The New Plant of India
The New Plant of India
The New Plant of India
Suzuki, saw two illegal strikes and wide-scale rioting in 2012. The
causes of the conflict included the extension of contract labour, a
higher work speed accompanied by real wage losses of 25 %,
since the early 2000s, and a harsh work regime. Despite the
events getting widespread attention they did not lead to a
considerable change of labour relations in India.
After the incidents of July 18, the factory remained closed for one
month, where 546 permanent workers and 1800 contract workers
were arbitrarily dismissed. In September 2012, wage hikes were
introduced, but they widened the gap between permanent and
contract workers. In the weeks after the unrest, police arrested
more than 150 workers, of which many had not been in the
factory on July 18. The entire former trade union body was also
jailed, but the trade union managed to organise around 600
workers of the present workforce in the factory. To date, they are
in jail without any sentence. Bail was not granted and they all
face murder charges. Protests against the arbitrary arrests were
met with violent police crackdowns and with new arrests. Many of
the prisoners were then tortured.
The results of the conflict were met with diverging views. Many of
the dismissed workers thought it was good to send a signal of
discontent, despite their individual situation. They also thought
that the uprising spread fear among many CEOs and hoped that
labour relations might improve. In fact, many car factories hiked
wages in Gurgaon after the conflict in Maruti in 2011, hoping to
prevent labour unrest. Some labour experts underlined that
companies used the struggle at Maruti to increase negative
sentiment against trade unions. During a recent strike by airline
pilots, the strikers were labelled as labour terrorists by
management. In any case, the conflict at Maruti Suzuki made a
lot of waves in India, and particularly in the automobile sector.
Although only permanent workers can be members of the trade
union due to Indian labour laws, the strike managed to unite all
categories of workers and drew its strength from this unity in
action. It was only in the aftermath of the strike action in 2011
and after the violent uprising that labour conditions improved.
The registration of the trade union was first inhibited by
management, and then its demands were completely ignored.
Even if the strike did not escalate at Bajaj Auto and the results
remain somewhat unclear, there are important similarities with
the conflict at Maruti-Suzuki: The companies in the auto industry
in India saw considerable growth in the last ten years and
increased the use of contract labour - it is this strategy of
increased exploitation that leads to labour unrest. The foundation
of a trade union proves to be the first way that workers can unite
and experience collective struggles. But this traditional way of
organising does not actually lead to improvements in the material
conditions of work. It seems to be necessary that workers
organise along the lines of supply beyond the company
boundaries as the just-in-time systems with suppliers are very
vulnerable. The production of a car does not only take place
inside of one factory, but the production sites are dispersed to a
high number of workplaces and it is the structural power going
along with this organisation of production that remains to be used
in its full scale by organised workers.[1]
[1] As this article goes into publication, workers at Toyota India in Bangalore complete a
second week of strike after a one week lockout that started on March 16, 2014. Union
leaders on hunger strike have been attacked by police on April 5 and two unionists had
to be hospitalised.