Focus GRP Part
Focus GRP Part
Focus GRP Part
Objective
The symptom-level MDP Focus group discussion objectives are stated below:
1. To study the different product attributes and customer satisfaction in deodorant category
2. To analyse pricing & positioning of deodorant category and Axe brand in particular.
Methodology
The respondents were initially screened in order to select a homogenous group. The focus
group discussion was conducted for 1 hour with 8 respondents. The homogenous group had
Age 22-27
Geography Urban
Inferences
All respondents were aware of the deodorant category and the different brands available in
the market. The major benefits claimed by respondents were prevention of bad odour,
perspiration, freshness all throughout the day, and comfort in public. The key features that
consumers checked during purchase were types of fragrance, strength of fragrance, brand
name and price. It was observed that respondents perceive strong fragrances to have long
lasting effects and mild fragrances do not last long. Most respondents stated that they
Most respondents claimed that they will confine their purchase to Rs 150 to Rs 200. All
respondents agreed that price will not influence the choice of brands in the above mentioned
price range. There were no complaints on the pricing of Axe and intentions to pay a premium
Most respondents claimed that only Axe and Fogg ads were visible and grabbed attention
instantly. All respondents have seen Axe ad and remember the theme of the ad. The key take
away was the theme of Men attracting women and it was claimed that the ad was
exaggerated. It was also stated that Axe ads dont meet customer expectations and needs. It
was observed that they were receptive to ads which communicated value proposition.
Focus groups
A methodology similar to symptom-level MDP was adopted for action-level MDP focus
group discussions.
Objective:
Results:
Most respondents stated that emotional ads communicating affective components would work
for this category. However, they seemed to welcome ads which may communicate
differentiating product attributes (cognitive component) and include humour aspects to grab
attention. They were not receptive of ads that were too exaggerated like Axe ads.
Most respondents felt that Axe was a brand for youth and the relevant target segment was the
20-30 age groups. They agreed that Axes positioning has become obsolete and it needs
redefining the brand image. It was agreed that both sporty and professional images work for
Axe, and that a sub brand for the executive/premium segment would be helpful. It was stated
that westernised ads would help to project Axe as premium but native (Indian) positioning
would form better brand associations. Most participants responded that youth celebrities
products.
Most respondents did not remember the names of different variants/fragrances of Axe and
other brands. They also stated that they could not relate the variant names with the fragrances
and would prefer to have names which would give them a sense of the fragrance of the
variant. Most respondents agreed that shifting to natural fragrances would not give much
advantage. It was strongly stated that deodorants should be antiperspirant in nature with mild
fragrances.