Lec02 M PDF
Lec02 M PDF
Lec02 M PDF
Tabish Qureshi
1
where the integrals over ps and q s are subject to the
contraint that the total energy is fixed to be E .
Let us now consider two systems 1 and 2, with en-
ergy E1 and E2 , volume V1 and V2 , number of par-
ticles N1 and N2 , respectively. The total energy is
fixed, E1 + E2 = ET . Let the two systems be iso-
lated to start with. The number of microstates of
the two systems are denoted by 1 (E1 , N1 , V1 ) and
2 (E2 , N2 , V2 ). The total number of microstates of
the combined system is given by
E 1 N1 V1 E 2 N2 V2
2
put /E1 equal to zero.
1 2
= 2 + 1 =0 (3)
E1 E1 E1
1 2
2 = 1
E1 E1
E2 2
= 1
E1 E2
2
= 1
E2
1 1 1 2
=
1 E1 2 E2
log(1 ) log(2 )
= (4)
E1 E2
From thermodynamics we know that in such a situa-
tion, equilibrium is attained when the temperature of
the two systems becomes equal, T1 = T2 . In ther-
modynamics, temperature is defined as
1 S
=
T E
Thus the condition of equlibrium should be
S1 S2
= (5)
E1 E2
Comparing (4) and (5) we infer
S log() (6)
3
Since the relation between thermodynamics and me-
chanics should be fundamental, Boltzmann postu-
lated that the proportionality constant in the above
equation should be a universal constant, indepen-
dent of any particular system. This constant is Boltz-
manns constant k , sometimes also written as kB .
Thus we obtain the expression for entropy, which is
of central importance in statistical mechanics
S = k log(). (7)
Probability of macrostates
From the preceding analysis, it is clear that the prob-
ability of a macrostate depends on how many mi-
crostates are there in it. Let us quantify this state-
ment now. Suppose there is a configuration of the
gas, which we denote by . The macrostate could,
for example, denote a particular momentum distribu-
tion of the particles, or it could denote a particular
position distribution of the particles. Let us assume
that the number of microstates associated with is
denoted by . Then the probability of the macrostate
is given by
P = , (8)
(E, V, N )
where (E, V, N ) is the total number of microstates
of the gas. Since every microstate is equally proba-
ble, the above equation is very obvious. It just says
4
that the probability of a state is equal to the num-
ber of microstates in divided by the total number of
microstates.
In terms of phase space, the number of microstates
can be written as
Z Y Z Y
1 1
= 3N dpi dqi , (E, N, V ) = 3N d
~ i
~ E i
R (9)
where denotes integral over the region of phase-
space described by . It of course also respects the
constraint of a fixed energy E .
An example here would make things clearer. Let us
consider an ideal gas of N particles, enclosed in a
volume V, and with a total energy E. We want to
know, what is the probability of the whole gas spon-
taneously occupying only one particular half of the
box. We know that this practically never happens, so
its probability should be neglegible. Let us calculate
it. now denotes the state of the gas with all parti-
cles in one particular half of the box. We know that
there is huge number of ways this is possible, be-
cause eventhough the particles are in one half of the
box, they have many microstates corresponding to
them shuffling their positions and velocities. In eqn
(9), the integral over space can be carried out easily.
For each particle, the volume integral gives a V , for
(E, N, V ), and it gives a V /2 for . Integrals over
5
momenta are identical for and (E, N, V ). Thus
the probability of the gas occupying one half of the
volume of the box is given by
1
R Q
(V /2)N i dpi
~3N
P = 1
R Q
~3N
(V )N E i dpi
1
= N (10)
2
We see that the probability of all the particles spon-
taneously occupying one particular half of the box
is 1/2N . Even for just 100 particles this number is
negligibly small. For N 1023 , the probability will
be so very tiny that one can wait till the end of the
world, and still such a state will never come up. On
the other hand, if the gas has just, say, 5 particles,
the probability of such a state occuring is 0.03125.
In this case, one can actually observe all particles
by chance coming to one half of the box, with some
patience.
So now we understand why equilibrium is what it
looks like. It is just a macrostate which has the max-
imum number of microstates associated with it.