Sanjida PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 58

Design of Low Speed Axial Flux Permanent

Magnet Generators for Marine Current


Application

Sanjida Moury

Supervised by
Dr. Tariq Iqbal

Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science


Memorial University of Newfoundland
St. Johns, NL, A1B 3X5, Canada
October 16, 2009 1
Presentation at a glance
Objective
Background
Design challenges
First prototype
Minimization of Cogging Torque TORUS Configuration
TORUS configuration
Alternating Pole Arc
Magnet Shifting
Fractional Number of Slots Per Pole
Generator design
Rotor
Stator
Stator winding
Prototyped Generator
Test Result
Mechanical Parameter test
Electrical parameter test
System model

2
Cont.
Second prototype
Generator Design
Rotor
Stator
Stator winding
Prototyped Generator
Test Result
Mechanical Parameter test
Electrical parameter test
System model
Comparison between two prototype
Conclusion
Future work
Acknowledgement

3
Objective
To extract few watts electrical power from the
sea-floor ocean current.

To design a generator suitable for under water


application.

To design a direct driven generator by


eliminating step-up gearbox.

To design permanent magnet generators as a


low speed energy converter.

4
Background
Permanent Magnet Generator (PMG)

Figure 1(a): Radial Flux PMG Figure 1(b):Axial Flux PMG

5
Background (Cont.)
Axial Flux PMG

Figure 2:Different types of AFPMG

6
Background (Cont.)
AFPM disc-type motor structures

Figure 3: (a) slotless TORUS, (b) slottedTORUS,


(c) slotless AFIR, and (d) slotted AFIR machines.

7
Design Challenges
No of pole
1
Tmax Ls = Lm + L
Ls
1 120 f
Lm n=
p2 p

Size
Material
Air gap

8
First Prototype

Figure 4: Designed generator

9
Minimization of Cogging Torque
Torque Components
1. Torque Ripple
2. Cogging Torque
3. Pulsating Torque
Minimization technique
1. Reducing the amplitude of each
portion
2. Shifting the relative phase of the
different components
10
Minimization of Cogging Torque (Cont.)
TORUS Configuration

(a) (b)

Figure 5: TORUS Topology (a) NN type and (b) NS type

11
Minimization of Cogging Torque (Cont.)

Alternating Pole Arc

Figure 6(a): Same magnet Figure 6(b): Different magnet


pole arc Pole arc

12
Minimization of Cogging Torque (Cont.)
Magnet Shifting
Fractional Number of Slots Per Pole

Figure 7: Axial view of Rotor


Figure 8: Two dimensional view
With Shifted magnet
of shifted magnet

13
Generator Design
Rotor
Magnetic material- NdFeB
Number of pole- 100 Large gap
Large magnet

Steel ring

Small gap
Small magnet

Figure 9: Full and sectional view of Rotor


14
Generator Design (Cont.)
Stator
Slotted stator is build with ferrite E-cores.

(a) (b)

Figure 10: (a) E-core (b) Stator

15
Generator Design (Cont.)
Stator Winding

Number of turns
E max 2 Ns
E rms = = N f max
2 2 N ph

max = Amagn Bmax


lm
B max = Br
(lm + )

16
Generator Design (Stator Winding) Cont

Figure 11: Prototyped stator


17
Generator Design (Stator Winding) Cont

Figure 12: Stator winding

18
Prototyped Generator

Figure 13: prototyped generator


19
Test result
Mechanical Parameter test

mr 2
r J =
2
Rotor

m
F

Figure 14: Initial torque Measurement

20
Test result (cont.)
Electrical parameter test
Generator

Multimeter
Oscilloscope
Load
Prime mover

Figure 15: Test setup

21
Test result (Electrical parameter test) cont.

Figure 16: Open Circuit voltage characteristic

22
Test result (Electrical parameter test) cont.

Each graph shows the


variation of generated
power with rotational
speed. The different
graphs are for different
load (2-20 ohm).

Figure 17: Output Characteristic

23
Test result (Electrical parameter test) cont.

The graph shows the


variation of load voltage
with load current as load
varies from 0-20 ohm.
The different graphs are
for different frequencies.

Figure 18:Load current and voltage characteristic

24
Test result (Electrical parameter test) cont.

Each graph shows the


variation of generated
power with load. The
different graphs are for
different frequencies.

Figure 19: Load characteristic


25
Test result (Electrical parameter test) cont.

Resultant wave form after


The voltage wave form for connecting the both sides
the both sides of the stator of the stator in series

Figure 20: Voltage wave form

26
System model
Internal resistance, Rg, [ohm] 1.8

Internal inductance, Lg [H] 216.7

Machine constant, m 0.071

No load loss. Rnull [ohm] 0.003f2+0.0116f-0.1458

Inertia, Jm [Kg-m2] o.96

Initial torque, To [N-m] 14.5

Open Circuit voltage at 72 rpm [volt] 5.18

Load for maximum power point 1.8


Figure 21: System model [ohm]

27
Conclusion
Output Power is 3.5 watt at 72 rpm.
Open circuit voltage is 5.2 volt at
designed speed.
Generating current is high due to
thicker wire.
Cogging torque is minimized.
Large in size
More frictional loss

28
Second Prototype

Figure 22: Designed generator


29
Generator design

PCB stator

Figure 23: Designed topology of second prototype

30
Generator design (cont.)
Rotor

Figure 24: Rotor

31
Generator design (Rotor )cont.

Figure 24: Rotor

32
Generator design (cont.)
Stator

Figure 25: 4 layer PCB Stator


33
Generator design (cont.)
Stator Winding

Figure 26: Stator Winding Pattern Figure 27: Stator winding

34
Generator design (Stator winding) cont.

Figure 28: A single winding with dimension (in Inches)

35
Prototyped generator

Figure 29: Prototyped Generator

36
Test Result
Stress and strain test

Figure 30: Stress strain test result

37
Test Result (Cont)
Mechanical parameter test

N1= No (1-e t1/BJ )

Figure 31: Friction loss test result

38
Test Result (Cont)
Electrical parameter test

Figure 32: Test setup

39
Test Result (Electrical parameter test) Cont.

Figure 33: Open Circuit voltage characteristic

40
Test Result (Electrical parameter test) Cont.

Each graph shows the


variation of generated
power with rotational
speed. The different
graphs are for different
load (2-20 ohm).

Figure 34: Output Characteristic

41
Test Result (Electrical parameter test) Cont.

The graph shows the


variation of load voltage
with load current as load
varies from 0-20 ohm.
The different graphs are
for different frequencies.

Figure 35:Load current and voltage characteristic


42
Test Result (Electrical parameter test) Cont.

Each graph shows the


variation of generated
power with load. The
different graphs are for
different frequencies

Figure 36: Load characteristic

43
Test Result (Electrical parameter test) Cont.

Figure 37: Voltage wave form

44
System parameter
Internal resistance, Rg, [ohm] 4.4

Internal inductance, Lg [H] 66.2


Machine constant, m 0.078
No load loss. Rnull [ohm] 0.0003f2+0.0066f-0.1107

Inertia, Jm [Kg-m2] 0.213


Friction, Bm 0.3
Initial torque, To [N-m] 0
Open Circuit voltage at 72 rpm [volt] 5.6
Load for maximum power point [ohm] 4.5

45
Conclusion

Small in size
No cogging
Less friction
Zero initial torque
Higher voltage, 5.6 volt at 72 rpm.
Less current and power (1.8 watt)

46
Comparison between two prototype

Size

Output

Torque

Manufacturing process

47
Conclusion
Two prototypes are built and tested.

First Prototype
New cogging torque minimization technique
More power
Larger size
Higher current
Lower voltage

Second prototype
PCB stator
Smaller size
Higher voltage
Lower current and power

48
Future Work

Air gap reduction

Material choice

Smaller E-core

More layer PCB

Optimization

49
Acknowledgement

Dr. Tariq Iqbal


Seaformatics group
Atlantic Innovation Funds
(www.acoa.ca)
Memorial University of Newfoundland
All of my friends and family

50
THANKS

?
Questions
51
Magnet properties

52
RENSHAPE 440 material properties

53
Properties of AWG 20

54
Rotor Yoke (mild steel C-1020) data

55
FR-4 data

56
Generator design parameters

57
Generator design parameters

58

You might also like