Mag Odd

The document discusses various allegations made against Russian oligarchs and companies. It questions the evidence provided for many of the claims and argues that more information is needed. It notes that some of the individuals discussed have legitimate business dealings and investments, and that their ties to the Kremlin are unclear or exaggerated in some cases. The document requests more documentation and specifics to support the most serious accusations that have been made.

Uploaded by

maganw

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

550 views1 page

Mag Odd

Uploaded by

maganw

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 1

From: RobertOtto<robertotto25@gmail.

com>
Senttime: 05/01/201609:44:48AM
To: JohnWilliams<[email protected]>
Subject: thefrieddocument

Itsquiteafrustratingread.Nodoubtthesearentgoodguys(seetheofficialbiosontheWIREsite).

Buttheinfobelowissketchy'toputitmildly(doesyoursonusethatterm)?Itallpromptsmorequestions.

ButalsokeepinmindtheyarebudswithToria.SheexplainedittomeasaJewishthingwhateverthatmaymean.

Whatfollowsiskeyedtothepointsinthedocumentyousent

1)Ifhehasdocuments,heshouldsharethem.TheNovoselovroleonthePutincaseisinthepublicdomain.EvenappearsintheWhoIs
MrPutinfilm,explainingtherationaleforthebarterdeals(manhasguts).

2)itusesGunvor:okaysowhat?Gunvorisalegittradingoperation-wedneedmore(evidenceitengagedinkickbacks,forexample)

3)CheckwithKelly.Inlightofthedeclineinoilpricesthedealdoesntlookthatgood,butIdontknowwhetherthatwasreallythecase
atthetimeofthesale.
IrememberMilovcriticizeditbasedonitsincreaseofthestateshareintheoilindustry,butIdontrecallhiscomplainingabouttheprice
perse.Therewasaconcernaboutwherethemoneywouldcomefrom,butthatsdifferent.WedohavestuffthatPutininretrospectis
nothappyaboutthedeal.

AsforLetterOneavoidingsanctionsetc.Purenonsense.Neitherguyissanctioned.Putinwantedthemtoinvesttheprofitfromthesale
inRussia,buttheyveignoredhim(LetterOneisanexample).TheydoinvestinUkrainetoo(asmallgascompany,butitsnotclearthat
itsinlinewithGazpromsdesires)

4)ThesemimythicalKrolldocument(s):Krollsroleonthepartymoneyetc.hasbeengreatlyexaggerated.byKroll.Atonetime,Anne
sawitandconcludeditwasntmuch.Ifwhatsallegedhereistrue,itsprobablyfromopensources.Evenleftthegovernmentpostin
December1992,btw.

5)TheVolckerreportwasalwaysabitweird.IrememberVoloshinsnamewasinit.WhenPeterRaskedmeaboutitIsaidsomething
alongthelinesthat,whilecorrupt,IdoubtedVoloshinwasstupid.DittoAlfaEcho-Idontruleitsparticipationout,butIdwantmore.

ItsofficialUSpolicytosupportBushehr.

6)See3above.ItsnotclearthatAven/FridmansinvestmentsinUkraineareinlinewithKremlinpolicy.Alfaisabankbanksissueloans.
SowhatsthebigdealwithitsloanstoUVZ?ItsalossmakingenterpriseandAlfahasthreatenedbankruptcyproceedingsovernon-
payment.IfailtseehowthatsattheKremlinrequest.

7)IknownothingaboutKarimovastiestoAlfa.ShehasthemtoUsmanov.AnditsUsmanovandShvidler(Abramovich)whoallegedly
bribedShuvalov,notAlfa(#8).

8)AsearchinIntegrumonmagnitskiyandalfagetsfivehits.NotaoneisaboutAlfalaunderingMagnitskiymoney,letalonea
centralrole.Whyrepeatsomethingsoeasilycheckable.WasitsomesortofAlfasubsidiary?Ifso,nameit.SeeaboveonShuvalov-
someofthemoneymayhavewentthroughAlfa,butthatsnotwhatwentpublic.(tidbit:oneofthefolksexposingShuvalovis
NatalyaPelevinthatsamewhosharedKasyanovsbedandchattedaboutananti-Navalnyyfront)

9)thisisthewaythecountryworks.

10)Averyseriousallegationthatrequiresinvestigation.Heshouldprovidemorei.e.whatdoessharedpremisesmean?Wehaveformer
Alfafellowsworkinginthebuilding.

11)Yesitdoes.

12)FSBsanctions?-beforethisOleshaguy,weprobablyshouldputViktorVoroninonthesanctionslistforhisroleINtheMagnitskiy
affair.Thatsaid,ifhehasdocuments,Idbeinterestedinseeingthem.