 44 sq. The ''burn-
by J. D. Woods (Adelaide, 1879), pp. ing'' alluded to in the text, of which

. .

CHAP.V THE TOWER OF BABEL
have seen that the Tlingits of Alaska explain the diversity

of tongues by the story of a great flood, which they may
1
have borrowed from Christian missionaries or traders. The
Quiches of Guatemala told of a time, in the early ages of
the world, when men lived together and spoke but one lan-
guage, when they invoked as yet neither wood nor stone,

and remembered naught but the word of the Creator, the

Heart of heaven and of earth. However, as years went on
the tribes multiplied, and leaving their old home came to
a place called Tulan. It was there, according to Quiche
tradition, that the language of the tribes changed and the
diversity of tongues originated ; the people ceased to un.der-
stand each other's speech and dispersed to seek new homes
2
in different parts of the world.
These last stories, in attempting to account for the These
diversities of language, make no reference to a Tower of ~~~~:Sbfye
Babel, and accordingly they may, with the possible exception independ-
of the Tlingit tale, be accepted as independent efforts of the ~!~~~e
human mind to grapple with that difficult problem, how- tradition.
ever little they succeed in solving it.
the writer gives no explanation, would History, vol. xvii. Part iii. (New York,
seem to have been a performance of the 1905) pp. 273, 275, 279, 283.
shamans, who danced to the light of a 1 Above, p. 3 l 8.
fire kindled by the friction of wood,
and who professed to walk through fire 2 Brasseur de Bourbourg, Popul
unscathed. See Roland B. Dixon, Vuk, le Livre Sacre et les Mythes de
''The Northern Maidt1,'' Bulleti1z of l'A1ztiquz'tt! Anzt!1icaine (Paris, 1861),
the Anterican Mzeseum ef Natural pp. 211-217.

PART II
THE PATRIARCHAL AGE

CHAPTER I
TfIE COVEN ANT OF ABRAHAM

WITH the story of the Tower of Babel, and the dispersion The
of the peoples from that centre, the authors of Genesis con- ~a~iar~hal
elude their general history of mankind in the early ages of ~!cribe~ .
.
th e wor ld . Th ey now narrow th e scope o f t h e1r narrative. 1n Genesis.

and concentrate it on the Hebrew people alone. The history
takes the form of a series of biographies, in which the fortunes
of the nation are set forth, not in vague general outlines, but
in a series of b1illiantly coloured pictures recording the adven-
1
tures of individual men, the forefathers of the race. The
unity which runs through the lives of the patriarchs is not
merely genealogical ; a community of occupation as well as
of blood binds these ancestors of Israel together ; all are
nomadic shepherds and herdsmen, roaming from place to
place with their flocks and herds in. search of fresh pasture ;
they have not yet settled down to the humdrum life of the
peasant, who repeats, year after year, the same monotonous
'
round of labour on the. same fields on which his father. and
his father's father had laboured all their days before him.
In short, it is the pastoral age which the writers of Genesis
have depicted with a clearness of outline and a vividness of
colouring vvhich time has not dimmed, and which, under all
the changed conditions of modern life, still hold the reader
spellbound by their ineffable charm. In this gallery of
1 I see no sufficieht reason to ques- substantial agreement with the rece11t
tion, with some modern writers, the English commentators on Genesis, S.
historical reality of the great Hebrew R. Driver (The Book ef Ge11es1's, Tenth
patriarchs, though doubtless some of Edition, pp. xliiisqq. ), Principal Sl<inner
the ,incidents and details which tradi- ( Co11i111entar)1 011 Ge1zesis, pp. xxiii sqq. ),
tion has recordecl concerning them are and Bishop lZyle ( 7'/ie Book of GenesiJ,
unhistorical. On this subject I a1n in pp. xxxix Jqq. ).
391
392 THE COVENANT OJ:t AJJJ1,AI:IAM l'AR'f II
portraits, painted against a background of quiet landscape,

the first place is occupied by the majestic figure of Abraham.
After quitting Babylo11ia, the land of his birth, he is said to
have migrated to Canaan and there to have received from
God in person the assurance of the future grandeur and glory
of his race. To confirm his promise the deity, we are told,
condescended to enter into a regular covenant with the
patriarch, observing all. the legal formalities which were
customary on such occasions among men. The narrative
of this important transaction affords us an interesting glimpse
into the means adopted by covenanters in primitive society
for the purpose of creating a binding obligation on both
sides.
God's We rea<l in Genesis that God commanded Abraham,
~~~nant saying to him, ''Take me an heifer of three years old, and a
Abraham. she-goat of three years old, and a ram of three years old,
and a turtledove, and a young pigeon." So Abraham took
the heifer, the she-goat, and the ram, cut them in two, and
laid each half of the animal over against the other ; but the
birds he did not divide. And when the birds of prey came
down on the carcasses, Abraham drove them away. When
the sun was going down, Abraham sank into a deep sleep,
and a horror of great darkness fell upon him. And it came
to pass that when the sun had set, and it was dark, behold
a smoking furnace and a flaming torch passed between the
pieces of the sacrificial victims, and God proclaimed his
covenant with Abraham. 1
Hebrew In this description the horror of great darkness which
~~i1;i~! a falls on Abraham at sunset is a premonition of the coming
covena?t of God, who in the darkness of night passes between the
by cutting f h l h d . . . .
a sacrificial pieces 0 t e s aug tere animals in the likeness of a
victim in smoking furnace and a flaming torch. In doing so the
two. deity only complied with the legal formalities required by
ancient Hebrew law at the ratification of a covenant for
.
we know from Jeremiah that it was the custom of the
'
contracting parties to cut a calf in twain and pass between
2
the pieces. That this. was the regular form observed
on such occasions is strongly suggested by the Hebrew
phrase for making a covenant, which is literally to '' cut a
1 Genesis xv. 9-2 I.
2 Jeremiah xxxiv. 18.

CHAP. I THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM 393
1
covenant,'' and the inference is confirmed by analogies in
the Greek language and ritual ; for the Greeks used similar Similar
phrases and practised similar rites. Thus they spoke of pra?tice in
ancient
cutting oaths in the sense of swearing them,2 and of cuttz'11g Greece and
a treaty instead of making one.3 Such expressions, like Rome.
the corresponding phrases in Hebrew and Latin,4 are un-
doubtedly derived from a custom of sacrificing victims
and cutting them in pieces as a mode of adding solem-
nity to an oath or a treaty. For example, we are told
that when Agamemnon was about to lead the Greeks to
Troy, the soothsayer Calchas brought a boar into the
market-place, and divided it into two parts, one on the west,
and one on the east. Then each man, with a drawn sword
in his hand, passed between the pieces of the boar, and the
blade of his sword was smeared with the 'blood. Thus they
swore enmity to P1iam. 5 But sometimes, and perhaps more Greek form
common 1y, 1n G ree k rtt ua1, 1nstea
d o f passing
b etween t h e of
anratifying
oath by
pieces of the victims, the person who made an oath stood stand~ngon
. . the pieces
upon them. S o tn trials before the court of the Areopagus of a
at Athens th~ accuser made oath standing on the pieces of s:;i.c~ificial
a boar, a ram, and a bull, which had been sacrificed by victim.
special persons on special days. 6 Again, when the fair
Helen was wooed by many suitors, her father Tyndareus,
fearful of the revenge which the rejected lovers might take,
made them all swear to defend her and the man of her
choice, whoever he might be ; and to give solemnity to the
oath he sacrificed a horse, cut it up, and caused the suitors
to swear standing on the pieces. 7 Again, in the council-
chamber at Olympia there was an image of Zeus surnamed
the God of Oaths ; and before the Olympian games began,
it was customary for the athletes, their fathers and brothers,
and also the trainers, to swear on the cut pieces of a boar
that they would be guilty of no foul play. 8 In Messenia
1 n:~ n!~, W. Robertson Smith, poetical. The ordinary expression is
Religion of the Sentites, New Edition, <r7rovoas 7rOLEt<r0aL, '' to 111aJ,e a treaty.''
(London, 1894), pp. 480 sq. 4 See below, Jl. 401, 11ote 2,
2 lipKLa rivELV. See, for exa1nple, 6 Dictys Cretensis, Bel/11111 Tro-
I-Iomer, Iliad, ii. l 24, Odysse)1 , xxiv. ;'a111111z, i. l 5.
48 3 ; Herodotus vii. l 32. o Demostl1enes, Oi. xxiii. }J 642.
3 Euripides, Helena, l 235, <r7rovoas
7 Pausanias iii. 20. 9.
riwEV Kal oia"A"Aa:x.071rl oL. But tl1e
Jlhrase is unust1al and perhaps only 8 l'ausa11ias v. 24. 9
394 THE CO VENAN1' OE' ABJ1>A-IAM l'AR'I' II
there was a place called the Boar's Grave, because Hercules

was there said to have exchanged oaths with the sons of
1
N eleus over the' pieces of a boar.
Si1nilar

Si1nilar ceremonies at taking an oath or making peace
ceremonies
at taking were observed also by barbarous tribes in antiquity. 'fhus
an oath the Molossians used to cut up oxen into small pieces when
observed 2
by tl1ey 1nade a treaty and swore to observe it ; however, we
barba1ous are not told what use precisely they made of the pieces in
t1ibes in
antiquity. the ceremony. Among the. Scythians, \vhen a man con-
ceived that he was wronged by another, against \vhom single-
handed he was powerless, he appealed to his friends for help
in tl1e following manner. He sacrificed an ox, cut up and
boiled the flesh, and having spread out the reeking hide on
the ground he sat down on it, with his arms doubled up
behind him, as if they were pinioned. This \Vas the most
urgent form of supplication known to the Scythians. While
the man sat thus on the hide, with the slices of boiled beef
beside him, his friends and relations and any one else who
chose to help him, would take each of them a slice of the
beef, and planting every man his right foot on the hide
would promise to furnish so many soldiers, horse or foot,

all found and free of charge, to assist the suppliant in
avenging himself on his enemy. Some would promise to
bring five men; some ten, and some more ; while the poorest
\Vould offer only their personal services. In this way some-
times a large force would be mustered, and so levied it was
deemed very formidable, because every man .in it was bound
Tibetan by his oath to stand by his fellow. 3 In Tibetan law-courts to
form of
oath. this day, '' when the great oath is taken, which . is seldom,
it is done by the person placing a holy scripture on his head, .
and sitting on the reeking hide of an ox and eating a part
of the ox's heart. The expense of this ceremony is borne
by the party who challenges the accused.'' 4
Similar
ceremonies ~eremonies. of a like kind are still observed at peace-
observed mal<:1ng by savage tribes in Africa and' India. Thus among
at peace-
making by the Kavirondo, of British East Africa, in making peace after
the 1 Pausanias iv. I 5. 8.
MoXorrwv.
Kavirondo
. 2 z b' ,.-. 8
eno 1us, ,_,e1it. 11. 3, 1n Paroemio- 3
N an d1, and . e d . E,, L . Lentsch et
h z. Graecz, Lucian, Toxaris, 48.
grap
B agesu o f F G S h a . 4
L. Austine Waddell, The B11dtih-
East G" .
. ~ pe1 ew1n ( ott1ngen, 18 39 _ is111 of Tibet (London, 1895), p. 569
Africa. 1851), 1. 53; Su1das, s.v. Boils 0 note 7
CHAP, I THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM 395
a war, the vanquished side takes a dog and cuts it in halves.

The delegates from each side then hold respectively the
forequarters and the hindquarters .of the divided dog, and
swear peace and friendship over the half dog which they
hold in their hands. 1 A similar ceremony is used to seal a
covenant of peace among the Nan di, another tribe of the
same region. They cut a dog in halves : the two halves
are held by men representing the two sides who have been
at war; and a third man says, ''May the man who breaks
this peace be kiJled like this dog.'' Others kill a tortoise
with blows of a. club, or smash a calabash full of water and
flies, and say,. '' May the man who breaks this peace be
killed like these things.'' Others again castrate a goat, and
after one man of each party has taken one of the testicles
in his hand they say : '' May God castrate the man who
breaks this peace." 2 Among the Bagesu, a Bantu tribe of
Mount Elgon, in British East Africa, when two clans have been
at war and wish to make peace, the representatives of the clans
hold a dog, one. by the head and the other by the hind legs,
while a third man cuts the dog through with a large knife
at one stroke. The body is then thrown away in the bush
and left, and thereafter the members of the two clans may
freely intermingle without any fear of trouble or danger. 3 ,
Among the Masai of East Africa, '' in settling serious Similar
disputes by oath, each disputant takes hold of a goat or !~~~;ino:
sheep, which is then cut in two. This is done in presence oaths
. an1ong the
of witnesses, and the matter thus settled 1s not supposed to Masai and
be reopened.'' 4 Among the Karamojo, another tribe of Karamojo
. of East
East Africa, ''a solemn oath is taken in the following way : Africa.
a black ox is selected and speared, the interested parties
then take hold of a leg each and these are cut from the
body ; each then partakes of the marrow from the leg he
has thus received.'' 5 In the Wachaga tribe of the same
1 Sir Harry Johnston, The Uga1ida 3 J ol1n Roscoe, The No1-ther11 Bantu
Protecto1-ate 2 (London, I 904), ii. 7 52 (Cambriclge, 1915), pp. 170 sq.
sq. ; C. W. Robley, Easter1t Uga1ida 4 J. I~. L. Macdonalcl, '' Notes on the
(London, 1902), p. 25. Ethnology of 1'ribes met with during
2 A. C. Hollis, The Nandi, thei'r progress of the Juba Expeditio11,''
Language a11d fiolk - Lore (Oxford, Jou1-1zal of the A11th1-opoloJ:ical I11~ti

I 909 ), p. 84. Com pare . Sir I1arry tute, xxix. (1899) p. 233.
Johnston, J'he Uga11da !"1-otectorate, 6 J. R. I,. !V1acclc>nalcl, op. 1it. lJP
ii. 884. 235 St].
THE COVENANT OF AliRAifAM PAR'f II
,
At n1aking region, when two districts have resolved to form a solemn
petice the
Wachaga
league and covenant of peace, the ceremony observed at the
of East ratification of the treaty is as follows. The warriors of the
Africa cut
a kid and two districts assemble and sit down crowded together in a

a rope 1n circle on some piece of open ground. A long rope is
two.
stretched round the assembly and its free ends are knotted
together on one side, so that the whole body of warriors
from both sides is enclosed within the rope. But before
the knot is tied, the rope is moved thrice or seven times
round the circle and a kid is carried with it. Finally, on
the side of the circle where the ends are knotted together,
the rope is passed over the body of the kid, which is held
stretched at full length by two men, so that the rope and
the kid form parallel lines, the rope being over the kid.
These motions of the rope and of the kid round the sitting
warriors are carried out by two uncircumcised and therefore
childless lads ; and the circumstance is significant, because
the lads symbolize that infertility or death without offspring
which the Wachaga regard as the greatest of curses, and
which they commonly refer to the action of the higher
powers. In most of their treaties they imprecate this
dreaded curse on perjurers, and on the contrary call down
the blessing of numerous progeny on him who shall keep his
oath. In the ceremony under discussion the employment
of uncircumcised youths is intended not merely to symbolize
the fate of the perjurer but to effect it by sympathetic
magic. For a similar reason the curses and the blessings
are recited by old men, because they are past the age of
begetting children. The recitation runs as follows, ''If
after the making of this covenant I do anything to harm
thee or devise devices against thee without giving thee
warning, may I be split in two like this rope and this kid ! ''
Chorus, ''Amen ! '' '' May I split in two like a boy who
dies without begetting children!'' Chorus, ''Amen ! '' ''May
my cattle perish, every one !'' Chorus, '' Amen ! '' '' But if
I do riot that ; if I be true to thee, so may I fare well ! ''
Chorus, ''Amen ! '' ''May my children be like the bees in
number!'' Chorus, ''Amen!'' And so forth and so forth.
When the representatives of the two covenanting districts
have sworn the oath, the rope and the kid are cut in
CHAP. I THE COVENANT OF ABRAHA,W 397
two at one stroke, and the spouting blood is sprinkled
on the covenanters, while the old men in a comprehensive '
formula call down curses and blessings impartially on both

sides. Afterwards the flesh of the goat is eaten by old men
'

who are past the. age of begetting children, and the rope is '

divided between the two districts, each of which keeps its

portion carefully. If epidemics should break out and be Wachaga
attributed by the diviners, who interpret the will of the mo~e ?f
exp1at1ng a
higher powers, to some breach of the treaty committed breach of
. wittingly or unwittingly by the inhabitants of the afflicted treaty.
country, the rope must be expiated or, as the native phrase
goes, ''cooled." For the magical power with which the
'
covenant invested the rope is now believed to be actively

engaged in avenging its violation. The expiation consists
in sacrificing a lamb and smearing its blood and dung on
the rope, while the following \vords are spoken : '' Those
people have done wrong without knowing it. Rope, to-day
I expiate thee, that thou mayst harm them no more! Be
expiated ! Be expiated ! Be expiated ! '' The persons
who have committed tl1e breach of faith are expiated by
a medicine-man, who sprinkles them with a magical mixture
compounded out of the blood of tortoises, rock-badgers, and
antelopes, together with portions of certain plants, the whole
being administered by means of a bunch of herbs of definite
1
sorts and accompanied by appropriate words.
Somewhat different, though conforming to the same Cere-
general type, are the ceremonies observed at peace-making monies at
peace-
among some tribes of South Africa. Thus, in the Barolong making
tribe, when the chief wished to make a covenant of peace ~=~~ribes
with another chief who had fled to him for protection, he of South
. took the paunch of a large ox, and bored a hole through it, Africa.

and the two chiefs crawled through the hole, the one after
the other, in order to intimate by this ceremony that their
2
tribes would thenceforth be one. Similarly among the
Bechuanas ''in making a public covenant or agreement with
one another, two chiefs tshwaragana moshwang; that is to
say, an animal is slaughtered, and some of the contents of its
1 J.
Raum, '' Blut- und Speichel- 2 Robert Moffat, Missio1iary Labours
biinde bei den Wadschagga,'' Archiv attd Scenes in Southern Africa
fur Religionswissenschaft, x. (I 907) (London, 1842), p. 278.
pp. 285-288.
THE COVENAN7' Of' AIJ!i'A/JAJf
stomach are laid hold of by botl1 ~ovenanting parties, their

hands meeting together and laying hold of cacl1 other, while
covered ove1 with the contents of the sac1ificed animal's
sto1nach. This would seem to be the most solemn form of
public agreement kno\vn in the country. It was performed
more than once at Shoshong while I was there, in the case
of chiefs who, with their people, placed themselves under
1
Sekhome's protection."
Similar Equivalent ceremonies are observed at peace-making
ceremoiiies among some of tl1e hill tribes of Assam. Thus the N agas
observed at
peace- ''have several ways of taking an oath. The commonest and
niaking h
among t e
most sacred is for the two parties to the oath to lay hold
Nagas and of a dog or fowl, one by its head the other by its tail or
~~~~i of feet, whilst the animal or bird is cut in two with a ddo,
2
Assam. emblematic of the perjurer's fate." According to another
authority, among the forms of oaths taken by the Nagas
are the following : '' When they swear to keep the peace,
or to perform any promise, they. place the barrel of a gun
or a spear between their teeth, signifying by this ceremony
that, if they do not act up to their agreement, they are
prepared to fall by either of the two weapons. Another
simple but equally binding oath is, for two parties to take ,
hold of the ends of a piece of spear-iron, and to have it cut
into two pieces, leaving a bit in the hand of each party; but
the most sacred oath, it is said, is for each party to take a
fowl, one by the head and the other by the legs, and in this
manner to pull it asunder, intimating that treachery or
3
breach of agreement would merit the same treatment."
Other N aga tribes of Assam have a somewhat different way
of settling disputes. '' A representative of each of the
'
1 John Mackenzie, Te1z Years North knife or sword, narrow at the haft,
efthe Orange River (Edinburgh, 1871), square, broad, and pointless at the tip,
p. 393. Compare W. C. Willoughby, with only one edge sharpened. The
''Notes on the Totemism of the ordinary ddo is used for many purposes,
Becwana,'' Journal ef the Anthropo- such as felling trees and cutting timber;
logical Insti'tute, xxxv. (1905) p. 306. the fighting dtio, long and heavy, is a
2 Lieut.-Col. R. G. Woodthorpe, weapon of, war. See Colonel Lewin,
''Notes on the Wild Tribes inhabit- quoted by T. C. Hodson, Tlte Naga
ing the so-called N aga Hills,'' Journal Tribes ef Manipur (London, 1911),
ef the Anth1opologz'cal I1istit2ete, xi. P 36.
(1882) p. 71 ; W. W. Hunter, 3
Major John Butler, T1avels and
Statistical Account ef Assa1n (London, Adventures in the Province ef Assam
1879), ii. 184. The ddo is a long (London; 1855), p. 154
CHAP. I THE CO VENANT OF ABRAI-AM 399
litigant parties holds an end of a cane basket inside which a

cat, alive, is placed, and at a signal a third man hacks the

cat in two, and both sides then cut it up with their daos,
taking care to stain the weapon with blood. On the .
occasion when I saw this ceremony I was told that the

ceremony was a form of peace-making or treaty, and that '
therefore the slaughter of the cat bound them in a kind of

1
covenant." Among the Lushei Kuki clans of Assam '' an
oath of friendship between chiefs is a serious matter. A
mithan is tied up to a post and the parties to the oath,

grasping a spear with their right hands, stab it behind the
shoulder with sufficient force to draw blood, repeating a
'
formula to the effect that until the rivers run backwards into
the earth again they will be friends. The animal is then
killed and a little of the blood is smeared on the feet and
forehead of the oath takers. 1'o make this oath more
binding they both eat a small piece of the liver raw." 2
We have now to ask, what is the meaning of these Two
sacrifi ces at ma k 1ng

a covenant or swearing an oat r h ., Wh different
y theories to
should the parties to a covenant or an oath ratify it by explain
killing an animal, cutting it in pieces, standing on the pieces ~~~!~onies,
'
or passing between them, and smearing the blood on their the. .
. retributive
persons? _.Two different theories have been suggested. The theory,
one may be called the retributive theory and the other the sacra- and the
sacra1nental or purificatory. We will consider the retributive mental or
theory first. According to it, the killing and cutting up of Pthurificatory eory.
the victim is symbolic of the retribution which will overtake
the man who breaks the covenant or violates the oath ; he,
like the animal, will perish by a violent death. This Th~ .
certain Jy appears to b e t h e in t erpre t a t"ion pu t upon th e theoryretr1but1ve
is
ceremony by some of the peoples who observe it. Thus the in. harmony
.Wachaga say, '' May I sp l"it in . two l"k h" d h"
i e t 1s rope an t 1s vie\v ofwith the
kid ! '' and in cutting a dog in two the Nandi say, ''May some of the
b k "ll
the man who breaks this peace e 1 e 1 e t 1s og. d l"k h" d '' 3 peopleswho
observe the

ceremonies.
1 T. C. Hodson, The Naga Tribes towards dusk they rett1rn of themselves,
efManipur(London, I9II), p. III. each to his owner's !1ouse. They
2 Lieut. - Col. J. Shakespea1, Tht are only used for slaughter. The tame
Lushei Kztki Clans (London, 19I2), mithan interbreecl freely witl1 the wild
p. 56. A mithan is a species of bison. mithan. See J. Shal,espear, op. cit.
These animals are allowed to wander PP 3 I sq.
at will in the jungle round the village ; 3 Above, pp. 395, 396.
THE CO VENAN.T 01'~ ABJ1'AlfAM PART II
Ceren1ony A similar ceremony, accompa11ied by similar impreca-

at peace-
111aking tions, used to solemnize the making of peace among the
among the Awome, a people of the Niger delta who are better known
Awon1e of
Calabar. to Europeans as New Calabars. When two towns or sub-
tribes grew weary of fighting, they would send to the ancient
village of Ke, situated near the coast, to the east of the
Sombreiro River, where was a fetish or ju-ju called Ke-ni
Opu-So. On such occasions the fetish priest was invited
to come and preside over the ratification of peace between
the belligerents. Accordingly he came in his canoe decked
with young palm leaves, and arranged with the former foes
to meet on an appointed day and swear to the covenant.
When the day came, the people gathered together, and the in-
habitants of Ke also came, bringing with them the necessary
offerings, which consisted of a sheep, a length of black or
dark blue cloth, gunpowder, and grass or grass seed. Over
these offerings th~ old enemies swore peace and friendship,
the priest first saying, '' To-day we Ke people bring peace
to your town.. From now on neither of you may have evil
mind against the other!' With these words he drew for-
ward the sheep and cleft it in two, saying, ''Should either
town fight again, may it be cleft asunder like this sheep.''
Then, lifting up the piece of dark cloth, he said, '' As this
cloth is dark, so may the offending town be darkened.''
Next, setting fire to the gunpowder, he said, '' As this powder
is burnt, so may fire burn the guilty town.'' Lastly, holding
out the grass, he said, '' Should either town fight again, may
that town be covered with grass." On account of the
services which the people of Ke rendered as peace-makers,
an ancient law of Calabar forbade any other town to wage
war on Ke under pain. of banishment to be inflicted on the
.
transgressors by all the other members of the tribe in con-

cert.1 In these Calabar rites the retributive intention of
cleaving the sheep in two is expressed without ambiguity,
and it is corroborated by the imprecations by which the
other symbolic ceremonies are accompaoied.
The same explanation is given of the similar rite
1 For this accottnt of the peace-mak- Talbot, District Commissioner in South '
ing ceremony of the Awome I am in- Nigeria. His letter is dated Degema,
debted to my friend Mr. P. Amaury S. Nigeria, December 7th, 1916.
CHAP. l THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM
among the Nagas, and is confirmed by the variations The

in the . form of the oath, which seem best explained a~ retributive
signifying the retribution that will befall the perjurer. !~:~7cr?~ce
1
The retributive theory can be also supported by evidence cases in such

drawn from classical antiquity. Thus when the Romans confirmed
and the Albans made a treaty, which, according to Livy, ~;a~~~e of
was the most ancient treaty on record, the representative of the Nagas
. . and of the
t h e R oman peopIe praye d to Jupiter, saying, '' If the Roman ancient
people shall knowingly and of set purpose depart from the Romans
terms of this treaty, then smite thou them, 0 Jupiter, on that ~~~eks.
day, as I smite this boar-pig to-day." So saying, he smote
2
and killed the pig with a flint knife. Again, we read in
Homer that at the making of a truce between the Greeks

and the Trojans, lambs were slaughtered, and while they lay
gasping out their life on the ground, Agamemnon poured a
libation of wine, and as he did so, both Greeks and Trojans
prayed that whichever side violated their oath, their brains
might be dashed out, even as the wine was poured on the
3
ground.
The retributive intention of the sacrifice in such cases The
. A . . . . h. h retributive
comes out very c1ear1y in an ssyr1an inscription, w ic theory of
records the solemn oath of fealty taken by Mati' -ilu, prince ~he sacrifice
, A . A h . . k"
o f B it- gusi, to s ur-nirar1, ing o f A .
ssyria. p f h in such
art o t e ceremonies
inscription runs thus : ''This he-goat has not been brought by illustrated
an
up from its flock for sacrifice, neither to the brave war- Assyrian
like (goddess Ishtar), nor to the peaceful (goddess Ishtar), ~e~~Y~f
neither for sickness nor for slaughter, but it has been
brought up that Mati' -ilu may swear fealty by it to Ashur-
nirari, king of Assyria. If Mati'-ilu sins against his oath,
just as this he-goat has been brought up from his flock, so
that he returns not to his flock and sets himself no more at
the head of his flock, so shall Mati'-ilu be brought up from
his land, with his sons, his daughters, and the people of
his land, and he shall not return to his land, i1either set
himself at the head of his land. This head is not the head
of the he-goat, it is the head of Mati'-ilu, it is the head of his
children, of his nobles, of the people of his land. If Mati'-ilu
1 Above, pp. 398 sq. the sense of 11tt1ki11g a t1eaty, like the
2 Livy i. 24. Hence the Latin Greek /JpKta. rep.PeLP
phrase '' to strike a treaty '' (joedus
/erire and foed11s 1'ctu111, Livy !.c.) in 3 1-Iomer, lliat!, iii. 292 sqq.
2D
VOL. I
402. THE CO VENANT Oft~ ABRAE-.fAM
\
l'AR'f II
breal<:s this oath, as the head of this he-goat is cut off, so

shall the head of Mati'-ilu be cut off. This right foot is not
th..e right foot of the he-goat, it is the right hand of Mati'-ilu,
the right ha11d of his sons, of his nobles, of the people of his
land. If Mati'-ilu (breaks this covenant), just as the right
foot (of this he-goat) is torn off (so shall the right hand of
Mati' -ilu, the right hand of) his sons (of his nobles, and of
the people of his land), be torn off." Here there is a long
gap in the inscriptio11. We may conjecture that in the
missing portion the dismemberment of the victim was
further described, and that as each limb was lopped off, the
sacrificer proclaimed that it was not the limb of the goat
that was severed, but the limb of Mati'-ilu, of his sons, his
daughters, his nobles, and the people of his land, if they
should prove traitors to their liege lord, the king of
1
Assyria.
Similar Similar sacrifices, accompanied and interpreted by
~~~;;~~=:~d similar imprecatio11s, meet us in the ritual of barbarous
?Y similar peoples at the present time. Thus i11 the island of Nias, by
impreca-. f "f . I h
tions, occur way o rat1 y1ng a so emn oat or covenant, a man w1
"11 cu t
ii_i the the throat of a sucking-pig, while at the same time he calls
ritual of . .
barbarous down on his own head a like death 1f he forswears htm-
peoples. self or breaks his engagement. 2 Int he island of Timor a
Examples
from the common form of giving evide11ce on oath is this : the witness
Indian
Archi-
takes a fowl in one hand and a Sv\'Ord in the other, and says,
pelago. '' Lord God, who art in heaven and on earth, look upon me !
If I bear false witness to harm my fellow-men, may I be
punished! This day I make iny oath, and if J am not
speaking the t1t1th, may my head be cut off like the head of
this fowl ! '' So saying, he chops off the bird's head on a
3
wooden block. Among the Battas of Sumatra when chiefs
i
are assembled to make peace or enter into a solemn

covenant, a pig or a cow is brought forth, and the chiefs
stand round it, each with his spear in his hand. Then the
1 F. E. Peiser, Studien zztr orie1z- eiland Nias en deszelfs Bewoners,''
talischen Altertu11zsku1zde, pp. 3 sqq. Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch
(Mitteilungen de1 Vorderasiatischen Genootschap van .Kitnsten en Weten-
Gesellschaft, Berlin, 1898). The schappen, xxx. (Batavia, 1863) p. 105.
words enclosed in brackets are wanting 3 H. D. Wiggers, '' Gewone eid der
in the inscription. Timoreezen en Rottineezen,'' Ti;a-
2
J. T. Nieuwenhuisen en H. C. B. sch1ift voor fndische Taal-, Lt1nd- en
von Rosenberg, '' Verslag omtrent bet Volkenkunde, xxxvi. (I 893) p. 279.
CHAP. I THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM
gongs are beaten, and the oldest or most respected chief

cuts the animal's throat with his knife; afterwards the
beast's body is opened, and the still palpitating heart torn
out and chopped into as many bits as there, are chiefs
present. Each chief thereupon puts his morsel on a spit,
roasts or warms it at a fire, and holding it up says, '' If ever
I break my oath, may I be slain lil(e this beast that lies
bleeding before me, and may I be eaten as its heart is now
eaten." So saying he swallows the morsel. When all the
chiefs have observed this rite, the still reeking carcass is
divided among the people present and serves them for a
1
feast.
The Malagasy had a solemn form of swearing allegiance Similar

to a new sovereign,' which was called ''spearing the calf.'' A sacri~ces
and impre-
young bullock was killed and dismembered, the head and cations in
tail being cut off and reversed in their position at each end :~~:;.
of the animal, while the hind-feet and the fore-feet were
similarly transposed ; moreover the carcass was cut open, and
a spear thrust into the bowels. Then a number of the I .
chiefs or other principal men who were to be sworn, took

hold of the spear, as many as co11ld conveniently grasp it,
and standing round the mangled animal listened, while the
senior judge pronounced the oath, calling down many terrible
curses on all who should pe1jure themselves, and winding up
with these words, '' If any of yot1 ever retract, if any of you
ever refuse allegiance to the sovereign appointed to reign,
whether all has been specifically named or i1ot, whether
present or absent, great or small, old or young, male or
female, newly brought to life or still unborn, \Vhether holding
the spear or not holding it, behold this glittering spear !
behold this young bullock ! and let the perjurer be as this
bullock; let him be speared of god ; let him not be favoured
2
in any thing, but let him be wholly accursed ! '' .
Among the Gallas of East Africa, when a man is Sin1~Iar
. . . If sacrifices
accused of a crime, a common form of clea11ng htmse and impre-
from the accusation is this. A cocl< and a rusty l<nife are cations i~
. . b f . b EastAfr1ca.
handed to him ; he kills the bird, cuts 1t 1tm rom 1tm , .

1 Franz Jungl1ul1n, Die Battali:i11der 2 \-Villian1 I~llis, llisto1;1 of ll1ada-
au/ Su111at1a (Berli11, 1847), ii. 142 ,,rrascti1 (London and I'aris, preface
sq. dated 1838) i. 368 J'IJ
THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM PART II
then hacks the body in pieces till he has made mince meat
of it down to the last feather, which he throws away with
an imprecation, praying that, if he is guilty, it may be
1
done unto him as he has done unto the fowl. Arnong the
Akikuyu of East Africa the most solemn for1n of oath is
administered by beating a goat to death with a stone and
imprecating at the same time a like fate on all who should
forswear themselves. The ceremony may only be performed
Kikuyu by an elder of a particular clan. Mr. C. W. Robley has
form of tl1e d .b d h h h d . . d t th t .b
ceremopy. escr1 e O\V t e oat was a min1stere o e rt e on a
particular occasion, when the head chief desired to bind his
people to the discha1ge of certain obligations which they had
of late neglected. '' A male goat of not less than t\vo or
three colours had its four legs tied together in a bunch by means
of a green withy, a number of twigs of certain plants were
gathered and then packed in between the legs and the body
of the ar:iimal. . . . These preparations being complete all
' the participators in the oath. moved to the windward of the
animal all except the elder who conducted the ceremony.
The elder in question then took a large stone and beat the
legs of the animal until he considered they were broken,
all the time calling out that any who broke the oath would
have their legs broken in a similar way. He then
enumerated the obligations which it was essential they
should fulfil. Next he hammered the spine of the animal,
and finally beat in the skull with . a stone, continually
haranguing the assembly and condemning them to a similar
fate if they broke the oath by omitting to fulfil the duties
he enumerated. It is considered very deadly to stand
down wind from the goat while this ceremony is going on.
The assembled crowd then marched off chanting, and about
half a mile down the road another speckled male goat
had been slaughtered and the blood and contents of the
stomach were spread on the path ; each mem her of the
assembly had to tread in this with his bare feet and on
every one who did this the oath was considered binding. '
The second goat was killed by its stomach being opened.
Neither of the sacrificial animals was eaten but left in the
1
Ph: Paulitschke, Ethnographie Nordost-Afrikas, die geistige Cultur der
Dandkzl, Galla und So11idl (Berlin, 1896), p. 52.,
CHAP. I THE COVENAN7.0F ABRAHAM
1
bush to be devoured by hyaenas." Among the Atheraka, Atherakan
another tribe of British East Africa the blood-feud which form of the
' ct-remony.
arises from a murder may be settled by the payment of a
fine and the performance of the following ceremony. The
murderer and the representative of the injt1red family are
taken by the elders to a river. A sheep and a goat are

produced, of which the sheep is killed first and its fat
smeared over the eyes of both men, so that they cannot
see. Thus blindfolded they are led to a hole which has
been dug in the ground, and between them the goat is
placed. The two men must then between them force the
goat's head into the hole, which is afterwards filled up, and
the men hold the goat with its head in the ground till it is
suffocated. Finally, they must break the animal's legs with
their hands, and as they do so, an elder addresses them in
these words, ''You are now as brothers, if you quarrel you
2
shall be broken as these bones."
Again, among the Chins, who inhabit the hills on the Similar
borders of Assam and Bur1na, when two tribes take an oath an sacdri~ces
1mpre-
of friendship, they meet and produce a tame bison. The cations
'vvise men of each village pour liquors over it and mutter to ~~~~go~he
their respective spirits to note the agreement which is now Assam and
to be made over blood. The chiefs of either side each Burma.
take a spear and standing on opposite sides of the bison
drive their spears into its heart. If guns and not spears
are used, the two chiefs simultaneously fire into the animal's
brain or heart. As the bison falls its throat is cut and
the blood collected in bowls ; tl1e tail of the animal is then
cut off and dipped in the blood, and with it the chiefs and
elders of the two parties daub the blood on each other's
faces, whilst the wise men mutter, '' May the party who
breaks this agreement die even as this animal has died,
anci may he be buried outside the village and his spirit
never rest ; may his family also die and may every ,bad
3
fortune attend his village."
I C. W. Robley, Ethnology of A- 255, who tells t1s tl1at this oath is com-
Ka11iba and other East African tribes n1only used in all l(ikt1yu districts.
(Cambridge, 1910), pp. 142 sq. See 2 I-Ion. C. Dt1ndas, op. cit. p. 271.
also Hon. C. Dundas, ''The Organiza- 3 Bertram S. Carey ancl l'l. N. Tue],,
tion and Laws of some Bantu tribes in The Chin .liills, i. (l~angoon, 1896)
East Africa,''Joitrnal of the Royal A1i- p. 195. Co1npare lYiajor W. Gwynne
thropological Institzete, xiv. (I 9 I 5) p. flughes, The Hill T1acts of A1aka11
THE COVENANT OF ABRAEIA111" PA!{1' II
Si1nilar In the old days, when tl1e l{arens of Burma desired to

"
sacrifices
and
mal{e peace with thei1 enemies, the representatives of the

impreca- two sides met and proceeded as follows. Filings made from
tions
among the a s\vord, a spear, a musket barrel, and a stone were mixed
Karens of in a cup of water with the blood of a dog, a hog, and a fowl,
Burn1a.
\vhich were killed for the purpose. This mixture of blood,
water, and filings was called the '' peace-mal\ing water."
Next the skull of the slaughtered dog was chopped in two,
and the rep1esentative of one side tool{ the lower jaw of the
animal and hung it by a string round his neck, while the
representative of the other hung the dog's skull, including the
upper jaw, round his neck in like manner. Thereafter the
representatives solemnly promised that their people would
thenceforth live at peace with each other, and in confirmation
of the promise they drank the '' peace-making water," and
having drunk it they said, ''Now that we have made peace,
if any one breaks the engagement, if he does not act truly,
but goes to war again and stirs up the feud again, may the
spear eat his breast, the musket his bowels, the sword his
(Rangoon, 1881), p.44. Agoodexample the East Indian Island of Bu1u people
of a symbolic oath, withot1t the sacrifice who swear an oath d1ink water 111ixed
of an animal, is f11rnished by the one with salt, earth, and gunpowder fro1n
which son1e Kt1ki-Lt1shai tribes of a bowl in which are placed a l{nife and
Assam take on the occasion when two -a pair of scissors. Tl1e meaning is that
villages make a. covenant of peace. the perjurer will waste away like salt in
The symbolic objects on which the water ; that tl1e earth will gape and
oath is sworn are an egg, a tiger's swallow hin1 ; that, like gunpowder in
tooth, a lump of earth, a red thread, a the fire, he will be consumed ; and that
black thread, a spear; a swo1d, and the knife and the scissors will cut his
the leaf of a ve1y sharp-stinging nettle. throat. See J. H. W. van der l\fiesen,
The swearer prays that, if he forswears '' Een en antler over Boeroe,'' Mededeel-
himself he may be lik.e the egg which ingen va11 wege het Nederlandsche Zen-
has neither hands nor feet, neither ears delinggenoot.rchap, xlvi. (I 902) pp. 449
nor head ; that he may be devo11red by sq. Compare J. G. F. Riedel, De
a tiger like the one on whose tooth he sluik-e1t kroesharige rasse1t tttssche1z
swears ; that he may be washed away Selebes en Papua (The Hague, 1886),
by the 1ain like tl1e lum1J of earth ; p. l I. In the Menta wei Islands, to
that his red blood may be shed in war the west of Sun1atra, a man who is
like the red thread ; that his sight may taking an oath will whittle away a sticl{
fail and the world be dark to him liJ,e with his knife, praying that, if he breaks
the black thread ; that he may be his oath, the spirits may cut him to
wounded by spear and sword ; and pieces j11st as he does to the stick. See
that his body may be continually sub- J. F. K. Hansen, ''De groep N.oord- en
jected to tortures like those inflicted Zuid-Pageh van de Mentawei-eilanden,''
by the stinging nettle. See C. A. Bijdragen tot de Taal- Land- en Volken-
Soppitt, A Short Account ofthe Kachcha kunde van Nederla1idsche-Indie, lxx.
Nt2ga (E111peo) 7ribe in the North (1915) p. 217.
CacharHi'lls(Shillong, 1885), p. 13. In
CHAP. I THE CO VENA NT OF ABRAHAM
I
head ; may the dog devour him, may the l1og devour .him,
1
may the stone devour him ! '' Here the sword the spear
, '
the musket, and the stone, as well as the sl~in dog, hog, and
fowl, are supposed to assist in bringing down vengeance on
the perjurer, who has imbibed portions of them all in the
'' peace-making water."
In these examples the retributive virtue ascribed to the In these
sacrifice is rende1ed unmistakable by the accompanying ~~~emonies
words : the slaughter of the animal symbolizes the slaughter slaughter

o f th e perjurer, or ra th er 1t 1s
a piece
o f 1m1tat1ve
magic. of the
animal
designed to bring do\vn on the transgressor the death symbolizes
which he deserves. A retributive effect is also ascribed !~:ughter
to the slaughter of an animal in the following instances, of t~e
. perjurer.
though 1n them apparently the efficient cause is believed to But
be the ghost of the slain animal rather than.
the magical virtue shomehtimes f
t e g ost o
of the ceremony. Thus the Kayans or Bahaus of Central the slain
Borneo swear in ordinary cases on the tooth of a royal ~~~~;~ti~o
tiger ; but in serious cases they pt1t a dog slowly to death ha~nt the
by stabbing it repeatedly \vith a sword, while the n1an who perjurer.
takes the oath smears his body with the streaming blood.
They believe that if he forswears himself the ghost of the
2
dog will haunt, bite, and kill him. Similarly, among the
Ossetes of the. Caucasus, a man who swears will sometimes
cut. off a cat's head or hang a dog, praying that if he swears
falsely or breaks his oath, the cat or dog may bite or
3
scratch him. Here agai11 it seems obvious that it is the
ghost of the hanged dog or decapitated cat which is charged
with the duty of avenging perjury.
1 Rev. F. Mason, D.D., ''On is spoken of as Ko11uzn asu, i. e. ' the
Dwellings, Wo1ks of Art, Laws, etc., eating of the dog''' (Ch. !lose and
of the Karens,'' Jozernal of t!te Asiatic W. McDot1gall, The Fagan Tribes ef
.Society ef Bengal, New Series, xxxvii. Bo111co, London, 1912, ii. 80). llow-
(Calcutta, 1868) pp. 160 sq. ever, in this case we are not told that
2 A. W. Nieuwenhuis, Quer durc!t vengeance is wreaked on the perjt1rer
Borneo (Leyden, 1904-1907), i. 62. by the ghost of the dog.
The l\1alanaus of Central Borneo '' t1se 3 Julius von Klaproth, Rez"se in deii
a dog in tal<ing a very solemn oath, Ka1ekas11s tt11d 11ac!t Georgzen (Halle
and sometimes the dog is killed in the and Berlin, 1812-1814, ii. 603). !<'or
course of this ceremony. Or instead mo1e examples of the symbolical or
of the dog l)eing killed, its tail may be nlagical sacrifice of animals at taking
ct1t off, and the man tal<ing the oath oaths, see R. Lasch, Der Eid (Stutt-
licks the blood from the stt1mp ; this gart, 1908), PlJ 51 J"fJ., 84-88, \vhere
is considered a most binding and many of the 1Jrecedi11g instances a1e
solemn for1n of oath. The ceremony cited.
THE CO VENA NT OF ABRAI:!AM PART II
'
The sacra- But it may be questioned whether the retributive function

me~fital or of the sacrifice suffices to explain the remarkable feature in
pur1 catory
theory the Hebrew and Greek rite which consists in passing between
~!r~':onies. the pieces of the slain animal or standing upon them.
Accordingly W. Robertson Smith suggested what we may
call the sacramental or purificatory interpretation of the
rite. He supposed that '' the parties stood between the
pieces, as a symbol that they were taken within the mystical
life of the victim '' ; 1 and in confirmation of this view he
pointed to the use of the very same rite_ in other cases to
which the idea of punishment or retribution appears to be
inapplicable, but of which some at least can be explained as
'
Bisection of modes of ceremonial purification. Thus in Boeotia a form

vict! ms in of public purification was to cut a dog in two and pass
pur111 catory
2
ceremonies. between the pieces. A similar rite was observed at purifying
a Macedonian army. A dog was ~ut in two : the head and
fore part were. placed on the right, the hinder part, with the
entrails, was placed on the left, and the troops in arms
marched between the pieces. On the conclusion of the rite
the army used to divide into two and engage in a sham
3
Peleus and fight. Again, it is said that when Peleus sacked Iolcus, he
Astydamia. slew the king's wife Astydamia, cut her in pieces, and caused
4
the army to march between the pieces into the city. The
ceremony was probably regarded as a form of purification
to which a high degree of solemnity was imparted by the
use of a human victim. This interpretation is con-
firmed b}' the ritual which the Albanians of the Caucasus
observed at the temple of the Moon; from time to
time they used to sacrifice a sacred slave by stabbing him
with a spear, after whicl1 the body was carried to a certain
South place and all the people stepped on it as a purificatory
African 5
purifica- rite. Among the _Basutos of South Africa a form of
tions, ceremonial purification is this. They slaughter an animal,
pierce it through and through, and then cause the person
who is to be purified to pass through the hole in the car-.
1 W. Robertson Smith, Religion ef purificatory rites, but he does not de-
the Se1nites 2 (London, I 894 ), p. 48 I. scribe the ritual.
2
Plutarch, Quaestio1zes Romanae, 3
Livy xl. 6 ; Quintus Curtius, .De
I I 1. In the same treatise ( Quaest. gestis Alexandrz' Magni, x. 9. 28.
Rom. 68) Plutarch tells us that almost 4 Apollodorus, Bibliotheca, iii. 13. 7.
all the Greeks useq dogs as victims in 5
Strabo xi. 4. 7,p. 503, ed. Casaubon.
CHAP, I THECO VENANT OF ABRAHAM 409
1
cass. We have seen that among the Barolong of South Africa
a similar rite is observed at making a covenant: the covenanters
force themselves through a hole in the stomach of the
2
slaughtered animal. Together, these South African customs
suggest that the passage between the pieces of a sacrificial
victim is a substitute for passing through the carcass itself.
The purificatory, or better, perhaps, the protective, inter- The
pretation of such rites is strongly confirmed by the practice purificatoiy
or pro-
of the Arabs of Moab, who still observe similar ceremonies tective
in times of public calamity, such as drought or epidemic, !f~~r~~eta
and explain them as intended to deliver the people from the rites
1 h" h ffi" h
t h e ev1 w 1c a 1cts or t reatens t em. h If c 1 confi1med
, tor examp e, by a
the tribe is suffering from the ravages of cholera, the sheikh ceremony
"11 d .
w1 stan up 1n t e mi h "ddl f h which
e o t e camp and cry out, Arabs of the
''Redeem yourselves,
0 people, redeem yourselves!'' There- Mo;b
per1orm
upon every family takes a sheep, sacrifices it, and, having in times
0
divided it in two, hangs the pieces under the tent or on two ear 1pu~ltic am1 y.
posts in front of the door. All the membe1s of the family
' then pass between the two pieces of the victim ; children
too young to walk are carried by their parents. Often they
pass several times between the bleeding fragments of the
sheep, because these are thought to possess the virtue of
driving away the evil or the jinn who would injure the tribe.
A similar remedy is resorted to in seasons of drought, when
the pastures are withered and the cattle dying for lack of
rain. The sacrifice is regarded as a ransom for man and
beast. The Arabs say, '' This is our ransom, for us and for
our flocks." Questioned as to the mode in which the cere-
mony produces this salutary effect, they say that the
sacrifice meets and combats the calamity. The epidemic,
or drought, or whatever it may be, is conceived as a wind
blowing across the plains and S\Veeping all before it, till it
encounters the sacrifice which, like a lion, bestrides the
path. A terrific combat ensues ; the disease or dro11ght is
beaten and retires discomfited, while the victorious sacrifice
3
remains in possession of the field. Here certainly there is
I E. Casalis, Les BasJoutos (Paris, 2 Above, p. 397.
1860), pp. 270 sq. In the English 3 Anton in Ta11ssen, Co11t11111es des
translation of this work, usually very Arabes au pay~ de ll!foab (l)aris, 1908),
correct, the present passage is wrongly pp. 361-363; id., ''Co11tt1mes Arabes,''
rendered. Revue Bi"bliqzee, April 1903, p. 248.

4ro THE CO VENANT OF ABlrAf-JAM PAf{'J' II
no idea of retribution : neither symbolically nor magically is

the death of the sheep supposed to entail the death of the
people who pass between the joints of mutton; on the contrary,
it is believed to save their lives by protecting them against the
evil which, in one way or another, threatens their existence.
Similar rites In the lil<:e circumstances a precisely similar custom is
observed
by the
observed and similarly explained by the Chins, who inhabit
Chins, the the hill country bordering on Assam and Burma. Among
Koryaks,
and the these people,' '' when a person believes that he is followed
gipsies of by an enraged spirit, such as the spirit of cholera, it is a
Transyl-

van1a. common practice to cut a dog in half without severing the
entrails and to place the fore-qt1arters on one side of the
road and the hind-quarters on the other side and connected
by the intestines stretched across the road; this is to
appease the spirit and to dissuade 11im from following any
1
further." So strictly do the Chins personify cholera as a
dangerous spirit, that when a party of them visited Rangoon
i11 time of the epidemic, they carried their swords drawn,
wherever they went, to scar~ away the demon, and they
spent the day hiding under bushes that he might not find
2
them. Similar means of averting a plague or pestilence
used to be employed by the Koryaks of north - eastern
Siberia. They slaughtered a dog, wound the guts about
3
two posts, and passed under them. No doubt they also
thought in this way to give the slip to the spirit of disease,
who would find an insurmontable barrier in dog's guts.
Again, women after childbirth are commonly supposed to
be unclean and to be exposed to the attacl<:s of malignant
supernatural beings. Hence among the gipsies of Transyl-
vania, when a woman in such circumstances leaves her bed
of sickness, she is made to pass between the pieces of a
cock \\'hich has been cut in t\vo, if her child is a boy, but
1 Bertra111 S. Carey and H. N. sacrifice wo11ld seem to be now obsolete
Tuck, The Chin Hills, i. (Rangoon, among tl1e l{oryaks ; at least it is not
1896) p. 200; H. W. Read, Hand mentioned by Mr. W. Jochelson in his
Book of Haka Chi1z Cztstorns (Rangoon, acco11nt of l{oryak sacrifices, tl1ough
1917), p. 40. .he describes the sacrifice of dogs as
2
Bertram S. Carey and H. N. still common in the tribe. See Walde-
Tuck, Tlze C/1i1z Hills, ~. 198. mar Jochel~on, '' The l{oryak, Religion
3 S. Krascheninnikow, Beschreibzeng and Myths,'' TheJesztp North Pacific
aes La1zdes Kan1tschatka (Lemgo, 1766), Expedition, vol. vi. Part i. (Leyden
pp. 277 sq. This particular form of and New York, 1905), pp. 90 sqq.
CHAP. I THE COVENANT
, OF ABRAHAM 411
between the pieces of a hen, if her child is a girl ; after

which the cock is eaten by men, or the hen by women. 1
In all these cases the passage between the severed pieces In these
of tl1e animal is clearly protective, not retributive, in inten- ?ases ~he

t1on : th fl h
e es an d bl d f h
oo o t e v1ct1m are thought some- passing 1ntent1on of
hovv or other to present an obstacle to the powers of evil b~tween the

' pieces of an
and so to prevent them from pursuing and 1nJur1ng the ani111al is to
person who
has passed through the narrow way. All such elude thef
po\\ers o
ceremonies may therefore be called purificatory in the wide evil.
sense of the word, since they purify or deliver the sufferer
from malignant i11fluences. The same purpose apparently
is effected in a slightly different way by the Khonds of
'
India. The death of. al'ly person in one of their villages
requires a purification, which is usually carried out by the
sacrifice of a buffalo. But if a man has been killed by a
tiger, his death requires an extraordinary ceremony to
expiate it. For this purpose the men of the village are
drawn up in a line with their legs astraddle : a pig is
brought forward, its head is chopped off with an axe by a
'
. hill weaver, and then, all dripping with blood, it is passed
between the legs of all the men. But it would be a bad
2
omen if the head touched any of the straddling legs. In
this case, instead of the men passing between the animal,

the animal is made to pass between the legs of the men;
but the intention of the ceremony is probably the same,
and its effect is without doubt equally salutary.
Returning to the point from which we started, we may The
now ask whether the ancient Hebrew form of making a ii;itstdances c1 e seem
covenant, by passing between the severed pieces of a to confi;m
sacrificial victim, \Vas retributive or purificatory in its inten- ~~~!r;r~~
tion; in other words, was it a symbolic mode of imprecat- protectiv.e
. . . l d f explanation
ing death on the petJurer? or \Vas 1t a magtca mo e o of the
purifying the covenanters from evil influences and so guard- Hebrew
. h b h . .k custon1 of
ing them against certain dangers to wh tc ot parties a 1I e passing
were exposed ? The other instances which I have cited of b~t\veenfthe
~ pieces o a
passing between the severed pieces of a sacr1fic1al v1ct1m sac1ificed
fi t t t' l
seem to support t h e pu11 ea ory or pro ec 1ve exp ana ton making at animal at
covenant.
1 11. von Wlislocki, Vo111 wandern 2Edgar Thurston, Eth1zo.graphi<
den Zigeunervolke (IIamb11rg, 1890), Notes in Southern .l11dia (Madras,
p. 92. ' 1906), pp. 165 sq.
412 THE COVENANT OF ABlrAHAM PART II
of the Hebrew rite ; for wl1ile none of them require the

retributive interpretation, some positively exclude it ; and
on the other hand some are only explicable on the puri-
ficatory or protective hypothesis, which is in fact expressly
alleged by certain of the peoples, such as the Arabs and the
Chins, who observe the custom. Certainly, in any attempt
to explain the ancient Hebrew rite, much weight must be
given to the analogy of the modern Arab ceremony ; for
the two customs are identical in form, and the peoples wh'o
practise or have practised them are both members of the
'
Semitic family, speaking kindred Semitic languages and
inhabiting the same country ; since the land of Moab,
where the Arabs still observe the ancient custom, formed
part of the land of Israel, where Abraham of old sojourned
and covenanted with God in like manner. The inference
seems almost inevitable, that the ancient Hebrew and the
modern Arab rite are both derived from a common Semitic
original, the purificatory or protective intention of which is
still clearly borne in mind by the Arabs of Moab.
Robertson .. One question still remains to be asked. In what did
Smith's the purificatory or protective virtue of such an act consist?
sacra-
mental why should the passage between the pieces of a slaughtered
interpreta-
tion of tl1e animal be thought to protect a man against danger?
Hebre\v Robertson Smith's answer is given in what may be called
custom as
a form of the sacramental interpretation of the custom. He supposed
blood that the persons who stood or passed between the pieces of
covenant.
the victim were thought to be thereby united with the
animal and with each other by the bond of a common
blood ; in fact, he held that such a covenant is only a
variant of the widespread custom known as the blood
covenant, in which the covenanters artificially create a tie of
consanguinity between themselves by actually mixing a
1
little of their own blood. On this hypothesis the only
material difference between the two forms of covenant is,
that the blood of an animal is substituted in the one for the
human blood of the covenanters themselves in the other.
Much is to be said for this theory. In the first place, as
1 W. Robertson Smith, The Religion 1zant (London, 1887). Many more
of the Se11tites 2 (London, 1894), pp. examples of the custom could be added
480 sq. As to the blood covenant, to those collected by the latter writer.
see C. H. Trumbull, The Blood Cove-
.
CHAP. I THE CO VENANT OF ABRAHAM
'
1
we saw, the South African evidence clearly points to the The inter-
conclusion

that the passage between the severed pieces of pretation
confirmed
a sacrificial victim is merely a substitute for the passage by the
an~logy of
through the carcass of the animal. This conclusion is con- various
firmed by observing that the Chins, in cutting the sacrificial s~vage
dog. in two, do not absolutely divide it, but keep the fore- rituals.
quarters connected with the hind-quarters by the string of
the animal's guts, under which the people pass ; and the
same appears, though less clearly, to have been the practice
2
of the Koryaks. The retention of the string of guts as a
bond uniting the otherwise severed halves of the victim
seems clearly to be an attempt to combine the theoretical
unity of the slain animal with the practical convenience of
dividing it, so as to admit of the passage of people through
its carcass. But what could be the sense of thus putting
people, as it were, into the body of the animal unless it were
for the purpose of investing them with some qualities which
the animal is believed to possess, and which, it is assumed,
can be transferred to anybody who physically identifies
himself \vith the animal by actually entering into it?
That this is indeed the conception at the base of the The
rite is suggested by the analogy of a custom observed by :~~~~1
the Patagonian Indians. Among these people, ''in some inter-
cases when a child is born, a cow or mare is killed, the ~~~t::~d
stomach taken out and cut open, and into this receptacle byacustom
while still warm the child is laid. Upon the remainder of ~a~~;onian
the animal the tribe feast. . . . A variation of the foregoing I11dians.
birth-ceremony is yet more savage. If a boy is born, his
tribe catch a mare or a colt if the father be rich and a
great man among his people, the former; if not, the latter-
a lasso is placed round each leg, a couple round the neck,
and a couple round the body. The tribe distribute them-
selves at the various ends of these lassos and take hold.
The animal being thus supported cannot fall. The father
of the child now advances and cuts the mare or colt open
from the neck downwards, the heart, etc., is torn out, and
the baby placed in the cavity. The desire is to l<eep the
animal quivering until the child is put inside. By this
means they believe that they ensure the child's becoming a
I Above, pp. 408 sq. 2 Above, p. 410.
THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAJ/,f l'AR'f II

1
fine horseman in the future." The custom and the reason
alleged for it are both significant. If you wish to make a
child a good horseman, these Indians argue, the best
possible way is to identify him at birth with a horse by
putting him into the body of a living 1nare or colt;
surrounded by the flesh and blood of the animal he \vill be
one with it corporeally, he will have the hunting seat of a
Centaur, whose human bogy is actually of a piece with the
body of his horse. In short, the placing of the child in the
body of the mare or colt is neither more nor less than a
piece of sympathetic magic intended to endue a human
being \vith equine properties. .
The On the same principle, as ~obertson Smith pointed out, 2
Scythian
rite
we can explain the Scythian form of covenant by treading
3
similarly on the hide of a slaughtered ox. All who put their right
explained.
feet on the hide thereby made themselves one \~rith the
anitnal and 'vith each other, so that all were united by a tie
of common blood which ensured their fidelity to each other.
For the placing of one foot on the hide was probably an
abridged form of wrapping up the man completely in it; as
a worshipper at the shrine of the Syrian goddess , at Hiera-
polis used to kneel on the skin of the sheep he had sac1i-
ficed, and drawing the sheep's head and trotters over his
own head and shoulders prayed, as a sheep, to the goddess
4
to accept his sacrifice of a sheep.
RoJ;er;son This interpretation of the Scythian custom, proposed by
Smiths
explanation R b S h 'k' I fi
o ertso~ rn1t , is stri ing y con rmed by an African
ofthe parallel. Among the Wachaga of East Africa it is
Scythian
rite
fi l d .
customary or a s to receive what may be called their war- .
confirmed baptism two years after they have been circumcised. They
~r~c:n assemble with their fathers and all the grown men at the
parallel. chief's village. Two oxen and two goats are killed, and
their blood is caught in an ox-hide, which is held by several
men. The lads strip themselves and go in long rows four
times round the blood-filled hide. , Then they stand in a
row. An old man makes a small cut in each of their
lower arms. Thereupon each boy, stepping up to the blood-
1 H. Hesketh Pritchard, Through note 3,
the Heart of Patagonia (London, 1902), 3
p. 96. Above, p. 394.'
2 Religion of the Se1rtitts,2 p. 402 4
Lucian, De dea Syria, 55.
filled hide, allows some drops of blood from his arm to fall
into it, takes up a handful of the mixed blood swallows it
'
and puts on his clothes. Then they crouch down round
' .
the chief, and after many speeches each lad receives a war-
name from his father or, if his father is dead from an
old man who acts in place of his father. ' Next the
chief harangues them, declaring that they are no longer
children but soldiers, and instructing them in their new
duties. He also gives them all a common scutcheon for
their shields, which marks them out as belonging to one
1
and the same company. Here the lads who are to fight
shoulder to shoulder in the same company l<:nit tl1emselves
together by a double bond of blood, their own and the
blood of the sacrificed animals, which are mixed together in
the ox-hide and drunk together frorn the hide by each of
the future warriors., Nothing could well demo11strate more
clearly the truth of Robertson Smith's view that the in-
tention of the ox-hide in the Scythian rite was similarly to
. unite the warriors by the tie of a commo11 blood.
Wit.h regard to the pieces of the sacrificial victim which Further
is cut in two at some of those rites, Robertson Smith .con- fillustra~ions
rom gipsy
jectured that they may formerly have been eaten by the and ancient
covenanters as a mode of further cementing the . bond ~~:~orns.
between them by participation in the flesh and blood of
2
the slaughtered animal. The conjecture is supported by
the Wachaga custom of drinking the blood of the sac1i-
ficial victims, and it is also to some extent confirn1ed by
the practice of the Transylvanian gipsies, \vl10, as 've saw,
. eat the pieces of the fowl through which a \Voman after
3
childbirth has to pass on leaving her bed. Ho\vever,
in the latter case the rite, to all appearance, is a purely ,
protective measure : it is in no sense a covenant. The
identification of a man with an animal, by" eating of its
flesh and surrounding himself with its fragments, may have
been the intention of a curious ceremony which Gi1aldus
Cambrensis, writing towards the end of the t\velftl1 century,
reports to have been observed at the inauguration of a king
1 M. Merker, Rechtsve1-halt1iisse uiid Ergiinzu1igsheft, No. I 38).

2 Religio1i efthe Sertiites, 2 p. 481.
Sitten der Wadschagga (Gotha, I 902),
p. I 6 (Petermanns ll.fitteilunf?e1i, 3 Above, p. 4 I I.
THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM PART II
in Ireland. '' There is," he tells us, '' in the northern and
most remote part of Ulster, 11amely at Kenel Cunil, a nation
which practises a most barbarous and abominable rite in
creating their king. The whole people of that country being
gathered in one place, a white mare is led into the midst of
them, and he wh? is to be inaugurated, not as a prince but
as a brute, not as a king but as an outlaw, comes before
the people on all fours,. confessing himself a beast with no
less impudence than_ imprudence. The mare being immedi-
ately killed, and cut in pieces and boiled, a bath is prepared
for him from the broth. Sitting in this, he eats of the flesh
which is brought to _him,. the people standing round and
partaking of it also. He is also required to drink of the
broth in which he is bathed, not drawing it in any vessel,
nor even in his hand, but lapping it with his mouth. These
unrighteous rites being duly accomplished, his royal authority
1
and dominion are ratified."
Discovery Perhaps this' discussion of Abraham's covenant may
of a half-
sli:eleton of help to throw light on a very dark spot of Canaanite
a bisected history. In his excavations at Gezer, in Palestine, Pro-
human
body at fessor Stewart Macalister discovered a burial-place of a
Gezer in very rema1kable l<:ind. It is simply a cylindrical chamber
Palestine.
about twenty feet deep and fifteen feet wide, \vhich has
been hewn out of the rock and is entered from the .top by a
circular hole cut in the roof. The chamber appears to
have been originally a water-cistern and to have been used
for that purpose before it was converted into a tomb. On
the floor of the chamber were found fifteen skeletons of

human beings, or rather fourteen and a half sl<:eletons ; for

of one body only the upper part was discovered the lower
'
.
part was wanting. The half skeleton was that of a girl

about fourteen years of age ; she had been cut or sawn.
through the middle ''at the eighth thoracic vertebra, and as
the front ends of the ribs had been divided at this level it
is plain that the section had been made while as yet the '
1 Giraldus Cambrensis, Topography connell, now the county of Donegal ;
ef Ireland, eh. 2 5 (The Historical and he adds, ''Irish antiquaries utterly
Works of Giraldus Cambrensis, revised repudiate the disgusting account here
and edited by Thomas 'Vright, London, given by Giraldus of the inauguration
1887, p. 138). In a note the trans- of the kings of this territory.''
lator tells us that Kenel Cunil is Tir-

CHAP. I THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM 417
bones were supported by the soft parts." The fourteen

other skeletons were all males, two of them imrnature, aged
about eighteen and nineteen years respectively ; all the rest
were full-grown adults, of fair stature and strongly built.
The position of the bodies showed that they had not been
thrown in through the hole in the roof but deposited by
persons who descended with them into the cave; and a
large quantity of charcoal found among the bones is thought
to indicate tSat a fune.ral feast, sacrifice, or other solemn
rite had been observed within the sepulchral chamber.
Some fine bronze weapons spear-heads, an axe and a
knife deposited with the bodies may be regarded as
evidence that the burial took place before the advent of the
Israelites, and accordingly that the men belonged to a race
who preceded the Hebrews in Palestine. Judged by the
shape of their bones, their large capacious skulls, their
arched noses, and other anatomical peculiarities, the males
are believed to be representative specimens of a race not
1
unlike the Palestinian Arab of to-day. If the corporeal
resemblance between these ancient men and the present
inhabitants of the country is sufficient to justify us in con-
sidering them as members of the same stock, we may
perhaps conclude that both belong to that Canaanite race
whom the Hebrew invaders found in occupation of Palestine,
and whom, though they reduced to bondage, they never
succeeded in exterminating. For it is the opinion of
competent judges that the modern Fellaheen or Arabic-
speaking peasants of Palestine are descendants of the pagan
tribes which dwelt there before the Israelite invasion and
have clung to the soil ever since, being submerged but never
destroyed by each successive wave of conquest which has
2
swept over the land. If that is so, it seems reasonable to The half-
. f h l G
suppose that 1n the half-skeleton o t e gtr at ezer we piobably skeleton
have a relic of that custom of human sacrifice which, as we a relic of

. b h d 1 . 1 .
know alike from the He rew prop ets an c ass1ca writers sacrifice, human
of antiq11ity, played a prominent part in Canaanite religion.

The supposition is strengthened by the discovery of many
1 R. A. Stewart Macalister, Reports ii. 429-43 I
on the Excavatz'on of Gezer (London, 2 C. T. Wilson, Peasa11t Life i1t the
N.D.), pp. 66-73, 103 sq.; id., The Holy La11d (Londo11, I 906), p. 3, quot-
Excavation of Gezer (London, 1912), ing Conder.
VOL. I 2E
THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM PAR'f II
'
'
skeletons of infants, which were found at Gezer buried in

large jars under the floor of the temple area; for these
remains are commonly believed to attest a practice of
sacrificing firstborn children at birth in honour of the local
deity. Similar burials of infants in jars have been dis-
covered round a rock-hewn altar at Taanach in Palestine,
1
and they have been similarly interpreted.
Why was But if the half-skeleton of the girl discovered in the
the human
victin1 cistern at Gezer is indeed a relic of human sacrifice, we
bisected? have still to ask, \vhy was she hewn or sawn asunder?
~~~~~~~- The analogy of the covenant of Abraham and the similar
tion or to rites which we have examined suggests that the bisection
ratify a d
covenant? of the victim may have been inten ed eit er to e11ect a
h a
public purification or to ratify a covenant ; or, to be more

explicit, we may suppose that the girl was cut in two and
that the people passed between the pieces either by way of
averting some present or threatened evil, or by way of,
cementing a solemn treaty of peace. We will consider the
purificatory or protective interpretation first.
The We have seen that when Peleus captured the city of
f::~~;a~~ry Iolcus, he is said to have taken the king's wife, cut he1 in
theri~emay two, and then led his army between the pieces into the city. 2
~~~ ~::ek The tradition is not likely to be a pure invention ; it may
1
tradition
of Peleus
well embody the reminiscence of a barbarous custom
ai1 d formerly observed by conquerors on entering a conquered
Asty-
damia.
cit)' We know that early man stands in great fear of the
magic of strangers, and that he resorts to a variety of
ceremonies in order to protect himself against it, either
when l1e admits strangers to his own country, or \vhen he
3
enters the territory of another tribe. A traveller in Central
Africa, for instance, tells us that magical ceremonies are
performed there 011 innumerable occasions to avert trouble
and misfortune from the country, to prevent the entrance of
1
R. A. Stewart l\Iacalister, Reports 1904), No. iv. pp. 32 - 37, 97 sq.
01z the Ex,avatz'o1z of Cezer, pp. 8 5-88 ; However, these infant burials are
id., The Excavatio1i of Gezer (London, st1sceptible of a different interpretation,
1912), ii. 405 sq.; H. Vincent, Canaan which I have suggested elsewhere
d'ap1es l' Explo1ation Recente {Paris, (Adonis, Attz's, Osiris,3 i. 108 sq.).
1914), pp. 188 sqq.; E. Sellin, ''Tell 2
Above, p. 408.
Ta'annek,'' De1zkschnjten der Kaiser. 3
For examples see Taboo and the
Akademie der Wisse1zschaflen, Phi!o- . Perils of the Soztl, pp. I 02 sqq. {The
sophz'sch-historische Klasse, ,J, {Vien11a, Colden Bough, Third Edition, Part ii.).
CHAP. I THE CO VENA NT OF ABRAHAM 4r9
'

1nconven1ent strangers, to ensure success in war, and so on ;
and he describes, by way of example, how when he and
his party entered the land of the Wanyamwesi, the chief of
that tribe caused a \vhite cock to be killed and buried under
an old earthenware pot at the boundary of his territory,
just in the path of th,e strangers.1 A similar dread of
hostile magic may induce a conqueror to adopt extra-
ordinary precautions for tl1e purpose of safeguarding himself
and his troops against the machinations of their enemies,
before he ventures to enter the city which he has won from
them by the sword. Such an extraordinary precaution
migl1t consist in taking a captive, hewing him or her in
two, and then causing the army to defile between the pieces
into the city. On the sacramental interpretation of this
rite the effect of the passage between the pieces of the
victim would be to form a blood covenant between the
conquerors and the conquered, and thus to secure the victors
from all hostile attempts on the part of the vanquished.
This would explain the tradition as to the treatment which
Peleus meted out to the captive queen of Iolcus: it \Vas a
solemn mode of effecting a union between the invaders and
the invaded. If this explanation be accepted, it seems to
follow that the purificatory or protective and the covenantal
aspects of the rite practically coincide : the invaders purify
or protect themselves from the malign influence of their foes
by implicitly entering into a blood covenant with them.
It is possible that a similar Semitic custom may explain TI1e puri-
the severed skeleton of tl1e girl at Gezer. To judge from !~~~~~~v':
the human remains that have been found on the site, the theorymay
was occupte
city d by dffi
1 erent races at d.ffi
1 eren t t1mes: 1n
the
alsoexplain
bisec-
the earliest ages it was the seat of a short, slenderly built, tio11 of the
. I
yet muscular people, with ong ova 1 h d h d.d l1t1man
ea s, w o 1 not victim at
belong to the Semitic stock and have not yet been correlated Gezer.
2
with any known Mediterranean race. If the city was
conquered by the Canaanites who afterwards possessed it,
these barbarous conquerors may have inaugurated their
entrance into the city by putting the queen or another
1 Fr. Stuhlmann, flfit E111i1i Pascha i11ciclent incorrectly.
i1ts Herz vo1t Afiika (Berlin, r894), 2 Professor Alexander Macalister, in
p. 94. In Taboo a1id the Perils of the R. A. Stewart Macalister's Ireports 01i
'iou!, p. r I I, I l1ave reported this the Excavatio1t of Gezer, p. 37 .
420 THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM PAR'f II
'
i
female captive to death, sawing her body ir1 two and march- ,,
'
'
1
ing between the pieces into the city. But in that case, '
how are we to explain the absence of the lower half of the

body? We need not suppose, as the discovere1 suggested, :;'
2
that it \Vas either burnt or devoured at a cannibal banquet ; ' '_\
:,
it may have been buried elsewhere, perhaps on the opposite
side of the town, for the purpose of extending the magical
it1fluence of the sacrifice over all the intermediate space, so
as to render the whole city secure for the conquerors and at ' '
the same time impregnable. to the assaults of their enemies.

Burmese In like manner an ancient king of Burma is said to have
mode of
rendering rendered his capital impregnable by cutting the body of a
a city traitor into four pieces and burying the quarters at the four
impreg-
nable by corners of the city. In vain did the traitor's brother besiege
the severed the capital with an army; all his assaults were fruitless, till
pieces of
a !1uman the widow of the slain man informed him that he cot1ld
victim. never take the city so long as her dead husband guarded
the walls. So the besieger contrived to dig up the moulder-
ing quarters of his dismembered brother, and after that he
3
Parallel captured the city without resistance. Similarly among the
mode of
protecting Lushais of Assam, when a woman is in hard labour, her
a won1an friends, in order to facilitate the birth, will take a fowl, kill
in labour
among the it, and cut the carcass in two equal parts. The portion
L11shais of with the head is then put at the upper end of the village
Assa1n.
with seven pieces of cane rolled into bundles, and the lower
portion of the fowl is put at the lower end of the village
with five rolls of cane. Moreover, the woman is given a
little water to drinl{. This ceremony is called arte-pu1n-
plielna, ''to ope11 the stomach with a fowl," because it is
supposed to enable the sufferer to bring forth. 4 The mode
in which the rite is believed to produce this salutary effect
1 On this hypothesis the body of or not. My general impression, how-
the gi1l must have belonged to the pre- ever, is that she did'' (quoted by R.
Canaanite race, and therefore must A. Stewart Macalister, Repo1ts on the
have differed in 1)hysical type from the Excavatiort of Ceze1, p. 104).
male skeleto11s which were discovered 2 R. A. Stewart Macalister, Reports
with 11er in the cistern. Hqwever, the on the Excavation of Cezer, pp. 70, 72.
remains of the skeleton appear to leave 3 A. Bastian, Die Voelker d(s Oest-
the questiort open. P1ofessor Alexa11der lz'chen Asie1z, i. (Leipsic, I 866) p. 47,
Macalister says, ''There was not any corn pare p. 2 I 4.
characteristic sufficiently distinctive 4
Lieut. -Colonel J. Shakespear, The
whereby it could be ascertained Lztshei Kztki Clans (London, 1912), '
whether she belonged to the same race p. 81. -.;
-
,.,,,
.. - ;_
CHAP. 1 THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM 421

I
is not mentioned, but we may conjecture that the severed

'pieces of the fowl placed at the two ends of the village are
thought to guard the intermediate space from the incursion
of those evil and especially demoniacal powers which had
hitherto prevented the birth of the child.
This theory of a purificatory or prot.ective intention of Discovery
the sacrifice of the girl at Gezer may perhaps be confirmed ~~:1~~0~a~f
by another discovery made at the same place. Later ex- another
cavations brought to light the half-skeleton of a boy about ~~~~nat
seventeen years of age, who, like the girl in the cistern, had Gezer.
been cut or sawn through the middle betwee11 tl1e ribs and
the pelyis ; and, just as in the case of the girl, only the
upper half of the body was found, the lower half was
missing. Along with it were found the complete skeletons
of two men lying at full length, with a number of earthen-
ware vessels above and around them. These remains were
discovered under, though not directly below, the foundations
of a building. Hence Professor Stewart Macalister plausibly Theorytl1at
inferred that the skeletons are the remains of human victims ~~:1 ~~~- is
who, in accordance with a widespread custom, had been a relic of a
fi d d b d d h r d d foundation
sacr1 ce an ur1e un ei t e toun at1ons 1n or er to give sacrifice.
strength and stability to the edifice or to guard against
1
enemies. The custom has been so amply illustrated by
examples drawn from many lands that it would be super-
fluous to dwell on it. I will cite only a single instance Example
recorded by an eye-witness, because it clearly sho\vs the ~~u~1 dation
t1ain of thought which led to the institution of the practice. sacrifice
. h E . h
Between seventy and e1g ty years ago a runaway ng11s Fijiaris. . a111ong the
sailor, by name John J acl<son, lived alone for nearly two

years ftmong the still heathen. and ba1barous Fijians, and
he has left us an artless, but valuable, account of his ex-
periences. While he was with the savages, it happened .that
the house of the local chief or king was rebuilt. 011e day,
being near the place where the worl< was going on, Jacl<son
saw men led along and buried alive in the holes in \vhich
the posts of the house were set up. The natives tried to
divert his attention fiom the scene, but in order not to be
R. A. Stewart Macalister, ''Re-

I State11zent jo1 I908, p. 206 ; id., The
port on the Excavation of Gezer,'' Excavati'on ef Gezer (Lonclon, 1912),
Palestine Exploration Fu1zd, Qua1terly ii. 428 sq.
422 THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM PART II
deceived he ran up to one of the holes and sa\v a man

standing in it with his arms 1ound the post and his head
still clear of the soil. When he asked the Fijians why they
buried men alive at the foot of the posts, they answered
that the house could not stand long if men did not sit down
and continually hold the posts up. When he f u1ther in-
quired how they could hold up the posts after they \Vere
dead, the Fijians answered, that if the men sacrificed tl1eir
lives in endeavouring to keep the posts in position, the
virtue of the sacrifice would induce the gods to uphold the
1
house after the men were dead.
The theory Such a train of thought might well explain the position
of a
foundation of the two male skeletons under the foundations at Gezer;
sacrifice for one of them was discovered with his bony hand in a
hardly
explains bowl, as if helping himself to food and thereby fortifying
tl1e half- himself for the weary task of holding up the walls. But it
skeleton at
Gezer. is less easy to understand the half-sl<eleton of the boy in
the same place, and the half-skeleton of the girl in the
cistern. If the object was indeed to bear up the fou11da-
tions, it seems obvious that stal\vart men would natu1ally be
selected for so fatiguing a dt1ty; of what use would half a boy
and half a girl be for such a purpose? How could walls
stand fi1m on lads and lasses who had no legs ? Hence the
theory that these victims were slain and bisected as founda-
tion sacrifices can ha1dly be accepted as satisfactory.
Thus far we have conside1ed the purificatory or protective
The theory of these mysterious sacrifices at Gezer. Let us now
covena11 ta!
theory of turn to the covenantal theory, and try whether it will not
the half- fit the facts better. The theory is that the boy and girl
skeletons
at Gezer is were slain and cut in two, not as a form of purification
confirmed
by the or mode of protecting the site, but as a ratification of a
practice of covenant, and that the covenanters passed between the
the
\\lachaga 1
''Jackson's Narrative,'' in J. E.
of East spirits of the dead, in gt1arding the
Africa, Erskine's Jottr1ial of a C1-uise a11zong place from human enemies, sho11ld also
who bisect the Isla1ids of the Western Pacijic keep evil spirits, that bring sickness,
a kid or a (London, 1853), pp. 464 sq. Com- at a distance.'' For collections of
human pare Mrs. Leslie Milne, Shans at evidence on tl1e subject, see (Sir) E. B.

v1ct1m at Honie (London, 1910), pp. 178 sq., Tylor, Pri11zitive Culture,2 i. 104sqq.;
making a ''In old times it was the custom in P. Sartori, '' tiber das Ba11opfer,''
solem11 the Shan States, as in Burma, to bury Zeitsch1-ift .fii1 Eth11ologz.e, xxx. ( 1898)
covenant. alive a man or woman under the palace pp. 1- 54 ; Taboo and the Peri"ls of the
or gate of a new city, so that the Soul, pp. 90 sq., with the references.
pieces of the human victims, just as in making a covenant

the ancient Hebrews passed between the halves of a
slaughtered calf. This view may be confirmed by the
followi11g analogy. We have seen that the Wachaga of
East Africa solemnize a covenant and league of peace
between tvvo districts by cutting a l<:id and a rope in t\vo at
one stroke, while they pray that, if they break their oath,
they also may be split in two, like the kid and the rope.
But they have another mode of concluding an alliance
which is said to have the sanction of great antiquity. They
take a boy and a girl and lead them three or seven times,
round the assembled covenanters, while solemn curses or
blessings are pronounced on such as shall break or keep
their oath. Then the boy and girl are cut in two tl1rough
the middle, the four halves are buried at the boundary of
the two districts, and the representatives of the t\vo peoples
who have made the covenant wall< over the grave, and
disperse to their ho1nes. The notion, we are told, is an
implied curse that the life of such as forswear themselves
may be cut in two, lil<:e the young victims, and that, like
them, they may perish without offspring. In order, it is
said, that we may understand the full depth and significance
of this curse, it is necessary to l<:novv that the religion of the
Wachaga consists in the worship of ancestral spirits ; so
that a man who dies without offspring has no one to offer
the sacrifices which alone can ensu1e him a favourable
reception and a continued maintenance among the dead ; a
childless man must lead for ever a lonely life in the far
country, with no one to stay his hunger for beef and to
quench his thirst for beer ; for beer and beef, or mutton,
are the things which the spirits of the departed chiefly
1
desire to receive at the hands of their surviving relatives.
If this comparison of Wachaga with Semitic ritual is The
\Vell founded, we can readily understand both v. hy the -:~~~~ga 1
victims at Gezer were cut in two, and why they vvere a boy explains
l T d \Vhy the
and girl, not a full - grown man and v. oman. 1 \ v e nee
1
human
only suppose that they \:Vere killed and cleft in two at the victims at
Gezer were
making of a solemn covenant ; that the covenanters passed a boy arid
a girl.
I J.Raum, '' Blut und Speichel- fiir Religz'o1zswissenschaft, x. ( r 907)
l>iinde bei den Wadschagga,'' Archiv pp. 289 J'q,
424 THE COVENANT OF ABRAIAM PART II
between the pieces, and that each side took half a boy or
half a girl home with them as a guarantee of the good faith
of the other side, exactly as among the Wachaga each side
takes home one half of the cut rope as a guarantee of the
good faith of the other party. At Gezer we have one half of
the girl and one half of the boy, in both cases the upper half.
It seems not wholly impossible that further excavations in
Palestine may yet bring to light the lower halves of the
same bodies which had been carried away and buried at
home by the other parties to the covenant. Further, we
can now understand why the victims chosen for the sacrifice
were a boy and a girl, not a grown man and woman. If the
Wachaga parallel holds good, the motive was an implied
curse, that if either side broke their oath they might perish
without offspring, like the child through whose mangled

remains they had passed. When we remember the pas-
sior1ate desire of the Semite for offspring, we can appreciate

the full gravity for 11im of such a curse, and can estimate
the strength of the bond which it knit between the
covenanters.
The Lastly, it is to be observed that the analogy of the

:~~17:1ga Wachaga ritual at making a covenant, whether the victim
confirms cut in two is a kid or a human being, strongly supports
the h
retributive t e retributive explanation of the Hebrew ritual on similar
explanation occasions ; since in both the Wachaga cases we are given
1
of tl e
Hebre\v t o un d ers t an d t h at t h e cutting
o f t h e v1ct1m

1n two
ritual. symbolizes the fate of the perjurer. Nevertheless it may
still be open to us to interpret the passage between the
pieces of the victim in the sense advocated by Robertson
Smith, na1nely, as a mode of identifying the persons with
the victim for the purpose of endowing them with certain
properties which the victim is supposed to possess, and
which, it is believed, can be imparted to all who enter into

communion with the animal, either by passing through its
body or in other ways, such as by smearing themselves
with its blood or wearing pieces of its skin.1 In the
making of a covenant the motive for identifying the
covenanters with the victim is apparently to ensure, by
1
As to the custom of wearing pieces of the skin of a sacrificial victim see
~low,wl.ii.pp.7~ '
...
CHAP. 1 THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM
means of sympathetic magic, that if any of the covenanters

forswear themselves they shall share the fate of the victim:
it is the magical sympathy thus created between the
covenanters and the victim which gives a binding force
to the covenant and furnishes the best guarantee of its
fulfilment.
Thus if my analysis of the Covenant of Abraham is The
correct, the rite is composed of two distinct but correlated retributive
and the
elements, namely, first, the cutting of the victim in t\vo, and, sacra-
1
second, the passing of the covenanters between the pieces. mthent'.1-
eo11es are
Of these two elements the first is to be explained by the comple-
retributive, and the second by the sacramental theory. The meiitlry.
two theories are complementary to each other, and together
furnish a complete explanation of the rite.

Before 'leaving the subject of Abral1am's covenant, it The

may be well to return for a little to the practice of the ~~a~rn
1
Arabs of Moab. The name which they give to the sacrifice theory of
in question is fedou, and the term is defined as '' the immola- -(,i;~~~iZ~s
tion of a victim sacrificed generally in the face of Allah to sacrifice.
deliver man or beast from some malady or impending
2
destruction." In short, the sacrifice appears to be a ransom
offered to God for the people or their flocks : it is a sub-

stitute which the deity deigns to accept instead of. human
and animal life. Hence the words with which the sheil(h
comn1ands the offering : '' Redeem yourselves, 0 people !
Redeem yourselves ! '' Hence, too, the saying of the Arabs
that the sacrifice is a ransom for. themselves and their
3
flocks.
This vicarious theory of sacrifice as a substitute offered The theory
r h l 'r f 1 b "d 1 d
ior t e 11e o a man or an1ma appears to e Wl e y sprea , sacrifice of vicarious
not only among the Arabs of Moab, but. among the Fella- \videlyheld
.
heen or peasantry of, Palestine genera y. 11 Th "d by the
e ev1 ence modern
has been collected by the late Professor S. I. Curtiss of peasaiitr.y
of Palestine.
Chicago, whose researches into the living folk-lore of the
Holy Land have shed much light on primitive Semitic
religion, and whose too early death was a grievous loss to
Biblical studies. From him we learn that in Syria the term
1 See above, pp. 409 sq. atJ pays de Moab, p. 361.
2 A. Jaussen. Coutunies des Arabes 3 A. Jaussen, op. c1"t. pp. 362, 363.
THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM 1'AR1' II
fedou is commonly applied to the vicarious sacrifice of an

animal in a general sense, without any necessary implication
that the sac1ificer cuts the victim in two and passes between
the pieces. The following definition of fedozt was given to
Professor Curtiss by Derwish Hatib, of Der Atiyeh, in the
Syrian Desert, who is a lecturer and leads the service in the
mosque of his village : '' Fedou means that it redeems the
other, in place of the other, substitute for 'the other. Some-
thing is going to happen to a man, and the sacrifice is a
substitute for him. It prevents disease, sufferings, robbery
1
and enmity." Again, a Moslem at N ebl<: in the Syrian
Desert told Professor Curtiss that ''the fedou is commonly
for the future to ward off evil. When they lay the founda-
tion of a house, they slaughter with the idea that (Khuddr)
St. George, will preserve the worl<:men. Every house must
be redeemed. If not redeemed by the sacrifice of some
2
animal, it must be redeemed by a human life." Similarly,
an orthodox Moslem, servant of a shrine at Homs, i11-
formed Professor Curtiss that he was familiar with the fedou.
He said, ''In moving from house to house, or in occupying
a new building ; the first night he sleeps in the house he
l<:ills the fedou. The object is the bursting forth of blood
unto the face of God. It is for himself and famil)r, a
3
redemption. It keeps off disease and the jinn." To the
same effect the minister of the '' Chair'' on the mountain-
side of Zebedani said, ''When a man finishes a house, he
makes a sacrifice on the doorstep. It is redemption for the

building. Every house must have its death, a man, womar1,

child, or animal. God has appointed a fedou for every
building through sacrifice. If God has accepted the sacrifice
he has redeemed the house." ~
An anin1al These statements clearly prove that the fedou or sacrifice
still
sac1ificed of an animal at occupying a new house is vicarious : it is a
in parts of
Syria as a
substitute for the human life, which otherwise God or a saint
substitute would require at the hands of the occupants. Similarly the
for a child.
sacrifice which in some parts of Syria is still offered for a
child appears to be regarded as a substitute accepted by
1
S. I. Curtiss, Primitive Senzitic 2
S. I. Curtiss, op. cit. pp. 196 sq.
Religz"on To-day (Chicago, New York, 3
S. I. Curtiss, op. cit. p. l 97.
Toronto, 1902), pp. 195 sq. 4
S. I. Curtiss, op. cz"t. p. I 96. ..
CHAP. 1 1'HE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM
God or a saint for the life of the child. Thus, speaki11g of

the custom of sacrificing for children, one of the Ismailiyeh
of northern Syria said, ''When they make a sacrifice for a
child they slaughter the victim in the courtyard where he
lives, and put a few drops of blood on his forehead and 011
his t1ose, to indicate that the sacrifice is on his behalf. The
breaking forth of blood is fedou. It redeems the child.
They vow to the saint that blood shall flow for the child if
he redeems it." Tl1e sacrifice offe1ed for a son is ust1ally a
goat or a sheep, but if the family is poor, a cocl{ will be
1
accepted for a baby boy, and a hen for a baby girl.
Thus it appears that the essence of all these sacrifices
consists in its vicarious character: the animal is a substitute
for the man. The principle of substitution in sacrifice is
brought out with unmistakeable clearness in a custom
observed by Indian Moslems at the largest mosque in
'
Baghdad, to which they go on pilgrimage : '' Tl1ey vow that An ~nimal
'f
1 a 1nan w o 1s 1h '11 b h h ll h
eg1ns to recove1 e s a go to t e a substitute sacr1ficedas
shrine. He is stripped to the waist. The11 two men lift a fora man at
lamb or a !{id above his head, and bathe his face, shoulders, Baghdad.
and the upper part of his body with the blood. While the
butcher kills the animal the sheikh repeats the first sura of
the Koran. They also wrap hi1n in the skin of the
2
animal." Here the pouring of the animal's blood on the
man, and the wrapping of him in the skin, are ve1y instructive.
In order to perfect the substitution of the animal for the
man, the ritual requires that the man should as far as
possible be identified with the animal, being drenched with
its blood and clothed with its skin. How could the pre-
tended identification be represented more graphically?
The same principle of substitution is still follo\ved in The same
. . . . h principle of
Syria not only 1n the relation of man to God, but in t e substitutio11
relation of man to man. '' In the neigl1bourhood of N ablus ~ollo\ved
111 cases of
it is customary, when a reconcil1at1on has been made n1t1rder.
between the murderer and the avenger of blood, for the
murderer to kill a goat or a sheep. He then kneels before
the avenger with a red handkerchief tied about his neck.
Some of the blood of the animal slain is put on the palms
of his hands. The avenger draws his sword and i11timates
I S. I. Curtiss, op. cit. pp. 202 sq. 2 S. I. Curtiss, op. cit. pp. 205 sq.
THE COVENANT OF ABRAHAM PAR'f II
that he could take his life from him, but that he gives it
back to him.'' 1 Here the identificatio11 of the man with
the animal is carried out by smearing him with the blood
of the slaughtered sheep or goat, and tying a red handker-
chief round his neck to simulate the severance of his head
from his body.
Vicarious We can now fully understand the sacrificial ritual at
sacrifice in

ancient
the temple of the great Syrian goddess in antiquity, in
Syrian accordance with which the worshipper clothed himself in
ritual. 2
the skin of the sheep which he offered to the deity. . The
life of the sheep was a substitute for his own, and to perfect
the substitution he pretended to be a sheep.
Vicarious
Now, too, we can understand why in certain solemn
aspect of
bisected sacrifices, to avert or mitigate calamity, the sacrificer cuts

v1ct1ms 1n the victim in two and passes between the parts. The
the ritu~tls
reviewed. passage between the parts, as we sa\v, is probably a
modification of an older practice of passing through the
carcass ; and that in its turn can hardly have any other
meaning than that the man identifies himself with . the
animal into whose body he forces himself, and that he offers
it to the higher powers as a substitute for himsel The
principle of vicarious sacrifice, which has played so great a
part in the history of religion, could hardly be carried out
more perspicuously than in these savage and bloody rites.
1 S. I. Curtiss, op. ci't. p. 9 I. 2
I Above, p. 414.
CHAPTER II
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB OR ULTIMOGENITURE
I. Traces of Ulti11zoge1zz'ture z"n Israel

THE traditions concerning the patriarch Jacob are fuller The
than those which relate to his father Isaac and his grand- Jaco.b.ite
trad1t1on.
father Abraham, and they are correspondingly richer in

folk-lore, that is, in reminiscences of archaic belief and
custom. It was natural that memories or fancies should
gather thick about the ancestral hero from whom the people
of Israel derived their name as well as their blood.
Yet the character of this great ancestor, as it is par- Jacob the
. trayed for us in Genesis, has little to attract or please a ~h~es~~rp
modern reader, and it contrasts unfavourably both with the Semitic
calm dignity of his grandfather Abraham and with the trader.
meditative piety of his father Isaac. If Abraham is the
type of the Semitic sheikh, brave and hospitable, dignified
and courteous, Jacob is the type of the Semitic trader,
supple and acute, fertile in expedients, with a keen eye to
gain, compassing his ends not by force but by craft, and
not too scrupulous in the choice of means by which to
outwit and overreach his rivals and competitors. This
'
unamiable combination of cupidity and cunning reveals

itself in the earliest recorded incidents of the patriarch's
life, the devices by which he contrived to cheat his elder
brother Esau out of his birthright and his father's blessing.
For Esau and Jacob were twins, and as the elder of the
two 1 Esau was entitled, according to the ordinary rule, to
receive the paternal benediction and to succeed to the
1 Genesis xxv. 2 I 26.
4~9
430 THE HEIR~'lHIP OF JACOB PART II
The frauds pater11al

inheritance. 1 The means by which Jacob managed
whic~ he
practised
to supplant his elder
.
brother we1e, to put it mildly, pieces
,
011 his of very sharp practice : he first took advantage of Esau s
~;~~;rand hunger to buy from him his birthright for a mess of
2
pottage; and afterwards, by dressing in his brother's clothes
and simulating the hairiness of his brother's skin, he palmed
himself off as Esau on his blind old father, and so inter-
3
cepted the blessing which was meant for his twin brother.
It is true that in the second of these transactions the trick
which the young hopeful played his doddered parent was
not of his own devising ; he was instigated to it by his
mother Rebekah, 'vhose maiden name might have been
Sharp, to judge b}' the skill with which she cl1oused her
husband. Yet the readiness with which ] acob le11t himself
to the hoax proves that it was not the goodwill, but only
the quick wit, that was wanting on his part to gull his
father.
1\t a certain At a certain stage of moral evolution such frauds excite
~~~~1 ~~ little or no reprobation except among those who immediately
such frauds suffer by them ; the impartial spectator indeed is apt to
~~~doned applaud them as exhibitions of superior intelligence and
or eve11 dexterity triumphing over me1e honest stupidity. However,
admired.
a time comes when public opinion ranges itself on the side
of the honest dullard and against the clever sharper, beca11se
.experience proves that every fraud, however admirable the
.
ingenuity and foresight it displays, directly injures not only

individ11als but society as a whole by loosening that bond
of mutual confidence by 'vhich alone any corporate body of
men is held together. When this truth has been generally
recognized, the historian comes to judge the doings of men
in the past by a moral standard which neither the men
themselves nor their contemporaries ever dreamed of apply-
. ing to their actions ; and if the heroic figures of the past
seem to fall far below that standard, the charitable critic,
instead of frankly acknowledging the gulf which moral
progress has created between himself and them, attempts to
.bridge it over by finding excuses or even justifications for
1 Under the Deuteronomic law the xxi. 5-17).
I
eldest son received the largest part of 2
Genesis xxv. 29-34.
the fan1ily property (Deuteronomy 3 Genesis xxvii.
'
CH. 11 TRACES OF ULTIMOGENITURE IN ISRAEL 431

. '
deeds v1hich his own ethical judgment leads him to con-

demn. The process of \vhite\vashing moral blackamoors,
whe11 it is prompted by the cha1ity of a kindly heart and
not by the empty vanity of maintaining a paradox, is credit-
able to the whitewasher and perhaps harmless to other
people, therein differing from the contrary practice, which
consists in blacl<ening the whitest characters ; for that
execrable, though popular, practice not merely wounds the
innocent by a stab in the back, but inflicts a public wrong
by lowering the moral standard, since it robs us of those
too rare models of virtue, the contemplation of \Vhich is
better fitted to touch the heart \Vith the admiration and
love of goodness than any number of abstract treatises on
moral philosophy.
In recent years the defence of Jacob's moral character Joseph
has been undertaken by a compatriot and namesake, Mr. !fe::~~!t
Joseph Jacobs, \vho has essayed to wipe out the blot on the Jacob,
. h . . f
ancestraI scutc h eon b y d emonstrat1ng t at 1n virtue o an youngeras the
ancient law Jacob, as the yot1nger son, was really entitled son, w~
. h . d h h h' h' h . h
to t h e 1n erita11ce, an t at t e c 1cane to w 1c , In t e custom by ancient
Biblical narrative, he resorts in order to obtain it is merely entihtled

to t e
a gloss put by the historian on a transaction he did not inheritance.
1
understand. Whether this ingenious apology is sound or
not, I will not venture to say ; but certain it is that such
an ancient law of inheritance as his apologist supposes has
prevailed among many peoples, and there seems to be no
reason why it should not have obtained at a remote time
among the ancestors of Israel. The law or custom in
question is known as junior-right or ultimogeniture in con-
trast to primogeniture, because it gives the inheritance to
the youngest son instead of to the eldest. In this chapter
I propose to illustrate the custom by examples and to
.1nquire
. . . . .
into its origin.
Let us begin by looking at other possible traces of Otl1er
. . h. h b d d . h
j11nior-right or ult1mogen1ture w IC may e etecte In t e custon1 of traces of a
Old Testament. In tl1e first place, then, if Jacob sup- i'.1nior-

r1gl1t or
planted his elder brother, he only did what his father Isaac ulti~10-
had done before him. For Isaac also was a younger son ?enhiture Ill t e
R'1gh tin
1 Josei)h Jacobs, ''Junior- Genes1s,
,, ..,,u
"' d'zes z1z
B i'b''
tica l A reh ae1Jogy
, patriarcl1al
history.
(London, 1894), pp. 46-63.
432 THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB l'AR1' II
and displaced his elder brother Ishmael in the inheritance

1
of their father Abraham. And the principle, if principle it
\Vas, on \vhich Jacob acted in dealing with his father and
brother, he appears to have followed in dealing with his
own sons and grandsons. For we are told that he loved
his son Joseph more than his elder sons '' because he was
the son of his old age''; and he showed his preference so
decidedly that the jealousy of J oseph's elder brothers was
2
aroused, and they plotted against his life. It is true that
according to the narrative, as it no\v stands, Joseph was not
the youngest son, he was only the youngest but one, since
3
Benjamin was born after him. But we may surmise that
in the original narrative Joseph \vas actually the youngest ;
the great affection whicl1 his father lavished on him, the
coat of many colours, or rather the coat with long sleeves,
by which he was distinguished among his brethren, and the
position of superiority to them which he attained in the
4
sequel, all point in. this direction. Again, the name of
Be11jamin, Benjamin, the youngest of J acob's sons, means ''the son of
~~t~hee ~~;ht the right hand''; and that this title marks him out as the
5
hand.'' lawful heir appears to be indicated by the remarkable

account of the way in which Jacob, in blessing his two
grandsons, the sons of Joseph, deliberately preferred the
younger to the elder by laying his right hand on the head
of the younger (Ephraim) and his left hand on the head of
the elder (Manasseh), in spite of the protest of their father
Joseph, who had placed his sons before their grandfather in
such a position that he would naturally lay his right hand
on the elder and his left hand on the younger ; so that the
old man was obliged to cross his hands over his breast in
order to reach the head of the younger with his right hand,
6
and the head of the elder with his left. Thus an apologist
for Jacob may say with truth that he was at least consistent
through life in his preference for younger over elder sons,
1 Genesis xvi., xxi. I 7. A. Briggs, Hebrew and Englz'sh Lexz'.
2 Genesis xxxvii. 3 sqq. As to the con ef the Old Testament (Oxford,
birtl1 of Joseph, see Genesis xxx. 22- 1906), p. 122, s.v. l'l?~~f
24. 6
Genesis xl viii. Nate particula1ly
3 Genesis xxxv. I 8. Jacob's words in v. 19, ''His younger
4 So Mr. Joseph Jacobs argued, brother shall be g1eate1 than he.''
Stztdies iii Biblical Aichaeology, p. 58. Compare Joseph Jacobs, St11dies z'n
5
F. Brown, S. R. Driver, and Ch. Biblical Archaeology, p. 57.
CHAP. II ULTIMOGENITURE IN EUROPE 433
'
and that he did not merely resort to that principle when it '
'
'
suited his o\vn selfish interests to do so.

But other witnesses may be called to speak in his Traces of
favour, in other words,
.
to testify to an ancient custom of ultii:nto- .
gen1 ure in
junior - right or u1timogeniture in Israel. We read in the family
Genesis that Tamar, the daughter of Judah, brought forth ~~~;Y of
twin sons, named Perez and Zerah, and though Perez was David.
born first, a curious detail as to the birth of the children
is related, of which the intention seems to be to prove that ''
Perez was really, like Jacob himself, the younger of the

twins, and not, as might have been thought, the elder. 1
The motive for proving Perez to be the younger son is not
obvious on the face of the narrative, but it becomes in-
telligible when we remember that Perez \vas the direct
2
ancestor of King David, that David himself was the
youngest son of his father, and that he was deliberately
promoted by Samuel to the kingdom in preference to all
3
his elder brothers. Thus the purpose of the narrator in
giving what might seem needless, if not indecent, details as
to the birth of the twins in Genesis, may have been to '
prove that King David was not only himself a youngest

son, but that he was also descended from the yo11nger of
Judah's twin grandsons. And David in his turn transmitted
the kingdom to one of his younger sons, Solomon, deliberately
setting aside one of his elder sons, Adonijah, who claimed the
4
crown. All these facts taken together may be held to raise
a presumption that in Israel the custom of primogeniture, or
preference for the eldest son, had been preceded by an older
custom of ultimogeniture or preference for the youngest son
as heir to his father. And the presumption is strengtl1ened
when we observe that a similar custom of junior-right or
ultimogeniture has prevailed in other parts of the world.
2. Ultimogeniture z"n Europe

'
One of the countries in which the custom of ultimo- Ultimo- ''
. "11 b d . E 1 d geniture
geniture has been observed , an d 1s st1 o serve , 1s ng an 1, 110wn as
Under the title of Borough English this ancient usage is ~oro~gh_
English in
I Genesis xxxviii. 27-30. Com- 2 1 Chronicles ii. 4- I 5. England.
pare Joseph Jacobs, Studies z"n Biblz"cal 3 J Samuel xvi. I- I 3
Archaeology, p. 56. 4 1 l(ings i.
'
VOI,. I 2F
434 THE HEIRSHIJ) OF JACOJJ PAR'!' II
still, or was till lately, the law of the land in many parts of
1
tl1e country. The English name for the custom is taken
fro1n a local word used in a t1ial of the time of Ed ward the
Third. It appears from a report in the Yearbook for the
first year of that reign that i11 Nottingham there were then
two tenures of land, called respectively Borough English
and Borough French ; and that under Borough English all
the tenements descended to the youngest son, and that
under Borough French all the tenements descended to the
eldest son, as at the common law. It is said that as late
as I 7 I 3 Nottingham remained divided into the English
Borough and the French Borough, the customs of descent
continuing distinct in each; and even at the present time
2
similar customs are observed in that neighbourhood.
Local The distribution of Borough Ene-lish or ultimogeniture
distribution
of Borougli 1n E 1 d hl
ng an was roug y as o ows.fi 11 Th d
e custom exten e d
English. along the whole line of the ''Saxon Shore'' from the Wash
to the neighbourhood of the Solent, including the whole of
the south-eastern counties. To be more precise, it \vas
most prevalent in Kent, Sussex, and Surrey, in a ring of
manors encircling ancient London, and to a less extent in
Essex and the East Anglian kingdom. In Sussex it pre-
vails so gene1ally on copyhold lands that it has often been
called the common law of the county ; and in the Rape of
Lewes the custom indeed is almost universal. There are
few examples in Hampshire, but farther west a great part
of Somerset in one continuous tract was t1nder the rule of
'
ultimogeniture. In the Midland Counties the usage was
co1nparatively rare, at the rate of two or three manors to
a county ; but it occurred in four out of the five great
Danish towns, namely in Derby, Stamford, Leicester, and
Nottingham, as well as in other important boroughs, as
Stafford and Gloucester. To the north of a line drawn
betwee11 the Humber and the Mersey the custom appears
3
to have been unknown.
I The evidence is adduced and dis- 3 Ch. Elton, o,igz'ns o.f English
cussed at lengtl1 by Charles Elton, History, pp. 188, 191, 194. Among
Origins o.f English History (London, tl1e boroughs round London in which
1882), chapter viii. pp. 183-221. Borough English prevails, or used to
2 Ch. Elton, Origins o.f English prevail, are Islington and Edmonton
History, p. 184. (op. ci't. p. I 93).
CHAP. II
ULTIMOGENITURE JN EUROPE 435
However, the . usage was not confined to the Saxon Borough
parts of the country it existed also in Celtic regions such Eng_lish in
' ' Cclt1c
as Cornwall, Devon, and Wales. In the ancient la\VS of regions.
Wales it is ordained that, ''when brothers share their
patrimony the youngest is to have the principal mes-
suage (tyddyn), and all . the buildings and eight acres of
land, and the hatchet, the boiler, and the ploughshare,
because a father cannot give these three to any one but his
youngest son, and though they are pledged, yet they can
never become forfeited." But the Welsh rule applied only
to estates comprising at least one inhabited house; when
property of any other kind was divided, the youngest son
could claim no exceptional privilege.1 In Scotland there
seems to be no evidence that ultimogeniture anywhere
prevailed ; but in the Shetland Islands it was the practice
that the youngest child of either sex should have the
dwelling-house, when the property came to be divided. 2
In old English law .ultimogeniture appears to have been Borougl1
commonly associated with servile tenure. On this subject ;0~:~~nly
the late Professor F. W. Maitland wrote to me as follo\vs : associated
. .
'' A s to t h e preva1ence o f ult1mogen1ture, I h with servile
ave seen a great tenure.
deal of it in English docum.ents of the thirteenth century,
and rightly or wrongly it is always regarded as evidence,
though not conclusive proof, of servile tenure the theory
being, apparently, that in strictness there is no inheritance
of se1vile tenements, but that custom requires the lord to
accept one of the family of the dead tenant as a ne\v
tenant. Here the choice of the youngest seems not un-
natural : there being no inheritance to transmit, the children
are sent into the world as they come of age; the you11gest
is the one most likely to be found at the hearth when the
father dies. In several customs which divide the inheritance
equally among sons, the youngest keeps the homestead, tl1e
astre or hearth. I am far from saying- that the servile origin
of ultimogeniture is proved, but certainly the succession of
the youngest was regarded as servile in the thi1teenth centt1ry.
I could give you ample proof of that. It is thus brought
I Ch. Elton, op. ci't. pp. 186 sq. Institutio11s (London, 1875), pp. 223
Con11Jare Sir Henry Sumner Maine, sq.
Lect11res on the Early History OJ 2 Ch. Elto11, op. cit. j). I 86.
THE HEIRS/Ill) OP']ACO!l PAil'!' II
1
into connection with the merclietu11z. Very commonly they

are mentioned together : 'You are my villains, for I have
talliged you, you paid fine for your daughter's marriage,
you were your father's youngest son and succeeded to his
2
tenement.' ''
Succession It deserves to be noticed that in England the right of
odf youhngtli>t ultimogeniture is not 'limited to males. There are scores, if
aug ters.
not hundreds, of little districts, where the right is extended
to females, the youngest of the daughters, or the youngest
3
sister or aunt, being preferred above the other coheiresses.
Ultimo- The custom of ultimogeniture, or the succession of the
r:~~~~~e, youngest to the inheritance, also obtained in some parts
particularly of France. Thus ''in some districts of the county of
in Brittany. Cornouailles, in Brittany, the youngest child enjoyed an
exclusive right, which is exactly the counterpart of the
right of the eldest : the last born, whether son or daughter,
succeeded to all the tenure called quevaise, to the exclusion
of his or her brothers and sisters." This is the right known
4
in French law as mainett. Though the custom existed in
several extensive lordships of Brittany, we cannot estimate
its original prevalence in that country; for when the customs
of the province were codified by the feudal lawyers the
nobles set their faces against the abnormal usage; and we
learn that in the seventeenth century the area \Vithin which
it survived was almost daily diminishing. The districts
where .the custom was in vogue included the Duchy of
Rohan, the Commandery of Pallacrec, and the domains of
the Abbeys of Rellec and Begare. In Brittany, as in
England, ultimogeniture was an incident of servile tenure ;
and in Brittany, as in many parts of England, wh~n a man
5
left no sons, the inheritance went to the youngest daughter.
Further, under the names of Mainete and Madelstad, the
custom existed in Picardy, Artois, and Hainault, in Ponthieu
and Vivier, in the districts around Arras, Douai, Arniens,
I Merchetum, 1nercheta or marcheta, 3 Ch. Elton, Origins of English

the fine which on the n1arriage of. his Hi'story, pp. 184 sq.
daughter a tenant paid to his feudal 4
lord. See below, pp. 486 sqq. Paul Viollet, Histoi're du Droit
2 Letter of F. W. Maitland to me, Ci'vile Franfai's, Seconde Edition (Paris,
dated l 5 Brookside, Cambridge, l st 1893), p. 842.
November 1887. 6 Cl1. Elton, op. cit. pp. I 87 sq.
CHAP. II ULTIMOGENITURE IN EUROPE 437
Lille, and Cassel, and in the neighbourhood of St. Omer.

In all these districts the right of ultimogeniture ranged
between the descent of the whole inheritance and the
privileged succession to articles of household furniture. 1
The same rule of inheritance was also followed at Grimbergthe
2
in Brabant.
Similar customs prevailed in many parts of Friesland. Uitimo-
The most notable of these was the Jus Theelacticu1n or gFe?itu1redin
' r1es an .
custom of the '' Theel-lands," doles or allottable lands, at
Norden in East Friesland, not far from the mouth of the
Ems. The ''Theel-boors'' of that district continued down
to the nineteenth century to hold their allotments under a
complicated system of rules designed to prevent an unprofit-
able subdivision of estates. An inherited allotment was
indivisible : on the death of the father it passed intact to
the youngest son, and. on his death without issue it became
8
the possession of the whole community.
Other examples of ultimogeniture may be drawn from Ultimo-
local customs, now superseded by the Civil Code, in West- ~~~~~~;.n
phalia and those parts of the Rhine provinces which were
under the ''Saxon Law," and in the Department of Herford
near Minden, the natives of \vhich claim to belong to the
purest Saxon race. So strong, we are infarmed, is the hold
of the custom on the peasants that ''until quite recently no
elder child ever demanded his legal obligatory share : the
children acquiesced in the succession of the youngest, even if
no portions were left to them, and never dreamed of claim-
ing under the law of indefeasible inheritance ; and even if
the peasant die without making the usual will the children
acquiesce in the passing of the undivided inheritance to
4
the youngest son." A similar practice has grown up in
Silesia and in certain parts of Wiirtemberg, where the
modern laws of succession have failed to break down the
time-honoured privilege of the youngest, whose rights are
1 Ch. Elton, op. cit. p. I95 Com- 3 Ch. Elton, Ongi1zs of E11g/1'sh
pare P. Viollet, Hz'stoire. ~zt Dr~it Hz'sto1y, p. 196, qt1oting We11cl<ebacl1,
Civi!e Ji'ra1zrais, Seconde Ed1t1on (Paris, Jits Theelachticu11z Redivivz1111 (I 759 ),
I893), pp. 842 sq. p. 69.
~ Adolf Bastian, Die Rechtsverhiilt-
nisse bei verschiede1zen Volkern der 4 Ch. Elton, Origi11s of English
1 Hz'storp, pp. l 96 sq. .
Erde (Berlin, I872), p. 185 n.
THE .fIEIR.S'HfP OF JA.COii PAR'I.' II
guarded by a secret settlement or by the force of the local

opinion. 1 Again, in the Forest of the Odenwald, and the
thinly peopled district to the north of the Lal{e of Constance,
there are properties called Hofgiiter, which cannot be divided,
but descend to the youngest son or, in default of sons, to the
eldest daughter. 2 And many mo1e examples, we are told,
1night be found in Swabia, in the Grisons of Switzerland, in
Alsace and other German or partly German count1ies, where
old customs of this sort have existed and still influence the
feelings of the peasantry, though they have ceased to be
3
legally binding.
No No evidence of ultimogeniture appears to have been
evidence
ultimo- or d. d
1scove1e 1n D k
enmar , N orway, or S d
we en. B h
ut t e
geniture youngest son has his privilege in the Island (once the
in Sca11-
diriavia. Kingdom) of Bornholm, an outlying appendage of the
Danish Crown ; and traces of a like custom have been re-
4
corded in the territory of the old .,Republic of Lubeck.
Ultimo- In the south and west of Russia it is becoming the
r;n~~~~a. practice to break up the old joint families and to establish
the children in houses of their own ; and it is said that in
such cases the youngest son is regarded as the proper
5
successor to the family dwel!ing-house. On this subject I
am indebted to Miss M. A. Czaplicka, the distinguished
Polish ethnologist, for the following information : ''Junior
or Minor right is known to have been the custom of the
Russian peasants as early as the time of Russkaya P1avda,
the first Russian code at the time of Yaroslav the Great.
It is even now a very widespread practice in the peasants'
customary law, which makes it possible to trace the origin
of this law of inheritance . The 'minor right' is not a
privilege but a natural course, owing to the fact that the
elder sons usually separate from the father and from their
own households, while the younger, or youngest, 'never
severs from the father's root.' If in addition to the father's
house the younger son inhe1its other property to the dis-
I Ch. Elton, op. cit. p. r 97. old German law see also J. Grimm,
2 Ch. Elton, op. cit. p. 197. .Dezttsche Rechtsalterthil111er 3 (Got-
3 Ch. Elton, op. cit. p. 197; A.
tingen, I 88 r ), p. 47 5
Bastian, Di'e Rechtsve1hiiltnisse bei ver- 4 Ch. Elton, Origins of English
schiedene1i Volkern ,fer Erde, p. r8 5 History, pp. 197 sq.
n. 1 For traces of t1ltimogeniture in 6 Ch. Elton, op. cit. p. r 98.

CH. tt QUESTION OF ORIGIN OF ULTIMOGENITURE 439

advantage of the elder sons, he also inherits certain duties :
to take care of his enfeebled father and mother, and often
also of unmarried sisters. If the elder sons have not
separated from the father before his death, the house'.goes to
the youngest son, but it is his duty to help the elder brotl1ers
in starting new households for themselves." 1 Further,
Miss Czaplicka tells me that ''there is no trace of junior
right among any other class than that of peasants in
Russia, and among the peasants it is restricted to the
house, or the house and a piece of personal, not communal
2
land."
Thus far we have considered the prevalence of ultimo- u1ti1110-
geniture among the Aryan peoples of Europe. Passino- genittire in
b Ht1ngary.
now to the Europea11 peoples who do not belong to the
Aryan stock we learn that ''in Hungary it was the law of
tl1e country districts that the youngest son should inherit
the father's house, making a proper compensation to the
other coheirs for the privilege. Among the Northern
Tchuds, although the chief of the family can delegate his
power to the eldest or youngest son, or even to a stranger
if he so pleases, yet the house in which he lives must go to
3
the youngest son at his death."
3. The Questio1z of the Orig-z'1z of Ultz'1nog-enz"ture

. So much for the distributio11 of ultimogeniture or the Sir William
E
pre fierence fior youngest sons 1n urope. W h t Blac](stone
e ave now o 011 the
ask, What was the origin of a custom whicl1 nowadays origin of
. d . d d
strikes us as so strange an tn ee unjust ? Q h" b Borougl1
n t 1s su - Eiiglish.
ject speculation has been rife. It may be well to begin
by quoting the opinion which the learned and jt1dicious Sir
William Blackstone has expressed in his celebrated Com-
mentaries on English Law. Speaking of the tenure of
t Andreevsky's Encyclopaedia, vol. 1896), pp. 39, 41, 47, 173, 22r, 231,
xix. (1896) p. 385, article by V. N., 387, fo1 references to seven authorities
quoted and translated by Miss M. A. for ''junior right'' among the l{t1ssia11
Czaplicka in a letter to me, dated 58 peasants, as far as the l1ouse is con-
T<irrington Sqt1are, W. C., July .2 5th, cerned.
1916. In the same Jetter Miss Czap- 2 Miss M. A. Czaplicl{a, in the
licka refers me to a bibliographical letter cited in tl1e JJreceding 11ote ..

work, Obyi:hnoye Pravo, by Y. Yaku- 3 Ch. Elto11,. 01igi1zs of E1zglisk
shkin, Second Edition (Yaroslav, Rz'story, p. 2l 8,
440 THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB PART II
property in bo1oughs, or towns which had the right of sending

members to parliament, he opposes it to militar}' tenure or
knight-service, and regards it as a relic of Saxon liberty
retained by such persons as had neitl1er forfeited it to the king
nor been obliged to exchange it '' for the more honourable,
as it was called, but, at the same time, more burthensome,
tenure of knight-service." Saxon liberty, in 11is opinion,
''may also account for the great variety of customs, affect-
i11g many of these tenements so held in antient burgage;
the principal and most remarkable of which is that called
Borough English ; so named in contradistinction as it were
to the Norman custo1ns, and which is taken notice of by
Glanvil, and by Littleton ; viz. that the youngest son, and
not the eldest, succeeds to the burgage tenement on the
death of his father. For which Littleton gives this reason :
because the 'younger son, by reason of his tender age, is
not so capable as the rest of his brethren to help himsel(
Other authors have indeed given a much stranger reason
for this custom, as if the lord of the fee had antiently a
right of concubinage with his tenant's wife on her wedding-
night ; and that therefore the tenement descended not to
the eldest, but the youngest son, who was more certainly
the offspring of the tenant. But I cannot learn that ever
this custom prevailed in England, though it certainly did
in Scotland (under the name of mercheta or marcheta), till
Ultimo- abolished by Malcolm III. And perhaps a more rational
geniture
reported account than either may be fetched (though at a sufficient
among the distance) from the practice of the Tartars; among whom,
Tartars.
according to Father Duhalde, this custom of descent to the
youngest son also prevails. That nation is composed totally
of shepherds and herdsmen ; and the eldest sons, as soon as
they are capable of leading a pastoral life, migrate from
their father with a certain allotment of cattle ; and go to
seek a new habitation. The youngest son, therefore, who
continues latest with his father, is naturally the heir of his
house, the rest being already provided for. And thus we
find that, among many other northern nations, it was the
custom for all the sons but one to migrate from the father,
\Vhich one became his heir. So that possibly this custom,
wherever it prevails, may be the remnant of that pastoral
. .
CH. 11 QUESTION OF ORIGIN OF ULTIMOGENITURE 441
state of our British and German ancestors, which Caesar

and Tacitus describe." 1
I have not found the passage of Du Halde to which Ultimoc.

Blackstone refers, but his statement is confirmed by a among thegeniture
modern historian, who tells us that '' a still more character- Turks and
IVIongols.
istic feature of ancient law among the Turks and Mongols,
and one which sheds a vivid light on their history, is the
custom which, for want of another term, I shall call ' inverse
adoption.' Turkish custom regulates succession in a very
peculiar manner ; the permanent heir, who is in a manner
attached to his native soil, is the youngest of the sons ; it is
he who is called the Ot-dzekine, as the Mongols say, or the
Tekine, as the. Turks say, ' the guardian of the hearth' ; it
is to him that the invariable portion of land reverts which
is mentioned by Chinese annalists and western travellers.
The elder brothers divide among themselves the moveables,
above all the principal one, the 1nal, or capital, that is, the
2
flocks and herds." Further, I find the custom of ultimo- Ultimo-
geniture common in a group of Mongoloid tribes in 10l!Il ~enitdu~e
Ill
south-western China a11d the adjoining parts of Burma 11ongoloid
and India. An inquiry into their social state may throw ~~~~~-of
light on the problem before us. But at the outset of Ea~tern
the inquiry I would observe that, contrary to what we Asia.
should expect if Blacl{stone's theory is correct, none of
these tribes is pastoral : all are agricultural, depending
almost wholly for their subsistence on the produce which
they extract from the earth by tillage.
I Sir William Blackstone, Co11i- (July 25th, 1916), as follows: ''As I

1nenta1z'es on the Laws ef E1zgland, am now traci11g the Tungus in Mon-
Eighteenth Edition (Lo11don, 1829), golian history, I have con1e across this
ii. 8 l -84. The statement as to the rule note which may be of some use to yo11
of ultimogeniture among the Tartars is as a proof that junior right is not recog-
repeated by Letourneau, b11t he does nised among the Mongols. ' Tomair (?)
not cite his authority. See Charles -Shaniuy, sent away by the Chinese
Letourneau, La Sociologie d'apres l' Eth- from Southern Mongolia, moved with
nographie, Deuxieme Edition (Paris, his people to Khall{a, in 22 5 B. c., or
1884), p. 417; z'd., Property, its Origi1z thereabouts. He wanted to pass over
and Developnient (London, 1892), p. his elder son Mods and leave the throne
325. to his younger son. But Mods, offended
at this, killed his father and his step-
Leon Cahun, Int1oduction a l' Hz's-
2 mother and his younger brother, and
toire de !' Asie, Tu1cs et Mongols ascended the throne' (Father J al{iuth
(Paris, 1896), pp. 61 sq. However, Bichurin, ' Notes on Mongolia,' Zapz'ski
Miss M. A. Czaplicka writes to me o Mo1zgolz'a, iii. PI) 9- I o ). ''
442 THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB PAR1' II
4. Ultz'mogenit1Jre z'1z Southern Asia
The
We begin with the Lushais, a tribe who inhabit a large
Lushais of tract of hills in Assam. They are a short, sturdy, muscular
Assam.
people, with broad and almost hairless faces, prominent
cheek-bones, short flat noses, small almond-shaped eyes, and
a complexion that varies between different shades of yellow
and brown. Their Mongolian origin is therefore unmis-
takeable.1 And the evidence furnished by their physical
appearance is confirmed by their language, which belongs to
the Tibeto-Burman branch of the Tibeto-Chinese family of
2
speech. They are an agricultural people and their staple
3
Their food is rice. Yet in virtue of the mode of cultivation
migratory which they follow they are compelled to be migratory,
system of
cultivation. seldom residing many years in any one district. Their
system of farming is commonly known to English writers
on India as ;'/zuming or ;'oo1ni1tg. They fell the timber or
bamboos in a piece of the forest or jungle; and when the
fallen trees or bamboos have dried, they are burnt, and the
ashes serve to manure the ground. The surface of the field
thus obtained is lightly hoed, and when the gathering clouds
warn the husbandmen that the dry season is nearly over
and that the rains are about to begin, every one sallies out
with a basket of seed over his shoulder and a long broad-
e11ded knife (dao) in his hand. Thus equipped, the whole
family sows the field, digging shallow holes in the ground
with their knives and dropping a few seeds into each hole.
The c.hief crop is rice, but maize, millet, Job's tears, peas,
beans, tobacco, and cotton are also grown. This mode of
cultivation is very \vasteful, for seldom more than two crops
are taken off the same piece of ground in successive years,
and the land is then allowed to lie fallow till it is again
overgrown with jungle or underwood. If the clearing has
been made in a bamboo jungle, three or four years will
elapse before the land is again fit for cultivation ; but if the
clearing was made in a forest, a period of from seven to ten
years will pass before the process of felling the trees is
1 Liet1t.-Colonel J. Shakespear, The
The Indz'a1i Et11jz're (Oxford, I 909),
Lushei Kukz' Cla1ts (London, 1912),
1. 393
pp. I sq. 3 J.
Shakespear, The Lushei Kuki
2 The I11zperial Gazetteer of India,
Clans, pp. 17, 36.
;
CH. II ULTIMOGENITURE IN SOUTHERN ASIA 443
'
repeated. Forest land is said to yield better crops than
jungle land, but the labour of clearing and weeding it is
much greater. In this way all the arable land ,vithin reach of
a large village is in time used up, and a migration to another
home becomes necessary. The choice of a new site is a
matter of anxious concern ; a deputation of elders' is sent
to sleep on the ground, and they draw omens from the
crowing of a cock which they take with them for the
purpose. If the fowl crows lustily an hour before daybreak,
the site is adopted. A village may be occupied for four or
five years, and in the old days the new village might be
distant two or three days' journey from the old one. The
inhabitants must carry all their worldly goods on their backs
from one place to the other; and the prospect of frequent
and laborious transportations naturally deters men from
multiplying their possessions, and so checks the growth of
1
wealth and industry. Under such a system of shifting Under this
cultivation, which is common to most of the hill tribes of ~h~~~~s no
.this region, the peasants acquire no rights in the soil, and property in
even the chiefs claim no property in the land and the land.
forests. ~!\. chief asserts his authority only over the 1nen of
his tribe, wherever they may wa11der, and wherever they
may temporarily settle. Among some of the wilder tribes
the labour of reclaiming and tilling the ground used to be
performed in great part by slaves, whom the tribesmen
had captured on raids mainly undertaken for the purpose
of procuring bondmen to relieve them of such servile
toil. 2
The villages of the Lushais are generally perched on the The Lushai
tops of ridges and extend down the steep sides of the hills. villages.
They are large, often comprising hundreds of houses ; but
under the security for life and property which the British
Government has brought to the country, the need for con-
gregating in large fortified villages has passed away, and
accordingly the size of the villages is steadily decreasing,
and the people are scattering more and more into hamlets
and even into lonely houses in the jungle far from other
I J. Shakespear, The Lushei Kttki the Relatioits of the Gove1?tn1e11t with
Clans, pp. 23 sq., 32 sq. the Hill Tribes of the Nortli-East
Fro11tier ef Be11gal (Calcutta, I884),
2 Alexander Mackenzie, Histo1y of PP 33 I sq.
444 THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB PART II
1
habitations. A notable feature in a Lushai village is regu-
larly the zawlbuk or bachelors' hall, in which the unmarried
men and lads from the age of puberty upwards pass the night;
for they are not allowed to sleep in the houses of their parents.
Travellers from other villages also lodge in these halls, of which
in a large village there will be several. The institution is a
2
common one among the hill tribes of Assam.
Amoi1g the Among the Lushais, each village is a separate state,
Lushais the ruled over by its own chief. '' Each son of a chief, as he
youngest
son of a
d bl "d
atta1ne a marr1agea e age, was prov1 e \Vlt a w1 e atd h 'fi
cliief
succeds to
his father's expense, and given a certain number of house-
his father's holds from his father's village, and sent forth to a village of
office and his own. Henceforth he ruled as an independent chief,
property.
and his success or failure depended on his own talents for
ruling. He paid no tribute to his father, but was expected
to help him in his quarrels with neighbouring chiefs ; but
when fathers lived long it was not unusual to find their
sons disowning even this amount of subordination. The
youngest son remained in his father's village and succeeded
3
not only to the village, but also to all the property." Thus
the practice of the Lushais strongly confirms the theoretical
explanation . of ultimogeniture which was suggested by
Blackstone ; for among them it would seem that the
youngest son inherits simply because he remains at his
father's home when all his elder brothers have left it and
gone forth into the world to form new homes of their own.
Bt1t If further confirmation of this view were needed it appears
1
througl
change of a to be furnished by a change which is taking place in the
circum- tribe at the present day. In the last Ce11sus Report on
sta11ces
ultimogeni- A d h h L h h
ssam we rea t at among t e us ais, '' t e decrease 1n
ture seems the size of villages has led to an important modification of
~~s~~n~~: 0 the custom under which the youngest son inherits his father's
prin1ogeni- village and property. The raison d' et1'e of this system of
ture an1ong . h . . h ld
theLushais. tn er1tance 1s t at e er sons established villages of their own
on their marriage. In order to enable them to do so a
. '
certain number of headmen or 1Jpas and also of the
common people were told off to accompany the young
I J. Shakespear, The Lushez' Kitki 3
J.Shakespear, op. cz't, p. 43, com-
Cla11s, pp. 20 sq. pare z'd. p. 54.
2 J. Shakespear, op. cit. pp. 2I sq.
chief and form the nucleus of his new village. When

all the elder sons had been established in this way,
it is not unnatural that the youngest should inherit his
father's village and property, and on him rested the responsi-
bility for his mother's support. But while there has been
no tendency for chiefs' families to decrease, the average
size of villages has been decreased by half and there are
not enough houses to go rot1nd among the sons. Indeed,
in some cases none of the sons have been able to start a

separate village, and it is obvious that under these circum-
stances inheritance should pass to the eldest son, and this
1
change has been readily accepted by the people."
Thus it would seem that among these people ultimo- Ultimo-
t 11 b h
gen1 ure 1s actua y passing into pr1mogen1ture; ecause t e in private geniture
social causes which led to the adoption of ultimogeniture families
. .
are ceasing to exist. I . h r l h l f among the
t is true t at so 1ar on y t e ru e o Ltishais.
inheritance in chiefs' families has been referred to ; but
substantially the same rule obtains as to the inheritance of
private property among ordinary people. According to
one account ''property is divided amongst the sons ; the
youngest, however, gets the largest share ; the rest in equal
2
portions." According to a later account, '' the general
rule is for the youngest son to inherit, but occasionally the
3
eldest also claims a share." And the reason for the custom
in the families of commoners is probably the same as in the
families of chiefs ; for we have seen that when a chief's son
is sent forth to found another village he takes with him a
certain number of commoners to be his retainers and sub-
jects in the new home. It is reasonable to suppose that in
all such cases the colonists are drawn from the elder sons
of families, while the young~st sons remain with their fathers
in the old home and inherit the family property.
Among the Angamis, another Mongoloid tribe of Assam, Ult~mo-
. . . fi d . . . d fi gen1ture
the custom of ult1mogen1ture is oun 1n a 11m1te orm. amoiig tlie
1 Census ef India, I9I I, vol. iii. Clans, p. 54. Among the Anals and Angamis of
Assa111, Part I. Report by J. McSwiney Purums, two clans of Manipt1r wl10 are Ass~tm.
(sh I.11 ong, 1912 ), P 138
c
related to the Lushais, '' tl1e sons of
the deceased tiivide tl1e pro11erty, but
2 Capt. T. H. Lewin, Wild Races
the youngest so11 tal{es the house and
ef South - Eastern India (London, st1pports the widow, thus approximat-
1870), p. 253. ing to the L11shai custom'' (J. Shake
3 J. Shakespear, The Lushei f('uki spear, op. tz"t. pp. 155 sq.).
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB PAilT II
11
During a man's life his sons, as they ma1ry, receive their
share of his landed property. Should, however, a man die,
leaving several unmarried sons, these will all receive equal
shares. As the sons marry, they leave the paternal
mansion, and build houses of their own. The youngest
son, therefore, in practice nearly always inherits his father's
1
house." Here again, therefore, the inheritance of the
paternal ,mansion by the youngest son depends simply on
the accident of his being left last at home after his elder
,
brothers have married and set up separate establishments of
their own. If, at the time of their father's death, it should
happen that there are several unmarried sons at home, the
youngest will have i10 advantage over his elder brothers.
The It deserves to be noted that the Angamis, wl10 are the
Angamis
practise a largest of the N aga tribes of Assam, are not migratory and
perma11ent do not cultivate the soil in the primitive and wasteful
system of
agriculture. manner com1non to most hill tribes of this region, namely
by clearing patches in the forest or jungle, cultivating them
for a few years, and then suffering them to relapse into
their former state of wild nature. On the contrary, the
Angamis raise their crops on permanent terraces excavated
witl1 great labour and sl<ill from the hillsides, and these
terraces they irrigate by means of. artificial channels carried
along the slope of the hills for long distances at easy
gradients. Their large fortified villages are also permanent,
for the Angamis are strongly attached to their homes and
2
reluctant to change them.
Ultimo- Ultimogeniture is reported to prevail to a certai11 extent
::~~1;~he among some of the. N aga tribes of Manipur, though the rules
Naga t:ibes of inheritance appear to vary from tribe to tribe, and even
ofMan1pur. . h' h t 'b Th . h
wit in t e same rt e. us 1n t e Mao group of tribes, for
example, at Jessami the youngest son gets the house and the
, '
best of the moveable property, while the other brothers take
equal shares ; at Laiyi, on the other hand, the eldest son
inherits half the property, and the othe1 sons divide the other
half between them; and at Mao the eldest son gets a special
1 Ce1isus of India, I89I, Assatn, by 1892), pp. 237 sq. As to the perman-
(Sir) E. A. Gait, vol. i. Repo1t (Shillong, ence of the Naga villages and the attach-
. 1892), p. 240. ment of the people to the sites, see
2 Census of I1idia, I89I, Assam, by

]. Shakesp~ar, The Lzeshei Kuki Clans,
(Sir) E. A. Gait, vol. i. Report (Shillong, pp. 20, 21.

share, but the house is reserved for the youngest son. Among
the Kabuis, again, the property is divided among the sons,
but the share of the youngest is larger than those of his
elder brothers. Similarly a1nong the Quoirengs, another
N aga tribe of Manipur, it is said that in one village the
youngest son takes all the property, but that in another
village the eldest son inherits the whole, but is charged with
the maintenance of all his brothers and sisters ; while in yet
a third village the rule is, that if all the sons are. grown up
at the time of their father's death, the property is divided
equally among them, bl,Jt if they are too young to look after
it themselves, their eldest surviving paternal uncle enjoys the
estate and maintains his nephews out of it until they are old
enough to take the management of the property into their
own hands. On this seeming diversity of usage our in-
formant, Mr. T. C. Hodson, observes : '' I think the variations
are perhaps more apparent than real, because the eldest son
. would be the natural ' manager ' of the property if he were
grown up and the younger sons still children, and that the
paternal uncle is the manager failing the sons, while the
custom of giving the youngest son the lion's share may be
associated \.Vith the c11stom of making provision for the others
1
as they grow to maturity and marry." Like the rest of the
Mongoloid tribes with whom we are here concerned, these
N ~gas of Manipur subsist chiefly by husbandry ; they inhabit
fortified villages built on heights, to which paths, overgrown
with jungle, lead steeply up from the valleys. Within the
stockade or rampart of stones, which usually surrounds a
village, the large, su.bstantially built houses are irregularly
2
disposed in groups according to the clans which occupy them.
Some of the tribes migrate periodically when the land in
their neighbourhood is exhausted ; others cling to their
villages tenaciously, but are compelled to shift the a1ea of
3
cultivation year by year accordi11g to a fixed rotation.
1 T. C. Hodson, The Niiga Tribes Major W. McC11lloch, Acco1111t of the
ef Manipur (Lonclon, I 91 I), llp. 103. Valley of M111111iporc a11d of tlze Hill
105. Tribes (Calcutta, 1859), pp. 4447
2 T. C. IIodson, The Niiga Tribes ( Selectio11s jro111 the lreco1ds o/ the
of l'rfanipur, pp. 39, 41, 43 Govern111e11t of J11dia, J<oreig1i Depa1t-
3 '1'. C. Ilodson, The Niiga Tribes 111ent, No. xxvii. ). 1'hc passage is
of Jl,fa11ipttr, p. 50. As to the agri- quoted also by T. C. IIodson, op. cit,
cultural system of these tribes, see ]Jp, 5 I Sljlj, .
THE HEIRSHIP O.F'JACOB PAR'f II
The The Meitheis, whp constitute the dominant race of

Meitheis
of Assam.
Manipur, in Assam, are a Mongoloid people speaking a
Tibeto-Burman tongue. Although by blood and language
they are akin to the wild hill tribes. which surround them,
they have advanced to a higher degree of social culture, so
as to form a singular oasis of comparative civilization and
1
organized society in the midst of a wilderness of barbarism.
They live in settled villages, and subsist chiefly by the rice
2
\Vhich they cultivate in permanent fields. They have thus
passed beyond the stage of periodical migrations caused by
the exhaustion of the arable lands in their neighbourhood.
As to the rules of inheritance among the Meitheis, we are
'
told that ''the Chronicles of Manipur do not afford us much
aid in ascertaining the rules of inheritance for private prop-
erty, and at the present time the economics of the State
are in flux under pressure of new ideas political and social.
Ultimo- Land is regarded as held at the will of the ruling power
geniture
among the of the State. As regards moveable property the general
Meitheis. practice seems to be to provide for the sons during the life-
time of the father, and to regard the youngest son as the
heir genera\ if at the time of the father's death he is still
living in the ancestral home. If he had separated and was
living apart from his father, the property should be equally
divided among the sons. Marriage is of course the cause
of the separation of the sons from the home, and is the
occasion of finding provision for them as well as for the
3
daughters." Thus among the Meitheis, as among the
Angamis, of Assam, the heirship of the youngest son

depends solely on the accident of his being left last at the
paternal home, after his elder brothers have married and
settled elsewhere. If like them he should have married
and set up house for himself, he will have no preference in
the inheritance, but will divide the property equally with
his brothers. Further, we see that in Assam, as in England,
the custom of ultirnogeniture survives in a limited form after
the population has ceased to be migratory and has settled
I T. C. Hodson, The lVIeitheis ence of the Meithei villages and cultiva
(London, 1908), pp. xvii. ro sq. tion is on]y implicit.
2 Compare T. C. Hodson, The
lVIez'theis, pp. 26 sq., 39 sq., whose 3
T. C. Hodson, The Meitheis, pp.
evidence, however, as to the perman- 77 sq.
CH. II ULTIMOGENJTURE IN SOUTHERN ASIA 449
down in permanent villages surrounded by fields which ~
- _- ;1
remain the same fro1n generation to generation. '..l

.
-,,
The Kachins or,, as they call themselves, the Chingpaws The -: l
..
or Singphos, are a Mongoloid race who inhabit the Ka.chins,

Ch1ngpaws
northern parts of Upper Burma. Their old settle- orSingphos
m,ents were on the head waters of the Irrawaddy oBfurma. Upper
'
...
River, but they have spread eastward into the Chinese

province of Yunnan, and westward into the Indian pro-
vince of Assam. The name of Chingpaws or Singphos,
which they give themselves, means simply ''men." The
Burmese call them Kachins or Kakhyens. They are \.Vild
and savage mountaineers, broken up into a number of small
communities or petty tribes, each under its own chief; their
raids were much dreaded by the more pacific Bu1mese and
Shans before the English occupation of the country. Yet
they cultivate the soil, and indeed are expert at tillage ;
their fields are often deep down in the valleys, while their
1
villages stand far above them on the hills. Of the Tartar
origin of the Kachins, we are told, there cannot be much

doubt. Their traditions point to a first home somewhere
south of the desert of Gobi, and their movements have
always been towards the south. But the diversity of com-
plexion and features which prevails even in tracts where
Shan and Burmese influences have apparently never pene-
trated, seems to point to admixture with aboriginal races
2
\Vhom the Kachins supplanted. .
The law of inheritance among the Kachins, as it is According
. to one
often stated, combines the principles 0 f pr1mogen1ture account the
and ultimogeniture ; for we are told that '' the patrimony is Kachin
h'l law of
divided between the eldest and the youngest son ; w 1 e inheritance
any children that may intervene, a1e left to push their own co!11bines_
pr1mogen1-
fortunes as they best can. The eldest son succeeds to the ture and
ulti1110-
. . , ge11it11re,
1 E. T. Dalton, Descriptive Ethno- Society fo1 I907 ( I,onc1on, l 907 ), pp. b t
logy ef Bengal (Calcutta, 1872), pp. 9 381 s~q'. ; Ch. Gilhod~s, ;,' Mytho_logie 1.e:li~~
sq.; J. Anderson, lVIandalay to 1Wo1nien et Rel1g1on des Katch1ns, A11th1opos, ultinio-
(London, 1876), pp. 125 sq.; (Sir) J. iii. (I 908) p. 672. ge11iture '
George Scott and J. P. Hardiman, 2 (Sir) J. George Scott and J. P. seen1s to be
Gazetteer ef Upper Burnza and t!ie Ilardiman, Gazetteer o.f Upper Bu1111a tl1e rule.
.S"han States (Rangoon, l 900- l 90 l ), and the .S"ha1t States, l'art I. vol. i .
Part I. vol. i. pp. 331 sq., 369 sqq.; p. 396; Ch. Gill1odes, ''La Culture
O. fianson, ''The J{achin Tribes and mati:rielle des J{atchins, '' A1itliropos, v.
Dialects,'' Journal o.f the J~oyal A.iiatz'c (1910) PIJ 617 sq.
VOL. I 2G

THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB I' AR'f II

450
title and estate, while the youngest, carrying away all the
personal and moveable property, goes in quest of a settle-
ment for himself." 1 According to this account, which has
been substantially repeated by several writers on the
Kachins, the eldest son remains at home in possession of
the paternal. estate, while the youngest son takes the
personal property and goes out to push his way in the
world. Th.is is just the contrary of what is commonly said
to happen among the kindred Mongoloid tribes of this
region, and we may suspect that the account, which appears
to have originated with Captain J. B. Neufville in I 828,
rests on a misunderstanding. At all events Sir George
Scott, who had ample means of acquainting himself with
the customs of the Kachins, has given a different account of
their law of inheritance. He says, ''There has been a con-
stant tendency to disintegration among the Kachins just as
there has been among the Tai, and the hillier character of their
country has made the subdivisions very much more minute.
This disintegration was also in past times due, no doubt,
chiefly to the necessity for migration caused by over-popula-
tion and the wasteful character of the hill cultivation. It
became the custom, on the death of a chief, for the youngest
son to succeed : while the elder brothers set out with such
follo'''ing as they could muster and founded fresh settle-
ments, which, if they were successful, in time came to be
distinct tribes named after their own founder. The Kentish
law of Borough English no doubt is a reminiscence of a
similar custom among the Anglian tribes.'' 2
Different Elsewhere Sir George Scott gives us an instructive account

systems of f h d .11.er
ownersl1ip 0 t e i erent systems of owi1ership, communal and indivi-
in the hills dual, which prevail in the hills and the valleys respectively
and valleys '
respectively, the difference in the ownership depending on the differ-
depe?ding ence between the migratory and the permanent systems of
on d1fferen t
systems of 1 W .
agriculture. Robinson, A Descriptive Journal of the Asz'atz'c Society of Bengal
Account of Assam (Calcutta and Lon- v. (1836) p. 202; R. G. Latham,
don, 1841), p. 378. To the same Descriptive Ethnology (London, 1859),
effect Capt. J. B. Net1fville, ''On the i. 135; E. T. Dalton, Descrzpti've
Geography and Population of Assam '' Ethnology of Bengal, p. l 3
Asz'atz'c Researches, xvi. (Calcutt~, 2
(Sir) J. George Scott and J. P.
1828) p. 341 ; J. McCosh, ''Account Hardiman, Gazetteer of Upper Burma
of the Mountain Tribes on the Ex- and the Shan States, Part I. vol. i.
treme N. - E. Frontier of Bengal,'' p. 373.
CH. II ULTIMOGENITURE IN SOUTHERN ASIA 45I
agriculture practised in the hills and valleys. He says,

'' With regard to taungya or hill cultivation, individual
property is not recognized ; the Tand is regarded as belong-
ing to the whole community as represented by their Duwa
[chief], and the system of cultivation does not permit of a
constant use of the same plot of ground. Where land is
owned in the valleys and wet-weather paddy is cultivated,
the case is different, and individual ownership is admitted
with this restriction, that the land cannot be parted with to
an alien. It is as a recognition of his theoretical ownership
of all the land that the Duwa gets one or two baskets of
paddy per house annually. Land descends to a household
as a whole, and is worked in common for the benefit of all.
Those who leave the household lose all right to participate.
When the household breaks up voluntarily, a division is
made according to no fixed rules, except that the youngest
son gets Benjamin's share, as well as the ancestral home-
stead." 1
In this account a sharp distinction appears to be drawn Permanent
. . . cultivation
b etween t h e up1an d s, wh ere t h e cu ltivat1on 1s migratory, associated
and the lovvlands, where the cultivation is permanent : ori with
t h e h "ll
i s t h e rice
1s grown on t h e d ry system, in
t h e va ll eys individual
ownership;
it is grown on ~he wet system. The coincidence of the dry rnig:at~ry
.h . l. . d f h cult1vat1on
system wit migratory cu tivation, an o t e wet system associated
with permanent cultivation, is not accidental ; for while the cornrnunawith
1
dry system is compatible with a temporary occupation of o\vnership.
the ground, the wet system necessitates its permanent
occupation. In Java, for example, where the cultivation of
rice is carried to a high pitch of excellence by means of
artificial irrigation, there are lands which have produced
2
two crops every year beyond the memory of living man.
Now it is very significant that among the Kachins the lands
which are under temporary cultivation are held in comn1on,
whereas the lands which are under permanent cultivation are
owned by individuals. Similarly we saw that among the
Lushais who follow the migratory system of agriculture,
' .
l (Sir) J. George Scott and J. P. I1zdian Archipela,rro (Edinbt1rgh, 1820),

Hardiman, Gazetteer ef Upper Burma i. 363. As to the different modes of
and the .S'han States, Part I. vol. i. cultivating rice, the clry a11d the wet,
P 416. see id. pp. 360 sqq.
i John Crii. wford, History ef the
452 THE HEIJ?SHIP OF JACOIJ PAR'l' II
1
there is no private property in the soil. The reason is
obvious. Permanent occupation is essential to individual
ownership; it is not essential to communal or tribal owner-
ship. And as in human history the nomadic life of the
hunter, the herdsman, and the migratory husbandman pre-
cedes the settled life of the farmer under the more advanced
systems of tillage, it seems to follow that individual owner-
ship of land has been developed later than communal
or tribal ownership, and that it cannot be recognized
by law until the ground is under permanent cultivation.
In short, common lands are older than private lands, and
the transition from communal to private ownership
of the soil is associated with a greatly improved mode
of tillage, which in its turn, like all economic improve-
ments, contributes powerfully to the general advance of
2
society.
The Like their brethren of Burma, the Kachins of China
Kachins of practise both the migratory and the permanent modes of
China, like
those of agriculture. Viewed from the top of a lofty mountain, their
Burma, country stretches away on every side like a sea of hills, far
practise
both the as the eye can range, their summits arrd slopes in great
migratory part clothed with forest, except where little clearings mark
and the
permanent the sites of villages, or where.ar1 opening in the mountains
system of reveals a river winding through a narrow valley far below.
agriculture.
The villages are al\vays situated near a perennial mountain
1 Above, p. 443.
2
When, however, we come to tribes
The truth, that private rights of like the Angamis, Lhotas, and Aos,
property in land only come to be re- who live in permanent and large
cognized after the amount of land at villages, and amongst whom land is
the disposal of a t1ibe has ceased to be none too plentiful, we find that the
practically unlimited, is clearly b1ought rights of individuals to property in land
out by Mr. A. W. Davis i11 his re- are well known and well recognised,
marks on la11ded property among the and the rules as to inheritance and
tribes of the Naga Hills in Assam partition of such property settled by
( Censzes of Indz"a, I89I, Assam, by E. strict customary law. Amongst the
A. Gait, vol. i. Report, Shillong, I 892, Angamis land, especially permanent
p. 250). He says, '',Private rights terraced cultivation, is freely sold and
of property in land are the rule bought, there being no more difficulty
amongst all the tribes in this district, in selling a terraced field than in selling
except the l(ukis, Mikirs, and plains a pig or a cow. Amongst the other
Rengmas, i.e. the migratory tribes. tribes the custom of letting out land is
That private rights of property in land largely practised, a rent varying fron1
are not recognised amongst these tribes Rs. 3 to Rs. 5 for a field (j"hum) large
is due to the fact that they are in no enough for the support of a household
way pressed for la11d, the villages being being the usual amount charged for the
small and uncut jungles extensive. use of land for two years.''
'
CH, II ULTIMOGENITURE IN SOUTHERN ASIA 453
str~am, generally in a sheltered glen, or straggling with
their enclosures up a gentle slope, and covering perhaps a
mile of ground. The houses, which usually face eastward, Their large
are all built on the same plan. They are constructed of houses. c~mmunal
bamboo and usually measure from one hundred and fifty to
two hundred feet in length, by forty to fifty feet in breadth.
The first room of one of these large communal dwellings is
reserved for the reception of strangers ; the others are the
apartments of several families, connected with each other
by blood or marriage, which compose the household com-
munity. The projecting eaves, supported by posts, form a
verandah, where men and women work or lounge by day,
and where the buffaloes, mules, ponies, pigs, and fovvls lodge
by night.
Near the- houses are small enclosures, where white- Their
. . I . d . d. I . d . mode of
fl owere d poppies, p anta1ns, an 111 1go are cu tivate ; rice agriculture.
and maize are grown together on the adjacent slopes and
knolls, which are carefully scarped in terraces, often pre-
senting the appearance of an amphitheatre. The stream is
dammed near the highest point, and directed so as to over-
flow the terraces and rejoin its bed in the valley
below.
Sometimes the water is led in bamboo conduits to rice
fields or distant houses. Fresh clearings are made every
year by felling and burning the forests on the hillsides.
Near every village disused paths may be seen, which have
been cut to former clearings, and along which little canals
11ave been carried. The cleared ground is broken up with
a rude hoe, but in the cultivated terraces wooden ploughs
are used. Excessive rain rather than drought is the evil
most dreaded by these rude husbandmen. But generally
the natural fertility of the soil more than repays their
labours with bountiful crops of rice, maize, cotton, and
tobacco, all of excellent quality. Near the villages are
orchards, where peaches, pomegranates, and guavas are
grown ; and the forest abounds with chestnuts, plums,
cherries, and various wild bram bleberries. On the higher
slopes, oaks and birches flourish, and large tracts are covered
with Cz'nnamomttm caudatum and C. cassia, of which the oil
is cornmonly sold as oil of cinnamon. Thousands of these
trees are felled annually to clea1 new ground for cultiva-
454 THE HEIJ?SHIP OF JACOB PART II
tion, and their fallen trunks and branches are burned where
1
they lie.
The The Mo11golian . origin of these Chinese Kachins is
Chinese
Kachins apparent from their physical features, though two types
are may be distinguished among them. By far the commoner
Mongolian

1n or1g1n. of the two comprises a short, round face, low forehead,
prominent cheek-bones, broad nose, thick protruding lips,
broad square chin, and slightly oblique eyes set far apart.
The ugliness of the face is only redeemed by its good-
humoured expression. The hair and eyes are usually dark .
bro\vn, the complexion a dirty buff. The other type shows
finer cut features, \vhich recall the \vomanly faces of the
Kacharis and Lepchas of Sikhim. In it the obliqueness of
the eyes is very marked, and the face is a longish, rather
compressed oval, with pointed. chin, aquiline nose, prominent
cheek-bones, and a complexion. so fair that in some cases it
might almost pass for European. This type may point to
admixture with Shan or Burmese blood. The stature of
the Kachins is rather low ; . the limbs are slight, but well
formed, the legs, however, being disproportionately short.
Though. not muscular, they are athletic and agile. They
bring down from the hills loads of firewood and deal planks,
which the ordinary European has much ado in lifting; and
the young gi1ls bound like deer along the hill-paths, their
2
loose dark locks streaming behind them on the wind.
Ultimo- Among these mountaineers the patriarchal system of
genitures
among the government has hitherto universally prevailed. Each clan
Chinese is governed by an hereditary chief assisted by lieutenants,
Kachi11s.
whose office is also hereditary ; but curiously enough, while
the office of lieutenant should in strictness be held only by
the eldest son of the family, ,, the chieftainship descends to
the youngest son, or, failing sons, to the youngest surviving
brother. The land also .follows this law of inheritance, the
younger sona in all cases inheriting, while the elder go
forth and clear wild land for themselves." 3 Thus . among
the Kachins, as among the Lushais, the right of ultimo-
geniture appears to be founded on a custom of sending out
'
. 1 John "Anderson, M.D., Mandalay PP 130 sq.

to Mo1nien (London, 1876), pp. 125,
128-130. 3 J. Anderson, Ma11dalay to Momz'en,
2 J. Anderson, Man1ialay to Mon1 ien,
p. 127. '
.,
CH. 11 . ULTIMOGENITURE IN SOUTHERN ASIA 455

the elder sons into the world to fend for themselves, '
I
I
I
while the youngest remains with his parents in the ,
I
'I'
,
old home. I
i
'
I'
A similar rule of succession, based on a similar custom, Ultimo- I'
was found by Dr. John Anderson to prevail among the geniture I
'
''
. among the I
Shans of China, the neighbours of the Kachins in the Chinese ' I
I
'
province of Yunnan. Among them, he tells us, the chiefs, Sbans. '
'
I
'
assisted by a council of headmen, exercise full patriarchal j

i
''
authority in their states, adjudicating on all cases, civil and j
'i
criminal. The chief (tsawbwa) ''is the nominal owner of ''
'
'
'
all land, but each fa,t11ily holds a certain extent, which they
, I
''''
.'
cultivate, paying a tithe of the produce to the chief. These

''
'
'
settlements are seldom disturbed, and the land passes in 1
I

i
succession, the youngest son inheriting, while the elder '
'
I
brothers, if the farm is too small, look out for another plot, -'
i
I
or turn traders ; hence the Shans are willing to emigrate I
i
and settle on fertile lands, as in British Burma." Most of ' '

''
i
these Chinese Shans are engaged in agriculture, and as ''
farmers they may rank with the Belgians. Every inch of

'
ground is cultivated ; the principal crop is rice, which is '

I
grown in small square fields, shut in by low embank-
ments, with passages and floodgates for irrigation. During
the dry weather, the water of the nearest stream is led off 1
and conducted in innumerable channels, so that each field '
'
'
can be irrigated at will. At the beginning of May, the

valley, from one end to the other, presents the appearance of
an immense watery tract of rice plantations glistening in . .
'
the sunshine, while the bed of the river is left half bare by '
2
the withdrawal of the water.
The Shans or Tai, as they should rather be called, are Distribu-
'd I
the most numerous an d wi e y sprea race o d f th I d tion
e n o- Sbans; of tl1e

Chinese peninsula, extending from Assam far into the tl1eir_

. .
Chinese province o f K .
wang-st, an d f B
rom ang o.k k t o th affinity to
e tile
interior of Yunnan. Siam is now the only independent Chi11ese.
Shan state. The people are closely akin to the Cl1inese

both in physical appearance and in speech ; indeed in
grammatical structure as well as vocabulary the Chi11ese
and Shan are sister languages, differing widely from the
I J. Anderson, Mandalay to Monii'en, 2 J. Anderson, Ma11dalay to lVIon1ic11,

P 302. PIJ 299 sq.
456 . THE HEIRS HIP OF JA COB l'AR'l' II
Burmese and Tibetan, which nevertheless belong to the

same general family of speech, now called by philologers
the Tibeto-Chinese. Though much of their territory is
mountainous, the Shans do not profess to be a hill people,
preferring to cling to the flat alluvial valleys or wide
straths, which are interposed between the mountains.
Their Ever}where they are diligent cultivators of the soil ; the
agriculture. larger plains aie intersected with irrigation canals, while in
the smaller the streams are diverted by dams into channels
which \vater the slopes, or bamboo wheels are used to raise
the water to the fields, where the river-banks are high and
1
there is enough flat land to repay the expense and tiouble.
However, when holdings are not to be obtained in the plain,
young men will sometimes apply for jungle land at a
distance from the village on the hillside. Of such jungle
land there is no lack, but it is useless for the cultivation of
2
rice and has to be laid out in orchards or banana-gardens.
It is interesting to observe the ancient custom of ultimo-
geniture surviving among a people so comparatively ad-
vanced as the Sl1ans.
Ultimo- The custom of ultimogeniture is also said to be observed
~:~~1;~he by the Chins, who inhabit the hills on the borders of
Chins, a Burma and Assam. Thei1 racial affinities have not yet been
\vild 1ace
on the exactly determined, but apparently they belong to the great
borders of Mongolian family and speak dialects of the Tibeto-Burman
Burma. and speec h .3 M ost o f t h e Ch"ins are st1"11 1n
Assam . a very w1"Id state,
living at enmity with all their neighbours. They aie
divided into numerous small clans, which make frequent
raids on each other or on neighbouring Burmese villages.
For their subsistence they depend chiefly on agriculture,
raising crops of rice, millet, peas, beans, sessamum, and
tobacco. But their country does not lend itself well to
1 (Sir) J. George Scott and J. P. of India, 7/ie Indian E111pire (Oxford,
Hardiman, Gazetteer of Upper Bur1na 1909), i. 384 sqq.; Census of India,
and the Sha1i States (Rangoon, 1900- I9I I, vol. i. Report by (Sir) E. A.
1901), Part I. vol. i. pp. 187 sqq., 272 Gait (Calcutta, 1913), pp. 329 sq.,
sqq. The identity of the Shan race is 336.
obscured by a bewildering variety of 2 Mrs. Leslie Milne, Shans at Honie
local names, such as Pai-i, Moi, Muong, (London, 1910), p. 98.
Tho or Do, and Hkamti (Khamtee), 3
with many more. As to the Tibeto- Hardiman, Gazetteer of Upper Burnza
Chinese family of languages see Sir G. and the Shan States, Part I. vol, i.
A. Grierson, in The I1nperial Gazetteer pp. 451 sqq.
'

tillage, for the hills are overgrown with jungle and under-
wood and broken up by ravines. Small patches, however,
are cleared for cultivation in the neighbourhood of the
villages. Among their rematk:able laws of marriage and
inheritance are the custom which gives a man prior right to
marry his cousin, and the rule that ''the younger son is the
heir of a Chin family, and he is bound to stay at home and
1
take care of his parents and sisters." However, among
the Haka Chins at the present time the custom of ultimo-
geniture seems to have passed, or to be passing, into primo-
geniture, though in two at least of the families or clans,
the Kenlawt and the Klarseowsung, the youngest son still
regularly succeeds to the family dwelling, unless he waives
his claim, or has. quarrelled with his fatl1er, or is a leper or
insane. Formerly it was the invariable rule in all the Haka
clans that the youngest son should inherit the family dwell-
ing ; but a certain Lyen Non, of Sangte, bequeathed his
house to his eldest instead of to his yo11ngest son, and
since his time the change of descent has been adopted by
most of the clans. '' As regards landed property (lai ra1n ),
situated within the Haka T1acts, two-thirds is apportioned
2
to the eldest and one-third to the youngest son."
Among the Kamees or Hkamies, a hill tribe of Arakan, Compro-
on the borders of Burma, the rule of inheritance is that ''if a bmitse

e wee11
man die leaving two or more sons, the property is divided prir:io-
as follows : two divide equally ; if there be more than two, !~~ ~{;~_
1
the eldest and youngest take two shares each, and the others moge11it111e
3 a1no11g the
one share each." This rule of inheritance is apparently a HJ,ainies
compromise bet\veen the principles of primogeniture and of Araka11
ultimogeniture, the eldest and the youngest sons being both

1 was Assistant Commissioner of British
Hardiman, op. cit. Part II. vol. ii. Burma, anti lived a1nong these tribes
pp. 302 sqq. for eigl1teen months, re1)orts the r11le of
2 W.R. Head, HandBookontheHaka inheritance as if it a1111lied alike to all
Chz'n Customs (Rangoon, I 9 I 7), PI) the hill tribes of N ortl1 Aral<an. llut
20 sq. this is a1)parently incorrect, ftir a111ong
3Major W. Gwynne Htighes, The the Chins of Arakan, '' if a 111a11 clie
Ifill Tracts o.f Arakan (Rangoon, leaving two so11s, the yo11nger is e11-
r88 r ), p. 27. See also R. I<'. St. titled to nothing; his elder l1rotl1er is
Andrew St. John, ''A short account bouncl ho\veve1 to 11rovicle for his tnar-
of the Hill 'l'ribes of North Aracan,'' riage, the expe11ses of wl1icl1 lie 11111st
Jou111al oftheAnthropo!ogt.'cal I1tstit1tte, pay'' (Major W. (7\\y1111e II11gl1es, 7'/i,
ii. (1873) p. 241. Mr. St. John, whrJ .I.Jill 7'rcicts f!!' rl 1al<a11, p. 30 ).

THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB PAR'f II
preferred in equal degrees to tl1eir intermediate brothers.

Perhaps the compromise marks a transition fro1n ultimo-
geniture to primogeniture.
Ultimo- The practice of ultimogeniture is reported also to prevail
geniture
among the among the Lolos, an important and widespread aboriginal
Lolos. race in the Chinese province of Yunnan, who belong to the
Mongolian family and speak a branch of the Tibeto-Burman
1
language. Among them, according to an English traveller,
'' the order of succession to property and chieftainship is
curious ; the youngest son generally succeeds and after him
2
the eldest."
Heirship Thus far we have dealt with Mongoloid tribes in which
of the
youngest
the principal heir to property is the youngest son. We
daughter have now to consider two tribes in which the principal heir
~~~~~ :~~ is the youngest daughter. These are the Khasis and Garos
Garos of of Assam. The origin and racial connexions of the Khasis
Assam. 3
The are still matters of discussion. They certainly speak a
Khasis, language which, unlike that of all the tribes aiound them,
their
language. does not belong to the Mongolian family and is apparently
related to the Mon-Kmer languages of Indo-China, which
in their turn are now believed to constitute a branch of a
great Austric family of. languages spoken from Madagascar
in the west to Easter island in the east, and from New
4
Zealand in the south to the Punjab in the north. How-
ever, their possession of a non-Mongolian language is no
proof that the Khasis belong to a non-Mongolian race ; for
when a language has not been fixed by being committed to
writing the people who speak it are very ready to drop it
and replace it by another borrowed from a dominant race
with which they have been brought into contact. In-
structive instances of such easy and rapid transitions from
one language to another have been observed and recorded
in modern times among the tribes of Burma, who speak a
1 See above, vol. i. pp. 2 I 2 sq. 3 Lieut. -Colonel P. R. T. Gurdon,
2 E. Colborne Baber, '' Travels and The Khasz's, Second Edition (London,
Researches in the Interior of China,'' 1914), pp. 10 sqq.
Royal Geographical Socz'ety, Supple- 4
Census of India, I9I I, vol. i.
mentary Papers, vol. i. (1886) p. 70. lndi'a, Part I. Report by (Sir) E. A.
I-Iowever, a somewhat different account Gait (Calcutta, I 9 I 3), pp. 324, 327, 336.
of the rule of inheritance among the Compare (Sir) G. A. Grierson, in The
Lolos is given by a French writer. Imperial Gazetteer o.f Itzdz'a, The Indi'an
See belo"' p. 531. Enipire (Oxford, 1909), i. 382, 386.
'
1
variety of languages and dialects. The physical appearance TheKhasis -
and character of the Khasis seem to point to a Mongolian apparently
origin ; indeed, according to Sir William Hunter:, their ~ongolian
Mongolian physiognomy is unmistakeable. 2 They are a people.
short, muscular people, with well-developed calves, broad .
high cheek-bones, flat noses, little beard, black straight hair,
black or brown eyes, eyelids set obliquely, though not so
acutely as in the Chinese and some other Mongols, and a
complexion, according to locality, varying from a light
yellowish - bro\vn to a dark brown. In disposition they
are cheerful, light-hearted, good-natured, and thoroughly
3
appreciate a joke. These characteristics certainly favour
the view that the Khasis belong to the Mongolian stock
rather than to the southern and chiefly tropical family of
peoples, with whom they are allied by language.
Be that as it may, in their manner of life and the l\1ode of
general level of their culture the Khasis do not differ ~~:i~~~ure .
markedly from the Mongoloid tribes of south-eastern Asia of the
who practise ultimogeniture. They live in settled villages, IZhasis.
4
which they seldom shift, and they subsist chiefly by agri-
culture, being industrious cultivators, though their modes of
tillage are- somewhat primitive. Like most hill tribes of
this region, they obtain fresh land for tillage by clea1ing
5
the forest, felling the trees, and burning the fallen timber.
6
Their staple food is rice and dried fish.
The social system of the Khasis is based on mother-l<it1, Mother-kin
among the
that is, on the custom of tracing descent exclusively through IZhasis.
women. Each clan claims to be sprung from a common
ancestress, not from a common ancestor ; and each n1an
reckons his genealogy through his mother, grandmother,
7
and so on, not through his father, grandfather, and so on.
And as with blood, so with inheritance, it passes through
__ ICensus ef India, I9I I, vol. i. Journals (London, I 89 I), p. 48 5 ;

Indz"a, Part I. J(ejJ01-t by (Sir) E. A. P. R. T. Gurdon, T/1e Ji:hasis, 2 p1>.
Gait (Calcutta, 1913), p. 328. 2 sqq. Unlike Lieut. -C(l]. Gt11don,
2 (Sir) W. W. 1-Iunter, A Statistical I-iooler describes the Khasis as '' stilly,
Account ef Assanz (London, 1879), ii. intractable fellows.''
216. Similarly, Sir Joseph Hooker 4 P.R. T. Gttrdon, The ll7iasis, 2 p. 33.
says, ''The Khasia people are of 6 P. I<. '1'. Gttr(lon, op. cz't. p. 39.
the Indo-Chinese race'' (Himalaya1t 6 P. R. T. Gurdon, op. 1it. p. 51.
fournals, I;ondon, 1891, p. 485). 7 P. I<. 'f. (_;t1rdon, op. lit. pp. 63,
3 Sir Jose1>h I-looker, Eii111alayan 82 sq.

THE HEIRSHIP OF JA COB PAR'f II

,
The women only, not through men, and it is the youngest, not
youngest
daughter the eldest, daughter who inherits ; if she dies in her mother's.
the heir lifetime, she is succeeded by. the next yot1ngest daughter,
among tl1e
Khasis. and so on. Failing daughters, a woman's property goes to
her sister's youngest daughter, who in her turn is succeeded
by her youngest dat1ghter, and so on. It is true that on
the mother's death, the other daughters are entitled to a
share in her property; but the youngest daughter gets the
largest share, including the family jewellery and the family

house, together with the greater part of the contents. Still
she may not dispose of the house without the unanimous
consent of all her elder sisters, who, on the other hand, are
1
bound to repair the dwelling for her at their own charges.
As for the landed estate, it belongs to the youngest daughter
only, but her elder sisters are entitled to maintenance from
2
the produce. Almost invariably the grandmother, her
daughters, and her daughters' daughters live together under

one roof or in adjoining houses within the same enclosure ;

and during her lifetime the grandmother is head of the
3
Insignifi- house. In such a household of women a mere man is
cance of

r11en 1n a nobody. If he is a son or brother, he is of no account,
Khasi because, when he marries, he will leave the house and go
household.
and live with his wife's family. If he is the husband of one
of tl1e women, he is still of no account, not being a member
of the family, and having no share in the inl1eritance. He
is looked upon as a mere begetter. Any property he may
earn by his own exertions will go at his death to his wife,
and after her to her children, the youngest daughter as
,
usual getting the largest share. So long as he lives, he is
a stranger in his wife's house; and when he dies, even his
4
ashes may not rest beside hers in the family tomb.
The custom of tracing descent and transmitting property
1 P. R. T. Gurdon, The A"hasis,2 sidered sang or taboo for the daugl1ter's
p. 83. house to be built on the right-hancl
2 P. R. T. Gurdon, op. cit. p. 88. side of the n1other's house, it should
3 P. R. T. Gurdon, op. cit. pp. 31, be built either on the left hand or at
63. That the mother and daughters the back of the mother's hot1se. ''
do not always live in the same 4 P. R. T. Gurdon, The .l-ihasis,2
house appears from the forme1 of pp. 76, 82, 83 sq.; E. T. Dalton,
these passages (p. 3 I), where we Descriptive Ethnology of Ben,g"<ll, pp.
read that '' when a daughter leaves 56 sq.; (Sir) W. W. I-Iu11ter, Stat~stical
her mother's house and bt1ilds a house Accou1it of Assa111 (I.ondon, 1879), ii.
in the mother's compound, it is con- 2 I 7 sq.
CH. II ULTIMOGENITURE IN SOUTHERN ASIA 46I
I
through women instead of through men is common among Why
uncivilized races, and may in its origin have been based daughters
. rather than
on the certainty of motherhood compared with the un- sons
certainty of fatherhood in a state of society which allowed succeed to
. . property
great freedom of tntercourse between the sexes. But that is among the
a large and difficult problem, the discussion of which would Khasis.
lead us too far. Among the Khasis at the present time,
whatever its remote origin may have been, the custom is
clearly bound t1p with the rule which keeps all the daughters
at home and sends out all the sons to live with their wives'
families. For unde1 such a rule the women are the only
lifelong members of the household, and it is therefore
natural that the house and its contents should be in their
hands rather than in the hands of the males, who leave or
enter the house only at marriage, and hence spend only a
portion of their life within its walls ; and the same reasoning
would apply also to landed property, if the lands are near the
houses, and the sons on marrying take up their abode \vith
their \Vives' people in distant villages. Under such circum-
stances it is easy to understand why daughters rather than sons
should succeed to the family property, botl1 real and personal.
But if the preference of daughters to sons as heirs is Reason
thus explained, the reason for preferring the youngest ~~g~~a1Zs
daughter, as heiress, to all her elder sisters is still to seek: for the.
h I t r th f; d
The Kh asts t emse ves accoun 1or e avoure post ton o of the "t" f succession
the youngest daughter by the religious duties which she is youngest

bound to d tsc. h arge. She h o Id s t he re r1g1on,
. as t hetr. p h rase daug11ter.
is; that is, she is bound to perform the family ceremonies
and propitiate the family ancestors ; hence it is right that,
incurring such heavy obligations to the family, she should
receive the largest share of the property. For the same
reason, if she changes her religion or commits an act of
sacrilege by violating a taboo, she forfeits her privileges and
is succeeded in them by her next youngest sister, just as if
she had died. 1 This explanation of the privileged position
accorded to the youngest daughter is hardly satisfactory ;
for we have still to ask, why should the yot1ngest daughter
be deemed better fitted than her elder sisters to discl1arge
the duty of worshipping the ancestors? To tl1is question
1 P. R. T. Gurdon, The A'ha.ri.r, 2 pp. 82 sq.
THE HE!RSHIP 01'~ JACOB PAR'f II
'
no ans\ver seems to be forthcoming. And the reason

assigned in other tribes for preferring the youngest son as
heir, because he stays at home in the parental house after
his elder brothers have gone out into the world, seems in-
'
applicable to the youngest daughter among the Khasis;
since in that tribe all the daughters apparently remain all
their lives at home in the parental house and there receive
their husbands. Yet we should naturally expect the reason
for preferring the youngest daughter to be analogous to the
reason for preferring the youngest son ; and accordingly a
theory which explains the one case but not the other, can
hardly be regarded as adequate.
. Mother-kin The other tribe of Assam who follow the customs of
and.ultimo- mother-kin and ultimogeniture in favour of the youngest
gen1ture
among the daughter are the Ga1os, who inhabit the thickly wooded
Garos. but not lofty hills which take their name from the tribe.
The They undoubtedly belong to the Mongolian race, for they
Garos a
Mongolian
are a short, stout-limbed, active people, with strongly marked
1
people of Chinese countenances, and they speak a Tibeto-Burman
Tibetan
. . language of the Ti beto- Ch inese family. 2 I ndeed , they have
or1g1n.
a very .distinct '' story of their migration from Thibet ; of
their arrival in the plains at the foot of the Himalayas; of
their wanderings eastward up the Brahmaputra valley, and of
the subsequent retracing of their steps until they came to the
plains which lie between that river and the hills they now
inhabit. Here they seem to have settled for a time before
making the last move into the mountainous country that
3
now forms the home of the tribe.'' Most of the great
virgin forests which formerly covered the Garo Hills have
been destroyed to make room for tillage, and their place
has been taken by bamboos and small trees; for, fostered
by the heavy rainfall, a dense jungle has overspread almost
the whole face of the country except where patches of land
4
Husbandry have been cleared for cultivation. The Garo is essentially
ga~~~- a husbandman. To till the soil is the beginning and the
Buchanan, quoted by E.T. Dalton,
I 2 (Sir) G. A. Grierson, in The Inz-
Descriptive Eth1zology ef Bengal, p. perz'al Gazetteer of India, The Indian
66. According to Major A. Playfair, Enipire (Oxford, 1909), i. 387, 393.
the Garos are darker than the Khasis
''and they possess the Mohgolian type 3 Major A. Playfair, The Garos
of feature in a more marked deg1ee '' (London, 1909), p. 8.
, (The Garos, London, 1909, p. 1). 4 A. Playfair, The Garos, pp. S sq.
CH. II ULTIMOGENITURE IN SOUTHERN ASIA
end of his life's work, and the occupation to which he

devotes all the energy he can muster. 1 His mode of
cultivation is rude. A piece of land, generally on a hillside,
is chosen and the jungle on it cut down in the cold weather,
which lasts from December to February. The felled trees
or bamboos _ for in many parts of the hills the jungle con-
sists of bamboos only cumber the ground till the end of
March, when they are burnt as they lie. The crops are
sown in April and May as soon as the first showers have
fallen. The land is not hoed, much less ploughed ; but
holes are made in it with a pointed stick and a few seeds of
rice dropped into each. Millet is simply sown broadcast in
the ashes of the burnt jungle. Land thus reclaimed is kept
under cultivation for two years ; then it is abandoned and
2
lies fallow for at least seven years. The villages are The
usually built in valleys or in hollows on the hillsides, where an
villdaghes
ouses
there is plenty of running water. Around, on all sides, of the
stretches the limitless jungle. The houses are raised on Garos.
piles and are very long, often more than a hundred feet in
length ; being destitute of windows, the interiors are dark
and gloomy. The public room of the family occupies the
greater part of the building, and there the unmarried women
sleep on the floor ; but spaces are portioned off in it for
married daughters and their husbands, and the householder
and his wife have a bedroom to themselves. The bachelors
do not sleep in their parents' house, but in a house set apart
for the use of all the unmarried men of the village. In this
bachelors' hall strangers are lodged, and the village elders
3
hold their meetings. Such dormitories for the unmarried
men are a regular institution with the N aga tribes of Assam,
4
but they are not found among the Khasi Uplanders.
Amongst the Garos, as amongst the Khasis, the system Motlier-I{in
. 1
of mother- k 1n preva1 s. Th 'fi . h h d f h
e w1 e is t e ea o t e Garos. an1ong the
5
family, and through her all the family property descends.
1 A. Playfair, The Garos, p. 33 the Garrow lfills, ''A siatick Researches,
2 A. Playfair, The Garos, pp. 34 sq., iii. (London, 1807) pp. 23 sq.
45. Compare E. T. Dalton, De- 4 P. I{. T. Gurdon, The Khasis,2
scriptive Eth1iology of Bengal, JJ. 6 5 p. 32.
3 A. Playfair, The Garos, pp. 35
sqq.; E. T. Dalton, Descriptive B'thno- 6 Sir W. W. Ht1nter, Statisti'ral
logy of Bengal, pp. 61 sq.; Jo~n Eliot, Accou11t of Assa11i (London, r879), ii.
''Observations on the Inhabitants of I 54
THE HEIRSEllP 01'' ]Al'OB I' AR'!' I I
The tribe is divided into a great many family groups or

'' motherhoods," called machongs. All the members of a
'' motherhood '' claim to be descended from a common
ancestress; and all the childreri of a family belong to their
mother's ''motherhood," not to that of their father, whose
family is barely recognized. Inheritance also follows the
same course and is restricted to the female line. No man
may possess property except what he ear11s by his own
exertions; no man may inherit property under any circum-
1
Among the stances whatever. ''The law of inheritance may be briefly
Garos,
women
stated to be, that property once in a motherhood, cannot
nominally pass out of it. A woman's children are all of her macho11g
inherit all
property,
d h r h fi
[motherhood], an t ere1ore 1t mig t at rst appear t at h
but men her son would satisfy the rule ; but he must marry a woman
..
~~~~:~~ai~~ of another clan, at1d his children would be of their mother's
sept, so that, if he inherited his mother's property, it would
pass out of her 1nachong [motherhood] in the second genera-
tion. The daughter must therefore inherit, and her daughter
after her, or, failing issue, another woman of the clan

2
appointed by some of its members." However, although
in the eyes of the law the family estate and property belong
to the woman, in practice her husband has full use of both
during her lifetime, and while he cannot will it away, his
authority otherwise over it is unquestioned. For example,
the lands of a village belong, strictly speaking, to the wife
of the village headman, yet he is always thought of and
spoken of as the proprietor; and although he derives his
rights exclusively through his wife, she is never considered,
unless it is convenient to mention her name in a lawsuit.
Practically, therefore, a woman is merely the vehicle by
which property descends from generation to generation for
3
the benefit principally of males.
Heirship of So far we have heard of the legal preference of daughters
youngest
daughters to sons among the Garos, but nothing has yet been said as
among the to a preference of the youngest daughter to all the rest.
Garos.
Indeed, Major Playfair, who has given us a valuable mono-
graph on the tribe, drops no hint of such a preference ;
from which we may perhaps infer that the practice of
1 A. Playfair, The Garos, pp. 65, 2
A. Playfair, op. cit. pp. 7 l sq.
7 l. 3
A. Playfair, op, cit. pp. 72, 73.
CH, II ULTIMOGENITURE IN SOUTHERN ASIA
ultimogeniture is obsolete or obsolescent among the Garos

at the present day. However, it appears to have existed in
the tribe down at least to nearly the end of the eighteenth
century ; for an Englishman who visited arid studied the
Garos in I 7 8 8 has recorded the custom among them.
After describing a Garo marriage which he witnessed, he J. Eliot's
goes on as follows: '' I discovered these circumstances of evidence.
the marriage ceremony of the Garrows, fr0m being present
at the marriage of Lungree, youngest daughter of the chief
Oodassey, seven years of age, and Buglun, twenty-three
years old, the son of a common Garrow : and I may here
observe, that this marriage, disproportionate as to age and
rank, is a very happy one for Buglun, as he will succeed to
the Booneahshz'p [chieftainship] and estate; for among all
the Garrows, the youngest daughter is al\vays heiress ; and
if there be any other children who were born before her,
they would get nothing on the death of the Booneah [chief].
What is more strange, if Buglun were to die, Lungree would
marry one of his brothers ; and if all his brothers were
dead, she would then marry the father : and if the father
afterwards should prove too old, she would put him aside,
1
and take any one else whom she might chuse."
Thus we have found the custom of ultimogeniture These
.
observed by a number of tribes o f s' h w
out - estern Ch' Mo11golian
tna tribes,
and the adjoining regions of Burma and Assam. With the pr~ctising
doubtful exception of the Khasis, all these tribes are of the ~~~~~;e,
Mongolian family. Their original home is believed to have seen1 to
have
been North-Western China, between the upper courses of migrated
the Yang-tse-kiang and the Ho-ang-ho, from which they to their
present
spread out in all directions. Following the river valleys in 11omes
their migrations, they passed down the Chindwin, Irrawaddy, ~~~: 11 _
and Salween into Burma, and down the Brahmaputra into Wester11
Assam. Three successive waves of migration of these China.
Mongoloid peoples have been traced ; the latest of them
was that of the Kachins or Singphos, which was actually in
1 John Eliot, ''Observations on widow marries the brother of tl1e

the Inhabitants of the Garrow Hills,'' deceased ; if he clie, the next ; if all,
Asiatick Re:.earches, iii. (London, I 807) the father'' (Desci-tptive JJ,'th11ology,
PJJ. 27 sq. Similarly, speaking of the London, 1859, vol. i. l) 109). His
Garos, I<.. G. Latham says, ''The authority see1ns to be l~liot, whom he
youngest claughter inherits. 1'he cites.
VOL. I 2 II
PAR1' II
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB
progress when it was stopped by the British conquest of

1
Upper Burma. The valleys of the great rivers Brahma-
putra and Irrawaddy are indeed the gateways through
whicl1 the hardy northern invaders have poured from
their colder, bleaker homes in Central Asia to invade the
warmer, riche1 regions of the South. By means of this
natural highway they were able to turn the flank of the
long, almost impenetrable barrier which the Himalayas
Their halt present to a direct invasion of India from the north. Yet
i11 the
highland in their southward march their hordes would seem never to
of Assam. have advanced beyond the rugged, wooded, rain-drenched
mountains of Assam; there they halted, and there they
remain to this day, like the vanguard of a great army look-
ing out from their breezy hill-tops and the edge of their
high tablelands over the hot valleys and sultry plains,
carpeted as with green velvet, which stretch away thousands
of feet below, till they melt into the sky-line or are bounded
by blue mountains in the far distance. The heat of India
probably served on this side as a better shield against the
northern invader than the feeble arms of its unwarlike
inhabitants. He could breath freely among the oaks, the
chestnuts, and the firs of these mountains: he feared to
descend among the palms, the rattans, and the tree-ferns of
2
the vales below.
.
Ultimo- However, the custom of ultimogeniture, or the preference
geniture
among the for the youngest child, whether son or daughter, is not
Mrus. restricted in these regions to Mongoloid tribes. Thus
among the Mrus, a small tribe who inhabit the hills between
Arakan and Chittagong, '' if a man has sons and daughters,
'
and they marry, he will live with his youngest child, vvho
1 (Sir) G. A. Grierson, in The mountains grow lt1xuriant orange
Iinperial Gazetteer ofIndia, J'he Indian g1oves, which supply all Bengal with
Enipire (Oxford, 1909), i. 384 sq. oranges, The fruit appears to be in-
2 Compare The Inzpeiial Gazetteer
digenous to the country, and from it,
of India, The Empi"re of India (Ox- according to Sir George Birdwood,
ford, 1909), i. 295 sq. The view the orange may have been first carried
from the edge of the Khasi tableland by tl1e Arabs to Syria, whence the
is finely described by Sir Joseph Crusaders helpecl to propagate the tree
Hooker, Hi111alayan Journals (Lo11- over southern Europe. See P. R. T.
don, 1891), pp. 488 sqq. As to the Gurdon, The Khasz"s,2 pp. 41 sq.;
forests of the Khasi hills (oaks, firs, Alexander Mackenzie, History of the
birches, chestnuts, rhododendrons), see Relatio11s of the Gove11i11ient with the
P. R. T. Gurdon, The Khasis,2 p. 8. Hill Tiibes of the North-East F1ontier
At the southern foot of the Khasi of India (Calcutta, 1884), p. 235.
CH. II ULTIMOGENITURE IN SOUTHER1V ASIA

also inherits all property on the death of the father." 1 The

Mrus are tall, powerful, dark men, with no traces of the
Mongol in their faces. They cultivate rice and drinl.;: mill.;:,
and eat the flesh of the cow or any other animal. In
character they are a peaceable, timid, simple folk, who settle
their disputes by an appeal to the spirits rather than by
fighting. Among them a ybung man serves three years for
his wife in her father's house, but if he is wealthy, he can
compound for this period of servitude by paying tvvo
ht1ndred or three hundred rupees down. 2
Further, the custom of ultimogeniture prevails among Ultimo-
the Hos or Larka Kols (Lurka Coles) ' who inhabit the among genitureh
t e
district of Singbhum in south-western Bengal. The Hos Hos or
belong to the dark aboriginal race of India, resembling the ~~~!:of .
Dravidians in physical type, though they speak a totally Be11gal.
different language believed to be a brancl1 of that great
Southern or Austric family of speech to which the Khasi
language in Assam also belongs. 1'he race of which the Racial
Kais (Coles) are members, used to be called Kolarian, but ~:i~~,and
it is now generally named Munda after the tribe of that home of '
name. 3 The Hos or Larka Kais are a purely agricultural tlie Hos.
people, and have advanced so far as to use wooden ploughs
4
tipped vvith iron. Their original home appears to have
been Chota N agpur, the great and isolated tableland to the
north of their present country, where their kindred the
Mundas still dvvell. The Hos admit their kinship with the
1 Capt. T. H. Lewin, Wild Races skin, and a rather low stature'' (E..<\.
o/ Soieth - Easte1n India (London, Gait, op. cit. p. 325). Ho\vever,
1870), PIJ 234 sq. As to the Mrus, Dalton \vrites (op. cit. p. 190), ''In
compare E. T. Dalton, Descriptive features the Hos exhibit much variety,
Ethnology o/ Bengal, p. I I 3. and I think in a great nJa11y fa111ilies
2 T. H. Lewin, op. cit. pp. 232, there is consiclerable adn1ixtt:re c>f
234, 235. Aryan blood. l\1any l1ave higl1 noses
3 E. T. Dalton, Descriptive Ethno- and oval faces, and yot1ng girls <lre
logy o/ Bengal, pp. 177 sq., 184 sqq.; sometimes nJet with wl10 have clelicate,
J'he I11iperial Gazetteer of .India, J'he and regttlar featt1res, finely chisellecl
Indian Empire (Oxford, 1909), i. 298 straight noses, and llerfectly formecl
sq., 382 sqq.; Census o/ .India, I9I I, mouths and chins. Tl1e eyes, l1ow-
vol. i. India, Part I . .!report by (Sir) E. ever, are seldom s<l large, so brigl1t
A. Gait (Calcutta, 1913), pp. 322 sqq. and gazelle-lil<e as tl1ose of pure I-fincl11
Tt1e main physical characteristics of maidens, but I have met stro11gly
this aboriginal In<lian stock are ''a ma~ked Mongolian feat11res, anti son1e
IJr<Jad n<>se, a long head, plentiful ancl are <l<Lrlc ancl coarse lilce tl1c Santa.Is.''
s<Jmeti1ncs cttrly (l>tlt not frizzly or 4 I<:. 1'. J)alto11, J)es11ipti71c Eth110-
worJlly) J1itir, a l>lacl{ or nearly blacl< logy of Jle11,~ril, 1i11. 195, 196.
THE HEIR~'iHIP OF JA CO Ii I'ART II
Mundas, and preserve a tradition of their migration from

Chota Nagpur. Accordi11g to the Oraons, a still more
primitive trib~ who inhabit Chota N agpur, it was their
invasion of the plateau which drove the Hos from it to seek
a new home in the south.; but it is difficult to believe that
the Hos should have given way to so inferior and so un-
warlike a race as the Oraons. Whatever the cause of the
migration may have been, the Hos now inhabit a country
still more wild and mountainous than the romantic hills
and valleys of Chota N agpur which their forefathers
The abandoned long ago. 1 Their territory, know11 as Kolhan
coudntryfa1:1,,d or Kolehan, is everywhere undulating, traversed by dykes
mo e o 111e
of the Hos. of trap which rise in rugged masses of broken rock ; and
the views are bounded on all sides by ranges of mountains
about three thousand feet high. The most fertile, populous,
and highly cultivated parts of the country are the lowlands
surrounding the station of Chaibasa. To the west stretches
a region of hills and vast jungles interspersed with some
fruitful valleys ; while the extreme south-west is occupied
by a mass of rugged, forest- clad mountains known as
'' Saranda of the Seven Hundred Hills," where the miserable
inhabitants of a few poor solitary hamlets, nestling in deep
glens, can hardly struggle for mastery with the tigers which
prowl the thick jungle. The Hos of these secluded high-
lands are more savage and turbulent than their brethren of
2
the lowlands, and their agriculture is primitive. They
clear a few patches in the forest or jungle which surrounds
their hamlets ; and though the rich black soil yields at first '
an abundant harvest, it is soon exhausted by the rude mode

of cultivation which the Hos practise, and in three or four
years they are obliged to make fresh clearings, and build for
themselves fresh lodges in another part of the great wilder-
ness. When even these resources failed them in time of
famine, the wild highlanders used to raid their neighbours
and bring back to their mountain fastnesses such plunder as
1 Lieut. Tickell, '' Memoir on the of the Lurka Coles,'' Journal of the
Hodesum ..
(improperly called Kole- Royal Asiatic Socz"ety, xviii. (London,
ban),'' Journal ef the Asiatic Socz'ety 1861) pp. 370 sq.; E. T. Dalton,
ef Bengal, vol. ix. Part II. (Calcutta, Descriptive Ethnology ef Bengril, pp.
1840), pp. 694 sqq.; Dr. William 177 sq.
Dunbar, ''Some observations on the 2 Lieut. Tickell, op. cit. pp. 699
manners, customs, and religious opinions sqq.; E. T. Dalton, op. ci"t. pp. 177 sq.
CH. II ULTIMOGENITURE IN SOUTHERN ASIA
1
they could lay hands on. Things are better with their
kinsfolk who inhabit the more open and fertile districts in
the north. There the villages are often prettily situated on
hills overlooking the flat terraced rice-fields and undulating
uplands. Very ancient and noble tamarind trees mark the
sites, and, mingled with mango and jack trees and bamboos,
add a pleasing feature to an agreeable landscape. The
roomy, substantially built houses, with their thatched roofs
and neat verandahs, stand each in its own plot of ground,
and each is so arranged with outhouses as to form a square
with a large pigeon-house in the centre. The village green,
carpeted with turf and . shaded by grand tamarind trees,
contains the great slabs of stone under which ''the rude
forefathers of the hamlet sleep." There, under the solemn
shade of the trees, when the work and heat of the day are
over, the elders love to gather, and sitting on the stones to
enjoy a gossip and smoke ; there, too, in due time they will be
2
laid to their last long rest with their fathers under the stones.
Each Ho village is under the authority of a headman Among the
called a Mu1zda; and a group of villages, numbering from dHos the f
3
escent o
six to twelve, is governed by a chief called a M ankze. chieftain-.
Curiously enough, the rule of inheritance for the chieftain- ~~~~ted
ship differs from the rule of inheritance for private property ; by i;irimo-
for while the descent of the chieftainship is regulated by f~~ ~~~e, 1
primogeniture, the descent of property is regulated by descent of

.
u1timogen1ture. Th d" . . t
e 1st1nct1on was ascer aine . d b y D property
r. by ultimo-
William Dunbar, who tells us that ''the custom of the Coles geniture.
regarding the inheritance of property is singular, and was
first explained to me in the case of a M ankie, as he is
termed, whose villages are contiguous to the cantonments
of Chaibassa. Although he ruled over a considerable
number of these, and was reckoned a powerful man among
his class, I was surprised to find that his house was a small
and poor one, and that his younger brother resided in the
largest building in the place, which had formerly belonged
to the deceased Mankz'e, his father. On enquiry, I found
that on the death of the parent, the youngest son uniformly
I Lie11t. Tickell, op. ci't. lJ 784 ; E. T. Dalton, op. cit. p. I 89.

Dr. \V. J)unbar, op. cit. p. 372.
3
2 Lieut. Tickell, op. ci't. p. 783; Dr. W. Dunbar, op. cit. 1>. 371.
THE HE.!RSH.!P OF JACOJ? t !'ART II
470
receives the largest share of the p1operty strictly personal;
and hence the M ankie, though he succeeded to his father's
. authority and station as ~ patriarchal ruler, was obliged to
1
resign all the goods and chattels to his younger brother."
Although Dr. Dunbar was not aware of it, the same rule of
succession to private property among the Hos or La1ka
l(ols (Lurka Coles) had been recorded many years before
by Lieutenant Tickell in the following terms : '' The
youngest born male is 11eir to the father's property, on the
plea of his being less able to help him~elf on the death of
the parents than his elder brethren, who have 11ad thei1
father's assistance in settling themselves in the world, during
2
his lifetime." The reason for the distinction between the
two rules of succession is perhaps not far to seek ; for
while on the death of a chief the enjoyment of
his private
possessions might safely enough be left to his youngest son,
even should he be a minor, prudence would generally pre-
scribe that the exercise of his public authority should be
committed to the more experienced hands of his eldest son.
The Bhils, Again, ultimogeniture in a limited form is reported to
~f~~~t~~~e be practised by the Bhils, a wild indigenous race of Central
India. India. They are a short dark people, wiry and often thick-
set, with great powers of endurance. Their name is said to
be derived from the Dravidian word for bow, the charac-
8
teristic weapon of the tribe. They have lost their 01iginal
. language, but it probably belonged either to the Munda
4
Theirmode (Kolarian) or to the Dravidian family. Formerly they roved
of life. as huntsmen through the forests of their native mountains,
but they have now, had to abandon the indiscriminate
slaughter of game and the free use of the woods, in which
they committed destructive ravages. At present many of
them live in the open country and have become farm
servants and field labourers. Some of them are tenants,
5
but very fev.r own villages. In the Barwani district of
. . ..
Dr. W. Dunbar, op. cit. p. 37 4.
1 Castes of the Central Provinces of
2
Lieut. Ticl{ell, op. cit. p. 794 note*. India (London, 1916), ii. 279.
3
The Eth1zographz"cal Szervey of the 5
R. V. Russell, op. cit. ii .. 292.
Ce1itral India Agency, Monograph No. Compare The Ethnographi"cal Sttrvey
II., The Jungle Tribes of Malwa, by of the Central India Agency, Mono-
Captain C. E. Luard (Lucknow, 1909), graph No. II., The Jungle Tribes of
P l 7. llfalwa, by Captain C. E. Luard (Luck-
4 R. V. l{ussell, The Tribes and now, 1909), p. 33.
Central India, for example, they are said to be as yet little
affected by civilization and to lead a most primitive life.
They have no fixed villages. The collections of huts, which
pass for villages, are abandoned at the least alarm ; the
report that a white man is coming often suffices to put the
whole population to flight. Even within what may be
called a village the huts are commor1ly far apart, for each.
man fears the treachery of his neighbours and their designs
1
upon his \Vife. The Bhil is an excellent woodsman. He
-
kno\vs the shortest cuts over the hills, and can walk the
roughest paths and climb the steepest crags without slipping
or feeling distressed. In old Sanscrit works he is often
called Venaputra, that is ''child of the forest,'' or Pal lndra,
''lord of the pass.'' These names well describe his char-
acter. For his country is approached through narrow defiles
(pal), and through these in the olden time none could pass
without his permission. On travellers he used always to
levy blackmail, and even now natives on a journey find him
ready to assert what he deems his just rights. As a hunts-
man the Bhil is skilful and bold. He knows all the haunts
of tigers, panthers, and bears, and will track them down and
kill them. Armed 'only with swords a party of Bhils will
attack a leopard and cut him in pieces. 2
Among the Bhils of Western Malwa and the Vindhyan- Ultimo-
Satpura region along the N arbada Valley, in Central India, genitureh
among t e
tribal custom determines inheritance. Of the property half Bhils.
goes to the youngest son, who is bound to defray all the
expenses of the funeral feast held usually on the twelfth
day after his father's death. He has also to mal(e provision
for his sisters. The other half of tl1e property is divided
between the elder sons. But if all the so11s live together,
which very rarely happens, they sl1are the property equally
3
between them. Here again, therefore, the preference for
the youngest son in the inheritance appare11tly depends on
his being left alone with his father at the tirne of his father's
1 Census ef India, I90I, vol. xix. Account ef t/1e lJ:fe101/1 Bhilo, pp. 357,
Central India, Part I. Report, by 358.
Captain C. E. Luard (Lucknow, 1902), 3 The Eth11ograpl1i<a/ Survey of tlze
p. I 97 Central I11dia Age11ty, Monograph No.
2 J{, V. Russell, The Tn"bes a1zd II., The Ju11gle 7'ribes of Malwa, by
Castes ef the Cent1al I 11ovi1tces of Captai11 C. E. Lt1arcl (Lt1cl<now, 1909),
!1tdia, ii. 292, c1uoting Major Hendley's p. 26.

THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB PAR'!' JI

472
deatl1 ; if all the sons chance to be living together with

their father at the time of his death, the youngest enjoys no
special privilege, but merely receives an equal share with
the rest.
Ultimo- Further, it appears that ulti1nogeniture in a limited form
~:1~~u;ethe prevails among the Badagas, an agricultural people who,
Badagas of along with the agricultural Kotas and the purely pastoral
~~~~ern Todas, inhabit the Ncilgherry Hills of Southern India. On
this subject Dr. Rivers reports as follows : '' Breeks has
stated that the Toda custom is tl1at the 11ouse shall pass to
the youngest son. It seems quite clear that this is wrong,
and that this custom is absolutely unkno\vn among the
Todas. It is, however, a Badaga custom, and among them
I was told that it is due to the fact that as the sons of a
family grow up and marry, they leave the house of the
parents and build houses elsewhere. It is the duty of the
youngest son to dwell with his parents and support them as
long as they live, and 'vhen they die he continues to live in
1
the parental home, of which he becomes the owner.''
Traces of Very few traces of ultimogeniture appear to be re-
ultimo-
geniture in ported from the Malay region. In Rembau, one of the
the Malay States ,,f the Malay Peninsula, all ancestral property
region and
Georgia. vests in women. When there are several daughters in
a family, the mother's house is normally inherited by
the youngest daughter, who undertakes, in return for
the prospective inheritance, to support her mother in old
2
age. The Battas of Sumatra are an agricultural people
living in settled villages. Among them, when a man dies and
leaves several sons or brothers, the custom is to divide the in-
heritance among them, giving the eldest and the youngest a
3
larger share than the rest, generally double the other shares.
In the Transcaucasian province of Georgia, according to the
provisions of a written but apparently unpublished code, it
is the rule that, on the death of a prince or nobleman, the

1 W. H. D. Rivers, The Todas B1anch oj the Royal Asiatic Society,

(London, 1906), pp. 559 sq. As i:o the No. 56 (Singapore, December 1910),
Badagas and the Kotas, see Edga1 pp. 65, 68.
Thurston, Castes a1td Tribes of Souther1t 3 G. A. Wilken, ''Over de verwant-
India (Madras, 1909), i. 63 sqq., iv. schap en het huwelijks-en erfrecht bij
3 sqq. de volken van het maleische ras, ''
2 C. W. C. Parr and W. H. Mack-
De versp1eide GeschnJten (The Hague,
ray, '' Rembau,'' Jou1nal of the Straits 1912), i. 332.
CH. 11 ULTIMOGENITURE IN NORTH-EASTERN ASIA 473
youngest son should get his father's house, with the adjoin-
ing buildings and garden ; if there is a church tower, the
youngest son keeps it also, but it is valued, and he pays his
elder brothers a portion of the value. On the death of a
p~asant his house and meadows go to his eldest son, but
his granary to the youngest.1
5. Ultz"mogenz"ture z"n North-Eastern Asia

So far the peoples amongst whom we have found the
practice of ultimogeniture are all agricultural. The custom
however prevails to some extent among tribes in the hunt-
ing and pastoral stages of society. Thus it is reported to The
obtain among the Yukaghirs, a Mongolian tribe of north- ~ !~~~~s 1
eastern Siberia, who live partly by hunting and fishing, and eastern
partly by their herds of reindeer. The possibility of agri- Siberia.
culture is excluded by the extreme rigour of the climate,
which is the coldest in all Siberia, indeed one of the coldest
2
on earth. ''The Yukaghir who subsist by hunting and
fishing near river-banks are so poor, and their mode of life
is so primitive, that the private possession in the family of
any article, not to speak of food-products, is almost entirely
beyond their conception. Whatever is procured through
hunting or fishing is turned over by the hunters and the
fishermen to the women, the oldest of whom looks after its
distribution. . . . Individual ownership is recognized to some
extent with reference to articles of clothing, and hunting-
implements, such as the gun, the bow, etc. Each member
of the family has what he calls hz"s clothing, and the hunter
has his gun . . . . The principle of private property holds
also in regard to women's ornaments, and to such utensils
as needles, thimbles, scissors, and thread. Here also belong
the smoking utensils the pipe, the strike-a-light, the
tobacco-pouch, and the tinder and the canoe. But boats,
fishing-nets, house and all household implements are the
common property of the whole family. . . . vVith regard to Ult~mo-
. h 1 f gen1ture
inheritance of family property, t e pr1nc1p e 0 m1nortty lS anlong tlie
I A. von I-Iaxthausen, Transl.:au- (Leyden and New York, 1910), p. 7 Yul{agl1irs.
kasia (Leipsic, 18 56 ), ii. 207, 2 I 5. ( Jne Jesiep No1th Pacijil Eci:peditio11,
2 W al<lemar Jochelson, The Yieka- 1Vle111oir ef the A 111er,a1z M11se11111 ef
ghir aizd tlie Yukacr;hz'rz'zed Tungies Mit111al Ilisto1y, New York).
'
474 THE HEIRSHIP OF JA COB PAR'l' II
gene1ally applied. When the older brothers separate from

the family, or, after their parents' death, go to live in the
families of their \Vives' parents, the family property remains
in the hands of the youngest brother. , He also becomes the
owner of the father's gun, after the death of the latter, while
all the dresses and trinkets of the mother become the pro-
perty of the youngest daughter. As already stated, the
youngest son does not leave the house of his parents to go
to live with his father-in-law. He serves for the latter a
certain time, in requital for his bride, and then she goes to
live with his parents. The Yukaghir explai11 the custom of
minority right to inheritance by saying that the youngest
child loves its pa1ents more than do the other children, and
1
is more attached to them than they are."
Among the In spite of the sentimental reason alleged by the
Yukaghirs
ultimo- Yukaghirs for preferring younger children in the inheritance,
geniture we may S\lspect that among them, as among the other tribes
is based
on the considered above, the preference is really based on the
principle custom of keeping tl1e youngest son at home, after his
that the
child who elder brothers have married and quitted the parental house
remains at to live in the houses of their wives' parents. The suspicion
home after
the others is raised to something like certainty when we observe in
have left it
is the heir. that branch of the tribe which depends for its subsistence on
herds of reindeer, that the sons '' do not leave their father's
house after marriage, but remain in the family, and share
the property in common. The brothers are kept together,
on the one hand by ties of kinship, and on the other by the
scarcity of reindeer, which makes divided households im-
2
practicable." Nothing could well set the true origin of
ultimogeniture in a, clearer light than the observation that
within the narrow limits of the same small tribe for the
Yukaghirs number. only a few hundreds all told 3
'
the
youngest. son only succeeds to the whole of the property in
that branch of the tribe where he remains alone in his
father's house, whereas, in that branch of the tribe \vhere all
the sons alike remain in their father's house, the youngest
son has no special privilege, but all the sons share alike in
the property at the death of their father. On the other
1
W. Jochelson, The lrukaghir, pp. 107.:109.
2 7
V\ Jochelson, op. cit. p. I 09. 3 W. Jochelson, op. cit. p. 2.
CH. 11 ULTJMOGENJTUI?E JN NORTH-EASTERN ASIA 475
hand among these reindeer-breeding Yukaghirs a married

daughter leaves the house of her parents and goes to
li\ e in the house of her parents - in - law.
1
He11ce she
gets no part of the family property on the death of her
parents ; the mother's personal property, such as clothes,
trinkets, a11d working utensils, pass at her death to her
1
unmarried daughters. Thus among these reindeer-breeding
Yukaghirs the social conditions are to some extent directly
the reverse of those which prevail among the Khasis.
Among the Yukaghirs the sons remain at the parental
home all their lives and inherit the parental property,
whereas daughters quit the parental home at marriage and
inherit nothing. Among the Khasis, on the other hand,
daughters remain at the parental home all their lives and
inherit the parental property, whereas sons quit the parental
home at marriage and inherit nothing. 2 In both cases the
inheritance passes, as is natural, to the children who stay at
home, whether they are sons or daughters.
Among the reindeer-breeding Chukchee, who inhabit Ultimo-
h h
t e nort -eastern extremity o f A geniture
s1a, great importance is among the
attached to the fire-board, which is a rude figure carved out Chukchee
of wood in human form and used in the kindling of fire by ~~s~~;~h
friction. These fire-boards are personified and held sacred : Siberia.
they are supposed to protect the herds of reindeer, and
actually to keep watch over them. Many families have
several fire-boards, some of them comparatively new, others
inherited from preceding generations. In every case the
oldest fire-board, as a precious heirloom, descends, \vith the
house and its belongings, to the principal heir, who is
3
usually either the eldest or the youngest son. Apparently
the question whether the eldest or the youngest son is to be
the principal heir is decided in favour of the one who
remains last at home ; for we are told that '' wl1en the elder
' .
brother leaves, the house is then given over to a younger
4
brother, who becomes the principal heir."
1 W. Jochelson, The Yi1kaghir, p. . (The Jesttp North Palijic Expediti"o1t,

109. . Me11zoir ef the A 111erica11 1Vfuse11111 ef
2 Above, pp. 459 sqq. Natural Histo1-y, New York).
3 Waldemar Bogoras, The Chuk-
chee (l,cyden and New York, 1904- 4 W. Bogoras, 7'/ie Chukchec, p.
1909), lllJ 349 sqq., compare p. 677 359.
THE HEIRS.HIP OF JA COB PART II
Ultin10- 'fhe Koryaks of north-eastern Siberia entertain a similar

geniture
among the superstitious reverence for their fire - boards, which they
Koryaks regard as the deities of the household fire, the guardians of
of north-
eastern the family hearth, and to which they ascribe the magical
Siberia. functior1s of protecting the herds of reindeer and helping
the men to hunt and kill the sea-mammals. '' Among the
Maritime group, as well as among the Reindeer Koryak,
the sacred fire-board is connected with the family welfare,
and therefore it must not be carried into a strange house.
But if two families join for the winter and live in one house,
in order to obviate the necessity of procuring fuel for two
houses, both take their own charms along into the common
house, without risk to their effectiveness by so doing. The
sacred fire - board is usually transmitted to the younger
son, or to the younger daughter, provided her husband
remains in his father - in - law's house and the brothers
establish ne\v houses for themselves or raise separate
1
herds." I-Iere again, therefore, ultimogeniture seems to be
determined solely by the residence of the youngest child in
the paternal home after tl1e elder children have quitted it :
the right is not affected by sex, for the heir may be either
the youngest son or the youngest daughter, whichever
happens to remain last in the house.
Primo- Among the other principal races of Siberia, including
geniture
in other the Voguls, Ostyaks, Samoyeds, Tungus, Buriats, and
Siberia11 Yakuts, it is said to be always the elder son who inherits,
tribes.
but he is bound to make a certain provision for the younger
son, even though his younger brother should be richer than
2
himself.
6. Ulti11iogeniture in Africa
Ulti1110-

Among the pastoral tribes of Africa the custom of
gen1ture
rare 1n ultimogeniture seems to be exceedingly rare. It is practised
Africa. in a limited form by tl1e Bogos, a tribe who subsist chiefly
by their herds of cattle, though they also till the ground to
1
W. J ochelson, The Aoryak (Ley- 58 . Torrington Square, W.C., July
den and New York, 1908), pp. 34-36 25th, 1916), in which she refers for
(The Jesup North Pacific Expedition, her authority to a work on the cus-
frfe11ioir ef the Anierican Mieseu11i ef tomary law of the Siberian natives by
Natural Hi'story, New York). D. Y. Sarnokvasov, Sboruik Obychnavo
2 This I learn from a letter written
prava sibirskz"kh i'norodtsev (Warsaw,
to me by Miss M. A. Czaplicka (dated 1876), pp. 20, 28, 29, 49, 183, 233.
CHAP. II ULTIMOGENITURE IN AFRICA 477
a certain extent. They inhabit the outlying spurs of the Among the
Abyssinian mountains towards the north their country Bogos. 0 .r
. '
1ac k s woo d s and flowing water, but enjoys a temperate and theAbyss1n1a
healthy climate. Almost the whole year the cattle roam youngest
son gets the
the mountains 1n search of fresh pastures, and about a third ho11se.
of the population migrates with them, dwelling in tents of
palm-mats, which, when the camp shifts, are transported on
the backs of oxen. The rest of the people live in more or
less permanent villages of straw huts ; but in case of need
they can burn down these frail habitatiol)S and decamp
with the herds in a night, for land is to be had in plenty
1
everywhere. Among the Bogos the rule of pr-imogeniture
prevails. The firstborn is the head of the family ; and
the chieftainship also descends through the firstborn from
generation to generation. Indeed, the firstborn of a great
family is regarded as something holy and inviolable ; he is
2
a king without the kingly power. On the death of a man
his property is divided, and the firstborn gets the best share,
including the highly valued white cows and all the furniture
and other domestic goods in the house. But the empty
3
house itself belongs of right to the youngest son. Among Ultimo-
the Nuers, a pastoral people on the White Nile, when the among genitureh
t e
4
king dies he is succeeded by his youngest son. Among Nuers,
the Suk, a tribe of British East Africa, the eldest son in- ~:~~a~:~.
herits most of his father's property, and the youngest son
inherits most of his mother's. The Sul( appear to have
been originally a purely agricultural people, but for some
time past they have been divided into two sections, the one
agricultural and the other pastoral. The rule of inheritance
just mentioned obtains in both sections of the tribe, and
5
also among the Turl{anas, another tribe of the same district.
The custom of ultimogeniture or junior right is observed
by some of the Ibos, a settled agricultural people of Southern Ulti.mo-
Nigeria ; but among them, curiously enough, the rule applies ~~~~~u;~lie
only to property inherited from women, it does not extend Ibos of
Souther11
1 Werner Munzinger, Sit/en 'und <' _,
JOttua1i (P . ) A s to Nigeria.
ar1s, I 8 5 5 , p. 24 I.
J(echt der Bogos (Winterthur, 1859), the Nuers, see J. Deniler, Tlze Races
pp. 25, 77-79 ef Man (London, 1900), p. 445.
2 W. Munzinger, op. cit. p. 29. 6 M. W. H. Beech, The ,'\11k, their
3 W. Munzinger, op. cit. p. 74 Language a11d Jio!klore (OxfClrll, 191 r),
4 J~run-l{o!let, Le Nil Bla11c et le pp. 4, 35
THE HEIRSHIJJ OF JACOIJ l'AJZ'l' II
'
to property inherited from men, and even in this limited form

the custom appears to be exceptio11al rather than general.
On this subject Mr. N. W. Thomas, who has reported the
practice, observes that ''with regard to a woman's property
there fire two currents of custom (a) primogeniture or equal
division among sons and daughters of the classes of property
heritable by either ; and (b) junior right or borough English,
as it is known in this country, in certain exceptional areas.
Junior right is undoubtedly the original custom at Aguku
I
and its sister town Enugu, if we may judge by the fact that
it applies to inheritance both by sons and daughters. At
Nofia and Nise, their nearest neighbours on either side, it
applies only in the case of sons, and it is reasonable to
suppose that it is an imported custom due to intermarriage
\vith Enugu or Aguku, the more so as both at Nofia and Nise
we alsb find that the custom of primoge11iture, or rather a
preferential share for. the firstborn, is combined with that of
1
giving a preferential share to the lastborn." To come to
details, at Mbwaku the youngest son buries his mother and
inherits her property. At Aguku the youngest son gets the
house of his dead mother, though in theory the husband
of the deceased is the owner; and the youngest daugl1ter
inherits her mother's pots, grinding-stones, and ivory anklets.
At Enugu the youngest son is heir to his mother's trees, and
the youngest daughter is 11eir to her 1nother's pots and house-
hold property. At Nise the eldest son and the youngest
so11 both get preferential shares of their dead mother's pro-
perty, but a daughter, whether married or single, gets nothing
but pots and the like. The house goes to the youngest son,
unless he has a house of his own. At N ofia sons inherit
their mother's property, the eldest and the youngest getting
preferential shares. If the mother had land, the youngest
son will get three shares, the eldest two, and the others one
each. '' Okwa trees would be equally divided, with an extra
one to the youngest; yams the same, with a double portion
for the youngest ; fowls and goats the same ; after the
youngest had taken his extra ones, any that remained over
1 Northcote W. Thomas, Anthropo- 1913) p. 93. Mr. Thomas's observa-
logical Report 01i the Ibo-speqki1zg tions refer particularly to the Ibos in
Peoples of Nigeria, Part i. (London, the neighbourhood of Awka.
: ' '' '
CHAP. II ULTIMOGENITURE IN AFRICA 479

would be killed and shared.. The house would go to the
youngest son till he got his own house 1 when the eldest
would become e11titled to it. The camwood stone and
market basket would go to the youngest daughter ; the wife
of the youngest son would get the pots and household stuff;
and if he were unma1ried, the youngest son would take them
1
over till such time as he got a wife." From this diversity
of usage in the inheritance of women's property Mr. N. W.
Thomas infers that the custom of allowing women to own pro-
2
perty is of comparatively recent origin among these people.
Among the N amaquas, a Hottentot tribe of South Ultimo-
Africa, the presumptive heir to the chieftainship, according genitured
reporte
3
to one account, is usually the chief's youngest son. But this an1ong the
report is probably incorrect ; for a good authority on the Namaquas.
N amaquas, Sir James E. Alexander, tells us that, according
to information given to him pe1sonally by old men of tl1e
tribe, the custom is to choose the eldest son of the last
4
chief to succeed him in office. The Thonga, a Bantu
tribe of Mozambique, have a curious notioh that a reigning
chief ought not to see his grandson ; hence among them a
chief's heir may not wed his official wife during his father's
lifetime, lest she should give birth to a son, and co.nsequently
the reigning chief should have the misfortune of beholding
his grandson. In the neighbouring district of Gaza, \vhich Ultimo-
is part of Mozambique, the Ba - Ngoni of Gungunyane, ~~~~ur~he
another Bantu tribe, entertain a similar objection to allowing Ba-N!oni
. f ' h d h It t I ft h
a c h 1e to see t e gran son w o 1s u 1ma e y, a er 1s son, bique.of Mozam-
to succeed him on the throne; but they evade the difficulty

in a different way. Among them ''the eldest son of the
chief's principal wife, when at the age requisite for marriage,
takes a wife and loses the right of succession ; it is the
'
youngest son, still young at the time of his father's death,

1 N. W. Thomas, op. cit. i. 94 sq. was Fritsch's at1thority. It appears

not to be Theophilt1s Hahn, a goocl
2 N. W. Thomas, op. cit. i. 86. witness, to wl1om F'ritscl1 re1)eatedly
a Gustav Fritsch, Die Eingeborenen refers. See Th. I-Ial111, ''Die Nan1a-
Siid-Afrika's (Breslau, 1872), P 365, I-Iottentoten, '' Glob11s, xii. (I 8 70) }Ji)
''Der prasu11zptive Erbe der Eaupt- 238-242, 275-279, 304-307, 332-336.
li1zgswurde soil gewohnlich der ju1zgste 4 Sir James Edward Alexa11der, A1i
.':iohn sein. '' The form of the state- E:xpeditio1z o/' 1Jiscove1:y i11to the /11-
ment (''soil'') seems to imply a doubt terio1 of Afii,a (I,011clon, 1838),i.
as to its accuri1cy. I do not know who I 7 I.
THE HEJRSHIP OF JACOll I' AJ{'f' I I
who inhe1its the throne, because he has no children of his

own. This leads to jealousy, civil war between brothers ;
it has brought numberless misfortunes to the royal family
of Gaza, and it was one of the causes of the downfall of
Gungunyane. The Thonga custom is much the more
simple and less dangerous to the maintenance of peace;
tl1e chief must not see his grandson, therefore his son will
not be officially married until after his father's death. Any
wives he may previously have taken will be morganatic, and
1
their children not entitled to inherit." From this account
we gather that among the Ba-Ngoni of Gungunyane the
youngest son succeeds to the chieftainship only if his elder
brothers are married at the time of their father's death, but
that, if all the sons remain unmarried during their father's
lifetime, the eldest son will succeed him on the throne in
accordance with the usual rule of SU5=cession among Bantu
tribes. Thus even among the Ba-Ngoni it would seem that
succession to the throne is regulated by the rule of primo-
geniture, though under certain definite circumstances that
rule is superseded by the rule of ultimogeniture.
The Why in these tribes a chief should be so reluctant to see
reluctance
of an
1
his grandson 1s not exp aine d b h h
y t e writer w o reports tl1e
African reluctance. But when we remember that in some parts of
chief in
certain south-eastern Africa it appears to have been customary. to
tribes to put a chief to death on the first symptoms of old age, 2 \Ve
see his
grandchild may conjecture that in certain tribes the fatal symptom was
may be
derived
the birth of a grandson, and that in order to avert it tl1e
from an chief forbade his sons to marry during his lifetime. Of such
~~dk~~~~;m a prohibition the rule which permitted the eldest son to marry
either the on condition of losing the right of succession may have been
~~:!elf a mitigation. Or possibly the rule that a chief should not
or his see his grandson may have been an alleviation of an older
grandchild. f . h d .
custom o putting t e gran son to death. The practice
of killing the firstborn of a family seems to have been
widespread, and there are some grounds for thinking that
it is based on a theory of transmigration. The soul
of a parent or grandparent is supposed to be born again in
'
1 Henri A. Junod, The Life of a 2

For the evidence, see The Dying
South African Tribe (N euchatel, I 9 I 2- God, pp. 36 sqq. (The Golden Bough,
1913), i. 343. Third Edition, Part iii.).
THE ORIGIN OF ULTIMOGENITURE
the person of his or her child or grandchild. But if the

person whose. soul is thus born again should chance to be
still alive at the time of the rebirth, it seems clear that he
runs a risk of dying in his O\Vn person at the same moment
that he comes to life again in his child or grandchild ; and
such a risk may be obviated either by preventing the child
or grandchild from being born or by killing it immediately
after birth in order to restore to its original owner the soul
which the infant had temporarily abstracted from him or
1
her. Thus the unwillingness of an African chief to see his
grandson may possibly be derived from an old custom of
killing either the grandson or the . grandfathe1 himself, a
custom which in later times, through the growth of humane
feeling, has been softened into a simple rule that the grand-
father
.
may not look upon hi's grandchild, as if, by a sort of .
legal fiction, he refused to iecognize the infant's existence.
I 7. The Origin of 0
Ultz.'1nogenz ture
Surveying the instances of ultimogeniture as they meet The
us among. the tribes of Asia and Africa,. we may conclude, f;:~~:nce
that the custom is compatible with an agricultural as well youngest
as \Vith a pastoral life. Indeed, the great majority of ~~~~:a
peoples who are known to observe ultimogeniture at the natural
present day subsist mainly by agriculture. But the ~~~~~~
migratory system of agriculture which many of them follow of hi~ .
rema1n1ng
is wasteful, and requires an extent of territory large out of longest
all proportion to the population which it supports. As the with his
parents,
sons of a family grow up, they successively quit the parental
abode and clear for themselves fresh fields in the forest or
jungle, till only the youngest is left at home with his
parents ; he is therefore the natural support and gua1dian
of his parents in their old age. This seems to be the
simplest and most probable explanation of ultimogeniture,
so far at least as it relates to the rights of youngest sons.
It is confirmed by the present practice of the Russian
peasants, among whom both the c1:1stom and the reason for
2
it survive to the present time. Further, it is corroborated
.
1 See The Dyi'ng Cod, pp. 179-193, ancl below, fljJ. 562 sq.
. . 2 See above, pp. 438 sq.
2 I
THE HEJRSHIP OF JACO/I PAR"l' II
by the observation that the parental house is the part of

the inheritance which oftenest goes to the youngest son ;
1
it is his rightful share, even if he gets nothing else. The
rule is natural and equitable, if the youngest son is the only
child l~ft in the parental house at the time of his parent's
2
death.
Tl1e same Perhaps among tribes like the Khasis and the Garos,
e_xplaila- who observe the custom of mother-kin, the succession of
t1on may d 1
applytothe the youngest daughter can be expla1ne on s1m1 ar
11
f~;~~= ce principles. The youngest daughter is naturally the last to
yq11ngest marry ; i11deed in some peoples, including the Garos, she is
~:~~f:.er actually forbidden to marry before her elder sisters. 3
She
therefore naturally remains at home longest with her parents
and becomes their stay and comfort in life and their heir
after death. Even when, as appears to be the custom with
the Khasis, the married daughters also remain at home in
the old pa1ental dwelling or in adjoining houses, the care of
tl1eir families will necessarily absorb most of their time a11d
energy, leaving them comparatively little leisure to spare for
attending to their pa1ents. In this case also, therefore, the
preference for the youngest daughter in the inheritance
seems not unnatural.
The Among pastoral peoples, as Blackstone long ago per-
f~:ference ceived, the preference for youngest sons is still more easily
youn?"est intelligible. The wide extent of territory needed to support
~~~:i~~larly a tribe of nomadic shepherds or herdsmen leaves ample
natural room for the sons, as they grow up, to go out into the
among
pastoral world and push their fortunes with wandering flocks or
peoples ..
1
See above, pp. 435 (Wales), 435 que1zt chez les petites gens: a la mort
(Shetland), 438 sq. (Russia), 439 du pe1e, les at1zes sqnt souvent pourvus ;
(Hunga1)'), 439 (Northern Tchuds),. le plus j'eu1ze reste dans la fa1nille prend
457 (Chins), 472 (Badagas), 472 sq. done naturellement la place die pere.
(Georgia), 477 (Bogos). Qzte ce fait se repete ap!usieurs reprises
2 A similar view is taken of the et il devz"e1zdra le droit, alors meme que
origin of ultimogeniture or 1naz'nete, as les circonstances qui l'expliquaient et le
it is called in French law, . by the ;"ztstijiaz'ent 1ze se rencontreraient plzts :
. historian of French civil law, Paul a
telle est, ?ltes yeux, l'une des orzgines
Viollet. He says, '' Ce droi"t que je du droit de mainete '' (L. Viollet,
1etrouve e>z Angleterre, en Frise, e>i Histoz"1e ,du D1oit Civi'l Franrais,
Saxe, chez les Slaves, etc., 1z' est parti- Seconde Edition; Paris, 1893, p. 842).
culier a aucu1ie race: 011 s'est quelque- 3 Major A. Playfair, The Garos
fois egare a la recherche de ses origines. (London, 1909), p. 69. For examples
C'est tout si11zple11ient la consolidatz"on of a similar prohibition an1ong other
d'un usage qzte la necessitt a rendu frt- peoples see below, vol. ii. pp. 264 sqq.
. .

CHAP, II THE ORIGIN OF ULTIMOGENITURE
. herds, while the youngest remains to the last \Vith the old
folks, to nourish and protect them in the decline of life,
and to succeed to their property when in due time they are
~athered to their fathers. Among the Bedouins the rela- Among tI1e
t1on between a father and his sons are such as might easily Bedouins a
. father is
resu l t 1n a preference for the youngest son over his elder often on
brothers. On this subject Burckhardt, who was familiar b~d te;ms
WI
'th B d 1r with his
e ou1n 11e, writes as follows: ''The daily quarrels elder sons.
between parents and children in the desert constitute the
worst feature of the Bedouin character. The son, arrived
at manhood, is too proud to ask his father for any cattle, as
his own arm can procure for him whatever he desires; yet
he thi11ks that l1is father ought to offer it to him : on the
other hand, the father is hurt at finding that his son behaves
with haughtiness towards him ; and thus a breach is often
made, which generally becomes so wide that it never can be
closed. The young man, as soon as it is in his power,
emancipates himself from the father's authority, still paying
him some deference
1
as long as he continues in his tent :
but whenever he can become master of a tent himself (to
obtain which is his constant endeavour), he listens to no
advice, nor obeys any earthly command but that of his own
will. A boy, not yet arrived at puberty, shows respect for
his father by never presuming to eat out of the same dish
with him, nor even before him. It would be reckoned
scand.alous were any one to say, ' Look at that boy, he
satisfied his appetite in the presence of his father.' The
youngest male children, till four or five years of age, are
often invited to eat by the side of their parents, and out of
the same dish." 1 Here again, as in so many other cases,
the turning-point in the relations between a father and his
sons appears to come at the moment when the sons quit
the paternal abode to set up dwellings of their own. The
haughty spirit of independence, which a Bedouin manifests
to his father from the time when he ceases 'to dwell with
his parent in the same tent, might easily alienate the father's
affections and lead him, in disposing of his property, to pass
over the proud headstrong elder son, who has gone forth
iJohn Lewis Burckhardt, Notes 01e the Bedoui11s a11d vVahabys ( Londo11,
1831), ii. 354 sq. l

THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOJJ PAR'l' II
fro1n him, and to leave everything to the obsequious

,defe1ential youngest son, who 11as remained with him in the
tent. It is true that, under the influence of Moham1nedan
law, the Arabs now divide the property equally among their
1
sons ; but in old days, before the rise of Islam, they may

often have yielded to the natural impulse to disinherit their

' elder in favour of their younger sons.
With a Thus, whether at the pastoral or the agricultural stage
change of
social
of society, the conditions requisite for the rise and pre-
conditions valence of ultimogeniture se~m to be a wide territo1y and a
ultimo-

ge111ture sparse population. When through the growth of popula-
tends to tion or other causes it ceases to be easy for the sons to hive
pass into

primo- off from the old stock and scatter far and wide, the right of
geniture. the youngest to the exclusive inheritance is apt to be dis-
puted by his elder brothers, and to fall into abeyance or
even to be replaced by primogeniture, as is happening at

the present-time among the Lushais of Assam. Neverthe-

less, through sheer force of inherited custom, the old rule
may continue to be observed even when the conditions of
life in which it originated have passed away. Hence it
comes about that ultimogeniture still exists, or existed till
lately, side by side with primogeniture in not a few parts of
Among the England. Hence, too, to return to the point from which
Hebrews
pr1mogen1- we started, we can understand why among the ancient

. .
ture may Hebrews some traces of ultimogeniture should have survived
have been
preceded long after the people generally had abandoned it for primo-
by ultimogeniture, having exchanged the nomadic life of herdsmen
geniture.
in the desert for the settled life of peasants in Palestine.
The historian of a later age, when the old custom of ultimo-
geniture had long been forgotten, was surprised to find
traditions of younger sons inheriting to the exclusion of
their elder brothers, and, in order to explain cases of
succession which violated all his own notions of propriety,
he represented them as exceptions due to a variety of
fortuitous causes, such as an accident at birth, the arbitrary
preference of the father, or the cupidity and cunning of the
younger son. On this view, therefore, Jacob did no wrong
I J. L. Burckhardt, Notes on the are those prescribed by the Kora11, and

Bedo1ti"11s a1zd Wahabys, i. 131, ''The the property is divided among the male
laws of inheritance among the Arabs children in equal shares.''
CH. II
ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS 485
to his elder brother Esau ; he merely vindicated for himself

that right of succession \Vhich the ancient law had uni-
versally conferred on younger sons, though in his own day
a new fashion had crept in of transferring the inheritance
from the youngest to the eldest son. .
8. Ultz"1nogeniture and ]us prz"mae Noctz"s 1 .

Having found what seems. to be the true cause, or at Suppos_ed
least one of the true causes, of ultimogeniture .\Ve may con- dferiv1 ~tion
' o u t1mo-
sider some other theories which have bee11 put forward to geniture
account for the succession of the youngest. One of these ~~~:1~~~
2
theories, as we have seen, would base the preference for the jus J'.rimae
yo11ngest son on a doubt as to the legitimacy of his elder noctzs.
brothers, or at least of his eldest brother, 'c as if the lord of
the fee had antiently a right of concubinage with his
tenant's wife on her wedding-night ; and that therefore the
tenement descended, not to the eldest, but the youngest
son, who was more certainly the offspring of the tenant."
The first writer to give this explanation of Borough English RobertP!ot
on the
or ultimogeniture in England appears to have been Robert origin or
Plot, Keeper of the Ashmolean Museum and professor of Borough
chemistry at Oxford in the latter part of the seventeenth English.
century, \vho, in his history of Staffordshire, after noticing
the existence of Baraw-English (Borough English) at two

places in the county, proceeds to discuss the origin of the
custom. He first notices the opinion of Littleton that the

youngest children are preferred cc for that in la\v they are
presumed the least able to shift for themselves.'' This
simple solution of the problem does not satisfy the learned
Keeper of the Ashmolean, and he discards it for a much
I The so-call eel jus primae 1ioctis or passionate, b11t j11st, defence of the -
seignorial right is well 11andled in the Catholic Ch11rch against a false and
following works : Lord I-Iailes (Sir 1itliculous accusation which has bee11
David Dalrymple), A1znals of Scotland brought against it by ignorant and
(Edinburgh, I 797 ), vol. iii. Appendix prejucliced writers ; the third is a con1-
I., ''Of the Law of Evenus and the prehensive antl dis1Jassio11ate clisc11ssion
Mercheta 111ulieru11i,'' pp. 1-2 I ; L. of the whole evitlence. All three
Veuillot, Le Droit du Seigneztr (Paris, writers, Scotch, l<'rench, a11d Germa11,
I 8 54) ; K. Schmidt, Jus pri11zae Nocti's agree s11bstantially in tl1eir concl11sion,
(Frei!Jurg im Breisgau, I 88 I). Of wl1ich I believe to lJe correct.
these works, the first is concerned
chiefly with Scotland ; the second is a ~ Above, p. 440.
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB l'AR'f JI
more recondite one, which he propounds as follows : ''Which

are reasons that appear plausible enough, but I guess the
more substantial cause of this custom may rather be, that
the places where now Borow-English obtains, were anciently
lyable to the same ungodly custom granted to the Lords of
Manors in Scotland by King Evenus or Eugenius, whereby
they had the privilege of enjoying the first night's lodging
1
with their tenants' brides, so that the eldest son being pre-
sumed to be the lord's they usually setled their lands (and
not without reason) upon the youngest. son, whome they
thought their owne; which being practised a long time,
grew at length to a custom. Now that this custom obtained
as well in England as Scotland, we may rationally conclude
from the Marcheta mitlierum (which King Malcolm ordered
the tenants to give their lords in liewe of it when he took it
2
away ) that was anciently paid here as well as there : for
which we have the express testimony of Bracton : T1~anavit
(says he) totam Anglz'a1n Marchetz' hu;us pecztniarz'i con-
8
suetudo z'n 11za1zcipiorum flliabus 1narz'tandz's, z'.e. that this
4
custom was spread all over the nation, etc."
Plot's From Plot's own \vords it appears that the discreditable
erroneous
interpreta- origin which he assigns to Borough English was no more

tion of the than a guess of his own, which he founded, first, on a11
Marcheta
1nulieru1n. alleged custom of this sort said to have been practised
many ages ago in Scotland but long since abolished, and
second, on the former exaction both in Scotla11d and
England of a tax or fine, called marchet or merchet (Mar-
cheta 1n1tlierum), which tenants had to pay to their lord
whenever they gave their daughters in marriage, and which
5
Dr. Plot, following older writers, believed to be a substitute
for a right of concubinage formerly exercised by a lord
over his tenants' daughters on their marriage night. As
Plot plainly admits that not only the custom itself, but even
the fine which he regarded as a pecuniary substitute for it,
had long been obsolete, it is clear that, if. ever the custom
.
1 Hect. Boetii Hz'st .. Soc. Li"b. 3. Angl. Lib. 2. tit. i. cap. 8. nu11i. 2.
cap. 12. 4
Robert Plot, The Natural History
2 Ceo. Biechanani Rer. Scot. Hi"st. of Staffordshire (Oxford, 1686), p.
Lib. 7, Fol. 64. 278.
3
6
Sir Jol1n Skene and Sir Henry
Bracton de Legi'b. et Consuetitd. S1)elman. See below, pp. 490 sq.
. ..
CH. II ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS 487
was practised at all, it must be referred to some period of

more or less remote qntiquity. Leaving out of account for
the present the positive tradition that a licentious custom of
this sort once prevailed in Scotland, we may ask what is
the value of Plot's inferenc~ from the marchet or merchet to
the former observance of a similar custom in England ?
Was that tax or fine for the marriage of a tenant's daughter
really, as he supposed, a commutation for an older and
grosser privilege enjoyed by the landlord over the woman's
person on her wedding night?
On that point Dr. Plot's opinion is in direct conflict Plot's
with the views of the best modern historians of English law, tthheor:y: 0
.r
e or1g1n ,
who seem to be unanimous in affirming that they know of of Borough
no ev1'd ence fior th e recogn1t1on o f any sue h rig h t or rejected
English by
privilege at any time in England. Blacl{stone, as we saw, ~ode~n

wr1"t es,1 '' I cannot 1earn t h at ever t h"1s custom preva1'J e d 1n
. of
h1stor1ans
English
England, though it certainly did in Scotland (under the law.
name of nzerclzeta or marcheta), till abolished by Malcolm
III.'' On this subject of Borough English I consulted,
many years ago, the great historian of English la\v, F. W.
Maitland, and in a letter to me he \vrote as follows : '' I
have great doubt about the ;its pn'mae noctz's I have never
seen the slightest proof that it existed or was supposed to
exist in England; on the other hand I have seen thousands
of entries about the 1narchetum, e.g. temp. Edw. i. almost all
tenants who were not i1eeholders paid 1nerchet in this part
of England. It may be worth your notice that the 11zerchet
was often higher for marriage out of the manor than for
marriage within the manor. I have just seen some tenants
of the Abbey of Ramsey who paid an arbitrary (i.e. unfixed)
fine for marrying their daughters extra villam, but only five
shillings z'ntra villa1n. Also fines for marrying so1zs out of
the manor are not unknown, and the 111erchet is often men-
tioned in close con11ection with a prohibition against givi11g
sons a clerical education an education which \Vould enable
them to take orders and so escape from bondage : the
context often gives the lord a right of pre-emption over the
beasts of the villainors. The idea at the root of the
1nerchetu1n seems to me much rather that of preserving the
1 Above, p. 440.
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB PART II
live stocl<: on the manor than that of a ;us prz"mae noctis-

of which even in legends I have seen no trace whatever.
However, there certainly was tall<: of it in France (how
about Scotland?), and where there was so much smoke
there may have been some fire. I may add that in England
the 11zerchet was 1egarded as ve1y servile at least as a
general rule to pay it argues not merely base tenure but
personal unfreedom : such at any rate was the view of the
1
lawyers." Again, I consulted Professor Paul Vinogradoff
on the subject of Borough English, an.cl ir1 his reply, after
2
referring me to passages of his books in which he had
touched on that theme, he adds, '' You vvill see that I did
not even allude to the fanciful explanation from ;"us prz"11zae
3
noctis. I do not know of any evidence in support of it."
Similarly in conversation \vith me Sir Frederick Pollock
expressed complete scepticism as to such a right of con-
cubinage (the so-called;its prz'11zae noctzs) having ever been
claimed . or exercised in England ; and he writes to me
that ''the supposed ;us przmae noctzs or droit du seigneur
has . long been exploded among scholars," and ''certainly
. there is no trace of such a thing in any authentic record
4
of English or Scottish customs.'' But where Blackstone,
Maitland, Vinogradoff, and Pollock have looked in vain for
evidence of an alleged rule of English law, it is not likely
that any one else vvill ever find it ; and accordingly we may
safely disrniss t~e alleged rule as a fable. Hence the theory
which would explain Borougl1 Englisl1 from such .a supposed
seignorial privilege derives no ,support from English law.
In Scotland But we have seen that, \Vhile Blacl<:stone knew of no
the so-
calledjus evidence for such a privilege in England, he confidently

prz1nae affirmed that it had existed in Scotland down to the reign
noctis is
said to of 'Malcolm III. What was his authority for saying so?
have been He appears to have derived his information, directly 'or
legalized
by the indirectly, from the old Scottish historian Hector Boece' the
.
legendary fiiend of Erasmus and first Principal of the University of
King .
Evenus. 1 1
F. W. Maitland, in a letter to me, 3 Professor Patil Vinogi:adoff,. in a
dated 15 Brool,side, Cambridge, lst letter to me dated Court Place, Iffiey,
November 1887. Oxford, 9th May 1916.
2 The Growth ef the English Manor
(London, 1905), pp. 314 sq.; Villain- 4 Sir Frederick Pollock's letter is
age i1t E?zgland (Oxford, 1892), pp. dated 13 Ola Square, Lincoln's Inn,
82, 157, 185. . 27th November 1917.
CH. II . ULTIMOGENITURE AND ]US PRIMAE NOCTIS 489
Aberdeen, the earliest writer known to have definitely

asserted the existence of such a custom in Scotland. In
his History of .S'cotland, published in the year 1 5 2 7, Boece The
tells of a certain early king of Scotland by name Evenus testin1ony
. ' ' of the early
who introduced a number of wicked laws, allowing his sub- Scottish
jects to marry any number of wives up to te11, according, to ~~~~:i.an
the degree of their wealth, placing the wives of commoners
at the disposal of nobles, and permitting a feudal lord to
deflower the daughters of his vassals at their marriage.
While the former laws, continues Boece, were abolished not
long afterwards by the authority of the kings, the last law,
which permitted a landlord to deflower the virgin brides of
his tenants, remained in force down to the reign of Malcolm
Canmore (1057-1093 A.D.), who at the advice of good
Queen Margaret abolished it entirely and decreed that a
gold coin, called in the historian's time nzarcheta, should . be
paid to the landlord as the price of redemption of the
bride's chastity at her marriage. '' And that custom," adds
the historiaI1, '' is observed by our countrymen even at the
1
present time." Elsewhere, in treating of the reign of
Malcolm Canmore, Boece repeats the statement in more
explicit terms. He says that the tyrant Evenus had
established a wicked and pestilent custom, in accordance
with which lords or feudal superiors had the right of
deflowering all the virgin brides in their territory, but that
this custom was abrogated by King lVIalcolm Canmore,
who permitted a bride to redeem her chastity by the pay-
ment of half a silver mark, ''which they are still compelled
2
to pay, and which is commonly called .,mulieru1n marketa." .
.
1 Boece, lib. iii. 35a, quoted by adeo ea pestis 111aptatu11t adolescent1e111
Lord Hailes (Sir David Dalrymple), ani111os iiifecerat; eam ta1zde11t Mal-
Annals of ~)cotland (Edinburgh, I 797), colnzus Can111or Rex, diva Margareta
iii. I sq., . ''' Fecit ad haec plura relatu Regina suadente, ztt opportuniori re-.
indigna, leges tu/it i111probas om11em feretur loco, velztt itt De1111t et ho111i1zes
olentes spurcitiam : Ut licerct sz'1zgztlis 1'nj1e1ia111, prorsus sz1b111ovit, sa11cie11.s
suae gerztis plures uxores, aliis sex, aliis num111u11t a111e11111 (Marchetam 11ost1a
decetn, pro opz'bus, ducere; 11obilib11s vocat aetas), z'n nuptiis spo11Jac p1tdo1is
plebeiorunz uxorfls co11zmu1zes essent, ac redi111e11di causa, loci do111i110 pc11den-
virginis novae nuptae, loci do111inus d1t111: .ldque pojtt!ares 1toJtri vel hoe
pri1na11t libandi pudicitiam potestate11t aevo observant.''
haberet. lfaec !ex tametsz' 1eliquae Boece, xii. 26oi1, quoted by Lord
2
dttae regum authorz'tate haud 11111/to Hailes (Sir David Dalrymple), A11nals
post petzitus s11blatae fuerunt, nu/lo of Scot!a11tl (Edinbt1rgh, I 797), iii. 2, .
!abore longa post secula potuit abrogari, '' .lllud vero i11ter caetera hattd indig-

490 THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB PAl{'I' II
But tl1e On this it is to be observed that King Evenus III., the

legislation
of King alleged author of the wicked law, appears to be a purely
Eve11us is mythical n1onarch ; for he is said to have reigned as
purely
fabulous. sixteenth king of Scotland at a time before the Christian
era as to which all genuine historical docume11ts are totally
1
wanting. Sober modern historians disdain to mention
even his name. But if the l{ing himself is mythical, the
iniquitous legislation fathered on him must be equally
fabulous. The repetition of Boece's statement in other
2
. words by later authors, such as the historian Buchanan
3
and the legal antiquaries Sir John Skene and Sir Henry
4
Spelman, adds nothing to its authority. Apart from that
nitm memoria existi11ze1n, abrogata1n i. p. 206), speaking of J\1alcolm Can-
pessi11ta11z eam ac pestilentetn consuetu- more, who succeeded to the crown in
dinem, olim ab Eveno tyranno i1z- 1057 A.D., '' Uxoris etia1n precibus
ducta11t, ut dontini praifectivi i1z szto dedisse fertur, ut pri1na1n novae nuptae
territorio sponsaru11t 01~niu11t virgi1zz"ta- noctem, quae proceribus per gradus
te11z praelibarent, di1nidiata argenti quosda1n lege Regis Eve1zi debebatztr,

11iarca una1n [l. pri11tam] 1zocte1n a sponszts dimidiata argenti nia1ca 1-edi-
praefectorum uxo1,ibus redi1nente mere posset: qua11z pe1zsio1ze11z adhuc
sponsa, quam etiamnzt11z pendere Marchetas mulierum vocant '' (where
cogzt1itur, vocantqne vulgo mulierum for Eveni all the MSS. read Ez1ge1zii).
marl{etam. ''
3 (Sir) John Skene, De Ve1-bo1-um
1 Some say that he reigned about
Signijicatione, The Exposition oj the
60 B. c.; others, with a show of ch1ono- Ternies and Dijfilill Wordes, co1ztei1zed
logical accuracy, would date his reign i1z the fou1e buikes of Reg1'.a11z Ma;es-
from 12 B.C. to 8 B.C. See L. Veuil- tate1n .(Edinburgh, 1797), s.zz. ''Mar-
lot, Le Droit du Seig1ieu1- au Moyen cheta,'' ''King Eve1zzts did .wickedlie
Age (Paris, 1854), pp. 266 sq.; K. ordaine, that the Lord or maister of
Schmidt, Jus priniae Noctis (Freiburg the ground, or Land, suld have the
im B1eisgau, 1881 ), p. 204. Buchanan, fi1st nicht of ilk maried woman within
who solemnly catalogues these mythical the samin. The quhill{ ordinance, was
kings, says that Evenus III. was after abrogate be ICing Malcome the
strangled in prison after a reign of Thrid; quha ordained, that the Bride-
seven years (Rerzt11t Scoticarunt His- groome sulde have the 11se of his awin
toria, lib. iv. cap. 16 ). wife. And therefore suld pay ane
2 George Buchanan, Rerunz Scoti-
peece of money, called Marca. Hector
cari-tm Hi"storia, lib. iv. cap. 21 (Opera Boetius, lib. 3, c. 1~. For the quhill,,
Omnia, Leyden, 1725, vol. i. p. I 10), certaine Kye, was t1sed to be payed.
''Huie successit Evenus Tertius, in- Lib. 4, cap. Scienduni 63. .. I think
dignus optimo patre jilizts: qztt' non that llfarcheta 1nuli'e1is is the raide of
contentus centum e nobilitate concu- the woman, or the first carnal! copula-
bi1iis, ni sua1n spztrcitie1n latis legibus tion and conjunction with her : quhilk
in vzelgus jJ1'oderet. Tulit enim, Ut in respect of her virginitie is maist .

cztivis liceret, pro opibus, quot a/ere esteemed be men. Quhilk interpreta-
posset, uxo1es ducere: ut Rex ante tion is confirmed alswa bee Citiac.
nuptias sponsarztm nobilium, nobiles. Lib. I. de feudis. ''
plebeiarunt praelibarent pudicitiani : 4
Sir Henry Spelman, Glossarium
ut plebeioru1n uxores cu11z nobilitate Archaiologic11m, Editio Tertia (Lon-
co1n1nunes esse1it '': id., lib. vii. cap. don, 1687), p. 397, s.v. ''ftfarthet,
'
21 (Opera Ontnia, Leyden, 1725, vol. Marcheta, et Marchetu111 : aliis Mer-

. . ..
c11. 11 ULTI.MOGENITURE AND }US PRIMAE NOCTIS 491

statement and its echo by later authors there seems to be

no evidence at all of the exercise in Scotland of a licentiot1s
privilege of the sort commonly designated by the phrase
;us pri1nae noctz's ; and \Ve may reasonably suppose that the
fable of such a privilege originated in Scotland, as in The fable
England, partly at least through a simple misinterpretation ~:ev~s to
of the marchet or 1nerchet, the fine paid by a vassal to ?riginated
his lord on the marriage of his, the tenant's, daughter. ~~i~nter
Certainly the notion, to \Vhich Sir John Skene gave currency, pretation of
marclzet or
in the sixteenth century, that the 1narchet or 1nerchet was a 1nerclzet,
pecuniary commutation for a former right claimed by a th~ fine
feudal lord of sleeping with his vassals' daughters, on their ~a;:n~~t
1
wedding night, derives no support from the account of the on t~e
n1arr1age
1narchet or 1nerchet given in the most ancient code of of his
Scottish laws, the so-called Regi'a1n _J,fa;estatem, 2 which is datighter.
popularly referred to the reign of King David I. in the
twelfth century, but was probably compiled at' a somewhat
3
later period, perhaps early in the fourteenth century.
'

chet, et Bractono Merchetu11z, '' '' Tu1- her nzarchet sail be ane kow, or sax
pis Scotoru111 veteru11z consuetudo, quli. schillings ; and for the sergents dewtie,
te1ritorii dominus vassalli sponsa11z sax pennies. 3. Jte111, The 111archet of
pri11zli. nocte con1p1i1neret, Jlo1e11zqite the dochter of ane Thane, or Ochiern,
ca1peret p11dicitiae. Ha1zc instz"tuisse t\va kye, or twelve schillings ; or the
fert111 lrex Evenus, plane Ethnicus, dewtie to the sergent, twelve pennies.
sitb Aztgusti seculo, sztstztlisse vero Re;,.: 4. Jte111, The ma1chet of the dochter
llalcol1n1ts 3 Christia1zus qui Jloruit of ane Earl perteines to the Queene,
Annu1n circiter gratiae 1080 re- and is twelve kye.'' See Regiam
de111ptionisque 11omine do111ino statuisse 1Vfajestate1n, The Auld Laivs a1zd Co11-
in1pendend11m (ztt ait Hector Boetz"us stitutio1zs ef Scotland, .faitlif21llie col-
lib. 3. cap. I 2.) 111a1ca111 ai-genti, 111ar- lected fi1rth ef the Register a11d
chetamque z'.nde suggerit appellatanz.'' traizslated oztt ef Lati1ze iiz Scottish
After which Spelman quotes Buchanan, Laizgua,l{e be Sir Joh11 Skene of
Sir John Skene, and J(egia111 Majesta- Curriel1ill, Clerlc of ot1r Soveraigne
te1n, lib. iv. cap. 31. . Lordis Register, Counsel!, a11d Rollis
1 See the passage of Sir John Skene (Edinbt1rgh, 1774), p. 137. In all
quoted above, p. 490, note 3 this there is no hint that the 111a1chet
2 The following is Sir John Skene's or 11zerchet was a pect1ni~1ry con1n1uta-
own translation of the J)assage of the tion for a11 infamot1s rigl1t for111erl}'
A'egiain Majestate1n (Book IV. cha1Jter exercised ])y lords over their vassals'
3 1) which bears on the 111archet or dat1ghte1s.
11zerchet, '' On the Marchet ef We11ze11. 3 It see1ns to be now generally
It is to wit, that confo1me to the law agreed tl1at the Regia111. Majestate111
of Scotland, the 111archet of ane woman, was based on the 7ractat11s de le,r;ib11s
noble, or servant, or hyreling, is ane et co1zsz1etz1di11ib11s 1e,i;1zi A 11gliae wl1icl1
young kow or thrie schillings : and the was co1nposecl by Ra1111lph de Glanville,
richt dewtie to the sergent thrie pennies. Chief J usticiary of England in tl1e reign
2. And she be the dochter of ane frie of rlenry II. (died I 190). lndeecl
man, and not of the Lord of the village, references to Glanville by 11ame occur
"
492
Mode1n This view of the true nature of the 1nart:het or 1nerlhet in

legal Scots Law has the sanction of 11igh legal authorities. Thus
authorities '
on tl1e Lord 11anl(ton writes, ''Charters from the crown, and even
11iarcket or
1nercket. those from subjects, frequently contain a grant of Merclzetae
Mulieru1n the Merchets of women. We have this described
' 1
in our old law book; and it is a consideration dt1e to the
over-lord, by his vassals, upon the marriage of any of their
daughters, taxed according to their quality. There is not
the least insinuation of the infamous original assigned to it
by some of our historians and lawyers, and therefore I must
doubt the truth of it ; for since there was due to the superior
the casuality of marriage, upon the heir's marrying, it was
thought reasonable that l1e should have a 'consideration on
the marriage of his vassals' daughters : the conveying it in
the charter imports a discharge of. the same, and having
2
gone into disuse some ages since, it is only matter of style."
And in his lectures on Scottish legal antiquities Mr. Cosmo
Innes makes the following observations : '' Some learning
has bee11 brought to show that on the Continent this tax-
mercheta 1nulierum represented an ancient seignorial right
the ;"us pri1nae noctis. I have not looked carefully into
the French authorities ; but I think there is no evidence of
a custom so odious existing in England ; and in Scotland
in all tl1e seven ma11uscripts of the by a Piedmontese namecl Joha11nes
Regzanz Ma;estate1n which are pre- Ferrerius, who came to Scotland in
served in Scotland. The historia11 of I 528 and earned his bread as a literary
Scotland, John Hill Burton, was of hack by compiling t1nhistorical his-
opinion that the Regianz Ma;estatem tories of the land which gave him hos-
was put together by some unknown pitality.
person soon after the War of In- 1 Regianz 11:fa;estate11z, lib. iv. cap.
dependence. See Lord Hailes (Sir 3 I
David Dalrymple), Annals of Scotland 2 Andrew McDot1all [Lord Bank-
(Edinburgh, 1797), vol. iii. Appendix ton], Atz Instititte of the Laws of
Second, No. 10, ''An Examination of Scotla1zd (Edinburgh, 1751-1753), i.
some of the Arguments for the high 395 sq. In Scots law '' casualities
Antiquity of Regia1n Majestate11z,'' pp .. of superiority are certain emol11ments
278-336; John Hill Burton, History arising to the superior, which, as they
of .S'cotland (Edinburgh, I 876), ii. 58 depend on uncertain events, are termed
' sqq. In his disse1tation on the subject casualitzes. '' See Bell's Dictzonary
Lord Hailes has shown that the testi- and Digest of the Law of Scotla1zd, '
'
mony borne to the antiquity of the adapted by George Watson (Edinbu1gh,

Re001-a11z Ma;estatem in the Chronicle of 1882), p. 123. I have to thank my
the Abbey of Iiinlos is of little or no old friend Lord Strathclyde, President
value, since the Chronicle of Ki'nlos of the Cort of Session, for kindly re-
was drawn. up about 1537, from very ferring me to these and other works on
scanty and untrustworthy materials, Scots Law. - -"
-.-_, .'
-.-. '"

I venture ~o say that there is nothing to ground a suspicion

. of such a right. The nzerchet of women with us was simply
the tax paid by the different classes of bondmen and tenants
and vassals, when they gave their daughters in marriage, .
and thus deprived the lord of their services, to which he
\Vas entitled, ;ure sanguz"nzs." 1 ,
A similar view as to the real meaning of the 1narchet or Lord

1nerchet in old Scots law \Vas expressed more fully by the Hailes on
. the 1narchet
eminent Scottish lawyer and historian, Lord Hailes. After or 1nerchet.
carefully examining tl1e evidence on the subject he concludes
as follows : '' The probable reason of tl1e custom appears to
have been this: Persons of low rank, residing on an estate,
were generally either ascripti glebae, or. were subjected to
some species of servitude similar to that of the ascriptz"
glebae. On that estate they were bound to reside, and to
perform certain services to the lord. As women necessarily
followed the residence of their husbands, the consequence

was, that when a woman of that rank married a stranger,
the lord was deprived of that part of his live stock. He
\Vould n.ot submit to this loss, without requiring indemnifica-
tion ; at first, the sum paid by the father of the young
woman would nearly amount to an estimated indemnifica-
tion ; and as the villains were grievously under the power
of their lord, it would be often exorbitant and oppressive.
In process of time, the lord would discover, that as the
young women of his estate were exported, the young men
of his estate would import others ; so that, upon the whole,
no great prejudice could arise from e:ctra-territorzaz marriages.
Hence the indemnification would be converted into a small
pecuniary composition, acknowledging the old usage, and
the right of the master. As . the intrinsic and marketable
value of money decreased, this stated composition would be
gradually omitted out of terriers and 1ent-rolls, or would be
2
thrown into the aggregate sum of rent." .
A similar explanation probably holds good of tl1e F. ~
. h
niarchet or 1nerc et 1n . E .
ng 11s h l th t .
aw : . ere oo, we may Ma1tla11d
on the
reasonably suppose, the merchet was in substa11ce a corn- 111a1cket or
1ne1chet.
pensation paid to the lord of the manor for the loss of a
2Lord Hailes, An1ials of Scotla1zd
Cosmo Innes, Lectures on Legal
1
A1itiquiti'es (Edinburgh, 1872), p. 52 . (Edinburgh, I797), Iii. 12 J'q,

494 THE HEIRSHIP OF JACO.B l'Af{'J' II
woman's services 011 her marriage. We have seen that this

was the opinion of the learned and acute historian of English
la~, F. W. Maitland, and he confirmed it by pointing out,
1
first, that the 1nerchet was often higher for marriage out of
the manor than for marriage within the manor ; second,
that fines for marrying sons out of the manor were not un-
known ; and, third, that the 1nerchet is often coupled with a
prohibition against giving the sons of tenants or bondsmen
a cle1ical education, which, by enabling them to tal\:e orders,
might deliver them from bondage and so deprive the lord

of their services. All these facts point clearly to the true

nature of 1nerchet as a compensation paid to the lord of the
manor for that loss of services which he incurred, or was
supposed to incur, through the marriage of his bondsmen's
or tenants' daughters, especially when they married men
\Vho did not belong to the 1nanor.
Professor A like view is taken of the meaning of the 1nerchet by .
P. \Tino-
gradoff
another distinguished historian of English law, Professor
on the Paul Vinogradoff. He writes as follows : '' The same
merchet.
observations hold good in regard to other customs which
c
come to be consiaered as implying personal servitude.

Merchet was the most st1iking consequence of unfreedom,
but manorial documents are wont to connect it with several
others. It is a common thing to say that a villain by
birth cannot marry his daughter without paying a fine, or
permit his son to take holy orders, or sell his calf or horse,
that he is bound to serve as a reeve, and that his youngest
2
son succeeds to the holding after his death. This would
be a more or less complete enumeration, and I need not
say that in particular cases sometimes one and sometimes
another item gets omitted. The various pieces do not fit
well together : the prohibition against selling animals is
connected with disabilities as to property, and not derived
directly from the personal tie ; as for the rule of succession;
it testifies merely to the (act that the so-called custom of
Borough English was most widely spread among the unfree
class. The obligation of serving as a reeve or in any other
capacity is certainly derived from the power of a lord over
the person of his subject ; . he had it always at his discretion
1 See above, pp. 487 sq. 2 ''
7
A otebook of Bracton, pl. 1230.''
CH. II
ULTIMOGENJTURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS 495
to take his man away from the field and to employ him
at pleasure in his service. Lastly, the provision that the
villain may not allow his son to receive holy orders stands
on the same level as the provision that he may not give his
daughter in 1narriage outside the manor : eitl1er of these
prohibited transactions would have involved the loss of a
subject." 1
On the whole we may conclude that neither in England No real
nor in Scotland is there any evidence worth speaking of for ~~;~~~ce .
the view tl1at the lord of a manor formerly enjoyed a ~o-call_ed
. customary right of concubinage \vith l1is tenants' daughters 1::Ct':::/iae
on the first night of their marriage. That view appears to Britain.
spring largely, perhaps mainly, from a simple misunder-
standing of the true meaning of 11zerchet.
In the secluded highlands of Scotland the nzerchet, and Survival
the uncharitable construction put upon it by popular pre- ~e~~~eta
judice, appear to have lingered down to the latter half of the ~nulieru1n
eighteenth century. When Dr. Johnson visited the small ~~g~:nds
island of Ulva, to the west of Mull, in the year 17 7 3, he ofScotland.

stayed in the house of the chief, M'Quarrie, who claimed
that his family had owned the island for nine hundred years.
In conversation with his English visitor, M'Quarrie ''insisted
that the Mercheta Muli'eru1n mentioned in our old charters,
did really mean the privilege which a lord of a manor, or a
baron, had, to have the first night of all his vassals' wives.
Dr. Johnson said, the belief of such a custom having existed
was also held in England, where there is a tenure called
Borough English, by which the eldest child does not inherit,
from a doubt of his being the son of the tenant. M'Quarrie
told us, that still, on the marriage of each of his tenants, a
sheep is due to him ; for which the composition is fixed at
five shillings. I suppose, Ulva is the only place where this
2
custom remains." In the light of the foregoing discussion
we may say with some confidence that both the highland
chief and his learned guest misunderstood the true meaning An African
f h h 1
and history o t e mere eta 1nuizerum. I t t. t
t 1s ins rue 1ve o parallel
to the
observe that to this day every man of a certain African tribe 111er~keta
mulien11n.
I Paul Vinogradoff, Villainage z"n z'n the Ifebrides, under'' Satt1rday, 16th
Englan{l (Oxford, 1892), pp. 156 sq. October '' (lJ 3 12 in Tke 7'e111ple
2 James Boswell, Journal of a Tour Classics Edition, London, 1898).
in the valley of the Congo is obliged, on the ma1riage of his

daughter, to give his chief a goat, precisely as every M'Quarrie
in the island of Ulva had to give his chief a sheep on a similar
occasion. '' Ma1riage with the Bayaka," we are told, ''is
always by purchase, and the price is I o,ooo clji"11zbu ; the
fathe'r of the bride must pay a goat to his chief, because the
bride goes out of the village. The woman fallows .her
1
husband, and he has absolute power over her." The reason
here assigned for the custom ('' because the bride goes out
of the village'') is doubtless the true one ; the chief loses a
subject when a woman marries out of his village, and he
accepts a goat as compensation for the loss.
The On the Continent of Europe, for example in France and
so-called
jus pri1nae Germany, a similar misunderstanding has originated, or served
noctis to st1pport, a similar fable; there, too, the fine which
equally
' fabulous vassals paid to their feudal superior on the marriage of their
on the daughters has been erroneously represented as a pecuniary
Continent.
commutation for the right which the superior, whether
.
civil or ecclesiastical, could legally claim of Jying with his

vassals' daughters on their wedding night. Writers who have
made careful search in the archives, where the supposed
right or traces. of it might be expected to be recorded,
2
have wholly failed to find any such records. The story
of the right may therefore safely be dismissed as unfounded.
But the belief in this fabulous right of a lord over 11is
vassals' wives was strengthened by another misapprehension

1 E. Torday, Ca1np and Tra1np in Piedmont, and that Cardinal Hieronimo

African UTilds (London, I 9 I 3 ), p. I 34. della Rovere told him how he himself
.2 L. Veuillot, Le Droit du Seig1ieur had burned a charter conveying the
(Paris, 1854), pp. 276 sqq.; L'Abbe privilege in question to his house.
Hanauer, Les Paysa1ts de l' Alsace au See P. Bayle, Dictionnai"re Historiqite
Moyen -Age (Paris and Strasburg, et Critique (Amsterdam and Leyden,
1865), pp. 135 sq.; K. Schmidt,Jus 1730), iv. 224, s.v. '' Sixte IV.''
primae Noctis, pp. 91 sqq. Bayle has No weight can be given to such a
given currency to a . story that the hearsay report in the absence of the
house of Rovere in Piedmont possessed charter on which the supposed right
the privilege of deflowering the brides . was alleged to be founded. If .the

whom their vassals married. The charter ever existed, it probably con-
story is told on the authority of an ferred on the house of Rovere only the
Italian writer Bonifacio Vannozzi, who. usual right to the payment of fines on
lived at the beginning of the seventeenth the marriage of their vassals' daughters.
century, and who, after retailing the Compare Lord Hailes (Sir David
familiar fable about King Evenus and Dalrymple), Annals ef Scotland (Edin-
King Malcolm, asserted vaguely that burgh, 1797), iii. 20 sq.; I(. Schmidt.
such a custom formerly existed in Jus printae Nocti's, pp. 239, 372. '
CH. II ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTJS 497
?f a si_milar kind. During the middle ages there prevailed The fable
in various parts of Europe a custom generally termed the was
. strength-
JUS prz1nae noctts, the true nature of which, like the true ened by
nature of the 1nerchet, has been misunderstood and conse- a~other
. m1sappre-
q uen t 1Y perverted into a proof of a licentious -seignorial 11ension of
privilege, with which in reality it had nothing to do. ~i~:ilar
Indeed the custom, far from originating in licence, appears
on the contrary to have taken its rise in an austere practice
of chastity which . was inculcated by the early Christian
Church, as we learn from a decree of the fourth Council
of Carthage, 11eld in the year 398 A.D., which enacted that
''When the bridegroom and bride have received the bene-
diction, let them remain tl1at same night in a state of
1
virginity out of reverence for the benediction." This
enactment was received into the canon law and was twice
2
repeated in the decretals.
By subsequent enactments the period of chastity which The
bride and bridegroom were required or recommended to ~~~~~c
obse1ve after marriage was extended from one to two or enjo~ned
t h ree n1g h ts. Th us in t h e cap1tu 1ar1es
o f Ch ar1emagne I't IS for
continence
three
written, ''Let the bride at the proper time, according to nights_(the
. . 1 r h. b h . t 'th '' Tobias
custom, b e bl essed in priest y ias ion y t e pries wi Nights'') .
prayers and oblations, and after she has been guarded by on 11 :\vly
married
bridesmaids, as usage demands, and attended by her rela- couples.
tions, let her, at the proper time, be legally asked and given
and solemnly received; and let them for two or three days
devote themselves to prayer and the observation of chastity,
in order that good offspring may be begotten, and that they
may please the I~ord in their actions." 3
The biographer of
1 ' ' Sponsus et spo1zsa cttm be11edi- rymple), Annals of Scotla1zd (Edin-
cendi su11t a sacerdote, a pa1e1ztibus burgh, I 797), iii. I 5. Con11Jare L.
suis vel a para1iymphis ojferantztr, qui Veuillot, Le Droit du Seig1zeur (Paris,
cu1n benedictione1n acceperint, eade111 1854), pp. 191 sq.
nocte, pro reverentia ipsius benedic- 3 ''Et a qttibzts cttstoditz11, uxor
tio1zis, in vi1ginitate per11zanea1zt," J. petatur, et a parentibzts p1opi11qztioribz1s
P. Migne, Patrologi'a Latina, lxxxiv. spo11setur et legibzts dotetz11, et suo
{Paris, 1850) col. 201. Compare tenzpore, sacerdotaliter, ut 1110s est,
Lord Hailes (Sir David Dalrymple), ci1111 praecibzts et oblatio11ib11s a sace1dote
An1zals of Scotland (Edinburgh, l 797), benedz'catur, et a para11.i111phio, zet ,011-
iii. l 5 ; L. Veuillot, Le Droit du suetzedo docet, ctestodita et sociata a
Seigne11r (Paris, 1854), pp. 190 sq.; proxi1nis, et te111pore co11g11to petita
K. Schmidt, Jzts pri1nae .Y,octis, p. legibus 1ietur et sole11111iter accipiatzzr.
152. Et bid110 vel tridito orat1:011ibz1s vace11t
2 Lord 1-Iailes (Sir David Dal et castitatenz eustodiant, 11t bo11ae
'
VOL. I 2K
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB J'AR1' II
St. Louis tells us that when that pious king married in the
year 123 4 A.D., he and his wife observed continence and
devoted themselves to prayer for three nights after marriage,
'' which was taught by the counsel of the Blessed Son of
1
God and confirmed by the example of Tobias." Several .
rituals of the fifteenth century, particularly those of Liege,
Limoges, and Bordeaux, lay down the same rule in regard
2
to the first three nights of marriage. In the sixteenth
century the sainted Carlo Borromeo, at a synod held in
Milan, enjoined the priests of his diocese to inculcate the
3
observance of the same rule on all married couples. A
provincial council, held at Cologne in I 5 3 8, went no farther
than to advise that the' example of Tobias and his wife
should be earnestly recommended to the imitation of newly
4
wedded pairs. And similarly in a religious manual of the
eighteenth century we read, '' When a curate perceives
that bride and bridegroom are persons of piety who enter
into marriage only from Christian views and can follow the
most perfect maxims of Christianity, he may advise them,
first, to practise what Tobias and Sarah, and all the
righteous persons of the Old Testament, practised, according
to the account of Saint Augustine; what Saint Louis and
many other saints in the New Testament exactly observed;
that is to say, to live in continence the first days of their
marriage, in order to employ them in prayer and good
5
\vorks."
The story Thus we see that the practice of chastity for some days
of Tobias
and his
f
a ter marriage was commended to the faithful by the
wife Sarah Catholic Church with special reference to the good example
in the Book t b T b' d h" . r s
of Tobit. se Y o 1as an 1s w11e arah. The story of that pious
couple, as related in the apocryphal Book of Tobz"t, runs as
'
suboles generentur et Domino suis in Droit du Seigneur (Paris, 1854), p.

actz"onibus placeant,'' J. P. Migne, 1,96.
Patrologia Latina, xcvii. (Paris, 1851) 2 L. Veuillot, l.c.
col. 859. Compare Lord Hailes (Sir
David Dalrymple), A1znals of Scotland a L. V euillot, Le Droit du Seigneur c
(Edinburgh, 1797), iii. 15 sq.; L. (Paris, 1854), p. 197. '

4 K. Schmidt, Jus prin1ae Nocti's, \
Veuillot, Le Droit du Seig1zeur (Paris,
1854), p. 192. p. I 53 .
. 1 Geoffroy de Beaulieu, Vz"e de Saz"nt . 5 L. Veuillot, op. cit. pp. 197 sq.,
\
I
Louis, eh. xvie. qui est de saintefe con- qt1oting Mangin, Introduction au saint

l'
tinence, quoted by L. Veuillot, Le 111inistere (I 7 50 ), p. 403.
'\.i
ea. II ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS 499
follows. A certain Jewess of Ecbatana in Persia, named Sarah

had been married to no less than seven husbands J but all of
them had perished as soon as they had gone in to her ; for
a wicked demon, named Asrnodeus, loved Sarah, and out of How a
spite

and jealousy he slew her seven bridegrooms
.
in the dhemonslew
t e seven
bridal chamber on the wedding night. On this account husbands
Sarah was exposed to the painful suspicion of having ~~ ~~:~:
murdered her seven husbands; and one day when she \v.edding
chanced to chide her handmaid for some fault, the hussy nights.
turned on her and said, '' Would you kill me as you have
already killed seven men, you murderess of your husbands?
Go after them ! Let us never see son or daughter of
yours!'' The reproach touched the sensitive widow to the
quick ; a thought of suicide crossed her mind, but out of
consideration for her father Raguel, whom such an act
would have covered with shame, she nobly resolved to live
for his sake, and retiring to an upper chamber she devoted
herself to prayer and fasting for three days and nights,
consoling herself in her affliction by the thought that
perhaps her seven husbands had not been worthy of her,
and that it might yet be God's good pleasure to reserve
her for an eighth. The prayers, perhaps we may add
the wishes, of the widow were heard. An eighth bride-
groom was even then on his way to her under the
safe-conduct of the archangel Raphael, disguised as a

courier. The bold suitor was no other than her cousin

Tobias, to whom his angelic conductor had explained
the whole situation with perfect frankness. ''You are
her father's heir," said the angel, ''his whole property is
yours, but you must marry his daughter." Tobias was
in a painful dilemma. The prospect of the property was
sweet, but the prospect of marrying a widow, who had
laid out seven husbands in rapid succession, was dubious.

The ardour of the lover was damped by the caution of the How,
man. He hesitated. But the archangel reassured him, ~;r;~eed
''Take my advice," said he, ''and I will show thee how archangel
. Raphael,
to prevail over the demon. They who on entering into Tobias put
marriage shut out God from their thoughts and give them- thefl~ehmon
l h' h to 1g t,
selves up to their own lusts, like the horse and mu e w 1c and .
have no understanding, over such has the demon power. niarrying
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOIJ l'All'f Il
Sarah, But thou, when thou hast received thy wife and hast entered
observed

continence
into the chamber, abstain from carnal intercourse with her
with her for three days and give thyself up to nothing but prayer
for three
nights. with her. On the first night, burn the heart and liver of
the fish, and make a smoke with it, and the demon will be
1
put to flight. On the second night thou wilt be admitted
to communion with the holy patriarchs ; on tl1e third night
thou wilt obtain the blessing that sons shall be begotten of
thee safe and sound. But when the third night is . passed,
thou shalt receive the virgin with the fear of God, moved
by a love of offspring rather than by lust, that thou mayest
obtain a blessing in respect of sons in the seed of Abraham."
Emboldened by these words, Tobias plucked up courage
and married the widow. Having taken the plunge, he
carried out the angel's instructions to the letter and with
the happiest results. On the first night, when he entered
the bridal chamber, he burned the heart and liver of the
fish on a coal fire ; and the demon Asmodeus no sooner
smelled the ill-savour than he fled away into the utmost
parts of Egypt, and there the angel bound him fast. Thus
rid of his ghostly rival, Tobias said to his bride, ''Sarah,

arise, and let us pray God to-day and to-morrow and the
day after to-morrow, because in these three nights we are
joined to God, but when the third night is passed v.re
shall be joined to each other in matrimony." So they
prayed that night, and after they had prayed they laid
them down and slept. Now the father of the bride had
been so accustomed to bury his sons-in-law on the morning
after the wedding night, that on that particular morning,
from mere force of habit, he got up at cock-crow, and,
summoning his servants, went out and dug the usual grave.
When it was ready, he said to his wife, ''Send one of thy
handmaids to see if he is dead, that I may bury him
before daybreak.'' So the maid went, and on entering
the room she saw bride and bridegoom both fast asleep .

1 On the way to Ecbatana, as he companion thereupon inforn1ed him
crossed the Tigris, Tobias had been that the smoke made by burning the
attacked by a fish, which by the advice fish's heart and liver would drive away
of the angel he caught and killed, and a devil, and that the gall dropped on
having done so he extracted the fish's blind eyes would restore their sight.
heart, liver, and gall. His angelic See the Book of Tobit, vi. 1-8.
'
CH. rr ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS 501

When she returned and reported the good news, Raguel

blessed God, and commanded his servants to fill up the
grave, and instead of burying his son-in-law he prepared
1
to celebrate his wedding-feast. ...
An abstinence like that which the pious Tobias practised In tin1e the
by the advice of the angel was long observed, with the Ccatholic hurch
approval of the Church, by newly married couples in France allowed.
~nd oth~r parts ?:
Europe ; . but in time the clergy judged ~;:~~~ts of
1t expedient to mitigate the rigour of the canon, and accord- lying with
.1ng1y th ey gran t ed h us b an d s th e rig h t o f ly1ng
. . h h . their \Vives
wit t etr on the first
own wives on the first night of marriage, provided that they night. of
'd d fi r h 'l h
pat a mo erate ee 1or t e pr1v1 ege to t e proper ecc est- onpayment l . marriage
astical authority. This was the true ;its prz'mae noctis, a of~ fee.
right accorded, not to a licentious feudal superior, but to a !e~~ission
woman's lawful husband. For example the Bishops of ~vasth~real
' ;us pn1nae
Amiens were wont to grant such dispensations or in- noctis.
dulgences to married couples on receiving payment of Lawsuit
. h h fl k
certain dues. I n course o f time, owever, t e oc growing the Bishop . bet\veen
restive under these exactions of their shepherds, husbands of Amiens

refused to pay_ the bishop a fee for the privilege of cohabit- ~~~nt~~
ing with their own wives on the wedding night. The bishop, Abbeville
about the
on the other hand, stood stiffly on what he conceived to be j11s prinzae
his legal rights, and accordingly the mayor and aldermen of noctis.
Abbeville brought the case before the parliament of Paris.
They alleged that ''although by common law husbands are
freely allowed to be with their wives on the first night of
marriage, nevertheless the said bishop, of himself or through
his officials, did exact of the said husbands, of some ten, of
others twelve, and of some as much as twenty or thirty
francs, before he would grant them a licence to lie on the
1 Tobit iii.-viii. (following the Vul- married to five httsbancls, all of wl101n
gate chiefly). There are serious dis- were l<illecl on the wedcling night by a
crepancies between the Greek text serpent, which crept ot1t of the bride's
of the Septuagint and the Latin text of mo11th and stung them. The hero
the Vulgate; in particular the injunc- marries her, but is saved fro1n death
tion and the practice of continence for by his servant, who l<eeps watch in
three nights are not mentioned in the the bridal cham her and c11ts off the
Septuagint, hence they are omitted in serpent's head with a sword. It turns
the English version. See below, PI) 5 I 7 011t tl1at the servant is really tl1e grate-
sqq. In anArmenian tale, which presents ful ghost of a debtor, whose debts the
some points of similarity to the story of hero had paid after the man's cleath.
'fobias ancl to other incidents in tl1e See A. von Haxtl1ausen, Traiiskaztkasia
Jiook of Tobi"t, a woman had been (Leipsic, 1856), i. 333 SfJ.

THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB T'ART II
502
said first night with their own newly wedded wives ; other-
wise 11e compelled them to abstain from their wives for
three nights." On the other hand the Bishop pleaded in
reply that '' in the town, deanery, and banlieue of the said
Abbeville it was an ancient custom that no one might lie
with his wife until the third night of marriage, without a
dispensation granted by himself or his official, and that this
custom was agreeable to canon law, to reason, and to the
opinion of the Church Fathers ; and that for the payment
of the clerk who wrote the dispensation, for the seal and
signature of the official, he, the bishop, might ask and
receive sometimes ten, sometimes twelve, sometimes sixteen,
a11d sometimes twenty Parisian sous ; and that if he received
more than the said sum of twenty sous, it was and had
been as a consideration for an absolution from a sentence
of excommunication or a dispensation from a ban, in
accordance with custom and synodical statutes." N otwith-
standing this plea of ancient custom, judgment was given
by the parlia1nent against the bishop and in favour of
husbands, represented by the mayor and_ aldermen of
Abbeville. The judgment, dated I 9th March I 409, is still
preserved in the National Archives at Paris. In it we read
that ''by the same judgment it was declared that any in-

habitant of the said town of Abbeville may lie with his

wife on the first day of thei1 marriage without the licence
1
or dispensation of the said bishop." The official report of
-
I L. V euillot, Le Droz't die Seigneur ipsis de cubando dicta prinia nocte cz111z
(Paris, 1854), pp. 232-243, 451-459; suis de 1zovo uxoribzes lz'ce1ztiam itn
K. Schmidt, Jus pri11iae Noctis, pp. pertz'ri vellet, exigebat, aut aliter [sic
273-282. Compare Lord Hailes (Sir Schmidt; alios Veuillot] ipsos a suz's
David Dalrymple), Annals of Scotland uxoribus per tres noctes absti1zere conz-
(Edinburgh, 1797), iii. 16. Extracts pellebat. '' The plea of the bishop ran
from tl1e judgment are p1inted by l(. thus: '' Dicto vero episcopo ex adverso
Schmidt ; the whole judgment is printed separatz'nz p1oponente, quod in villa,
by L. Veuillot, op. cz't. pp. 451-459. decanatu et banleuca de predzi:ta Abbatz's-
The 1nost important passages, which I villa, ex co1zsz1etudine, sacro canoni,
have translated in the text, are as rationi et sanctis patribus consona, ab
follows. The plaintiffs urged, ''Et antiquis observatum fuerat, ne cui
quamvis, de jure co11zmuni, 1narz'tis usque ad tertz'am nuptiarum noctenz
cu1n uxoribus sztis prima nocte 1zup- cunz uxore sua cubare sine szta aut
tiaru11z cuba1e libe1e concedatur, dictus qfficialis szei dispensatione, absque
ta11zen episcopus, per se aut suos qffi e11ze1zda, lz'ceret; quodque tanz pro
ciarios, dictos conjttges, quosdam ad salario cle1ici litteram dispensatz'onis
decent, alios ad duodeci11i, nonnullos ad scrz'bendi quam pro sigz'llo et qfficialz's
viginti vet triginta francos, priusquam signeto, interdunz decenz, nonnunqua1n
CH. 11 ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PR/MAE NOCTIS 503
the case, from which the foregoing extracts are translated

.
sets the true nature of the ;us pn'mae noctz's, and of the fee
'
paid for it to the bishop, in the clearest light ; it shows that
the fee was paid to the bishop for an ecclesiastical dispensa-
tion allowing the husband to sleep with his wife on the first
. three nights of their marriage; it lends not a shadow of sup-
port to the fantastic supposition, that the fee was paid to the
bishop to compensate him for his self-denial i11 not lying him-
self with the biide before turning her over to the bridegroom.
Though the payment formerly exacted by the Survival of
Church from a husband for the immediate exercise of his thepractice
. of the
marital rights has long been abolished, nevertheless, Tobias
through the force of habit and tradition the old custom of 1n ~ightds
mo ern
observing chastity for three nights after marriage is still Europe.
voluntarily observed, or was observed till lately, by the
common people in many parts of Europe. Thus in several
communes of Brittany ''the bride is entrusted, during the
first night of marriage, to the supervision of the best man
and the bridesmaid, so that the spouses still remain strangers
1
to each other." At Scaer,
.
.
in Brittany, ''out of respect for
certain canonical rules, the first night of the marriage
belongs to God, the second to the Virgin, and the third to
2
the husband's patron saint." At Sachelay, in the depart-
ment of Seine-et-Oise, the marriage night is dedicated to
the Holy Virgin ; the newly married pair do not meet in
3
the bridal chamber till the second night. Down to the
second half of the nineteenth century the custom of practis-
ing continence for three nights after marriage was still
4
observed in some districts of Alsace. In various parts of
.
duodecint, et aliquando sexdeci111 et dicte ville de Abbatisvilla, pri111a die
quandoque viginti solidos parisienses suarzt11t nuptiaru111 poterit cunt szea
[sic Schmidt ; parisisie1tsi'u11t Veuillotj, ztxore, absq11e co11ged1'0 sett di'spensatione
secundum personarum facultates, petere predicti e{Jiscopi, cztbare. ''
et recipere poterat. Et si ultra dictam 1 A. de Nore, Coutzt111es, Mythes et
viginti solidorum suttt111a11t receperat, Traditions des Provinces de Fra1zce
illud ratione absolutionis a se11te11tia (Paris and Lyons, 1846), p. 195.
excotttn,unicationis sive bannorunt dis- 2 A. de Nore, op. cit. p. 194
pe1zsationis erat et fuerat, ex co1:- 3 Ida von Dliringsfeld und Otto
suetudine etiam e.t sinodalibus statutts, Freiherr von Reins berg- Dll11ngsfeld,
observatum. '' Part of the judgment Hochzeitsbuch (Leipsic, l 87 I), p. 250.
given by the parliament of Paris ran 4 L'Abbe IIanauer, Les paysa11s
as follows ; '' Et per idem judiciuni d' Alsace azt Mo;1e11- Age (Paris and
dictum .fuz't qzeod quz'lz'bet habita1zitum Strasburg, 1865), p. 137 note 2
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOll PART II
Switzerland and Germany, including the Bohmerwald and

the Upper Palatinate, bride and bridegroom practise con-
tinence for three nights after marriage, because they believe
1
that otherwise their wedded life would be unlucky. ''A
beautiful custom, based on the Bible, was observed in the
Allgau, for example at Christatzhofen and Egloffs ; whether
it is still observed I do not know. It was the custom of
keeping the 'Tobias nights.' In the Book of Tobit vi. 22
it is written, ' When the third night is passed, take to thee
the virgin in the fear of the Lord'; and accordingly the
newly wedded pairs pass the first three nights after marriage
in like manner without exercising their conjugal rights.
The marriage will be all the more fortunate, because in
consequence of this abstinence the devil will not be able to
2
do any harm." At Bettringen, near Gmund, ''the 'Tobias
nights ' are here and there observed ; that is, the bride-
groom does not touch his bride for three successive nights.
Through this abstinence people hope to secure the release
3
of a poor soul from purgatory."
Survival of A similar custom of continence after marriage is still prac-
the custom
of the tised by some of the South Slavs. Thus in Herzegovina and
''Tobias Montenegro the newly wedded pair do not sleep together on
Nights''
among the the marriage night. The bride sleeps, fully dressed, with the
South bridesman, who is commonly chosen from among the husband's
Slavs.
brothers; she passes the following nights with her sisters-in-
law. This separation of husband and wife may last a long
time. The husband's mother alone has the right to decide
4
when it shall end. ''Neither on the first nor on the follow-
ing nights does the bridegroom sleep with the bride ; it is
.the bridesman who sleeps with her, but so as if she were his
5
sister." On the Bocche de Cattaro, in Dalmatia, the bride
sleeps the first night with two bridesmen, between whom '
she is also seated at the wedding feast. It is not till the

second night that the bridegroom is allowed access to her
6
in her bridal chamber. At Risano, on the Bocche de
1 A. Wuttke, De1- de1;tsche Volks- 4
F. Demeli~, Le Droit Coutzt111ier
aberglaube"' (Berlin, 1869), p. 352, des Slaves Mt!n'di'onaux d'apres les
569. Recherches de M. V. Bogisic (Paris,
2 Anton Birlinger, Volksthii11zliches
1877), pp. 109 sq.
azts Schwabe1i (Freiburg im Breisgau, 6 F. S. Krauss, Sitte u1id Bra11ch
1861-1862), ii. 334. der Siidslaven (Vienna, 1885), p. 456.
3 A. Bir linger, op. cit. ii. 354. 6 }<,. Demelic, op. cit. pp. 108 sq.
Cattaro, the bride formerly .had to sleep the first three

nights with two bridesmen, who were fully dressed. But
this custom has now been changed. 1 In some parts of
Croatia it is believed that a married pair will beget children
for as many years as are the nights during which they
practise continence immediately after marriage. 2 Among
the Esthoniar1s it used to be the rule that a husband might
not unloose his wife's girdle nor tal{e any other liberty with
3
her on the wedding night. Writing in the latter part of
the eighteenth century Lord Hailes observes, ''I am in-
formed that the superstitious abstinence sanctified by the
Council of Carthage is still observed by the vulgar in some
4
parts of Scotland."
It is natural enough to suppose, as some writers appear The
to have done, that such customs are founded on the teach- prac~ice of
continence
ing of the Christian Church, exemplified and confirmed by for some
the case of Tobias in the Book of Tobit. But in poin't of ~~;r~~:ris
fact the practice of deferring the consummation of marriage older than
r
1or .
a certain
time a f ter t h e nuptia
l ceremony is o Id er t h an Christi-
anity, and
Christianity, and has been observed by heathen tribes in has been
. observed
many parts of the world ; from which we may reasonably by many
infer that, far from instituting the rule and imposing it on h:athen
. tribes.
the pagans, the C hurch on the contrary b orro\ve d it from
the heathen and sought to give it a scriptural sanction by
appealing to the authority of the archangel Raphael. Cer-
tainly the archangel's advice to Tobias has its exact counter-
'
part in the rule which ancient Indian law laid down for the
guidance of a Vedic householder. In the Grihya-Sutras, a Continence
o f co d es regu Iat1ng
series d omes t Jc
ritua o f con- for
1, t 1le practice three
nights after
tinence for three nights after marriage is repeatedly enjoined. m~r~iage 5
. .
Thus 1n the code which passes under the name o f A b en101ned
pastan1 a in Vedic
India.
1 F. S. l{rauss, I.e. Vedic literature, may rot1ghly be dated
2 Baron Rajacsich, Das Leben, die betwee11 500 and 200 B.C. See Pro-
Sz'tten und Gebriiuche der i11t ./'iaiser- fessor A. A. l\1acdonell, ''Sanskrit
th11me Oesterreich lebende1z Sudslaven Literature,'' in The I111perial Gazettee1
(Vienna, 1873), p. 147. ef India, The I1zciia1z E111pi1e, ii. (Ox-
3 Boecler-Kretttzwald, Der Ehsten ford, 1909) p. 232. The date of the
aberg!iiubische Gebrauche, Weise1z u11d Book of ]obit, which appears to be a
Gewohnheiten (St. Petershurg, I854), composite worl<, is uncertai11 ; in its
P 25. original form the boo];: is thought by
4 I.ord Ilailes, Annals of .S'cotland W. Erbt to have been written abot1t
(Edinhurgl1, 1797), iii. I 5 note*. 200 B. c. See Encyclopcz:dia Biblica,
o The Sutras, the latest product of iv. col. 5126, s.v. '' Tobit.''
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB I'AR'f II
506
we read, ''Let him notice the day on which he brings his wife
hotne. (From that day) through three nights they should
both sleep on the ground, they should be chaste, and should
avoid salt and pungent food. Between their sleeping-places
a staff is interposed, which is anointed with perfumes and
1
wrapped round with a garment or a thread." Similarly in
another of these codes, which is attributed to Gobhila, we
read, '' From that time through a period of three nights
they should both avoid eating saline or pungent food, and
should sleep together on the ground without having con-
2
jugal intercourse." In another of these codes, ascribed to
Khadirakarya, abstinence from milk as well as from salted
Sometimes food is enjoined on the newly married pair during the three
in Vedic 3
India the nights when they observe the rule of continence. But,
period of in other codes drawn up for the guidance of householders

continence
after in the Vedic age, the period of continence imposed on

marriage bride and bridegroom is extended to six or twelve nights
was
extended

or even a year. Thus in one of them we read, '' Th1ough
to six or a period of three nights they shall eat no saline food ; they
twelve
i1ights cir a shall sleep on the ground ; through one year they shall
whole year.
refrain from conjugal intercourse, or through a period of
4
twelve nights, or of six nights, or at least of three nights."
As an inducement to observe continence for a whole year
after marriage, another of these codes holds out to the
wedded pair the prospect of having a saint (Ri'shz") born to
5
them. Yet another ancient Indian lawgiver refines on the
rule still further by offering five different periods . of co11-
tinence to the choice of the newly married couple, and
promising them a son of rank exactly proportioned to the
I The Grihya-Szttras, translated by H. Oldenberg, Part I. (Oxford, 1886)
H. Oldenberg, Part II. (Oxford, 1892) p. 43 (Sacred Books ef the East, vol.
p. 267 (Sacred Books ef the East, vol. xxix. ), ''Through a period of three
'
xxx.) ; M. Winternitz, Das alti1idische nights let them refrain from conjugal
Hochzei'tsritzeell nach dent Apastanzbfya- intercourse. Let them sleep on the
G1ihyasutra (Vienna, 1892), p. 25 ground.''
(Denkschriften de1 Kaiserli.che1t Aka- 3 The Grihya-Sutras, translated by
demie . der Wisse1ischaften in Wien,
H. Oldenberg, Part I. p. 384.
Philosophisch-Hz.storische Classe, vol.
4
xl. ). The Grihya-Sutras, translated by
2 The Grihya-Sutras, translated by H. Oldenberg, Part I., p. 286. 'fhis
H. Oldenberg, Part II. p. 48. A Szetra is attributed to Paraskara.
similar injunction is contained in the 6 The Grz:hya-Sutras, translated by
Grihya-Sutra ascribed to Sankhayana. H. Oldenberg, Pa1t I. p. 171. This
See The Grihya-Sutras, translated by Sutra is ascribed to Asvalayana.
CH. 11 ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS 507
longer or shorter time during which they had abstained

from th<? exercise of their conjugal rights. An abstinence
of three nights, he tells us, would be recompensed with the
birth of a Vedic scholar of the ordinary type ; an abstinence
of twelve nights would be blessed with a really first-ciass
Vedic scholar ; an abstinence of four months would produce
a Brahman of a still more exalted rank ; an abstinence of six
months would be rewarded by the birth of a saint (Rishi) ;
and an abstinence of a whole year would be crowned by the
1
nativity of a god.
In India the custom of deferring the consummation of Contine11ce
"l f h 1 h
marriage unti some time a ter t e nuptia s as not been time afterfor some
confined to the Aryan race. Among the Kammas, a nlarri.age

. . practised
T e 1ugu caste o f Sout hern India, ''consummation does not by various
take place till three months after the marriage ceremony, n~n-Aiyan
. . "d d l k h h . tribes of
as 1t 1s consi ere un uc y to ave t ree 11eads of a family India and
in a household during the first year of marriage. By the Baluchi-
stan.
delay, the birth of a child should take place only in the
second year, so that, during the first year, there will be only
two heads, husband and wife. In like manner, it is
2
noted by Mr. Francis, that, among the Gangimakkulu and
Madigas, the marriage is not consummated till three months
3
after its celebration." Among the Variyars, Pisharotis,
and Nambuthiris of Cochin, in Southern India, the consum-
mation of marriage is deferred until the night of the fourth
4
day. Among the Rajjhars, a mixed Hindoo and aboriginal
. caste of the Central Provinces, bride and bridegroom
sleep on their wedding night with a woman lying between
them. 5 The Wazirs of Bannu, in the Punjab, say that
formerly it was their practice not to consummate the mar-
6
riage for a long time after the wedding ceremony. In
Baluchistan, even after the marriage has been solemnized,
the bride'' often continues to share her bed with a kinswoman
I M. Winternitz, Das altindische Cochin Tribes and Castes (Madras,
Hoch-zez"tsrz"tuell nach dem .Apasta111biya- 1909-1912), ii. 139, 143, 192.
Grihyasutra (Vienna, 1892), pp. 86 6 R. V. Russell, T1ibes a11d Castes
sq. of the Cent1al Provinces of l11dia (Lon-
2 Gazetteer of the Bellary Dist1ict. don, 1916), iv. 407.
3 Edgar Thurston, Castes a1zd Trz"bes 6 H. A. Rose, Glossary ef the Tribes
of Soztther1z India (Madras, I 909 ), iii. and Castes ef t1ze Pu11:1ab a1zd North-
103 sq. West Fro1ztier P1ovi11ce, iii. (Lahore,
4 L. I{. Anantha Krishna Iyer, The ( 1914) p. 507.
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB1 I' AR'l' I I
508
for three nights more ; and when her husband eventually

joins her, he is expected in some tribes to defer consumma-
1
tion for a considerable period."
Contine11ce Again, the practice of deferring consummation is observed
for some
tin1e after
by some of the wild hill tribes of Assam. Thus we are told

n1arr1age that among these tribes '' marriage has a curious prohibition
practised
by hill attached to it. In some groups the young couple are for-
tribes of bidden to come together until they have slept under the same
Assam and
Bttrma. roof at least three nights without intercourse. The prohibi-
2
tion is relaxed in the case of the marriage of widows."
Amongst the Naga tribes of Manipur ''marital intercourse
within the dwelling house is prohibited for the initial nights
of the married life. This prohibition extends in some cases
over a period of a month, but is always less in cases of re-
3
marriage." In the Angami tribe of Nagas, a bride is cor1-
ducted on the wedding day to the house of the bridegroom's
parents. She is escorted by. a large number of persons of
her own clan (lr:hel), of whom two v.romen and one man
sleep with her that night in the house, while the bridegroom
returns to the bachelors' hall (deka chang), vvhere he sleeps
with the other unmarried men of the village. Next day the
bride and bridegroom meet and eat together, but at night
the bridegroom again returns to the bachelors' hall, wl1ile
his bride remains in his father's house. On the morning of
the third day after the wedding the young couple go
together to the husband's field where they both do a little
\Vork and eat and drink together. They then wait for
another seven or eight days. At the end of that time the
high priest of the clan is called in ; he sacrifices a chicken,
and the ceremony of marriage is complete. Till then the
bride and bridegroom do not sleep together, but after the
4
completion of the ceremony they are allowed to cohabit.
Among the Aos, another N aga tribe of Assam, for six
1 Census of India, I9I I, vol. iv. 4 Census of Assani, I89I, Assam,
Baluchista1i, by De11ys Bray (Calcutta, by (Sir) E. A. Gait, vol. i. Report
1913), p. 113. . (Shillong, 1892), p. 239. As to the
2 T. C. Hodson, ''The Ge1ina bachelors' hall (deka chang) in a Naga
amongst the tribes of Assam,'' Journal village, see Miss G. M. Godden,
of the Anthropological Institzete, xxxvi. '' N aga and othe1 frontier t1ibes of
(1906) p. 97. North - East India,'' Journal of the
3 T. C. Hodson, The Naga Tn'bes
Anthropological Institute, xxvi. (I 897)
o.f Manipu1- (London, 191,1), p. 87. pp. 179 sqq.

nights after marriage six men and six women sleep in the
house of the newly wedded pair; the men and women keep
apart from each other, the bridegroom sleeping with the
1
men, and the bride sleeping with the women. Among the
Kacharis, another tribe of Assam, it is said that '' custom
sanctions a certain interval of time, sometimes amounting'to
five days, between the bride's entering her husband's house
2
and the consummation of the marriage." Similarly among
the Meches, a cognate tribe of the same region, it is re-
ported that '' matrimonial etiquette requires postponement
of consummation of the marriage for a \veek or so after the
completion of the wedding ceremonial." 3 Among the
Khyougtha, a hill tribe of Chittagong, it is the rule that
a bridegroom ''does not consummate his marriage until he
and his wife (sleeping apart) have for seven days eateR
4
together seven times a day." So among the Kachins or
Chingpaws of Upper Burma, ''as a rule, cohabitation does
not take place for some days after marriage, the only
5
reaso11 given being that the parties are ashamed."
A like custom of observing continence for some time Continence
f h 1 b f h d for some
a ter t e ce e ration o t e marriage ceremony 1s practise time after
by various peoples of the Indian Archipelago. Thus in ma1riage
. l ll d l observed
Central S umatra a h us b and 1s not a ways a owe to s eep by various
with his wife on the \vedding night ; in many villages the peoples of
. . h h r Sumatra
young coup1e are prevented f:ram en3oy1ng eac ot er 1or and Java.
three nights by old women of the family, who keep watch
6
over them. In Achin, at marriages between persons of
the higher classes, bride and bridegroom sleep apart from
each other for several nights in the same room, which is
kept constantly illuminated ; and they are further \Vatched
by old women, who do not leave the pair alone till the
seventh day. 7 Among the inhabitants of the Teng'ger
1 Census of India, z89z, Assanz, 6 (Sir) J. George $cott and J. P.

by (Sir) E. A. Gait, vol. i. Report Hardiman, Gazetteer of Upper Bur111a
(Shillong, 1892), p. 245. aizd the Shaii States (l~angoon, 1900-
2 Rev. S. Endle, The Kacharis 1901), Pa1t I. vol. i. p. 407.
(London, I 9 I I), p. 46. 6 A. L. van 1-Iasselt, Volkesbes,h1fjv-
3 f{ev. S. Endle, The Ilachaiis, p.
ing van Midden-Sztnzatra (Leyden,
95.4 Capt. T. H. Lewin,
. r;rr.1a R 1882), p. 280.
rrz,, aces
of Soitth Eastern India (London, 7 J.
A. l{ruijt, Atjeh eii de Atjehers .
1870), p. lJO. (Leyden, 1877), pp. 192 sq.
510 THE I-IEIRSIIIJ) OF JA COJJ PAR'l' II
Mountains in Java the marriage is not consummated till

the fifth day after the nuptial ceremony. ''This interval
between the solemnities and the consummation of marriage
is termed by them unda1ig mdntu, and is in some cases still
observed by the Ja vans in other parts of the island, under
1
the name of ztndulz 11zdntu." ''I questioned Drahman con-
cerning Javanese weddings and courtings, and was surprised
to learn that the man and woman we had just seen were
not yet married, though, according to the rites of the
Mohammedan creed, they had been legally allied for nearly
a whole week. The young couple were as yet 011ly passing
through a probationary period, during which they live apart.
Among the princes and the wealthy this separation some-
times continues three months, during which time the bride-
groom meets his bride every afternoon, in the presence of a
number of friends invited on .such occasions, for whose
entertainment music is provided." When food is set before
them, it is the duty of the bridegroom to feed his bride with

rice before all the people. At midnight the bridegroom

conducts his bride to bed, draws the curtains, and leaves
her ; he may not see her again till the middle of the next
2
day. Among the Sundaneeze of Java the bridegroom does
not cohabit with the bride until the fourth day after
marriage ; during the first three nights she sits beside him
like a waxen doll, with downcast eyes, not answering a
3
word to his whispered remarks. Among the . Madureeze
and in some parts of Eastern Java cohabitation takes place
for the first time on the third night after the celebration of
4
the wedding.
Continence In Endeh, a district of the East Indian island of Flores,
for some
time after eight women sleep with the bride and bridegroom for the

marriage first four nights after marri~ge, and two of. them must
observed
in Flores, always keep awake to prevent the young couple from
the Babar approaching too near each other. 5 In the Bahar Archi-
1 T. S. Raffles, History of Java Geschrzfte1z (1'he Hague, 1912), i. 500,
(London, 1817), i. 331. referring to Ritter, Java, p. 29.
2 W. Barrington d'Almeida, Life z"n 4
P. ]. Veth, Java, Geographisch,
Java (Loridon, 1864), i. 315 sq. Ethnolo,s'isch, Hz"storisch . (Haarlem,
3 G. A. Wilken, '' Plechtigheden 1875-1884), i. 635 sq.
en Gebruiken bij Verlovingen . en Ii S. Roos, ''lets over Endeh,''
Huwelyken bei de Volken van den Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal- Land-
Indischen . Archipel,'' De versprez'de en Volkenkunde, xxiv. (1878) p. 525


pelago, after the marriage ceremony has been performed Archi-
the newly wedded pair are at liberty to sleep near each pelago .
. the Ke1
oth er, but the bridegroom must be surrounded by his. male Islands,
relations and the bride by her female relations. Should the Borneo,
. Celebes,
two, 1n spite of these precautions, contrive to come together Ne:-v
in the dark, the watchers return home on the fourth or fi.fth ~n~nt~~
1
day, or even earlier. So in the Kei Islands, to the south- Philippine
wes ot f N G f h l b . f .
ew u1nea, a ter t e ce e ration o the marriage, Islands.
the young couple sleep for three nights with an old woman,
a relation of th~ bride, between them. Sometimes a child,
too young to run about, is introduced by the bride into the
bridal chamber to sleep between her and her husband. 2
Among some of the Dyaks of Dutch Borneo a husband and
wife are on no account allowed to come together on the
first night of marriage ; the bride spends the night in the
house of her mother or of some other kinswoman. 3 Among
the tribes of the Barito valley in Dutch Borneo a bridegroom
usually abstains from cohabiting with his bride during the
first three nights of their wedded life ; he passes the interval
drinking in the company of his friends, but he visits his wife
from time to time to eat and drink with her and overcome
4
her shyness. In families of high rank among the Macassars
and Bugineeze of Southern Celebes the marriage ceremonies
are elaborate and sometimes last for a month. During this
time the bride is attended by eight old women, whose duty it is
to sleep at night with the newly wedded pair and to prevent a
5
too close intimacy between them. Among the Tinguianes,
of the Philippine Islands, the marriage may not be con-
summated on the wedding. night, and to prevent an in-
fringement of the rule a boy, six or eight years old, sleeps
between the young couple, who are forbidden even to speak
6
to each other. Among the Nufors of Geelvinks Bay, in
Dutch New Guinea, bride and bridegroom are obliged to
1 J. G. F. Riedel, De sluik- en ingvan het St100111gebz"edva11 de1t Barito
kroesharige rassen tussche1i Selebes en (Amsterdam, 1853-1854), i. 197.
I"apua (The Hague, 1886}, p. 351. 6 B. F. Matthes, Biy"dragen tot de
Ethnolog1:e van Zuid - Celebes (The
2 J. G. F.
Riedel, op. cit. p. 236.
Hague, 187 5}, pp. 29, 35
:i l\f. T. H. Perelaer, Eth1zogra- 6 F. Blumentritt, Versttch ez"11er
phische Beschrzj"vi'ng der Dajaks (Zalt- Ethnographie der Philippine1t (Gotha,
Bommel, 1870), p. 53 1882}, . p. 38 (E'ete1111a111z's Mitthei-
4 C. A. L. M. Schwaner, Bt:schryv- lungen, Ergii11zu11gshe(t, No. 67}. ,
512 THE llEIRSlfIP 0.ft~ JACOJJ PAR'r II
pass the first night, or according to another account, the first

four nights, after marriage sitting with their backs turned
to each other ; they may not fall asleep, and if they grow
drowsy, their friends wake them. They believe that to keep
awake on the wedding night is a means of ensuring a long
1
life.
Co11tinence The custom of deferring the consummation of marriage
for some
ti111e after for some time after the completion of the wedding ceremony

marriage was observed even by some of the savage aborigines of
observed
by the Australia. Thus in the Narrinyeri tribe of South Australia,
aborigines ''it is a point of decency for the couple not to sleep close to
of
Australia. each other for the first two or three nights ; on the third or
fourth night the man and his wife sleep together under the
same rug. This arrangement is for the sake of decency.
At the marriage many persons are present, sleeping in the
same camp; so the newly-married couple wait till they
have moved off, and only a few relatives are left vvith them.
2
They then often make a little hut for themselves." Among
the natives of Fraser Island (Great Sandy Island), Queens-

land, it is said that bride and bridegroom do not come

3
together for nearly two months after marriage. Among
the aboriginal tribes of Western Victoria, a marriage
used to be observed with somewhat elaborate ceremonies
and attended by a large number, perhaps two hundred,
of the friends and relations of the couple. A new hut

was erected for the bridegroom by his friends, and

here he and his bride had to sleep on opposite sides of
the fire for two months. During all this time they were
not allowed to speak to or look at each other. Hence
the bride was called a tiz'rok meetnya, '' not look round."
She kept her head and face eovered with her opossum rug,
while her husband was present, and he in like manner
turned his face away from her. Their mutual avoidance of
each other during these months was a source of much
1 J. B. Van Hasselt, ''Die Noe- und der Bz's11iarck-Archipel (Leipsic,
forezen, '' Zeitschrift fur Ethnologze, N. D.), p. 26.
viii. (1876) pp. 181 sq.; A. Gouds- 2
Rev. George Taplin, in E. M.
waard, De Papoewa's van de Geel- Ct1rr, The Australia1z Race (Melbourne
vinksbaaz (Schiedam, 1863), p. 67 ; and London, 1886-1887), ii. 245.
Otto Finsch, Neu- Guinea und seine 3
R. Brough Smyth, The Aborz'g"Z'11es
Bewohner (Bremen, 1865), p. 103 ; of Victona (Melbourne and London
Carl Hager, Kaz'ser Wz'lhel11is-Land 1887), i. 84 note*. '
CH. II
ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS 513
amusement to young people, who would peep into the hut

and laugh at the abashed pair. If the two needed to
communicate with each other, they must do so indirectly
through friends. The observance of these rules v1ras ensured
by the attendance of a bridesman and a bridesmaid who
waited on the bridegroom and bride respectively both by '
day and by night. At night the bridesman, who was a
bachelor friend, slept with the bridegroom on one side of
the fire ; \vhile the bridesmaid, who must be the nearest
unmarried relative of the brideg1oom, slept with the bride
1
on the other side of it.
In U sambara, a district of East Africa, the ''marriage Continence
ceremonies are peculiar. The young people meet at the f?r somfe
time a ter
house of a friend ; two native bedsteads are placed one on marriage
either side of the room, with a big fire between. On these ~~s~:~::us
the bride and bridegroom recline in the sight of each other trib_es in
for four days without food. Lukewarm water is allowed Africa.
them \vhen they are thirsty. On the fifth day one basin of
thin porridge is given them before the bridal procession
2
commences to the house of the bride's mother.'' Among
the Wataveta, a people of mixed Hamitic and Bantu race at
the foot of Mount Kilimanjaro, in British East Africa, a bride
sleeps with four little bridesmaids for five nights after marriage,
and it is not until about a week afterwards that the bride-
3
groom is at length allowed to take possession of her. Among
the Zulus, according to one account, marriage may not be
4
consummated until the third night after . the ceremony.
Among the Baganda of Central Africa a bride was attended
to her husband's house by a girl who slept \vith her for
the first two nights. Not till the third night did the bride-
5
groom consummate the marriage. So among the Ban-
I James Dawson, Australian Ab- Wabondei.
origines (Melbourne, Sydney, and Ade- 3 C. Hollis, '' Notes on the History
laide, 1881), pp. 31 sq. and Customs of the People of Taveta,
2 J. P. Farler, ''The Usambara I~ast Africa,'' Jo11rnal ef tlie Africa1t
Country in East Africa,'' Proceedings Society, No. I (October, 1901), pp.
oj the Royal Geographical Society, N.~. 115-117.
i. (1879) p. 92. The ceremony 1s 4 A. Delegorgue, v'oyage da11s
similarly described by 0. Baumann, l'Afriqzee A11strale (Paris, 1847), ii.
Usambara und seine Nachbargebiete
231.
(I~e1lin, 1891), pp. 133 sq., from
whose account we learn that tl1e tribe 6 Jol1n l~oscoe, The Baga11da (Lon-
who practise the custom are the don, 191 I), pp. 90 sq.
VOL. I 2L
l'Al{'f JI
yanl{ole or 13ahin1a, another tribe of Central Africa, a bride

is accompanied to her new home by an aunt, her father's
sister, who remains with her for three nights. On the
third night the marriage is consummated, and the aunt
1
retu111s to her home. Among the Banyoro, another tribe of
Cent1al Africa, marriage was consummated in the eveni11g
of the second day after the \vedding ceremony, when the
2
guests had departed. In Darfur ''it must be observed
that the marriage is seldom considered as completely cele-
brated until the seventh day, a11d never until the third. A
husband always shuns the insulting epithet of the impatient
man. Each day of temperance is dedicated to some parti-
cular person : the first to the father of the bride, the second
3
to the mother, and so on." Among the Ait Tameldu of
Morocco a bridegroom has not intercourse \vith his bride
until the t11ird day after she has been brought to his house,
4
when all the guests have gone away.
Continence Similar customs have been observed by various tribes of
for some
time after American Indians. Thus among the Musos and Colimas

marriage of New Granada ''at sixteen or seventeen years of age
observed
by various parents disposed of their daughters in marriage, the relations
tribes of making up the match without the knowledge of the bride;
American
Indians. \vhich done the bridegroom went to the place where she
was and spent three days caressing her, she in the mean-
time scolding, striking him with her fist, or cudgelling him.
When the three days were over, she grew good-humoured,
dressed the meat, sent it him by her mother or some kins-
woman, and then he lay by her all that moon without con-

summating the marriage, sowed a piece of ground with
Indian wheat for the bride and her mother, gave the string
of beads which \Vas the portion, and if he \vere a rich man
presented clouts to wrap about them with hawksbells after
their fashion, 'vhich made a dull noise as they moved. But
if the matrimony happened to be consummated duri11g the
first three days, they looked upon the woman as lewd and
1
John Roscoe, The Northern Bantu Souda1t, abridged from the French by
(Cambridge, 1915), p. 120. Bayle St. John (London, l 8 54), p.
2
John Roscoe, 7ne Northern Bantze, 107. .
p. 40. 4
Edward Westermarck, Marriage
3 Travels ef a1i Arab Merchant
Ceremonies in Morocco (London, 1914),
[Mohammed Ibn-Omar El Tounsy] z"n pp. 252 sq.
. k
w1c e .d ''I A mo11g the Karayas on the Rio Araguaya, in
Brazil, bride a11d bridegroom sleep for the first four nights
on a mat with a wide interval between them ; custom for-
bids them to approach each other on these nights, and
the marriage is not consummated till several days later. 2
Among the ancient Mexicans, when the guests who
had been invited to a marriage were flushed with \Vine,
''they went out to dance in the yard of the house, while the
married pair remained in the chamber, from which, during
four da}'S, they never stirred, except to obey the calls of
nature, or to go to the oratory at midnight to burn incense
to the idols, and to make oblations of eatables. They
passed these four days in prayer and fasting, dressed in new
habits, and adorned with certain ensigns of the gods of their
devotion, without proceeding to any act of less decency,
fearing that otherwise the punishment of heaven would fall
upon them. Their beds on these nights were two mats of
rushes, covered with small sheets, with certain feathers, and
a gem of Chalchihuz"tl in the middle of them. At the four
corners of the bed, green canes and spines of the aloe were
laid, with which they were to dra\v blood from their tongues
and their ears in honour of their gods. The priests were
the persons who adjusted the bed to sanctify the marriage ;
but we know nothing of the mystery of the canes, the
feathers, and the gem. Until the fourth night the marriage
was not consummated; they believed it would have proved
unlucky, if they had anticipated the period of consumma-
3
tion." '' The Mazatec bridegroom abstained for the first
.fifteen days of his wedded life from carnal knowledge of his
4
wife, and both spent the time in fasting and penance."
Among the N ootka Indians of Vancouver Island there used
to be no intercourse between a newly married pair for a
I Antonio de Herrera, The General Mexi'co, translated by Charles Cullen
History .ef the Vast Co1itine1zt and (London, 1807), i. 320 sq. Compare
Islands ef Anierica, translated into Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hi.rtoi1e des
English by Captain John Stevens Natio1zs civilist!es du lYlexique et de
(London, 1725-1726), vi. 184. l'A1t1t!rz'que - Ce11trale (Paris, 1857-
2 P. Eh1enreich, Beitriige zur Volker- 1859 ), iii. 56 5 sq.; H. H. Bancroft,
kunde Brasili"ens (Berlin, 1891), p. 29 Native Races ef the P11ciji.c .S'tates
( Veroffentlichunge1z aus de11i Konig- (London, 1875-1876), ii. 258 sq.
liche1t Mu.reum fur Volkerkie1ide, vol.
ii. I"ieft 1/2). 4 H. II. Bancroft, Native Races ef
3 F. S. Clavigero,. The Histo1y ef the Pacific States, ii. 261.
THE .l:IEIRSHll' OF JACOJJ l' A R'J' I I
1
period of ten days after marriage. Of tl1e Thompson Indians
in Britisl1 Colt1mbia we read that ''a newly married couple,
although sleeping under the same robe, were not supposed
to have connubial connection until from two to seven nights
-generally four nights after coming together. The young
\vife slept with her husband, but still wore her maiden's
2
breech-cloth." Among the Thlinl{eets br Tlingits of Alaska
bride and bridegroom had to fast severely for four days at
marriage; after the fast they were allowed to live together
3
but not to consummate the marriage for four weeks. Speak-
ing of the Indian tribes of Canada and the United States,
a writer of the eighteenth century, who knew them well,
observes, '' What is almost incredible and is nevertheless
attested by good authors is, that in several places the newly
married spouses are together for a whole year, living in
perfect continence, for the purpose, as they say, of showing
that they have married out of friendship and not in order
to satisfy their passions. They would even point the finger
at any young woman who might be found with child \vithin
4
a year of marriage."
The In these customs it deserves to be noticed that men
function of
bridesmen and women are often employed as attendants on the bride
an~ brides- and bridegroom for the express purpose of preventing the
maids. speedy consummation of marriage. The freqt1ency of the
practice suggests that this may have been the original
function of bridesmen and bridesmaids in Europe generally,
as it is still among some of the South Slavs.
The Finding the custom .of continence for a certain time,
precept of . ll r
observing espec1a Y 1or three nights, after marriage observed so widely
the .
'Tobias
throughout the world by races who can hardly have learned
nights''was it from Jewish or Christian teachers, we may reasonably
probably
borrowed
suspect
that in Europe the Church did not institute the
by the practice, but merely borrowed it, like so many other cus-
Church
from 1 H. I-I. Bancroft, op. cit. i. I 98.
Societatis Sci'entiaru1n Fenn.z"cae, iv.
paganism. 2
James Teit, The Thompson Indians (Helsingfors, 1856) pp. 314 sq.; T.
of Brz'tish Colu1nbia, p. 326 (The de Pauly, Description Ethnographique
Jesztp No1th Pacijic Expedz'tion, Memoi1 des Peuples de Russie (St. Petersburg,
of the Anzerican Museum of Natural 1862), Peuples de l' A1neriqzee Russe,
History, New York, April, 1900). p. 12 ; H. H. Bancroft, Native Races
3
of the Pacijic States, i. 111.
H. J. Holmberg, '' Ueber die 4
Charlevoix, Histoire de la Nouvelle
. Volker des Russischen Amerika,'' Acta France (Paris, 1744), v. 422.
CH. II ULTIMOGENITURE AND ]US PRIMAE NOC7'IS 517
toms, from paganism, and attempted to give it a Christian, Though

or at all events a Biblical colour, by citing the pious it occurs
in the
example of Tobias and his wife Sarah. Curiously enough, Vulgate, it
is wanting
the three nights of continence, which these personages are
in most
said to have observed for the sake of defeating the nefarious of the
ancient
designs of a demon, are not so much as mentioned in most versions of
of the extant versions of the Book oif Tobit includincr the The Book
' :::. of Tobit.
Gree!<, the Old Latin (the Itala), and the Aramaic; 1 they
appear only, so far as I am aware, in the Latin of the
Vulgate and in a Hebrew version, which agrees closely with
the Vulgate and may perhaps represent the original text
from which the Vulgate was derived th1ough the medium of
2
an Aramaic translation. For Jerome, the author of the
1 The .i\ramaic version was first pub- Biblical Aichaeology, xviii. (1896) PlJ
lished and translated into English, 208 sqq., 259 sqq. The mant1script,
from a t1nique manuscript in the Bod- accordi11g to Dr. Gaster, is not later
leian, by A. Ne11bauer, who reprinted than tl1e tl1irteenth centt1ry, and is
along with it the old Latin (ltala) probably copied from a manuscript of
version and the Hebre\v version, which the eleventh century. The la11guage
is commonly called the Miinster text. of the version is closely al;:in'to Biblical
This Miinster text was first printed at Hebrew ; indeed, so close is the re-
Constantinople in I 5 I 6 and was resemblance that Jerome could easily
printed by Sebastian :tviiinster in I 542. have understood it without an inter-
It is believed to have been made from ]Jreter. Hence we cannot identify this
the Aramaic at some time between the Hebrew version with the Aramaic
fifth and the seventh century of our version which J ero1ne, with the help of
area. See Ad. Neubauer The Book ef an interpreter, t11rned into Latin. And
Tobit (Oxford, 1878), pp. ix sqq. The wl1ile there is a general agreement be-
incident of the '' Tobias nights'' is not tween the HelJrew and the Vulgate,
mentioned in it. The Aramaic version the discrepancies between them are,
has lJeen translated into German. See in Dr. Gaster's opinion, sufficient in
Prof. Dr. Aclalbert Schulte, '' Die numl1er and l;:ind to forbid the sup-
aramaische Bearbeitung des Biichleins position that the Hebre\v is a mere
Tobias verglichen mit dem Vulgata- translation fro1n the Vulgate. On the
text,'' Theologische Quartalschrift, xc. whole he concludes that, '' lool;:ing
(TUbingen, 1908) pp. 182-204. The now upon our ne\vly-recovered Hebrew
German translator professes to compare text in the light wl1icl1 I have tried to
the Aramaic text with the Vulgate, throw upon it, we may conficlently
but omits to notice the presence of the assert that we have here undot1bteclly
remarkable incident of the ''Tobias the oldest Semitic text extant older
nights'' in the Vulgate and its absence than Jerome and Vet11s Latin, ancl
from the Aramaic. coming nearest to the lost I-Iebrew
2 This Hebrew version (which is not original, if it does not faitl1ft1lly repre-
to be confounded with the so-called sent it'' (op. cit. JJlJ 217 sq.). Fo1
Munster text, see the lJreceding note) the mention of tl1e '' Tobias nights''
was first described and translated into in this 1-Iebrew version, see Dr.
English from a manusc1ipt(A(ld. I 1639) Gaster's translation, pp. 267 sq., 269.
in tl1c British Museum, by Dr. M. I am indebte(l to my learned frie11cl
(;aster. See M. Gaster, ''Two t1n- Dr. J. Sutl1erland Bluel;: for calli11g
know11 I-Iebrew versions of the 'fobit my atte11tion to the Ilebrcw a11c~
legend,'' f'ioceedings of tlze Society of Aramaic versio11s of The Book of Jobit.
l'Al<'J' II
THE HEIRSJ/JJJ OF JACOB
Vulgate, tells us that he tra11slated the boo!( into I~atin

from a Chaldee, that is an Aramaic, text with the help of a
man who was a master both of Aramaic and of I~Iebrew;
the interpreter rendered the Aramaic into .tiebrew, and
, Jerome turned the Hebrew into Latin, dictating his trans-
lation to a secretary, who wrote it down. In this way the
Latin version of the Book of Tobit, as we have it in the
Vulgate, was completed in a singl~ day. 1
Now in the Greek
version the demon Asmodeus is overcome and put to flight,
not by the continence of the ne\vly wedded pair, but simply

by the smell of the fish's liver, which Tobias, by the advice of
the archangel Raphael, burned on entering the marriage
chamber. 2 The Vulgate preserves the incident of the
fumigation and the consequent flight of the demon ; but it
adds the injunction and the practice of continence for three
The nights as a further means of vanquishing the foul fiend. It
incident seems unlikely that both incidents the fumigation and the
of the
Tobias continerrce were contained in the original version of the
nights story ; and since the incident of the fumigation is inter-
seerr1s to 3
have been woven _much more closely into the texture of the tale than

;~~:;ed in the incident of the continence, which can be omitted with-
The Book out affecting the rest of the narrative, it seems probable
lar~~:t that the latter incident is an interpolation \vhich has been
7ake of. at some time foisted into the story for the pious purpose of
1nculcat1ng l . f 11
temporary incu eating a temporary practice o continence on a married

contine11ce couples at the commencement of their wedded life. Whether
after h" . fi .
marriage. t e interpo1at1on v.ras ound In the Aramaic text from which
Jerome made his Latin translation ; whether it was inserted
by Jerome himself or by the Jew whom he employed
as interpreter ; or, finally, whether it has been introduced
into the Vulgate at some later time, are questions which
apparently we have no means of definitely deciding. If the
1 See .T erome's Preface, Biblia Sacra English translation follows the Greelc,
Vulgatae Edi'tio1iis (Tornaci N erviorum, omitting all. inention of the nights of
1901 ), p. xix, ''Et quia vici'na est continence.
Chaldaeoru11t li'ngz1a ser11ioni Hebraico, 3 The gall of the same fish is used
utriusque li'nguae periti'ssi'mu11t loqua- by Tobias to heal the eyes of his father
ce11t repe1ie1zs, unius diei labore11t Tobit, wl10 had lost his sight through
'
a1ripui: et quidquid ille 1nihi Hebraii:is an accident consequent on his cha1ity
verbt's expressit, hoe ego accz'to notari'o, in burying the body of a Je\v who
ser1nonibus Latinis expositi. '' had been executed. See the Book oj
: 2 Book of Tobi't, viii. 2 sqq. The Tobi't, ii. I- JO, vi. I -8, xi. I I- I 3.
Hebrew version, which contains the incident of the ''Tobias

nights," really rep1esents, as Dr. Gaster believes, the original
text which was known to Jerome through the medium of
an Aramaic translation, it will follo\v that the interpolation
of that incident in the narrative is older than the time of
Jerome; but if it should turn out that, contrary to the view
of Dr. Gaster, the Hebrew version is merely a translation.
fro1n the Vulgate, the question of the date at which the
episode of the '' Tobias nights"'' was worked into the story
would have to remain open, and we should consequently
be unable to pronounce with any confidence whether the
interpolator was a Jew or a Christian. But, Jew or
Christian, his motive for making this addition to the story '
seems clearly to have been the practical one of recom-
mending chastity as the best prelude to married life; and the
same motive probably led the Church to dwell on the three
''Tobias nights'' as the model to which all virtuous and God-
fearing couples should conform their behaviour at marriage.
At first sight it is natural to suppose that this injunction The
of contine11ce for three . nights after marriage flowed simply con pract~ice of
1nence
from an exalted conception of the virtue of chastity and a after

correspon d 1ng d eprec1at1on
o f t h e on 1y means wl11c
h nature was
marriage
has vouchsafed for the continuance of our species; in other probably
d h b h h h h l
wor s, 1t rn1g t e t oug t t at t e 1nJUnct1on was mere y fear of thebased on a
one manifestation or effect of that ascetic ideal which has demons,

profoundly influenced Oriental religion and has stamped ::~~~:Iy
itself deep on Christianity. But the discovery of a similar suppo_sed
to lie 1n
counsel and a similar practice among many barbarous and wait for
even savage races, whom neither their admirers nor their the n_e\dvly
marr1e .
detractors can tax with a propensity to asceticism, suffices to
prove that the origin of the custom must be sought i11 some
other direction ; and the story of Tobias, as it is related in the
Vulgate, may perhaps furnish us with a clue in the search.
For in that story the practice of continence is enjoined, not
primarily as a means of pleasing God, but for the purpose
of defeating the jealous devil, who had already massacred
Sarah's seven husbands, and would have killed her eighth, if
that bold man had not received timely warning and prudently
abstained from exercising his conjugal rights for three nights
after marriage. The inference suggested by tl1e narrative is
THE HEJRS//P OF JAC'O/J l'Alt'l' II
520
that by this abstinence Tobias left the field open to his

spiritual rival, \vho, after enjoyi11g the bride undisturbed for
three nights, was co11tent to pass 11er on to 11er lawful husband
for the term of his natural life. The temporary restraint
which the bridegroom imposed on his passions was, in short,
an accommodation, not with heaven but with hell, in vi1-tue
of which the demon lover resigned his cast-off mistress to
the arms of her human spouse. At all events, if this explana-
tion does not fit all the facts, it is more or1 a level with the
ideas of the peoples who have practised the custom than the
theory wl1ich would derive it from a glorified asceticism. A
kindred expla11ation has been proposed, with special reference
to the Vedic practice, by a learned and acute V edic scholar,
H. Olden- Professor Hermann Oldenbe1g. He says, ''If after marriage
berg on
temporary the young couple are enjoined to p1actise continence for a
continence time, whether for three nights or a longer period, the original
after

marriage meaning of this ancient custom, though it was obviously 110
as a longer unde1stood by the Vedic Indians, must, in my opinion,
precaution
against undoubtedly be sougl1t in the fear of spirits who, in the act
demons.
of copulation, might slip into the woman and endanger 11er
offspring, or might even themselves beget offspring on he1,
for spirits are well I<:nown to lust after st1ch intercourse ; they
are misled by a pretence of omitting the consummation of
1
marriage." On this I would only observe that the intention
of 'the custom is perhaps not so mt1ch to deceive the demons
by pretending that the marriage is not to be consummated,
as to leave them free scope for making love to the bride in
the absence of the bridegroom. But in which e\'er way the
custom is supposed to protect bride a.nd bridegroom at
marriage, the danger apprehended is probably believed, at
least in many cases, to spring from demons ; for it is a
common belief that evil spirits lie in wait for newly married
couples, and many are the superstitious devices resorted to
for the sake of cheating them out of their prey. To illustrate
this topic fully would lead us too far. It must suffice to cite
a few typical instances. .
A traveller in Java tells us that'' among other apartments
we saw the 'family bridal chamber,' in which we noticed two
painted wooden figures, one of a man and the other of a
1
H. Olden berg, Die Religio1z des Veda (Berlin, I 894), p. 27 r.
CH. II ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS 52I
woman, standing at the foot of the 'family nuptial couch.' Precau-

These figures, as we were told are called Lorobonyhoyo or tion_s take11
' ' against
the youth and maiden, and are placed there to cheat the demons at

devil, who, according to their belief, during the wedding-night :-:a;~~~~e
hovers round the bed, with the view of carrying off one of the Borneo,

h appy pair. T.h fi h . . . Ce!ebes,
. ese gures, owever,. are their protection, for, and India.
deceived by their resemblance, he carries tl1em off instead of
1
the sleeping lovers." The Javanese of Surakarta similarly
believe that ne;vly wedded pairs are exposed on the first night
of their marriage to the injuries and outrages of evil spirits, who
try to turn their love to hate. Hence when the young couple
have been in the b1idal chamber for about an hou1, their
friends enter with burning torches and poke about the room
with them, as if they were looking for something. This they
do to frighten away the demons by the glare of the torches,
or at least to disturb and thwart the1n in their hellish design. 2
Among some of the Dyaks of Dutch Borneo bride and bride-
groom are not allowed to sleep on the wedding night, lest
evil spirits should avail themselves of their slumber to make
3
them sick. At a marriage bet\\.een persons of high rank in
Southern Celebes the bridegroom's nails, both on his hands
and feet, together with the palms of his hands and the instep
of his feet, are dyed red with the juice of Lawsonia alba L.,
because this is believed to be a good protection against the
4
envy of evil spirits. It is said that among high-caste
Hindoos of the Punjab a bridegroom, on entering the bridal
chamber, always carries an iron weapon with him to diive
away the evil spirits that haunt him at the marriage cere-
mony.5 Similarly we are told that in Bombay the bride-
groom, from the beginning to the end of the 1narriage 1ites,
keeps a dagger in his hand day and night for the purpose of
1
averting evil spirits.< Among the N aoda, a caste of fer1y1nen
1 W. B. d' Almeida, Life in Java Bon11nel, 1870), p. 53
(London, 1864), ii. 160 sq. 4 B. F. Matthes, Bij1i1ai,'~11 tot ilc:
2 C. F. Winter, '' Instellingen, Ge- Eth11olog1:e va11 Z111"d - Celeb1:.1 (Tl1e
woonten en Gebruiken der Jairanen te I-Tague, 1875), lJ 30.
Soerakarta,'' Tijdsclirift voor Neerla1t1!s 0 Maya Das, in l'a11j1ib Notes a111l
Indie Batavia,. 1843, Eerste Deel,
p. 48S; I>. J. Vetl1,Java, Geo<f{raphisch, Qtterie.>, vol. i. p. 98, 759 (}tine
Ethnologisch, Hislori"sch (Haarlen1, 1884).
11 I\-f unshi, in JJa11jab 1Vott'.\' a111l
187 5-1884), i. 635.
:i M. 1'. JI. Perelaer, Eth11og1aph- Q11e1i1:.r, veil. i. lJ 125, 940 (r\t1gt1st
ische flesth1efj11i1~{/' der Dajaks (Zall I 884).
522 THE HEIRSHIP 0.1<, JACOB PAR'!' II
in the Cent1al Provinces of India, ''before the bridegroom

sta1ts for his wedding his mother takes and passes in front
of him, successively from his head to his feet, a pestle, some
stalks of rusa grass, a cl1urning-rod and a wi11nowing-fan.
This is done with the object of keeping off evil spirits, and
it is said that by her action she th1eatens to pound the spirits
with the pestle, to tie them up with the grass, to cl1urn and
mash them with the churning-rod, and to scatter them to
1
the winds with the winnowing-fan." Among the Rajjhars,
another caste of the Central Provinces, when bride and
bridegr~om arrive for the first time after marriage at the
bridegroom's house, the bridegroom's mother meets him at
the door '' and .touches his head, breast and knees with a
churning-stick, a winnowing-fan and a pestle, with the

object of exorcising any evil spirits who may be accom-

2
panying

the bridal couple."

Among the Savars of the
Central Provinces of India, '' on the return of the bridal pair
seven lines aie drawn in front of the entrance to the bride-
groom's house. Some relative takes rice and throws it at
the persons returning with the marriage procession, and then
pushes the pair hastily across the lines and into tl1e house.
They are thus freed from the evil spirits who might have
acco1npanied them home, and who are kept back by the rice
8
and the seven lines." Among the Oraons of Bengal a
screen is held round bride and bridegroom while the marriage
rite is being performed, in order to protect them from the
gaze of demons and of strangers who may have the evil
4
eye. The custom of veiling the bride, which is common to
many peoples, was probably in origin intended to serve the
same purpose.
~recau- In Ar1nenia bride and bridegroom are believed to be
t1ons taken . d h h" . f d
against expose to t e mac 1nat1ons o emons both before and after.
dem~ns a.t the wedding ceremony ; hence they carry as talismans a
marriage 1n l l d
Arn1enia, oc <ed oar-lock and a closed clasp-knife. Further, they
Morocco,
and
are constantly attended by a man armed with a sword for
Normandy. their protection. \Vl1enever they pass through a door their
guardian makes a cross with the sword over the lintel,
1
R. V. Russell, The Tribes and 3
R. V. Russell, op. cit. iv. 506.
Castes of the Central P1ovi1ices of India 4 Sarat Chandra Roy, The. Oraons
(London, 1916), iv. 284. of Chot11.-Nagpu1 (Ranchi, 191 5), p.
2 R. V. Russell, op. 1i1. iv. 407.
363.

c1I. II ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS 523
because doorways are thought to be the abode of spirits. 1 At

marriages in Morocco ''the constant firing of guns, the loud
music, and the quivering noise of women, especially of tl1e
one who keeps hold of the bridegroom's hood, obviously serve
the purpose of purifying the atmosphere and frightening away
evil spirits by the noise and, in the case of the powde1-play,
also by the smell of powder, of which the jinn are believed to be
much afraid. For a similar reason the bridegroom carries a
sword, dagger, or pistol ; and the crossi11g of swords over 11is
head or in front of him is lil{ewise intended to ward off jir1n,
\vho are afraid of steel and, especially, of weapons of this
metal. The same is the case with his wearing of various
charms and the use of salt, vvhich is also a common safeguard
2
against evil spirits." At weddings in Normandy, \vhen the
bridegroom joined the bride in the marriage chamber, it was
customary for a friend to crack a whip in order to drive
away the evil spirits who, but for this precaution, might
3
molest the newly wedded pair.
The precautions against spi1its at marriage are peculiarly ~recall
.
stringent wh enever one o f t h e coup1e h appens to b e a w1'd ow tagainst
1011s
or a widower, because in that case the usual demons are the ghost
powerfully reinforced by the jealous ghost of the deceased ~~:b~~~ctor
husband or wife, whose tenderest feelings are wounded by wife ~t the
h h
t e s1g t o f h h l" h f l' . . l n1arr1age
1s or er re 1ct in t e arms o a 1v1ng r1va . a wido\v or of
Common prudence suggests the desirability of averting the widower.
threatened danger by appeasing the anger of the injured
ghost, eluding his inconvenient attentions, or forcibly driving
him away. The last of these measures is adopted by the
N ufors of Dutch New Guinea: When a widow \vall{s for the
first time with her second husband into the forest, the couple
are followed by widows or married women, who throw sticks
4
at the ghost of the bride's first husband to hasten his departure.

1lVIanuk Abeghian, Der arme11ische (Paris and Lyons, l 846 ), p. 240.

Volksg!aube (Leipsic, 1899), p. 91. 4 J. B. van Hasselt, ''Die Noefo1e-
zen,'' Zeitsch1ift fur Eth1iologie, viii.
2 Edward Westermarck, Marriage
(1876), p. 182 sq.; J. L. van I-Iasselt,
Cere1nonies in Morocco (London, 1914),
'' Eenige aanteekingen aangaande de
pp. 122 sq. In quoting Dr. West-
bewoners der N. Westl{ust van Nieuw
marck I have altered his spellingjnun
Guinea, meer bepaaldelijl{ de stam
into the usual English jinn. N oefoorezen,'' 7'ijdscl11ift voo1 111-
3 Alfred de Nore, Coutu111es, Mythes, dische 7'aal- La1i1f- e11 Vol/..e1i/..11111le,
et Traditions des l'rovince.r de Ji'ia1i1e xxxi. ( r886) p. 585.
THE HEIR SHIP OF JA COfi PAR'f II
The Baganda of Central Africa adopted a rnore conciliatory

attitude towards the departed spirit. ''When a man wished
to marry a widow, he first paid the deceased husband a
barkcloth and a fowl, which he put into the little shrine at
the grave ; in this way he imagined he could pacify the
1
ghost.'' The Savaras of Southern India in like manner
seek to propitiate the jealous spirits of deceased husbands.
Whenever one of them marries a wid0w, he kills a pig and
offers the flesh of the animal, with some liquor, to the ghost
of the bride's late husband, while a priest prays the ghost not
to spoil the wedded bliss of l1is wido\v and her second spouse.
'' Oh ! man," says the priest, addressing tl1e deceased by name,
''here is an animal sacrificed to you, and with this all con-
nexion between this woman and you ceases. She has taken
with her no property belonging to you or your childrer1. So do
'
not torment her within the house or outside the house, in the
jungle or on the hill, when she is asleep or when she wakes.
Do not send sicl(ness on her children. Her second husba11d
has done no harm to you. She chose him for her ht1sband,
and he consented. Oh ! man, be appeased ; oh ! unseen
2
ones ; oh ! ancestors, be you witnesses." Among the Soma-
vansi Kshatriyas in Bombay ''there is a strong belief that
when a woman marries another husband, her first husband
becomes a ghost and troubles her. This fear is so strongly
rooted in their minds, that whenever a woman of this caste
sickens, she attributes her sickness to the ghost of her former
husband, and consults an exorcist as to how she can get rid
of him. The exorcist gives her some charmed rice, flowers,
and basil leaves, and tells her to enclose the1n in a small
copper box and wear it round her neck. Sometimes the
exorcist gives her a charmed cocoa-nut, which he tells her to
\vorship daily, and in some cases he advises the \voman to
make a copper or silver image of the dead and worship it
3
every day." ''So in Northern India, people \Vho marry
again after the death of the first wife wear what is known as
the Saukan Maura, or second wife's crown. This is a little
1
J0!1n Roscoe, The Baga11da (Lon- 3
W. Crooke, Popzelar Reli'g-ion and
don, 191 I), p. 97. Folk-lore ef Northe1-n India (\Vest-
2
Edgar Thurston, Castes a11d Tribes n1inster, 1896), i. 235 sq., quoting
ef Southe111 I11dia (J\fadras, 1909), vi. J. M. Campbell's Note;; 011 the Spirit
32 l. Basis ef Belief ancl Ciesto111, p. l 7 I.
c11. 11 ULTJMOGENITURE AND ]US PR/MAE NOCTIS 525
silver amulet, generally \.vith an image of Devi engraved on

it. This is hung iound the husband's neck, and all presents
made to the second wife are first dedicated to it. The idea
is that tl1e new \vife recognizes the superiority of her prede-
cessor, and thus appeases her malignity. The illness or death
of the second \vife or of her husband soon after marriage is
attributed to the jealousy of the ghost of the first wife, which
1
l1as not been suitably propitiated." In the Punjab, for a
similar reason, '' if a man has lost two or three wives in
succession, he gets a woma11 to catch a bird and adopt it
as her daughter. He the11 pays the dower, marries his bird
bride, and immediate divorces her, By this means the
1nalignant influence is diverted to the bird, and the real wife
2
js safe."
Nor is this the only kind of mock marriage which is 11ock
celebrated in the Punjab for the purpose of appeasing or ~~arriages

eluding the wrath of a dead wife when the widower marries wido;vers
.
again. '' Th
. e cus t om o f moc k marriage,
. . going
z.e., . t h roug h widows
and in
a form of marriage with an animal, tree or other inanimate the Punjab.
object, which prevails among certain .castes of the Hindus
more or less throughout the Province, is based upon fear
of ill luck. Mock marriages take place (1) when a
widower wishes to marry a third wife, and (2) when
the horoscope of a girl shows that the influence of certain
stars is likely to lead to early widowhood. In cases of the
former kind, the mock marriage is celebrated in the western
Punjab \.vith a sheep, in the central Punjab with the Ber
(Zizyphus ;u;uba) tree or sometimes with the Pipal (Fz'cus
religiosa) and in the eastern Punjab with the Ak ( Calotropis
procera) bush. The fear of ill luck. is due partly to
the suspicion, caused by the death of the two former
wives, viz., that the wife of the man whosoever she might be,
is destined to die, and particularly the wife taken by the
third marriage, which is considered to be peculiarly in-
auspicious. . . . But it is also due partly to the belief
that the jealousy. of the spirit of the first wife is instru-
mental in causing the death of the subsequent wives. It
is for this latter reason that when a widower has to marry
a second time, a miniature picture of the first wife, either
t W. Crooke, op. cz"t. i. 236,. .2 W. Crooke, I.e.
PAK'!' II
cased in silve1 or gold or engraved 011 a silver or gold plate,

is hung round the neck of the bride at the wedding cere-
monies. When a picture cannot be obtained or engraved,
the name of the deceased wife is substituted for the picture.
The idea seems to be to humour the spirit of the first wife,
by proving the fidelity of the husband, who in marrying the
second wife pretends to really marry the picture or name of
the deceased. wife, thus identifying the second wife with the
first. In the central Punjab, at a second marriage, the bride
is dressed like a milk-maid ( Gu;"ri) or a flower-seller ( M dlan)
and given a servile nickname such as Gu;ri, Mdlan, jatto,
Mehri, etc. The object of this apparently is to convince
the spirit of the deceased wife, that the female being
married is. not a real patni (wife) but a ddsi (slave-girl).
But when the death of the second wife shows that the
device was unsuccessful, a mock marriage is resorted to, at
the third occasion. The bridegroom is sometimes taken out
to a tree of the above-mentioned variety, which is bedecked
with clothes and jewelry, and he is made to go round it,
with the usual incantations, as if he \Vere going through the
Ldvdn ceremony. After completing this preliminary step,
he proceeds to the bride's house, to celebrate the formal
marriage with the bride, which is supposed to be a nominal
one or equivalent to a fourth. But in most cases, a twig or
(in the Western Punj~b) a sheep is taken to the bride's

house, where it is anointed and bedecked with clothes and

ornaments to represent a wife, and at every stage of the
ceremony the bridegroom goes through the forms, first with
this mock-wife and then with the real bride. It is interest-
ing to watch the bedecked sheep sitting on the khdrds
(reversed baskets) wi~h a bridegroom and being led by him
round ~he sacrificial fire while the real bride sits by. All
these formalities are peculiar to the third marriage, and if
the third wife also dies and a fourth one has to be married ,
no mock marriage is usually deemed necessary, as the evil
influence of the first wife is believed to have spent itsel('' 1
Similar pretences are enacted for similar purposes . in
other parts of India at the marriages of widowers or widows .
1 l.'ensus of India, 1911, vol. xiv. Harikishan Kaul (Lahore, pp

. Pun;'ab, Part i. Report, by Pandit 283 Sij,
191 2)
' .
ctt. 11 ULTl1lfOGENITURE AND JU.S' PRJ1lfAE NOCJY.S" 527
Thus in the Konkan, a province on the coast of the Bombay Mock

"d h h 1 t
P res1 ency, w en a man as os two wives an w1s es to of d h marriages
marry a third, he is married to a Ruz plant before he weds wido\\ers

the real bride, because people believe that the third wife ~7~o\vs in
would be sure to die if the spirit of the deceased wife were other parts
.
not ma d e to enter t h e R uz p ant. l 1 A h .
mong t e Barats, a of India.
caste of growers and sellers of the betel-vine leaf in the

Central Provinces of India, '' a bachelor espousing a widow
must first go through the ceremony of marriage with a
swallow-wort plant. When a wido\ver marries a girl a
silver impression representing the deceased first wife is made
2
and worshipped daily with the family gods." In the latter
case the intention of worshipping the portrait of a deceased
wife at marriage with a second is no doubt to propitiate the
jealous ghost of the dead woman and induce her to spare
her living rival. Among the Kawars, a primitive tribe of
the Central Provinces of India, '' if a widower marries a girl
for his third wife it is considered unlucky for her. An
earthen image of a woman is the refore made, and he goes
through the marriage ceremony with it ; he then throws the
image to the ground so that it is broken, when it is con-
sidered to be. dead and its funeral ceremony is performed.
After this the. widower may marry the girl, who becomes
3
his fourth wife." Here apparently the ghost of the first
wife is thought to be contented with the breaking of the
earthen image, which perhaps she is supposed to mistake for
the real bride. In some parts of Bastar, which is one of the
Central Provinces of India, the Goods view with particular
apprehension marriage with a widow whose husband has
been killed by a tiger, because they believe that the ghost
of the deceased has entered into the tiger and in that
form will seek to devour the rash man who marries his
widow. In order to prevent that catastrophe the widow is
formally married, not to her new husband, but either to a

1 R. E. Enthoven, Folk-lore of the of India a bachelor who marries a -

Konkan, p. 73 (Supplement to The widow must first be married to an
Indian Antz'quary, vol. xliv. Bombay, akra or swallow-wort ( Calotropis gz'gan-
1915). tea), a very common plant \Vith mauve
2 R. V. Russell, Tribes and Castes or purple flowers, wl1ich grows on
of the Central Provi1zces (London, waste land. See R .. V. Russell, op. cit.
1916), ii. 195. In like manner among iv. 28.
the Kunbis of the Central Provinces 3 R. V. Russell, op. cit. iii. 395.

528 THE HEIJ?S'J:!JJJ OF'JACOJI PAR'!' II
dog or to a lance, axe, 01 swo1d, because they calculate that

the ghost, 1nistaking apparently the fictitious for the real
bridegroom, will either ca1ry off the dog or perish by one of
1
these lethal weapons.
Preca11- Still more elaborate are tl1e precautions which the
tion.s
against Kunbis, a great agricultural class of the Central Provinces
the ghost of India, adopt for the pu1pose of protecting a man who
odfecease
a d marries a widow against the assaults of her late husband's
husband ghost. Among these people, we are told, '' the ceremony of
at the "d . . 1 1
mariiage of w1 ow-1narriage 1s arge y governe d b th 'd f
y e t ea o escaping .
his \vido\v or placating the wrath of the first husband's ghost, and also
among the . .
Kunbis of its being something to be ashamed of and contrary to
and 1-ianas orthodox Hinduism. It always takes place in the dark
of Central .
India. fortnight of the month and al\vays at night. Sometimes no
women are present, and if any do attend they must be
widows, as it would be the worst of omens for a married
woma11 or unmarried girl to witness the ceremony. This, it
is thought, would lead to her shortly becoming '
a
.
widow
herself. The bridegroom goes to . the widow's house \Vith
his male friends, and two wooden seats are set side by side.
On one of these a betel-nut is placed which represents the
deceased husband of the widow. The new bridegroom
advances with a small wooden sword, touches the nut with
its tip, and then kicks it off the seat with his right toe.
The barber picks up the nut and burns it. This is supposed
to lay the deceased husband's spirit and prevent his inter-
ference with the new union. The bridegroom then takes
the seat from which the nut has been displaced and the
woman sits on the other side to his left He puts a neck-
lace of beads round her neck and the couple leave the house
1R. V. Russell, Tribes a1zd Castes fortune which would otherwise attend
of the Central Provz'nces of 111dia the union. See R. V. Russell, op.
(London, 1916), iii. 81. Mock cit. iii. r88 sq., iv. 506; W. Crooke,
marriages with plants or inanimate Popztlar Religion and Folk-lore of
objects, less frequently with animals, Northern India (Westminster, 1896),
are common in India, and appar- ii. r I 5- I 28 ; z'd., '' The Hill Tribes of
ently they cannot all be explained the Central Indian I-I ills,'' Journal of
on the same principle. The fear of the A1tthropological I1zstitzete, xxviii.
the ghost of a dead wife or husband is (1899) pp. 242 sq.; Tote111is111 and
only one of the motives which has con- Exoganiy, iv. 2 lo sqq. ; The Magz.c
tributed to the observance of these Art and the Evolution of Kz'1zgs, ii.
quaint ceremo11ies .. Generally the mock 57 sq. (The Golden Bough, Third
marriage ap1)ears to be contracted for Edition, Part i.).
th~ ~ake of averting !?Orne ill-luck or mis-
cH. rr ULTIMOGENITURE AND ]US PRIMAE NOCTIS 529
in a stealthy fashion and go to the husband's village. It is

considered unlucky to see them as they go a\vay, because
the second husband is regarded in the light of a robber.
Sometimes they stop by a stream on the way home, and,
taking off the woman's clothes and bangles, bury them by
the side of the stream. An exorcist may also be called in,
who will confine the late husband's spirit in a horn by put-
ting in some grains of wheat, and after sealing up the horn
deposit it with the clothes. When a widower or wido\v
marries a second time and is afterwards attacked by illness,
it is ascribed to the ill-will of their former partner's spirit.
The metal image of the first husband or wife is then made
1
and worn as an amulet on the arm or round the neck."
Again, among the Manas, a Dravidian caste of cultivators and
labourers in the Central Provinces of India, ''when a wido\v
is to be remarried, she stops on the way by the banks of a
stream as she is proceeding to her ne\v husband's house, and
here her clothes are taken off and buried by an exorcist \Vith
a view to laying the first husband's spirit and preventing it
2
from troubling the new household.'' In this practice of
burying a widow's clothes on the bank of a river, which, as
we have just seen, is observed also by the Kunbis of the
same region, we may probably detect an effort to disguise
the woman from her husband's ghost, like the attempt of a
criminal to evade the pursuit of justice by shaving his
whiskers and donning a strange attire. - The circumstance
of burying the cast-off garments by the side of a stream is per-
haps a further refinement of the subterfuge, designed to take
advantage of a spirit's well-known inability to cross water.
The foregoing instances may serve to illustrate some N? real

'
o f t h e spiritua 1 d h' h h f evidence
angers w IC , In t e opinion o many that in
peoples, attend the entrance into the married state, and Europe
lords ever
1 R. V. Russell, Tribes and Castes Hartland in a learned essay (''The po~sessed
of the Central Provinces of India, iv. Haunted Widow,'' Ritual and Belief, a righbt _of
concu 1n-
27 sq. London, 1914, pp. 194-234). Ir1 age \vith
2 R. V. Russell, The Tribes and Madagascar it is admitted that a dead their
Castes of the Central Provinces of man sometimes begets a child on his te 11 a 11 ts'
India, iv. 1 7 5. The belief that widow, and the infant is acknowledged brides at
a widow is haunted by the jealous as legitimate. See A. et G. Grandidier, marriage.
and dangerous ghost of her deceased Ethnographie de Madagast-ar, ii. (Paris,
husband is illustrated by Mr. E. S. 1914) p. 246 note 2
VOL. I 2M
; THE IIEIR.S'JIJJ:l OF JACOli P ;\R'l' I I
530
they perhaps account, at least in some measure, for the
delay in consummating the marriage. Certainly, ho\v-
ever we may explain it, the practice of continence for
a certain time, especially for three nights, after marriage
has been widespread over the world among heathen as well
as Christian peoples, and its persistence in Et1rope down to
our own day combines with the historical evidence to
prove that the 1us prz"1nae noctis was no more than an
ecclesiastical dispensation granted by the Cl1urch to free
newly married couples from the obligation of complying
with an ancient custom, which, through a change in public
opinion, had come to be felt superfluous and burdensome.
The notion that the ;us prz"mae noctis in Europe was a right
which a feudal lord or ecclesiastical dignitary claimed of
sleeping with the wives of his tenants or subordinates on
their marriage night appears to be destitute alike of historical
proof and of intrinsic probability; it is a monstrous fable born
of ignorance, prejudice, and confusion of ideas. The sources
of the fable appear to be mainly twofold, a misapprehension of
the nature of the 11ierchet, and a misapprehension of the nature
of the ;'us prz'niae noctz"s. These two things were perfectly
distinct and had no connexion with each other. The 1tzerchet
was the fine which a tenant or vassal paid to his feudal lord
for the right of giving his daughter in marriage ; the ;'us
prz"niae noctzs was the right of sleeping with his own \vife on
the wedding night, which a husband received from his bishop
or other ecclesiastic~l authority on the payment of a fee
for the licence. Neither the one nor the other had any-
thing to do with a practice of sacrificing the virginity of
brides to men other than their husbands. Yet these two
things, totally different in nature and in origin, were popularly
confounded together and perverted into a baseless calumny
on two classes of men feudal lords and the higher clergy-
who, whatever other faults and failings may be laid to their
charge, appear to have been perfectly innocent of st1ch a
systematic outrage on the domestic affections of their civil
and ecclesiastical inferiors.
.
'
To return to the question fro1n which we started, we

--'

conclude that in Europe the rule of ultimogeniture, or the -- "~
'

' "
.'
I . ' ,J
c11, II ULTIMOGENITURE AND JUS PRIMAE NOCTIS 531
preference for the youngest son in the inheritance, cannot be Ultimo-

founded on a custom which allowed a man other than the gEeniture t1rope no
int
husband to cohabit with the bride at marriage, since no derived
h k h b d E
sue cus om ts nown ever to ave een practise tn urope. fabulous
t from this
But since ultimogeniture has prevailed among other right.

. . f h Id .
races 1n various parts o t e wor , 1t may e as ed that b k No proof
whether among these races, some of which stand at a ultii.no-

ge111ture
comparatively low level. of culture, the rule of ultimogenit11re has
may not have arisen through a doubt
as to the legitimacy abny,vlblered
een a$e
of the firstborn consequent on a right of concubinage on the
exercised with the mother at marriage by men other than ~~ef~~imacy
the husband ? To this question the reply is like that which firstborn.
has been given for Europe. There seems to be no positive
proof that such a right has ever been recognized in any of the
tribes which are known to practise ultimogeniture. Only in
one of the tribes, so far as I know, is there a slight ground Someslight
for suspecting such an origin of the custom. Among the ~~~;~~i~~
1
Lolos of South-Western China, as we saw, the youngest son such an
is said to inherit in preference to the eldest. However, a ~~;~~~f
French writer gives a somewhat different account of the rule geniture
of inheritance in the tribe. He tells us that '' the first child ~~1~~~ the
of the marriage, though reared with the same care and atten-
tion as those that come afterwards, is nevertheless not
recognized by the husband, who considers it in some sort as
a stranger. It is to the second child, whether boy or gi1l,
2
that the title of eldest is given." If this account is correct,
it sets the custom of junior right (for it could not strictly be
called ultimogeniture) among the Lolos in a very different
light ; for it suggests that the first born is excluded from
the heritage on the, ground of illegitimacy, and consistently
with that supposition it apparently assigns the inheritance,
not to the youngest, but to the second child, whether male
or female. All this would be a natural consequence -of a
. practice of submitting brides at marriage to the embraces of
men other than their husbands. Now in Tibet, the natives
of which are racially akin to the Lolos and speak a language
of the same family, a practice of the defloration of virgins
by strangers before marriage is reported by Marco Polo to
1 See above, p. 458. Yiin-na1i, Deuxieme Partie (Paris,
2 Emile Rocher, LaProvi'ncechinoise 1880), p 17.

THE HEIRSHIJ:i OF JACOll l' AR'!' I I
532
Marco Polo have actually prevailed at the time when he travelled through
on a.
practice
the land
''No man of that country'''
he tells us, ''would
.
of the on any consideration take to wife a girl who was a maid ;
dfefl.?r~tiobn
o v1rg1ns y
for they say a wife is nothing worth
unless she.
has.
been
strangers used to consort with men. And their custom is this, that
in Tibet. h Id
when travellers come that way, t e o woinen o f th 1
e p ace
get ready, and tal<:e their unmarried daughters or other girls
related to them, and go to the strangers who are passing,
and make over the young women to whomsoever will accept
them; and the travellers take them accordingly and do
their pleasure ; after which the girls are restored to the old
women who brought them, for they are not allowed to follow
the strangers away from their home. In this manner people
travelli11g that way, when they reach a village or hamlet or
other inhabited place, shall find perhaps twenty or thirty
girls at their disposal. And if tl1e travellers lodge with
those people they shall have as many young \vomen as they
could wish coming to court them. You must know, too,
that the traveller is expected to give the girl who has been
with him a ring or some other trifle, something in fact that
. she can show as a lover's token, when she comes to be
married. And it is for this in truth and for this alone that
they follow that custom ; for every girl is expected to obtain
at least twenty such tokens in the way I have described
before she can be married, and those who have most tokens,
and so can show that they have been most run after, are in
the highest esteem, and most sought in marriage, because
they say the charms of such are greatest. But after mar-
riage these people hold their wives very dear, and would
consider it a great villainy for a man to meddle with another's
wife; and thus though the wives have before marriage acted
as, you have heard, they are kept with great care from light
1
conduct afterwards.''
It may be that the people of whom Marco Polo here
2
speaks were no other than the Lolos; but it is highly im-
1The Book ef Ser Marco Polo, newly observes, ''All this is clearly n1eant
translated and edited by Colonel (Sir) to apply only to the rude people to-
Henry Yule, Second Edition (London, wards the Chinese frontier ; nor would
187 5), ii. 35, 37. the Chinese (says Richthofen) at this
2 Commenting on the preceding pas-
day think the description at all ex-
sage of Marco Polo, Sir Henry Yule aggerated, as applied to tl1e Lolo who
ctr. 11 ULT_!MOGEN_!TURE AND JUS PRfi'VfAE NOCTIS 533
p1obablc that a11y such usage prevails among them at the Liberty
.
presen t t 1me. H owever, th e F renc l1 writer
w h ose account baccordedto
.d f
' r1 es a ter
of their rule of inheritance I have quoted, mentions a Lolo marriage

cus t om ob served a t marriage wh'1ch m1g. h t perh aps b e inter-
. among
Lolos. the
preted as a relic of a farmer licence accorded to women
before marriage. He says, ''An old custom requires that
on the day after marriage the bride should quit her husband's
roof at sunrise and return to the house of her parents \Vith-
out any consideration for her husband or her new family;
she has not the right to return to her spouse till she feels the
first symptoms of motherhood. During the whole time of this
separation, she enjoys complete liberty and makes no scruple
of running about the neighbouring villages or taking part in
the festivals and amusements of the young people. If at
the end of a certain ti1ne, which varies from a year to
eighteen months, she experiences no sign of maternity, her
husband, convinced that he has no hope of offspring by her,
takes back his word, as he has a right to do by virtue of
ancient custom, and looks out else\vhere for another wife.
On the contrary when, after some months, his wife returns
to his roof to become a mother, from that time the husband,
assured of having a numerous posterity, calls her to no
account for her conduct and treats her with the regard due
to her fecundity. She on her side bids farewell to the
pleasures of youth and begins the active and laborious life
1
of housekeeping."
However, the custom which permits or requires a bride The Lolo
soon after marriae-e to return for a time to the house of her :Uhle
~
~tf
1n er1 ance
2
parents, appears to be not uncommon ; it need not have probably
any connexion with leave granted to. the woman to cohabit ~~tabased
with men other than her husband. On the whole, if we profligate
. d f h f 1 . 't .
may JU ge rom t e custom o u t1mogen1 ure as it is actua y. 11 practice.
observed by Mongoloid tribes akin to the Lolos, it seems
occupy the mountains to the south of 1880), pp. 16 sq.

Yachaufu '' (The Book of Ser Marco 2 For examples see E. W estermarck,
Polo, newly translated and edited by Marriage Cerenzonies in Moiocco (Lon-
Colonel Henry Yule, Second Edition, don, 1914), pp. 300 sqq. ; R. V.
London, 1875, vol. ii. p. 40). Russell, The Tribes and Castes of the
Central Provinces of India (London,
1Emile Rocher, La Province chinoi'se 1916), iii. 193, iv. 187. Similar in-
Yun-1tan, Deuxieme Partie {Paris, stances could, I believe, be multiplied.
534 THE HEIJ..'SHIJ' Of' JAC'Oli l'A R'J" I I
more probable that tl1e French write1 has unwitti11gly mis~

rep1esented and misinterpreted the Lolo rule of inheritance
than tl1at it is based on a profligate practice, of the existence
'
of which there is no evidence in this group of tribes.

The It is true that a custom of entrusting the defloration of
pfrachtice
o t e
brides at marriage
,
to men other than their husbands has
1
defloration undoubtedly been observed among not a few peoples, and
of brides by
strangers
h 1 t
that wherever sue a usage preva1 s it mus necessar1 y 'I
could not throw doubt on the legitimacy of the eldest child born after '
accot1nt for . . h
ultimo- mar11age. But this custom cannot be accepted as t e true
geniture. or probable explanation of ultimogeniture, and that for two
reasons : first, because the custom is not known to be
observed by any of the peoples who practise ultimogeniture;
and, second, because such a custom, though it might supply
a plausible reason for preferring the second child to the first-
born, could not explain the preference of the youngest to
all his elder brothers and sisters, which is the characteristic
feature of ultimogeniture. Thus even if we granted the
existence of a practice like that which is commonly, though
incorrectly, understood to be indicated by the phrase ;its

primae noctzs, it would not account for the very facts which
it is adduced to explain.
9. Ultz'mogenz'ture and Polygamy.

Theory Yet another theory has been proposed to account for
that ultimo-
geniture the origin of ultimogenitt1re. It has been said that among

arises polygamous peoples the last wife whom a man marries is
from a
preference generally the principal wife and the mother of the heir, who
for the 1 For evidence see W. H;ertz, '' Die
youngest band's father. The intercourse between
wife in a Sage vom Giftmadchen,'' Gesanimelte the two takes place in the spirit or
polygam- Abhandlunge1t (Stuttgart and Berlin, goblin house of the village ; the man
ous family. 1905), pp. 195 sqq. ; and for references personates a spirit or goblin ; and the
to the authorities who have recorded child which he has by the woman is
the custom, see Adonz's, Attis, Osiris, called the spirit-child or goblin-child.
Third Edition, i. 57 sqq. The custom See Richard Thurnwald, '' Banaro
is reported to be observed in some Society,'' Me1noirs of the Ame1i'ca1i
parts of Morocco. See Ed. Wester- Anthropological Association, vol. iii.
marck, Marriage Cerenionies in Morocco No. 4 (October-December, 1916), pp.
(London, 1914), pp. 269 sq. In the 261 sqq. Yet it does not appear that
Banaro tribe of northern New Guinea among the Banaro this custom has led
a woman's first child after marriage is to a preference for younger sons over
regularly begotten on her, not by her the firstborn.
..
'

husband, but by a friend of her hus- - .:-:
. .
CHAP. II ULTJMOGENJTURE AND POLYGAMY 535
is, or may be, the youngest son of the father. On tl1is
view, ultimogeniture rests, or may rest, in polygamous
society on a preference for the youngest son of the last
wife. This theory was independently suggested by the late
Sir Laurence Gomme and Dr. Br. Nicholson; and both of
them appealed in confirmation of it to the customs of the
Kafir tribes of South Africa, among whom they apparently
supposed the practice of ultimogeniture to prevail. 1 The But the
rtac t s, so f;ar as I am acqua1nte
d wit h t h em, seem rat h er African
evidence,
to refute than to confirm the theory that has been built to which
upon them. For, in the first place, among the polygamous ~~~ocates
peoples of Africa the principal or great wife is generally the of this
theory
first, not the last, to be married by the husband ; and, in appeal,
the second place, whether she is the first, or the last, or an rat
seehms
er to
intermediate wife, it is not her youngest but her eldest son 1efute than
who regularly succeeds to the inheritance. In short, the ~~support
principle which regulates the succession both of property
and of power in the great majority of polygamous African
tribes is not ulti1nogeniture but primogeniture ; which is
just the contrary of what we should expect if ultimogeniture
were a natural consequence of polygamy. All the evidence
that I have been able to discover for the practice of ultimo-
2
geniture in Africa has already been laid before the reader.
It is meagre in quantity and to some extent doubtful in
quality. The evidence for the practice of primogeniture in
Africa, on the contrary, is both abundant and trustworthy.
To deal with it at large would be out of place here. I shall
content myself with citing such facts as bear directly on the
IG. Laurence Gomme, ''On archaic one Vl'hich can account for the origin
conceptions of property in relation to of ultimogeniture ; on the contrary he
the Laws of Succession, and their sur- accepts the ordinary and (as I believe)
vival in England,'' Archaeologia, or the correct explanation of ultimogeni-
Miscellaneous Tracts relating to Anti- ture in Europe, namely, that ''it
quz'ty, published by the Socz'ety of Antz'- originated in the tribal practice of the
quaries of Lo11do1z, vol. 1. (London, elder sons going ottt of the tribal house-
1887) pp. 212 sq. (1eferring to Mac- hold to found tribal households of their
Jean's Ka.fir Laws and Custo111s, p. own, thus leaving the youngest to in-
26) ; z'd., Folklore as an Historical herit the original homestead'' (Folk-lore
Science (London, I 908 ), pp. 17 1- I 74 ; as an Hz'storical Science, pp. 171 sq.).
Br. Nicholson, M.D., '' Heirship of But he thinl{s that ai'nong savages who
the Youngest among the Kafirs,'' The practice polygamy the r11le of ultimo-
Ar~aeologz'cal Revz'ew, ii. (London, geniture arises throt1gh a preference for
I 889 ), pp. I 6 3- I 66. Sir Laurence the son of the last wife.
Gomme is careful to state that he does
not put this theory forward as the only 2 Above, pp. 476-481.
THE HEI!~SHIP OF JAl'OB f'ART rr
questions raised by the theory under discussion. 1'11ese

questions are two. First, what is the position of the
principal or '' great '' wife, the mother of the heir, in a
polyga1nous family? Is she generally the last wife married,
as the theory supposes, or is she not? Second, what is the
position of the heir among the children of the principal or
''great'' wife? Is he generally the youngest son, as the
theory supposes, or is he not? The following facts appear
to answer both these questions in the negative.
Superiority In Senegambia ''polygamy is admitted in principle
~~:ehfnfirst and exists in practice among the Wolofs, as among
Sene- all the Mohammedans. The hu~band may take as
f;:.1r~a, many as three legitimate wives and as many concubines
Leone, and as he can afford. The first legitimate wife, who bears
Guinea.
the title of awho, has extensive prerogatives in the
household, owns the finest house, and has the right of
1
first choice of presents offered to the family." In regard
to the tribes of Sierra Leone we are told that ''polygamy
is universally practised upon this coast, which tends still
more to debase the female sex. Every man may have
as many wives as his circumstances will allow him to
maintain ; his wealth is therefore estimated according to this

criterion, and he rises in the esteem of his neighbours in

'
proportion to the number of his women. . . . The first wife
a man takes enjoys a greater share of respect than the
others, and retains the title of head woman, with a degree
of enviable authority, long after her personal charms have
2
ceased to enslave her husband's affections." At Great
Bassam, on the Ivory Coast, '' as in the Gaboon, so here
the wife first married is almost always the favourite. She
possesses the full confidence of her husband, prepares him
his food, rules the whole household, and has besides the
right to cohabit with the head of the family oftener than
3
the other wives." To the same effect another \vriter
informs us that on the Ivory Coast ''the first wife enjoys a
special authority. She commands the others, she has often
1 L. J. B. Berenger-Feraud, Les hood of Sierra Leone (London, 1803),
peuplades de la Sbz!gambie (Paris, pp. 145-147.
1879), p. 40. 3 Iiyacinth Hecquard, Reise an dz"e
2 Thomas Winterbottom, Account of
Kiiste iend z"n das Innere von West-
the Native Africans in the neighbour- Afn"ka (Leipsic, 1854), p. 44 .

CHAP. II ULTifi10GENITURE AND POLYGAMY 537
authority over all the children of the house, especially over
the daughters. The husband who desires to take another
wife must obtain the co11sent of the first, to whom all the
1
wives owe a certain deference.'' Speaking of the natives
of the coast of Guinea in general, an old writer observes,
''Those \vho are rich, have two wives perpetually exempted
from labour ; the first of which is the oldest and principal
. \Vife, here called La M uliere Grande, or the chief woman ; to
whom the house-keeping and command over all the rest is
entrusted. The second is she who is consecrated to his god,
and thence called Bossum, of whom he is very jealous, and
so much enraged if any man kisses her, that if he could do
it private!)', he would so severely punish her that she would
not be able to serve l1im so again ; but as for the remainder
of his wives, he doth not watch them so narrowly, especially
2
if he can get any money by them." On the Slave Coast,
''one of the wives, usually the first, has the name of iya'lle,
' mistress of the house.' That does not mean that the
master allows her to stand on a footing of equality with
him. She approaches the master more nearly than the
others ; she prepares and serves the meals ; she manages
everything in the interior of the house and looks after its
good administration ; she has a real precedence over the
other wives, and up to a certain point she enters into the
secrets and the plans of the master whose immediate and
3
habitual servant she is."
The Ewe-speaking peoples of Togoland believe that Superiority
their souls lived in another world before they were born ~::=~:~tg
upon earth. Further, it is an article of their creed that the E~e-
.1n t h at ot h er wor Id every man h a d b ut one w11e,
.r an d 1t
. speaking
peoples of
is tacitly assumed that the first wife \vhom he marries the Slave
. h h . d Coast,
here on earth 1s the same woman to w om e was marr1e and among
in the spiritual realm. She is the only true and proper the Hausas
. of North
wife given by God and the Mother of Sp1r1ts to him. If he Africa.
fails to find her here belo\v, and marries another, his spirit-
wife will continually disturb his domestic bliss, and she
1 G. Joseph, ''Condition de la Guinea,'' in J. Pinkerton's General
femme en Cote d'Ivoire,'' Bulletz'ns et Collection of Voyages a1id Travels
Memoires de la Socz'ete d' Anthropologie (London, 1808-1814), xvi. 419 sq.
de Paris, vie Serie, iv. (1913) p. 589. 3 Pierre Bouche, La Cote des Esclaves
2 William Bosman, ''The Coast of (Paris, 1885), p. 14 ....
THE HEIRSI:!IP OF JACO!i f'ART II
1
inust be appeased with sacrifices and gifts. Polygamy
prevails a1nong the Ewe-speaking peoples of the Slave
Coast. Each wife has her own separate dwelling in the
enclosure in which her husband's house stands, and her
children and slaves reside \vith her. '' The first wife is
termed the 'head-wife'; she supervises the internal arrange-
ments of the entire 11ousehold, is consulted by her husband,
and sometimes her. opinion has weight. The second wife
acts as the assistant of the head-wife; those married later
are all classed together. It is unusual, except amongst
2
chiefs, for a man to have more than four or five wives."
Among the Yoruba-speaking people of the Slave Coast in
like manner ''each wife has her own house, situated in the
'compound' of the husband, and her own slaves and
dependents. The wife first married is the head wife, and is
charged with the preservation of order among the women.
She is styled Iyale (Iya ile), 'Mistress of the house.' The
jt1nior wives are called JYawo (Iya owo), 'Trade-wives' or
' \tVive~ of commerce,' probably because they sell in the
3
markets." In Dahomey '' the subject is allowed as many
concubines as he can maintain ; but the first wife is alone
considered the legitimate one. She superintends and directs
all tl1e dom,estic duties, and all must be subject to her
4
control." Among the Hausas of North Africa ''the first-
born son of any wife is the eldest son, and ranks accord-
ingly, but the first wife is the chief, or Uwar-Gida (Mother
of the House) a11d is in charge of the others." 5
'
Among the Ekoi of Southern Nigeria, on the border of

1 Jakob Spieth, Die Ewe-Stii11t11ie wrote throughout from personal obser-
(Berlin, 1906), pp. 63 sq. On the vation, and whose book on the Ewe
other hand another German writer, tribes is one of the most thorough
speaking of Togoland, affirms that monographs ever published on an
''among the Ewe negroes a man who African people.
is in a position to keep several wives 2
(Sir) A. B. Ellis, The Ewe-speak-
generally has two or three. In that ing peoples of the Slave Coast of West
case for the most part the favourite Africa (London, 1890), pp. 204 sq.
wife is the younger, who ornaments 3
(Sir) A. B. Ellis, The Yoruba-
herself, serves only for the husband's speaking peoples of the .'>lave Coast of
pleasure, and bears rule over the other West Africa (London, 1894), pp. 182 sq.
wives'' (H. Klose, Togo unter deutscher 4
F. T. Valdez, Six Years of a
Flagge, Berlin, 1899, p. 254). But Traveller's Life in Western Africa
the authority of this latter writer, whose (London, 186 1), i. 346.
work is partly a compilation from p1e 5
A. J. N. Tremearne, The Ban of
vious publications, is not equal to that the Bori (London, preface dated 1914),
of the missionary Jakob Spieth, who p. 122.

CHAP, II ULTIMOGENITURE AND POLYGAMY 539
tl1e Cameroons, ''on marriage the wife becomes a member Superiority

f h h b d ' [; 'I d 1. h.
o er us an s am1 y, an goes to 1ve 1n 1s compoun . wife in d of the first
A man's first wife is always the head of the house. The Southern
younger wives obey her and consider her in everything. ~~geria,
Therefore a wife likes her husband to marry plenty of other Gaboon,
women. The chief complaint of cruelty brought by the ~f~:~ncb
wife of Njabong of Oban before the Native Court was that Congo.
1
her husband refused to marry anyone but herself." Among
the M'Pongos of the Gaboon ''polygamy is permitted, and
every man takes as many wives as he believes he can
support. However, the wife \vhom he married first bears
rule over all his other wives. She alone has the
keys to everything, knows where the money is hidden,
generally tastes first all the foods and drinks offered to
l1er husband, lest they should be poisoned, and is named
2
the Great Wife." In the Shekiani tribe, to the south of
the Gaboon River, '' each man has generally a head or chief
wife mostly the woman he married first ; and for any one
to have criminal intercourse with this woman ranks as a
most heinous crime, for which the offender is at least sold
into slavery. When the hsband forms new marriage con-
nexions, and, as often happens, his new bride is but a child,
she is then put under the care and guardianship of the head
3
wife, who brings her up to the proper age.'' In Angola
''the men take as many wives as they can maintain, but the
first has some authority over the others, if her marriage was
4
celebrated with Christian rites." Among the Bayas, who
inhabit the right bank of the Kadei River in French Congo,
on the border of the Cameroons, '' with the exception of the
first and oldest of a man's wives, who always keeps her
priority over the others, there is perfect equality among all
the wives of the household. Each of the other wives
flatters the oldest by presents, so as to be distinguished by
her and to be appointed to succeed her at her death in the
5
domestic command.''
I P. Amaury Talbot, In the Shadow (London, 1861), p. 162.
of the Bush (London, 1912), p. 109. 4 0. Dapper, Descripti"on de l' Afrique
2 H. Hecquard, Rez"se an dt"e Kiiste (Amsterdam, 1686), P. 367.
und in das I1tnere von West-Afrika 5 A. Poupon, '' Etude ethnogra-
(Leipsic, 1854), p. 8. phique des Baya de la circonscription
3 Paul B. du Chaillu, Explorations du M'bimou, '' L' Anthropologt."e, xxvi.
and Adventures i"n Equatorial Africa (1915) p. 125.
l'HE HEIR.S'JffJY Or' JACOJI PAR'f II
540
St1pe1iority Among the Baganda of Ce11tral Africa ''there were no

ofif the r restrictions as to the number of wives that a man might take
rst Wl1e "f
an1011g the from one clan ; he might even marry two or three sisters, 1
Bagatlda of he wished to do so. When a man married more than one
Cent1al
Africa. wife, he built a separate house for each ; the houses were
generally side b)r side, and were enclosed by a fe11ce. He
had his own house in front of the women's quarters, and the
wives visited him, and slept in his house, when he invited
1
them to do so." With regard to the order of precedence
among Baganda wives, and the rule of inheritance among
their children, my experienced friend, Mr. John Roscoe, our
principal authority on the tribe, writes to me, ''My African
knowledge leads me to agree fully with you about the first
wife being the principal wife. In Uganda she was called
Kadttlubare (the little guardian of theLubare), because she took
charge of all her husband's fetishes and directed all worship
and offerings during his absence. She also had chief
authority over his wives and was responsible for their moral
conduct, especially during her husband's absence. So far as
I can remember, she was never divorced. The ultimogeni-
ture theory does not at present com1nend itself to me for
any solution of African law of inheritance. All children in
Uganda belonged to the clan, and a man's property belonged
to the clan ; hence any member might be chosen to inherit
a certain property, though he was not a son. . . . I have 110
theory to offer as to how a man is chosen fro1n a clan to
inherit. I cannot remember any special rule having ever
2
been suggested." From this account, which may be
regarded as authoritative, we gather that among the
Baganda inheritance was regulated neither by primogeni-
ture nor by ultimogeniture.
Superiority Among the Nandi of British East Africa ''a man may
of the first
wife in marry as many wives as he can support, and rich men have
East
Africa. I Rev. John Roscoe, The Baganda or going to war ; ft1rther that a man
(London, 191 l), p. 83. was compelled to take his second wife
2 Rev. John Roscoe, in a letter to
from his paternal grandmother's clan,
me, dated ''Ovington Rectory, Thet- and that this second wife, whom he
ford, l4th July 1916.'' Compare J. called Nasaza, ''had her special duties,
Roscoe, The Baganda (London, I 9 l r ), such as shaving him, Cutting his nails,
p. 83, from which we learn that it was and so disposing of the hair and nail-
with his first wife that a man was chips that they should not fall into an
bound t.o fulfil the taboos of journeying enemy's hands.''
CHAP. Il ULTIMOGENITURE AND POLYGA1WY 541
had as many as forty wives. Each wife has her own house,
and with her children attends to a portion of her husband's
property, both live-stock and plantations. The first wife is
always the chief wife, and her eldest son is considered the
eldest son of the family, even if one of the other wives
1
bears a son first." '' In Masai families the first wife
remains the chief wife, even if she ceases to be a favourite,
and the arrangement of the affairs of the household is in
2
her hands." Among the Wanyamwesi of German East
Africa ''polygamy of course exists, but the first wife. is
considered the principal one," and ''at a man's death the
eldest son of his principal wife inherits the larger portion
3
of the property, including the other wives of his father."
Similarly among the Sangos of German East Africa
'' the wife first married is the chief wife. She takes pre-
cedence of all others. The husband must build her house
for her first, and so on. The other wives occupy a sub-
ordinate position in regard to her. Nevertheless her
children, in the matter of inheritance, are only on an
equality with .the children of the other wives. An excep-
tion is made among chiefs. The eldest son of this wife is
the ruler, but gets no more of the inheritance than the
4
other children.'' Among the tribes on the south-eastern
.
1 A. C. Hollis, The Nandi, their W. Felkin, Uganda and the Egyptian

Language a1zd Folk-lore (Oxford, 1909), Souda1z (London, 1882), i. 187, 188,
p. 64. ii. 49 ; W. Bosman, ''The Coast of
2 S. L. Hinde and H. Hinde, The Guinea,'' in John Pinkerton's Voyages
Last ef the Masai (London, 1901), p. and T1-avels (London, 1808-18I4),
76. xvi. 480, 528 ; H. Ling Roth, Great
3 Lionel Decle, Three Years in .!Jav- Benin (Halifax, 1903), p. 97; N. W.
age Africa (London, 1898), p. 348. In Thomas, Anthropologz'cal Report on the
many other African tribes it is similarly Edo-Speaking Peoples ef Nigeria, Part
customary for the eldest son, as i. (London, I910) pp. 69, 74, 75, 76,
principal heir, to inherit all his father's 78, 79, 86, 87 ; Theodor Waitz,
wives except his own mother. For Anthropologie der Naturvolkei- (Leipsic,
examples see L. Decle, op. cit. p. 486 ; 1860-1877), ii. 115; A. H. Post,
Entin Pasha in Central Africa (Lon- Afrikanische Jurisprudenz (Oldenburg
don, 1888), pp. 86, 209, 230; Franz and Leipsic, 1887), i. 419 sqq. Ab-
Stuhlmann, Mit Emin Pascha z"ns salom's treatment of his father's con-
Herz von Aftz"ka (Berlin, 1894), pp. cubines (2 Samuel xvi. 21 sq.) suggests
93, 525; E. Nigmann, Dz'e Wahehe that a similar custom tormerly obtained
(Berlin, I908), p. 61 ; John Roscoe, in Israel.
The Northern Bantu (Cambridge, 4 Missionar Heese, '' Sitte und
I9I5), pp. 26I, 263; John H. Weeks, Brauch der Sango,'' Aichiv fur An-
Among. Congo Cannz'bals (London, thropologie, Neue Folge, xii. (1913) p.
1913), p. III; C. T. Wilson and R. I 37
i
542 THE HEIRSHIP OF JACOB l'AR'J' II
banks of Lake Tanganyika ''when the father of a family

is polygamous, he must build a different house for each
of his wives. The first in date has always the first
rank, and generally lives in the principal house. The
secondary \Vives have all therefore their separate estab-
lishments and receive the husband at their table accord-
ing to his good pleasure, but in a rotation of a sort ;
for customary law obliges him to hold the balance
1
nearly even." ''We have said that the first wife kept
a superior position in the family. She is dressed more
elegantly and stylishly. It is she who distributes to the
secondary wives the meat, fish, beans, and everything that,
with ougalz', makes up the ordinary fare. In this distribu-
tion she naturally reserves for herself a share proportionate
to her rank. She has also the special right of enjoying,
for herself and her children, the property of her husband,
when he at his death leaves no surviving brother. This
peculiar position is not subject to the caprice of the husband.
It cannot be infringed unless the first wife chooses to quit
2
the family hearth." Moreover, in these tribes ''the children
of the first . wife are regarded as the eldest of the family
and tal<:e precedence over the children of later wives." 3
Superiority Among the Ainamwanga and Awiwa of North-Eastern
~;ehfnfirst Rhodesia ''the first wife married by law and custom is
North- treated as superior to the second wife, who may have had
Eastern
Rhodesia only a proxy-Bwznga marriage or even no ce1emony at
and British all. But an inherited wife carries with her her previous
Central
Africa. status. Thus the widow of an elder brotl1er, on being
, inherited, ranks officially before the first wife of her in-
heritor (the deceased man's brother); she has the privilege
of joining in the prayers and assisting in the other rites of
family worship. The husband may still show his private
preference for the wife of his choice, though to neglect an
inherited wife would be considered very wrong if done in
4
public." Among the Angoni of British Central Africa
1 Mgr. Lechaptois, Aux Rives dze 4
J. C. C. Coxhead, The Native Tribes
Tanganz'ka (Algiers, r9r3), p. 125. of North-Eastern Rliodesia, thez'r Laws
2 Mgr. Lechaptois, Aux Rives du
and Custo1ns (London, r9r4), p. 52.
Tanganika, pp. I 26 sq. (The !?oyal Anthropological Institute, '
3 Mgr. Lechaptois, Aux Rives du '

Occasional Papers, No. 5). Bwinga ''
Tanganika, p. 123. is the native name for the marriage '

'
',
'
- :.;
CHAP. II ULTIMOGENITURE AND POLYGAMY 543
'' the woman a man first marries is, looked upon as

his head wife ; '' and the law of succession is ''that
the eldest son of the chief, by his first wife (should she
have been secured by purchase), shall succeed the father.
Should he have only female issue, a daughter vill succeed,
1
should the chief have no brother.'' Among the Anyanjas,
at the southern end of Lake Nyasa, ''the first wife is the
head wife, she does no cleaning nor cooking ; a man may
change his head wife, but must sleep equally with each
wife, otherwise she may bring a case against him ; each
wife lives in a separate house, occasionally in a room of a
2
large one." Among the tribes of British Central Africa,
''the chief wife is generally the woman that was married
first. There may be exceptions. For instance, if the
'
principal \vife be betrothed in infancy to a full-grown man,
this man will take a female ' to fill the place of the betrothed
infant.' After being married for a year or two the husband
is almost expected to get junior wives. These the chief
wife, as a matter of courtesy, calls her younger siste1s
(apwao). We have seen instances, however, when a great
strife arose on the introduction of the other \Vives, and
where the chief wife would threaten a separation, and carry
it out too. But these' were instances rather of self-will
than of conformity to the customs of the country. It is an
object of common aspiration to be possessed of five wives.
'
The chief wife has the superintendence of the domestic
and agricultural establishment. She keeps the others at
their work, and has power to exercise discipline upon them.
The punishment she inflicts for laziness is to banish junior
wives from meals until hunger bring them to their senses.
When a junior wife is very obstreperous her superior may
put her in a slave stick. The authority of the chief wife
is not a matter to jest with. I know of a case of a junior
v;rife that had' her infant child promptly put upon the fire
ceremony, ''The Bwinga was per- 1 R. Sutherland Rattray, Some Folk-

formed by the husband in person for lore Stories and Songs in Chi"nya1z;a
the first wife, but for a second wife the (London, i907), pp. 188 sq., 202.
husband was represented by a young, ll H. S. Stannus, ''Notes on some
boy who went through the ceremony Tribes of , British Central Africa,''
as his proxy'' (J. C. C. Coxhead, op. Journal of the Royal Anthropological
cit. p. 50). Insti"tute, xl. ( 1910) p. 309.
THE HEIRSIIIJJ OF JACOJI PAR'l' II
544
by this terrible overseer. When a man is severely pressed
by some legal action a11d has to pay heavy fines, he begins
by selling off his junior wives. When reduced to one wife
he has reached the highest point of distress. His free wife
1
he cannot sell as she is under the protection of her surety."
In the old native kingdom of Monomotapa, which bordered
on Sofala in Portuguese East Africa, '' a man is allowed to
take as many wives as he can keep, but the first remains the
mistress ; her children are the heirs, and the other wives are
' regarded as little better than serva11ts. The king has more
than a thousand \vives, who are all daughters of his vassals ;
but the first is the queen, and the eldest of her children is
2
the heir to the throne.''
Superiority The preceding examples, drawn from widely separated
of the first
wife in tribes of Western, Central, and Eastern Africa, appear to
Western, raise a presu1nption that in these regions the principal wife
Central,
and of a polygamous family is generally she whom the husband
Eastern first married. It remains to consider the Bantu or, as they
Africa.
are commonly called, the Kafir tribes of South Africa, on
whose marriage customs the particular theory of ultimo-
geniture, which we are now discussing, has been especially
founded.
Superiority Among the Herero, a tribe of nomadic herdsmen in
0
~,,the
w11eamong
first South-Western Africa, it is the custom for chiefs or men rich
the Herero in cattle to marry a number of wives in proportion to their
of South-
Western wealth. ''The first wife gets the title of 01nunene, the
Africa. ' great wife.' Her hut is distinguished from those of the
other wives by its size, by the number of hides which form
the roof, and by the large quantity of firewood lying on the
roof or stacked round about. But the owner of the kraal

does not live in the hut of the 'great wife' ; he inhabits a

1 Duff Macdonald, A.fricana (Lon- tion holds good of one or all of these
don, Edinburgh, and Aberdeen, 1882), tribes.
i. 134 sq. As usual, this writer gives
no indication of the particular tribes to 2 0. Dapper, Descriptz'on de l'A.frique
which his description applies. l\1iss (Amsterdan1, 1686), p. 391. For more
Alice Werner's account of the marriage evidence as to the superiority of the
customs of these tribes is also some- first wife in polygamous marriages in
what vague, but in the course of it she Africa, see A. H. Post, A.frz'kanische
mentions the Yaos, Anyanjas, and Jurisp1udenz (Oldenburg and Leipsic,
Angonis (The Natives o.fBritish Central 1887), i. 312, by whom many of the.
Africa, London, 1906, pp. 132 sq.). foregoing instances have already been
Perhaps Mr. Duff Macdonald's descrip- cited.
CHAP. II ULTI1lfUGENITURE A1VD POLYGA11fY 545
hut of his own. The other \Vives are called oz,011Lba11da,
that is, ' the \vomen taken afte1\vards.' Their huts stand
round about in the kraal or at a distance on t11e larger
1
cattle stations." The rules of inheritance among t11e
Herero are complicated by the existence of a ct1rious double
system of clans, one set hereditary in the paternal and the
2
other hereditary in the maternal line ; but it may be said
broadly that in the tribe descent both of pO\\'er and of
property is traced in tl1e female line a11d is regt1lated by
tl1e principle of primogeniture. Tl1us the cl1ieftainsl1ip
descends, not to the cl1ief s O\\'n eldest son, but to the eldest
3
son of his eldest sister ; in tl1e pater11al cla11s the property
descends, not to a man's own eldest son, but to the eldest so11
4
of his eldest sister ; and in the maternal clans p1ope1ty
descends to the eldest sister of the deceased, \vhetl1e1 man
5
or woman. Thus in every case pri1noge11iture, not ultimo-
geniture, controls the inheritance.
Among the Ovambo, another Bantu tribe of South- St1pcriority
Western Africa, polyga1ny also prevails ; the ricl1er a man ~;;.st:i~~ifc~
is, the more wives he has ; chiefs often have ten or fifteen a111or1g the
or even more. A mong t h e wives . th l h Ovan1lJo of
ere rs a ways one w o s 011111 _
ranks as the pri11cipal wife, and generally she is the 011e whom \Ve.ste111
the husband first married. 6 The descent of po\ver and ;\frica.
property is regulated among the Ovambo, as among the
Herero, by the principles of mother-kin and primogeniture;
hence the chieftainship descends, not to the late chief's
eldest sor1, but to his eldest surviving brother, or, failing a
7
brother, to the eldest son of his eldest sister. Here again
the1e is no hint of ultimogeniture.
Among the Basutos also polygamy is customary, and Superiority
. f 11 h . . t d .
'' t h e marriage o a t e \Vives is contrac e 1n a s1m1 ar first wife . 1 of the
manner ; but a very marked distinction exists bet\veen the among the
first and those \vho succeed her. The choice of the great Basutos.
wife (as she is always called) is g~nerally made by the
father, and is an event in which all the relations are
1 J. Irle, Die Herero (Glitersloh, 3 J. Irle, Die Herero, p. 137.
1906), p. 109. 4J. Irle, Die Herero, p. 146.
2 J. Irle, Die Herero, pp. 144 sqq.
5 J. Irle, Die Herero, p. 14 5.
As to this double system of clans,
6 H. Tonjes, Ovanzboland, Land,
namely the otztzo (paternal clans) and
the omaanda (maternal clans}, see Leute, Mission (Berlin, 1911), p. 132.
Tote11zism and Exoga11ry, ii. 357 sqq. 7 H. Tonjes, op. cit. pp. 130 sq.
"lTAT 1 ?N
THE JIEIRSHJJJ OI'']ACOR I' A R'l' I I
interested. The others, who are designated by the name of

se1ete (heels), because they must on all occasions hold an
inferior position to the mistress of the house, are articles of
luxury, to which the parents are not obliged to contribute.
These wives of a second order are exactly what Bilhah and
Zilpah were to Jacob. In the reigning families, only the
children of the great wife have the right of succeeding their
fathe1. The chief of the Basutos can hardly keep an
account of the children that are born to him ; still, when
asked by foreigners how many he has, he answers ' Five,'
only alluding to those of his first wife. He says sometimes
that he is a widower, which means that he has lost his real
\Vife, and has not raised one of his sixty concubines to the
rank she occupied. She has been dead for more than
twenty years, and her dwelling is kept in perfect order, and
still bears her name. The chief would have thought he
was offering an insult to the memory of' the deceased by
introducing another partner to this retreat, where the sons
of Mamohato take up their abode when they visit their
native village. . . . The inheritance of the father belongs of
right to the sons of the first wife ; and these, with the
eldest at their head, give what they choose to the other
offspring of their father. . . . The idea of that which is
improper and anomalous in polygamy is so inherent in
every human conscience, that many natives dread dying
near a wife of second order; that is called, in the language
of the Basutos, 'making a bad death.' The \Vives of the
first rank consider their rights so firmly established, that, in
certain cases, they themselves encourage their husbands to
become polygamists. They are prompted by motives of
interest and idleness, as they intend to put off upon others .
the most laborious of their occupations." 1
These facts lend no countenance to the view of those

who look for ultimogeniture among the Kafirs, a11d who
find the origin of the custom in a preference for the ,
last over the first wife of a polygamous family. How-
ever, it is true that in a certain group of Kafir tribes in
South-Eastern Africa the principal wife of a chief and the
.. .

mother of his heir is often not his first wife, and that she . '

'
_, ' ''
.~
1 J
E. Casalis, The Basutos (London, 1861), pp. 186-188. :)
--~
.:~
CI-IAP. II ULTIMOGENITURE ANJJ POLYGAMY 547
may be even his last wife. But it is to be carefully observed, I11 some
first, that even in tribes where the principal wife of a chief tr1 K.abfir ,
es 01
is usually one of his later wives, the principal wife of a South-
. t"ll 1 h fi . d d
commo11er is s I as a ru e t e rst marr1e ; an , secon , ,\frica d Eastern
even whe1e the principal wife of a chief is a later wife or a ?hi~f's

the last wife, it is still not her youngest but her eldest son fv~~~c~~~
who inherits the chieftainship, so that 11ere also, as in most the motl1er
. . b . .
Afr1can tr1 es, succession Is regu atel d b . . of his !1eir
y pr1mogen1ture and is often
not by ultimogeniture. not hi~
"b . h" h h . I first wife.
A mongst t he B antu tr1 es in \V IC t e pr1ncipa wife S11periority
is commonly either the first or a later wife according as her fiofrsttlie. \V1fe
husband is a commoner or a chief, are the Tho11ga, who among
inhabit the southern part of Mozambique, about Delagoa f~~:oners
Bay. In this tribe, so far as the families of commoners are Tl1onga
concerned, '' the first wife is certainly the most respected ; tribe.
she is called the 'great one' (nsati' li"we' nkulu) ; those \vho
are taken in marriage afterwards being the 'little wives.'
She is the true wife and acts as such in some old rites,
those which accompany widowhood and the foundation of
1
the village." '' There are amongst the Th.onga some
striking customs, giving to the ' first ' or 'great ' wife a
special position, which seem to confirm the hypothesis of a
primitive monogamy. The first of these is the ritual
incision made by the first wife in the inguinal region after
the death of the husband ; it is not performed by the other
widows. In the same r.,ay the widower accomplishes this
rite only after the death of the first wife and not when
' little wives ' die; The second one is met with, in the rite
of the foundation of the village ; . . . the first wife has a
special part to play in these significant customs. When
I asked Magingi, an old Rikatla heathen, why such a
difference was made between the first wife and . her co-wives,
he told me : 'The first one is the true one and the others
are but thieves. That is why it is said at the death of the
first wife : '' the house of the husband has been crushed ''
(a tj"hobekelwi hi yindlu ya kwe). When another dies, it is
2
only said : ''he has lost a wife (a felwi ht" nsati")." '''

l Henri A. Junod, The Lift of a 2 Henri A. Junod, The Life of a
South African Tri'be (Neuchatel, 1912- South African Tribe, i. 272 sq.
1913), i. 186 sq.
THE HEIRSHIP OF JACO!i T'AR'I.' I I
But an1ong But \vhile among Thonga commoners the first wife is
T 11011 ga the principal wife and occupies a position of strongly marl<ed
cl1iefs the
principal superiority over the wives whom the husband marries after-
,,,ife is
ge11era11y
wards '
among Thonga chiefs the principal wife, the mother
not tl1e fi1st of the heir to the th1one, is usually not the first but a later
\vife btit a w1re. 1 She is called ''the wife of the country,'' perhaps
later 011e. '
because the lord of the land is to be born from her, or
perhaps rather because it is a rule that she must be bought
with 1noney collected from all the people. Yet though she
is in a sense the principal wife, she does not rank as the
equal of. the first wife in certain respects ; for at her death
the chief does not have an incision 1nade in his groin, as he
, does at the death of 11is first wife : in short, on a corn parison
between tl1ese two wives ''the first in date remains the first
1
from the ritual point of view."
This If we asl< why, in contrast to the wives of Tl1onga
stiperiority
of a later commoners, the principal wife of a Thonga chief should
\vife is said not be the one whom he married first, the answer
to spring .
from a appears to be that the custom rests on a curious aversion
Tlionga which the chief entertains to seeing his grandchild ; ''there
chiefs
relucta11ce is a saying, a precept of the royal code, as follows : Hosi a yi
t~ sede hhi_sld fa1zeli' ku bona ntukulu, a chief must never see his grandson,
g1 an c 1 .
i.e. the one who will eventually succeed his son in the royal
line." Hence in order to satisfy his father in this respect
the heir does not marry his official wife, the '' wife of the
country,'' until after his father's death, and thus he spares
the old man the pain of looking on the face of the grand-
child \vho will be his next successor but one on the throne.
But the heir, if he is of mature age, is at liberty to marry
other wives i11 his father's lifetime ; and the fi1st of these,
though she cannot give birth to the heir, \Vill always possess
the usual superiority in religious ritual over all the sub-
sequent wives, including the ''wife of the co.untry,'' the
mother of the heir. 2
Suggested The writer who records these custoqis does not assign
reason
for tl1is any motive for a chiefs reluctance to behold the grand-
aversion child who will ultimately reig11 after him. It may be that
of a chief h
to see his t e reluctance springs merely from a natural unwillingness
grandchild: 1 He11ri A. J 11nod, op. cit.
I. 27 3, 2 Henri A. Junod, op. cit. i. 273,
341, 348, com1Jare p. 198. 342 sq.
CHAP. II ULTI1ifOGENITURE AND POLYGA11Y 549
on the part of the chief to be reminded of the lapse of time fo1merly

1
and the approach of the 11our when he mt1st quit the stage cpherhfaps 1e may
tl e
to make room for another. Yet it is difficult to suppose l1ave lJeen
.
th a t a sen t imen t so con t rary to th e instinctive
l ove o f or
supe1sedecl
killecl on
offspring could suffice to originate the custom in question ; the birth of

an d accord ing y1 I h d h l . a gra11clso11.
ave conjecture t at t 1e aversion to This ex-
beholding a son's son dates from a time vvhen the birth of a planation is
confirn1ed
grandson was the signal for deposing or even putting to by a sirnilar
death the chief his o-randsire on the plea that a grandfather reltictai1ce
' b ' 011 the part
1
must be too old and feeble to handle the reins of povve1. of a cl1ief
The conjecture is confirmed by tl1e observation that in to see his
O\VIl son.
these tribes the chief apparently entertains a similar objectio11
to looking on the face even of the infant son, his o~'n off-
spring, who will afterwards reign -in his stead. For when his
principal wife, she who is called ''the wife of the country,"
perceives that she will in due course present her lord with an
heir,. she is sent away, under pretext of illness, from the
capital into one of the provinces. It may not be whispered
abroad that she is with child, for, from this moment, every
precaution must be taken to hide the future chief. If the
infant should prove to be a boy, the knowledge of it is kept
secret. Only the most renowned doctors of the country,
whose loyalty to the chief is beyond reproach, assemble to
watch the birth and to prepare the precious fluid, which,
drunk by the infant daily, is believed to promote its growth
even better than its mother's mill<:. When the queen vvalks
about carrying the baby on her back, she covers it with
a cloth to prevent any one from seeing whether it be a boy
or a . girl. She will even dress the boy in girl's cloth-
ing, because it is dangerous~ to say in a loud voice, ''This
child will be a chief.'' Such an imprudent declaration would
bring bad luck on the little one, and to dress him in boy's
2
clothes would be equally disastrous. All these precautions
to conceal the birth of an heir may be inte11ded to soothe
the jealousy of the child's father, by removing from his sight
the youthful rival who is one day to supplant him.
'
Unnatural as such paternal jealousy may seem to us, it

1 See above, pp. 480 sq. South Africa1i Tribe, i. 341. As to

the medicine administered to infants to
2 Henri A. Junod, The Life of a malce them grow, see i"d. i. 46 sq.
'
55 THE I-IEll~.Sr/JJ> OJ'' JA l'()!J l'AJ{'J' II
1"01n1e1ly might easily 11ave originated under an old rule of succession

tile birth of like that which prevailed in Polynesia and 1)articularly in
a so11 or of
ag1a11dson Tahiti, \\'l1ere as soon as a king had a son born to him he
~~: ~~;e was compelled by custom to abdicate the throne in favour
sig11al for of the infant ; 1 for even whe11 the custom had been
~~fe~s~~g a abolished or had fallen into desuetude, the feelings which it
puttinghitll engendered might easily st1rvive and find expression in a
to death.
practice of concealing the royal infant from the eyes of his
jealous parent. On this hypothesis the declared reluctance
of a Thonga chief to see his grandson, and his apparent
reluctance to behold his own son, are both to be explained
as relics of an ancient usage of deposing, if not of killing,
the ruler as soon as he came to be regarded as super-
annuated, the signal for his. deposition or death being given
by the birth either of. a son or of a grandson. If that \Vas
so, it seems probable that the more stringent practice, which r
superseded a chief the moment he became a father, was
afterwards relaxed and replaced by a milder practice, which
suffered him to rule until he attained to the rank of a
grandfather. However, it is possible that the curious veil
of secrecy thrown over the birth and childhood of a Thonga

chiefs son is to be explained on a totally different principle
as designed to protect the infant from the baneful influence of
envious demons who lie in \Va it for children. The p1actice of
dressing the boy as a girl favours the latter interpretation ;
for such a change of costume is known to be adopted else-
2
\Vhere as a protection against the evil eye.
Among the tribes which occupy what used to be called
1 See The Dying God, p. 190 (The the son, the whole authority of the
Golden Boug!t, Third Edition, Part father vanishes ; and, howeve1 great
iii.). To the authorities there cited I or powe1ful he might have been before,
\Vould now add John Turnbull, Voyage he now becomes a petty chief. The
rou11d the Wo1ld (London, r8r3), pp. fatl1er of this king n1ade us a visit, b11t
134, 137, 1S-8 sq., 344, who says, \vith so little appearance of rank or
''By the laws of Otaheite the son, infl11ence, that had he not been pointed
i111mediately on his birth, st1cceeds to out to us as such, we sl1ould not have
the dignity of his fatl1er, the father known him ; he had absolutely nothing
from that instant becoming only ad- abo11t him which could lead to any
ministrator for his child '' (p. I 34) ; st1spicion that he was above the meanest
and again, ''The custom of the., son of his countrymen '' (pp. r 88 sq.).
disinheriting his father exists here [in 2 Evidence of this has been cited by
the island of Ulitea] as at Otaheite, me in a note, '' The Youth of Achilles,''
accompanied by circumstances still in The Classical Review, vii. (I 893)
more degrading and t1nnatural. From pp. 292 sq., and in a note on Pa11sanias,
the birth, or at least the manhood of i. 22, 6 (vol. ii. p. 266 ).
Cl-IAP. rr ULTIMOGENITURE AND JJOLYGAMY 551
l(affraria in South-Eastern Africa, a chief's principal or Among the
r t h e mot h er o f h"1s h eir,
'' great '' w11e: IS a 1so f requent ]y, perh aps tribes of
IZaffraria
generally, not the first but a later \vife. The reason why in a ?hi:f's
this group of tribes the ''great'' wife of a chief is seldom 11is ~~~~~ fha~
1
first wife has been explained as follows : '' The first wife n1other of
' h" f ' h
o f a K a fi r c 1e, t e w11e o r f h" h , f l his
IS yout , IS not un requent y frequently
heir, is
taken fiom amongst the families of his O\Vn councillors. He not his
first but a
IS as yet unknown to fame ; his wealth IS not so cons1de1able later wife.
as it is to be. After a while his alliance becomes more
worthy the attention of those of other tribes, whose daughters
demand a higher dowry than \Vas required by the humbler
parents of his first wife. Another and another aie sent to
him ; for it must be borne in mind that a Kafir chief does
not choose his own wives. He is surprised from time to
time by the arrival of a bridal party, bringi11g \Vith them as
his offered bride some chief's daughte1 whom he has never
seen before. The danger of refusing her is according to the
rank and power of the family to which she belo11gs, for to
decline such an alliance is to offer a public insult to the whole
tribe. The usual order of things, then, is, that as a chief
grows older and richer, wives of higher rank are sent to him,
and the reasons which operate against their refusal operate
also against their having an inferior rank allotted to them in
the successional distribution. The mother of him who is to
be the 'great son ' may thus be the last wife the chief has
1
taken, which is, in fact, sometimes the case.''
In these tribes a chief commonly has three wives \vho The''great

rank above all the rest, and bear respectively the titles of the ;";~~~t~he
''great wife," the ''right-hand wife,'' and the.'' left-hand wife," ha11d\vife, ''
or ''the wife of the ancestors." The ''right-hand wife'' is ~.~~r:~eand
usually the first wife whom the chief marries, but it is not wife of a
c!lways so ; sometimes both the ''great wife'' and the ''right- ~~::.
hand wife '' are chosen and invested with their dignity by
the chief in council. In the kraal the hut of the ''right-hand
wife '' stands to the right of the hut of the '' great wife '' ;
and \Ve may conjecture, though this does not appear to be
expressly affirmed, that the hut of the '' left-hand wife ''
t Rev. I-I. H. Dugmore, in Col. donald, '' Bant11 C11stoms and Legends,''
John Maclean's Co11zpendz"u11z of. K afi1 Folk-lore, iii. (1892) pp. 338 sq. ; G.
Laws and Custo111s (Cape Town, 1866), M'Call Theal, Records of Soi,th-Easte11z
pp. 25 sq. Compare Rev. James Mac- Africa, vii. (1901) pp. 396 sq.
I
TIIE HEIRSI-:!IP OF JACO/I I'ART II
552
stands to the left of the hut of tl1e ''great wife." Of the
three wives, the ''great wife'' ranks highest, the ''right-hand
wife'' next, and the ''left-hand wife'' lowest. \Vith the
' '' left-hand wife'' rests the responsibility of providing an heir,
in case the ''great wife'' has no son. The son of the ''left-
hand \Vife '' is called the ''representative of the ancestors."
The office of ''left-hand wife '' is a comparatively modern
institution, having been created by the chief Graika some six
generations ago. On the other hand, the distinction between
the ''great wife '' and the '' right-hand wife '' is of great
antiquity. These three wives form three main ''houses," and
however many wives a chief may have, they are all added as
'' rafters '' to one or other of the three main '' houses," which
they are supposed to support. The eldest son of the ''great
wife'' is the heir, and succeeds to the chieftainship 011 the
deatl1 of his father. The eldest son of the ''right-hand wife ''
cannot succeed to the chieftainship till all the other wives
have failed to supply a son. 011 the other hand, this eldest
son of the.'' right-hand wife'' is constituted the head of a
certain allotted portion of the tribe, and on the death of his
father he assumes the separate jurisdiction of that portion.
He thus becomes the originator of a new tribe, acknowledg-
ing the precedency in rank of his brother, the son of the
'' great wife," but independent of him except in matters
involving the general relations of the tribes at large. More-
over, if the old chief dies while his heir, the eldest son of the
''great wife," is still a minor, wl1icl1 he may often do, since
the ''great wife'' is not uncommonly married by him com-
paratively late in life, the ''right-hand'' house assumes the
regency. Thus a conflict of interest betvveen the two brothers
may easily arise, and the elder brother, the son of the'' right-
l1a11d wife," may become a dangerous rival of his younger
brother, the rightful heir to the throne. Accordingly there

are numberless legends, most of them marvellous, but some

of them probably historical, of the perfidy of the ''right-hand
wife's'' son and the ultimate triumph of the true heir. 1
1 Col. John Maclean, Co1npe11diu11t (1892) pp. 338 sq.; G. M'Call Thea!,
of Kajir Laws a1zd Cztsto111s (Cape Town, Records of South-Eastern Afn"ca, vii.
1866), pp. II sq., 25sq.,45, 69sq., 113 (I 901) pp. 396 sq. ; Dudley Kidd,
sq. ; Rev. James Macdonald, ''Bantu The Essential Kaifir {London, 1904),
Customs and Legends,'' Folk-lore, iii. pp. I 3 sq., 360 sq. .
CHAP. II ULTI1tf.OGENITURE AND POLYGA1lY 553
It is this possible or even general succession of a younger But even
in preference to an elder half-brother among these tribes, which ~~i:e:~~e
has created a specious but illusive appearance of junior right s11ccessio11
or ultimogeniture in Kafir law. The writers who have been ~~i~~~'1in
imposed upon by this appearance have failed to observe that ship is
the chief, though possibly younger than many of his half- ~g;~~~~
brothers, the sons of other wives, is, nevertheless, invariably geniture.
1
the eldest son of his mother ; so that even in these tribes
the succession to the throne is regulated by the principle of
primogeniture, not of ultimogeniture.
\Vhen \Ve quit tl1e spl1ere of public law, regulating the I11 I<.afi1
h l f h' d 1
succession to t e c 11e ta1ns 1p, an turn to private aw, regu- heir of a tri!Jes the
lating the succession to property, the prevalence of primo- ~on1n1011er

. d l . 't . K fi l .
gen1ture as oppose to u t1mogen1 ure 1n a r a\v 1s st1 11 tlie eldest . 1s ge11erally
more clearly manifest ; for in ordinary families, not related so11 of h!s
h" f h fi r d 11 h ,,
to t h e c 1e , t e rst w11e marr1e 1s usua y t e great \VI1e, . r ,, 2 eldest \VJfe.
and since the heir is alwa1s the eldest son of the ''great
wife," it follows that among commoners the heir is generally
the eldest son not only of his mother but of his father also,
and therefore that he is older than all his half-brothers, the
sons of his father's other wives ; in short, he is the eldest male
of the whole family. Ho,vever, it need not be so. The
''great wife '' is not necessarily the wife first married ; a
commoner, like a chief, may have three principal wives, to
wit, the ''great wife," the ''right-hand wife," and the '' left-
hand wife '' ; and in that case each of these three worn en is
at the head of a separate house or establishment. The eldest
son of each house inherits all the property which has been
allotted by his father in his lifetime to that house ; but if the
father has neglected, in his life to declare in a formal and
public manner what portion of his property he has assigned
to his several establishments, he may be said to die intestate,
and in that case the eldest son of the ''great house'' takes
'
possession, as heir-at-law, of the whole of his father's estate,
1 Col. John Maclean, Co1npendizt11i 396, '' It generally happened that his
of .IC-q fir Lazos and Customs, p. I I, consort of 11ighest rank was taken when
'' Tl1e eldest son of the 'great' wife is he was of advanced age. . . . She was
presumptive heir to his father's dignity, termed the great wife, and her eldest
and succeeds him in his gene1al govern- son was the principal heir.''
ment''; G. M'Call Theal, Records ef 2 Dudley Kidd, The Esse11tial Kaji1,
South-Eastern Africa, vii. (1901) p. p. 14.
THE HEll?SHIP Oft, JACOJJ PAll'f II
554
though he is bound at the same time to care and provide
1
for all his father's establishments. Thus in private as in
public law the succession of Kafir tribes is determined by
primogeniture.
We conclude that the theory which would derive ultimo-
geniture from a preference for the youngest wife in a poly-
gamous family, derives no support from Kafir law and
custom.
Relative The relative position of wives in polygamous families out-

p~siti~n
\Vives 1n
of side of Africa has not yet, so far as I know, been ful(y
polygan1- examined ; but a considerable body of evidence on the
ous families k"
outside of subject has been collected by Dr. Edward Westermarc ,~
Africa. and it tends to show that elsewhere, as in Africa, the woman
who is first married usually ranks above the later wives and
enjoys a position of dignity and authority in her husband's
household. As this superiority of the first wife bears directly
on the theory of ultimogeniture which is now under discus-
sion, I propose to illustrate it by examples drawn from races
in many parts of the world.
I11India In ancient India ''a peculiar sa11ctity," we are told, ''seems
the first
wife of a to have been attributed to the first marriage, as being that
polyga~- which was contracted from a sense of duty, and not merely
ous family
is generally c 1 'fi .
1or persona grat1 cation. Th fi . d 'fi
e rst marr1e w1 e a pre-. h d
the chief cedence over the otl1ers, and her first born son over his half-
\vife.
brothers. It is probable that originally the secondary wives
were considered as merely a superior class of concubines, lil<:e
3
the handmaids of the Jewish patriarchs." To the same effect
another authority on ancient Hindu law observes that in the
literature ''there is frequently mention of the privileges of
the eldest, that is, the first married wife ; for even among
several wives, who were equal in respect of birth, she as a
4
rule ranked first.'' Among the Chuhras, the sweeper or
scavenger caste' of the Punjab, ''two wives are allowed ;
1 Col. John Maclean, Compendiu11z Hindu Law and Usage, Third Edition
of Kqfi1 Laws a1zd Customs, pp. 45, (Madras and London, 1883), p. 82,
69, l 13; Dudley l(idd, The Essential 85.
Kqfir, pp. 360 sq.
2 Edward Westermarck, The History 4
Julius Jolly, Recht u1zd Sz"tte (Stras-
of Hu111an Marriage (London, 1891), burg, 1896), p. 64, 19 (in G. Blihler's
pp. 441-448. ' Gru1zdriss der Indo-Arische11 Philologie
3 John D. Mayne, A T1eatise oj
u111l A lte1tu111skunde, vol. ii.).
CHAP. II ULTIMOGENITURE AND POLYGAMY 555
the former of whom is considered the head, and has peculiar
rites and privileges. The wives live together in the sarne
1
house." Among the Bhots or Bhotiyas, a tribe apparently
of Tibetan origin in North-Western India, ''the \vife of the
first marriage is the head wife, and she receives by inheritance
a share one-tenth in excess of that given to the other
2
wives. Among the Kharwars, a Dravidian tiibe of land-
O\vners and cultivators in South Mirzapur, ''a man may marry
as many wives as he can afford to purchase and maintain.
They live in separate rooms in the same house. The senior
wife is head of the household, and is treated \vith respect at
3
social meetings." Similarly among the Parahiyas, another
Dravidian tribe of Mirzapur, ''polygamy is recognized, but
as a rule a man does not take a second wife unless the first
is barren. The senior \vife rules the household and shares
in the family worship; if she is not treated with respect, they
believe that the family goes to ruin. The wives live apart in
4
separate huts." Among the Kadirs, a people of short stature
and dark skins, who lead an isolated life in the jungles and
forests of Southern India,'' in the code of polygynous etiquette,
the first wife takes precedence over the others, and each wife
5
has her own cooking utensils.'' The Khamtis, a people of
the Shan or Tai stock in north-eastern Assam, ''are not
restricted to one wife. I do not, however, recollect having
met with more than two to one husband, and though the
second wife may be the favorite companion of her lord, the
6
supremacy of the first wife is always maintained." In the
Old Kuki clans, as they are called, of Manipur, ''polygamy
is, as a rule, permitted. Among the Anal and Lamgang,
. the first wife is entitled to the company of her husband for
. '
7
five nights, the second for four, and the third for three."
' .
With regard to the Meitheis of Manipur we are told that
''in polygamous households the husband's attentions to the
several wives are strictly regulated by precedence, the eldest
1 H. A. Rose, Glossary1 of the Tn'bes 4 W. Crooke, op. cz't, iv. I 27.
and Castes of the Pun;'ab and North- 6 Edgar Thurston, Castes a1id Tribes
West Frontier Provz'nces, ii. (Lahore, ef Southern Indza (Madras, l 909 ), iii.
' .
1911) p. 190. . 19
2 W. Crooke, Tribes and Castes of 6 E. T. Dalton, Descriptive Etli-
the North-Western Provinces and Oudh 1zology ef Be1igal (Calcutta, 1872), p. 8.
(Calcutta, l 896 ), ii. 62. 7 J. Shakespear, The Lushei R"11kz'
'
s W. Croole, op'. cz't. ,iii. 24 l. Clans (London, 1912), p. 155.
556 7'/IE J/EII?~'illll) 01'' JA C'OJI I' A ll'l' I I
rrettino-
b b
twice the nominal share of the wife next below her.
In actual practice, I am given to unde1stand that these rules
1
are often bio]{en.'' Speaking of the N aga tribes of Manipur
the same writer observes that ''polygamy is permitted among
the Ta11gkhuls, who have a knowledge of tl1e practice of the
Manipuris in this respect. It is not very common, as separate
establishments must be maintained, and custom demands that,
as in Manipur, the greater attentions should still be paid to
2
the elder \Vife." -
In other In Burma ''polygamy is legal, but except among officials

~:~~ t~~ and the wealthy, is seldom practised . . . . Though all the
first \vife of wives are equally legitimate, there is always one chief wife,
~Js ~~~~- generally the first married, whose house is the family home; the
0
is gen~ia!Iy lesser wives being provided each with her own house, perhaps
tl1e cl11ef
wife. living in another town or village, but never under the same
3
roof as the head wife." In Siam '' the rich and the great
take several \Vives ; but the first, with whom they have per-
formed the ceremony of the kha1z nzak, is always regarded as
the only legitimate spouse. They call her ' the great wife,'
whereas the others go by the name of' little wives.' She is
the true mistress of the house ; she and her children inherit
all the husband's property, whereas the 'little wives' and
their children have no right to anything except what their
husband gives them personally, or what the heir may be
4
pleased to bestow on them." Among tl1e Koryaks of north-
eastern Siberia, '' in a household with more than one wife, the
first is considered the mistress of the house. The second
'
wife consults the first in everything, and carries out her

5
instructions." Among the Chukchees, at the north-eastern
extremity of Asia, who p1actise polygamy, ''the position of
the several wives is different in different families. The first
wife is generally much older, and has had s~veral children
\vhen the young wife makes her first appearance in the family.
In such cases the first wife is the mistress, while the second

11'. C. Hodson, The Meitheis (Lon- I(oyau111e Thai ou Sz'atrt (Paris, 1854),

don, 1908), p. 77. I. 2 3 I.
2 T. C. Hodson, The Naga Tribes 5 Waldemar Jochelson, The I("oryak
ef Manipur (London, 191 l), p. 94. (Leyden ancl New York, 1908), p. 754
3 C. J. F. S. Forbes, British Bur111a (The Jesup North Pacijic Expedz'tion,
a1td its People (London, 1878), pp. 64, vol. vi., Me111oz'r ef the A111erican
65. Mtese1e111 of Natural History, New
4 Mgr. Pallegorix, Dest1'1ptio11 die
York).
ClfAP. II ULTIMOGENITURE AND POLYGAfifY 557
is t1eated almost like a maid. The first wife sits vvith the
11usband in the warm sleeping-room, \Vhile the second works
1
outside in the cold, prepares the food, and serves it."
Among the Kirghiz of Semipalatinsk, a province of south- Ai11or1g the
western Siberia, polygamy has been customary \vith the richer ~~%~~~
nomads ever since the conversion of the people to Islam, \vife of a
which, wl1ile it diminished the number of their gods, increased ~~7&~:Iy
the number of their wives. As Kirghiz wives are expected is gen~rally
. . . . . . h . f h fi tl1e cl11ef
to \VOr k h ar d fior t lie1r 11v1ng, 1t 1s 1n t e interest o t e 1st \\'ife.
wife that her husband should marry others, who will relieve
her, to some extent, of her laborious duties ; nor has she much
reason to be jealous of her younger rivals, since \VOmen age
rapidly a11d soon lose their youthful bloom under the severe
conditions of nomadic life. With regard to the relative
"
position of the wives, we are told that, '' as the bride-price
(kaly1n) is regarded as earnest-money, and the wife as at1
article that has been bought, the first thing expected of her is
submission, like that of a female slave ; the only exception
is made in favour of the first \Vife, on whom age confers a
privilege. The second, third, or fourth wife may never appear
uninvited in the tent of the master of the family ; she must
always remain in the lower part (eden) of the tent; she may
never sit down by the fire, and still less take a place at the
common table, and she must content herself with the leavings
of the meal. In accordance with customary law the first
wife, if she is energetic enough, need brook no infringement
of her privilege as mistress supreme. By her intrigues, or
sometimes even by violence, she can hinder her husband from
marrying a second wife, who is called Takal-kadi1i (' concu-
bine ') or f{irnak ('young wench ') ; and if she fails to do so,
her faithless spouse must find a place for his ne\v flame at a
distance from the principal tent ; nay, even from that bower
of love the first wife may chase her husband with a whip,
and drive him to her own tent, whither, fretting and fuming,
he must follow her amid the laughter and jeers of the
2
spectators."
In the Indian Archipelago'' the wife of the first marriage
1 Waldemar Bogoras, The Chukchee Anierican Museu11t ef Natu1al History,
(Leyden and New Yorl{, 1904-1909), New York).
p. 600 (The Jesup Nortli Pacific Ex- 2 Hermann Vambe1y, Das Tii1ketz-
pedition, vol. vii., Me11zoir OJ the volk (Leipsic, 1885), p. 248.
558 THE HEIRSHIP Ol 'JAC'()JJ 1 l'J\R'f II
111 tl1e is al\vays tl1e real mistress of the family, a11d the rest often
I11dia11 h
..\icili- little better than her handmaids. No man will give is
pelago tl1e dat1ghter for a second or third wife to a man of l1is ow11 rank,
fi1st \\ife of
a polyga111 . so that, generally, no wife but the first is of equal ranl<: with
1
?us f< mily the husband."
1 In Lam pong, the most southernly district of
is ge11e1a!ly ~ d I
the chief Sumatra,'' whoever can contrive to o so, marries severa , not
,,ife. uncommonly four wives, and maintains besides a number of
co11cubines. The thi1d wife is subject to the first wife, and the
fourth to the second, while the concubines have to obey all
four. The first \vife is the highest in rank, and has also the
best room in the house.... The eldest son of the eldest wife
is his father's successor; but he does not inherit the whole
property, only the half, while the other sons get the remaining
2
half." Among the Battas or Bataks of Central Sumatra
'' polygamy is allowed, but as the price of a wife is high,
being about seven buffaloes or forty-five piasters, it follows
that hardly any common villager possesses more than one, and
monogamy is predominant in the country. To this rule the
solitary exception is made by the Rajahs, who are almost
, the only opulent persons among the people; they have always
more wives than one, usually three, often five, but seldom more,
and never more than eight, who all possess equal rights among
themselves, except that the eldest, that is, the one \vho was
first married, exercises a certain authority over the others.'' 3
Among the Bagobos of Mindanao, one of the Philippine
Islands, ''a man may have as many wives as he desires and
can afford, but he may not take a second mate until a child
has been born to the first union, or the \vife has been proved
beyond doubt to be barren . . . . The first wife is generally
the lady of the house, and does not particularly object to
having othe1 girls added to the family, provided they are
4
willing to obey her." In N e\v Zealand every Maori chief
was at liberty to take as many wives as he pleased, but ''the
first wife was generally a lady of rank, and always viewed as
the head, however many there might be, and of whatever
1 John Crawford, Hi'story of the 3 Franz Junghuhn, Di'e Battaliinder
Indian Archipelago (London, 1820), azif Sumatra (Berlin, 1847), ii. 133.
i. 77.
2 G. A. Wilken, '' Over het huwe- 4 Fay-Cooper Cole, The Wi'ld Tn'bes
lijks- en erfrecht bij de volken van of Davao Distri'ct, Mindanao (Chicago,
Zuid-Sumatra,'' De verspreide Ge- 1913), p. 103 (Field Museum of
schriften (The I-Iague, 1912), ii. 281 sq. Natural History, Publication r70).
CHAI'. II ULTJMOGENITURE AND POLYGAMY 559
1
rank; some were rega1ded as only servile ones." Among
the N arrinyeri, an aboriginal tribe of South Australia, ''poly-
gamy is practised; but there are seldom more than two
wives. The eldest wife is the chief. An elderly wife has
little objection to her husband having a younger one, as she
2
is subo1dinate to her."
Polygamy prevails among some but not all the Indian Among the
111
tribes of British Guiana' but ''even when there is more than Soutl1 dians of
one wife, the first is almost always chiefly regarded and An1erica
favoured; those that are married afterwards seem to be ~~i~efi~~ta
3
tal{en more as domestic helpers of the first and real wife." polygam-
I d .
Th e U aupes n ians o f B 'l '' 11 h b 'fi ous
raz1 genera y ave ut one w1 e, is generally family
but there is no special limit, and many have two or tl1ree, th_e chief
and some of the chiefs more ; the elder one is never turned wife.
4
away, but remains the mistress of the house." Among the
Juris, Passes; Uainumas, Miranhas, and many other Indian
tribes of Brazil, '' the wife whom a man first married is
regarded as the head-wife. Her hatnmock hangs next to
that of her husband. Power, influence over the community,
ambition, and temperament are the motives which lead the
husband afterwards to take several subordinate \Vives or con-
cubines to the number of five or six, but seldom more. To
possess several wives is deemed a matter of luxury and
vanity. Each of them gets her own hatnmock, and usually
also a separate hearth, especially as soon as she has children.
Despite frequent jealousy and quarrels, the eldest or head-
wife exerts her influence in household affairs to such a pitch
that on the decline of her personal charms she will herself
5
introduce younger wives to her consort." The Araucanians
of Chili may marry as many wives as they can pay for, but
''the first wife, who is called unendo1no, is always respected
I Rev. Richard Taylor, Te Ika A the mistress of the hut or wurley. ''
Maui, or New Zeala1zd and t'ts Inhabit- 3 (Sir) Everard F. im Thurn, At1zong
ants, Second Edition (London, 1870), the Indians of Guiana (London, 1883),
PP 337 sq. P 223.
2 Rev. George Taplin, in E. M.
4 Alfred Russel Wallace, Narrative
Curr's The Azestralz'an Race (Melbourne
and London, 1886-1887), ii. 246. of Travels on the Anzazon a1zd Rl:o
Compare id. ''The Narrinyeri,'' in Negro (London, 1889), p. 346 (The
Minerva Lib'>ary).
J. D. Wood's The Native Trz'bes of
South Australia (Adelaide, I 879 ), p. 5 C. Fr. Phil. v. Martius, Zte1
12, ''In case of a man having two Ethnographie A1nerika's, zumal Brasil.
wives, the elder is always regarded as iens (Leipsic, 1867), pp. 105 SCJ.

560 THE HEil?.SHII) OJ,~ JACO!J l'1\ l('l' I I
as the real and legitimate one by all the otl1ers, who are
called i1zando11to, or secondary wives. She has the manage-
ment of the domestic concerns, and 1egulates the interio1 of
the house." 1 .
An1ong the Among the Mosquito Indians of Central America ''poly-
I11dia11s of
Central gamy obtains, some men having six wives each, and t e 1ngh k
and Nortl1 yet more. The first wife, who as a rule is betrothed from
.J\111eri ea
the fiist early infancy, is mistress com1na11di11g ; her marriage is
\vife of a attended with festivities, and later additions to the harem
polyga1n- 2
ous fan1ily are subject to 11er." Concerning the Indian. tribes who
is geii~rally inhabit, or rather used to inhabit, Western Washingto11 and
the chief
,vife. North-Western Oregon, we are told that ''the condition of
the woman is that of slavery under any circumstances. She .
is the property of her father, of her nearest relative, or of her
tribe, until she becomes that of her husband. She digs the
roots and prepares them for wi11ter, digs and dries clams,
cures the fish which he catches, packs the horses, assists in
paddling the canoe, and performs all the menial offices. The
more wives a man possesses, therefore, the richer he is ; and
it is an object for him to purchase others as his means

increase. . The accession of a new wife in the lodge very

naturally produces jealousy and discord, and the first often
returns for a time in dudgeon to her friends, to be reclaimed.
by her husband when he chooses, perhaps after propitiating
her by some presents. The first wife almost al\vays retains a
sort of predominance in the lodge ; and the man, at least
after his appetite for a subsequent one is satisfied, usually
lives with her. Wives, particula1ly the later ones, are often
3
sold or traded off." Among the Tlingits or Thlinkeets of
Alaska ''polygamy is general, especially among the richer
men, but the first wife always preserves a certain authority
4
over the others." Similarly among the Koniags of Alasl{a
. 1 J. Ignatius Molina, The Geog1a- pp. 198 sq.
phical, Natuial, a1zd Civil History ef 4 H. J. Hol1nberg, '' U eber die
'Chz"lz" (London, 1809), ii. I 15 sq. Volker des Rttssischen Amerika, '' Acta
2 H. H. Bancroft, Native Races ef Societatis Scientiarit11z Fen1ticae, iv.
the Pacific States (London, 1875-1876), (Helsingfors, 1856) p. 313. To the

1. 7 29, same effect writes Dr. Aurel Krause,
Die Tlinkit-.lndianer (Jena, 1 88 5), p.
3 George Gibbs, '' Tri~es of Western 220, ''Rich men may have several
Washington and Northwestern Ore- wives, as many as they can maintain,
gon,'' in Contribietions to North Anzeri- but the first always ranks above the
can Eth1iology,
.
i. (Washington,
. . 1877), rest.''
CHAP. II ULTIMOGENJTURE AND POLYGAllfY
polygamy used to be prevalent ; rich men wot1ld have as

many as five wives, but ''the first wife al\vays rai1ked above
1
the rest.'' Of the Eskimo about Bering Strait we read Among the
that ''men who are able to provide for them frequently take EsdkiGmo
a11 reen-
t\VO or even more wives. In st1ch cases the first wife is Ia11ders
regarded as the head of the family and has charge of the ~~~efi~~ta
2
food." Among the Eskimo of Hudson's Bay, ''when polygan~-
. ous fa1n1ly
t h e family is prosperous the husband often takes a second is generally
wife, .either with or without the approval of the first, who tl~e cl1ief
kno\vs that her household duties will be lessened, but knows \vife.
also that the favors of her husband will have to be divided
\Vitl1 the second \vife. The second wife is often the cause of
the first wife's leaving, though sometimes she is sent away
herself. . . . The sons of the first wife, if there be more than
one wife, tal{e precedence over those of the second or third
wife. . . . When the father becomes superannuated or his
sons are old enough to enable him to live without exertion,
the management of affairs devolves on the eldest son,
3
and to the second is delegated the second place." He.re
the superiority of the first wife to the later wives, though
it is not directly affirmed by the writer, may be inferred
from the acknowledged superiority of her sons to the
sons of the second or third wife. Among the Greenlanders,
before the arrival of Christian missionaries, polygamy
was lawful, but few men had . more than one wife, a11d
in polygamous families ''the first wife was reckoned the
4
mistress."
These examples, drawn from many different races in In poly-
rnany different parts of the world, seem to show that where ;:;:~~~
polygamy prevails the first wife generally occupies the prin- generally
cipal place in the household, ranking 'above the other wives, ~~i~efi;:~he
'
exercising authority over them, and continuing to maintain chiefwife,
. =dt~
her hold on the affections of her husband even when age ai1d heir is her
infirmity have robbed her of youthful grace and beauty. And eldest son.
1 H. J. Holm berg, op .. cit. pp. 398 sq . the Ungava District, Hudson Bay Terri-
2 E. W. Nelson, ''The Eskimo tory,'' Eleventh Annual Report of the
about Bering Strait,'' Eighteenth A n1tual Bu1-eau of Ethnology (vVashi11gton,
Report. of the Bureau of A11lerican 1894), pp. I 89, I 90.
Ethnology, Part i. (Washington, 1899)
p. 292. 4 Hans Egede, Description of Gree1i-
a Lucien M. Turner, ''Ethnology of land (London, 1818), p. 140.

VOL. I 20
I'AR'f If
011 tl1e so far as the question of inherit<1nce is raised in the foregoing

whole
potyga 111 y
1
ii1stances, it seems to be always the eldest, not. t 1c youngest,
see111s to son of the eldest wife wl10 succeeds to his father's rank and
favour h
pri1110 _ property. Thus the evidence tells decidedly against t e
geniture theory that ulti1nogeniture or the preference fo1 the youngest
rather tha11 '
ultimo- child in tl1e inheritance, arises naturally through the favou1
genittlie. accorded by the husband to the youngest wife i11 a poly-
gamous family. On the contrary, the te11dency of polygamy
is apparently to promote primogeniture rather than ultimo-
geniture.
I o. Ultz"mogenitztre and Infantz"cide

Possible

In considering the causes which may have operated to
connexion
of ultimo- produce a custom of ultimogeniture, the practice of infanti-
genit11re . cide should not, perhaps, be left \vholly out of account.
\Vith the
custon1. of Many races in different parts of the world aie reported to
killing the have been in the 11abit of putting all their firstbor11 cl1ildren
first born. 1
to death. The motives for this barbarous custom are ob-
.
scure, but among them in certair1 cases appears to have been

a superstitious fea1, that the bi1th of a firstbo1n son \Vas in
some way a me11ace to the life of the father. Fo1 example,
among tl1e Baganda ''in most cla11s . the first child born to a
.
chief \vas awaited with considerable anxiety, because it was '
thought that the birth of a boy i11dicated that his father

would die ; hence, if a male was born, the midwife strangled
it, and gave .out that it was born dead ; in this way the
chief's life \Vas ensured, otherwise, it was thought, he \vould
2
die." This practice of putting a cl1ief's firstborn son to

death, out of regard for the father's life, fits in with 011e of
the alternative explanations which I have suggested for the
remarkable precautions taken to conceal the birtl1 of a chief's
3
heir among the Thonga, a tribe which belongs to the same
Bantu stocl-:: as the Baganda; the concealment of the infant
may have been a substit11te for an older practice of putting it
to death. In fact, we are informed that clown to comparatively
recent times among tl1e Kafir tribes of South Africa only
1 The evidence has been collected 2
John Roscoe, The Bagn1ida (Lon-
by 1ne in The Dying God, pp. I 7 I sqq. don, 1911), p. 54.
( The Golck1t Bough, Third Edition,
.
Part iii.). 3 See above, pp. 480.sq., 549 sq.
_!

;
CHAP. 11 ULTIMOGENITURE AND INFANTICIDE 563
1
one son of a chief was allowed to live. Which of the sons
was spared, we are not told ; if it was the youngest, then

certainly the practice of ultimogeniture existed in the ut-
most rigot1r among the chiefly families of Kafir tribes in
South Africa ; but in the absence of definite and authentic
evidence it would be rash to make any affirmation on
the subject. The Greek story how Zeus, the youngest of
his brothers and sisters, succeeded his father Cronus on
the throne of heaven, may perhaps contain a reminis-
cence of a practice of ultimogeniture carried out with the
same ruthless severity ; for it is said that Cronus, having
learned that he was destined to be vanquished by his son,
took the precaution of swallowing his children as soon as
they were born, and that Zeus, the youngest, was only
saved from the fate of all his elder brothers and sisters by
the cunning of his mother Rhea, who hid him in a cave a11d
gave his cruel father a stone wrapt in swaddling bands to
2
swallo\v instead of the babe.
However, it seems unlikely that infanticide has had any B11t a
' bl' h' f 1
s h are 1n esta 1s 1ng a custom o u t1mogen1ture. F connexion
or, 1n of ultimo-
the first place, a practice of putting the firstborn to death, g~niture
'l . - h 1 . r r d ld \~1th
wh 1 e 1t mtg t exp ain a pre1erence 1or secon sons, cou infanticide
hardly account for the preference for youngest sons in the is improb-
inheritance ; and, in the second place, a practice of killing able.
all children except the youngest, if it ever existed, has
probably been so rare that it can hardly have originated
the widespread custom of ultimogeniture.
Nevertheless it may not be irrelevant to remark on the Traces in
coincidence in ancient Israel of traces of ultimogeniture oIsfrau1et1mo- 1. both
with almost indubitable traces of a systematic practice of geniture

putting first born children to death. 3
The coincidence may and t~f
prac ice o
a f
. . killing the
1 Dudley Kidd, Tke Essential Kafir, of men. This pre-eminence, however, firstbo
p. 14. According to Mr. Kidd, this he attained, not by knocking his elder rn.
rule was observed down to the time, brothers on the head, but simply by
six generations ago, when the custom anticipating them in tying his bridle to
of the ''left-hand wife,'' or ''wife of a silver post in front of his father's
the ancestors'' was instituted. See house. See Miss M. A. Czaplicka,
above, pp. 55 l sq., 553 Aboriginal Siben'a (Oxford, 1914), p.
. 2. Hesiod, Theogon. 453-491. In 289
Finnish mythology we hear of a god
named Mir-Susne-Khum, who was the 3 For the evidence see The Dyz'ng
youngest of his family, yet was ap- God, pp. 166 sqq. (The Golden Bough,
pointed ruler of his elder brothers and Third Edition, Part iii.).
..
VOL. I . 202
THE HEIRSHIJJ OF JACOIJ PAR'f II
be merely fortuitous ; still, in the difficulty and uncertainty

which attend all inquiries into the origin of human institu-
tions, we shall do well to l<eep our minds open to the possi-
bility that after all among the Semites, and perhaps among
other peoples, a causal connexion may be discovered to exist
between infanticide and ultimogeniture.
11. Sitperstz'tions about youngest Children

In conclusion it may be worth while to notice a few
miscellaneous superstitions attaching to youngest children
which have not found a place in the preceding pages.
Various According to old German law, the mandrake, a plant to
si-:~er-
st1t1ons
which magical and oracular virtues were ascribed, passed by
attaching inheritance on the death of the father to the youngest son,
~~fi~~~~~~t on condition that he buried a morsel of bread and a piece of
1
Eu_rope, money with his father's body in the coffin. Similarly we
!~;~~a. and have seen that among the Koryaks of North-Eastern Asia
the Pacific. the sacred fire-board, a magical as well as a useful imple-
ment, is inherited by the youngest son or the youngest
2
daughter. Among the Ibibios, a tribe of Southern Nigeria,
there are more witches than wizards ; and if a witch has
children, she always passes her .wicked knowledge to one of
3
her daughters, usually to the youngest born. In the Hervey
Islands, South Pacific, the firstborn child, \vhether male or
female, was deemed especially sacred. He or she ate
separately, and the very door, through which he or she
entered the paternal dwelling, became sacred and might be
used by no one else. The eldest son inherited the greater
part of his father's landed property, and all the younger
brothers were bound to submit to his authority. In general,
the chieftainship and the priesthood of the' clan were h~ld
by the firstborn. Nevertheless, ''by a curious perversion. of
ideas, the god was sometimes said to have taken up his
abode in the youngest of the family, who was then invested
1 Grimm, Deutsche Sagen 2 (Berlin, see below, vol. ii. pp. 372 sqq.
1865-1866), No. 84, vol. i. pp. l 17 sq.; 2
Above, p. 476. Compare p. 475
J. Grimm, Deutsche Rechtsalterthiimer 3 as to the Chukchee.
(Gottingen, 1881), p~ 475. Compare 3 (Mrs.) . D. Amaury Talbot,
Ch. Elton, Origz"ns of Engli'sh Hi"story, Woman's Mysteries of a Pri"mz"tz"ve
pp. 2 l 9-22 I. As to the mandrake,
1 People (London, 1915), p. 162.
ctt. II .5UPERSTITIONS ABOUT YOUNGEST CHILDREN 565
by the clan with all the honours due to the firstborn. This
was resorted to whenever the feebleness of intellect or lack
of energy on the part of the real leader exposed the tribe
1
to destruction." However, in this case the transference of
the rights of the eldest to the youngest was clearly a tem-
porary expedient designed, by a sort of legal fiction, to
commit the reins of power to stronger hands, and to justify
the supersession of an incapable ruler. .
Among the Akikuyu of British East Africa the ruling Youn~est
ld h d 'th . l' . d . h
e ers are c arge w1 various re 1g1ous ut1es, sue as t e ritualh sons in
offering of sacrifices and the cleansing of the people from am.cing the
. f . 1 11
t h e taint o ceremon1a po u ion.t' Q f h . .
ne o t eir most im- .'\k1kuyu.
portant functions is to purify the country from disease.

Many measures are adopted for that salutary purpose, but
the principal is this. A root or bulb called kihoithia is
scooped out of the ground, and certain butterflies and insects
are put in it, after which it is buried in some muddy place.
This must be done by a man who is the last born of his
mother, that is, his mother must be past the age of child-
bearing.2
Among the Taiyals, a tribe of mountaineers in the interior Youngest
of Formosa, when the new grain is cooked for the first time, ~ft~~1 n 1
the youngest boy of the family must eat some of it before among the
the others. When he has done so, the other members of i~!.;1~~~a~f
the family follow his example. The food prepared from the

new grain may not be given to strangers; further, it may

not be consumed all at once, it must furnish the material
for two meals. '' All these superstitions," we are told,
''involve a form of magic by which plentifulness of the crop
is secured. A portion of the new crop is kept within the
house and it is eaten until the new moon appears ; the rest
is placed in a store-room, whence it should not be removed
before the new moon rises. This is also a form of magic to
3
secure fertility. Like the moon, it must not wane, but wax.''
'
If this explanation of the customs in question is correct, the

I Rev. William Wyatt Gill, Life z"1i Royal Anthropologz'cal Instz"tute, xiv,
the Southern Isles (London, N.D.), pp. ( 1915) pp. 246 sq.
46 sq.
2 Hon. Charles Dundas, ''The 3 Shinji Ishii, ''The Life of the
Organization and Laws of some Bantu Mountain People in Formosa,'' Folk-
tribes in East Africa,'' Journal of the lore, xxviii. (1917) p. 123.
566 THE HEllrSHIP OF JACOJJ P1\R1' II
reason why the youngest boy eats the i1e\v grain before his
elders may be a notion, that the crop will last the longer
for being first eaten by that member of the family \vho may
naturally be expected to live the longest ; by sympathetic
magic he communicates his prospect of longevity to the
grain which he takes into his body.
'
'
ADDENDA
Pt. i. Ch. iv. THE GREAT FLOOD

PAGE 168. With the ancient Greek tradition of a great inundation, 'furkish
consequent on the sudden opening of the Bosphorus and the legend of a
D ar d ane11 es, we may compare. a mo dern T urk"IS h tra d"Ition,
. wh.IC h consequent
great flood
has been recorded at Constantinople. on the
The Turks say that Iskender-Iulcarni, by whom they mean opening
Alexander the Great, lived before Moses and conquered both the C:0~~~orus.
East and the West. In the course of his conquests he sent to demand
tribute from Katife, Queen of Smyrna, whose ruined castle bears her
name (Katife-Calessz) to this day. But the queen not only refused the
demand but threatened, in very insulting language, to drown the king
if he persisted in pressing it. Enraged at her reply, the conqueror
resolved to punish the queen for her insolence by drowning her iI) a
great flood. ''I will open the Bosphorus,'' said he, ''and make of it
a strait.'' For that purpose he employed both Moslem and infidel
workmen, from which we gather that, according to popular Turkish
tradition, Mohammed must have lived, not. only before Alexander
the Great, but even before Moses. Calmly overlooking this slight
chronological difficulty, the story proceeds to relate that the infidel
workmen received only one-fifth of the pay which rewarded the
exertions of the true believers. So the canal was in process of
excavation. But when it was nearly completed, Iskender, for some
unexplained reason, reversed the proportions of the pay, giving the
true believers only one-fifth of what he paid to the infidels.
Consequently, the Moslems withdrew in disgust, and the heathen
were left alone to finish the canal. The strait of the Bosphorus was
about to be opened, when the current of the Black Sea swept away
the frail remaining dyke and drowned the infidels who were at work
in the great trench. The inundation spread over Bithynia, the
kingdom of which Smyrna was the capital, and several cities of
Africa. Queen Katife perished in the waters. The whole world
would soon have been engulfed, if ambassadors' from every land
had not implored Iskender-Iulcarni to save mankind from the
threatened catastrophe. So he commanded to pierce the Strait of
Gibraltar in order to let the water of the Mediterranean escape into

t 567
568 ADDENDA
the ocean. \Vhen that new canal was opened, the drowned cities of
Asia Mi11or reappeared from the bed of the sea. .
Ever since that flood a to"'n of Asia Minor, situated some way
inland from Smyrna, has been known in the Turkish tongue by the
name of Denizli, which signifies ''City on the Sea.'' But the towns
of Africa remained beneath the waves. To this day, on the coast

of ~i\.frica, you can see the ruins of the cities under water. The
Black Sea used to cover the greater part of Mount Caucasus.
After the piercing of tl1e Bosphorus the isthmus of the Crimea
appeared. All along the Asiatic coast of the Black Sea, to a
distance of three hours from the shore,. you may find at a consider-
1
able height. the places where ships used to be. moored.
.
Page 241. A story of a great flood, like that which the natives
of tl1e New Hebrides tell, is related by the natives of Lifu, one of
the Loyalty Islands, which lie to the south of tl1e New Hebrides.
The tale runs thus : .
Story of a ''An old man nained Nol made a carioe inland; .the natives
great flood
told in
laughed at him for making it so far from. the sea, declaring that
Lifu, one they would, not help him to drag it to the coast ; but he told them
of the Ne\v that it \vould not be necessary, for the sea would. come to it.
Hebrides. When it was finished the rain fe11 . in torrents and flooded the
island, drowning everybody. Nol's canoe was lifted by the waters
and borne along by a current ; it struck. a high rock which \Vas still
out of the water, and split it in t"'o. (These two rocks are still
pointed out by the natives : they form the heads of a fine bay on
the north side of the island.) The water then rushed into the sea
and left Lifu 'high and dry.'
''This tradition may have reference to the time when Lifu,
after the first lift, was a lagoon island like what the island of Uvea
is now. If. so, it shows that this island has been inhabited for a
very long time.'' 2
Story of a Page 323. The Kaska Indians, a tribe of the Athapascan stock
great flood in the northern interior of British Columbia, have a tradition of a
among t11e
Kaska great flood which runs as follo,vs : -
Indians of '' Once there came a great flood which covered the earth. Most
British
Columbia.
of the. people made rafts, and some escaped in canoes. Great dark-
ness came on, and high '''inds which drove the vessels hither and
thither. The people became separated. Some were driven far
1
Henry Carnoy et Jean Nicolaides, Journal ef the Royal A1zthropological
Folklore de Constantinople (Paris, Institute, xlvii .. (1917) pp. 278 sq.,
1~94), pp. 16-18. quoting the Rev. S. Macfarlane, Tlte
. 2 Sidney H. Ray, ''The People Story ef the Lifzt Mz'ssion (London,
and Language ofLifu, Loyalty Islands,'' 1873), p. 19.

ADDENDA
away. When the flood subsided, people landed wherever they found
the nearest land. When the earth became dry, they lived in the
places near where they had landed. People were now widely scat-
tered over the world. They did not know where other people lived,
and probably thought themselves the only survivors. Long after-
wards, when in their wanderings they met people from another place,
they spoke different languages, and could not understand one an-
other. This is why there are now many different centres of popula-
tion, many tribes, and many languages. Before the flood there was
but one centre; for all the people lived together in one country, and
spoke one language.'' 1
Thus the Kaskan tradition combines the story of a great flood
'vith an explanation of the origin of the diversity of tongues.
Pt. i. Ch. v. THE TOWER OF BABEL

Page 384. A story of an attem1)t to build a tower that should Story of a

reach up to the clouds is told also by the natives of Lifu, one of ' tower of
the Loyalty Islands. The tale runs as follows : LB~fbel
I U.
'' in
''Their forefathers assembled at a place to build, or rather erect,
a scaffolding which should reach to the clouds. They had no idea
of works in stone, hence their ' tower of Babel ' was raised by tying
stick to stick with native vines. They laboured on undaunted by
the sad consequences of the discovery and stealing of yams under-
ground ; perhaps they anticipated a more agreeable issue to their
explorations in the heavens. But, alas, for human expectations !
before the top touched the clouds, the ground-posts became rotten,
and the whole affair came down with a crash.'' 2
1James A. Teit, '' Kaska Tales,'' Journal ef the Royal A1zthropologz'cal

Journal ef A111erican Folk-lore, xxx. Instz'tute, xlvii. (1917) p. 279, quoting
(1917) pp. 442 sq. the Rev. S. Macfarlane, The Story ef
2 Sidney H. Ray, ''The People the Lijit Missio1z (London, 1873), pp.
and Language of Lifu, Loyalty Islands,'' 19-20.
END OF VOL. I
Pri11ted by R, & R. CLARK, LIMITED, Etiinburg-!t,

Chosen for their Literary Beauty

and Interest
.
Bv SrR J. G. FRAZER
FELLO\V OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAlliljRIDGE
AUTHOR o~ 'THT; <~OLDEN JJOUGH'
'PSYCHE'S TASI..::,' ETC.
New and Enlarged Editz.on. Large Crow1z 8vo.

Cloth. Price 3s. 6d. net.
SOME PRESS OPINIONS OF THE FIRST EDITION

''Considering its object, tl1e selection of passages by M1. F1azer is
nearly as perfect as could be desired. Hardly a ve1se or song that
rings in any one's 111emo1y bt1t will be found 11e1e. '' Book11zan.
''Mr. Fraze1's selections are, as was to be expected, macle \\itl1 ca1e

and taste, and he has prefixed to each of the1n an approp1iate 11eading. ''
-A thenceu11z.
'' He has given us a fascinating book, the pert1sal of whicl1 cannot
fail to invest the Bible, even for 1nany of those who know it best, \vitl1
a fresh interest and significance.'' Westnzinster Gazette.
''Mr. Frazer has chosen his passages \vell. Stowed modestly away
at the e11d of this volume are to be found some excellent notes, the
fruit of diligence and learning.'' Real111.
'' M1. Frazer appends

.
a few pages of notes illustrative of customs and
scenes. These, as was to be expected, are excellent, and 1nake us
wish he had extended them.'' Bn.tish Weekly.
''The notes are simply admirable.'' National Observer.
'' Tl1e thanks, not only of all wl10 love the Bible for the truth's sake,
but of those also who, as yet, recognise in it only tl1e first classic in the
world, the 'most ancient of all written records, and the purest lite1ature
existing in human language, are due to Mr. Frazer for l1is painstaking
and successful volume, the perusal of which cannot fail to elevate the
soul, and inspire the loftiest conceptions of the \vays and works of the
Most High.'' English Church1nan.
PUBLISHED BY
ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK, LTD., SOHO SQUARE, LONDON, W.

Folklore of Old Testament

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Folklore of Old Testament

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Folklore of Old Testament

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FOLK-LORE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT

MACMILLAN AND CO., Lil\fITED

'fHE MAC1',1ILLAN COMPANY

TI-IE M.\.CMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, I_,Tn.

STUDIES IN COMPARATIVE RELIGION

S1R JAMES GEORGE FRAZER

MACMJI,J_,AN ANJ) CO., f,IMI'I'Ef)

l\I.<\GNIS l\IAGNORUl\I INGENIORlTl\I INCUNAEULIS

SPLENDIDO Ll'f1'ER.<\RU1\1 DOC'fRIN:\RUl\IQUE J,Ul\IINI

TU'l'O VIR()RUl\I DocroI<UlVI .<\DVERSUS FORTUNAE TJl\IPEST.<\'l'ES

POR1'UI .<\C PERFUGIO

P:\R\"UI"Ul\l l'l<O TAN1'IS IN i\IE COI"LATIS EENEFICIIS i\TUNUSCUI,Ul\I

PIO GR.<\TOQUE :\Nll\10

l\IOR'l'AI"IS Il\ll\IOIZ'l~ALI OFF'ERO

majority of men in a community have ceased to think and

Elsewhere I have had occasion to notice other similar sur-

moral evolution, just as, applied to the human body, it

It is a familiar truth that the full solution of any one

particular statements by this general and sincere profession

Hebrew genius which has manifested itself in a spiritual

of wisdom and virtue, as sunbeams appear to shine with a

I BRICK COURT, TE1\1PLE, LONDON,

Evolution of men out of animals in At1stralia 41

l. Tl1e Nan-ative i1Z Ge1iesis

2. The Story of the Pe1-ve1-tcd llfessage

3. T/1e Story of the Cast Ski1z

THE GREA1' FLOOD

2. The Babylonian Stoiy ef a Great Flood

Modern discovery of the original Babylonian story I 10

Ut-naJJishtim's sto1y of the Great Flood 113

'l'he buillling of the ship the e111barkation the sto1111 I 14

3. The Hebi-e;u Stoiy of a Great Flood

Flood story told by the gipsies of Transylvania . 177

6. Supposed Pe,rsia1t Sto1ies of a Gr-eat Flood

Sttpposed traces of a flood story in ancient Persian literature 179

7. Ancient I1idt"an Stories of a Great Flood

The story in the Satapatha Bra!t111a11a. Manu and tlie fish

8. ll:fode11i I1zdia11 Stories of a Great Flood

Stories told by the Bhils and l(amars of Ce11tral India . 193

9 Sto1ies of a G1eat Flood i"1t Easte111 Asia

lo. Sto1ies oj a G1eat fi'lood iii the I1tdia11 A 1lhipe!ago

Stories told by the Battas of Sumatra 217

l l. Sto1-ies ef a G1-eat fi'/ood i11 Az1st1-a!ia

l 2, Stories ef a Gi-eat Flood i11 Nero Gui11ea aizd ll:felanesia

13. Stories ef a Great Flood i1z Poly11esia a1zd ll1icro1zesia

14. Stories ef a G1eat Flood z'n Soztth A111erica

Story told by the Ackawois of British Guiana . 263

l 5 Stories ef a Gieat Flood i1z Ce1ztral A111erica and Mexico

l 7. .)tories ef a C1eat Flood i;z .4fiica

General absence of flood stories in Africa 329

18. The Geogiaphical Dijfitsio1i ef Flood Sto1iej

Presence of flood stories in the India11 Archipelago, New Gui11ea, A11stralia,

I 9. The Ori'gi1i of Sto1ies of a Great Flood

The Tower of Babel and the confusion of tongues . 362

Story told by the Anals of Assam

The Patriarchal Age described in Genesis 391

Discovery of another half-skeleton of a !1t11na11 vicli111 at Gezer .

I. T1-aces ef Ulti1tzoge11itztre i1t Israel

The character of Jacob 429

Borot1gh English in England 433