Focus GRP Part

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Focus Group

Objective

The symptom-level MDP Focus group discussion objectives are stated below:

1. To study the different product attributes and customer satisfaction in deodorant category

2. To analyse pricing & positioning of deodorant category and Axe brand in particular.

Methodology

The respondents were initially screened in order to select a homogenous group. The focus

group discussion was conducted for 1 hour with 8 respondents. The homogenous group had

the following characteristics:

Age 22-27

Geography Urban

Occupation Graduate students with work ex of 0 to 3 years

Inferences

Product attributes and customer satisfaction:

All respondents were aware of the deodorant category and the different brands available in

the market. The major benefits claimed by respondents were prevention of bad odour,

perspiration, freshness all throughout the day, and comfort in public. The key features that

consumers checked during purchase were types of fragrance, strength of fragrance, brand

name and price. It was observed that respondents perceive strong fragrances to have long

lasting effects and mild fragrances do not last long. Most respondents stated that they

preferred mild fragrances over strong fragrances.

Pricing and competition:

Most respondents claimed that they will confine their purchase to Rs 150 to Rs 200. All

respondents agreed that price will not influence the choice of brands in the above mentioned
price range. There were no complaints on the pricing of Axe and intentions to pay a premium

for Axe were not displayed.

Current positioning of Deodorants and Axe:

Most respondents claimed that only Axe and Fogg ads were visible and grabbed attention

instantly. All respondents have seen Axe ad and remember the theme of the ad. The key take

away was the theme of Men attracting women and it was claimed that the ad was

exaggerated. It was also stated that Axe ads dont meet customer expectations and needs. It

was observed that they were receptive to ads which communicated value proposition.

Focus groups

A methodology similar to symptom-level MDP was adopted for action-level MDP focus

group discussions.

Objective:

To obtain insights for repositioning and reengineering of Axe products.

Results:

Perception of deodorants positioning:

Most respondents stated that emotional ads communicating affective components would work

for this category. However, they seemed to welcome ads which may communicate

differentiating product attributes (cognitive component) and include humour aspects to grab

attention. They were not receptive of ads that were too exaggerated like Axe ads.

Potential positioning for Axe:

Most respondents felt that Axe was a brand for youth and the relevant target segment was the

20-30 age groups. They agreed that Axes positioning has become obsolete and it needs

repositioning. It was stated that innovation in product attributes would be helpful in

redefining the brand image. It was agreed that both sporty and professional images work for
Axe, and that a sub brand for the executive/premium segment would be helpful. It was stated

that westernised ads would help to project Axe as premium but native (Indian) positioning

would form better brand associations. Most participants responded that youth celebrities

donning as sportsmen/professionals would be appropriate and relevant influencers for Axe

products.

Product attributes that need changeover:

Most respondents did not remember the names of different variants/fragrances of Axe and

other brands. They also stated that they could not relate the variant names with the fragrances

and would prefer to have names which would give them a sense of the fragrance of the

variant. Most respondents agreed that shifting to natural fragrances would not give much

advantage. It was strongly stated that deodorants should be antiperspirant in nature with mild

fragrances.

You might also like